Not only that, but also that in genesis 3;17-19 God tells adam that: Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil (FARMING) you will eat food from it all the days of your life. 18 It will produce thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the plants of the field. 19 By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground,
@@dougwood6387 : Farming began about 9,500 BC and humans have been around for 100-250 thousand years. And who do those experts think they are? Experts?
One question that has never been answered (to my knowledge). IF we came from apes, how come they stayed as they are and we evolved so? It makes no sense.
According to evolution: Humans didn't evolve from modern apes. But, humans do share a common ancestor with modern apes. Scientists believe this common ancestor existed 5 to 8 million years ago. The reason apes are still around is because evolution doesn't require the elimination of previous stages, and ancestral animals continue to evolve in there environments (like chimpanzees). For example, current wolves and fish are different from those that existed in the past. Hope that helps.
@@JimTwerellexactly. It's like how there are different ethnicities. If Asians and Caucasians both came from Adam, why are there still Asians? One population spreads over a large region, and those in one part of the region (lets say europe) adapt to the conditions there (lets say evolving into people), while those in another part of the region evolve differently (i.e. evolving into the other types of apes we have today). Same story with wolves, coyotes, dingos, dogs, etc. This misunderstanding comes from creationists misrepresenting the views of evolutionists, either intentionally or because they don't fully understand the theory. You have to listen to people who believe in evolution if you want to know what they actually believe.
Evolution as Darwin explains it simply didn't happen. There has never been a transitional fossil discovered in any species. All the old homo Erectus and lucy skeletons they are claiming are of the homo genus are not. They are just guessing with no dna
According to my calculations, to go from 70 people to 2,700,000 people in 480 years, the growth rate is only 2.22%. If you go with 215 years, the growth rate still only goes up to 5.03%. To go from 6 people to 7,000,000,000 in 4,500 years, I calculated a growth rate of .465%, off just slightly from the .464% in the video.
@@logicalatheist1065 Akshualley ree taard- it's still called the theory of evolution, not the law of evolution for a reason, maybe you should check that out before you come and spew your bullshit.
@@logicalatheist1065 Of course evolution is a scientific fact. God thought of it and designed man with the ability to change slightly under prolonged environmental conditions, what you call "evolve". If you don't believe me, then just force yourself to read Genesis chapter 18, where it writes about the "curse" that God placed upon all living things. Such as the appearance of thorns on some plants. The changes that occurred in child birth for the women, etc. If you know anything about genetics then you know that these are all GENETIC changes--or in other words: "evolution". So please don't continue to spew your ignorance about who created "evolution" because the Bible documented it thousands of years ago.
Peoples around the World named the Constellations by the same meanings. This is supportive evidence that the Constellations were named before the confusion of languages.
Just watching news and some idiot scientists claim a planet billions of miles away seems to have a bit of oxygen and hydrogen - and be a possible future home! They get massive salaries for such fairy tales!
The mazzaroth. Mentioned in the book of Job, the oldest book in the Bible. The constellations were already named then. The constellations originally told the story of Christ.
@@TempleoftheSon Job 38:22 also tells how in a few years time vast numbers of people will die from giant hailstones: 22 Hast thou entered into the treasures of the snow? or hast thou seen the treasures of the hail, 23 Which I have reserved against the time of trouble, against the day of battle and war?
@@TempleoftheSon GOD put the stars in the sky just to look pretty. In Creation and until The Flood there was no need to know seasons for planting as all Earth had a nice warm moist climate perfect for natural abundant plant growth to feed all creatures and humans. Try read and understand GENESIS.
@@TempleoftheSon Yes I heard somewhere that a tradition supposedly was that Adam told his descendants of Yehovah's plan of History by the Stars of Constellations. Beginning with the name of the brightest Star in a given Constellation which has meaning in it's name and then to the next Star in order of magnitude and so on. Many Star names have been lost and forgotten I suppose.
As a kid going to church and learning about God, Adam & Eve, Noah and all the other biblical stories, then going to school and learning about evolution, I "knew" someting wasn't right concerning the age of the earth and us people. I believed evolution was wrong because I tried adding up all the ages of the people in the bible and comparing it to evolutionary numbers. Their math was way off but I couldn't prove it. Thank you for your research and video. Very informative and professionally presented.
You believed evolution was wrong but accept an archaic book written by dessert dwelling goat herding ignorant primitives thousands of years ago as truth? You should have payed more attention in school and what the scientist have to say about evolution. Or in the case of the age of earth geologists have said.
@@TwistedElbow24 what sort of dessert did they live in Banana cream pie ? Tell me it was I love Banana cream pie 😂 sorry couldn't resist ,I am on your side on this
What seems should be correct, is in fact, what you said, that is, man "became" a living soul. And it stands to reason that as we become older, we also become wiser and with that we see and understand the value of the living soul and the sanctity of mind, God and life in a purer un adalterated way. There happens to be some word play in which the bible illustrates its intentions from the beginning, but does a good job through out explainig its purposes and propositions as to the reasoning why by unfolding its mysteries to the open eye and ear. Like the Blues Brothers said ,very simply put, Im A Soul Man.
@@lancecarter100 yes, the part of our personal trinity called the soul, is the part that God put within us all so he could 'commune' with us. That still small voice he uses to guide us thru life. The Spirit and Body are also there, which serve other purposes
Noah was from Atlantis before it sank abd the floods came ... Noah couldn’t predict when a storm would arrive , but could predict when his island would sink..
Allison Cicero that is not so. People died at an early age. As we get older we get sicker.....hence more people getting sick. We are also getting better at diagnosing disease. If Cicero is your name....look up the Roman Orator Cicero. The flu is evolving...Evolution
It's a human thing, we try and use what we can to support our worldview. I can understand it, despite being a Christian I had been taught, and believed evolution. I now understand that evolution is true if you accept it as change over time as in dog breeds or bacteria but I also understand that it is impossible for anything to change into anything which isn't in its genetic material. Mutations do not provide that. The funny thing is that if an example of Darwinian evolution was found it would not disprove God. If God wanted to write into a cow's genetic code that it should turn into a whale at a certain time or in certain conditions then He could do so, just as easily as he wrote the code that makes a caterpillar turn into a butterfly.
No. Science isn't used to dis-prove God and there is no evidence of any kind that it is. Science constantly challenges theories, laws, and hypotheses. No matter the challenges to accepted theories and laws, making the leap to the supernatural has zero evidence or scientific merit. There is nothing to test so there is no factual information to support your claim. You can believe whatever you like but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
@@lrvogt1257 The word science comes from the Greek word for knowledge, so yes, human knowledge is growing with time. Though humanity is easily kept in the dark. The Romans invented benefit payments. They understood that if you kept a population fed and entertained they would not cause trouble, be easy to control. They provided chariot racing and gladiator sports. We do the same today with TV and movies. I know it is a waste of time quoting the Bible to someone who doesn't believe the Bible but if you read 1 Corinthians chapter 2. Verses 9 to 16 it will explain why you see no evidence. You can search it on line if you have no Bible.
@@jt2097 : Well, you're right not to quote the Bible as it's circular reasoning to say that the Bible proves that the Bible is true. We can only know what is factual with the scientific method. There is no possible test for the supernatural. Anything is possibly true but the supernatural is so lacking in evidence and therefore so unlikely that it should not be assumed to be true until someone can actually verify it. It certainly will not provide any useful factual information from which we can learn anything about the natural world so it's not a scientific study.
@@lrvogt1257 Do you believe in the Oort cloud? Because without it's existence it would indicate that the Solar system is less than 10,000 years old. If you do believe it exists I'd like you to provide scientific proof of its existence.
at 11:43 he omits mentioning that the more recent large growth was due to changes in technology and food production, nothing to do with people's reproductive rates. Before that the population was limited by food. In the industrial age the ability to transport and deliver food (e.g. by trains) changed the world. In addition to farming methods, including machine-pumped irrigation and chemical fertilizrs.
If you look at it like 90 years old at death instead of 900 He was in his prime through his 60’s or 600’s so Eve was still fertile at 45 or at 450 years.
If Adam and Eve are mother and father to all people then all people are related. Incest has been happening from the beginning. The incest between close family members is taboo. All other incestuous relationships are not,
one more thing. The old world had no idea that North and South America existed. Why is it then that Native Americans, Mexicans and others from South America have no record of the whole world flooding ?
1. The most common date given for the flood is 4400 years ago, right in the middle of the Egyptians first burst of city and temple building, why did they not notice they were under water? 2. To flood the planet to over top the highest mountain you would need about 3 to 4 times the known amount of water in the world, where did all that water come from? 3. After the flood, where did the water go? 4. How did 8 people build a wooden ship bigger than any wooden ship built in modern times when THAT ship was reinforced with steel bracing and still broke up and sank. 5. How did animals with odd diets get to the ark? 6. How did 8 people deal with the needs of 10000 animals on the ark? Each animal had to be fed, watered, exercised and the poop scooped. Working 12 hours a day they would need to deal with over 100 animals per hour. 7. How did the animals get back to the four corners of the world when all plant life had been killed off by the flood? 8. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood. 9. Well according to the Book of Jasher, the wives ARE sisters. Jasher 5: 32-35 "And thou shalt choose for thy sons three maidens, from the daughters of men, and they shall be wives to thy sons. And Noah rose up, and he made the ark, in the place where God had commanded him, and Noah did as God had ordered him. In his five hundred and ninety-fifth year Noah commenced to make the ark, and he made the ark in five years, as the Lord had commanded. Then Noah took the three daughters of Eliakim, son of Methuselah, for wives for his sons, as the Lord had commanded Noah." If a species undergoes a population bottleneck, the lack of genetic diversity can be seen in the members of that species. NO such bottle neck exists in the overwhelming majority of species. 10. 4400 years is not a long enough time to generate the diversity in the human population to give rise to the different populations of people we see on the planet especially when you consider that effectively the genetic diversity was limited to 4 people, Noah and his wife and Eliakim and his wife. 11. Ken Ham's phony Ark has a million Dollar + heating, ventilation and air conditioning system that ensures that workers and visitors do not suffocate in the building. According to the bible, the original Ark had one window, 18 in square. Sorry people but if Ham's estimate of 1600 species represented by a minimum of 4000 animals, they would have suffocated.
Too many questions... You left out the part about how they all survived the 1000ATM of pressure and superheated atmosphere that would result from the fluid mechanics and thermodynamics of such an event.
Our problem is that we are thinking this too scientifically.. The biblical story might be fictional but it's a reality to certain people..if they can converge their realty to others realty.. the whole story is a reality to everyone.. Now the choice is ours...Blindly follow their realty or you think and experience to find the ultimate realty.
@@j_unofficial789 I was being sarcastic with the "too many questions". It is the ridiculousness of believing such a story as fact (I know a few of them personally) that makes me wonder if those people can actually tie their own shoes. lol
@@jknengr796 One thing I hate is people get stuck on one book like Bible ,Quran , Torah etc.. If they go through all the books plus some scientific knowledge...The world would be something else spiritual and magical!
@clifton gaither None of them can provide any form of evidence. Just wild arse claims and baseless assertions with no substance. There only go to card they have is " because I feel that he exists", which is not proof.
We should also note in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve there still exists the original genetic chart (called Simplified Human mitochondrial phylogeny) showing that haplogroups M and N are not necessarily descended from L. This is because all human mtDNA is descended from one of the three daughters-in-law of Noah. Notice the Scholar's Union had to revise the expanded chart to look like out-of-Africa.
Out-of-Africa. You can not use today's map to talk about mankind during the last Ice age. There was NO water between Africa and the Middle East this was one land mass.
Before I advance some questions let me establish my credentials: I am an evolutionary biologist with 5 university degrees and 30 years experience re field work and research in my field. I also have a fellowship in cancer research ( BeV-1 viral destruction of osteosarcomas ). My focus has been upon evolution of whales from land mammals and statistical evaluation bearing upon the evolution of the saber-cat, Smilodon fatalis. My findings are well received in the USA and Europe. I have furnished museums with 35 new whale species not previously known to science. Though not focused on human evolution, I know something about it and human genetics. Questions: Inbreeding is not accounted for in the presentation given here. Inbreeding occurs when a pair of related parents pass genetic errors on to their offspring. For example sickle cell anemia. If parents are heterogeneous for this gene which effects blood component formation, off spring may remain sickly or have no symptoms at all while retaining an immunity to malaria. But if both parents are homogeneous for the sickle cell gene, their offspring will die. If a few people interbred for very long and they represented the human population, all would die very soon. Another question: Is the flood a legend perhaps given religious status when in fact it was an extensive regional event such as the Black Sea Flood that encompassed parts of Asia and Europe 8,000 years ago ? One thing is certain. No evidence for a global flood exists and it has been searched for 100 years. Furthermore, the Noah legend is based upon four previous tales, the one just prior to the Noah account being "The Epic of Gilgamesh." The initial story features many gods. Noah's tale features one. Another fact: Man evolved from ape like Australopithicines in Ethiopia, East Africa.3.2 - million years ago. The first of these had ape-like skulls but human lower limbs. They could walk upright. Ape ( chimp & gorilla ) DNA compares favorably with that of humans 90% certainty.Humans possess between 2% and 4% Neanderthal ( caveman ) DNA in their DNA. Humans Also possess the basic skeletal structure that first appeared in fish and amphibians 400-million years ago and they possess the modified skulls of synapsid mammal - like reptiles that first appeared about 300-million years ago During the Permian Period when all continents joined as one due to continental drift ( Pangaea.). All mammals do. Additional comment: Genesis 1 and 2 relate different accounts of creation specifically directed at the origin of the Jewish population. Yom in Hebrew does not have to mean a 24 hour day. It could mean millions of years, an indefinite period of time. Only in the Hebrew Commentaries will a reader discover that Adam had one wife followed by Eve. MitoDNA is very likely the result of a combination of previously isolated cells ( symbiosis ) as Mito and nuclear DNA differ. .
@@krakoosh1 And the title of this video is? First off. The Bible, save for some valid archeological information, scattered history like the original Hebrews were the Sahir', and a wonderful philosophy pertaining to how others should be treated that apparently died with Jesus, is a collection of fairy tales. Though they are between the same covers, the Old differs substantially from the New. All religions are created by different cultures. They do not represent reality. No where on earth is there evidence for a global flood and anyone familiar with genetics knows that whole sale incest would destroy a population. And what of the animal life aboard the ark ? Incest would destroy them too. Anyone that says differently is twisting scientific fact to sell books and DVDs to uneducated folks.
No proof of evolution, evidence is the opposite: 1) Cambrian explosion: All body plans appear at same time, early in Cambrian explosion. Eyes and other complex features all appear at once in Cambrian explosion. Fossil record is firm. 2) Avalon explosion single cells to complex life all at once. Fossil record is firm. 3) Lack of transitional fossils for most of life forms. Animals appear remain unchanged and most go extinct. The past predictions that new fossils finds would fill in the gap in the transitional fossils as not come true. There are “missing links” for most species. 4) Living fossils: Horseshoe crab, Nautilidae, Australian lungfish, nurse shark and many more. Animals appear, remain unchanged for long time spans. 5) Convergent evolution: Many complex features appear in unrelated animals and plants, too many to be evolution. Look at Chameleon and Sand Lance fish, same eyes (independent eye movements and special focusing lenses) and a darting tongue. The list is very long of convergent evolution, too long. 6) 6) Studies have shown mutations are only beneficial for species that have a very large population size, like bacteria. For all other animals mutations drives the species towards extinction. So mutations do not produce new and complex features, like eyes. When animals are stressed and have a small population size, we protect then, as they do not change. Mutations occur when DNA is damaged and left unrepaired. The ratio of negative to beneficial mutations in anything larger than an ant is harmful to the life form. 7) Natural selection can change an animal’s color and other small changes, but has been shown to have limits. Also, it has been shown that once the pressure that forces the change is gone, the animal will go back to its original state, changes are not permanent! Finch beak evolution, shown as proof, always fails to note the finch does not keep the large beak. As the food that forced the large beak is gone, the beak returns to its original size. 8) Origins of life: There was no primordial soup. There was no time for natural origins, as soon as the Earth cooled there was life. The first life forms were not “simple” as predicted. Cyanobacterium is very complex. There was not one simple early life form, there was a complete ecosystem with sulfate-reducing microorganisms also shows up early in the record, also a very complex life form. 9) Some clades are very diverse and some unusually sparse, evolution should work everywhere the same. 10) The recovery after mass extinctions is very quick, too quick for evolution. Permian-triassic Extinction: 90 percent to 95 extinction rate. Yet, life recovered in just thousands of years. Triassic-jurassic Extinction: Triassic dinosaurs gone and in just thousands of years all new Jurassic dinosaurs. Cretaceous-tertiary Extinction: Mass extinction, all dinosaurs are gone, as is most life forms, yet there are all new life forms in just thousands of years. 11) Breeding for dogs and horses for thousands of years. Change comes at a heavy cost, shorter life span and poor health. 12) DNA testing of close animals has shown they are not related. The two river dolphins and ocean dolphins are not related. The two panda bears are not related and the list can go on and on. 13) The proof of evolution is mostly: Animal A looks like animal B, so animal B must have come from animal A, how childish if you can not show how it happened. 14) Common Ancestry problem. Animals that have a recent common ancestor are too different. A donkey is very close in ancestry to the horse and zebra. So close that they may breed producing mules and zonkeys. Yet the donkey, horse and zebra are very different, too different. The donkey is very cautious and departs from danger, they can not be used in a battle. The horse willingly will go into battle, some like the danger. The Donkey and the horse are easily tamed and once tame will remain tame. Zebra are difficult to tame and difficult to remain tame. Other sample of this problem can be found in nature. 15) “Evolution Junk”, those that only believe in evolution have put on blinders and have made gross errors in the past about designs in nature. The theory is evolution is a series of random mutations, thus residual vestige of random mutations will be found in nature. In this thinking many scientists overlooked designs in life. Only later to be shown that what they called junk, was in fact a good design. Examples of this are many: Tonsils, Appendix, Panda's thumb, Whale hips (still taught as vestige, but this is wrong), Junk DNA, Humpback Whales fins, and more. There are neutral mutations, like some humans have three or one kidney, but these are not residual vestige or a case for design as they are rare. 16) Human exceptionalism: Charles Darwin wrote and many scientists followed this thinking: Animals that most look like us will most closely match our cognitive capabilities. After study and research, the animals that has the closest cognitive capabilities to humans are crows, ravens and New Caledonian Crow. The New Caledonian Crow can: Make fish hooks, teach others how to make fish hooks. Crows and ravens (same family) are the only animals to be able to solve multi step problems and make tools to solve these problems. MRI scans have shown crow and raven brains are the closest brain to humans. Yet Human exceptionalism has shown are not just a higher animal. Humans different much from animals. Humans are the only one to be active in: art, musical, jewelry, use symbolism, active religion, written languages, mathematics, have moral dilemmas and much more. Many of these appeared as soon as humans appear. Neanderthal has few of these abilities and is too different from Humans. Near the end Neanderthals lived at the same time as Humans. Neanderthals had no tear ducts, very large sinuses, large barrel shaped chest, short arms, heavy bones, different braincase, different ear bones, and more. There is no “missing link” to humans from bipedal primates. The large brain evolution hypothesis has been falsified after the discovery of early hominin with larger brains than later hominin fossils.
7:30 He says, “The earth was divided sometime in the life of Peleg [because Peleg means “divided” and in “his days the earth was divided”] So how did his parents know to name him that? Were they predicting that the earth was soon to be “Peleg-ed?” I believe those that argue Eber was the father of “Hebrew” language and Peleg was named “divided” because the division happened around the time of his birth. This is just common sense. It’s worth noting here that Dr Carter is a staunch traditionalist with regards to his adherence to the Masoretic timeline and there are all kinds of problems that result from this approach. Smart dude. I just wish he’d open his mind a little bit. God bless.
Though the biblical genealogies offer little help in establishing Adam’s creation date, three other biblical clues do. First, Genesis 10:25 states that the world was divided in the time of Peleg. Given the context of God scattering humanity over the whole face of Earth, this statement probably refers to the time when the Bering land bridge became the Bering Strait. Reliable carbon-14 dating places this event at 11,000 years ago. This date implies that the worldwide scattering of humanity must have predated 9000 BC and that Noah’s flood must have occurred before 9000 BC. The creation of Adam would have occurred much earlier yet.
We have a wonderful tool at our disposal that not many use. I have an audio Bible and play it in my house 24/7. I can hear the whole New Testament in a day. 7 times in a week. I have the words of Jesus and the Apostles. I really don't need anything else but there is a lot of interesting information that strengthens my faith.
Eve being created must have been something like mitosis, amazing to see. It's things like that that make me so jealous of the angels that got to watch the Lord create the universe, the earth, Adam/Eve, the animals, the plants, everything. What a sight that would be, freezing the water leftover from the flood would have been amazing to see as well.
Great video, great discussion. Thanks Dr. carter for taking time explaining things like this. It’s one of the most detailed explanation on genetics and origins of man in sync with the bible. 👍🏻
Or they have come to terms with their own mortality. These monotheistic religions push the notion of an afterlife to appeal to our genetically wired desire not to die. Your fear of death is driving you to believe this bullshit. Come to terms with it, embrace the fragility and fleeting nature of life. You will be a lot happier.
@@mickhealy572 "evolution has been proved true beyond doubt" As an agent of change, correct. As the origin of life, incorrect. No one cares that Evolution is true in so far as it explains how some life has changed over a period of time.
@@mickhealy572 My point is rather obvious, Evolution doesn't propose an explanation for the origin of life and so is irrelevant in the discussion. What's funny, in an ironic way, is that you say "I never claimed it was the origin of life" which may very well be true, but many could make a case against you being truthful given the way you interjected with your first inkstain comment to Mattman. However, you then go on to ask me if I think that Evolution has any bearing on the debate between Creationism and Science, followed by an ad hominem. Interesting, and, there seems to be an inconsistency in your thinking... Since Creationism is an assertion about the origin of life (a Creator created everything), why do you think there is a conflict with Science? Unless, in your mind Evolution *does* provide a counter theory to the origin of life, why would you bring it up in a discussion about the origin of life? It seems obvious to me, in your followup comments to Mattman and me, you somehow think Creationism is false, yet you have no proof that your position is true. Evolution is certainly not the proof you are in need of.
We are lead to believe that we couldn't travel around to other continents until much later in human history, but Noah had a boat, as if his 3 sons had forgotten the craft.
Adam was almost 1000 years when he died, but that's from the time of expulsion from the Garden, he was in the Garden for thousands of years, but his age and time starts when he sins
@@DanielBrownsan i'm a physicist, 2d animator, 3d animator, writer and music composer with an advanced diploma in software engineering. whats your point?
Neanderthals are bi-pedal primate animals. Neanderthals are too different from Humans. Neanderthals lived at the same time as Humans. Neanderthals had no tear ducts, very large sinuses, large barrel shaped chest, short arms, heavy bones, different braincase, different ear bones, and more. There is no “missing link” to humans from bipedal primates. The large brain evolution hypothesis has been falsified after the discovery of early hominin with larger brains than later hominin fossils.
@@DONNALANDS they built the great pyramids around the world that Whites cannot comprehend the complexity of how! Even in South America, with the remnants of the Olmecs, your ignorance amuses me. I wonder who taught Europeans how to properly bathe and wash? The isles of Corsica and Sardis, small islands in the Mediterranean, has placed a reminder on their flags!
@@reyandy4851 Let me get this straight...Blacks meet smarter men of North Africa which were white because the Berbers prove that....They intermingle with the Berbers and the Jews and the pyramids get built. Rest of Africa doesn't build diddly squat...ever and never. No great buildings, no boats, no great water ways, no great sewers, and nothing more than grass huts. Africa has no historical poets, no great artists and and no nobel prize winners. Please tell me how great Africans are other than brainwashing dumbass tribal members? You're lost in your mind. Blacks have the lowest IQ's in the world and their brains are smaller. Africa is a shuck and jive continent of feeble-minded idiots. They are so dumb and pathetic that they can't even cultivate their own focking food even to this day. Only one country did anything and that was Egypt. Nothing of greatness has been done for 3500 years. The Pharoah's were a mixed race.
God is the creator of the universe and what it contains. We are descents of Adam and eve whether some people reject or nor. The truth never is that we are children of Adam and eve.
Why is it that when arguing evolution no one considers the the fact that TWO LIFE FORMS had to evolve simultaneously, a male and a female of the species. Calculate that!
Hi. I'm open to persuasion either way but if not evolution how was life created? Am I to believe,as this documentary says. God mad man from dust. I'm not even going down the road of which god. There are many many myths on creation. How do you know you have chosen the correct one. Are you advocating magic? Calculate that's
@@dacman53265 well contemplate this.......is man made of "dust"? Is the "order" of the bibles explanation of creation correct? I've started salt water aquariums and I see a direct correlation. A simple explaination for people at that time but accurate non the less. If you want to dismiss the simple explanation of the incredible complexity of the origins of life that the bible recounts, go ahead. I can completely understand. However, I am able to conceive of life forms that are different/superior to ours, things seen and unseen. Most people believe in some form of this. The concept of a designer/creater/architect is completely acceptable to me, even reasonable as nothing worthwhile has ever happened accidentally, hence the word "accident". Not a very good word to describe something as incomprehensibly complicated as life. Can I explain /understand every detail? No. But I do know this, male and female mammals are different creatures and it takes one of each to "procreate" life, as we know it. The possibility of these two life forms "evolving" together over millions or billions of yrs is incalculable. Not enough 0s in the knowen or unknown universe.
Keri Williams Hi. It's ok to say everything you see has to be designed. You can look at buildings, paintings,cars etc. You can trace these back to the designer and the manufacturer. It's a big leap to be able to do that with creation. You must have heard the saying extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. You can't just say because I don't believe evolution ,it makes more sense that a god did it. That's called the god of the gaps. If the sun wasn't the perfect distance away from the earth and the moon wasn't in the perfect position to the earth we wouldn't exist doesn't mean it's not possible that it just happened bearing in mind there are trillions upon trillions of planets and stars ✨. That to me is more possible than a supernatural being had control and made it the way it is. Keri, are you also a young earther? You say that nothing happens on its own but you are accepting a god producing everything from nothing.
You forgot to mention that this was also a much larger earth then, being were also much larger and lived with dinosaurs. They also lived longer (the longest was i think 969 years) which means they populated much faster, they also lived on pangaia which was all one continent and easy to populate.
@BMore so the bible is the bar that science has to reach. The bible is full of stories. Science deals with facts not your feelings. Use science to prove fairies dont exist then?
Evolutionary biology and materialism are two different things. One needs to be in denial to deny evolution, which has been observed, and is therefore an indisputable fact, just like 'the Earth is not flat' is an indisputable fact.
@@doctorwebman I am trying to figure out if some people try to be misleading intentionally, or just out of ignorance... Evolution, as an agent of change, is indeed proven. Evolution, as an explanation for the origin of life, is NOT proven. Good day and God bless!
@@michaelwill7811 Evolution is not a theory about the origin of life, nor is it meant to be. It is only meant to explain the origin of the diversity of species. Evolution has been observed in controlled and uncontrolled conditions in the lab and field, including speciation, and is therefore a fact.
@@doctorwebman And yet many non-believers trot it out on a regular basis as the "Christianity-busting" proof that us Christians are wrong. I apologize if they don't understand what Evolution is, really, I do...
There is a not so different similarity With digital code and genetic code. A word in digital code is either 0000 or 1111 or any combination possible with just 1 or 0. This called a word in hex coding. With RNA or DNA it is A, T, C and G.. I think the math for this is 256-4 possible combinations for each word. If my math is right then there cannot be a zero in the DNA code. Kinda points to someone wrote the code to generate life.
The mutations leading to extinction would be something interesting to show for many of these “living fossils” such as the coelacanth, dragon flies, horseshoe crabs, etc to show a young earth.
At minute 20 he asks says the model would be flatter if the wives of Noah's sons were sisters. Well according to the Book of Jasher, the wives ARE sisters. Jasher 5: 32-35 "And thou shalt choose for thy sons three maidens, from the daughters of men, and they shall be wives to thy sons. And Noah rose up, and he made the ark, in the place where God had commanded him, and Noah did as God had ordered him. In his five hundred and ninety-fifth year Noah commenced to make the ark, and he made the ark in five years, as the Lord had commanded. Then Noah took the three daughters of Eliakim, son of Methuselah, for wives for his sons, as the Lord had commanded Noah."
All humans have mtDNA from one of three haplogroups, conveniently coded L,M,N. This is because all humans have mtDNA from one of the three daughters-in-law of Noah. They were certainly not sisters.
@@darryl5372 Because a book that rhymes with Dasher is what the nose code was all about. If you count the number of times the word "taketh" is said to have been followed by "thou" in the odd verses of even origin, ignoring when shalt has been written upon this page. The amazing part is wish upon a star can be typed out using three hands. See how obvious it is?
@@Mdebacle One of the daughters of Eliakim must have been descended from one of the Nephilim in order for the SEED-DNA of Satan to be carried through the millennia if we are to believe Genesis 3:16. And personally I do believe it! As that woman is the nominal mother of approximately 33% of the human population and she followed Ham into Africa and then her descendants were taken as slaves to the East and the West where the SEED-DNA was passed on - Meghan Markle's hatred of DONALD may be because she carries that satanic SEED-DNA? Ilhan Omar is as demonic as can be and also carries the satanic seed.
I hardly think that the sequencing of the human genome and the work put in by thousands of geneticists since 1990 can be honestly described as "a superficial study"! Quasi science to the fore in this production.
@@PJRayment I don't doubt it. Sounds like the sort of thing he'd look long and hard for. Denying scholarship is the mark of a conspiracy theorist, this old boy fits right in with the definition. So you think there is a possibility that genetics fit the Biblical account? Correct me if I am wrong, but did you not say you were a 'supernaturalist' and not a believer in 'naturalism'? Or I am confusing the issue?
@@peterleadley "I don't doubt it." In which case your original claim is shown to be baseless. "Sounds like the sort of thing he'd look long and hard for." Who? The host? "Denying scholarship is the mark of a conspiracy theorist, this old boy fits right in with the definition." What scholarship is he denying? And is it a case of denying scholarship, or rejecting the philosophical underpinning of the naturalistic view? "So you think there is a possibility that genetics fit the Biblical account?" Given that this video shows that it fits, then obviously yes. "Correct me if I am wrong, but did you not say you were a 'supernaturalist' and not a believer in 'naturalism'? Or I am confusing the issue?" You're confusing the issue. I believe that God exists, created the world, and created the laws of physics under which his creation operates. So it _operates_ according to natural laws, but had a supernatural origin. When a biblical creationist looks at the evidence, he can consider whether or not something came about naturally or supernaturally. A naturalistic view rejects supernatural explanations, and will consider only natural explanations.
🤺☦🇷🇺It's very easy job for you, western saтапs, to attack those Protestant heathens and Zionists, who twist and interpret the Bible like 4 year olds, and can't give the true answers for you, doesn't it? But you could never win against us, true Christians, Muslims and Jews. We appreciate all the genetical work and data, only not your funny evolutionist interpretation of the genetical data. Non of you wiseguys can win an argument against me - I will school your weak a$$ and humiliaтe you😼
That's very interesting... I'd like to see a response from some fanatic evolutionists and the discussion with Dr. Carter, that could be pretty interesting
There’s really no debating facts. He explained what evolutionist think happened. You cannot get around the truth. Shake it up, flip it around, and butt your head against a wall. God created what you see. That’s a fact. You may not like it. You would be just like me 20 years ago. I enjoyed sinning. I loved drinking, drugs, women, and all the rest. However, none of those things filled my soul. I was left empty. Boris Becker, famous German tennis player, won Wimbledon, and had fame and fortune. He reached the pinnacle of his profession. When he got there, he became despondent. He asked himself, “Is this it?” He almost committed suicide, because he felt like he had no other purpose. We all have a God shaped hole in us. It can only be filled by Him. You will never feel satisfied by what the world offers you. Denying truth doesn’t make it untrue.
It is almost always a waste of time trying to to debate or convince the die hard atheist/evolutionist . They insist you "prove" the Bible and creationism. Even though their theories have no basis in proof according to the principles and procedures of true scientific theory then models then discovery then proof, that sort of thing. You can present them with indisputable facts like the statistical impossibility of origin of life and principles of the laws of entropy but that does not matter to them. They will come up with "well such and such a person has a theory how this or that may have happened" all of which is of course just wild speculation. They try to impress and overwhelm you on how smart ,educated and how many degrees they have and when all else fails mock you and make jokes about you because they can't really give you an honest response that will work for their side. The bottom lines is they want to be their own "God's", and for them to admit that there is a creator would mean that they are accountable to Him. That is the one thing they will never do unless there is a true change in their hearts.
I was wondering how the structures at Gobekli Tepi fit into your chronology. These structures in Southern Turkey are dated as starting construction 12,000 years ago. This means there was active, organised human societies 10, 000 years BC. Please do let me know your thoughts.
@@frankwoodward9914 I know this of course Frank, but Im interested to know how young earth proponents support their 6,000 year old beliefs in the light of the overwhelming Göbekli Tepi evidence. It will be interesting to see if they reply. Why do you say carbon dateing does to work? Of course it does if it is done correctly.
Carbon dating is inaccurate due to the flood itself. The 12,000 uears is no longer a valuable time frame. Take it down by 6,000 and check your research to that time frame. You'll see that it is more valid.
There was an article in TIME magazine many, many years ago presenting genetic evidence that we all come from just a few ancestors. But the scientists, ignorant of the Scriptures, did not understand the consequences of what they were presenting. The Bible is tomorrow's newspaper today. I am a Ph.D mathematician with an NSF postdoc behind me. The odds against spontaneous self-organization are ineffable. The great logician Kurt Godel is reputed to have declared (to Hao Wang) "The formation within geologic times of a human body by the laws of physics (or any other laws of similiar nature) is as unlikely as the separation by chance of the atmosphere into its components" The Universal Generalization that the current experience presents us is that intelligent organization depends on an intelligent agent for its existence. All books have authors All computer programs have authors No computer boots itself Buildings, automobiles etc same thing The explanations given by modern biology are based on INVALID PATTERNS OF INFERENCE. For example, the biologist reasons in this manner Here is an egg and here is a golf ball. Therefore they have a common ancestor (homology fallacy).
Here is the phrase that makes me laugh more than anything. The atheist swears( to whom I wonder) that creation can't make any predictions... then you see a video like this. (:^D) The bible was making scientific predictions that are shown to be true today , long before science as we know it today was even a thing.
My great grandfather had 10 children,starting in about 1880 something,ending in 1904 when his last,my grandfather was born. My grandmother,also born in 1904,also came from a family of 10 children. I only have one daughter,but I have one aunt and one uncle that had no children,along with a couple cousins. But somewhere around 40-50 people ,came from my grandfather and grandmother. To make a long story short, that's like a 1900% increase in three generations! Now everybody knows there's a tradition of men having more than wife in the Middle East,that predates Islam by thousands of years. If someone were to calculate stuff like that...there's no telling what kind of crazy numbers you could come up with.
Yep, and people don't think about stuff like that. Take David,he had..I forget how many wives and concubines but it was hundreds upon hundreds. But the Bible names his children as who,Solomon. If you skip over the part where it gives the number of his wives and concubines you'd think Solomon was an only child, but that has to be improbable if not downright impossible, he was just the only one that mattered.
The book of genesis is from Abraham who decided there is only one god and got the stories from Sumer All the stories in genesis are from different religions beliefs from around the middle east and far east
Using science to disprove God’s existence is like using the existence of computer science to disprove the existence of computer engineers and programmers. Nonsense from atheists.
I don't know really what you were trying to say, no one would dispute the existence of computer science because there are mountions of evidence for its existence. There are exactly no lines of evidence of a person called Jesus Christ ever existed outside of the bible which is a problematic book at best Which contradicts it's self in virtually every book.
@@christopher22859 Oh... You should really study the oldest writings we have...the Chinese. Please study Shang De. Also there is another man called Josephus. 🤔🤔 Really should do more study before making nonsense statements. 😒
Josephus was a Jewish turncoat after being captured by the Romans. He never wrote about Jesus, although a proven plagiarized version was written in by the Catholic church. Really should do more studies before making nonsense statements
@@jthomas196 Are you seriously saying Josephus is proof of Jesus? Everyone knows those parts were added hundreds of years later - everyone except people who need to lie to each other in order to maintain their fantasy.
Science is a method for learning and study. It has numerous built in fail safes to remove the individual biases of the researchers. Science is based upon evidence which can be shown to be true. No one, ever, has been able to find any evidence at all to prove the reality of god, gods, or any of it. NOT. ONE. BIT. Y'all have had thousands of years to come up with something, but the best you have are people who like to lie, like the person who made this video. The fact of evolution is based upon huge amounts of provable evidence and experiments which can be repeated and which always get the same results. After nearly 200 years since Darwin first wrote about Natural Selection, the evidence for this has grown, and the evidence that contradicts it is, still, non-existent.
Dr. Robert Carter is a marine biologist. There is not enough genetic diversity between two people and then eight people to populate the human race because of the inbreeding problem.
@@justchilling704 under what authority did the people who authorized the books of the bible have? That's right, NONE, they were not commanded or inspired to make those decisions, fact.
@@justchilling704 the bible is composed of books that man chose to incorporate, not God. God never created a "book" containing all of his writings. Man took it upon himself to do so, and in doing so, they eliminated many books of God that they didnt agree with. That's anti christ
@@justchilling704 How could u possibly know whether it was inspired? Different churches around the world have always held different sets of books to be "The Bible". Who ate you to say which actually count and which don't? Just because of the specific set of books that YOU happen to have grown up with? You are but one person. With a personal preference, based on custom. "The Bible" (the one I've heard of) warns against customs.
Even if what is said is a load of rubbish, I still will trust God as He has given me His Spirit. Ultimately even if the whole world is wrong, God will be true, as His Spirit alone is truth.
How did 2 penguins waddle and swim all the way from the south pole to the middle east, ride a boat and then waddle and swim all the way back? What about kangaroos? How did they get from australia to the middle east and back? How did hawaii get repopulated? Japan? The rest of the remote islands? What about north and south america? Does not add up.
Someone posted a comment concerning "why", not on this matter but the responder in other words said his understanding , wisdom,, knowledge, God divinity is and will always be greater than ours. If we knew everything we would be equal to him but we're only human and everything is not for us to understand because he wants us to have faith in believe in him and his word and even concerning of the truth he said seek and you shall find.
"How did 2 penguins waddle and swim all the way from the south pole to the middle east...?" Nobody claims that they did. "What about kangaroos? How did they get from australia to the middle east..." Again, nobody claims that they did. If you want to critique an idea, it's best to actually understand it first.
According to Dr John Barnett, it was the fallen angels spirit possessing a man and mated with women. This created the giant races. Think 500 feet tall and taller. Angels are spirit beings and must inhabit a body, (become possessed) and have strength beyond anything we can even dream of. These spirits are also intelligent, far beyond even Einstein’s level, to the point of not being comparable. Super genius.
Sad he was talking genetics and population but completely left out the genesis 6 narrative. Those fallen angels mating with women really changed things.
What a fascinating video! Even if studies didn't appear to prove the Bible I would still trust Gods Word completely for I've had a supernatural experience while fasting, praying and reading it! I was not only Saved but also Sanctified by the Holy Ghost in a "Circumcision made without hands" by the Spirit using the Word, that is sharper than any two-edged sword, as a Holy scalpel to seperate my fallen, sinful flesh from my "quickened", reborn spirit so that He could always live within me as I live within Christ! Therefore it doesn't matter what mankinds foolish "wisdom" thinks is truth; I know Truth, for He lives within my heart.
He lives in all that will receive him. You see the starvation and the sickness and the poverty and what do you do about it? You show your hatred towards God by attacking his word you commit every sin which he warns you would lead you to hell. And then you take up a railing accusation against God, who made you. You are self righteous and pathetic. You’re probably in favor of abortion, which is murdering children. When’s the last time you’ve done anything for anyone other than yourself? Think about this I don’t know what’s coming for you on judgment day, but I’m guessing it’s going to be along these lines. They what measure you judge, and she’ll be judged under you. Go accuse GOD of all the starvation and suffering in the world, it is very easily proven that most of it is the result of mankind‘s disobedience to biblical principles on one hand and mankind’s willingness, and even enthusiasm to persecute his neighbor for small gaiins. The problem for Christendom over the last 150 years as we’ve been willing to suffer fools and grown ass children like yourself. You are at the point of open mockery. You have been wrong about everything and GOD mocks to your face but you’re too stupid to see it. You’re a kind will say that the world is overpopulated and we will be starving by the 90s and then in the 90s, and all the kids are obese. You cried about global cooling in the 70s but things warmed up and now you cry about global warming, but things cool down so now you call a climate change. You can’t even admit there’s two genders anymore because you’re a degenerate fool who has been turned over to delusion, and he chose your delusions to mock you before those who are willing to listen to the voice of God. Many will wake up because your foolishness will be exposed. I pray that both the science and the archaeology bring forth multitudes of examples against your foolish conjecture, and lies against your creator, who you hate because you are evil. And my prayers will be answered. You will die mocked and defeated. You will no longer even care about your own reputation or intellectual standing as you are perplexed with how badly your wife has gone and then behold, your old and frail frame broken and diseased, will tremble with thoughts of your coming damnation. Laugh now you shall week later. This is your time. enjoy every moment Hell Eternal is your portion, accept you repent. There is no counsel against the Lord. Our God is not mocked, but long-suffering, so that even a wretched fool, like you might come to repentance, but at the end, he is not mocked he will reap that what you sow either by his will to eternal life in the saving of your soul, or to your will which is contrary to your on welfare unto eternal damnation(prepared not for mankind, but for the angels who rebelled against him who is chattel you are in Adam, if you are not redeemed in Christ unto eternal life. The choice is yours ,I hope against hope that you would throw off your self hatred and turn to God while there is time. He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. Your spiritual condition is worse than any bigger or starving child among the heathen, and he died to save you, and feed you with the bread of life, if you only receive it.
@Christopher Tracy • I got ahold of a Septuagint and Josephus book of Genesis 11th chapter. You are right. I need prayer and encouragement because this is the Bible belt and I wanted to make this masoretic text come under the scrutiny we as Bible believers owe the word of God! We got enough light of Egyptian history to see that the KJV is out of sync with history.
It hasn't been but only the past 10years and more and more evidence that the book is more true than you ever think I thought it was all myths and fables before
There is nothing mythical about it, nor any fables within it either. In fact, it’s the real deal, replete with hidden messages that no other religious book contains.
Read Alexander waugh’s book God! Was a Christian all my life until I read the above! He explains every contradiction, every false shit and how inaccurate the whole of the bible is. An absolute page turner! I’m possible to argue against!
Robert Dunn can you flesh out your claims for me? I’m especially interested in ‘hidden messages’ if that helps you at all. As for ‘nothing mythical’ I suspect you have not the slightest knowledge of the countless legends and stories from other cultures and civilisations that predate the Bible and which can be found in an almost exact form within the Old Testament writings. I suspect you need to get out more.
Thank you Robert for a brilliant video of the evidence that the Bible is the true History of the World and the correct explanation for population genetics.
You she entity lifeforces have hijacked the word "truth" and try to make it mean whatever you want it to mean. And this includes she entity lifeforces currently existing in XY DNA bodies.
@@theresawilliams4296 - It's like one long-ass 3,000-year-long zombie movie... (with bad actors, a weak story-line, but a good marketing department - so it still makes money).
4 ปีที่แล้ว +1
So does love and hope. And faith in your intellect..
Hi Cornerstone TV, could you direct me to where Dr Robert Carter's papers are - the ones he referred to in this video? Its all very interesting. Big thanks.!
All of his organizations information is here: creation.com/ His bio and more are here: creation.com/dr-robert-carter Creation Ministries International If you want a more updated video with similar information you can check this one out too: th-cam.com/video/gqxB_7p1cIE/w-d-xo.html Thank you for watching
BEAUTIFUL channel! Thank you so much for all the work you've done to bring these truths to the layman. That's not even mentioning the actual work done to show the science behind the WORD OF GOD! Thank you, all of you involved, thank you! God bless you and your families! david
What an abysmal analogy. God is a failed hypothesis that adds nothing to the global body of knowledge we have seen and observed. It's just a fable from a time when we didn't know where the sun went at night.
Because God knows all and time does not affect him as he States I am the Alpha and Omega beggining And the end we are only human again and will never understand everything.
Can you prove that human lineage only began with two people? What coroborrating evidence do you have besides ancient mythology that you're claiming as fact without offering any shred of proof?
@@TheRynovision "Did you notice his degree is in marine biology yet he's lecturing us on anthropology and genetics? Priceless!" He has also done genetics research. Can you dispute his claims, or only question his integrity?
May God bless you all. You believed or not, it is your free will. You have the right to beieve or not. But my right i will pray for your good health and peace for all of us
@Adam Taylor Maybe you should read the Koran and the Hadiths and the Surrahs (the foundation books of Islam) before you pick Hebrew and Christian literature to criticize. If you find this tiny list out of thousands of pages challenging, try the Hadiths and Surrahs, you will be horrified. Starting with #1, the common translations have 70, not 50,000. And was this a true event or Hebrew allegory to get a point across? #2 In islam it is not appropriate for women to reveal skin or talk to a stranger male, therefore this old tribal rule is not surprising for ancient mankind. It was a different world back then, you are conflating modern values with ancient ones which is ridiculous. ? #3 and #4: Slavery was acceptable human practice for 6,000 years, nothing surprising to read. Pleasure palaces were not invented by the Romans. Did you not watch Game of Thrones? ;) #5: Yes adultery is moral sin. I would have to go back and research this part of the bible but are you sure this is not referring to not getting a formal divorce before cheating on your spouse? #6 Is this not referring to the famine blamed on the sinful nature of the community? Allegory or true event, not certain. #7 This had to do with eunuchs if i recall correctly. #8 You are conflating again ancient culture values with modern ones. #9 Yes lusting after other women instead of your own is akin to adultery, Jesus said it himself. All of us males are guilty of it but his point was important, sin begins with thought before action.
Joey Feliciano Nope. We have fact, proof, reality, evidence and common sense. All you have is irrational dark age superstition and gibberish. I suggest you grow and get an education.
@@inkblack6256 Nope, the 3 main components of evolution are, Mutation Natural selection and Imagination. Try to remove one and it will collapse!!!! The only thing that support evolution THEORY is theory, they add up pictures, animation, and old bones that no one knows what it look like, to make it sound real. But in reality, those who believe in their bullshit are gullible and lunatic. People like you who live in scifi fantasy don't realize that.
@@maxmac7845 Faith is the substance of all things hoped for. Meaning all men have faith. But what do you know of reason? Your belief system is based off what a group of people believe just as Ann Brown's is. You simply disagree. But don't get confused you don't have proof in your belief either.
@@alamotte2005 You're conflating faith with trust. They are two entirely separate things. Trust is real world evidence based and, well, they don't call it "blind faith" for nothing. I care about what is actually true. Do you?
Very late comer here, but when I first watched this on channel 40, though a deep biblical researcher myself, I definitely learned something. Robert Carter is a wonderful doctor and good Christian presenter. It would appear this is too conservative of an example though, since we are talking roughly 1500 years until the Flood and then 4, 500 years until the present time, and we have 7,000,000,000 people now after triple that time span...the population before the Flood in one third of that time could easily be estimated from 500 million to 2 billion for the population of the earth before this huge destruction.
Thanks - I was able to use this program as a painfully non-scientific approach to interpreting data in my lecture on scientific method versus nonsense (non-science)
Those that study and research have facts and truth. Try yours, the languge, Latin aka LADINOES, ROME, PORTUGLE, SPAIN. THOSE ARE CLUES TO SPAIN-ISH and HEBREW. When we talk about Hebrew to include the word LADINOES, is to refer only to the BLACK SPEAKING LADINOES, you could not be mixed and be called Ladino.
Very good question!! I've been tossing that around for awhile now, wondering if there are still distinctive behavioral traits that might be associated with it.
@SAP 23 Thank you for that very informative, long-winded explanation. It explains what Paul was going through at Romans 7:14-25, and what I, and probably most self-examining persons, have to be constantly reminded, the struggle that living in the flesh is in conflict with living in the spirit. I thank Jesus every day for helping me hold the line and "rescuing me from the body of death". Thank you again. You made sense.
"biblical account"? The "sons of God" that this passage tells about are not angels, but the descendants of Seth who served God. The "sons of man" were the Descendants of Cain who did not. Angels were created to be in God's service. They do not procreate, Jesus said. Math. 22 23:31
Taqifsha Nanen I agree - I’m just directly quoting what the “expert” in this video says. Sadly, he (and all others who believe this stuff literally) is basing his entire line of reasoning on this false assumption.
@Taqifsha Nanen What. There is one creation story. Genesis 1 speaks about the general creation of everything, including humans, and Genesis 2 focuses on the topic of humans. That is why there are "two stories of creation". Read some Bible before you will try to speak about it. In the Bible there is a lot of repetitions of everything, and that is done in order to ensure that people will notice and understand. However, you only prove that repeating yourself may seem for some, as two separate stories lol
If you want to know in detail what really happened, how Long it took to build the ark, Adam and Eve details, their daughter, other children, who beget whom, read Jubilees, Jasher, enoch has some enlightening details as well. Then there is not guessing of whom begat whom and when. Its in detail. You all need to realize that several books were canonized and taken out by the Catholic Church and they admit they did it because it scared the people and caused chaos. Some say 14 books were taken out, some say 18 some say 75. Nonetheless, we have the original Dead Sea scrolls which give us all the information we need in detail. It says in 2 Timothy 3:7 always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. Its like the movie Raiders of the lost Ark. They dont have the entire map and they are digging in the wrong place. Read those books and you will see what is truth. Its astonishing to say the least. Thats why it says in the Bible study NOT read but Study his word. Look up what the words meant in ancient languages, not our muted English language which does not have the same meanings. If in 1960s gay meant happy and today it means homesexual, dont you think that has happened 6000 years ago? There are so many Greek translations of the New Testament and meanings have changed. Check out the books taken out and enjoy the journey. JUST REMEMBER THE FIRST THING IN SCIENCE IS FROM NOTHING, NOTHING COMES. The only way we got a mermaid, half man half horse, is by doing what we are doing now, taking the DNA of man and animal and making other beings. We are taking the DNA of man and changing it. We are taking the DNA of plant GMO's and changing it. So shall be the days of Noah....they were doing the same thing as we are doing now. Dont be fooled there is no such thing as mythology. They are doing transhumance, transgender stuff now like they did back then. I saw what Japan is doing in a documentary among others creating all body parts for super humans. They said and I quote, we dont have to die now. In revelations it says man will want to die but cant. They just showed on the news what we are doing with babies in the test tubes creating perfect humans tampering again with the DNA of God. He said he knew us before the foundations of the Earth. He said we were perfectly made in his image. We changing our DNA man, plant, and animal seed like it says in Genesis, and we are doing now, we have made a mockery of God saying his handiwork is no good we as man can do a better job. A slap in his face thus came the deluge the first time and fire the second. Wake up America it's coming and we all have been warned. Solomon says history repeats itself there is nothing new under the sun.
@@PURPLE.REIGN.1999 Adam had many other sons and daughters" Genesis 5:4 (KJV) And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters: After Cain killed Abel, he married a sister and started building cities with his children: Genesis 4:17 (KJV) And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch. What we call "incest" was not an issue until numerous generations after Noah's Flood when human genetics had devolved to a point where marrying and pro-creation by close relatives produced deformities and mental issues. The first commandment against it appears in the Mosaic Law (about 3500 years ago): Leviticus 20:17 (KJV) And if a man shall take his sister, his father's daughter, or his mother's daughter, and see her nakedness, and she see his nakedness; it is a wicked thing; and they shall be cut off in the sight of their people: he hath uncovered his sister's nakedness; he shall bear his iniquity.
Your comments is imply a false statement. The books you refer to gained only sparse acceptance among ANY Christians and were (and are still) rejected for numerous reasons. For example, most of these books were penned by people who assumed false names and PRETENDED to be someone else. They were fraudulent. Secondly, most of them were obviously not penned by eyewitnesses. They were FORGERIES. If you want to be deceived, read the deception. But if you want to remain informed and follow TRUTH, read your King James Bible and the 66 Books found therein.
@@GregoryMiller that's hilarious, because not one of the books were written in English, and the original languages in which they were written have changed and morphed. For the accurate interpretation, you need to understand the historical contexts, the language used at the time each book was written, the customs and government at that time, and the audience for whom it was written.
@@PURPLE.REIGN.1999 Now, THAT is hilarious. You don't understand anything you just said everyone needs to understand. No one does. If there's one thing anyone who studies ancient languages DOES understand it is that much of those languages and MOST of the culture and customs of the day, as well as the actual function of government, is barely understood at all. Your god is dead. Mine has given us a Book that is sufficient for us to understand that Adam had children who married one another to begin the human race, etc. We know the truth. God's word is truth. And it's as true in English as it was in those ancient (dead) languages when people who actually understood them spoke and wrote them. You people who want to be blinded by your arrogance can go right ahead and walk into your self-dug ditches. The rest of us read our King James Bible and laugh at the scribes and pharisees who know to much to know anything,.
thomas bittner genetic mutations. Just like two black parents can have the possibility of having a white child and two white parents can have a darker child we are equal color or race doesn't matter
Genetics and DNA, Dr. Carter has other videos explaining this. If you started with middle brown people who had dominant and recessive genes in their mix, you would end up with todays population. Easy.
We must also consider the three daughters-in-law of Noah were not necessarily close relatives. Human mitochondrial DNA is descended from three haplogroups, conveniently coded L,M,N. It would be good if Dr. Carter emphasized this.
The Israelites were only in Egypt for 215 years, not 480, not 430, and not 400 years. But I still believe their increase from 70 to 2.5 million was attainable. The Egyptians even attested to their rapid growth
Semitic people are also African, Ham also African Japheth also African just slight variations. Israel is on the African continental plate. You can not get different races from the same parents just different shades or slightly different features. Actually Ethiopia was from north Egypt downwards. The aryans changed the look of some Africans. Med/Persian empire. We are all the same!
I'm seriously looking at the Reasons To Believe flood theory. That it was a regional flood, and modern people are reading the text wrong. In context, "the earth" can simply mean "all the ground around them" rather than the actual planet the way we read it with modern eyes. They wouldn't have known what a planet was anyway. So waters "covering the earth" doesn't require a global flood to be both literal and accurate.
WT Keeton Gen 7:19 (KJV) And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered. Yes it was a world wide flood.
How can you have a flood that covered the mountains (Ararat, which is in the region, is over 5000 metres high) and lasted a year, be contained to just that region? How do you know that they wouldn't have known what a planet was? Why build an ark and take on the bird as passengers if it was merely regional? Why not simply migrate?
@@wtk6069 I realised what you were referring to. But it's unbiblical. I pointed out the fallacy of a regional flood. Hugh Ross also believes in deep time, which contradicts the biblical account. His answers are not "compelling", but wrong.
@@PJRayment Basically, he believes the Earth is 4.5 billion years old, but the Garden of Eden existed relatively recently,, closer to Young Earther models. The one part that gets potentially sketchy isn't the age question but the related "days" question. He believes the Genesis days were ages or epochs. That's the part I'm not totally sold on, Still, it's good mental exercise to discuss these non-salvation issues.
Why is it that everbody says that farming was invented at a later date, when Cain was a farmer?
Notice the flat earth map
@@williamnordeste9653 what does this have to do with anything?
Not only that, but also that in genesis 3;17-19 God tells adam that:
Cursed is the ground because of you;
through painful toil (FARMING) you will eat food from it
all the days of your life.
18
It will produce thorns and thistles for you,
and you will eat the plants of the field.
19
By the sweat of your brow
you will eat your food
until you return to the ground,
@@emmanueldominguez2403 exactly, farming has been going on since the beginning. Try telling the expert archioligigist that.
@@dougwood6387 : Farming began about 9,500 BC and humans have been around for 100-250 thousand years. And who do those experts think they are? Experts?
One question that has never been answered (to my knowledge). IF we came from apes, how come they stayed as they are and we evolved so? It makes no sense.
According to evolution: Humans didn't evolve from modern apes. But, humans do share a common ancestor with modern apes. Scientists believe this common ancestor existed 5 to 8 million years ago. The reason apes are still around is because evolution doesn't require the elimination of previous stages, and ancestral animals continue to evolve in there environments (like chimpanzees). For example, current wolves and fish are different from those that existed in the past. Hope that helps.
@@JimTwerellexactly. It's like how there are different ethnicities. If Asians and Caucasians both came from Adam, why are there still Asians? One population spreads over a large region, and those in one part of the region (lets say europe) adapt to the conditions there (lets say evolving into people), while those in another part of the region evolve differently (i.e. evolving into the other types of apes we have today). Same story with wolves, coyotes, dingos, dogs, etc.
This misunderstanding comes from creationists misrepresenting the views of evolutionists, either intentionally or because they don't fully understand the theory. You have to listen to people who believe in evolution if you want to know what they actually believe.
Evolution as Darwin explains it simply didn't happen. There has never been a transitional fossil discovered in any species. All the old homo Erectus and lucy skeletons they are claiming are of the homo genus are not. They are just guessing with no dna
How many types of lizards are there? How many types chickens are there? How many types of spes are there?
Hahaha 😂😂😂😂
According to my calculations, to go from 70 people to 2,700,000 people in 480 years, the growth rate is only 2.22%. If you go with 215 years, the growth rate still only goes up to 5.03%. To go from 6 people to 7,000,000,000 in 4,500 years, I calculated a growth rate of .465%, off just slightly from the .464% in the video.
Really?
Thanks Spock.
How dare you give evidence.😂
Cool
Wish I had that kind of smarts.
Dorothy Ann ahh comment
Meanwhile Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson has been busy at work. Please look him up and also his book "Traced". Great stuff!!!
The evolutionists moved their genetic origin area to exactly where you showed it on the map in the last couple years. Amazing.
Evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life.
Evolution is the scientific fact that explains the diversity of life
@@logicalatheist1065 Akshualley ree taard- it's still called the theory of evolution, not the law of evolution for a reason, maybe you should check that out before you come and spew your bullshit.
@@logicalatheist1065 Evolution is a fairy-tale belief.
@@logicalatheist1065 Of course evolution is a scientific fact. God thought of it and designed man with the ability to change slightly under prolonged environmental conditions, what you call "evolve". If you don't believe me, then just force yourself to read Genesis chapter 18, where it writes about the "curse" that God placed upon all living things. Such as the appearance of thorns on some plants. The changes that occurred in child birth for the women, etc. If you know anything about genetics then you know that these are all GENETIC changes--or in other words: "evolution". So please don't continue to spew your ignorance about who created "evolution" because the Bible documented it thousands of years ago.
@@logicalatheist1065That would be know as adaptation.
Peoples around the World named the Constellations by the same meanings.
This is supportive evidence that the Constellations were named before the confusion of languages.
Just watching news and some idiot scientists claim a planet billions of miles away seems to have a bit of oxygen and hydrogen - and be a possible future home!
They get massive salaries for such fairy tales!
The mazzaroth. Mentioned in the book of Job, the oldest book in the Bible. The constellations were already named then. The constellations originally told the story of Christ.
@@TempleoftheSon Job 38:22 also tells how in a few years time vast numbers of people will die from giant hailstones:
22 Hast thou entered into the treasures of the snow? or hast thou seen the treasures of the hail,
23 Which I have reserved against the time of trouble, against the day of battle and war?
@@TempleoftheSon GOD put the stars in the sky just to look pretty.
In Creation and until The Flood there was no need to know seasons for planting as all Earth had a nice warm moist climate perfect for natural abundant plant growth to feed all creatures and humans.
Try read and understand GENESIS.
@@TempleoftheSon Yes I heard somewhere that a tradition supposedly was that Adam told his descendants of Yehovah's plan of History by the Stars of Constellations. Beginning with the name of the brightest Star in a given Constellation which has meaning in it's name and then to the next Star in order of magnitude and so on. Many Star names have been lost and forgotten I suppose.
It seems like Noah's son's picked the most diverse set of wives, all a different color to show that we're all equal. That's love.
As a kid going to church and learning about God, Adam & Eve, Noah and all the other biblical stories, then going to school and learning about evolution, I "knew" someting wasn't right concerning the age of the earth and us people.
I believed evolution was wrong because I tried adding up all the ages of the people in the bible and comparing it to evolutionary numbers. Their math was way off but I couldn't prove it. Thank you for your research and video. Very informative and professionally presented.
You believed evolution was wrong but accept an archaic book written by dessert dwelling goat herding ignorant primitives thousands of years ago as truth? You should have payed more attention in school and what the scientist have to say about evolution. Or in the case of the age of earth geologists have said.
@@TwistedElbow24 what sort of dessert did they live in Banana cream pie ? Tell me it was I love Banana cream pie 😂 sorry couldn't resist ,I am on your side on this
@@johnmudd6453 just don't tell them that if eve came from Adams rib, Eve would be a man genetically. Looks like God created Adam and Steve instead :)
Science always provides better answers than religion... That should have told you that your indoctrination was wrong.
If the Bible doesn't line up with science, the Bible is wrong
Right off the bat...
1. Man did not become a "living creature"...
He became a "Living Soul"
What's a soul eh...
What seems should be correct, is in fact, what you said, that is, man "became" a living soul. And it stands to reason that as we become older, we also become wiser and with that we see and understand the value of the living soul and the sanctity of mind, God and life in a purer un adalterated way.
There happens to be some word play in which the bible illustrates its intentions from the beginning, but does a good job through out explainig its purposes and propositions as to the reasoning why by unfolding its mysteries to the open eye and ear.
Like the Blues Brothers said ,very simply put, Im A Soul Man.
@@lancecarter100 yes, the part of our personal trinity called the soul, is the part that God put within us all so he could 'commune' with us. That still small voice he uses to guide us thru life.
The Spirit and Body are also there, which serve other purposes
And a dead soul is not a ghost.
@@gsgidney trinity is a pagan belief. Not from God.
The genetics don't lie my man, great work!
Noah was from Atlantis before it sank abd the floods came ...
Noah couldn’t predict when a storm would arrive , but could predict when his island would sink..
@@elizajayne2888That's a great idea for a story but since the bible doesn't mention any of that I'll just ignore it.
Correct. Genetics don't lie, people do.
The second segment seems to also provide an explanation of why so many people are getting sick.
Allison Cicero that is not so. People died at an early age. As we get older we get sicker.....hence more people getting sick. We are also getting better at diagnosing disease. If Cicero is your name....look up the Roman Orator Cicero. The flu is evolving...Evolution
@@pennychurchward1481 that is what he said, natural selection/variation on a theme/ micro evolution
😊
Funny how science (most scientists), tried to use science to dis-prove God. But science (DNA analysis), is actually Proving God!
It's a human thing, we try and use what we can to support our worldview. I can understand it, despite being a Christian I had been taught, and believed evolution. I now understand that evolution is true if you accept it as change over time as in dog breeds or bacteria but I also understand that it is impossible for anything to change into anything which isn't in its genetic material. Mutations do not provide that. The funny thing is that if an example of Darwinian evolution was found it would not disprove God. If God wanted to write into a cow's genetic code that it should turn into a whale at a certain time or in certain conditions then He could do so, just as easily as he wrote the code that makes a caterpillar turn into a butterfly.
No. Science isn't used to dis-prove God and there is no evidence of any kind that it is. Science constantly challenges theories, laws, and hypotheses. No matter the challenges to accepted theories and laws, making the leap to the supernatural has zero evidence or scientific merit. There is nothing to test so there is no factual information to support your claim. You can believe whatever you like but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
@@lrvogt1257 The word science comes from the Greek word for knowledge, so yes, human knowledge is growing with time. Though humanity is easily kept in the dark. The Romans invented benefit payments. They understood that if you kept a population fed and entertained they would not cause trouble, be easy to control. They provided chariot racing and gladiator sports. We do the same today with TV and movies. I know it is a waste of time quoting the Bible to someone who doesn't believe the Bible but if you read 1 Corinthians chapter 2. Verses 9 to 16 it will explain why you see no evidence. You can search it on line if you have no Bible.
@@jt2097 : Well, you're right not to quote the Bible as it's circular reasoning to say that the Bible proves that the Bible is true. We can only know what is factual with the scientific method. There is no possible test for the supernatural. Anything is possibly true but the supernatural is so lacking in evidence and therefore so unlikely that it should not be assumed to be true until someone can actually verify it. It certainly will not provide any useful factual information from which we can learn anything about the natural world so it's not a scientific study.
@@lrvogt1257 Do you believe in the Oort cloud? Because without it's existence it would indicate that the Solar system is less than 10,000 years old. If you do believe it exists I'd like you to provide scientific proof of its existence.
at 11:43 he omits mentioning that the more recent large growth was due to changes in technology and food production, nothing to do with people's reproductive rates. Before that the population was limited by food. In the industrial age the ability to transport and deliver food (e.g. by trains) changed the world. In addition to farming methods, including machine-pumped irrigation and chemical fertilizrs.
Also technological advances with births and infancy death rates went down even in the last 100/200 years
Gen. 9:20 "And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard:" .... farming right there.
@Matt G . The claim backed up with absolutely no extra biblical evidence whatsoever .
Lol :p Same story is there in Indian Mythology. But only few thousand years older than Noah. :). I wonder why religious people lie much.
@@yashodamoily16 .
Believers in bronze age superstitions actually don't know when they lie .
@ . The Noah flood story is ridiculous !
No scientific way the fictional Ark could possibly have survived, period
What about Adam, the first gardener!?
I would love to read more about the genetic mutations causing troubles rather than hope for future generations.
Well, we hear about it all the time. Diabetes, downs, cancer, albinism, sickle cell... take your pick.
That’s called sin
JUST FOR PERSONAL EDIFICATION TO MAKE THESE PEOPLE MORE REAL THIS WITHOUT A DOUBT WAS AWSOME!
Carolyn Tallen No need to shout
I like that his guest is a marine biologist talking about human DNA. Winning?
when you consider that Adam lived over 900 years, an 80 year old Eve is a young woman.
If you look at it like 90 years old at death instead of 900 He was in his prime through his 60’s or 600’s so Eve was still fertile at 45 or at 450 years.
If Adam and Eve are mother and father to all people then all people are related. Incest has been happening from the beginning. The incest between close family members is taboo. All other incestuous relationships are not,
one more thing. The old world had no idea that North and South America existed. Why is it then that Native Americans, Mexicans and others from South America have no record of the whole world flooding ?
Because their Internet was down
1. The most common date given for the flood is 4400 years ago, right in the middle of the Egyptians first burst of city and temple building, why did they not notice they were under water?
2. To flood the planet to over top the highest mountain you would need about 3 to 4 times the known amount of water in the world, where did all that water come from?
3. After the flood, where did the water go?
4. How did 8 people build a wooden ship bigger than any wooden ship built in modern times when THAT ship was reinforced with steel bracing and still broke up and sank.
5. How did animals with odd diets get to the ark?
6. How did 8 people deal with the needs of 10000 animals on the ark? Each animal had to be fed, watered, exercised and the poop scooped. Working 12 hours a day they would need to deal with over 100 animals per hour.
7. How did the animals get back to the four corners of the world when all plant life had been killed off by the flood?
8. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood.
9. Well according to the Book of Jasher, the wives ARE sisters. Jasher 5: 32-35 "And thou shalt choose for thy sons three maidens, from the daughters of men, and they shall be wives to thy sons. And Noah rose up, and he made the ark, in the place where God had commanded him, and Noah did as God had ordered him. In his five hundred and ninety-fifth year Noah commenced to make the ark, and he made the ark in five years, as the Lord had commanded. Then Noah took the three daughters of Eliakim, son of Methuselah, for wives for his sons, as the Lord had commanded Noah." If a species undergoes a population bottleneck, the lack of genetic diversity can be seen in the members of that species. NO such bottle neck exists in the overwhelming majority of species.
10. 4400 years is not a long enough time to generate the diversity in the human population to give rise to the different populations of people we see on the planet especially when you consider that effectively the genetic diversity was limited to 4 people, Noah and his wife and Eliakim and his wife.
11. Ken Ham's phony Ark has a million Dollar + heating, ventilation and air conditioning system that ensures that workers and visitors do not suffocate in the building. According to the bible, the original Ark had one window, 18 in square. Sorry people but if Ham's estimate of 1600 species represented by a minimum of 4000 animals, they would have suffocated.
Too many questions... You left out the part about how they all survived the 1000ATM of pressure and superheated atmosphere that would result from the fluid mechanics and thermodynamics of such an event.
@@jknengr796 There are too many problems with the "Global Flood" to list them all.
Our problem is that we are thinking this too scientifically.. The biblical story might be fictional but it's a reality to certain people..if they can converge their realty to others realty.. the whole story is a reality to everyone.. Now the choice is ours...Blindly follow their realty or you think and experience to find the ultimate realty.
@@j_unofficial789 I was being sarcastic with the "too many questions". It is the ridiculousness of believing such a story as fact (I know a few of them personally) that makes me wonder if those people can actually tie their own shoes. lol
@@jknengr796 One thing I hate is people get stuck on one book like Bible ,Quran , Torah etc.. If they go through all the books plus some scientific knowledge...The world would be something else spiritual and magical!
Just as we were created with physical and spiritual nature, we also have spiritual evidence of God in our lives as well as the physical
@clifton gaither None of them can provide any form of evidence. Just wild arse claims and baseless assertions with no substance. There only go to card they have is " because I feel that he exists", which is not proof.
Iván GP ‘spiritual’? I think you’ll have to help me with that one.
Uummmm, nope. I've never seen a spiritual. It's not part of MY body.
What?😂😂
Which God, 3000 of them out there, at least
We should also note in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve
there still exists the original genetic chart (called Simplified Human mitochondrial phylogeny) showing that haplogroups M and N are not necessarily descended from L. This is because all human mtDNA is descended from one of the three daughters-in-law of Noah.
Notice the Scholar's Union had to revise the expanded chart to look like out-of-Africa.
Out-of-Africa. You can not use today's map to talk about mankind during the last Ice age. There was NO water between Africa and the Middle East this was one land mass.
Before I advance some questions let me establish my credentials: I am an evolutionary biologist with 5 university degrees and 30 years experience re field work and research in my field. I also have a fellowship in cancer research ( BeV-1 viral destruction of osteosarcomas ). My focus has been upon evolution of whales from land mammals and statistical evaluation bearing upon the evolution of the saber-cat, Smilodon fatalis. My findings are well received in the USA and Europe. I have furnished museums with 35 new whale species not previously known to science. Though not focused on human evolution, I know something about it and human genetics.
Questions: Inbreeding is not accounted for in the presentation given here. Inbreeding occurs when a pair of related parents pass genetic errors on to their offspring. For example sickle cell anemia. If parents are heterogeneous for this gene which effects blood component formation, off spring may remain sickly or have no symptoms at all while retaining an immunity to malaria. But if both parents are homogeneous for the sickle cell gene, their offspring will die. If a few people interbred for very long and they represented the human population, all would die very soon.
Another question: Is the flood a legend perhaps given religious status when in fact it was an extensive regional event such as the Black Sea Flood that encompassed parts of Asia and Europe 8,000 years ago ? One thing is certain. No evidence for a global flood exists and it has been searched for 100 years. Furthermore, the Noah legend is based upon four previous tales, the one just prior to the Noah account being "The Epic of Gilgamesh." The initial story features many gods. Noah's tale features one.
Another fact: Man evolved from ape like Australopithicines in Ethiopia, East Africa.3.2 - million years ago. The first of these had ape-like skulls but human lower limbs. They could walk upright. Ape ( chimp & gorilla ) DNA compares favorably with that of humans 90% certainty.Humans possess between 2% and 4% Neanderthal ( caveman ) DNA in their DNA. Humans Also possess the basic skeletal structure that first appeared in fish and amphibians 400-million years ago and they possess the modified skulls of synapsid mammal - like reptiles that first appeared about 300-million years ago During the Permian Period when all continents joined as one due to continental drift ( Pangaea.). All mammals do.
Additional comment: Genesis 1 and 2 relate different accounts of creation specifically directed at the origin of the Jewish population. Yom in Hebrew does not have to mean a 24 hour day. It could mean millions of years, an indefinite period of time. Only in the Hebrew Commentaries will a reader discover that Adam had one wife followed by Eve. MitoDNA is very likely the result of a combination of previously isolated cells ( symbiosis ) as Mito and nuclear DNA differ. .
Stephen Faust there is a more recent video he did with Origins that did cover incestuous marriages.
@@krakoosh1 And the title of this video is? First off. The Bible, save for some valid archeological information, scattered history like the original Hebrews were the Sahir', and a wonderful philosophy pertaining to how others should be treated that apparently died with Jesus, is a collection of fairy tales. Though they are between the same covers, the Old differs substantially from the New. All religions are created by different cultures. They do not represent reality. No where on earth is there evidence for a global flood and anyone familiar with genetics knows that whole sale incest would destroy a population. And what of the animal life aboard the ark ? Incest would destroy them too. Anyone that says differently is twisting scientific fact to sell books and DVDs to uneducated folks.
No proof of evolution, evidence is the opposite:
1) Cambrian explosion: All body plans appear at same time, early in Cambrian explosion. Eyes and other complex features all appear at once in Cambrian explosion. Fossil record is firm.
2) Avalon explosion single cells to complex life all at once. Fossil record is firm.
3) Lack of transitional fossils for most of life forms. Animals appear remain unchanged and most go extinct. The past predictions that new fossils finds would fill in the gap in the transitional fossils as not come true. There are “missing links” for most species.
4) Living fossils: Horseshoe crab, Nautilidae, Australian lungfish, nurse shark and many more. Animals appear, remain unchanged for long time spans.
5) Convergent evolution: Many complex features appear in unrelated animals and plants, too many to be evolution. Look at Chameleon and Sand Lance fish, same eyes (independent eye movements and special focusing lenses) and a darting tongue. The list is very long of convergent evolution, too long.
6) 6) Studies have shown mutations are only beneficial for species that have a very large population size, like bacteria. For all other animals mutations drives the species towards extinction. So mutations do not produce new and complex features, like eyes. When animals are stressed and have a small population size, we protect then, as they do not change. Mutations occur when DNA is damaged and left unrepaired. The ratio of negative to beneficial mutations in anything larger than an ant is harmful to the life form.
7) Natural selection can change an animal’s color and other small changes, but has been shown to have limits. Also, it has been shown that once the pressure that forces the change is gone, the animal will go back to its original state, changes are not permanent! Finch beak evolution, shown as proof, always fails to note the finch does not keep the large beak. As the food that forced the large beak is gone, the beak returns to its original size.
8) Origins of life: There was no primordial soup. There was no time for natural origins, as soon as the Earth cooled there was life. The first life forms were not “simple” as predicted. Cyanobacterium is very complex. There was not one simple early life form, there was a complete ecosystem with sulfate-reducing microorganisms also shows up early in the record, also a very complex life form.
9) Some clades are very diverse and some unusually sparse, evolution should work everywhere the same.
10) The recovery after mass extinctions is very quick, too quick for evolution. Permian-triassic Extinction: 90 percent to 95 extinction rate. Yet, life recovered in just thousands of years. Triassic-jurassic Extinction: Triassic dinosaurs gone and in just thousands of years all new Jurassic dinosaurs. Cretaceous-tertiary Extinction: Mass extinction, all dinosaurs are gone, as is most life forms, yet there are all new life forms in just thousands of years.
11) Breeding for dogs and horses for thousands of years. Change comes at a heavy cost, shorter life span and poor health.
12) DNA testing of close animals has shown they are not related. The two river dolphins and ocean dolphins are not related. The two panda bears are not related and the list can go on and on.
13) The proof of evolution is mostly: Animal A looks like animal B, so animal B must have come from animal A, how childish if you can not show how it happened.
14) Common Ancestry problem. Animals that have a recent common ancestor are too different. A donkey is very close in ancestry to the horse and zebra. So close that they may breed producing mules and zonkeys. Yet the donkey, horse and zebra are very different, too different. The donkey is very cautious and departs from danger, they can not be used in a battle. The horse willingly will go into battle, some like the danger. The Donkey and the horse are easily tamed and once tame will remain tame. Zebra are difficult to tame and difficult to remain tame. Other sample of this problem can be found in nature.
15) “Evolution Junk”, those that only believe in evolution have put on blinders and have made gross errors in the past about designs in nature. The theory is evolution is a series of random mutations, thus residual vestige of random mutations will be found in nature. In this thinking many scientists overlooked designs in life. Only later to be shown that what they called junk, was in fact a good design. Examples of this are many: Tonsils, Appendix, Panda's thumb, Whale hips (still taught as vestige, but this is wrong), Junk DNA, Humpback Whales fins, and more. There are neutral mutations, like some humans have three or one kidney, but these are not residual vestige or a case for design as they are rare.
16) Human exceptionalism: Charles Darwin wrote and many scientists followed this thinking: Animals that most look like us will most closely match our cognitive capabilities. After study and research, the animals that has the closest cognitive capabilities to humans are crows, ravens and New Caledonian Crow. The New Caledonian Crow can: Make fish hooks, teach others how to make fish hooks. Crows and ravens (same family) are the only animals to be able to solve multi step problems and make tools to solve these problems. MRI scans have shown crow and raven brains are the closest brain to humans. Yet Human exceptionalism has shown are not just a higher animal. Humans different much from animals. Humans are the only one to be active in: art, musical, jewelry, use symbolism, active religion, written languages, mathematics, have moral dilemmas and much more. Many of these appeared as soon as humans appear. Neanderthal has few of these abilities and is too different from Humans. Near the end Neanderthals lived at the same time as Humans. Neanderthals had no tear ducts, very large sinuses, large barrel shaped chest, short arms, heavy bones, different braincase, different ear bones, and more. There is no “missing link” to humans from bipedal primates. The large brain evolution hypothesis has been falsified after the discovery of early hominin with larger brains than later hominin fossils.
7:30 He says, “The earth was divided sometime in the life of Peleg [because Peleg means “divided” and in “his days the earth was divided”] So how did his parents know to name him that? Were they predicting that the earth was soon to be “Peleg-ed?” I believe those that argue Eber was the father of “Hebrew” language and Peleg was named “divided” because the division happened around the time of his birth. This is just common sense. It’s worth noting here that Dr Carter is a staunch traditionalist with regards to his adherence to the Masoretic timeline and there are all kinds of problems that result from this approach. Smart dude. I just wish he’d open his mind a little bit. God bless.
Is there a good video that explains your perspective?
Though the biblical genealogies offer little help in establishing Adam’s creation date, three other biblical clues do. First, Genesis 10:25 states that the world was divided in the time of Peleg. Given the context of God scattering humanity over the whole face of Earth, this statement probably refers to the time when the Bering land bridge became the Bering Strait. Reliable carbon-14 dating places this event at 11,000 years ago. This date implies that the worldwide scattering of humanity must have predated 9000 BC and that Noah’s flood must have occurred before 9000 BC. The creation of Adam would have occurred much earlier yet.
No matter how hard the atheist heathen tries, the word of God stands true. ALWAYS.
😂😂😂. Heathen here.god stands true. And god blow life into dirt and ha presto man. Of course it’s true. Sounds perfectly logical 😂🤭
We have a wonderful tool at our disposal that not many use. I have an audio Bible and play it in my house 24/7. I can hear the whole New Testament in a day. 7 times in a week. I have the words of Jesus and the Apostles. I really don't need anything else but there is a lot of interesting information that strengthens my faith.
Hi chris. As you know when you become adult you stop believing in myths. You were not believed when children got older.🤣😇🎅🎅🎅
Eve being created must have been something like mitosis, amazing to see. It's things like that that make me so jealous of the angels that got to watch the Lord create the universe, the earth, Adam/Eve, the animals, the plants, everything. What a sight that would be, freezing the water leftover from the flood would have been amazing to see as well.
This is the video I was looking for!!! My heart is pleased.
Ya. Genetics is proving noah s flood n adam/eve theory finally.
Great video, great discussion. Thanks Dr. carter for taking time explaining things like this. It’s one of the most detailed explanation on genetics and origins of man in sync with the bible. 👍🏻
Some people just DON'T WANNA BELIEVE THE BIBLE I'S TRUE... cause then they have to admit they are not the final authority over their lives
Or they have come to terms with their own mortality. These monotheistic religions push the notion of an afterlife to appeal to our genetically wired desire not to die. Your fear of death is driving you to believe this bullshit. Come to terms with it, embrace the fragility and fleeting nature of life. You will be a lot happier.
@@mickhealy572 "evolution has been proved true beyond doubt"
As an agent of change, correct.
As the origin of life, incorrect.
No one cares that Evolution is true in so far as it explains how some life has changed over a period of time.
@@mickhealy572 My point is rather obvious, Evolution doesn't propose an explanation for the origin of life and so is irrelevant in the discussion.
What's funny, in an ironic way, is that you say "I never claimed it was the origin of life" which may very well be true, but many could make a case against you being truthful given the way you interjected with your first inkstain comment to Mattman. However, you then go on to ask me if I think that Evolution has any bearing on the debate between Creationism and Science, followed by an ad hominem. Interesting, and, there seems to be an inconsistency in your thinking...
Since Creationism is an assertion about the origin of life (a Creator created everything), why do you think there is a conflict with Science? Unless, in your mind Evolution *does* provide a counter theory to the origin of life, why would you bring it up in a discussion about the origin of life? It seems obvious to me, in your followup comments to Mattman and me, you somehow think Creationism is false, yet you have no proof that your position is true. Evolution is certainly not the proof you are in need of.
Once death is near then humans give authority to God
We are lead to believe that we couldn't travel around to other continents until much later in human history, but Noah had a boat, as if his 3 sons had forgotten the craft.
God is the first farmer then he told Adam to take care of it you know nothing went well after that new employee eve she got him fired🤣
Standard henhouse hit squad
Even cheated on Adam with the beastly Neanderthals we still have those genes he thinks incest is ok.
This guy is a mutant
That makes no sense....
Go back to sleep....
@@Is..4110 .
62 People would seem to disagree with U .
People lived a long time. I always thought Adam and Eve lived hundreds of years as did their children
Adam was almost 1000 years when he died, but that's from the time of expulsion from the Garden, he was in the Garden for thousands of years, but his age and time starts when he sins
@@charleneboren5255 your delusional
No it’s called fantasy imbecile
@@Stuartharrod1 Fantasy is believing that you are related to apes.
Not a single skeleton has been found of humans living older that 100.... no facts, no evidence.
Thank you, I've been waiting to have someone finally bring this into light.
His PhD is in marine biology, not genetics.
@@DanielBrownsan i'm a physicist, 2d animator, 3d animator, writer and music composer with an advanced diploma in software engineering. whats your point?
@@blyrax That means you are no more qualified to make conclusions on the part of genetics as he is.
It’s nonsense gibberish delusional idiots
Your delusional to even entertain such gibberish
Ok so where did Neanderthals, Denisovans, Floriensis and the other hominids come from?
Neanderthals are bi-pedal primate animals. Neanderthals are too different from Humans. Neanderthals lived at the same time as Humans. Neanderthals had no tear ducts, very large sinuses, large barrel shaped chest, short arms, heavy bones, different braincase, different ear bones, and more. There is no “missing link” to humans from bipedal primates. The large brain evolution hypothesis has been falsified after the discovery of early hominin with larger brains than later hominin fossils.
one thing is for certain... since the flood, everyone on the planet has known how to build a boat.
Good thing I dont live on a planet....Might get some serious motion sickness.
@@THUTH-ix3tt I'm a physical person, that experience natural (physical) occurence. Btw I do understand what Scientistism claims but fail to prove.
Not true...look at Africans. They never built schit until they met smarter people.
@@DONNALANDS they built the great pyramids around the world that Whites cannot comprehend the complexity of how! Even in South America, with the remnants of the Olmecs, your ignorance amuses me. I wonder who taught Europeans how to properly bathe and wash? The isles of Corsica and Sardis, small islands in the Mediterranean, has placed a reminder on their flags!
@@reyandy4851 Let me get this straight...Blacks meet smarter men of North Africa which were white because the Berbers prove that....They intermingle with the Berbers and the Jews and the pyramids get built. Rest of Africa doesn't build diddly squat...ever and never. No great buildings, no boats, no great water ways, no great sewers, and nothing more than grass huts. Africa has no historical poets, no great artists and and no nobel prize winners. Please tell me how great Africans are other than brainwashing dumbass tribal members? You're lost in your mind. Blacks have the lowest IQ's in the world and their brains are smaller. Africa is a shuck and jive continent of feeble-minded idiots. They are so dumb and pathetic that they can't even cultivate their own focking food even to this day. Only one country did anything and that was Egypt. Nothing of greatness has been done for 3500 years. The Pharoah's were a mixed race.
God is the creator of the universe and what it contains. We are descents of Adam and eve whether some people reject or nor. The truth never is that we are children of Adam and eve.
Thank you so much for this presentation, I'm definitely going to go through all the other presentations. Well done
Why is it that when arguing evolution no one considers the the fact that TWO LIFE FORMS had to evolve simultaneously, a male and a female of the species. Calculate that!
Hi. I'm open to persuasion either way but if not evolution how was life created? Am I to believe,as this documentary says. God mad man from dust. I'm not even going down the road of which god. There are many many myths on creation. How do you know you have chosen the correct one. Are you advocating magic? Calculate that's
@@dacman53265 well contemplate this.......is man made of "dust"? Is the "order" of the bibles explanation of creation correct? I've started salt water aquariums and I see a direct correlation. A simple explaination for people at that time but accurate non the less. If you want to dismiss the simple explanation of the incredible complexity of the origins of life that the bible recounts, go ahead. I can completely understand. However, I am able to conceive of life forms that are different/superior to ours, things seen and unseen. Most people believe in some form of this. The concept of a designer/creater/architect is completely acceptable to me, even reasonable as nothing worthwhile has ever happened accidentally, hence the word "accident". Not a very good word to describe something as incomprehensibly complicated as life. Can I explain /understand every detail? No. But I do know this, male and female mammals are different creatures and it takes one of each to "procreate" life, as we know it. The possibility of these two life forms "evolving" together over millions or billions of yrs is incalculable. Not enough 0s in the knowen or unknown universe.
Keri Williams Hi. It's ok to say everything you see has to be designed. You can look at buildings, paintings,cars etc. You can trace these back to the designer and the manufacturer. It's a big leap to be able to do that with creation. You must have heard the saying extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. You can't just say because I don't believe evolution ,it makes more sense that a god did it. That's called the god of the gaps.
If the sun wasn't the perfect distance away from the earth and the moon wasn't in the perfect position to the earth we wouldn't exist doesn't mean it's not possible that it just happened bearing in mind there are trillions upon trillions of planets and stars ✨. That to me is more possible than a supernatural being had control and made it the way it is. Keri, are you also a young earther? You say that nothing happens on its own but you are accepting a god producing everything from nothing.
@@dacman53265 thanks for your opinion/view. Your right.
@@dacman53265 I see...Any, anything made man and other lifeforms, except an all powerful being that we are accountable to.
You forgot to mention that this was also a much larger earth then, being were also much larger and lived with dinosaurs. They also lived longer (the longest was i think 969 years) which means they populated much faster, they also lived on pangaia which was all one continent and easy to populate.
funny how we see no human inside a T-rex stomach
🤦🏻♂️ you have a great imagination sir 😂
One day Science might catch up with the Bible.
@BMore so the bible is the bar that science has to reach.
The bible is full of stories.
Science deals with facts not your feelings.
Use science to prove fairies dont exist then?
@BMore 😁
BMore Archeology proves the Bible true with every new discovery.
@@whiteclifffl and now prove your assertion.
Maybe you should write this post on a stone tablet, not an Apple tablet
With every passing day adherence to Materialism requires an ever deeper retreat into the haze of denial.
Evolutionary biology and materialism are two different things. One needs to be in denial to deny evolution, which has been observed, and is therefore an indisputable fact, just like 'the Earth is not flat' is an indisputable fact.
@@doctorwebman I am trying to figure out if some people try to be misleading intentionally, or just out of ignorance...
Evolution, as an agent of change, is indeed proven.
Evolution, as an explanation for the origin of life, is NOT proven.
Good day and God bless!
@@michaelwill7811 Evolution is not a theory about the origin of life, nor is it meant to be. It is only meant to explain the origin of the diversity of species. Evolution has been observed in controlled and uncontrolled conditions in the lab and field, including speciation, and is therefore a fact.
@@doctorwebman And yet many non-believers trot it out on a regular basis as the "Christianity-busting" proof that us Christians are wrong. I apologize if they don't understand what Evolution is, really, I do...
@@michaelwill7811 Evolution only shows that Genesis is wrong about Adam and Eve, and about each species being specially created.
Why not having a debate with people opposing your views? Then i can judge for myself
Generally speaking, those who oppose refuse to debate. They're probably worrying about losing.
There is a not so different similarity With digital code and genetic code.
A word in digital code is either 0000 or 1111 or any combination possible with just 1 or 0. This called a word in hex coding.
With RNA or DNA it is A, T, C and G.. I think the math for this is 256-4 possible combinations for each word. If my math is right then there cannot be a zero in the DNA code.
Kinda points to someone wrote the code to generate life.
that mutation point was the check mate!
Hahaha was it?
The mutations leading to extinction would be something interesting to show for many of these “living fossils” such as the coelacanth, dragon flies, horseshoe crabs, etc to show a young earth.
Yup Crocodillians and Turtles have been around for a while too.
Genesis is fantasy nonsense.
Wonderful! Fascinating! So glad that there are scientists out there that give the real data and perspective🙏
I love watching your videos! Very impressive and good content
At minute 20 he asks says the model would be flatter if the wives of Noah's sons were sisters. Well according to the Book of Jasher, the wives ARE sisters.
Jasher 5: 32-35 "And thou shalt choose for thy sons three maidens, from the daughters of men, and they shall be wives to thy sons.
And Noah rose up, and he made the ark, in the place where God had commanded him, and Noah did as God had ordered him.
In his five hundred and ninety-fifth year Noah commenced to make the ark, and he made the ark in five years, as the Lord had commanded.
Then Noah took the three daughters of Eliakim, son of Methuselah, for wives for his sons, as the Lord had commanded Noah."
All humans have mtDNA from one of three haplogroups, conveniently coded L,M,N. This is because all humans have mtDNA from one of the three daughters-in-law of Noah. They were certainly not sisters.
Book of Jasher is not inspired.
@@michaelnewzealand1888 And you know this how?
@@darryl5372 Because a book that rhymes with Dasher is what the nose code was all about. If you count the number of times the word "taketh" is said to have been followed by "thou" in the odd verses of even origin, ignoring when shalt has been written upon this page. The amazing part is wish upon a star can be typed out using three hands. See how obvious it is?
@@Mdebacle One of the daughters of Eliakim must have been descended from one of the Nephilim in order for the SEED-DNA of Satan to be carried through the millennia if we are to believe Genesis 3:16. And personally I do believe it!
As that woman is the nominal mother of approximately 33% of the human population and she followed Ham into Africa and then her descendants were taken as slaves to the East and the West where the SEED-DNA was passed on - Meghan Markle's hatred of DONALD may be because she carries that satanic SEED-DNA?
Ilhan Omar is as demonic as can be and also carries the satanic seed.
I hardly think that the sequencing of the human genome and the work put in by thousands of geneticists since 1990 can be honestly described as "a superficial study"! Quasi science to the fore in this production.
He's probably referring to a superficial study of how the genetics fit with the biblical account.
@@PJRayment I don't doubt it. Sounds like the sort of thing he'd look long and hard for. Denying scholarship is the mark of a conspiracy theorist, this old boy fits right in with the definition.
So you think there is a possibility that genetics fit the Biblical account? Correct me if I am wrong, but did you not say you were a 'supernaturalist' and not a believer in 'naturalism'? Or I am confusing the issue?
@@peterleadley
"I don't doubt it."
In which case your original claim is shown to be baseless.
"Sounds like the sort of thing he'd look long and hard for."
Who? The host?
"Denying scholarship is the mark of a conspiracy theorist, this old boy fits right in with the definition."
What scholarship is he denying? And is it a case of denying scholarship, or rejecting the philosophical underpinning of the naturalistic view?
"So you think there is a possibility that genetics fit the Biblical account?"
Given that this video shows that it fits, then obviously yes.
"Correct me if I am wrong, but did you not say you were a 'supernaturalist' and not a believer in 'naturalism'? Or I am confusing the issue?"
You're confusing the issue. I believe that God exists, created the world, and created the laws of physics under which his creation operates. So it _operates_ according to natural laws, but had a supernatural origin. When a biblical creationist looks at the evidence, he can consider whether or not something came about naturally or supernaturally. A naturalistic view rejects supernatural explanations, and will consider only natural explanations.
🤺☦🇷🇺It's very easy job for you, western saтапs, to attack those Protestant heathens and Zionists, who twist and interpret the Bible like 4 year olds, and can't give the true answers for you, doesn't it? But you could never win against us, true Christians, Muslims and Jews. We appreciate all the genetical work and data, only not your funny evolutionist interpretation of the genetical data. Non of you wiseguys can win an argument against me - I will school your weak a$$ and humiliaтe you😼
That's very interesting... I'd like to see a response from some fanatic evolutionists and the discussion with Dr. Carter,
that could be pretty interesting
@Make Me Believe could you provide a link for me? I believe the bible and enjoy watching debates. Please no bill Nye.
There’s really no debating facts. He explained what evolutionist think happened. You cannot get around the truth. Shake it up, flip it around, and butt your head against a wall. God created what you see. That’s a fact. You may not like it. You would be just like me 20 years ago. I enjoyed sinning. I loved drinking, drugs, women, and all the rest. However, none of those things filled my soul. I was left empty. Boris Becker, famous German tennis player, won Wimbledon, and had fame and fortune. He reached the pinnacle of his profession. When he got there, he became despondent. He asked himself, “Is this it?” He almost committed suicide, because he felt like he had no other purpose. We all have a God shaped hole in us. It can only be filled by Him. You will never feel satisfied by what the world offers you. Denying truth doesn’t make it untrue.
It is almost always a waste of time trying to to debate or convince the die hard atheist/evolutionist . They insist you "prove" the Bible and creationism. Even though their theories have no basis in proof according to the principles and procedures of true scientific theory then models then discovery then proof, that sort of thing. You can present them with indisputable facts like the statistical impossibility of origin of life and principles of the laws of entropy but that does not matter to them. They will come up with "well such and such a person has a theory how this or that may have happened" all of which is of course just wild speculation. They try to impress and overwhelm you on how smart ,educated and how many degrees they have and when all else fails mock you and make jokes about you because they can't really give you an honest response that will work for their side. The bottom lines is they want to be their own "God's", and for them to admit that there is a creator would mean that they are accountable to Him. That is the one thing they will never do unless there is a true change in their hearts.
@@johnstudd4245
Wonderful selection of ambit claims based on assumptions.
Just did that. Feel free to discuss my comment.
I was wondering how the structures at Gobekli Tepi fit into your chronology. These structures in Southern Turkey are dated as starting construction 12,000 years ago. This means there was active, organised human societies 10, 000 years BC. Please do let me know your thoughts.
Not true the earth is only 6000 years old now your a DR you should know this.Carbon dating does not work
@@frankwoodward9914 I know this of course Frank, but Im interested to know how young earth proponents support their 6,000 year old beliefs in the light of the overwhelming Göbekli Tepi evidence. It will be interesting to see if they reply. Why do you say carbon dateing does to work? Of course it does if it is done correctly.
@@Campbellteaching carbon 14 only lasts for 100000 years
Maybe it is of the ‘pre-flood’ world? The flood buried it and with it all the skills that built it. Then, us humans, started over .....
Carbon dating is inaccurate due to the flood itself. The 12,000 uears is no longer a valuable time frame. Take it down by 6,000 and check your research to that time frame. You'll see that it is more valid.
There was an article in TIME magazine many, many years ago presenting genetic evidence that we all come from just a few ancestors. But the scientists, ignorant of the Scriptures, did not understand the consequences of what they were presenting.
The Bible is tomorrow's newspaper today.
I am a Ph.D mathematician with an NSF postdoc behind me. The odds against spontaneous self-organization are ineffable.
The great logician Kurt Godel is reputed to have declared (to Hao Wang)
"The formation within geologic times of a human body by the laws of physics (or any other laws of similiar nature) is as unlikely as the separation by chance of the atmosphere into its components"
The Universal Generalization that the current experience presents us is that intelligent organization depends on an intelligent agent for its existence.
All books have authors
All computer programs have authors
No computer boots itself
Buildings, automobiles etc same thing
The explanations given by modern biology are based on INVALID PATTERNS OF INFERENCE.
For example, the biologist reasons in this manner
Here is an egg and here is a golf ball. Therefore they have a common ancestor (homology fallacy).
Here is the phrase that makes me laugh more than anything. The atheist swears( to whom I wonder) that creation can't make any predictions... then you see a video like this. (:^D) The bible was making scientific predictions that are shown to be true today , long before science as we know it today was even a thing.
@@THUTH-ix3tt Might want to take your own advice.
Wm tyndale your so correct something like 10 to the trillionth power
@@THUTH-ix3tt Oh don't worry. You will certainly meet Him. Mark the date.
@@THUTH-ix3tt he's all around you
Genesis Nimrod was a Giant, where do we come from? forget chapter 1 verse 26 Genesis ? I wish it was as simple as what you're saying
Genesis 6:1 to 10 For your answer
Amazing! Thank you to your guest.
Indeed, dickheads like him are hard to come by.
TwoWardrobes Wardrobes Woah! Thats really uncalled for. Being rude isn’t helpful and certainly won’t help you win any arguments.
My great grandfather had 10 children,starting in about 1880 something,ending in 1904 when his last,my grandfather was born. My grandmother,also born in 1904,also came from a family of 10 children. I only have one daughter,but I have one aunt and one uncle that had no children,along with a couple cousins. But somewhere around 40-50 people ,came from my grandfather and grandmother. To make a long story short, that's like a 1900% increase in three generations!
Now everybody knows there's a tradition of men having more than wife in the Middle East,that predates Islam by thousands of years. If someone were to calculate stuff like that...there's no telling what kind of crazy numbers you could come up with.
AMEN bro! there would of most likely been a crazy amount of people and that probable had alot to do with the Evil and GOD decision...
Yep, and people don't think about stuff like that. Take David,he had..I forget how many wives and concubines but it was hundreds upon hundreds. But the Bible names his children as who,Solomon. If you skip over the part where it gives the number of his wives and concubines you'd think Solomon was an only child, but that has to be improbable if not downright impossible, he was just the only one that mattered.
@SmoothRide Ummm...ok... I think you may have misread something lol
Yeah. You could make up whatever crazy shit fits your model. Wonder why nobody has thought of that .... erm, like the guy in this video!
No other religious book can accurately have a book that is genesis
The book of genesis is from Abraham who decided there is only one god and got the stories from Sumer All the stories in genesis are from different religions beliefs from around the middle east and far east
@@globalcoupledances Watch the videos about the Sumerians they tell a different story of creation than the bible.
All religions have a creation story and they do not agree with the bible!!!
@@globalcoupledances
Adam was ancestor of humans not Chimpanzees.
Using science to disprove God’s existence is like using the existence of computer science to disprove the existence of computer engineers and programmers. Nonsense from atheists.
I don't know really what you were trying to say, no one would dispute the existence of computer science because there are mountions of evidence for its existence. There are exactly no lines of evidence of a person called Jesus Christ ever existed outside of the bible which is a problematic book at best Which contradicts it's self in virtually every book.
@@christopher22859 Oh... You should really study the oldest writings we have...the Chinese. Please study Shang De. Also there is another man called Josephus. 🤔🤔 Really should do more study before making nonsense statements. 😒
Josephus was a Jewish turncoat after being captured by the Romans. He never wrote about Jesus, although a proven plagiarized version was written in by the Catholic church.
Really should do more studies before making nonsense statements
@@jthomas196 Are you seriously saying Josephus is proof of Jesus? Everyone knows those parts were added hundreds of years later - everyone except people who need to lie to each other in order to maintain their fantasy.
Science is a method for learning and study. It has numerous built in fail safes to remove the individual biases of the researchers. Science is based upon evidence which can be shown to be true.
No one, ever, has been able to find any evidence at all to prove the reality of god, gods, or any of it. NOT. ONE. BIT. Y'all have had thousands of years to come up with something, but the best you have are people who like to lie, like the person who made this video.
The fact of evolution is based upon huge amounts of provable evidence and experiments which can be repeated and which always get the same results. After nearly 200 years since Darwin first wrote about Natural Selection, the evidence for this has grown, and the evidence that contradicts it is, still, non-existent.
Let me assume my conclusion and then prove my conclusion.
Sounds familiar?
Yup, that's the principle of the scientific method.
Dr. Robert Carter is a marine biologist. There is not enough genetic diversity between two people and then eight people to populate the human race because of the inbreeding problem.
No inbreeding required. They just went to many of the Sumerian, Indus Valley and Egyptian cities who failed to notice Noah and intermarried.
Reading the book of Jasher helps to explain more Biblical history.
Just remember it's not, a part of the Bible it's not, inspired it's just a cool ancient Hebrew history book.
@@justchilling704 under what authority did the people who authorized the books of the bible have? That's right, NONE, they were not commanded or inspired to make those decisions, fact.
@@-kepha8828 God's authority is the only that matters and since the Bible is true I'd recommend you not question God.
@@justchilling704 the bible is composed of books that man chose to incorporate, not God. God never created a "book" containing all of his writings. Man took it upon himself to do so, and in doing so, they eliminated many books of God that they didnt agree with. That's anti christ
@@justchilling704 How could u possibly know whether it was inspired? Different churches around the world have always held different sets of books to be "The Bible". Who ate you to say which actually count and which don't? Just because of the specific set of books that YOU happen to have grown up with? You are but one person. With a personal preference, based on custom. "The Bible" (the one I've heard of) warns against customs.
Even if what is said is a load of rubbish, I still will trust God as He has given me His Spirit. Ultimately even if the whole world is wrong, God will be true, as His Spirit alone is truth.
You're delusional
John 20:29 (NET)
Jesus said to him, “Have you believed because you have seen me? Blessed are the people who have not seen and yet have believed.”
Malcolm Abram please seek help Malcolm! Get laid and above all read a science book!
@@hollyfanatic8686 I am a PhD scientist.
@@malcolmabram2957
In what? Christian science from a diploma mill?
How did 2 penguins waddle and swim all the way from the south pole to the middle east, ride a boat and then waddle and swim all the way back? What about kangaroos? How did they get from australia to the middle east and back? How did hawaii get repopulated? Japan? The rest of the remote islands? What about north and south america? Does not add up.
Pangea
16:00
Someone posted a comment concerning "why", not on this matter but the responder
in other words said his understanding , wisdom,, knowledge, God divinity is and will always be greater than ours. If we knew everything we would be equal to him but we're only human and everything is not for us to understand because he wants us to have faith in believe in him and his word and even concerning of the truth he said seek and you shall find.
"How did 2 penguins waddle and swim all the way from the south pole to the middle east...?"
Nobody claims that they did.
"What about kangaroos? How did they get from australia to the middle east..."
Again, nobody claims that they did. If you want to critique an idea, it's best to actually understand it first.
Apparently, you are expected to believe the fantastical stories without question, as though you, like the biblical text, are from the Iron Age!!
The TH-cam ads are so irritating
This guy forgot to include the corruption of genetics by the fallen angels that mated with women
Irrelevant tho.
They died in the flood. Didn't they? I know there are nephilim sightings after the flood but couldn't those be produced after the flood?
According to Dr John Barnett, it was the fallen angels spirit possessing a man and mated with women. This created the giant races. Think 500 feet tall and taller. Angels are spirit beings and must inhabit a body, (become possessed) and have strength beyond anything we can even dream of. These spirits are also intelligent, far beyond even Einstein’s level, to the point of not being comparable. Super genius.
This was very limit and ended.
Sad he was talking genetics and population but completely left out the genesis 6 narrative. Those fallen angels mating with women really changed things.
Didn't Jesus himself say that angels do not procreate? (Mathew 22:23 31)
We are sons of, first, God, then Adam and Eve. Nobody elses.
@@warpnin3 so you don't believe in the nephilim?
What a fascinating video! Even if studies didn't appear to prove the Bible I would still trust Gods Word completely for I've had a supernatural experience while fasting, praying and reading it! I was not only Saved but also Sanctified by the Holy Ghost in a "Circumcision made without hands" by the Spirit using the Word, that is sharper than any two-edged sword, as a Holy scalpel to seperate my fallen, sinful flesh from my "quickened", reborn spirit so that He could always live within me as I live within Christ!
Therefore it doesn't matter what mankinds foolish "wisdom" thinks is truth; I know Truth, for He lives within my heart.
It's too bad he doesn't seem to live inside the hearts of all the starving, sick, dying children and people around the world.
No need for you to watch crap like this on the internet then,if you’re going to believe the same shit regardless.
He lives in all that will receive him. You see the starvation and the sickness and the poverty and what do you do about it? You show your hatred towards God by attacking his word you commit every sin which he warns you would lead you to hell. And then you take up a railing accusation against God, who made you. You are self righteous and pathetic. You’re probably in favor of abortion, which is murdering children. When’s the last time you’ve done anything for anyone other than yourself? Think about this I don’t know what’s coming for you on judgment day, but I’m guessing it’s going to be along these lines. They what measure you judge, and she’ll be judged under you. Go accuse GOD of all the starvation and suffering in the world, it is very easily proven that most of it is the result of mankind‘s disobedience to biblical principles on one hand and mankind’s willingness, and even enthusiasm to persecute his neighbor for small gaiins. The problem for Christendom over the last 150 years as we’ve been willing to suffer fools and grown ass children like yourself. You are at the point of open mockery. You have been wrong about everything and GOD mocks to your face but you’re too stupid to see it. You’re a kind will say that the world is overpopulated and we will be starving by the 90s and then in the 90s, and all the kids are obese. You cried about global cooling in the 70s but things warmed up and now you cry about global warming, but things cool down so now you call a climate change. You can’t even admit there’s two genders anymore because you’re a degenerate fool who has been turned over to delusion, and he chose your delusions to mock you before those who are willing to listen to the voice of God. Many will wake up because your foolishness will be exposed. I pray that both the science and the archaeology bring forth multitudes of examples against your foolish conjecture, and lies against your creator, who you hate because you are evil. And my prayers will be answered. You will die mocked and defeated. You will no longer even care about your own reputation or intellectual standing as you are perplexed with how badly your wife has gone and then behold, your old and frail frame broken and diseased, will tremble with thoughts of your coming damnation. Laugh now you shall week later. This is your time. enjoy every moment Hell Eternal is your portion, accept you repent. There is no counsel against the Lord. Our God is not mocked, but long-suffering, so that even a wretched fool, like you might come to repentance, but at the end, he is not mocked he will reap that what you sow either by his will to eternal life in the saving of your soul, or to your will which is contrary to your on welfare unto eternal damnation(prepared not for mankind, but for the angels who rebelled against him who is chattel you are in Adam, if you are not redeemed in Christ unto eternal life. The choice is yours ,I hope against hope that you would throw off your self hatred and turn to God while there is time. He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. Your spiritual condition is worse than any bigger or starving child among the heathen, and he died to save you, and feed you with the bread of life, if you only receive it.
@@alicenorman5236We all have the opportunity to feed and protect those children, stop wars and take care of our fellow man in need
Not dealing very honestly there with the Y-Adam and Mitochondrial Eve, doctor.
Great video!
My only critique is that you rely on the Masoretic Old Testament, which has removed 650 years from Noah to Abraham.
MrKneeV, Truth is offensive to non truth beleivers.
@@auletjohnast03638 That is probably true. Are you saying that about me or about the people who made the video?
They have had many resets,like mudfloods, tons of men died in the many wars also.
In the Masoretic text you are missing a 1 in front of the 1st born from Arphaxad 2 Peleg.
@Christopher Tracy •
I got ahold of a Septuagint and Josephus book of Genesis 11th chapter. You are right. I need prayer and encouragement because this is the Bible belt and I wanted to make this masoretic text come under the scrutiny we as Bible believers owe the word of God!
We got enough light of Egyptian history to see that the KJV is out of sync with history.
Is there any way to prevent genetic mutations?
No, there is solar radiation and from rocks.
It hasn't been but only the past 10years and more and more evidence that the book is more true than you ever think I thought it was all myths and fables before
Read ‘God’ by Alexandra Waugh! Brilliant! And comical in parts! Especially John’s account of Sophia!
There is nothing mythical about it, nor any fables within it either. In fact, it’s the real deal, replete with hidden messages that no other religious book contains.
Read Alexander waugh’s book God! Was a Christian all my life until I read the above! He explains every contradiction, every false shit and how inaccurate the whole of the bible is. An absolute page turner! I’m possible to argue against!
Robert Dunn can you flesh out your claims for me? I’m especially interested in ‘hidden messages’ if that helps you at all. As for ‘nothing mythical’ I suspect you have not the slightest knowledge of the countless legends and stories from other cultures and civilisations that predate the Bible and which can be found in an almost exact form within the Old Testament writings. I suspect you need to get out more.
JC Kensway Agree with you 100%. Read Alexandra Waugh’s ‘God’ Brilliant👌
Thank you Robert for a brilliant video of the evidence that the Bible is the true History of the World and the correct explanation for population genetics.
That's it, short and to the point, and now for the rest of the story. Keep the faith.
Surely we live in the age of the great delusion. Sadly, we will all find out the"truth", and so very many will not be pleasantly surprised
You she entity lifeforces have hijacked the word "truth" and try to make it mean whatever you want it to mean.
And this includes she entity lifeforces currently existing in XY DNA bodies.
Your "truth" is usually not the truth at all.
Yeah, religion has been the delusion for a couple of millenia now. And that delusion is still going.
@@theresawilliams4296 - It's like one long-ass 3,000-year-long zombie movie... (with bad actors, a weak story-line, but a good marketing department - so it still makes money).
So does love and hope. And faith in your intellect..
Hi Cornerstone TV, could you direct me to where Dr Robert Carter's papers are - the ones he referred to in this video? Its all very interesting. Big thanks.!
All of his organizations information is here: creation.com/
His bio and more are here: creation.com/dr-robert-carter
Creation Ministries International
If you want a more updated video with similar information you can check this one out too: th-cam.com/video/gqxB_7p1cIE/w-d-xo.html
Thank you for watching
BEAUTIFUL channel!
Thank you so much for all the work you've done to bring these truths to the layman. That's not even mentioning the actual work done to show the science behind the WORD OF GOD!
Thank you, all of you involved, thank you! God bless you and your families!
david
What an abysmal analogy. God is a failed hypothesis that adds nothing to the global body of knowledge we have seen and observed. It's just a fable from a time when we didn't know where the sun went at night.
@@jdbjdbjdbjdbWell, that's one opinion. Good luck with that.
theavailability of food has been ignored
I believe both science and the Bible and the key component never being used is Time.
Because God knows all and time does not affect him as he States I am the Alpha and Omega beggining And the end we are only human again and will never understand everything.
Can you prove that human lineage only began with two people? What coroborrating evidence do you have besides ancient mythology that you're claiming as fact without offering any shred of proof?
DNA. that was the point.
That laugh at 4:19 lol
This is why peer review in needed. Just because one egg head makes a claim doesn't make it so.
Did you notice his degree is in marine biology yet he's lecturing us on anthropology and genetics? Priceless!
@@TheRynovision Dawkins lectures on theology. What a goon.
@@CJFCarlsson You're right! He is a goon. He's also delusional with intent.
@@TheRynovision "Did you notice his degree is in marine biology yet he's lecturing us on anthropology and genetics? Priceless!"
He has also done genetics research. Can you dispute his claims, or only question his integrity?
@Paragon Partners: His work in this area has been peer-reviewed.
Well done!
The Church has never addressed this topic. A great disservice to the body of Christ.
May God bless you all. You believed or not, it is your free will. You have the right to beieve or not. But my right i will pray for your good health and peace for all of us
@Adam Taylor Maybe you should read the Koran and the Hadiths and the Surrahs (the foundation books of Islam) before you pick Hebrew and Christian literature to criticize. If you find this tiny list out of thousands of pages challenging, try the Hadiths and Surrahs, you will be horrified.
Starting with #1, the common translations have 70, not 50,000. And was this a true event or Hebrew allegory to get a point across?
#2 In islam it is not appropriate for women to reveal skin or talk to a stranger male, therefore this old tribal rule is not surprising for ancient mankind. It was a different world back then, you are conflating modern values with ancient ones which is ridiculous.
?
#3 and #4: Slavery was acceptable human practice for 6,000 years, nothing surprising to read. Pleasure palaces were not invented by the Romans. Did you not watch Game of Thrones? ;)
#5: Yes adultery is moral sin. I would have to go back and research this part of the bible but are you sure this is not referring to not getting a formal divorce before cheating on your spouse?
#6 Is this not referring to the famine blamed on the sinful nature of the community? Allegory or true event, not certain.
#7 This had to do with eunuchs if i recall correctly.
#8 You are conflating again ancient culture values with modern ones.
#9 Yes lusting after other women instead of your own is akin to adultery, Jesus said it himself. All of us males are guilty of it but his point was important, sin begins with thought before action.
geotech6 All Religion is demented, useless and not a path to truth. Jesus never said anything - he never existed.
@@inkblack6256
And evolutionist are brainwashed!!! Hahaha
Joey Feliciano Nope. We have fact, proof, reality, evidence and common sense.
All you have is irrational dark age superstition and gibberish.
I suggest you grow and get an education.
@@inkblack6256
Nope, the 3 main components of evolution are, Mutation Natural selection and Imagination. Try to remove one and it will collapse!!!!
The only thing that support evolution THEORY is theory, they add up pictures, animation, and old bones that no one knows what it look like, to make it sound real. But in reality, those who believe in their bullshit are gullible and lunatic. People like you who live in scifi fantasy don't realize that.
Thank you for your efforts and sharing.
It's not that I have 'faith' but WHOM I have faith in😁
A tiny bit of faith in the right thing is worth alot more than absolute faith in the wrong thing.
Having faith is nothing to brag about. Faith requires the purposeful suspension of reason. That's not a good way of deducing the truth.
Max Mac How right you are.
@@maxmac7845 Faith is the substance of all things hoped for. Meaning all men have faith. But what do you know of reason? Your belief system is based off what a group of people believe just as Ann Brown's is. You simply disagree. But don't get confused you don't have proof in your belief either.
@@alamotte2005 You're conflating faith with trust. They are two entirely separate things. Trust is real world evidence based and, well, they don't call it "blind faith" for nothing. I care about what is actually true. Do you?
Very late comer here, but when I first watched this on channel 40, though a deep biblical researcher myself, I definitely learned something. Robert Carter is a wonderful doctor and good Christian presenter. It would appear this is too conservative of an example though, since we are talking roughly 1500 years until the Flood and then 4, 500 years until the present time, and we have 7,000,000,000 people now after triple that time span...the population before the Flood in one third of that time could easily be estimated from 500 million to 2 billion for the population of the earth before this huge destruction.
The Flood was about 50,000 BC.
I bless you in the name of Jesus!
@clifton gaither how!?
@@ejc8466 . Because not everyone believes in Jeebus .
Blostin I bless you in the name of Buddy Holly a great person and artist!
@@hollyfanatic8686 .
True 'Words Of Love'
Redone by The Beatles
Thanks - I was able to use this program as a painfully non-scientific approach to interpreting data in my lecture on scientific method versus nonsense (non-science)
So what is supposedly non-scientific about it?
For a moment there i thought.. Men this guy is good he even knows the time noah was born,1056Am oh you mean the Year!! Ok ;c)
😂
Those that study and research have facts and truth. Try yours, the languge, Latin aka LADINOES, ROME, PORTUGLE, SPAIN. THOSE ARE CLUES TO SPAIN-ISH and HEBREW. When we talk about Hebrew to include the word LADINOES, is to refer only to the BLACK SPEAKING LADINOES, you could not be mixed and be called Ladino.
How is the Biblical account of the infusion of Nephilim genes into those of mankind demonstrated in your models?
Very good question!! I've been tossing that around for awhile now, wondering if there are still distinctive behavioral traits that might be associated with it.
@SAP 23 Thank you for that very informative, long-winded explanation. It explains what Paul was going through at Romans 7:14-25, and what I, and probably most self-examining persons, have to be constantly reminded, the struggle that living in the flesh is in conflict with living in the spirit. I thank Jesus every day for helping me hold the line and "rescuing me from the body of death". Thank you again. You made sense.
Thank you both. I have a feeling I would very much enjoy discussing this topic and many others, further with either of you.
"biblical account"? The "sons of God" that this passage tells about are not angels, but the descendants of Seth who served God.
The "sons of man" were the Descendants of Cain who did not.
Angels were created to be in God's service. They do not procreate, Jesus said. Math. 22 23:31
Nothing to learn here. Quote: "the Bible *claims* to be the history book of the Universe. So starting with THAT as an assumption"...
Taqifsha Nanen I agree - I’m just directly quoting what the “expert” in this video says. Sadly, he (and all others who believe this stuff literally) is basing his entire line of reasoning on this false assumption.
@Taqifsha Nanen What. There is one creation story. Genesis 1 speaks about the general creation of everything, including humans, and Genesis 2 focuses on the topic of humans. That is why there are "two stories of creation". Read some Bible before you will try to speak about it. In the Bible there is a lot of repetitions of everything, and that is done in order to ensure that people will notice and understand. However, you only prove that repeating yourself may seem for some, as two separate stories lol
So even if Modus ponens is not your cup of tea it is the way science progresses.
If you want to know in detail what really happened, how Long it took to build the ark, Adam and Eve details, their daughter, other children, who beget whom, read Jubilees, Jasher, enoch has some enlightening details as well. Then there is not guessing of whom begat whom and when. Its in detail. You all need to realize that several books were canonized and taken out by the Catholic Church and they admit they did it because it scared the people and caused chaos. Some say 14 books were taken out, some say 18 some say 75. Nonetheless, we have the original Dead Sea scrolls which give us all the information we need in detail. It says in 2 Timothy 3:7 always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. Its like the movie Raiders of the lost Ark. They dont have the entire map and they are digging in the wrong place. Read those books and you will see what is truth. Its astonishing to say the least. Thats why it says in the Bible study NOT read but Study his word. Look up what the words meant in ancient languages, not our muted English language which does not have the same meanings. If in 1960s gay meant happy and today it means homesexual, dont you think that has happened 6000 years ago? There are so many Greek translations of the New Testament and meanings have changed. Check out the books taken out and enjoy the journey. JUST REMEMBER THE FIRST THING IN SCIENCE IS FROM NOTHING, NOTHING COMES. The only way we got a mermaid, half man half horse, is by doing what we are doing now, taking the DNA of man and animal and making other beings. We are taking the DNA of man and changing it. We are taking the DNA of plant GMO's and changing it. So shall be the days of Noah....they were doing the same thing as we are doing now. Dont be fooled there is no such thing as mythology. They are doing transhumance, transgender stuff now like they did back then. I saw what Japan is doing in a documentary among others creating all body parts for super humans. They said and I quote, we dont have to die now. In revelations it says man will want to die but cant. They just showed on the news what we are doing with babies in the test tubes creating perfect humans tampering again with the DNA of God. He said he knew us before the foundations of the Earth. He said we were perfectly made in his image. We changing our DNA man, plant, and animal seed like it says in Genesis, and we are doing now, we have made a mockery of God saying his handiwork is no good we as man can do a better job. A slap in his face thus came the deluge the first time and fire the second. Wake up America it's coming and we all have been warned. Solomon says history repeats itself there is nothing new under the sun.
So Adam and Eve had only two sons. Where did the wives come from????? Did they just pop up out of the Earth suddenly?
@@PURPLE.REIGN.1999 Adam had many other sons and daughters" Genesis 5:4 (KJV) And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:
After Cain killed Abel, he married a sister and started building cities with his children: Genesis 4:17 (KJV) And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.
What we call "incest" was not an issue until numerous generations after Noah's Flood when human genetics had devolved to a point where marrying and pro-creation by close relatives produced deformities and mental issues. The first commandment against it appears in the Mosaic Law (about 3500 years ago): Leviticus 20:17 (KJV) And if a man shall take his sister, his father's daughter, or his mother's daughter, and see her nakedness, and she see his nakedness; it is a wicked thing; and they shall be cut off in the sight of their people: he hath uncovered his sister's nakedness; he shall bear his iniquity.
Your comments is imply a false statement. The books you refer to gained only sparse acceptance among ANY Christians and were (and are still) rejected for numerous reasons. For example, most of these books were penned by people who assumed false names and PRETENDED to be someone else. They were fraudulent. Secondly, most of them were obviously not penned by eyewitnesses. They were FORGERIES.
If you want to be deceived, read the deception. But if you want to remain informed and follow TRUTH, read your King James Bible and the 66 Books found therein.
@@GregoryMiller that's hilarious, because not one of the books were written in English, and the original languages in which they were written have changed and morphed. For the accurate interpretation, you need to understand the historical contexts, the language used at the time each book was written, the customs and government at that time, and the audience for whom it was written.
@@PURPLE.REIGN.1999 Now, THAT is hilarious. You don't understand anything you just said everyone needs to understand. No one does. If there's one thing anyone who studies ancient languages DOES understand it is that much of those languages and MOST of the culture and customs of the day, as well as the actual function of government, is barely understood at all.
Your god is dead. Mine has given us a Book that is sufficient for us to understand that Adam had children who married one another to begin the human race, etc. We know the truth. God's word is truth. And it's as true in English as it was in those ancient (dead) languages when people who actually understood them spoke and wrote them.
You people who want to be blinded by your arrogance can go right ahead and walk into your self-dug ditches. The rest of us read our King James Bible and laugh at the scribes and pharisees who know to much to know anything,.
If all men and women come from the only 3 Noah's children . How do you explain all the different races ?
thomas bittner genetic mutations. Just like two black parents can have the possibility of having a white child and two white parents can have a darker child we are equal color or race doesn't matter
Genetics and DNA, Dr. Carter has other videos explaining this.
If you started with middle brown people who had dominant and recessive genes in their mix, you would end up with todays population.
Easy.
We must also consider the three daughters-in-law of Noah were not necessarily close relatives. Human mitochondrial DNA is descended from three haplogroups, conveniently coded L,M,N. It would be good if Dr. Carter emphasized this.
Oh man...you dont know your bible
Fabian69 - two white parents cannot have a black child, what you speaking there is pure BS
The Israelites were only in Egypt for 215 years, not 480, not 430, and not 400 years. But I still believe their increase from 70 to 2.5 million was attainable. The Egyptians even attested to their rapid growth
This is excellent. Thank you!
Fascinating information interesting program thumbs up 👍🏽
Shem/Semitic, Ham/Egypt and Africa and Japeth/ Europe and Asia. Evolution is a THEORY not a fact!
Semitic people are also African, Ham also African Japheth also African just slight variations. Israel is on the African continental plate. You can not get different races from the same parents just different shades or slightly different features. Actually Ethiopia was from north Egypt downwards. The aryans changed the look of some Africans. Med/Persian empire. We are all the same!
Always note the three haplogroups of mtDNA are L,M,N. Mrs. Ham, Mrs. Shem. Mrs. Japheth.
Ham was mostly Africa, look at DNA studies of the mummies in Egypt!!
@@spongehead1354 African is not 1 thing it is many, there is more genetic diversity in Africa then anywhere else in the world
You totally misunderstand the meaning of the word "Theory" when used in the scientific context, as evidenced in your post.
I'm seriously looking at the Reasons To Believe flood theory. That it was a regional flood, and modern people are reading the text wrong. In context, "the earth" can simply mean "all the ground around them" rather than the actual planet the way we read it with modern eyes. They wouldn't have known what a planet was anyway. So waters "covering the earth" doesn't require a global flood to be both literal and accurate.
WT Keeton Gen 7:19 (KJV) And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
Yes it was a world wide flood.
How can you have a flood that covered the mountains (Ararat, which is in the region, is over 5000 metres high) and lasted a year, be contained to just that region?
How do you know that they wouldn't have known what a planet was?
Why build an ark and take on the bird as passengers if it was merely regional? Why not simply migrate?
@@PJRayment I'm referring to the Hugh Ross Reasons To Believe model. He has compelling answers to these questions. It's an interesting model.
@@wtk6069
I realised what you were referring to. But it's unbiblical. I pointed out the fallacy of a regional flood. Hugh Ross also believes in deep time, which contradicts the biblical account. His answers are not "compelling", but wrong.
@@PJRayment Basically, he believes the Earth is 4.5 billion years old, but the Garden of Eden existed relatively recently,, closer to Young Earther models. The one part that gets potentially sketchy isn't the age question but the related "days" question. He believes the Genesis days were ages or epochs. That's the part I'm not totally sold on, Still, it's good mental exercise to discuss these non-salvation issues.