Even if the genes seem very similar, that doesn’t disprove a creator. That just proves we have the same creator who creates things similarly. But not the same.
But the similarity of the genes is not the point, its a bit more involved. The genes are not just similar, but are distributed in the natural world in a way that shows a pattern called a nested hierarchy. That pattern arises from branching processes. Railing against similarity is irrelevant - you need to explain the pattern that is a hallmark of evolution.
teddansonLA Even the fossil record doesn’t show any evolutionary changes over time. You only find fossils in their already complete state. Any change in dna is an actual lack of information not an addition to the already dna that’s there. There’s something about the differences in us now that’s important. You don’t see any results of current t evolutionary things happening either. Humans are humans and dogs are dogs and cats are cats.........the list goes on and on. God made everything according to its “kind”, and God saw that it was very good. Last week I spent a few days in the woods and we are so much more then animals, we are supreme beyond the animals. Human intelligence is so beyond an animal that it’s plain to see with the naked eye. We were definitely made in God’s image.
Raymond Palmer You are also correct that Jesus was there during creation. For by him and through him all things were made. “And God said” (Genesis 1)that’s the Word (Christ) making the creation. However, he never lost dominion. And his coming into the world was not to get power back. His coming into the world was to atone for our sins and to lay his life down as a ransom for many. He exercised his power over Satan the second he didn’t give into Satan in the desert. About the other stuff you mentioned, I have not read that in the scriptures and I am curious where you got that from.
@@globalcoupledances the assertions that this species of “ape” is related to humans is absurd. They are claiming it as fact when there’s no traceable way to connect those dots. The best attempt would be a theory and people believe this is the truth. They choose to believe a lie and live under a delusion.
@@globalcoupledances no, humans and apes are separate. Just like today. There may be many similarities but never have they been related. Humans were made in God’s image and animals were not.
Had the Bible said something along the lines that we all shared a common ancestor and it branched out into different beings ( just like what the current evolution theory says) then the secular scientists would've had something else to say and laughed it off. It's not about seeking truth it's about finding evidence that suits their preconceived notions that challenges the religious notions.
Steven Jones its good having a spiritual father to learn from also it’s a loving thing and men were meant to be in a relationship with their father from the start like Adam. Self worth is a valuable moral concept foundationally to help rationalize threw love for fellow man and God threw out life as well people not recognizing this is a big part of the problem now days . N it beats studying blindly by a long shot lol
How can one have "historical science" without first making some guesses at history? That's the thing about historical science, it's truly meaningless without assumptions.
@@All-shall-say-Jesus-is-Lord "How can one have "historical science" without first making some guesses at history? " By looking at the evidence over time. "it's truly meaningless without assumptions."" Assuming that evidence is a valid thing to use it supported by the success of those assumptions. As opposed to believing in a long disproved because you told you should believe it. The same sort of people that lied to you about how science works. Fossils ARE observations. Dating is supported by testing and evidence. IF the dating techniques were as faulty as Creationists lie, then fusion bombs would have failed to go BOOM because the same science is in use for both. Oh and fusion bombs do go boom, life does evolve, the Earth is old, the universe older and there was no Great Flood. Ethelred Hardrede
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv I seriously doubt dating techniques and the bombs going boom had anything to do with each other. In the same field of science? Yes, but that's meaningless unless there's a real connection. Could you point one out for me? You said the dating techniques have been proven to be solid. How exactly? I don't think it's possible without first assuming something was ridiculously old. Fossils are evidence, yeah, evidence for a global flood. Fossils don't form unless something dies and is buried rapidly.
@@All-shall-say-Jesus-is-Lord "I seriously doubt dating techniques and the bombs going boom had anything to do with each other. " Your doubts are not relevant to reality. Nuclear cross sections, stability and decay rates are all involved. "You said the dating techniques have been proven to be solid. How exactly?" By testing them. That is how the decay are determined. " I don't think it's possible without first assuming something was ridiculously old. " You are not thinking because that is not needed at all. The testing can be done without any assumptions. Just a know decay rate and a measurement of the relevant isotopes in the sample. "Fossils are evidence, yeah, evidence for a global flood. There was no such flood so they are not from one. Nor do the sediments and fossils fit such a thing. " Fossils don't form unless something dies and is buried rapidly."" Gee really it has to die? It doesn't have to be buried immediately, just before the bones decay and some fossils show degradation before being covered. There is no need for a global flood for bodies to be covered. That is just plain silly. Floods happen every year. All that is needed is a LOCAL flood and not even that as some fossils are found in desert sandstone. You are arguing from your ignorance on the subject to retain your ignorance. The Great Flood was disproved long ago, by Christians in the 1800's who were looking for evidence of the flood. No college, producing working geologists, has even one class in Flood theory. By NOT using it do the needed jobs for their employers. IF there had been such a flood they would have to take that into and they do not. You just plain ignorant on the subject and you will stay that way as long as you only go on Creationist nonsense. Get a real education on the subject. Ethelred Hardrede
Fascinating, really interesting; this is for those who doesn’t want to believe. But for us believers, there is no need for explanation, we walk by faith, and we know that God is the creator of everything including us.
Patricia - It's not a matter of "wanting to believe". I was raised evangelical but as I matured and gained knowledge it came down to (1) the BIble was true and all scientists and historians are wrong or (2) the Bible is an ancient manuscript of letters, poems, songs, biographies and some history. At its core it's the story of a tribe who became convinced they were chosen by their particular god. Scientific or historical truth never figured since they knew nothing of science or (real) history. The Israeli=Moab war (2 Kings) has Israel winning. But Moabite stone carving found in Jordan records the same war with a different outcome! LOL This was the standard practice - "history" favors those in power at the moment. Even today we pick and choose. We ignore teachings that rainbows, floods, earthquakes, storms, disease and deformity are divine signs because we know the natural causes. It doesn't make the stories less interesting. We ignore the fact that not a single piece of evidence of millions of Jewish slaves in Egypt has been found because the whole point is the story (I prefer the original Ten Commandments)
Nupuqi Om-Re Khonectics Chamber 45 plus degree The Generations of ADAM Atom ( ADAM , Axim ) from the Exosphere 9 cipher Sperm ( SETH ) from the Thermosphere and Heliosphere 9 cipher Nitrogen Oxygen Argon Helium (Noah) from the Mesosphere 9 cipher Hydra O gene Hydrogen ( ABRAHAM , Alpha and Beta particles ) from the Mesosphere 9 cipher 2 atoms of Hydra gene testicles ( Ishmael , Isaac )( Rivers and Creeks ) from the Ionosphere 9 cipher Water channel ( Musa , Moses ) from the Ozone ( Azim ) 9 cipher Universal radiation RAIN ( Gabriel ) 9 cipher Oceans ( Mari , Mare , Mary ) 9 cipher Clouds ( Tri stage of Ion , Isa , Jesus , Ieous ) .
Scientists are the first to say that miracles are not scientific. God performed miracles that the human mind can’t understand. This world is beyond our human understanding.
this woman is really smart. I love this because I haven't got all the time in the world to unravel the stupid assumptions evolutionists use when presenting their "data"
I am not an evolution preacher but just for fun pretend to just leave God out of the equation like a scientist that only uses the natural world to explain things. Then come up with the best explanation for how things came to be. Just a thought. See what i am getting at ?
Adam Lived for 932 years and Noah lived generations after and was also 900 years ... abraham was after this ! hmm ... her years are not correct according to the bible.... The original sin was to be awake .. as we was in adream period for many generations until one day we ate fruits on the trees which changed them and they began to think and even make clothes and name things and rememebr other things even defy things and people.... the pre time period... the genetic changes of the human genome did not take place in 6,000 years ... the races of humankind took perhaps 180,000 years..
Excellent episode! And welcome to Dr Georgia Purdom as a new guest! This new guest is refreshing and welcome. Dr Purdom is an excellent speaker, lively and focused. The information is fresh and up-to-date. An overall refreshing episode! *Note:* Kudos too on the clean up of the show's introduction. It has been noted and appreciated.
"I don't know if Adam was made out of dust " I do, he was made out of the imagination of ignorant men. "but I know when we die we become dust " Sometimes, some bodies have been mummified, some fossilized but none have become normal dust as most dust is mostly made of inorganic material. In any case, Genesis got nearly everything wrong. Ethelred Hardrede
"By the sweat of your brow will you have food to eat until you return to the ground from which you were made. FOR YOU WERE MADE FROM DUST AND TO DUST YOU WILL RETURN.” Genesis 3:19
Years ago a friend of mine challenged my faith concerning Creation & not evolution... In the chimp/human part of the ‘debate’ he asked “then how do you explain how similar they are?” My (God inspired) answer; “They had a common Creator” God’s WORD is Truth.
" God’s WORD is Truth." If only you had the word of god. Since there was no Great Flood it obvious that you have the words of men not a god. Indeed you have only give us YOUR word that you have the word of a god. Ethelred Hardrede
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv same goes for evolution nobody seeing it happen and still you believe it cause ''people' say it dead is dead it cannot come alive by itself like evolution claims.
The great devastating thing and ignorant of all kind theologians and believers don’t understand the the very simple and wise logic ‘ if god is perfect and omnipresent is there any space or room for sin?
I really have no issues with claiming to be human, as opposed to claiming to be a descendent of an animal. I am proud to be an awesome creation from God
Bella Eva - Humans are animals. There is no doubt we evolved from 1 celled organism 4 billion years ago. There may be a God that created that first cell of life...but after that it's evolution. You may not have any issues except your living in a world where you can't have your reality questions so you choose to blind fold yourself and stick cotton wool in your ears.
@@creativesource3514 How do we know that god doesn't keep an eye on evolution and adjust it to keep the balance or do what he can without upsetting the order. Maybe it must keep in.order to work ?
@@creativesource3514 Certain aspects that i understand are things God uses to keep the balance of nature . How it all works out is a bit of a mystery but the separation of biological science and religion must be kept separate for the good of both . Other than the origin of modern man in regards to the ability to use reason and consciousness of the possibility of a god we must allow science to discover as much about how the natural environment works. I am not blood thirsty to convince anyone either way, just want to keep the playing field level by exposing misrepresentations of each side by educating the people to examine the subjects with proper critical thinking skills. I enjoy people that know what they are talking about concerning evolution or theology. I hate religion even though i am a theist and Christian .Many don't think so (me a Christian ?). I am at the raw end from both sides . But i love to argue so it's OK.
I have my daughter in Catholic school. Yesterday she told me her religion teacher told her that Adam and Eve, and Noah were just stories. I had to show from the Bible that Jesus confirmed Adam,Eve and Noah. I am planning to have a very loud discussion with her teacher.
I applaud parents like you who speak up against what some teachers teach. I heard the story of here in my area that a teacher gave the students an assignment to take pictures of themselves as if they were getting married in a gay marriage. One student said it was against their beliefs and didn't do it so they got an F. I wondered, why didn't the parents get that teacher fired.
@@senseijuan3230, agreed. I get sick of milk toast, gutless, wimpy "Christians" that don't stand up for God. God told US to be bold and strong, and yet so many of the "believers" just want to fit in and not rock the boat. It's disgusting because they are disgusting.
@@2fast2block Jesus spoke very v clearly about right and wrong, the apostles face persecution, God told us to praise him openly and yet we see Christian who water down his message just not to offend anyone.
lol, very sad to see people fight for 'god'. There are many questions that you cannot simply reply. Holding a book which is written 2k years ago is difficult to explain now.
Thank you Host and thank you Dr. Purdom. Was gathering and studying information about ADAMIC NATURE, I came across this, brought in a new light seriously to the same ancestral debate. Thank You for pointing out those differences.
Jesus was only a apostle of god not God why God is need to born from a women Why God made Adam and eve Jesus was descendant of Adam and eve not biological son of god or self God He didn't claim he is God or son of God
@@rixgamer5748 John 8:58 “Jesus answered them: 'I solemnly declare it: before Abraham came to be, I AM.” [This was the name God gave himself when he first communicated with Moses, Exodus 3:14 “God replied, 'I am who am. ' Then he added, 'This is what you shall tell the Israelites: I AM sent me to you. '”]
I have been looking for something like this since I started learning about the scientific nature of the Bible how everything is provable, that's why the Bible is written to give us proof and evidence for what you believe and even if something isn't written in the Bible it gives you the time reference and a starting point for what you look need to look for, thank you for this.
It's not about questioning God's narrative, it's about understanding it. The implication in the original Hebrew (placed in proper cultural context) is that Adam and Eve are not necessarily the progenitors of every human, but a pair selected to be priests to represent mankind; and appear to be at least the first *sapient* hominids. (This would explain where Cain's wife came from for example.) But they are the progenitors of the ruling line of mankind, ultimately producing the "kinsman redeemer" or Messiah. As for the "dust" thing: again, the Hebrew says ""God formed man, the dust of the earth" not "FROM the dust of the earth". Referring to man as dust or clay was a common ancient near eastern way of saying we are earthly or mortal and distinguishing us from heavenly beings or "gods". As for "evolution", yes they cook the data to exclude anything suggestive of theism. But Genesis itself says the earth *brought forth* or produced various life forms suited for various environments. Not exactly incompatible with evolution! But it happened because "God said 'Let it be so' " not by happy accident, funny coincidence and random happenstance as atheists and philosphiical materialists pretend. If it's 1925, Model T cars don't produce themselves But Henry Ford doesn't personally put on coveralls pick up a toolbox and build each one personally. He orders it done and it happens.
Which 'god' would that be? The 'yahweh' that paul/saul said in the bible he and his herd of gullible believers are following? The same 'yahweh' benedict in 2009 and francesco again in 2021 declared as not the 'god' of christians, and both ordered the priesthood to stop using that name in their liturgies, sermons and preachings? Do tell...
@@MedellínInsider-n3o YHVH is pure conscious being. Jesus identified himself with as YHVH referring to himself as "I AM". If the apostate Roman Catholic "church" rejects YHVH they reject Christ and are no longer Christian.
@@Nunya_Bidness_53 Mate, if you want to contribute, read and learn from the 'bible' first. What you are saying is LSD-induced hallucination. Your 'jesus' CRITICISED 'yahweh". Attacked him and insulted him as a liar deceiver and murderous maniac. Do not respond before you finally open the 'bible', find, read and understand what you have just read. Then, and only then, return and apologise for your inappropriate, religious delusional comment.
We need to translate and interpret the Bible. The Holy Spirit of Truth needs to be our guide and our Teacher. Man can only speak to our ears what God is showing us.
That'a what all the money grabbing false teachers say. Sorry we need to know how to read first . And like everything else it takes skill to glean out and interpret with the correct understanding concerning the details for correct understanding of the bible . That is why our teachers Go to biblical studies departments in University's Seminaries around the world. So my point is it depends on what school of thought has influenced you . Whether you know it or not these things are influencing us. Even the translation has an hidden agenda and message they are promoting. This is why the teaching of man is very important . Without it we would not even be able to read. The study of Hermunitics is very important. So is Church history, . Ancient language studies, The History of Western Civilization, Greek Philosophy. Just things that help our mind see and look at the world through the eyes of the time being spoken of. The bible comes to life and makes it fun to read the more we understand the culture the better equipped to give a ready answer for our faith and counter the scepters with our understanding . This should not be neglected . Some times people use excuses for not doing the work concerning biblical studies. . Sometimes boring but pays off . . . In my opinion.
Adam and Eve is a Biblical myth, exactly as the Bible itself is a religious allegory, never intended to be taken seriously. It remains the single greatest book of poetry and ancient wisdom ever written by man, *but it is by no means a history book, it belongs to pre-history.* For us to believe in Adam & Eve would be to believe in the mystical Garden of Eden and the evil Talking Snake, which is on its face is a tale that even a 5-year old child would have difficulty believing. I will now completely DISMANTLE this fantastical fairytale, once and for all. First of all, for only ONE human couple to even survive long enough to successfully reproduce would be one in a billion, particularly given the incredible hazards awaiting all ancient people. The odds of sudden death from predators, illness, stavation, and catastrophic weather events would be monumental, even in the best of times, rendering the survival of just two potential mates virtually IMPOSSIBLE. *The ultimate success of ALL species depends on having as many numbers as possible, which is why ancient man began to live in groups in the first place.* But let's just imagine that this miraculous couple actually DID survive long enough to procreate, then raise the only family in human history... WHAT THEN?? This is when I tear the Good Doctor's superstitions to bits, strictly by using facts that apply to ALL types of animals, worldwide, and for all time: *Whenever you have one only one mating pair of mammals, the result will be offspring with horrendous physical mutations, fatal illlnesses, the propensity to die from all manner of disease, and with this kind of disastrous inbreeding, CONTINUE TO CREATE EQUALLY MALFORMED, MENTALLY DEFECTIVE CHILDREN, FOREVER.* This basic fact of genetics effects all forms of life on earth, and can easily be seen in the breeding of modern day dogs, also known as, "Man's Best Friend." Anyone knowing anything about these beloved pets knows how dangerous it is to inbreed brother and sister canines, and this practice is universally condemned for its inherent dangers. The exact, same thing applies to humans, only more so. This is the precise reason we now have LAWS preventing incest, still the greatest single taboo in human history. I'm sorry to relate, but the myth of Adam and his Mate will remain just that, a myth.
@@tiffsaver Lol, yeah I was actually on a video about Bill Nye disproving the flood and the Ark. It's SO FUN! We get crazy comments every day and it's so great responding to them, debates, arguments, good conversations, dumb people, etc.. I was recommended this video because someone was talking about Adam and Eve and they sent me this video to clear things up. It unfortunately did not.
Of course what you say is true today. Genetic defects are multiplied when brothers and sisters reproduce and cause very serious and severe consequences. But the Bible says man was created perfect, so perfect a man could live 1,000 years after the fall. In the beginning there were no genetic defects to be inherited from a still pure genome and therefore would not be the issue you claim. The Bible is much easier to believe than the evolution scientism religion. What we now understand about the genome proves beyond any doubt we were created by a higher power. There is no greater nonsense than unguided evolution.
@@mwils51 *"BUT THE BIBLE SEZ..."* What the Bible says, is that God made the entire earth in only six days and we should believe in a fu*king TALKING SNAKE and that Noah saved the dinosaurs on his homemade canoe!! But the most amazing thing is that there are morons like you stupid enough to believe it.
I’m not a geneticist. I do understand logical arguments and cognitive dissonance. This presentation is riddled with inconsistent logical arguments to justify a belief system. I started out as an orthodox Catholic grounded in absolute belief in the gospel. As I look at other religion and belief systems that grossly predate the Hebrew origins ... the similarity in the fundamental story are humbling, but punch historical holes in diehard believers in obsolete Bible thinking. All of these systems independently keep arriving at a conclusion or belief that there is a Supreme being or God ... all independently arrived at separate from the “Bible” as Jude-Christians recognize. Add science to this, and the orderliness screams that this is not random, but part of a plan from a Supreme Being or God. All these “scriptures” emphasize an understanding about why “humans” exist; how “humans” should live; how “humans” should interact with each other.
This is fascinating and she exposes the lies and deceit that comes from evolutionists. I studied anthropology and came the conclusion that anthropology on ancient life forms is no more scientific than astrology. It too is based on lies and deceit.
I know I do these scientists be tripping. If they haven't figured out by now God is the creator they seriously are blinded. By the lies of the devil. Or just dont wanna admit that there is a God who created everything even us.
We're mammals in that we are warm blooded vertebrae that give birth to live young and feed them with milk. It has nothing to do with being an animal or not. We're human and set apart from the rest of living creatures in that we have a soul. Therefore, not animals.
I have a bachelors in biology and never worked in the field and I can debunk her confirmation bias and cherry picking. "If Adam and Eve aren't real people and there is no fall, then why do we need Jesus?" Exactly.
There are over 200,000 science books in the Harvard Library that goes to detail to show Genesis chapter one. The first 31 verses in the Bible. There are a total of 31,000 verses in the Bible.
@@andrewoliver8930 For well over 100 years people have been using Science to show that the Bible is accurate and true. Esp Archaeology has time and again shown the historical accuracy of the Bible.
@@andrewoliver8930 Talk is cheap, show me your evidence. I have never found any conflict between true science and a true understanding of the Bible. Most of the Bible is History and 100 years worth of archaeological evidence shows the Bible to be very accurate and true. As Gerald Schroeder points out there are over 200,000 science books in the Harvard University Library that shows us that the first 31 verses in Genesis are accurate and true. As well as the science books at his school MIT. Remember Elliot Gould the Harvard professor that tired to prove the Bible wrong and died young from cancer after he miserably failed to prove his claim. Then there was Hawking who like Gould failed to prove that there is no God. Again he had sever health problems and even lost the ability to be able to talk. It does not seem to go well with the men of Science that want to fight against God. Although even Hawking raises interesting questions. Which maybe why he defied the odds to live as long as he did in his condition. He says: "Most sets of values would give rise to universes that, although they might be very beautiful, would contain no one able to wonder at that beauty." So why would there be so much beauty in a universe if God did not create us to appreciate the beauty of His Creation? "The Anthropic Principle," contends that the universe was brought into existence intentionally for the sake of producing mankind. Neil deGrasse even takes the finely tuned universe one step further. He tells us that "one second of time had passed" from the beginning of the Universe. "Without Billion-and-one imbalance to one Billion between matter and antimatter, all mass in the universe would have self-annihilated". If this is not enough for you. We are told that all matter was created in a "Planck era" The length of a Planck era is "ten-million-trillion-trillion-trillionths of a second". Not much time for evolution to take place there. Tyson does not fight against God they way Gould and Hawking did. But he clearly is not tainted with creationist bias. So is the The Anthropic Principle and the extremely precise finely turned universe evidence for God? Francis Collins would say yes. Although some men of science would say we do not have enough evidence one way or the other so we can say with certainty. Because Atheist Scientist do not have a very good track record when it comes to their health and longevity so it does not seem to be advisable to fight against God. Science in general can say that belief in God is beneficial. For example people that are a part of a community religious group tend to live five to ten years longer and they tend to have higher levels of empathy. So even if we can not prove that there is a God, we can still provide Scientific evidence to follow the Bible and believe in the God of the Bible. We should also mention Sir Fred and his predictions: "Hoyle found that there were numerous "fortunate" one-time occurrences which seemed to indicate that purposeful "adjustments" had been made in the laws of physics and chemistry in order to produce the necessary carbon." So do we consider this evidence for God or do we just say there is a very high probability that there is a God as described in the Bible. A God that watches over His word and makes the necessary adjustment so that His Word Accomplishes His plan and His purpose. Now I realize this is just a intro to a few of the "evidences" for God.
I think it is even more amazing that human came from countless generations of evolution from single cell organism. It only goes to show the Almighty God is truly almighty.
By George, I think you got it! Evolution never denies the possibility of a creator god, and limits itself entirely to explaining how life, once it got here in whatever way, came to have such a dazzling variety.
Well, this is a pretty hard topic to discuss, because Adam and Eve were in this world about some 6000 years ago, according to the Bible and what some scholars said. Anyways, according to the atheistic community they say that we are far more beyond of those 6000 years the Bible says we are at; I am a Christian person that it is pretty skeptical about what the so-called science have told us about evolution, because they are still looking for that missing link that cannot find, and some other scholars have said that they have found it, yet I doubt it. I guess that the missing link the science is looking for would be found once they accept that we are not from this world and accept that we have an omnipotent Lord that might be that missing link they are looking for!!!
O what's in a parable As it's not of the flesh 1st Timothy 1:4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do. Titus 3:9 But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain.
Ok, so at 3:38, she reads the statement from Giberson and Collins. "None of these 'explanations' can possibly be actual descriptions." The rest of the quote points out that human physiology doesn't contain dust, and a human can't be made "quickly" from a rib. But then they both agree that this "One time supernatural event" is why it doesn't make sense to us in society today. I've got to throw in the towel here. Because at this point, it's obvious that the rest of the "interview" is going to be a pandering confirmation biased explaining science away with, "Well, obviously it's written in the Bible. So that's why we will take these events at face value."
That's precisely the Creationist creed. At the "Discovery Institute" they actually have to sign a disclaimer that they will accept the Bible and deny anything that contradicts.
@@MrWeezer55 It doesn't matter what anyone's creed is. Or what they have to sign to keep a job. The only thing that really matters are facts. And the fact is Science does not disprove God... ID does not PROVE God... but the last 20 years of scientific discoveries have made the existence of God more and more likely.
@@bruce3102 The "last 20 years of scientific discovery" have NOT made the existence of God more likely. This is exactly the kind of thing the nematode brains at the Discovery Institute say. Creeds and signatures DO matter because they plainly state that they will deny any facts that don't agree with their "view". Balderdash.
@@MrWeezer55 YOU JUST PROVED THAT YOU HAVE BEEN PAYING NO ATTENTION... SUCH THAT, AT EAST ON THIS SUBJECT YOU HAVE EVINCED A PROFOUND DEGREE OF IGNORANCE.
Since you've never _seen_ any god, nor _heard_ any god, nor have you any evidence of any _god,_ aren't you believing in the theory of god? Yes; yes, you are.
You ought to tell that to the myriad of scientists who scientists who accept macroevolution and believe in Christianity. They’re the ones who have discovered most of the evidence for evolution. Here are some names: 1. Ken Miller 2. Francis Collins 3. Robert T. Bakker 4. Mary Schweitzer (known for discovering T. Rex “hemoglobin”) 5. Theodosius Dobzhansky 6. Mike Jones from inspiring philosophy (not a scientist, but a TH-cam Christian apologist who accepts macroevolution) Moreover, I urge you to go on to Answers in Genesis, a young-Earth creationist organization, and read their article titled “arguments creationists should NOT use.” You’ll find your little “evolution is just a theory” argument on the list.
God made Adam (has 22 chromosomes pairs plus X and Y), Eve was made from Adam's "tzela" (rib, beam, side)... Eve has 22 chromosome pairs plus two X chromosomes) The "rib" is the building block of life.
Thank you to this channel, came up in my recommendations a couple days ago and I’ve already obtained so many answers to so many questions. God bless all!
@Tim Webb " Lord Jesus Christ I am an American, lords are not legal in the US. He can run for office just as soon as he comes back from the dead. Which was supposed to happen nearly 2000 years ago. Didn't happen. Failed prophecy. Ethelred Hardrede
@@vulgarresponse7080 I am calm, you must be projecting your anger at my well reasoned fact based posts. How about you deal with what I really wrote instead of lying about me to assuage your anger at being exposed to reality.
Dust means many things but it includes the organic elements of the earth as in the dirt dust ground, earth, the elements etc as in earths organic material... in hebrew there are many defenitions of dust. Not only that but each letter does as well and easily clarifies the overall meaning. Our translations are true yet coprehendedly diminished. Learn hebrew, read it and see how much clearer the word becomes.
"For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse." Rom 1:20 (NASB)
Ten to the Negative 33 a part of your observation is spot on... As in it is so simple that even a child can understand it. You have to go through years of higher education to unsee the obvious: miracles don't do themselves. Was Mt Rushmore created by wind erosion? No? Well, then THE WORLD and all that live in it wasn't either. Even the simplest one cell organism is more sophisticated than a space shuttle. Let alone Mt Rushmore. So no. Some more translations of the same simple statement from a man whose education amounted to the equivalent of a minimum of 3 university degrees: For from the creation of the world His invisible qualities, both His eternal power and divinity, are clearly seen, being understood by the things made, for them to be without excuse. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse. For his invisible qualities, namely his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. Because His invisible attributes, namely His eternal power and divine nature, are clearly seen from the creation of the world, being understood from what has been made, so that they are inexcusable; And the translator's note to this last one: All scientific experiment and true human knowledge is based on the principle of cause and effect-we observe an effect and try to isolate its cause. As a logical corollary, the cause must be as great or greater than the effect, otherwise it could not produce it. Any human being who is both honest and intelligent, confronted with the observable universe, with its incredible order and complexity, must conclude that there has to be a CAUSE who is both incredibly intelligent and powerful-to refuse to do so is perverse. Since we have personality, He must as well. So Paul’s argument is precisely correct.The science of physics tells us that the entire known universe, taking only what is inorganic (not part of any living system), can be described using perhaps 250 bits of information. To describe the smallest protein molecule (unable to live alone, but part of a living system) requires some 1,500 bits of information (the ecoli bacterium some 7 million; one human cell some 20 billion). Now just where could chance plus nothing find 1,250 bits of new information (to produce the simplest protein), if in the whole universe there was only 250? The evolutionary hypothesis as an explanation for the origin of life is ridiculously, stupidly impossible!The science of genetics, with its genome projects, has discovered that a change of just 3 nucleotides is usually fatal to the organism. The genetic difference between a human being and a chimpanzee (closest relative) is at least 1.6%-this represents a gap of some 48 million nucleotide differences. Since a random change of only 3 nucleotides is fatal to an animal, and a dead animal can’t reproduce, there is no possible way that a chimp could evolve into a human. Each individual species had to be assembled separately, just like Genesis says. The ‘geologic column’ is a fiction, since there are multistrate tree fossils. Symbiotic plants and insects could not possibly evolve. And so on.
Yudon Ituno Awe, butthurt? I would be too. You are comparing erosion on the my Rushmore to the creation of life. These are false equivalencies and the same childish understanding of most things that lend your narrow mind to thoughts of supernatural skydaddies. You are sadly mistaken, and proud to be
Ten to the Negative 33 why exactly "false equivalencies"? Please elaborate instead of name calling. Who knows, you may be smarter than me and I may learn something!
Yudon Ituno Comparing an unknown event to erosion, which we know everything about is a false equivalency. False equivalencies and logical fallacies are at the heart of all arguments for religion. And your not out to learn if you immediately go to such a lame argument. That only tells me you like to preach but care little for what your arguments mean, you know, follow them to their logical conclusion before you try it on a stranger. You can use shallow arguments on ur family whom already believe, but not those who are serious bud
jamie glatz sorry it’s a proven fact there were never an Adam and Eve this garbage is Christian bias. Therefore everything they claim is automatically bullshit. They say and make up anything to defend their beliefs.
Julia Moon and when it acmes to ripping off another religion they obviously just can’t used it for word for word or people would be worshipping the god or gods of the religion they stole nit from . So what they do is they Change a few details like names obviously and places. And a few other details. Because if it a book like Harry Potter and if someone took everything except changing the name to Henry tinderperry they would so be sued for plagiarism.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Who are you to tell us anything, when God said He created Heaven and earth. 1 Corinthians 3:19 KJV For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.
@@boltman2u2 The whole first post. A fool wrote that lie. Oh there may be a god but all testable gods fail testing. Including the god of the Bible. There was no Great Flood, hardly the only error, so there is no Jehovah. I was not alluding. I came right out and said it clearly. Ethelred Hardrede
As a minister and theologian I understand what is truly said in the Bible! Genesis 1:26 and 27 has God saying let us create man in our own image and likeness it does not say he completed that act. Genesis 2 speaks of Adam being created from the dust of the earth, dust of the earth is found throughout the Bible and is a Middle Eastern term still used which means the same as scum of the earth many new converts say they were the dregs of society, scum of the earth, when God saved them. Kabbalistic Rabbinic teaching says that Adam was taken from another people and set aside by God to serve him. Eve's being taken from his rib is simply a term implying she was from the same source as Adam. God uses multiple covenants with Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and finally the New Covenant of Jesus to evolve man to become like God. The New Testament plainly says that this corruptible must put on incorruption, mortal must put on immortality. That we will be changed in a twinkling of an eye, that it does not yet appear what we shall be, but we shall be like him for we shall see him as he is. We shall put on a glorified body like God's then will the evolution of man into the image of God be complete. Its not completed in Genesis 1:26-27.
As both a Christian and a biological scientist, I can say that this woman is exceptionally biased and deceptive. She presents arguments for her beliefs in detail but quickly glosses over counter arguments and differing information. She throws out belief statements as fact with no evidence and then quickly moves on. She thinks she is presenting a strong case for the bible, but by clearly being deceptive and biased, she turns people off to the bible who can see through her. I cannot call her a credible scientist, regardless of her degrees and positions. Why doesn't she talk about the 2.5% Neanderthal genes in most humans? Why doesn't she mention the Denisovans and many other hominoids who fossil records prove once walked the earth? Because the scientific evidence runs contrary to her biased and uninformed beliefs.
That's good. I only have a BS in Computer Engineering and MS in Information Technology Management and survived a 15 month deployment to a combat zone as a EOD tech aka the bomb squad. How long do you think you will survive being a EOD tech in a combat zone using your intelligence?
Sad that anyone could have that education yet remain so willfully ignorant about reality. The universe is chaotic, its almost entirely hostile to life. If its from a god, that god loves vacuum and not life. How you fail to notice that is beyond reason.
@@damiandagger We survive based on consciousness not intelligence. My son is working on his degree in computer engineering. He still has three semesters to go. So far he is still debt free. What are the odds of being debt free when you graduate?
Within a mathematical certainty. Follow back every family tree to it's origin one man one woman. Adam means first man Eve means mother of all living because Adam named her that Gen. 3:20.
@@harshcalls "meaning the truth is... your blood is contaminated because of your sins?" I think he was trying to point out that blood is not where the Truth is. Truth should only be capitalized at the start of a sentence. When it is treated as a proper noun, it invariably involves either lying or just plain nonsense. The latter is the case with the OP. The truth is in DNA which does not remotely support Genesis on ANYTHING. It disproves both Adam and Eve and that silly flood story. Ethelred Hardrede
I do believe the Bible is real and that's why when religions change the Bible you still get the message they can't take it out even though they might not want to teach certain things you can see where their Doctrine doesn't match the Bible and you're not supposed to say anything but deep down you know it doesn't make sense what they are spewing and what's the Bible says you got to teach yourself and I'm not making punctuation marks and all that no time.
"ou need faith the Bible is all the evidence we need t Faith is not evidence of anything other than faith. However the Bible is testable. It claims there was a Great Flood. False. It shows mankind as existing less than 10,000 years. It looks very much like it was written by ignorant men with no special knowledge.
The mitochondrial genetics is something we must protect in ourselves...interesting topic at all times! God bless, in the name and blood of Jesus Christ: amen.
Note the preeminence in their "BELIEF" statement on their website of "speaking in tongues"... LISTED FIRST!! "The Baptism of the Holy Spirit Though the Holy Spirit is present in the life of every Christian, we believe that scripture clearly demonstrates a second work of God available to all believers, known as Holy Spirit Baptism. A common evidence of this work is the receiving of a personal prayer language, also known as “speaking in tongues.” That is FALSE and so many people FAKING speaking in tongues and too many churches pressuring people to speak in tongues.
your right man being in God's image is our consciousness and our human nature doesn't change, been the same in all recorded history, it's the same in all eight billion of us and it will naver evolve to something else. And Physical similarities don't mean our bodies are animal. Wolf breeds with dog, lion with tiger. Can humans breed with an ape? We have lots of similarities even without looking at the DNA so it shouldn't be a surprise we share similar DNA.
It all comes down to Pride, if non-christian scientists accept creation etc, they have to accept they are sinners and need a saviour. It is another lie satan has planted for man to reject Christ, even when Jesus did miracles when he walked on earth they rejected him. God could reveal the most amazing evidence and man will still and does reject Christ.
It does not matter if Adam and Eve existed or not. It's fun to talk about . What matters is that one understands there's a war going on for your soul. Wake up and smell the locust. It's them or us. Choose wisely.
Why did so many people doubt whether the first eleven chapters of Genesis were intended to be literal historical events long before evolution was a thought ? Even Philo a Jew living from 30 BC to 40 AD see below ; Philo
The idea that these challenges began due to The theory.of evolution is a false dichotomy. Historical Source Criticism began in the German Seminars at the end of the sixteenth century and by the time of Darwin Had taken over every University Seminary in the country. You aught to study theology.
Truethinker - maybe some Jews thought, it's not surprising because when "He came unto His own they received Him not" . Jesus Christ had no doubts, He reiterated the Scriptures - Moses, Isaiah, Elijah etc. He confirmed the Sabbath, thus the 4th commandment "Remember the Sabbath ... ". It reaffirms the 6 day creation narrative of Genesis 1. If we can't believe that then why believe anything in Mathew to Revelation. All of the Word of God is Truth, in it's time and context.
@@truethinker221 - if you do some serious research - you will find what a "slave" means in Old Testament - not what you imagine based on slave owners of the 18th - 20th century or even today. Study the Word of God for yourself. Abraham had a slave who would have inherited all of his wealth had Abraham remained childless.
I understood that the Evolution theory by Darwin said that chimps species are more similar, comparing with other species, to the human species but he did not say that we are the same. why she tries to show us we are different from the chimps? of course, we are different. Evolution theory never says we are the same.
@@voiceofreason162 you just can't take scientific findings and ignore half of it because it doesn't fit your opinion. This is the difference between a thinker and a believer, the thinker can change opinion according to scientific discoveries, the believer only accept whatever fits his beliefs and deny all the rest, and this is what is shown in this video
@@daijirokatoh3769 thanks, I'll pass on your comment to Richard Dawkins. A philosophical precursor is the normal starting point for most. Using an acceptability filter is par for the course. Evaluating the science is what I do. You don't know how entrenced you are until you do. That is why Scientific debates end up in mud wrestling matches. Whoever drowns first loses.
@@voiceofreason162 someone who believes just can't have a scientific debate, because his mind is all set even before the debate start. If religious people could think by themselves they could easily understand that stories like Noah's Ark, flat earth or Adam and Eve are technically impossible but it just won't happen because they don't have this ability
Of course we're evolved from earlier apes. That's why so many people are still not evolved enough to understand science. This is why apelike, superstitious, behaviour still pervades society.
It is like watching a baseball game that was won in overtime in 16 innings. Then going back to the first inning and claiming that you would have won if the umpire had called that third ball a strike which would have caused a run to score.Rather than be the third out.
Very dishonest as well since the real science has the last common female common ancestor about 100,000 years agon and last male common ancestor about 200,000 years ago.
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv Maybe you should elaborate if you know so much. What did she say that is wrong, scientifically? What makes her science bad compared to others? Simply the fact that she starts with the Bible and takes a look at some problems with mainstream scientific assumptions/methodologies, etc? Criticism is fine, but if that's all you do without saying why, you don't come across as being very credible yourself.
Mart TL1000S I am not a scientist as most humans. I am a common man though do not understand science understands Life. You may ask why? because of my life’s experiences proving the love of GOD. You are depending from the book of science, I depend upon MY own book of Life. But you know, GOD in HIS goodness gives this kind of opportunity to everyone, in HIS time. GOD Bless You.
Rankf Dsantos Not many creationists are that’s why they believe the pseudoscience of the bible without question. Which life experiences prove the love god ? Every member of every religion makes similar claims , they can’t all be true but they can all be false.
Rankf Dsantos Of course you do just like all believers of all cults but there’s no convincing evidence for your or any other god . Life experience has nothing to do with or points to a god . I suggest you deploy whatever degree of critical thinking capability you possess and try looking at things from a logical rather than a religious perspective. No god is necessary for anything it’s just an argument from ignorance or incredulity.
Every thing on earth was put here from a creator in such a way to work in harmony with each other.Nothing = nothing .Even evolution was designed by god.
Will you guys please let me know what the name of the article was that said the mitochondrial DNA traces back to 6500 years ago? I would love to share this information and would appreciate the original article from The Atheist :) thanks so much
The Ohio State University needs to take her diploma back. She is an embarrassment. I almost fell over when she said with great confidence that the world was only 6,000 years old.
Repent for the kingdom of God Is Near in we need to go back to good when we first was.. So invite Jesus Christ in your heart and the truth will set you free John 3.16. Without Jesus Christ we are nothing we are just evil twisted bad people walking on Earth. But through his son he can change us change your heart and live.. And be perfect as we once were with Jesus we can be righteousness be as holy as he is be perfect as he is. Before we got by the devil who is the deceiver and lie..
I was struck by the photo at 20:02 of Dr. Jeanson's computer screen sitting on a cardboard box. The poor guy needs better funding so that he can at least afford proper office furniture. The box, by the way, has a sticker on it that indicates it once contained copies of a book called "The Design and Complexity of the Cell."
@@kevin12553 I have, many times. I must admit, I do enjoy the evil deity portrayed in its collection of fables from a primitive people attempting to fabricate a history of themselves. Murder, rape, incest, genocide, etc.. always makes for a good read.
Does anyone know where I can get a good honest DNA test or tests from ?? So far I went for a test to a place that said mitochondria DNA comes from both the father and mother. Supposedly a reputable company but I now have some serious doubts.
"So far I went for a test to a place that said mitochondria DNA comes from both the father and mother." In general that is false. There seem to have a few cases where some mDNA came from the father. The people this happens to are not healthy and thus get selected out of the gene pool. " Supposedly a reputable company but I now have some serious doubts."" So do I based on that claim but you might want to see if you can find out their reputation.
Maybe you can Google for reviews of some or something. I've heard that DNA normally comes from the mother and, really rarely from the father, a process which isn't understood yet (if, I didn't read it, could be known, idk).
Dogma is what the devil uses to divide us. All we need to know is that we are to love each other and love Him. If we truly loved each other, no one could ever get us to believe we need walls. We'd want to help each other rather than isolate ourselves. But we are so easily mislead by the money people. Sigh.
@@lancecarter100 That is BS not water. Thank you for that fact free reply. I am not you. I can support myself with verifiable facts. Something that Ken Ham cannot manage either. I just love his fake ark. No gopher wood was involved in its making. Lots of steal and they rarely show the other side. Because its a regular building. A geological disproof of the Great Flood. Here have one of many disproofs of the Flood. Please note that dating is NOT relevant nor needed in this so the usual ignorant rants about dating are not relevant to this disproof. Yes I BLEEPING know that there is dating in this post but its not needed for the disproof. Ranting about the dating will not change the disproof which is based on layering. Here you go Creationists, disproof of the Bible all based on well understood and undeniable science. The layers, even without any dating of any kind, fully disprove the Great Flood that never happened. They simply cannot be laid down the way they are in a dozen floods much less one. No Creationist has ever shown an error this. Few have even tried to deal what I am actually posting. The data is from: GRAND CANYON Explorer kaibab org The same layer structure can be on on nearly any site about the Grand Canyon. Most of the writing is mine except some of the specifics on the layers. So far no one has shown any real error in this and I have posted it many times. IF the Flood was a real as you claim then the over 30,000 geologists in the US alone would HAVE to use Flood theory to do their job. They don't, and the do their job anyway. No mining or oil company would hire someone that used a theory that was that far off from reality. IF the Bible was a source of special knowledge, that is from a god, there would be clear evidence of the Great Flood. There is none. Yes there are fish fossils on mountains, from around 200 million years ago. The ones in question are often those first discovered by Charles Darwin. They are evidence that the world is old that moutains can rise from the ocean floor. The mountains to the north of me have risen about twenty feet in two earthquakes in my lifetime alone. I do not have to know everything to know that there was no such flood. I only have to be sure about what can be tested. Life evolved and all the evidence supports that. The nonsense Creationists push is disproved by the utter lack of evidence for the Flood. And no, ancient flooding cannot prove a recent flood. Nor can multi million year old fossils prove a flood from 4400 years ago. In REAL science a theory is checked against reality. You look at the theory and see what should be if the theory is real. Evolution is supported by evidence so lets look at the Flood. By using internal evidence in the Bible it can be dated. The usual date is around 4400 years ago. That is disproved by actual written history. However this is about the geology as Creationist just deny known history. The dating for the layers is irrelevant for this as the layers themselves, and the meanders cut into them, could not have formed this way in a whopping great flood. This can be seen by anyone that goes to the Grand Canyon. ANYONE. IF there was flood there should be sediment sorted by density vs cross section as that is how suspended matter settles out of a water column. That is actual physics that anyone can test with dirt and glass of water. But that is not what we find at the Grand Canyon. The Grand Canyon would have this order of sediment. Lime Dust Fine sand Sand Gravel Boulders Granite base as there wasn't enough time or flooding to have a major sediment base under the flood boulders. Unless you think Jehovah made the Earth as lie. In which case why not the Bible as the lie instead of simply being the result of ignorance as it is. A god that deceives in geology is a god that would deceive in writing. What you actually get is: Limestone - water based both of those layers formed over millions of years not in a flood. More limestone different color - water based then: Sandstone - from sandunes which means NOT from water and thus not from the Flood. Shale which is finer grained than sandstone and is from water and that shows the Flood didn't occur right there But wait there is more as there is sandstone that is on top of top of mixed shale and limestone. Does not fit flood either. Next: Redwall Limestone - marine limestone - hmm how could that be below the sandstone if it was formed in the Flood instead of millions of years ago as real science shows. Can't happen the Creationist way. Temple Butte Limestone - Fresh water - Can't have the fresh below the salt in Flood Nonsense. But reality shows there was no flood in yet another layer. Muav Limestone - composed primarily of limestone that is separated by beds of sandstone and shale. Again can't have formed in single whopping great flood. s not have much in the way of fossils, some trilobites and brachiopods. Which means marine again and now below fresh water limestone. Bright Angel Shale - marine animals such as trilobites and brachiopods. Which somehow aren't in the higher limestone. Again not fitting Flood Nonsense. And not one fish among them as would be the case if the Bible was true. Tapeats Sandstone - this a marine sandstone. Then the really old stuff. Sixtymile Formation - This tan colored layer is composed primarily of sandstone with some small sections of shale. Kwagunt Formation - This layer is composed primarily of shale and mudstone with some limestone- Fossils to be found in this layer are those of stromatolites, the oldest fossils to be found anywhere in the Grand Canyon. Which form near the surface yet are the bottom. And no trilobites. Which all fits reals and evolution and completely fails Flood Nonsense again. And again no fish as should be there as ALL life that exists now should have existed at the beginning of the flood. Galeros Formation - This layer is composed of interbedded sandstone, limestone and shale. Impossible in a single whopping great flood. Again Fossil stromatolites also exist in this layer and no trilobites nor fish nor whales nor any fossils that we know evolved much later. Nankoweap Formation - This layer averages about 1,050 million years old and is composed of a coarse-grained sandstone. Well at least is below limestone. Cardenas Lavas - not exactly a flood thing. Can't form as it exists there while underwater. You would have pillow lava. Dox Sandstone - This layer averages about 1,190 million years old, is composed of sandstone interbedded with shale. Shinumo Quartzite - This layer averages about 1,200 million years old and is composed of sandstone Hakatai Shale - This layer averages about 1,200 million years old and is composed primarily of shale with some sandstone. Bass Formation - This layer averages about 1,250 million years old and is composed primarily of limestone with some interbedded shale Woops now the sandstones in Nankoweap ARE above limestone. None of this fits Flood Nonsense. Vishnu Schist and Zoroaster Granite - This layer averages about 1,700 to 2,000 million years old and consists of mica schist. These were originally sediments of sandstone, limestone and shale that were metamorphosed and combined with metamorphosed lava flows to form the schist. Which does not fit a world that was just 1600 years old or a whopping great flood. Nor can the entrenched meanders of the flood form in whopping great flood. Nor could the river flow ACROSS the slope of the land as it does instead of downhill in multiple rivers to the Gulf of Mexico as it would have if there had been a whopping great flood. So the Grand Canyon fits real science and Henry Morris and Dr. Brown just plain LIED about such things fitting Flood Nonsense. So with the Bible's Flood fitting right in the middle of the Egyptian Pyramid building era just how does ANYTHING fit the Flood? Start dealing WITH reality instead of telling silly lies about it. Ethelred Hardrede
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv Well thats quite a lot of evidence and fact in order to disprove the flood. Seems like a lot of work. It doesnt have to be that hard. I dont need it because i never said that i beleive in the flood the way you are used to hearing about it. So yeah lots of BS to float that boat on. What i dont understand is that you are striving to disprove the bible by geological science. But you dont have to. Thats way too much work.
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv honestly with everything you know, you should be a professor. But seriously, the bible has nothing to do with the science of geology. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. Now we know that a man wrote this. This implies that this man whoever he is, understands the nature of God, because he just said, " God created". So he knows God creates. So Creation happens to be part of a cycle. Im sure you already know what this is. This cycle consist of many laws of nature. All of which are attribute of G.o.d. and the rest of the book elaborates on these laws as they pertain to the healthy outlookof the developing and civil man.
My criticism of sciences is that data often creates a new narrative, often forgetting the old data. My criticism of religion is a belief in few sources of data and disregarding any new data. My applause to Science Fiction for addressing all possibilities.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 86 | คู่เอก "คมเพชร vs ชาติพยัคฆ์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/m3q_dRYDuU8/mqdefault.jpg)
Even if the genes seem very similar, that doesn’t disprove a creator. That just proves we have the same creator who creates things similarly. But not the same.
But the similarity of the genes is not the point, its a bit more involved. The genes are not just similar, but are distributed in the natural world in a way that shows a pattern called a nested hierarchy. That pattern arises from branching processes. Railing against similarity is irrelevant - you need to explain the pattern that is a hallmark of evolution.
teddansonLA
Even the fossil record doesn’t show any evolutionary changes over time. You only find fossils in their already complete state. Any change in dna is an actual lack of information not an addition to the already dna that’s there. There’s something about the differences in us now that’s important. You don’t see any results of current t evolutionary things happening either. Humans are humans and dogs are dogs and cats are cats.........the list goes on and on. God made everything according to its “kind”, and God saw that it was very good.
Last week I spent a few days in the woods and we are so much more then animals, we are supreme beyond the animals. Human intelligence is so beyond an animal that it’s plain to see with the naked eye. We were definitely made in God’s image.
Raymond Palmer
You are also correct that Jesus was there during creation. For by him and through him all things were made. “And God said” (Genesis 1)that’s the Word (Christ) making the creation. However, he never lost dominion. And his coming into the world was not to get power back. His coming into the world was to atone for our sins and to lay his life down as a ransom for many. He exercised his power over Satan the second he didn’t give into Satan in the desert. About the other stuff you mentioned, I have not read that in the scriptures and I am curious where you got that from.
@@globalcoupledances the assertions that this species of “ape” is related to humans is absurd. They are claiming it as fact when there’s no traceable way to connect those dots. The best attempt would be a theory and people believe this is the truth. They choose to believe a lie and live under a delusion.
@@globalcoupledances no, humans and apes are separate. Just like today. There may be many similarities but never have they been related. Humans were made in God’s image and animals were not.
Had the Bible said something along the lines that we all shared a common ancestor and it branched out into different beings ( just like what the current evolution theory says) then the secular scientists would've had something else to say and laughed it off. It's not about seeking truth it's about finding evidence that suits their preconceived notions that challenges the religious notions.
It's like present-day "journalism."
Air Nomad false prophets, just like Jesus predicted.
Scientific Evidence would say otherwise
Romans 18-32 is my favorite and most eye opening as a former atheist now in the glory of God.
@@cartertran270 Amen to that. Romans 1:18-32 😉
"If you abide in my word you are really my disciples........."
🌹🌹🌹
The thing about science is you don't work backwards from your conclusion to fit your narrative.
Steven Jones its good having a spiritual father to learn from also it’s a loving thing and men were meant to be in a relationship with their father from the start like Adam. Self worth is a valuable moral concept foundationally to help rationalize threw love for fellow man and God threw out life as well people not recognizing this is a big part of the problem now days . N it beats studying blindly by a long shot lol
How can one have "historical science" without first making some guesses at history? That's the thing about historical science, it's truly meaningless without assumptions.
@@All-shall-say-Jesus-is-Lord
"How can one have "historical science" without first making some guesses at history? "
By looking at the evidence over time.
"it's truly meaningless without assumptions.""
Assuming that evidence is a valid thing to use it supported by the success of those assumptions. As opposed to believing in a long disproved because you told you should believe it. The same sort of people that lied to you about how science works. Fossils ARE observations. Dating is supported by testing and evidence. IF the dating techniques were as faulty as Creationists lie, then fusion bombs would have failed to go BOOM because the same science is in use for both.
Oh and fusion bombs do go boom, life does evolve, the Earth is old, the universe older and there was no Great Flood.
Ethelred Hardrede
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv I seriously doubt dating techniques and the bombs going boom had anything to do with each other. In the same field of science? Yes, but that's meaningless unless there's a real connection. Could you point one out for me?
You said the dating techniques have been proven to be solid. How exactly? I don't think it's possible without first assuming something was ridiculously old.
Fossils are evidence, yeah, evidence for a global flood. Fossils don't form unless something dies and is buried rapidly.
@@All-shall-say-Jesus-is-Lord
"I seriously doubt dating techniques and the bombs going boom had anything to do with each other. "
Your doubts are not relevant to reality. Nuclear cross sections, stability and decay rates are all involved.
"You said the dating techniques have been proven to be solid. How exactly?"
By testing them. That is how the decay are determined.
" I don't think it's possible without first assuming something was ridiculously old. "
You are not thinking because that is not needed at all. The testing can be done without any assumptions. Just a know decay rate and a measurement of the relevant isotopes in the sample.
"Fossils are evidence, yeah, evidence for a global flood.
There was no such flood so they are not from one. Nor do the sediments and fossils fit such a thing.
" Fossils don't form unless something dies and is buried rapidly.""
Gee really it has to die? It doesn't have to be buried immediately, just before the bones decay and some fossils show degradation before being covered. There is no need for a global flood for bodies to be covered. That is just plain silly. Floods happen every year. All that is needed is a LOCAL flood and not even that as some fossils are found in desert sandstone.
You are arguing from your ignorance on the subject to retain your ignorance. The Great Flood was disproved long ago, by Christians in the 1800's who were looking for evidence of the flood. No college, producing working geologists, has even one class in Flood theory. By NOT using it do the needed jobs for their employers. IF there had been such a flood they would have to take that into and they do not.
You just plain ignorant on the subject and you will stay that way as long as you only go on Creationist nonsense. Get a real education on the subject.
Ethelred Hardrede
Fascinating, really interesting; this is for those who doesn’t want to believe. But for us believers, there is no need for explanation, we walk by faith, and we know that God is the creator of everything including us.
Patricia - It's not a matter of "wanting to believe". I was raised evangelical but as I matured and gained knowledge it came down to (1) the BIble was true and all scientists and historians are wrong or (2) the Bible is an ancient manuscript of letters, poems, songs, biographies and some history. At its core it's the story of a tribe who became convinced they were chosen by their particular god. Scientific or historical truth never figured since they knew nothing of science or (real) history.
The Israeli=Moab war (2 Kings) has Israel winning. But Moabite stone carving found in Jordan records the same war with a different outcome! LOL This was the standard practice - "history" favors those in power at the moment. Even today we pick and choose. We ignore teachings that rainbows, floods, earthquakes, storms, disease and deformity are divine signs because we know the natural causes. It doesn't make the stories less interesting. We ignore the fact that not a single piece of evidence of millions of Jewish slaves in Egypt has been found because the whole point is the story (I prefer the original Ten Commandments)
Nupuqi Om-Re Khonectics
Chamber 45 plus degree
The Generations of ADAM
Atom ( ADAM , Axim ) from the Exosphere 9 cipher Sperm ( SETH ) from the Thermosphere and Heliosphere 9 cipher Nitrogen Oxygen Argon Helium (Noah) from the Mesosphere 9 cipher Hydra O gene Hydrogen ( ABRAHAM , Alpha and Beta particles ) from the Mesosphere 9 cipher 2 atoms of Hydra gene testicles ( Ishmael , Isaac )( Rivers and Creeks ) from the Ionosphere 9 cipher Water channel ( Musa , Moses ) from the Ozone ( Azim ) 9 cipher Universal radiation RAIN ( Gabriel ) 9 cipher Oceans ( Mari , Mare , Mary ) 9 cipher Clouds ( Tri stage of Ion , Isa , Jesus , Ieous ) .
Scientists are the first to say that miracles are not scientific. God performed miracles that the human mind can’t understand. This world is beyond our human understanding.
this woman is really smart. I love this because I haven't got all the time in the world to unravel the stupid assumptions evolutionists use when presenting their "data"
I am not an evolution preacher but just for fun pretend to just leave God out of the equation like a scientist that only uses the natural world to explain things. Then come up with the best explanation for how things came to be. Just a thought. See what i am getting at ?
Adam Lived for 932 years and Noah lived generations after and was also 900 years ... abraham was after this ! hmm ... her years are not correct according to the bible.... The original sin was to be awake .. as we was in adream period for many generations until one day we ate fruits on the trees which changed them and they began to think and even make clothes and name things and rememebr other things even defy things and people.... the pre time period... the genetic changes of the human genome did not take place in 6,000 years ... the races of humankind took perhaps 180,000 years..
Excellent episode! And welcome to Dr Georgia Purdom as a new guest! This new guest is refreshing and welcome. Dr Purdom is an excellent speaker, lively and focused. The information is fresh and up-to-date. An overall refreshing episode!
*Note:* Kudos too on the clean up of the show's introduction. It has been noted and appreciated.
I actually know Dr. Purdom's daughter and her by extent
I don't know if Adam was made out of dust but I know when we die we become dust
Yes Adam was made out of dust
@Truth Dat 666?
My turtle also turned to dust after it died last year.
"I don't know if Adam was made out of dust "
I do, he was made out of the imagination of ignorant men.
"but I know when we die we become dust
"
Sometimes, some bodies have been mummified, some fossilized but none have become normal dust as most dust is mostly made of inorganic material.
In any case, Genesis got nearly everything wrong.
Ethelred Hardrede
"By the sweat of your brow will you have food to eat until you return to the ground from which you were made. FOR YOU WERE MADE FROM DUST AND TO DUST YOU WILL RETURN.” Genesis 3:19
Years ago a friend of mine challenged my faith concerning Creation & not evolution... In the chimp/human part of the ‘debate’ he asked “then how do you explain how similar they are?” My (God inspired) answer; “They had a common Creator” God’s WORD is Truth.
" God’s WORD is Truth."
If only you had the word of god. Since there was no Great Flood it obvious that you have the words of men not a god.
Indeed you have only give us YOUR word that you have the word of a god.
Ethelred Hardrede
Well you can still believe that, but we are related to all primates and we have descended from apes and ape like humans.
Erm did you watch the video above? It kinda very concisely knocked out that claim
It is encouraging to see how deep scientific investigation brings you back to the truth of the Bible
Amen.
I’m glad I followed science and left evolution!
Praise Jesus 🙏
In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God,and the word was God.
John 1:1. Simple DNA.
And we have your word for that and not a thing that supports your word.
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv same goes for evolution nobody seeing it happen and still you believe it cause ''people' say it dead is dead it cannot come alive by itself like evolution claims.
4 molecules with only 2 possible combinations is not a word or a authored script dude. Don't learn science from religious people.
@@nicky158 and then he didnt reply anymore.haha he's now ranting on my post.hahaha thought he could make a dent with his proud stagnant wits.😂😂😂
i think the word is just a god's message that he is whatever he chooses to be. and os he sent this messenger jesus to speak for him
Thank you so much CTV for the excellent show.
I forgot about you for a while and was refreshed by this episode. GREAT stuff.
The great devastating thing and ignorant of all kind theologians and believers don’t understand the the very simple and wise logic ‘ if god is perfect and omnipresent is there any space or room for sin?
@@mannanserviceholder nope
I really have no issues with claiming to be human, as opposed to claiming to be a descendent of an animal. I am proud to be an awesome creation from God
Bella Eva - Humans are animals.
There is no doubt we evolved from 1 celled organism 4 billion years ago.
There may be a God that created that first cell of life...but after that it's evolution.
You may not have any issues except your living in a world where you can't have your reality questions so you choose to blind fold yourself and stick cotton wool in your ears.
@@creativesource3514 How do we know that god doesn't keep an eye on evolution and adjust it to keep the balance or do what he can without upsetting the order. Maybe it must keep in.order to work ?
@@truethinker221 So you believe in evolution but also a God as a creator? That may work. But also evolution without a creator also works.
@@creativesource3514 Certain aspects that i understand are things God uses to keep the balance of nature . How it all works out is a bit of a mystery but the separation of biological science and religion must be kept separate for the good of both . Other than the origin of modern man in regards to the ability to use reason and consciousness of the possibility of a god we must allow science to discover as much about how the natural environment works.
I am not blood thirsty to convince anyone either way, just want to keep the playing field level by exposing misrepresentations of each side by educating the people to examine the subjects with proper critical thinking skills. I enjoy people that know what they are talking about concerning evolution or theology. I hate religion even though i am a theist and Christian .Many don't think so (me a Christian ?). I am at the raw end from both sides . But i love to argue so it's OK.
@@truethinker221 I respect your position and attitude my friend.
I'm an atheist but open to be convinced otherwise.
Got here by accident but thx gor the laugh 😂
There are no accidents. You were brought here to make a choice, so that you are accountable and have no excuse.
I have my daughter in Catholic school. Yesterday she told me her religion teacher told her that Adam and Eve, and Noah were just stories. I had to show from the Bible that Jesus confirmed Adam,Eve and Noah. I am planning to have a very loud discussion with her teacher.
I applaud parents like you who speak up against what some teachers teach. I heard the story of here in my area that a teacher gave the students an assignment to take pictures of themselves as if they were getting married in a gay marriage. One student said it was against their beliefs and didn't do it so they got an F. I wondered, why didn't the parents get that teacher fired.
@@2fast2block This is just another example of the prejudice that Christians are now experiencing in our country that was founded by christians
@@senseijuan3230, agreed. I get sick of milk toast, gutless, wimpy "Christians" that don't stand up for God. God told US to be bold and strong, and yet so many of the "believers" just want to fit in and not rock the boat. It's disgusting because they are disgusting.
@@2fast2block Jesus spoke very v clearly about right and wrong, the apostles face persecution, God told us to praise him openly and yet we see Christian who water down his message just not to offend anyone.
lol, very sad to see people fight for 'god'. There are many questions that you cannot simply reply. Holding a book which is written 2k years ago is difficult to explain now.
You have to laugh when people say goo-to-you evolution scientists are not biased.
Great teaching. Thanks!
Should of put links to these studies
Thank you Host and thank you Dr. Purdom. Was gathering and studying information about ADAMIC NATURE, I came across this, brought in a new light seriously to the same ancestral debate. Thank You for pointing out those differences.
this scientist is fantastic in explaining everything so clearly. thanks for sharing this.
Just discovered this channel and I am hooked!! Praise God Jesus Christ for revealing the truth more and more!
Jesus was only a apostle of god not God why God is need to born from a women
Why God made Adam and eve
Jesus was descendant of Adam and eve not biological son of god or self God
He didn't claim he is God or son of God
@@rixgamer5748 John 8:58 “Jesus answered them: 'I solemnly declare it: before Abraham came to be, I AM.” [This was the name God gave himself when he first communicated with Moses, Exodus 3:14 “God replied, 'I am who am. ' Then he added, 'This is what you shall tell the Israelites: I AM sent me to you. '”]
I have been looking for something like this since I started learning about the scientific nature of the Bible how everything is provable, that's why the Bible is written to give us proof and evidence for what you believe and even if something isn't written in the Bible it gives you the time reference and a starting point for what you look need to look for, thank you for this.
JÓ LENNE ÉBREDEZNED, OLVASNI UJ DOLGOKAT ---
It's not about questioning God's narrative, it's about understanding it. The implication in the original Hebrew (placed in proper cultural context) is that Adam and Eve are not necessarily the progenitors of every human, but a pair selected to be priests to represent mankind; and appear to be at least the first *sapient* hominids. (This would explain where Cain's wife came from for example.) But they are the progenitors of the ruling line of mankind, ultimately producing the "kinsman redeemer" or Messiah.
As for the "dust" thing: again, the Hebrew says ""God formed man, the dust of the earth" not "FROM the dust of the earth". Referring to man as dust or clay was a common ancient near eastern way of saying we are earthly or mortal and distinguishing us from heavenly beings or "gods".
As for "evolution", yes they cook the data to exclude anything suggestive of theism. But Genesis itself says the earth *brought forth* or produced various life forms suited for various environments. Not exactly incompatible with evolution! But it happened because "God said 'Let it be so' " not by happy accident, funny coincidence and random happenstance as atheists and philosphiical materialists pretend.
If it's 1925, Model T cars don't produce themselves But Henry Ford doesn't personally put on coveralls pick up a toolbox and build each one personally. He orders it done and it happens.
Which 'god' would that be? The 'yahweh' that paul/saul said in the bible he and his herd of gullible believers are following? The same 'yahweh' benedict in 2009 and francesco again in 2021 declared as not the 'god' of christians, and both ordered the priesthood to stop using that name in their liturgies, sermons and preachings?
Do tell...
@@MedellínInsider-n3o YHVH is pure conscious being. Jesus identified himself with as YHVH referring to himself as "I AM".
If the apostate Roman Catholic "church" rejects YHVH they reject Christ and are no longer Christian.
@@Nunya_Bidness_53
Mate, if you want to contribute, read and learn from the 'bible' first. What you are saying is LSD-induced hallucination.
Your 'jesus' CRITICISED 'yahweh". Attacked him and insulted him as a liar deceiver and murderous maniac. Do not respond before you finally open the 'bible', find, read and understand what you have just read.
Then, and only then, return and apologise for your inappropriate, religious delusional comment.
The Bible is literal God means just what he SAID.
The Bible is literal, the Bible also has a deeper meaning. Usually we refer to this as shadow and types
Ya it, Bible, literally says what it means . What it means is the part we don't agree on.
We need to translate and interpret the Bible. The Holy Spirit of Truth needs to be our guide and our Teacher. Man can only speak to our ears what God is showing us.
That'a what all the money grabbing false teachers say. Sorry we need to know how to read first . And like everything else it takes skill to glean out and interpret with the correct understanding concerning the details for correct understanding of the bible . That is why our teachers Go to biblical studies departments in University's Seminaries around the world.
So my point is it depends on what school of thought has influenced you . Whether you know it or not these things are influencing us. Even the translation has an hidden agenda and message they are promoting. This is why the teaching of man is very important . Without it we would not even be able to read.
The study of Hermunitics is very important. So is Church history, . Ancient language studies, The History of Western Civilization, Greek Philosophy. Just things that help our mind see and look at the world through the eyes of the time being spoken of. The bible comes to life and makes it fun to read the more we understand the culture the better equipped to give a ready answer for our faith and counter the scepters with our understanding . This should not be neglected . Some times people use excuses for not doing the work concerning biblical studies. . Sometimes boring but pays off . . . In my opinion.
Jesus said "my sheep hear my voice" Are we literally sheep? How do you interpret what he said here?
I know this is the wrong thing to focus on and I don't mean it to sound dirty about it but I find this lady to be incredibly smart and attractive.
Thank you so much my brother and sisters for this
Adam and Eve is a Biblical myth, exactly as the Bible itself is a religious allegory, never intended to be taken seriously. It remains the single greatest book of poetry and ancient wisdom ever written by man, *but it is by no means a history book, it belongs to pre-history.* For us to believe in Adam & Eve would be to believe in the mystical Garden of Eden and the evil Talking Snake, which is on its face is a tale that even a 5-year old child would have difficulty believing. I will now completely DISMANTLE this fantastical fairytale, once and for all.
First of all, for only ONE human couple to even survive long enough to successfully reproduce would be one in a billion, particularly given the incredible hazards awaiting all ancient people. The odds of sudden death from predators, illness, stavation, and catastrophic weather events would be monumental, even in the best of times, rendering the survival of just two potential mates virtually IMPOSSIBLE. *The ultimate success of ALL species depends on having as many numbers as possible, which is why ancient man began to live in groups in the first place.* But let's just imagine that this miraculous couple actually DID survive long enough to procreate, then raise the only family in human history... WHAT THEN??
This is when I tear the Good Doctor's superstitions to bits, strictly by using facts that apply to ALL types of animals, worldwide, and for all time: *Whenever you have one only one mating pair of mammals, the result will be offspring with horrendous physical mutations, fatal illlnesses, the propensity to die from all manner of disease, and with this kind of disastrous inbreeding, CONTINUE TO CREATE EQUALLY MALFORMED, MENTALLY DEFECTIVE CHILDREN, FOREVER.* This basic fact of genetics effects all forms of life on earth, and can easily be seen in the breeding of modern day dogs, also known as, "Man's Best Friend." Anyone knowing anything about these beloved pets knows how dangerous it is to inbreed brother and sister canines, and this practice is universally condemned for its inherent dangers. The exact, same thing applies to humans, only more so. This is the precise reason we now have LAWS preventing incest, still the greatest single taboo in human history. I'm sorry to relate, but the myth of Adam and his Mate will remain just that, a myth.
Outstanding! Very well done👌
@@eliasjakemoran6434
You seem to be the only one on this channel who agrees with me, but thank you just the same.
@@tiffsaver Lol, yeah I was actually on a video about Bill Nye disproving the flood and the Ark. It's SO FUN! We get crazy comments every day and it's so great responding to them, debates, arguments, good conversations, dumb people, etc..
I was recommended this video because someone was talking about Adam and Eve and they sent me this video to clear things up. It unfortunately did not.
Of course what you say is true today. Genetic defects are multiplied when brothers and sisters reproduce and cause very serious and severe consequences. But the Bible says man was created perfect, so perfect a man could live 1,000 years after the fall. In the beginning there were no genetic defects to be inherited from a still pure genome and therefore would not be the issue you claim. The Bible is much easier to believe than the evolution scientism religion. What we now understand about the genome proves beyond any doubt we were created by a higher power. There is no greater nonsense than unguided evolution.
@@mwils51
*"BUT THE BIBLE SEZ..."*
What the Bible says, is that God made the entire earth in only six days and we should believe in a fu*king TALKING SNAKE and that Noah saved the dinosaurs on his homemade canoe!! But the most amazing thing is that there are morons like you stupid enough to believe it.
I’m not a geneticist. I do understand logical arguments and cognitive dissonance. This presentation is riddled with inconsistent logical arguments to justify a belief system. I started out as an orthodox Catholic grounded in absolute belief in the gospel. As I look at other religion and belief systems that grossly predate the Hebrew origins ... the similarity in the fundamental story are humbling, but punch historical holes in diehard believers in obsolete Bible thinking. All of these systems independently keep arriving at a conclusion or belief that there is a Supreme being or God ... all independently arrived at separate from the “Bible” as Jude-Christians recognize. Add science to this, and the orderliness screams that this is not random, but part of a plan from a Supreme Being or God. All these “scriptures” emphasize an understanding about why “humans” exist; how “humans” should live; how “humans” should interact with each other.
May God continue to bless you both.
Thank You You Too ✝️!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is fascinating and she exposes the lies and deceit that comes from evolutionists. I studied anthropology and came the conclusion that anthropology on ancient life forms is no more scientific than astrology. It too is based on lies and deceit.
True Christians believe The Bible...
I know I do these scientists be tripping. If they haven't figured out by now God is the creator they seriously are blinded. By the lies of the devil. Or just dont wanna admit that there is a God who created everything even us.
Leah Chalmers You’re an idiot
AMEN to that!
How can she say "we are NOT animals" and just a moment later say "chimps and humans are both mammals"? Make up your mind lady
Whales are mammals and nothing like us. It makes sense.
We're mammals in that we are warm blooded vertebrae that give birth to live young and feed them with milk. It has nothing to do with being an animal or not.
We're human and set apart from the rest of living creatures in that we have a soul. Therefore, not animals.
IGAZA VAN ÖNNEK, SÜKET SZÖVEG, A BIBLIA SUMÉR TÖRTÉNET ÉKIRÁSOS
TÁBLÁK MEGFEJTÉSÉBÖL ÁTVETT ADATOK---
I have a bachelors in biology and never worked in the field and I can debunk her confirmation bias and cherry picking.
"If Adam and Eve aren't real people and there is no fall, then why do we need Jesus?"
Exactly.
This was great! I love when science proves creation
There are over 200,000 science books in the Harvard Library that goes to detail to show Genesis chapter one. The first 31 verses in the Bible. There are a total of 31,000 verses in the Bible.
It really doesn't.
@@andrewoliver8930 For well over 100 years people have been using Science to show that the Bible is accurate and true. Esp Archaeology has time and again shown the historical accuracy of the Bible.
@@JohnR77 really?
It's a shame that geology, physics, biology doesn't show the Bible to be true.
@@andrewoliver8930 Talk is cheap, show me your evidence. I have never found any conflict between true science and a true understanding of the Bible. Most of the Bible is History and 100 years worth of archaeological evidence shows the Bible to be very accurate and true. As Gerald Schroeder points out there are over 200,000 science books in the Harvard University Library that shows us that the first 31 verses in Genesis are accurate and true. As well as the science books at his school MIT. Remember Elliot Gould the Harvard professor that tired to prove the Bible wrong and died young from cancer after he miserably failed to prove his claim. Then there was Hawking who like Gould failed to prove that there is no God. Again he had sever health problems and even lost the ability to be able to talk. It does not seem to go well with the men of Science that want to fight against God. Although even Hawking raises interesting questions. Which maybe why he defied the odds to live as long as he did in his condition. He says: "Most sets of values would give rise to universes that, although they might be very beautiful, would contain no one able to wonder at that beauty." So why would there be so much beauty in a universe if God did not create us to appreciate the beauty of His Creation? "The Anthropic Principle," contends that the universe was brought into existence intentionally for the sake of producing mankind.
Neil deGrasse even takes the finely tuned universe one step further. He tells us that "one second of time had passed" from the beginning of the Universe. "Without Billion-and-one imbalance to one Billion between matter and antimatter, all mass in the universe would have self-annihilated". If this is not enough for you. We are told that all matter was created in a "Planck era" The length of a Planck era is "ten-million-trillion-trillion-trillionths of a second". Not much time for evolution to take place there. Tyson does not fight against God they way Gould and Hawking did. But he clearly is not tainted with creationist bias.
So is the The Anthropic Principle and the extremely precise finely turned universe evidence for God? Francis Collins would say yes. Although some men of science would say we do not have enough evidence one way or the other so we can say with certainty. Because Atheist Scientist do not have a very good track record when it comes to their health and longevity so it does not seem to be advisable to fight against God. Science in general can say that belief in God is beneficial. For example people that are a part of a community religious group tend to live five to ten years longer and they tend to have higher levels of empathy. So even if we can not prove that there is a God, we can still provide Scientific evidence to follow the Bible and believe in the God of the Bible.
We should also mention Sir Fred and his predictions: "Hoyle found that there were numerous "fortunate" one-time occurrences which seemed to indicate that purposeful "adjustments" had been made in the laws of physics and chemistry in order to produce the necessary carbon." So do we consider this evidence for God or do we just say there is a very high probability that there is a God as described in the Bible. A God that watches over His word and makes the necessary adjustment so that His Word Accomplishes His plan and His purpose.
Now I realize this is just a intro to a few of the "evidences" for God.
I think it is even more amazing that human came from countless generations of evolution from single cell organism. It only goes to show the Almighty God is truly almighty.
By George, I think you got it! Evolution never denies the possibility of a creator god, and limits itself entirely to explaining how life, once it got here in whatever way, came to have such a dazzling variety.
Well, this is a pretty hard topic to discuss, because Adam and Eve were in this world about some 6000 years ago, according to the Bible and what some scholars said. Anyways, according to the atheistic community they say that we are far more beyond of those 6000 years the Bible says we are at; I am a Christian person that it is pretty skeptical about what the so-called science have told us about evolution, because they are still looking for that missing link that cannot find, and some other scholars have said that they have found it, yet I doubt it. I guess that the missing link the science is looking for would be found once they accept that we are not from this world and accept that we have an omnipotent Lord that might be that missing link they are looking for!!!
It's not the atheist community that says it. It's the scientific community.
O what's in a parable
As it's not of the flesh
1st Timothy 1:4
Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do.
Titus 3:9 But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain.
MoodyMami #1 so what do you believe to be truth?
MoodyMami #1 if you seek the truth, you will find it. You have NOT found it. That’s obvious by what you say AND the spirit in which you say it.
Ok, so at 3:38, she reads the statement from Giberson and Collins. "None of these 'explanations' can possibly be actual descriptions." The rest of the quote points out that human physiology doesn't contain dust, and a human can't be made "quickly" from a rib. But then they both agree that this "One time supernatural event" is why it doesn't make sense to us in society today. I've got to throw in the towel here. Because at this point, it's obvious that the rest of the "interview" is going to be a pandering confirmation biased explaining science away with, "Well, obviously it's written in the Bible. So that's why we will take these events at face value."
You left too soon... she presented accepted, albeit inconvenient facts.
That's precisely the Creationist creed. At the "Discovery Institute" they actually have to sign a disclaimer that they will accept the Bible and deny anything that contradicts.
@@MrWeezer55 It doesn't matter what anyone's creed is. Or what they have to sign to keep a job. The only thing that really matters are facts. And the fact is Science does not disprove God... ID does not PROVE God... but the last 20 years of scientific discoveries have made the existence of God more and more likely.
@@bruce3102 The "last 20 years of scientific discovery" have NOT made the existence of God more likely. This is exactly the kind of thing the nematode brains at the Discovery Institute say. Creeds and signatures DO matter because they plainly state that they will deny any facts that don't agree with their "view". Balderdash.
@@MrWeezer55 YOU JUST PROVED THAT YOU HAVE BEEN PAYING NO ATTENTION... SUCH THAT, AT
EAST ON THIS SUBJECT YOU HAVE EVINCED A PROFOUND DEGREE OF IGNORANCE.
The theory of evolution ought to be recognized as what it is, a theory. Open your eyes.
Since you've never _seen_ any god, nor _heard_ any god, nor have you any evidence of any _god,_ aren't you believing in the theory of god? Yes; yes, you are.
You ought to tell that to the myriad of scientists who scientists who accept macroevolution and believe in Christianity. They’re the ones who have discovered most of the evidence for evolution. Here are some names:
1. Ken Miller
2. Francis Collins
3. Robert T. Bakker
4. Mary Schweitzer (known for discovering T. Rex “hemoglobin”)
5. Theodosius Dobzhansky
6. Mike Jones from inspiring philosophy (not a scientist, but a TH-cam Christian apologist who accepts macroevolution)
Moreover, I urge you to go on to Answers in Genesis, a young-Earth creationist organization, and read their article titled “arguments creationists should NOT use.” You’ll find your little “evolution is just a theory” argument on the list.
gravity is also a theory
@@mmmnuts5645 And why is gravity a theory if we KNOW it excists.
goosebump
God made Adam (has 22 chromosomes pairs plus X and Y), Eve was made from Adam's "tzela" (rib, beam, side)... Eve has 22 chromosome pairs plus two X chromosomes) The "rib" is the building block of life.
The rib regrows.
And that's why woman has always been a pain in his side ever since
In summary, the conclusions drawn by the people who did the actual work are wrong.
Thank you to this channel, came up in my recommendations a couple days ago and I’ve already obtained so many answers to so many questions.
God bless all!
Can I translate this wonderful episode into Arabic so this great message reach bigger audience?!
Yes, please to spread more ignorance and nonsense to the Muslim world that already has way too much of both.
@Tim Webb
" Lord Jesus Christ
I am an American, lords are not legal in the US. He can run for office just as soon as he comes back from the dead.
Which was supposed to happen nearly 2000 years ago. Didn't happen. Failed prophecy.
Ethelred Hardrede
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv calm down Ethel.
@@vulgarresponse7080
I am calm, you must be projecting your anger at my well reasoned fact based posts. How about you deal with what I really wrote instead of lying about me to assuage your anger at being exposed to reality.
You don't need to. Arabs and Muslims have The Qur'an.
Dust means many things but it includes the organic elements of the earth as in the dirt dust ground, earth, the elements etc as in earths organic material... in hebrew there are many defenitions of dust. Not only that but each letter does as well and easily clarifies the overall meaning.
Our translations are true yet coprehendedly diminished. Learn hebrew, read it and see how much clearer the word becomes.
The Creation story according to Genesis is foundational to the Christian faith. Thank you for this research and information.
And it's all a lie, so why take everything the Bible says seriously?
"For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse." Rom 1:20 (NASB)
Mark
Clearly seen yet never seen? What a load of childish bullshit!
Ten to the Negative 33 a part of your observation is spot on... As in it is so simple that even a child can understand it. You have to go through years of higher education to unsee the obvious: miracles don't do themselves. Was Mt Rushmore created by wind erosion? No? Well, then THE WORLD and all that live in it wasn't either. Even the simplest one cell organism is more sophisticated than a space shuttle. Let alone Mt Rushmore. So no.
Some more translations of the same simple statement from a man whose education amounted to the equivalent of a minimum of 3 university degrees:
For from the creation of the world His invisible qualities, both His eternal power and divinity, are clearly seen, being understood by the things made, for them to be without excuse.
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse.
For his invisible qualities, namely his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse.
Because His invisible attributes, namely His eternal power and divine nature, are clearly seen from the creation of the world, being understood from what has been made, so that they are inexcusable;
And the translator's note to this last one:
All scientific experiment and true human knowledge is based on the principle of cause and effect-we observe an effect and try to isolate its cause. As a logical corollary, the cause must be as great or greater than the effect, otherwise it could not produce it. Any human being who is both honest and intelligent, confronted with the observable universe, with its incredible order and complexity, must conclude that there has to be a CAUSE who is both incredibly intelligent and powerful-to refuse to do so is perverse. Since we have personality, He must as well. So Paul’s argument is precisely correct.The science of physics tells us that the entire known universe, taking only what is inorganic (not part of any living system), can be described using perhaps 250 bits of information. To describe the smallest protein molecule (unable to live alone, but part of a living system) requires some 1,500 bits of information (the ecoli bacterium some 7 million; one human cell some 20 billion). Now just where could chance plus nothing find 1,250 bits of new information (to produce the simplest protein), if in the whole universe there was only 250? The evolutionary hypothesis as an explanation for the origin of life is ridiculously, stupidly impossible!The science of genetics, with its genome projects, has discovered that a change of just 3 nucleotides is usually fatal to the organism. The genetic difference between a human being and a chimpanzee (closest relative) is at least 1.6%-this represents a gap of some 48 million nucleotide differences. Since a random change of only 3 nucleotides is fatal to an animal, and a dead animal can’t reproduce, there is no possible way that a chimp could evolve into a human. Each individual species had to be assembled separately, just like Genesis says. The ‘geologic column’ is a fiction, since there are multistrate tree fossils. Symbiotic plants and insects could not possibly evolve. And so on.
Yudon Ituno
Awe, butthurt? I would be too. You are comparing erosion on the my Rushmore to the creation of life. These are false equivalencies and the same childish understanding of most things that lend your narrow mind to thoughts of supernatural skydaddies. You are sadly mistaken, and proud to be
Ten to the Negative 33 why exactly "false equivalencies"? Please elaborate instead of name calling. Who knows, you may be smarter than me and I may learn something!
Yudon Ituno
Comparing an unknown event to erosion, which we know everything about is a false equivalency. False equivalencies and logical fallacies are at the heart of all arguments for religion. And your not out to learn if you immediately go to such a lame argument. That only tells me you like to preach but care little for what your arguments mean, you know, follow them to their logical conclusion before you try it on a stranger. You can use shallow arguments on ur family whom already believe, but not those who are serious bud
It all adds up really scientific and scripture. Same for revelation history has a way of repeating itself.
jamie glatz sorry it’s a proven fact there were never an Adam and Eve this garbage is Christian bias. Therefore everything they claim is automatically bullshit. They say and make up anything to defend their beliefs.
@@user-none-of-your-business666 Please provide some links to "the proof".
Julia Moon and when it acmes to ripping off another religion they obviously just can’t used it for word for word or people would be worshipping the god or gods of the religion they stole nit from . So what they do is they Change a few details like names obviously and places. And a few other details. Because if it a book like Harry Potter and if someone took everything except changing the name to Henry tinderperry they would so be sued for plagiarism.
@@JuliaMoonChannel DNA is a great reason
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
Who are you to tell us anything, when God said He created Heaven and earth.
1 Corinthians 3:19 KJV For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.
It takes a fool to believe that lie.
And anyone who says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell. Matthew 5:22
Ethelred Hardrede what lie are you alluding to?
boltman2u2
The bible .
@@boltman2u2
The whole first post.
A fool wrote that lie. Oh there may be a god but all testable gods fail testing. Including the god of the Bible. There was no Great Flood, hardly the only error, so there is no Jehovah. I was not alluding. I came right out and said it clearly.
Ethelred Hardrede
As a minister and theologian I understand what is truly said in the Bible! Genesis 1:26 and 27 has God saying let us create man in our own image and likeness it does not say he completed that act. Genesis 2 speaks of Adam being created from the dust of the earth, dust of the earth is found throughout the Bible and is a Middle Eastern term still used which means the same as scum of the earth many new converts say they were the dregs of society, scum of the earth, when God saved them. Kabbalistic Rabbinic teaching says that Adam was taken from another people and set aside by God to serve him. Eve's being taken from his rib is simply a term implying she was from the same source as Adam. God uses multiple covenants with Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and finally the New Covenant of Jesus to evolve man to become like God. The New Testament plainly says that this corruptible must put on incorruption, mortal must put on immortality. That we will be changed in a twinkling of an eye, that it does not yet appear what we shall be, but we shall be like him for we shall see him as he is. We shall put on a glorified body like God's then will the evolution of man into the image of God be complete. Its not completed in Genesis 1:26-27.
As both a Christian and a biological scientist, I can say that this woman is exceptionally biased and deceptive. She presents arguments for her beliefs in detail but quickly glosses over counter arguments and differing information. She throws out belief statements as fact with no evidence and then quickly moves on. She thinks she is presenting a strong case for the bible, but by clearly being deceptive and biased, she turns people off to the bible who can see through her. I cannot call her a credible scientist, regardless of her degrees and positions. Why doesn't she talk about the 2.5% Neanderthal genes in most humans? Why doesn't she mention the Denisovans and many other hominoids who fossil records prove once walked the earth? Because the scientific evidence runs contrary to her biased and uninformed beliefs.
Why not presence video of your own to disprove Her at molecular level same as the presentation???? Seems you're intelligent and a researcher.
??? Why would a believer in the Word of God ask an unbeliever anything???
Who cares what these God haters think about anything, they have no Truth.
Lindsay James what’s your truth other than the Bible?
Well, the KJV covers all Truth, I need no other. What 's true for you???
We don't hate God. There's nothing to hate.
Nothing to hate???
and ?How did you get a 'highlighted reply''??? lol
I have a PhD in Physics and a ThD and the universe manifest a divine order.
Write the paper. Get rich.
That's good. I only have a BS in Computer Engineering and MS in Information Technology Management and survived a 15 month deployment to a combat zone as a EOD tech aka the bomb squad. How long do you think you will survive being a EOD tech in a combat zone using your intelligence?
@@damiandagger I did paramilitary training in Israel.
Sad that anyone could have that education yet remain so willfully ignorant about reality. The universe is chaotic, its almost entirely hostile to life. If its from a god, that god loves vacuum and not life.
How you fail to notice that is beyond reason.
@@damiandagger We survive based on consciousness not intelligence. My son is working on his degree in computer engineering. He still has three semesters to go. So far he is still debt free. What are the odds of being debt free when you graduate?
I don't think he gets into DNA but Kent Hovind has some interesting ideas on about everything else ! check out his videos .
Within a mathematical certainty. Follow back every family tree to it's origin one man one woman. Adam means first man Eve means mother of all living because Adam named her that Gen. 3:20.
Their DNA had the correct protein build up so it could express correctly. And their dominion was holding up the protein build up
The Truth is in the BLOOD !
So is HIV.
Truth is knowledge that reflects reality, unlike the Bible.
Gatsby Light meaning the truth is... your blood is contaminated because of your sins?
@@harshcalls - Just because a person _believes_ that something is in their blood, doesn't mean that it's a good thing (or that it's actually true).
@@harshcalls
"meaning the truth is... your blood is contaminated because of your sins?"
I think he was trying to point out that blood is not where the Truth is. Truth should only be capitalized at the start of a sentence. When it is treated as a proper noun, it invariably involves either lying or just plain nonsense. The latter is the case with the OP.
The truth is in DNA which does not remotely support Genesis on ANYTHING. It disproves both Adam and Eve and that silly flood story.
Ethelred Hardrede
That was an awesome presentation!
You need faith the Bible is all the evidence we need thank you in Jesus name Amen
I do believe the Bible is real and that's why when religions change the Bible you still get the message they can't take it out even though they might not want to teach certain things you can see where their Doctrine doesn't match the Bible and you're not supposed to say anything but deep down you know it doesn't make sense what they are spewing and what's the Bible says you got to teach yourself and I'm not making punctuation marks and all that no time.
"ou need faith the Bible is all the evidence we need t
Faith is not evidence of anything other than faith. However the Bible is testable. It claims there was a Great Flood. False. It shows mankind as existing less than 10,000 years. It looks very much like it was written by ignorant men with no special knowledge.
Ethelred Hardrede you’re reeeeally taking time out of your day to say the same thing on nearly every comment
@@lights4946
You took time out of your day to whine about reality being posted.
Hypocrite.
All I have to say YOU REPLIED SO IT'S IN YOUR HEAD NOW, OR ON YOUR MIND. THINK ABOUT IT!
This was amazing and very simple to understand. But complex at the sametime. You just got a new subscriber 😊
The mitochondrial genetics is something we must protect in ourselves...interesting topic at all times! God bless, in the name and blood of Jesus Christ: amen.
Well done!!!
Wow amen !! May the lord continue to use these people (his people )
This is a joke right ?
Jes, ... that’s a good question ~ if there is no “fall”, ... why do we need Jesus?
Note the preeminence in their "BELIEF" statement on their website of "speaking in tongues"... LISTED FIRST!!
"The Baptism of the Holy Spirit
Though the Holy Spirit is present in the life of every Christian, we believe that scripture clearly demonstrates a second work of God available to all believers, known as Holy Spirit Baptism. A common evidence of this work is the receiving of a personal prayer language, also known as “speaking in tongues.”
That is FALSE and so many people FAKING speaking in tongues and too many churches pressuring people to speak in tongues.
The body is 1000 percent an animal. Man being in god’s IMAGE is our consciousness. we aren’t one thing
Body/mind
Spirt (presence )
Soul
your right man being in God's image is our consciousness and our human nature doesn't change, been the same in all recorded history, it's the same in all eight billion of us and it will naver evolve to something else.
And Physical similarities don't mean our bodies are animal. Wolf breeds with dog, lion with tiger. Can humans breed with an ape? We have lots of similarities even without looking at the DNA so it shouldn't be a surprise we share similar DNA.
It all comes down to Pride, if non-christian scientists accept creation etc, they have to accept they are sinners and need a saviour. It is another lie satan has planted for man to reject Christ, even when Jesus did miracles when he walked on earth they rejected him. God could reveal the most amazing evidence and man will still and does reject Christ.
It does not matter if Adam and Eve existed or not. It's fun to talk about . What matters is that one understands there's a war going on for your soul. Wake up and smell the locust. It's them or us. Choose wisely.
this should have billion views
Why did so many people doubt whether the first eleven chapters of Genesis were intended to be literal historical events long before evolution was a thought ? Even Philo a Jew living from 30 BC to 40 AD see below ; Philo
The idea that these challenges began due to The theory.of evolution is a false dichotomy. Historical Source Criticism began in the German Seminars at the end of the sixteenth century and by the time of Darwin Had taken over every University Seminary in the country. You aught to study theology.
Truethinker - maybe some Jews thought, it's not surprising because when "He came unto His own they received Him not" .
Jesus Christ had no doubts, He reiterated the Scriptures - Moses, Isaiah, Elijah etc. He confirmed the Sabbath, thus the 4th commandment "Remember the Sabbath ... ". It reaffirms the 6 day creation narrative of Genesis 1.
If we can't believe that then why believe anything in Mathew to Revelation.
All of the Word of God is Truth, in it's time and context.
The fourth commandment says to not make your slaves work that mean Jesus condoms slavery. ?
@@truethinker221 - if you do some serious research - you will find what a "slave" means in Old Testament - not what you imagine based on slave owners of the 18th - 20th century or even today.
Study the Word of God for yourself. Abraham had a slave who would have inherited all of his wealth had Abraham remained childless.
Wrong you do some research .
I understood that the Evolution theory by Darwin said that chimps species are more similar, comparing with other species, to the human species but he did not say that we are the same. why she tries to show us we are different from the chimps? of course, we are different. Evolution theory never says we are the same.
Evolution says we are 98% the same as the ape and we evolved from the Ape.
Just finished trawling through the comments. Many of them, fingers in ears, nananananananananananananan.
Maybe they expected something more scientifically accurate
@@daijirokatoh3769 More philosophically acceptable. In my travels, scientific accuracy trails far behind "coz it does".
@@voiceofreason162 you just can't take scientific findings and ignore half of it because it doesn't fit your opinion. This is the difference between a thinker and a believer, the thinker can change opinion according to scientific discoveries, the believer only accept whatever fits his beliefs and deny all the rest, and this is what is shown in this video
@@daijirokatoh3769 thanks, I'll pass on your comment to Richard Dawkins. A philosophical precursor is the normal starting point for most. Using an acceptability filter is par for the course. Evaluating the science is what I do. You don't know how entrenced you are until you do. That is why Scientific debates end up in mud wrestling matches. Whoever drowns first loses.
@@voiceofreason162 someone who believes just can't have a scientific debate, because his mind is all set even before the debate start. If religious people could think by themselves they could easily understand that stories like Noah's Ark, flat earth or Adam and Eve are technically impossible but it just won't happen because they don't have this ability
Thanks very much for posting this, very interesting.
Of course we're evolved from earlier apes. That's why so many people are still not evolved enough to understand science. This is why apelike, superstitious, behaviour still pervades society.
It is like watching a baseball game that was won in overtime in 16 innings. Then going back to the first inning and claiming that you would have won if the umpire had called that third ball a strike which would have caused a run to score.Rather than be the third out.
The holy cow of evolution is time. Their best excuse for science to demonstrate. God's word is perfect and we are perfectly created by His Word.
Very interesting, informative, clearly explained video!
Very dishonest as well since the real science has the last common female common ancestor about 100,000 years agon and last male common ancestor about 200,000 years ago.
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv Maybe you should elaborate if you know so much. What did she say that is wrong, scientifically? What makes her science bad compared to others? Simply the fact that she starts with the Bible and takes a look at some problems with mainstream scientific assumptions/methodologies, etc? Criticism is fine, but if that's all you do without saying why, you don't come across as being very credible yourself.
@@rubenbehnke2283 Where did the dust come from ? Five days should not be enough time for dust to occur or settle. .
She uses science and evidence when it’s convenient for her.
there is NO common ancestry for Humans and chimps. But simply a COMMON CREATOR.
Rankf Dsantos
You need to do some research into real science not a book of fairytales.
Mart TL1000S I am not a scientist as most humans. I am a common man though do not understand science understands Life. You may ask why? because of my life’s experiences proving the love of GOD. You are depending from the book of science, I depend upon MY own book of Life. But you know, GOD in HIS goodness gives this kind of opportunity to everyone, in HIS time. GOD Bless You.
Rankf Dsantos
Not many creationists are that’s why they believe the pseudoscience of the bible without question. Which life experiences prove the love god ? Every member of every religion makes similar claims , they can’t all be true but they can all be false.
Mart TL1000S I claim mine to be true. In your case I respectfully suggest you try to discern in your own life’s experiences to discover the same.
Rankf Dsantos
Of course you do just like all believers of all cults but there’s no convincing evidence for your or any other god . Life experience has nothing to do with or points to a god . I suggest you deploy whatever degree of critical thinking capability you possess and try looking at things from a logical rather than a religious perspective. No god is necessary for anything it’s just an argument from ignorance or incredulity.
Every thing on earth was put here from a creator in such a way to work in harmony with each other.Nothing = nothing .Even evolution was designed by god.
Will you guys please let me know what the name of the article was that said the mitochondrial DNA traces back to 6500 years ago?
I would love to share this information and would appreciate the original article from The Atheist :) thanks so much
No.
The Ohio State University needs to take her diploma back. She is an embarrassment. I almost fell over when she said with great confidence that the world was only 6,000 years old.
If you truly follow Jesus then you have to pick and choose..
Huh?
@@sabcam2000 you have to pick the red letters over the black or be like most everyone else and choose black over red..
Repent for the kingdom of God Is Near in we need to go back to good when we first was.. So invite Jesus Christ in your heart and the truth will set you free John 3.16. Without Jesus Christ we are nothing we are just evil twisted bad people walking on Earth. But through his son he can change us change your heart and live.. And be perfect as we once were with Jesus we can be righteousness be as holy as he is be perfect as he is. Before we got by the devil who is the deceiver and lie..
I was struck by the photo at 20:02 of Dr. Jeanson's computer screen sitting on a cardboard box. The poor guy needs better funding so that he can at least afford proper office furniture. The box, by the way, has a sticker on it that indicates it once contained copies of a book called "The Design and Complexity of the Cell."
Dude you are getting a" Cell"
Are you trying to astound with your observational skill, or prowess with a pause button? Congratulations either way.
They're real. Get over yourself. You who are in charge of the world want them not to be real so your lies can become Truth.
They are imaginary. Get over you long disproved book.
Thank you, that was excellent. Very clearly logically explained, i learned a lot.
You know this is entirely bullshit.
Logically explained?
You obviously failed basic biology
Nothing is impossible with God
Nothing is impossible with stupidity
@@dopeydonaldtrump3744 say what
@@Nightsaberban Thanks for proving my point
@@dopeydonaldtrump3744 ah 😐
All things all things I say it again all things are possible with the Lord thy God Almighty Creator of all things
The difference is that we have a soul that will live on either way it goes
Could you please cite your evidence for a 'soul' please??
Charles Hendrick I got to meet you in person I would gladly show you
@@kevin12553 That sounds kind of scary. I'd much rather you just present your sources, thanks anyways.
@@charleshendrick7266 I was joking sorry , read ur BIBLE
@@kevin12553 I have, many times. I must admit, I do enjoy the evil deity portrayed in its collection of fables from a primitive people attempting to fabricate a history of themselves. Murder, rape, incest, genocide, etc.. always makes for a good read.
Does anyone know where I can get a good honest DNA test or tests from ?? So far I went for a test to a place that said mitochondria DNA comes from both the father and mother. Supposedly a reputable company but I now have some serious doubts.
"So far I went for a test to a place that said mitochondria DNA comes from both the father and mother."
In general that is false. There seem to have a few cases where some mDNA came from the father. The people this happens to are not healthy and thus get selected out of the gene pool.
" Supposedly a reputable company but I now have some serious doubts.""
So do I based on that claim but you might want to see if you can find out their reputation.
Maybe you can Google for reviews of some or something. I've heard that DNA normally comes from the mother and, really rarely from the father, a process which isn't understood yet (if, I didn't read it, could be known, idk).
Very good information and shows that this is right on track! Thank you so much guys I think this video will do alot more help!
Jesus is the best interpreter of the origins. He mentioned the first human Adam and eve. They literally existed in history. . .
Do you remember the verse reference?
Thank you, Origins
Very Cool!
Dogma is what the devil uses to divide us. All we need to know is that we are to love each other and love Him. If we truly loved each other, no one could ever get us to believe we need walls. We'd want to help each other rather than isolate ourselves. But we are so easily mislead by the money people. Sigh.
Ya and do you know what dogma spelled backwards says amgod.
TT@ 1/3/19
@@truethinker221 Now that's some true thinking lol! Indeed it does.
Wow. You are not right, you're not even wrong. I don't even know what to call this.
yeah, and you are even wrong
Laugh all you want. One day you will find out
Found out already, Ken Ham makes his living pushing a disproved religion as there was no Great Flood. Hardly the only major error in the Bible.
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv the waters are rising
@@lancecarter100
That is BS not water. Thank you for that fact free reply. I am not you. I can support myself with verifiable facts. Something that Ken Ham cannot manage either. I just love his fake ark. No gopher wood was involved in its making. Lots of steal and they rarely show the other side.
Because its a regular building.
A geological disproof of the Great Flood.
Here have one of many disproofs of the Flood. Please note that dating is NOT relevant nor needed in this so the usual ignorant rants about dating are not relevant to this disproof. Yes I BLEEPING know that there is dating in this post but its not needed for the disproof. Ranting about the dating will not change the disproof which is based on layering.
Here you go Creationists, disproof of the Bible all based on well understood and undeniable science. The layers, even without any dating of any kind, fully disprove the Great Flood that never happened. They simply cannot be laid down the way they are in a dozen floods much less one. No Creationist has ever shown an error this. Few have even tried to deal what I am actually posting. The data is from:
GRAND CANYON Explorer kaibab org
The same layer structure can be on on nearly any site about the Grand Canyon. Most of the writing is mine except some of the specifics on the layers. So far no one has shown any real error in this and I have posted it many times. IF the Flood was a real as you claim then the over 30,000 geologists in the US alone would HAVE to use Flood theory to do their job.
They don't, and the do their job anyway. No mining or oil company would hire someone that used a theory that was that far off from reality.
IF the Bible was a source of special knowledge, that is from a god, there would be clear evidence of the Great Flood. There is none. Yes there are fish fossils on mountains, from around 200 million years ago. The ones in question are often those first discovered by Charles Darwin. They are evidence that the world is old that moutains can rise from the ocean floor. The mountains to the north of me have risen about twenty feet in two earthquakes in my lifetime alone.
I do not have to know everything to know that there was no such flood. I only have to be sure about what can be tested. Life evolved and all the evidence supports that. The nonsense Creationists push is disproved by the utter lack of evidence for the Flood. And no, ancient flooding cannot prove a recent flood. Nor can multi million year old fossils prove a flood from 4400 years ago.
In REAL science a theory is checked against reality. You look at the theory and see what should be if the theory is real. Evolution is supported by evidence so lets look at the Flood.
By using internal evidence in the Bible it can be dated. The usual date is around 4400 years ago. That is disproved by actual written history. However this is about the geology as Creationist just deny known history. The dating for the layers is irrelevant for this as the layers themselves, and the meanders cut into them, could not have formed this way in a whopping great flood. This can be seen by anyone that goes to the Grand Canyon. ANYONE.
IF there was flood there should be sediment sorted by density vs cross section as that is how suspended matter settles out of a water column. That is actual physics that anyone can test with dirt and glass of water. But that is not what we find at the Grand Canyon. The Grand Canyon would have this order of sediment.
Lime
Dust
Fine sand
Sand
Gravel
Boulders
Granite base as there wasn't enough time or flooding to have a major sediment base under the flood boulders. Unless you think Jehovah made the Earth as lie. In which case why not the Bible as the lie instead of simply being the result of ignorance as it is. A god that deceives in geology is a god that would deceive in writing.
What you actually get is:
Limestone - water based both of those layers formed over millions of years not in a flood.
More limestone different color - water based then:
Sandstone - from sandunes which means NOT from water and thus not from the Flood.
Shale which is finer grained than sandstone and is from water and that shows the Flood didn't occur right there But wait there is more as there is sandstone that is on top of top of mixed shale and limestone. Does not fit flood either. Next:
Redwall Limestone - marine limestone - hmm how could that be below the sandstone if it was formed in the Flood instead of millions of years ago as real science shows. Can't happen the Creationist way.
Temple Butte Limestone - Fresh water - Can't have the fresh below the salt in Flood Nonsense. But reality shows there was no flood in yet another layer.
Muav Limestone - composed primarily of limestone that is separated by beds of sandstone and shale. Again can't have formed in single whopping great flood. s not have much in the way of fossils, some trilobites and brachiopods. Which means marine again and now below fresh water limestone.
Bright Angel Shale - marine animals such as trilobites and brachiopods. Which somehow aren't in the higher limestone. Again not fitting Flood Nonsense. And not one fish among them as would be the case if the Bible was true.
Tapeats Sandstone - this a marine sandstone.
Then the really old stuff.
Sixtymile Formation - This tan colored layer is composed primarily of sandstone with some small sections of shale.
Kwagunt Formation - This layer is composed primarily of shale and mudstone with some limestone- Fossils to be found in this layer are those of stromatolites, the oldest fossils to be found anywhere in the Grand Canyon. Which form near the surface yet are the bottom. And no trilobites. Which all fits reals and evolution and completely fails Flood Nonsense again. And again no fish as should be there as ALL life that exists now should have existed at the beginning of the flood.
Galeros Formation - This layer is composed of interbedded sandstone, limestone and shale. Impossible in a single whopping great flood. Again Fossil stromatolites also exist in this layer and no trilobites nor fish nor whales nor any fossils that we know evolved much later.
Nankoweap Formation - This layer averages about 1,050 million years old and is composed of a coarse-grained sandstone. Well at least is below limestone.
Cardenas Lavas - not exactly a flood thing. Can't form as it exists there while underwater. You would have pillow lava.
Dox Sandstone - This layer averages about 1,190 million years old, is composed of sandstone interbedded with shale.
Shinumo Quartzite - This layer averages about 1,200 million years old and is composed of sandstone
Hakatai Shale - This layer averages about 1,200 million years old and is composed primarily of shale with some sandstone.
Bass Formation - This layer averages about 1,250 million years old and is composed primarily of limestone with some interbedded shale Woops now the sandstones in Nankoweap ARE above limestone. None of this fits Flood Nonsense.
Vishnu Schist and Zoroaster Granite - This layer averages about 1,700 to 2,000 million years old and consists of mica schist. These were originally sediments of sandstone, limestone and shale that were metamorphosed and combined with metamorphosed lava flows to form the schist. Which does not fit a world that was just 1600 years old or a whopping great flood.
Nor can the entrenched meanders of the flood form in whopping great flood. Nor could the river flow ACROSS the slope of the land as it does instead of downhill in multiple rivers to the Gulf of Mexico as it would have if there had been a whopping great flood.
So the Grand Canyon fits real science and Henry Morris and Dr. Brown just plain LIED about such things fitting Flood Nonsense.
So with the Bible's Flood fitting right in the middle of the Egyptian Pyramid building era just how does ANYTHING fit the Flood?
Start dealing WITH reality instead of telling silly lies about it.
Ethelred Hardrede
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv
Well thats quite a lot of evidence and fact in order to disprove the flood.
Seems like a lot of work. It doesnt have to be that hard. I dont need it because i never said that i beleive in the flood the way you are used to hearing about it.
So yeah lots of BS to float that boat on.
What i dont understand is that you are striving to disprove the bible by geological science. But you dont have to. Thats way too much work.
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv honestly with everything you know, you should be a professor. But seriously, the bible has nothing to do with the science of geology.
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Now we know that a man wrote this. This implies that this man whoever he is, understands the nature of God, because he just said, " God created".
So he knows God creates. So Creation happens to be part of a cycle. Im sure you already know what this is. This cycle consist of many laws of nature. All of which are attribute of G.o.d. and the rest of the book elaborates on these laws as they pertain to the healthy outlookof the developing and civil man.
Awesome video full of truth! Thank you and God bless you!
Nice looking middle aged woman there. And smart too.
My criticism of sciences is that data often creates a new narrative, often forgetting the old data. My criticism of religion is a belief in few sources of data and disregarding any new data. My applause to Science Fiction for addressing all possibilities.
We are unique. This lady is amazing and....not stupid. We are aware of our creation think about it
She is amazingly stupid or just working for a paycheck.