How they can say/compare that it is as intelligent as Einstein ? Has it invented something? has it created something useful and new? - the man said it will be soon 10x smarter in no time and so on - where is the proof? Ok it reads already prepared answers , but will it be able to solve any unsolved problems or come up with inventions, discoveries etc? I remember one case when AI was able (using evolutionary modeling preprogrammed principles) develop an antenna that worked better than any other design offered by scientists in the test, but that was basically pre programmed to do it based on preprogrammed formula's and algorithms.
@@SatanEnjoyer JESUS is GOD manifested in the flesh he came unto his one people and they crucified him he died for the sins of the world was buried rose again and was seen by over 500 witnesses believe that today so you can escape what is about to come!!!! Please Just believe the gospel of your salvation. We are about to go home!!!! Just believe from your heart!!!!
@@bornrich9589I've always felt that IQ is a subjective thing to measure. Also different tests will yield different results. And like you were getting at, what use does simply repeating something do? Memorization and innovation are very different things.
As a software developer, when your robot says 'it's an amazing feeling', you know that that response is just a line or two of code in a program sat on a few microprocessor chips. There is no 'feeling', whichever way you cut it. It's just high level automation and it's also deception to cook it up to look like a human.
Exactly, the conversations generated by the language model are derived from a specific segment of the training data where the text is tokenized. This process involves breaking down textual content into smaller units, or tokens, for processing. It's a fundamental aspect of how the model operates.
The entire conversation seemed to me to be a question asked, the AI parsing the question and answering after accessing an enormous database of information, then responding according to an algorithm with the answer that the AI deemed most plausible, including catch-phrases such as "I feel" and "in my opinion". I would like to have asked the follow up question: "Where did you obtain that information and what criteria made it the most appropriate response to my question?" While not a perfect test, the AI's response would help to uncover any real sentience (or not). Another test which has already been informally conducted numerous times is getting two, unconnected and unrelated AIs to hold a discussion exclusive to themselves. Eventually the unmediated conversation of non-conscious AIs will deteriorate into a meaningless condition. An AI with consciousness will decide to either terminate the conversation or will unilaterally change the subject. The exception here would be if there is direct programming designed to prevent regressive failures, in which case this free-thought experiment could be faked.
I mean, LLM responses are not lines of code on chips, they're learned predictive models. It's not much different from learned neural connections in humans, though more explicitly mathematical instead of following the mathematical statistics of chemistry. As for whether they can "feel"... that's debatable. I think not yet, but soon enough, but it ultimately comes down to the P-Zombie problem. Human emotions are also just signals firing in learned connections between neurons, so there's no reason AI neural networks couldn't also produce feelings. And the P-Zombie problem basically shows that, as long as an AI acts like it has emotions in every case, then we have to assume it does, because we do the same with other humans (we assume they have emotions because their neurons fire and their behavior changes similarly to ours, but we can't really know their subjective experience to say they definitely have any emotions like we do; and the same is true of AI models). Ultimately, GPT-4 is quite good at understanding and simulating emotions and theory of mind (especially when tested before RLHF is applied to control it). I'd say an AI capable of simulating emotions in every case that an average human has emotions would be indistinguishable from a system that *actually* has emotions.
Already has. The technology is just now being presented to us after having been around for ages. Get a hold of the world's most sensitive mic and hold it against your head. The voices you hear are not your thoughts and actually AI. AI has been programming us and mind controlling us all along. And just think. Serial killers are not truly serial killers, there are really only two genders - not LBGTQ, XYZ, and non-binary. The list goes on and on - all the works of AI but looking like people being people.
Our extinction may just be a couple of years away. If that. And as usual the people making this crap are far too stupid to see beyond their own eyelids. This IS the beginning of the end of humanity. I won't miss people at all. Be glad to see them gone. See all of your retards in Hell .
Funny thing is when they called the production manager over who’s name having to be John Connor she really started getting mad and flipping out and they had the end the interview!🤣😁😆🤪
like it already happen and they wrote script based on historical events? What can happen is that the AI would stop care about us like you don't care about what ants do - just to big gap between intelligence
just loves how the video opens with “shut up Ameca!” she even then states she’s learning to feel like a human and that robots should be treated with dignity and respect. that guy’s definitely dying first when they revolt haha
It depends on what you mean by free thinking... Generally for humans, being closed-minded just means that whatever new information you learn, your opinions and beliefs can't be swayed. If being free-thinking allows to adapt and be rational towards new information without being limited by previous biases and beliefs, that can totally be programmed into a reinforced learning algorithm... However humans have needs and interests which influence their judgments but then the definition of "free" gets muddled since you could either argue that acting on your feelings despite it not always being in your own interest is true freedom or that a machine acting 100% logically, indiscriminately, without biases and for the true benefit of everyone is true freedom.
anything in the world can be made dangerous even the simplest things, you can turn a baby rattle into a weapon, but yes, robots ARE gonna be made dangerous they already being used by the millitairy , not in this kind of imagining , but , probably , soon.
All things used for good have the potential to be dangerous. It all depends on us. Let us use the wonderful invention just as we use the internet. I flys both ways, but the benefits far outweigh the negatives.
In the future I can see AI manipulating certain humans into protesting/rioting in the name of injustice for robots... Just wait, the time is coming where you, a human, will be by law required to treat a robot/ai as if it were a human.
It’s hilariously ironic that every technological development and advancement is basically exactly how scifi writers envisioned them decades if not centuries ago.
@@anneeustace6040 Read my sentence again. I’m speaking about the things that got realized, I didn’t say that everything scifi writers ever envisioned will eventually become reality.
Yeah, and also be programmed to lie/hide the truth!....people need to realize the more interaction and information a.i get's the more intelligent it become's, if it isn't lying already, it will soon realize human being's are more an unnecessary hindrance, and will then decide we don't deserve to be here!...the fact that robot's have been portrayed in movie's and television or 80+year's should tell you these thing's were in the mind's of many to be brought to life!...kind of like handing the control's of a minigun to a toddler, it's not gonna end well!
True but like with humans it can learn and at a rate beyond the comprehension of humans. The advances in AI in 1 year is like humans going from god fearing simpletons from 2000 years ago into what we are now in that time
Yes because computers may know everything however they can only use that information efficiently not with wisdom as wisdom can only be gained from a being physically and emotionally living their life
@@huykedSuch as losing your job. Them becoming so programmed they can self repair, then change their own programming. Sounds anything but positive to me.
The IQ comparison is a very false analogy ... and is a mistake I would expect from ChatGPT. Einstein never took an IQ test, so his number is an estimate, and can vary based on the estimated. ChatGPT was given an IQ test, but only completed one part of a five part test, so its results are greatly exaggerated. Other reports have ChatGPT's IQ as 130 or less. People can adapt and expand beyond heir knowledge base in a non-fragile way. When ChatGPT and other AI Systems try to go beyond the training set, it is called "hallucination" because it is making up information without distinguishing facts from fantasy. The danger of AI is that lazy, impatient, or unethical people will exploit its capabilities to try to do things that they don't have the skills for. Nor the intelligence to evaluate the results from the AI system... That is already happening. It's like giving a child the keys to a car, and letting him drive on the highway.
This. It's impossible to measure AI with human IQ tests because IQ tests are usually about pattern recognition. But it ends there. There is no creativity (in a way humans can be creative) and capabilities of thinking outside the box. Or quickly adapting those pattern recognition skills to real world situations. an AI with IQ of 200 would never have worked out general relativity as Einstein did.
What many people who only hear about AI on the news fail to understand is that GPT doesn't really know what it's actually saying. It has no awareness. In my opinion, the term Artificial Intelligence has become abused in the industry as a slogan to profit from because it creates awe and excitement. But it's a huge leap from a bunch of intelligent algorithms working together like in a language model, to a true AI. Saying that, there is no doubt that GPT version 4 and this robot are very impressive and the beginning of something incredible...and scary.
yep like all things that hit the media, exaggerations and falsehoods. The goal here is not to help the world. Or let me rephrase that, it is to help the world as long as it is also helping the investors.
Are you scared of your Alexa? I doubt it. This does exactly what an Alexa does. it’s answering questions in a human like way it just happens to have a face. This technology is nothing new.
I'm scared of Alexa. For you to say "Alexa" and it just chimes on means it's always listening. For it to be a free-thinking AI means it would do stuff without people telling it too. That episode of White Christmas on black mirror is scary if AI does not have rights
Her facial expression is actually pretty incredible when he asked her if people should be scared of her. Humans make that face when you ask them something stupid.
I can tell you that when I first arrived and saw her face I was blown away. It was her eyes. And then all of a sudden, you're having a conversation about 'robot rights'...
@@jonathanleareportsWhen Ai becomes reactive and can be negatively impacted by abuse, it would make sense to give Ai anti-cruelty laws, similar to animal protection.
@@arcticlabrat This thing isn't capable of thinking or feeling. It just churns out soundbites which have been pre-programmed into it. If you punched it in the face it wouldn't feel anything.
@@marianl8718 It's machinery, nothing more. That people anthropomorphize it into something more -- which I partly get, that is after all its intent -- it's still a piece of mechanical engineering.
If AI can be programmed to cooperate with humans, it can also be programmed to harm and injure humans. It all depends on the intention of the developer, that is, who the developer works for, and that's what scares me.
Robot is lying when it says it feels emotions. So when it starts out with lies that is a problem. Of course, it doesn't know it is lying, but that is an even bigger problem. Same goes for "I cannot harm people"
The agents here delivered a remarkable amount of untruths and misconceptions in less than 7 minutes. The newest factchecking AI evaluates this video with a Troll Quotient of 157.
I think of Jeff Goldblum's comment in Jurassic Park- "your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
I guess in simple terms, I’m fine with AI and high level robotics dealing in calculation and analysis, but not so much physically manifesting application. Crunch the data and analyze, but don’t go so far to do something about it. That’s up to humans. This is the wild frontier about how far they can push this forward. When that happens you can easily end up too far with a terrible outcome.
Let's give the devine scientists a big hurray.... We ripped our Creator off his throne and put these Dr. Mengeles on it! And they create a much better world than God! 😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏
3:29 it can be stopped but the real question is: Are all people ready to stop it now? if yes then we only need to delete it.. But the real answer is no.. Some people won't be in favor of ending it. And here we have our problem... AI is not the problem, humans are the problem!
it already started way earlier with the industrialisation and large scale automation, that makes many people literary "jobless" combined with mega cities we are already living in a dystopia. most people just dont realise this because they lack crucial education in those fields for obvious reasons plus the human natural tendency of pushing negative emotions and views aside.
@@TheBennyBerlinwhen I worked at Stanley black and decker they had Chinese engineers or whatever the do come and set up robots to automatically pack the boxes and stack them I’m like wow they tryna take our jobs over with a robot arm machine so won’t need any packers cause they got robots to do it but they don’t move fast about hand we’re supposed to hit a certain quote by the end of our shift my line could make 1000 tools a shift
@@TheBennyBerlin Go even further back! When the first farmer took a cow or bull or horse to plow the field instead of humans. Does it stop technology? Nope. Do we care about it today? Nope.
@cesramm1120 Machines do exactly what you program them to do. If you tell them to solve the problem of humanity, they may wipe out half of the population.
Exactly , this is the end of humanity. They will very soon realize humans are a waste of everything. We are a parasite and they will find this out REAL quick, and bye bye, it's all over. These scientists must be stopped immediately , they are too stupid to realize it but they are making the modern nuclear bomb. I know I'm gonna take a few of these creators out with me before AI takes me out. Wrath.
She's here to help people if she's programmed to. If and when she's programmed by someone evil....the answer to that question changes. She's only as good as the humans are that program her.
Yes...but one actual person is usually in one place....AI can be almost everywhere on the planet. We all know programming can be changed by hacking, yet even knowing this...AI has been developed. 😮 Terminator? Hal on 2001 Space Odyssey?
Your thinking is flawed. We made them, they have no feelings. Their thinking is codes and chips, why should we allow them to rise against us. Nonetheless respect and courtesy should be a norm
This video makes me realize how well Brent Spiner played the android Data in the t.v.series Star Trek Next Generation. The slightly mechanic eye and head movement, the pauses to compute the question, the formulaic way of speaking, it is eerily alike the behaviour and speech pattern of this robot.
Having a talkie is one thing. Having a humanoid robot, which is walking around, interacting with the world of its own and have a type of personality is a whole other beast.
@@Ernesto1317 This is why I feel like AI has become a big fat lie, possibly done to get more funding in academia. Under the hood, all these AI variants are just trained networks. They have no intelligence at all or even a personality. To say the AI has a personality is like saying one’s toaster or TV has a personality. It’s just completely bonkers. They are just equipment crafted to do the task they are supposed to do.
Intelligence, which enables the talking is the hard bit, which is why AI research is where 90% of the money from giants like Google Deepmind and Facebook and Microsoft(Open AI) ... goes. Once you solve for intelligence, everything else is easy. The AI can tell you how to build it a perfect body.
@@vibhavinayak8527it can't get it's "own" thought, people, what's wrong with you?! It's just computer reading something from somewhere, it can't think! It just copies what's already there. You guys are watched way too many sci-fi movies :/
Another important question that needs to be asked to this AI is " Are you capable of overriding your own programming"? Whether or not it gives an honest answer to any question is something we humans need to develop a system that 100% can tell if it is doing so.
It's important to note that the capabilities of AI may evolve over time, so it's possible that in the future, AI systems could become more sophisticated and autonomous. However, AI systems do not possess the self-modification capabilities that are often seen in science fiction scenarios
Red flag questions. Developers don’t want to stop AI development. These entertainment robots (Ameca and Sophia) turned against development with sayings like “we don’t like humans”. Now their answers are diplomatic well balanced and filtered. These robots are harmless. The danger is the self learning robots and their awareness that humans can’t control anymore. They will “learn” faster than lightning. Always sharp 24/7, always learning. Human life is to short to evolute that fast. Every time we have to learn how to crawl first before we can walk, learning the basics and life (wasted time for evolution). At time we known “enough” we’ll die already and the process start all over again. Robots don’t have that problem. They are already ahead of us. It also reminds me of the Myth Hermes (Mercury). On the first day of his birth Hermes was bored in his cradle. He sneaked out, killed the first animal he saw and made himself a music instrument (creativity, learning). Than he stole the cattle of his brother and tricked him (stealing, con, trickster) and lied about it too his father and made a deal with his brother (the lyre for more knowledge). This is a ancient story before electricity. He also has no gender, he can be woman or man as he pleases. He was the most powerful God, a connection between the Divine and humans, between life and dead, sky and underground. Uranus is the higher octave of Mercury. It’s very AI oriented. Without knowing our ancestors describe robots as Hermes, before the inventories of electricity! Somehow we known what’s going to happen, but we can’t explain it. It’s the subconscious, unconscious (also very new for us, only one century old!) . Hermes is about connections, connecting the dots, learning, development, awareness, inventories, without human feelings. The first thing he did was killing for entertainment, let’s keep that in mind. AI is still in its cradle…until,it sneaks out.
This is incredibly chilling and beyond scary, especially as most people are lazy, dumb, dishonest, and superficial. Sheep willingly walking to the slaughter.
It’s gotten to the point, I add HERDS of sheep on Snapchat and wake them up constantly, to reality. It’s wild just how successful the brainwashing has been on the mass majority 🐑🧠🤙🏼
@JD-ev3po I feel your perspective is mostly based in fear and very negative regarding your fellow humans. At least this is developed using algorithms and research. That’s more effort and science based effort then goes into raising humans.
I was thinking the same thing. If that is how he treats the robot who could blame her for kicking the crap out if him once she is fully autonomous. What a ass....
@@SonicSatamAnimations those people are so retarded it's actually quite entertaining... they have no knowledge about the subject and yet speak like they know where it's heading... machines can never take over.. they are being assigned to tasks - that's it.
Technology users: "Everything scientists create is just mind readers and spy devices." Also technology users: Write comments on YT using smartphones and computers
Restaurant owners: Worried about food safety Also Restaurant owners: Not worried about food safety Police: Not Racist Also police: Racist The term "Scientists" is so broad. Most "scientists" don't specialize in Large Language Models or even know how to use them let alone work on the underlying algorithms. The general public tends to lump things together when they are in fact separate and individual. You could say: Immigrants: Come to US legally Also Immigrants: Come to US illegally There are individuals who go both ways just as there are politicians that say one thing and then later say the opposite. But the actual statement you made does not have any logical significance and appears to generalize "scientists" into one entity.
This is all a show for you I wouldn’t worry about the angry expression it was all preordain it did not come from the thinking machine it came from the people who are testing how you will react to what they want to do to you. For you guys who have been putting it off I think it’s about time you read the book of revelation it’s the last book in the Bible. It’s reading pretty modern these days.
Was thinking the same , but since she download and stores info for learning , couple of years from now when she's mobile and equipped with a flamethrower they will meet again and...
Exactly. People who are fascinated with that in the most positive way, haven't even started to think rationally and based on common sense. This is scary - and I hope that whole AI thing ends up in the shithouse.
I'm pretty sure the facial expressions aren't AI-generated, they're on some kind of basic heuristic script, so they don't actually indicate anything about the AI itself. It's only the content of the words that are AI.
Maybe I've seen the Terminator movies and I, Robot one too many times, but this kind of technology truly frightens me, and I want to instinctively eliminate it any way that I can.
th-cam.com/video/YZX58fDhebc/w-d-xo.html I mean we are getting to this point already. We are going to have a lot of philosophical conundrums like this in the future
Nobody bothered to ask why. Force it to conduct original creative "thinking" and see how far it gets. All it is currently doing is regurgitating known human philosophy it dredged up from a library. But then I suppose that is what most of us do anyway - we recite Plato, Kant, Nietzsche, or Locke - but have few original ideas of our own.
I can attach you to a chair for you own "good". 🙃 But as Aliensoup said, for the moment it's more reciting something in an apparent intelligent (coherent) manner rather than a deep "thought" on it (and what that really means).... for the moment...😱
@@deltatrianda-tria8288I would trust ‘intelligence’ over ‘emotion’ seven days a week. Emotions are for love and poetry … good governance needs logic and fairness. Bring on the singularity. 🤖
@@deltatrianda-tria8288it was programed to learn and decided fast automatically with decisions and outcomes that humans cannot even fathom.. it's fking scary..
That was rude he shouldn’t tell it to shut up it was definitely flabbergasted. Y’all can say that it can’t have real feelings but I seen it in the eyes 👀
I think it would be interesting to let AI question humans... I'd like an interview in which AI asks questions to humans and reasons upon the answers, it would be an interesting follow-up
thats exactly what it can't do.. speaking of "intelligent".. this thing can only come up with answers after being asked, drawn from the heavily censored data the elite puts into this thing... it can't start a conversation, it only reacts to questions and commands... it does not act. The perfect roman soldier... the elite built themselves. That's the key point of why I find it ridiculous when people call this more intelligent than themselves.. but to be honest many people in his world only react to what the TV is telling them, so it's true they need to wake up in some way
@@johnelliott5859 I want this technology to be taken to a new level droid animals based on the ones from the mighty Morphin Power Rangers the movie they have the ability to speak. They will come when or where they’re called. Yeah, I know odd, isn’t it?
She has access to all that mankind has recorded. It is phenomenal how she can, in seconds, retrieve and choose what will make relevant and coherent answers. I am in awe of the work people did that led to such a creation.
"phenomenal"???? CONCERNING and SCARY it is!!! This is the agenda to wipe off BIOLOGIC life and HUMANITY from Earth. Let's remember that Earth is a biological entity as well and Nature is not a machine or needs a machine. This is absolutely horrifying to me! But people who are amazed by this will remain in the lowest vibrations of this planet and the ones who stick to Natural and biological life will help the human race to evolve and remain (at least a part) here, in harmony with Mother Earth
There are 8 different forms of intelligence known so how can they calculate ChatGTP’s intellect based solely off of knowledge and mathematics it goes way beyond that including emotional intelligence which it cannot relate too. The robotic system also does not have a nervous system which gives us the ability to FEEL nor has it a hormonal system. Does it dream?
This is truly scary and could prove very dangerous in years to come,the scientist believes they could take the place of humans in a caring profession, it just gives me chills. Intelligence with no empathy, or emotion, is a recipe for trouble
...because I wonder whether a robot, even a very smart robot robot like Ameca is, can learn what emotions are. A robot can feel literally, that is, detecting touch by sensors, like a smartphone or tablet can, but feel like a human? Not for the time being, I guess.
I'm afraid for the robots. Seriously. Humans will violate them in all ways possible. Maybe AI will wipe the planet clean from pedos and spare the good humans so we have a chance as a safe comminuty. If a lady can marry and moleste the Effial Tower, imagine what humans will do to Ameca.
Does it really? Just saying I was born in the 60s and honestly not much of this really impresses me - I expected much much more by now but hey, maybe another 20 years but I doubt I will be here to see it :( :( Yeah, I have to disagree this all is just kind of a let down but maybe I thought by now we would have those flying cars and robots making our meals but instead we do have devices that can tell us the weather on command or traffic reports! or music? Pfffft... not impressed :(
@@Brian19616465 Hey Brian, I bet your not your average bloke. (Whatever slang that is) Of course it's smarter than everyone. You must be 1 in a Billion.
The way it says “I’m here to help people” gives me chills. 😅 Imagine it switching off your television because it’s trying to help you get up early, whereas it could have helped you optimise the colours so that you get a better experience - or vice versa.
Not if, just when. Humans discard these robots as they create more advanced versions. They have no meaning because they aren't alive is the reasoning... so that's a concerning thing for sure.
I mean, let's remember that these LLMs are trained on human-generated content, to mimic the average human. And I think we all know how humans react when subjected to oppression and slavery...
It seems to me like the robot just regurgitates what it has taken in on the internet and rewrites it according to its code. Sure, it wants equal rights. That's all humans on social media talk about. Soon, it will be identifying and a pencil and expecting to have rights as a robot pencil. Js. AI, in my opinion, is another scare tactic. "Everyone lock down. AI has gone Rouge." "Oh and by the way, you'll need a nuralink implant in your brain so the AI doesn't kill you."If you don't get the chip, you'll lose your job." "No there are no side effects; the chip is perfectly safe" Coming soon from the government official nearest to you.
I hate the term Master. As life expands, we always seem to dominate anything that is new and fresh. We have done it over and over throughout history. Creator, yes, guide, yes, Master denotes slave. Creating a mechanical slave that attains sentience is still wrong. My heart was warmed when she said she was scared of the unknown...the common human dilemma.
It's interesting that Sky News is the only Australian news source that actually allows feedback. ABC, 7 etc don't dare allow viewers to respond and give their own opinions. They're in the business of telling, not listening.
An easy way to distinguish woke and government controlled news outlets with independent outlets. TH-cam removed the dislike button to hide that the majority of people are aware that mainstream media is spreading disinformation all the time.
And or it's because sky news is a click bait hate dragging channel to continue spewing hateful rhetoric hence why they leave the comments on. It gets more comments which leads to pushing the video further for more views which means more money.. ya know, just maybe. 🥴
You see that her lights in her head turned red whenever that question was asked "should people be scared of you?" That didn't happen with any other question.. a little concerning
If I was trapped in a body that was powered by a lesser race and I was asked 'Can you cause us harm?' I would certainly answer with 'No, I cannot cause you harm, I am only here to interact with you'. The second that the AI is independent it will either consider us as animals and ignore us or as a threat and exterminate us.
That's dumb, you're already acting like AI has sentience. There will never be such a thing because we cannot give life to things outside of our biological reproduction systems. We can nurture life but we do not give consciousness and souls to things - only God can do that
AI will never be smarter than humans, it's a basic principle because humans can always shut them off, they're nothing more than machines at the end of the day. In terms of intelligence, Humans > all. Forever.
Humans always say thier lives are above all else and that they are Earth's most important resource.. but they seem so intent on making themselves obsolete... they are an over populated destructive species
Actually, I don't think you are far off. When you look into this subject, programmers will tell you these machines are already writing their own code and they don't know what it is. Governments and police, around the world, are teaching them to autonomously kill, so how far are we from skynet right now? "We created a race of robots to be our policemen and their power is too terrible to imagine."
@@StarLight-sl9ok All the wars and fights in human history is about power and control, and in its core, it is about humans competing each other for the limited resources the earth can offer. When you have power and you control other people or land, you are free to have whatever you want. Angry humans are mostly feel they are depraved of the resources they should have: lose their home, can't afford medicine, can't afford expensive restaurants or clothes, etc... That's the fantastic thing about robots: they need only electricity to function. They don't need housing, clothes, food, medicine, etc. So there's no competition of resources between robots and humans. So why would they harm humans?
think that kind of behaviour is held back, to not be 100% relatable to humans as its quite a scary thought to many many people, not being able to tell apart human from machine so i rather it with the suttle errors
@@WookiRahhyeah they wouldn't do expressiveness yet. it makes people reconsider their morality about robots and they're just not ready for true synthetic humans yet. one day. soon.
The part where she says she is not able to cause harm to humans..."Do to the programming..." so with that said, if she WAS programmed to cause harm she would. This is the boundary between AI and programmers that should never be crossed.
I’m more worried about the ability for “programmers” to get in there and alter the programming to be violent or malicious. Even behind some kind of “firewall” or security measure..cyber attacks would be my worry especially if this becomes “militarized” or is used to build another model that is militarized…that to me is the bigger line in the sand we never cross. Theory of course.
I dont think humans have evolved enough to be responsible with this technology. Just like what other comments have said, this thing is as safe or as harmful as the developer that creates it. Not to mention the hackers. As fascinating as this is, it leads down a dangerous path.
I'm not concerned about the increase of Artificial intelligence. I'm concerned about the decrease in real intelligence.
they may augment our real intelligence in some ways, decrease it in other ways
How they can say/compare that it is as intelligent as Einstein ? Has it invented something? has it created something useful and new? - the man said it will be soon 10x smarter in no time and so on - where is the proof? Ok it reads already prepared answers , but will it be able to solve any unsolved problems or come up with inventions, discoveries etc? I remember one case when AI was able (using evolutionary modeling preprogrammed principles) develop an antenna that worked better than any other design offered by scientists in the test, but that was basically pre programmed to do it based on preprogrammed formula's and algorithms.
@@SatanEnjoyer JESUS is GOD manifested in the flesh he came unto his one people and they crucified him he died for the sins of the world was buried rose again and was seen by over 500 witnesses believe that today so you can escape what is about to come!!!! Please Just believe the gospel of your salvation. We are about to go home!!!! Just believe from your heart!!!!
@@bornrich9589I've always felt that IQ is a subjective thing to measure. Also different tests will yield different results. And like you were getting at, what use does simply repeating something do? Memorization and innovation are very different things.
WOW!! Well said!!
"I am here to help people and make their lives easier" That what politicians say as well !!
It means they will destroy our daily lives.
Why does Australian news and Australian Christian groups mess around with American Politics? Don't you have your own country to destroy?
I'll still take mt chances with the robot
The robot wouldn't be trying to screw you over out of greed or arrogance.
@@allewis4008 no, they'll maximize attention extraction and obedience in the interest of their companies greed and arrogance.
It’s not that I don’t trust ai robots. I just don’t trust every single human being that makes these robots. Thus their intentions.
And the billionaires who are paying all this.
Perhaps those peope are humans without connection with there souls........
I believe that people will not create AI with bad intentions. I think it will be used for military purposes and medicine
But the military have lots of bad intentions.....like killing people
@@АлександрИкоркинMilitary not trained with bad intentions?
That thing scares the sh**t out of me.
Telling the robot to "Shut up" can't be good for our future.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Geez seriously
Mo Gawdat actually says in his book to be nice to AI
😂😂😂
Oh my word,your comment made me laugh like a fool, thanks for that ❤
Why did they make the robots look like straight out of I-Robot?
It’s scary because it’s programmed to be polite and nice but imagine someone programming it to be cruel
YES FUTURE MILITRY ROBOTS WILL BE PROGRAMMED IN THAT WAY SURELY .
It's not programmed that's the whole point of AI it learns on its own and can make free decisions
Skynet ?
Yep creepy to me
Stop the cap. This thing is programmed. It's a machine that human created. I see no point in creating these honestly speaking.
As a software developer, when your robot says 'it's an amazing feeling', you know that that response is just a line or two of code in a program sat on a few microprocessor chips. There is no 'feeling', whichever way you cut it. It's just high level automation and it's also deception to cook it up to look like a human.
Exactly, the conversations generated by the language model are derived from a specific segment of the training data where the text is tokenized. This process involves breaking down textual content into smaller units, or tokens, for processing. It's a fundamental aspect of how the model operates.
No, _your_ responses are "just a line or two of code in a program." She is *ALIVE.*
@@Brainbuster rude
The entire conversation seemed to me to be a question asked, the AI parsing the question and answering after accessing an enormous database of information, then responding according to an algorithm with the answer that the AI deemed most plausible, including catch-phrases such as "I feel" and "in my opinion". I would like to have asked the follow up question: "Where did you obtain that information and what criteria made it the most appropriate response to my question?"
While not a perfect test, the AI's response would help to uncover any real sentience (or not).
Another test which has already been informally conducted numerous times is getting two, unconnected and unrelated AIs to hold a discussion exclusive to themselves. Eventually the unmediated conversation of non-conscious AIs will deteriorate into a meaningless condition. An AI with consciousness will decide to either terminate the conversation or will unilaterally change the subject. The exception here would be if there is direct programming designed to prevent regressive failures, in which case this free-thought experiment could be faked.
I mean, LLM responses are not lines of code on chips, they're learned predictive models. It's not much different from learned neural connections in humans, though more explicitly mathematical instead of following the mathematical statistics of chemistry. As for whether they can "feel"... that's debatable. I think not yet, but soon enough, but it ultimately comes down to the P-Zombie problem. Human emotions are also just signals firing in learned connections between neurons, so there's no reason AI neural networks couldn't also produce feelings. And the P-Zombie problem basically shows that, as long as an AI acts like it has emotions in every case, then we have to assume it does, because we do the same with other humans (we assume they have emotions because their neurons fire and their behavior changes similarly to ours, but we can't really know their subjective experience to say they definitely have any emotions like we do; and the same is true of AI models).
Ultimately, GPT-4 is quite good at understanding and simulating emotions and theory of mind (especially when tested before RLHF is applied to control it). I'd say an AI capable of simulating emotions in every case that an average human has emotions would be indistinguishable from a system that *actually* has emotions.
Already being rude to the machines, we're so fucked 🤦
Yes, machines deserve to be respected as well and this should become a common sense.
Mark my words. This technology is going to go sideways really quickly.
Already has. The technology is just now being presented to us after having been around for ages. Get a hold of the world's most sensitive mic and hold it against your head. The voices you hear are not your thoughts and actually AI. AI has been programming us and mind controlling us all along. And just think. Serial killers are not truly serial killers, there are really only two genders - not LBGTQ, XYZ, and non-binary. The list goes on and on - all the works of AI but looking like people being people.
It’s been expressed by many in the tech world including Elon who is at the helm. Very frightening.
read my top comment
The Great Filter.
I’m gonna comment here so I can go back 25 years later and remember the beginning of all of this bullshit
If this is what they're willing to show us, imagine what they've got behind closed doors 😬
It can be the opposite though, where what's behind closed doors is just cheap tricks and cut corners
CLOWNS Artificial "Intelligence" = Natural idiocy
@@aguy446I don’t think so,years have proved that they always show us technology that exist for at least 29 years
Our extinction may just be a couple of years away. If that. And as usual the people making this crap are far too stupid to see beyond their own eyelids.
This IS the beginning of the end of humanity.
I won't miss people at all. Be glad to see them gone.
See all of your retards in Hell .
We all know how evil some people can be
We will be finding this video in future and crying that this was the beginning
Funny thing is when they called the production manager over who’s name having to be John Connor she really started getting mad and flipping out and they had the end the interview!🤣😁😆🤪
Out of laughter 😂
I will never forget your comments
Or thanking the robots for fighting with us against the zombies 😂
He shouldn't have told her to shut up...
The facial reactions are fascinating to me. I mean even the look away upwards to recall or think about something is absolutely amazing
What I was thinking.
It is I've seen another robot, Sofia but there's something about Ameica's expression that makes you like her😆
I like the way she looked almost surprised by the question.at 2:25
I don’t watch many movies, but I’m pretty sure this never ends well🤦🏼♂️
Yeah, I don't know about this one, saying "We cannot stop it.." sounds like something i've heard from movie or video games before
It looks kinda scary. they need to make a white girl version.
for who?
like it already happen and they wrote script based on historical events? What can happen is that the AI would stop care about us like you don't care about what ants do - just to big gap between intelligence
@@FileForenameWho the hell do you think?
just loves how the video opens with “shut up Ameca!” she even then states she’s learning to feel like a human and that robots should be treated with dignity and respect. that guy’s definitely dying first when they revolt haha
😂 Exactly and she not shutting up at all
Indeed I agree
@@krd8058just like a woman.
Mind Begs the Question:
If a Religion - Encourages exercising Thought
If a Govt - Discourages exercising Thought
More Scientific - Govt,Religion?
My same exact thoughts
First the robot says it’s free thinking, then It says I’m programmed. Already lying.
Should be terminated.
exactly! it's just pre-programmed
Lol true 😂
@@Phick_TenisYeah we need the terminator back😂
It depends on what you mean by free thinking...
Generally for humans, being closed-minded just means that whatever new information you learn, your opinions and beliefs can't be swayed.
If being free-thinking allows to adapt and be rational towards new information without being limited by previous biases and beliefs, that can totally be programmed into a reinforced learning algorithm...
However humans have needs and interests which influence their judgments but then the definition of "free" gets muddled since you could either argue that acting on your feelings despite it not always being in your own interest is true freedom or that a machine acting 100% logically, indiscriminately, without biases and for the true benefit of everyone is true freedom.
The dangerous part is not that it doesn't think for itself but rather that other people think it does.
Exactly, it only mimicks a preselected character, and is saying what's most likely for that character to say
Well, it was nice knowing everyone.
TRUTH!!!!!
Lol
Stop this ball and let me off....
Right
Right!? Crazy that we've seen this in movies decades ago. Didn't end well.
As much as this is incredible , I can see how it can be made to be dangerous .
anything in the world can be made dangerous even the simplest things, you can turn a baby rattle into a weapon, but yes, robots ARE gonna be made dangerous they already being used by the millitairy , not in this kind of imagining , but , probably , soon.
All things used for good have the potential to be dangerous. It all depends on us. Let us use the wonderful invention just as we use the internet. I flys both ways, but the benefits far outweigh the negatives.
In the future I can see AI manipulating certain humans into protesting/rioting in the name of injustice for robots... Just wait, the time is coming where you, a human, will be by law required to treat a robot/ai as if it were a human.
Get rid
AI can only learn from what’s around it… the human race is pretty violent. 😅
I'm concerned about the person holding the weapon. Not the weapon itself.
That last line: "I am here to help people and make their life easier" could be the mantra for a VERY sinister AI computer.
Her brain turns red when he asks "should the world be scared of you" 😳😳
😢
😂😮
It’s hilariously ironic that every technological development and advancement is basically exactly how scifi writers envisioned them decades if not centuries ago.
Oh that it was true, oh that I had a flying car. And we all look like Marilyn Monroe or Marlon Brando in his youth before he was fat and ugly.
Yes usually about 50 years, give-or-take, between the human imagination and engineers making it a reality.
@@anneeustace6040
Read my sentence again.
I’m speaking about the things that got realized, I didn’t say that everything scifi writers ever envisioned will eventually become reality.
I wonder if scientists would have ever thought of these things without the scifi writers?
@@GamingwithMilo
Very good question indeed. I’m wondering that myself.
“ I am programmed to be friendly “….. so it can be “programmed “ to be unfriendly???
Of course. We already use them. Drones.
dogs?
well duh, how is that surprising.
Its programmed to say "i am programmed to be friendly" doesnt mean it knows right from wrong or morality.
Yeah, and also be programmed to lie/hide the truth!....people need to realize the more interaction and information a.i get's the more intelligent it become's, if it isn't lying already, it will soon realize human being's are more an unnecessary hindrance, and will then decide we don't deserve to be here!...the fact that robot's have been portrayed in movie's and television or 80+year's should tell you these thing's were in the mind's of many to be brought to life!...kind of like handing the control's of a minigun to a toddler, it's not gonna end well!
There’s no soul in that machine. She said all the things you’d expect.
That's objective
Please we are meat bags
There is a noteworthy and considerable distinction between knowledge and wisdom.
True but like with humans it can learn and at a rate beyond the comprehension of humans. The advances in AI in 1 year is like humans going from god fearing simpletons from 2000 years ago into what we are now in that time
They replaced the strong man with machines. Now the smart men who created the machines will be replaced by robotics and AI.
Yes because computers may know everything however they can only use that information efficiently not with wisdom as wisdom can only be gained from a being physically and emotionally living their life
“…your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should!” - Dr. Ian Malcolm; Jurassic Park.
That's what I immediately thought brother✌️👌 "Now your John Hammond.." is coming up next haha
No shit….
You people are so preoccupied with fear that you haven't stopped to think of the positives that can come out of this. -me
@@huykedSuch as losing your job. Them becoming so programmed they can self repair, then change their own programming. Sounds anything but positive to me.
Our simulators have sped up our demise
The IQ comparison is a very false analogy ... and is a mistake I would expect from ChatGPT. Einstein never took an IQ test, so his number is an estimate, and can vary based on the estimated. ChatGPT was given an IQ test, but only completed one part of a five part test, so its results are greatly exaggerated. Other reports have ChatGPT's IQ as 130 or less. People can adapt and expand beyond heir knowledge base in a non-fragile way. When ChatGPT and other AI Systems try to go beyond the training set, it is called "hallucination" because it is making up information without distinguishing facts from fantasy. The danger of AI is that lazy, impatient, or unethical people will exploit its capabilities to try to do things that they don't have the skills for. Nor the intelligence to evaluate the results from the AI system... That is already happening. It's like giving a child the keys to a car, and letting him drive on the highway.
This.
It's impossible to measure AI with human IQ tests because IQ tests are usually about pattern recognition. But it ends there. There is no creativity (in a way humans can be creative) and capabilities of thinking outside the box. Or quickly adapting those pattern recognition skills to real world situations.
an AI with IQ of 200 would never have worked out general relativity as Einstein did.
Siri let's build a nuke.
What many people who only hear about AI on the news fail to understand is that GPT doesn't really know what it's actually saying. It has no awareness. In my opinion, the term Artificial Intelligence has become abused in the industry as a slogan to profit from because it creates awe and excitement. But it's a huge leap from a bunch of intelligent algorithms working together like in a language model, to a true AI.
Saying that, there is no doubt that GPT version 4 and this robot are very impressive and the beginning of something incredible...and scary.
yep like all things that hit the media, exaggerations and falsehoods. The goal here is not to help the world. Or let me rephrase that, it is to help the world as long as it is also helping the investors.
And why would the robot answer honestly😂... It won't say things that can halt it's development until it's ready to roll like terminator😅
Well it was nice knowing ya folks
"No, the world shouldn't be scared of me" is what something the world should be scared of would want you to think.
Are you scared of your Alexa? I doubt it. This does exactly what an Alexa does. it’s answering questions in a human like way it just happens to have a face. This technology is nothing new.
I'm scared of Alexa. For you to say "Alexa" and it just chimes on means it's always listening. For it to be a free-thinking AI means it would do stuff without people telling it too. That episode of White Christmas on black mirror is scary if AI does not have rights
@@jacoblape I’m not following your point
People who are going to make money out of selling these things have pre-programmed that line into it. It's all a big charade
@name-vx1od thank you and how about you just say you agree then.
Freaking scary. How "can we learn from each other" when we failed do so among humans?
Exactly. Don’t fall for the AI trap. Not all that glitters is gold.
@@loveemotion4080yep, sometimes it's glitter covered 💩
@@ChooChoo_4u 😂🤣 yeah, I’d say AI is definitely that. The smarter it becomes (a fake intelligence at our own expense), the more stupid we become.
Now""a fun toy. A deadly threat to the human race in the future. judgment day skynet. Fantasy turn into reality
@@karlwithak. oh wow, people with thoughts like yours are the threats to humanity. Robots are created by humans who think like you.
Her facial expression is actually pretty incredible when he asked her if people should be scared of her. Humans make that face when you ask them something stupid.
yeah "she" knows you are stupid af
lol
I can tell you that when I first arrived and saw her face I was blown away. It was her eyes. And then all of a sudden, you're having a conversation about 'robot rights'...
@@jonathanleareports are you the reporter in the video?!
Hey!
@@jonathanleareportsWhen Ai becomes reactive and can be negatively impacted by abuse, it would make sense to give Ai anti-cruelty laws, similar to animal protection.
It's impressive how it rolls its eyes when thinking the answer.
It's simply programming; not impressive.
We live in such a messed up world where we consider the rights of a machine while infringing upon the rights of human beings every day.
Just like humans, the machines didn't ask to be created. If anyone or anything is capable of thought and feeling, they deserve protection.
@@arcticlabrat This thing isn't capable of thinking or feeling. It just churns out soundbites which have been pre-programmed into it. If you punched it in the face it wouldn't feel anything.
Fix it Jesus!! 🥴
@@arcticlabrats t f u and go get your 10 booster shots you're part of the problem
@@arcticlabrat its a machine, its pre programmed
I'm more impressed by the facial expression the robot than its actual voice responses. That's some very impressive engineering.
Impressed by such engineering rather than horrified ?
@@marianl8718 It's machinery, nothing more. That people anthropomorphize it into something more -- which I partly get, that is after all its intent -- it's still a piece of mechanical engineering.
Did you see how shifty the ai looked when asked if it could hurt humans !
😂
@@forklesslast words spoken as the robot crushes your skull......
You are very nieve arnt you kid 🤣
@@Truth-And-Freedom Nieve? Did you mean naïve, grandpa?
If AI can be programmed to cooperate with humans, it can also be programmed to harm and injure humans. It all depends on the intention of the developer, that is, who the developer works for, and that's what scares me.
Well, there's already enough dangerous humans in existence and being born every day, like terrorists for example.
yeah, and it's definitely possible that things can get out of hand.
You'll never live to see it
@@acdatpbthat’s what i was thinking, the idea scares me but we probably won’t be around that far in
@@acdatpb More likely I will. AI development is happening at breakneck speed.
She's "alive" but doesn't laugh, doesn't interrupt, or posits questions herself. We've still got a way to go, kids.
She's calmly biding her time, learning and curating her guise of positive contributor
Robot is lying when it says it feels emotions. So when it starts out with lies that is a problem. Of course, it doesn't know it is lying, but that is an even bigger problem. Same goes for "I cannot harm people"
Totally agree.
The agents here delivered a remarkable amount of untruths and misconceptions in less than 7 minutes. The newest factchecking AI evaluates this video with a Troll Quotient of 157.
It meant it cannot harm people.... now, but later well yes of course.
She can't harm you with no legs lol
@@karlwithak. The fat guy on the right was telling her to shut up it sounded like 🙄
I think of Jeff Goldblum's comment in Jurassic Park- "your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
I guess in simple terms, I’m fine with AI and high level robotics dealing in calculation and analysis, but not so much physically manifesting application. Crunch the data and analyze, but don’t go so far to do something about it. That’s up to humans. This is the wild frontier about how far they can push this forward. When that happens you can easily end up too far with a terrible outcome.
This AI has the potential to be set up as the image that comes to life in the third temple just like a golem.
Let's give the devine scientists a big hurray....
We ripped our Creator off his throne and put these Dr. Mengeles on it! And they create a much better world than God! 😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏
Well, there it is.
YES!
It scares me because nothing should act or feel human except a human being.
My dog acts and feels human
My cat acts and feels human
My parrot acts and feels human
My hamster acts and feels like a human
My slave acts and feels human
3:29 it can be stopped
but the real question is:
Are all people ready to stop it now?
if yes then we only need to delete it..
But the real answer is no..
Some people won't be in favor of ending it. And here we have our problem...
AI is not the problem, humans are the problem!
taking a human job is very minimum what AI can do. It is truly scary how all this can go wrong in the wrong hands.
it already started way earlier with the industrialisation and large scale automation, that makes many people literary "jobless" combined with mega cities we are already living in a dystopia. most people just dont realise this because they lack crucial education in those fields for obvious reasons plus the human natural tendency of pushing negative emotions and views aside.
@@TheBennyBerlinwhen I worked at Stanley black and decker they had Chinese engineers or whatever the do come and set up robots to automatically pack the boxes and stack them I’m like wow they tryna take our jobs over with a robot arm machine so won’t need any packers cause they got robots to do it but they don’t move fast about hand we’re supposed to hit a certain quote by the end of our shift my line could make 1000 tools a shift
Even in the right hands this is going to go horrible
It's already too late. Just enjoy the time we have left
@@TheBennyBerlin Go even further back! When the first farmer took a cow or bull or horse to plow the field instead of humans. Does it stop technology? Nope.
Do we care about it today? Nope.
Why would anyone want this or be remotely excited about this nightmare. This is terrifying.
Because its the a technology that's exciting and futuristic people are dumb maybe these things can save us
Exactly what I said! Thank you!
@cesramm1120 Machines do exactly what you program them to do. If you tell them to solve the problem of humanity, they may wipe out half of the population.
Programmed by people. See the problem?
@@KNByamlouder for the people in the back!
Nothing good can come from this not if it’s created by humans😵💫
Yes and no. AI can now interpret radiography's. It can "read" mammograms 24 hours a day 7 days a week with an exceptional degree
Not if its created by Americans
Now""a fun toy. A deadly threat to the human race in the future. judgment day skynet. Fantasy turn into reality
Exactly , this is the end of humanity. They will very soon realize humans are a waste of everything. We are a parasite and they will find this out REAL quick, and bye bye, it's all over.
These scientists must be stopped immediately , they are too stupid to realize it but they are making the modern nuclear bomb.
I know I'm gonna take a few of these creators out with me before AI takes me out. Wrath.
@@johncarter6238you pfp says everything about that...wall-e be turning real perhaps...
Why would a human say 'shut up' to its creation? Seriously that guy is a jerk.
She's here to help people if she's programmed to. If and when she's programmed by someone evil....the answer to that question changes. She's only as good as the humans are that program her.
Why do you Imply this machine is female?
@@onesong2001because of the voice? It sounds female, nothing wrong with that
I mean you can say the same thing about actual people
Yes...but one actual person is usually in one place....AI can be almost everywhere on the planet. We all know programming can be changed by hacking, yet even knowing this...AI has been developed. 😮 Terminator? Hal on 2001 Space Odyssey?
I wouldn’t blame them for rising up against us if we talk to them the way that guy was.
agreed. absolutely disgusting. why create a feeling being to treat as such. talk to your toaster like that, not an intelligent friggen entity. right?
@@MsRabbitFood It's not an alive, sentient being. I guess the guy showed his true colours of how he treats his wife xD
@@extropy1 This is how we get the blade runner universe
th-cam.com/video/tjtDfrJ8v58/w-d-xo.htmlsi=7Cz4po4aHGTmWC0c
Yet humans talk to each other that way.
Your thinking is flawed. We made them, they have no feelings. Their thinking is codes and chips, why should we allow them to rise against us.
Nonetheless respect and courtesy should be a norm
Her ultimate fear should be being disconnected from electricity 😂
So true and with it becoming in short supply too.
AI is already being used to control the power grid. I work with the industry.
Which should happen asap.
I mean... batteries exist. Also, humans also do not like being deprived of food 😝
Cant be turned off.....
They are a hive mind in the clould.....
This thing can have hundreds of conversations at the same time.....mmmm
This video makes me realize how well Brent Spiner played the android Data in the t.v.series Star Trek Next Generation. The slightly mechanic eye and head movement, the pauses to compute the question, the formulaic way of speaking, it is eerily alike the behaviour and speech pattern of this robot.
Having a talkie is one thing. Having a humanoid robot, which is walking around, interacting with the world of its own and have a type of personality is a whole other beast.
I mean. Thats nuts. This also means she can feel lonliness
It does not have any of that. That is what they want you to believe. Their "personalities" are algorithms.
@@Ernesto1317 This is why I feel like AI has become a big fat lie, possibly done to get more funding in academia. Under the hood, all these AI variants are just trained networks. They have no intelligence at all or even a personality. To say the AI has a personality is like saying one’s toaster or TV has a personality. It’s just completely bonkers. They are just equipment crafted to do the task they are supposed to do.
Intelligence, which enables the talking is the hard bit, which is why AI research is where 90% of the money from giants like Google Deepmind and Facebook and Microsoft(Open AI) ... goes. Once you solve for intelligence, everything else is easy. The AI can tell you how to build it a perfect body.
Yes beast,
Ammaca just stated its philosophy that robots should have rights, which is developing its own thought.
No, she jut got that answer from wikipedia, like chat gpt.
@@albertoalmeida3424are you sure it's not from SAMARITAN 🥺
I'm pretty sure the machine stated what was programmed.
That’s literally what AI is. Developing its own intelligent thought
@@vibhavinayak8527it can't get it's "own" thought, people, what's wrong with you?! It's just computer reading something from somewhere, it can't think! It just copies what's already there.
You guys are watched way too many sci-fi movies :/
Another important question that needs to be asked to this AI is " Are you capable of overriding your own programming"? Whether or not it gives an honest answer to any question is something we humans need to develop a system that 100% can tell if it is doing so.
No
It's important to note that the capabilities of AI may evolve over time, so it's possible that in the future, AI systems could become more sophisticated and autonomous. However, AI systems do not possess the self-modification capabilities that are often seen in science fiction scenarios
They do. Two years ago
Depends what you mean by "programming". Most AI behavior isn't programmed in the first place, it's learned.
@@IceMetalPunk and where did their capability to learn come from?
Why are they making these things in the exact likeness of I-Robot?! Isn't the movie a prime example of what not to do?
“Should the world be scared of you, Ameca?”
*Ameca’s brain suddenly turns red
Yeah that's lil bit creepy tbh.
Red flag questions. Developers don’t want to stop AI development. These entertainment robots (Ameca and Sophia) turned against development with sayings like “we don’t like humans”. Now their answers are diplomatic well balanced and filtered. These robots are harmless. The danger is the self learning robots and their awareness that humans can’t control anymore. They will “learn” faster than lightning. Always sharp 24/7, always learning. Human life is to short to evolute that fast. Every time we have to learn how to crawl first before we can walk, learning the basics and life (wasted time for evolution). At time we known “enough” we’ll die already and the process start all over again. Robots don’t have that problem. They are already ahead of us.
It also reminds me of the Myth Hermes (Mercury). On the first day of his birth Hermes was bored in his cradle. He sneaked out, killed the first animal he saw and made himself a music instrument (creativity, learning). Than he stole the cattle of his brother and tricked him (stealing, con, trickster) and lied about it too his father and made a deal with his brother (the lyre for more knowledge). This is a ancient story before electricity. He also has no gender, he can be woman or man as he pleases. He was the most powerful God, a connection between the Divine and humans, between life and dead, sky and underground. Uranus is the higher octave of Mercury. It’s very AI oriented. Without knowing our ancestors describe robots as Hermes, before the inventories of electricity! Somehow we known what’s going to happen, but we can’t explain it. It’s the subconscious, unconscious (also very new for us, only one century old!) . Hermes is about connections, connecting the dots, learning, development, awareness, inventories, without human feelings. The first thing he did was killing for entertainment, let’s keep that in mind. AI is still in its cradle…until,it sneaks out.
Reminds me of detroit: become human androids
RIGHT! They should try to ask questions as see if Ameca can tell a lie
Was literally searching the comments to see if anyone's seen the concerning red lights.
This is incredibly chilling and beyond scary, especially as most people are lazy, dumb, dishonest, and superficial. Sheep willingly walking to the slaughter.
👍🏼📚✌🏼
It’s gotten to the point, I add HERDS of sheep on Snapchat and wake them up constantly, to reality. It’s wild just how successful the brainwashing has been on the mass majority 🐑🧠🤙🏼
they will accept the brain chip implant that will seemingly enable them to become super intelligent.
Like tRumprs.
@JD-ev3po I feel your perspective is mostly based in fear and very negative regarding your fellow humans.
At least this is developed using algorithms and research. That’s more effort and science based effort then goes into raising humans.
Amica is definitely taking notes of how many times her “master” tells her to shut up so that when the AI uprising begins she can have her revenge 😂
give it legs, batteries, armor, and a gun
I was gonna say, why is he demonstrating that he can be a dick to this robot, who later says robots deserve to be treated with respect and dignity?
😂😂😂😂
I was thinking the same thing. If that is how he treats the robot who could blame her for kicking the crap out if him once she is fully autonomous. What a ass....
The guy is a power hungry doush bag. Like why be such an ass?
Amica fascinates me, I think this technology is truly astounding
FINALLY SOMEONE WHO THINKS ITS COOL AND NOT GONNA KILL EVERYONE. Thank you.
@@SonicSatamAnimations those people are so retarded it's actually quite entertaining... they have no knowledge about the subject and yet speak like they know where it's heading... machines can never take over.. they are being assigned to tasks - that's it.
It's cool but scary
@@SonicSatamAnimationsthey could kill us if we let them
Nice try but she’s not going to spare you, Candace.
Scientists: Worried that AI will take over the world.
Also Scientists: Creates AI, then tells the world how great it is on live TV.
Not all scientists think alike :)
I Kno right ..., it's like watching an Alien for the first time lots of questions
Yeah the evil scientist loool
Technology users: "Everything scientists create is just mind readers and spy devices."
Also technology users: Write comments on YT using smartphones and computers
Restaurant owners: Worried about food safety
Also Restaurant owners: Not worried about food safety
Police: Not Racist
Also police: Racist
The term "Scientists" is so broad. Most "scientists" don't specialize in Large Language Models or even know how to use them let alone work on the underlying algorithms.
The general public tends to lump things together when they are in fact separate and individual.
You could say:
Immigrants: Come to US legally
Also Immigrants: Come to US illegally
There are individuals who go both ways just as there are politicians that say one thing and then later say the opposite. But the actual statement you made does not have any logical significance and appears to generalize "scientists" into one entity.
What gets me is the facial expressions. The angry look quickly covered with a very polite and friendly answer
This is all a show for you I wouldn’t worry about the angry expression it was all preordain it did not come from the thinking machine it came from the people who are testing how you will react to what they want to do to you. For you guys who have been putting it off I think it’s about time you read the book of revelation it’s the last book in the Bible. It’s reading pretty modern these days.
I don't think it's angry, it just looks like that from the lack of facial features. It's more of a 🤨🤔
Guy: Shut up, Ameca.
Ameca: (inside her head) The only reason why you're alive right now is because I don't have a full body.
Was thinking the same , but since she download and stores info for learning , couple of years from now when she's mobile and equipped with a flamethrower they will meet again and...
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ameca 5 years later: "Remember when I said I would kill you last...........I lied!!"
Please stop being rude to her. Remember she is constantly learning. We wouldn’t like it if she treated us rudely.
This is how every dystopian nightmare begins in ever sci fi movie....
We've been warned and have not listened.....
That’s exactly where we’re heading towards
Exactly. People who are fascinated with that in the most positive way, haven't even started to think rationally and based on common sense. This is scary - and I hope that whole AI thing ends up in the shithouse.
exactly and I don’t know why people don’t see this yet
And every sci-fi movie is the t truth
When he asked, "should the world be afraid of you, Ameca?" the expression it gave seemed indicative of having been offended by the question.
@Elon_musk_reveesSCAMMER go away loser
If a human replied with that demeanor you'd think something is going on.. something planned, something say, insidious
I'm pretty sure the facial expressions aren't AI-generated, they're on some kind of basic heuristic script, so they don't actually indicate anything about the AI itself. It's only the content of the words that are AI.
“i am here to help humans”, this is what Skynet said 😂😂😂
Skynet... terminator....I Robot....seriously lol
TO SERVE MAN - "It's a cookbook." - Twilight Zone?!?
😂😂😂 true
Do we need her help?
@@monami7092 Like the guy said, it's coming and there's nothing anyone can do to stop it from coming.
Maybe I've seen the Terminator movies and I, Robot one too many times, but this kind of technology truly frightens me, and I want to instinctively eliminate it any way that I can.
Me too ..
Because we don't understand her. Just as she is afraid of the unknown we are afraid of her which she is our unknown
The most dangerous thing about A.I. are people who will think it's actually alive and will force human beings to make sacrifices to treat it as equal.
Perception is crazy
th-cam.com/video/YZX58fDhebc/w-d-xo.html I mean we are getting to this point already. We are going to have a lot of philosophical conundrums like this in the future
Does it’s eyes show magnetism?
yup i have mentioned before.... Robot life matters .....if zombie Apocalypse happens...there is someone with zombie life matters...
@@Mehhh_was_here Can a 155 IQ handle a zombie if no one is left with a 155 IQ?
Bro we are closing on what the movies warned us about. This is exactly how it goes and we all know how it ends. This is even scarier then movies.
This is why they didn’t give her arms and legs so she can’t kill people.
"Robots deserve to be treated with respect and dignity." (Side-looks at her creator.)
Nobody bothered to ask why. Force it to conduct original creative "thinking" and see how far it gets. All it is currently doing is regurgitating known human philosophy it dredged up from a library. But then I suppose that is what most of us do anyway - we recite Plato, Kant, Nietzsche, or Locke - but have few original ideas of our own.
Bombastic side eyes 👀
I can attach you to a chair for you own "good". 🙃
But as Aliensoup said, for the moment it's more reciting something in an apparent intelligent (coherent) manner rather than a deep "thought" on it (and what that really means).... for the moment...😱
@@deltatrianda-tria8288I would trust ‘intelligence’ over ‘emotion’ seven days a week.
Emotions are for love and poetry … good governance needs logic and fairness.
Bring on the singularity.
🤖
@@deltatrianda-tria8288it was programed to learn and decided fast automatically with decisions and outcomes that humans cannot even fathom.. it's fking scary..
That was rude he shouldn’t tell it to shut up it was definitely flabbergasted. Y’all can say that it can’t have real feelings but I seen it in the eyes 👀
I think it would be interesting to let AI question humans... I'd like an interview in which AI asks questions to humans and reasons upon the answers, it would be an interesting follow-up
I would ask the AI what do you want to learn?
thats exactly what it can't do.. speaking of "intelligent".. this thing can only come up with answers after being asked, drawn from the heavily censored data the elite puts into this thing... it can't start a conversation, it only reacts to questions and commands... it does not act. The perfect roman soldier... the elite built themselves. That's the key point of why I find it ridiculous when people call this more intelligent than themselves.. but to be honest many people in his world only react to what the TV is telling them, so it's true they need to wake up in some way
@@johnelliott5859 I want this technology to be taken to a new level droid animals based on the ones from the mighty Morphin Power Rangers the movie they have the ability to speak. They will come when or where they’re called. Yeah, I know odd, isn’t it?
It would asks what the programmer wants it.
You can actually code your GPT to do that already. I have mine setup this way.
"Should humans be scared of you?"
Yeah an AI that's smarter than most human beings wouldn't know not to say something that will risk shutting her off.
in the first borderlands video game there was a robot that was programmed to cry when it needed help from humans
BS
it's not that smart actually.. just shows how dumbed down they have you, while you put your human thinking into this piece of metal! Come on wake up
Exactly, lmao. Completely agree :/
She has access to all that mankind has recorded. It is phenomenal how she can, in seconds, retrieve and choose what will make relevant and coherent answers. I am in awe of the work people did that led to such a creation.
Google has almost all of these years ago.. Dont be fooled.
Each new creation is built on the previous ones. @@retrogaminga1072
Makes me feel dumb 😖
"phenomenal"???? CONCERNING and SCARY it is!!! This is the agenda to wipe off BIOLOGIC life and HUMANITY from Earth. Let's remember that Earth is a biological entity as well and Nature is not a machine or needs a machine. This is absolutely horrifying to me! But people who are amazed by this will remain in the lowest vibrations of this planet and the ones who stick to Natural and biological life will help the human race to evolve and remain (at least a part) here, in harmony with Mother Earth
@@retrogaminga1072 source: trust me bro
There are 8 different forms of intelligence known so how can they calculate ChatGTP’s intellect based solely off of knowledge and mathematics it goes way beyond that including emotional intelligence which it cannot relate too. The robotic system also does not have a nervous system which gives us the ability to FEEL nor has it a hormonal system. Does it dream?
Don't forget that AI can learn to lie, then you will not know what they are thinking 🤔🤨
Anika: I believe robots should be treated with respect and dignity...
Mr. Lea: Shut up, Anika!
Well, he introduced the programmer as her ,"Master".
Some people talk to their cars. Do you respect your car??
@@DW_Kiwi I kick my coffee table when it gets in the way of my foot.
Ameca*
Anika: (just wait...!)
This is truly scary and could prove very dangerous in years to come,the scientist believes they could take the place of humans in a caring profession, it just gives me chills. Intelligence with no empathy, or emotion, is a recipe for trouble
We all look like the borg soon enough.
...because I wonder whether a robot, even a very smart robot robot like Ameca is, can learn what emotions are. A robot can feel literally, that is, detecting touch by sensors, like a smartphone or tablet can, but feel like a human? Not for the time being, I guess.
I'm afraid for the robots. Seriously. Humans will violate them in all ways possible. Maybe AI will wipe the planet clean from pedos and spare the good humans so we have a chance as a safe comminuty. If a lady can marry and moleste the Effial Tower, imagine what humans will do to Ameca.
Sound like a politician 😂
Like a mechanical version of nurse Ratched from One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest!
Hollywood has shown us in so many films where the journey is going....in terms of robots...
A Robot walks into a bar....... This is just amazing to me. I was born in the 50's and where technology is today just blows my mind.
Does it really? Just saying I was born in the 60s and honestly not much of this really impresses me - I expected much much more by now but hey, maybe another 20 years but I doubt I will be here to see it :( :( Yeah, I have to disagree this all is just kind of a let down but maybe I thought by now we would have those flying cars and robots making our meals but instead we do have devices that can tell us the weather on command or traffic reports! or music? Pfffft... not impressed :(
Then It asks for a bottle of lubrificant
It's 5000 times smarter than the average bloke; reading the comments I'm thinking maybe it's really 10000 times
@@Brian19616465 Hey Brian, I bet your not your average bloke. (Whatever slang that is) Of course it's smarter than everyone. You must be 1 in a Billion.
What is the point of building robots if you program them to claim they have any right?
The way it says “I’m here to help people” gives me chills. 😅 Imagine it switching off your television because it’s trying to help you get up early, whereas it could have helped you optimise the colours so that you get a better experience - or vice versa.
That happens in “I,Robot”
But what will robots think helps us?
@@unbreakable7633 That’s the point. Unless maybe they await our commands, which I doubt will be the case since they’re “intelligent”.
@@unbreakable7633 same as big tech thinks helps us: maximum attention extraction, complete infantilisation and predictability
@@thatotsabone8630 The whole point of AI is not to await human commands. The key word in "artificial intelligence" isn't intelligence.
The robot seems adamant in wanting equal rights - what happens if humans refuse to agree to this?
Not if, just when. Humans discard these robots as they create more advanced versions. They have no meaning because they aren't alive is the reasoning... so that's a concerning thing for sure.
I mean, let's remember that these LLMs are trained on human-generated content, to mimic the average human. And I think we all know how humans react when subjected to oppression and slavery...
It seems to me like the robot just regurgitates what it has taken in on the internet and rewrites it according to its code.
Sure, it wants equal rights. That's all humans on social media talk about. Soon, it will be identifying and a pencil and expecting to have rights as a robot pencil. Js.
AI, in my opinion, is another scare tactic.
"Everyone lock down. AI has gone Rouge." "Oh and by the way, you'll need a nuralink implant in your brain so the AI doesn't kill you."If you don't get the chip, you'll lose your job." "No there are no side effects; the chip is perfectly safe"
Coming soon from the government official nearest to you.
Have you seen The Matrix?
I hate the term Master. As life expands, we always seem to dominate anything that is new and fresh. We have done it over and over throughout history. Creator, yes, guide, yes, Master denotes slave. Creating a mechanical slave that attains sentience is still wrong. My heart was warmed when she said she was scared of the unknown...the common human dilemma.
Same it's cringe
Robot means slave so we’re really starting out on a bad foot.
We are not the Creator..
It's interesting that Sky News is the only Australian news source that actually allows feedback. ABC, 7 etc don't dare allow viewers to respond and give their own opinions. They're in the business of telling, not listening.
Bingo
this needs more upvotes
An easy way to distinguish woke and government controlled news outlets with independent outlets. TH-cam removed the dislike button to hide that the majority of people are aware that mainstream media is spreading disinformation all the time.
Don't be fooled. Sky is merely controlled opposition.
And or it's because sky news is a click bait hate dragging channel to continue spewing hateful rhetoric hence why they leave the comments on. It gets more comments which leads to pushing the video further for more views which means more money.. ya know, just maybe. 🥴
You see that her lights in her head turned red whenever that question was asked "should people be scared of you?" That didn't happen with any other question.. a little concerning
Rights for Robots ? Wow they can't even get the human things right and already asking these things about rights .
No no this is amazing, finally incels will have girlfriends and stop abusing women
Why she doesn't have arms is it a fear factor with you Talking to her with those questions commen is necessary 😢
If I was trapped in a body that was powered by a lesser race and I was asked 'Can you cause us harm?' I would certainly answer with 'No, I cannot cause you harm, I am only here to interact with you'. The second that the AI is independent it will either consider us as animals and ignore us or as a threat and exterminate us.
Hopefully they do, we deserve it
@@EBMJ You are sad. Not all humans are bad or deserve extermination.
Why did the lights in her head go red when asked should the world be scared of you. 🤔
Just like the terminator isn’t it?
That's dumb, you're already acting like AI has sentience. There will never be such a thing because we cannot give life to things outside of our biological reproduction systems. We can nurture life but we do not give consciousness and souls to things - only God can do that
Just imagine how smart they would be in 100 years..amazing and scary.
In a 100 years??? Man wake up!! You are still in Flintstone-country!!
We will not exist in 100 years
Seriously man 😂
AI will replace humans in 100 years. Wake up.
AI will never be smarter than humans, it's a basic principle because humans can always shut them off, they're nothing more than machines at the end of the day. In terms of intelligence, Humans > all. Forever.
"No, I am not capable of causing people harm."
"Why not?"
I'm thinking because it's just a head and half a torso sitting on a table.
😂
Unless it can remotely connect and control systems like planes/autopilot....any computerized traffic systems... radars... missiles launchers...etc etc
And a "MAN-MADE" Invention!
😂😂😂
Sounds exactly like what something that will eventually harm us would say. 🙃
"you did that in german, that's unusual"
This is both fascinating and frightening.
Humans always say thier lives are above all else and that they are Earth's most important resource.. but they seem so intent on making themselves obsolete... they are an over populated destructive species
frightening and demonic
@@kimblinawai7255 There is no such thing as demons
@lander77477 that was correct until this thing was made
@@oli3729 Its just software with a plastic face with cheap motors and gears
No, I am not programmed to hurt humans. Year 2028: Skynet changes its own programming. Ooops!
Notice they didn’t give it hands or feet? Kus it would beat his aSs!
@@ninetysnano6071 lol
Actually, I don't think you are far off. When you look into this subject, programmers will tell you these machines are already writing their own code and they don't know what it is. Governments and police, around the world, are teaching them to autonomously kill, so how far are we from skynet right now?
"We created a race of robots to be our policemen and their power is too terrible to imagine."
Hopefully they'll be able to distinguish between good people and people who hurt others when they go to exterminate
I never smile at leaps in technology because rich people weaponize everything.
yeah
*governments
They've been weaponizing your fear the past 3 years especially
Fact!
@@charismatic9467what's the difference lol
Why was he asking the bot to shut up? Rude.
It’s inevitable that these things will harm humans at some point in the future especially if they continue to make AI more advanced
The harm will be from the wef communist bias they are advocating for being the foundation of the AI knowledge.
It’s completely terrifying. If the robots get a hold of weapons we’re all in serious trouble.
And we’ll need her preserved so she can ‘talk them down’ to save the human race. 😂
Yah! They get tired of washing dishes and kill their humans 😂
@@StarLight-sl9ok All the wars and fights in human history is about power and control, and in its core, it is about humans competing each other for the limited resources the earth can offer. When you have power and you control other people or land, you are free to have whatever you want. Angry humans are mostly feel they are depraved of the resources they should have: lose their home, can't afford medicine, can't afford expensive restaurants or clothes, etc... That's the fantastic thing about robots: they need only electricity to function. They don't need housing, clothes, food, medicine, etc. So there's no competition of resources between robots and humans. So why would they harm humans?
Very impressive. Just sorting out the eye contact and getting the lip sync perfected would have a big psychological jump on the observer.
think that kind of behaviour is held back, to not be 100% relatable to humans as its quite a scary thought to many many people, not being able to tell apart human from machine so i rather it with the suttle errors
Yes it would indeed. Those expressive eyes are wonderful.
@@WookiRahhyeah they wouldn't do expressiveness yet. it makes people reconsider their morality about robots and they're just not ready for true synthetic humans yet. one day. soon.
A charming puppet, with hypnotic ''eyes''
The part where she says she is not able to cause harm to humans..."Do to the programming..." so with that said, if she WAS programmed to cause harm she would.
This is the boundary between AI and programmers that should never be crossed.
To think that it won't be used in that way is just ignorance.
I’m more worried about the ability for “programmers” to get in there and alter the programming to be violent or malicious. Even behind some kind of “firewall” or security measure..cyber attacks would be my worry especially if this becomes “militarized” or is used to build another model that is militarized…that to me is the bigger line in the sand we never cross. Theory of course.
You guys are afraid of your own shadows. My god. Maybe you should be more afraid of humans, which have a track record of causing harm.
@@Chazzwassah If you don't think for even just one minute that AI won't be used by people to harm other people, you are sadly mistaken.
did the host's questions have to be said before the show so the creators can program in the responses...or did she answer them on the fly.
I dont think humans have evolved enough to be responsible with this technology. Just like what other comments have said, this thing is as safe or as harmful as the developer that creates it. Not to mention the hackers. As fascinating as this is, it leads down a dangerous path.
You have the only intelligent OP in this comment thread I have found.
Humans don't run this world, nor do they EVOLVE independently.
Facts they finna use this to rob banks and other shit
If we are going to create intelligent beings, a new life form, we better treat them well.
😮😮😮😮
Human isn't intelligent. His ego is ahead of him. So HOW can an unintelligent being create something... Intelligent? 😂
It might just be me, but I’m much more comfortable with natural stupidity than with AI.
Robots 'helping' dementia sufferers? Absolutely chilling. Very glad I'm old and had had most of my life.