Naomi Klein Stands Up To Tories In Frustrating Debate

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
  • Novara Live broadcasts every weekday from 6PM on TH-cam and Twitch.
    Episodes of Downstream are released Sundays at 6PM on TH-cam.
    __________________________
    Can you help fund people-powered media? To be ready for next year, we need 5,000 of you to join our regular supporters and back our work.
    Donate one hour’s wage per month, or whatever you can afford at novara.media/su... today.

ความคิดเห็น • 384

  • @shinywarm6906
    @shinywarm6906 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    We're living in a looking glass world. What kind of insanity is it to claim we are moving away from the fossil fuel economy by boosting the fossil fuel economy?

  • @yetidodger6650
    @yetidodger6650 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    the fossil fuel paymasters have spoken and the tories have agreed.

  • @doreenhollywood7459
    @doreenhollywood7459 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    What a disaster. We do not need this. It will only benefit sunak's family. Totally unnecessary

  • @lilacbookshelf1909
    @lilacbookshelf1909 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    "In order to quit smoking I have to increase the amount of cigarettes I have a day. Obviously, that has to be part of my transition away from smoking."

  • @3PointBeats
    @3PointBeats ปีที่แล้ว +53

    Tories love a ‘transitional period’

    • @T1tusCr0w
      @T1tusCr0w ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It will last 4 decades. Up until the apocalyptic period. 🤣🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @berniethekiwidragon4382
      @berniethekiwidragon4382 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@T1tusCr0wDuring which they will do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

    • @user-bg9ws7ys4k
      @user-bg9ws7ys4k ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yup....ad infinitum 😅

    • @homosexualpanic
      @homosexualpanic ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hate trans, love transition periods

  • @nicholasglanfield9221
    @nicholasglanfield9221 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    This smells of corruption.

    • @ciaranhughes1199
      @ciaranhughes1199 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That's just the smell of politicians

    • @user-bg9ws7ys4k
      @user-bg9ws7ys4k ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Smells???? It is !!!

    • @hassamneetoo956
      @hassamneetoo956 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      massive profits for the corporates and nothing of benefit for the consumers

  • @thegamingeconomist3831
    @thegamingeconomist3831 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    "Yes, we destroyed the climate and doomed all of the species on the planet - including our own - but for a few glorious years we increased shareholder value."

  • @robertwilliams4084
    @robertwilliams4084 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    North sea oil doesn't get drilled by UK companies. We have to buy it back from the open market as mentioned. Rishi's father in law will do well from the contracts he has arranged.. we as always will get rinsed.

    • @zeeone4492
      @zeeone4492 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tories corruption at its best

  • @dogmatictales
    @dogmatictales ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Naomi Klein’s books taught me so much about capitalism, climate and corruption that I can honestly say they changed my life

  • @steveozone4910
    @steveozone4910 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    What's annoying me right now is the people complaining about windmills in their back yard, while complaining about the price of energy!

  • @Ayeright.
    @Ayeright. ปีที่แล้ว +39

    In 2021, Shell UK paid zero tax for their oil production in the UK and claimed £100 million in government subsidies. Go figure?

  • @stephenbarlow2493
    @stephenbarlow2493 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The whole dialogue over the climate crisis is so confused and ignorant, that I utterly despair, at nearly everything said here. Let's get this clear, there is no green transition, and this was supposed to happen just after the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, not now. Also, the 1992 Rio Earth Summit was not when these systemic problems were discovered. The 1992 Rio Earth Summit, had as its blueprint, Our Common Future (1987) the report of the Brundtland Commission, set up in 1984, because the UN was so alarmed, that no progress had been made on the Action Plan, from the 1972 UN Environment Conference in Stockholm. I cannot blame people not understanding the longevity of this procrastination, on taking action on problems science understood in the 1960s. I only know all this, because I became environmentally aware over 50 years ago, so I've seen all this happen with my own 2 eyes. People don't believe me when I tell them, that there was probably more climate awareness in the late 1980s and early 1990s, than there is now. If you don't believe me, read "International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century" (2014), Capstick et al. It is based on a collection of global public opinion polls going back to the 1980s.
    All this bullcrap about this transition over the next decades, wrongly assumes it has only been recently discovered in recent year what we needed to phase out fossil fuels. No, this was well established and agreed 31 years ago. Absolutely, the only reason climate change was separated from the rest of the sustainability crisis at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, was to enable a quick agreement to phase out fossil fuels, similar to the 1987 Montreal Protocol treaty to phase out CFCs, causing holes in the ozone layer. No one envisaged when UNFCCC, which set up the COP talks at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, that we'd be on COP28, and the president would be the CEO of a major oil company. It was all supposed to be settled in the 1990s. Really, phasing out fossil fuels was supposed to have started 30 years ago. Yet, something like 60% of all emissions in the whole of human history, have happened in the last 33 years i.e. during the period when we were supposed to have already largely phased already.
    There is talk here about keeping to the Paris Agreement, target of staying below 1.5C. This presumes that no one knows that the global average temperature for the last 2 months has been 1.5C. This will likely fall back a bit after the current El Nino event ends, but it may go higher next year, and will soon go back to 1.5C degrees.
    The IPCC say we have to halve global emissions by 2030, to be within a 50:50 chance of keeping to the Paris Agreement 1.5C target. No major government in the world has got any such policy. In fact, on current policy, it is highly likely that global emissions will be higher in 2030, than they are now, not less.
    When I hear Siobhain McConagh say "if we want to keep the lights on and heating on in our homes until we get to Net Zero, we've got to have a transition period", I feel like screaming. WTF, how are we going to get to Net Zero whilst still burning lots of fossil fuels? The ignorance and stupidity is off the scale. Rather than explaining more myself, I beg people to watch, "A True Paradise: WHERE WE ARE HEADING" on TH-cam, by climate scientist Professor Kevin Anderson, probably the leading expert in what current policy is leading to. And he calculates about 3-4C of warming by the end of the Century, not Net Zero. In fact, he calls Net Zero policy, Not Zero, because it won't achieve anything like Net Zero. What's more, that's taking into account, the not yet invented magic technology to suck CO2 out of the atmosphere, that will almost certainly never work at scale. We are being gaslighted, and most of the nonsense being spouted, even by supposed progressives supposedly wanting to address the climate crisis, is total nonsense. Either, we start implementing radical and profound system change, or our civilization is not going to get to that future they are speaking about. I haven't even started. It is not just about an energy transition. Less than 18% of the global population do not own a car, and over 80% of the global population have never flown on a plane. Buying EVs, flying less, is only of relevance to those that fly or drive petrol/diesel cars, which most of the global population don't. It's not just a climate crisis, either, but a biodiversity crisis, a much bigger ecological crisis, none of which is going to be helped by an energy crisis. There was a global plan, signed by world leaders 31 years ago, Sustainable Development, which you hardly ever hear about now.

  • @anthonywright460
    @anthonywright460 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    I saw this live, that Canadian woman wasn't given much respect, especially from that guy Richard Stanley. There was a horrible atmosphere from this discussion to discredit this woman as much as possible. The Labour MP was very limp. 🙈🙈

  • @sayanosis
    @sayanosis ปีที่แล้ว +14

    How is Labour not against this?

  • @julianshepherd2038
    @julianshepherd2038 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I really do not like the Tories.
    TH-cam compliant statement.

  • @allmodcons2274
    @allmodcons2274 ปีที่แล้ว +194

    My god! The ineptitude, ignorance and arrogance of these politicians 🤯

    • @jamesbarbour8400
      @jamesbarbour8400 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's exactly why they're politicians - no-one would employ them in the real World. It's not called the Westminster 'bubble' for nothing !

    • @owenrichards1418
      @owenrichards1418 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nothing inept about this. They all want to get rich and if you think these politicians are doing it for ideological reasons then you will be disappointed. Someone is paying them well for these decisions.

    • @fredatlas4396
      @fredatlas4396 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@capt.bart.roberts4975 The tories are just following the same old tory ideology and policies that they always implement. Just now their lies and corruption appears to be more blatant, or maybe its because of the Internet, its much easier to find out what's really going on. We've never had good governance under a tory government, and our economy has never done well under the tories, its all just a load of right wing, tory false propoganda to fool the gullible.

    • @dominicparker6124
      @dominicparker6124 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They are paid to have these opinions

    • @scatmann5839
      @scatmann5839 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@dominicparker6124Excellent point. Hope many more pick up on this.

  • @profdrrameshkumarbiswas1337
    @profdrrameshkumarbiswas1337 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Very disappointing that the Labour lady in red is saying exactly what the slimy Tory said.

    • @XlouietheflyX
      @XlouietheflyX ปีที่แล้ว +6

      But not in the least bit surprising. These are Blairites after all

    • @berniethekiwidragon4382
      @berniethekiwidragon4382 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@XlouietheflyX "YoU cAn'T cAlL uS tHaT!" 👶😭

    • @zeeone4492
      @zeeone4492 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The only real difference between this tories and labour is the spelling

    • @tedh79
      @tedh79 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I could truly weep at the state of the UK’s current opposition party

  • @KillaKermit
    @KillaKermit ปีที่แล้ว +124

    Our politicians are truly the worst among us. Set of clowns.

  • @Mustardonmyjeans
    @Mustardonmyjeans ปีที่แล้ว +79

    This is what happens when you have a genuinely intelligent person on to debate rando parliamentarians whose understanding of the issue doesn't extend beyond half a page of talking points circulated by the Leader's office.

    • @scatmann5839
      @scatmann5839 ปีที่แล้ว

      Excellent comment. Nailed it perfectly. Yet, we like to see ourselves as a developed country when we're actually represented by halfwits and id10ts, led by wannabe dictators in both parties!

    • @briancrowther3272
      @briancrowther3272 ปีที่แล้ว

      Spot on.

  • @lisalisker2659
    @lisalisker2659 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    No difference between the Tory and Labour MP?!? Still repeating the story that the energy will benefit the UK in some way.

  • @jeltoninc.8542
    @jeltoninc.8542 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I just read the thumbnail as “PAINFUL BBC” and spit my drink out laughing.

  • @jillallan8985
    @jillallan8985 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    This is not the Labour I once knew.

  • @SteveGouldinSpain
    @SteveGouldinSpain ปีที่แล้ว +87

    Surely the takeaway here is not that the Tories support fossil fuels, but that Labour do also. Centrists are always banging on about getting the Tories out, but every day that goes by, the policy difference is becoming so indistinguishable it's reaching five sigma.

    • @martindornan1667
      @martindornan1667 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Red and Blue Tories.

    • @alastairwallace6153
      @alastairwallace6153 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I hate the centrists, but I'd rather have a competent government in right now, the fascist tories are killing the country.. vote Labour in now then change out kier or vote green moving forward.. we can ill afford another 4 years of tory.

    • @MrMusicbyMartin
      @MrMusicbyMartin ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not red and blue anymore, it’s green vs grey . . . .

  • @SuzanneO707
    @SuzanneO707 ปีที่แล้ว +109

    Naomi's books are well researched, rational and balanced. She offers strategies instead of just waffling on. Must be frustrating having someone throwing out rehearsed lines at you.

  • @72rmboyd
    @72rmboyd ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Labour proving they are no different to Tories talking tbe exact same claptrap.

  • @call_in_sick
    @call_in_sick ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Is anyone really surprised that the tories have said one thing and then proceed to do the opposite . That’s what they do.

  • @stevebartley8902
    @stevebartley8902 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    Another great con by the Tories. At least they'll roast like the rest of us.

    • @cugal1613
      @cugal1613 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      And Labour……

    • @stevebartley8902
      @stevebartley8902 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@cugal1613 13yrs out of power? Give me a break. 🙄

    • @davidtracey5471
      @davidtracey5471 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@cugal1613😂😂😂

    • @bestbehave
      @bestbehave ปีที่แล้ว

      No. We’ll be fighting in the streets over food and water. They’ll have stockpiled a load for themselves in compounds defended by the police and army

    • @jake751
      @jake751 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They'll roast eternally for eternity in hell.

  • @julianshepherd2038
    @julianshepherd2038 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The welders, electricians etc are in short supply and if they work on oil and gas they cant work on wind, tidal, hydro and hydrogen.

  • @MD-cj4yh
    @MD-cj4yh ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Another gravy-dribbling Tory MP... not seen this one before. He's got the Gove/Pobb thing going on.

  • @tonymurphy2624
    @tonymurphy2624 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    There's a whole bait and switch in the presentation of the problem when they talk about oil from the UK rather than importing, when what's quite obviously happening is that this oil from the UK _will be imported_ to the extent that any of it makes its way to the UK market.
    It's pure rhetorical flannel.

  • @clivepierce1816
    @clivepierce1816 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    As Sir David King and others have commented, the atmosphere does not respond to hand waving gestures and distant targets but to emission reductions today. At what point does this chasm between climate policy and reality hit home? We are out of carbon budget and out of time.

  • @janeannabeleades8193
    @janeannabeleades8193 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Things are already bad at 1.2C, and everyone is uncomfortably affected now. Yet the public continually gets a message through the media that 1.5C is "what we must bring it down to". Novara, be careful you don't collude with this.

  • @Thelordofalldarkness
    @Thelordofalldarkness ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Its going to be funny when Scotland becomes independent and those drilling are going to be told where to go, since they are in Scottish waters.

    • @ianking8315
      @ianking8315 ปีที่แล้ว

      way forward christopher stop drilling and we will be bankrupt the snp will take us back to the dark ages.

  • @profdrrameshkumarbiswas1337
    @profdrrameshkumarbiswas1337 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The moderator lady in black from Novara at the rnd had all the right arguments!

  • @gideonpepys
    @gideonpepys ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Labour saying the same as the Tories as usual.

  • @TheIncredibleBeard_
    @TheIncredibleBeard_ ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Labour has gone back to being the left twix to the Conservatives right twix

  • @cdean2789
    @cdean2789 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Norway is a key supplier of oil and gas to the UK. Norway provides over a quarter of the UK’s primary energy demands, supplying 42% of our imported gas and around 62% of our imported oil in 2011.

    • @itaz6276
      @itaz6276 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Because uk exports most of its gas production to Europe due to lack of storage and then imports it in… also exports most of our oil production then refine and import it in
      Basically the privatisation means uk produced fuels are sold elsewhere for better prices and not given to the uk population
      Then imported in by energy companies at higher prices for uk consumers
      It’s a relay of corporates making money and rishi granting permits to his father in law and friends to make even more money
      Thus isn’t about production for the uk populations benefits

  • @CADJewellerySkills
    @CADJewellerySkills ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I’m surprised how Naomi or anyone else didn’t respond to the Tory mouthpieces by saying the Tories have shut down all other green policies like wind farm development, insulation, or even their own green targets.

    • @annemoncrieff3875
      @annemoncrieff3875 ปีที่แล้ว

      Remember this is little england. Meanwhile the Scottish govnt is trying to push ahead with its insulate homes campaign, has been offering £10k to citizens to install heat pumps and u pay back £2.5k interest free up to 5 yrs, u choose how quickly u want to pay it back. Been a much better deal than that offerred by littke engkand for a decade. Trouble is I bet little engkand cuts back on the money they give to Scotland which is already worth less cos of truss' mini budget AND IT IS OUR MONEY THAT GOES TO LONDON AND WE R GIVEN SOME OF IT BACK.

    • @briancrowther3272
      @briancrowther3272 ปีที่แล้ว

      She may not know.

  • @lewa3910
    @lewa3910 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Its frightening how little our mainstream leaders care about the future, ignoring the necessity of transitioning to green energy sources

  • @shinywarm6906
    @shinywarm6906 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Klein is a giant of integrity and intellect, and here she is having to fight for time amongst these venal, opportunist nobodies. What a state we are in

  • @TequilaToothpick
    @TequilaToothpick ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Bloody Labour just agreeing with the Tories yet again. I'd rather take the Tories for 4 more years than Starmer's Tory-lite win. I'm voting Green.

  • @dr_ned_flanders
    @dr_ned_flanders ปีที่แล้ว +3

    When the planet heats up, it doesn't matter how rich you are you're are still going to burn with us. This is so short-sighted, for short term profit.

  • @craigsmith7457
    @craigsmith7457 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    'I plan on stopping drinking, but to do that I first need to drink myself to death!'

  • @parametr
    @parametr ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why give £500 million of TAXPAYER MONEY to a private company, so they can extract OUR resources and ENRICH THEMSELVES?

  • @nicholaswright3081
    @nicholaswright3081 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about what our lovely children think!! They won't have a life due to their actions!! Ask them!! Citizens assembly now!!

  • @anthonywilson8998
    @anthonywilson8998 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Until you have spaffordable long term storage for intermittent renewables ,as batteries are trillions and not available in scale, you will need Fossil to provide that backup and volume which scales out as as much as we have now. Nuclear 25% will need 125 , wind 75 massive , and fossil 25% of the 500 Gigawatts needed to be all electric by 2050 but more likely NEVER.

  • @m.rebman7221
    @m.rebman7221 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is the best overall UK source for British and world affairs available. The key word here absent from even the BBC and other public media is “analysis..”. Despite the dire nature of many global events, coverage such as this makes one optimistic. Bravo.

  • @DaDonMega
    @DaDonMega ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why not spend 500m into nuclear energy ffs, that'll more than help us in the "transition" period. It's all BS, they want to make money

  • @Jopasd
    @Jopasd ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lol. That's my MP. Listened to the podcast and don't even recognise his cookie cutter Tory bluster.

  • @MsFuruodden
    @MsFuruodden ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It’s not true it will be cheaper for consumers We ( consumers) have very expensive energy here in Norway. And we have a lot of energy sources, but the profiteers taking it all. The so called Green shift is also a lie for the company to make more money from wind energy. It’s disappointing

  • @dfishpool7052
    @dfishpool7052 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rishi's father in law will be rejoicing at this decision - his company Infosys signed up a massive deal with BP just a couple of weeks before Spineless announced the release of exporation licenses in the North Sea.

  • @clach1958
    @clach1958 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What to do is get Scotland to ask for Independence and that will make the oil disappear….viola No Rosebank!!

  • @MaxVliet
    @MaxVliet ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The waves are not 50-60 metres high in the north sea... They get to 20-30 metres at most. Please try your best to avoid using hyperbole when talking about climate related issues because it gives the deniers ammunition to dismantle your argument.

  • @Mickyboy
    @Mickyboy ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Please everyone read Naomi Kleins books. ‘The shock doctrine’ is an eye opener. ‘No is not enough” is another that needs to be read.

    • @SuzanneO707
      @SuzanneO707 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      "This Changes Everything", too. It is one of the best books I have read👍.

    • @Mickyboy
      @Mickyboy ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SuzanneO707 yeah great book too.

    • @SuzanneO707
      @SuzanneO707 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Mickyboy 👍

    • @Mickyboy
      @Mickyboy ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "No logo" is another great one.

    • @SuzanneO707
      @SuzanneO707 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Mickyboy Must investigate. Its hard to find quiet spaces to read these days👍

  • @queefchiefwiggam3386
    @queefchiefwiggam3386 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why would we drill for new gas and oil?? Anything to do with rishi's father in-laws stock in BP?

  • @Phase52012
    @Phase52012 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Here's what will happen. The oil will go on the world market. The "transition" will always be something we "will do"; just not yet. And it never gets done.

  • @forecast_hinderer
    @forecast_hinderer ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Seeing as the elected panelists champion the idea of this extraction being necessary during the transition to net zero, I bet if asked they couldn’t explain just HOW this will work.

    • @user-bg9ws7ys4k
      @user-bg9ws7ys4k ปีที่แล้ว

      ....and you would win your bet😅

    • @jake751
      @jake751 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They won't be asked that's the problem with that programme and why i don't watch it.

    • @briancrowther3272
      @briancrowther3272 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You arecspot on. In a recent state election in Oz , I pretended to be ignorant of the science of climate change I asked the Tory candidate if she could explain hiw how driving my car to work causes climate change. She could not. Later I delivered a letter to her office offering my services to teach her. Also included where she could learn. She has not responded. She is now deputy leader of the nsw Tories, they are called the Liberal Party here, they are worse than the UK Tories re climate, if you can imagine that. Luckily her govt party lost the election. Her name is Robyn Preston, the seat is Hawkesbury, 80kms nw of Sydney CBD. Useless, worse than.

  • @peterlpool1387
    @peterlpool1387 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So this oil will be used for oil companies to sell to British customers at probably extortionate prices in years to come. Keeping the rich even richer and most people poorer. Not to mention the environmental damage this causes.

  • @anthonywilson8998
    @anthonywilson8998 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Green energy is so weak you need hundreds not one. Cost is escalating to rediculous levels. Nuclear much better and gas is ok .

  • @Greedst
    @Greedst ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Most people have gas boilers and petrol cars and not enough money to buy a new electric only verison of either... also the basic infrastructure to go fully electric is just a fairy tale, it takes parking space up and hours to get fuelled up, there simpley would not be enough room to do it on large scale... some serious thought need sto go into this that has not gone into this. There no point in trying shoe horn this.

  • @JugglinJellyTake01
    @JugglinJellyTake01 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Legal action against Equinor is needed since they are the larger stakeholder. Shell has already u-turned on commiting to renewables despite a court order to reduce emissions by 50% by 2030. Clearly they feel the penalties will be insignificant.

  • @mariogaeta8911
    @mariogaeta8911 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I guess we’re too comfortable for Revolution. Feels like we’re at the point where there is no other choice

  • @silvrfox23
    @silvrfox23 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Funny that!!....During our independence referendum in 2014 the unionists said there was next to no oil left..🤔..noo there seems to be plenty...🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿Saor Alba🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

    • @caterthun4853
      @caterthun4853 ปีที่แล้ว

      English oil for English high speed rail. Whisky sales down 20% due to Brexit.. Poor Scots

  • @ExplodingPiggy
    @ExplodingPiggy ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No money for public sector payrises 🤷🏼‍♂️

  • @janeglover3118
    @janeglover3118 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Australian Govt is doing the same here too. And this is our Labor Govt as well, not just our previous LNP 'tory' Govt.
    There's NO damn difference between them in this respect either (...dont get me started on their Austerity policies).
    Approving new fossil fuel projects, including fracking (ffs?!!). Projects, of which some even pose a direct *threat* to our biggest natural fresh water acquifier The Great Artesian Basin (in an often very dry country!!) ...and yep, the results of which are also all mostly exported for profit by private multinational corps.
    Its well beyond insane, all round.
    These private greedy billionaires and their obedient/bought political cronies, are going to be the end of us all. 😞👎

  • @scottwrightson8584
    @scottwrightson8584 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think we are all gonna burn ..these scary people are full on mental

  • @jillallan8985
    @jillallan8985 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It is vandalism

  • @MrTimwingate
    @MrTimwingate ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Considering the vast profits that these oils companies make!! why, why, why??? do they need 500 million subsidies??

    • @caterthun4853
      @caterthun4853 ปีที่แล้ว

      Taxpayers money. to Oil companies then to donations to Tory party to corrupt politicians.. That's how it's done

  • @georgeryan3310
    @georgeryan3310 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is doing absolutely nothing for our energy security,what this is really doing is securing positions and huge salaries for several Tory MP,s and Sunaks father in law.

  • @kev643
    @kev643 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I thought the STOP OIL protesters were wrong. I see I was wrong.

  • @DidierDunn
    @DidierDunn ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why do they get £500M of our money??

  • @damianmoran1512
    @damianmoran1512 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They're talking about someone elses oil fields

  • @john6200
    @john6200 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Westminster taking from Scotland agin 😢

  • @marcuskirsch4128
    @marcuskirsch4128 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just imagine it would run out tomorrow? Why don't we assume there isn't any more and start there, and not kick the can down the road and maybe start actually changing things in another 10 years?

  • @MrTimwingate
    @MrTimwingate ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ITS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY,!!!!! ALL I WANT IS SOME TRUTH!!!

  • @cdean2789
    @cdean2789 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Starmer won't reverse it. 😐

    • @colinstephenson5386
      @colinstephenson5386 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cdean what’s two times two ? Shouldn’t be too difficult, boy yer nailed what Starmer’s gonna not do , I Hope the villagers ain’t lost their compassion and everyone’s out looking for you ?

  • @evadd2
    @evadd2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    300M barrels is about a weeks worth of global use. Use the subsidies for renewals.

  • @grahamshepherd8821
    @grahamshepherd8821 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Short termism from both major parties. No hope

  • @rajazulfiqar9290
    @rajazulfiqar9290 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Hit 200k today. Thank you for the knowledge you had thrown my way over the last months. Started with 14k in October 2022

    • @rajazulfiqar9290
      @rajazulfiqar9290 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I engage in various prolific Investments by compound interest & leveraging and as well operating with an Investment Professional Mr Charles Soward, So far I've attained returns over *12k* this mon'th.

    • @hafizkhawaja
      @hafizkhawaja ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wow😊l know him and I have also been trading with him, he's such an amazing man with good skills, keeps me happy all week knowing I earn 15thousand extra income trading with him

    • @lanceroberts7463
      @lanceroberts7463 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If I had not experienced this myself I would have said this is all lies but I've made withdrawals a few days ago and that's one thing I find difficult and impossible with other brokers but Charles Soward is the best

    • @rajazulfiqar9290
      @rajazulfiqar9290 ปีที่แล้ว

      He's always active on Whats'akp 👇👇

    • @rajazulfiqar9290
      @rajazulfiqar9290 ปีที่แล้ว

      十𝟏𝟒𝟐𝟑𝟐𝟐𝟕𝟔𝟔𝟕𝟓🇭🇰👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻✅________👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻.....

  • @thomaswilga735
    @thomaswilga735 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Labourers plans and their total lack of aspiration are laid bare ,none of the main parties deserve to have an overall majority after the next election,play your part to ensure it doesn’t happen whoever you vote for

  • @josephhenry4725
    @josephhenry4725 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Scotland needs to stop this .

  • @anthonymcnamee6297
    @anthonymcnamee6297 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Even labour turning blue

  • @jeromekeeper
    @jeromekeeper ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Climate crisis! 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @killthomas8373
    @killthomas8373 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Going backwards to go forwards only works if you actually stop moving backwards

  • @evolutionxbox
    @evolutionxbox ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Labour are basically conservatives these days

    • @Ghengiskhansmum
      @Ghengiskhansmum ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Labour are new conservatives and old conservatives are now Ukip or for their true name BNP.

  • @jasonstation
    @jasonstation ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Another day, another young, keen Tory spokesperson I don’t recognise.

    • @user-bg9ws7ys4k
      @user-bg9ws7ys4k ปีที่แล้ว

      The Torry gravy train is a desirable commodity and a super career choice....just look what it has brought up from the swamps since....

    • @SuzanneO707
      @SuzanneO707 ปีที่แล้ว

      The change over rate amongst this lot is disturbing, and doesn't fill me with confidence.

  • @i-am-vonnegut
    @i-am-vonnegut ปีที่แล้ว

    £500million to :
    Tata
    Southern water companies
    Battery factory
    And oil subsidies.
    Now, how much to schools, hospitals, teachers, nurses etc etc

  • @MichaelShawcross
    @MichaelShawcross ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wasn't there a book written about Naomi called, "Who's Afraid of Naomi Klein?" I think Elizabeth Taylor played her in the movie.

  • @sgbh8874
    @sgbh8874 ปีที่แล้ว

    £500 million government backhander? How many electricity producing windmills could you get for that? Use it to upgrade the energy infrastructure.

  • @camdencobain1460
    @camdencobain1460 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tim Stanely, a Starmerrhoid & a Tory Vs. Naomi Klein - a clubfooted spree killer on a 60s Batman set would exhibit more balance than the average pundit panel on the BBC.

  • @keithwilson1554
    @keithwilson1554 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Transition Argument is 30 Years Old. It's time to build only Renewables. The technology was available in the 90's and has improved greatly to the point it is cheaper than Gas and Coal. It should be treated like a War budget and have 5 Years of huge production and integration of Renewable Energy. Time is Up for Fossil Polluting fuels.

  • @TheRealSlimSteve
    @TheRealSlimSteve ปีที่แล้ว

    300 million barrels total output for that environmental cost? At 100 millions barrels per day global usage, that is 3 days supply. That is what we are fucking ourselves over. You couldn't make it up.

  • @neilhenderson3710
    @neilhenderson3710 ปีที่แล้ว

    Since 1969 and the start of North Sea oil and gas, the UK has had 50+ YEARS to build a secure energy structure by creating a "sovereign wealth fund", which would have helped our transition to a greener energy environment. Sadly, nobody seems to be talking about the one thing that would make UK energy policy secure - wave, tidal and hydro power.

  • @Rickflairetyty
    @Rickflairetyty ปีที่แล้ว

    How did you get to Finland Rivika? I'm sure you didn't walk there... the jet you flew on requires fuel. You lefties are nuts

  • @JJDoole
    @JJDoole 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That’s Siobhan “anti-capitalism is antisemitism” McDonagh! Ridiculous individual.

  • @sugarloafoutdoors7601
    @sugarloafoutdoors7601 ปีที่แล้ว

    Realistically, prices won’t come down either as it is set in global pricing. I remember not long ago the government told us that the Ukrainian/Russian war would not affect our energy prices as we use very little Russian gas. What happened?? Everyone’s fuel bills went up extortionately. I installed solar and battery storage at the beginning of the year. My monthly cost when from around £100 - £150 per month to around £5 per month.

  • @alberthawkins1240
    @alberthawkins1240 ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely awful. This is just a sop to big business. Note the labour representative's lack of opposition. Vote green.

  • @f1remandg
    @f1remandg ปีที่แล้ว

    Rivkah makes a good if not a panicky point, I agree entirely with her and it’s a global situation, we are still at the point of, Everyman/ person for themselves, we don’t know where it will happen first and if it happens in Europe or Africa, India, South America, America, Canada, Russia god forbid! Iceland, the Nordic area, Australia, Asia, we all then start to help, because that’s what happens, how about we pool proportional wealth and potential! It’s a planet that we all live on, no one has more rights than anyone else! Discuss!!!! I’m 73 it’s your life.

  • @mercomania
    @mercomania ปีที่แล้ว

    hat a surprise Labour MP agreeing with and using exactly same language as a Tory MP. Two cheeks of the same @rse.

  • @1flinns
    @1flinns ปีที่แล้ว

    Net zero impossible with current economic mindset. Oh and don't mix words like 1.5 temperature rise. Say it as it is, There endangering all are childrens futures.