The flood didn't happen so there's no such thing as a "pre-flood" world. This is not science, it's using bad post-hoc reasoning based on the presupposition that the Bible MUST be true because "god".
It is indeed interesting to watch someone piece together complete hypothetical conjectures of how the earth was before some fanciful event described only in ancient holy books and never shown to have actually happened. We know for a fact that there was no worldwide flood; look up Ashfall Fossil Beds State Historical Park in Nebraska. Fossils of animals covered by volcanic ash 12 million years ago are completely intact and the site shows no evidence of flood damage. Floods are common occurrences around the world, and really bad ones stick in people's minds for a long time. A catastrophic flood would certainly have become woven into the myths and folklore of many ancient pre-literate people.
Thank you Kurt. Your last name gives you away, Wise. Always thought my Geology education was lacking. Too many assumptions and not enough thought. Love the lectures.
I can't think of a bigger assumption than a literal interpretation of Genesis. It's clear to everyone BUT Christians that the Earth is ancient and this flood never happened. Surely you who claim to have had formal Geology education should know that. Young Earth Creationism is so problematic as to be impossible.
Because your minders block truth,@Reclaimer77 You can make your assertions without rebuke. Too bad, so sad come the judgment. Telling our creator you actually believe that may well be curtains for you. The creation shouts out THERE IS A CREATOR. see Romans 1 verse 20.
@joel5644 there happens to be far more evidence for a recent creation, as in only a tad less than 6000 years but the gatekeepers of knowledg, block every attempt at showing some of those truths. Protecting lies is a tricky business and they've got it to a fine art
Dr. Kurt Wise... Legend, truth teller joyful, mighty man of God >>> Preach IT 😎 hold back !!! One day soon enough brother, we'll get to watch it all play out as it was ... I think your gonna be spiking the ball>>>
Indeed, after analyzing air samples taken from amber (fossilized tree sap), scientists have found that the oxygen content of that atmosphere was 50% higher than today with a higher air pressure.
The canopy theory, the ice surrounding the earth, the waters above the firmament, would have increased air pressure and oxygen content. Dr. Kent Hovind explains it well.
@@kevinunger433 how could a layer of ice and liquid water surround the earth? Sunlight hitting ice would melt it and gravity would bring liquid water down. Creationist haven't held to that notion for over 40 years.
I think you should know by now that evolution is absolute bologna. We have found inside the dinosaur bones collagen which puts the age of dinosaurs under 10,000 and puts the Biblical timeline back to where it never left my mind.. lol
At the ~34 minute mark I realized that the picture of the "ancient (pre-flood) wheel" found in ceiling of a coal mine in Russia/Ukraine area was more likely a hollow tree - just as Paul Garner proposed.
Prof. Wise! Good to see you, Sir! If an atheist challenges me to "prove it", I send them right over! :) EDIT: Note to self: If I come upon a wild Venus fly trap plant turn around and go right back.....
@@htos1av Even if this video disproved evolution (which it doesn't), it still wouldn't prove the existence of a god. Don't you understand that basic logic? Disproving one thing, doesn't automatically prove another thing. 🤡🤡🤡
A pretty wild speculation that leaves one very open problem: Fossilized, all these different plant forms would all end up in the same strata of lignite (which is formed pretty much exactly as described). And that's not what the plant fossil record shows. And so, there collapses the hypothesis.
I experienced something just like this when I was in boy scouts as a kid. There was an area at the boy scout camp that was very similar but on a smaller scale. The are is in South Western Michigan.
I think the pre flood oceans were filled with fresh water (not enough erosion to bring salts to the oceans). Creation was good for all plants (so also for the floating forest) and drinkable by the animals. The salt came during and after the flood. Then sealife had to adjust. Not all could, so extinction of many species.
Fun-Fact: All present day salt water fish are descended from fresh water fish. They all have the kidney structure needed to live in fresh water, but it is atrophied in ocean fish and still functional in fresh water fish. I recall when I learned this asking my zoology prof something to the effect of, "Wait a moment, so some event took place which extinguished ALL fish in the ocean and the ocean had to be recolonized by fresh water fish?" and was told yes, something like that must have happened since the oceans were always salty. Or? The ocean God originally created was fresh water and the Deluge increased the salt content. This killed the vast majority of marine life that couldn't cope with the salinity change and the marine life we have now are the survivors.
There are similar matts in the Okefenokee swamp in South Georgia. Pretty cool. I have stepped on those too. Everyone should experience this phenomenon at least once. I could see islands of that stuff floating around in the ancient past, under the right conditions.
As always, a fascinating presentation. Lots to think about here. What is the evolutionists’ explanation for C14 in coal seams? That would seem to debunk the validity of C14 dating in general.
Dr. Wise, are you saying that the original land created in Genesis 1 was a huge floating forest? Or several? I'm wondering about the verse that says the earth was divided during the days of Peleg. How does that fit? Thanks for all you do. I enjoy your videos.
The problem with this viewpoint is that land-based plant life supposedly contributed nothing or close to nothing in comparison to the floating forests to the fossil record. That's unlikely.
Thank you, Kurt. Love all your lectures. Truth God bless you always Kurt In bringing the Bible to life in a secular world. May I mention Doug Petrovich Also bringing the Truth of the Bible.
Swamp coal theory, maybe seaquakes? The regrow and again a seaquake or sea storm and regrow and so on. Is flat because is a floating forest. Greetings.
Wouldn't this be true of regular forests? The smaller plants would be buried first, followed by larger plants, then followed by trees? Wouldn't the phenomenon of liquefaction (water saturation) have the same effect as a bog?
This has been my thought too. And even with the animals, it would seem to make sense that the closer-to-coast creatures would be the first to go generally, and smaller animals would have a harder time escaping and also be more likely to be first to go. Any higher elevation prone to landslides in the severe initial quakes would also upset this ordering, by having whatever is collected in the wave of death dumped on top of the landslide-buried organisms when the waves finally make it however far inland the landslide was.
There was large scale flooding at the end of the most recent ice age. That was about 5,000 years before Genesis says the universe was created. There was no world wide flood.
Question: Could many of the giant creatures with their heavy hips and giant back limbs (such as T-Rex) have been shallow water creatures who scavenged from the floating forests? The water would have neutralized much of their extreme hip weight.
I would say his first point is backwards, that fossil order is explained by evolution. No, evolution is explained by fossil order. In typical fundamentalist fashion, he says that science does what his religion does, start with a conclusion and then try to fit the evidence to it. Science (evolution) starts with the evidence and tries to find if the evidence leads to some possible conclusion. Evolution does not "predict," it studies and learns and then draws conclusions that can be supported by the results of this study.
@@jacob.tudragens Now, if we could just find some real scientific evidence that there actually was a (with cap. F) Flood. What we do have is tons of evidence that there never was a worldwide biblical flood. I refer you to Ashfall Fossil Beds State Historical Park in northeast Nebraska. Completely undisturbed by a great mythological flood, we find perfectly intact fossils of small flocks of different animals buried at a watering site by volcanic ash some 12,000,000 years ago. All are extinct species but all are represented by their descendants living today, animals native to this region and obviously not carried by any ark.
@@jacob.tudragens What flood? Where is the evidence for a worldwide biblical flood? There is plenty of evidence against that event, places in existence for millions of years undisturbed by any flood.
So.... was the garden of Eden on "solid" land? or floating island? (obvious question I would think) The real question would become: could there be hills such that there would be rivers such as those that indicated the position of the Garden of Eden. If there was actually solid land that was attached to the sea floor and not floating, were any of these floating islands attached to that land?
Plausible. Until you introduce radiometric dating, as you did with Carbon14 dates. There are two problems: 1) The dates that you gave for coal, using C14 dating, were all in the region of 50,000 years. You must be aware that this is at the extreme end of where C14 dating can be used, as almost all the C14 will have decayed by that time and only traces of it can be detected. The error margin on that detection will be such that the coal may be millions of years old. You need to use a different dating method. 2) The pattern you propose for the deposition pattern of plants below a floating raft of vegetation seems plausible, with small plants deposited around the edges at the beginning of a catastrophic event such as the Flood, and large plants, trees, and suchlike, deposited near the centre as the island finally breaks up and sinks - with layers of silt covering the initial deposits, and the larger debris deposited on top of them. The problem is that radiometric dating has shown that the vegetation in the different rock layers was deposited at vastly different times, not as the result of a single catastrophic event at essentially one point in time. You ignore that completely and don't include it in your hypothesis, meaning that it does not explain all the evidence available and therefore cannot be considered a theory (in the scientific usage of that word). It is only part of the picture. This is the same pattern I see from Creationists all the time: Selecting a few scientific facts that fit their view, and ignoring all the rest. How anyone can refer to different vegetation fossils in different rock layers without referring to radiometric dating of those rock layers is beyond me. Incidentally, here's a challenge for you: You mention that you found sundews at the very fringe of the floating mat you explored, and therefore your hypothesis should result in them being deposited in the very lowest levels as the Flood began to break up the floating island. Sundews digest insects, and so evolution claims that they would not have appeared before the insects. If you can find a fossilised sundew plant within a rock layer that predates insects, you will have disproved evolution. Evolution is falsifiable. You just haven't been able to falsify it yet, after 150 years of trying. Do you want to take up the challenge? Or admit defeat?
Because it points to a creator God. If he’s a creator God then it means he made us each from a heart of love. Not a random, loveless process without compassion or understanding.
Many of us are curious creatures we want to understand how everything came to be and how it works. They tax people like you and me so they can go search for their Answers.
How is it with some basic critical thinking a lay person like me can debunk this? How can someone with PhD call something little more than "what if" as a theory instead of a hypothesis? He definitely knows better. Creationists need to learn to do better if even i can pick enough holes in this that it can't hold water (sorry for the bad pun) Oh, and knowingly misrepresenting C14 data is called "lying".
I'm following a PhD that has a very good overall theory on Earth and moon creation. All based on scientific research. The moon, according to the theory is about 250 million years old and was basically ripped out of the Earth by a large and massive (10% the mass of our sun) from what is now the Pacific ocean. Look on Google Earth and the ocean basins. Pacific basin doesn't look like the Atlantic Basin. The author reworked the current land masses to fit them together into a logical model. Much more evidence on the Moon points to the validity of the theory as well as the timeframe (dust layer on the moon being a good indicator) Pre 250 million years ago, earth had shallow oceans over much of the world.
@michael? The concept of millions of years was scientifically determined to be false by the RATE project nearly 20 years ago. More recently, Dr Tim Cleary has reported on the results of a decade of studying oil and gas well logs from all around the world. He found evidence that thousands of feet of sediments were laid down all over the earth by some sort of worldwide flood in a very short period of time. There is not enough time in the actual record for millions of years. Unfortunately, most geology courses are still presenting "the millions" of years' concepts. At the current rate of correcting issues in the academic world, it will probably take a million geologic years for this to be corrected.
Given the rate of erosion, were the earth a half-million years old, no land would remain. So far, the Bible has never been refuted but in fairy tales. There certainly would be no soft tissues in fossils, let alone DNA.
And that’s completely absurd. The God of the Bible, our only God is real and created everything. There’s no evolution, or millions or billions of years. The theory of evolution is less than 150 years old; Founded by the crackpot Darwin. We don’t come from slime nor apes or monkeys. Read Romans Chapter One; It explained thousands of years ago, how there would eventually be people (atheists) who outright reject God our Creator, and that they are self-deceived in their own mind and heart. It explains that deep down in a person’s mind and soul that they know God is real yet they suppress the truth.
You talk like you had photographs of it from 250 million years ago. Historical science is full of errors and bad assumptions. It's nothing like the science we use to engineer modern life, which is fact and experimental based
Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today. The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is: Sunrise to sunset Sunset to next sunset Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ). We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast. Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains". Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens” The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours. Have you entered into the 7th as Hebrews 4:9-10 asks you to? Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.
It has been a joy the last few years watching Dr Wise slowly piece together the conditions of the pre flood world !!!
The flood didn't happen so there's no such thing as a "pre-flood" world. This is not science, it's using bad post-hoc reasoning based on the presupposition that the Bible MUST be true because "god".
It is indeed interesting to watch someone piece together complete hypothetical conjectures of how the earth was before some fanciful event described only in ancient holy books and never shown to have actually happened. We know for a fact that there was no worldwide flood; look up Ashfall Fossil Beds State Historical Park in Nebraska. Fossils of animals covered by volcanic ash 12 million years ago are completely intact and the site shows no evidence of flood damage. Floods are common occurrences around the world, and really bad ones stick in people's minds for a long time. A catastrophic flood would certainly have become woven into the myths and folklore of many ancient pre-literate people.
Please post more Kurt Wise lectures. Every one of his lectures are very informative
Heartily agreed, Cinnamon..
Kurt Wise is a great Godly man. I love his lectures!
Always enjoy hearing Kurt Wise present his theories.
He's got a godly heart and a genuine scientist's mind!
Thank you Kurt. Your last name gives you away, Wise. Always thought my Geology education was lacking. Too many assumptions and not enough thought. Love the lectures.
I can't think of a bigger assumption than a literal interpretation of Genesis. It's clear to everyone BUT Christians that the Earth is ancient and this flood never happened. Surely you who claim to have had formal Geology education should know that. Young Earth Creationism is so problematic as to be impossible.
Because your minders block truth,@Reclaimer77
You can make your assertions without rebuke.
Too bad, so sad come the judgment.
Telling our creator you actually believe that may well be curtains for you.
The creation shouts out THERE IS A CREATOR.
see Romans 1 verse 20.
@@alanmcnaughton3628 You're rebutting a blind person who can't see.
@@Reclaimer77 How is it clear to everyone? Do you know that for a fact or are you just generalizing?
@joel5644 there happens to be far more evidence for a recent creation, as in only a tad less than 6000 years but the gatekeepers of knowledg, block every attempt at showing some of those truths.
Protecting lies is a tricky business and they've got it to a fine art
Brilliant! Always enjoy Dr. Wise's lectures.
Thank You, God, for Kurt Wise
I have been waiting and waiting for a new one. Thank you so much looking forward for more.
A theory such as this is much more believable than the establishment ‘splaining.
Thank you Dr. Wise, I always liked your enthusiasm. You really know how to keep my attention. Get that energy up!!
Kurt is outstanding.
Wonderful thank you Mr Wise
Genius.
Truly fascinating! Reporting on actual science making actual discoveries.
And consistent with the scientific theory.
*Loved this!!*
Thank you Dr. Kurt
Nice to see something new from Dr. Wise.
I love the way you teach Dr Wise.
Dr. Kurt Wise... Legend, truth teller joyful, mighty man of God >>> Preach IT 😎 hold back !!! One day soon enough brother, we'll get to watch it all play out as it was ... I think your gonna be spiking the ball>>>
Dragon flies had two and one-half foot wingspans in the antediluvian world. The oxygen levels and air pressure had to have been greater.
Indeed, after analyzing air samples taken from amber (fossilized tree sap), scientists have found that the oxygen content of that atmosphere was 50% higher than today with a higher air pressure.
So what? So…..god?
The canopy theory, the ice surrounding the earth, the waters above the firmament, would have increased air pressure and oxygen content. Dr. Kent Hovind explains it well.
@@kevinunger433 how could a layer of ice and liquid water surround the earth? Sunlight hitting ice would melt it and gravity would bring liquid water down. Creationist haven't held to that notion for over 40 years.
@@kevinunger433 We do know that there are ice rings around 4 of today's planets in our solar system.
Love to be at one of your lectures sir. You're the best
This is fascinating.
God providing for our energy needs today!
Yup, I commented the same thing
Divine educational skills. Kurt is a blessing.. A voice for God and all of his creations. ❤
I think you should know by now that evolution is absolute bologna. We have found inside the dinosaur bones collagen which puts the age of dinosaurs under 10,000 and puts the Biblical timeline back to where it never left my mind.. lol
Loved this lecture on the floating forest. Thanks for sharing and I look forward to more in the future.
At the ~34 minute mark I realized that the picture of the "ancient (pre-flood) wheel" found in ceiling of a coal mine in Russia/Ukraine area was more likely a hollow tree - just as Paul Garner proposed.
Prof. Wise! Good to see you, Sir! If an atheist challenges me to "prove it", I send them right over! :)
EDIT: Note to self: If I come upon a wild Venus fly trap plant turn around and go right back.....
@@htos1av Even if this video disproved evolution (which it doesn't), it still wouldn't prove the existence of a god. Don't you understand that basic logic? Disproving one thing, doesn't automatically prove another thing. 🤡🤡🤡
This was a great lecture! Thank you for dedication to this topic and for sharing your theories and findings with us. God bless the continued research.
Evolution can't predict anything. There's no such thing ✝️
Excellent presentation Dr. Wise. 👏🏻
Dr. Wise's "Perelandra."
i very much appreciate your online lectures :)
A pretty wild speculation that leaves one very open problem: Fossilized, all these different plant forms would all end up in the same strata of lignite (which is formed pretty much exactly as described). And that's not what the plant fossil record shows. And so, there collapses the hypothesis.
I experienced something just like this when I was in boy scouts as a kid. There was an area at the boy scout camp that was very similar but on a smaller scale. The are is in South Western Michigan.
I so appreciate your channel. Thank you so much for all you do.
More people need to hear this. Many evolution theories have significant flaws. This theory solves many things.
It is so hard to find creatainist content this good. Thank you!
Brilliant
Amazing level of confidence delivering this pile of fertilizer.
You were there pre flood? Besides, what's your theory? Or are you going to believe the propaganda from mainstream?
Independence from water < resilience to drought
Makes total sense to me!
I always enjoy these lessons. Like the godly approach. I am also glad that you have started a new series.
Excellent, what a guy! Thank you!
I think the pre flood oceans were filled with fresh water (not enough erosion to bring salts to the oceans). Creation was good for all plants (so also for the floating forest) and drinkable by the animals. The salt came during and after the flood. Then sealife had to adjust. Not all could, so extinction of many species.
Fun-Fact: All present day salt water fish are descended from fresh water fish. They all have the kidney structure needed to live in fresh water, but it is atrophied in ocean fish and still functional in fresh water fish. I recall when I learned this asking my zoology prof something to the effect of, "Wait a moment, so some event took place which extinguished ALL fish in the ocean and the ocean had to be recolonized by fresh water fish?" and was told yes, something like that must have happened since the oceans were always salty.
Or? The ocean God originally created was fresh water and the Deluge increased the salt content. This killed the vast majority of marine life that couldn't cope with the salinity change and the marine life we have now are the survivors.
There are similar matts in the Okefenokee swamp in South Georgia. Pretty cool. I have stepped on those too. Everyone should experience this phenomenon at least once. I could see islands of that stuff floating around in the ancient past, under the right conditions.
Floating forests would help to answer the vast quantities of crude oil and gas in the Earth.
As always, a fascinating presentation. Lots to think about here. What is the evolutionists’ explanation for C14 in coal seams? That would seem to debunk the validity of C14 dating in general.
Dr. Wise, are you saying that the original land created in Genesis 1 was a huge floating forest? Or several? I'm wondering about the verse that says the earth was divided during the days of Peleg. How does that fit? Thanks for all you do. I enjoy your videos.
The problem with this viewpoint is that land-based plant life supposedly contributed nothing or close to nothing in comparison to the floating forests to the fossil record. That's unlikely.
quaking bogs are so cool!!! wow!
Thank you, Kurt. Love all your lectures. Truth
God bless you always Kurt
In bringing the Bible to life in a secular world.
May I mention Doug Petrovich Also bringing the Truth of the Bible.
The Bible says that God formed the land upon the waters. Makes sense to me
Swamp coal theory, maybe seaquakes? The regrow and again a seaquake or sea storm and regrow and so on. Is flat because is a floating forest. Greetings.
Wouldn't this be true of regular forests? The smaller plants would be buried first, followed by larger plants, then followed by trees? Wouldn't the phenomenon of liquefaction (water saturation) have the same effect as a bog?
This has been my thought too. And even with the animals, it would seem to make sense that the closer-to-coast creatures would be the first to go generally, and smaller animals would have a harder time escaping and also be more likely to be first to go.
Any higher elevation prone to landslides in the severe initial quakes would also upset this ordering, by having whatever is collected in the wave of death dumped on top of the landslide-buried organisms when the waves finally make it however far inland the landslide was.
There was large scale flooding at the end of the most recent ice age. That was about 5,000 years before Genesis says the universe was created. There was no world wide flood.
Question: Could many of the giant creatures with their heavy hips and giant back limbs (such as T-Rex) have been shallow water creatures who scavenged from the floating forests? The water would have neutralized much of their extreme hip weight.
…and swamplands?
Please reach out to Nerdrotic. He needs your influence . I can't say more or TH-cam will delete me
I would say his first point is backwards, that fossil order is explained by evolution. No, evolution is explained by fossil order. In typical fundamentalist fashion, he says that science does what his religion does, start with a conclusion and then try to fit the evidence to it. Science (evolution) starts with the evidence and tries to find if the evidence leads to some possible conclusion. Evolution does not "predict," it studies and learns and then draws conclusions that can be supported by the results of this study.
Layers laid down by the Flood.
@@jacob.tudragens Now, if we could just find some real scientific evidence that there actually was a (with cap. F) Flood. What we do have is tons of evidence that there never was a worldwide biblical flood. I refer you to Ashfall Fossil Beds State Historical Park in northeast Nebraska. Completely undisturbed by a great mythological flood, we find perfectly intact fossils of small flocks of different animals buried at a watering site by volcanic ash some 12,000,000 years ago. All are extinct species but all are represented by their descendants living today, animals native to this region and obviously not carried by any ark.
@@jacob.tudragens What flood? Where is the evidence for a worldwide biblical flood? There is plenty of evidence against that event, places in existence for millions of years undisturbed by any flood.
So.... was the garden of Eden on "solid" land? or floating island? (obvious question I would think) The real question would become: could there be hills such that there would be rivers such as those that indicated the position of the Garden of Eden. If there was actually solid land that was attached to the sea floor and not floating, were any of these floating islands attached to that land?
Plausible. Until you introduce radiometric dating, as you did with Carbon14 dates. There are two problems:
1) The dates that you gave for coal, using C14 dating, were all in the region of 50,000 years. You must be aware that this is at the extreme end of where C14 dating can be used, as almost all the C14 will have decayed by that time and only traces of it can be detected. The error margin on that detection will be such that the coal may be millions of years old. You need to use a different dating method.
2) The pattern you propose for the deposition pattern of plants below a floating raft of vegetation seems plausible, with small plants deposited around the edges at the beginning of a catastrophic event such as the Flood, and large plants, trees, and suchlike, deposited near the centre as the island finally breaks up and sinks - with layers of silt covering the initial deposits, and the larger debris deposited on top of them. The problem is that radiometric dating has shown that the vegetation in the different rock layers was deposited at vastly different times, not as the result of a single catastrophic event at essentially one point in time. You ignore that completely and don't include it in your hypothesis, meaning that it does not explain all the evidence available and therefore cannot be considered a theory (in the scientific usage of that word). It is only part of the picture.
This is the same pattern I see from Creationists all the time: Selecting a few scientific facts that fit their view, and ignoring all the rest. How anyone can refer to different vegetation fossils in different rock layers without referring to radiometric dating of those rock layers is beyond me.
Incidentally, here's a challenge for you: You mention that you found sundews at the very fringe of the floating mat you explored, and therefore your hypothesis should result in them being deposited in the very lowest levels as the Flood began to break up the floating island. Sundews digest insects, and so evolution claims that they would not have appeared before the insects. If you can find a fossilised sundew plant within a rock layer that predates insects, you will have disproved evolution. Evolution is falsifiable. You just haven't been able to falsify it yet, after 150 years of trying. Do you want to take up the challenge? Or admit defeat?
he wont use different method because it might contradict his first finding.
he does not believe that because it contradicts his presumed conclusion.
41:45 "here is Steve, back in the day when he was a little less conservative than he is now" funny internal comment of the day
This ia a fallen world nothing is the same as it initially was
Why do we have to know all this stuff?
Because it points to a creator God. If he’s a creator God then it means he made us each from a heart of love. Not a random, loveless process without compassion or understanding.
@@TheMichealFHansen oh, I thought the Bible and the gospel pointed to a creator God. Guess I was mistaken. I will now watch your video. Thank you.
Many of us are curious creatures we want to understand how everything came to be and how it works. They tax people like you and me so they can go search for their Answers.
I was a science teacher before I was a theologian. I am a born again Christian. There are very many problems with his teachings.
Please reach out to Nerdrotic. I can't say more or TH-cam will delete me
Anything is possible.
Not hardly. The non living matter becoming living, a cell capable of evolving is not possible with no design or purpose
Yes I met a giraffe the other day that spoke English and that's exactly what she said to me, anything is possible
@@bobdalton2062 there's a few around here as well.
Answer ? NO. Because there was no flood
Genesis says that God created the world on 6 days
if you have to get a PhD or whatever to prove Jesus or God is real you should never be a preacher
yep, its always the geologists, isnt it ?
I dnt know which explains this video better -
hilarious or just really sad
How is it with some basic critical thinking a lay person like me can debunk this? How can someone with PhD call something little more than "what if" as a theory instead of a hypothesis? He definitely knows better.
Creationists need to learn to do better if even i can pick enough holes in this that it can't hold water (sorry for the bad pun)
Oh, and knowingly misrepresenting C14 data is called "lying".
I'm following a PhD that has a very good overall theory on Earth and moon creation. All based on scientific research.
The moon, according to the theory is about 250 million years old and was basically ripped out of the Earth by a large and massive (10% the mass of our sun) from what is now the Pacific ocean.
Look on Google Earth and the ocean basins. Pacific basin doesn't look like the Atlantic Basin. The author reworked the current land masses to fit them together into a logical model. Much more evidence on the Moon points to the validity of the theory as well as the timeframe (dust layer on the moon being a good indicator)
Pre 250 million years ago, earth had shallow oceans over much of the world.
@michael? The concept of millions of years was scientifically determined to be false by the RATE project nearly 20 years ago.
More recently, Dr Tim Cleary has reported on the results of a decade of studying oil and gas well logs from all around the world. He found evidence that thousands of feet of sediments were laid down all over the earth by some sort of worldwide flood in a very short period of time.
There is not enough time in the actual record for millions of years.
Unfortunately, most geology courses are still presenting "the millions" of years' concepts. At the current rate of correcting issues in the academic world, it will probably take a million geologic years for this to be corrected.
Given the rate of erosion, were the earth a half-million years old, no land would remain. So far, the Bible has never been refuted but in fairy tales. There certainly would be no soft tissues in fossils, let alone DNA.
And that’s completely absurd. The God of the Bible, our only God is real and created everything. There’s no evolution, or millions or billions of years. The theory of evolution is less than 150 years old; Founded by the crackpot Darwin. We don’t come from slime nor apes or monkeys.
Read Romans Chapter One; It explained thousands of years ago, how there would eventually be people (atheists) who outright reject God our Creator, and that they are self-deceived in their own mind and heart. It explains that deep down in a person’s mind and soul that they know God is real yet they suppress the truth.
You talk like you had photographs of it from 250 million years ago. Historical science is full of errors and bad assumptions. It's nothing like the science we use to engineer modern life, which is fact and experimental based
The claim is incorrect because there are areas where there are every animal all mixed up as if it was a floating bone mass that finally settled
The flood did that. Animals died and were washed away together causing boneyards.
seriously this doesnt make sense to me....and maybe even has contradictions
i will get 0 likes, lol
Why and how would a floating forest produce the predicted (and found) fossil record? He doesn’t begin to provide a scientific explanation.
Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today.
The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
Sunrise to sunset
Sunset to next sunset
Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).
We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast.
Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains".
Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens”
The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours.
Have you entered into the 7th as Hebrews 4:9-10 asks you to?
Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.
Thank you Dr Wise!!!