Enemy at the Gates (2/9) Movie CLIP - Battle of Stalingrad (2001) HD
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ค. 2012
- Enemy at the Gates movie clips: j.mp/1J9iTWZ
BUY THE MOVIE: j.mp/KLyws8
Don't miss the HOTTEST NEW TRAILERS: bit.ly/1u2y6pr
CLIP DESCRIPTION:
Zaitsev (Jude Law) and other Russian foot soldiers attempt to reclaim the city of Stalingrad from German control.
FILM DESCRIPTION:
A turning point in 20th century war history is the focus of this fact-based account of the 1942-1943 battle of Stalingrad, in which the Germans were finally defeated by Russian influence -- one of the bloodiest battles in World War II history. The film stars Jude Law as Vassili, a marksman from the Urals who is transported to Stalingrad in 1942, and a master German sniper, Major Koenig (Ed Harris). Koenig, an expert German sniper, is determined to eliminate his formidable opponent by any means necessary; meanwhile, Vassili has joined forces with Danilov (Joseph Fiennes), a young Russian political adversary, who is impressed by Vassili's skills and raises his profile in the Soviet Union. Both Vassili and Danilov become involved with Tanya (Rachel Weisz), whose Jewish parents have been captured by the Germans and have forced her to take up with the men on a sniper expedition. Koenig and Vassili begin to develop traps for each other, until fate inevitably must bring the two sharpshooters together. This large-scale production, financed mostly by Teuton companies, also features Bob Hoskins as Nikita Krushchev and Ron Perlman as an aging Russian sniper.
CREDITS:
TM & © Paramount (2001)
Cast: Jude Law
Director: Jean-Jacques Annaud
Producers: Jean-Jacques Annaud, Alain Godard, Roland Pellegrino, Jörg Reichl, John D. Schofield, Alisa Tager
Screenwriters: Jean-Jacques Annaud, Alain Godard
WHO ARE WE?
The MOVIECLIPS channel is the largest collection of licensed movie clips on the web. Here you will find unforgettable moments, scenes and lines from all your favorite films. Made by movie fans, for movie fans.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR MOVIE CHANNELS:
MOVIECLIPS: bit.ly/1u2yaWd
ComingSoon: bit.ly/1DVpgtR
Indie & Film Festivals: bit.ly/1wbkfYg
Hero Central: bit.ly/1AMUZwv
Extras: bit.ly/1u431fr
Classic Trailers: bit.ly/1u43jDe
Pop-Up Trailers: bit.ly/1z7EtZR
Movie News: bit.ly/1C3Ncd2
Movie Games: bit.ly/1ygDV13
Fandango: bit.ly/1Bl79ye
Fandango FrontRunners: bit.ly/1CggQfC
HIT US UP:
Facebook: on. 1y8M8ax
Twitter: bit.ly/1ghOWmt
Pinterest: bit.ly/14wL9De
Tumblr: bit.ly/1vUwhH7 - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
![Hacksaw Ridge (2016) - Attack Continues [1080p]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Vi6RZEoWfV4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Battle of Berlin 1945 - Nazi Germany vs Soviet Union [HD]](/img/n.gif)
Not a cellphone in sight, just people living the moment.
Cellphones weren’t Invented back then! Idiot...
R/woooooosh
Living the moment?
@@dhruvthejarani9405 r/ihavereddit
Except for the camera men recording the movie
1:27
"Hans get to cover!"
"Why bother? They dont even have guns"
Ur underated
*just incase*
They have their fists lmao
i dont need cover.
@@hans7032 Guten tag Hans!
Mad respect to the camera man, still managed to film everything even under heavy artillery explosions.
It was indeed a rare footage to get at those times.
and upload it on youtube
pov:the camera man is on the german side
Bro just shut up
@@victuz it’s a movie ☠️
The extra at 1:02 really looks like he enjoyed himself!
Can't blame him blasting away with that beast.
how’d he even see the enemy?
I mean i would too XD
He's the german soldier from tf2
Tf2 soldier
“We have more bodies than the enemy has bullets. Victory is a guarantee” -Stalin 1942
You can just feel his cruel nature through that quote
Tấn Nguyễn he did send human waves multiple times especially at the end of the war
@@Dark_S_9. End of the war?! Are you mental. At the end of the war, the German army was consistently losing more men dead than the Soviets. The Soviets by that point were likely the most skilled army in the world on the tactical and operational levels, far outclassing the Western Allies.
Stalin killed more people then Hitler
@@borris3768 That's also inaccurate, the book which originally gave that obscene figure (60 million) has since had most of it's authours turn it's back on it. Realistically speaking, Stalin killed somewhere in the region of 10-20 million people. Hitler on the other hand, (including all the Soviet civillians and soldiers that he either killed or starved to death during WW2) has likely got somewhere in the region of 30-40 million AT LEAST.
This does not at all account for the fact that Stalin was in power for more than twice as long and ended up winning his war which meant he had free rein in Eastern Europe. Not nearly as many deaths occured under him as would have under Hitler (Hunger Plan has estimates of 50-100 million Soviet civillians being starved to death). So no, that statement is in fact wrong.
0:58 you can see the cameraman lol
LMAO
Agustin Guerra Nice catch! I never even saw him the first time
the commissars don't have the balls to execute him
He is just a war photographer. Nothing wrong with that.
he was having flashbacks, they figured he added to the immersion
Girls in dodgeball: Hides in the back
Boys in dodgeball:
holy true
Me and the boys defending Stalingrad, rare footage:
Huraaaaaah
0:15 When you play Enlisted
Hoooorahhh JAA JAA JAA
Do boys carry guns and shoot each other in dodgeball? That’ll be interesting.
0:58 another proof that cameraman is the most overpowered character
Literally! He can even survive nuclear blast
100th like
Didn't you people already know? The camera man is always invulnerable.
TH-cam comment section: where everyone is a 5 star general, historian, and confuses movies with documentaries
+HAcoreRD lmao, so true xD
+HAcoreRD lmao, so true xD
+HAcoreRD ....jejejejejejeje....But you know.....opinions are like assholes....everybody got one.....and they all stink.....jejejeje
+Deckie Deckie you are funny and I suspect you are Filipino which is wonderful.
Thank you
Why are the Germans speaking German and the Russians speaking English
Isprikitik burkabush Because Americans don't like reading subtitles.
aSecondCaesar
And US is a large market, so many films/series are made to appeal to the Americans.
Pikkabuu True, though that dynamic may eventually change with China emerging as a huge market for American films.
+Pikkabuu and because the French director wanted English speaking actors
+Isprikitik burkabush MURICA cannot read ?
1:02 The way he POUTS his Mouth while FIRING the machine gun is just INTENSE!!!
props to the german soldier standing two feet to the right of a tank barrel as it fires, given how much air concussion there is from even a large rifle muzzle flash. employee of the week, right there
They used black powder to simulate the tanks firing. Would have been a lot of smoke and coughing on set
definitely a shoe-in for middle management
Hard as krupp steel
German morale is and was h8ghest that is crucial but after stalingrasld low German morale so they lost the war
1:28 german soldier bends over the wreckage: "just chilling, relaxing and shooting at some massive russian brigade rushing against me”.
"A real turkey shoot."
he was like :
dont mind me,just shooting some commies in sight
You can also see his MP-40 jammed. The bolt goes forward, but it did not fire.
its supposed to make you the hardest target to hit
You do know that Belorussians p, Ukrainians and many others died for Supid Soviet Union too?
The first ten minutes of this film are totally unforgettable. From where the soldiers are unloaded from the trains and herded across the river into the meat grinder.
Never mind that it didn't happen. The Soviets had millions of Mosin-Nagants in storage and after dropping the plan to convert to SVT-40s, production of the Mosin-Nagant was increased (it was much cheaper and faster to produce in large quantities then the SVT-40). They certainly didn't lack rifles to give to their soldiers.
@@kovesp1 that may be, but in Stalingrad they did. The city wasn't well supplied during the EARLIER stages. They were so poorly supplied, they even had to use ww1 artillery during the earlier phases of the battle. They supplies and reinforcements poured in later on
@@joshuaandre8911 As far as I can recall, no such shortages are mentioned by any of the reputable military historians writing on the topic: Glantz, Erickson, Overy, Beevor, ... Same goes for the memoirs of Chuikov and Zhukov, but I suspect you'll just discount that.
of course, all this is blatant lies, the film is trying to defile at least like the Red Army
@@Towarish_Chekist ok tankie
Damn movie clips. They always end it right when it starts to get good.
1:02 German machine gunner:
Get some get some!
Call of duty 2003 dev: “damn this movie is so cool what if something like this was in a video game?”
Too bad it isn’t
cooldloop it is...2003 first call of duty.
Git Sum Gaming first mission of the first Call of Duty on PC
@@FuNWithAChemicaLBomb yuo...damn i loved that game....wish I could rewind the clock and go back to the good ol days
It was COD world at war! Now they remake same shity game only better graphics!
0:17 when you open a pack of gum at school
It's OUR pack of gum !!
Lol
So?
Some Dude my god that’s actually hilarious
And bribed some and defending yourself
I've only now noticed how unauthentic the sound of that MG 42 is.
Ive noticed this too comrade!
The real MG42 make Brttt with chains sound but 10x faster
(sry for my BAD english)
Just one problem,The mg 42 was still in the prototype stage when this was happening. It should have been the mg 34. Since the mg 42 is still used in some armies,im shure it was easier to get for the movie. I think they did a nice job replicating this battle. It was a good movie!
Ma man a big fan of firearms just like me
@@adriani.m4163 a firearm is only a tool! It ďoes not make you a man!
@@kevinmahaney3650 Fine, Mr. Sergeant !
0:28 When you read the first question on the exam
0:50 give this man running on the right an oscar for the facial expressions man
>:0
Hes doing the pogchamp face lmaoo
Look at 01:02
@@UnknownPersononGoogle 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@UnknownPersononGoogle man really said "😠"
Hearts of Iron 4 Force Attacking with no Equipment in a Nutshell
Against entrenched forces,no less
*mass assault doctrine intensifies*
@Hammerschlägen M reminder that this is historically, complete bs.
@@virgiljianu7166 no air superiority either
@Hammerschlägen M except there's not, the only truth is that the later executed a few deserters, similar how they used to do in ww1 all over the place. but shooting soldiers that were running back is bs.
I appreciate how at 1:28 there's a guy just chilling there, not even behind cover shooting down soviets like it's an average Tuesday afternoon
Many russian army is send to the war not fully trained back in those days.. so germans think is easy to fight russia in ww2
0:16 this is a perfect representation of boys when home bell rings
0:55 the cannon fire just looks like coffee creamer being lit.
LMAO HAHAHAH
I know!!!! lol
“Sergeant! There’s too many! We’re out of shells!”
“Give them the Coffee Mate then!”
I know..it looks like a Roman Candle going off
Red Orchestra 2 in a nutshell.
sees ppsh41 as rifleman, fights over it to take it
no arty :(
Recovered from a stream of a Commisar's House control match with only 1 minute remaining
"OK guys go go go!"
"But there's a machine gun!"
"Fucking rush B noobs wtf!!!???"
*Everyone rushes B*
*TL calls arty on B*
Not enough T-34's camping at the back of D or C.
the red army did not have a shortage of rifles. they had large industrial capacities and could produce tons of new guns. meanwhile, it was the germans who didnt have enough fuel supply, their most important means of transport then were horses.
They did have a shortage of weapons
Still cool
Well the Red army did have a supply chain problem I would agree about the whole rifle thing they had plenty of them. But this film is a movie and it doesn't get a lot right.
In the early stages of Stalingrad they did. Soviet logistics haven't supplied them well enough in the EARLY phase. The middle to final phases are a different story as you may be aware
Well they did have sucidal charges, but not like how the westreners portray it, but these same tactics were also used by the British, Americans, Germans, and well known the Japanese. So it’s nothing new and it’s not surprising. I mean these tactxs have Been used since the start of humanity, running sucidally to the enemy. I mean even today, with what’s going on in Ukraine you hear about the Russian convoy that moved up and got destroyed, and Ukraine had a counter offensive in Kherson region and they got absolutely annihilated by Russian airstrikes and artillery
Just so you know - The soviets didnt actually do suicidal frontal charges...they did the opposite. (The japanese were famous for kamikaze frontal charges tho)
Soviets used bombed out buildings or whatever confined areas that could be defended to stay close to the germans in order to negate their artillery, airforce and tanks.
Without area of effect weaponry and technological superiority the fights would devolve into a slow and grinding close combat hell in a labyrinth of buildings.
Yep those frontal charges was USA propoganda about soviet
Frontal charges were a thing during all the early war, not only the Soviets did them but the Germans and French as well, same with Italians. Because the concept of combined tactics still was evolving
@@idlearctic592 I don't think all of those people were willingly sacrificed. But hey salute to all who died in a conflict of old men bickering and clinging to actions of the past.
They sacrificed 25 million...not 5
No.
During the first part of the war, suicidal charges were very common. The Russians employed the same tactics as during the First World War.
I read the testimony of a German soldier who was fighting on the Eastern Front. He said "The russians were charging in a compact mass of infantry, facing our machine guns. Before rushing forward and while they were running, they were shouting 'hooray!!!' I wonder why they were shouting like that. We hardly had to aim. They were falling by the hundreds"
The Germans are Walmart and the Russians are shoppers on Black Friday......
Ryan Sohn
Great
XDD the bullets are the products XDD
I laughed hard, great comment!
Ryan Sohn That a way to say that.
Hahahaha
In Russia you hit the bullet......
+Austin Thacker in soviet russia you destroy mine
In USA you have right to bear arms. In Motherland Russia you have right to whole bear!
Frank Müller was für ne Demokratie ?
Hier in D ?!
Träum weiter...
LOL
hahaha lmao!! that explains lot that scean at 1:32..!!😂😅👏
Брат моего отца погиб под Сталинградом.
Было дяде Саше 22 года.
he was probably shot by one of your own russian officers
German's :remember no Russian
Commisar:remember no Russian
Yes
Wow an actually funny joke on a WW2 video
🤣🤣🤣
That joke makes no sense.
@@17MrLeon because you dont know the context
"Another unit was lost in the defence of the Rodina"
LMAO Company of Heroes 2 references here we goooo
Lol
“ another squad had been killed, Death to the motherland”
I hear that all too often lol
All these people arguing insignificant shit and no one noticed the real problem with this scene.
Almost none of those mosins have bayonets fixed on them! What is this bullshit?
***** Have you ever owned a mosin or seen picture of WW2 Russians dumbshit? A mosin is zeroed in the factory with the bayonet fixed, therefore the bayonets were meant to be fixed at all times.
***** True as you state, however, a good many of the rifles had their bayonets cut off in the field so the soldiers had something to slice the cheese loaves with. They were also sold on the black market to gay bath house owners to be used as painful spanking implements.
robert glenn But Russia dislikes homosex. They would never allow such a thing.
calm down mister!
You know what another significant problem is? I don't think panzers with 50 mm cannon create little magical puffs of smoke. Also, the gun fires 3 times every second, not humanly possible to load a gun, that big, that fast.
"Flanking around the enemy was invented in 1943"
Soldiers in 1942:
I was wondering the very same thing.
Teacher: ok kids were getting a student from Russia
Girls: I hope he’s cute
Me and the boys: 0:10
Those are some british sounding russians
I know why do they use English sounding actors for a soviet charge
I think they did summer class ;)
Lend lease
British Film.
Because if it it was voiced by Russians they would be spamming the cyka blyat war cry and and dodging bullets because of Russian bias
0:17 boys when the lunch bell rings
Straight up
My favorite school instrument is the lunch bell
😂😂😂
*URA*
"i may not have the perfect aim on shooting the enemy, but when it comes to friendly fire i never missed a shot"
-Tank Fish
Love how the tank guns are essentially just flare guns
0:17 Boys when they see students from a different school
Tell me about it 💀😂😂 fr tho
Peace was never an option
But the other school is uncool but good.
Imagine being in Russia or Germany in the 1990s and seeing old men sitting on the park bench feeding the pigeons reconciling their past and remembering fallen comrades while you mistakenly believe they did nothing with their lives.
Aww...that’s sad though. 😢
I grew up in Moscow in the 1980's. Honestly, I don't remember meeting many veterans who'd served in WW2. Those guys - even if they'd survived the war - didn't live too much past 60-70.
@@ThisHandleWasTheOnly1Available too much drinking
John :They did not get past the age of 60 and 70 because of war issues like radiation, wounds , and lung issues
Many of the real Soviets which fought the war where already dead in the 60s or even faster. Most of the German lived also up till the 80s and 90s. These elder ones you see today are Folks from the Hitler Jugend. On the Post-soviet side however i have a strong suggestion that the elders of today just pinned some medals and are pretending today that they fougth the real deal when in fact they did nothing or where deployed 100kms behind the front.
Real Normandy : You have 20% chance of survival
This Normandy : 100% death unless you're the main character
Stalingrad, not Normandy. Opposite sides of Europe. Normandy was the Americans, British, and Canadians.
Such an inaccurate account of the fighting and stereotyped view of the Red Army detracts from an otherwise enjoyable film.
Which part is innacurate? the lack of weapons for the average soviet soldier or the human wave attack tactic?
@@dv2045 both
@@toypoodle666 Both things were half true. All soviet soldiers were armed but they experienced shortages at the begining of Barbarrossa in 1941 (they lost such quantities that factories had a hard time to replentish the losses) and during Stalingrad the soviets didnt enjoyed full strenght divisions (most divisions were destroyed in weeks and during the railstation battles these divisions were destroyed in days if not hours) until 1943 after Kurks Offensive. About human wave attacks, at the begining of Barbarrossa yes, they were desperate to stop the germans so the officers (those who werent shot by Stalin or survived the first weeks of the war) were survivors of the Civil War who applied this tactic due they lacked cohesive tank and artillery support. During Stalingrad there were several of these attacks but most were not human wave but high casualty infantry charge.
@@dv2045 Shortages yes: but no record of being sent into battle unarmed. Order No. 227 “Not a Step Back!" did not lead to retreating troops being machine-gunned either.
@@toypoodle666 If you are viewing this as a film that is establishing an important theme for the viewer who hasn't read a close account of history, I think is hardly as obscene as many films which are completely ficitious. It is generally true that the Soviet Union absorbed a near deadly shock and then turned the tide of the war by being able to suffer and yet sustain unbelievable casualties over a prolonged period. At the onset, the Germans were better equipped, better trained, and far more successful. The Soviets were beaten back to a near defeat, regrouped, and essentially wore the Germans out in the long run. In the final year of the war you see glimpses of the Red Army becoming both strategically and tactically sound and there where many instances were they truly outmaneuvered the Germans (supported by voluminous Allied equipment and supplies). There is no doubt that the Soviets benefitted from the Germans being distracted on two fronts, as did the Americans/British, so this always seems like a strange argument to me. I think one can say with certainty that the German army fell from a combination of Soviet casualties and American industrial might, and in the final 12 months of the war both the Soviets and Americans demonstrated equal or superior competency to the flailing Germans.
The Russians had a weapon shortage in WW1, but in WW2 they had plenty of weapons. Russians fielded more sub-machine guns than any other country in the war combined.
From John Erickson's book - The Road To Stalingrad -
January to December 1942:
Manpower
Germany 250,000 Soviet 187,000
Machine Carbines
German 524,473 Soviet 952,332
Light Machine Guns
German 71,923 Soviet 100,183
*****
Not 5 times more you idiot... In fact during 1941 invasion the German outnumbered teh Russians 3 million to 2.8 million.
This movie takes place during the battle of Stalingrad.. Initially, the number of German soldiers were 270,000 vs Soviet soldiers 187,000.. And by the time of the Soviet counter attack, the number of German soldiers rose to 1,040,000 whilst the Soviet number rose to 1,143,000... YES hardly the 5:1 ratio... you fucking moron. Stay away from history kid. Leave it to the adults.
*****
I know what you said, And I'm telling you that you're WRONG.
@@thomass1891 man got no chill
@@callysweatgamer9732 my guy this was from 7 years ago
just imagine what that was like in the 1940's. "commander, I dont have a rifle!'' "dont worry, keep Running and you will find one."
The logic behind it was that, you would have the unarmed charge just behind those with the rifles. So that once he got shot you could pick up the rifle and keep fighting. A good example of this is CoD: Finest Hour. They replicated the situation for every 2nd person to be in the weapons line would get an ammo clip instead of rifle. If one were to die holding a rifle, you were to pick up his rifle and shoot.
oh ya, i know. the part that make me laugh is that the officers stood there and basicly toold there men to die
"CoD fanboy alert"
Yeah, the Red Army was in a very poor state in 1941-1942 before they could get the factories spamming small arms and tanks later on...
Brock lacey This whole idea is quite inaccurate as it wasn't happening by this point in Stalingrad. The reinforcements coming from the East bank of the Volga were well kitted out with submachine guns and grenades, they were equipped for street fighting.
Hats off to the camera team who lay down their lives to bring us war time films salute
The whole movie is hilariously inaccurate but the thing that bothers me the most is that some Soviets have rifles while the rest are only carrying cartridges.
This shortage only occurred in 1941 due to the Red Army's shortage of trucks and trains that couldn't transport the millions of tons of guns and ammunition from their vast factories but this is in 1942 the US with their lend-lease gave them 500k trucks and their factories also produced trucks and trains to fix the shortage.
The only thing this movie got right was that the Germans and the Soviets are fighting in a city called Stalingrad.
0:58 stop and look to the right "Camera man" ;)
This is obviously one of the soviet war correspondents, taking some pictures of the operation.
Ahh, you completely ruined my immersion! Kudos, you have eagle eyes.
Sneak 1943
Blud is from the future
(Chill it's just a joke💀)
Me and the boys storming Area 51
I can't wait, bring lots of sun tan lotion, and a wide brim hat. Finally get to the bottom of this.
let's just hope we manage to successfully invade Area 51
What if the guards open fire?
@@sr.6001 don't stop comrades we do not fall back.
Americans are never short of guns only reason the red's had to give every other a handful of bullets is because they were communists.
Good old Russia, nothing has changed, still the same tactics, reconnaissance and catching bullets with live meat
The cameraman single handedly lived through all of this, what a true war hero!
This joke isn't funny any more
@@aboxofbeans it's been 2 years 💀
@@aboxofbeansafter 2 years 😂
IS NO GOOD COMRADES
FALL BACK
kkkkkkk
Is no good Comrades! Attack in the OPPOSITE direction!
Yman83464 lmao! That was good.
>springfield rifle
Patrick Bateman Hey Paul!
1:03 love the guy on the right just chilling sitting on the rubble picking shots at people hahahaha what a badass
Camper
Okay here's some facts about the Battle of Stalingrad
1: the Soviets didn't gun down their own with machine guns
2: the Soviets were mostly fighting in defensive positions instead of attacking
3: yes the city was pretty much blown up to hell and the Soviets were desperate.
4: the Soviets were so desperate that they were sending tanks outside of the local factories to fight immediately.
5: an actual strategy of the Soviets was to hug up as close as possible to the Germans so said Germans couldn't use artillery or aircraft
6: and no the Soviets did not give two guys one rifle and told them to pick it up when the other guy got killed.
7: bring the period of the battle which the scene was showed which was in the city the Soviets in German would fight in the buildings and ruins in vicious close combat.
8: the Soviet sniper that was the main character in this movie was actually part of a special forces unit called in from Siberia.
9: the battle was won by encircling the Germans so the infantry fighters and say they didn't actually push him back they just had to hold out.
10: the average lifespan of a Soviet soldier was 24 hours and their commanders was roughly 3 days during the battle.
Yes who shots his soldiers at wars
1. it happened elsewhere though in the eastern front, or are you seriously suggesting it is a hollywood invention? people dont just make this up because they were bored.
2. no, at one point the germans controlled most of the city so they had to attack to regain districts.
@@ImperialDiecast well if you're talking about Soviet soldiers being gunned down by their own or sharing a rifle no it didn't there's been no reports of that. Also the fact that the Germans took most of the city is a clear indication that the Soviets were on the defense true the Soviets did put an offensive every now and then but this was very rarely. The biggest offensive they had was trying to retake the hill near the city. But remember they didn't win by pushing the Germans out of the city they won by encircling the city.
@@ImperialDiecast Yes, the filmmakers pretty much made it up. The only men getting shot were officers.
That got to be one of the most nonchalant relaxed ways of firing at people charging at you at 01:03 lol
“The soldier is the Army. No army is better than its soldiers. The
Soldier is also a citizen. In fact, the highest obligation and privilege
of citizenship is that of bearing arms for one’s country”
―
George S. Patton Jr.
People will defend their Homeland like rabid animals if you threaten it
"We fought the wrong enemy"
- Also George S. Patton
So throwing your life away in a charge that you are clearly going to die in for no reason is your duty?
@@avionrico6941 in what was Russia's standing is that no sacrifice too great if it meant that they would throw every man at the enemy tooth and nail and that their sacrifice whether consentually or forcefully in the end it was to ensure that their country survived and pushed back the enemy after realizing their country was losing ground extremely fast and was majorly under equipped but had the more staggering numbers thus forcing them to use their numbers in population to push the german occupation back before completely overrun losing their country and lively hood. they did not die for no reason their charge helped win that war whether by alot or only a little, still counted.
@@YuhMothaYuhFeelMeh There is a difference between saving your country and throwing your life away for it. Serving your country and helping rid the said country of the occupiers out of your own free will is a sacrifice one can make, however this quote is implying that it is your duty to serve it, one's sole purpose. Not only is that morally messed up in it's own right, but when used in the context of this video, it is literally saying that your only purpose in life is to give up everything and run into bullets to wear them down, with no obvious means of protecting yourself. An obvious death sentence that may or may not give the rest of the millions of "body bags" a slim chance to survive.
This is no prestigious duty, it is a roll of dice that demands millions of unwilling sacrifices to be performed. As I've said, there is a massive difference between volunteering to fight and being forced to fight. Volunteering to fight is a prestigious role, being forced to commit to such commitments is no different than being fed to a meat grinder for no discernible goal, and I suspect you believe that is people's greatest role to end up in.
RUSH B NO STOP CYKA BLYAT
lol
Ah, Fallen Fighters... such a shit map :)
HA
noob team
It is not funny . My grandpa die in this battle.
Zerg rush - it's been 80 years now, and soviet tactics didn't evolve a bit since then.
Best part for me is the movie doesnt show the Germans just using the Tiger, instead, they show the Panzer 3
would've been even better if they showed soviets using actual tactics they used during the battle and not the mass charges.
@Joshua Payne I haven't said they never did it. But most of such charges were only used in the first couple of months to delay the enemy as long as possible. After that it was an exception. I highly doubt that they were used in Stalingrad battle, but if you have sources that claim they did happen there, can you link them?
@Joshua Payne There’s a difference between tactical charges and simply throwing men at the enemy without any forms of tactics. The horde stuff was a myth in actuality.
I just played this level in Call of Duty.
Just ask some Russian Stalingrad veterans about this movie and they'll tell you it's some real bullshit. Russians charging without rifles and bullets? That might have been WWI and perhaps earlier during WWII, but in Stalingrad the fighting was house-to-house, street by street. The Russians didn't just charge into machine gun fire like idiots in Stalingrad, although they did take enormous losses anyway. And the 'Not-A-Step-Back-Order' was a real thing, but it was mainly aimed at commanders who ordered retreats from their position without orders. Unlike what's shown here, Soviet soldiers could retreat to their starting positions if the attack failed, they just weren't allowed to retreat further.
Yeah, inexperience mofos like Zhukov, Russokovsky, Koniev and Chuikov
NKVD barrier troops didnt shoot retreating soldiers. Soviets had detainement groups located several kilometres behind the battle to catch retreating troops and send them back to the battle, or they would be taken in penal battalions which were the most brutal/suicidal battles. Quite comparable to these scenes for a penal battalion but the movie is utter shit.
actually. the only ones that were charging without guns at that time were the penal battalions. criminals, traitors, cowards
Alex Kyriacou It's a movie...
There actually were some instances of NKVD barrier troops, either at the Tractor factory or Barrikady ( can't remember exactly, I am citing Anthony Beevor here ). There were also many other instances of incredibly irresponsible executions for "deserters". One example I remember was a pilot who baled out of his plane and tore up his Communist party card because he thought he was behind German lines ( trying to evade being victim of the Commissar Order ). He then went back to his men and was accused of desertion and most likely shot.
its sad that people actually think that the russians won only bcs of winter
It wasn't winter the whole war. The Russians were winning in spring and summer as well
@@Anakin_Sandy_High_Ground Winter helps when you're on the defense and hinders when you're on the offense, which the Russians were continually from August 1943 and still beat the Germans completely.
love the choice of thumbnail. looks like those boys were having a lot of fun
There is absolutely no logic to mass executing your own men during battle, especially when the enemy is advancing on your position, you need every men that can fight to defend their current position. It would also be a waste of ammunition. Doing so not only would allow the enemy a clear path to advance but also any remaining defenders would not be able to fight back against such an advance(having used up their ammunition). That would be the easiest way to lose a battle. And the Soviet Military clearly did not lose the battle of Stalingrad.
I don't see where you guys see the (actual footage colorized) stuff, I must be blind
There was thing called order 227 whih says that all retreating man are traitors and should be executed, it began in battle od Stalingrad, the soldiers mostly didn't retreat as they knew what awaited them.
@@kanapka3659 order 227 is for the officers, not the soldiers.
@TAWOG most of them kill in captivity, in labour, dude. First months of war 3 mil captured soviet, most of them just because mistake of Stalin.
Watch good documentary
U.S army personnel defending the outskirts of Area 51 from a crowd of advancing internet users. (2019, Colourized)
The Massacre of Area-51
Jesus Leyva Sadly ;(
Lol
@66760 • 67 million years ago r/wooosh
CreeptheCreepers what a pipe dream. Most outside 51 would be too stoned, too busy complaining about the patriarchy or confused about what bathroom to use. 2 well placed shots and they would all run back to their parents basement.
Nothing changed so much til today on Russian attacks.
Come in mass without good or no equipment and hope not to get killed.
They didn't do these WWI style charges any longer...
0:14 when the teacher says that's it for today
1:02
He reminds me of The soldier from TF2
R. I. P soldier's voice actor.
Rest In Peace, Rick May (Soldier’s voice actor)... 😞
He was good son, real good, maybe even the best... 🙏💪😪
Team fortress 2 is it?
@@velocityofthesun1399 yes
Why is there fire coming from the Tank Barrel everytime it fires 😂
Loving the historical revisionism in movies featuring USSR
It's safe to say the Russians invented YOLO
In Soviet Russia, you are a statistic.
"The death of one man is a tragedy, the death of millions is a statistic." - Joseph Stalin
wigster600 in Soviet Minecraft blocks place you
wigster600 we have reserves
I read that as "autistic"
wigster600 and we always have reserves
It's 2023 and pretty much the same Russian strategy except we have drone and GoPro footage
I was always impressed with the Humanistic approach of Human Wave Attacks
1:24 when someone takes the last cookie at lunch
Its clear that this scene is false in so many ways, historically the Russians did not use these tactics for one thing, in reality they used several bears with machine guns attached to their heads to demoralize the enemy.
Pasha Staravoitau the hell do you think?
Ox van cool obviously that wasnt sarcasm, saying Russians used bears with machine guns attached to their heads is like saying the sky is blue, it's a simple fact with no political or any strings attached to it.
Is your head all right?
Love the German soldier extra mugging for the camera in the preview image.
Crazy thing is that Russian still do the same tactic in Ukraine..LOL!
What are you even saying??
myth
who needs bullets and weapons when you have a magic flag
Right?
morale boost 75%
50% speed boost
The kyles rushing the defense of Area 51
0:51, moment in thumbnail...
Reminds me of the Volga and Stalingrad missions in the og Call of Duty, great game
How do you name at 1 million of men and 2 rifles?
Soviet offensive :v
Aid from the United States
Not In the Eastern Front
True
well i don't know if its a joke or a hate comment, but they hadn't a lot of weapons during that period of time.
germany attacked and ussr wasn't really prepared, so they had to be so fucking strong to win a war like this during 4 years.
Q: Why do French tanks have rearview mirrors?
A: So they can see the frontlines :D
0:18 when dodgeball starts
POV: *Russian tactics in Bakhmut 2023*
Ukrainian tactics*
@@eliasziad7864 Nah, not really mate, considering Ukraine doesnt have a single reported case of mass assault tactics, not to mention they have much lower casualties, you could at least make an effort to fact check lmao
@@zaerdna
What are you talking about ?
In Bakhmut , Russians and Ukrainians literally fight like cod warzone and from a distance
@@zaerdna According to CNN
@@yurinalysis8034 Source, common research
That thumbnail🤣🤭. One of them watching onwards Camera.
This scene is ridiculous.
And so is the rest of the movie, from a historical point of view.
Swatbot2611. You don't sound like an historian and these battles are fairly accurate
Rhys Nichols I don't need to be a historian to study history. If you think a movie like this one is "fairly accurate", I suggest you grab a book.
First of all, Zaitsev's real story is quite different from what this movie shows.
Also, charges like this nonsense rarely happened, specially during the battle of Stalingrad. also, the "one rifle for ten soldiers"? Totally made up, at least when comes to the battle of Stalingrad. And that's not to mention how badly the blocking detachments were represented in this scene.
Girls locker room:*complaining about P.E class*
Boys locker room:
Jelous much ?? 😂😂
Let me just bring my Mosin
boys locker room: Battle of Stalingrad, Battle of Kursk, Battle of Berlin, Battle of Britain, Battle of El Alamein, Invasion of Poland, Battle of Midway, Invasion of France, Invasion of Russia, Invasion of Norway, Pearl Harbour, Operation Barbarossa.
Dio
It was you dio!
0:23 Dwight Einsenhower in Stalingrad?
0:52 the guy on the right is having the best ever
I know this movie isn’t meant to be realistic at all but these scenes are just heartbreaking.
This just shows that Stalin wasnt human at since, he was basically a fat demon hiding inside a human skin
@@hybridAbsol hello bot, nice try, but churchil eat more
@@hybridAbsol I'm not sure Stalin was responsible for these tactics.
... or it might be completely realistic? Bakhmut holds.
@@sam4secretary based
I gotta say, this must have been terrifying for the Germans. Imagine having that huge blob of people charging at you and no matter how many you put down, they just keep coming at you. They just keep getting closer and closer until they finally give up.
Yeah it's called swamping your enemy, but even for the Soviets it was costly doing that when the Germans had an MG42 spandau machine gun, very very costly infact they did forbid such assaults when they saw how many were dying, but what proved decisive at Stalingrad was the Russians 'although they had to get men & supplies across that volga river they were nevertheless closer to their supplies unlike the Germans whose supplies were driven all the way across conquared but partisan infested Russia and although that wasn't bad enough it was far harder in the winter, The sixth army did incredibly well to say they lacked essentials because they actually did take the city centre but all they were doing is being lured into the trap Marshall Zhukov had set, those Romanian soldiers on the flanks should've been replaced by snowmen really as they wouldn't have ran off like the Romanians did when those T-34s came flying out the snowstorm to encircle Von Paulus and his troops.
It's called a hollywood movie
Never happened lmao
@@tacoblude8208 it happened in the 1st world war in trench warfare
The Russians got better at this with practice. They eventually learned that charging over open ground didn't work and started using the abundant cover to get up to almost melee range before charging in. If they didn't have cover, they'd dig trenches and tunnel until they got into almost melee range. Fighting in Stalingrad did devolve down to room to room. And yes, this does get terrifying when it starts like 10 meters from you, and when you mass charge from 10 meters away, it matters less that you are just armed with a grenade and a sharpened shovel.
Fighting even without a single weapon 😢
The Soviet soldier charging w/o a Rifle reminds me of the Soviet campaing in COD 1, you are only given an ammo clip lmao
probably because this scene inspired that one, CoD finest hour had a similar opening
Lmao this guys face is legit the best 1:02 lmao
Yeah funny thing about this scene... it's entirely made up
Yes, many Soviets were involved in human wave attacks in the battle some with no equipment but they were never sent in half equipped with inferior arms to assault fortified positions. Even Soviet commanders before Zhukov knew that would be pointless and a waste of lives. Also the barrier troops (those that would shoot dead those that fled) were never present in the Stalingrad battle because Zhukov ordered that they be removed and those who retreated would be placed in penal battalions (in charge of digging entrenchments or fighting to regain their honor and avoid being tried). This is backed up by statements from actual veterans from the battle so don't just say "How would you know if you weren't there?"
Aside from the major historical inaccuracies, you gotta admit this movie is entertaining to watch.
wow, how did you get such clear footage of the ukraine war?
Hahah😂