INS Vikrant Will Add To India’s Maritime Muscle
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
- NEW DELHI: Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to commission INS Vikrant, India’s first indigenous aircraft carrier, on September 2. This will put India in a select club of nations that have the capacity to design and develop aircraft carriers. When fully operational, the warship will significantly scale up India’s maritime capabilities, especially in the Indian Ocean Region. In this episode of ‘Ask Nitin’, StratNews Global Editor-in-Chief Nitin A. Gokhale elaborates on some of the key features of the vessel and why it took so long to be built at a civilian shipyard.
#insvikrant #IAC1 #asknitin #nitingokhale #aircraftcarrier
Since many of our well-wishers requested a UPI payment id to contribute and support us, here’s the link, which gives us 100% of what you choose: stratnewsgloba...
You can also click and buy a TH-cam Super Thanks(the heart icon where you liked this video), which directly supports StratNewsGlobal, with 70% of your chosen amount.
Leave your comments, questions and feedback. Like and share our videos.
Subscribe to our TH-cam channel. Click on the 🔔icon to get notified of our latest uploads.
To get instant updates join our telegram circle - t.me/stratnews...
Aircraft carrier without Aircraft. Only in India
So, ours will be an aircraft carrier without aircraft? WTF?
india now has 1.5 aircraft carrier
By not acknowledging/giving credit 2 China's naval achievements or 2 her future development goals is pretty lame, n it's quite disrespectful that u're leading ur followers in2 a false sense of superiority,
Allowing women is a stupid idea, India's rise won't last very long. Women will weaken the morale and resolve of the men and give Pakistan a relative advantage.
Excellent discussion and information given. Dhanyavad Nitin Sir. Jai Hind 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
India can build an 45000 ton aircraft carrier but can not build an assault rifle. Is this not a paradox and contradiction?
.....not even bullets for your own military.........your military using Brit,Romanian Israeli,Italian,Russian and Indian assault rifles and when India comes to wars will be disaster !
Quite an insight
Displacement capacity of 43000 tonns and not 38000
India needs more nuclear submarines as compared to aircraft carriers. First priority should be to build nuclear submirines as many as possible.
Indian scientists and engineers should be capable enough to reverse enginner the advanced technolgies around the world. But sadly they kept on copy pasting licensed russian millitary equipments in indian factories. Where as chinese played very cleverly with reverse engineering these tecnologies.
Power generator are from America lift is from britain radars and communication pods from Israel ciws from russia superstructure designed by russian sensors are Italian fighter jet will be foreign so does the helicopter and Vikrant is indigenous lol 🤡🤦♀😂😂how funny
Developing a nuclear reactor for our submarines and aircraft will be needed for future
What is the future of Aircraft Carriers in the age of anti ship missiles, including the hypersonic ones ??
Information news
Excellent analysis and video quality
nice information shared
Aircraft carrier s are sitting duck cont escape from hypersonic missiles but it is not alone only battle has to decide the future of Aircraft carrier s
Nitin...what is cooking with the MRFA? Can you please discuss in detail. Our patience is running out!
Great content as always 👏 thanks sir
Compared to lioning shandong and fujian vikrant is so small 🤡🙄
Hahaha 😂🤣
At least a 190 MW reliable efficient nuclear reactor should be made in coming 5-7 years which will propel our next generation ships and submarines.
Do we have ciws in place and electronic attack plane sir
The elevator lift doesn't fits Rafale Marine and it somehow fits FA-18 SuperHornet.
I wonder what the designers could make this blunder...
or is it the Russian lobby who force Indian Navy for this design keeping in mind the size of Mig29 ?
..........your AC lift is only 8m wide it only fit M-29k ( 7.46 m folded wings) and Super hornet folded Wings 9.32 m.Russian Design Bureau they were smart and calculated. 😁😁😁😁
Good to see Nitin sir
Dining table fucking required for Chinese
Nithin ji strategists like Edward Luttwark believe, We need bunch of nuclear submarines than these costly aircrafts which r only helpful in projection of flag. We have islands in all sides that can act as aircrafts. Atleast from nowon we need to make as many submarines as possible or purchase japanese submarines so we can own Indian Ocean to ourselves.Jai Hind!🇮🇳
Yes, some of them argue that most of our fleet will be stuck with these carriers to form battle group and these carriers will become liability instead we would have submarines which can give us attack capabilities.
Not just there are quite a few strategic thinkers who think that way, however most of them have no practical experience of managing a naval force, the Indian navy on the other hand is extremely clear that they require a third AC carrier, they even went to the extent of proposing to build it through internal navy funding.
Now balance the two schools of thoughts n come to ur own conclusion.
Submarines are for area denial. Owning the Indian Ocean cannot come from subs, it comes from sea domination which is what aircraft carriers do.
@@sachair2701 you need three minium if you expect to use two as the third will be in port for maintenance
@@johndoe-vc1we looking into our total ship count we can never think of total control, each carrier group will take most of ship available with us and leaving nothing for other missions. We should always keep balance between carrier and submarines especially nuclear so that they can do long endurance missions.
The history of indian armed forces leadeship of frequent change of requirements and dilidaling procuring millitary equipments from indian industry has also affected the self reliance in indegenious millitary equipment.
Generators are american radars are from Israel ciws is from russia super structure was designed by russians otto molera and sensors are Italian then how it is indigenous ? I think only hull is made in india
Thats really great combining all these different countries tech into one
To combine all these some special mind is required and they have done it , appreciation is due for that
they will learn from it --Jai Hind
Hahaha 🤣😂
Not just the hull, the roti maker that produces 3000 rotis in an hour was also made in India. No other platform in the world can make that many rotis at the speed mentioned. Let's not underplay our world beating achievements.
India is importing GE414 engines for Tejas MK2. The US F18 Super Hornet is in India's 114 MMRCA tender of joint fighter & fighter Engine production. F18 has updated Electronic attack variant EA-18G Growler also. Air Force, Growler & naval variant of F18 use GE414 Engine. India is part of Quad & the naval variant can help in better integration into Quad. What is more, identical engine would help in cost-effective technical support to Tejas, naval & other variants if selected. US AGM-158C anti-ship missiles have a range of 370 Km unlike AGM -84 Harpoon with range of 124 km which can also be added for naval variant. Such a formidable range can keep Chinese ships far away.
However, the US must give equal importance to both trade & strategic relations with India & India must insist for that. Unlike US-China trade which is one sided overwhelmingly favoring China, the US-India trade can be very balanced, complementary & mutually beneficial. India should evolve its relations with the US more like France - Independent but leaning towards West, being a strategic partner but without being a NATO type ally like France.
China is planning to build 10 Aircraft Carriers, and perhaps its next Aircraft Carrier will be nuclear powered. They must be having plans on how and where to deploy them. I wonder whether they will base one or more Carriers in their military base at Djibouti. How many Carriers will they want to deploy at a time? If India can deploy two Aircraft Carriers at any time, then will that be enough? If the Malacca Straits are closed to shipping, both merchant and naval due to reasons, then how will this change the stance of the Chinese Navy?
When the two Carrier requirement was conceptualized by the Indian Navy, we didn't know that China planned to build ten such naval ships. Does such an eventuality still seem possible for the Chinese Navy? Will it have the resources to carry it out?
3 years to build a ship, 300 to build a navy 😉
Just don't worry. If China is planning to build 10 aircraft carriers, I'm sure India will plan to build 20. No one can beat India on planning.....😜😂
Thanks
Wonderful news
We have to take f18 that is best
Nitin ji please cover the topic of Project Zorawar in some of the episodes.
I have to confess, I had a very different idea of Indian housewives and the kind of topics they'd discuss in their day to day life. I stand corrected madam who was asking question about Chinese spy ship.
Excellent video 👍
Great news Nitin 😊
Christian as INS Vilrant?
I don't feel comfy with those kind of statements..
Is Bharath independent or still a colony of the British?
Great..👍
We need nuclear fueled catobar based aircraft carrier over 80000 ton displacement. China already have started building 2 such aircrafts
.........just one 004 is working on with the displacement of 120000 ton....building 6 destroyers type 052D at the same time and 20 submarines 093,094B and 096 all with AIP.
This guy clearly doesn't know anything about carriers. His attempt to explain jet blast deflectors is hilarious.. Jet blast deflectors are a must, especially for smaller carriers like the Vikrant, and often used so that planes can line up for take off without getting damage. Without that, it will take a longer time to launch subsequent planes in a row
Please don't insult this wonderful achievement of Bharath using Abrahamic terms. May I recommend 'namakaran' instead.
Excellent addition to indian navy. Tejas naval variant is more than enough ...why buy f 18?
Indian navy need twin engine aircraft , tajas navy is single one
And also Tejas sucks
@@rakesh1pa2 Indian navy needs kickbacks....Thats why they rejecting Tejas...The same goes with iaf... they prefer mig21 to tejas.. pathetic ppl
@@sujalbharadwaj2342 only tejas or mig 29 can be accomodated on vikrant... And tejas is better ..Stop sucking foreign stuff buddy... get over foreign maal craze
I'm Just stating fact indian navy prefer foreign jet becoz it is much better and advance then flying samosa and Tejas will be deployed for only short period of time 🙄 navy is going for fa 18 at last for Vikrant and Tejas didn't even prove its capabilities yet to navy that's why it got rejected same goes to iaf due to government pressure iaf is buying Tejas 🥲👍
Dont underestimate china
China has never operated aircraft carriers so they are in initial stage -- i think is a thing of past
they are building something we have to respect them so that we can analyze where to improve and commit to it
A CATOBAR Aircraft carrier is must even if it is 40k tonnes like france that will far more good than a stobar one
if Kochi shipyard is building a 3rd one in future dont make a mistake to build a stobar one , CATOBAR IS A necessity
Jai HInd
Don't know what he is talking about. China operates 2 fully operational 60k+ ton carriers which are much larger than the Vikrant. A 3rd even larger carrier with flattop at 90k tons with electromagnetic launch system has just been launched.
@@arshjordan5455 please go and check out type 003. India not having the technical chops to do so doesn't mean it can't be done. Type 003 emals has been well documented for years as a breakthrough in not needing nuclear power. Hold your horses. They would not have launched the type 003 plus invested tons of money to upgrade the j15 planes to be emals capable if they were not confident.
@@arshjordan5455 let's not dampen things unless you have evidence that it will affect the 'endurance'. If you recall, people said it wasn't even possible to have emals with conventionally powered carriers and yet, it is here.
@@arshjordan5455 hold your horses. You are speculating and theorizing while the chinese have launched type 003. So please wait.
@@arshjordan5455 couple things. That is what BREAKTHROUGHS mean! And If EMALS on a carrier were so simple as you claim, why is it that only 2 countries have them? And even the US has had (and still do) problems with their version? Here is a article published by Defense News... In 2017...
"MELBOURNE, Australia - China has reportedly achieved a breakthrough on a conventional propulsion system for its next carrier, which would allow it to operate advanced catapults for launching aircraft without necessitating the use of nuclear propulsion.
Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post newspaper, quoting sources close to China’s People’s Liberation Army, reported that a team led by China’s top naval engineer, Rear Adm. Ma Weiming, has developed a medium-voltage, direct-current transmission network to replace an earlier system based on alternating current.
Forming part of an integrated propulsion system, the new system would allow a conventionally powered aircraft carrier to operate an Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System, or EMALS, which conveys a number of advantages over traditional steam catapults that include increased efficiency, precision and shortening aircraft launch cycles.
The source also said the Central Military Commission, chaired by President Xi Jinping, had wanted China’s next aircraft carrier to be fitted with EMALS, but designers had up to now been stymied by the power requirements of the system and whether a non-nuclear-powered ship will be able to generate enough power to operate it.
With this breakthrough, China will now be able to proceed with plans to build its third aircraft carrier, which is expected to be in the 80,000-ton range and capable of carrying a more well-rounded air group if it is fitted with catapults as planned.
The People’s Liberation Army Navy, or PLAN, has been operating a pair of catapults at its carrier training base at Huangdicun since the second half of 2016. The pair are believed to consist of a single steam catapult and one EMALS. The service is evaluating both systems and carrying out test launches using a modified Shenyang J-15 (Flying Shark) carrierborne fighter jet.
The PLAN currently has one aircraft carrier - the Liaoning, which is a refurbished and modernized Soviet-era Kuznetsov-class carrier - in service with another, locally built ship currently fitting out. The latter ship is a slightly modified version of the Liaoning, and both are equipped with a ski jump, which is used to launch the J-15.
However, the use of ski jumps places operational limitations to the PLAN’s carriers, as they are unable to launch larger and heavier aircraft like the U.S. Navy’s E-2 Hawkeye airborne early warning aircraft or the C-2 Greyhound carrier on-board delivery aircraft. The PLAN currently operates a version of the Changhe Z-18 transport helicopter fitted with a multimode active electronically scanned array radar on board the Liaoning as its airborne early warning platform.
However, compared to a fixed-wing turboprop aircraft like the Hawkeye, a helicopter has significantly reduced endurance and operating altitude, which results in a significantly reduced time on station and radar range, respectively.
The new power-generating system could allow PLAN warships to be armed with modern weapons like electromagnetic rail guns and directed-energy weapons. In March, Ma had told state broadcaster CCTV that the “ultimate aim” of his work on the integrated propulsion system was to “solve the problem of deploying high-energy weapons” from its ships.
He has also subsequently claimed that China’s EMALS technology was more advanced and more reliable than the system used on the U.S. Navy’s aircraft carrier Gerald R. Ford. The Ford marked its first aircraft launches using EMALS during post-commissioning trials in July.
Its development in the U.S. Navy has, however, been beset with problems, particularly concerning reliability while testing modifications of EMALS, which are meant to allow it to launch the Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and EA-18G Growler while carrying external fuel tanks."
@@arshjordan5455 dude. Where did I say they developed technology that produces more energy than it takes? Why can't you understand that they found a way to make EMALS work with the amount they can generate with conventional power on the carrier!? Read the article again and pay attention to the DC transmission. You are all basic theory and stuck on a certain way. If everyone were to follow people like you, we'd still be using steam trains!
Aircraft carriers Project power ?
The question is do we have the courage to take this to China’s east coast .. ?
considering we “a nuclear power” were literally pushed by China and our territory is lost without a single fire shot because we fear getting into conflict with China ..
a vessel that requires 10 other ships and submarines to protect itself, how is it helping in sea dominance ?
the carrier is itself quite expensive to be kept operational
CBG is the only way one can become a blue water navy. If there is a crisis within our sphere of influence the CBG is the only way to tackle it. I don't know if you remember how INS Vikrant blockaded East Pakistan in 1971 war. India does not have to enter South China Sea to tackle China, it can tackle it at the Malacca Strait in the event of a conflict. There is little China can do about it. Our CBG can take care of all Chinese naval threats in the Indian ocean.
Nithin uncle this is a junk just because it is late by a decade. I would probably say this is a added capability in ship building but as a asset, its a huge liability to maintain. Let's be sure Indians do not have the mindset to project power. First we need to come out of colonial mind set rest all next. Any way I am happy for you to spend time in this huge asset.
Anything less than 60k displacement is just hox
We need real potent machines
Who is the adversary?
@@johndoe-vc1we with more than 60k displacement value
How does it matter? Something that size would be better powered by nuclear. How long you want to wait
@@johndoe-vc1we no it doesn't matter
You live your life this way being innocent
@@mr.surveillance8110 good, when you grow up you can build us one
Plzz hindi
Goodclarity.miceinfo.