Secure Protocols - CompTIA Security+ SY0-501 - 2.6

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 16

  • @arona4620
    @arona4620 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I recently passed my security + certification and I have to credit you along with other resources that helped me to pass. Thank you so much for the effort you put into these videos !

    • @jtube411
      @jtube411 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Can I ask what other resources you used to pass? Would be greatly appreciated

    • @afshin8047
      @afshin8047 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would also like to know what other resources you used.

    • @jtube411
      @jtube411 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@afshin8047 besides Prof Messer, people have cited Jason Dion and the Sec+ book from Darril Gibson, which I am currently reading, great read thus far. Hope this helps

  •  3 ปีที่แล้ว

    very thorough & to the point explanations! truly valuable info, also!

  • @crazitomali
    @crazitomali 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So the difference in SNMPv3 and LDAPS or a SASL on LDAP is that the LDAPS/SASL protocols specifically refer to communicating to a directory and the SNMP is a secured way to communicate to a router or switch?

    • @professormesser
      @professormesser  4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      SNMPv3 is the secure version of SNMP. LDAPS is the secure version of LDAP. Those are two different protocols used for different purposes.

    • @crazitomali
      @crazitomali 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@professormesser thank you so much. I passed my test with a 790 because of you!!

  • @devonholcombe3565
    @devonholcombe3565 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    At 2:33 it says to "always encrypt with SSL" if the mail is browser based. Hasn't TLS replaced SSL as the better public encryption technology?

    • @professormesser
      @professormesser  5 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Although TLS is now used as a replacement of SSL, we still habitually say SSL even though TLS may actually be in use. If you hear anyone mention SSL, they almost always really mean TLS.

    • @devonholcombe3565
      @devonholcombe3565 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@professormesser Thanks for the clarification. That aligns with something I read before

  • @Ohmywrx
    @Ohmywrx 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great Video. Have a question... What if someone was to send an encrypted email (through cisco or something) on open public wifi? Is that email still technically encrypted event though it was sent through unsecure wifi?

    • @professormesser
      @professormesser  5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      An unencrypted WiFi could reveal everything that you weren't additionally encrypting, which could include other non-encrypted email messages and unencrypted login credentials. The contents of your encrypted email message would remain safe.

    • @STIG_Automation
      @STIG_Automation 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, the encrypted e-mail uses AES for encryption

    • @Ohmywrx
      @Ohmywrx 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      paulpierce9191 what about public WiFi that asks for a user name and password ? Usually only provided by the hotel or something . Is that just to ensure the network doesn’t get flooded by random people ? Would that mean it would be a little more secure since only certain people can use it ?

    • @nikesbruh3058
      @nikesbruh3058 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      vuhsace highrolla from what I understand, this is mostly just to avoid war driving, or people just trying to find some free wifi to use. Anyone who has the username and password can have access to the network and could potentially see everything that goes on. VPNs are a great way to make sure you have a secure connection. (Someone correct something if I’m wrong)