I find it interesting, how all the „he itches - he lies“-CIA-Expert kind of videos are so much more popular and get no critical comments. And the actual scientific one, that said „we are actually bad at it“, is ignored and criticized.
I find his points to be valid most often when the "target" is a stranger (basically cold reading). If it is someone you know very well, deception is much easier to detect.
Lie detectors are crap. And not allowed in court in most states. I went through THREE tests concerning a former friend that fell on my property (stalking) and died later on because of injuries. I didn't even know he was here, they found him the next morning at bottom of stairs on side of property. First test, inconclusive. 2nd test, inconclusive. THIRD test... "Well, we KNOW you had something to do with his death". I said, "Yeah ! Because the constantly drunk and high dude came to my place and fell down the stairs in the dark !". Now what really gets me... this was during the Holidays... "they" never got back to me to say, well... anything. So I was unnecessarily nervous for months. Fuckers.
Just Hang on a minute? What exactly were the 'truths' or 'lies' propounded by the researcher in the experiment? Don't you think these might have a bearing on your results? Furthermore your results might be quite different outside the cultural conserve of academia. I do not think they can be necessarily generalised to folk in general at all.
Did he just say these people were standardly chosen for attractiveness or looking sketchy? Lol yes I know he did of course. Just wanted to chuckle. About how easily it goes by and noone says a word about it. When academia and the self described "elite" of the world. Happen to group, judge, categorize and label people based on their own artificial standards of looks or traits. As long as its for science, I guess. Lol Im sure the outrage will follow. Haha
I find it interesting, how all the „he itches - he lies“-CIA-Expert kind of videos are so much more popular and get no critical comments. And the actual scientific one, that said „we are actually bad at it“, is ignored and criticized.
Impressive speech delivery on a topic that could quickly get boring. You made it fun and, instructive! and that is the truth! ...or is it now ?
I find his points to be valid most often when the "target" is a stranger (basically cold reading). If it is someone you know very well, deception is much easier to detect.
Yeah, so that applies for criminal investigations, where this is most important.
Its just nice listening to him
It would be great if you posted some references. I'd love to use these studies in my essay
2:45
Lie detectors are crap. And not allowed in court in most states.
I went through THREE tests concerning a former friend that fell on my property (stalking) and died later on because of injuries. I didn't even know he was here, they found him the next morning at bottom of stairs on side of property.
First test, inconclusive. 2nd test, inconclusive. THIRD test... "Well, we KNOW you had something to do with his death".
I said, "Yeah ! Because the constantly drunk and high dude came to my place and fell down the stairs in the dark !".
Now what really gets me... this was during the Holidays... "they" never got back to me to say, well... anything. So I was unnecessarily nervous for months.
Fuckers.
Andre Wank's talk is very good.
Experts agree, there is no valid means of lie detection
Actually there are
@@augustassimonis8345 Elaborate please
Wt he said went above my head.. couldn't understand a thing
Just Hang on a minute? What exactly were the 'truths' or 'lies' propounded by the researcher in the experiment? Don't you think these might have a bearing on your results? Furthermore your results might be quite different outside the cultural conserve of academia. I do not think they can be necessarily generalised to folk in general at all.
Really good speech
Very nice job.
Are there experiments about how accurately a wife can detect her husband is lying? I bet there will be some interesting results.
stop lying is not immoral and using a lie detector without a warrant is a crime.
I thought the content itself was interesting, but the speaker's delivery style didn't convey confidence that he knew what he was talking about.
Did he just say these people were standardly chosen for attractiveness or looking sketchy?
Lol yes I know he did of course.
Just wanted to chuckle. About how easily it goes by and noone says a word about it. When academia and the self described "elite" of the world. Happen to group, judge, categorize and label people based on their own artificial standards of looks or traits. As long as its for science, I guess. Lol
Im sure the outrage will follow. Haha