Smartphones Are Dead (But We FINALLY Know What's Next)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ต.ค. 2023
  • Learn EXACTLY how I make my videos: www.enricotartarotti.com/stor...
    --------
    📮 Behind the scenes and nuggets on my free newsletter:
    www.enricotartarotti.com/emai...
    💻 My gear and tech setup:
    www.enricotartarotti.com/tech
    🎆 Instagram:
    / enritarta
    --------
    The journey to the next iPhone moment. In this video I am piecing together the journey to the next iPhone moment and to the next big thing after the smartphone era. From multimodal AI, ChatGPT and OpenAI to Humane, Imran Chaudri, Jony Ive, Zuck and Meta Glasses. This video has been super complex to write, since everyday something new was coming out, but I now have a pretty good idea of what's really ahead of us.
    --------
    🖖 Hey! I'm Enrico and I am a Product Manager working in tech. On this channel I go behind the scenes of the design, psychology and stories behind technology and the products we use everyday.
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 899

  • @enricotartarotti
    @enricotartarotti  10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Learn how I ACTUALLY made my most successful videos with hands-on, practical behind the scenes breakdowns:
    www.enricotartarotti.com/storybehind?

  • @mrbr549
    @mrbr549 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +741

    Yes, ads delivered right in front of your eyes that you can't skip. I can hardly wait.

    • @pirateluffy01
      @pirateluffy01 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Haven't seen an ad in ages

    • @Goodgu3963
      @Goodgu3963 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      @@pirateluffy01 I'm not sure if you've tried recently, but blocking ads on a smartphone is challenging. Blocking ads on a device that is mostly just a camera microphone and display, that is probably extremely locked down from modification, will be nearly impossible.

    • @pirateluffy01
      @pirateluffy01 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Goodgu3963 If you use Android you will its not uncommon

    • @woodypigeon
      @woodypigeon 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Goodgu3963 AdAway works pretty good on android. It just feeds your internet through a local VPN. no root needed.

    • @robelbelay4065
      @robelbelay4065 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

      I shuddered when I read this... Having something akin to unskipable TH-cam ads or Google ads glued to your eyes is a dystopia we're 100 percent headed for

  • @LiamAnthony_
    @LiamAnthony_ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +199

    The biggest problem I see with this is that it's going to be another huge blow against privacy. With smartphones, not only do companys know where you are and where you've been with location tracking, but with glasses tech, they're even going to know what you're looking at - how long you spend looking at a certain advert or a certain product, It'll be taking a record of everything you look at

    • @Martian74
      @Martian74 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      -2 social credit points for you. If it can augment what it wants you to see, it can also augment so we don't see things it doesn't want us to see by blurring out brands it doesn't like or making them disappear from view.

    • @Neil-Aspinall
      @Neil-Aspinall 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      If you have nothing to hide you will be fine Liam. By the way can we have your passwords as I am sure you have nothing to hide?

    • @kuromiLayfe
      @kuromiLayfe 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      don’t worry .. you will only be able to get them steal your privacy if you pay for the $89,99 per week subscription excluding AI server usage per hour that adds $9,99 for 2 GPU runtime hours to generate the ads you see

    • @mactep1
      @mactep1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Its not even about your own privacy, you choose to put on the glasses. But what about other peoples privacy?, how can you causally talk to another person, with a camera constatly pointing at you, without knowing if you're being recorded, its the same problem as Gglass and why this should be made illegal asap, you shouldn't have to sacrifice your privacy, because someone else chooses to look like a dork.

    • @Jorge-ew6fk
      @Jorge-ew6fk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That´s a very accurate thought right there, it didn't came to my mind until now.

  • @andrewcheshire244
    @andrewcheshire244 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +362

    My next phone will be an old Nokia from the 90's. Removable battery, calls/texts, perfect for actually getting social again (after you get over anti-social media).

    • @girohead
      @girohead 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      So 'retro' yet truly progressive. Every other new iteration is regressive. Smart phones will be seen like smoking in near future, I only want basic communication. I use my 24" monitor for any real use, the phone is useless.

    • @spankeyfish
      @spankeyfish 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      This is probably what the people who made the Light Phone were thinking of.

    • @thorinbane
      @thorinbane 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Going back to blackberry and BB10 OS. Perfect for browsing had apps, security, great feel. Just a crap camera .

    • @scroopynooperz9051
      @scroopynooperz9051 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The OG gangsters Nokia 3110 and 5110 will make a comeback and safe people from all the privacy- hacking alphabet agency snitch stuff 😂

    • @ReynbowSync
      @ReynbowSync 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Wow, you're so edgy and unique. I'm sure that'll totally work for you.

  • @alux3552
    @alux3552 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    One source of common confusion is that "this new technology" shall replace the previous ones, I remember people saying that smartphones and tablets will kill the PCs and laptops, but here we are, we still use all of them regularly. We have to keep in mind that each of these technologies, no matter how useful and awesome they are, they cannot be used all the time and in all contexts....

    • @arcomarco7131
      @arcomarco7131 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So true. I also think it will be not replacement but enhancement

    • @Maxinequinzel
      @Maxinequinzel 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Totally, I think we’re so far from replacing smartphones, and that the glasses will be nothing more than mere in-home entertainment

    • @borisblagojevic571
      @borisblagojevic571 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agree.

  • @bilboswaggings
    @bilboswaggings 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +120

    That is what everyone said about VR for gaming, but it takes a long time for a majority of people to be able to get their hands on them
    There are still people around the world who don't have access to normal glasses
    So maybe having to use your hand to hold your phone isn't something we need to change when most of that screen time is worthless doom scrolling

    • @raduungureanu2080
      @raduungureanu2080 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      good point. but it was never about needing.

    • @bilboswaggings
      @bilboswaggings 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@raduungureanu2080 my point being the smartphone isn't going to die any time soon even if we move on to something else

    • @jeremyandrews3292
      @jeremyandrews3292 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      "You mean you have to use your hands? That's like a baby's toy!"

    • @9mmfederalrimmed235
      @9mmfederalrimmed235 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      VR in gaming has never gotten mainstream. I never saw an VR in my life and only few people may use VR. It kind of fizzled away.

    • @Ultrazaubererger
      @Ultrazaubererger 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@9mmfederalrimmed235 VR is still fizzling. I would like it to succeed because it's really cool and a completely new experience but I'm keeping my hopes low.
      There would have to be light VR goggles for below 200$ or really really good ones for under 400$ for it to have a chance and I'm not seeing that anytime soon with the current technology.

  • @cryohellinc
    @cryohellinc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +278

    Corporations will hear what we say, see what we see, and understand literally everything about us. Ah the fantastic future ....

    • @MyVanir
      @MyVanir 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      Better not engage in any wrongthink.

    • @ericvulgate7091
      @ericvulgate7091 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Double plus good!

    • @godschild6694
      @godschild6694 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      a nightmare

    • @Agostoic
      @Agostoic 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Spoiler: they already do. Dystopia is next.

    • @DavidHalverson
      @DavidHalverson 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Central Artificial Intelligence Main Core will be the Leader of the next planet Earth in the coming technological revolution as AI becomes sentient. One corporation will be that of the One World Government, run by AI, all other corporations will be subservient followers or be assimilated if they are renegades.

  • @MrBananahat123
    @MrBananahat123 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +281

    The vision with proper user control over hardware and the ai itself would be pretty neat. Unfortunately as long as ai is under corporate control I have little faith that my ai assistant will be working in my best interests.

    • @mr.jamster8414
      @mr.jamster8414 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      I want my own R2-D2, not this dystopian crap.

    • @ethimself5064
      @ethimself5064 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@mr.jamster8414 🤣

    • @LiveType
      @LiveType 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      100% this. I've used google glass and while it was hella clunky I agree with enrico that it was a glimpse of the future. Realtime spatial and situational context clueing would be game changing. It will enable people to become literally superhuman (at least the ones willing to put up with it and learn).
      I can see this future but boy would companies charge a literal arm and leg for it.
      Also the invasive privacy concerns. Oh boy. Imagine government just paging into said company and being able to see EXACTLY what you were doing 24/7 without your consent.
      Yikes... Big big yikes.

    • @strandedinparadise8202
      @strandedinparadise8202 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @MrBananahat123 corporations found a way to keep us glued to our other devices all day - and to make us think it was our choice so I'm sure they'll find a way to get you to 'choose' to use an AI assistant

    • @veganconservative1109
      @veganconservative1109 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      We definitely still need to watch out for 'Hal', I'm thinking.

  • @mrunankBathe
    @mrunankBathe 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +169

    Most of us get onto our smartphones just to waste our time. That's what we need to change first.

    • @rjk1404
      @rjk1404 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Frankly: The Smartphone is a tool that enables you to do what ever you like. If you "waste time" with it, you should consider having ideas for new usecases or use it less and participate more to the world around you (no rant, just my opinion).
      But I also want to give credits to you, because we can't ignore the fact, that there are lots of companies and individuals earning money in the attention industry.

    • @enricotartarotti
      @enricotartarotti  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      It's a tool and I believe this is up to society and people to do, not the companies making the devices or apps. They will adapt to the broader culture around how we use devices, privacy etc, not the other way around

    • @michaelcorcoran8768
      @michaelcorcoran8768 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yeah but that's a choice to some degree as to how we use them. Of course we are very much conditioned to use them in that way, but we don't have to. They have effectively become little machines to help us consume, provide data, and be passive against major institutions to genuinely control most of our lives.
      But they could theoretically be used for political, organizing and resistance and personal enrichment... And shortly some people use these things to make beautiful art or photography or to share their literature et...

    • @porvoonosho
      @porvoonosho 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I've had a smartphone since 2000 (Nokia Communicator and Ericsson R380). I just switched to a dumb phone 2 months ago, and I'm never going back. I got my life and attention back.

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      aint happening. ur shaking ur fist at a cloud. unless u choose totalitarianism.

  • @Kraust
    @Kraust 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +549

    Cool, so the whole point of this video was glasses that track your location every moment of every day to feed everything you see and hear into a huge data model without your consent?

    • @mr.jamster8414
      @mr.jamster8414 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +117

      *with* your "consent".

    • @itzhexen0
      @itzhexen0 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +84

      and a bunch of people in society recording you without your consent then that also gets fed to the big tech companies.

    • @JohnDBlue
      @JohnDBlue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      I mean... Yes? Obviously? People who want this kind of cutting edge tech are gonna have to take risks in their privacy and security.
      It can't function in the crazy futuristic way envisioned without that access. Of course, we like to imagine digital security advances will handle the risks in an acceptable manner (not like anything digital is 100% secure even now)
      Though it is indeed a concern that your device might affect other people's privacy and security, so that's gonna be something regulations and whatnot has to address... and they're likely to be behind on these issues because tech is hard for old men lol

    • @michaelcorcoran8768
      @michaelcorcoran8768 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@mr.jamster8414 Right. Basically by agreeing to use the operating system and the phone when you sign up, you're giving so-called consent . Of course there's only two major operating systems and you can't participate in society without them.
      The mobile tech industry is particularly egregious with the way to handle repair and environmental e-waste. I need Christ, unreparable air pods and true wireless earbuds are little fossils of capitalism that won't degrade for thousands of years after humans are gone.
      Hundreds of dollars of something is designed to be e-waste in years. And look I have several pairs of true wireless earbuds so I'm not trying to suggest I'm above this. But when you really think about the business model, it's just unconscionable.

    • @TheFeatInk
      @TheFeatInk 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah this vid is really dumb hey, what a bore

  • @naturligthinder
    @naturligthinder 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +177

    A device that could record anything and send it to an online database sounds like a legal nightmare.
    I think it could become a thing but not 'The Thing'.
    The smartphone solved some many daily problems, it was all your digital devices in a neat package.
    Besides being handy in some situations, what would smartglasses solve that a camera app could not.

    • @personzorz
      @personzorz 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      A smartphone is already a device that could record anything and send it to an online database.

    • @naturligthinder
      @naturligthinder 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      @@personzorz But when using a smartphone it is clear. If someone starts pointing their phone in someones face the other party often reacts.
      With smartglasses you have to assume they are recording you at all times. And if we were to put our smartglasses in our pockets when not in use we have just made a worse smartphone.

    • @woodypigeon
      @woodypigeon 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      You can stick a smartphone in your pocket and forget about it. The glasses would be on your face constantly beaming crap into your eyes.

    • @shtboxgarage
      @shtboxgarage 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@woodypigeoneven if it isn't beaming light in your elites who knows how much data it's collecting in the background

    • @woodypigeon
      @woodypigeon 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@shtboxgarage All my devices are de-googled and de-crapwared as far as possible, and running adblockers. It isnt a perfect solution, but it eliminates the worst of it.

  • @AntoniatheUniverse
    @AntoniatheUniverse 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Great video, but imagine streaming your whole life to Mark Zuckerberg. I'm sure he would never misuse our data!

    • @Martian74
      @Martian74 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Exactly! Please don't remove your glasses, as we care about you, and we can protect you from seeing anything that is objectionable. If you look at any brands that don't advertise with us, we will blur the image and superimpose ads for better products, ones that pay us to advertise to you. If we see you vote for someone that is not approved we will be forced to lower your credit score, if we see you eating cake and smoking, your insurance cover will get more expensive because we care about you. If you please us, we will allow the glasses to release chemicals that will bring you pleasure, but if you displease us, an electric shock will be released till you repent, because we care about you. Please note, the next model comes with non-removable straps to firmly affix the glasses to your face at all times, even when you sleep, because we love you.

  • @findlay234
    @findlay234 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Gosh can you imagine walking down a busy street... "sorry are you talking to me?" This is where I see the sticking point of AR in glasses, the interface is hard... typing is still private and secure, talking out loud, not so much. Interesting to see how it pans out. I think neuralink is a potential route through, perish the thought.

  • @Happy_Shopper
    @Happy_Shopper 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

    I dont want to have an intrusive ai strapped to my face. I want to live life free from dependence on technology. I wish people were more opposed to the idea of artificial intelligence being baked into every facet of modern life which is where we seem to be going

    • @WalterLoggetti
      @WalterLoggetti 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wait until Kiroshi Optics will come out... :)

    • @margra99
      @margra99 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I dont want to have an intrusive human strapped to me. I want to live life free from dependence on humans.

    • @HDSPKSRecords-gi1ob
      @HDSPKSRecords-gi1ob 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@margra99 There is a solution, but you won't like it.

    • @karlsnowsill208
      @karlsnowsill208 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I agree, this is why google glass flopped, in many spaces it was banned because people thought it was creepy and people didn't want the artificial tech world encroaching on the real one. People are more opposed to tech now, they've had a decade to see what it has done to society.

    • @Neil-Aspinall
      @Neil-Aspinall 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Happy, report to Room 101 for reprogramming. Independent thought should and will be illegal soon enough. Big Brother is only thrying to help you.

  • @alanfitzgerald9026
    @alanfitzgerald9026 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Glasses replacing a brick in your hand is very improbable

  • @asdf8948
    @asdf8948 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    Smart glasses is going to be a privacy nightmare. I hope they are going to be banned in public places.

    • @alexwr
      @alexwr 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Well, it's not currently illegal to film in public places (in most countries), why would that change with smart glasses?

    • @zman7357
      @zman7357 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      there's cameras all over in public, most stores, traffic cams, dash cams, phones when anything interesting happens.

    • @stielimusterman3066
      @stielimusterman3066 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@alexwr
      Yeah, but these devices won‘t just record, but also relay said data, which is illegal in most countries and should be illegal everywhere.

    • @airsicklowlander7756
      @airsicklowlander7756 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It is illegal to record public conversations in many places

    • @zman7357
      @zman7357 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@airsicklowlander7756 it's legal in the US.

  • @HesselFolkertsma
    @HesselFolkertsma 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    I will always be fascinated by technological developments, but on the other hand…
    …more tech consuming, more gadgets, more distractions, more ecosystems, more batteries, more raw materials, more kobalt, more people at the lowest steps of the socionomic ladder suffering, more problems.
    Anyone else feel that way sometimes?

    • @pirateluffy01
      @pirateluffy01 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Well tech has to progress and it will progress (although i feel that sometimes too)

    • @HesselFolkertsma
      @HesselFolkertsma 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@pirateluffy01 Yeah I totally understand, and I'm not against it progressing either. I love dreaming about optimistic sci-fi future worlds. But I get the impression the current tech-world is not pursuing progression for the betterment of humanity.

    • @customjuices
      @customjuices 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes.

  • @MG-js8bn
    @MG-js8bn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    There were invasion of privacy LAWSUITS, actual lawsuits, that resulted from the Google Glass experience. If the user doesn't have complete control of something that sits on one's face, and in the paradigm we live in these new gadgets definitely WILL NOT be user-controlled to a great extent (unless you think of the company as the actual user), this will not be tempting to a huge number of people.

  • @RxLush
    @RxLush 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    I thunk you are missing a point: Everybody wanted a computer that fit in their pocket, but only a small fraction of people want a device watching and hearing everything you do. And I know, I know, smartphones already do it, but most people do their best to not use those features. I dont know any “non-geek” person that use any of the things you mentioned. Including assistances

  • @johnb6749
    @johnb6749 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    You know, it occurs to me that the glasses might even be a 'straw to beak the camel's back' in terms of our relationship with ever-more pervasive and invasive distraction of so-called 'smart devices'. To me I'm almost sick to death of having every train of thought, idea or attempt to know more interfered with and confused by for example a search engine like Google. The glasses sound like a living-hell for the wearer - even your vision being interrupted by overlays and voice-prompts. All I want to do when I turn my attention, either through my hearing or vision, to something other than myself, is to be able to do so with my ears or eyes, otherwise reality itself which is delivered by our body's senses will not only be corrupted but gradually become something of which we have little capability to process without some attached technology. Sound like hell - imagine being born and seconds later (or maybe even before!) having implants and devices attached to our body for the duration of our life. Good grief - advertising able to be inserted into our dreams and unconscious-states - I can se it coming and feel so sorry for future generations.... the horror. I thought subliminal advertising was pretty bad when it first became public knowledge decades ago - but the extrapolation of today's technology seems to promise an essentially un-human future for us all - all for the sake of selling us the latest tat no doubt....

    • @woodypigeon
      @woodypigeon 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      AR sounds hellish - even assuming you can get a decent ad-blocker for it.

    • @jeremyandrews3292
      @jeremyandrews3292 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      You're pretty much talking about the Borg from Star Trek, right? Except instead of them being distant aliens that assimilate us, they are the future we're creating for ourselves.

    • @TheStarBlack
      @TheStarBlack 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Totally agree. They're not inventing this stuff because it'll make out lives better, but because it'll make them richer.

  • @redbloodcell4047
    @redbloodcell4047 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    AR glasses just seem like an easy way to collect even more user data while also delivering even more intrusive advertisements, which I feel is the primary motivation behind developing such technology.. Also it seems like people could be one software error away from being run over by a car.

  • @garveziukas
    @garveziukas 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The major problem with AI glasses is that the server side part is hugely expensive which means expensive memberships on top of expensive product for the clients. Until an advanced AI model becomes very efficient or fit onboard, this will not be viable. At first it will only be fit for narrow niches like the ones you mentioned in the video.

  • @breadman32398
    @breadman32398 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Awesome! Now I can have unskippable ads for homemade arthritis remedies that take up my entire field of vision!

  • @qdavi1831
    @qdavi1831 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    when i see a giant ad from mc donalds in front of my eyes, you can securely say that someting is about to burn

  • @kellyanderson995
    @kellyanderson995 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I've always wanted an AI parrot sitting on my shoulder like a pirate. It would remember all the things I'm supposed to do, remind me of appointments, tell me when I was not being consistent and all kinds of things like a little Jiminy Cricket. I could also send it up in the air to get a little more situational awareness, like what's around the corner, where's my mom and such. Even put a projector on it, and the nearest wall becomes a screen. Or integrate it with the glasses. I think you're probably right about all this stuff, but an AI parrot is still a pretty cool idea too.

    • @woodypigeon
      @woodypigeon 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nah, a pigeon would be better. Pigeons are ace.

  • @bessimaestro
    @bessimaestro 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Super super cool, but very hard to ship: since you can't run such large models using the glasses hardware, you would need a 5G connection to call a server running the multimodal AI model.

    • @InventorZahran
      @InventorZahran 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      We need better 4G coverage, not 5G!

  • @novacorponline
    @novacorponline 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Smart glasses have failed like, how many times so far? There are far too many practical problems for them to work. Just for one example, the balance between "Able to see the UI in any lighting conditions" vs "Able to see reality clearly" is impossible to strike.

    • @alexwr
      @alexwr 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not to mention even more battery constraints, and just having to sit on your face for the whole day.

    • @CaptainKremmen
      @CaptainKremmen 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Not to mention those of us who wear glasses already and want zero additional hardware added to them. (Field of view/weight/comfort would all be affected.)

    • @mevensen
      @mevensen 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Not to mention that large number of people who don’t like wearing glasses at all, or need/like a variety of glasses, so you can’t just have one device.

    • @WizardOfWor
      @WizardOfWor 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This. Smart Glasses will only backfire in the long run.

  • @CESAR_H_ARIAS
    @CESAR_H_ARIAS 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Next we all are going to loose the last bit of privacy we still have and we'll clap them on the stage for taking it from us!

  • @KaioFalcrow
    @KaioFalcrow 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I think for most people it would be uncomfortable to wear something. It’s way more comfortable to have something in your hand or pocket.
    So I don’t see glasses replacing smartphones 🤔 if something is gonna replace smartphones, it’s just another, more advanced type of smartphone in my opinion 🤔

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ooookkkkkkkk. ur like person shaking head at the automobile and its internal combustion engine, it will NEVER replace the horse

    • @KaioFalcrow
      @KaioFalcrow 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@newagain9964 hahah no, usually I think things are gonna change, for example I think AI will replace a lot of jobs. But I just don’t see people wearing glasses all the time, I might be wrong of course!

    • @WalterLoggetti
      @WalterLoggetti 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I wear glasses, not smart, but for see things well.
      What a glorious day will be when i can see informations directly in front of me with my glasses...
      :)

  • @kootenpv
    @kootenpv 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I'm going to get my eyes lasered in 2 weeks not to have to wear glasses all the time. I really wonder if smart glasses will be the future...

    • @personzorz
      @personzorz 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No

    • @BootJamesOut
      @BootJamesOut 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hello folks: Soon will all be a walking computer hard-wired and online full-time.
      Nickname, On-liners.
      At 65 in age, I still have to ask to go to the washroom with permission first. Day one in school to death
      Sad but true and never Free. As school the training machine that limits are free thinkers to think on are own. Roll up your diploma and smoke it.
      Remember what rolls down hill. So don't step into it, oh
      SH T___. Corporation runs the government as they overview the workforce ( work and force, Scarry) are the blackmailer hidden with protection offered by the corporate world and the laws control and police us all that who isn't invented.
      That's why that sign reads. Keep off the grass.
      Music Frank Zappa song Slime. Whine up working in a gas station.
      Ride Easy

  • @aljosa_lesjak
    @aljosa_lesjak 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great content... Keep it up!

  • @chipmunkshavenuts
    @chipmunkshavenuts 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    While this seems good, and as suggested (and has already been in movies) can lead to an almost superhuman level of "knowledge", this 100% screams that it will become the crutch that people will start to rely on, and not be able to function without. It's like the newbie at work that ALWAYS turns to the experienced people to ask questions, and never takes the time to figure it out on their own and understand how anything works.

    • @carmelwolf129
      @carmelwolf129 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      to be honest, you could say the same about phones. and yet they make us more efficient, help us learn and work. i don't see this particular thing being a problem.

  • @jackpisso1761
    @jackpisso1761 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I don't think people will be comfortable being on camera and recorded by anybody all the time.

  • @swagmuffin9000
    @swagmuffin9000 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    sounds like a privacy nightmare, and smartphones already are a nightmare.

  • @salvsays
    @salvsays 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    The end of privacy is near. Cameras on our faces recording every sound every image everywhere all the time. Also having to gesture to the sky or talk out on the open to do something seems like it needs tweaking

    • @Neil-Aspinall
      @Neil-Aspinall 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The death of privacy and independent thought will be the greatest thing to happen to mankind since the wheel Sal.

  • @laurentziu7895
    @laurentziu7895 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I dont know if you actually going to read this comment. I really appreciate your content, but for a while it has felt a bit clickbait-ish and cliffhanger-ish. I mean, showing the 4 pieces of the puzzle and then blurring them? As an adult conscious about wasting time on the internet, I feel like this insults my intelligence a bit. I dont think you should have to appeal to such techniques, as you have good video topics and interesting takes on them. I feel like this distracts from the information quality and focused on "tricking" people into giving your attention. Just my 2 cents.

  • @ThisSteveGuy
    @ThisSteveGuy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Whatever the next thing is, it needs to solve an actual problem people are having.

  • @tamagodonald7149
    @tamagodonald7149 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    to be fair it might stay for longer but we'll see in the future what beholds

  • @frankbrislin4378
    @frankbrislin4378 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Hey Google, turn on the lights; and stop spying on me."

  • @galactic904
    @galactic904 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Soon i'll be walking around like Stevie Wonder, with a big smile, working remotely and simultaneously steamming-out with my friends, playing games and again listening to Stevie Wonder in outer-space. I can't wait for 2069, the quantum-hippie era

  • @sarahsperspective4369
    @sarahsperspective4369 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fascinating!

  • @kjellvb1979
    @kjellvb1979 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    For me, until the glasses are self contained and don't require a link to the internet and corporate servers, this tech won't be for me.
    I already hate cell phones for their privacy invasion, but at least I am tech savvy enough to limit that to a degree. But still we need a less corporate based world if this type of tech is not to be abused.

  • @personzorz
    @personzorz 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why does there have to be something next? That is an assumption about the way the world works, rather than a deduction

  • @Isaacpam_edit
    @Isaacpam_edit 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    In the future phone will be made from Bamboo.

  • @patrickbuswell
    @patrickbuswell 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just commenting for the algorithm. Keep up the great videos :)

  • @genetico909
    @genetico909 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This next phase won't begin for another eight years (at least). Right now they are still conditioning society to be ready to submit to the terms and conditions this next phase in tech will demand for access to it. The name of the game right now is to promote the idea of no individual privacy, pro censorship for the sake of your security, and no private ownership of anything physical or digital. They introduce these concepts in small amounts with changes here and there while they wait for the old generation to die out and the younger generation is old enough to replace them. There will be those that resist but it will not take much to make them submit. Exclusive access to the latest and greatest popstar's latest album, the ability to play Call of Duty 45 or Halo 3000, interactive lifelike porn etc.
    It's important to pose these questions to everyone... We stand at an influx in how society progresses. Is there a threshold to be reached before you stop? How much is convenience worth to you? Does access to certain kind of information hold a higher value over others? Have you ever stopped and wondered what you are losing in exchange for what you currently have? Are you a human being or an input/output device and what is the difference?

  • @kozjegyzo
    @kozjegyzo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dude! All the lights turned on in my lliving room when you said "Hey Google turn on the light" 😂 So I guess Assistants do work

  • @pap5616
    @pap5616 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I can imagine glasses bateries exploding on people faces

  • @The_Chad_
    @The_Chad_ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Damnit! You just turned on my lights and about blinded me😂

  • @Kolesha
    @Kolesha 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The shout out to Yagami Light was brilliant.

  • @niksgee3538
    @niksgee3538 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video! I wonder if those glasses will be one step away from placing the chip inside of you. As that would be easier than glasses?

  • @Goodgu3963
    @Goodgu3963 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This will be the downfall of user privacy. Everything you see, hear, do and say will be recorded and use to train Ai models on how to manipulate consumers. If not manipulate you personally. It is already happening, but this is the real driver behind these products. It's not about making you more productive, it's about making you as a product more valuable to real consumers that pay for your time spent watching ads.

  • @Borishal
    @Borishal 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you. Recently I have been asking this question a lot - what next?

  • @azamhanafi2997
    @azamhanafi2997 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Like the fonts ❤

  • @iham1313
    @iham1313 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    ar seems to be a way bigger market than vr -> extend reality with additional infos, displays/screens in front of you without wasting space, getting directed to poi's or articles in a shop, ...
    lightweight glasses would be awesome - even without speakers and with separate compute units (use a smartphone for that task)

  • @devilichus
    @devilichus 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Enrico you are really smashing it. Your videos are streamlined and addictive to watch because of how streamlined the environment, the topic and the visual quality it all matches nicely. Great job!

  • @zeitgeist888
    @zeitgeist888 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I think you nailed it with the features and needs of the next connected device beyond smart phones. AR glasses that allow you to hear responses and have a mic to listen to your voice and inputs as well as a camera to view what you see and take pictures or video while also having a screen to project information all hands free is the next logical step. Having a device that keeps the hands free and head up and ears unblocked means situational awareness and safety are greatly enhanced. Hands free ability to translate language heard/spoken or in text format and the ability to make or receive calls and texts while walking aware of your surroundings and phone in pocket is freedom. Add in AR directions for GPS guidance and you have most of the total package. Corporate and enterprise users could benefit from step by step instructions and remote support being able to assist by being able to see and hear what you are seeing and hearing. Use the phone as the brains/connection and just add glasses for screen, camera, mic and speaker interface. That keeps the price, size and weight down and battery drain lower too.

    • @Martian74
      @Martian74 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly! Please don't remove your glasses, as we care about you, and we can protect you from seeing anything that is objectionable. If you look at any brands that don't advertise with us, we will blur the image and superimpose ads for better products, ones that pay us to advertise to you. If we see you vote for someone that is not approved we will be forced to lower your credit score, if we see you eating cake and smoking, your insurance cover will get more expensive because we care about you. If you please us, we will allow the glasses to release chemicals that will bring you pleasure, but if you displease us, an electric shock will be released till you repent, because we care about you. Please note, the next model comes with non-removable straps to firmly affix the glasses to your face at all times, even when you sleep, because we love you.

  • @randomdude-4353
    @randomdude-4353 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I don’t care how advanced the tech is I’m not talking to a computer

    • @redbloodcell4047
      @redbloodcell4047 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've only ever met a single person who actually used voice assistants like Siri.

  • @rgalfarob182
    @rgalfarob182 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The "hey google, turn on the light" actually turn on the light in my nightstand 😅😂

  • @respecttheconstitution1146
    @respecttheconstitution1146 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Yeah, glasses are perfect. Like walking around in the city and getting you glasses snatched from your face from one of those "scholars" or "teens". Brilliant.

  • @MrC0MPUT3R
    @MrC0MPUT3R 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A product manager who is completely out of touch with what users want??? Impossible.

  • @daemon1143
    @daemon1143 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It has yet to be demonstrated that it won't lead to dying in space (or the analogous outcome for whichever location the victim finds themselves).

  • @ShinyTechThings
    @ShinyTechThings 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The PPC6700 was before that if I remember correctly. I had one and it was awesome for it's day especially if you flashed your own ROM!

  • @DodoNn
    @DodoNn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I never understood how Google Glass flopped so hard. It was exactly what for me, a 15 year old then, a future looked like, and it still makes sense. I also do not understand how for 10 years no one, not even Google, has come close to that again? Like, it exists??

    • @AntoshaPushkin
      @AntoshaPushkin 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Because it's a gimmick, just like VR. It's fine to play around with it for a few days, but then you get bored. Also it has quite a lot of issues: it becomes pretty much useless on a sunny day, it drains battery fast, and it's quite clunky. It's not a good device for a consumer, it's a good toy you could present as a gift to your geeky friend

    • @stielimusterman3066
      @stielimusterman3066 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The real question should be what‘s wrong with the present in that context and is it really in the consumers interest to force "innovation“ just for the sake of being innovative...

    • @thorinbane
      @thorinbane 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Because it was garbage and some of us gen x people remember when privacy meant something and looking like a weird geek was bad.

    • @aformofmatter8913
      @aformofmatter8913 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, it looks like the future. Because that's what it was designed to do: *look* like the future.
      In the 50s, people thought the future would look like shiny foil shirts & big boxy robots. But those shirts are pointless & look dumb & our ability to miniaturize robots advanced faster than they could've anticipated (while simultaneously, our ability to make AI advanced way slower than they expected)
      In the 80s & 90s, people thought the future would look like food pills & flying cars. But people like eating delicious food & flying cars are an awful, impractical idea for more reasons than I can list.
      In the 2000s, people thought that the future looked like AR glasses. Simple as that.
      Nobody gets the future right because reality is stranger than fiction & is bound by practicalities that writers (& tech bro executives) never seem to predict.

    • @TheStarBlack
      @TheStarBlack 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because people don't want it

  • @DerbJd
    @DerbJd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Remember mobiles with removable antennas? You could unscrew it while talking to someone you didn't want to... "Hello? Hello?? Lost the signal..."

  • @timothyreynolds6255
    @timothyreynolds6255 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a teacher with literally hundreds of students, I need/want AR glasses that show me student names, grade, classroom teacher name, health concerns.

  • @sandovalproducer
    @sandovalproducer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imagine anyone you encounter on streets pointing at you with the smarphone camera and analizing you, that's what this video is about

  • @isaiahgillett2573
    @isaiahgillett2573 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If my tablet and phone can't even determine the difference between your voice and mine, we're not ready for a voice only interaction device.

  • @Hollowdude15
    @Hollowdude15 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think people need to understand that it will always be a place for everything and great video man :]

  • @captainpumpkinhead1512
    @captainpumpkinhead1512 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would love to hear what you think of the Rabbit R1 device that was just announced at CES this year.

  • @YashrajThakor06
    @YashrajThakor06 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    wow, great content continuw to make videos like this please

  • @Eric-qi9us
    @Eric-qi9us 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    as the technology advances, we lose our privacy more and more

  • @bahamutsspiritsubs
    @bahamutsspiritsubs 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Although your videos are very click-baity, they do quite keep my attention as a well-informed video essay form! Just came across you channel and I like the formulae.

  • @nickbrough8335
    @nickbrough8335 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Interesting POV. I have a different perspective. Producing IP, indeed content as a whole is expensive even when the content is prepared for "free" as on youtube. IP and content owners are NOT going to give that to AI for free (just as old media is seeking to generate replacement revenue from Google et al for using its content for free). This battle has only just begun.
    As a consequence more IP, content and data is going to stay behind paywalls (your blog on why google search is not as good as it was shows this effect very clearly), so those who create AI are ultimately going to have limited free access to the same limited public data as google search currently has. Chat GP style AI may well be able to present the data much better than google search does, but the quality of content will be lacking in far to many specialist areas.
    What AI is most likely going to deliver to users is assistant/secretary functions that will enable high skilled/knowledgeable people to become much more efficient and productive at the cost of removing lower skilled, lower IQ people. I dont doubt that everyone will benefit from this to a significant degree.
    However, when it comes to the technology you carry around, the interface may well change (VR glasses, the wearable projection shown in your video), but its still going to need to have a processing box (aka evolved smart phone) to do the heavy lifting as well as much higher bandwidth data/coms network.
    It looks to me that the way we interface with smart phones will change (from touch to voice/eye driven), but the pocket sized portable computer will be around for quite a long time yet.
    The other issue is that the internet itself is expensive and is becoming increasingly shit to use due to higher number of ads, subscription costs and i don't see this changing. The increasing use of paywalls to protect IP and content to allow content/IP owners to make a living from their investment is just gonig to continue to fragment the internet.
    I do agree that AI itself is going to change the content we watch for entertainment and how it is produced. Consensual shared virtual realities may become much more common as entertainment rather than TV.

  • @RPM91102
    @RPM91102 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So, it's Miss Minutes. Miss Minutes is the future. Embedded in glasses, in watches, in a chip in my head projecting it unto my own vision, hearing, and all my senses, messing with me going HEY Y'ALL all the freaking time. I'll lose my mind and, then, she'll be in control. I can already see the Community episode of "Troy and Abed with AI Zooombies"

  • @S.E.C-R
    @S.E.C-R 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am super excited for  Vision Pro to be released this year, if they can do this, you know they’ve been working on glasses also that are probably already years ahead of Metaberg’s!

  • @mariatomlinson2663
    @mariatomlinson2663 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pros: Can ask my glasses "where did I put the ?" and it will know and tell me!
    Cons: The Company knows what I'm looking at, every last one of my secrets, the true name of god, and will use this to target the unskippable ads on my eyeballs.
    Hmm. decisions decisions.

  • @ausbare140
    @ausbare140 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Soon we will have "Don't trust any one who wears glasses"

  • @themirrazz
    @themirrazz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “Hey Google, turn on the light”
    “Light Yugami is the main character of the popular manga and anime series Death Note. In the show, light gets in contact-“
    😂😂😂

  • @urglegurgle5807
    @urglegurgle5807 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    2001 a space odessey was published circa 20 years later than nineteen eighty four that had the concepts of interactive screen, microphone, camera combination, and the issues it could cause with control over people.

  • @Radulf666
    @Radulf666 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The only interesting thing what I'm thinking of is advertisement. So when you walk around, and then you normally see these billboards, with an AR-Glass this could be animated, popping into your vision, and you couldn't look away. Sure, it could be cool like Bladerunner to see 3D with it (2 displays) but the power we give the companies...

  • @arsims1
    @arsims1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For me it seems difficult and impossible to replace smartphones with smart glasses.

  • @RichardLucas
    @RichardLucas 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Last time someone wheeled this out everyone freaked out and hated it. The reasons they hated it have not been defeated. People still don't want to feel like you're recording them or scanning them. People worry over whether other people are watching porn while in their presence, lol. Has there been science to suggest the strong backlash to Google Glass won't return with someone else's glasses product? If not, you actually have more reason to believe it's going to be a flop.

  • @RobertDeCaire
    @RobertDeCaire 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had some insight into what was going on behind the scenes at North when they were still on version 1 of their smart glasses and were developing version 2, and I have to say, I'm seriously disappointed that Google bought them and mothballed all the patents for AR glasses. It was going to be kind of amazing hardware, and fix most of the issues with Google Glass, but who the hell knows if we'll see that tech again.

  • @Fennek_Kaipii
    @Fennek_Kaipii 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Knowingly calling out smarthome automations should become a crime to this day...

  • @rrecherei9092
    @rrecherei9092 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    makes me wonder what is under that stocking cap

  • @matbroomfield
    @matbroomfield 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The internet already knows too much about me. The last thing I want to do is tell it more.

  • @wayando
    @wayando 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Smartphone is still peak personal computer for another 10yrs+

  • @AidanLeBaller
    @AidanLeBaller 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Me personally, I’d much prefer using my hands to control physical objects, like buttons, and touch screen, and I don’t think I’ll ever see smart glasses more than an accessory

  • @I_know_it_I_sew_it_I_grow_it
    @I_know_it_I_sew_it_I_grow_it 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thinking about that movie, "They Live".

  • @D_S_88
    @D_S_88 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Close, but you're slightly off.
    The next 'device' to transcend the ubiquity and use/usage of smart phones is going to be something implanted into the human body; biometrics - facial recognition/retina scans, etc. were the purpose of mass producing and normalizing smart phones in the first place - free data pooling; with the added benefit of being surveillance based and purposed of course.
    Just look at all the POS palm readers that are being rolled out and put into grocery/retail stores all over the world. Spearheading this are brands such as Whole Foods and Amazon. I'd wager more are to follow soon.
    In fact technology that would have seemed impossible to exist will be revealed quickly over the next seven years.
    I hope you're ready to embrace this new technocratic 'utopia'. I have a feeling many will reject it once they understand it's true use and the intent behind said use.
    Anyways thanks for the video and have a blessed day. 🙏

  • @ManabuMiwa
    @ManabuMiwa 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    13:15 multimodelLLM, sounds like Multi Level Marketing. 😂😂

  • @JuanTheBone
    @JuanTheBone 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you already wear glasses this seems like a no brainer, if you are not a normal glasses wearer the idea of wearing them constantly will make your nose bridge hurt. So don't wear them all the time? At that point its no different than just taking out your phone when you need to.

  • @robertmcgee4050
    @robertmcgee4050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My understanding is that every Tesla car is streaming video to a supercomputer for analysis. Do you think Tesla is a good candidate to be first to market with smart glasses? Like Arby’s, the have the meats already - tons of video data already being used to train their version of AI.

  • @casanova419
    @casanova419 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So in other words The Glassholes are coming back.

  • @freeshipping9643
    @freeshipping9643 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I 1000% agree. Apple vision pro was the monitors of 90s. Good insight man. Your on the money.

  • @Dcat682
    @Dcat682 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've been thinking AR Glasses is the future we've been moving towards two decades now and have been super excited about VR headsets getting smaller and smaller becoming less of a novelty in gaming and more of a day to day wear. My main concern has been how would they interface with prescription lenses and I'm both hopeful and nervous. Hopeful because prescription lenses for VR headsets are now a thing. Nervous because if it's being projected on/in a lens adding a prescription to the mix could be very expensive and limit future upgrades at the user level.
    Do you know if companies developing these technologies are also looking into this concern?

  • @bachirmessaouri4772
    @bachirmessaouri4772 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nah, you are wrong about this.
    The crucial thing you didn't take into account is privacy.
    You know the history of the Google glasses very well so you should know that when they were a prototype, one of the main issues they faced is that people around were very nervous about them as they felt they were spied. There were a few incidents during the testing process where some fights were about to start in public because people didn't want to be looked at by those glasses. The people wearing them were real targets.
    And the other privacy issue is legal. These glasses would potentially be breaking massive laws anyway and violating human rights in the process.
    So, it's basically a no go.
    That's too big of a paradigm shift for this to happen. We are not there yet. At all.
    People working in high tech companies are maybe ready for this but the average Joe isn't. Far from it. And once again, the buyer is not the real issue. The issue is the acceptance from the rest of the world. People wearing those things will be putting themselves in harm's way. They wouldn't stand an hour in public with those glasses without being punched on the face.
    Even cops will not approve this. Just look at how they react when you are recording them with your phone...
    People are willing to give up their privacy but up to a point. And when they do, they give up their own privacy but this is something else as it involves giving up the privacy of everyone else around. It's so different.
    Despite all the lobbying and PR operations in the world, the resistance will be infinite.

  • @Scripture-Man
    @Scripture-Man 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So what is the device in the thumbnail with the colored squares?

  • @QoraxAudio
    @QoraxAudio 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But how do you squeeze so much power into just glasses?
    Or do you use glasses to connect to a server that does the heavy lifting?