Boston Logan in a Bonanza - Real Time
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 พ.ค. 2018
- Several viewers have asked if I can show some of my flights in full length. Here is an attempt to do that, for a short flight - Beverly, MA to Boston Logan International Airport, a distance of 14 nautical miles. You'll see all camera angles simultaneously, and I suggest a 4K display for best quality.
I am very interested in hearing how you like this format, and if you'd like to see longer flights in full length. Please let me know in the comments section below.
Thanks for watching, and if you like this video, please do subscribe.
Just had a chance to view this flight, and I really like the full-flight format, and hope you will continue it with all of your flights. This is a real pilot's video...great composite views show us map position, the MFD, over-the-nose and wingtip views...no silly shots of the airplane's underbelly, thank you! At a time when other You Tube channels are going stale with buddy ride-along flights and meet-ups, you're out there trying to innovate! Keep up the good work!
Thank you for the feedback, William.
Nice format, short and sweet. I was impressed with the ATC and Boston ground. These gals were sharp.
I agree, ATC was very efficient and professional on this flight.
Very well done! The multiple split screens was great. Good learning exercise. Thanks
Thanks, Robert!
- Martin
I like the format. I would like to see your flights like this. Perks my interest. Thank you. Fly safe
Thanks for the feedback, Gary.
Really like how you caption the radio communications on your video, great learning tool for us rusty pilots!! Thank you!
Glad you find it useful, Andy. I'll keep doing this.
Regards, Martin
Yep, this format is a keeper. Thanks.
Thanks foe the feedback, William.
Another great learning video! Fantastic, thank you!
Thank you, James - glad to hear you liked it.
- Martin
Nicely done. Imagine those taxi instructions on a drizzly night and the bright lights from the terminals on your spotted windows! Would've been a chore. I'd take the breezy day and the smell of jet exhaust any time!
Yes. I haven't been to one of these really large airports at night yet, but I'd imagine it's a handful.
I was a CFI at PYM for a while before I went to the airlines. I love flying into BOS now! It’s home for me.
Yes, BOS seems like a very nice airport to fly into. The one downside for me was the landing and handling fees, which were very high even by Class Bravo airport standards. I've been to a lot of those, and BOS was so far the most expensive, by quite a margin.
Martin Pauly that’s unfortunate. I’m glad I do not have to pay them! Everything is considerably more expensive in boston. Don’t even get me started on rent 😣
Hi Martin.....another very nice presentation, I look forward to your videos. I agree with many of the other previous commentators, - this format works well on your shorter flights, or longer flights that have been edited for brevity. I also agree that the view of the cockpit panel 6 pack instruments is much more informative, and thus could replace the transponder/Garmin 530 view in the upper right corner. Thanks for all the time and effort you make on these vidioes!
Thank you for the feedback, Michael. I'll keep it in mind.
Great flight and Format. Hope for more.
Thank you! :-)
Brilliant video!! Can learn a lot from all your videos. 👊
Thank you - glad to hear!
Great Video Martin! I'm really impressed by your editing/post production. I love to see your flights, edited, live, or real time. Thanks!
Thank you, Brad. :-)
Short flight and a long drive :) I liked it. Part of me wanted to see the instrument cluster but another part of my liked the outside view. All in all, well done
Thanks, Michael. A view of the instruments is a frequent request - I've done that a couple of times; it's not easy, but I'll try to do that a little more often.
I like it. Keep em coming.
Thank you for the feedback, Jack.
- Martin
awesome job as usual.....waiting for next adventure
Thank you, Gary.
Great format, love all the simultaneous views.
Thanks for the feedback, Sean.
awesome format!
Vielen Dank, Josef.
Gruss, Martin
For shorter flights with lots going on, this is great. Good job as always!
Thanks for the feedback, John.
Ich liebe diese Format!!
Sehr gut - danke! :-)
I think this is a cool format for short flights
Thank you for the feedback, Jodi.
- Martin
yep great format
Thank you, Phil.
nice edit ! i had to subscribe , that effort right there
Thank you, Sam.
Love this format! Would also love to see more live feeds!
Thanks, Dustin.
As for the live feeds, I haven't quite decided yet when (and more importantly WHERE) to do one of those again, but it'll happen.
Martin Pauly how about a live feed of practice approaches? Showing and explaining how they are done. Your IMC practice approaches in low IFR is one of my favorite videos.
I could try that. My worry is I would lose the cellular connection (video uplink) by going that high. I've tested it in the pattern; it works fine at 1,000 or even 1,500 AGL but gets spotty above that. So the ideal scenario is a flight where there's a lot to see on the ground, prior to take-off - which made Chicago Midway kind of ideal.
Great format! Kind of wish I could see the instruments. As a student pilot at CID, it's been really fun watching your videos!
Good feedback, Michael. Let me try that on a future flight.
Hi Martin. Love this full flight Video. May we please have more? Please also include your trademark Great Commentary? ? Thanks in advance.
Regards, Christopher.
Thanks for the feedback, Christopher. I'll try to be more "talkative" in the future. :-)
As long as the flights are short like this one, the real time video is OK. I would think that longer flights with long periods of watching the scenery crawl by would not be desirable. You do a good job of editing allowing us to get an adequately complete picture and that edited version is more desirable. I like it when I can see at least the artificial horizon, air speed, vertical speed, and altimeter as a minimum. More when you have the cameras to do it.
Thank you for the detailed feedback, Carl.
I agree with Carl. The edited videos are extremely educational.
Thank you.
I'm sold, brother! i like this format! But don't throw the old format out the window either!
Yeah, I guess from the comments received so far, I can see a strong interest in both the old and the new format. I'll just have to mix and match (or do both). :-)
Thanks for the feedback.
I echo some of the other comments. I prefer videos that are in the 30 min. range because I don't always have the block of time to watch longer. This edit was interesting with the multiple cameras, but I do agree that more of the instrument panel would be good. I know you are not providing instruction, but the speeds, climb/descent rates, altitudes, etc. are informational for some learning. I also found your planning videos to be helpful in putting context to your decisions and the process you use. Thanks for the time and effort in creating the videos.
Thanks for the feedback, Ben.
You were right in my backyard, I'm just south of Boston and have been into BOS and BVY many times. Too many cameras for me and causes too much distraction. I prefer a camera or two outside and one inside the plane.
Martin you do not like small airports do you?Municipal Ports have no challenge......Great video!!!
Haha - I do go to small airport, of course - probably 99% of the time. But for the big ones I bring the GoPros.
- Martin
Another great video Martin. I like the format. Length is nice, I like to watch up to an hour. Instrument panel would be cool too. Love the position display on the charts, the view straight ahead, transponder/coms and the pilot camera.
For future videos it would be great to have both formats, like many viewers already suggested.
Who was your german passenger?
Greetings from Bonn/Germany
Andreas
Hallo Andreas,
My passenger was my nephew Leonard - my sister and her family visited from Germany last summer, and Leonard had to cut his US visit short due to another vacation trip with some of his friends. So I took him to Boston Logan for his flight back home (on Lufthansa).
Herzliche Grüsse, Martin
I liked it. Maybe up to hour to hour and a half would be my limit.
Thanks for the feedback, Damian.
Martin,
What video editing software do you use ... and what do you use for doing your great graphics.
Thanks, Chuck
Hi Chuck,
I use Final Cut Pro from Apple for video editing, and Adobe Photoshop for the graphics (still images).
- Martin
If it's a long flight I wouldn't show all of it. Also the wing shots aren't really necessary. Maybe the panel shot would give some good info to people. A little about cruise power and TAS with fuel burn would be good on longer flights too.
Makes sense - good suggestions. Thank you!
- Martin
Recommend one camera be focused on the 6-pack.
27:00 mmmmmm Piaggio Avanti!!
Yes, the beautiful Piaggio Avanti. That would be a nice airplane to fly!
Love real.
If you trade your 530 for a GTN750 it will make ground taxi and approaches very easy and quick
That would of course be nice. However, after upgrading to the GTN750 I wouldn't have money left to pay for gas. :-)
Regards, Martin
Fun ride-along. Thanks. Longer form videos are good, but if they contain long sequences with nothing happening and not ATC chatter then its OK to edit that out. Taxiing, takeoff, climb out, and ATC calls in cruise, then decent, approach, landing, and taxiing are all A-OK. Use your judgment. If you think a long sequence with nothing going on (and you are not talking to the audience) need to be edited then OK.
Thanks for the feedback, Paul.
How often do you make it to New England? I am in New Hampshire and do a lot of flying in the areas of this video!
Not often, I'm afraid. That one trip last year was my first and (so far) only trip to the area, visiting Rhode Island and Massachusetts.
- Martin
@@martinpauly well, nevertheless, I thoroughly enjoy your first class videos!
4 tiles is a much better use of the screen real estate
Hi Dmitri, just to check my understanding, you are saying using six tiles made it too crowded?
You'd prefer just four?
Hi Martin, in my opinion 4 tiles would be an ideal use of the real estate:
1) Pilot
2) Front looking camera
3) Instrument panel (most used instrument(s)
4) iPad
Side view ... there is not much happening, that is why if I were you, I'd make the front pointed camera and instrument panel tiles wider because this is where the "action is"
Got it - thank you.
You may jave addressed this in another video, but what do you do for a living that allows you to fly so much and travel so broadly?
Hi Matt, I have a pretty "normal" office job in an aerospace company, though I don't fly for my job. My flying is all for fun and travel, e.g. for family vacation trips or quick weekend getaways. The videos on my channel have been accumulating over several years, it's not like I have a trip like this every month (sadly) - but when I think there's going to be something nice or special to see, I bring the cameras along on my flights.
Martin Pauly I have to travel periodically for work. Whenever it's feasible, I try to fly myself. I haven't flown to as many places as you, but I looked back at my logbook and have been into 130 different airports in 10 years (I went about a year and half without flying due to a medical siuation). I put up a big US map in my office with colored thumbtacks where I've flown myself.
Matt, you make me jealous. Use of small GA airplanes was not just allowed but encouraged in our company in the 1970s and 1980s, but then I guess we became a victim of corporate thinking and liability concerns, like so many organizations. So today it is strictly forbidden for our employees to fly themselves for work.
I do have a map in my hangar, much like you describe, with a pin marking each airport I've taken the Bonanza. Still needs a lot more pins, especially in the western half of the country. :-)
ok on short flight like this but longer I couldn't watch all that
Thank you for the feedback, Don.
- Martin
Nice job! A bit odd that you edited out the part where you picked up the ATIS...
Edited out... you are funny!
I never got the ATIS on this flight. (I know, I said I would get it.) Short flight, busy approach control frequency, and really the flight was so short that the weather couldn't have changed that much from take-off to touch-down. Plus those automated ATIS systems they use at the very large airports tend to create very, very long messages. Right or wrong, I decided I didn't need the ATIS on this particular flight.
ATC gave you runway wind and altimeter - that's the important stuff anyway. When I depart a close in airport and land BOS, I'll listen to the ATIS just before I check in with approach.
Grüße aus Berlin haben gerade diesen Kanal gefunden welche Art von Bonanza du fliegst
Hallo Michael, ich habe eine A36, also sechs Sitze. Baujahr 1978.
Viele Grüsse aus Iowa, Martin
It was all good. But maybe you could give some narrating while you are flying. Talk to the cameras a little bit.
Good feedback - thank you, Charles.
Thank you for your time making your videos!!!!
The multi-screens are great, but you should put the wing views on either side of the nose view, to make a 180 degree panorama.
That makes sense - I'll keep that in mind. Thank you!
oops
To many screens for me .....
Martin, WAY too distracting. Get some good 'B' roll footage and cut between the main scene and what you are trying to emphasize. I usually really like your videos but not this one.
Good to know, Frank. Maybe a compromise could be to make two edits of such flights in the future, one cut to highlight the key activities, and another one for those that like to see things in real time.