I'm not a huge fan of Superman, but even i know he doesn't see himself as a god, he knows he has great powers and the directive of his father Jor-El could turn him into a tyrant, but, thanks to both his directive and him being raised by the Kents, he uses his powers to help others, he gives people an example of courage, truth, justice, virtues to cultivate. That is one of the reasons why the Snyder Superman bothers me, he isn't like that, and his father died giving him advice Jon Kent never would.
I couldn't get back into the film after that. It made no bloody sense. Why the heck would he stand there and watch his father die. He has super speed. Run out and tie him to something, nobody sees.
I agree but I will play Devil's Advocate mainly that while Superman clearly doesn't see himself as a God, that is exactly how humans could perceive Superman as because the aspirational archetype of courage, truth, justice and heroism puts him on a pedestal above everyone else. I think this especially true in modern age where cynicism is treated as the norm while idealism is the outlier.
13:50 Superman is that guy you meet who tells you he does charity work, goes to church every Sunday, remembers peoples names and birthdays, and always has time to talk with people, and you want to doubt he’s got it all together but then you see him do it all and all you can think once you see him do it is “You know what, if he can do all of this stuff, I can do just a little better myself.”
If Prof had a superhero name "Bastion" would be perfect. Definition: an institution, place, or person strongly defending or upholding particular principles, attitudes, or activities
James Gunn know how to do only one kind of movie and one kind of character and people is unable to notice that. This puzzled me to no end. And honestly I don't know how a guy who finds fun joking about kids could ever understand a paragon like Superman
Gunn's 'jokes' reveal a disgusting mind. And his Suicide Squad was a lot like his Guardians films. The shark was Groot. And this forgettable film lost money. His Peacemaker is equally forgettable. And Gunn disrespects the DC brand in a disgusting and perverted manner that should disqualify him from overseeing the franchise and one of its flagship characters.
@@Chicken_Little_SyndromeIn the garbage Peacemaker TV show James Gunn puts on his script that Aquaman fu*** fish and Superman has a scat fetish, but that's the guy WB trust to command DC's universe in live action.
A few years ago, Gunn produced a movie called, "Brightburn" which took Superman's origin and twisted it so that instead of becoming a hero, he became a murderer. He's not the right fit for a Superman movie.
The notion of Superman being a god also comes from the gradual OP-ing of him over time. That's one thing I like about the 90s Animated series. He was simply "Super". Not Omnipowerful. He could fight a big robotic T Rex and have a bit of a challenge.
Those who call out the kind , virtueos and merciful as being "weak" only end up revealing their own selfish flaws and limitations. Gunn doesn't understand Superman.
That's just right. Superman is a representation of liberty, hope and good, of USA deep roots. James Gunn doesn't know about that, at least iy doesn't show on his movies.
My position is that you don't hire an auteur to be the Big Picture Guy overseeing a franchise. It takes a different skill set. Nor do you hire the auteur to direct a story with established characters. For these you want someone who is a "gun for hire" to direct because that director will stay on point more often that the auteur who just wants to slather his brand over the established property. It was Dean Cain in Lois and Clark: The New Adventures of Superman who said, "Clark Kent is who I am. Superman is what I can do."
While I enjoy Guardians of the galaxy, I don't think Gunn is the person I would go to for a superman movie. Honestly Sam rami is the person I would go to, or at least someone he would recommend since he has a very grounded style to his characters but knows to push the envelope with special effects.
Also I would argue the only real conflict from superman heritage to use is an exterior conflict, meaning the consequences of krypton being destroyed . Example Zodd, the villain in superman earth one etc.
_Brightburn._ Written by Brian and Mark Gunn, and produced by James Gunn. A fundamental misunderstanding of Superman. I don't need the BS Multiverse defense, either. Now James Gunn is going to make _Superman: Legacy._ I can only imagine this means a legacy of bad ideas. They should just call it _Soupy Leftovers._ After what Hollywood has done the past decade to Superman, that's all we're going to get on the big screen.
He's clearly going to do All Star Superman. So his first move is going to be killing off Superman. My guess is that he's going to do a Super Saccharin tribute/sendoff to Superman, so that he can claim to honor the character whilst disposing of him promptly. So Superman will just be an former icon to the Gunn DCU.
I agree bro and I was thinking the same. Gunn is a great director and he has made great movies but he isn't a good choice for a superman movie. His strenghts are quirky and weird characters and that superman is not.
It's not weakness to uphold your principles, that is why i hate The Batman as a movie, Batman and Alfred are completely out of character, whoever wrote the movie doesn't understand Batman.
Nothing about gunn, says he can do a proper Superman story. He clearly doesn't understand the character or like him. The dude has a blatant disregard for source material and sheeple praise him for it. He has no problem insulting customers. He reminds me of tika watitity.
Exactly! James Gunn should stick to horror and gross-out movies even though I did like Super 2010. I also liked his Slither which is an underrated horror, but is too definitely a gross-out comedy movie. Brightburn felt too silly and edgy to be compelling and believable. It just shows the narcissism and the "I don't give a crap about what happens anymore. The universe and world be damned and thrust into hellfire," passive-nihilistic attitude of the 90s and onward because of government oversight, institution corruption, Bush and the Iran and Iraq oil stuff and Hussein Ba'th party stuff. Besides all that, the first couple times I saw Guardians of the Galaxy was great including Dave Bautista's character whom I found charming and funny, but also badass. It also helped that I like Chris Pratt as an actor and didn't mind him being in the MCU. Anyway, I agree with all your conclusions, Prof. I didn't enjoy the following Guardian of the Galaxy films after 1 though. Brightburn and Gunn and Snyder are what you get when money and greed and narcissism override genuine sincere virtues like hope, loyalty, reverence and worship, morality, goodness and kindness of people, righting wrongs, and courage etc. These people I would be willing to bet if I was a betting man, are the same people who lack these very same principles and are more than likely paid nepo baby sleazebags like Weinstein and co. I don't think Gunn and Snyder knows or even believes in the goodness and kindness of humanity and having heart. It has to be all doom-and-gloom and the next great depression era for everyone. They probably just want to see the world crash and burn up from their ivory sheltered towers. All because they want to morph the USA into what it's not into something unrecognizable and twisted and grim and hellish. They're actually trying to morph youngins' impressionable, gullible still developing minds. Deplorable.
For the record too, I only liked Man of Steel because to his credit Snyder is excellent at visual and special effects directing. And because of Henry Cavill who I mainly enjoyed in Mission Impossible Fallout and The Man from Uncle, the 2000s film adaptation of Count of Monte Cristo and The Witcher. It was just nice to see him doing something different with Man of Steel. Not saying he was good. I didn't expect him to be Superman. Him being fired for my soggy knees just proves to me that Gunn and Snyder and his cohorts are the actual people against women and hate them; not to mention Gunn's sleaziness in how he treats actresses directed and working under him for films. This is the same damn industry that has actual terrible slimy greasy reprehensible people like Weinstein with women, Bryan Singer (X-Men films and others; only he assaulted and manipulated little boys and men). Gunn just happened to be 'different' under some guise of "I love superheroes and comics". ****For more information about Gunn's sleaziness and crimes and questionable behavior, look no further than this video and choosing Saw VI Scream Queen, "That Really Weird James Gunn Saw Themed Reality Show" by In Praise of Shadows. Excellent video and highly informative as it shows you what kind of person and figure James Gunn really is and what monstrous lengths he is capable of. Down with James Gunn and this iteration of DC. His twitter takes and opinions on r4p3 and pD0philia and children were only the TIP of the iceberg.
Gunn is going to butcher Superman and that universe even worse than Zack did. He doesn't have a fundamental understanding of this character thanks to woke Hollyweird's narcissistic attitude about heroism. I haven't supported that industry in a long time and I don't plan on going back for the same helping of sh*t just because its under new management.
Waititi fans are even worse. Many of the same people who hated TL&T always loved Thor: Ragnarok. Thor Ragnarok was absolute trash. Utter character assassination
How would you compare a character like AXEL FOLEY from Beverly Hills Cop to Superman? I see many similarities, especially how he is actually super competent but often plays a buffoon to fool others. Axel doesn't need to learn anything from his adventures, he changes all of the people around him.
We don't need another origin story. Nobody wants that. That's why the skipped it with new Spiderman movies. They knew we've already seen it a million times. Besides we've already seen this approach with the Snyder movies. Why not keep cavil because everybody loves the guy and he'll put buts in the seats. Use Flashpoint to change his personality to be more in line with his traditional personality. Expand his world. Give him truly worthy enemies to fight. Of whitch there are many, Lobo, braniac etc. And just tell a fun entertaining story. It's not that hard.
I could not agree more. I hate origin stories with every fiber of my being. It's oversaturated, but also lazy as hell. There's so much autism fanboying for Gunn and Origin Stories. People need to learn when enough is enough. I loved the Sam Raimi Spider-Man films because it only had a singular protagonist with one or two clear villains and no other crossover from a different comic of the same franchise unlike MCU and DCU now. And because of 2 and 3 where 2 had major great character development with Peter and him having to think about separating his time as a web-slinging crime fighter and an awkward nerdy boy. Forget about all the woke blackwashing tokenizing crap in the comics nowadays. Fix your characters first and stories then the woke stuff, but until then, hire better competent people and fire Gunn and Snyder (if only). And Lex Luthor is only as good as the director and writers want him to be and he's generic. There's a whole host of villains and dudes for Supes to choose from and fight, kind of like how Antman 3 had him and the Wasp fight Kang only the execution is what I can only describe as 'terri-bad'.
I speak with my wallet and remote. I was willing to give Cavill a chance because there's no other actor out there that can sell Supeman's image. With Gadot and Cavill out, Gunn has begun to feel the pain. Many fans skipped Shazam for that very reason and the fact that they will portray a version of superman as a young man, something we saw ad nauseam in Smallville.
A lot of people in Hollywood don't, but sadly, people will defend him because reasons and desperation. Isn't that one terrible writer that attacked first-responders and hates fans, or is that his own thing?
His slate is an absolute mess, im glad people are begining to get over their recency bias, this reboot is like when DC did the new 52 but kept all of Batman and GL's history while scrapping every other character, Very similar to gunn keeping Suicide Squad his Wife and Peacemaker while scrapping everything else. This slate will only get worse with time these gunn fanboys will see
I think he likes or loves it. I'm pretty sure I remember from one of his past or older streams about him kind of gushing and fanboying about Berserk. That's usually what happens when get big and deep into Berserk; it's phenomenal and better than half the stuff James Gunn writes and directs. Gunn should stick to horror and gross-out.
I think I can defend the title. I'm not in James Gunn's mind, so I don't know his reasons for calling it "Gods and Monsters", but I think the title works. DC characters are the closest thing that we have to gods in a secular society. They've been around longer than the Marvel characters, they've achieved greater cultural penetration than Marvel has and when people think of superheroes, they're the ones they normally think of, in much the same way that people would cite Heracles or Perseus when discussing heroes of antiquity. As far as Superman goes, I don't have much hope for him getting a good portrayal outside of animation. I've come to the conclusion that it's never going to happen in my lifetime.
Well prepare to be disappointed because peacemaker and gunns suicide squad characters are staying around in his new DCU and he recasted or will recast literally everyone else.
Your completely off when it comes to The Batman movie. That movie was a step in the right direction. All, ALL, the live action Batman movies before it were god awful.. not even just as Batman movies, but just as movies in general too. Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water.
I just got through watching Superman the animated series which I haven’t seen since it air. I am looking forward to that new show “my adventures with Superman”but I am’s sceptical about. I hope it is a more lighthearted and wholesome take on the character. Back in to my opinion after re-watching Superman damages at deck knows how long. You know that into adjacent to Superman is good but I have noticed a lot of problems that have been creeping up with the county over the years. Unfortunately for whatever reason the DCAU Superman remind me a lot of the Zack Snyder Man of Steel Superman. However by far my biggest problem with the DCAU Superman is its betrayal of Clark Kent. Diversion the Clark asked too much like Superman in this highlight Hollywood biggest phone was Superman. They only see Superman through his surface level of detail. The only see the super and not the man inside. Since its debut Superman has arguably involved to be the most human of all superheroes. At a fundamental level he is far more grounded and relatable then Spider-Man/Peter Parker and way more human then will Batman would ever be. He simply I kindhearted good person at his core who loves his friends, family and home. He started saving people not out of a sense of responsibility but for the love of people. If he didn’t even have powers he is the type of guy would go out and into community surveys purely because he wants to. His possibilities as Superman just ended up developing over time. Yes, he do use this or that he’s alienated help deflect (and get the word) the public from his real life as quite can’t. But even as the mild-mannered reporter Clark lost his job and the people he worked with. You do what you can to make life better as Clark Kent purely out of love. I can’t help but be reminded of what Batman sets to the Joker at the end of the dark night. The Joker just refuse to see the good in people, and that is precisely how Hollywood feels about that audience. They refused to believe that a person can purely be good just for the sake of being good. This is what was one of my favourite superhero movie if not for a movie of all time is “Superman versus the elite”. Sorry for long post. But as a some point I just got through watching Superman the anime series and I am looking forward to that new show. Or being hopefully optimistic about it.
![“อาร์ต พศุตม์” เกือบเอี่ยวทุกคดีดัง เอ๊ะไว้ก่อน ไม่มีอะไรได้มาง่ายๆ | แฉ 16 ต.ค. 67 [2/3] | GMM25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0Gx-0-kUBv8/mqdefault.jpg)
I'm not a huge fan of Superman, but even i know he doesn't see himself as a god, he knows he has great powers and the directive of his father Jor-El could turn him into a tyrant, but, thanks to both his directive and him being raised by the Kents, he uses his powers to help others, he gives people an example of courage, truth, justice, virtues to cultivate. That is one of the reasons why the Snyder Superman bothers me, he isn't like that, and his father died giving him advice Jon Kent never would.
I couldn't get back into the film after that. It made no bloody sense. Why the heck would he stand there and watch his father die. He has super speed. Run out and tie him to something, nobody sees.
I agree but I will play Devil's Advocate mainly that while Superman clearly doesn't see himself as a God, that is exactly how humans could perceive Superman as because the aspirational archetype of courage, truth, justice and heroism puts him on a pedestal above everyone else. I think this especially true in modern age where cynicism is treated as the norm while idealism is the outlier.
13:50 Superman is that guy you meet who tells you he does charity work, goes to church every Sunday, remembers peoples names and birthdays, and always has time to talk with people, and you want to doubt he’s got it all together but then you see him do it all and all you can think once you see him do it is “You know what, if he can do all of this stuff, I can do just a little better myself.”
God knows we need more of you here, Professor. Hope you've been doing well.
If Prof had a superhero name "Bastion" would be perfect. Definition: an institution, place, or person strongly defending or upholding particular principles, attitudes, or activities
Heck yes.
This is A great video. You made A lot of great points
James Gunn know how to do only one kind of movie and one kind of character and people is unable to notice that. This puzzled me to no end.
And honestly I don't know how a guy who finds fun joking about kids could ever understand a paragon like Superman
Gunn's 'jokes' reveal a disgusting mind. And his Suicide Squad was a lot like his Guardians films. The shark was Groot. And this forgettable film lost money. His Peacemaker is equally forgettable. And Gunn disrespects the DC brand in a disgusting and perverted manner that should disqualify him from overseeing the franchise and one of its flagship characters.
@@Chicken_Little_SyndromeIn the garbage Peacemaker TV show James Gunn puts on his script that Aquaman fu*** fish and Superman has a scat fetish, but that's the guy WB trust to command DC's universe in live action.
A few years ago, Gunn produced a movie called, "Brightburn" which took Superman's origin and twisted it so that instead of becoming a hero, he became a murderer. He's not the right fit for a Superman movie.
AI generated comment holy shit
The notion of Superman being a god also comes from the gradual OP-ing of him over time.
That's one thing I like about the 90s Animated series. He was simply "Super". Not Omnipowerful.
He could fight a big robotic T Rex and have a bit of a challenge.
and he'd be drained and kicked around by Parasite, fire lady, etc
I always liked the ideals Superman espoused but very few people know how to write a good Superman and certainly not James Gunn.
Those who call out the kind , virtueos and merciful as being "weak" only end up revealing their own selfish flaws and limitations.
Gunn doesn't understand Superman.
Ai generated comment
@@Sovereign2319 👏👏👏. This is proof of the upcoming paranoia awaiting a generation of online readers.
My statement is 💯 human initiated, by the way.
That's just right. Superman is a representation of liberty, hope and good, of USA deep roots. James Gunn doesn't know about that, at least iy doesn't show on his movies.
My position is that you don't hire an auteur to be the Big Picture Guy overseeing a franchise. It takes a different skill set.
Nor do you hire the auteur to direct a story with established characters. For these you want someone who is a "gun for hire" to direct because that director will stay on point more often that the auteur who just wants to slather his brand over the established property.
It was Dean Cain in Lois and Clark: The New Adventures of Superman who said, "Clark Kent is who I am. Superman is what I can do."
Gunn's a B-movie hack. He's not even an auteur.
Fucking yikes, James Gunn pretty much said being a decent person is a bad thing. This is the reason people shouldn't support Warner Bros.
I don't know how anyone can say he doesn't understand Superman when we haven't even seen his Superman yet
Yeah, he's not the guy that's gonna give us the definitive DC cinematic universe. Guess we'll just have to keep waiting.
James Gunn doesn't actually read comics but he fooled everyone into thinking he does
While I enjoy Guardians of the galaxy, I don't think Gunn is the person I would go to for a superman movie. Honestly Sam rami is the person I would go to, or at least someone he would recommend since he has a very grounded style to his characters but knows to push the envelope with special effects.
Also I would argue the only real conflict from superman heritage to use is an exterior conflict, meaning the consequences of krypton being destroyed . Example Zodd, the villain in superman earth one etc.
_Brightburn._ Written by Brian and Mark Gunn, and produced by James Gunn. A fundamental misunderstanding of Superman. I don't need the BS Multiverse defense, either. Now James Gunn is going to make _Superman: Legacy._ I can only imagine this means a legacy of bad ideas. They should just call it _Soupy Leftovers._ After what Hollywood has done the past decade to Superman, that's all we're going to get on the big screen.
He's clearly going to do All Star Superman. So his first move is going to be killing off Superman.
My guess is that he's going to do a Super Saccharin tribute/sendoff to Superman, so that he can claim to honor the character whilst disposing of him promptly. So Superman will just be an former icon to the Gunn DCU.
the agenda is to introduce black Superman. that's the goal of woke Hollyweird.
I agree bro and I was thinking the same. Gunn is a great director and he has made great movies but he isn't a good choice for a superman movie. His strenghts are quirky and weird characters and that superman is not.
It's not weakness to uphold your principles, that is why i hate The Batman as a movie, Batman and Alfred are completely out of character, whoever wrote the movie doesn't understand Batman.
Nothing about gunn, says he can do a proper Superman story. He clearly doesn't understand the character or like him.
The dude has a blatant disregard for source material and sheeple praise him for it.
He has no problem insulting customers. He reminds me of tika watitity.
Exactly! James Gunn should stick to horror and gross-out movies even though I did like Super 2010. I also liked his Slither which is an underrated horror, but is too definitely a gross-out comedy movie. Brightburn felt too silly and edgy to be compelling and believable. It just shows the narcissism and the "I don't give a crap about what happens anymore. The universe and world be damned and thrust into hellfire," passive-nihilistic attitude of the 90s and onward because of government oversight, institution corruption, Bush and the Iran and Iraq oil stuff and Hussein Ba'th party stuff. Besides all that, the first couple times I saw Guardians of the Galaxy was great including Dave Bautista's character whom I found charming and funny, but also badass. It also helped that I like Chris Pratt as an actor and didn't mind him being in the MCU. Anyway, I agree with all your conclusions, Prof. I didn't enjoy the following Guardian of the Galaxy films after 1 though.
Brightburn and Gunn and Snyder are what you get when money and greed and narcissism override genuine sincere virtues like hope, loyalty, reverence and worship, morality, goodness and kindness of people, righting wrongs, and courage etc. These people I would be willing to bet if I was a betting man, are the same people who lack these very same principles and are more than likely paid nepo baby sleazebags like Weinstein and co. I don't think Gunn and Snyder knows or even believes in the goodness and kindness of humanity and having heart. It has to be all doom-and-gloom and the next great depression era for everyone. They probably just want to see the world crash and burn up from their ivory sheltered towers. All because they want to morph the USA into what it's not into something unrecognizable and twisted and grim and hellish. They're actually trying to morph youngins' impressionable, gullible still developing minds. Deplorable.
For the record too, I only liked Man of Steel because to his credit Snyder is excellent at visual and special effects directing. And because of Henry Cavill who I mainly enjoyed in Mission Impossible Fallout and The Man from Uncle, the 2000s film adaptation of Count of Monte Cristo and The Witcher. It was just nice to see him doing something different with Man of Steel. Not saying he was good. I didn't expect him to be Superman. Him being fired for my soggy knees just proves to me that Gunn and Snyder and his cohorts are the actual people against women and hate them; not to mention Gunn's sleaziness in how he treats actresses directed and working under him for films. This is the same damn industry that has actual terrible slimy greasy reprehensible people like Weinstein with women, Bryan Singer (X-Men films and others; only he assaulted and manipulated little boys and men). Gunn just happened to be 'different' under some guise of "I love superheroes and comics".
****For more information about Gunn's sleaziness and crimes and questionable behavior, look no further than this video and choosing Saw VI Scream Queen, "That Really Weird James Gunn Saw Themed Reality Show" by In Praise of Shadows. Excellent video and highly informative as it shows you what kind of person and figure James Gunn really is and what monstrous lengths he is capable of. Down with James Gunn and this iteration of DC. His twitter takes and opinions on r4p3 and pD0philia and children were only the TIP of the iceberg.
Preaching the gospel right now 🙏
Gunn is going to butcher Superman and that universe even worse than Zack did. He doesn't have a fundamental understanding of this character thanks to woke Hollyweird's narcissistic attitude about heroism. I haven't supported that industry in a long time and I don't plan on going back for the same helping of sh*t just because its under new management.
I cant stand james gunn fans , to me they are just more annoying than snyder fans.
Waititi fans are even worse. Many of the same people who hated TL&T always loved Thor: Ragnarok. Thor Ragnarok was absolute trash. Utter character assassination
@@leyenda6149 true..but they are a whole another breed of fan since they part of disney.
He probably read JLA Act of God and thinks this is who Superman is. 🙄
How would you compare a character like AXEL FOLEY from Beverly Hills Cop to Superman? I see many similarities, especially how he is actually super competent but often plays a buffoon to fool others. Axel doesn't need to learn anything from his adventures, he changes all of the people around him.
Oh u didnt know ? James gunn is the savior,our guide,he understand everything,hé will be the man who do superman proper...😢😢😅😂
lol he’s going for justice league dark in a way
Thank you
We don't need another origin story. Nobody wants that. That's why the skipped it with new Spiderman movies. They knew we've already seen it a million times. Besides we've already seen this approach with the Snyder movies. Why not keep cavil because everybody loves the guy and he'll put buts in the seats. Use Flashpoint to change his personality to be more in line with his traditional personality. Expand his world. Give him truly worthy enemies to fight. Of whitch there are many, Lobo, braniac etc. And just tell a fun entertaining story. It's not that hard.
I could not agree more. I hate origin stories with every fiber of my being. It's oversaturated, but also lazy as hell. There's so much autism fanboying for Gunn and Origin Stories. People need to learn when enough is enough. I loved the Sam Raimi Spider-Man films because it only had a singular protagonist with one or two clear villains and no other crossover from a different comic of the same franchise unlike MCU and DCU now. And because of 2 and 3 where 2 had major great character development with Peter and him having to think about separating his time as a web-slinging crime fighter and an awkward nerdy boy. Forget about all the woke blackwashing tokenizing crap in the comics nowadays. Fix your characters first and stories then the woke stuff, but until then, hire better competent people and fire Gunn and Snyder (if only). And Lex Luthor is only as good as the director and writers want him to be and he's generic. There's a whole host of villains and dudes for Supes to choose from and fight, kind of like how Antman 3 had him and the Wasp fight Kang only the execution is what I can only describe as 'terri-bad'.
I speak with my wallet and remote. I was willing to give Cavill a chance because there's no other actor out there that can sell Supeman's image. With Gadot and Cavill out, Gunn has begun to feel the pain. Many fans skipped Shazam for that very reason and the fact that they will portray a version of superman as a young man, something we saw ad nauseam in Smallville.
A lot of people in Hollywood don't, but sadly, people will defend him because reasons and desperation. Isn't that one terrible writer that attacked first-responders and hates fans, or is that his own thing?
His slate is an absolute mess, im glad people are begining to get over their recency bias, this reboot is like when DC did the new 52 but kept all of Batman and GL's history while scrapping every other character, Very similar to gunn keeping Suicide Squad his Wife and Peacemaker while scrapping everything else. This slate will only get worse with time these gunn fanboys will see
What is your opinion on the manga Berserk?
I think he likes or loves it. I'm pretty sure I remember from one of his past or older streams about him kind of gushing and fanboying about Berserk. That's usually what happens when get big and deep into Berserk; it's phenomenal and better than half the stuff James Gunn writes and directs. Gunn should stick to horror and gross-out.
So…pattern recognition. Got it.
Both movies of Suicide Squad suck, and no, i will not change my stance on that.
Well, in defense of the first film, it was hastily remade, but Gunn Squad was not remade by anyone.
@@ВіталійКовач-г8ч The first one blows Gunn's live-action cartoon away. Gunn's DC work is garbage.
I think I can defend the title. I'm not in James Gunn's mind, so I don't know his reasons for calling it "Gods and Monsters", but I think the title works. DC characters are the closest thing that we have to gods in a secular society. They've been around longer than the Marvel characters, they've achieved greater cultural penetration than Marvel has and when people think of superheroes, they're the ones they normally think of, in much the same way that people would cite Heracles or Perseus when discussing heroes of antiquity.
As far as Superman goes, I don't have much hope for him getting a good portrayal outside of animation. I've come to the conclusion that it's never going to happen in my lifetime.
Well prepare to be disappointed because peacemaker and gunns suicide squad characters are staying around in his new DCU and he recasted or will recast literally everyone else.
Well the DC characters were based on Greek gods.
only the Greek gods in DC were
@@wa-bu3ke They were brought in later.
Good thing I have the Bruce Timm shows on DVD.
Your completely off when it comes to The Batman movie. That movie was a step in the right direction. All, ALL, the live action Batman movies before it were god awful.. not even just as Batman movies, but just as movies in general too. Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water.
I just got through watching Superman the animated series which I haven’t seen since it air. I am looking forward to that new show “my adventures with Superman”but I am’s sceptical about. I hope it is a more lighthearted and wholesome take on the character.
Back in to my opinion after re-watching Superman damages at deck knows how long. You know that into adjacent to Superman is good but I have noticed a lot of problems that have been creeping up with the county over the years. Unfortunately for whatever reason the DCAU Superman remind me a lot of the Zack Snyder Man of Steel Superman. However by far my biggest problem with the DCAU Superman is its betrayal of Clark Kent. Diversion the Clark asked too much like Superman in this highlight Hollywood biggest phone was Superman.
They only see Superman through his surface level of detail. The only see the super and not the man inside.
Since its debut Superman has arguably involved to be the most human of all superheroes. At a fundamental level he is far more grounded and relatable then Spider-Man/Peter Parker and way more human then will Batman would ever be.
He simply I kindhearted good person at his core who loves his friends, family and home. He started saving people not out of a sense of responsibility but for the love of people. If he didn’t even have powers he is the type of guy would go out and into community surveys purely because he wants to.
His possibilities as Superman just ended up developing over time. Yes, he do use this or that he’s alienated help deflect (and get the word) the public from his real life as quite can’t. But even as the mild-mannered reporter Clark lost his job and the people he worked with. You do what you can to make life better as Clark Kent purely out of love.
I can’t help but be reminded of what Batman sets to the Joker at the end of the dark night. The Joker just refuse to see the good in people, and that is precisely how Hollywood feels about that audience. They refused to believe that a person can purely be good just for the sake of being good.
This is what was one of my favourite superhero movie if not for a movie of all time is “Superman versus the elite”.
Sorry for long post. But as a some point I just got through watching Superman the anime series and I am looking forward to that new show. Or being hopefully optimistic about it.