Now this is a damn test goddammit. Even specifically catering towards the video editor. Amazing. I am copping this laptop. I am fine with putting my quality down to 1/4th to edit the simple things I would on a laptop. Thanks for the effort man. Great stuff.
Do you recomment this laptop for colour grading?? Will the device hang while colour grading ? Nd can i edit 6k videos in it?....which one would you prefer this or proart studiobook 16(2023)?......btw 👍video
Hello, thank you for the review. I assume you might have a sponsorship arrangement with Asus, but I'd like to suggest looking into the new Lenovo Yoga Pro i9 14". It's an absolute beast when it comes to editing, and the CPU/GPU performance truly shines with the Intel 13905 and 4060 NVIDIA, but there is also a 4070 option as well with 64GB Ram. In my opinion, thanks to its Mini LED Screen and the 6400 Ram, it takes the lead as the superior option for on-the-go edits, handling 4K effortlessly. I switched to a 4TB SSD internal as Well. Also, I took it a step further and repasted it with Liquid Metal, resulting in the elimination of thermal throttling. Now, I no longer experience those performance limitations Only PL1/2. I hope you can maintain some level of impartiality in your evaluations. Having tested both the Asus 14x and the Lenovo Yoga, I firmly believe that the Yoga outperforms the competition, both in terms of performance and build quality.
Would love it if you tried out and included in your list a few custom laptop builds. Like the Falcon Northwest DRX, or maybe the XMG Neo Laptop with the external Oasis watercooling addon? Both of those are marketed as "desktop replacements" and would love to see real-world performance testing with them.
Merhaba, kanalınızı yeni keşfettim. İçeriklerinizi genel olarak beğenmekteyim. Yeni laptop almayı planlıyorum. Sizce "ProArt Studiobook Pro 16 OLED (W7604)" satın almamı önerir misiniz?
I feel like you left out possibly the most important component of any editing setup: the monitor. I understand you're trying to potray video EDITING performance, which doesn't necessarily include color grading into the equation. However, if you are editing these kinds of files on the go you most certainly going to be delivering out of the laptop itself. With all that's going on with Mini-LED, QD-OLED, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG, Rec 2020, DCI-P3 and most high-end grading monitors costing as much or more than these laptops I am very skeptical on the qualities of those panels. One of the reasons is that I'd have jumped in on the M series Macbooks trendwagon straight away if it weren't for the fact that the monitor is slightly under 4k, meaning all my editing and grading would be downscaled by a fraction instead of a half or quarter. That can introduce aliasing and will result in a perceptually lesser detailed image, perhaps even worse than 1/2 resolution, so it's kind of a dealbreaker to me and I'm hoping M3 Macs will have native 4k displays as standard. However, I highly doubt that will be the case and that Apple has accidentally given their "Pro" laptops this kind of inconvenience at random. I believe they won't release anything alike until the Pro Studio Diplay XDR will be replaced by a 4k 1600nit or 8k variant. Either way I really hope you at least plan to give some feedback on the display capabilities of each model by considering HDR delivery capabilities. I personally shoot 6k R3D so I'm already going to need high end hardware and got money to spare, issue is no product has ticked all my boxes so far and the display is the one that's always left out. That said cheers for the video and thank you for doing this kind of extensive product-range reviews, they are super helpful and you're one of the few real ones if you know what I mean. Side notes: reviews on monitors in the 3000 to 6000 euro range are nowhere to be found, both on TH-cam and web in general. No one has truly covered Asus Proart Display series, there's plenty new 4k QD-OLED and alike TVs, there's a plethora of high-end HDR gaming displays with VESA certifications with a completely useless resolution (for video work) of 3560x1440 that still sport 98 to 99% DCI-P3 coverage anyway and no one's talking about any of these (from a videomaker pov). That means looking for a budget grading monitor today feels like walking into a jungle where no one has ever entered before. R3D Raw has to be played from a paid version of Davinci, otherwise dGPU accelleration will be off and won't be able to be turned on at all (which is why M series Macs always perform better on TH-cam benchmarks). Don't ask me how I know... In addition, a single or few R3D clips with color transform and correction are already heavy to playback but it's when you start working on a whole project that you really feel the weight of it. In other words, try adding multiple different clips to a timeline and see what happens. My RTX 2080 had enough juice and vRAM to run a few sample files, however as soon as I got my own RED camera and started working on projects the vRAM would fill up over time (30 min give or take) and I'd have to restart DaVinci to make things smooth enough to work. I now have a Strix RTX 4090 and even that isn't enough to add advanced effects into the equation, however that's also on me for having a dated AMD CPU. You really do need to have an integrated GPU to not go crazy while working with these files and as far as I can tell they are easy to run smoothly when the footage is untouched but you're on the edge most often than not and any addition will tip the scale completely. I.E. you can run 24fps 6k R3D files as smooth as silk on a base M1 Macbook Air but add ANY effect and it will basically not run at all.
you mean well, but it seems to me, you are redoing a Puget Benchmark from scratch without much obvious added value. I think you should explain why your test is better than the multi-codec, multi-function (playback, GPU effects; export) the friends at Puget have put together in a synthetic number.
Here's why I'm doing these tests: 1. Pugetbench doesn't have live playback score anymore 2. A score of 40 vs 50 vs 80, how does it translate to your workflow, what exactly changes with your codecs? 3. If you're working with certain types of codecs and want to know if certain hardware is able to handle it, I bet a test like this will be a more useful test than a score of 60 or 100 Let me know what you think? :)
thanks for the information! What version of Windows do you use? Windows 11 Home Single Language Windows 11 pro? Windows 10 pro? . My problem is in Premier. does not have good performance
Would love to see the XMG Neo with Oasis. The loud fans on laptops are super annoying and the water cooling really give it a boost in performance as well as less dB
👏👏👏 great , thanks . i appericte you for video . do you think this config can pass all of your tests? i9 14900hx -32GB- RTX4060 asus ROG . Editing and mixing 4k and 6k . i use too much effect . thanks
*IMPORTANTE NOTE: As myself a producer i can say this test is not well done. I mean not as it should. No hater here! I love the videos, BUT.* a) Editing in INTER-Frame LONG-GOP on highly compressed codecs like 264/265 its DUMB! I know, I know everyone do it, but its wrong. Try o edit on Intra frames codecs like Sony XAVC or any other intra frame codec and you will have no problem at all 4k, 10bit, 8k ecc. b) Comparing 265 / 264 timeline against RAW timeline its another dumb comparation. 265 / 265 timeline the computer have to decompress the frames, calculate the Long Gop frames, and so on... On the RAW in other hand the computer have to read RAW and playback on the timeline... - 2 separate technologies to handle the file format. c) Any computer on this test is able to handle 4k 60fps or even 8k if they are INTRA-Frame and not INTER-Frame. Long Gop. *FINAL NOTE:* Please search for INTRA-Frame and INTER-Frame and what codec you can use to edit your footage. In the internet age everyone use the tools and technology out of the box, without reading or learning about it, that is why everyone is editing in 264 / 265. I´m here to HELP! Not a hater! BIG NEWS: You know that 264 / 265 are output codecs not editing codecs?? BTW search also about it. It will help your editing job really well.
Back in may I tried the Zenbook duo with Intel i9-12900H and 3050Ti and it was crazy hot and loud with the fans.. it also struggled with some codecs so I got a MBP M1 Max for 300€ more and haven't looked back since....
I just need to know how one thing.. . How much noise does the Proart studiobook 16 OLED make... how is the batterylife.. how is the scrubbing performance in Premiere pro.. does it handle everything from the C70 and the R5C in all formtats and codex... :P is it better than my Macbook pro 1M Pro ??
When I am on the go. I want to know how it actually performs on battery because most of the time on the go I don't get any power source in our country. If you can show that that will be actually very helpful thanks
When you say creators, you should state that you are talking for Video and 2D graphics. For 3d creation, all those laptops are a not good option. To have the GPU spin all the time, it drives you crazy.
![[Full Episode] MasterChef Junior Thailand มาสเตอร์เชฟ จูเนียร์ ประเทศไทย Season 3 Episode 10](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8kldrPPsDZs/mqdefault.jpg)
Now this is a damn test goddammit. Even specifically catering towards the video editor. Amazing. I am copping this laptop. I am fine with putting my quality down to 1/4th to edit the simple things I would on a laptop. Thanks for the effort man. Great stuff.
It's the Best hardware testing on TH-cam for creators I've seen so far.
Tech Notice is raising the bar for the others in the industry =)
love this series of testing I can't wait to see more of it
Wow impressive overview. I skipped directly to the conclusion but I can see from the chapters that you really put it through the ringer.
This is crazy,the best way to buy laptop in this channel.😂❤
Thanks for this series!!! currently looking for a editing laptop
Do you recomment this laptop for colour grading?? Will the device hang while colour grading ? Nd can i edit 6k videos in it?....which one would you prefer this or proart studiobook 16(2023)?......btw 👍video
What if you compare the one you’re reviewing or a better one vs MacBook Pro M1 or M2, I wonder which one would take the lead in video editing?!
Hello, thank you for the review. I assume you might have a sponsorship arrangement with Asus, but I'd like to suggest looking into the new Lenovo Yoga Pro i9 14". It's an absolute beast when it comes to editing, and the CPU/GPU performance truly shines with the Intel 13905 and 4060 NVIDIA, but there is also a 4070 option as well with 64GB Ram. In my opinion, thanks to its Mini LED Screen and the 6400 Ram, it takes the lead as the superior option for on-the-go edits, handling 4K effortlessly. I switched to a 4TB SSD internal as Well.
Also, I took it a step further and repasted it with Liquid Metal, resulting in the elimination of thermal throttling. Now, I no longer experience those performance limitations Only PL1/2. I hope you can maintain some level of impartiality in your evaluations. Having tested both the Asus 14x and the Lenovo Yoga, I firmly believe that the Yoga outperforms the competition, both in terms of performance and build quality.
FYI, there's no sponsored arrangement with ASUS in this video series. This is all from my own back! :)
Would love it if you tried out and included in your list a few custom laptop builds. Like the Falcon Northwest DRX, or maybe the XMG Neo Laptop with the external Oasis watercooling addon? Both of those are marketed as "desktop replacements" and would love to see real-world performance testing with them.
Merhaba, kanalınızı yeni keşfettim. İçeriklerinizi genel olarak beğenmekteyim.
Yeni laptop almayı planlıyorum. Sizce "ProArt Studiobook Pro 16 OLED (W7604)" satın almamı önerir misiniz?
I feel like you left out possibly the most important component of any editing setup: the monitor.
I understand you're trying to potray video EDITING performance, which doesn't necessarily include color grading into the equation.
However, if you are editing these kinds of files on the go you most certainly going to be delivering out of the laptop itself. With all that's going on with Mini-LED, QD-OLED, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG, Rec 2020, DCI-P3 and most high-end grading monitors costing as much or more than these laptops I am very skeptical on the qualities of those panels.
One of the reasons is that I'd have jumped in on the M series Macbooks trendwagon straight away if it weren't for the fact that the monitor is slightly under 4k, meaning all my editing and grading would be downscaled by a fraction instead of a half or quarter. That can introduce aliasing and will result in a perceptually lesser detailed image, perhaps even worse than 1/2 resolution, so it's kind of a dealbreaker to me and I'm hoping M3 Macs will have native 4k displays as standard.
However, I highly doubt that will be the case and that Apple has accidentally given their "Pro" laptops this kind of inconvenience at random. I believe they won't release anything alike until the Pro Studio Diplay XDR will be replaced by a 4k 1600nit or 8k variant.
Either way I really hope you at least plan to give some feedback on the display capabilities of each model by considering HDR delivery capabilities.
I personally shoot 6k R3D so I'm already going to need high end hardware and got money to spare, issue is no product has ticked all my boxes so far and the display is the one that's always left out.
That said cheers for the video and thank you for doing this kind of extensive product-range reviews, they are super helpful and you're one of the few real ones if you know what I mean.
Side notes: reviews on monitors in the 3000 to 6000 euro range are nowhere to be found, both on TH-cam and web in general. No one has truly covered Asus Proart Display series, there's plenty new 4k QD-OLED and alike TVs, there's a plethora of high-end HDR gaming displays with VESA certifications with a completely useless resolution (for video work) of 3560x1440 that still sport 98 to 99% DCI-P3 coverage anyway and no one's talking about any of these (from a videomaker pov). That means looking for a budget grading monitor today feels like walking into a jungle where no one has ever entered before.
R3D Raw has to be played from a paid version of Davinci, otherwise dGPU accelleration will be off and won't be able to be turned on at all (which is why M series Macs always perform better on TH-cam benchmarks). Don't ask me how I know...
In addition, a single or few R3D clips with color transform and correction are already heavy to playback but it's when you start working on a whole project that you really feel the weight of it. In other words, try adding multiple different clips to a timeline and see what happens.
My RTX 2080 had enough juice and vRAM to run a few sample files, however as soon as I got my own RED camera and started working on projects the vRAM would fill up over time (30 min give or take) and I'd have to restart DaVinci to make things smooth enough to work. I now have a Strix RTX 4090 and even that isn't enough to add advanced effects into the equation, however that's also on me for having a dated AMD CPU. You really do need to have an integrated GPU to not go crazy while working with these files and as far as I can tell they are easy to run smoothly when the footage is untouched but you're on the edge most often than not and any addition will tip the scale completely.
I.E. you can run 24fps 6k R3D files as smooth as silk on a base M1 Macbook Air but add ANY effect and it will basically not run at all.
Thanks for dumbing down at the end Hahaha i dont know much about computers
you mean well, but it seems to me, you are redoing a Puget Benchmark from scratch without much obvious added value. I think you should explain why your test is better than the multi-codec, multi-function (playback, GPU effects; export) the friends at Puget have put together in a synthetic number.
Here's why I'm doing these tests:
1. Pugetbench doesn't have live playback score anymore
2. A score of 40 vs 50 vs 80, how does it translate to your workflow, what exactly changes with your codecs?
3. If you're working with certain types of codecs and want to know if certain hardware is able to handle it, I bet a test like this will be a more useful test than a score of 60 or 100
Let me know what you think? :)
thanks for the information!
What version of Windows do you use?
Windows 11 Home Single Language
Windows 11 pro?
Windows 10 pro?
. My problem is in Premier. does not have good performance
Would love to see the XMG Neo with Oasis. The loud fans on laptops are super annoying and the water cooling really give it a boost in performance as well as less dB
👏👏👏 great , thanks . i appericte you for video . do you think this config can pass all of your tests?
i9 14900hx -32GB- RTX4060 asus ROG . Editing and mixing 4k and 6k . i use too much effect . thanks
Looking forward to a couple of these computer models. Would it be possible to include bitrates in the chapters?
First ❤
*IMPORTANTE NOTE: As myself a producer i can say this test is not well done. I mean not as it should. No hater here! I love the videos, BUT.*
a) Editing in INTER-Frame LONG-GOP on highly compressed codecs like 264/265 its DUMB! I know, I know everyone do it, but its wrong. Try o edit on Intra frames codecs like Sony XAVC or any other intra frame codec and you will have no problem at all 4k, 10bit, 8k ecc.
b) Comparing 265 / 264 timeline against RAW timeline its another dumb comparation. 265 / 265 timeline the computer have to decompress the frames, calculate the Long Gop frames, and so on... On the RAW in other hand the computer have to read RAW and playback on the timeline... - 2 separate technologies to handle the file format.
c) Any computer on this test is able to handle 4k 60fps or even 8k if they are INTRA-Frame and not INTER-Frame. Long Gop.
*FINAL NOTE:* Please search for INTRA-Frame and INTER-Frame and what codec you can use to edit your footage.
In the internet age everyone use the tools and technology out of the box, without reading or learning about it, that is why everyone is editing in 264 / 265. I´m here to HELP! Not a hater!
BIG NEWS: You know that 264 / 265 are output codecs not editing codecs?? BTW search also about it. It will help your editing job really well.
I found a hidden gem comment
Back in may I tried the Zenbook duo with Intel i9-12900H and 3050Ti and it was crazy hot and loud with the fans.. it also struggled with some codecs so I got a MBP M1 Max for 300€ more and haven't looked back since....
I just need to know how one thing.. . How much noise does the Proart studiobook 16 OLED make... how is the batterylife.. how is the scrubbing performance in Premiere pro..
does it handle everything from the C70 and the R5C in all formtats and codex... :P is it better than my Macbook pro 1M Pro ??
well, wait for part 4 :)
Great video as always... great work - Must have taken long time to record all of that @@theTechNotice
When I am on the go. I want to know how it actually performs on battery because most of the time on the go I don't get any power source in our country. If you can show that that will be actually very helpful thanks
In that case Apple Macs are the best for on the battery power video editing :)
thanks
@@theTechNotice
I am lost, a "best video editing laptop" video without a Macbook Pro?
Louis Rossman intensifies.
❤
🎉🎉🎉
Its surprising to see even with i9 hx processor and 4070 gpu the vivobook pro 16x (all under $2k) didn't make the cut here.
The best editing laptop is a gaming laptop with 13900hx and gtx 4090.
Rtx 4090
@@Vj-mi7fi right
Please record videos how to OC ddr5, 4090 and 13900k !!! PLEASE!
When you say creators, you should state that you are talking for Video and 2D graphics. For 3d creation, all those laptops are a not good option. To have the GPU spin all the time, it drives you crazy.
Funny everything you test is the best for creators! Each week it's the"best for creators!" Geez get over it. AKA the new Linus!