Anti-Tank Gun Fight | Fury | CineClips | With Captions

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ธ.ค. 2024
  • Watch now in Australia bit.ly/LFURYYTAUS
    Watch now in Canada bit.ly/LFURYCA
    Watch now in US bit.ly/LFURYUS
    Watch now in New Zealand bit.ly/LFURYNZ
    A group of American tanks run into some anti-tank guns and have to carefully manouevre to defeat them.
    #Fury #BradPitt #Tanks
    Fury. April, 1945. As the Allies make their final push in the European Theatre, a battle-hardened army sergeant named Wardaddy (Brad Pitt) commands a Sherman tank and her five-man crew on a deadly mission behind enemy lines. Outnumbered and outgunned, and with a rookie soldier thrust into their platoon, Wardaddy and his men face overwhelming odds in their heroic attempts to strike at the heart of Nazi Germany.
    CineClips. CineClips is home to all the best film content, from classic favourites to the latest releases! Subscribe for weekly clips, compilations, and behind the scenes features!

ความคิดเห็น • 7K

  • @CineStreamOfficialChannel
    @CineStreamOfficialChannel  3 ปีที่แล้ว +918

    Looking for more movie magic? 🎬 SUBSCRIBE to get your cinema-fix with clips from action, comedies, drama and more 🍿 !

  • @xumier4246
    @xumier4246 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20416

    As a former tank admiral, historian, civil army engineer, and WoT veteran, I can say that thats a tank

  • @CriticalPosthumanism
    @CriticalPosthumanism 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2363

    Those Germans: "Scheiße!! They have Plot Armor!!"

    • @basber9529
      @basber9529 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Jawohl!

    • @foty8679
      @foty8679 3 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      Thats why we lost the war. We were the antagonist and the heros had plot armor

    • @albogypsy2842
      @albogypsy2842 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hahaha

    • @huskpl3yz358
      @huskpl3yz358 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Cringeman i think you didnt get the joke

    • @huskpl3yz358
      @huskpl3yz358 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Cringeman ok them

  • @SpanishAvenger
    @SpanishAvenger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9646

    The only thing I didn’t like about this scene is how the only tank that hits ALL the targets is the Fury, the rest shoot but no one hits anything. They are like a game campaign’s AI allies xD

    • @blizzardfog9501
      @blizzardfog9501 3 ปีที่แล้ว +172

      Well what are they gonna hit besides anti-tank guns in the forest

    • @Perfectly_Cromulent351
      @Perfectly_Cromulent351 3 ปีที่แล้ว +347

      Kinda makes sense bc it’s the only Sherman with a 76mm gun.

    • @SpanishAvenger
      @SpanishAvenger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      @@blizzardfog9501 that’s what I mean, they all shoot at the guns but Fury is the only to hit them

    • @SpanishAvenger
      @SpanishAvenger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +101

      @@Perfectly_Cromulent351 the one at 1:21 also does though

    • @Perfectly_Cromulent351
      @Perfectly_Cromulent351 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      @@SpanishAvenger good eye. It doesn’t have the muzzle break like fury does.

  • @danielmanly4793
    @danielmanly4793 ปีที่แล้ว +519

    My grandfather told me a terrible account of a tank crew not paying attention and unintentionally traveling over some of his service members. He always stopped at that point, I can only imagine the memories he once held of the sights and sounds which the event did manifest before him. RIP grandpa.

    • @AngelEyes124
      @AngelEyes124 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Your grandpa was a warrior and a hero ❤ RIP

    • @danielmanly4793
      @danielmanly4793 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@AngelEyes124 Thank you Hans.

    • @AngelEyes124
      @AngelEyes124 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@danielmanly4793 Stay safe out there 👊

    • @lasajnae9626
      @lasajnae9626 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      These are some sweet replies bruh. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, y'all

    • @drjamespotter
      @drjamespotter 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      My father in law ran someone over in a tank on an exercise. Came over the top of a hill and there were infantry on the other side he didn't know about.

  • @taorichan1751
    @taorichan1751 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6134

    4:22
    Panzerfaust guy: Shit I’ve got 999 ping

    • @omer2223
      @omer2223 3 ปีที่แล้ว +375

      Let me stick my head out and prepare the gun. Not like they are gonna shoot me

    • @RealDavidChipman
      @RealDavidChipman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +163

      Same at 4:38

    • @good8619
      @good8619 3 ปีที่แล้ว +164

      Mf was like "nah man I gotta wait till its in melee range"

    • @maxthibodeau3627
      @maxthibodeau3627 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@good8619 one stabby boi Vs a well respected American medium tank.

    • @Padre_416
      @Padre_416 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      "nonononono not now!!"

  • @hansg6336
    @hansg6336 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8331

    That German Pak75 anti-tank gun was a terror for allied tanks. The crews were generally highly skilled and they used the best optics. I can't see how they could have missed that many times in an open field.

    • @Rodoaker07
      @Rodoaker07 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2090

      American Propaganda-Movie. Entertaining, but lacking in historical authenticity. Still a great movie with bombass sfx and cinematography.

    • @Pbairsoftman
      @Pbairsoftman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1108

      This is 1945, all the skilled gunners were dead.

    • @imperialguardsman5929
      @imperialguardsman5929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1414

      @@Pbairsoftman It's an open field and the sherman's were coming in slowly straight ahead in front of the Pak 40s. It's not about how skilled you are because at this point you have to be literally blind to miss them at all.

    • @mohamedbaradji7504
      @mohamedbaradji7504 3 ปีที่แล้ว +434

      @@Pbairsoftman if you’re trained to use it, then you’re skilled crew member. Only thing that would make sense is that since this was nearing the end of the war and these aren’t people who trained enough with it. They only had a week to train before the allied forces marched through Germany. Even still, it is an open field and your enemy is moving slow and grouped up

    • @AndyisRIPPIN
      @AndyisRIPPIN 3 ปีที่แล้ว +150

      German gunners had strong parkinsson

  • @lejenddairy
    @lejenddairy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3201

    4:22 Panzerfaust guy is like I’m just going to stare at the tank and not shoot.

    • @Spartans-bm9vd
      @Spartans-bm9vd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +137

      @@werewolfbishop5465 M1A2, yes a pzfaust would not penetrate the frontal armour but I think your are referring to the M4 not the M1. The PzFaust dependent on version would most probably have little problem penetrating the frontal armour up to ranges of 150m. My guess is that the crew of the M4 seeing the pzfaust 10m in front of them would of probably gone into shock.

    • @tonybaloney8401
      @tonybaloney8401 3 ปีที่แล้ว +165

      @@werewolfbishop5465 every version of the panzerfaust could penetrate the front armor of a Sherman, the lightest panzerfaust could penetrate 140mm

    • @noidea8995
      @noidea8995 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@Spartans-bm9vd roasted

    • @Kargaron
      @Kargaron 3 ปีที่แล้ว +73

      @@Spartans-bm9vd A Panzerfaust 60 can penetrate 200mm of steel. That means it could penetrate even the frontal armor of a Tiger II.

    • @Spartans-bm9vd
      @Spartans-bm9vd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@Kargaron Not quite sure of your meaning? The M1A2 is the current US MBT, has has an effective frontal armour thickness of over 1000mm of RHA to Potential Energy warheads even the Panzerfaust 150 cannot penetrate.
      .

  • @johnf.kennedy7339
    @johnf.kennedy7339 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

    I have an original photo of my grandfather during the war standing on top of one of those Sherman tanks all by himself. Family Story: He told me he was hit while a crew member in the tank. He was the only survivor.

    • @dumann9142
      @dumann9142 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Whats his opinion on Inglorious Basterds?

    • @johnf.kennedy7339
      @johnf.kennedy7339 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dumann9142What year’s did WWII take place?

    • @Kanasan-u1c
      @Kanasan-u1c 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@johnf.kennedy7339 1939-1945

  • @lp6390
    @lp6390 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4601

    Hollywood: How unrealistic do you want it?
    Fury: Hell yeah!

    • @dylangray9664
      @dylangray9664 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      best comment

    • @acutechicken5798
      @acutechicken5798 3 ปีที่แล้ว +331

      Realistic would have been the Americans calling in an artillery barrage and completely destroying the German position, then moving their tanks unopposed.

    • @ElZilchoYo
      @ElZilchoYo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +297

      This movie is a weird mix of extreme authenticity and weird bullshit

    • @num1_herald785
      @num1_herald785 3 ปีที่แล้ว +82

      Giacomo2189 people keep crying about how unrealistic it is, movie would’ve been boring af

    • @LtActionCam
      @LtActionCam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@Giacomo020189 it’s in our rifle squad publication that the enemy wouldn’t expose himself. If we are taking fire and a general direction is known, we would distribute fire across our sector and close with the enemy (once we have fire superiority). We are trying to negate his cover and kill him once we get close enough.

  • @BubbleBelly
    @BubbleBelly 3 ปีที่แล้ว +685

    4:54 A high budget hollywood film using real tanks from WWII, and that's the sound they go with for the M1 Garand. Amazing

    • @klevdud
      @klevdud 3 ปีที่แล้ว +114

      Thats how m1 garands sound in old videogames loooool... didnt catch how bad it is before now

    • @ItsLikeFerrari
      @ItsLikeFerrari 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Looked likr M1 carbines at first

    • @putnamehere3803
      @putnamehere3803 3 ปีที่แล้ว +80

      That's litteraly the sound they use for guns in roblox XD

    • @thamor4746
      @thamor4746 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      I like it more that they keep screaming and yelling then go for hip shooting, accuracy at it's best.

    • @andrevertucio772
      @andrevertucio772 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Honestly, having fired a lot of 30-06 and M1s, that's a pretty close sound.

  • @kamilzadrabaj699
    @kamilzadrabaj699 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5878

    When you play game on easy difficulty.

    • @garmenlin5990
      @garmenlin5990 3 ปีที่แล้ว +153

      But you still can't do the mission objectives properly.

    •  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Who won?

    • @Gamingclutch1993
      @Gamingclutch1993 3 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      More like recruit difficulty

    • @manuelwowchow1476
      @manuelwowchow1476 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      He was right, you have no clue if they're really dead, I would give it a few rounds before doing anything else, cause you'll never know when the next man shoots you back.

    • @ericgaius8791
      @ericgaius8791 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      They play it on hard later.

  • @taylorstout4939
    @taylorstout4939 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    When they open up on the tree line is one of the best tank shots in a movie ever.

    • @BlaneNostalgia
      @BlaneNostalgia 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      agreed, also the shot @5:01 is amazing

    • @bundywaters5988
      @bundywaters5988 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yeah, even showing no fire coming out of Fury's bow gun lol.

  • @1968lr
    @1968lr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1948

    Michael pena is such an underrated actor. He's so versatile, he can literally play any part, any character.

    • @mydigitallife8311
      @mydigitallife8311 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      I think he didn't play in the Ant man.

    • @MrAdamske
      @MrAdamske 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      LOOK AT YOUR PERISCOPE!

    • @r.b.2958
      @r.b.2958 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      AGREED 100

    • @LeFaisDoDo
      @LeFaisDoDo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      lol i think he’s about where he needs to be

    • @viceroybear6298
      @viceroybear6298 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Under rated?

  • @Aerondighteternal
    @Aerondighteternal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1762

    So the Sherman hits the MG team dug into a fox hole while moving and a antitank gun that was sitting there for 10 minutes watching the tank completely misses from head on?

    • @Softpaw1996
      @Softpaw1996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +235

      didn't you know US tank have plot armor? magnetic fields will prevent german rounds to hit them.
      unless the plot demands otherwise ofcourse.

    • @VladiSSius
      @VladiSSius 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yes.

    • @revol148
      @revol148 3 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      @Taylor welcome to the Hollywood treatment of the second world war - where the Americans never seem to die !

    • @TomGibson.
      @TomGibson. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      @@revol148 they always portray them as the undying hero’s, never show the parts like how they tried to make the UK follow their segregation policies against black troops, we had gotten rid of such rules many years beforehand

    • @gregrock7451
      @gregrock7451 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@revol148 The first scene of the movie shows the crew repairing the tank with a dead crewmember in it. Upon returning to the rally point, we learn that Fury is the only tank in their section that didn't get blown to hell. A crewman in another tank who they seem to know is so overcome with fear and shock at the carnage he has witnessed that he blows his own hand off with a grenade to get out of getting sent back into combat (though that was edited out ofthe final cut).
      As Fury rolls through the camp, trucks are loaded with dead soldiers. Nurses and corpsmen are dumping buckets of blood and used bandages outside a field hospital.
      The new guy's first job: sponge the blood and skin of the aforementioned dead crewman out of his crew station.
      Shortly after rolling out, the lead tank in the column cobbled together from the remnants of the otherwise wiped-out battalion gets hit with a Panzerfaust. The crew dies screaming, trapped inside the tank as it's engulfed in flames. Save for the TC, who managed to clamber out of the turret, fall to the ground, and spare himself any further agony by pulling a bullet through his own head.
      AAAAAAAND that just about covers the first 20 minutes. By the time the movie is over, the frightened FNG who joined the crew in the beginning is the only tanker featured in the whole movie to make it out alive due to a combination of luck, and a merciful young Wehrmacht soldier who pretends not to see him, sparing his life as he hides under the tank waiting for them to leave.
      It would appear that your snarky, "knowing," cynically clever assessment of this movie was in no way influenced or biased by having actually bothered to watch it. Or any other American-made war movie of the past 25+ years.

  • @MyCoolZz
    @MyCoolZz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1183

    Which difficulty would you like to start your game?
    - I'm too young to die ✔

    • @Superintendent_ChaImers
      @Superintendent_ChaImers 3 ปีที่แล้ว +71

      Meanwhile the Germans chose Nightmare difficulty.

    • @albogypsy2842
      @albogypsy2842 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Brad Pitt difficulty (basically cheating).

    • @lewiqe
      @lewiqe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      "Story Mode"

    • @efe992
      @efe992 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Baby mode

    • @zippyparakeet1074
      @zippyparakeet1074 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Game journalist mode ✅

  • @dushmanextreme...2564
    @dushmanextreme...2564 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +137

    PAK 40 anti-tank gun rate of fire was up to 14 rounds per minute. In this scene it only fires 4 times in 2 minutes at sitting duck targets, from a dug in position and would have presighted range, yet misses everytime. Make believe Hollywood twaddle.

    • @Delpuertadecabetha
      @Delpuertadecabetha 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      not sure they would miss that much with the high quality optics in open field of view. its an amazin movie

    • @theparanormalattractions
      @theparanormalattractions 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Delpuertadecabethathe PAK 40 anti-tank gun is actually bad at aiming due to the barrel being long or something like that, so you would have to be close to use the gun to hit the tank so it makes sense that it missed its targets

    • @Delpuertadecabetha
      @Delpuertadecabetha 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes sir👍

    • @raay411
      @raay411 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@theparanormalattractions Yeah , as per Hollywood

    • @selametas-salafi3726
      @selametas-salafi3726 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@theparanormalattractionsnah, they all would have been destroyed in real life. The AT guns have optics too. In Tunisia German afrika corps destroyed like 70-80 Sherman’s with just AT guns alone

  • @jcman-lp6lg
    @jcman-lp6lg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7709

    Germany's biggest downfall is that they hired stormtroopers to fight their war

    • @admiralwolf7218
      @admiralwolf7218 3 ปีที่แล้ว +235

      sturmtruppen is more World War One but yeah

    • @NwoSwat
      @NwoSwat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +160

      Nope attacking russia was

    • @hayate7592
      @hayate7592 3 ปีที่แล้ว +257

      @@admiralwolf7218 no i think what he means is that stormtroopers from Star wars don't know how to aim and it's the same thing with the German soldiers in this scene, and with the tank destroyers too, they either don't have good aim

    • @admiralwolf7218
      @admiralwolf7218 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@hayate7592 probably isn’t easy aiming those things

    • @hayate7592
      @hayate7592 3 ปีที่แล้ว +108

      @@admiralwolf7218 yea but notice how the shermans dident miss a single shot whilst the anti tank guns miss all the time?

  • @cabnbeeschurgr
    @cabnbeeschurgr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2133

    Everyone's saying how unrealistic this all is but you have to admit 2:40 with the round deflecting off the armour was so cool

    • @Lunarcheese72
      @Lunarcheese72 2 ปีที่แล้ว +359

      that fucking sound effect was crispy and awesome

    • @katekarin3838
      @katekarin3838 2 ปีที่แล้ว +94

      I wonder where that round will land on

    • @cabnbeeschurgr
      @cabnbeeschurgr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +357

      @@katekarin3838 some random French guy is gonna have a very bad day

    • @Obamavrat671names
      @Obamavrat671names 2 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      @@cabnbeeschurgr can be monsieur Lapadit

    • @leesunghwa809
      @leesunghwa809 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      The sounds in this movie were done so well.

  • @joe67tro
    @joe67tro 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1136

    Love how the Infantrymen were shooting their M1s from the hip.

    • @beesechurger929
      @beesechurger929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +89

      That shit bother me so much! XD

    • @theodorebennett7938
      @theodorebennett7938 3 ปีที่แล้ว +242

      It's called marching fire or walking fire. It was actually used in ww2 and you can hear Brad Pitt's character shout "Walking Fire"!

    • @Oblio1942
      @Oblio1942 3 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      @@theodorebennett7938 that was more of a ww1 thing, and even by 1918 it was seen as kinda pointless. I doubt thered be much of that happening that late into the war in 45

    • @picallo1
      @picallo1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      @@theodorebennett7938 Exactly this. That was a real thing.

    • @frost3193
      @frost3193 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@theodorebennett7938 that ain't Wardaddy.

  • @christianethic
    @christianethic ปีที่แล้ว +23

    The obliterated torso being flung into the air is weirdly realistic and brutal.

    • @Raidernation1994
      @Raidernation1994 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The shell did land directly where were dug in so they got obliterated.

  • @dalek14mc
    @dalek14mc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1093

    “How do you know they’re dead? Are you a doctor?”
    For some reason, I REALLY love that line.

    • @dalek14mc
      @dalek14mc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Miria noSix Said no one.

    • @dalek14mc
      @dalek14mc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @Miria noSix Okay, why and how is it moronic? It’s pretty much what anyone would say if they were dealing a crew member who refused to do his task. If anything, it helps push the story foward by not only establishing the relationship of the tank crew by showing Gordo’s increasing frustration with Norman, but also further establishes Normans character. It’s far from moronic. In fact, it’s kind of essential.

    • @slabbinonspokezz2375
      @slabbinonspokezz2375 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      ​@mirianosix9274 despite how you feel about being yelled at in this situation he's basically a liability being too timid and scared to pull the trigger. It puts his squad at risk of immediate death so hurting someone's feelings or so called being wrong about yelling at him is not something anyone would care about especially if your life is one the line

    • @byronmeir1240
      @byronmeir1240 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@slabbinonspokezz2375 So easy to judge someone when you're not put in that position.

    • @jimyang9889
      @jimyang9889 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      War is HELL, welcome to hell.@mirianosix9274

  • @Jon.A.Scholt
    @Jon.A.Scholt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2141

    Those Stormtroopers shoot about as well as Stormtroopers

    • @VonRammsteyn
      @VonRammsteyn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Sturmtruppen

    • @Sid-08m---8
      @Sid-08m---8 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh I don’t think ww2 had sturmtrooper

    • @VonRammsteyn
      @VonRammsteyn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@Sid-08m---8 nop. It doesn't. But seems that everyone calls stormtroopers to the sturmtruppen...

    • @wgm284
      @wgm284 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I understand this Star Wars reference

    • @duncanmcgee13
      @duncanmcgee13 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@VonRammsteyn sturmtruppen translates as storm troopers however in WW2 they were part of the Nazi SS instead of the regular military and renamed the Sturmabteilung

  • @skyraiderskynighthybrid
    @skyraiderskynighthybrid 2 ปีที่แล้ว +228

    3:13 dat scream of the shell coming out of the barrel

    • @Cyb3rKats
      @Cyb3rKats 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Dat German 8,8 cm don't mess around

  • @factsspace8326
    @factsspace8326 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    " It's just a ricochet were okay" one of the best scene

  • @jamesblumensheid353
    @jamesblumensheid353 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1913

    Just remember people. Tracers rounds were every five rounds. In other words there four rounds to one tracer.

    • @mydigitallife8311
      @mydigitallife8311 3 ปีที่แล้ว +105

      and they were doomed because it gave up the position. Remember they were drafted, farmers and fathers.

    • @MrAdamske
      @MrAdamske 3 ปีที่แล้ว +143

      @@mydigitallife8311 either way if you got hit with the 1200 rpm that is the MG42 it still ruined your day forever xD

    • @greenglassman
      @greenglassman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Can you explain better? I didnt understand and i am curious. Thx

    • @MrAdamske
      @MrAdamske 3 ปีที่แล้ว +169

      @@greenglassman in a magazine they would stack the ammo like so:
      Tracer, normal, normal, normal, normal, Tracer, normal, normal, normal, normal, Tracer, normal, normal, normal, normal.
      Helps you track your shots to the target. Also scary that in between each tracer there's been 4-5 rounds already fired so in effect there's a lot of shit flying your way if you see tracers. Some forces tend not to use them because they reveal your location and there are better alternatives for ammunition. But in a stand up fight like this it doesn't matter. They know where you are and you have a rough idea of where they are (treeline AT guns) so they just let rip. War is hell bro.

    • @07foxmulder
      @07foxmulder 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@MrAdamske Are you a vet or just a war junkie? Not trying to be condescending, just curious.

  • @Aaleg
    @Aaleg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +924

    4:22 bruh did this guy using the panzerfaust suddenly have a stroke

    • @TuAFFalcon
      @TuAFFalcon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +187

      Of course. Panzerfaust takes 10 minutes to figure out while it's loaded and ready to go.

    • @nefasto11a
      @nefasto11a 3 ปีที่แล้ว +240

      You could say he was left in shock and awe at the amount of "Plot Armor" the Sherman tank was shielded by XD

    • @xnet_cascade6257
      @xnet_cascade6257 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      @@nefasto11a realistically, even if he shot the panzerfaust, the tank would still be okay because he would shoot it in the front

    • @simonphoenix3789
      @simonphoenix3789 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      @@xnet_cascade6257 unless it hit the bottom of the tank, given the angle he was shooting from. Even if it was to the front armor, its still not a given that everyone inside will be fine.

    • @xnet_cascade6257
      @xnet_cascade6257 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@simonphoenix3789 true, especially that close

  • @edwardramirez8768
    @edwardramirez8768 3 ปีที่แล้ว +588

    US Army: Red Tracers
    Germans : green tracers.
    At least we know who the enemy is!

    • @stephenwraysford6788
      @stephenwraysford6788 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      Star Wars in the War 👌

    • @chrisl.6211
      @chrisl.6211 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      That’s... that’s the point of colored tracers?

    • @foty8679
      @foty8679 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@chrisl.6211 Germany did not only use green Tracers. We also used yellow, green, white and even red.

    • @herheartbeats5727
      @herheartbeats5727 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@foty8679 For some books I have been reading, in the German army tracers were specifically used for air/ground coordination. But maybe they had other purposes, I don't know ?

    • @lampada5037
      @lampada5037 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@chrisl.6211 No
      Tracers are used to know were your bullet is going
      But gives your position

  • @adammatis5527
    @adammatis5527 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    "CLEAR!!"
    "On the way!"
    I can't tell you why those guys sound so good together, but they sure do.

  • @javlon9960
    @javlon9960 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5339

    In American movies, only American troops can hit the targets.

    • @HappyHog11
      @HappyHog11 3 ปีที่แล้ว +534

      Someone hasn’t seen the whole Movie

    • @bandinamerica3035
      @bandinamerica3035 3 ปีที่แล้ว +494

      In all seriousness though, all those Sherman's woulda been cut down in this scenario.

    • @motokid6008
      @motokid6008 3 ปีที่แล้ว +84

      And fire from their hips....

    • @Yukiyak0
      @Yukiyak0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      It’s just plot armor

    • @helterskelter416
      @helterskelter416 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      @@bandinamerica3035 probably not, considering it was 2 tanks in cover vs 4 shermans and a large amount of ground troops.

  • @MW-bi1pi
    @MW-bi1pi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3257

    My Dad was in the 4th Armored Division, CCA as a Tanker from the Breakout , Bastonge and the 'Rat Race' to the very end. NO WAY those Kraut Anti-Tank guns could miss like that at 200 yards or less. Dad said they were accurate as all get out and ALWAYS had their ranges marked. The Kraut guns were so high velocity and with such tough armor piercing tips, they would not deflect off a Sherman at that range.... Dad said in the whole war he only saw one Kraut round deflect.. Even at a 10 degree angle, they would blow through a Sherman like a hot knife through butter.

    • @nickwilliams5967
      @nickwilliams5967 3 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      Cool.

    • @steveshepherd2712
      @steveshepherd2712 3 ปีที่แล้ว +362

      Hollywood will never let the facts get in the way of a good story 😉

    • @FredomHack
      @FredomHack 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      dude this is a movie,not a historical recreation, with all due respect fuck the story, it's a movie made to make america look amazing and the german "sucks" here, next time complain that the storm troopers don't hit Luke ever in the movies...

    • @MikeyMike-ql3ry
      @MikeyMike-ql3ry 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Well sir, Your Daddy is Wrong Again lol
      Reminds me of my momma said, from the Waterboy movie

    • @therandommailman
      @therandommailman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Cool dude!

  • @ondracekivo
    @ondracekivo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1612

    Anti-tank gun crew to their officer: "Sir, several enemy tanks ahead". Officer: "Hmmm, send an MG to the suicidal spot in the open field. Then let them come under 800m, which is a standard tank clash distance." Crew: "But sir..!!! Officer: "Silence! Wait, until the tanks collect all the enemy infantry and let them come deadly close...and then aim the empty places between the tanks." Crew: "Oh boy, now i know, why we lost this war..."

    •  3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      LOOOOOOL, the best comment I read over here

    • @TheLoprais58
      @TheLoprais58 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Tak to je dobré 😂

    • @Stalicone
      @Stalicone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Maybe the officer was a distant cousin of Dan Sickles? (How’s THAT for obscure humor?)

    • @GunMeat
      @GunMeat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Actually it was: let them come under 80 m !

    • @XpVersusVista
      @XpVersusVista 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      "um actually" letting the tanks get to 500m was a good choice, since the pak 40 penetrates the front armor at 500m, which means every hit should have been deadly. Instead we got bouncy action.

  • @jonny-b4954
    @jonny-b4954 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    3:28 That tap of the foot.... Great detail.

  • @zoobins3163
    @zoobins3163 3 ปีที่แล้ว +908

    German anti-tank artillery had more than 80% accuracy. 4 missed shot?! Only in Hollywood!

    • @rodhoek1046
      @rodhoek1046 3 ปีที่แล้ว +64

      Anti Tank crew where drunk from Snaps

    • @bakatzen6243
      @bakatzen6243 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      probably very worn out barrels. i get it its hollywood.

    • @raihanamirulhusana7134
      @raihanamirulhusana7134 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      It's not the artillery, it's the crew

    • @LUCIFER-ts2yq
      @LUCIFER-ts2yq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Stfu

    • @Theocook1
      @Theocook1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +75

      Bear in mind this is in Spring 1945, the gun crews are most likely very inexperienced, and the sight of an American armoured column advancing towards them would only make that worse. All things considered they gave a decent account of themselves

  • @chrisinstasis7986
    @chrisinstasis7986 2 ปีที่แล้ว +970

    I absolutely love the comms in this scene prior to the battle properly heating up. Such a good example of how hard you have to work sometimes to make it work smoothly, rather than in most movies, where someone just shouts one order and everything runs like clockwork.

    • @MaiSirAndrey
      @MaiSirAndrey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      ON THE WAAAAY

    • @Brucey69
      @Brucey69 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It’s completely inaccurate and essentially a fairytale

    • @SisuTheShattered
      @SisuTheShattered ปีที่แล้ว +38

      @@Brucey69 To which do you refer? The communication before the PAKs open fire or the battle between the Shermans and PAKs?
      Battle? Yes it is unrealistic. I agree completely, even stormtroopers have better aim.
      Communication? No, that's on point and accurate as Chris stated. People are human and sometimes need to correct a lot when there's a lot of variables in the scenario they are facing.

    • @erickolb8581
      @erickolb8581 ปีที่แล้ว

      "Knuckle up!"

    • @slabbinonspokezz2375
      @slabbinonspokezz2375 ปีที่แล้ว

      Merry Christmas ya filthy animal

  • @Mishkafofer
    @Mishkafofer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +294

    After the battle German were recruited to Impirial forces under the leadership of Darth Vader. The reason: They can't hit any targets.

  • @TheCeltic819
    @TheCeltic819 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    from years of studying WW2 military vehicles and de-classified blueprints, I can say that tank is made from some kind of metal

  • @davidcox3076
    @davidcox3076 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1041

    I know the Germans were the enemy. But I still have to tip my hat to the PAK gunners in this scene. It's very brave and patriotic to, as a blind man, volunteer to serve your country on the front line.

    • @blackhawk1812
      @blackhawk1812 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Underrated comment 🤗

    • @angieroxy7550
      @angieroxy7550 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I should tell my Friend this 😅

    • @30pranaypawar17
      @30pranaypawar17 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      💀

    • @michaelram3411
      @michaelram3411 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      If %100 of the german troops had been on the western front , ,the glorious german army would have scattered the us troops to million pieces.

    • @castillosolisroberto2506
      @castillosolisroberto2506 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Estás seguro que eran voluntarios??

  • @Spitfire__1944
    @Spitfire__1944 3 ปีที่แล้ว +380

    That ricochet whistle sounds so damn good! This movie's sound design is my guilty pleasure

    • @dennisrodriguez3689
      @dennisrodriguez3689 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Reminds me of the Soccer penalty that made my country lose the world championship. Cueva ctm.

    • @hubertszymanski4817
      @hubertszymanski4817 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      how ricochet from ronson ? cause in reality almost every hit in sherman means destroyed tank.

    • @sebulller
      @sebulller 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@hubertszymanski4817 almost? naah it was eavry sherman lol

    • @tygrenvoltaris4782
      @tygrenvoltaris4782 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sound design, characters, acting and cgi + effects are gorgeous.

    • @todd9031
      @todd9031 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It really is.

  • @davidavery2629
    @davidavery2629 3 ปีที่แล้ว +758

    And that's how a single American tank unit won the war.....True story....in M'erica.

    • @phil4487
      @phil4487 3 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      Ugh, as someone who studied history...particularly WW2, American History books are such rubbish 😵. While the Americans deserve much credit on the Pacific front, the same can't be said about the European front.

    • @swolllincoln186
      @swolllincoln186 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      I'ts a movie. If it was realistic, the tanks would sit back and call in overwhelming air, and artillery strikes, since it was 1945, almost at the end of the war.

    • @Dominator5515
      @Dominator5515 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Watch again there are at least 4 American tanks and there was not any moment about winning the war , butthurt much ?

    • @davidavery2629
      @davidavery2629 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@Dominator5515 Jokes. not for everyone. Plus I did say unit. Head hurt much?
      PS the head bit's right at least.

    • @arbynChief617
      @arbynChief617 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@phil4487 clearly you haven’t studied enough. The US kept the war going for the UK and USSR (both Churchill and Stalin said they could not go on with the US). They supplied the entire war effort and secured the Atlantic. They then partook in Africa, Italy, and Western Europe, fighting the Germans on three fronts, all the while fighting Japan at the same time.
      The US deserves the most credit out of any country during WW2. We did the most.

  • @TheDennys21
    @TheDennys21 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This movie will be a decade old this year, i can't believe it, i remember when it was released like it was yesterday.

    • @stevestruthers6180
      @stevestruthers6180 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Amazing, isn't it, that a decade has slipped by that quickly? I also remember when I first saw it, and just like yesterday, too.

    • @fredfinks
      @fredfinks 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      what a total utter crapfest. this the equivalent of shindlers list with stern donning a cape and punching all the germans out, then flying into the air, and ending ww2 for the usa. even though hes polish.

    • @TheDennys21
      @TheDennys21 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@fredfinksin another scene the Tiger leaves the safety of it's cover to fight other tanks out on an open field (no tank commander would ever do that), the Fury is an M4A2E8 Sherman also known as the "Easy Eight" which was a much weaker tank vs. the Tiger which was an absolute beast, no way in hell would an Easy Eight ever defeat a Tiger, this is typical Hollywood bullshit. Still, if you put that aside it's a good movie, i quite enjoyed it.

  • @vandorentramplur8375
    @vandorentramplur8375 2 ปีที่แล้ว +187

    that soldier at 3:57 looking up while being in the trenches always got to me. its like literally inches away from possibly being killed instantly and no where to go while 4 tanks and a hundred soldiers coming towards you and your ally tanks behind you are gone.

  • @TheBuccaneer1975
    @TheBuccaneer1975 3 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    It's a great movie with some brilliant set pieces and top acting but in reality those Pak 40's wouldn't have consistently missed at that range.

    • @Betterhose
      @Betterhose 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Their reactive plot armor was too thick.

  • @proudamerican183
    @proudamerican183 2 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    I don't care how unrealistic this movie is because the scene at 3:51 is like the 2nd greatest part of the movie. Seeing all those guns firing is awesome.

    • @Cpl._Dwayne_Hicks
      @Cpl._Dwayne_Hicks 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Normally I would say "Okay, thats your damn right, if u are sure, that the germans weren´t that bad after watching this piece of nice sfx patriotismmovie. But your nickname let me think, that u wouldn´t do that.

    • @proudamerican183
      @proudamerican183 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@Cpl._Dwayne_Hicks Just how much crack have you smoked?

    • @Cpl._Dwayne_Hicks
      @Cpl._Dwayne_Hicks 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@proudamerican183 Because i damaged ur view on history?

    • @proudamerican183
      @proudamerican183 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Cpl._Dwayne_Hicks No. Because the way you spoke was crazy. Like, who talks like that? Either you are crazy and high/drunk or just really bad at English.
      Also the fact that you came aggressively. "That's your DAMN right". Like bro, chill.
      Also also the fact that I was talking about the guns firing and you had to bring up the germans. I'm always one to devil advocate but you apparently take it to a whole different level. Bringing up conversation that has nothing to do with the topic.
      All together, I feel like you just shouldn't be speaking. Not with your messed up sense of logic and lack of foresight.

    • @proudamerican183
      @proudamerican183 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@Cpl._Dwayne_Hicks No.
      1) You clearly didn't understand my message. I talked about the GUNS and you babble on about the germans? Your view is skewed.
      2) You are aggressive. "That's your DAMN right"? Chill bro.
      3) You clearly aren't a native English speaker and your attempt at doing so is painful to read.

  • @krissylallo
    @krissylallo หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    4:01 lol that scene gets me😂

  • @bullettime8760
    @bullettime8760 3 ปีที่แล้ว +155

    Even though the battles are historically inaccurate (strategy wise) especially that tank scene I have to say using an actual functioning Tiger tank is really impressive

    • @cd2320
      @cd2320 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah, especially since the Germans couldn’t even do that

    • @prvt.harumi6821
      @prvt.harumi6821 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cd2320 do what

    • @twcnz3570
      @twcnz3570 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So/so historic accuracy, great technical accuracy, looney tunes tactical.

    • @mg9854
      @mg9854 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@prvt.harumi6821 Tigers were notorious for mechanical breakdowns. So yeah Germans couldn't keep them functioning for long but one which survived is still functioning in Bovington!

  • @sajjadalikhan
    @sajjadalikhan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +584

    Sherman tanks had gyro stabilizers and I think that's pretty cool

    • @greatunclestroller7179
      @greatunclestroller7179 3 ปีที่แล้ว +84

      It was an innovation, but Iam certain that a projectile from a pak40 from that range should've taken those tanks out..

    • @sajjadalikhan
      @sajjadalikhan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      @@greatunclestroller7179 Oh for sure, they should be toast. SS soldiers may have been despicable, but they were good soldiers and I'm sure they could aim. One of the AT guns even had several victory markings on it, so if they've already had several successful engagements they should have been able to hit them no problem. Maybe might get a (un)lucky bounce off the front plate of the Jumbo at an angle, but the others it would punch right through. You're correct

    • @dddhhh2612
      @dddhhh2612 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Never knew that. Thanks!

    • @bobojo37
      @bobojo37 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Same with the bomb sights that American bombers had. Closely guarded military secret at the time, but it made our high altitude bombers more effective.

    • @jb76489
      @jb76489 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@sajjadalikhan the reputation of the SS being elite units is propaganda. They were chosen for irrelevant physical characteristics( e.g. Hair/eye color) send political beliefs/reliability. They were well equipped, by German standards, but poor soldiers

  • @florians9949
    @florians9949 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1029

    Those guys where lucky that the germans couldn’t aim with highly accurate anti-tank guns. In realmlife they would have all died.

    • @Softpaw1996
      @Softpaw1996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +140

      the germans accidently reset their skill points after the first attack on the American forces. They clearly forgot to spend points in anti-tank accuracy.

    • @harrison00xXx
      @harrison00xXx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +83

      Hollywood.... thats typical american propaganda!

    • @pikkeone
      @pikkeone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      Fun Fact: The second Pak40 even has 4 rings on it's barrel, meaning it destroyed 4 Tanks before

    • @smoldoggy1005
      @smoldoggy1005 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      In real life the infantry would flank around them and the Sherman’s would stay back to guard their flanks

    • @MrBonethugs4lyfe
      @MrBonethugs4lyfe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +80

      In real life, the Germans were getting rolled over in every which direction in 1945. Too many fucking wehraboo's in these comments, mad that their fabled Nazi supermen lost the war.

  • @OBrienDesigns
    @OBrienDesigns ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ive definitely seen pictures of tanks in my day and i can confirm this is definitely a movie that has tanks in it.

  • @TheAudience388
    @TheAudience388 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    1:38 Imagine getting run over by your own side because the tank driver wasn’t paying attention

  • @MW-bi1pi
    @MW-bi1pi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +393

    The vehicles, props, uniforms and weapons are all damn good and realistic in the movie. The plot and battle scenes are complete Hollywierd bullshit.

    • @MrTuerte
      @MrTuerte 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If you dont like hollywierd bullshit I can recomend The Unknown Soldier movie

    • @TheMysteryMushroom
      @TheMysteryMushroom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      2 + 2 = 4, we stating the obvious here?
      I watched the movie 2 times, enjoyed it both times because I'm not analyzing each scene with an autistic drive of proving a point.
      If you want realism, watch "come and see".

    • @twcnz3570
      @twcnz3570 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@TheMysteryMushroom "Come and See" bordered on the surreal. Brilliant movie - different method. Unfortunately, the consistent "non-tactics" of the German forces in "Fury" bordered on the ridiculous. An SS battalion ( likely including veterans of Kursk)held up and mauled by a single crippled Sherman?!?! Not an apologist for Adolf and his lot, but no. Just no.

    • @TPDManiacXC626
      @TPDManiacXC626 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@twcnz3570
      I still want to see that 1985 Soviet movie, Elim Klimov’s final film and masterpiece. I’ve heard great things about it, it’s the horror of war movie to end all horror of war movies.

    • @tankman1814
      @tankman1814 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your bullshit

  • @rse_0122
    @rse_0122 3 ปีที่แล้ว +168

    "But what do I shoot at?"
    "The nazis dumbf***!!"
    best line in the movie

    • @PSsquadron
      @PSsquadron 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      "But what do I shoot at?"
      "The Germans dumbf***!!"

    • @Betterhose
      @Betterhose 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Saying "Shoot at the nazis!" is completely stupid.
      Nazi is an abbreviation for National Socialist and refers to a member of the NSDAP (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei / national socialist german worker's party).
      Referring to all german soldiers in WW2 as nazis is like calling all american soldier in WW2 "democrats" because Roosevelt and Truman were democrats.

    • @rse_0122
      @rse_0122 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Betterhose >:(

    • @NostalgicGamerRickOShay
      @NostalgicGamerRickOShay 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Betterhose Amen.

    • @Dondingdingding
      @Dondingdingding 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@Betterhose it's not stupid, those guys are tired battle hardened men, you think they give a fuck about either the right term for the political party or for the wehr? This was a front line perspective anyone that is armed and wears swastikas are nazis to them. When germany completely collapsed the discrimination on german people was high if you're a german you're a nazi. Go read it, it's real

  • @stayoutofthewater
    @stayoutofthewater 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    "It ain't pretty, but it's what we do." So many great lines and scenes in this movie. I can't believe I never knew about this movie until just a few months ago. It's f**king awesome.

  • @wyllefps
    @wyllefps 2 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    I love how Trini was yelling Norm for doing wrong but when Norm starts to break it down, Trini just gently tell him "it's what we do" because no matter what, they're on the same side and they're already brothers since when Norm entered that tank

  • @jimtashev
    @jimtashev 3 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    I was trained as antitank guner , I could say from this position , well hidden antitank gun has excellent chances to knock out 1-2 tanks. This scene is completely hollywood style :)

    • @rebootxd6012
      @rebootxd6012 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yeah, i think that they should have started with more tanks in the beginning of the movie so that they can be realistically whittled down. I get they wanted to show the power of the Tiger by having it destroy 3 of the 4 in the column and ramp up movie tension, but the filmmakers could have gotten the same result if they started with 6 tanks and lost 2 in this skirmish. Better yet, start with 7 and lose another one in the town

    • @albogypsy2842
      @albogypsy2842 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ridiculous Hollywood cr4p.

    • @ThatGuyWayOverThere
      @ThatGuyWayOverThere 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      any military that uses AT guns is completely out-dated.

    • @Dr.KarlowTheOctoling
      @Dr.KarlowTheOctoling 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ThatGuyWayOverThere What’s next? Tanks are outdated because there are AT weapons? Planes are outdated because of AA weapons? What a fucking joke.

    • @StirbMensch
      @StirbMensch 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Dr.KarlowTheOctoling no, tanks are outdated because drones and atgm missiles exist.

  • @teamvoldemort6114
    @teamvoldemort6114 3 ปีที่แล้ว +343

    “This ain’t pretty, you know. It’s what we do.” Gives me chills every time.

    • @supershane1960
      @supershane1960 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yep. And someone’s got to do it...

    • @GARRY3754
      @GARRY3754 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@supershane1960 until we evolve theoretically

    • @Looaxe
      @Looaxe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Lol its like did you think we came here to bake cookies?
      I get it though, some people have a more fragile mental constitution than others.
      Nowadays the majority of fighting age males would be that kid in my opinion.
      A draft would almost be pointless.

    • @wakcedout
      @wakcedout 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      It was his way of being compassionate in the moment. Understanding that the kid cracked. Even the tank commander held back when telling him to turn off his comms.
      This is why drafts are dumb, as ugly as war is, you need someone who can compartmentalize that trauma and deal with it later, so they can focus on the mission at hand.

    • @Looaxe
      @Looaxe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@wakcedout Well said.

  • @TheRealPsychoDevil
    @TheRealPsychoDevil ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As a professional TH-cam binger, World of Tanks veteran and World of Warships captain, I can confirm that those tanks are made of tank.

  • @RagnarCzerwony
    @RagnarCzerwony 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    American boys' accuracy +100, nazis accuracy -100, all hits missed the targets, even bazzoka guy had to pray a bit before shooting so he scored his own death with a head squashed.

    • @diamondsanimations3879
      @diamondsanimations3879 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The "bazzoka" is actually a Panzerfaust.

    • @Eire_Aontaithe
      @Eire_Aontaithe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      First, how do you know they are nazis ?
      Second, that's not a bazooka.

    • @einundsiebenziger5488
      @einundsiebenziger5488 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      If it misses a target it can't be a hit. A hit is when, well when you hit something.

  • @ericscottstevens
    @ericscottstevens 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    4:31
    "Gordo" Garcia: Do your job!
    "Machine" Ellison: I was loading the typewriter .......(paper loaded and ready)
    "Gordo" Garcia: Hit the space bar!

  • @g.j.g.vercher3100
    @g.j.g.vercher3100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +183

    Fight? The germans missed all the shoots.

    • @garmenlin5990
      @garmenlin5990 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      By April 1945, Germany was collapsing fast. Those guys on the AT guns probably got little to zero training for that thing.

    • @steviejohnson378
      @steviejohnson378 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      @@garmenlin5990 its called plot armor smart ass

    • @garmenlin5990
      @garmenlin5990 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@steviejohnson378 From a movie standpoint, yes. From a historic standpoint, also yes.

    • @g.j.g.vercher3100
      @g.j.g.vercher3100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@garmenlin5990 but there were a lot of germans that came from the East Front. That means veterans with quite experience.

    • @TemplarX2
      @TemplarX2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@steviejohnson378 It's not plot armour. He is right. The quality of the troops on the Western front was atrocious at this stage.

  • @Kakjung124
    @Kakjung124 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    2:44 That one Bounced.

    • @hhh12361
      @hhh12361 หลายเดือนก่อน

      👍👍👍

    • @Drlrable
      @Drlrable หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Y'know its already a ricochet if the tank is an sherman M4A2

    • @sgt_32
      @sgt_32 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@Drlrable Agree

  • @igoravonich2013
    @igoravonich2013 3 ปีที่แล้ว +259

    2 heavily concealed guns miss 4 easy targets. Yeah right. American fantasy movie. Pak 40s would’ve wrecked those shermans.

    • @mynamejeff785
      @mynamejeff785 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      They missed 4 tanks who were making random evasive turns whilst returning fire, and they nearly killed em a few times, including one dead on ricochet. Not really a fantasy movie, just battlefield tactics. Granted, no one complained when we were saving them from the nazis.
      Now the King Tiger battle later on is where the movie jumped the shark

    • @justinthomas85
      @justinthomas85 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@mynamejeff785 just a regular Tiger.

    • @ultimate2635
      @ultimate2635 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      No tanks. No movie. It's called plot.

    • @commandercritic9036
      @commandercritic9036 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      You also have to remember this is at a later stage in the war, so the German Army is starting to scrape the bottom of the barrel in terms of manpower, plus all the experienced troops are over on the eastern front fighting the Russians, so the ones fighting the allies are either young and poorly trained, or simply not as battle hardened. In fact, after the victory over France, Western Europe became pretty much a relaxation location for German soldiers and officers, being assigned to duty in Western Europe before D-day was living the high life for a German soldier and/or officer, while the Eastern front became very much every soldier’s worst nightmare, to the point that such an assignment was seen and used, as a punishment.

    • @BavarianHobbit
      @BavarianHobbit 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@commandercritic9036 That AT-Gun had several marks on it. The crew manning that gun was not inexperienced.

  • @Invisible_Socks
    @Invisible_Socks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +325

    All the tracers make it look like Star Wars. Esp when they use green and red lol

    • @monetaryvalue2303
      @monetaryvalue2303 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      where u think Lucas got the idea

    • @anotherarmchairhistorian2831
      @anotherarmchairhistorian2831 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      One of the most amazing things I've ever seen were live night fires with tracer. It looks just like star wars. It's freaking crazy.

    • @ThePizzaGoblin
      @ThePizzaGoblin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      well actually star wars looks like that because of WWII. Americans and brits used red tracers while the germans used green.

    • @wadewhitewilson4177
      @wadewhitewilson4177 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@ThePizzaGoblin very true

    • @aidankilleen7372
      @aidankilleen7372 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      How do you think they filmed star wars? They just shot each other with tracers.

  • @taggartlawfirm
    @taggartlawfirm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    The Germans didn’t usually put troops and mg/s out in the open when there was a perfectly good tree line right behind them.

    • @itszoniq
      @itszoniq 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      and Positions always was flanked by german snipers and motars, where are they when fight in an american propaganda movie?

    • @TommyGlint
      @TommyGlint 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, you work with what you got, and that tree line would have been very crowded if the infantry protecting the PAKs also had its positions there.
      You work with the space and terrain that’s there.

  • @Kebablover495
    @Kebablover495 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Despite the seemingly infinite number of historical inaccuracies in this movie, it’s still nice to watch.

  • @sphynxlegacy7195
    @sphynxlegacy7195 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    2:29 when you enjoy being a tank crew

  • @patrickfranco2579
    @patrickfranco2579 3 ปีที่แล้ว +184

    the pak 40 is effective at range of 1,800 m(1969 yd ) against most types of Allied tanks, including the Soviet T-34 and American Sherman. The weapon, along with the famous 88 mm, was considered one of the best anti-tank guns of the war.

    • @lorenzuploads4543
      @lorenzuploads4543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Not here

    • @gnolkenstein5527
      @gnolkenstein5527 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      they are only good if they manage to hit their targets

    • @bobtester7850
      @bobtester7850 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      effective doesn't mean 'kill every time'

    • @Batka
      @Batka 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Yes, but this is an american movie...

    • @TheNerdForAllSeasons
      @TheNerdForAllSeasons 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Oh look it's the "I read some internet comments about an artillery piece and now I'm an expert on warfare" guy

  • @sanseverything900
    @sanseverything900 3 ปีที่แล้ว +148

    "Okay, just so it doesn't seem like the Germans are totally incompetent, let's make it so they actually hit one of the tanks but it ricochets off."

    • @Surfer041
      @Surfer041 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@chocolat-kun8689 this was towards the end of the war. The German War machine had been thoroughly crippled by this point. These were mop up operations.

    • @JakeTheOnion
      @JakeTheOnion 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@Surfer041 Surely they weren't so crippled as to use soft steel in their ap rounds though!

    • @Surfer041
      @Surfer041 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@JakeTheOnion tanks were designed so that shells would ricochet of them if they hit at a certain angle

    • @JakeTheOnion
      @JakeTheOnion 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@Surfer041 Of course, I know that, it's just I wouldn't expect what looked like a 75mm PaK to just bounce off a Sherman's front plate at such a close range. However, on rewatching the clip it looked like it hit the side of the tank, which I would expect to cause a ricochet. However, this raises another problem... why would hitting the side of a tank cause it to ricochet upward?

    • @Surfer041
      @Surfer041 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@JakeTheOnion trajectory of the shell, speed and angle tank is moving at? I'm not a military expert, and this is a movie.

  • @Razzle_Dazzle-
    @Razzle_Dazzle- 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    2:43 Such a cool scene

  • @AkimboJV
    @AkimboJV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    I love how everyone is an expert at shooting from the hip

    • @josephlongbone4255
      @josephlongbone4255 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The British army used to train in that, so maybe the Americans did too?

    • @erwinwanto5299
      @erwinwanto5299 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What🤕
      🇦🇱🇩🇪VS🇺🇸

    • @matthewjones39
      @matthewjones39 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s called marching fire. You can even hear someone yell the order to do that.

    • @AkimboJV
      @AkimboJV 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@matthewjones39 I can get why they would teach that for cqb purposes but man they weren't too close here.

    • @matthewjones39
      @matthewjones39 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AkimboJV It wasn’t for CQB, it was for keeping the enemy suppressed while advancing.

  • @chr0min0id
    @chr0min0id 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    3:23 I like how the .50 Cal acted like a rapid-fire laser pointer

    • @chr0min0id
      @chr0min0id 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @ I know, but I like how the gunner was essentially using them to kinda point out the position of the Anti-tank gun.

    • @chr0min0id
      @chr0min0id 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @ I mean, I’m a middle-class dude who browses the internet for shits and giggles. I don’t think I’ll be in combat anytime soon 😐

    • @viceralman8450
      @viceralman8450 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Tracers.

    • @chr0min0id
      @chr0min0id 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@viceralman8450 I know, but I like how the gunner was essentially using them to kinda point out the position of the Anti-tank gun.

  • @psyl3ntkn1ght10
    @psyl3ntkn1ght10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    5:18 me at work every day

  • @penepatitenor
    @penepatitenor 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What an amazing piece of cinema this was! Can only imagine what it was like on the field in actual moments like that… just insane.

  • @pelleban
    @pelleban 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    That placement of a machine gun in open terrain like 20 meters in front of perfectly fine coverage is not the best tactical placement.

    • @postmodernmarxistnihilist4282
      @postmodernmarxistnihilist4282 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm glad that they placed machine guns 20 meters in front of perfectly fine coverage. Or we would be speaking german right now.

  • @joachimdeckart7848
    @joachimdeckart7848 3 ปีที่แล้ว +205

    How bad this movie really is, the tanks would never got out of their cover of the hedge and advance to the treelinie. They would have stayed there and blasted the treelinie with everything they got, or called in an airstrike like in a Bridge to far. The infantry would never advanced like that with the tanks, standing behind a tank makes you a target for enemy fire especially if you know that they have anti tank guns. Band of brother shows how infantry would advance.
    The Germans also are portrayed pretty bad, they are entrenched in a good position, easily killed of a column of American vehicles, and now a machine gun would open fire on a tank before the PAK? Or they would just shoot on the tank not on the infantry behind it or the tank commanders and extra machine gunner standing on top of the tank? Pls just fire any „military“ or „historic“ consultant on this movie and never ever employ him in anything other than a fantastic flick.

    • @gradeobama9141
      @gradeobama9141 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      dog shutup its a movie

    • @huyphannguyen8747
      @huyphannguyen8747 3 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      @@gradeobama9141 yikes. a movie about something in history should be a little bit correct?

    • @bamagrad99
      @bamagrad99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      This scene is EXACTLY how infantry and tanks worked together to assault across a large open area. TH-cam is full of actual documentary footage of tanks and grunts working together like this. Also, it's a myth that the US had so much air and artillery always available that they could just blow up every bush that might have a Nazi hiding in it.

    • @Jay-eg4fe
      @Jay-eg4fe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@huyphannguyen8747 Yeah, so the makers of Overlord should feel ashamed, even though it was never advertised as an historically accurate movie.

    • @attackmaster519
      @attackmaster519 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@bamagrad99 Explains why we lost 200k men in Europe. Those Germans must have been laughing as they lined up easy shots.

  • @benauwarter6261
    @benauwarter6261 3 ปีที่แล้ว +167

    My grandfather told me something different about the braveness and the fighting skills from the allies. If the germans really fought like this they whould never have been able to make the war that long🤣

    • @void1968able
      @void1968able 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Advance, contact, call in artillery / airstrike, advance... that was allied (mainly US) tactics. Was efficient, but not so heroic like they wanted to be. Read Otto Carius book "Tigers in the mud" about the eastern front where he earned his merites. They accepted the soviets as brave fighters while he regarded the US as cowards and was very eager to tell them a lesson.

    • @mimir4965
      @mimir4965 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      War criminals having the audacity to call the other side criminals. 21st century wehraboos even recounting the propaganda books lmao

    • @publiusthefederalist6843
      @publiusthefederalist6843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      ​@@void1968able Yea I heard that's what they did in D Day all the allies just called in air strikes while eating hot dogs and drinking beer on the beach and all the brave and heroic german soldiers died honorably fighting against overwhelming odds right lmao nothing is worse than a naziphile

    • @anon_148
      @anon_148 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mimir4965 you're part of the same hypocrisy

    • @theshadow7201
      @theshadow7201 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mimir4965 the US did many warcrimes as well. Just look at the urban bombing of Hamburg and Dresden. Only civilian targets.

  • @carlosrubiano2999
    @carlosrubiano2999 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This movie is so bad, but I love the effects, landscapes and the toys, everything else........

  • @Del-Canada
    @Del-Canada 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    My grandfather stormed Juno Beach with the North Nova Scotia Highlanders on D-Day. He was a "sapper". A great man with a deadpan sense of humor. Rest in peace.

    • @GameGlobalOfficial
      @GameGlobalOfficial 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Wasn't expecting a Nova Scotia comment!

    • @Del-Canada
      @Del-Canada 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GameGlobalOfficial Halifax here.

  • @thatgingerguy6666
    @thatgingerguy6666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +519

    In my opinion, Fury does a REALLY good job of depicting what it was like to be a tanker in WW2. They do a really good job of showing what it was like to live that life, how you can just die without warning, have friends that are there one minute, gone the next, and showing the camaraderie that existed between tank crew members. That is what I feel Fury did really well. Unfortunately the combat scenes are very unrealistic, which is really unfortunate considering the potential the movie had, especially since it was using all real tanks, including the last fully functioning Tiger in the world, which has never been done before. I still love it, and still think it’s the best WW2 tank movie out there, but damn I wish it was more historically accurate.

    • @theMull90
      @theMull90 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Agree completely.

    • @macmcleod1188
      @macmcleod1188 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      One thing a lot of people Miss is that the Sherman's intended role was for what they're showing here. Taking out Machine Gun Nest and hardened positions. It was not intended to go toe-to-toe in tank battle. A lot of infantrymen came home because the Sherman did its job.
      And, especially after the wet ammo innovation, tank crew deaths were a fraction of infantry deaths. In many cases, the tank was disabled and the crew escaped and the tank was recovered and put back into service after repairs.
      It's very dramatic to show a Tiger tank in a defensive location destroying a tank and killing all the crew but it's not the reality.

    • @macmcleod1188
      @macmcleod1188 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      So I thought I should look it up since my memory is fuzzy and here's the quote
      "For the US they were incredibly low - 8% of tankers were killed vs 18% of Rifleman. Only 1581 American tankers were killed in all of WW2 - All types of tanks, in all theatres - Adjutant General's Report. 1/3 of those weren't even in the tanks when they died."

    • @thatgingerguy6666
      @thatgingerguy6666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@macmcleod1188 Yeah that’s true 100%, something that I indeed forgot to mention. Sherman was one of the best infantry support tanks, and this scene in specific does do a good job of showing it

    • @DOI_ARTS
      @DOI_ARTS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Kelly's Heroes would put this movie to shame but yeah it one good WW2 movie.

  • @JohnDoe-on6ru
    @JohnDoe-on6ru 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    2020: Social distancing.
    1:24: WATCH YOUR F******** SPACING

  • @KaptifLaDistillerie
    @KaptifLaDistillerie วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    - How do we defend Herr Commandant ? Should we concentrate all of our fire power at once on one tank ?
    - No Hans ! Fire the MG first even though it will do nothing and our AT guns have 5 times the range of the MG. Then, you wait for the MG to die until you fire the first canon, then you wait until the first canon dies before you open fire with the second. Then you die.

  • @hardmetal97
    @hardmetal97 3 ปีที่แล้ว +160

    4:54 really, tf2 sniper sounds

  • @iw_legendary_sayain2215
    @iw_legendary_sayain2215 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I remember watching this in a RPX theater. Every time these tanks would fire their shells you’d feel it throughout the entire theater.

  • @eoghanoriordan2818
    @eoghanoriordan2818 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    3:53 that was absolutely epic

  • @JesseBundrick
    @JesseBundrick 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Let's be honest the smartest German in the scene is the guy with binoculars. More concealed like a real German soldier 😂

  • @brucelee6415
    @brucelee6415 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Gun specs on the internet: "Accurate up to 4 miles"
    Gun specs in the movie: "Accurate up to 4 millimetres"

  • @texas70.32
    @texas70.32 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    “All I see are dead bodies…”
    “HOW YOU KNOW ARE YOU A DOCTOR?!?!…”
    Glad this made the script. 🤩

  • @ozgundemirr
    @ozgundemirr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    2:44 that's friggin awesome

  • @MFPofficer1983
    @MFPofficer1983 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    2:44 bro that bounced like a nerf bullet 💀

    • @einundsiebenziger5488
      @einundsiebenziger5488 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Nobody is your bro here.

    • @MFPofficer1983
      @MFPofficer1983 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@einundsiebenziger5488 who tf is you???

  • @kbholla
    @kbholla 3 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    I love the tone and intensity of this film, however, even historical accuracy aside, if the combat scenes were half-way plausible, Fury could be remembered as a great war film. It's a shame. I still like it though.

    • @finddeniro
      @finddeniro 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Air Strike ?

    • @caelincoolz5814
      @caelincoolz5814 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Isn't it remembered as a great war film?

  • @sinistervipers3689
    @sinistervipers3689 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I love when he says " You a Doctor"

  • @thegermanfool8953
    @thegermanfool8953 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    The guy with the anti-tank weapon suffered a bigger stroke then the loader in the Tiger when they were fighting Fury

  • @theskiesnotthelimit8005
    @theskiesnotthelimit8005 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's like watching starwars with those flashy bullets they're firing

    • @einundsiebenziger5488
      @einundsiebenziger5488 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Those "flashy bullets" are called tracer rounds.

  • @prasanthvasudevan8597
    @prasanthvasudevan8597 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Germans in good position, stable aim, having most effective anti tank gun in that time and visible targets.
    Shermans on the move, no vision, jerking terrain.
    Hollywood:- Shermans win.

  • @skunxx960
    @skunxx960 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Blood and death everywhere, bratt pitts haircut is still perfect!!!

  • @magnusberge
    @magnusberge 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I saw this movie in the cinema and in the room with there best sound system, that riccochet was un-belivable, made we go back and se it a 2nd and a 3rd time hehe.

    • @rezlongboards3918
      @rezlongboards3918 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Haha I remember that, for a split second it felt real, dobly atmos full surround or something like that

    • @magnusberge
      @magnusberge 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rezlongboards3918 also the MG3 earlyer inn that scene made the hole cinema rumble

  • @caelincoolz5814
    @caelincoolz5814 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Despite the many, many inaccuracies, this movie is still so awesome

  • @aurorathekitty7854
    @aurorathekitty7854 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    This has got to be one of the most unbelievable war movies I ever seen.

    • @lol-un6nl
      @lol-un6nl ปีที่แล้ว +4

      im sure you can enrich us with knowledge from your numerous combat encounters

    • @aurorathekitty7854
      @aurorathekitty7854 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lol-un6nl I've seen better tactics from COD players than this movie.

    • @RikkeDK1996
      @RikkeDK1996 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      2 years late... but that could describe pretty much all scenes in the movie... Especially the last stand against 100+ soldiers in a tank that cant move.

    • @matthewjones39
      @matthewjones39 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh, but our beloved T34 movie is so much more realistic.
      Grow up.

    • @aurorathekitty7854
      @aurorathekitty7854 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@matthewjones39 Never seen that movie

  • @MatteoPrezioso
    @MatteoPrezioso 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    The world famous 'nazi shot': it goes nowhere, it always misses, and always serves to show their position.

  • @einarvolsung2202
    @einarvolsung2202 3 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    I'm curious..how did the German soldiers miss everything they shot at?

    • @johnmactavish4838
      @johnmactavish4838 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      It's Hollywood

    • @usmcdevildog3497
      @usmcdevildog3497 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Late war

    • @pizzaguy4134
      @pizzaguy4134 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Very simple: the Americans needed every excuse possible to survive

    • @javiermichel7097
      @javiermichel7097 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The enemy AI was left in Merican Hollywood difficult

    • @elfhighmage8240
      @elfhighmage8240 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      By early 1945, the Axis powers were putting in anybody they could into the field with very little training. Germany was so depleted with good soldiers, they were using old men and children with 1/4 the required training. Had this been 1942 when America first entered the war at Kasserine Pass, it would be quite a different scene. Also, this unit of Germans were most likely not an SS unit which pulled the best troops from all of the branches in the Third Reich. This wasn't a negative effect until about 1943 when the quality of the regular army (Wehrmacht) began to decline. But all in all, it's a movie.