I have both the Evo SL and the SB2. When I first ran in the SB, it was an immediate “wow” In contrast, my initial run in the Evo SL didn’t give me that same feeling. I think the Adidas is a really solid shoe, but for me, the SB stands out.
Opposite for me and I loved the SB1… again, I’m glad there are two valid options for different types of runners for a single “do-it-all” shoe. Options are good. 👍🏻
Completely agree and I also own both! That’s why I find many of these reviews BS as what works for some won’t work for others! Anyone watching these reviews to actually make a buying decision needs to get to a store and try shoes.
It is good to find a reviewer that your insist with, be it similar shoe tastes (or even totally opposite) as from there you can get a sense of what may or may not work. Ultimately though, it does take alot of trial and error.
@@SagasuRunning Same for me. I didn't enjoy the Superblast 2 as much as the rest of the internet seems to. I was able to hit a 3:30/mi pace with it during a sprint though! The dimensions felt too large, it was too wide/stable, the upper was uncomfortable, the heel dug into my skin, and the slapping against the pavement was obnoxious. I wanted to like it but sometimes you have to walk away from popular opinion. I got the Evo SL and it felt exactly like when you get new shoes as a kid and feel lightning fast. I prefer the Prime X 2 Strung to the Superblast 2 as well.
Your Asics Frankenshoe in the intro was 🔥. Moving to the outro, I 💯 agree that a shoe rotation is vital, especially for us oft injured runners who rotate heel drops, stack heights, and midsole materials to prevent repetitive motion injuries.
The review we wanted but the review we didn't know we needed! Chris - your review format (at least in my view) has set a new standard for how we conceptualize shoe performance & comparisons - especially with the ride characteristics comparison and performance matrix. Well done! Also - would be curious to get your take on Evo SL vs ORG Superblast. We know ORG Superblast and Superblast 2 have slightly different midsoles & therefore different ride characteristics and different versatility ranges. Curious if the ORG superblast has a broader versatility similar to Evo SL (and whether you believe the Evo SL still has a superior compliance / resiliency profile).
The SB1 did feel like it had more range for me, but I don't think it was the foams. I never liked FFTurbo, it was brutal on my legs too...and FFBlast+ is one of my most disliked foams. Oddly though, mixing them together in the SB1 seemed to cancel the bad of both. I think the SB1 "felt" like it did more, 2 years ago a when there wasn't really another shoe like the SB1. Now in 2025 there are a lot of other options that made the SB2, albeit a better shoe in all ways, less special. Thank you for the kind words on the content. 🤙🏻
The superblast 1 was my primary training shoe for the Baltimore marathon last year. Was a joy to run in every time. Only downside was the outsole rubber grip. I got the superblast2 at launch and just hated it! I’m probably the only person that prefers the sb1 to sb2. Sb2 just felt firmer and more dead to me. Was able to get the Evo SL in December and only have a few miles on it. Excited to try it on long runs when the weather ever warms up here. 😭. Thank you for your content!
The SB2 was a great update but the magic of the SB1 was lost. It wasn’t any engineering thing Asics did or changed… the magic was gone. Objectively the SB2 is a better shoe… but running shoes evolved and that are many other options that do some or most of what the SB2 does that weren’t around when it was only the SB1.
That shoe you started to design @ 1:20 looks like it would be an amazing running shoe. The upper and midsole design by combining the original Superblast and having a Meta Speed midsole is 🔥. Would be nice if Asics is watching to make this happen.
The ESL isn't REALLY a daily trainer, it will do that, but it's not what it is really best at. The NB5 IS a daily trainer that CAN to faster running. I'll have a video up on Friday discussing the two shoes.
I like that you highlighted the heavier runner composite for this. That's why I returned the SL and stayed with the SB2. The wider base of the SB2 suits me well and adds some stability that the SL seems to lack.
Currently have SB2 but struggling with fit and comfort after 50km. Evo SL a better option for training and race for HM (1:45-1:50)? SB2 feels clunky and awkward at Z2 paces (6:00+ min/km)!
The main reason why I like the superblast 2 for easy runs is that it gives me a real secure feeling, especially on the poor roads and walking paths here in Germany. I dont like the Super boring stability shoes or flat feeling shoes. So the sb2 gives me an exciting running experience while also offering a stable and secure ride. Does that make sense?
Thnx, as a heavy runner i did not like the superblast 2 at all. Even prefer the Novablast 4 over it. Looking forward to trying out the evo sl. Love your videos. Thanks
From a marketing perspective, I believe the Superblast should maintain its current style to position the Novablast as a viable option for daily training. This approach also helps to justify its premium price.
The NB5 IS the brands daily training, by design AND marketing... Asics has NEVER once marketed the SB2 as a daily trainer.... thats all run influencers doing that.
Fantastic. Wanted the between 2 shoes (SB2 and ESL) and here we are. WOW!!! Will get EvoSL, when it is available in April. Use SB2 (same colorway as you have) when I feel that I need more support for my knees. Query: When it rains or when it is windy, which of the two uppers is better (that is, keeps you dry or warm). Thanks!!!!
No shoe will keep your feet totally warm an dry in the rain. Just accept you are going to get wet. Some will resist longer than others but your feet are still going to get wet. Nether one of these shoe uppers offer much against wet roads or rain. The SB2 might resist longer but the ESL will shed water and drain better. 🤷🏼♂️
Exactly as you described the desired SB (1:30 min) would be the ideal SB for me. SB1 upper + FFTurbo from Metaspeed (without a plate) and the FFEco lower sole unit.
The laces are standard Adizero laces, they suck but at least they aren’t stretchy. Being a Vaporfly runner for MANY years… the tongue in the ESL is totally fine. Yes, it can be better though.
I know this is not an area you generally cover on this channel but the enormous difference in RRP is notable. The price point of the Evo SL is quite something for this day and age.
No I don't. This is a good case in point too. $50 USD is not something I'd be concerned with here. Again, that is just me. I realize cost is deeply personal.
I swapped out the insole of my EVO SL and put a thicker and bouncier one I had laying around. Now the EVO SL has an even bouncier feel and more of a race fit. It really took the slack out of the upper and it remains comfortable.
The midfoot and heel are perfect. Not sure this would resolve my fit issue. That being said, both sizes fit my foot well for different purposes. The .5 down one is the fast option for me though.
I had two Superblasts. Eventually I got kinda sick of it. I always told myself, “why is this not 40mm?” They could have made it much lighter. I don’t think there’s going to be a problem with it being 40mm because of how resilient the foam is. I’ve decided to skip Superblast 2 and wait for the 3. Instead I will get the Evo SL since it is made from Lightstrike Pro classic? It will be my “super trainer” for tempo training: short and long.
Right now, since I'm testing so many shoe I don't really have a rotation I'm using at the moment. However, I'll have a 2025 Adidas rotation video out in the next week or two. Also the NB5 + ESL is a very hard two shoe combo to beat right now.
I’m increasingly drawing parallels between ADIZERO and the iPhone. From both an aesthetic and functional standpoint, once customers know they work for them, it becomes increasingly difficult to consider other brands. Consistent materials, construction and design language tweaked for each running discipline.
I wore the evo sl for a track workout last year during a shoe demo. I wore the superblast 2 in the final 5 weeks of fall marathon training, and for the (3:30:00) race itself. I agree with almost everything you're saying, and some things you're spot on to how I feel about both shoes. From a durability standpoint I think I would chew through the evo sl with my running style, and the places I train. If you're talking "do it all", the peg is the standard all contenders should be compared to. I was surprised either of the shoes in this video were compared in that lens without mentioning the king.😂
I'm about as pro Pegasus as you will find on TH-cam (maybe only Tim Grose is at my level) and the Peg IS the standard I judge all dialy trainers on (which means it should be capable of ALL training/paces)...but I'd never race in the Peg. I would race in the ESL. I actually don't love the ESL on the track. The stability in the turns isn't there. It's almost like a VF3, but with no plate to structure the midsole for the foot it becomes super squirrelly. On the straights though.... 🚀
I haven’t run in the Evo SL but the Superblast is such a great long run shoe. But according to this video the Evo SL will match the Superblast 2’s long run experience? I’ve stayed away from the Evo SL because most reviews made it sound like a speed trainer and not a great easy / long run shoe. I have too many race shoes / speed trainers. I guess I’ll pick it up when it drops wide anyways. I refuse to pay over retail to get it a month or so early.
I've found the ESL to be much more enjoyable for "set and forget" threshold running. The longest run I've done in them is 18k, far shorter than marathon training, but I'm also not focused on any race distance over 5k right now... so I have no need for the volume. Multiple 16k+ runs in the ESL have all been outstanding though and I've have no hesitation taking to 25k+.
From your video, I starting to believe that EVO SL will be something between Novablast 5 (General Performance Trainer) and Superblast 2 (Marathon Performance Trainer).
I never actually tried the Superblast 1 or 2. The price always put me off a bit because it's 220€ here... It's very rarely discounted as well, where you can get Carbon Race Shoes for less. At this point I've kind of lost interest in it too. The Evo SL is significantly lighter and less bulky. Hard to imagine the Superblast could possibly be a better Trainer.
As ever class video. Many thanks. I have a pair of the SL2 and absolutely love them. Would you suggest up grading to the Evo Sl Or buy another pair of the SL2.? Many thanks in advance. Regards Paul Starr
If you are looking for a true daily trainer to pair with existing tempo/race shoe, go SL2. If you want a tempo shoe, that can do easy running (but is not a daily trainer) add in the Evo SL.
Nice comparison! I think i’d go for the evo sl. Can you do a comparison of the evo sl and the Nike Zoom Fly 6? I know that the zf6 is a carbon plated shoe, but the two shoes are the hot talk right now for a daily/tempo training. Thank you for always having a great comparison!
I'm a slower runner with some stability needs, the superblast 2 is stable enough for me and it is my workout and race shoe. I've tried the evo SL on and it felt too unstable for me
I have both and love both, but agree that Evo SL has a wider range of applications and paces it can handle. The SB2 is the long run king. If I want to go on 15+ mile runs at a steady pace, then it is the one. I've done 15+ mile runs with the Evo SL but I mixed it up with easy warmup and cooldown with faster tempo/threshold segments in the middle, which it is perfect for. The feel and ride between the two are very different and quite enjoyable in their own ways. They can both be used as daily trainers depending on your weight and personal preferences. They both seem very durable and get better (softer and bouncier) with more mileage while remaining responsive. The Evo SL is more nimble while the SB2 is more stable. They are very complementary. I'll be packing these two (actually wear one of 'em) on my long business trips to Asia (4~5 weeks) and I know I'll be covered.
Where is everyone getting the Evo Sl? It seems the only option in the US is to buy on the secondary market. It doesn't even show up on Adidas website for me 🤔
I’m not based in the US. March 2025 release date according to Adidas still, though they also don’t seem to have any actual idea when their shoes release anymore.
Don’t the SBs have a bit of a mix of foams? I don’t think it is a pure racing foam but a bit of a mix with the somewhat firmer eco firm. EvoSL has the same foam all around? Similar to the Nike invincible, which is super spongy. I just found the geometry strange (dug into my outer midfoot because the angle).
Technically speaking, yes. Practically speaking the FFBlast+ ECO on the SB2 only smooths out the FFTurbo+ and makes it usable in a training context. 85% of rhe midsole is their race super foam. I even reference this in the video…
@ thanks! Your version of the ideal ASICS super training shoe looks good. Just a bit more sleeker than the SB. I think the bottom of the ASICS SB and Novablast creates the responsivness for a non plated shoe more than any other brand. It’s like mini trampolines. The eco foam hardens or balances the ride like a carbon plate. Their carbon shoes have the good bouncy foam balanced by the plate. I would think the EvoSL is pretty close to the Takumi Sen. But I’m interested in trying them. I returned the Adios Pro 4. It was really squishy.
@@SagasuRunning Have been using Noosa Tri 16 as my daily trainer (mostly up to 10km, no more), and I think bcs of the low stack and FFBlast+ foam, it hurt my feet (plantar, arc, etc) everytime a ran with it
Great video! Will you compare the EVO SL with the Endorphin Speed 4, my favourite all-round shoe? (I know the ES4 has a plate, but it a relatively soft nylon plate)
Won't be happening. No longer have a ES4, I did my 2024 shoe donation clean out post my end of year content in December (I have very little storage space where I live and had to make way for 2025 shoes). I will say Lightstrike Pro foam is LIGHTYEARS ahead of PWRRUN PB...can't even compare the two. I'm on the fence if I will cover the ES5. I was unimpressed with what I saw on that shoe... if I do though there likely will be a ESL vs ES5...we will see.
I'm one of those heavier runners who finds the Superblast suitable for just about all my runs. But I agree with you that the subset of runners for whom the SB2 ticks all the boxes is a small one. I can understand how many runners find it perhaps too bulky for uptempo running, and a bit slappy at easier paces. But with that said, why do you think that the big brands have been so slow to follow the Superblast example of a thick(er)-stacked, plateless trainer with (essentially) a full racing foam midsole? Given the Superblast's success I'dve expected a lot of copycat shoes to be released in the next product cycle. I also agree with you that a Superblast/Metaspeed Frankenshoe if done right would be an awesome shoe. Unfortunately according to what I've heard it seems Asics is going a different direction with the rumored 'Sonicblast' plated trainer in the works.
I do think other brands are trying. Brooks released their answer, in a very Brooks way… and there will be a few more this year. At the end of the day though, outside of the running shoe world online the Superblast really isn’t that popular. Not when compared to something like a Ghost or a Clifton. So it’s a big I cents from a brand to make a sure few ultimately need (or use). That’s why you are seeing other brands put their own spin on their versions and making them less performance focused and more comfort focused, which will sell more (theoretically).
The more I wear the SB V2 (and more fit I get) the more the shoe is becoming a ong run with marathon pace/power only injections shoe. In the summer/fall, I loved it for MP/HMP...but the last 3 times I wore the shoe running with HMP injections on 25km+ runs the shoe just felt like a boat. I was forced to run my long run today on treadmill due to freezing rain. I had gone outside to run with the SB V2 on before I pulled the plug and went home, and decided to just dry off the shoes and jump on the treadmill....and WOW did the boat feeling ever hit home. I almost stopped and took them off on the first 15min HMP section and put on my 1300km pair of Tempo Next%. 70mins later I was hoping the 2nd 15min interval would somehow feel better. Nope....boat. I generally don't run marathon pace/power until the last quarter of a marathon build. Before that, it's all HMP to push LT2. This really will limit the SB V2 now...or maybe I just turn it into an easy long run shoe to run it to death. Guess I keep burning through my Tempo Next% pairs till the next replacement comes along (Evo SL maybe, ZF V6, Tempo Next% V2?).
Wow...the SB2 on a treadmill... i can't even imagine the clown shoe like feel there. Still better than freezing rain. In all my testing of the SB1/2, it LOVES MP (threshold) but as soon as I need to pick it up the shoe never wanted to do it. Sort of like a AF2 feel, but worst. However, if you stayed at MP...it was/is perfection.
My shoe rotation for 2025 is going to be the Supernova Prima (recovery/easy/daily), superblast 2 (long run ), Evo sl (everything but recovery) and adios pro 4 (race day).
If the Evo SL is more readily available than the Superblast 2, it’ll be a win for Adidas. Regarding your ideal “Metablast,” it sounds very similar to the Novablast archetype with a different foam/rubber composition. I really liked that ASICS decided to scale some of the bulk back when moving from the Novablast 4 to 5. Hopefully the Superblast 3 will take the same direction away from the Hokafication of all shoes.
I agree, the NB5 is kind of there already. If you put the Nb5 in FFTurbo+ it may be the shoe I wanted, almost. I talked about how much more nimble and useful the NB5 is in my review. Still the form factor of a Metaspeed is hard to beat... a plateless Metaspeed would be killer...
I start running from last august, I always wear asics for daily shoes so eventually I go for gel nimbus 26 as my first real running shoes. And two weeks before my first 10k race I got SB2, and start running on that got a pretty good result. However I always feel some pain on my hip due to maybe high stack? Afterwards I got passionate on trainers and luckily get a cut price boston 12 and felt way better after break the foam, the lower drop and stacks made feel way better after long runs, and then get the EVO SL, its bouncy and smooth, although I doubt if its good for long run, but after a 20K run that worry vanished and just cant go back to SB2. I gave chance to SB2 for few more long runs and easy runs, but that's enough, and sold it even it was my first race shoes. Easy run, even easy long run, nimbus 26 is way better and long run I rotate between EVO SL, Boston12 and purchased a Puma Deviate Nitro 3, that is a great replacement to SB2, have the stiffness from the plate, but not too aggressive still bouncy and stable enough for slow long run and most importantly the 10mm heel drop is a positive fact for rotation. I think will probably choose EVO SL as my next half marathon race in coming May. Anyway that just my experience as I'm a normal to lightweight person.
The added width of the SB2 was likely what was causing your hip pain. The fact you don't get that on other high stack, yet less stable shoes, would make me thing that. The ESL is a total no brainer for a HM in my mind, especially if you respond to the shoe.
@@SagasuRunning Thx for your comment! Maybe Novablast series will work for me too, do you think Puma MagMax would get similar problem to SB2 on me? anyway, I'm very happy with my rotation right now!
The NB5 isn’t as wide as the SB2, I have a comparison video with the dimensions on the channel. I haven’t run I the Puma, nor do I plan too, so nothing to add.
Really tempted to buy some evo sls. This video might have just persuaded me. Also, how come the left superblast weighs 7g more than the right? Shouldnt they weigh exactly the same?
In my area they sell EVO SL for twice as much because it's not officially available yet. On the other hand, the Superblast lasts twice as long if even longer than the EVO SL.
In reality it's a $50 USD difference. I don't talk about price on this channel often... but for what you get in these two shoes it's a substantial difference that doesn't get much more in the SB2.
Great video as usual. I have only tried on the SB1 and ran up and down the street and felt it was too bulky for me. I currently have the SN Rise, SL2 and Takumi Sen 10 for my Adidas shoes. Which of these shoes feels the most similar to the Evo SL (TTS and 1/2 Down) in terms of fit and lockdown? I’m also a size 9 and have a 9 in all these Adidas shoes. I won’t be in need of the Evo SL immediately, but plan to pick up a pair later in the year after putting more miles in other shoes and once they are more readily available. My other daily trainer is the Novablast 5 in addition to the SL2 and SN Rise.
The ESL fits nothing like the three Adidas shoes you have. It has a version of the upper from the TS10, the heel (refined) of the SL2 and the toebox of the SNR (but more volume. See my ESL review for more sizing thoughts. I’m still trying to decide which is right for my foot…
@ Thanks for the input. Based on the ESL review, I feel the US8.5 might be the better choice for me because I like a more race like fit. When the time comes, I may order both sizes and keep the better fitting shoe. Your videos on the ESL have me excited to try it. I had been down on trying it for a variety of reasons after initially wanting it, but you’ve restored the WANT to try and test it for myself. I haven’t missed on a shoe that you’ve been really high on yet and can’t say that about many TH-cam reviewers.
@mattbeier The ESL is a special one for sure. I think the biggest consistent criticism of it is how minimal it is overall. Coming from someone who trains in super shoe, that is a big part of the appeal. The minimal ness of a race shoe but the durability and function of a trainer that CAN be raced. A hard balance to find but Adidas has done a great job.
@ That sounds like my kind of shoe, especially of the non-plated variety. I’m personally annoyed by the “Super Trainer” naming when in most cases it doesn’t truly apply. I’ve adopted your term of Performance Trainer which to me is a much better description for that type of shoe.
@mattbeier Ya, especially with the whole super trainer thing exploding into a range of shoe now. I’ll have some content in Feb around the ESL and its overall importance for this category of shoe. Stay tuned.
I have the SB2 and it is a good shoe but for me at every run after 10km or so I can feel a bit of hotspot and it irritates my toes to the point that it felt cramped. So for me the upper is a no bueno for me for long runs, might be that I have a slightly wider foot. I also have the Boston 12 which I prefer now over the SB2 for long runs, minimal upper and my feet stayed fresh, no hot spots, no soreness. Now thinking whether I should go for the Evo SL or NB5 but if the Evo SL is more similar to Boston 12 I might get the Evo :)
Hi Chris , did you get the Superblast 2 up to 100 miles ? As some mention it can take 60 miles for it to find its sweet spot , you seemed so fond of the original , I get the 2 was heavier and people didn't like the rock catcher design underneath so to Asics credit they did try , I have found both versions of the sb very good and run my PB in the half marathon in the 2 but I think perfect conditions and a fast course and cool temps aided that. I'm very interested in the Evo SL but I think the SB is still better for heavier runners, I am 81kg at 5ft8 height, but it seems Adidas are doing a bit of a Nike Jordans , ALphafly type hype release and limiting numbers , so annoying. I'm in New Zealand and funnily enough its been very easy to get both Superblasts , you just have to go into running stores and put your name down for a pre order , I think the superblast 2 is available has far better supply than the 1 , Is it gonna be a case that the Evo SL is gonna be hard to find ?
I’m sorry… a running shoe in 2025 , especially a super shoe (which the SB2 really is) shouldn’t require a 60mins break in. 10-20 to settle into your foot, fine. So no, I never got it that far. TBH, it’s just not a shoe I need right now. I like the SB2, it’s excellent at what it is designed for. However it’s just too big, stiff and bulky for anything outside of its design spec…. For me (I realize this isn’t an issues for some). I did get my MSEP to about 90mi, before I blew them up. So I have a good sense of FFTurbo+. I also didn’t find a massive break in for the MSEP, other than 10-20mile to mold to my foot and disappear. I do think the SB2 is a better option for a heavier runner… while I’m not the lightest runner, at around 160lbs’ish I’m not that heavy and prefer more nimble versatile shoes. Years of training in the Pegasus and Vaporfly have molded my preferences in how I want a running shoe to feel.
The Evo SL unfortunately didn't work for me for some reason I couldn't get the most out of it. I was able to really use the SB2 as my do it all trainer probably because I am a bigger athletic runner. However, the SB2 doesn't do intervals and fast tempo workouts well it is too much shoe but for everything else it is a swiss army knife for me. I found the fit and build quality much better as well when compared to the Evo SL. Paired the SB 2 with the Adios 9 and waiting for the Takumi 11/Streakfly 2 to add for my faster workout rotation
Interesting. How does the Adios 9 work for you? You don;t have the same issues with ti was the Evo SL? Or is it more you JUST use it for intervals/fast workouts?
It's hard to explain it completely in this comment, but I believe versatile shoes don't matter all that much since most runners already have a complete rotation anyway. Even if you don't, most people also have a impulse buying problem 😅
You’d be surprised by the amount of runners running in one shoe, or maybe one shoe and an old one once in a while. Also the idea of a “single shoe for everything” is an interesting idea.
Have them both and both are for different uses so in my opinion can't compare yes superblast appears to be bulky but one hell of a smooth ride firmer but still can feel cushion and certainly can pick up the pace. Evo sl to me not a daily it's a up-tempo speed shoe with a baggy upper that dosent have great structure that said the midsole is outstanding at pace but at slower speeds a bit boring, with the aggressive rocker my toes always hurt with the toe off... Both shoes are great but winner to me is definitely superblast... Probably the best around shoe I have ever owned..
So fascinating how individual shoe and shoe fit is. It’s why I find talking about this stuff so fascinating. We all have what feels best for us individually. It changes person to person too.
@SagasuRunning I suppose we all have different gates as well as different running styles...buying any trainer has it slight chance not to work or be a hit as well...reviews are great but not to be taken as gospel I suppose
I agree. The asics is too bulky and clumsy. I personally think they could simplify the midsole , take out that heel/tail protrusion, and save weight at the same time.
@@SagasuRunning I'm guessing the next version of ffblast turbo will be more compliant, and will probably lose some resilience because polymer engineering. If so, you're right. Some of us will not be happy. Good thing I stocked up on SB2s.
@MLHunt Actually I haven’t seen anything about FFTurbo+, but there is a new foam in that white “Tokyo” shoe (MetaLite is one name for it). The midsoles in the new 2025 Metaspeeds look more stable, which will help a lot, as well. As for the Superblast… it’s more that it’s being split up into two shoes… at least that was the last leak/.rumor… so the SB as we know it now won’t technically exist. The more training/race focused one seems to be much more interesting. I’m Curious what actually happens here. Not sure when we will get news on it all…
I have both the Evo SL and the SB2. When I first ran in the SB, it was an immediate “wow” In contrast, my initial run in the Evo SL didn’t give me that same feeling. I think the Adidas is a really solid shoe, but for me, the SB stands out.
Opposite for me and I loved the SB1… again, I’m glad there are two valid options for different types of runners for a single “do-it-all” shoe.
Options are good. 👍🏻
Completely agree and I also own both! That’s why I find many of these reviews BS as what works for some won’t work for others! Anyone watching these reviews to actually make a buying decision needs to get to a store and try shoes.
It is good to find a reviewer that your insist with, be it similar shoe tastes (or even totally opposite) as from there you can get a sense of what may or may not work. Ultimately though, it does take alot of trial and error.
@@SagasuRunning Same for me. I didn't enjoy the Superblast 2 as much as the rest of the internet seems to. I was able to hit a 3:30/mi pace with it during a sprint though! The dimensions felt too large, it was too wide/stable, the upper was uncomfortable, the heel dug into my skin, and the slapping against the pavement was obnoxious. I wanted to like it but sometimes you have to walk away from popular opinion.
I got the Evo SL and it felt exactly like when you get new shoes as a kid and feel lightning fast. I prefer the Prime X 2 Strung to the Superblast 2 as well.
Ya… I got similar slapping when trying to pick up past 10k pace in the SB2. Also agree on the feeling of excitement in the ESL… it’s quite special.
Really enjoyed the Adizero video you recommended, but this comparison is fire.
Two great shoes that give options to runners who want a single “do-it-all” shoe. Options are good.
@SagasuRunning Yeah, and the EVO SL is so much cheaper. SB2 is about $250 here in South Africa, and the EVO is $175 from Adidas.
I mean, the ESL is $50 USD less that the SB2 at retail… so this makes sense, even with import and local currency issues.
Your Asics Frankenshoe in the intro was 🔥. Moving to the outro, I 💯 agree that a shoe rotation is vital, especially for us oft injured runners who rotate heel drops, stack heights, and midsole materials to prevent repetitive motion injuries.
💯
A basic rotation is need for any runner. Not just your described cohort 🤣
@@SagasuRunning Touche'
🤣
The review we wanted but the review we didn't know we needed! Chris - your review format (at least in my view) has set a new standard for how we conceptualize shoe performance & comparisons - especially with the ride characteristics comparison and performance matrix. Well done!
Also - would be curious to get your take on Evo SL vs ORG Superblast. We know ORG Superblast and Superblast 2 have slightly different midsoles & therefore different ride characteristics and different versatility ranges. Curious if the ORG superblast has a broader versatility similar to Evo SL (and whether you believe the Evo SL still has a superior compliance / resiliency profile).
The SB1 did feel like it had more range for me, but I don't think it was the foams. I never liked FFTurbo, it was brutal on my legs too...and FFBlast+ is one of my most disliked foams. Oddly though, mixing them together in the SB1 seemed to cancel the bad of both.
I think the SB1 "felt" like it did more, 2 years ago a when there wasn't really another shoe like the SB1. Now in 2025 there are a lot of other options that made the SB2, albeit a better shoe in all ways, less special.
Thank you for the kind words on the content. 🤙🏻
The superblast 1 was my primary training shoe for the Baltimore marathon last year. Was a joy to run in every time. Only downside was the outsole rubber grip. I got the superblast2 at launch and just hated it! I’m probably the only person that prefers the sb1 to sb2. Sb2 just felt firmer and more dead to me. Was able to get the Evo SL in December and only have a few miles on it. Excited to try it on long runs when the weather ever warms up here. 😭. Thank you for your content!
I prefer SB1over the 2, FF Eco not good like FF Blast (more bounce)
But slowly there are more and more running shoes that i prefer over the SB.
The SB2 was a great update but the magic of the SB1 was lost. It wasn’t any engineering thing Asics did or changed… the magic was gone. Objectively the SB2 is a better shoe… but running shoes evolved and that are many other options that do some or most of what the SB2 does that weren’t around when it was only the SB1.
🎯
I've never gotten that wow factor from the SB2. But I do from the Evo SL. I'm beginning to think Lightstrike Pro is the foam I get along best with.
Same...I still respond to ZoomX better but Lightstrike Pro Classic is close for me.
That shoe you started to design @ 1:20 looks like it would be an amazing running shoe. The upper and midsole design by combining the original Superblast and having a Meta Speed midsole is 🔥. Would be nice if Asics is watching to make this happen.
Good thing Adidas already made it as Asics doesn’t seem interested in this line of engineering.
Thanks for the review! Had all but decided on trying the NB5 as my next daily, really interesting to hear about your experiences with the EVO SL.
The ESL isn't REALLY a daily trainer, it will do that, but it's not what it is really best at. The NB5 IS a daily trainer that CAN to faster running. I'll have a video up on Friday discussing the two shoes.
@SagasuRunning - thanks very much, looking forward to that video 👍
Awesome breakdown and review !
🙏🏻 🤙🏻
I have both of these shoes, and I completely agree with everything mentioned in this review. It 100% represents my opinion about both of these shoes
Great great video Chris! I wonder if you will run a versus video of the Evo Sl vs the zoom fly 6? I think that will be a tough match 😅
Next video up... you are one step ahead.
Great review 👏🏽😊. I don’t have either of these shoes but happy enough with my ZOOMFLY 6. But the ESL a temptation at its current price 😬
The next video on the channel is a ESL vs ZF6 video... you might be interested in that. Stay tuned. 🤙🏻
Interesting observations as usual 👍
Thank you for watching. 🤙🏻
I like that you highlighted the heavier runner composite for this. That's why I returned the SL and stayed with the SB2. The wider base of the SB2 suits me well and adds some stability that the SL seems to lack.
Definitely, it's an ideal shoe for a larger runner.
Currently have SB2 but struggling with fit and comfort after 50km. Evo SL a better option for training and race for HM (1:45-1:50)? SB2 feels clunky and awkward at Z2 paces (6:00+ min/km)!
To be fair.... 50km is a lot for any shoe...
I think the ESL is a no brainer for a HM, especially if you respond to it.
@ 50km in total not a single run 😅 I do like a rocker and previously used Rebel v4 so might give Evo SL a go! Thanks!
Oh…. Then ya… not a lot. 😅
The main reason why I like the superblast 2 for easy runs is that it gives me a real secure feeling, especially on the poor roads and walking paths here in Germany. I dont like the Super boring stability shoes or flat feeling shoes.
So the sb2 gives me an exciting running experience while also offering a stable and secure ride.
Does that make sense?
You also like them THICC and hate to feel the ground... the SB2 is your ideal shoe. 🤣
@@SagasuRunning a poetic masterpiece from your mouth, almost as if I wrote it... I just love big:°)
@Chungdol 🤣🤣🤣
Thnx, as a heavy runner i did not like the superblast 2 at all. Even prefer the Novablast 4 over it. Looking forward to trying out the evo sl. Love your videos. Thanks
Interesting. What didn't you like? I'm very curious.
From a marketing perspective, I believe the Superblast should maintain its current style to position the Novablast as a viable option for daily training. This approach also helps to justify its premium price.
The NB5 IS the brands daily training, by design AND marketing... Asics has NEVER once marketed the SB2 as a daily trainer.... thats all run influencers doing that.
Fantastic. Wanted the between 2 shoes (SB2 and ESL) and here we are. WOW!!! Will get EvoSL, when it is available in April. Use SB2 (same colorway as you have) when I feel that I need more support for my knees. Query: When it rains or when it is windy, which of the two uppers is better (that is, keeps you dry or warm). Thanks!!!!
No shoe will keep your feet totally warm an dry in the rain. Just accept you are going to get wet. Some will resist longer than others but your feet are still going to get wet. Nether one of these shoe uppers offer much against wet roads or rain. The SB2 might resist longer but the ESL will shed water and drain better. 🤷🏼♂️
Exactly as you described the desired SB (1:30 min) would be the ideal SB for me. SB1 upper + FFTurbo from Metaspeed (without a plate) and the FFEco lower sole unit.
I think many would enjoy it. Good thing it is now called the Evo SL.
Yes but the adidas upper is not well designed in the evo sl. Special the tongue and laces are not good as it should be.
The laces are standard Adizero laces, they suck but at least they aren’t stretchy.
Being a Vaporfly runner for MANY years… the tongue in the ESL is totally fine. Yes, it can be better though.
I know this is not an area you generally cover on this channel but the enormous difference in RRP is notable. The price point of the Evo SL is quite something for this day and age.
No I don't. This is a good case in point too. $50 USD is not something I'd be concerned with here. Again, that is just me. I realize cost is deeply personal.
I would shift the Superblast an entire square to the right in your matrix. It is an easy-steady long run shoe with some threshold capabilities.
Not for me...It's a chore at easy paces, at least to use as a dedicated shoe for that. Recovery in sets of work, fine...
I swapped out the insole of my EVO SL and put a thicker and bouncier one I had laying around. Now the EVO SL has an even bouncier feel and more of a race fit. It really took the slack out of the upper and it remains comfortable.
The midfoot and heel are perfect. Not sure this would resolve my fit issue. That being said, both sizes fit my foot well for different purposes. The .5 down one is the fast option for me though.
@ I needed the length for my left foot and could not go down a half size. Regardless happy ending for both of us.
@TomCantu-q2x I’m glad you got them figured out! Yes, happy ending. 🤙🏻
I had two Superblasts. Eventually I
got kinda sick of it. I always told myself, “why is this not 40mm?” They could have made it much lighter. I don’t think there’s going to be a problem with it being 40mm because of how resilient the foam is. I’ve decided to skip Superblast 2 and wait for the 3. Instead I will get the Evo SL since it is made from Lightstrike Pro classic? It will be my “super trainer” for tempo training: short and long.
Big changes for the Superblast in 2025…. Though right now the Evo SL is a shoe you can’t miss. So good choice.
Your videos make me really interested in the Evo SL. What is your current favorite rotation looking like (when not testing shoes?
Right now, since I'm testing so many shoe I don't really have a rotation I'm using at the moment.
However, I'll have a 2025 Adidas rotation video out in the next week or two.
Also the NB5 + ESL is a very hard two shoe combo to beat right now.
I’m increasingly drawing parallels between ADIZERO and the iPhone. From both an aesthetic and functional standpoint, once customers know they work for them, it becomes increasingly difficult to consider other brands. Consistent materials, construction and design language tweaked for each running discipline.
Interesting. I haven’t considered this. I do follow your logic… 👍🏻
I wore the evo sl for a track workout last year during a shoe demo. I wore the superblast 2 in the final 5 weeks of fall marathon training, and for the (3:30:00) race itself.
I agree with almost everything you're saying, and some things you're spot on to how I feel about both shoes.
From a durability standpoint I think I would chew through the evo sl with my running style, and the places I train.
If you're talking "do it all", the peg is the standard all contenders should be compared to.
I was surprised either of the shoes in this video were compared in that lens without mentioning the king.😂
I'm about as pro Pegasus as you will find on TH-cam (maybe only Tim Grose is at my level) and the Peg IS the standard I judge all dialy trainers on (which means it should be capable of ALL training/paces)...but I'd never race in the Peg. I would race in the ESL.
I actually don't love the ESL on the track. The stability in the turns isn't there. It's almost like a VF3, but with no plate to structure the midsole for the foot it becomes super squirrelly. On the straights though.... 🚀
I haven’t run in the Evo SL but the Superblast is such a great long run shoe. But according to this video the Evo SL will match the Superblast 2’s long run experience? I’ve stayed away from the Evo SL because most reviews made it sound like a speed trainer and not a great easy / long run shoe. I have too many race shoes / speed trainers. I guess I’ll pick it up when it drops wide anyways. I refuse to pay over retail to get it a month or so early.
I've found the ESL to be much more enjoyable for "set and forget" threshold running. The longest run I've done in them is 18k, far shorter than marathon training, but I'm also not focused on any race distance over 5k right now... so I have no need for the volume. Multiple 16k+ runs in the ESL have all been outstanding though and I've have no hesitation taking to 25k+.
From your video, I starting to believe that EVO SL will be something between Novablast 5 (General Performance Trainer) and Superblast 2 (Marathon Performance Trainer).
That’s called a Tempo trainer… but yes.
I love the Superblast but I think the Evo SL and the Zoom fly 6 give it a very good go😊
They do... but I still look for non plated options as all rounders...so these two stand alone still.
No contest. EVO SL all day. Lighter, cheaper, full race foam, more fun and faster
🎯
Novablast is better
I never actually tried the Superblast 1 or 2. The price always put me off a bit because it's 220€ here... It's very rarely discounted as well, where you can get Carbon Race Shoes for less.
At this point I've kind of lost interest in it too. The Evo SL is significantly lighter and less bulky. Hard to imagine the Superblast could possibly be a better Trainer.
It’s not. Given your speed, build and shoe preferences…. You aren’t missing anything.
As ever class video. Many thanks.
I have a pair of the SL2 and absolutely love them.
Would you suggest up grading to the Evo Sl
Or buy another pair of the SL2.?
Many thanks in advance.
Regards Paul Starr
If you are looking for a true daily trainer to pair with existing tempo/race shoe, go SL2. If you want a tempo shoe, that can do easy running (but is not a daily trainer) add in the Evo SL.
Nice comparison! I think i’d go for the evo sl.
Can you do a comparison of the evo sl and the Nike Zoom Fly 6? I know that the zf6 is a carbon plated shoe, but the two shoes are the hot talk right now for a daily/tempo training. Thank you for always having a great comparison!
That’s the next video up on the channel… mid week… stay tuned. 🤙🏻
@ will be waiting. 👏
Surely Peg Plus is the direct competitor in Nike’s roster?
Yes, and no…I’ll have some content on the ESL & PP in early Feb.
I'm a slower runner with some stability needs, the superblast 2 is stable enough for me and it is my workout and race shoe. I've tried the evo SL on and it felt too unstable for me
I’m glad you have the SB2 then. You should take a look at Saucony’s lineup… they all have a level of stability built into them.
Puma also the prices are much more fair than saucony
I have both and love both, but agree that Evo SL has a wider range of applications and paces it can handle. The SB2 is the long run king. If I want to go on 15+ mile runs at a steady pace, then it is the one. I've done 15+ mile runs with the Evo SL but I mixed it up with easy warmup and cooldown with faster tempo/threshold segments in the middle, which it is perfect for. The feel and ride between the two are very different and quite enjoyable in their own ways. They can both be used as daily trainers depending on your weight and personal preferences. They both seem very durable and get better (softer and bouncier) with more mileage while remaining responsive. The Evo SL is more nimble while the SB2 is more stable. They are very complementary. I'll be packing these two (actually wear one of 'em) on my long business trips to Asia (4~5 weeks) and I know I'll be covered.
Agree, nothing beats the SB2 for those long runs with pace. Maybe only a proper super shoe, which i many ways the SB2 is.
Where is everyone getting the Evo Sl? It seems the only option in the US is to buy on the secondary market. It doesn't even show up on Adidas website for me 🤔
I’m not based in the US. March 2025 release date according to Adidas still, though they also don’t seem to have any actual idea when their shoes release anymore.
Don’t the SBs have a bit of a mix of foams? I don’t think it is a pure racing foam but a bit of a mix with the somewhat firmer eco firm. EvoSL has the same foam all around? Similar to the Nike invincible, which is super spongy. I just found the geometry strange (dug into my outer midfoot because the angle).
Technically speaking, yes. Practically speaking the FFBlast+ ECO on the SB2 only smooths out the FFTurbo+ and makes it usable in a training context. 85% of rhe midsole is their race super foam. I even reference this in the video…
@ thanks! Your version of the ideal ASICS super training shoe looks good. Just a bit more sleeker than the SB. I think the bottom of the ASICS SB and Novablast creates the responsivness for a non plated shoe more than any other brand. It’s like mini trampolines. The eco foam hardens or balances the ride like a carbon plate. Their carbon shoes have the good bouncy foam balanced by the plate.
I would think the EvoSL is pretty close to the Takumi Sen. But I’m interested in trying them. I returned the Adios Pro 4. It was really squishy.
Just give me a Noosa Tri 15 with ff turbo+ and maybe a couple of extra mm of stack height and some normal color ways.
Honestly, that might make me pay attention to that shoe finally. The foam is the biggest barrier for me on the Noosa Tri.
@@SagasuRunning Have been using Noosa Tri 16 as my daily trainer (mostly up to 10km, no more), and I think bcs of the low stack and FFBlast+ foam, it hurt my feet (plantar, arc, etc) everytime a ran with it
@bintangraihan8358 FFBlast+ is not a great foam… at all.
Great video! Will you compare the EVO SL with the Endorphin Speed 4, my favourite all-round shoe?
(I know the ES4 has a plate, but it a relatively soft nylon plate)
Won't be happening. No longer have a ES4, I did my 2024 shoe donation clean out post my end of year content in December (I have very little storage space where I live and had to make way for 2025 shoes).
I will say Lightstrike Pro foam is LIGHTYEARS ahead of PWRRUN PB...can't even compare the two.
I'm on the fence if I will cover the ES5. I was unimpressed with what I saw on that shoe... if I do though there likely will be a ESL vs ES5...we will see.
I’m so torn between these two right now. In all honesty I’ll probably end up buying both.
Can't go wrong with both...especially if you need a dedicated long run trainer in the SB2.
exactly what happened to me... go for it! No duplication.. cause they look and feel so different. I love them both.
I'm one of those heavier runners who finds the Superblast suitable for just about all my runs. But I agree with you that the subset of runners for whom the SB2 ticks all the boxes is a small one. I can understand how many runners find it perhaps too bulky for uptempo running, and a bit slappy at easier paces.
But with that said, why do you think that the big brands have been so slow to follow the Superblast example of a thick(er)-stacked, plateless trainer with (essentially) a full racing foam midsole? Given the Superblast's success I'dve expected a lot of copycat shoes to be released in the next product cycle.
I also agree with you that a Superblast/Metaspeed Frankenshoe if done right would be an awesome shoe. Unfortunately according to what I've heard it seems Asics is going a different direction with the rumored 'Sonicblast' plated trainer in the works.
I do think other brands are trying. Brooks released their answer, in a very Brooks way… and there will be a few more this year.
At the end of the day though, outside of the running shoe world online the Superblast really isn’t that popular. Not when compared to something like a Ghost or a Clifton. So it’s a big I cents from a brand to make a sure few ultimately need (or use). That’s why you are seeing other brands put their own spin on their versions and making them less performance focused and more comfort focused, which will sell more (theoretically).
Which is better sir vaporfly 3,takumi sen 10 or evo sl
Depends on what you are looking to do?
For easy running @@SagasuRunning
@AnilSharma00075 Evo SL from your list… but I’d recommend the Asics Novablast 5 as an easy run shoe more.
Ok sir thanks i try to get the shoe which one is available in my size novablast 5 or Adidas evo sl 🙏
The more I wear the SB V2 (and more fit I get) the more the shoe is becoming a ong run with marathon pace/power only injections shoe. In the summer/fall, I loved it for MP/HMP...but the last 3 times I wore the shoe running with HMP injections on 25km+ runs the shoe just felt like a boat. I was forced to run my long run today on treadmill due to freezing rain. I had gone outside to run with the SB V2 on before I pulled the plug and went home, and decided to just dry off the shoes and jump on the treadmill....and WOW did the boat feeling ever hit home. I almost stopped and took them off on the first 15min HMP section and put on my 1300km pair of Tempo Next%. 70mins later I was hoping the 2nd 15min interval would somehow feel better. Nope....boat. I generally don't run marathon pace/power until the last quarter of a marathon build. Before that, it's all HMP to push LT2. This really will limit the SB V2 now...or maybe I just turn it into an easy long run shoe to run it to death. Guess I keep burning through my Tempo Next% pairs till the next replacement comes along (Evo SL maybe, ZF V6, Tempo Next% V2?).
Wow...the SB2 on a treadmill... i can't even imagine the clown shoe like feel there. Still better than freezing rain. In all my testing of the SB1/2, it LOVES MP (threshold) but as soon as I need to pick it up the shoe never wanted to do it. Sort of like a AF2 feel, but worst. However, if you stayed at MP...it was/is perfection.
My shoe rotation for 2025 is going to be the Supernova Prima (recovery/easy/daily), superblast 2 (long run ), Evo sl (everything but recovery) and adios pro 4 (race day).
Not sure you need to SB2… especially with the Prima… but enjoy that rotation.
If the Evo SL is more readily available than the Superblast 2, it’ll be a win for Adidas.
Regarding your ideal “Metablast,” it sounds very similar to the Novablast archetype with a different foam/rubber composition. I really liked that ASICS decided to scale some of the bulk back when moving from the Novablast 4 to 5. Hopefully the Superblast 3 will take the same direction away from the Hokafication of all shoes.
I agree, the NB5 is kind of there already. If you put the Nb5 in FFTurbo+ it may be the shoe I wanted, almost. I talked about how much more nimble and useful the NB5 is in my review.
Still the form factor of a Metaspeed is hard to beat... a plateless Metaspeed would be killer...
I am dreaming about a MiniBlast too... 😭
👌🏼👍🏻
MetaBlast…. And it’s called the Evo SL now…
Is that the novablast?
@@Pakperformance
Novablast is standard daily-trainer not more
@ No, the Novablast is too soft.
I start running from last august, I always wear asics for daily shoes so eventually I go for gel nimbus 26 as my first real running shoes. And two weeks before my first 10k race I got SB2, and start running on that got a pretty good result. However I always feel some pain on my hip due to maybe high stack? Afterwards I got passionate on trainers and luckily get a cut price boston 12 and felt way better after break the foam, the lower drop and stacks made feel way better after long runs, and then get the EVO SL, its bouncy and smooth, although I doubt if its good for long run, but after a 20K run that worry vanished and just cant go back to SB2. I gave chance to SB2 for few more long runs and easy runs, but that's enough, and sold it even it was my first race shoes. Easy run, even easy long run, nimbus 26 is way better and long run I rotate between EVO SL, Boston12 and purchased a Puma Deviate Nitro 3, that is a great replacement to SB2, have the stiffness from the plate, but not too aggressive still bouncy and stable enough for slow long run and most importantly the 10mm heel drop is a positive fact for rotation. I think will probably choose EVO SL as my next half marathon race in coming May. Anyway that just my experience as I'm a normal to lightweight person.
The added width of the SB2 was likely what was causing your hip pain. The fact you don't get that on other high stack, yet less stable shoes, would make me thing that.
The ESL is a total no brainer for a HM in my mind, especially if you respond to the shoe.
@@SagasuRunning Thx for your comment! Maybe Novablast series will work for me too, do you think Puma MagMax would get similar problem to SB2 on me? anyway, I'm very happy with my rotation right now!
The NB5 isn’t as wide as the SB2, I have a comparison video with the dimensions on the channel.
I haven’t run I the Puma, nor do I plan too, so nothing to add.
Yes I am using SB2 and it's really a eye pleasing looks but ride is firmer and noisy.
The SB2 can be very “slappy” depending on running for. Certainly.
Really tempted to buy some evo sls. This video might have just persuaded me. Also, how come the left superblast weighs 7g more than the right? Shouldnt they weigh exactly the same?
Manufacturing tolerances. Most brands will QC and accept a shoe within 7-9g range, some more. It's very common.
There are markets where the Superblast 2 is almost twice the price of the Evo SL
In my area they sell EVO SL for twice as much because it's not officially available yet. On the other hand, the Superblast lasts twice as long if even longer than the EVO SL.
In reality it's a $50 USD difference. I don't talk about price on this channel often... but for what you get in these two shoes it's a substantial difference that doesn't get much more in the SB2.
3rd party and after market sales platforms are just awful.
Will you be reviewing the Streakfly 2 rumored to be releasing in February 2025, and the adidas takumi sen 11 in March?
Both....yes.... and plenty of "vs" videos for both.
Great video as usual. I have only tried on the SB1 and ran up and down the street and felt it was too bulky for me.
I currently have the SN Rise, SL2 and Takumi Sen 10 for my Adidas shoes. Which of these shoes feels the most similar to the Evo SL (TTS and 1/2 Down) in terms of fit and lockdown? I’m also a size 9 and have a 9 in all these Adidas shoes. I won’t be in need of the Evo SL immediately, but plan to pick up a pair later in the year after putting more miles in other shoes and once they are more readily available. My other daily trainer is the Novablast 5 in addition to the SL2 and SN Rise.
The ESL fits nothing like the three Adidas shoes you have. It has a version of the upper from the TS10, the heel (refined) of the SL2 and the toebox of the SNR (but more volume.
See my ESL review for more sizing thoughts. I’m still trying to decide which is right for my foot…
@ Thanks for the input. Based on the ESL review, I feel the US8.5 might be the better choice for me because I like a more race like fit. When the time comes, I may order both sizes and keep the better fitting shoe. Your videos on the ESL have me excited to try it. I had been down on trying it for a variety of reasons after initially wanting it, but you’ve restored the WANT to try and test it for myself. I haven’t missed on a shoe that you’ve been really high on yet and can’t say that about many TH-cam reviewers.
@mattbeier The ESL is a special one for sure. I think the biggest consistent criticism of it is how minimal it is overall. Coming from someone who trains in super shoe, that is a big part of the appeal. The minimal ness of a race shoe but the durability and function of a trainer that CAN be raced. A hard balance to find but Adidas has done a great job.
@ That sounds like my kind of shoe, especially of the non-plated variety. I’m personally annoyed by the “Super Trainer” naming when in most cases it doesn’t truly apply. I’ve adopted your term of Performance Trainer which to me is a much better description for that type of shoe.
@mattbeier Ya, especially with the whole super trainer thing exploding into a range of shoe now. I’ll have some content in Feb around the ESL and its overall importance for this category of shoe. Stay tuned.
I have the SB2 and it is a good shoe but for me at every run after 10km or so I can feel a bit of hotspot and it irritates my toes to the point that it felt cramped. So for me the upper is a no bueno for me for long runs, might be that I have a slightly wider foot. I also have the Boston 12 which I prefer now over the SB2 for long runs, minimal upper and my feet stayed fresh, no hot spots, no soreness. Now thinking whether I should go for the Evo SL or NB5 but if the Evo SL is more similar to Boston 12 I might get the Evo :)
As I said in my ESL vs Adizero video… the ESL is a better Boston… you’ll see. 👍🏻
Hi Chris , did you get the Superblast 2 up to 100 miles ? As some mention it can take 60 miles for it to find its sweet spot , you seemed so fond of the original , I get the 2 was heavier and people didn't like the rock catcher design underneath so to Asics credit they did try , I have found both versions of the sb very good and run my PB in the half marathon in the 2 but I think perfect conditions and a fast course and cool temps aided that.
I'm very interested in the Evo SL but I think the SB is still better for heavier runners, I am 81kg at 5ft8 height, but it seems Adidas are doing a bit of a Nike Jordans , ALphafly type hype release and limiting numbers , so annoying.
I'm in New Zealand and funnily enough its been very easy to get both Superblasts , you just have to go into running stores and put your name down for a pre order , I think the superblast 2 is available has far better supply than the 1 , Is it gonna be a case that the Evo SL is gonna be hard to find ?
I’m sorry… a running shoe in 2025 , especially a super shoe (which the SB2 really is) shouldn’t require a 60mins break in. 10-20 to settle into your foot, fine.
So no, I never got it that far. TBH, it’s just not a shoe I need right now. I like the SB2, it’s excellent at what it is designed for. However it’s just too big, stiff and bulky for anything outside of its design spec…. For me (I realize this isn’t an issues for some).
I did get my MSEP to about 90mi, before I blew them up. So I have a good sense of FFTurbo+. I also didn’t find a massive break in for the MSEP, other than 10-20mile to mold to my foot and disappear.
I do think the SB2 is a better option for a heavier runner… while I’m not the lightest runner, at around 160lbs’ish I’m not that heavy and prefer more nimble versatile shoes.
Years of training in the Pegasus and Vaporfly have molded my preferences in how I want a running shoe to feel.
The Evo SL unfortunately didn't work for me for some reason I couldn't get the most out of it. I was able to really use the SB2 as my do it all trainer probably because I am a bigger athletic runner. However, the SB2 doesn't do intervals and fast tempo workouts well it is too much shoe but for everything else it is a swiss army knife for me. I found the fit and build quality much better as well when compared to the Evo SL. Paired the SB 2 with the Adios 9 and waiting for the Takumi 11/Streakfly 2 to add for my faster workout rotation
Interesting. How does the Adios 9 work for you? You don;t have the same issues with ti was the Evo SL? Or is it more you JUST use it for intervals/fast workouts?
It's hard to explain it completely in this comment, but I believe versatile shoes don't matter all that much since most runners already have a complete rotation anyway. Even if you don't, most people also have a impulse buying problem 😅
You’d be surprised by the amount of runners running in one shoe, or maybe one shoe and an old one once in a while. Also the idea of a “single shoe for everything” is an interesting idea.
@SagasuRunning Oh no I definitely get it. I have a rebel v4 and the adios 9, and I use the adios for virtually everything including travelling 😅
@noscop444 I’m finding the A9 just so useful and good for so much. Outstanding shoe that keeps impressing
I think I will go with the evo tbh cuz superblast cant be found anywhwre
Many people will make this same choice in 2025 I think...
11:00 perfectly visualised
🤙🏻
novablast 5 + evo sl = only 2 shoes you need
I have to agree. That is maybe the best two shoe combo on the market in early 2025... I'll have a video out later this week discussing that.
@@SagasuRunning also it is kinda cheap for these only 2 shoes
In japan i could get them both
for 220$ or 230$
if discounted much less
I have both 😂 like them both, I agree that evo SL is faster
Faster for sure at more paces for more people.
Have them both and both are for different uses so in my opinion can't compare yes superblast appears to be bulky but one hell of a smooth ride firmer but still can feel cushion and certainly can pick up the pace.
Evo sl to me not a daily it's a up-tempo speed shoe with a baggy upper that dosent have great structure that said the midsole is outstanding at pace but at slower speeds a bit boring, with the aggressive rocker my toes always hurt with the toe off...
Both shoes are great but winner to me is definitely superblast...
Probably the best around shoe I have ever owned..
So fascinating how individual shoe and shoe fit is. It’s why I find talking about this stuff so fascinating. We all have what feels best for us individually. It changes person to person too.
@SagasuRunning I suppose we all have different gates as well as different running styles...buying any trainer has it slight chance not to work or be a hit as well...reviews are great but not to be taken as gospel I suppose
@JRuns5987 Yes, reviews are just another data point that leads you in the right direction… then the work is on you to make the shoe work (or not).
I agree. The asics is too bulky and clumsy. I personally think they could simplify the midsole , take out that heel/tail protrusion, and save weight at the same time.
Fully agree. Big changes for the Superblast in 2025 though… some will be happy many will not be though.
Really in 2025 ? Are you sure about that ? and many would not be tough ...? 🤔
@@SagasuRunning I'm guessing the next version of ffblast turbo will be more compliant, and will probably lose some resilience because polymer engineering.
If so, you're right. Some of us will not be happy. Good thing I stocked up on SB2s.
@MLHunt Actually I haven’t seen anything about FFTurbo+, but there is a new foam in that white “Tokyo” shoe (MetaLite is one name for it). The midsoles in the new 2025 Metaspeeds look more stable, which will help a lot, as well.
As for the Superblast… it’s more that it’s being split up into two shoes… at least that was the last leak/.rumor… so the SB as we know it now won’t technically exist. The more training/race focused one seems to be much more interesting. I’m
Curious what actually happens here. Not sure when we will get news on it all…
Lol then it aint a superblast 😉
☕🥐
🤙🏻