BOOST vs 9R | Is one Polaris WAY better?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 พ.ย. 2023
- In this episode of Let's Assess we talk about the advantages and disadvantages of the Polaris Boost Snowmobile Models and the Polaris 9R Model. We talk about who they are for and what our preferences are when it comes to each. Let us know what you think!
Turbocharged and naturally aspirated snowmobiles have distinct advantages and disadvantages. The choice between the two depends on your specific needs and preferences. Here are some of the key considerations:
Advantages of a Turbocharged Snowmobile:
Power and Performance: Turbocharged snowmobiles generally offer significantly more power and performance compared to their naturally aspirated counterparts. They can produce more horsepower, allowing for faster acceleration and higher top speeds.
Altitude Performance: Turbos can help maintain power at higher altitudes, where naturally aspirated engines tend to lose power due to reduced air density. This is particularly advantageous for riders in mountainous areas.
Improved Torque: Turbos often provide increased torque, which can be beneficial when climbing steep terrain or when towing heavy loads.
Better High-Altitude Riding: Turbochargers can help maintain consistent power and throttle response at high altitudes, making them suitable for mountain riding.
Disadvantages of a Turbocharged Snowmobile:
Complexity: Turbocharged systems are more complex, with additional components like intercoolers and associated plumbing. This can lead to higher maintenance and repair costs.
Cost: Turbocharged snowmobiles are typically more expensive to purchase and maintain than naturally aspirated ones.
Throttle Lag: Some turbocharged snowmobiles may exhibit throttle lag, which can affect responsiveness and ride experience, although newer models aim to minimize this issue.
Reliability: Turbochargers can add stress to the engine, potentially reducing long-term reliability if not properly maintained or if pushed beyond their limits.
Advantages of a Naturally Aspirated Snowmobile:
Simplicity: Naturally aspirated snowmobiles are simpler in design, with fewer components, and tend to have fewer maintenance requirements.
Lower Cost: They are generally more affordable to purchase and maintain compared to turbocharged models.
Reliability: Naturally aspirated engines are known for their long-term reliability and durability, making them a good choice for riders who prioritize low maintenance and longevity.
Instant Throttle Response: Naturally aspirated snowmobiles typically have immediate throttle response, providing a more direct and intuitive riding experience.
Disadvantages of a Naturally Aspirated Snowmobile:
Lower Power: Naturally aspirated engines often have less power and performance compared to turbocharged ones. This can limit their top speed and acceleration capabilities, especially at high altitudes.
Altitude Performance: At high altitudes, naturally aspirated engines may lose power due to reduced air density, affecting their performance.
Towing Capacity: If you need to tow heavy loads or ride in challenging terrain, the lower torque of naturally aspirated engines may be a limitation.
In summary, the choice between a turbocharged and a naturally aspirated snowmobile depends on your riding preferences, budget, and specific needs. Turbocharged models offer more power and are well-suited for high-performance riding, while naturally aspirated models are known for their simplicity, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. Consider where you plan to ride and your performance requirements when making your decision. - บันเทิง
![[ไฮไลต์] แบดมินตันชาย วิว กุลวุฒิ(ไทย) vs Kenta Nishimoto(ญี่ปุ่น) รอบ 16 คน | โอลิมปิก 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kaQRLljJkSI/mqdefault.jpg)
Great discussion. I live in Tahoe at 6,000 elevation and will be riding up to 10,000. You’ve helped me decide. It will have to be the boost. Thanks for the help.
I realized I hadn't watched this one yet so I had to come back and watch it. My issue with the Boost is the abysmal fuel economy... like 3 mpg. Though that doesn't stop me from wanting one next year... thinking I'd get a 165 Boost and then convert my 850 165 to a 155.
There’s no need to fear ! Underdog is here ! Herters RULES !
Hahahaha
lol @ the bug on AJ's mic at 13:58
For me it’s either Boost or 850. If I’m going Na I prefer the simple reliability of an 850, lower initial purchase cost, and 3 year warranty. I doubt I am a discriminating enough rider to reap any advantage a 9R offers, but Boost sure makes a difference. Given the initial purchase cost of the 9R, for slightly more a Boost makes more sense to me. Throw an IBexx clutch kit on the boost to liven up the low to mid, and you have a great all around sled. That said, although I love the Boost, I may just go 850 for the next machine. Wife and I ride to a lot of really remote areas, just the two of us. I like the idea of simplicity and reliability. Not to say the Boost or 9R are not reliable, but the 850 just works and is a proven platform.
I tend to think very similarly. Like we talked about in the video we aren't knocking the 9R at all it just doesn't really make a whole lot of sense when it comes to the price you are going to pay vs an 850. Then on top of that it doesn't really mesh with the conditions we ride at as much as boost does so boost is a clear winner for us. You make great points, wouldn't disagree with that at all.
@@brentcook24Ok, I totally went against my own philosophy today…..sold my Boost and picked up a 9R….lol. New 2023 9R Khaos Slash 165. I thought the price at $16,400 ($22,000cad) out the door was too good to pass on. Been riding in trees a lot and after some miles my thoughts on the Boost have done a 180. On day 4 of our last trip, my wife’s 850 Pro 165 finished break-in. Jumped on that thing and I was floored by what I could do on it compared to my Boost Pro 165. It just felt so rippy and light. It was immediate confidence. Literally night and day. We ride interior BC mostly 4000-6500ft. So I think it will be a better fit. I absolutely cannot believe how much more effort it takes to turn and transition on the Boost as compared to her 850. I truly was hating my life on that thing in technical terrain and I had an iBexx clutch which helped the low end response quite a lot. Once you found deep, steep, and open terrain it could be quite fun, but a lot of our days are not great snow conditions.
Hi Brent, i have both great sleds , curious to the mods you have done on your boost?
I have done a couple things to try to make it better for my riding style. I put a skinz hood to lighten it up, a boondocker tunnel dump exhaust, VOHK av gas non-intercooled tune, durapro stuff, and that's about everything I had last year other than a camera case. This year the sled will be completely different. I will make a video going over the full build when it is done!!!
My last sled was a ‘19 G4 850 165”. I ordered a Shredder RE, but didn’t take delivery due to later season. For the area we ride (
I think for that elevation both would be good options! Can you justify the higher price from 850 to 9R?
@@brentcook24 , thanks for the reply! It’s just money, right?🤷🏻♂️ Right now, I would say since I didn’t snowcheck one. It’s about availability and the options. Living in eastern WA state has slowed my roll on getting a new sled. I’ve been leaning more and more towards getting a UTV for how much more usage I can get out of it. Also, WA state legalized track SxSs on trails too. Yes, I understand this is a hot button topic!
Would you say that 9r is more precise and easier to handle? The boost being almost 25 lbs heavier, can’t you really feel that? Also, what would you pick if I ride at around 5000-8000 feet most of all the time but also ride at 2500-3500 feet a few times throughout the year. It seems like a 9r would be better for me but what do you think?
Yes I would definitely say it is easier to handle and doesn't fatigue guys as much as boost. I would agree it could be considered more precise because more power makes a sled harder to handle. I would say a boost, if you are around 8 a lot just because I have more fun on a boost but if majority is under 8,000 I think you could go 850 and put some stuff on it to pep it up for less money or if you can justify the price go with the 9r. For the same budget if I were you I would probably go 850 throw some light stuff on there some clutching, can, and then do suspension for a very similar price.
@@brentcook24 ok, thanks!
Common now you want a boost to pull wheelies like BC! lol 😂 🔥 do you like open area riding as well because if you eat it in the trees your sled could turn into a yard sale?
HAHAHA thanks for watching guys!! I really like filming in the trees, but when it comes to being efficient with trying to get a lot of content the open areas can be better. The sending into a tree is definitely part of it hahaha but sometimes you just gotta let er fly
@@brentcook24we have been looking to add a bigger sled so my brother and I could try it. The 9r 146 is so expensive but there are some deals on 9r 155’s….. we considered an 850 146 because it’s much cheaper or a boost 155 for crazy. Would you say the 850/9r is funner going slow and the boost more wild but forward speed is much higher
It an easy answer of why people love the 9r
Chris burandt rides one, and told them it the greatest. They spent the 20k on one now to save face to justify the cost they have to push how great it is..
HAHAH you might be on to something! I think there is a time and place where a 9R is a great option though.
@@brentcook24 absolutly.
Since you don’t understand why guys enjoy the 9R in the conditions you speak of maybe include one in your discussion so that the result isn’t biased towards your specific riding and conditions.
We talked about it later in the video. We talked about the guys that ride at lower elevations, and then we went through the pros and cons of it!
@@dc-pr6xt no I couldn’t understand your comment but then I understood what you were saying. So I responded
Yeah I saw the pros/cons but it still seemed like even for higher elevation you were skeptical. Anyhow it’s a good run down. I don’t ride much over 7500’ in BC and basically from 4500-7500 is prime zone. Boost is awesome but carrying lots of fuel for the boost is a big con.
What we were getting at is when riding at 8000 feet plus the boost is our choice because it compensates its power to the elevation. The 9R or any naturally aspirated sled does not, therefore for guys who ride at high elevations the boost delivers considerably more power and that is why we think it is a better choice for us. For the guys under 7000 feet that’s not as much of a factor so with the pros of the 9r we could see those guys liking the 9r a lot over the boost. If that makes sense?
lame show... you guys right off the bat went boost and then rambled on for half hr of bullhish
Thank you Johnnyboy preciate that