When you play, you are indeed reacting to the live signal. However, the microphone is capturing a different sound than your ear due to placement, amplitube, frequency response, room resonance, etc. Re-amping can actually help better match the recording to what your ear heard in the first place.
Exactly, all that "you react to the sound you're recording..." is BS because the mic is in front of the speaker, you are NOT! There are also alot of people playing at home and recording stuff at home, that don't have the luxury to have a cranked amp and then record it (because neighbors and landlords...)
Just wanted to say I hope you, your family and friends are well during a time that must be very worrying given the summer offensive going on. I hope Putlers stupid war is over as soon as possible, so you can then choose which home you want to live in this month: Germany or Ukraine Best wishes
When you reamp, you can play with the amp controls during playback, which is real hard when you're playing. Or use both your hands and your feet to trigger FX pedals. Or tweak FX pedals for different parts of a song. While you're playing, you can just focus on playing instead of all that stuff.
@@niclastname I have Neural Amp Modeler and hundreds of amps+settings I can play through my real amp. Recorded or realtime. I can run my pedals into the computer into a SLO100 sim and back into the power section of my amp. Or any number of ENGLs, Friedmans, Mesas, etc. Even a sim of my actual amp, just to make it meta. There are a lot of uses for a reamp setup.
Reamping should be called "repreprocessing", which is what you actually do with pedals, amps and so on. By the way, I don't like the concept either. But it's amazingly easy to do in Amplitube 5, using only an interface like the Scarlet 2i2, and it's pretty cool for trying a bunch of options. And then you do the take with the preprocessing chain you created / discovered. Great channel, man!
As a producer you need reamping if I want to send say a drum/synth/whatever track through some guitar pedals. I wouldn’t say reamping for that instance is dumb.
Do you need reamping if you are recording in a large room with a shit ton of amps and a switcher you can easily record, maybe not. For us that can't record our tube amps at home it is useful so we can concentrate on playing and then get the sound better later or automate fx or use amp sims. Also the phase switch is needed when blending amps as each gain stage usually flips the phase 180.
Great video…of COURSE! But hmmm… not fully following the idea that reamping isn’t a pretty cool and useful idea & tool…especially where it would concern being able to use all of my cool pedals on my board as a post-production effect, rather than being forced to record them wet or end up using plugins just because they’re easier. Reamping gives you the opportunity to use all of those cool pedal board favorites freely when you mix. I kind of agree about using it with an amp, but utilizing the pedals is really kind of awesome! 🤷♂️😬
I saw Andy video about this one lol I think your point is right about getting it right the first time. I don't have a reamp box, that said it seems to me that it have more benefit for home recording that an actual recording studio. Using the amp line out and IR ( most company just do V30 😑 not many do EV12L for example, or cheap speakers like my Celestion G12E-50 Rocket 50) I notice that if the tone is good on the DAW, is ugly in real life 🤣🤣🤣 but hey, it does work on mix! A Reamp box would actually help in this situation. With a mic the result are better, but my takes got the noise of the unplugged guitar. Of course, this is because I'm not in an optimal space for recording, and cant vol up or isolate my speaker right now. Reamp Box may help here too. I believe there are more scenarios where this tool could prove helpful. It's not a necessity, but is cool having one just in case.
I record a DI track and the effected signal out of my Synergy SYN-1 without the cab-simulation. That way I can play with the full signal chain in Amplitube or just change the cabs around and see what I like best. Most of the time just picking the right cab for my Synergy 5150 track is all I need to do.
A little confused at fhe start Henning as you lulled me back to my youth with Mario bros music during the unboxing. I’m with you on getting a tone right at the start particularly for the performance. I like having a DI as a backup or for laziness when doing backing tracks (doubling tracks with a different amp). Mostly I “re-amp” in the box with plugins if I do it (again laziness avoids plugging in cables too). As a re amp box though this does look simple but flexible, might have to look at one.
Thank you. Refreshing. Can't best real, in the moment guitar. FWIW - to me it does not sound the same as the signal direct from the guitar into live gear, when recorded.
Hemning, have you been pumping iron etc because I never seen you so physically fit & strong. I remember seeing your climbing training wall, have you been using it more? It's always great to see people gain fitness, its encouraging to laggards like myself OK I have CFS/ME etc but I remember how great it was riding my full suspension bike in dense traffic in London 20 years ago. I never been fit enough to do rock climbing at school - despite being top roped - I would regularly fall off a dif/v. dif aka 1a or 1b Whilst my friends were regularly climbing HVS or E1!
And hugs to you back. Honestly see you go from strength to strength & seeing you & your friends both enjoying yourself & Building strong communities is utterly wonderful. You all give me both a feeling of en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mudita and hope for my own future
I think nowadays a lot of people just record DIs and play through plugins anyway. Some of these people then want real amps on the final mix. So there is a market for Re-amping.
Hennnnnnnnnnnnnning! Would a Schtinknormal (and cheap) Palmer reamp box let me run my vocal mics (dynamic or condencer) through my pedals with a good, clean signal, or would I have to run this thing? And if not, are there other options?
I don't see why you need the re-amp box in this situation. I guess Mike Stent did just use an effects sent without any re-amp box when using guitar pedals for the Spice Girls' vocal chain.
"Reamping" isn't restricted to "Reamping" a DI guitar signal through a different amp/mic/impulse response. A signal from absolutely anything that was recorded can be sent through any piece of "outboard" gear such as an entire pedalboard rig, compressors or anything else. I think the term reamping is the problem. An example would be all the cool stuff people are doing with kalimbas through "reamping". Some absolutely epic sounds are being created without anything remotely to do with guitar amplifiers in that context. We need some new terminology boys and girls.
This modelling tech has been around a while now, every new gadget get rave reviews from those paid to review gear, the Elephant, well large rectangular boxes in the room, tell a different story, why do all these reviewers not sell their Valve Amps, while they are still worth something, why would you need them, if you can download a software version of an Amp, nobody wants analogue recording equipment or VHS recorders, why are they hanging on to the fragile and heavy old tech?
Why all the swearing? It doesn't make you cool, or even get your points across with any added authority. It is totally unnecessary and sounds immature and unprofessional. You also come out with guns blazing on your philosophical musings on why you hate re-amping. So what? A re-amp box is simply a tool in one's toolbox. Why should I watch this if the whole things sucks from the get-go? You don't even know what the mute switch is for. Nine minutes in and I'm out...
When you play, you are indeed reacting to the live signal. However, the microphone is capturing a different sound than your ear due to placement, amplitube, frequency response, room resonance, etc. Re-amping can actually help better match the recording to what your ear heard in the first place.
Exactly, all that "you react to the sound you're recording..." is BS because the mic is in front of the speaker, you are NOT!
There are also alot of people playing at home and recording stuff at home, that don't have the luxury to have a cranked amp and then record it (because neighbors and landlords...)
It's my birthday and I'll re-amp if I want to... re-amp if I want to...
Good one
Happy Re-amp day
Just wanted to say I hope you, your family and friends are well during a time that must be very worrying given the summer offensive going on.
I hope Putlers stupid war is over as soon as possible, so you can then choose which home you want to live in this month: Germany or Ukraine
Best wishes
You would re-amp too if this happened to you!
When you reamp, you can play with the amp controls during playback, which is real hard when you're playing. Or use both your hands and your feet to trigger FX pedals. Or tweak FX pedals for different parts of a song. While you're playing, you can just focus on playing instead of all that stuff.
Yeah using a looper to loop a riff while you dial in tones was one of the biggest "why didn't I think of that" tips I ever had when someone showed me.
@@niclastname I have Neural Amp Modeler and hundreds of amps+settings I can play through my real amp. Recorded or realtime. I can run my pedals into the computer into a SLO100 sim and back into the power section of my amp. Or any number of ENGLs, Friedmans, Mesas, etc. Even a sim of my actual amp, just to make it meta.
There are a lot of uses for a reamp setup.
Re-amping or having the unprocessed singal won't hurt and is great to have. 👍
Reamping should be called "repreprocessing", which is what you actually do with pedals, amps and so on.
By the way, I don't like the concept either. But it's amazingly easy to do in Amplitube 5, using only an interface like the Scarlet 2i2, and it's pretty cool for trying a bunch of options. And then you do the take with the preprocessing chain you created / discovered.
Great channel, man!
As a producer you need reamping if I want to send say a drum/synth/whatever track through some guitar pedals. I wouldn’t say reamping for that instance is dumb.
I use reamp pedals to use guitar pedals with synths
Do you need reamping if you are recording in a large room with a shit ton of amps and a switcher you can easily record, maybe not. For us that can't record our tube amps at home it is useful so we can concentrate on playing and then get the sound better later or automate fx or use amp sims. Also the phase switch is needed when blending amps as each gain stage usually flips the phase 180.
Great video…of COURSE! But hmmm… not fully following the idea that reamping isn’t a pretty cool and useful idea & tool…especially where it would concern being able to use all of my cool pedals on my board as a post-production effect, rather than being forced to record them wet or end up using plugins just because they’re easier. Reamping gives you the opportunity to use all of those cool pedal board favorites freely when you mix. I kind of agree about using it with an amp, but utilizing the pedals is really kind of awesome! 🤷♂️😬
I got it for reamping to use my analog pedal effects as a parallel track like delay/reverb, since it’s best to record dry.
I saw Andy video about this one lol I think your point is right about getting it right the first time. I don't have a reamp box, that said it seems to me that it have more benefit for home recording that an actual recording studio.
Using the amp line out and IR ( most company just do V30 😑 not many do EV12L for example, or cheap speakers like my Celestion G12E-50 Rocket 50) I notice that if the tone is good on the DAW, is ugly in real life 🤣🤣🤣 but hey, it does work on mix! A Reamp box would actually help in this situation.
With a mic the result are better, but my takes got the noise of the unplugged guitar. Of course, this is because I'm not in an optimal space for recording, and cant vol up or isolate my speaker right now. Reamp Box may help here too.
I believe there are more scenarios where this tool could prove helpful. It's not a necessity, but is cool having one just in case.
I record a DI track and the effected signal out of my Synergy SYN-1 without the cab-simulation. That way I can play with the full signal chain in Amplitube or just change the cabs around and see what I like best. Most of the time just picking the right cab for my Synergy 5150 track is all I need to do.
A little confused at fhe start Henning as you lulled me back to my youth with Mario bros music during the unboxing.
I’m with you on getting a tone right at the start particularly for the performance. I like having a DI as a backup or for laziness when doing backing tracks (doubling tracks with a different amp). Mostly I “re-amp” in the box with plugins if I do it (again laziness avoids plugging in cables too).
As a re amp box though this does look simple but flexible, might have to look at one.
Thank you. Refreshing. Can't best real, in the moment guitar. FWIW - to me it does not sound the same as the signal direct from the guitar into live gear, when recorded.
Hemning, have you been pumping iron etc because I never seen you so physically fit & strong. I remember seeing your climbing training wall, have you been using it more?
It's always great to see people gain fitness, its encouraging to laggards like myself
OK I have CFS/ME etc but I remember how great it was riding my full suspension bike in dense traffic in London 20 years ago.
I never been fit enough to do rock climbing at school - despite being top roped - I would regularly fall off a dif/v. dif aka 1a or 1b Whilst my friends were regularly climbing HVS or E1!
And hugs to you back. Honestly see you go from strength to strength & seeing you & your friends both enjoying yourself & Building strong communities is utterly wonderful. You all give me both a feeling of en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mudita and hope for my own future
It's so pretty and relatively cheap tho. I saw someone on twitter say it was a way of using vsts or something, I forget. I'm so high right now
The animals thing was a cool ass bonus.👍👍✌️
Thought you were wearing a shirt with a cherubim depicted on it, I fullscreened youtube, and IT'S A PARROT! Lol. Cherubim was cooler.
Very good points about reamping H 👍🤘🤛
IS TRUE! HAZLO BIEN AL PRINCIPIO!
Lange nicht mehr gesehen .... ganz schön fett geworden Freundchen ....
Du Sack!!! Haha
28:30 Hacking the Gibson!
I totally agree man!
So does the humeo IEC filter work on the Syn-50? My Syn-50 doesn't like 4CM and has a bad ground loop when I try it.
It can absolutely work for ground loops and if this doesn’t fix it, the hum eliminator will… watch my Humno video
@@EytschPi42 Thanks Henning!
I think nowadays a lot of people just record DIs and play through plugins anyway. Some of these people then want real amps on the final mix. So there is a market for Re-amping.
Hennnnnnnnnnnnnning! Would a Schtinknormal (and cheap) Palmer reamp box let me run my vocal mics (dynamic or condencer) through my pedals with a good, clean signal, or would I have to run this thing? And if not, are there other options?
Can't see why it won't work, try it and report back
There are tons of options… what the differences are exactly I don’t know
I don't see why you need the re-amp box in this situation. I guess Mike Stent did just use an effects sent without any re-amp box when using guitar pedals for the Spice Girls' vocal chain.
@@johanneschristopherstahle3395 Some pedals work fine, some don't using that method. This method is more likely to be successful.
Effective reeffecting , record your DI to CYA and let the producer pick the tone if he knows so much !
Odds are if you’re paying your producer, he or she knows way more than you so be creative and let them make it better.
Can you use a reamp box to connect a microphone to guitar pedals?
You could, but with the help of a mixer or audio interface
Or you could just try to do it without the re-amp box like we did in the 90's 😂. Will it make a difference? Sure. Does it matter? I'm not sure.
What pedal are you reamping through for the effect?
Allpedal macrodose
Let's see if TH-cam yet again deletes my posts!
Re-amping is great for saving money on studio time, not about recreating a sound.
"Reamping" isn't restricted to "Reamping" a DI guitar signal through a different amp/mic/impulse response. A signal from absolutely anything that was recorded can be sent through any piece of "outboard" gear such as an entire pedalboard rig, compressors or anything else. I think the term reamping is the problem. An example would be all the cool stuff people are doing with kalimbas through "reamping". Some absolutely epic sounds are being created without anything remotely to do with guitar amplifiers in that context. We need some new terminology boys and girls.
get it right the first time? yeah because any type of recording is only done right the first time ? lol what
First take???? 🤣🤘
👍👍👍
Henning + Glenn = Glenning
This modelling tech has been around a while now, every new gadget get rave reviews from those paid to review gear, the Elephant, well large rectangular boxes in the room, tell a different story, why do all these reviewers not sell their Valve Amps, while they are still worth something, why would you need them, if you can download a software version of an Amp, nobody wants analogue recording equipment or VHS recorders, why are they hanging on to the fragile and heavy old tech?
I am the walrus
I am the egg man
Why all the swearing? It doesn't make you cool, or even get your points across with any added authority. It is totally unnecessary and sounds immature and unprofessional. You also come out with guns blazing on your philosophical musings on why you hate re-amping. So what? A re-amp box is simply a tool in one's toolbox. Why should I watch this if the whole things sucks from the get-go? You don't even know what the mute switch is for. Nine minutes in and I'm out...
Glen is ALWAYS RIGHT because he shouts louder than the rest of us!
22:44 - Ich höre eine Fliege im Raum. #sinnloserkommentar