People continually miss the point about full-size vs. mid-size pickups--it is this: Full-size pickups are simply too large for some applications--tight off-road trail use, urban parking, smallish garages, etc. For people with those types of needs, a mid-size pickup is often better suited for them. Often lost in these reviews is the fact that even extremely off-road capable full-size pickups can't go where they won't fit. Probably at least 25% of the off-road 4WD trails where I live fall into that category. On those trails, my full-size pickup is useless; I have to have a second smaller 4WD for that.
You'll find the midsize are much larger on the trail too. If you need a trail machine buy a cj they are much easier to offroad than these luxury trucks.
@@navyphyrfitr6550 People take 40k+ Jeeps offroading all the time. I mean, that's their actual design purpose. I wouldn't take a truck at all no matter what the price because the turning radius always sucks no matter how small they are, compared to a Wrangler. And these new mid-size things are the size of older half tons. They're not true small trucks.
i tried a 2019 ford ranger xlt sport 4x4 today and let me say i was pretty impressed, nice handling, lots of power, i am 6'2 250 and room was great and the seats are very confortable. i liked it.
I work at a Ford dealership in Massachusetts and last week I took a Ranger Lariat supercrew up to Maine (130+ mile trip). I also bought myself a 2018 Colorado Z71 extended cab back in the fall. My assessment: The Ranger has more comfortable seats that are easier to slide in/out of, I like the torque from the EcoBoost, the FX4 package includes more skid plating than the Z71/All-Terrain package does from the factory, the B&O stereo in the Ford sounds a little better to my ears than the Bose system in the GM trucks, and the interior feels a bit more spacious thanks to its higher roof line and sloping dash design. The Colorado and Canyon are better looking to me, I prefer the n/a 3.6 V6 over the 2.3 EcoBoost I4 for longevity, the ride is much quieter, I like the bumper and tailgate setup better, and the biggest thing for me is the front end suspension/steering setup is a lot better than the Ranger's in every way, even down to the steering wheel. Overall in this case I slightly prefer the GM to the Ford, but honestly I'd be happy with either one. Also I took the front air dam off of my Colorado, didn't notice a big difference in fuel economy but it's way more confidence inspiring now in rough terrain, plus it looks better without it.
for longevity? The 4 is making peek torque at 3k RPM. IT does not work hard at all. Those V6 torque numbers are what 6K RPM? The 6 has to work harder than the 4. which will last longer? the 4.
EcoBoost is proven tech. They on Gen2 now with hugh success! 3.6L GM motor is excellent but low on tech. I love both but bought the new Ranger. Ford trucks have been very good to my family!
Your right the 2003 Ford Ranger looked rugged now they look like a pus truck looks excacly like the Isuzu pup truck of the 80s gm got it beat I looks bumpers use and longevity in power and smoothness Ranger eco boost at 50 or 60 are gonna have turbo probs Ford should have used a v6
Wow, I can't believe a base 4x4 Canyon is $5k more than a base 4x4 Ranger. That is insane for GM to do that. Definitely planning on getting a midsize truck soon and looking like it's gonna be a Ranger!!
@lynn rainwater Hey it's not really a fair comparison at this point to compare an XLT to a ZR2 because Ford hasn't come out with the Ranger Raptor yet and a ZR2 is basically GM's version of a Raptor, and the sticker price is more like 44k (gas) and 48k (diesel) for the ZR2s (U.S.)
@aLilBabyOtter if you compare the canyon and the Colorado, the canyon Interior is a dramatic improvement over the chevy. They should not have used a GMC.
That's a good point -- the under-seat storage in my Ranger sucks compared to pretty much every other mid-sized truck on the market. It is the one thing that disappoints me the most.
I like the idea of owning a midsize for marginally better MPG than a full-size, easier to park, maneuver and still being able to pull a decent boat or snowmobiles or what have you. V8 power is awesome and great to have, but not always needed. Just different strokes for different folks is all.
@@g496r500t Heavily upgraded for NA markets . Was all new general design in 2012. Amazing powertrain only goes to US & Canada. Tech /features are best in class. Love my new Ranger!
The ranger is a turbo. There is no turbo engine that sounds great. The ranger has it where it counts which is capability. If your buying because of how it sounds your buying wrong.
Randy Thompson if someone wants car for the sound they should get like a Dodge Challenger with a hemi or something. Otherwise don’t people want a quitter ride?
@@altrock86 they complained about how the ranger sounds i gave my 2 cents. Your commenting about cars and not these 2 midsize trucks. Does that make sense?
Randy Thompson You considering the ranger to have capability is a great reason for YOU to buy one. But telling others they’re wrong for making decisions based on their own preferences is what’s truly wrong. And just for the record, saying there is no turbo engine that sounds great is as wrong as two boys kissin in a female prison. I would def agree this particular engine doesn’t sound very good but you must have never heard an old Detroit 12v71 in person. It’s a personal favorite of mine but some might argue it’s a bit excessive. Still there’s a straight piped Cummins or Fords 7.3? Both are well known, highly desired engines that a lot of folks absolutely love the sound of. And even if you were meaning strictly gas engines the Subaru WRX and Mercedes G wagons both sound absolutely beautiful.
@@brycejcox The Ranger sounds fine & more importantly its fast & torquey.. like the RS "rally race car" this 2.3L is based off. Powertrain is also very refined. I own a 19 Ranger XLT FX4 crew cab loaded! Test drove em all. Ranger is clear winner & being quickest & best looking is icing on cake! Btw, build quality is typical Ford truck which translates to far above average.
@@andrewc9234 actually it was used but with 13K miles on it...but to answer your question yes I bought an affordable truck that meets all of my needs/wants and didn't plauge myself with $40K+ worth of debt. What's your question?
@@justinsimpson3139 I've been off-roading the crud out of it. Could not be happier. First buy was an OBD connector for forscan. 2nd will be some Bilstein 5100's to level the front, then some 33ish Toyo Open Country R/T... But I'll have to buy the wife something, if I don't want to sleep on the couch... So, there's that. Will be getting a toneau cover 1st of the year, then maybe look at a rack.
Not sure why the sound matters a whole lot as far as vehicle performance.... I prefer the Ranger, more quiet, less likely to wake people if you need to leave at night, like picking someone up from the airport or something. More of a polite sound. I hate when some loud car or motorcycle blasts through the neighborhood.
@@shawnjohnson689 I'm 32. But I'm considerate. I have a wife and kid. Don't see the need to wake up the family. "Trucks are supposed to be loud" says who? Trucks are supposed to carry heavy loads.
@l b obviously you haven't researched your trucks. I'm talking about used 2015 to 17 Ford or Dodge regular cab short bed with a V6. They literally have a better EPA rating and real world fuel mileage proven to beat the midsize class.
I have the 2019 Lariat/FX4/tow pkg. Great truck. Before buying the Ranger I test drove a Colorado ZR2 diesel. I loved the engine,but the leather seats were uncomfortable on a short test drive.Then we went and test drove the Ranger,what we ended up buying,with no regrets.
Let's see some comparisons of the mid-size trucks to their full-size counterparts. Price them out with same options (heated seats, sun roof, etc etc). No need to do a towing comparison... we know the answer there.
Ok here’s real cost comparison of my trucks ... supercab f150 xlt fx4 .. everything but leather blis and adaptive cruise control , also it has the 3.5 liter twin turbo , tge supercab is about the same size for rear passengers as a ranger crew( my other truck ) , I paid 41300 for the ranger and 42500 for the f 150 ... step that f 150 up to a crew and it would have been eight at 50000... let’s talk more stock specs.. the tires on f 150 measure out at 32.1 for primacy in the f 150.. ranger measures out at 30.5 for. The hankooks ... ranger has more technology in my xlt .. it has blis adaptive cruise control folding mirrors .. in other words if you talking money ... the supercab fx4 xlt and the xlt ranger fx4 are close in price , f 150 a bit more , going up to crew versus crew it’s 8 thousand more ... you buy a ranger because you want a ranger not instead of a f 150 ... both have uses and purposes for me but if I could only have 1 it be f 150 .. .. you buy a ranger because you want a truck not a car .. you buy a f 150 cuz you want a truck
@@juliedominesey9009 You already didn't do apples-to-apples. Your F-150 is Supercab, but the Ranger was CrewCab. The Cab differences across all lines of trucks is HUGE $$$ b/c of the demand for more passengers in the last decade. I talked to a dealer about this. They only sell the standard cab to commercial; all consumer trucks are sold to be passenger haulers nowadays; so they price the hell out of bigger Cabs: I"ve seen $5k difference just to seat 3 more people -- that is MORE expensive than adding on 4x4 to some of these trucks! So the rest of your comments are based on a flawed comparison.
@@juliedominesey9009 If I go to Ford.com and build an F-150, and just add 3 options -- 4x4, Towing, and 101A (b/c of Cruise Control in 101A) -- to a XL SuperCab w/ the cheapest bed (the cheaper box is 6.5' not 5.5' for some reason), the factory price is: $38.5k. Switch to Ranger, and add same options -- 4x4, Towing, and 101A -- to it's XL trim (which is a 6' box BTW), the price is: $31.5k. That's a $7k difference that matters to some who are on a budget
Clever using the break in period as an excuse to not test mpg especially with all the recent controversy over the ranger mpg. I suspect we would have been ok with the asterisk but ford may not have.
Paid $28,000 for my full size truck after discounts. 2250lb payload/ 11,250lbs towing. Only time i miss my midsize truck is when parking lots are tight fit
What did you get my local ford dealer has a 2019 f150 xl magnetic grey 4x4 2.7 ecoboost for 28k i really like that it had the gear shifter near the steering wheel vinyl floors. And damn it was fast for a truck im still waiting on the bronco but if its a let down im getting that f150
Classic tfl, comparing things that are not even close in comparison. From doing tests with different kind of tires, to asking what sounds better a stock truck exhaust or aftermarket. Classic tfl.
Not sure about the Ranger since its so new, but I actually think the Colorado/Canyon have a greater domestic parts content. Both the Tundra and the Tacoma used to be ranked high, but around 2015 it seems that Toyota must have changed a supplier since both trucks saw a decrease in American made parts.
Nope! The Tundra is Texas. The Tacoma is Mexico! A college did a study recently and ranks which vehicles sold in the U.S. are best for the Econommy. The Honda Ridgline was #6, the Colorado was #11, the Tacoma was something like#38 and fell to the 60s when inTRD trim, and the Frontier was something like #68
This is the sad truth about the marketing machine behind what the truck manufacturers are promoting, though subtly. Let's say Joe wants to buy a new (full size) truck with a few bells and whistles. No problem, MSRP for the truck Joe wants from any of the big three, Chevy, Ford, Dodge is between 42-50 g's. Joe, says, "holy sh$t, I can't afford that." Dealer says, "don't worry, we can get you into a new truck (albeit much smaller) that you can afford between 32-45g's." Joe says "great, I get a new truck." We (Joe and all the consumers) just keep drinking the Kool-aid. In reality the manufacturers are just creating a product for the demand that unfortunately most people simply cannot afford. First and foremost, trucks shouldn't cost consumers anywhere near 40-50g's. It's just crazy. Full size trucks shouldn't even cost over 35 g's. These new models will be the rise of the popular trend of small truck purchasing, and I'm sure the manufacturers will do very well sales-wise. I remember talking with a Dodge sales manager, and I asked him, " how can trucks sell for over 50 g?" He said simple, "because people are willing to pay 50 g for a truck." Consumers often forget they are the most important driving force in purchasing decisions.
I have been trying to choose between the two for quite some time. This is the first time I have heard the point about the v6 power being at higher rpms. That might just be the clincher in favor of the Ford.
You guys should really consider talking more about what rear axles are pushing these trucks around. That is just something I noticed you guys never cover. Not just if it has a locker not but what actual model "10 bolt" or "8.5 inch"...
Can't stand the square wheel wells. Full disclosure, I'm a Ford guy, but there is no reason not to get an F150. You will adjust to the size difference and get a better truck overall.
I get what you are saying, but parking in some garages is an issue, I wouldn't buy a new house to fit my truck, would you? I hate the square wheel wells as well
Ford: 8 year old platform GMC: Not 8 year old platform Ford: 1 (crappy) engine option GMC: 2 (awesome) engine options Ford: Weak offroad package GMC: Real offroad packge Ford: Looks like a 2011 Edge on the interior GMC: Looks like something modern on the interior I hate to admit it, but GM takes the victory here. Ford came back to the segment and brought their C-game. Foolish move.
Have you not heard of the numerous reports of piston problems within the Chevy Engines, people are having to take him back to the factory before 70,000 miles. Ford has had this motor in more than 6 Vehicles, so I think they know what they've been doing with this motor. And I bet you this off-road package is probably more capable than the Chevy anyways. But that's just my two cents
Ford adapted the global ranger platform to the U.S. market and said global platform is coming up on a redesign. Given that it's close they most likely decided it would be better to hold off on making a completely brand new off the ground ranger until the current global generation ranger came up on the end of its life cycle. It's actually a pretty smart business move that when you look at it from their perspective makes sense. Why make a brand new ranger for just the north American market earlier than what you projected the redesign on the current ranger to be only to have to introduce that redesign into all the other market segments? From a logistical standpoint it would be a mess.
I drove a 2020 Ranger and liked it. The 4 cyl. turbo drives like a 6,and smooth. I ended up buying a 2018 Canyon All Terrain because I have no patience ! No..The 2019 Ranger(at one Dealer) that I wanted to test drive was loaned out and wouldn't be back til Wed. The insurance $ from my totaled out Ford Exp. Sport Trac was burning a hole in my pocket and the Canyon was just too nice so I fired down on Mon..I'm going to like it but I do think I would have liked that Ranger too.
I wold buy neither truck, too expensive, may as well get a full size truck for the cost of a baby truck. The only people i feel would want a baby truck would be a city dweller that wants a small truck for ease of parking or girls.
A 2019 Ford Ranger is the same or bigger in every dimension than 1996 F150. They can tow/haul more and make more power. i certainly wouldn't call it a baby truck.
@@austinjordison I'd like to see the numbers proving that. I've owned a '94 F150 in my past, my buddy has a '96 F250...and I'd say both were wider in the cab inside than the new Ranger. And the shortest bed on a 90's F150 is still longer than 5'.
@@AKJeeper the 90s f150s are bigger o test drove the new ranger it feels a few inches wider and taller than the older ranger. But damn the seats are comfortable. It basically has the interior of a focus/fusion
@@Jv19979 Having driven a new Ranger also, I'd say interior space on the Ranger is comparable to Dodge Dakotas from '97-'11. The Dakotas still had bigger beds, though.
Guarantee you'll wear right through those rubber steering wheel buttons in the canyon. Soft, fragile material is no good for buttons that will get many thousands of presses.
The gas motor in the GM is a plague. The water&sewage board that I work for has them. They bought 5 of the 201 6 gas ones, all have had cylinder problems and leaks. One was done by 70k miles. All have dash warning lights on now, despite being serviced.
If you think that's bad, try sitting in a Tacoma. It's absolutely a joke for anyone above 6 foot. But I honestly don't think I'd want to deal with all the issues the Chevy has
The One I’ve got a first gen Canyon and it’s pretty solid. No issues really. Small crap, nothing major. I agree though no more GM after this truck dies.
Peak HP and Peak torque have nothing to do with the powerband of an engine. An engine might make 400 lbft of torque at 5,000 RPM, yet still make 380 lb-ft between 2k and 5k RPM. The current 3.6 V6 makes 90% of its peak torque between 3k and 4k RPM. Even at 2500 RPM it's still making 80% of the torque it makes at 4k RPM.
Yeah they act like it gos from 0 to 300. They shouldn't test the gmc i dont think it really competes with the ranger gmc is more fancy than a chevy. But both companies over charge for them.
It is interesting how reviewers get brand new trucks, drive them for a few weeks and a few miles and declare one the 'best'. My definition of best is the truck that gets all the work I expect of it, is reliable, has low cost of maintenance, and lasts me 20 years. That is what my last truck did. I have my doubts about these two.
@@GregKittle NO!!! Every reviewer should hold onto these trucks for a 20yr test so we can know FOR SURE which ones best so we can than go find that 20yr old beater on craigslist and enjoy it for a couple more years before it becomes a yard ornament.
@Alan Bowers My 20 yr old was a 99 Silverado 2500 and was well maintained. The truck previous was an 88 F-150 standard cab manual transmission also well maintained that I kept for 11 years. The standard cab just didn't fit my family needs so I went to the extended cab. Both were good reliable trucks (not beaters) and neither ever left me stranded. The key to such a comparison is being well maintained which is hit and miss in the used market for vehicles that old and often have multiple owners. I have pretty much come to the conclusion that any video title with the word "best" in it is nothing more than click bait.
Cannot believe how far these guys are in the tank for Ford. The riff about gas mileage and break-in was the last straw. I kept watching up to that point, despite the editorializing about the GMC's far superior braking performance being attributed to the difference in tires. TFL does themselves no favors. Their audience is guys who understand trucks. Trying to paper over the Ranger's deficiencies is lame. I really like what Ford is trying to do bringing back the Ranger, but they are simply falling down on executing their strategy and it's taken them WAY too long to get a solid competitive truck into the midsize space. A big let down.
@Matthew Alfieri i was thinking same thing... the Ranger failed to the colorado on almost every single review and test..the ranger may be a littke "quicker" but thats it!
If I want a mid size for offroad the Tacoma all day and all night. For a service truck with lots of road time the GM and its crossover type handling. For a weasel mobile, clown carrier, Floral deliveries, or ice cream truck the Ford ranger would be perfect.
Yes 2019 Ford Ranger XLT 2.3L 4-CYLINDER crew cab short bed Fx4 Ultimate compact Sexy 21-26 Midsize Truck Vs 2019 Gmc Canyon 3.6L v6 4wd crew cab short bed Truck!!!!!!!!!!!
What the hell is it with you guys and the sound? Does the vehicle get the job done? And is it versatile to your needs? Does it get you to one point and back again? If the answer is yes to those three questions, than what the hell difference does it make what it sounds like?
Does GM even still make the 4.3? I thought that motor died with the S-10. I know I had an S-10 with the 4.3 Vortec(whatever the f Vortec even was other than a brand on the valve covers) and that thing had pretty darn good torque at the low end.
The GM has the 2.8 Diesel, that eats the competition as far as towing goes. It also has a cc with an extended bed option(my truck) and it's phenomenal for day to day use. In fact, it's a more useful bed than what you get on any full-size cc pickup with a short bed.
I am very happy with my Canyon. Can't reccomend it enough. If you can lease a well equipped SLE for under $250 a month then that's the truck for you...
What I'm implying is if this is the off road comparison put the zr2 against the fx4 because obviously the ranger rapt. Is not available in us or Canada. Plus the fx4 runs in the $40k and so does the zr2 so might as well compare them by their price range. Everyone knows the all terrain and z71 are barely off road packages and more appearance packages.
Oh just eat your crow and drive your dated GMC already. Your almost as bad as the Tacoma crowd. An XLT beat your GMC, your going to have to live with it.
They always pick Ford no matter what. But as you can see the REAL off road truck was left behind (zr2) because the ranger can't stack up against it in any category
It does seem like this is more of a "which is a better off road truck?" Video, not best truck overall. As someone that does no off roading, I'll take the canyon for comfort.
@@tonygiordano939 I don't drive GMC's. I'm just saying that literally ever other review I've seen has the Ford dead last. And the GM twins are almost always at the top. And just for the record, this Ranger has been around since 2012 in other parts of the world, making it "old". And it shows.
Once again, nobody in their right mind buys a truck based on the stock tires! That’s like buying the truck based on what octane of fuel was pumped on its first fill up . It’s a consumable .
then why bother buying ANY option that has aftermarket "consumption"? why get factory towing? factory bed liner? factory offroad suspension? et cetera et cetera et cetera.
These are just as big as previous generation full size trucks. I had a Colorado park next to me yesterday and I never woulda known it wasn't a full size if I hadn't seen the badging. I guess the hope of someone making a small truck again is never going to happen. Long gone is the days of small economical trucks the poor working man could afford. I still have the 1988 Chevy S10 my dad bought brand new for 9500 dollars. Had it repainted a few years ago and it looks brand new. No rust no dents no nothing. I guess I better hang onto it!
@@mikefoehr235 minivan with a bed I guess. Lots of storage space and a comfortable cabin/ride. They said they had "Tailgate parties" in mind for the design.
@King Willis GMC, GM is currently being boycotted by the U.S. and Canadian taxpayers! Close 5 to 6 plants in the U.S. and Canada and open plants in China and Mexico, GM deserves to be boycotted!
You can't really fit rear facing child seats in there with the proper gaps recommended between front and rear seats. You can fit one on the passenger side if your wife is short. I really wanted to buy a Colorado ZR2 but the actual space inside with a big car seat just didn't allow it. I consider it a tie between Ford and GM. Why? GM gives you so many options on engines, packages, and so forth. The 2.8 diesel has been killing it on fuel economy. The gas V6 you don't have to worry about turbo issues. Buy a Ranger and it will cost you. Dealers want near full sticker price. GM will give you 5-8k off most of the midsize line. Its like a fully loaded Canyon Denali Diesel for the price of a Lariat Ranger. If the Ranger was competitive price wise it would be an easy choice for a lot of mid size buyers.
The siping is made for rain and snow as you stated, but does not clean out mud. Siping will hold mud and that is why mud tires do not have them. Good all terrains like the bfg ko and duratracs do. If you took these trucks off road the Hankooks would be much better. Same tire used on the Pro4x frontier, which is still the best small truck for capability by price.
If I had to choose between the two, I’d pick the Ford, if I bought a new truck it would be a F150 STX with the FX4 package....and the 5.0 engine. That’s what works best for me, and I think it’s a good value, although new trucks are still too expensive.
Will be interesting to see the Ranger Raptor vs the ZR2 in off road comparison!!! That ZR2 sets the bar high with Axle lockers front and rear and amazing approach / departure angles. Cant wait!!!
Because it doesn't sound truck enough. It's quiet like a car, and a lot of people LOOK for a brash loud exhaust. I don't care either way. But a lot of people do
The true answer is Toyota Tacoma made in Texas and California. Last time I checked Texas was part of America; but I may not be so sure about California.
I like the ranger. In my experience the fords are generally more reliable overall than GM and especially ram. But for the money I'd never choose mid-size over an f-150.
Interesting about the acceleration comments. The only instrumented test I've seen with both of these trucks, had the Colorado ahead all the way up to its max speed. Although it apparently won't break 100mph like the Ford can, and it had slightly better passing performance too. A 30+ horsepower deficit is mighty hard to overcome. I guess perception is a bitch. I'm sure at elevation in Colorado, the Ford would just might take it though.
Let's face it these trucks aren't fast but I've also read that the V6 Colorado/Canyon out runs the the Ranger I4 turbo. I much prefer the GM looks and the way it drives but a simple performance tune from Ford is all it takes to make that Ranger a lot quicker. My personal truck is a 21 Colorado Z71 with the V6 and I think it would be fun to see how it does against a Ranger, it won't change my mind in which truck I prefer but still fun regardless of which is faster.
I think I’d rather have the steering wheel buttons on the Ranger, the membrane on the Canyon buttons doesn’t look like it’s going to wear as well as a hard plastic button.
More cab/bed configurations, trailer brake controller integrated, more engine choices, more leg room and hip room front and back, higher trailer rating, higher mpg, better interior, better storage (noticed he didn't flip the seats down in the back), more available packages and this comparable model has a heated steering wheel. Also, a better RTI for wheel travel. GMC hands down.
Longterm I think GMC is better especially since it offers both diesel and gas V6. Plus its more of a luxury truck. It should have been Colorado vs Ranger.
People continually miss the point about full-size vs. mid-size pickups--it is this: Full-size pickups are simply too large for some applications--tight off-road trail use, urban parking, smallish garages, etc. For people with those types of needs, a mid-size pickup is often better suited for them. Often lost in these reviews is the fact that even extremely off-road capable full-size pickups can't go where they won't fit. Probably at least 25% of the off-road 4WD trails where I live fall into that category. On those trails, my full-size pickup is useless; I have to have a second smaller 4WD for that.
You'll find the midsize are much larger on the trail too. If you need a trail machine buy a cj they are much easier to offroad than these luxury trucks.
@@navyphyrfitr6550 We're crazy and despise most puddle pirates, mall crawlers, anybody named Brad, Ashley, or Chad, and all have large penises.
people just dont understand
You are quite right!
@@navyphyrfitr6550 People take 40k+ Jeeps offroading all the time. I mean, that's their actual design purpose.
I wouldn't take a truck at all no matter what the price because the turning radius always sucks no matter how small they are, compared to a Wrangler. And these new mid-size things are the size of older half tons. They're not true small trucks.
i tried a 2019 ford ranger xlt sport 4x4 today and let me say i was pretty impressed, nice handling, lots of power, i am 6'2 250 and room was great and the seats are very confortable. i liked it.
This guy is my new favorite on TFL. His narration is excellent and sounds perfectly natural. Keep up the great work!
I work at a Ford dealership in Massachusetts and last week I took a Ranger Lariat supercrew up to Maine (130+ mile trip). I also bought myself a 2018 Colorado Z71 extended cab back in the fall. My assessment:
The Ranger has more comfortable seats that are easier to slide in/out of, I like the torque from the EcoBoost, the FX4 package includes more skid plating than the Z71/All-Terrain package does from the factory, the B&O stereo in the Ford sounds a little better to my ears than the Bose system in the GM trucks, and the interior feels a bit more spacious thanks to its higher roof line and sloping dash design. The Colorado and Canyon are better looking to me, I prefer the n/a 3.6 V6 over the 2.3 EcoBoost I4 for longevity, the ride is much quieter, I like the bumper and tailgate setup better, and the biggest thing for me is the front end suspension/steering setup is a lot better than the Ranger's in every way, even down to the steering wheel. Overall in this case I slightly prefer the GM to the Ford, but honestly I'd be happy with either one. Also I took the front air dam off of my Colorado, didn't notice a big difference in fuel economy but it's way more confidence inspiring now in rough terrain, plus it looks better without it.
1mlb704. Truth spoken
for longevity? The 4 is making peek torque at 3k RPM. IT does not work hard at all. Those V6 torque numbers are what 6K RPM? The 6 has to work harder than the 4. which will last longer? the 4.
EcoBoost is proven tech. They on Gen2 now with hugh success! 3.6L GM motor is excellent but low on tech. I love both but bought the new Ranger. Ford trucks have been very good to my family!
Your right the 2003 Ford Ranger looked rugged now they look like a pus truck looks excacly like the Isuzu pup truck of the 80s gm got it beat I looks bumpers use and longevity in power and smoothness Ranger eco boost at 50 or 60 are gonna have turbo probs Ford should have used a v6
@@todsimpkins9301 turbos are additional items to go wrong, thus longevity on a simpler design is always more likely.
Wow, I can't believe a base 4x4 Canyon is $5k more than a base 4x4 Ranger. That is insane for GM to do that. Definitely planning on getting a midsize truck soon and looking like it's gonna be a Ranger!!
@lynn rainwater Hey it's not really a fair comparison at this point to compare an XLT to a ZR2 because Ford hasn't come out with the Ranger Raptor yet and a ZR2 is basically GM's version of a Raptor, and the sticker price is more like 44k (gas) and 48k (diesel) for the ZR2s (U.S.)
@lynn rainwater in English please? He just broke down the base prices for you so watch it again.
I havent tried the colarado or canyon, byt i did try the tacoma and frontier. For me, ranger is just more comfortable
@aLilBabyOtter if you compare the canyon and the Colorado, the canyon Interior is a dramatic improvement over the chevy. They should not have used a GMC.
You might want to add lock to lock steering radius comparison in the future along with interior storage specifically under the rear seats.
That's a good point -- the under-seat storage in my Ranger sucks compared to pretty much every other mid-sized truck on the market. It is the one thing that disappoints me the most.
Ford needs to hurry up with the bronco
The exhaust test is dumb if your not comparing bone stock trucks.
Steven D lol don’t get so worked up, it’s entertainment.
...shits and giggles...that's it's real value.👌
The Performance exhaust is bone stock on the 2019 Canyon All-Terrain
@@tskraj3190 ...but those snow tires are not.
The exhaust note test is dumb on any vehicle that has a catalytic converter.
I like the idea of owning a midsize for marginally better MPG than a full-size, easier to park, maneuver and still being able to pull a decent boat or snowmobiles or what have you. V8 power is awesome and great to have, but not always needed. Just different strokes for different folks is all.
Precisely why they should bring back the Dodge Dakota v8
Plus the cost of the vehicle is nice. If u dont need v8 pwr, might as well save like 10+k
Mpg ain't gonna be much better.
I have the new Ranger and it awesome
Emmett Sampson you mean the old but new to America ranger ...
@@g496r500t it's not the same as the overseas ranger....
Me too! Love it. Home run Ford trucks division. This test editor had alot dumb & orchestrated comments/complaints toward Ranger . Can you say BS!
@@g496r500t Heavily upgraded for NA markets . Was all new general design in 2012. Amazing powertrain only goes to US & Canada. Tech /features are best in class. Love my new Ranger!
@@Trumplican truth! Lots differences. Amazing midsize truck.
The ranger is a turbo. There is no turbo engine that sounds great. The ranger has it where it counts which is capability. If your buying because of how it sounds your buying wrong.
Randy Thompson if someone wants car for the sound they should get like a Dodge Challenger with a hemi or something. Otherwise don’t people want a quitter ride?
@@altrock86 they complained about how the ranger sounds i gave my 2 cents. Your commenting about cars and not these 2 midsize trucks. Does that make sense?
Randy Thompson You considering the ranger to have capability is a great reason for YOU to buy one. But telling others they’re wrong for making decisions based on their own preferences is what’s truly wrong.
And just for the record, saying there is no turbo engine that sounds great is as wrong as two boys kissin in a female prison.
I would def agree this particular engine doesn’t sound very good but you must have never heard an old Detroit 12v71 in person. It’s a personal favorite of mine but some might argue it’s a bit excessive. Still there’s a straight piped Cummins or Fords 7.3? Both are well known, highly desired engines that a lot of folks absolutely love the sound of. And even if you were meaning strictly gas engines the Subaru WRX and Mercedes G wagons both sound absolutely beautiful.
Yes. The Ranger powertrain is simply awesome. High tech/refined/powerful as heck! #Fordperformance
@@brycejcox The Ranger sounds fine & more importantly its fast & torquey.. like the RS "rally race car" this 2.3L is based off. Powertrain is also very refined. I own a 19 Ranger XLT FX4 crew cab loaded! Test drove em all. Ranger is clear winner & being quickest & best looking is icing on cake! Btw, build quality is typical Ford truck which translates to far above average.
I don't see the value of a paying almost full size truck price for a 1/2 size truck.
They aren't even smaller they're like 4 inches shorter than full size trucks
I bought a frontier last year and already want a Titan :(
Same reason some laptops cost the same as some desktops
@@kmeekins4168 you bought a new 14 year old truck.....
@@andrewc9234 actually it was used but with 13K miles on it...but to answer your question yes I bought an affordable truck that meets all of my needs/wants and didn't plauge myself with $40K+ worth of debt. What's your question?
This video was brought to you by Ford.
They got black listed by ford tho
Already bought me a Ranger, I'm just here to bolster my confirmation bias
ditto... mine arrives tomorrow. :)
B H how long did you wait on the build?
@@justinsimpson3139 I've been off-roading the crud out of it. Could not be happier. First buy was an OBD connector for forscan. 2nd will be some Bilstein 5100's to level the front, then some 33ish Toyo Open Country R/T... But I'll have to buy the wife something, if I don't want to sleep on the couch... So, there's that. Will be getting a toneau cover 1st of the year, then maybe look at a rack.
Not sure why the sound matters a whole lot as far as vehicle performance.... I prefer the Ranger, more quiet, less likely to wake people if you need to leave at night, like picking someone up from the airport or something. More of a polite sound. I hate when some loud car or motorcycle blasts through the neighborhood.
Andrew Hernandez how old are you 60?
nope he's been busted by the old lady skippin out
@@shawnjohnson689 I'm 32. But I'm considerate. I have a wife and kid. Don't see the need to wake up the family. "Trucks are supposed to be loud" says who? Trucks are supposed to carry heavy loads.
@l b no way, we live in an era of 20 + MPG trucks
@l b obviously you haven't researched your trucks. I'm talking about used 2015 to 17 Ford or Dodge regular cab short bed with a V6. They literally have a better EPA rating and real world fuel mileage proven to beat the midsize class.
I have the 2019 Lariat/FX4/tow pkg. Great truck. Before buying the Ranger I test drove a Colorado ZR2 diesel. I loved the engine,but the leather seats were uncomfortable on a short test drive.Then we went and test drove the Ranger,what we ended up buying,with no regrets.
Let's see some comparisons of the mid-size trucks to their full-size counterparts. Price them out with same options (heated seats, sun roof, etc etc). No need to do a towing comparison... we know the answer there.
Not really a baby truck... they are just about the same as a full size truck now a days.
Ok here’s real cost comparison of my trucks ... supercab f150 xlt fx4 .. everything but leather blis and adaptive cruise control , also it has the 3.5 liter twin turbo , tge supercab is about the same size for rear passengers as a ranger crew( my other truck ) , I paid 41300 for the ranger and 42500 for the f 150 ... step that f 150 up to a crew and it would have been eight at 50000... let’s talk more stock specs.. the tires on f 150 measure out at 32.1 for primacy in the f 150.. ranger measures out at 30.5 for. The hankooks ... ranger has more technology in my xlt .. it has blis adaptive cruise control folding mirrors .. in other words if you talking money ... the supercab fx4 xlt and the xlt ranger fx4 are close in price , f 150 a bit more , going up to crew versus crew it’s 8 thousand more ... you buy a ranger because you want a ranger not instead of a f 150 ... both have uses and purposes for me but if I could only have 1 it be f 150 .. .. you buy a ranger because you want a truck not a car .. you buy a f 150 cuz you want a truck
H
@@juliedominesey9009 You already didn't do apples-to-apples. Your F-150 is Supercab, but the Ranger was CrewCab. The Cab differences across all lines of trucks is HUGE $$$ b/c of the demand for more passengers in the last decade.
I talked to a dealer about this. They only sell the standard cab to commercial; all consumer trucks are sold to be passenger haulers nowadays; so they price the hell out of bigger Cabs: I"ve seen $5k difference just to seat 3 more people -- that is MORE expensive than adding on 4x4 to some of these trucks!
So the rest of your comments are based on a flawed comparison.
@@juliedominesey9009 If I go to Ford.com and build an F-150, and just add 3 options -- 4x4, Towing, and 101A (b/c of Cruise Control in 101A) -- to a XL SuperCab w/ the cheapest bed (the cheaper box is 6.5' not 5.5' for some reason), the factory price is: $38.5k. Switch to Ranger, and add same options -- 4x4, Towing, and 101A -- to it's XL trim (which is a 6' box BTW), the price is: $31.5k. That's a $7k difference that matters to some who are on a budget
Clever using the break in period as an excuse to not test mpg especially with all the recent controversy over the ranger mpg. I suspect we would have been ok with the asterisk but ford may not have.
Fords get real good economy when behind a tow truck...I know this from owning one.
Mike Foehr yep that’s i I got a raptor instead of a rebel
@@jackmackenzie2118 www.caranddriver.com/news/a27452851/2019-ford-ranger-fuel-economy/
I am averaging 25 MPG with my 4x4. what controvery?
As far as engine choice's! Or lack of for the ranger. Knowing Ford! That will change. 2.7tt would be awesome, in that ranger.
The All Terrain also adds Transfer case shield and Automatic locking rear differential.
I have locking rear diff on my Ranger. Do not need to buy a couple K package for it.
Paid $28,000 for my full size truck after discounts. 2250lb payload/ 11,250lbs towing. Only time i miss my midsize truck is when parking lots are tight fit
That's what grill guards and heavy duty steel aftermarket bumpers are for.
Haha
What did you get my local ford dealer has a 2019 f150 xl magnetic grey 4x4 2.7 ecoboost for 28k i really like that it had the gear shifter near the steering wheel vinyl floors. And damn it was fast for a truck im still waiting on the bronco but if its a let down im getting that f150
Just curious Is that for a crew cab 4x4?
@@cleetismcdougall5425 hat Altima never saw it coming
Classic tfl, comparing things that are not even close in comparison. From doing tests with different kind of tires, to asking what sounds better a stock truck exhaust or aftermarket. Classic tfl.
Isn't the Tacoma made in Texas and comprised of more American made parts than the Colorado/Canon and Ranger?
Nick Cerbone yes
You bring up a good point. Quite possibly why it's not as reliable anymore.
The frontier is super American as well
Not sure about the Ranger since its so new, but I actually think the Colorado/Canyon have a greater domestic parts content. Both the Tundra and the Tacoma used to be ranked high, but around 2015 it seems that Toyota must have changed a supplier since both trucks saw a decrease in American made parts.
Nope! The Tundra is Texas. The Tacoma is Mexico! A college did a study recently and ranks which vehicles sold in the U.S. are best for the Econommy. The Honda Ridgline was #6, the Colorado was #11, the Tacoma was something like#38 and fell to the 60s when inTRD trim, and the Frontier was something like #68
We get it TFL, the ecoboost motors don’t sound like a v-8. Can we please move on?
Iowa Mallard but they go like a bad outta hell!!!
maxracingteam23 That’s for sure!
Absolutely agree !!! Sound is irrelevant to how the vehicle performs. Not important at all in my opinion.
@Curtis Fleabag EB is the most selling motor.
@@omarrodrig yeah funny thing is other manufacturers are putting turbos in vehicles but you don't hear all the negative comments about them
I love the ranger, but it needs a longer bed option for the crew cab models
This is the sad truth about the marketing machine behind what the truck manufacturers are promoting, though subtly.
Let's say Joe wants to buy a new (full size) truck with a few bells and whistles. No problem, MSRP for the truck Joe wants from any of the big three, Chevy, Ford, Dodge is between 42-50 g's.
Joe, says, "holy sh$t, I can't afford that."
Dealer says, "don't worry, we can get you into a new truck (albeit much smaller) that you can afford between 32-45g's."
Joe says "great, I get a new truck."
We (Joe and all the consumers) just keep drinking the Kool-aid. In reality the manufacturers are just creating a product for the demand that unfortunately most people simply cannot afford. First and foremost, trucks shouldn't cost consumers anywhere near 40-50g's. It's just crazy. Full size trucks shouldn't even cost over 35 g's. These new models will be the rise of the popular trend of small truck purchasing, and I'm sure the manufacturers will do very well sales-wise. I remember talking with a Dodge sales manager, and I asked him, " how can trucks sell for over 50 g?" He said simple, "because people are willing to pay 50 g for a truck." Consumers often forget they are the most important driving force in purchasing decisions.
I like the GMC a little better
I have been trying to choose between the two for quite some time. This is the first time I have heard the point about the v6 power being at higher rpms. That might just be the clincher in favor of the Ford.
You guys should really consider talking more about what rear axles are pushing these trucks around. That is just something I noticed you guys never cover. Not just if it has a locker not but what actual model "10 bolt" or "8.5 inch"...
Can't stand the square wheel wells. Full disclosure, I'm a Ford guy, but there is no reason not to get an F150. You will adjust to the size difference and get a better truck overall.
I get what you are saying, but parking in some garages is an issue, I wouldn't buy a new house to fit my truck, would you?
I hate the square wheel wells as well
@@willie9397 I wouldn't build a new house to fit my trcuk, but I would (and have) built new garages to fit my vehicles. I get what you are saying.
Ford: 8 year old platform
GMC: Not 8 year old platform
Ford: 1 (crappy) engine option
GMC: 2 (awesome) engine options
Ford: Weak offroad package
GMC: Real offroad packge
Ford: Looks like a 2011 Edge on the interior
GMC: Looks like something modern on the interior
I hate to admit it, but GM takes the victory here. Ford came back to the segment and brought their C-game. Foolish move.
OFFRD ford:not owned by government
Gm:owned by everyone but gm
Have you not heard of the numerous reports of piston problems within the Chevy Engines, people are having to take him back to the factory before 70,000 miles. Ford has had this motor in more than 6 Vehicles, so I think they know what they've been doing with this motor. And I bet you this off-road package is probably more capable than the Chevy anyways. But that's just my two cents
Ford adapted the global ranger platform to the U.S. market and said global platform is coming up on a redesign. Given that it's close they most likely decided it would be better to hold off on making a completely brand new off the ground ranger until the current global generation ranger came up on the end of its life cycle. It's actually a pretty smart business move that when you look at it from their perspective makes sense. Why make a brand new ranger for just the north American market earlier than what you projected the redesign on the current ranger to be only to have to introduce that redesign into all the other market segments? From a logistical standpoint it would be a mess.
@@FloorItDuh agree
I will keep on dreaming on owning a raptor. I'll stick with my 2005 Hyundai grandeur for now!!! That's my beater car here in Korea.
Dude a raptor?? Seriously you have some low expectations
They are worth it. The Ranger Raptor might be in your reach soon!
Are you out of Korea yet? 😂
The rubber on those GM knobs always rubs off within a couple years.
True my jetta has the same thing and it wore off id rather have plastic buttons
I've had my Colorado since 2015 with no issues.
I drove a 2020 Ranger and liked it. The 4 cyl. turbo drives like a 6,and smooth. I ended up buying a 2018 Canyon All Terrain because I have no patience ! No..The 2019 Ranger(at one Dealer) that I wanted to test drive was loaned out and wouldn't be back til Wed. The insurance $ from my totaled out Ford Exp. Sport Trac was burning a hole in my pocket and the Canyon was just too nice so I fired down on Mon..I'm going to like it but I do think I would have liked that Ranger too.
I wold buy neither truck, too expensive, may as well get a full size truck for the cost of a baby truck. The only people i feel would want a baby truck would be a city dweller that wants a small truck for ease of parking or girls.
A 2019 Ford Ranger is the same or bigger in every dimension than 1996 F150. They can tow/haul more and make more power. i certainly wouldn't call it a baby truck.
Nobody should pay MSRP for these. My dealer has a 19 All Terrain fully loaded for 29k.
@@austinjordison I'd like to see the numbers proving that. I've owned a '94 F150 in my past, my buddy has a '96 F250...and I'd say both were wider in the cab inside than the new Ranger. And the shortest bed on a 90's F150 is still longer than 5'.
@@AKJeeper the 90s f150s are bigger o test drove the new ranger it feels a few inches wider and taller than the older ranger. But damn the seats are comfortable. It basically has the interior of a focus/fusion
@@Jv19979 Having driven a new Ranger also, I'd say interior space on the Ranger is comparable to Dodge Dakotas from '97-'11. The Dakotas still had bigger beds, though.
Guarantee you'll wear right through those rubber steering wheel buttons in the canyon. Soft, fragile material is no good for buttons that will get many thousands of presses.
The gas motor in the GM is a plague. The water&sewage board that I work for has them. They bought 5 of the 201
6 gas ones, all have had cylinder problems and leaks. One was done by 70k miles.
All have dash warning lights on now, despite being serviced.
Junk
boobacockaa the ranger isn’t a new truck.
60,000 miles on my Colorado. Runs great. Just need to take care of your possessions. ;)
@@brendanschriber3242 You cant take care of inferior engineering. Have fun when that 3.6 needs a timing service prematurely
TheeJoeyLee how do you know how it was engineered. It’s not like your even an engineer, or even a person that is apart of design. 😂
The Ranger is so small inside. I sat in one at the auto show. It’s for midgets. The Canyon was nice. I’m 6’2.
Yes pls, Tacoma is even smaller inside imo.
Agreed. If I was ok with being cramped, I'd just get a Tacoma.
I’m 6’ and I didn’t think the ranger was small, at least on in the front. Then back was small, but still a lot bigger than older rangers
If you think that's bad, try sitting in a Tacoma. It's absolutely a joke for anyone above 6 foot. But I honestly don't think I'd want to deal with all the issues the Chevy has
The One I’ve got a first gen Canyon and it’s pretty solid. No issues really. Small crap, nothing major. I agree though no more GM after this truck dies.
Definitely ringer tires on the GMC!
Peak HP and Peak torque have nothing to do with the powerband of an engine. An engine might make 400 lbft of torque at 5,000 RPM, yet still make 380 lb-ft between 2k and 5k RPM. The current 3.6 V6 makes 90% of its peak torque between 3k and 4k RPM. Even at 2500 RPM it's still making 80% of the torque it makes at 4k RPM.
Yeah they act like it gos from 0 to 300. They shouldn't test the gmc i dont think it really competes with the ranger gmc is more fancy than a chevy. But both companies over charge for them.
Ranger is 310 Ft Lbs at 3k RPM. try to research first. GM engines/trannys are crap.
@@todsimpkins9301 yeah gm is junk
...AND STILL LESS that the Turbo 4. Peak torque at 3K. And it's connected to a non POS tranny.
It is interesting how reviewers get brand new trucks, drive them for a few weeks and a few miles and declare one the 'best'. My definition of best is the truck that gets all the work I expect of it, is reliable, has low cost of maintenance, and lasts me 20 years. That is what my last truck did. I have my doubts about these two.
Steve Rowe even a little bit of logic will tell you why that’s not possible. They have to work with what they have.
@@GregKittle NO!!! Every reviewer should hold onto these trucks for a 20yr test so we can know FOR SURE which ones best so we can than go find that 20yr old beater on craigslist and enjoy it for a couple more years before it becomes a yard ornament.
Mr M lol, very well said
Greg Kittle THOROUGH REVIEW OF THE 1999 F-150 versus CHEVY SILVERADO! SEE WHICH IS BEST IN 2019!!!
@Alan Bowers My 20 yr old was a 99 Silverado 2500 and was well maintained. The truck previous was an 88 F-150 standard cab manual transmission also well maintained that I kept for 11 years. The standard cab just didn't fit my family needs so I went to the extended cab. Both were good reliable trucks (not beaters) and neither ever left me stranded. The key to such a comparison is being well maintained which is hit and miss in the used market for vehicles that old and often have multiple owners.
I have pretty much come to the conclusion that any video title with the word "best" in it is nothing more than click bait.
I think that the canyon is better
I have 0 interest in midsized trucks but it’s from the Fast Lane Truck, so I watch! Good video as always.
2 inches can make a big difference 😏
Thats what she said, lol
Cannot believe how far these guys are in the tank for Ford. The riff about gas mileage and break-in was the last straw. I kept watching up to that point, despite the editorializing about the GMC's far superior braking performance being attributed to the difference in tires.
TFL does themselves no favors. Their audience is guys who understand trucks. Trying to paper over the Ranger's deficiencies is lame. I really like what Ford is trying to do bringing back the Ranger, but they are simply falling down on executing their strategy and it's taken them WAY too long to get a solid competitive truck into the midsize space. A big let down.
But are those winter tires going to be good when Spring comes around
yes.
But you should switch to all season or summer when winter is over...
Researched all '19 midsize trucks. Went w/ the review winner & more importantly my own personal experience! Ford trucks are unbeatable. #Ecoboost
@Matthew Alfieri i was thinking same thing... the Ranger failed to the colorado on almost every single review and test..the ranger may be a littke "quicker" but thats it!
If I want a mid size for offroad the Tacoma all day and all night. For a service truck with lots of road time the GM and its crossover type handling. For a weasel mobile, clown carrier, Floral deliveries, or ice cream truck the Ford ranger would be perfect.
Yes 2019 Ford Ranger XLT 2.3L 4-CYLINDER crew cab short bed Fx4 Ultimate compact Sexy 21-26 Midsize Truck Vs 2019 Gmc Canyon 3.6L v6 4wd crew cab short bed Truck!!!!!!!!!!!
Isaac Miranda why would you post this? You’re a weirdo...
Isaac Miranda what
What the hell is it with you guys and the sound? Does the vehicle get the job done? And is it versatile to your needs? Does it get you to one point and back again? If the answer is yes to those three questions, than what the hell difference does it make what it sounds like?
This would be a no brainer if GM would make the 4.3 V6 a option
Does GM even still make the 4.3? I thought that motor died with the S-10. I know I had an S-10 with the 4.3 Vortec(whatever the f Vortec even was other than a brand on the valve covers) and that thing had pretty darn good torque at the low end.
The GM has the 2.8 Diesel, that eats the competition as far as towing goes. It also has a cc with an extended bed option(my truck) and it's phenomenal for day to day use. In fact, it's a more useful bed than what you get on any full-size cc pickup with a short bed.
@@2005OEFArmy Lose the diesel, 4.3, drop 10g off the price. Otherwise these are all big suck.
@@filanfyretracker They make a 4.3 V6 for the full size trucks.
And Vortec supposedly referred to the shape of the combustion chamber.
I am very happy with my Canyon. Can't reccomend it enough. If you can lease a well equipped SLE for under $250 a month then that's the truck for you...
Brought to you by Ford
JonH562 And if the GMC would have won you would have said “Brought to you by GMC”? Your comment is 100% useless.
JonH562 that a good one
@@mikek5298 And yet you took time out of your life to make an issue of it.....lol.
What I'm implying is if this is the off road comparison put the zr2 against the fx4 because obviously the ranger rapt. Is not available in us or Canada. Plus the fx4 runs in the $40k and so does the zr2 so might as well compare them by their price range. Everyone knows the all terrain and z71 are barely off road packages and more appearance packages.
As a ford guy myself, I 100% agree. He was very biased in this review
I'll be dogged! The Ranger sounds like a 4 cylinder... because IT IS A 4 CYLINDER! LOL
To much talking about nothing
I think you are the only review I've seen that picks the Ranger over ANY midsize truck, let alone a GM one. Sounds like you got paid in this review.
Oh just eat your crow and drive your dated GMC already. Your almost as bad as the Tacoma crowd. An XLT beat your GMC, your going to have to live with it.
They always pick Ford no matter what. But as you can see the REAL off road truck was left behind (zr2) because the ranger can't stack up against it in any category
It does seem like this is more of a "which is a better off road truck?" Video, not best truck overall. As someone that does no off roading, I'll take the canyon for comfort.
@@tonygiordano939 I don't drive GMC's. I'm just saying that literally ever other review I've seen has the Ford dead last. And the GM twins are almost always at the top. And just for the record, this Ranger has been around since 2012 in other parts of the world, making it "old". And it shows.
K. Tucker how much does the zr2 canyon cost compared to an xlt ranger?
Great job!
Once again, nobody in their right mind buys a truck based on the stock tires! That’s like buying the truck based on what octane of fuel was pumped on its first fill up . It’s a consumable .
You can't buy the Canyon with winter tires as a factory option.
then why bother buying ANY option that has aftermarket "consumption"? why get factory towing? factory bed liner? factory offroad suspension? et cetera et cetera et cetera.
Wow. That Canyon spare tire hangs really low...
cwoolfork , so if that’s a big deal, take the air dam off and throw the spare in the back.
Can confirm, I almost scrape the sidewalk at work with it...
ZR2 is all you need
It literally took me 15-20 minutes to take of the air dam on my diesel canyon. Giving me MUCH better approach angle and clearance in the front.
I was waiting for this :)
Why compare stopping distance when one truck has aftermarket winter tires, the Canyon's winter tires aren't available as a factory option.
That’s why he did it
Ranger is my great workhorse
Love from Malaysia
Yours is a third world truck. US Trucks are much more sophisticated
These are just as big as previous generation full size trucks. I had a Colorado park next to me yesterday and I never woulda known it wasn't a full size if I hadn't seen the badging. I guess the hope of someone making a small truck again is never going to happen. Long gone is the days of small economical trucks the poor working man could afford. I still have the 1988 Chevy S10 my dad bought brand new for 9500 dollars. Had it repainted a few years ago and it looks brand new. No rust no dents no nothing. I guess I better hang onto it!
Best for what? Off-road? Probably ZR2 or Taco. Best for streets? Ranger or Canyon.
Best for streets/city driving, would probably go to the Ridgeline tbh. Seems to be made for that purpose.
@@Squishysforbreakfast Ridgeline...what is that... a car or something. Or is it an SUV Wannabee
@@mikefoehr235 minivan with a bed I guess.
Lots of storage space and a comfortable cabin/ride. They said they had "Tailgate parties" in mind for the design.
Best for streets most likely isn't 4 wheel drive.
@King Willis GMC, GM is currently being boycotted by the U.S. and Canadian taxpayers! Close 5 to 6 plants in the U.S. and Canada and open plants in China and Mexico, GM deserves to be boycotted!
Hi from Europe, here a happy Ranger owner
Thanks for doing the car seat test!!!!
I would like to see a non-turbo engine option for the Ranger. Maybe the base 3.3L that Ford uses as the base engine for the F-150.
u really need 4 wheel drive in Canada and then some. any one there that buy a 2 wheel drive truck is kidding them self
I have a 2019 XLT Ford Ranger 4x4 and I love it.
Also, what engines in each are you using for those US/Canada fuel economy numbers?
I would compare stock for stock in all tests
I’d like to see the Ranger have a twin turbo V6 option
2.7l
My f150 has the 2.7 and its a monster. I couldnt imagine that in the ranger. it would be a cyclone killer
You can't really fit rear facing child seats in there with the proper gaps recommended between front and rear seats. You can fit one on the passenger side if your wife is short. I really wanted to buy a Colorado ZR2 but the actual space inside with a big car seat just didn't allow it. I consider it a tie between Ford and GM. Why? GM gives you so many options on engines, packages, and so forth. The 2.8 diesel has been killing it on fuel economy. The gas V6 you don't have to worry about turbo issues. Buy a Ranger and it will cost you. Dealers want near full sticker price. GM will give you 5-8k off most of the midsize line. Its like a fully loaded Canyon Denali Diesel for the price of a Lariat Ranger. If the Ranger was competitive price wise it would be an easy choice for a lot of mid size buyers.
I don’t understand the TFL fascination with exhaust sound. We get it a V8 sounds best, move on!
To a lot of people exhaust sound is a consideration when comparing two vehicles.
gufuffin
Maybe to people who can’t afford them. Like kids
DIESEL EXHAUST SOUNDS BETTER
The siping is made for rain and snow as you stated, but does not clean out mud. Siping will hold mud and that is why mud tires do not have them. Good all terrains like the bfg ko and duratracs do. If you took these trucks off road the Hankooks would be much better. Same tire used on the Pro4x frontier, which is still the best small truck for capability by price.
If I had to choose between the two, I’d pick the Ford, if I bought a new truck it would be a F150 STX with the FX4 package....and the 5.0 engine. That’s what works best for me, and I think it’s a good value, although new trucks are still too expensive.
Will be interesting to see the Ranger Raptor vs the ZR2 in off road comparison!!! That ZR2 sets the bar high with Axle lockers front and rear and amazing approach / departure angles. Cant wait!!!
its a 4 cyl, and a 6 cyl. why keep harping on the sound.
Because it doesn't sound truck enough. It's quiet like a car, and a lot of people LOOK for a brash loud exhaust. I don't care either way. But a lot of people do
@@umad42 then buy a 8 cylinder. You just can't get that exhaust note any other way
Ford EcoBoost all day long! Cant go wrong.
Both sound like shit, irrelevant
Hes biased towards the Ranger in neg way. The Ranger is new class leader 90% of reviews rave about it.
You should try a 120 kilometer per hour head on crash test in each truck.
you go first
The true answer is Toyota Tacoma made in Texas and California. Last time I checked Texas was part of America; but I may not be so sure about California.
😂😂😂👍
Trust me we're not all liberal in California. There's actually more closeted conservatives lol.
@@dishingoutls8137 Then for the sake of the USA get them out of the closet and into the voting booth! That advice from a conservative Democrat.
Ford Ranger made in Michigan! Last time I checked that was in the U.S.! Also, the profits stay in the good old U.S.A!
Harley Jackson no one here said it wasn’t...
I like the ranger. In my experience the fords are generally more reliable overall than GM and especially ram. But for the money I'd never choose mid-size over an f-150.
Interesting about the acceleration comments. The only instrumented test I've seen with both of these trucks, had the Colorado ahead all the way up to its max speed. Although it apparently won't break 100mph like the Ford can, and it had slightly better passing performance too. A 30+ horsepower deficit is mighty hard to overcome.
I guess perception is a bitch. I'm sure at elevation in Colorado, the Ford would just might take it though.
if it woun't go over 100mph it has to bee electronically limited,higher hp should equal higher top speed.
Canyon and Colorado v6’s are electronically limited to 98mph
The canyon has a 30ftlb torque deficit compared to ranger. Torque is what matters.
Let's face it these trucks aren't fast but I've also read that the V6 Colorado/Canyon out runs the the Ranger I4 turbo. I much prefer the GM looks and the way it drives but a simple performance tune from Ford is all it takes to make that Ranger a lot quicker. My personal truck is a 21 Colorado Z71 with the V6 and I think it would be fun to see how it does against a Ranger, it won't change my mind in which truck I prefer but still fun regardless of which is faster.
I think I’d rather have the steering wheel buttons on the Ranger, the membrane on the Canyon buttons doesn’t look like it’s going to wear as well as a hard plastic button.
My thoughts EXACTLY.👍
Check out the Edmonds review of the Colorado, Tacoma and ranger.. , it's not on paper...
It feels the Edmund's comparo was more accurate...
I was just going to comment this, much better comparison. I knew he was going to give the Ranger the win before I even watched it.
@@user-wq8bh4ct3u there is another real world test video with the 3 on a farm, the Colorado won again.
Ranger is more Ford garbage..
More cab/bed configurations, trailer brake controller integrated, more engine choices, more leg room and hip room front and back, higher trailer rating, higher mpg, better interior, better storage (noticed he didn't flip the seats down in the back), more available packages and this comparable model has a heated steering wheel. Also, a better RTI for wheel travel. GMC hands down.
Nice Real World review but the ranger will be the one for me Each truck has there personality quirks but to me the ranger is the better buy
Very informative review, thank you!
I like the Ranger. Its more bang for your buck.
And Ford always makes the best trucks.
On paper, maybe. In the real world, no, the GMC is better.
Longterm I think GMC is better especially since it offers both diesel and gas V6. Plus its more of a luxury truck. It should have been Colorado vs Ranger.
I gmc canyon was a lemon. 8 speed transmission likes to shake.
Thank you for calling out the Ford interior. It’s a problem across all Ford pick ups. It’s like being the “Boy in the Plastic Bubble”...
i think they tried to hide that in the lariat and up. ohh leather pads on teh dash make it look good.. blah
SRT Sorbs I think gm makes the worst truck interiors
Nick Henry no argument there unless grey plastic is someone’s favorite color and texture. GM seems to have catered to those wanting bland.
I like the Ranger exhaust better .
The Tacoma or the zr2 for mid size truck no other trucks compare to those two
The Ranger wins easily!
That's laughable (Tacoma)
Tacoma is wimpy!
Frontier pro4x will go in the trails just as far as the taco
Great review, thanks
Whoa!!!! Where's all that gag reflex reducing aluminum for the Ford? Can the GM get an excuse?
But but but the Toyota marketing department and Toyota drones tell me the Tacoma is American as it’s made by non union temp workers in Texas!
I'm still loving my 2003 Toyota Tacoma Prerunner & it only has 53,000 original miles on it!!
Jeff Hess - so has the a/c system blown up on it yet? I wouldn't have a Toyota truck
@@rockandroll4689 No problems what so ever with the A/C the truck has been Stellar Awesome!!
I like both of these trucks very much-I’d be happy with either. It comes down to price, so we will see tomorrow which one comes in cheaper.
Ford wins period. Innovators of American trucks. And the GMC has a higher trim. Ford 10 speed has enough power train
You should change out the tires with each other. This way you could see if it's just the tires or there are other factors involved in the stop test.