DIY-project with 3D printing and micro cement for better sound!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 4

  • @v4projects
    @v4projects  2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    00:00 Trollolo
    00:18 A status update
    00:33 A three channel amp and low pass filter
    01:37 Subwoofers
    02:18 Designing in Fusion
    03:54 My first problem with AMS
    05:12 Mixing Jesmonite
    08:25 Steinway Grand Piano as a reference
    08:43 Jazz quartet, switching speakers (no subwoofer).
    09:31 Jazz quartet switching speakers and subwoofers.
    10:43 Icelandic and catchy pop music from the Pandemic when most people stayed at home
    11:20 Same, but with subwoofers
    11:57 Outro. Would this be the last video on this channel? (no it wasn't)

  • @Speedgaming802
    @Speedgaming802 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    cool glad they turend out good

  • @Mark_5150
    @Mark_5150 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I wonder how Jesmonite filled enclosures would compare to a sild fill 3D print, in sound quality and price.
    I always print with a .6 nozzle. .2 layer height but .4 infill at 100%. So infill is every other layer and it prints relatively fast. You could use a 1mm nozzle and print .3 and .6 layers for even faster builds.
    With a Jesmonite designed builds, you have a lot of outer perimeters to print, so a solid fill may actually print faster.

    • @v4projects
      @v4projects  25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      In my experience the speaker driver is the most important part. Doing minor changes to the enclosure could have some effect, but at low to moderate listening levels a 3D printed enclosure works fine for the small drivers. I am pretty convinced Jesmonite (or similar) improves the «large» sub. Using wood would probably be the cheapest option, I totally agree with you about nozzle sizes and improvements in printing speed. It was a bit lazy to stick to 0.4 nozzle and 0.2 layer height. But I am not going to print more of these. I have what I need for now.