Unfortunately due to some Adobe weirdness in the final export I uploaded there's a colorful placeholder instead of me talking in some sequences. I was about to reupload the video, but to be fair it almost looks cool, so let's all pretend it's on purpose 😎
I switched to Linux recently, and I had similar worries as your exaggerated example before I did it. After two months of use, I have to admit that Linux is the first operating system to achieve the perfect balance between freedom and 'walled garden'. You have a walled garden, but you can easily tear down the walls if you like (and dare).
Linux itself is neither walled nor seamless, it's some distros which add that. But on the other hand, it's the distros where most conflict rise - like Ubuntu push for snap packages or red hat killing centos. Again - giving seamless experience, but limiting freedom
It's wild, I'm back in university as a mature student. I never saw the "iphone vs android" wars when younger. But it's insane and the memes over the past decade are real, trying to get anything done between android and iphone users is impossible
@@kowboy702 that is a very negative view of open source! But I can't deny it's real to some extent. I just figure that since we are becoming the product nowadays it's just fair that we don't have to pay for apps. We are being exploited and paying twice as it is. The developers will find a way to get their money, I'm quite sure.
That was 20 years ago. Companies corrupted that when the big push to the cloud started around the 2010s. Now it seems like a defensive battle. Totally different game in contrast to how it was 20 years ago when Free Software and Open Source were advancing and becoming mainstream.
Exactly. Why do people think that Android devices are gltchy or full of viruses? They're not. Anyway, most people only ever download apps from Google Play and are even less likely to "root" their device.
@@Totomenuwell well well allow me to introduce you to KDE connect. developed by the KDE team (yes that linux desktop environment) works on most OS anyways coz why not. give you a lot of nice phone to PC interconnection. the caveat being both devices must be connected to the same WIFI but thats like not that big of a deal coz most of the time you are just connected to the same network on all the devices.
That is not entirely true. I felt like they were finally getting some traction (apps started apperaring) just when they announced that they are closing it down
That, but also the fact that it wasn't open source. Android could be integrated by any phone manufacturer for no cost making it widely available and Apple was of course the first with the smartphone. There weren't many Windows phones available and they were behind on Apple.
@fabiandrinksmilk6205 Technically, 3Com dropped the first smart phone years prior to Apple on the Palm platform, although it was web-based because, well, "apps." I was a religious user of the Windows Phone(s). It was such a fast platform and as the other comment alluded to, they were making progress, alas it was far too little far too late in the phone race. I used mine until the last update. I had often used company issued iPhone for work and didn't enjoy them much, so I reluctantly made the hop to Andriod. It's served me without complaint. They're all pretty much parity at this point.
You forgot to mention that the real movement that made App Store possible was to kill the Flash Player. With Flash we basically had all the powers we have today in terms of Web Apps and I'm talkin about 2005-2010.
I don't belive that you have to compromise seamlessness for freedom. Just getting something that works is what most people are conditioned to do out of habit. If most people got out of there comfort zone then you would definetly see people start to leave "walled gardens" for better and more privacy respecting choices. As the years go by free software gets more advanced and seamless. I completly diagree that this is a trade off situation.
I like how when speaking of MAC people love to claim "no viruses" (actually, not exactly true) but when its Linux then "oh no, command line!". Oh well, things never change.
Awesome video - didn’t realize some of these interesting connections and history - like the stuff with the web and Microsoft compared to now. Very cool!
Correction: Spotify has to give 30% to Apple in Year 1 of the customer and 15% afterwards. Love the sound effects and cleanliness of the video. Awesome.
Once again - Amazing Video, Enrico! You‘re a big inspiration for me and I finally started my youtube journey (not this channel). Love your style of editing and pacing. Keep it up!
Important note: You don’t need an iPhone to use Vision Pro. Some users are actually frustrated it isn’t more connected. You scan your face with the Vision headset’s front cameras, and it acts as its own completely separate, independent computing device.
You're actually wrong you do need a iPhone 15 or I believe the iPad pro to do the initial face scan to order the vision pro. The custom make the cushion to fit your face from what I understand.
The things is that apple still can provide their seemless experience but there can just be an escape hatch for users that want more freedom. A product can be seamless but at the same time allow freedom.
The main reason I use an iphone is that I use Macs. The early Mac minis were very empowering. A great combination of freedom and "it just works". But now the Mac OS feel unempowering. I feel like I have to take courses in Mac OS just to feel comfortable in it again - which was exactly why I stopped using Windows. In the 80s they had a for-credit college class to teach students to do simple things on a computer. Maybe we're regressing? If I did have the interesting in learning every little thing about an OS, I would jump out of walled gardens and go with companies that let you repair your device.
@@joelbechtolt The first mac I ever bought was the plastic version of the mini. I installed a game on it which didn't work because one of it's libraries wan't compatible. I was able to get the game working without too much effort - which I could not have done on a Windows computer. Now MacOS is much more complicated and harder to understand, and I can't play amateur hacker on it anymore.
@@darkwing3713 Literally anyone else you ask will state that MacOS has become too dumbed down and too closely resembling iOS. I've never heard of modern Macs being more complicated than the older ones. Always the opposite. Then again I've never heard of Mac software missing a library or having an incompatible library that was required for it to work (how is that less frustrating than everything today that just works with no drivers, extensions, or libraries??)
@chtolt Maybe dumbing down is a better way of putting it. It just feels like I can't do much to make my Mac work. For instance, I want the non-default scroll direction. So I set the non-default direction. My Mac ignores the setting. There's nothing more I can do. And it wasn't the OS that was missing a library. The Mac version of the game came with an incompatible version of a third party library. I figured out what the error meant, found a another version of the library, checked it with my security software, and installed it in my user-level library. Success! If it had been a Windows computer I wouldn't have bothered to to try for a fix. I'm not an IT person.
You have to understand that as a first gen device that it doesn’t make sense to open up to mass market. Creating the experience needed for what your proposing needs to come from focused research and development from its early user base. Overtime we should see the Vision Pro open up to other platforms.
In your videos what you miss almost always it's talking about the real important matter. The cost! the iphone first price was more or less 300 dollars (6-700 dollars today). It introduced all features that are needed or at least are useful. Who needs a 4000 dollar visor that adds a little animated horse on your furniture? today then, where young people have less money that can be wasted. Maybe some designer can use it in its project, maybe some tech nerd that wants a new toy to play with. not the 99% of people that needs tools to do things.
7:17 the problem isn't "complete freedom"; a mac has as much freedom as the average user could want, yet doesn't come with the hassle of messing with the command line and w/e. the problem is... well, hassle. people want things that "just work" when they want it to, but also gives them the flexibility to do more when they want more. the problem with alternative operating systems is that things don't "just work", you have to do more just to achieve the same results you got with mainstream operating systems
everyone has this ridiculous superstition that inorder to just open an app in linux, you have to enter 50 commands or something. IT'S NOT TRUE. linux in 2020s is SO MUCH DIFFERENT to linux in the 90s. it's even better than windows to be honest. NO ADS, NO BLOATWARE, NO TRACKERS. clean and open source OS
From my understanding an iphone is only needed to do the scan for a ´perfect´ fit, My concerning is that besides gaming and pro simulators, vr/ar offers nothing new/necessary to become mainstream.
To be honest, I'm looking to return to Android. My smartphone journey started there. Then I went iPhone, now I want to go back. They do stuff I actually want
app support is killing the galaxy tabs bc the pro apps are just on the ipads. the apple vision pro not getting apps might just kill it and make the future something else
Actually you are wrong on subscriptions. They take 30% the first year and 15% thereafter. The only service that retains the higher fees are non-recurring charges like micro transactions
Let’s be clear on something - this is not “developers vs Apple”; it is large tech companies vs another large tech company. This is not some righteous war; it’s about money and that money is not going to a bunch of indie developers whether Apple loses or wins in the end. Edit: Also, I hate web apps 😅. I don’t care what Steve Jobs said 50 years ago. I’m alright with Google web apps but that’s about it. Most of all, I hate apps that pretend to be native when they are just web pages in some web view container (e.g. Figma and Notion)
there are some points to be made for the walled garden such as simplicity and also the security of iOS is based on the fact Apple can largely how you get apps through the app store. However them reading the letter of the law and purposely designing the worst, most expensive yet legal system possible really isn't a good move.
If Apple won't support PWAs which have been developing and improving over the last seven years, there is absolutely no way they support a web-based alternative to ARKit. And it's hilarious because all they would need to do is look at Samsung and the debacle that was Tizen to realize they are making the biggest mistake of all time here. What's amazing to me is that they want to jump into the AI space next with a replacement for Siri, but they are already way behind and Siri was never as good as competing options. How hilarious would it be if Microsoft, the owners of OpenAI, made a dedicated AI hardware that wasn't necessarily a smartphone but was an accessory to the smartphone and it literally did everything the Vision Pro can do but better and cheaper?
I remember buying my first serious smartphone, it was an samsung ace II. It was amazing... At that time apps were the reason to have a smartphone, God, theres an app for that, yes, there were, there were good, and complete, games also, and a reason for existence where the phone was just a hardware required for the software. Since then I've jumped from samsung to apple, back to samsung and back to apple, and its kinda lame that they both look and feel the same and the only use for it, nowadays, it seems to be social media. Kinda what happned to the internet, whereas before we had blogs and everything and now its only social. I miss the fun of my humble ace II and I despise the boredom of my "powerfull" Iphone... Gosh, the time where we started instagram and all we could see was the glamorous early phone photo technology, now its so perfect but devoided of meaning only used to promote ads and ego culture. Sad times man
If you're only using your phone for social media that's on you. There's never been a more robust offering of apps that do all sorts of things. Time to get creative again and get off social media. The only stopping you is you.
@@joelbechtolt Its not that I'm only using my phone for social media, and of course theres a lot of good apps and evertything. The point that I was trying to make was about how I miss the experimental fase of it. For exemple, Instagram, it started as a cool way to share pictures that we took from our phones and now it just serves to show a fake side of us all and make us depressed and FOMO filled and for influencers to put ads and for companies to add adtrackers. It started as an experimental app for photo sharing and it just ended up being another social media. Games were cool ways to pass time and some gems of the past are stil here but most just became this freemium shite that we see. Before we had Snapchat because of the cool feature of temporary photos but now its everywhere, even fucking whatsapp has it. Whereas before I would youtube videos about the apps of the month and see a bunch of cool different apps, now-a-days its just apps trying to copy what other sucssefully created or trying to hard to burst the bubble. I dont know if you play games, but I rember the companion app for assassins creed 4 it was awesome and apps that were there just for fun or to make something even more enjoyable. I remember how ppl would create apps for amusement and not only to try to get rich. Also phone companies just absorved core functions that were 3rd party and now its already pre installed. Remember that u had to download a flashlight app? U dont need it anymore because its already there! Remember downloading a step counter? u dont need it anymore its already here. Remember downloading a note taking app, well u dont need it anymore etc. To be fair, I think pokemon go was the last big novelty in smartphone apps. The smartphone mainstream kinda shifted towards social media and we see that in numbers, like how tiktok was the biggest downloaded app of all time for some amount of time and etc. For the sake of trying I opened both my Galaxy and my Iphone and went in their respective stores and I found nothing worth of really downloading or that enticed me. I dont really now if thats on me, or if its just not there anymore. Well this is my 2 cents on the subject.
Done with apple and smartphones frankly. I'm actively looking to leave this trap of an ecosystem. its milk money at every turn. Forget it. I miss cheap 99cent apps so much and it was blissful not having in-app purchases. I miss having decent storage and dont want to pay $50+ a month for cloud. Gimme offline expandable storage goddamnit. If you're gonna milk me i will be forced to sail the pirate seas...which is no biggie at all i grew up with that
I know what you meant by saying that walled gardens are good, but I disagree. I disagree weith your definition of walled gardens and being non-open (I still agree with general message of this video). I think that it is possible to make device/ecosystem that is easy to use and open. Sure, there will be restrictions: you, for example, won't allow malware in your appstore but I wouldn't call it walled garden just because it have some restrictions. It depends on what is the result of all the restrictions. For example If you are still able to install this malware if you really want to (I mean, there can even be usecases for that if you want to test some specific security etc.), you still should be able to. Should it be behind tons of security layers/password etc.? Obviously. PS. I think you never used linux. I mean, I know you said that you are joking, but linux is just nothing like you said. Well it can be, but it also can be complete oposite if you really want. And If you want "easy" linux experience, buy product that have linux preinstalled, like for example some from system76. I know, linux might not be familiar or clear; and still might require sometimes some tinkering if something breaks but it doesn't mean that it can not be fixed without making it walled garden.
We had installable apps before iPhone. More hassle but still not that hard. We even had widgets on both smart and some "dumb" phones before the iPhone. And also HTML web browser etc. iPhone brought nothing new in reality.
Oh don't worry Apple is ruining the Mac as well they keep trying to pull iPhone features on the Mac like the new settings application that is such a pain to use or even just find some thing in it because well it's designed 100% for a phone. It didn't used to be this way things sort of just worked on Mac and also just worked with windows until about 10 years ago.
All Apple needs to do is have way easier sideloading on iPhones and iPads. if it was exactly the way Google does it with Android, stuff would be FINE. People are saying security would take a nosedive but Android has gotten way better with security since the early days. It's not 2014 anymore. The walled garden argument is a joke. If I can install my own apps on a Mac without needing to pay apple some weird tax, I should be able to do the same on an iPhone and an iPad, no excuses.
Why do people always insist on starting the story too early? I don't need to know the whole history of iPhone and Apple apps. Or if you're talking about a person as soon as I hear they were born at such and such date I instantly click off. I could care less when someone was born where they were born or the early childhood if we're talking about some invention they made when they were 58 years old... Is this just something people do to pad videos for extra length? I absolutely love Apple for the quality of their hardware and the quality of the software. But then they are so anti-customer it's insane. How anybody puts up with their crazy rules I just don't understand. I had an iPhone for a year if it works it's the most perfect experience ever. But if anything ever breaks you're just totally bone because the system is set up to do everything automatically but if that doesn't work there's no fall back. For example something got messed up with my Apple account. I couldn't download any apps or even set up my Apple TV. So I sold it but the latest greatest Samsung phone at the time and never looked back. Note 9 was rock solid for 4 plus years for me. 😂😂😂
Oh so the most popular TH-camr ever uses this format? Mr beast? No they cut out all the unnecessary parts leaving only the entertaining part or sections that add value to the content. @@ElizabethUkeh
Iphone most successful product in all of history? What about the wheel? There has gotta be a bunch of stuff we take for granted that have had a massive impact on the world for a long time, like the milk carton. What about refined petroleum? That is a product and the money exhanged for that must dwarf the entirety of Apple's history as a company by a lot.
I think Epic Games is in the wrong. If you don't want to play by the rules of a particular app store, then don't make apps for it. Once Apple and Google stop making money off their piniatas because no one is filling them with candy anymore, they will change. Stop making their platform valuable to them if it isn't already valuable for you!
I see what you’re getting at, but if we’re being intellectually, honest here, Microsoft aim to dominate the Internet using Internet explorer is not the same as Apple trying to maintain control over a platform that they built. Microsoft did not build the Internet…
Right. There is a difference between for example forcing people to take off shoes just in your home vs in the whole city. Also I think that TH-cam, Netflix etc. will eventually come to Vision Pro though maybe not in this first generation yet. Once this type of device becomes more and more popular they won't want to loose potential customers. However, just like with the iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch I do hope that Vision Pro will force the competition to also improve their devices.
This story is dumb, android has a 30% cut, and most of your pros aren’t really pros when it comes to web apps. The reason why there are no apps for the Vision Pro is simple, the amount of people who have it are minuscule. It’s t due to them not allowing web apps. The meta quest also has this issue, with not many apps, also another issue that even companies like Netflix that have made apps, end up not updating them, you can run Netflix on the quest but still only at 480p Rez.
People keep saying “you need an iPhone to use it” that is completely wrong. You need an iPhone to scan your face to buy it online. You need an iPhone because no other phones readily come with the kind of face scanning radar than iPhones have. If you don’t have an iPhone, you can go directly to the store and get one. The only time my iPhone and VP using combine is looking at the phone through the passthrough. 😊
@@Daniel_VolumeDown so… what’s the cost benefit analysis to research which phones they are, what market share that it, how likely they are to buy the device to make it worth creating an app just for that niche?
@@kowboy702 hey, I am not saying that it was good for apple to make specific app for these phones. You just said that no other phone comes with face scanning radars. And I just responded that this is not true. Wether they should or should not release app for other phones is different question. Personally I think that onr kind of solution might be that they send you some device for few bucks that would scan your face and then you send it back. Or you go to apple store and they scan your face there. Or they would release this face scanning app as a web app, so every devica that have web browser and sensor can scan your face (I am not sure if that is possible though because I am not sure if web browser have possibility to request these kinds of sensors).
couldve said what was in around the 5th minute right from the start and close the video. so desperate for adsense with that clickbait title and thumbnail, huh?
Solved ...haha nice joke but not even close. You have 2 rather no Brainerd beginners suggestions but not all are that simple and you did not solve my issue.... but good thing I'm educated and can figure out how to solve the not so... it's it plugged in kind of problem and since you are the is it plugged in kind of solutions that you call problem solved I'll be sure to pass on you and not waste my time ever again!!
Unfortunately due to some Adobe weirdness in the final export I uploaded there's a colorful placeholder instead of me talking in some sequences. I was about to reupload the video, but to be fair it almost looks cool, so let's all pretend it's on purpose 😎
Like that one TH-camr
I was absolutely sure it’s intentional, it even matches the visual style of the video
I really thought it was intentional, asking myself “how did he do this” 😂
Yeah it actually looks amazing!
is not a bug, it's a feature. If you do it again in another video it would be a chad move
I switched to Linux recently, and I had similar worries as your exaggerated example before I did it. After two months of use, I have to admit that Linux is the first operating system to achieve the perfect balance between freedom and 'walled garden'. You have a walled garden, but you can easily tear down the walls if you like (and dare).
It's not a walled garden. It's your house, and it's up to you what you do with it!
Linux itself is neither walled nor seamless, it's some distros which add that. But on the other hand, it's the distros where most conflict rise - like Ubuntu push for snap packages or red hat killing centos. Again - giving seamless experience, but limiting freedom
It's wild, I'm back in university as a mature student.
I never saw the "iphone vs android" wars when younger. But it's insane and the memes over the past decade are real, trying to get anything done between android and iphone users is impossible
The future is open-source
The future is the past then? Exploiting the work of free maintainers tricked into believing clout is better than money in the bank?
I deeply wish that will be the case!
@@kowboy702 that is a very negative view of open source! But I can't deny it's real to some extent.
I just figure that since we are becoming the product nowadays it's just fair that we don't have to pay for apps.
We are being exploited and paying twice as it is.
The developers will find a way to get their money, I'm quite sure.
That was 20 years ago.
Companies corrupted that when the big push to the cloud started around the 2010s.
Now it seems like a defensive battle. Totally different game in contrast to how it was 20 years ago when Free Software and Open Source were advancing and becoming mainstream.
Its not.
Incredible how apple has come from believing in the future of web apps, to being the most hostile platform towards PWAs ever.
Android phones work seamlessly, this isn't 2012. You can have freedom and also a device that functions.
Exactly. Why do people think that Android devices are gltchy or full of viruses? They're not. Anyway, most people only ever download apps from Google Play and are even less likely to "root" their device.
I can copy something on my mac, and paste it on my iphone. It's absurd how those little integrations make a difference
No, they don't.
@@Incognito-pk2ct skill issue
@@Totomenuwell well well allow me to introduce you to KDE connect. developed by the KDE team (yes that linux desktop environment) works on most OS anyways coz why not. give you a lot of nice phone to PC interconnection. the caveat being both devices must be connected to the same WIFI but thats like not that big of a deal coz most of the time you are just connected to the same network on all the devices.
The app war also claimed Window's Phone. Nobody would build for it, so they essentially were forced to close the project down.
That is not entirely true. I felt like they were finally getting some traction (apps started apperaring) just when they announced that they are closing it down
That, but also the fact that it wasn't open source. Android could be integrated by any phone manufacturer for no cost making it widely available and Apple was of course the first with the smartphone. There weren't many Windows phones available and they were behind on Apple.
@fabiandrinksmilk6205 Technically, 3Com dropped the first smart phone years prior to Apple on the Palm platform, although it was web-based because, well, "apps." I was a religious user of the Windows Phone(s). It was such a fast platform and as the other comment alluded to, they were making progress, alas it was far too little far too late in the phone race. I used mine until the last update.
I had often used company issued iPhone for work and didn't enjoy them much, so I reluctantly made the hop to Andriod. It's served me without complaint. They're all pretty much parity at this point.
But contrary to Apple who puts high tax on writing app for iOS, MS very strongly promoted development for Windows Phone
You forgot to mention that the real movement that made App Store possible was to kill the Flash Player.
With Flash we basically had all the powers we have today in terms of Web Apps and I'm talkin about 2005-2010.
People freaking out abou Vision Pro having fewer apps (still thousand, and millions compatible). Man, its been just 3 weeks since the thing exist.
I don't belive that you have to compromise seamlessness for freedom. Just getting something that works is what most people are conditioned to do out of habit. If most people got out of there comfort zone then you would definetly see people start to leave "walled gardens" for better and more privacy respecting choices. As the years go by free software gets more advanced and seamless. I completly diagree that this is a trade off situation.
For example, see the Steam Deck. It is extremely easy to use out of the box, but you can mess with the internals however you wish
You know wahat, on Steam its also the same. They take 30% cut 😅
I like how when speaking of MAC people love to claim "no viruses" (actually, not exactly true) but when its Linux then "oh no, command line!". Oh well, things never change.
"there are no viruses" bro this is misinformation
Marques Brownlee covered this issue on his vision pro review, but you took that topic and scored a touchdown with it. Excellent video, man.
6:33 is that a Rotoscoping error or were you meant to disappear? The intro was INSANELY good btw
I think this is the first video I've seen that actually gets it as to why those apps aren't on this new device this makes total sense.
Awesome video - didn’t realize some of these interesting connections and history - like the stuff with the web and Microsoft compared to now. Very cool!
Correction: Spotify has to give 30% to Apple in Year 1 of the customer and 15% afterwards.
Love the sound effects and cleanliness of the video.
Awesome.
Once again - Amazing Video, Enrico! You‘re a big inspiration for me and I finally started my youtube journey (not this channel). Love your style of editing and pacing. Keep it up!
This was an excellent video. Great job. Very interesting. Subbed
There were literally 650,000 apps made for Vision Pro at launch. Over 1,000,000 if you count iPad apps ported to Vision Pro.
Important note: You don’t need an iPhone to use Vision Pro. Some users are actually frustrated it isn’t more connected. You scan your face with the Vision headset’s front cameras, and it acts as its own completely separate, independent computing device.
You're actually wrong you do need a iPhone 15 or I believe the iPad pro to do the initial face scan to order the vision pro. The custom make the cushion to fit your face from what I understand.
you need a iphone to scan your face before purchase
Love your videos! Keep up the great work
Amazing thoughts as always! Nice work on video and visual too 😊
The things is that apple still can provide their seemless experience but there can just be an escape hatch for users that want more freedom. A product can be seamless but at the same time allow freedom.
Nice take. Very Interesting to watch it all unfold.
The main reason I use an iphone is that I use Macs. The early Mac minis were very empowering. A great combination of freedom and "it just works". But now the Mac OS feel unempowering. I feel like I have to take courses in Mac OS just to feel comfortable in it again - which was exactly why I stopped using Windows. In the 80s they had a for-credit college class to teach students to do simple things on a computer. Maybe we're regressing? If I did have the interesting in learning every little thing about an OS, I would jump out of walled gardens and go with companies that let you repair your device.
What is the difference between "early" Mac Mini's and current Mac Minis? They both run MacOS only MacOS is now better.
@@joelbechtolt The first mac I ever bought was the plastic version of the mini. I installed a game on it which didn't work because one of it's libraries wan't compatible. I was able to get the game working without too much effort - which I could not have done on a Windows computer. Now MacOS is much more complicated and harder to understand, and I can't play amateur hacker on it anymore.
@@darkwing3713 Literally anyone else you ask will state that MacOS has become too dumbed down and too closely resembling iOS. I've never heard of modern Macs being more complicated than the older ones. Always the opposite. Then again I've never heard of Mac software missing a library or having an incompatible library that was required for it to work (how is that less frustrating than everything today that just works with no drivers, extensions, or libraries??)
@chtolt Maybe dumbing down is a better way of putting it. It just feels like I can't do much to make my Mac work. For instance, I want the non-default scroll direction. So I set the non-default direction. My Mac ignores the setting. There's nothing more I can do.
And it wasn't the OS that was missing a library. The Mac version of the game came with an incompatible version of a third party library. I figured out what the error meant, found a another version of the library, checked it with my security software, and installed it in my user-level library. Success!
If it had been a Windows computer I wouldn't have bothered to to try for a fix. I'm not an IT person.
Intro Fantastica 😂😂😂
This is the most underrated youtuber
Man this video really deserves more than 20k Views
Missed your excellent content.
Mental note to self ‘have less than 20 YT subscriptions’
You have to understand that as a first gen device that it doesn’t make sense to open up to mass market. Creating the experience needed for what your proposing needs to come from focused research and development from its early user base. Overtime we should see the Vision Pro open up to other platforms.
In your videos what you miss almost always it's talking about the real important matter. The cost! the iphone first price was more or less 300 dollars (6-700 dollars today). It introduced all features that are needed or at least are useful. Who needs a 4000 dollar visor that adds a little animated horse on your furniture? today then, where young people have less money that can be wasted. Maybe some designer can use it in its project, maybe some tech nerd that wants a new toy to play with. not the 99% of people that needs tools to do things.
Sempre molto bravo e simpatico. Mi piacciono i tuoi ragionamenti e l’ironia (come le battute su Disney o Clippy).
13:13 haha that was so unexpected XD
A tiny correction: 6:50 you can in fact set any piece of audio as your ringtone on iPhone
7:17 the problem isn't "complete freedom"; a mac has as much freedom as the average user could want, yet doesn't come with the hassle of messing with the command line and w/e. the problem is... well, hassle. people want things that "just work" when they want it to, but also gives them the flexibility to do more when they want more. the problem with alternative operating systems is that things don't "just work", you have to do more just to achieve the same results you got with mainstream operating systems
An amazing video. From beginning to end
You only need an iphone to buy one, and an apple device to send any files (maybe unless you use the developer lightning port)
everyone has this ridiculous superstition that inorder to just open an app in linux, you have to enter 50 commands or something. IT'S NOT TRUE. linux in 2020s is SO MUCH DIFFERENT to linux in the 90s. it's even better than windows to be honest.
NO ADS, NO BLOATWARE, NO TRACKERS.
clean and open source OS
From my understanding an iphone is only needed to do the scan for a ´perfect´ fit, My concerning is that besides gaming and pro simulators, vr/ar offers nothing new/necessary to become mainstream.
You just need a nice combat piolt helmet to match vision pro.
To be honest, I'm looking to return to Android. My smartphone journey started there. Then I went iPhone, now I want to go back. They do stuff I actually want
Please let us know what model this amazing (Seiko?) d
ivers watch with the white strap is and where to get both.
app support is killing the galaxy tabs bc the pro apps are just on the ipads. the apple vision pro not getting apps might just kill it and make the future something else
Looks like some Apple executives are buddies with the heads of Unity game engine
Great vid man
Actually you are wrong on subscriptions. They take 30% the first year and 15% thereafter. The only service that retains the higher fees are non-recurring charges like micro transactions
Let’s be clear on something - this is not “developers vs Apple”; it is large tech companies vs another large tech company. This is not some righteous war; it’s about money and that money is not going to a bunch of indie developers whether Apple loses or wins in the end.
Edit:
Also, I hate web apps 😅. I don’t care what Steve Jobs said 50 years ago. I’m alright with Google web apps but that’s about it. Most of all, I hate apps that pretend to be native when they are just web pages in some web view container (e.g. Figma and Notion)
there are some points to be made for the walled garden such as simplicity and also the security of iOS is based on the fact Apple can largely how you get apps through the app store. However them reading the letter of the law and purposely designing the worst, most expensive yet legal system possible really isn't a good move.
I thought in 2024 a "tech" youtuber would know that Linux does not equal command line.
Will we be able to use apps (Uber, Airbnb, Turno, etc) to work? I mean, at some point people will create emulators/simulators to use it on web!
i dont understand apple even allows apps to opt out of vision pro.
2:00
And people start to hacking iPhone , installing .... MEET GOOGLE PIXEL 8 PRO
8:32-8:40 Audio seems out of sync, your picture isn't correlating to the audio.
If Apple won't support PWAs which have been developing and improving over the last seven years, there is absolutely no way they support a web-based alternative to ARKit. And it's hilarious because all they would need to do is look at Samsung and the debacle that was Tizen to realize they are making the biggest mistake of all time here. What's amazing to me is that they want to jump into the AI space next with a replacement for Siri, but they are already way behind and Siri was never as good as competing options. How hilarious would it be if Microsoft, the owners of OpenAI, made a dedicated AI hardware that wasn't necessarily a smartphone but was an accessory to the smartphone and it literally did everything the Vision Pro can do but better and cheaper?
I remember buying my first serious smartphone, it was an samsung ace II. It was amazing... At that time apps were the reason to have a smartphone, God, theres an app for that, yes, there were, there were good, and complete, games also, and a reason for existence where the phone was just a hardware required for the software. Since then I've jumped from samsung to apple, back to samsung and back to apple, and its kinda lame that they both look and feel the same and the only use for it, nowadays, it seems to be social media. Kinda what happned to the internet, whereas before we had blogs and everything and now its only social. I miss the fun of my humble ace II and I despise the boredom of my "powerfull" Iphone... Gosh, the time where we started instagram and all we could see was the glamorous early phone photo technology, now its so perfect but devoided of meaning only used to promote ads and ego culture. Sad times man
If you're only using your phone for social media that's on you. There's never been a more robust offering of apps that do all sorts of things. Time to get creative again and get off social media. The only stopping you is you.
@@joelbechtolt Its not that I'm only using my phone for social media, and of course theres a lot of good apps and evertything. The point that I was trying to make was about how I miss the experimental fase of it. For exemple, Instagram, it started as a cool way to share pictures that we took from our phones and now it just serves to show a fake side of us all and make us depressed and FOMO filled and for influencers to put ads and for companies to add adtrackers. It started as an experimental app for photo sharing and it just ended up being another social media.
Games were cool ways to pass time and some gems of the past are stil here but most just became this freemium shite that we see. Before we had Snapchat because of the cool feature of temporary photos but now its everywhere, even fucking whatsapp has it.
Whereas before I would youtube videos about the apps of the month and see a bunch of cool different apps, now-a-days its just apps trying to copy what other sucssefully created or trying to hard to burst the bubble.
I dont know if you play games, but I rember the companion app for assassins creed 4 it was awesome and apps that were there just for fun or to make something even more enjoyable. I remember how ppl would create apps for amusement and not only to try to get rich.
Also phone companies just absorved core functions that were 3rd party and now its already pre installed. Remember that u had to download a flashlight app? U dont need it anymore because its already there! Remember downloading a step counter? u dont need it anymore its already here. Remember downloading a note taking app, well u dont need it anymore etc.
To be fair, I think pokemon go was the last big novelty in smartphone apps. The smartphone mainstream kinda shifted towards social media and we see that in numbers, like how tiktok was the biggest downloaded app of all time for some amount of time and etc.
For the sake of trying I opened both my Galaxy and my Iphone and went in their respective stores and I found nothing worth of really downloading or that enticed me. I dont really now if thats on me, or if its just not there anymore. Well this is my 2 cents on the subject.
Done with apple and smartphones frankly. I'm actively looking to leave this trap of an ecosystem. its milk money at every turn. Forget it. I miss cheap 99cent apps so much and it was blissful not having in-app purchases. I miss having decent storage and dont want to pay $50+ a month for cloud. Gimme offline expandable storage goddamnit. If you're gonna milk me i will be forced to sail the pirate seas...which is no biggie at all i grew up with that
I know what you meant by saying that walled gardens are good, but I disagree. I disagree weith your definition of walled gardens and being non-open (I still agree with general message of this video). I think that it is possible to make device/ecosystem that is easy to use and open. Sure, there will be restrictions: you, for example, won't allow malware in your appstore but I wouldn't call it walled garden just because it have some restrictions. It depends on what is the result of all the restrictions. For example If you are still able to install this malware if you really want to (I mean, there can even be usecases for that if you want to test some specific security etc.), you still should be able to. Should it be behind tons of security layers/password etc.? Obviously.
PS. I think you never used linux. I mean, I know you said that you are joking, but linux is just nothing like you said. Well it can be, but it also can be complete oposite if you really want. And If you want "easy" linux experience, buy product that have linux preinstalled, like for example some from system76. I know, linux might not be familiar or clear; and still might require sometimes some tinkering if something breaks but it doesn't mean that it can not be fixed without making it walled garden.
13:40 💀
We had installable apps before iPhone. More hassle but still not that hard. We even had widgets on both smart and some "dumb" phones before the iPhone. And also HTML web browser etc. iPhone brought nothing new in reality.
On iPhone everything works but the keyboard
Oh don't worry Apple is ruining the Mac as well they keep trying to pull iPhone features on the Mac like the new settings application that is such a pain to use or even just find some thing in it because well it's designed 100% for a phone. It didn't used to be this way things sort of just worked on Mac and also just worked with windows until about 10 years ago.
Last time it happened is with windows phone lol...
With renewals it's only 15% not 30% after the first year.
Sound leveling of this video is not good 😢
7:05 linux is great lmao
ad drop 🥵
fratè sei fortissimo
07:08 what is dbnv (at least that's what subtitles say)?
I hear "Debian" (A Linux distro), and then he lists of random version numbers.
All Apple needs to do is have way easier sideloading on iPhones and iPads. if it was exactly the way Google does it with Android, stuff would be FINE. People are saying security would take a nosedive but Android has gotten way better with security since the early days. It's not 2014 anymore. The walled garden argument is a joke. If I can install my own apps on a Mac without needing to pay apple some weird tax, I should be able to do the same on an iPhone and an iPad, no excuses.
Learn how I ACTUALLY made my most successful videos with hands-on, practical behind the scenes breakdowns:
www.enricotartarotti.com/storybehind?
Why do people always insist on starting the story too early? I don't need to know the whole history of iPhone and Apple apps. Or if you're talking about a person as soon as I hear they were born at such and such date I instantly click off.
I could care less when someone was born where they were born or the early childhood if we're talking about some invention they made when they were 58 years old... Is this just something people do to pad videos for extra length?
I absolutely love Apple for the quality of their hardware and the quality of the software. But then they are so anti-customer it's insane. How anybody puts up with their crazy rules I just don't understand. I had an iPhone for a year if it works it's the most perfect experience ever. But if anything ever breaks you're just totally bone because the system is set up to do everything automatically but if that doesn't work there's no fall back.
For example something got messed up with my Apple account. I couldn't download any apps or even set up my Apple TV. So I sold it but the latest greatest Samsung phone at the time and never looked back. Note 9 was rock solid for 4 plus years for me. 😂😂😂
That's how storytelling works in general especially in video media. Even documentaries are in this format😅
Just skip ahead
Oh so the most popular TH-camr ever uses this format? Mr beast? No they cut out all the unnecessary parts leaving only the entertaining part or sections that add value to the content. @@ElizabethUkeh
mr beast is kids content, kids get bored easily
Dude why some of your videos get millions of views while some barely scrap 10k
I think it's that music bro, I really wanna see you win
Iphone most successful product in all of history? What about the wheel? There has gotta be a bunch of stuff we take for granted that have had a massive impact on the world for a long time, like the milk carton. What about refined petroleum? That is a product and the money exhanged for that must dwarf the entirety of Apple's history as a company by a lot.
Garageband for iOS allows you to set a custom ringtone
You shouldn't need a whole app that doesn't even come pre-installed just to change your ringtone.
I think Epic Games is in the wrong. If you don't want to play by the rules of a particular app store, then don't make apps for it. Once Apple and Google stop making money off their piniatas because no one is filling them with candy anymore, they will change. Stop making their platform valuable to them if it isn't already valuable for you!
.
I see what you’re getting at, but if we’re being intellectually, honest here, Microsoft aim to dominate the Internet using Internet explorer is not the same as Apple trying to maintain control over a platform that they built. Microsoft did not build the Internet…
Right. There is a difference between for example forcing people to take off shoes just in your home vs in the whole city. Also I think that TH-cam, Netflix etc. will eventually come to Vision Pro though maybe not in this first generation yet. Once this type of device becomes more and more popular they won't want to loose potential customers.
However, just like with the iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch I do hope that Vision Pro will force the competition to also improve their devices.
ugggh, random in-video ads, cutting you off mid-sentence.
jakidale?
13:33 oh, I thought you were bald 🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️
lol not yyet
@@enricotartarotti me neither yet 😅
PWAs all the way ... oh wait.. 😂
Comment for the algorithm.
This story is dumb, android has a 30% cut, and most of your pros aren’t really pros when it comes to web apps.
The reason why there are no apps for the Vision Pro is simple, the amount of people who have it are minuscule. It’s t due to them not allowing web apps. The meta quest also has this issue, with not many apps, also another issue that even companies like Netflix that have made apps, end up not updating them, you can run Netflix on the quest but still only at 480p Rez.
Bro please use a different font
Just use a PC.
People keep saying “you need an iPhone to use it” that is completely wrong.
You need an iPhone to scan your face to buy it online. You need an iPhone because no other phones readily come with the kind of face scanning radar than iPhones have. If you don’t have an iPhone, you can go directly to the store and get one.
The only time my iPhone and VP using combine is looking at the phone through the passthrough. 😊
LIDAR is also present in few android phones. Or maybe apple uses something else to scan face?
@@Daniel_VolumeDown so… what’s the cost benefit analysis to research which phones they are, what market share that it, how likely they are to buy the device to make it worth creating an app just for that niche?
@@kowboy702 hey, I am not saying that it was good for apple to make specific app for these phones. You just said that no other phone comes with face scanning radars. And I just responded that this is not true. Wether they should or should not release app for other phones is different question.
Personally I think that onr kind of solution might be that they send you some device for few bucks that would scan your face and then you send it back. Or you go to apple store and they scan your face there. Or they would release this face scanning app as a web app, so every devica that have web browser and sensor can scan your face (I am not sure if that is possible though because I am not sure if web browser have possibility to request these kinds of sensors).
you really are a social justice warrior
I think we have apps for everything, I think..
couldve said what was in around the 5th minute right from the start and close the video. so desperate for adsense with that clickbait title and thumbnail, huh?
Solved ...haha nice joke but not even close. You have 2 rather no Brainerd beginners suggestions but not all are that simple and you did not solve my issue.... but good thing I'm educated and can figure out how to solve the not so... it's it plugged in kind of problem and since you are the is it plugged in kind of solutions that you call problem solved I'll be sure to pass on you and not waste my time ever again!!
First
😂
Why the background Muzak?
Off putting and Tinnitus inducing...
I stopped watching...