Our small bible study group invited Dr. Wise out to Whidbey Island about 25 years ago. He stayed about a week and spoke several times. He is the real deal and we enjoyed him immensely.
When I was cutting sandstone blocks for the foundation of my house, I let all the spoil accumulate where I was doing the majority of the cutting. Some of the cutting required sawing and grinding. Other cuts were simply made by breaking with a hammer and chisel. Larger pieces were broken down with wedges. I simply rinsed the cut blocks off with a gardeb hose before placement. Afterwards I had a certain amount of cleanup to do and the larger pieces were loaded by hand. The sand and dust however where i was using the hose had formed a concretion and this was simply from the residue and water. No cement or mortar was anywhere near where I was cutting. This was an area a little over 10 ft x 10 ft and i had to bust up the layer of sedimentary rock that had formed under my feet. Over the course of a few weeks, the sand and powder had reformed into a layer of stone two to three inches thick on top of the grass. I would have used that as well if not for the grass sticking to it. Under the right conditions with repeated wetting and drying, sandstone will form pretty quick.
@@JusNoBS420that does not mean deep time all that means is there's more gravity now pushing the water out of the column 🤦 I think you might want to study hydrology....🤮🚩🚩🚩
@bulldogma99 I know that your approach is convenient, but do try harder, for your eternal resolution is at stake ☦️🕊❤️🔥🛐 May the power of Gods love bless and guide you in Yeshuah's supremely mighty and most mercifully precious name of essential necessity .
I share everything I can find that Dr. Wise puts out with my family. He’s an excellent source of knowledge and he’s usually animated when speaking about how you can see God in his wonderful creation.
@fletcherlewis Not if they want to keep their jobs, not get published, not qualify for grant money, not have their names in prestigious journals, not keep a roof over their heads, not eat, and not if they want to be invited to leave fellowship bodies. If those were the conditions for getting into university, most students would deny their own mothers just to get a seat at the table - or not get an education. It's called peer pressure. Bit like the Hollywood thing: deny God, drink blood, swear allegiance to Satan, you'll get a glittering career. Stand alone, expect the full weight of Hollywood against you. People get thrown out all the time for finding evidence they weren't supposed to find. Or get careers stomped on after they do. There are over 30,000 scientists worldwide you won't find on those "acceptable" lists precisely for that reason - they broke the silence and published at great cost.
I asked an ardently atheist coworker how he could believe that nothing created everything. He quickly replied, "it's been reproduced in a lab." I then asked, "in a what?" He said, "in a lab". I asked again, "in a what?" He said, in a la...." The light dawned on his face; a "lab" isn't "nothing"!
@@CuriousCattery love the guy but no. The atheist here is saying that "nothing created something" and that has been recreated in the lab. Its impossible to do that. It's just a bold lie.
Been an Atheist does not mean you have the knowledge or answers, Atheism is simply a lack of belief meaning Atheists can come from any background, culture or education system, there are no common ties other then a lack of belief in a God so asking a question and not getting an answer demonstrates little in your point here. In answer to your point, we can demonstrate particles of matter popping in and out of existence from nothing and measure the effect, so to the educated Atheists like myself we can actually show you, this Lab analogy is a poor attempt at mocking, the lab is simply a structure to perform the experiment in his case, it bares no link to the experiments and the controls it is under. The hard part of that question is defining nothing, when we say nothing we often mean the vacuum of space but even the vacuum of space is teaming with particles and energy, it is the fabric of spacetime where the word nothing really has no meaning so the whole premise of the theist argument about the universe coming out of nothing is flawed until you define nothing on a quantum level and also includes many theories where we did spring out of other multiverses etc which also render the nothing argument mute.
The proliferation of confirmation bias amongst the geological community has been as disaster for science for so very long, especially with all that dating methods that base their initial values on suppositions based on their original biases. Thank you for fighting against it.
@@chadamongmen5223Confirmation bias doesn't require any outward conspiracy. It is simply seeing only what you expect to see and NOT being open to (at least, certain kinds of) skepticism that would let you self-correct.
Geological Myopia, the same as Biological Myopia (faith in Common Descent) is due to these: "He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them." --John 12:40 "In whom the god of this world [Satan] hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them. For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord;" --2 Corinthians 4:4
Why is quoting from a pretend book always supposed to stand in for facts? I don't get why bible thumpers do this. Quoting from a book doesn't make it so. Quote from Lord of the Rings if you want, it means about as much.
@@garyb6219 Noah's flood is a fact, the evidence overwhelming that the entire earth was once covered with water whose height was higher than the mountains. It is interesting that the thickest glaciers are the same depth as most of the highest mountains. All people have an Authority concerning the origins of life and historical events. The atheist relies upon science (so-called) textbooks that are ever-changing, such as the once touted "science" of Phrenology and the medical "science" of bleeding and leeches. The bible is not a "pretend book" as you pre-suppose, it is a truthful and accurate account of 1) The creation of living things 2) historical events such as Noah's flood, kings of empires like Babylon and Assyria, as well as prophesying the coming of Jesus, the messiah who is the Son of God who takes away the sins of the world. The Lord of the Rings does not have architectural nor geological evidence whereas the bible certainly does, as Prof. Wise has competently demonstrated.
@garyb6219 do u not see the irony in the fact that your entire belief system is based on books from random scientists in the last 300ish years and the majority of which you yourself haven't even personally heard of nor read but believe to be absolute truth without question and then for seemingly no reason want to argue the ideas of others as wrong with out cause nor purpose when your belief system is entirely juxtaposed too and says his is false. so why ultimately would you have feelings on the matter if what you believe is true.
I grew up on the Beaches of Washington State, playing in the sands as the tides drained out, and flooded in. I have done many many experiments in my childhood, which "experts" don't do until they've already wasted many years of their lives, and then they do very narrow experiments in their artificial world of labs ... also fun, but missing the other things which happen when water floods, surges, and drains away. As one flies out of Albuquerque NM Westward bound in the morning from the airliner, one can look down, as ascending and see that all of the terrain below was created on a gigantic scale using the same water effects of quick flooding and erosion, creating the same features which I created many times as a child with buckets of water, or trapped dams of tide water on sandy beaches. When driving from Zion NP, UT to Las Vegas, again, the features are massive flood effects, and likewise from Las Vegas to Barstow, CA. Across the earth, at the base of dormant past volcanic mountains which reach the seas and oceans, one can see how the water has carved away their sides and even under-cut them, as evidence of how shortly ago these mountains were formed and eroded. There is much evidence of rock continuing to be formed in only decades, with man-made objects entombed in recent rock, such as the pick-axe. On a mining cave tour in South Dakota, we were told how stalactites took immense quantities of time to be formed, yet I could see on the wooden roof supports growing stalactites which were inches long, grown in just 50 years, rather than the millions of years the experts declare. Since cement requires only hours to become rock, is there any wonder that making rocks without human help takes only a few decades, instead of millions of years. Nearly everywhere across the world, human eyes can see the signs of catastrophic floods, greater than any regional flood that mankind has ever seen, and for centuries after Noah's flood, before the land became covered over in places by great forests, Noah's flood results were easily seeable by every human, but not so strangely, humans prefer to live where plants cover-over the obvious signs of Noah's flood, since plants provide food for humans, but barren rock does not. We, in our myopic, near-sighted, survival level mindset, don't naturally look at the "big-picture", until we reach adulthood, when we seek education, which is just brain-washing by Darwinian geologists, biologists, and social scientists. As a small child, I thought that everyone older knew more then me, which was true; but only after many decades of study, and far later than I should have been told, I learned that most teachers and professors had just average intelligence, and that what they taught as truth was being taught by them as a parrot repeats words that he has heard, or a monkey can be trained to repeat the many steps of basic brain-surgery which a human taught him, but neither has the knowledge and discernment needed to prove what the parrot says or recreate from nothing the advanced steps of brain-surgery. Likewise is true of most professors at universities, these days; they have nothing but "wrote" words mimicked from someone else, with the exceptions of those of the so called "hard" sciences such as mathematics and chemistry; this is not to say that the persons don't have the ability to use discernment, but rather that they don't as a rule.
Until the American people start waking up to the reality that they have been lied to about so much on so many subjects, it is impossible for them to wrap their heads around this stuff!!
You're being far too kind. Sure, there are many that just blindly believe the so-called experts. However, many more choose the myopia as an excuse to deny God's existence...
The bible teaches a flat earth, yet 400 years ago people chose to believe the "intellectuals". Instead of believing our senses and proof in front of our face. People refuse to comprehend that the deception is indeed STRONG. God warned us about the changing of laws and times by the beast.
In "Already Gone", Ken Ham claims that (at Christian colleges) Theology majors are More likely to believe in old earth than Science majors. Strrong evidence that is kept suppressed
As former devout Christian, Noah's flood is just one of the reasons I no longer believe. In so much that this story is based on earlier regional stories, it also would have resulted in the destruction of the planet given what apologists claim. Ask yourself simple questions. Like, how could they possibly have known that the ENTIRE world was covered in water? Doesn't it make more sense that their ENTIRE world was the immediate geographic location in which they lived flooded? Taking all the animals, that they owned, onto a boat to save them from a flood in an area prone to flooding makes more sense, yes? Given the physical world, the logistics of such a story are untenable. Do yourself a favor. Go look into why this story is parable and not factual. Doesn't mean you lose your faith. Doesn't mean you shouldn't believe in God. It means you look at God's world with your eyes open.
How about theological myopia. Everything has to agree with a man made Iron Age book. Science is ignored in favour of rehashed ancient Middle East myths.
@@jamgill9054 You say it doesn't mean you lose your faith or you shouldn't believe in God. Is it ok to believe God created the world and universe? Or that a virgin conceived? Or that Jesus was raised from the dead? If we can believe these things, why can we not believe in a global flood?
Your going to need a bigger boat. Approximately 8.7 million species are estimated to exist on Earth, with around 6.5 million of those species found on land and about 2.2 million in the oceans. However, it's important to note that a significant percentage of these species, estimated at 86% on land and 91% in the seas, have yet to be discovered and described. Noah’s ark doesn’t hold water.
Atheist scientists had originally said that humans broke off from ape-like creatures 2.5 million years ago. And that modern man evolved from that humanoid about 250,000 years ago. Well, even if we assume that humans have ony been on the planet for 10,000 years, when the alleged agricultural revolution started and being extremely conversative. Only doubling the world's population every 150 years (currently the population doubles about 40 years), *after 150 years there will be 4 people, after another 150 years there will be 8 people, after another 150 years there will be 16 people, and so on* This rate is actually very conservative. (we have records of a Russian woman in the 1700's who gave birth to over 60 children). I am taking into account *disease, plagues, famines, natural disasters, wars, and reverse birth to death ratio at various intervals.* Way before the discovery of penicillin in 1928. We have records of women from the 1400's giving birth to 10 children on average, let's say only 5 would make it to old age for the factors mentioned above, so 2 children per couple every 150 years for 10,000 years it is extremely generous. Calculating these numbers, there would have been averaging close to 100 doublings in 10,000 years. The world’s population would be whopping figure of the # 1 followed by 30 zeros. Check it out: 1,000000000000000000000000000000. You can still wipe out humanity a couple of times more and the numbers still don't add up. *Think about this in 1912 when the Titanic sank. The world's population was only a little over 1 billion people. Fast-forward 100 years and we are 8 billion. And we have had world war I and world War II in between (70 million people died). In 1945-46 around 140,000 people died as a result of the bombing of Hiroshima, Plus the worst influenza plague the world has ever seen, which happened 1918 (50 million people die)* Still In the last 100 years alone we can see a population growth of 8 times its numbers. *Now, let's look at this other also very conservative math:* If we start about 4,500 years ago (time of Noah's flood, only 8 people survived). After about 30 doublings, which is about 4,500 years, the world's population would have reached about 8 billion people (4,500 years ÷ 150 years in between births = 30 doublings // 8 exponentially doubled 30 times = 8,589,934,592 people). Just more or less what we have today. Give or take a few millions due to the negative factors mentioned above. Yes, some Christians and many other religions believe in some sort of evolution. But this is only because they have been influenced by this indoctrination since they were children. *Math doesn't lie. We can see how man invented the a theory of his origin to try to do away with God’s moral laws. We have lied about our origin, our history. And the studies of archeology, biology, anthropology, and so on. We even rather believe in panspermia (aliens from other galaxies). We are very ready to accept anything but God. BTW, religion is also man's made. For God there's only two religions good and evil* There's gonna be people regardless of their educational level that because of their cognitive biases can look at these facts and will still want to continue their merry-way without having any accountability for their actions. Today's world population is over 8 billion in about 25 years we will be over 20 billion. The world's economy will collapse. *REPENT OF ALL YOUR SINS. JESUS CHRIST IS COMING BACK VERY SOON. YOU DON'T WANNA MISS LIVING IN A GLORIFIED BODY WITHOUT DEATH AND SUFFERING ON A NEW EARTH*
@@sulongenjop7436 *This same question was asked many years ago.* *Answer:* God subjected the entire universe to a pervasive law of decay or thermodynamics (Romans 8:20-22) as a means to efficiently eradicate evil and suffering (see Why the Universe Is the Way It Is1 for details and an explanation). Consequently, all physical life on Earth experiences death. Psalm 104:29-30 says that it is the property of all life to die but that God re-creates and renews the face of the earth. Psalm 104 also implies that God has packed Earth with as much life as possible and as diverse as possible. When much of Earth’s landmass was covered by huge shallow seas, God created large dinosaurs. Thanks to the shallow seas, these large dinosaurs could take advantage of the shallow seas to support their huge body masses that otherwise would have been impossible to sustain. The existence of a huge, diverse, and enduring population of dinosaurs during past eras when much of Earth’s continental landmass was covered by huge shallow seas significantly contributed to Earth’s present store of biodeposits. Examples of such biodeposits include limestone, marble, coal, oil, and natural gas. Dinosaurs, therefore, are expressions of God’s love and generosity. It is thanks in part to God’s creation of dinosaurs that humans possess more than 76 quadrillion tons of biodeposits that we can use to develop the civilization and technology to take the good news of salvation through Jesus Christ to billions of humans within just a few millennia.
A hypothetical: If there was a local flood, where would it have been? Seems to me that there would have to be mountains surrounding the water, restraining it for ~1 year (assuming the Bible's timeline is correct). But I can't find a mountain range anywhere in the middle east capable of containing water that long. But then, I'm not a geologist. Any suggestions?
The dam holding the water back was called a GLACIER. Then as the glaciers retreated the water could have broken through and a massive flood following the paths he described. We now believe that similar events happened several times as the glaciers advanced over time and retreated. He is only telling the parts of these events that fits his narrative. I live in Washington State and have been to Mount St.Helens and the pothole lakes/ Eastern WA many times.
Dr. Wise is my favorite flood scientist. I have a geologist as an older brother. I've heard the old earth, long process evolutionary model all my life. It's great to see the well thought out counter to that argument as food for thought and debate. Thank you.
If the bible said the Earth was 500 years old he'd find a way to make that fit. If the bible said the Earth was a million years old, poof, he'd find a way to make that fit. Actual science says there is only one age.
Exactly Gary, he has a prior theological commitment and that keeps him from engaging honesty with the data. It's sad really because he's a sharp guy. Every time I see one of these pop up it's just like look at all that wasted potential.
When I was a kid in the 60's my father worked at a rock quarry. Occasionally he would bring home fossils that had not been blown or crushed to smithereens. I remember one particularly that stood out looked like a ram's horn but was actually an ancient sea creature over a foot in diameter. This was along the Missouri River in Nebraska.
The Babylonian story of the Deluge predates the Biblical account. It’s is Utnapushtim’s Flood before it is Noah’s. During the Babylonian Captivity, the Genesis account is written using the original pagan story as a template.
I appreciate your tone and attitude throughout the talk. So many Christians adopt a knowing, mocking tone while speaking against the current science. It doesn't help their cause.
They don't 'deny the biblical record'. There just any evidence to support the flood story. Also, if the flood had happened the way apologist say, it would have destroyed the world (the heat problem). Also, use a little critical thinking. The boat was on the water for nearly a year. Every plant and animal not on the boat would have been dead and gone. Yet a dove shows up with a mature olive branch and they knew where the bird got it from? How could Noah possibly know that the ENTIRE world was flooded? Also, if the flood killed everyone in the world at the same time, why haven't we found a common layer of the bones of humans and animals all mixed together on the same layer around the world? Why didn't any other culture in the world notice the flood? No, the story falls apart with the most basic questions being asked. This is why it isn't a part of academic study. You are of course welcome to write a paper and present testable evidence. Just remember to leave out the magic parts because magic isn't real.
dr wise hello and thank you for another wonderful video great stuff ! and very well done ! i enjoy a lot ! being very much a believer myself i really appreciate all your work and effort and videos
What does this geological process discussion have to do with the impact to the southern Indian Ocean about 2900 BCE that formed a 29 km diameter Burkle crater, a tsunami that was about 1.5 km high when it impacted Western Australia. Going north it was funneled between India and the Saudi Arabian peninsula to go over the Kuwaiti-Iraqi desert to reach the south of the mountains of Ururat. There, at Mt. Nisir is a sanctuary built to the prophet Noh whose boat landed there. The Mosque in the town at the bottom of Mt. Nisir is dedicated to the prophet Noh (Hebrew spelling). In Ajerbaijan is a mausoleum to the Prophet Noah.
Wow! so, it seems the ancient prophets meant exactly what they said about the cyclical dotl when earth shifts to line up with ''the Master when He returns from His long journey!''
Most ungodly people do not want to give God the praise for creation or believe the word of God, the Bible. This is the bedrock of why geology has not changed. It will not change until Christ returns. As Revelation 16:9 shows, even when His wrath is evident, the unrighteous will not turn to God.
I did the soil and water in a mason jar experiment with my second son who is now 25 years old, back when he was about nine. Formed quite a few layers within a week. 😊
I don't buy there was any rapid decay. You ever see the Proton Labs Z-pinch experiments? They were working on fusion and when they made the isotopes like they use for dating methods. The parent daughter elements ratio was like what we see today.
@@jeffbybee5207 off topic. But also covered in the video. If you examine the sedimentation rates for the major Land masses and the large river deltas, if they had been doing that for billions of years, they would have filled up the oceans long ago. The earth can't be more than several thousand years old.
@@sammcrae8892Zirkon probes withvUranium Lead tell you something different and there are multiple different materials that allow you to determine the conditions and verify your age.
@@samuelrodriguez9199 Polio, TB, Measles, eyesight defects, the ability to survive in harsh environments on a largely hostile earth, How many more examples do you need?
The problem with accelerated decay is heat. As the Alpha and Beta decay happens it releases quite a lot of energy that heats up the environment. How do you account for this energy release?
It's not just the heat which is a huge problem for creationists. Cramming 4.5 billion years' of radioactive decay into 1 year would release enough deadly alpha, beta, and gamma radiation to fry every living thing on the Ark 1000X over. 😮
How did you miss this? The WA Ice Age flood wasn't a single event. They estimate it was somewhere between a dozen to thirty plus foods over several hundred to thousands of years. The ice dam formed somewhere in the Cabinet Gorge where the present day Clark Fork river flows from Missoula, to lake pend Oreille, and on to the mighty Columbia river and eventually the Pacific Ocean. This should be sufficient evidence to explain the differentiated radiometric dating in the rhythmic layering.
@@sciencerules2825 This particular fact reinforces the feature he was talking about by explaining that catastrophism is still the method of deposition and the number of floods over a relatively short period of time geologically speaking could account for the variance in the radiometric dating.
@@bpuryea Wrong. The speed at which a geologic formation develops has zero effect on any radiometric dating of the formation. Did you even bother to think that through?
@@bpuryea OK, I read your statement wrong. I though you were talking about speed of formation affecting radiometric decay rate, not the actual measured date determined by radiometric means. My bad.
I saw a presentation on Mt. St. Helens by the late John Morris many years ago now. Morris started off his talk by showing slides of aerial views of the Grand Canyon. After a few slides he stopped for effect and told us the slides had all been from Mt. St. Helens and not the Grand Canyon. The Washington State volcano damage looked just like the G.C. It was only just not as big. ICR scientists in 1985 standing on the edge of rock cliffs that only five years earlier had been mud right after the eruption was convincing. Amazing and very interesting to see.
@@pomegranatepip2482 Mr. Morris was a trained geologist by degree. So I don't know what you mean by being geologically wrong. At Mount St Helens it was a basically fast forming sedimentary rock. And that was the implication for the Grand canyon. The ICR scientists were standing on top of Rock cliffs that 5 years earlier had been pure mud. So the rock formed awfully quickly.
@@garylshelton2463 Mount St Helens post eruption was not fast-forming sedimentary rock. I quote an article on this comparison “Unfortunately for this idea the authors aren’t comparing like with like. The debris fields around Mt St Helens are made up of rocks & gravels, ash & mud, & the remains of pyroclastic flows, sitting loosely atop each other - they’re not compacted or consolidated. All this is sitting on steep slopes, pretty much unprotected by any plant cover (particularly immediately after the eruption sequence), and in an area where the average annual rainfall is about 3m for year - a recipe for some pretty impressive erosion. The Grand Canyon is different. This significant geological feature cuts through layers of limestone, sandstone, shale and metamorphic granite, a mile down to the Colorado River, arranged as shown in the following image from the TalkOrigins website” So yeah, anyone who compares the two is simply talking hogswash. If you try to erode through actual rock, it’s a lot more difficult than trying to erode through a pile of mud and stones that were once rock and are now unconsolidated. As for “ICR Scientists”, well, that’s just laughable. These people are not scientists. They are liars. They try to manipulate science to a given outcome. They are totally dishonest, and the best thing they offer us as humanity is a little bit of a giggle at how indoctrination can destroy a person’s ability to distinguish between reality and fiction.
I love your content, but you pretty much ruined my experience with most of the other geologists... And that's perfectly fine with me!! As a believer, I find it hard to listen to many of those in your profession. I didn't realize that geology was such a young science.
To have everlasting life you absolutely must trust in the person and finished work of Christ alone for salvation ❤️ this means that saving repentance is turning from unbelief to belief. You either believe that Jesus paid your sin debt in full or you don't.
How does one believe in something with zero evidence. Ancient writings by ancient men copied numerous times and compiled into the Bible and called the word of God.
There are many problems with Noah's flood. Here are 11 I can think of: 1) It is EXTREMELY similar to (much older) stories about floods that wiped out mankind, etc from more ancient societies such as Babylonia, Persia and Egypt. Similar in the story elements of having two of each animal, releasing birds to find out if land had appeared (why not look out a window?), etc. The Epic of Gilgamesh is much older and contains more than 80% of the elements of Noah's Ark. Even the 'Institute for Creation Research' (ICR) admits this, although they draw the conclusion that the biblical epic was spread by word of mouth before it was written down and therefore was "probably older". They assume, I guess, that the Gilgamesh Epic was etched into stone tablets as it was dictated by the original author. 2) If you read the story of Noah, you will see that in the middle of the parts where God tells Noah to gather two of each animal, He then changes His mind and says to gather *7* pairs of the "clean" animals and 1 pair of the "unclean" animals. [Genesis 6:19-22 says to bring 2 of each animal, then Genesis 7:2-3 says to bring 7 pairs of the clean animals and 1 pair of the unclean animals, then Genesis 7:9 reiterates that Noah is to bring 1 pair of each animal]. 3) Since the Kosher rules did not come about until the time of Moses - much later than Noah's time - Noah would not know what is "clean" and what is "unclean". 4) God instructs Noah in Genesis 6:21 to also bring along all of the food required for all of the animals and the people for the journey, but neglects to tell Noah how long the journey will be so Noah could not know how much food to bring. And we know Noah did not know, because he had to release several birds over a period of weeks to get news that dry land had appeared. 5) Noah and the animals were on the ark for about 370 days total, not 40 days and nights as is commonly believed (It *rained* for forty days and forty nights). Don't believe me? Here: Noah entered the ark in the 600th year of his life, on the 17th day of the 2nd month (Genesis 7:11-13). Noah left the ark on the 27th day of the 2nd month of the following year (Genesis 8:14-15). Therefore, assuming a lunar calendar of 360 days, Noah was on the ark for approximately 370 days. An African elephant eats 440 to 660 pounds of food per DAY. That would be 162,800 to 244,200 pounds of food for the journey for EACH elephant. Elephants in a zoo eat about 150 pounds of food per day, but even that is over 55,000 pounds of food for the journey - IF Noah knew how long it was going to be, which he didn't. Oh, and they require up to 50 gallons of fresh water each day, or 18,500 gallons of water for the trip. 6) Speaking of food, since the flood, having been on the Earth for over a year, would have destroyed all life - including plant life - there would be no food for the animals to eat once the ark opens up to let the animals out. Therefore, Noah would *also* have to bring enough food to feed the animals AFTER the flood for at least a few months while new plants begin to grow. The meat eaters would probably just eat the smaller animals - whoops! There goes the repopulation of THAT species! - but we'll leave that one alone. 7) How did the animals get to (and from!) the ark? How long do you suppose it would take for a sloth to make it from Australia to Noah's ark? Or an ant? How would a sloth even know how to get back there? And since they can't swim...Well, you get the idea. Noah really should have dropped all of the animals off at their original locations once the flood was over! 8) "Kinds" in the bible are not well defined, but they read to me like species. I have yet to hear a cogent explanation from a biblical literalist that explains the difference between a "kind" and a species. If it's species, then the impossibility of the whole story really becomes evident. There are over 300,000 different species of JUST beetles. There are MILLIONS of species on the Earth. Since the dimensions of the ark are given in the bible, we can say that there is NO WAY that those 6 million plus species could have fit in there. (If the dimensions had NOT been given, apologists could say the boat was 5 miles long and 2 miles wide, etc. to hold all of the animals). You can twist the meaning of "kinds" to mean whatever you want, but if you do that so that you can reduce that number to a few thousand, then AFTER the flood those "kinds" would have to *evolve* RAPIDLY to create the diversity that we see in the wild. But, alas, there would not be nearly enough time for that to happen. 9) If God is ashamed that He ever made man and wants to wipe all life from the face of the Earth, why not just snap His fingers and get it over with? Why have a 500+ year old man build a giant boat, gather all of the animals to save them, then have it rain for 40 days and nights and stay on the Earth for a year? 10) Are you telling me that every INFANT in the world was worthy of death by drowning? EVERY pregnant woman? Every child? Every cat, dog, squirrel and rhinoceros that did not get gathered onto the ark needed to be destroyed? 11) Some apologists have suggested that the animals brought on the ark were babies or eggs, so they wouldn't take up as much room or eat as much food. There are a couple of problems with this idea. First, since the Earth needed to be repopulated as soon as possible once the ark came to rest on dry land, the animals would have to be near sexual maturity in order to reproduce. An elephant reaches sexual maturity between the ages of 12-14 years, so a baby elephant on the ark would have to wait a decade before they could begin repopulating their species. Second, if they were babies, who took care of them once the ark came to rest? Babies need to be fed, nurtured and taught how to hunt, etc and eggs need to be sat on!
I am a Creationist. Just wanted to hopefully make a constructive criticism. You take too long to make a point, you don't need to spend 15 minutes on Graded Bedding. Make your point, move on, Stop beating around the bush. It's boring. Thank you. Hope your next one is better.
"Find the facts that agree with your feelings. There can NOT be a God because then I would have to obey Him." If He created everything, then He owns everything, and He can make the rules, not me.
I simply obey him because the mess I made was an earth shaking disaster. I had no problem believing I was a sinner. It was a little hard to think Jesus would love such a rebel.
@@RedLotus42069 …remember, also, that there were only two of them so they both would have had to survive that 10,000+ mile trek across deserts and oceans. I’m also interested in how the two deer mice made it to North America and how the two sloths made it back to South America.
Back to? There was likely only one continent before the flood. Ocean levels were much lower during the ice age after the flood so it was not such a formidable challenge as it is today.
@@garyb6219 There is not a single scientist who documented what he saw happen. Not one. All we have is the historical account in Scripture, and even it's not clear. So "likely" is the best we can do.
@@KenJackson_US *There is not a single scientist who documented what he saw happen.* Millions of scientists have documented the evidence they've seen showing what happens. Creationists have come up with some sad sack claims over the years but "if no one saw it then it didn't happen" is quite possibly the lamest.
A few issues... 1. Radiometric dating of rocks shattered by earthquakes would not be altered by the earthquakes. The earthquake would not change the elements from which the rocks are made. So radiometric dating cannot be used to date an earthquake event. 2. I can find no mention elsewhere of a boulder whose diameter is greater than 1 mile in diameter. I have to treat this as an unsubstantiated claim. Normally we would call something like that bedrock. 3. Multiple references are made to the radiometeic dating of sedimentary rock in this video, without an explanation of the specific types employed. But logically, sedimentary rocks cannot be dated radiometrically, for their sediments are necessarily older. If you are dating the cements that hold the sediments together, those minerals would have also been suspended in the flood waters, so unless there is a mechanism to reset the radioactive clocks of these minerals (such as the demonstrably false presumption from potassium-argon dating that newly solidified volcanic rocks contain no occluded argon), then they cannot be dated to the time when the sedimentary rocks were cemented together.
Radiology assumes constants back in time so is invariably a guess - Bible and supporting evidence talk of waters above the atmosphere in the thermosphere which a) limits radiation levels making all measurements far too long and b) provides source for most of the deluge.
Oooookay. New Earth Creationism is back on my radar. I’ve been giving the old earthers the benefit of the doubt for decades and every time I turn around they’re scrambling to explain something weird. *No amount of scrambling’s getting them out of this.*
@@wkrapek Of course there was a flood. Floods are routine events. What is less likely is covering the entire earth to a depth of Mount Everest, with the single exception that an olive tree appears to have been unharmed. Global warmists assert that if all the ice melted, the sea would rise about 100 meters. That would certainly flood some lowlands. Baghdad is 35 meters above sea level. But of course, a magical God can do anything, including creating enough water to cover mount everest, and protect an olive tree, and then vanish all that water. but if that's going to be the argument, then what is to say we haven't actually been created yet? This is some sort of practice run? Or maybe we were created five minutes ago complete with implanted memories of having viewed this youtube channel?
@@wkrapek…it is “unanticipated” because it is impossible. When you plan a vacation with your family do you “anticipate,” and plan for, aliens from the planet Xeronos to greet you at your destination? No, you don’t because it isn’t going to happen.
Any creationist who wants to be taken seriously needs to demonstrate all the geologic formations shown in this video and all the sediments deposits worldwide *were formed at the same time by the same event* only 4400 years ago. Not that they were formed by many separate local events over the last several hundred million years as the evidence indicates.
I wonder how Iceland and Hawaii formed so fast after the flood? Aren't they mostly igneous rock, where's all the flood sediment? Lol Noah's flood is nuts people please stop lying to children about history and science
@@steventhompson399 the continents rose as water drained off… and mountains grew. You need to watch the entire Flood series, and Mountains After the Flood. TMI for one short lecture.
@@steventhompson399A great deal of volcanic activity happened after the flood. It generated the aerosols needed to keep the earth cool so snow could last after it fell from hypercanes. When the oceans cooled down, the needed evaporation dropped off, leading to the glaciers melting.
Yes that's why they always come with the same arguments that already have been debunked. And remember, the sole purpose of an atheist is to reject GOD regardless of proof, otherwise he would be agnostic.
Is the "Heat Problem" reflected in the research going on at Mt St Helens? What evidence, if any speaks to rapid cooling OR contrary to it, in the new rocks formed at the eruption sight and affected areas? It's the radio active decay affected significantly?
2:50 Q. Why didn’t the consequences of one volcanic eruption change geological principles? A. because it was one eruption. Volcanology and geology are well understood. Catastrophic events do occur, but they are localised. You can’t extrapolate these conditions to change whole world geology. 4:00 Graded bedding. Big long spiel here about timescales for sedimentation. So what. If you want to find the time a particular sedimentary layer formed, radio date an igneous rock above and below and interpolate rather than speculate! 26:00 Now he’s suggesting that a flood, which he has not shown to be global, will accelerate radioactive decay. This is nonsense and would have to break the laws of physics. The heat generated would vaporise all water then go on to melt the earth’s crust. That would be a catastrophic event! 35:00 Sand nowhere near a beach. Perfectly natural geological explanation. Go look it up. He is looking at current maps, without considering how the continents drifted away from Pangaea. Basically forty minutes of the same old stuff that has been refuted numerous times by mainstream science.
@@graemeross6970 Yup. It’s strange how these “Drs” and their following think they have a “gotcha” while at the same time they ignore the fact that the Bible isn’t even translated correctly from Hebrew and Greek, the meaning changing radically in many instances. Yet to them, one event created a similar looking result (because that will corrode and compress quickly, erasing it) whose results are understood supposedly negates all the rest as if we don’t know why it doesn’t. Even from a religious view the fact that these Jesus freaks do all this and try to diminish natural processes to a design demeans the idea of a devine creator, turning a god into a kid playing with plasticine, instead of a complex, creative mind that works one idea that cascades into this infinite variety we call the universe. If there is a god, I think the second option is much more awe inspiring than the first.
Yeah im a catholic and i take it to be a much more localized flood. It’s def not a worldwide flood, the evidence you provided completely refutes it. Also we wouldnt just find a few geological anomalies, the whole planet should show evidence for this. Now arguments from silence aren’t usually good but in this case, the evidence should be overwhelming in favor of a global flood if it did happen. It would be literally impossible to hide the evidence for it happening, whereever humans explore, they should see it. I think for me, the biggest gap in the evidence is the runoff…. Imagine that much debris from literally the surface of the planet, washing into the oceans and there being no trace of it. As for a local flood concept, the area of turkey where this happened in scripture is right in the fertile crescent and was known to be prone to earthquakes, mudslides, and evidence for this is at multiple archaeological sites like gobekli tepe, carahan tepe, and others. I feel like biblical literalism is kind of silly. Even the church fathers knew the day night cycle came from the sun so it being created on the third day is obvious poetic language. You have 3 days of creation and then 3 days of adornment. It’s meant to poetically represent god creating the universe but not meant to be a historical account of a catastrophic event that wouldve caused extinction of nearly every species on the planet. The ark is likely a preservation of righteousness and all the good things in the world. The flood probably was a local catastrophe and if noah was a real person or a representative of a people that survived, the story is meant to teach us right and wrong, punishment and god’s power to do so. The catholic church is free to take this literal or allegorical but i think if youre going to engage the scientific facts you have to consider the flood being a local event.
If you go to Mlilwane Nature Reserve in Eswatini, you will find bright red mudwalls next to the rivers up to 5 meters high. These red ravines are not even layered. The red mud all came down in one swoop. You will find the fossils of large trees next to the ravines. If you travel from the Highveld to Eswatini you frequently encounter signs of this red mud next to the road, covering the deeper gray soil layers. In my opinion it was not just water that destroyed habital earth during the Noah's flood, it was mud. The mud destroyed life here in Africa, and also covered cities with mud, removing any evidence that anyone had stayed there.
35:00 There isn't a continuous layer of sandstone stretching across all of N. America as his drawing shows. That is a really silly creationist misrepresentation of the actual data. N. America does have isolated pockets of sandstone but they were deposited at different times in the last 500 million years and they certainly are *NOT* contiguous.
@samburns3329 "creationist misrepresentation of the actual data." You better look at the data again and again, then maybe you will stop misrepresenting the data. Or as it looks like are you just here to scoff at Noah's Flood? If you don't believe God's word that's all you but why discourage others?
@samburns3329 No, you’re incorrect. There is indeed a continuous layer of sandstone stretching across the North American continent. It’s at the base of the Sauk Sequence, which is one of the five megasequences in the geologic record.
@@animaladventures14 You're full of it. Find me a reputable scientific source which says or shows a *continuous* sandstone layer across all of N. America.
@@animaladventures14 the basal sandstone of the Sauk sequence is called the Tapeats, but this is a formation name and the individual beds of sand do not extend that far. Stratigraphic analysis from the 1940's showed that this unit is time transgressive. That is it was not all deposited at a single time.
Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today. The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is: Sunrise to sunset Sunset to next sunset Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ). We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast. I work the day shift. (Both are not 24 hours) Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains". Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens” The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours. Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.
Wrong, in Hebrew the word Yom applies to a literal 24 hour period. In the days of creation the word Yom is used in the original Hebrew text. Also, why do some people have such an issue with creation being 24 hours for each day? Nobody says Jesus was dead for 3000 years, it was 3 24 hour periods, or was he in the wilderness for 40 days and nights, or 4000 years? Come on, it's clear that when Genesis reads there was a morning, and an evening, it is a typical day. Your idea about days of creation being longer throw out all the dates in chronology and prophecy too. God can do anything except lie, He is demonstration how wise and powerful He is by making such an amazing creation in just six LITERAL days.
@@Mark-ec3lp Leaders who reject parts of the Bible that do not fit their worldview (YEC) are not leaders. Leaders who make personal attacks on others who disagree with their worldview (YEC) are not leaders. Rejects: Hebrews 4:9-10 Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 Romans 5:12 Romans 1:20 Psalm 19 1-4 Leviticus 25:2 and Exodus 23:10-11
Wise is regarded as a joke in the scientific community and no proper university would employ him. "Creation science" is an oxymoron but he doesn't speak to the masses, he speaks to the poorly educated, feeble minded, gullible fools who will never question him. This is precisely how Islam works as well so you're no different to Muslims.
Because maybe God didn’t send adults, or maybe no carnivorous types at all. Remember He destroyed the earth and animals because of the violence( sin). Maybe God didn’t create dragons/ dinosaurs, maybe they were creatures corrupted by aliens/fallen angels?
Most were vegetarian to start with the nat I re ov the flood conditions caused them to also go into a hibernation type mode even meat eaters can survive either vege dieg been proved
Genesis 9:3 Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things. - King James Bible Before the flood, the animals and mankind were herbivores. Genesis 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. Genesis 1:30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.
Denying the evidence against a global flood just to keep a book accurate, is an insult to humanity. It happening or not also have no affect what so ever on your god existing. It's just utter ignorance that people continue to follow this path.
Merci du partage! Hypothèse intéressante! J'ai l'impression qu'il y a eu la même chose en Europe, et en Asie, ce qui expliquerait la disparation brutale d'anciens mondes, d'anciens continents... Mais maintenant, il faut trouver le ou les déclencheurs! Stéph.
@@The-DOI think it's a conspiracy theory not a cult. There's a decent amount of theological diversity within YEC with the commonality being a literal interpretation of Genesis.
@@danhoff4401 YEC and Flat-Earth are based on secret knowledge, so they should be classified as cults (can they be both conspiracy theories and cults at the same time, I think so, yes)
Dr. Wise is correctly showing that North-America has been flooded. But don't blend that with the local flood at the time of Noah, it happened in todays Takla Makan desert. That aerea is a perfect spot for inundation, due to the huge mountain ranges around. The problem is that christians have been tought that the world is 6000 years old, but thats just back to the time of Adam. The earth is very old, Gen 1:1 'In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth'.
Promoters of the concept of Noah's ark annoy me with their lack of common sense. Just take one factor, when the animals came off the ark, what did the meat eaters live on? If everything was dead from the flood? My father was really annoyed when at seven years old I asked the Sunday school teacher this question. When I asked him he said there was two things I must understand. First was that if it was in the bible it was true. Second it was obvious that God had found a solution because we still had all the animals. This was most unfortunate because I decided that this was nonsense and from then on questioned everything he told me. He thought I was a difficult child. I thought he was delusional. He was a lay preacher in our church.
@@davebisset3613 I don't KNOW how it happened but I can think of multiple solutions to that problem on my own, however you don't think the god who caused the whole thing could have solved that little issue? Was he going to be stopped by THAT out of all things? also, what do you have to say about all the evidence presented in this analysis? He isn't making it up, he's making observations on the same world you and I live in
I always find it highly amusing when people tend to believe in science until it contradicts their extreme religious beliefs. Then attempting to cherry pick parts of scientific evidence only to come up with a hypothesis that none of the world experts in the field agree with.
The consensus of world experts in geology and geography say a flood of the entire planet to the depth quoted in the Bible is totally impossible. Biologists have said that Noah's Arc would only be big enough for the food of 2 junior elephants for a year. Also expert boat builders made a large scale replica Arc and tried to sail it, but they couldn't stop it leaking. Apparently wooden ships can only be built up to a certain size because wood flexes and causes them to sink. There are of course a huge list of other problems, but I think you get my point.
Like cherry picking parts of the bible to believe or not believe. Whatever the current consesus is on the bible, that is what is preached. And you want to be taken seriously?
@@jonathanrussell1140 : So Newton’s Law of Gravity doesn’t work for you then? After all , it was only an apple and a tree in a ‘ localised’ garden. Maybe you should write a paper telling the world what ‘ scale of experimental evidence’ is acceptable .
I'm not certain, but I don't think Noah took insects, at least not intentionally. Some surely hitched a ride. Others could have survived on floating mats of vegetation and debris, of which there were surely many.
@@adamrspears1981 Then how do you explain the continent-scale fossil-bearing miles-deep hydraulically-sorted layers (strata) of sediment that cover the whole earth if not from the worldwide flood? (Did you watch this video?)
@@KenJackson_US How do I explain fossils scattered through out the globe? Oh boy, you picked a toughy.......hmmm, let me see......oh I know! There's fossils everywhere because life's been on this planet for millions upon millions of years! Next question...
El problema, en el otro lado, es que el Mabbul, o Diluvio, no es necesariamente un evento geológico o natural. Algunos creyentes, que no hallan la forma de separarse de los conceptos del método científico, quieren ajustar las dos narrativas, la bíblica y la científica, pero el objetivo final es validar la ciencia y sentirse relativamente a sus anchas, considerando que la ciencia objetiva es un derivado de la literatura bíblica. La tentativa está muy bien intencionada, pero no es necesariamente lo que quiere explicar la Biblia.
Could the rythmites we see now where the last, or final ones laid down, meanwhile the flooding and filling of glacial lake Missoula could have been happening sequentially over a longer period, so the dating is showing that?
Love your lecture. Just east of Reno, Nevada you can clearly see ripple marks ( we refer to as high water marks). They can be seen on both sides of Highway I-80. Hard to estimate but I-80 from Fernley, Nev would have been 200 - 300 feet underwater. The Native American living there tell the story of the Great Lake Lahontan. These high water marks can be seen for miles as you travel the highway. How far south the water extended is beyond hard to determine, as you said without an aerial survey. Great presentation thank you.
No biblical flood. There are plenty of ancient places around the world never disturbed by a great flood. I refer you specifically to Ashfall Fossil Beds State Historical Park in northeast Nebraska. Fossils are just as a volcanic eruption left them 12 million years ago.
What about the idea presented off a large flood through the Grand canyon such as just explained? I don't know the first thing about the science here but in your opinion was it explained accurately? Other evidence and other areas obviously need to be considered like what you bring up but do you have any comment on the content presented here? Without considering a biblical narrative, just the facts as they stand?
@@cs77smith67 No, a tree cannot live for millions of years, but the trees you see today are all living descendants of some forms of plant life from a million years ago.
@stevepierce6467 so tell me if this fossil record of millions of years as you say is true, why is there proof of a tree growin through all the fossil record?And it's still alive to this day?
@@cs77smith67 I am a bit confused by your question. The oldest confirmed living tree is about 5000 years old, but there are some where local tradition claim as much as 9000 years. These all have fossilized ancestors that go back further. There is a tree they call a "living fossil," called the gingko biloba. It has proven fossilized ancestors going back about 200 million years. There are other long-lived trees which have fairly long fossil histories. But I do not know of any present-day tree that has lived for millions of years. The nickname "living fossil" refers to the fact that the gingko has changed little over the millions of years and that the present plant is quite similar to its fossil ancestors.
The problem is, we've been filled with the secular narrative of history for so long that it's hard to see past it. God helps us day by day to see past these lies. It takes awhile but step by step He leads us through. What a good God we serve.
Many things wrong with noahs flood ,chinese calender is older , no records of flood in aisia or europe on bibles timeline , caves and caverns around the world showing ancient drawings thousands of years old , massive caverns as big as towns under volcanos , all would be filled up with debris and skeletons but there not 👍
Can you site your evidence for the accelerated radioactive decay far in the past ? Having worked with half-life equations and implications for accurate measurement, I have never seen a deviation that would even come close to suggesting that decay rates slow down with time. The only component that slows down is the creation of decay products, as with each cycle of 1/2 life decay, only 1/2 of the material remains to decay further.
They can't. I went looking for that once upon a time and that's when I learned about OKLO natural nuclear reactor. We know the decay rates haven't changed for 2 billion years on the basis of analysing that natural experiment.
It never dawned on this guy that maybe *HE* is the one with geologic myopia and the other 99.999% of all professional geologists are actually correct. Talk about a lack of self-awareness.
@@garyb6219 yes your right to go through all this trouble to justify a magic sky daddy that killed everyone while putting animals on a boat that never existed is pathetic
@@missouritravelers if there is no creator then your reasoning comes from the firing of neurons in your brain and totally void of actual thought. Moist robots can’t reason, which was Darwin’s dilemma. Logic and reason is another sign we are formed in the image of our creator.
I enjoyed this video because you didn't try to force the argument that science proves the Bible. What it proves is that certain assumptions from the past must be questioned due to present observations. This is occurring in many scientific fields and is making it possible to cause deep misgivings about the tyranny of Atheism. Some are likely to (with astonishment) look at the biblical text anew.
It is the epitome of ignorance to dismiss the glaring evidence of Earth's catastrophic past. The present is absolutely NOT the key to understanding the past
This is much older than the bible, same story was found in sumerian texts. But who help the human and teach him how to construct the boat is called Enki.
@@chimmy___ Its you opinion, based on your religion. The fact is, its not. Dont forgot that Abraham was born in UR, an SUMERIAN city. Thats were he came from.
Our small bible study group invited Dr. Wise out to Whidbey Island about 25 years ago. He stayed about a week and spoke several times. He is the real deal and we enjoyed him immensely.
When I was cutting sandstone blocks for the foundation of my house, I let all the spoil accumulate where I was doing the majority of the cutting. Some of the cutting required sawing and grinding. Other cuts were simply made by breaking with a hammer and chisel. Larger pieces were broken down with wedges. I simply rinsed the cut blocks off with a gardeb hose before placement. Afterwards I had a certain amount of cleanup to do and the larger pieces were loaded by hand. The sand and dust however where i was using the hose had formed a concretion and this was simply from the residue and water. No cement or mortar was anywhere near where I was cutting. This was an area a little over 10 ft x 10 ft and i had to bust up the layer of sedimentary rock that had formed under my feet. Over the course of a few weeks, the sand and powder had reformed into a layer of stone two to three inches thick on top of the grass. I would have used that as well if not for the grass sticking to it. Under the right conditions with repeated wetting and drying, sandstone will form pretty quick.
Yes, and layers of sandstone, mudstone, etc can be thousands of feet deep above and underground. You now have a small grasp on deep time
@@JusNoBS420
Where do you find them where you claim they exist without evidence?
@@JusNoBS420that does not mean deep time all that means is there's more gravity now pushing the water out of the column 🤦 I think you might want to study hydrology....🤮🚩🚩🚩
I think it has more to do with people being very comfortable in their lives of sin and they do not want to hear the truth...
what truth
@@bulldogma99 Sin is lawlessness.
@@brunobastos5533 The ☀️ne we'll be dealt by
@bulldogma99 I know that your approach is convenient, but do try harder, for your eternal resolution is at stake
☦️🕊❤️🔥🛐 May the power of Gods love bless and guide you in Yeshuah's supremely mighty and most mercifully precious name of essential necessity .
@@cptcosmo men suppress truth. Kjv
I share everything I can find that Dr. Wise puts out with my family. He’s an excellent source of knowledge and he’s usually animated when speaking about how you can see God in his wonderful creation.
Because he is a creation driven geologist who's scientific integrity is flawed because of his belief? Do most geologists agree with him?
That's daft .There'd be wiser than him, out chewing grass.
I feel sorry for your family.
@fletcherlewis Not if they want to keep their jobs, not get published, not qualify for grant money, not have their names in prestigious journals, not keep a roof over their heads, not eat, and not if they want to be invited to leave fellowship bodies. If those were the conditions for getting into university, most students would deny their own mothers just to get a seat at the table - or not get an education. It's called peer pressure. Bit like the Hollywood thing: deny God, drink blood, swear allegiance to Satan, you'll get a glittering career. Stand alone, expect the full weight of Hollywood against you. People get thrown out all the time for finding evidence they weren't supposed to find. Or get careers stomped on after they do. There are over 30,000 scientists worldwide you won't find on those "acceptable" lists precisely for that reason - they broke the silence and published at great cost.
@@fletcherlewis proof of your claim. Need your refutation of his presentation, how can we trust a random person spouting non substantiated claims.
I asked an ardently atheist coworker how he could believe that nothing created everything. He quickly replied, "it's been reproduced in a lab." I then asked, "in a what?" He said, "in a lab". I asked again, "in a what?" He said, in a la...." The light dawned on his face; a "lab" isn't "nothing"!
@@nofearnow8190 also, it hasn’t been reproduced in a lab.
@@CuriousCattery love the guy but no. The atheist here is saying that "nothing created something" and that has been recreated in the lab. Its impossible to do that. It's just a bold lie.
There was nothing in my head. Then I started thinking and everything appeared to me, clear as day!
The Big Bang Theory does not say the universe started from nothing, that is what theist say.
Been an Atheist does not mean you have the knowledge or answers, Atheism is simply a lack of belief meaning Atheists can come from any background, culture or education system, there are no common ties other then a lack of belief in a God so asking a question and not getting an answer demonstrates little in your point here.
In answer to your point, we can demonstrate particles of matter popping in and out of existence from nothing and measure the effect, so to the educated Atheists like myself we can actually show you, this Lab analogy is a poor attempt at mocking, the lab is simply a structure to perform the experiment in his case, it bares no link to the experiments and the controls it is under.
The hard part of that question is defining nothing, when we say nothing we often mean the vacuum of space but even the vacuum of space is teaming with particles and energy, it is the fabric of spacetime where the word nothing really has no meaning so the whole premise of the theist argument about the universe coming out of nothing is flawed until you define nothing on a quantum level and also includes many theories where we did spring out of other multiverses etc which also render the nothing argument mute.
Love when science supports the evidence! Love it when scientists follow the evidence and lets it tell the story. Great presentation! Thank you!
Young Earth = Flat Earth. Pure nonsense
His "science" is wrong. He twisted and generalized it to fit the way he wanted it to.
You got it wrong; evidence is what supports real science, not the other way.
It doesn't, this is why the science community don't take Wise seriously.
@@garyb6219 in what way is the science wrong? Please provide a substantive response.
The proliferation of confirmation bias amongst the geological community has been as disaster for science for so very long, especially with all that dating methods that base their initial values on suppositions based on their original biases. Thank you for fighting against it.
The most logical answer to that is rebellion to authority and wanted to live without accountability.
Ah yes, another global conspiracy
@@chadamongmen5223Chad on the case, eh?
@@chadamongmen5223Confirmation bias doesn't require any outward conspiracy. It is simply seeing only what you expect to see and NOT being open to (at least, certain kinds of) skepticism that would let you self-correct.
@@chadamongmen5223 well you sound like a perfect example of what he was saying about bias lol.
Geological Myopia, the same as Biological Myopia (faith in Common Descent) is due to these:
"He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them." --John 12:40
"In whom the god of this world [Satan] hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them. For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord;" --2 Corinthians 4:4
Hallelujah!!!
LoL
Why is quoting from a pretend book always supposed to stand in for facts? I don't get why bible thumpers do this. Quoting from a book doesn't make it so. Quote from Lord of the Rings if you want, it means about as much.
@@garyb6219 Noah's flood is a fact, the evidence overwhelming that the entire earth was once covered with water whose height was higher than the mountains. It is interesting that the thickest glaciers are the same depth as most of the highest mountains.
All people have an Authority concerning the origins of life and historical events. The atheist relies upon science (so-called) textbooks that are ever-changing, such as the once touted "science" of Phrenology and the medical "science" of bleeding and leeches.
The bible is not a "pretend book" as you pre-suppose, it is a truthful and accurate account of 1) The creation of living things 2) historical events such as Noah's flood, kings of empires like Babylon and Assyria, as well as prophesying the coming of Jesus, the messiah who is the Son of God who takes away the sins of the world.
The Lord of the Rings does not have architectural nor geological evidence whereas the bible certainly does, as Prof. Wise has competently demonstrated.
@garyb6219 do u not see the irony in the fact that your entire belief system is based on books from random scientists in the last 300ish years and the majority of which you yourself haven't even personally heard of nor read but believe to be absolute truth without question and then for seemingly no reason want to argue the ideas of others as wrong with out cause nor purpose when your belief system is entirely juxtaposed too and says his is false. so why ultimately would you have feelings on the matter if what you believe is true.
Thank you Dr. Wise for your teachings that others won't do. The truth prevails!
What if: Others don't do this lessons because they are pure nonsense
Is that a possibility?
Wise has no concept of truth just have you have no concept of morality.
You gave the BEST lecture on Noah’s flood! Your excitement of the subject was enjoyable to watch. Bless you, brother.🙏🏼😁👍🏼
… that lecture was several years ago. I still watch rewatch it from time to time. Good to see you that you are still at it.
Thank you, Dr. Wise. Excellent presentation as always 👏🏻
I remember going to New Mexico and seeing, from elevation, an area that looked like an enormous drainage gulley. It stood out. And I knew
I grew up on the Beaches of Washington State, playing in the sands as the tides drained out, and flooded in. I have done many many experiments in my childhood, which "experts" don't do until they've already wasted many years of their lives, and then they do very narrow experiments in their artificial world of labs ... also fun, but missing the other things which happen when water floods, surges, and drains away. As one flies out of Albuquerque NM Westward bound in the morning from the airliner, one can look down, as ascending and see that all of the terrain below was created on a gigantic scale using the same water effects of quick flooding and erosion, creating the same features which I created many times as a child with buckets of water, or trapped dams of tide water on sandy beaches. When driving from Zion NP, UT to Las Vegas, again, the features are massive flood effects, and likewise from Las Vegas to Barstow, CA. Across the earth, at the base of dormant past volcanic mountains which reach the seas and oceans, one can see how the water has carved away their sides and even under-cut them, as evidence of how shortly ago these mountains were formed and eroded. There is much evidence of rock continuing to be formed in only decades, with man-made objects entombed in recent rock, such as the pick-axe. On a mining cave tour in South Dakota, we were told how stalactites took immense quantities of time to be formed, yet I could see on the wooden roof supports growing stalactites which were inches long, grown in just 50 years, rather than the millions of years the experts declare. Since cement requires only hours to become rock, is there any wonder that making rocks without human help takes only a few decades, instead of millions of years. Nearly everywhere across the world, human eyes can see the signs of catastrophic floods, greater than any regional flood that mankind has ever seen, and for centuries after Noah's flood, before the land became covered over in places by great forests, Noah's flood results were easily seeable by every human, but not so strangely, humans prefer to live where plants cover-over the obvious signs of Noah's flood, since plants provide food for humans, but barren rock does not. We, in our myopic, near-sighted, survival level mindset, don't naturally look at the "big-picture", until we reach adulthood, when we seek education, which is just brain-washing by Darwinian geologists, biologists, and social scientists. As a small child, I thought that everyone older knew more then me, which was true; but only after many decades of study, and far later than I should have been told, I learned that most teachers and professors had just average intelligence, and that what they taught as truth was being taught by them as a parrot repeats words that he has heard, or a monkey can be trained to repeat the many steps of basic brain-surgery which a human taught him, but neither has the knowledge and discernment needed to prove what the parrot says or recreate from nothing the advanced steps of brain-surgery. Likewise is true of most professors at universities, these days; they have nothing but "wrote" words mimicked from someone else, with the exceptions of those of the so called "hard" sciences such as mathematics and chemistry; this is not to say that the persons don't have the ability to use discernment, but rather that they don't as a rule.
lol
Well done! Should be sufficient for a dissertation, and start learning Swedish, because the Nobel Prize is waiting for you.
What a load of rubbish
@@guygifford : Judging by the above moronic replies to your piece, no doubt from eminent evolutionary scientists, you are on to something.
Until the American people start waking up to the reality that they have been lied to about so much on so many subjects, it is impossible for them to wrap their heads around this stuff!!
You're being far too kind. Sure, there are many that just blindly believe the so-called experts.
However, many more choose the myopia as an excuse to deny God's existence...
The bible teaches a flat earth, yet 400 years ago people chose to believe the "intellectuals". Instead of believing our senses and proof in front of our face. People refuse to comprehend that the deception is indeed STRONG.
God warned us about the changing of laws and times by the beast.
In "Already Gone", Ken Ham claims that (at Christian colleges) Theology majors are More likely to believe in old earth than Science majors. Strrong evidence that is kept suppressed
As former devout Christian, Noah's flood is just one of the reasons I no longer believe. In so much that this story is based on earlier regional stories, it also would have resulted in the destruction of the planet given what apologists claim. Ask yourself simple questions. Like, how could they possibly have known that the ENTIRE world was covered in water? Doesn't it make more sense that their ENTIRE world was the immediate geographic location in which they lived flooded? Taking all the animals, that they owned, onto a boat to save them from a flood in an area prone to flooding makes more sense, yes? Given the physical world, the logistics of such a story are untenable. Do yourself a favor. Go look into why this story is parable and not factual. Doesn't mean you lose your faith. Doesn't mean you shouldn't believe in God. It means you look at God's world with your eyes open.
How about theological myopia. Everything has to agree with a man made Iron Age book. Science is ignored in favour of rehashed ancient Middle East myths.
@@jamgill9054 You say it doesn't mean you lose your faith or you shouldn't believe in God.
Is it ok to believe God created the world and universe? Or that a virgin conceived? Or that Jesus was raised from the dead? If we can believe these things, why can we not believe in a global flood?
Always enjoyable to learn from Kurt Wise!
To learn what? How NOT to interpret the Bible?
Kurt Wise has nothing useful to teach
Oh, I believe it. I believe that everything in God's word is true. ❤✝️
Learn to read it then. If you are YoungEarther/FlatEarther it means you are NOT doing a good job
You actually stated the truth. By including the words "I believe that..." at the beginning, it makes your statement utterly true.
Your going to need a bigger boat. Approximately 8.7 million species are estimated to exist on Earth, with around 6.5 million of those species found on land and about 2.2 million in the oceans. However, it's important to note that a significant percentage of these species, estimated at 86% on land and 91% in the seas, have yet to be discovered and described. Noah’s ark doesn’t hold water.
Atheist scientists had originally said that humans broke off from ape-like creatures 2.5 million years ago. And that modern man evolved from that humanoid about 250,000 years ago. Well, even if we assume that humans have ony been on the planet for 10,000 years, when the alleged agricultural revolution started and being extremely conversative.
Only doubling the world's population every 150 years (currently the population doubles about 40 years), *after 150 years there will be 4 people, after another 150 years there will be 8 people, after another 150 years there will be 16 people, and so on* This rate is actually very conservative. (we have records of a Russian woman in the 1700's who gave birth to over 60 children). I am taking into account *disease, plagues, famines, natural disasters, wars, and reverse birth to death ratio at various intervals.* Way before the discovery of penicillin in 1928. We have records of women from the 1400's giving birth to 10 children on average, let's say only 5 would make it to old age for the factors mentioned above, so 2 children per couple every 150 years for 10,000 years it is extremely generous. Calculating these numbers, there would have been averaging close to 100 doublings in 10,000 years. The world’s population would be whopping figure of the # 1 followed by 30 zeros.
Check it out:
1,000000000000000000000000000000. You can still wipe out humanity a couple of times more and the numbers still don't add up.
*Think about this in 1912 when the Titanic sank. The world's population was only a little over 1 billion people. Fast-forward 100 years and we are 8 billion. And we have had world war I and world War II in between (70 million people died). In 1945-46 around 140,000 people died as a result of the bombing of Hiroshima, Plus the worst influenza plague the world has ever seen, which happened 1918 (50 million people die)* Still In the last 100 years alone we can see a population growth of 8 times its numbers.
*Now, let's look at this other also very conservative math:*
If we start about 4,500 years ago (time of Noah's flood, only 8 people survived).
After about 30 doublings, which is about 4,500 years, the world's population would have reached about 8 billion people (4,500 years ÷ 150 years in between births = 30 doublings // 8 exponentially doubled 30 times = 8,589,934,592 people). Just more or less what we have today. Give or take a few millions due to the negative factors mentioned above.
Yes, some Christians and many other religions believe in some sort of evolution. But this is only because they have been influenced by this indoctrination since they were children.
*Math doesn't lie. We can see how man invented the a theory of his origin to try to do away with God’s moral laws. We have lied about our origin, our history. And the studies of archeology, biology, anthropology, and so on. We even rather believe in panspermia (aliens from other galaxies). We are very ready to accept anything but God. BTW, religion is also man's made. For God there's only two religions good and evil*
There's gonna be people regardless of their educational level that because of their cognitive biases can look at these facts and will still want to continue their merry-way without having any accountability for their actions.
Today's world population is over 8 billion in about 25 years we will be over 20 billion. The world's economy will collapse.
*REPENT OF ALL YOUR SINS. JESUS CHRIST IS COMING BACK VERY SOON. YOU DON'T WANNA MISS LIVING IN A GLORIFIED BODY WITHOUT DEATH AND SUFFERING ON A NEW EARTH*
It is so weird that huge dinosaurs simply popped out from no where! What was their purpose to live on earth?
@@sulongenjop7436
*This same question was asked many years ago.*
*Answer:* God subjected the entire universe to a pervasive law of decay or thermodynamics (Romans 8:20-22) as a means to efficiently eradicate evil and suffering (see Why the Universe Is the Way It Is1 for details and an explanation). Consequently, all physical life on Earth experiences death. Psalm 104:29-30 says that it is the property of all life to die but that God re-creates and renews the face of the earth. Psalm 104 also implies that God has packed Earth with as much life as possible and as diverse as possible.
When much of Earth’s landmass was covered by huge shallow seas, God created large dinosaurs. Thanks to the shallow seas, these large dinosaurs could take advantage of the shallow seas to support their huge body masses that otherwise would have been impossible to sustain. The existence of a huge, diverse, and enduring population of dinosaurs during past eras when much of Earth’s continental landmass was covered by huge shallow seas significantly contributed to Earth’s present store of biodeposits. Examples of such biodeposits include limestone, marble, coal, oil, and natural gas.
Dinosaurs, therefore, are expressions of God’s love and generosity. It is thanks in part to God’s creation of dinosaurs that humans possess more than 76 quadrillion tons of biodeposits that we can use to develop the civilization and technology to take the good news of salvation through Jesus Christ to billions of humans within just a few millennia.
A hypothetical: If there was a local flood, where would it have been?
Seems to me that there would have to be mountains surrounding the water, restraining it for ~1 year (assuming the Bible's timeline is correct). But I can't find a mountain range anywhere in the middle east capable of containing water that long. But then, I'm not a geologist.
Any suggestions?
The dam holding the water back was called a GLACIER. Then as the glaciers retreated the water could have broken through and a massive flood following the paths he described. We now believe that similar events happened several times as the glaciers advanced over time and retreated. He is only telling the parts of these events that fits his narrative. I live in Washington State and have been to Mount St.Helens and the pothole lakes/ Eastern WA many times.
Dr. Wise is my favorite flood scientist. I have a geologist as an older brother. I've heard the old earth, long process evolutionary model all my life. It's great to see the well thought out counter to that argument as food for thought and debate. Thank you.
If the bible said the Earth was 500 years old he'd find a way to make that fit. If the bible said the Earth was a million years old, poof, he'd find a way to make that fit. Actual science says there is only one age.
Exactly Gary, he has a prior theological commitment and that keeps him from engaging honesty with the data. It's sad really because he's a sharp guy. Every time I see one of these pop up it's just like look at all that wasted potential.
Wise gave up science at a young age. Science doesn't begin with a conclusion and then set out to prove it. This is what deluded theists do.
Well thought out??? lol.
When I was a kid in the 60's my father worked at a rock quarry. Occasionally he would bring home fossils that had not been blown or crushed to smithereens. I remember one particularly that stood out looked like a ram's horn but was actually an ancient sea creature over a foot in diameter. This was along the Missouri River in Nebraska.
Thank you for this excellent presentation! I always enjoy listening to Dr. Wise speak. He makes learning about geology interesting!
The Babylonian story of the Deluge predates the Biblical account. It’s is Utnapushtim’s Flood before it is Noah’s. During the Babylonian Captivity, the Genesis account is written using the original pagan story as a template.
Thank you for sharing. :)
Love your lectures Kurt. Wish we could get you out to our Church for a big Creation Conference
I appreciate your tone and attitude throughout the talk. So many Christians adopt a knowing, mocking tone while speaking against the current science. It doesn't help their cause.
Have you read some of the trolls replies in the comments? "Knowing, mocking tone"? Yea right.
@@beestoe993 what do you mean?
Most “experts” and/or “academics” will do anything to deny the biblical record of the world deluge catastrophe.
They don't need to do anything. They just follow the evidence.
Sorry that it shows that the biblical flood is a myth.
Same in archeology
@@jackiepowell7513I highly doubt so. They just follow the evidence and don't care about your god.
@@christopheespic What about the evidence in this video? LOL.
They don't 'deny the biblical record'. There just any evidence to support the flood story. Also, if the flood had happened the way apologist say, it would have destroyed the world (the heat problem). Also, use a little critical thinking. The boat was on the water for nearly a year. Every plant and animal not on the boat would have been dead and gone. Yet a dove shows up with a mature olive branch and they knew where the bird got it from? How could Noah possibly know that the ENTIRE world was flooded? Also, if the flood killed everyone in the world at the same time, why haven't we found a common layer of the bones of humans and animals all mixed together on the same layer around the world? Why didn't any other culture in the world notice the flood? No, the story falls apart with the most basic questions being asked. This is why it isn't a part of academic study. You are of course welcome to write a paper and present testable evidence. Just remember to leave out the magic parts because magic isn't real.
Great presentation. I really enjoy your detailed explanations.
A lot of similar evidence is given for the Eye of the Sahara having gone through a similar type of event. I totally agree with your theory.
dr wise hello and thank you for another wonderful video great stuff ! and very well done ! i enjoy a lot ! being very much a believer myself i really appreciate all your work and effort and videos
What does this geological process discussion have to do with the impact to the southern Indian Ocean about 2900 BCE that formed a 29 km diameter Burkle crater, a tsunami that was about 1.5 km high when it impacted Western Australia. Going north it was funneled between India and the Saudi Arabian peninsula to go over the Kuwaiti-Iraqi desert to reach the south of the mountains of Ururat. There, at Mt. Nisir is a sanctuary built to the prophet Noh whose boat landed there. The Mosque in the town at the bottom of Mt. Nisir is dedicated to the prophet Noh (Hebrew spelling). In Ajerbaijan is a mausoleum to the Prophet Noah.
Wow! so, it seems the ancient prophets meant exactly what they said about the cyclical dotl when earth shifts to line up with ''the Master when He returns from His long journey!''
Most ungodly people do not want to give God the praise for creation or believe the word of God, the Bible. This is the bedrock of why geology has not changed. It will not change until Christ returns. As Revelation 16:9 shows, even when His wrath is evident, the unrighteous will not turn to God.
Looking through the lens of the Bible can correct the Myopia!
There is noting in the bible about optics - The Earth is 4.5 BILLION YEARS OLD
or worsen it
Like looking through rose colored glasses
@@joedavenport6156 I would bet most so-called believers actually agree with you (and me).
I did the soil and water in a mason jar experiment with my second son who is now 25 years old, back when he was about nine. Formed quite a few layers within a week. 😊
How did the surface of the earth not melt if radioactive decay was happing a milion times faster?
Their god was blowing on it to cool it down?
@@jeffbybee5207 how do you cool down a nuclear reactor? Submerge it in water.
I don't buy there was any rapid decay. You ever see the Proton Labs Z-pinch experiments? They were working on fusion and when they made the isotopes like they use for dating methods. The parent daughter elements ratio was like what we see today.
@@jeffbybee5207 off topic. But also covered in the video.
If you examine the sedimentation rates for the major Land masses and the large river deltas, if they had been doing that for billions of years, they would have filled up the oceans long ago. The earth can't be more than several thousand years old.
@@sammcrae8892Zirkon probes withvUranium Lead tell you something different and there are multiple different materials that allow you to determine the conditions and verify your age.
It's called: Blind leading the blind
Correct, the geologists are blind, and leading other geologists.
If God's word declares it, I believe it.
where is word
You’re god didn’t right anything it been right by humans, why god didn’t do his self ? 😊
@@Kebekwoodcraft7375 because of reasons
@@Kebekwoodcraft7375 what have human beings righted that God has not?
@@samuelrodriguez9199 Polio, TB, Measles, eyesight defects, the ability to survive in harsh environments on a largely hostile earth, How many more examples do you need?
The problem with accelerated decay is heat. As the Alpha and Beta decay happens it releases quite a lot of energy that heats up the environment. How do you account for this energy release?
It's not just the heat which is a huge problem for creationists. Cramming 4.5 billion years' of radioactive decay into 1 year would release enough deadly alpha, beta, and gamma radiation to fry every living thing on the Ark 1000X over. 😮
How did you miss this?
The WA Ice Age flood wasn't a single event. They estimate it was somewhere between a dozen to thirty plus foods over several hundred to thousands of years. The ice dam formed somewhere in the Cabinet Gorge where the present day Clark Fork river flows from Missoula, to lake pend Oreille, and on to the mighty Columbia river and eventually the Pacific Ocean.
This should be sufficient evidence to explain the differentiated radiometric dating in the rhythmic layering.
Don't confuse the sheep with scientific facts.
@@sciencerules2825 This particular fact reinforces the feature he was talking about by explaining that catastrophism is still the method of deposition and the number of floods over a relatively short period of time geologically speaking could account for the variance in the radiometric dating.
@@bpuryea Wrong. The speed at which a geologic formation develops has zero effect on any radiometric dating of the formation. Did you even bother to think that through?
@@sciencerules2825 yeah, too bad you havent.
@@bpuryea OK, I read your statement wrong. I though you were talking about speed of formation affecting radiometric decay rate, not the actual measured date determined by radiometric means. My bad.
I saw a presentation on Mt. St. Helens by the late John Morris many years ago now. Morris started off his talk by showing slides of aerial views of the Grand Canyon. After a few slides he stopped for effect and told us the slides had all been from Mt. St. Helens and not the Grand Canyon. The Washington State volcano damage looked just like the G.C. It was only just not as big.
ICR scientists in 1985 standing on the edge of rock cliffs that only five years earlier had been mud right after the eruption was convincing. Amazing and very interesting to see.
Except, geologically they are totally different, so the whole comparison is absolutely pointless and some would say, dishonest.
@@pomegranatepip2482 Mr. Morris was a trained geologist by degree. So I don't know what you mean by being geologically wrong. At Mount St Helens it was a basically fast forming sedimentary rock. And that was the implication for the Grand canyon. The ICR scientists were standing on top of Rock cliffs that 5 years earlier had been pure mud. So the rock formed awfully quickly.
@@garylshelton2463 Mount St Helens post eruption was not fast-forming sedimentary rock. I quote an article on this comparison “Unfortunately for this idea the authors aren’t comparing like with like. The debris fields around Mt St Helens are made up of rocks & gravels, ash & mud, & the remains of pyroclastic flows, sitting loosely atop each other - they’re not compacted or consolidated. All this is sitting on steep slopes, pretty much unprotected by any plant cover (particularly immediately after the eruption sequence), and in an area where the average annual rainfall is about 3m for year - a recipe for some pretty impressive erosion. The Grand Canyon is different.
This significant geological feature cuts through layers of limestone, sandstone, shale and metamorphic granite, a mile down to the Colorado River, arranged as shown in the following image from the TalkOrigins website”
So yeah, anyone who compares the two is simply talking hogswash. If you try to erode through actual rock, it’s a lot more difficult than trying to erode through a pile of mud and stones that were once rock and are now unconsolidated. As for “ICR Scientists”, well, that’s just laughable. These people are not scientists. They are liars. They try to manipulate science to a given outcome. They are totally dishonest, and the best thing they offer us as humanity is a little bit of a giggle at how indoctrination can destroy a person’s ability to distinguish between reality and fiction.
I love your content, but you pretty much ruined my experience with most of the other geologists...
And that's perfectly fine with me!!
As a believer, I find it hard to listen to many of those in your profession.
I didn't realize that geology was such a young science.
We certainly saw how quickly the landscape changes in NC this year with a flood much, much smaller than the deluge of Noah's time.
God bless yall
Thanks for your patience and work
To have everlasting life you absolutely must trust in the person and finished work of Christ alone for salvation ❤️ this means that saving repentance is turning from unbelief to belief.
You either believe that Jesus paid your sin debt in full or you don't.
How does one believe in something with zero evidence. Ancient writings by ancient men copied numerous times and compiled into the Bible and called the word of God.
There are many problems with Noah's flood. Here are 11 I can think of:
1) It is EXTREMELY similar to (much older) stories about floods that wiped out mankind, etc from more ancient societies such as Babylonia, Persia and Egypt. Similar in the story elements of having two of each animal, releasing birds to find out if land had appeared (why not look out a window?), etc. The Epic of Gilgamesh is much older and contains more than 80% of the elements of Noah's Ark. Even the 'Institute for Creation Research' (ICR) admits this, although they draw the conclusion that the biblical epic was spread by word of mouth before it was written down and therefore was "probably older". They assume, I guess, that the Gilgamesh Epic was etched into stone tablets as it was dictated by the original author.
2) If you read the story of Noah, you will see that in the middle of the parts where God tells Noah to gather two of each animal, He then changes His mind and says to gather *7* pairs of the "clean" animals and 1 pair of the "unclean" animals. [Genesis 6:19-22 says to bring 2 of each animal, then Genesis 7:2-3 says to bring 7 pairs of the clean animals and 1 pair of the unclean animals, then Genesis 7:9 reiterates that Noah is to bring 1 pair of each animal].
3) Since the Kosher rules did not come about until the time of Moses - much later than Noah's time - Noah would not know what is "clean" and what is "unclean".
4) God instructs Noah in Genesis 6:21 to also bring along all of the food required for all of the animals and the people for the journey, but neglects to tell Noah how long the journey will be so Noah could not know how much food to bring. And we know Noah did not know, because he had to release several birds over a period of weeks to get news that dry land had appeared.
5) Noah and the animals were on the ark for about 370 days total, not 40 days and nights as is commonly believed (It *rained* for forty days and forty nights). Don't believe me? Here: Noah entered the ark in the 600th year of his life, on the 17th day of the 2nd month (Genesis 7:11-13). Noah left the ark on the 27th day of the 2nd month of the following year (Genesis 8:14-15). Therefore, assuming a lunar calendar of 360 days, Noah was on the ark for approximately 370 days. An African elephant eats 440 to 660 pounds of food per DAY. That would be 162,800 to 244,200 pounds of food for the journey for EACH elephant. Elephants in a zoo eat about 150 pounds of food per day, but even that is over 55,000 pounds of food for the journey - IF Noah knew how long it was going to be, which he didn't. Oh, and they require up to 50 gallons of fresh water each day, or 18,500 gallons of water for the trip.
6) Speaking of food, since the flood, having been on the Earth for over a year, would have destroyed all life - including plant life - there would be no food for the animals to eat once the ark opens up to let the animals out. Therefore, Noah would *also* have to bring enough food to feed the animals AFTER the flood for at least a few months while new plants begin to grow. The meat eaters would probably just eat the smaller animals - whoops! There goes the repopulation of THAT species! - but we'll leave that one alone.
7) How did the animals get to (and from!) the ark? How long do you suppose it would take for a sloth to make it from Australia to Noah's ark? Or an ant? How would a sloth even know how to get back there? And since they can't swim...Well, you get the idea. Noah really should have dropped all of the animals off at their original locations once the flood was over!
8) "Kinds" in the bible are not well defined, but they read to me like species. I have yet to hear a cogent explanation from a biblical literalist that explains the difference between a "kind" and a species. If it's species, then the impossibility of the whole story really becomes evident. There are over 300,000 different species of JUST beetles. There are MILLIONS of species on the Earth. Since the dimensions of the ark are given in the bible, we can say that there is NO WAY that those 6 million plus species could have fit in there. (If the dimensions had NOT been given, apologists could say the boat was 5 miles long and 2 miles wide, etc. to hold all of the animals). You can twist the meaning of "kinds" to mean whatever you want, but if you do that so that you can reduce that number to a few thousand, then AFTER the flood those "kinds" would have to *evolve* RAPIDLY to create the diversity that we see in the wild. But, alas, there would not be nearly enough time for that to happen.
9) If God is ashamed that He ever made man and wants to wipe all life from the face of the Earth, why not just snap His fingers and get it over with? Why have a 500+ year old man build a giant boat, gather all of the animals to save them, then have it rain for 40 days and nights and stay on the Earth for a year?
10) Are you telling me that every INFANT in the world was worthy of death by drowning? EVERY pregnant woman? Every child? Every cat, dog, squirrel and rhinoceros that did not get gathered onto the ark needed to be destroyed?
11) Some apologists have suggested that the animals brought on the ark were babies or eggs, so they wouldn't take up as much room or eat as much food. There are a couple of problems with this idea. First, since the Earth needed to be repopulated as soon as possible once the ark came to rest on dry land, the animals would have to be near sexual maturity in order to reproduce. An elephant reaches sexual maturity between the ages of 12-14 years, so a baby elephant on the ark would have to wait a decade before they could begin repopulating their species. Second, if they were babies, who took care of them once the ark came to rest? Babies need to be fed, nurtured and taught how to hunt, etc and eggs need to be sat on!
Sunday School ended for you many decades ago … please grow up …
He still learns science from children books. That's why he's a Flat-Earther/Science-Denier
I am a Creationist. Just wanted to hopefully make a constructive criticism. You take too long to make a point, you don't need to spend 15 minutes on Graded Bedding. Make your point, move on, Stop beating around the bush. It's boring. Thank you. Hope your next one is better.
"Find the facts that agree with your feelings. There can NOT be a God because then I would have to obey Him."
If He created everything, then He owns everything, and He can make the rules, not me.
I simply obey him because the mess I made was an earth shaking disaster. I had no problem believing I was a sinner. It was a little hard to think Jesus would love such a rebel.
Sincere conversations = Sincere answers
btw Young Earth = Flat Earth, both 100% science-deniers
How did the Kangaroos get back to Australia after the flood..... they walked from the middle east to south Africa them swam to Australia?
Excellent point. And all the animals found only on certain islands and nowhere else. How did they return? Waverunners.
@@RedLotus42069 …remember, also, that there were only two of them so they both would have had to survive that 10,000+ mile trek across deserts and oceans.
I’m also interested in how the two deer mice made it to North America and how the two sloths made it back to South America.
Back to? There was likely only one continent before the flood. Ocean levels were much lower during the ice age after the flood so it was not such a formidable challenge as it is today.
@@garyb6219 There is not a single scientist who documented what he saw happen. Not one. All we have is the historical account in Scripture, and even it's not clear. So "likely" is the best we can do.
@@KenJackson_US *There is not a single scientist who documented what he saw happen.* Millions of scientists have documented the evidence they've seen showing what happens. Creationists have come up with some sad sack claims over the years but "if no one saw it then it didn't happen" is quite possibly the lamest.
A few issues...
1. Radiometric dating of rocks shattered by earthquakes would not be altered by the earthquakes. The earthquake would not change the elements from which the rocks are made. So radiometric dating cannot be used to date an earthquake event.
2. I can find no mention elsewhere of a boulder whose diameter is greater than 1 mile in diameter. I have to treat this as an unsubstantiated claim. Normally we would call something like that bedrock.
3. Multiple references are made to the radiometeic dating of sedimentary rock in this video, without an explanation of the specific types employed. But logically, sedimentary rocks cannot be dated radiometrically, for their sediments are necessarily older. If you are dating the cements that hold the sediments together, those minerals would have also been suspended in the flood waters, so unless there is a mechanism to reset the radioactive clocks of these minerals (such as the demonstrably false presumption from potassium-argon dating that newly solidified volcanic rocks contain no occluded argon), then they cannot be dated to the time when the sedimentary rocks were cemented together.
Radiology assumes constants back in time so is invariably a guess - Bible and supporting evidence talk of waters above the atmosphere in the thermosphere which a) limits radiation levels making all measurements far too long and b) provides source for most of the deluge.
Oooookay. New Earth Creationism is back on my radar. I’ve been giving the old earthers the benefit of the doubt for decades and every time I turn around they’re scrambling to explain something weird. *No amount of scrambling’s getting them out of this.*
This series isn't meant to change your mind.
"No amount of scrambling’s getting them out of this."
Out of WHAT?
@@thomasmaughan4798 That’s there’s no possible explanation for this other than a flood. This is *completely* unanticipated by their model.
@@wkrapek Of course there was a flood. Floods are routine events. What is less likely is covering the entire earth to a depth of Mount Everest, with the single exception that an olive tree appears to have been unharmed.
Global warmists assert that if all the ice melted, the sea would rise about 100 meters. That would certainly flood some lowlands.
Baghdad is 35 meters above sea level.
But of course, a magical God can do anything, including creating enough water to cover mount everest, and protect an olive tree, and then vanish all that water. but if that's going to be the argument, then what is to say we haven't actually been created yet? This is some sort of practice run? Or maybe we were created five minutes ago complete with implanted memories of having viewed this youtube channel?
@@wkrapek…it is “unanticipated” because it is impossible.
When you plan a vacation with your family do you “anticipate,” and plan for, aliens from the planet Xeronos to greet you at your destination? No, you don’t because it isn’t going to happen.
Many are biased against the truth.
Thank you for this.
The truth being what exactly, nonsense about a god?
Any creationist who wants to be taken seriously needs to demonstrate all the geologic formations shown in this video and all the sediments deposits worldwide *were formed at the same time by the same event* only 4400 years ago. Not that they were formed by many separate local events over the last several hundred million years as the evidence indicates.
Are you listening? Global distribution of sequential sedimentary layers is explained elsewhere.
I wonder how Iceland and Hawaii formed so fast after the flood? Aren't they mostly igneous rock, where's all the flood sediment?
Lol Noah's flood is nuts people please stop lying to children about history and science
@@steventhompson399 the continents rose as water drained off… and mountains grew. You need to watch the entire Flood series, and Mountains After the Flood.
TMI for one short lecture.
@@steventhompson399A great deal of volcanic activity happened after the flood. It generated the aerosols needed to keep the earth cool so snow could last after it fell from hypercanes. When the oceans cooled down, the needed evaporation dropped off, leading to the glaciers melting.
@@appaloosa42 where i live there are none sedimentary rocks now how you deal with that
I so enjoy your videos!
The speed of sound is faster in hard materials, like rock.
The speed of sound is in air. You have no speed of sound in rock.
Say, where can I learn more about the boulders 'a mile in diameter' mentioned after the 38 minute mark? Any articles or a videos? Thanks
So students are taught to believe in long term, that can not be viewed. And to disregard that which can be viewed. Typical atheist view of life.
Yes that's why they always come with the same arguments that already have been debunked. And remember, the sole purpose of an atheist is to reject GOD regardless of proof, otherwise he would be agnostic.
Is the "Heat Problem" reflected in the research going on at Mt St Helens? What evidence, if any speaks to rapid cooling OR contrary to it, in the new rocks formed at the eruption sight and affected areas? It's the radio active decay affected significantly?
2:50 Q. Why didn’t the consequences of one volcanic eruption change geological principles? A. because it was one eruption. Volcanology and geology are well understood. Catastrophic events do occur, but they are localised. You can’t extrapolate these conditions to change whole world geology.
4:00 Graded bedding. Big long spiel here about timescales for sedimentation. So what. If you want to find the time a particular sedimentary layer formed, radio date an igneous rock above and below and interpolate rather than speculate!
26:00 Now he’s suggesting that a flood, which he has not shown to be global, will accelerate radioactive decay. This is nonsense and would have to break the laws of physics. The heat generated would vaporise all water then go on to melt the earth’s crust. That would be a catastrophic event!
35:00 Sand nowhere near a beach. Perfectly natural geological explanation. Go look it up. He is looking at current maps, without considering how the continents drifted away from Pangaea.
Basically forty minutes of the same old stuff that has been refuted numerous times by mainstream science.
@@graemeross6970 Yup. It’s strange how these “Drs” and their following think they have a “gotcha” while at the same time they ignore the fact that the Bible isn’t even translated correctly from Hebrew and Greek, the meaning changing radically in many instances. Yet to them, one event created a similar looking result (because that will corrode and compress quickly, erasing it) whose results are understood supposedly negates all the rest as if we don’t know why it doesn’t. Even from a religious view the fact that these Jesus freaks do all this and try to diminish natural processes to a design demeans the idea of a devine creator, turning a god into a kid playing with plasticine, instead of a complex, creative mind that works one idea that cascades into this infinite variety we call the universe. If there is a god, I think the second option is much more awe inspiring than the first.
Yeah im a catholic and i take it to be a much more localized flood. It’s def not a worldwide flood, the evidence you provided completely refutes it. Also we wouldnt just find a few geological anomalies, the whole planet should show evidence for this. Now arguments from silence aren’t usually good but in this case, the evidence should be overwhelming in favor of a global flood if it did happen. It would be literally impossible to hide the evidence for it happening, whereever humans explore, they should see it. I think for me, the biggest gap in the evidence is the runoff…. Imagine that much debris from literally the surface of the planet, washing into the oceans and there being no trace of it.
As for a local flood concept, the area of turkey where this happened in scripture is right in the fertile crescent and was known to be prone to earthquakes, mudslides, and evidence for this is at multiple archaeological sites like gobekli tepe, carahan tepe, and others. I feel like biblical literalism is kind of silly. Even the church fathers knew the day night cycle came from the sun so it being created on the third day is obvious poetic language. You have 3 days of creation and then 3 days of adornment. It’s meant to poetically represent god creating the universe but not meant to be a historical account of a catastrophic event that wouldve caused extinction of nearly every species on the planet. The ark is likely a preservation of righteousness and all the good things in the world. The flood probably was a local catastrophe and if noah was a real person or a representative of a people that survived, the story is meant to teach us right and wrong, punishment and god’s power to do so. The catholic church is free to take this literal or allegorical but i think if youre going to engage the scientific facts you have to consider the flood being a local event.
Western Nebraska contains the largest dune field in the western hemisphere. It's nowhere near an ocean.
@@garyb6219no where near a current ocean. It definitely was an ocean. I grew up in western SD and have a small collection of marine fossils.
@@danhoff4401 Yes, that's what I meant.
If you go to Mlilwane Nature Reserve in Eswatini, you will find bright red mudwalls next to the rivers up to 5 meters high. These red ravines are not even layered. The red mud all came down in one swoop. You will find the fossils of large trees next to the ravines. If you travel from the Highveld to Eswatini you frequently encounter signs of this red mud next to the road, covering the deeper gray soil layers.
In my opinion it was not just water that destroyed habital earth during the Noah's flood, it was mud. The mud destroyed life here in Africa, and also covered cities with mud, removing any evidence that anyone had stayed there.
EXCELLENT!! 😊
Shout out to Randall Carlson for really getting people to start seeing this massive flood theory
Randall Carlson isn’t talking about a world wide flood. There is no evidence of a global flood. The ark is a myth.😊
35:00 There isn't a continuous layer of sandstone stretching across all of N. America as his drawing shows. That is a really silly creationist misrepresentation of the actual data. N. America does have isolated pockets of sandstone but they were deposited at different times in the last 500 million years and they certainly are *NOT* contiguous.
@samburns3329 "creationist misrepresentation of the actual data."
You better look at the data again and again, then maybe you will stop misrepresenting the data.
Or as it looks like are you just here to scoff at Noah's Flood? If you don't believe God's word that's all you but why discourage others?
And you were there?
@samburns3329 No, you’re incorrect. There is indeed a continuous layer of sandstone stretching across the North American continent. It’s at the base of the Sauk Sequence, which is one of the five megasequences in the geologic record.
@@animaladventures14 You're full of it. Find me a reputable scientific source which says or shows a *continuous* sandstone layer across all of N. America.
@@animaladventures14 the basal sandstone of the Sauk sequence is called the Tapeats, but this is a formation name and the individual beds of sand do not extend that far. Stratigraphic analysis from the 1940's showed that this unit is time transgressive. That is it was not all deposited at a single time.
I thought this was a great video . Great information. Thank you . Blessings
Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today.
The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
Sunrise to sunset
Sunset to next sunset
Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).
We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast. I work the day shift. (Both are not 24 hours)
Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains".
Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens”
The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours.
Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.
Wrong, in Hebrew the word Yom applies to a literal 24 hour period. In the days of creation the word Yom is used in the original Hebrew text. Also, why do some people have such an issue with creation being 24 hours for each day? Nobody says Jesus was dead for 3000 years, it was 3 24 hour periods, or was he in the wilderness for 40 days and nights, or 4000 years? Come on, it's clear that when Genesis reads there was a morning, and an evening, it is a typical day. Your idea about days of creation being longer throw out all the dates in chronology and prophecy too. God can do anything except lie, He is demonstration how wise and powerful He is by making such an amazing creation in just six LITERAL days.
@@Mark-ec3lp Leaders who reject parts of the Bible that do not fit their worldview (YEC) are not leaders.
Leaders who make personal attacks on others who disagree with their worldview (YEC) are not leaders.
Rejects:
Hebrews 4:9-10
Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6
Romans 5:12
Romans 1:20
Psalm 19 1-4
Leviticus 25:2 and Exodus 23:10-11
Thank you Dr. Wise. You have great examples to prove creation science to the masses.
Wise is regarded as a joke in the scientific community and no proper university would employ him. "Creation science" is an oxymoron but he doesn't speak to the masses, he speaks to the poorly educated, feeble minded, gullible fools who will never question him. This is precisely how Islam works as well so you're no different to Muslims.
I just want to know how Noah kept the dinosaurs on the Ark from eating all the rest of the animals.
Because maybe God didn’t send adults, or maybe no carnivorous types at all. Remember He destroyed the earth and animals because of the violence( sin). Maybe God didn’t create dragons/ dinosaurs, maybe they were creatures corrupted by aliens/fallen angels?
They were babies
I'm more concerned about the termites...
Most were vegetarian to start with the nat I re ov the flood conditions caused them to also go into a hibernation type mode even meat eaters can survive either vege dieg been proved
Genesis 9:3 Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.
- King James Bible
Before the flood, the animals and mankind were herbivores.
Genesis 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
Genesis 1:30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.
Your work is a great service. My eyes have been opened and now I see and understand.
Denying the evidence against a global flood just to keep a book accurate, is an insult to humanity. It happening or not also have no affect what so ever on your god existing. It's just utter ignorance that people continue to follow this path.
Merci du partage! Hypothèse intéressante! J'ai l'impression qu'il y a eu la même chose en Europe, et en Asie, ce qui expliquerait la disparation brutale d'anciens mondes, d'anciens continents... Mais maintenant, il faut trouver le ou les déclencheurs! Stéph.
That zeus cataclysmic even
Time to go back to intelligence school you need to
Actually the reason geologists don't accept a global flood only 4400 years ago is called *intellectual honesty.*
Are you sure about that? Are you sure YEC is not a wild cult?
@@The-DOI think it's a conspiracy theory not a cult. There's a decent amount of theological diversity within YEC with the commonality being a literal interpretation of Genesis.
@@danhoff4401 YEC and Flat-Earth are based on secret knowledge, so they should be classified as cults (can they be both conspiracy theories and cults at the same time, I think so, yes)
Dr. Wise is correctly showing that North-America has been flooded. But don't blend that with the local flood at the time of Noah, it happened in todays Takla Makan desert. That aerea is a perfect spot for inundation, due to the huge mountain ranges around. The problem is that christians have been tought that the world is 6000 years old, but thats just back to the time of Adam. The earth is very old, Gen 1:1 'In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth'.
@@danhoff4401 *literalistic
Promoters of the concept of Noah's ark annoy me with their lack of common sense. Just take one factor, when the animals came off the ark, what did the meat eaters live on? If everything was dead from the flood? My father was really annoyed when at seven years old I asked the Sunday school teacher this question. When I asked him he said there was two things I must understand. First was that if it was in the bible it was true. Second it was obvious that God had found a solution because we still had all the animals. This was most unfortunate because I decided that this was nonsense and from then on questioned everything he told me. He thought I was a difficult child. I thought he was delusional. He was a lay preacher in our church.
The small little ponds and lakes were full of fish….
@@davebisset3613 I don't KNOW how it happened but I can think of multiple solutions to that problem on my own, however you don't think the god who caused the whole thing could have solved that little issue? Was he going to be stopped by THAT out of all things?
also, what do you have to say about all the evidence presented in this analysis? He isn't making it up, he's making observations on the same world you and I live in
I always find it highly amusing when people tend to believe in science until it contradicts their extreme religious beliefs. Then attempting to cherry pick parts of scientific evidence only to come up with a hypothesis that none of the world experts in the field agree with.
@@philharris5848 : So what did he say that was wrong?
@@GusShrednyMt St Helens was a massive volcanic eruption , localised in effect. Not a flood. Pretty simple really.
The consensus of world experts in geology and geography say a flood of the entire planet to the depth quoted in the Bible is totally impossible. Biologists have said that Noah's Arc would only be big enough for the food of 2 junior elephants for a year. Also expert boat builders made a large scale replica Arc and tried to sail it, but they couldn't stop it leaking. Apparently wooden ships can only be built up to a certain size because wood flexes and causes them to sink. There are of course a huge list of other problems, but I think you get my point.
Like cherry picking parts of the bible to believe or not believe. Whatever the current consesus is on the bible, that is what is preached. And you want to be taken seriously?
@@jonathanrussell1140 : So Newton’s Law of Gravity doesn’t work for you then? After all , it was only an apple and a tree in a ‘ localised’ garden. Maybe you should write a paper telling the world what ‘ scale of experimental evidence’ is acceptable .
A major shift in a persons mindset is actually exciting but can have its pains.
Where did Noah put 2 termites?.....in a wooden cage😂
I'm not certain, but I don't think Noah took insects, at least not intentionally. Some surely hitched a ride. Others could have survived on floating mats of vegetation and debris, of which there were surely many.
@@KenJackson_US noah's flood never happened.
@@adamrspears1981 Then how do you explain the continent-scale fossil-bearing miles-deep hydraulically-sorted layers (strata) of sediment that cover the whole earth if not from the worldwide flood? (Did you watch this video?)
@@KenJackson_US How do I explain fossils scattered through out the globe?
Oh boy, you picked a toughy.......hmmm, let me see......oh I know! There's fossils everywhere because life's been on this planet for millions upon millions of years!
Next question...
@@adamrspears1981 I asked about *sediment.* You answered about the fossils from the flood. Tell me about the *sediment.*
El problema, en el otro lado, es que el Mabbul, o Diluvio, no es necesariamente un evento geológico o natural. Algunos creyentes, que no hallan la forma de separarse de los conceptos del método científico, quieren ajustar las dos narrativas, la bíblica y la científica, pero el objetivo final es validar la ciencia y sentirse relativamente a sus anchas, considerando que la ciencia objetiva es un derivado de la literatura bíblica. La tentativa está muy bien intencionada, pero no es necesariamente lo que quiere explicar la Biblia.
All the atheists saying there is no evidence of the global flood are on TH-cam shorts, meanwhile...
bring on the empty claims
Are you implying that science is best communicated in 30 second videos over long form videos? (Trying to understand your point.)
@@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n It's just what I see...
@@warnerchandler9826 I don't think you can understand much in 30 seconds.
@@wesleycolemanmusic I don't think you can learn much if you think you have all the answers.
Could the rythmites we see now where the last, or final ones laid down, meanwhile the flooding and filling of glacial lake Missoula could have been happening sequentially over a longer period, so the dating is showing that?
People in Asia and Egypt had no idea that they all drowned. This guy needs reeducation.
Read the Bible and then study the fossil record, and history, you will maybe realise the flood did happen.
@@Mark-ec3lpso, they did or didn’t die? When were the Egyptians building their pyramids?
Interesting. Have you been to Babyland? Oktoberfest in Helen (No Mt. Saint?)
Do you believe in Noah's Flood? You might have a case of Geological Myopia. - There, I fixed the title for you!
At 35 minutes what formation or formations are you claiming is one sandstone?
There was a flood in Tennessee last week so there must have been a worldwide flood last week!
Love your lecture. Just east of Reno, Nevada you can clearly see ripple marks ( we refer to as high water marks). They can be seen on both sides of Highway I-80. Hard to estimate but I-80 from Fernley, Nev would have been 200 - 300 feet underwater. The Native American living there tell the story of the Great Lake Lahontan. These high water marks can be seen for miles as you travel the highway. How far south the water extended is beyond hard to determine, as you said without an aerial survey. Great presentation thank you.
No biblical flood. There are plenty of ancient places around the world never disturbed by a great flood. I refer you specifically to Ashfall Fossil Beds State Historical Park in northeast Nebraska. Fossils are just as a volcanic eruption left them 12 million years ago.
What about the idea presented off a large flood through the Grand canyon such as just explained? I don't know the first thing about the science here but in your opinion was it explained accurately? Other evidence and other areas obviously need to be considered like what you bring up but do you have any comment on the content presented here? Without considering a biblical narrative, just the facts as they stand?
Wait ✋️ let me ask, can a tree 🌳 live for millions of years?
@@cs77smith67 No, a tree cannot live for millions of years, but the trees you see today are all living descendants of some forms of plant life from a million years ago.
@stevepierce6467 so tell me if this fossil record of millions of years as you say is true, why is there proof of a tree growin through all the fossil record?And it's still alive to this day?
@@cs77smith67 I am a bit confused by your question. The oldest confirmed living tree is about 5000 years old, but there are some where local tradition claim as much as 9000 years. These all have fossilized ancestors that go back further. There is a tree they call a "living fossil," called the gingko biloba. It has proven fossilized ancestors going back about 200 million years. There are other long-lived trees which have fairly long fossil histories. But I do not know of any present-day tree that has lived for millions of years. The nickname "living fossil" refers to the fact that the gingko has changed little over the millions of years and that the present plant is quite similar to its fossil ancestors.
The problem is, we've been filled with the secular narrative of history for so long that it's hard to see past it. God helps us day by day to see past these lies. It takes awhile but step by step He leads us through. What a good God we serve.
Why does god give children cancer, or as in the case of the flood, commit mass genocide of all species?
Many things wrong with noahs flood ,chinese calender is older , no records of flood in aisia or europe on bibles timeline , caves and caverns around the world showing ancient drawings thousands of years old , massive caverns as big as towns under volcanos , all would be filled up with debris and skeletons but there not 👍
don't be ruining the narrative with facts and logic
Yup
Thanks for doing this!
Do you even have a conscience ? What a scam...
Mile wide boulders? Seems like that kind of thing could be independently verified.
Can you site your evidence for the accelerated radioactive decay far in the past ? Having worked with half-life equations and implications for accurate measurement, I have never seen a deviation that would even come close to suggesting that decay rates slow down with time. The only component that slows down is the creation of decay products, as with each cycle of 1/2 life decay, only 1/2 of the material remains to decay further.
They can't. I went looking for that once upon a time and that's when I learned about OKLO natural nuclear reactor. We know the decay rates haven't changed for 2 billion years on the basis of analysing that natural experiment.
It never dawned on this guy that maybe *HE* is the one with geologic myopia and the other 99.999% of all professional geologists are actually correct. Talk about a lack of self-awareness.
hilarious, isn't it ?
or maybe just really sad
Or maybe HE is right.
Makes more sense to me than the mainstream explanations.
Lack of self awareness? The man has multiple PHDS, and your credentials are?
@@appaloosa42 there's no account for some people's sense, I suppose
Pure cognitive dissonance! Sad that a one time scientist will toss aside all scientific evidence to protect his belief.
I think Dr. Wise meant to say 1922, not 1822.
This is beyond pathetic.
@@garyb6219 yes your right to go through all this trouble to justify a magic sky daddy that killed everyone while putting animals on a boat that never existed is pathetic
When your channel name is "Is Genesis real?"
This is a text book confirmation bias.
He doesn't seem to recognise that sandstone is largely formed by desert conditions i.e nothing to do with water. 😢
Nice try but it is still a myth
The biggest myth is the bible.
Is it possible your reasoning powers are mythical?
@@Leo-e5f7y i can assure you my reasoning is sound
@@missouritravelers if there is no creator then your reasoning comes from the firing of neurons in your brain and totally void of actual thought. Moist robots can’t reason, which was Darwin’s dilemma. Logic and reason is another sign we are formed in the image of our creator.
@@NCSLIM1 believe in creator defies all logic and reason
I enjoyed this video because you didn't try to force the argument that science proves the Bible. What it proves is that certain assumptions from the past must be questioned due to present observations. This is occurring in many scientific fields and is making it possible to cause deep misgivings about the tyranny of Atheism.
Some are likely to (with astonishment) look at the biblical text anew.
It will never NOT be hilarious that there are educated adults who believe Noah's flood actually happened! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It is the epitome of ignorance to dismiss the glaring evidence of Earth's catastrophic past. The present is absolutely NOT the key to understanding the past
This is much older than the bible, same story was found in sumerian texts. But who help the human and teach him how to construct the boat is called Enki.
The Sumerian texts might have been written before The Bible but the oral traditions go back to Noah and the Bible account is the most accurate.
@@chimmy___ Its you opinion, based on your religion. The fact is, its not. Dont forgot that Abraham was born in UR, an SUMERIAN city. Thats were he came from.
@@fabios.253 Abraham, a descendant of Noah, was born about five hundred years after The Flood.