Lampard or Gerrard | Patrice Evra
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ม.ค. 2024
- Lampard or Gerrard | Patrice Evra
#shorts #life #story #thierryhenry #leomessi #messi #barcelona #fcbarcelona #goat #hazard #cristiano #ronaldo #cristianoronaldo #lampard #gerrard #beckham #modric #iniesta #xavi #ozil #drogba #torres
Motivational Video | Motivational Speech | Inspirational Video | Life Success
Speaker: Patrice Evra
Music:
Epic Dramatic Military Music by Infraction [No Copyright Music] / Hero
• Epic Dramatic Military...
Hope you like it,
just enjoy and share.
TIKTOK: / andreaspoke
INSTAGRAM: / andreas_poke
Absolutely no copyright infringement is intended. All audio and video clips are the sole property of their respective owners. This is only clipped for entertainment.
Source:
Evra Chooses Rooney v Ronaldo, Ji Sung Park v Nani, Mbappé v Henry & Van Persie Story - This Or That
• Evra Chooses Rooney v ... - กีฬา
For those who said lamps was more of a no 10, he actually played most as Box-to-box no 8 in his career either in 433 or 442 double pivot. People forgot he played in a 442 under ranieri, most of the time middle, but ocassionally on right flank. Only time he was more of a 10 was under scolari and ancelotti in a 442 diamond. Yes, he had makelele and essien behind, but so did Gerrard had Alonso mascherano as well. Gerrard also played as 10 behind torres in case people forget. So don't tell me one is a 10 and one is more complete as Box-to-box. Rather, I would say, one has higher football IQ in terms of positioning, instinct, and reading of the game, whilst the other has superior shooting technique and passing range.
Perfect analysis
spot on. the idea lampard was a 10 is absolutely bewildering due to the fact lampard was very slow and had very little dribbling qualities. he had to be a box to box RCM or LCM bc he had so many weaknesses in advanced roles. if lampard was in the modern era he'd have half the goals he got from largely open spaces and a lack of tactical support from opposition to close down midfielders running into the box
people also need to recognise that high intelligence isn't the highest ceiling at all in a footballing world. it means a lot if you are zidane, of berbatov, or iniesta, but it means very little when you are lampard, and have very little technical ability or speed to work with. the same applies to average donkeys like muller who depend on others so much to create space for him
Gerrard and Lampard were both awesome going forward. But Gerrard was great defensively too. So overall Gerrard was better.
@@glidinggolovinn Bro said Lampard was slow and didn't have enough skills 😂
@@MrNoNonsenseYeshe meant the technical applicability to fully optimize the Football IQ he possessed... Thinking it is one thing, implementing it is another thing and his football ability could not fit it ...
"Steven Gerrard is the best CM "
- Zinedine Zidane
Because he can't mention him self that's why he mentioned 2nd best player after him
It's always these bullshit quotes that you people pull up. First it's Scholes, then it's Gerrard. You'll find similar quotes about all sorts of midfielders in world football. Gerrard was never the 2nd best after Zidane, that's mental.
you honestly must have the brain of a vegetable to believe these quotes. it's out of kindness, not seriousness. gerrard isn't even in the top 30 midfielders of all time, let alone second
iniesta, golovin, seedorf, gullit, matthaus, ballack, pirlo, barella, bellingham, foden, laudrup, ozil, tonali, verratti, zidane, pastore, nedved, davids, and many more, are all superior attacking midfielders compared to some guy who had a decent shot and versatility
gerrard was slow, took ages to reach a good stride, cannot dribble well, technically average in first touch and vision in tight areas. there's nothing to warrant him near the greats that ive mentioned
you honestly must have the brain of a vegetable to believe these quotes. it's out of kindness, not seriousness. gerrard isn't even in the top 30 midfielders of all time, let alone second
iniesta, golovin, seedorf, gullit, matthaus, ballack, pirlo, barella, bellingham, foden, laudrup, ozil, tonali, verratti, zidane, pastore, nedved, davids, and many more, are all superior attacking midfielders compared to some guy who had a decent shot and versatility
gerrard was slow, took ages to reach a good stride, cannot dribble well, technically average in first touch and vision in tight areas. there's nothing to warrant him near the greats that ive mentioned
Fake bullshit
@@Al-ji4gdthe exact quote from Zidane was, "the most complete midfielder I've seen...".
I am Arsenal fan and no doubt Captain Gerard 💪
Give lampard his flowers 🌺
Its not easy to score goals ,
For me it’s Lampard all day there is no debate l. But I am so disappointed with England for not playing 433 lamps and Gerard box to box with someone like Barry holding. With a few trial and errors refinement that would have been an incredible dynamic to witness. All the ingredients were there for them to play together. Hats off to Gerard for staying loyal to Liverpool but I would have loved for them to have played together domestically too. I know Chelsea wanted to sign him several times.
I like how Patrice wanted to give respect to the great midfielders Lampard played with but only named the French one 😂
no one has given a viable reason on this debate ever since 😂.... they just try to debunk Lampard to only goals ... forgetting how efficient he was as a player also
played almost 3 seasons in a row without missing a single match ...maybe one day Lampard will get his flowers
Gerrard was more physical, better defensively and perhaps more iconic - more of a natural leader on the pitch, I would say, and had the ability to carry the team.
Lampard however was a better playmaker and goal scorer. He got more assists more goals and generally had better passing stats throughout his career than Gerrard.
In summary, I’d have Gerrard in an average team due to his versatility and his ability to lift the team. However, in an already good team, I’d have Lampard for his creativity, and goal scoring - assuming other positions are sufficiently covered.
Also, stop with this Lampard was a 10 nonsense.
Best answer
Wow!! Best answer!! You resumed perfectly Lampard and Gerrard. Without taking any position. It's very difficult to choose the best between the two. Even Greatest midfielders like Zinédine Zidane, Kaká, Iniesta, Xavi, scholes, nedved... Were not able to tell who was the best between Gerrard and Lampard.
Between these two great legends, my favorite is Gerrard but to be honest, it's impossible to say exactly who was the best between them. What Evra forgets is that, Gerrard also had great midfielders who were helping him carrying Liverpool. Xabi Alonso, Hyppia, Mô Sissoko, and later Javier mascherano were there to help Gerrard in the midfield. Now like he explained, Gerrard was a natural and example of pure leadership. That's why when John Terry was removed as captain of the English national team, all the players including Lampard were agreed that Gerrard was the perfect captain. On the other hand, Frank was a creative box to box midfielder and good playmaker. That's why for me it's impossible to compare them and decide who was the best. The only regret I have for them, is that england national team was not able to win a trophy with these 2 great midfielders just because there was not a defensive midfielder behind Lampard and Gerrard. There was not a cyborg like ngolo Kante or Makelele.
Lampard was a final action player who'd get more goals and assists because he'd get to make the passes to the final 3rd he wasn't really a Guy Who Could Cut through a Defense on his own Or even Take over a whole he by himself
@@Demon11238 I think he could but mostly he didn't need to.
I mean, you don't need to cut defences if you can just shoot from 30+ meters out
There’s no one thing Lamps can do that Stevie cannot,but there’s of things that was being asked from Stevie to do that Lamps couldn’t even think about doin!
How about scoring 20+ goals a season? How about winning league titles? How about finishing second only to Ronaldinho as the best player in the world? Gerrard is a titan, a legend, a talisman, and an icon, but don't put disrespect on Lampard. They are contemporaries, and no one should disregard either one, no matter who you prefer.
@@BeTheSpecialhow about the fact that all the things you mentioned are team achievements not individual achievements.
@@Prince-lo3nz lol How is FIFA World Player of the Year award and Ballon D'or team awards? 🤣 Lampard got silver in both. Gerrard is also more than great; he finished third one time. These are two colossal figures, and neither should be disregarded offhand
C@@Prince-lo3nz lols ,if individuals don't perform how will team perform 😂
Try winning the premier league and finishing 5 seasons in a row with more than 20 goals AND 20 assists from central midfield. I think there is allot lampard could do gerrard couldnt.
Why always disscredit Lampard with that Bs, did you all forget Gerrard was playing with Xabi Alonso, Dirk Kuyt, Arbeloa, Torres, Hypia, and lastly Luis Suarez.
The only reason many people choose Gerrard over Lampard just because Liverpool isn't hated as much as chelsea in that Era.
Suarez would disagree
Ouch
I think iniesta is the best midfielder i have ever seen
Then it's your problem if your brain stuck at negreira fc 😒
Replace inesta for stevie g. Look at the team around inesta.
Noone mention it
@@stevecam2109Iniesta MOTM in WC Final, CL Final And In Domestic Cup Finals Gerrard Couldn't Do It What Iniesta Done Only In 2008-12
@@be_61_shaikh_shaista97 are you thick?? Replace stevie with inesta put him in barca team in Spain national hed win the same if not more. Sure I know inesta is amazing but put him in liverpool team I know for a fact he wouldn't do what stevie done
If an ex man United player refers to you as captain Gerrard.. There is no debate 👍
The disrespect Lamps get is mindblowing. Lamps ended his career as the second highest assists in EPL history.
Lamps was the biggest star in a star studded team, while Gerard was the star in an average team. Lamps had to produce the goods that won things and he delivered time and again
i don't see how it's disrespectful to say gerrard was better. he just was a better player
@@glidinggolovinn saying Gerard isn't disrespectful but making it seem Lamps was all about goals is. Lamp beat Gerard on all levels. If he'd the same freedom Gerard had in the national team, England would have probably won something. He was a born winner in his prime.
@@adeshinaademola3429
all of that is a lie you tell yourself. gerrard was quicker, better defensively, better athleticism and in the air, better dribbler, better versatility, and a superior shooting diversity/technique. lampard only had superior passing argubaly, superior intelligence and all round shooting within the box. gerrard is the better player and no one in the video disrespected him. lampard's only real value for the debate is the fact he scored a lot of goals
@@glidinggolovinn you need look at the stats, it's clear you only watched Gerard. Lamp has all the numbers. Gerard isn't even anywhere close. Gerard playing as AMF is the reason England struggled in every tournament. Lamp was the only natural number 10 and all the relevant stat backs that up. Gerard couldn't even with the title. 😂
@@adeshinaademola3429
im a chelsea fan that watched chelsea more than gerrard. the fact you've assumed this without refuting any of my arguments for the traits gerrard is better in, shows you don't have any clue what you're talking about
stats are the worst indicator of defining player value of all time so you're already displaying your lack of knowledge of the game. with your IQ you would say haaland is better than shevchenko bc "stats say so!!!!11" - use your brain to at least some degree before challenging someone above you intellectually and historically in relation to understanding player assessments
has your hollow head ever wondered that lamps has better numbers because he plays for chelsea, while gerrard plays for liverpool? jesus, your sophistry and rhetoric is on full display here and you're proudly making arguments in bad faith, knowing it is wrong. with your logic, defoe is a better striker than berbatov bc he scored more PL goals. use. your. brain.
lamps isn't a natural 10 at all. he doesn't even know how to dribble so provide evidence besides "stats bro!!!111" - ive proven with evidence stats do not matter so provide real arguments besides your ramblings scrub
The fact the José Mourinho tried to sign Gerrard while at Chelsea even though he had Lampard says it all.
It says not, cause Mourinho never once said he wanted to sign Gerrard to replace Lampard.
Funny comment. There was no way Gerard would have replaced Lamps, he would have been useful as a CM not AMF. Y'all don't understand the pressure of playing for Chelsea. He would have to perform every week and I as good as he was he would have struggled. Ask Torres
I know excatly what u mean these other comments dont understand
Because Chelsea had more money to spend than Liverpool. Mourinho wanted to establish a football heritage and dynasty at Chelsea
@@joshuaombaka3116 It is one thing to have money, it is another to have quality. Mou met Lamps at Chelsea.
The most complete player I’ve ever seen! And one of the greatest players of all time. I get he didn’t win the league but he drove an average Liverpool team to achieve trophies that were beyond their reach and was up against a Man United team a Chelsea team and an Arsenal team that were full of world-class players and managers and probably the best teams of their respective clubs eras. If he played in one of those teams or one of the best Liverpool teams, he would have won league titles for fun. One of the best keepers and the forwards of all time in Buffon and Ibrahimović haven’t won the champions league but that doesn’t take anything away from them being one of the greatest legends!
The myth about the average Liverpool side... loooooooool.
both great players. Gerrard may be more complete as a footballer, but reducing Lampard on his goals isn‘t fair either. I remember the time against prime R10 at barca and many other big games he stepped up and scored crucial goals. I don‘t think that these types of comparisons are fair to any player as they both were great and left a mark in the PL history.
Evra chose Gerrard and proceeds to explain Lampard is better.
u missed the point then
@@KASKUSevenFOLD how is carrying an unsuccessful Liverpool team comparable to scoring 20 goals a season?
What if he is the reason for Liverpool not being successful? You ever thought of that? He played with Mascherano, Alonso, Kuyt, Torres, Suarez - don't give me the bullshit that he played with some randoms.@@neorenjie
@@hristiyanhristov2480 Liverpool during that period were a solid top 4 team. They had ballers like you mentioned, but they always lacked quality in some areas of the pitch. Top 4 is fair enough.
I think this is the same comparison as Xavi and Iniesta. Senselless comparision, one is more offensive and scores more goals other is more of a leader and controls the game and the team.
Just have to score ??? Evra talking like he scored goals.....lampard the blue legend
Lampard wasn't a box to box, everybody can come back but you watch their style of play. He was an hole player, playing exactly behind the striker.
Like Bruno Fernandes, Gerrard actually did it for a season behind Torres.
Obviously Lampard had more physicality and defence than Bruno but that is what he was, like Kaka playing just behind the striker watching him drag away a defender. Like Bellingham is doing this season.
lampard is one of the worst ever second strikers to exist if that is your argument. you need pace to thrive in this position, lampard was slow as heck
@@glidinggolovinn Griezmann isn't exactly fast, you can bring something different.
Secondly Grealish isn't fast for a winger, football isn't white and black.
griezmann is extremely quick. at real sociedad he played as a RW. bro your braincells are hurting mines with your rhetoric and sophistry
grealish isn't a world class winger. he is used for possession only and the point is that lampard isn't a second striker since you need pace to occupy the second striker role. you literally have no knowledge of football to claim this, it's quite honestly absurd for your brain to claim griezmann didn't have much pace when he factually did. lampard has zero pace and you have zero grasp on how the second striker role functions my guy. sort your brain out and debate honestly for once in your ordinary mind
@@afallenworld1581
griezmann is extremely quick. at real sociedad he played as a RW. your brain is hurting mines with your rhetoric and sophistry
grealish isn't a world class winger. he is used for possession only and the point is that lampard isn't a second striker since you need pace to occupy the second striker role. you literally have no knowledge of football to claim this, it's quite honestly absurd for your brain to claim griezmann didn't have much pace when he factually did. lampard has zero pace and you have zero grasp on how the second striker role functions my guy. sort your brain out and debate honestly for once in your miserable state of mind
You have lost your mind smiley! Lampard played in a 442 first with ranieri and then in a 433 with mourinho on the left side of central midfield with makelel in the defensive midfield position. Same with ancelotti. How do you play as a 10 in a 442 FLAT or a 433 with a DM and 2 CM's??? You must have a tactic nobody knows about.
Gerald was Liverpool period
Evra is speaking out of sentiment and is very obvious
Enough said he played with two world class midfielders his whole career lampard had world class talent round him his whole career
Because Xabi Alonso was a Liverpool cook? I get it.
Today, it is the playing Lampard Chelsea are lacking and see how bad they are. Hazard replaced him in his retirement with that midfield goal return. Today, Palmer is trying but he still needs to run for it. Makelele retired, Ballack too but Lampard still excelled. It was not the mid that strengthened Lampard, Lampard was just good. Not any midfielder matches his arrival in the box. He outmatched strikers even in that. He was at West
😂😂😂😂 the first line got......I personally I'm a gerrard guy but those are the best points I've heard brought forward the lampard debate
@@michaelmoeller6982 Truth be told. I don't think Liverpool had far bad team to compete at the elite level. We are talking of a team that Won Champions League, yet Evra makes us believe they were bad and Gerrard carried the team. I think it is just managerial and ownership issues that affected Liverpool. I'm not underrating Gerrard, the guy was the best during that time but it will be a debate that will never fizzle.
In as much as Chelsea strikers scored goals, but we must agree that it was not Salah and Haaland rate. Their midfield, I'm talking of Lampard before then Hazard later filled the gap. Today, the strikers are misfiring, the midfield is not doing that better.
@joshuaombaka3116 Gerrard carried Liverpool boss evra is spot on ,all Liverpools major honors at the time Gerrard was there was because of him ,he made a habit of scoring very important goals in very important games ,hence he was the difference......without him they don't get to the champions league final and without him there is no Fa Cup against West ham ...Gerrard to me is a better footballer than lampard in an unfair conversation. Lampard was special and I don't think we shall ever see a player like lampard or Gerrard. ...I personally would have chosen to have Lampards career over Gerrards ,Chelsea had all the new ambromovich money and were stable in terms of leadership, Gerrard had a much tougher environment and still cemented Legendary status . He was that guy. ....Chelsea had Terry, Lampard and Drogba, Essien, makalele who were among the glory. .........Suarez and Torres were legends to but dint win anything. ..Gerrard won the champions league with lesser I believe
@@michaelmoeller6982 I just wondered who was Xabi Alonso, and who was Mascherano? Gerrard had a prime Torres, Arbeloa. The same Mereiles who played at Liverpool, won Champions League with Chelsea. I am not saying that Chelsea team was equal to Liverpool team, I am saying that diminishing Lampard career that he played with great men than Gerrard is a lie. Lampard is arguably Chelsea Greatest of All Time, so even among these greats, Lampard was an edge above them. I can tell you more than 10 matches Chelsea won because Lampard was there.
WE know Liverpool diminished and left Top Four, it was not because Gerrard left, it is because the likes of Mascherano and Alonso left. Those who replaced them were not that standard. The liverpool team 2006-2008 was a word class. Lampard excelled as individual not as Chelsea. I believe he would still score if behind him was Masherano and Alonso.
You love lampard I love Gerrard no problem with that ,what they did for the game and for there fans should be celebrated, I think its a mistake comparing them,there's no true Chelsea fan that would ever think Gerrard is better ,there's no true Liverpool fan that would say lampard was better, none of us are in a position to speak objectively....football is more than goals and stats ,all those times lampard carried your team across the line ,scoring those crucial goals in the last minute that joy it would bring you almost like you had seen a superhero in action, I have them to in Gerrard, there's no argument that should convince us otherwise, these guys were superheroes, I fell in love with football because of the moments and things Gerrard did ,I'm sure it was the same with u and frank
Lampard taught me what a playmaker does then i saw Iniesta. Respect all Lampard, Gerrard and Iniesta.
To be fair lampard had legends in the midfield while Gerard not so much
Gerrard all day long over lampard
Evra hotel room monologue before CL final @ Monaco vs Chelsea:
"Mf Lampard, Mf p****y"
Not even a debate to be fair!
Steven Gerrard thank you
What a mighty argument - he had to just go and score the goal. Which is the hardest and most important thing in football - oooh, he just... had to do that :D :D :D
Respect to footballers, but they aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.
That's a very fair assessment.
Howson wasn’t expecting that answer he was furious inside he said Lampard
Lampard had no responsibility really , had other midfielders to do all dirty work so he could go on and score , Gerrard had to do eveything
I alway knew when lampard crashed the box its a goal. They are both really good but i go stevie g
I love Lampard, but same as Evra, i pick Stevie all day.
But you forget about Xabi alonso and Mascherano. Even playing with these 2 best player, Gerrard never could win the EPL.
Lampard was hero, when the striker was off-fire.
Yeah can’t argue with that
The tragedy is that they didnt gel together playing for England
The best English midfielder was named Paul
Strikers are alowed to have players back them but not midfielders? LOL
To me Gerrard is the Third best player to Ever play in the Premier League. Behind Cristiano Ronaldo and Thierry Henry. I know Shearer, Berkamp, Suarez, Torres, Shearer, Drogba, Lampard, Scholes, Rooney, Vidic, Van Dijk, Bale, Son, Salah, Yaya, Van Nistelrooy, deserve their own well deserved credit... Thierry, Steven and Cristiano are the best of the bunch Imo ❤️
I was gerrard for a long time but I think lampard just edges it.
Lol wrong
Lampard is the better
gerrard > scholes > lampard is the only correct ranking
lampard doesn't really edge gerrard in anything besides his IQ in the box and around that. intelligence is important but he needed more speed and dribbling ability to challenge gerrard
Edges him in goals and assists. Two most important things
@@kingcameron8374 you don't know ball
If its easy to score goals , why dont Gerard score lampards numbers
Was makele and essien the reason terry had more goals for chelsea than iniesta had for Barca too?
This is crazy
Lampard being a 10 that just scored goals is absolutely moronic and wrong
Said this for ages lampard could only do that coz he had makelele an players like essien behind him he was a 10 he werent a cm
Carrying Liverpool without an epl
U mean alonso was not helping Steve g the only difference is Gerrard was more as a fighter thts all nothing else
Lamps on any day what a player he was
Gerrard does everything with Liverpool. While Lampard is more of in an advanced role. He can be a 6, but most of his career, he is an 8.
I'd choose lampard I just proffered him and I'm a gooner before anyone jumps on the band wagon
Gerrard had much more to his game than, frank tap in Lampard
true
Both strong, but i think lampard was more complete than Gerrard.
He just wasn’t
Literally anyone that knows football would disagree with you
That’s the maddest statement I think I’ve ever read. More complete 😂
You could play Gerrard at RB and he did in fact play there. Could Lampard do that? No. Gerrard had more to his game, sorry.
lampard had very little running ability. gerrard wasn't exactly quick either but his defensive utility in tracking down runners like ronaldo is pretty impressive. lampard is only superior to gerrard in the box but even then, gerrard has a better aerial threat and shooting in the box
Gerrard
we gonna forget prime Xabi Alonso, Kuyt, Riise??
Exactly lampard doesn’t the get criticism they give to Pogba. Lampard had great midfielders next to him, doing all the hard work so he could shine.
Even Michael Ballard who is better than lampard, watch him play for Germany you’ll know why, even he had to take a step back for lamps 🤷
Michael ballack was never better than Lampard. Ballack took a step back for Lampard cos Lampard was the best at doing what he knows how to do(scoring goals,late runs and pure intelligence).
Ballack can't do half of what Lampard did.
@@SugarcaneBaby your nuts bro. You must be 16 years old.
But agree to disagree 👍
@@avatarkana1161 I must be 16 years old and I watched both play from their youth into their prime?
Y'all underrate Lampard too much cos he wasn't all agile and physically energetic.
The names mentioned by others can't do what he did. That simple.
Agreed.
Stevie G is more complete midfielder than Lampard.
👏🙌
Wow the disrespect to Lampard😅
Gerrard more centre. Lampard more to top
lets be real Lampard wasn't a Guy Setting Tempo dictating Play Being an Engine In the Midfield he was a Final action Player That Was placed as a midfielder on Paper plain and simple
Let's be real, you have never watched a single chelsea game neither you know what Lampard did. Watching few compilations from youtube doesn't make you an expert
That's not even close ! Gerrard by a mile
100%
Gerrard better midfielder, lampard better scorer
That's something someone who never saw either of them play would say
Gerard.
I want to give an edge to Gerrard💀💀💀
You should ask overhyped or overhyped?
Pretty simple ,, Chelsea would have had the success without lampard in that period facts!! Liverpool wouldn’t have a single trophy if it wasn’t for Gerrard
Somewhat different players. Gerrard was a true box to box midfielder, while Lampard was more of a #10
Lampard was a box to box midfielder. Unless you never watched him play.
@@joshuaombaka3116He wasn't a box to box, everybody can come back but you watch their style of play. He was an hole player, playing exactly behind the striker.
Like Bruno Fernandes, Gerrard actually did it for a season behind Torres.
@@afallenworld1581 Lampard was not an out and out attacking player. He had defensive duties, and you have to know then that he became prominent under Mourinho. If Lampard was a number 10, where was Joe cole, later Juan Mata playing? His goal return was just due to his eye to get into the box at the right moment.
they both play the same position. rcm
@@joshuaombaka3116 You arr right that Joe Cole waz more suited to be the 10. But that's the thing, Lampard was actually more closer to the Striker even though Cole was far superior player in a creative/dribbling sense.
This was possible because Chelsea fullback at thatt time were insane defensive monsters, unlike today whete wingback enjoying going forward than backwards.
If Gerard was captain
England had already won the world cup
Lol okay
English football fans🤝 ridiculous hypothetical
Gerrard!!! He did it for Liverpool on his own most of the time! Lampard, Xavi, Iniesta,Zidane, Scholes, Pirlo etc was always surrounded by superstars!
Stevie G was a 1 man Heartbeat.
Alonso is a joke to you ? Mascherano is a joke to you 😅😅😅
"He just have to go and score the goal", okay Patrice, so tell me why Lampard has more assists than Gerrard also? He also has more successful tackles made in his own half, more interceptions in his own half, and also beats Gerrard in all chance creation/big chances created stats? I love this shit narrative that all Lampard did was score goals, because it fucks his legacy and the actual work he did. He was a BOX TO BOX midfielder than put in absolute work both defensively and offensively, fuck off with the bullshit 'AlL hE dID wAs ScOrE'.
Who is this man?
Gerard anyday
Lampard on number 10 Gerrard on number 8.
Gerard 100%
Gerrard played with Xabi Alonso and Mascherano behind him
For a while. Then it was Joe Allen and Lucas Leiva.
Lampard is better
In no universe is Lampard better than Gerrard
That statement suck, do u know what Alonso did for Gerrard, besides lampsrd scored more and had more assists
He says Gerard but spends the whole video saying how great lampard is, naming his achievements, and can't name anything about Gerrard ...
In the end Evra says," i wanna give a edge To Gerard
He says that you m0ron
Lampard ⭐️ Stevie G was probably capable of more different things, Lamps was capable of more outrageous things!
He said Lampard just jhave to go and score the goals , disappointing from evra , how do you just go and score the goal 😂😂
If scoring goals was that easy. Why didnt scholes try it himsefl
Why do the majority of players always say Gerrard? Oh i dont know. Could it be because he genuinely was better overall? Tired of mostly chelsea fans always saying Lampard.
I don't think it is Chelsea fans. Lampard entered the Premier League hall of Fame ahead of Gerard. So, not only Chelsea fans could give him that.
You have to know he got a podium finish for Balloon d'or. So no overating. Everyone have their preference.
Lampard is better
i grew up as a chelsea fan and gerrard + scholes are better than him. it's not even a debate, drogba carried him
It's 50-50
Yees? Lampard won UCL as a captain
Who did the others pick?
Gerrard never won EPL Title Lampard did
Get rid of this music. So annoying!
Please stop forcing the idea that these two players were some kind of football geniuses .
These are 2 extremely average players.
pretty much. tbf rio ferdinand doesn't think berbatov is an elite tier striker, so that sums up his lack of football knowledge
😂😂😂 i bet you live iniesta and xavi .
@@gimmesomechocho7878
xavi is average but why mention iniesta? he's arguably the GOAT
@@glidinggolovinn 🤣🤣🤣 Iniesta and xavi would be raggdoll and bullied if they played on this era . They cant toich players like Lampard Gerard Zidane kaka Nedved .
@@gimmesomechocho7878 I am ok with the duo , but those 2 are way better than Gerard and Lampard.
Gerard and Lampard are average players , nothing very special really.
Comparing legends of different eras are completely nonsense and a disrespect " to the game"...
Lampard is a no. 10 or even a 2nd striker at times with Drogba dragging defenders away from him
Lampard was not a number 10. The number 10 position was played by the likes of Joe Cole. Lampard was a box to box player, his advantage was his arrival into the box. No one ever matched that.
@@joshuaombaka3116you are confused, Lampard played as a 10. You British confused 8 with 10.
Yes Lampard could play box to box but he was actually an hole player like Kaka.
@@afallenworld1581
lampard had zero pace so he never at all played a similar role to kaka. lampard is awful from any attacking role
lampard is far too slow to be a 10. stop making up fantasies in your mind
@@glidinggolovinn Like Griezmann is slow, Zidane wasn't exactly fast. You keep exposing yourself.
Oh Ok then its hold true for his best mate utd team mate ronaldo also I😂
Shitty music isn't loud enough.
Lampard for me.
Im a united fan and i agree gerrard is better than lampard. Both are classy players dont get me wrong.
Scholes your dady
i think scholes was heavily underrated bc he didnrt score that many goals. he was pivotal and prolly thr best out of the three