I love how Dr. Ross harkens back to when he was 19 and the pivotal moments in that stage of life. One of the biggest moments in my life was when I was 19, arriving back to my shared apartment with my roommates from university. An epiphany descended upon me from the Almighty. I immediately knew that God could not possibly be an old man with a big white beard on a throne in the sky. It was that simple. That set me free. Free to explore the nature of Truth, of what is truly good, of beauty, etc. I could write several books on just how I came full circle to my faith in Christ. It took me to all ends of the earth.
Dr. Ross blessings appreciate your gifts and your diligence in serving. I'm neither as intelligent or diligent as you sir, think ths spirit has revealed some truths to me. 1 that prophecies parables and as embedded as scripture is just occurred to me that covers most if not all truth. For example Days as days or literal days, is the universe 13.7 billion years old or six days old? Or is it both. Time is relative so as some podcasts point out if we could instantly travel half way towards the singularity or center. The universe would appear to be 7 billion years old I we go to the C ter the universe would literally appear to be 6.8 days old. This is simplified and not precise. Also, your seem to think it is the 7th day but my study as led by the spirit it is still the 6th day very late in the 6th day. This was brought to me by the words🎉 of the messiah whe🎉n he is interrogated by pharisees when questioned about working on the sabbath. From memory. Since the beginning til now my father has gone about his work, I also will be about my father's work. The spirit highlighted this through a word. Study showed me that assuming that "o. The 7th day go's rested" is past tense for god not us. He does not view time he exists through and outside of all time so to him he has rested on his seventh day even though from our perspective his seventh day has not occurred yet. You ststw creation is over. Where about, I have knit you together in your mother's womb for such a time as this?
Wow ! I’ve been hesitant to watch this video due to its length but I am so glad I did watch it . There is so much scientific evidence contained in this talk it’s crazy ! I’m 66 years old and I learn more watching Dr. Hugh Ross than I ever did in school . Of course , I wasn’t a good student and wasn’t interested in learning then either . Thank you Sir for investing your time in the research and knowledge of these topics and especially for taking the time to share it with the rest of us . I’ve passed your name on to others that I hope will pay attention and learn from you as I have . Take care and God bless you !
Apart from the Best Explanation Ever, definitely the BEST English Accent I have ever heard! Canadians has to be the Best! Bradley R. Reddy, Johannesburg, RSA
Yes and as time goes on with more and more information , more scientists and researchers will realize there has to be a designer . It’s just to fine-tune for life. Even Christopher Hitchens agreed about the fine-tuning for human life.
Thank you Dr. Your view is very convincing backed by science. As a curious person, I will use the link you provide to do further and deeper study into the subject. Greetings from Papua New Guinean.
Really sad, with all the proof of creation ppl (us humans) choose to deny our awesome God, and the provision he made for us to save us sinners so that we hv access to him....our God is mighty ,simply awesome ...
Hey God bless you Brother in Christ here, So please forgive me I'm not that educated so I'm gonna try here, I know that Paul wrote that our battle is not against flesh and blood although humanity will always rail against our Creator God, but I believe that for the most part I do believe that the knowing beings we don't see are a big factor "please notice the little ( b ) in the word big"
I loved this lecture and it gave me so much clarification of issues, questions. I did find it strange that he said Neanderthals didn’t wear clothing as I’m sure that’s incorrect. Also, I think that they became extinct for several reasons but mainly because God knew that we were the new and improved model and that he likely didn’t want to have us both exist together any longer for his own reasons, whatever they be. I do understand that some of us still carry their dna, which is no biggie but interesting for sure. I also have long understood that species are created fully formed, all at once and that creatures don’t evolve into other forms, it’s unproven nonsense. I love the thought of God creating living beings out of his will, out of thin air as it were! It’s beautiful, miraculous but also is the only thing that makes sense.
Out of thin air" is not correct, and "from nothing" is incorrect. We use those fraises all the time but I wonder how any of us can mean them literally. God didn't create Adam out of thin air or from nothing, He did't even create the universe from nothing, out of thin air. As for Neanderthal, the findings are inconclusive, it may simple be that scientists contaminated their samples, or it could be as complicated as tho Neanderthals are animal, somehow their DNA is so close to human that cross breeding could have occurred. Adam's descendants became reprobate before the Noah's flood event, they may have been committing bestiality.
How sure are you that "that is incorrect"? These scientists deal with probabilities. what are the probabilities that 2 different species can mate and reproduce?
@@cynic150That is how the fossil record tells it. Look at chimpanzees - on physical and boring, menial, repetitious tasks they are far superior to us whereas we excell at analytical and comparative problem solving. Plus them having 48 chromosomes. That raises a couple more questions... ...coz we got 46.
I would love to see Dr. Ross debate many of the atheist or quasi-atheist physicists (I.e., Brian Green, Sean Carroll, Michio Kaku, etc.). I think he would likely annihilate them
" The latest discoveries in the Cambrian explosion tell us that the Fillae shows up first and the orders, families, and species show up last." This fact gives strong evidence in favor of Creation as written in Genesis.
" The latest discoveries in the Cambrian explosion tell us that the Fillae shows up first and species show up last." This fact gives strong evidence in favor of Creation as written in Genesis.
I have greatly broken these values online. I’m so convicted!!! But I’m not breaking these values when dealing with other Christians .. I’ve broken those values when dealing with the spiritually blind. That’s not good either.
@@petertaranto8192 Because he's interpreting Genesis to fit his theory of theistic evolution. For example, he's claiming the "days" in Genesis are not to be taken as literal 24 hour periods. However, Exodus 20: 8-11 ties them directly to 24 hour periods. If Mr. Ross's theory is correct than Exodus would be wrong. It would take too much to point out his numerious other misinterpretations. However, the bottom line is this. The creation as described in Genesis and the modern universe of science can never be harmonized because they are completely different realities.
APL Leukemia treatments of IV arsenic trioxide have given me debilitating peripheral neuropathy in my feet and shins and my hands and fingers. I already suffered from very mild PN from back surgery and existing nerve damage, also I have to take warfarin for an artificial heart valve, that also contributes to my neuropathy. I am taking iron and mag and max dose of neurotin every day. To no avail, please anybody help me I'm struggling to stand and even walk! I can't feel my legs!
@54:00 concerning Adam and Eve's children marrying brother and sister. It didn't have to continue for very long, the Bible says that Adam and Eve had many sons and daughters ,they didn't all have to marry each other, it must have been that the first few brother and sister marriages had to occur but soon after that it could have been uncle and niece, cousin to cousin. It's not that big a deal.
Secular science has their "Mitochondrial Eve" - the woman that we can all trace our mitochondrial DNA back to. They claim that there must have been women before her but obviously there had to have been a first human woman, even from a naturalist standpoint. In any case, she existed and knowing that she did we have to infer that inbreeding happened in human history. Her daughters were the only women to pass on her DNA. It's interesting to ask a nonbeliever why they're comfortable with this incest happening in a world of cold determinism but are suddenly offended if God allowed it. At the end of the day it's just another dishonest argument on their side - genetic bottlenecks have to exist in all species even from the evolutionary point of view (when species evolve there can't be more than two new members: the likelihood of it happening once seems to be astronomical but there needs to be two who find each other and mate) and that's seen as perfectly fine until somebody mentions Jesus and then suddenly they're scoffing and nudging each other over the "immorality" or "scientific ignorance" of God.
What part of 12 hours called a day dont you understand, what part of a long time also called day dont you understand? 6 -24 hour days just dont work scientifically, a long but finite period of time works perfectly, scientifically. ....now move along and dont bother the adults, I had a long day at work today, all 8 hours.
Animals do know their creator and so do the plants and trees and flowers and planets and stars. The Bible says all of creation speaks so no one can give an excuse for not knowing God. God used a donkey to speak to balaam.
Believe in The Lord Jesus Christ that He came from God, He became human and offered His life for our sins, by sacrificing His life for us on the cross in our favor .for those who believes in Him will have eternal life.
One explanation is that he’s “talking “ to himself in the triune being of God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. How do we understand this triune nature? We don’t! It’s one of the mysteries and also just a way for the limited mind of a human to grasp a concept that is beyond our ability to comprehend. The creation cannot understand the ultimate creator and to even attempt to fully “know” is folly. The book was written for humans to understand as best as we can in our current, embodied and limited way. I personally embrace and accept that, at least while I’m living in a human body I’ll never be able to understand or comprehend the fullness of the creator.
@@amytrumbull156 Hi, the Holy Trinity doctrine is critical to one's salvation. Some Christians go even to say if one rejects this doctrine, one is not saved. Let me explain: ▪︎I have searched long and hard, no one - pastors, Bible scholars and teachers can understand the Trinity. ▪︎If it is truly incomprehensible, or comprehensible to only a few, then how can the Christian community ever know who Jesus is. ▪︎If one cannot know who Jesus is, how does one love, follow and obey him? ▪︎Then, in what manner, can one hope to have his/her sins forgiven and be granted everlasting life? So, you see - holding by faith to the Holy Trinity as basis of salvation, only leads to one losing his/her salvation. If you find it more comforting, keep the Holy Trinity - but leave in the back-burner of your mind. But in your daily communion with God, apply this knowledge to establish grounding of your relationship with them. ▪︎The Father is the LORD God - the Almighty and Most High of all. ▪︎The Son is Jesus Christ, Son of the LORD God, sent by the Father as Son of Man, to bring about salvation of the world. ▪︎The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of the LORD God and the spirit of Jesus - as one. Until you have come to the Father (Jn 14:6), address Him as "the LORD". (For other gods may respond if you asked for "God".) Until you are certain you personally know Jesus, call out to him as "Lord Jesus" or "Jesus Christ". (For there are others who also bear the name "Jesus") May the LORD God bless you through the ministry of Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit.
It is a shame that these fidgety and disinterested children are sitting up front. Very disrespectful to his gift and intelligence. God bless you, Hugh Ross!
'God made two great lights-the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars.' (Genesis 1:16) How to get around this, it seems God did make sun, moon and stars on the fourth day, before 'light' on the first day' and 'vegetation' on the third day? The order doesn't seem right? Please enlighten me
What a stupid question! God is light, He is the source of light Himself. Can't He sustain anything as His will? The seemly contradictory Scriptures is such a wonderful way to lift our mind above the boundaries of what we can comprehend.
The question you should be asking is - why did god create the universe twice? Genesis 1 to Genesis 2 3 ends with ‘Thus the heavens and the earth were completed’. Then Genesis 2 4 starts creation again with ‘This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, when the Lord God made the earth and the heavens’ Why did the god make it twice? The patriarchs, Abraham, Noah, Jacob, etc. were Caananites and worshipped a council of gods with El at the head, he had a wife/consort Ashera and his council of gods included Baal, Mot, Yam, Ashtar, Shahar and many others who all had different duties and responsibilities, collectively called the Elohim, you see evidence of this in the names of people and places, ie Isra-el, Dani-el etc. etc. It wasn’t until around 500-600BCE, during the Babylonian exile that the banished priests began worshipping Yahweh, a monotheistic deity. They rewrote the old myths and legends to urge the Israelites to worship the new god concept. That’s why there are two creation accounts, two flood stories, two sets of Ten Commandments. Genesis 1 to Genesis 2 verse 3 is the account of the Elohim creating the heavens and earth, in the Hebrew Bible it calls them the Elohim, translated simply as ‘god’ in the English versions. “Then god (Elohim) said, let us (plural) make mankind in our (plural) image, in our (plural) likeness”. Genesis 2 1 “Thus the heavens and earth were completed” and the account finishes with the Elohim resting on the seventh day. Then Genesis 2 verse 4 begins the story again with Yahweh (translated as ‘Lord god’ or ‘Lord’) as the creator. “This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, when the Lord god (Yahweh) made the earth and the heavens”. After the conversion to monotheism the worship of the old gods was frowned upon, statues of Ashera were smashed and burnt, and her name removed from the biblical record, and in Kings, Elijah tests the priests of Baal before discrediting and slaughtering them for worshipping the gods that their own ancestors, the patriarchs, worshipped. Psalm 82: El (god) has taken his place in the divine council, among the Elohim (gods) he judges.
Ross does explain that quit extensively. i would just remind you that the Bible's first 10 words says that in the beginning God created the whole universe, so the light was created in the beginning.
I think his arguments against young earth sound very similar to the young earther arguments. The physical laws changed at least once from when they didn’t exist to when they did. I like this guys arguments very much but I would prefer a more humble response to young earthers because I don’t think his arguments are any more reliable than the young earthers. I think there is just too much that we don’t know and he does align the creation with historical Science however science could completely change their theories tomorrow. As I wrote this he kind of talked about being respectful and nice to eachother and I respect that. However he does not have a monopoly on the truth so I like his take but I’m not convinced he is right. I see it as a compelling argument. But I also see the young earth as a compelling argument also. I think we should follow the evidence and our beliefs but also be open to the possibility we are wrong.
Dr Ross, are you familiar with the Ferrar Fenton version of the Scriptures? It reads Genesis chapter 1 differently.. It uses the term periods in place of day.. In looking at the root word in Strongs Exhaustive Concordence, it looks to me that word is proper.. If you have the chance obtain a copy of that translation! It confirms your understanding of properly reading the text..
How can any animal function without a brain, heart, circulatory, or digestive system unless it was a spiritual being before the increase of oxygen? Hugh Ross does not go into detail on this, and it is confusing for someone who is not a scientist to understand.
They would have been Created on day five. Dinosaurs are not mentioned in the Bible. The fossil record is clear. Dinosaurs went extinct 66 million years ago. Dinosaurs did not coexist with man.
6 epochs of creation time for 6 days? Did He bring everything into existence in those 6 days? His spirit hovered over the surface of the waters on the first day, meaning on day 1, the Heavens and the Earth were already in existence. Where had this surface of the waters His spirit hovered over come from ? I take it during the 6 days He perfected a universe that He had already created times earlier.
He is a God of Miracles! Do you not believe that He split the seas? Tore down the temple of Babel? Earthquake under the priests? Rose from the dead? There are no limitations of physics in Gods ability.
Is his interpretation of Genesis shared by any other group, faith, religious tradition, apologetic. All this seems kind of new to me. The idea that the spirit of god Hovered over the water being the same as the point of view of this book is someone hovering over the water below the clouds is not a natural following of the text. For example is it even possible for god to have a point if view since he is everywhere? I have a feeling that if you looked at what Jews and early christians believed about the text it would be a very different interpretation than the one presented here. Just my opinion.
0 there is evening and there was morning the first day God called the LIGHT THE DAY and never ⁰ call The Night time darkness part of the day because the Darkness separated the 6 days of creation The morning broke the DARKNESS'S and there was light } LIGHT the first day God called the LIGHT THE DAY But the darkness was not called the day
Yes, thee are many things that are interesting and informative. However, the part about Neanderthals leaves me wondering. Why would God make breeding between these supposed simian animals and humans compatible? Creatures who interbreed are considered the same species. Additionally, they found musical instruments and ceremonial burials in relation to Neanderthals. I don't see chimps nor gorillas doing that. Only humans.
The Q&A part works better for me when I just listen & not watch. The kids at the table in the foreground are not mature enough for this lecture and they're distracting. SuperBook cartoons would probably be more appropriate for them.
Lots of scientist have measured it, its what they come up with. Only Bishop Usher a couple of hundred years ago added up the names in the genealogy between Adam and Abraham that we first learned of 6000 years.
@@SamytheGreek Only Bishop Usher? You'd be wrong about that. A young earth is found in both Hebrew and Christian tradition. For example, according to the official Hebrew calender of Israel the year is 5,784 based on Genesis. Science has no proven/reliable way to date the earth.
@@difficultjourney3216 Yes, there are Jewish (creation of Adam) and Muslim young Earth's. Yes, scientists do know the age of the universe and the Earth and can measure it with great accuracy. Uranium dating, thorium dating are very accurate.
@@SamytheGreek You're wrong again..science has no reliable way to determine the age of the earth. If they did there would be no debate. For example, Christian scientists like Jonathan Sarfati make a strong case for a young earth. You really need to stop commenting till you know what you're talking about.
I believe in the LORD GOD Almighty Not man. Satan at work in this time of darkness. John. 8: 32. And ye shall know the TRUTH and the TRUTH shall make you FREE. (King James Version.)
Sorry it sounds just to low... I'm so sick of most petioles sound is good then u get what? Ivo crack the volume so high ACS then lower for the next video that's gonna play...😮UR a speaker I don't the back row can hear u🙄
Do animals go to heaven? It’s a question most of us have pondered, especially after losing a beloved animal companion. The Bible actually has a lot to say on this topic. And for those of us who hope to spend eternity with our animal family members, it’s good news. Several Bible verses depict animals in heaven: The wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion and the yearling together; and a little child will lead them. The cow will feed with the bear, their young will lie down together, and the lion will eat straw like the ox. The infant will play near the cobra’s den, and the young child will put its hand into the viper’s nest. They will neither harm nor destroy on all my holy mountain, for the earth will be filled with the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea.” -Isaiah 11:6-9 Then I heard every creature in heaven and on earth and under the earth and on the sea, and all that is in them, saying, ‘To him who sits on the throne and to the Lamb be praise and honor and glory and power, for ever and ever!’” -Revelation 5:13
Everything said in this video is impressively wrong. However, ... Credit where credit is due. 1. At least you're consistent. and 2. Kudos for allowing comments under this video; which 98% of Christian-Fundamentalist channels won't allow, because they don't want to risk their sheeple being exposed to sound reasoning and real data.
Where is your proof - not just accusations? I know the Bible and the only thing that sticks out is God making us in His image? Where did that part come in?
@@ENFPerspectives I never received a notification of your reply. But if you read the reply I just posted to Joe Turner, you'll see some of what I think about this.
Ross has debated many other PhD. scientists, they don't disagree with him of his science, just on the Jesus part, atheist scientists who critique his books have said the same thing.
We are wholly on our own. There is no supernatural dimension, no invisible man in the sky watching everything we do, and the concept of sin is just an alternate manifestation of guilt.
You are in denial. More brilliant minds than you or I have been thinking about the origins of life and mankind. How many hours have you spent researching these things? Educate yourself. God bless.
Christ returned in AD 70 just as the Bible tells us he would. Yeshua himself told us that he would return to the generation to whom he spoke. Matt 24:34, Matt 16:27,28, Luke 21:32, mark 13:30
Yes, that generation is this one. Those of us who were born AFTER May 14th, 1948, if we live long enough , would witness the Rapture. Generation = 100 years approx.
I am finding it very difficult to believe that the millenial Kingdom which Jesus in theory inaugurated in 70 A.D. with His supposed return doesn't at all live up to the advertising that every tear would be wiped away from their eyes... The sorrowful lamentation in Gaza, Sudan, and Pakistan (80% of the population without access to clean water)---> does the advent of the Kingdom really leave those pockets of misery unattended? Sorry, that is nonsensical...
Don't forget that some will come to tempt you with the bible in their hands! By carefully fooling you into believing the interpretation of "day age" they are opening a large gateway towards reinterpreting other important passages! Read Basil the Great or if you want something more adapted to your modern ear, read Father Seraphim Rose. Re-read Genesis the KJV and you will easily see that our Lord is all powerful, and he created the heaven and the earth using literal 6 days of 24h each. He did not create inferior creatures then superior creatures, or some creatures and then after a milion years some more. In Genesis we get a picture of an Almighty God creating all that is needed beautiful and ready to multiply - complete creatures. Concerning the laws of physics that do not change look again at genesis. God did not change the laws, he just added new laws as punishments (intense physical labour in order to get food out of the earth, multiplied child bearing suffering for the women, decay, death etc) Man became evil and he was chased out of the place that was originally intended for him so he would not eat from the tree of life and become immortal. We are now in our fallen state away from the glory of God which explains all the sufferings that we have to get through.
People like Hitler or Mussolini cannot live long lives. Death is the cost of sin. A sinful man will not live a long life. Your reasoning may be a bit off.
Thank you for so much richness. But, no neanderthal man. And no neanderthal man living 40,000 years ago. That was part of the evolution theory. The Jews/Yahudym have been keeping the time and the year, according to Michael Rood-- excellent time keeper, it is the year 6024 (as of Oct 17, 2024). // Anyone reading this who is not saved, ask the Messiah to be your Savior.
Not sure what's going on here. If made so plausible with all these qualifications (an education in itself; who has it?), then the Bible should have mass appeal. Everything makes specific sense now whereas there was mystery before with the onus on believing rather than understanding. If we were to rewrite the Bible the way Dr. Ross has it, would we still have, as a result, the Bible, or some other work? I am not sure where to draw a line. So many versions of the Bible have been written but all maintain a high degree of the supernatural and hard to grasp. Why has the "Dr. Ross Bible" not yet been written? Or has it? And how far can we bend science to incorporate the "facts" of the Bible? I'd love to follow Dr. Ross, but am not sure about the role and extent of interpretation, even, or especially, if correct! What happens to the Bible and us? What remains to believe? And wasn't faith the cornerstone of Christianity? I am now very much puzzled. I wrote to Reasons in Canada about just this point but haven't got a reply as yet.
FORGET H ROSS, STICK TO THE THE ONLY CORRECT TRANSLATION OF THE BIBLE THE KING JAMES AND LIVE FOR CHRIST WHO DIED FOR YOU, ROSE VICTORIOUS FROM THE GRAVE AND IS COMING BACK VERY SOON NOW. CONCENTRATE ON THE IMPORTANT STUFF. YOU CAN ASK JESUS ONE DAY TO EXPLAIN GENESIS. GOD BLESS YOU LAD
Don't be too easy on yourself. No, H Ross is great as he leads me to see these "book of nature" truths revealed in the Bible and vice versa. Also, I don't think God is a stickler for words, we can use interpretation without contradicting the spirit of the Holy Book. After all, He has given us the capacity of think.
@@pauljepson1379 Paul I agree totally. At 27:00 Mr. Ross says, “Let there be lights in the sky. God didn’t make the sun, moon and stars.” Reg flags are shooting up. Gen l :16, “And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.” King James Bible. I don’t know which Bible he believes, but it’s wrong. Sounds like Mr. Ross is am evolutionist to me. I can’t figure out Genesis 1, but I believe every word in my King James Bible. Our focus is to go out into all the world and preach the Gospel. Keep standing on God’s word brother!!
Are you Christian, water baptised Holy Spirit filled. Do you fellowship at a church. It seems you have many questions and are searching on an intellectual basis. Your questions could be shared with the church pastor/Christian brothers/sisters. Dr Ross has often stated on TH-cam that he can be personally contacted ( Instagram/Twitter ) and willingly answers questions
Read this. Old earth “If God used unique creative processes to bring the universe into being, one cannot expect to understand the universe by applying “standard models” that are, by nature, oblivious to creative processes.” EXACTLY! So why would any believer in a Creator God accept the secular theory of the origin of the universe when it is built on the assumption that there could not have been any miracles. Why would God choose to create the universe in such a way as to fit the secular assumptions about it’s origin? It would almost be like He is trying to hide the fact that He was involved in the creation/origin of the universe. But that is not like God. On the contrary, He puts His glory on display so to me, it makes no sense whatsoever to try to read the Bible in such a way as to harmonize with the godless secular view of the origin of the universe. Makes no sense whatsoever. Hugh Ross is so stuck in his self made paradigm to fit the Bible into his science. Sad. Sad.
Probably the opposer of God posing as an angel of light. Not called the deceiver and liar for no reason. Just too much evidence that the bible is true. The rest of religious writings- he’s probably behind those as well as one of his schenes
Come on , we're to give credence and have faith in a fictional Jewish messiah who is invisible to observe and interact with and has promised that he would return " SOON " some 1900 + years ago ( revelation chapter 22 ) when he jesus forecast that the time was " Near " and Not seal up the scroll as in Daniel when he would return with his fathers celestial kingdom , which is Long , Long , Long overdue ! And we are to have faith in a false prophet and someone who was clearly wrong and deluded about himself and what was about to happen ? Now that's CRAZY !
Ross's presentation would have had greater credibility if he would have shared his god proposition with Aron Ra or Forrest Tucker ! But he would have Lost !
Man, I listened to this and I could not believe how many lies he said. Animals did NOT appear all at once when the oxygen level reached 8%. And even if that were true, it is the fine tuning fallacy argument.
His books site the published studies. He has receipts and has made them available to you. He is an astrophysicist... the biology is taken from the works of the leading biologists and their published works. Most of them atheists. But scientific discovery is scientific discovery regardless of your beliefs.
God created the heavens and the Earth First the heaven's before the actual ⁰ Earth God called the dry land EARTH on the third day Of creation God called the FIRMAMENT HEAVEN on the SECOND day of the creation The EARTH was without form and VOID on the First day of the creation JOB 38 verse. 4. and 7 WHEN I LAID THE FOUNDATIONS O] THE EARTH THE MORNING STARS SANG TOGETHER and all sons of God shouted for joy
I love how Dr. Ross harkens back to when he was 19 and the pivotal moments in that stage of life.
One of the biggest moments in my life was when I was 19, arriving back to my shared apartment with my roommates from university. An epiphany descended upon me from the Almighty. I immediately knew that God could not possibly be an old man with a big white beard on a throne in the sky. It was that simple. That set me free. Free to explore the nature of Truth, of what is truly good, of beauty, etc. I could write several books on just how I came full circle to my faith in Christ. It took me to all ends of the earth.
An epiphany descended upon me from the Almighty" What was written on the drug package, and any associated health warnings?
@@aue82a
Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap.
Galatians 6:7
@@captainfantastic7843 "whatever a man sows, that he will also reap" In that instance, you are toast.
You sir are certainly the loser in this one. Truth hurts.@aue82a
Dr. Ross blessings appreciate your gifts and your diligence in serving. I'm neither as intelligent or diligent as you sir, think ths spirit has revealed some truths to me. 1 that prophecies parables and as embedded as scripture is just occurred to me that covers most if not all truth. For example Days as days or literal days, is the universe 13.7 billion years old or six days old? Or is it both. Time is relative so as some podcasts point out if we could instantly travel half way towards the singularity or center. The universe would appear to be 7 billion years old I we go to the C ter the universe would literally appear to be 6.8 days old. This is simplified and not precise. Also, your seem to think it is the 7th day but my study as led by the spirit it is still the 6th day very late in the 6th day. This was brought to me by the words🎉 of the messiah whe🎉n he is interrogated by pharisees when questioned about working on the sabbath. From memory. Since the beginning til now my father has gone about his work, I also will be about my father's work. The spirit highlighted this through a word. Study showed me that assuming that "o. The 7th day go's rested" is past tense for god not us. He does not view time he exists through and outside of all time so to him he has rested on his seventh day even though from our perspective his seventh day has not occurred yet. You ststw creation is over. Where about, I have knit you together in your mother's womb for such a time as this?
Wow ! I’ve been hesitant to watch this video due to its length but I am so glad I did watch it . There is so much scientific evidence contained in this talk it’s crazy ! I’m 66 years old and I learn more watching Dr. Hugh Ross than I ever did in school . Of course , I wasn’t a good student and wasn’t interested in learning then either . Thank you Sir for investing your time in the research and knowledge of these topics and especially for taking the time to share it with the rest of us . I’ve passed your name on to others that I hope will pay attention and learn from you as I have . Take care and God bless you !
Hugh Ross is paradigm shattering!! 🎉
Excellent video! Thank you Dr. Ross!
A treasure of information for believers in God and those who do not believe also............great classes from Dr. Ross.
Apart from the Best Explanation Ever, definitely the BEST English Accent I have ever heard! Canadians has to be the Best! Bradley R. Reddy, Johannesburg, RSA
Thank You Dr. Ross
You are one of God's greatest creations! Thank you for sharing your knowledge.
also not too far away from becoming one of "god's" average cremations.
kiss ass.
Truly, he is one of God’s remarkable human beings. He is an example of man’s intelligence. ❤
Thank you 🙏🏼
I enjoyed this immensely. Thank you Dr. Ross.
This man is a world wide treasure wow!
And a mainstream disinformer, as expected.
@@TommyTCGTand what are you doing here?watching him?😅
@@feltorres4807 "watching him" Oh yes, and carefully, especially those of us who are opposed to bullshit.
Yes and as time goes on with more and more information , more scientists and researchers will realize there has to be a designer . It’s just to fine-tune for life. Even Christopher Hitchens agreed about the fine-tuning for human life.
@@TommyTCGT Probably that's why he is not refuted.?
45:23 The bible gets a PERFECT SCORE ON CREATION😀 Awesome summary of each day of creation
God Bless, Hugh! What a blessing!
Thank you Dr. Your view is very convincing backed by science. As a curious person, I will use the link you provide to do further and deeper study into the subject. Greetings from Papua New Guinean.
Thank you Dr Ross ❤❤❤
Thank you Dr. Ross!! Another great video.
It's all bullshit.
This guy,he's my type of guy!
book a room then.
@@aue82a
neanderthal ?
Really thankful to Dr Ross for this sharing🙏
This teaching is amazing! God is truly using him in a awesome way to teach us
I’m always in AWE of Dr Ross’ teaching. I share with everyone. Absolutely FASCINATING!!!
Really sad, with all the proof of creation ppl (us humans) choose to deny our awesome God, and the provision he made for us to save us sinners so that we hv access to him....our God is mighty ,simply awesome ...
Hey God bless you Brother in Christ here, So please forgive me I'm not that educated so I'm gonna try here, I know that Paul wrote that our battle is not against flesh and blood although humanity will always rail against our Creator God, but I believe that for the most part I do believe that the knowing beings we don't see are a big factor "please notice the little ( b ) in the word big"
Oh, blessed hope Christ is in us for the glory of God. Alleluia!
Brilliant lesson and some excellent points to help strengthen my faith.
As always Dr. Ross is such a wonderful blessing. Praise God
❤ This is so incredible!!!
Incredibly nonsensical.
@@TommyTCGT
I can reduce your argument down to a three word declaration::
"Fuck you dad!"
Your turn tommy .
Hey kids, how's the old Abiogenesis solution goin these days..?
I loved this lecture and it gave me so much clarification of issues, questions. I did find it strange that he said Neanderthals didn’t wear clothing as I’m sure that’s incorrect. Also, I think that they became extinct for several reasons but mainly because God knew that we were the new and improved model and that he likely didn’t want to have us both exist together any longer for his own reasons, whatever they be. I do understand that some of us still carry their dna, which is no biggie but interesting for sure. I also have long understood that species are created fully formed, all at once and that creatures don’t evolve into other forms, it’s unproven nonsense. I love the thought of God creating living beings out of his will, out of thin air as it were! It’s beautiful, miraculous but also is the only thing that makes sense.
i do not think that serious biologists would agree with that last part of yours. Complete species came about out of thin air? Come on!
Out of thin air" is not correct, and "from nothing" is incorrect. We use those fraises all the time but I wonder how any of us can mean them literally. God didn't create Adam out of thin air or from nothing, He did't even create the universe from nothing, out of thin air. As for Neanderthal, the findings are inconclusive, it may simple be that scientists contaminated their samples, or it could be as complicated as tho Neanderthals are animal, somehow their DNA is so close to human that cross breeding could have occurred. Adam's descendants became reprobate before the Noah's flood event, they may have been committing bestiality.
How sure are you that "that is incorrect"? These scientists deal with probabilities. what are the probabilities that 2 different species can mate and reproduce?
@@cynic150That is how the fossil record tells it. Look at chimpanzees - on physical and boring, menial, repetitious tasks they are far superior to us whereas we excell at analytical and comparative problem solving. Plus them having 48 chromosomes. That raises a couple more questions...
...coz we got 46.
@clivewells1736 the fossil record doesn't tell you anything. It has to be interpreted. That is where the belief part can cloud your interpretations.
Fantastic
Regards
Dave from Scotland
What a great point about no knew phyla after humans. If evolution is as they say it is, why dont’ we see a constant stream of new ones?
I would love to see Dr. Ross debate many of the atheist or quasi-atheist physicists (I.e., Brian Green, Sean Carroll, Michio Kaku, etc.). I think he would likely annihilate them
Great show
God bless the nation of Israel and God bless the Church of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
Save this man at all cost
" The latest discoveries in the Cambrian explosion tell us that the Fillae shows up first and the orders, families, and species show up last." This fact gives strong evidence in favor of Creation as written in Genesis.
I'm wondering what Dr. Ross's opinion is on the excellent and wonderous topic of Theomatics. It can't be denied.
Is there any chance to have this presentation with an arabic subtitle ttranslation?
" The latest discoveries in the Cambrian explosion tell us that the Fillae shows up first and species show up last." This fact gives strong evidence in favor of Creation as written in Genesis.
I have greatly broken these values online. I’m so convicted!!! But I’m not breaking these values when dealing with other Christians .. I’ve broken those values when dealing with the spiritually blind. That’s not good either.
The age of man is prophetically determined. The world may be old, but human beings are based on the chronology of Adam's age when Seth was born.
I love Dr. Ross 🙌
I think he is a big fake.
How can he be a big fake?
@@petertaranto8192 Because he's interpreting Genesis to fit his theory of theistic evolution. For example, he's claiming the "days" in Genesis are not to be taken as literal 24 hour periods. However, Exodus 20: 8-11 ties them directly to 24 hour periods. If Mr. Ross's theory is correct than Exodus would be wrong. It would take too much to point out his numerious other misinterpretations. However, the bottom line is this. The creation as described in Genesis and the modern universe of science can never be harmonized because they are completely different realities.
@difficultjourney3216
Dr Ross doesn't believe in Theistic Evolution. You are wrong about that. He is a progressive Creationist.
APL Leukemia treatments of IV arsenic trioxide have given me debilitating peripheral neuropathy in my feet and shins and my hands and fingers. I already suffered from very mild PN from back surgery and existing nerve damage, also I have to take warfarin for an artificial heart valve, that also contributes to my neuropathy. I am taking iron and mag and max dose of neurotin every day.
To no avail, please anybody help me I'm struggling to stand and even walk! I can't feel my legs!
Pray to Jesus for healing, I will pray for you too.
I'm so sorry you're dealing with that.
Fast and pray. If you're asking your body to heal then give it a rest from processing food so it can do some housework.
What about judaism and the very specific date of Adam's creation at 5785 years ago, not hundred thousand years? For Starters...
@54:00 concerning Adam and Eve's children marrying brother and sister. It didn't have to continue for very long, the Bible says that Adam and Eve had many sons and daughters ,they didn't all have to marry each other, it must have been that the first few brother and sister marriages had to occur but soon after that it could have been uncle and niece, cousin to cousin. It's not that big a deal.
Secular science has their "Mitochondrial Eve" - the woman that we can all trace our mitochondrial DNA back to. They claim that there must have been women before her but obviously there had to have been a first human woman, even from a naturalist standpoint.
In any case, she existed and knowing that she did we have to infer that inbreeding happened in human history. Her daughters were the only women to pass on her DNA. It's interesting to ask a nonbeliever why they're comfortable with this incest happening in a world of cold determinism but are suddenly offended if God allowed it.
At the end of the day it's just another dishonest argument on their side - genetic bottlenecks have to exist in all species even from the evolutionary point of view (when species evolve there can't be more than two new members: the likelihood of it happening once seems to be astronomical but there needs to be two who find each other and mate) and that's seen as perfectly fine until somebody mentions Jesus and then suddenly they're scoffing and nudging each other over the "immorality" or "scientific ignorance" of God.
If we are all living in day 7, then Adam was born yesterday.
@@kevinurquhart2469: Fat 7-? What is that?^^
@ColinWrubleski-eq5sh I'm sorry, I corrected my comment. My phone, how smart it is, doesn't know how to correct my words when writing to fast, lol.
What part of 6 days is so hard to understand?...God Bless!!!
ikr, solar system moves at 140 miles per seconds
@@spoopyradicalsnake "Solar Systems" are a theory that dont exist.
What part of 12 hours called a day dont you understand, what part of a long time also called day dont you understand? 6 -24 hour days just dont work scientifically, a long but finite period of time works perfectly, scientifically. ....now move along and dont bother the adults, I had a long day at work today, all 8 hours.
Animals do know their creator and so do the plants and trees and flowers and planets and stars. The Bible says all of creation speaks so no one can give an excuse for not knowing God. God used a donkey to speak to balaam.
I spend a lot of time on TH-cam. They want me to pay for a subscription to end the ads, but I refuse, so I have to continue dealing with them.
43:45
So was morning and evening thousands of years? Too many variables to say that its exact like that.
Billions and millions. It's not a day, as he said that word can actually mean "an age"
what do I have to do to become a Christian?
Believe in The Lord Jesus Christ that He came from God, He became human and offered His life for our sins, by sacrificing His life for us on the cross in our favor .for those who believes in Him will have eternal life.
Hmmm Genesis. First page, “and God said, let us make man in our image”. Question...who was he talking to?
Michael Heiser answers this, but I don't think all scholars agree with him.
One explanation is that he’s “talking “ to himself in the triune being of God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. How do we understand this triune nature? We don’t! It’s one of the mysteries and also just a way for the limited mind of a human to grasp a concept that is beyond our ability to comprehend. The creation cannot understand the ultimate creator and to even attempt to fully “know” is folly. The book was written for humans to understand as best as we can in our current, embodied and limited way. I personally embrace and accept that, at least while I’m living in a human body I’ll never be able to understand or comprehend the fullness of the creator.
@@amytrumbull156
Hi, the Holy Trinity doctrine is critical to one's salvation.
Some Christians go even to say if one rejects this doctrine, one is not saved.
Let me explain:
▪︎I have searched long and hard, no one - pastors, Bible scholars and teachers can understand the Trinity.
▪︎If it is truly incomprehensible, or comprehensible to only a few, then how can the Christian community ever know who Jesus is.
▪︎If one cannot know who Jesus is, how does one love, follow and obey him?
▪︎Then, in what manner, can one hope to have his/her sins forgiven and be granted everlasting life?
So, you see - holding by faith to the Holy Trinity as basis of salvation, only leads to one losing his/her salvation.
If you find it more comforting, keep the Holy Trinity - but leave in the back-burner of your mind.
But in your daily communion with God, apply this knowledge to establish grounding of your relationship with them.
▪︎The Father is the LORD God - the Almighty and Most High of all.
▪︎The Son is Jesus Christ, Son of the LORD God, sent by the Father as Son of Man, to bring about salvation of the world.
▪︎The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of the LORD God and the spirit of Jesus - as one.
Until you have come to the Father (Jn 14:6), address Him as "the LORD". (For other gods may respond if you asked for "God".)
Until you are certain you personally know Jesus, call out to him as "Lord Jesus" or "Jesus Christ". (For there are others who also bear the name "Jesus")
May the LORD God bless you through the ministry of Jesus Christ, Holy Spirit.
This again ?
How many times do I have to tell You Tube I'm simply not interested ?
It is a shame that these fidgety and disinterested children are sitting up front. Very disrespectful to his gift and intelligence. God bless you, Hugh Ross!
Beautiful.
'God made two great lights-the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars.' (Genesis 1:16) How to get around this, it seems God did make sun, moon and stars on the fourth day, before 'light' on the first day' and 'vegetation' on the third day? The order doesn't seem right? Please enlighten me
What a stupid question! God is light, He is the source of light Himself. Can't He sustain anything as His will? The seemly contradictory Scriptures is such a wonderful way to lift our mind above the boundaries of what we can comprehend.
The question you should be asking is - why did god create the universe twice?
Genesis 1 to Genesis 2 3 ends with ‘Thus the heavens and the earth were completed’.
Then Genesis 2 4 starts creation again with ‘This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, when the Lord God made the earth and the heavens’
Why did the god make it twice?
The patriarchs, Abraham, Noah, Jacob, etc. were Caananites and worshipped a council of gods with El at the head, he had a wife/consort Ashera and his council of gods included Baal, Mot, Yam, Ashtar, Shahar and many others who all had different duties and responsibilities, collectively called the Elohim, you see evidence of this in the names of people and places, ie Isra-el, Dani-el etc. etc.
It wasn’t until around 500-600BCE, during the Babylonian exile that the banished priests began worshipping Yahweh, a monotheistic deity. They rewrote the old myths and legends to urge the Israelites to worship the new god concept. That’s why there are two creation accounts, two flood stories, two sets of Ten Commandments. Genesis 1 to Genesis 2 verse 3 is the account of the Elohim creating the heavens and earth, in the Hebrew Bible it calls them the Elohim, translated simply as ‘god’ in the English versions. “Then god (Elohim) said, let us (plural) make mankind in our (plural) image, in our (plural) likeness”. Genesis 2 1 “Thus the heavens and earth were completed” and the account finishes with the Elohim resting on the seventh day. Then Genesis 2 verse 4 begins the story again with Yahweh (translated as ‘Lord god’ or ‘Lord’) as the creator. “This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, when the Lord god (Yahweh) made the earth and the heavens”.
After the conversion to monotheism the worship of the old gods was frowned upon, statues of Ashera were smashed and burnt, and her name removed from the biblical record, and in Kings, Elijah tests the priests of Baal before discrediting and slaughtering them for worshipping the gods that their own ancestors, the patriarchs, worshipped.
Psalm 82: El (god) has taken his place in the divine council, among the Elohim (gods) he judges.
Ross does explain that quit extensively. i would just remind you that the Bible's first 10 words says that in the beginning God created the whole universe, so the light was created in the beginning.
@@fudgedogbannana Don't you think the first 10 words is a summary? Then explains how the work be done in 6 days, step by step?
@@fudgedogbannana Love Dr Ross but I am more convinced by Chunk Missler's explanation :)
What about the Cro-Magnons, who had larger brain capacity than we homo sapiens sapiens do now? Where do they fit into things?
I think his arguments against young earth sound very similar to the young earther arguments. The physical laws changed at least once from when they didn’t exist to when they did. I like this guys arguments very much but I would prefer a more humble response to young earthers because I don’t think his arguments are any more reliable than the young earthers. I think there is just too much that we don’t know and he does align the creation with historical Science however science could completely change their theories tomorrow. As I wrote this he kind of talked about being respectful and nice to eachother and I respect that. However he does not have a monopoly on the truth so I like his take but I’m not convinced he is right. I see it as a compelling argument. But I also see the young earth as a compelling argument also. I think we should follow the evidence and our beliefs but also be open to the possibility we are wrong.
Well said.
Thank you.
So which animals were there at 8% oxygen, that then became extinct ? and where does it’s say so in the bible or point to this period?
The Bible doesn't get into it but the period of time was from the Avalon explosion to the Cambrian.
Why we don’t have unicorns
Dr Ross, are you familiar with the Ferrar Fenton version of the Scriptures? It reads Genesis chapter 1 differently.. It uses the term periods in place of day.. In looking at the root word in Strongs Exhaustive Concordence, it looks to me that word is proper..
If you have the chance obtain a copy of that translation! It confirms your understanding of properly reading the text..
What is a neanderthal?
How can any animal function without a brain, heart, circulatory, or digestive system unless it was a spiritual being before the increase of oxygen? Hugh Ross does not go into detail on this, and it is confusing for someone who is not a scientist to understand.
Thanks Ross
What about dinosaurs? When did they exist? Is there any evidence that they actually did?
They would have been Created on day five. Dinosaurs are not mentioned in the Bible. The fossil record is clear. Dinosaurs went extinct 66 million years ago. Dinosaurs did not coexist with man.
dinosaurs existed millions of years before we did.
No evidence for “dinosaurs”
Last of the dino went extinct 60 million years ago.
@@SamytheGreek fairy tales
6 epochs of creation time for 6 days? Did He bring everything into existence in those 6 days? His spirit hovered over the surface of the waters on the first day, meaning on day 1, the Heavens and the Earth were already in existence. Where had this surface of the waters His spirit hovered over come from ? I take it during the 6 days He perfected a universe that He had already created times earlier.
That's the way I see it myself.
He has not studied the Dead Sea Scrolls nor has he studied the prophesies of Daniel.
Why do we need a Book other than the Bible to understand the Book of Genesis? Didn't Jesus forbid Buying and Selling in his House?
So what is a Neanderthal? Another beast?
I don’t bank on “carbon dating” whatsoever! Ever.
He is a God of Miracles! Do you not believe that He split the seas? Tore down the temple of Babel? Earthquake under the priests? Rose from the dead? There are no limitations of physics in Gods ability.
Day can mean ETERNAL.
Is his interpretation of Genesis shared by any other group, faith, religious tradition, apologetic. All this seems kind of new to me. The idea that the spirit of god Hovered over the water being the same as the point of view of this book is someone hovering over the water below the clouds is not a natural following of the text. For example is it even possible for god to have a point if view since he is everywhere? I have a feeling that if you looked at what Jews and early christians believed about the text it would be a very different interpretation than the one presented here. Just my opinion.
0 there is evening and there was morning the first day
God called the LIGHT THE DAY and never ⁰ call The
Night time darkness part of the day because the
Darkness separated the 6 days of creation
The morning broke the DARKNESS'S and there was light
} LIGHT the first day God called the LIGHT THE DAY
But the darkness was not called the day
Light of the messiah was day 1 not the sun
Yes, thee are many things that are interesting and informative. However, the part about Neanderthals leaves me wondering. Why would God make breeding between these supposed simian animals and humans compatible? Creatures who interbreed are considered the same species. Additionally, they found musical instruments and ceremonial burials in relation to Neanderthals. I don't see chimps nor gorillas doing that. Only humans.
The Q&A part works better for me when I just listen & not watch. The kids at the table in the foreground are not mature enough for this lecture and they're distracting. SuperBook cartoons would probably be more appropriate for them.
But i dont believe that earth is billion of years of age
It's not.
Lots of scientist have measured it, its what they come up with. Only Bishop Usher a couple of hundred years ago added up the names in the genealogy between Adam and Abraham that we first learned of 6000 years.
@@SamytheGreek Only Bishop Usher? You'd be wrong about that. A young earth is found in both Hebrew and Christian tradition. For example, according to the official Hebrew calender of Israel the year is 5,784 based on Genesis. Science has no proven/reliable way to date the earth.
@@difficultjourney3216 Yes, there are Jewish (creation of Adam) and Muslim young Earth's. Yes, scientists do know the age of the universe and the Earth and can measure it with great accuracy. Uranium dating, thorium dating are very accurate.
@@SamytheGreek You're wrong again..science has no reliable way to determine the age of the earth. If they did there would be no debate. For example, Christian scientists like Jonathan Sarfati make a strong case for a young earth. You really need to stop commenting till you know what you're talking about.
I believe in the LORD GOD Almighty Not man. Satan at work in this time of darkness. John. 8: 32. And ye shall know the TRUTH and the TRUTH shall make you FREE. (King James Version.)
I also believe in Lord God Almighty; His worlds are the only truth in this universe
Sorry it sounds just to low... I'm so sick of most petioles sound is good then u get what?
Ivo crack the volume so high ACS then lower for the next video that's gonna play...😮UR a speaker I don't the back row can hear u🙄
If animal fossil's were found, how could they survive or grow, without food? Without vegetation, all animals must have been carnivores?
Do animals go to heaven? It’s a question most of us have pondered, especially after losing a beloved animal companion. The Bible actually has a lot to say on this topic. And for those of us who hope to spend eternity with our animal family members, it’s good news.
Several Bible verses depict animals in heaven:
The wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion and the yearling together; and a little child will lead them. The cow will feed with the bear, their young will lie down together, and the lion will eat straw like the ox. The infant will play near the cobra’s den, and the young child will put its hand into the viper’s nest. They will neither harm nor destroy on all my holy mountain, for the earth will be filled with the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea.”
-Isaiah 11:6-9
Then I heard every creature in heaven and on earth and under the earth and on the sea, and all that is in them, saying, ‘To him who sits on the throne and to the Lamb be praise and honor and glory and power, for ever and ever!’”
-Revelation 5:13
will I find my deceased pet rat in heaven?
@@aue82ayes :)
way too quiet it needs to be 200% louder
Everything said in this video is impressively wrong.
However, ...
Credit where credit is due.
1. At least you're consistent.
and
2. Kudos for allowing comments under this video; which 98% of Christian-Fundamentalist channels won't allow, because they don't want to risk their sheeple
being exposed to sound reasoning and real data.
Where is your proof - not just accusations? I know the Bible and the only thing that sticks out is God making us in His image? Where did that part come in?
We welcome your thoughts, but saying the video is impressively wrong without saying what and why doesn't help your case.
@joeturner9219
humansocialsystems.blogspot.com/2023/08/responding-to-reasons-to-believe-hugh.html
@@ENFPerspectives I never received a notification of your reply.
But if you read the reply I just posted to Joe Turner, you'll see some of what I think about this.
Ross has debated many other PhD. scientists, they don't disagree with him of his science, just on the Jesus part, atheist scientists who critique his books have said the same thing.
I think something's wrong with the camera because it went 10 12.
We are wholly on our own. There is no supernatural dimension, no invisible man in the sky watching everything we do, and the concept of sin is just an alternate manifestation of guilt.
You are in denial. More brilliant minds than you or I have been thinking about the origins of life and mankind. How many hours have you spent researching these things? Educate yourself. God bless.
Should we have guilt if there is no God and we're merely material organisms with no free will?
Heaven and God are not in the sky. The sky is in the sky. Heaven and God are in another dimension.
Wait. God created sun on day 4? Hmmm 😅
So.many ads.
Please talk louder or use a better microphone. Thank you
Christ returned in AD 70 just as the Bible tells us he would. Yeshua himself told us that he would return to the generation to whom he spoke. Matt 24:34, Matt 16:27,28, Luke 21:32, mark 13:30
Yes, that generation is this one. Those of us who were born AFTER May 14th, 1948, if we live long enough , would witness the Rapture. Generation = 100 years approx.
I am finding it very difficult to believe that the millenial Kingdom which Jesus in theory inaugurated in 70 A.D. with His supposed return doesn't at all live up to the advertising that every tear would be wiped away from their eyes... The sorrowful lamentation in Gaza, Sudan, and Pakistan (80% of the population without access to clean water)---> does the advent of the Kingdom really leave those pockets of misery unattended? Sorry, that is nonsensical...
@@ColinWrubleski-eq5sh the “millennium” was 30-70 AD .
@@allthingsbing1295 : You have GOT to be kidding...
@@ColinWrubleski-eq5sh I am just going by what the Bible says.
Don't forget that some will come to tempt you with the bible in their hands! By carefully fooling you into believing the interpretation of "day age" they are opening a large gateway towards reinterpreting other important passages! Read Basil the Great or if you want something more adapted to your modern ear, read Father Seraphim Rose. Re-read Genesis the KJV and you will easily see that our Lord is all powerful, and he created the heaven and the earth using literal 6 days of 24h each. He did not create inferior creatures then superior creatures, or some creatures and then after a milion years some more. In Genesis we get a picture of an Almighty God creating all that is needed beautiful and ready to multiply - complete creatures. Concerning the laws of physics that do not change look again at genesis. God did not change the laws, he just added new laws as punishments (intense physical labour in order to get food out of the earth, multiplied child bearing suffering for the women, decay, death etc) Man became evil and he was chased out of the place that was originally intended for him so he would not eat from the tree of life and become immortal. We are now in our fallen state away from the glory of God which explains all the sufferings that we have to get through.
People like Hitler or Mussolini cannot live long lives. Death is the cost of sin. A sinful man will not live a long life.
Your reasoning may be a bit off.
i am amazed at how he spent so much time on this bullshit explanation... its just heresy
Thank you for so much richness. But, no neanderthal man. And no neanderthal man living 40,000 years ago. That was part of the evolution theory. The Jews/Yahudym have been keeping the time and the year, according to Michael Rood-- excellent time keeper, it is the year 6024 (as of Oct 17, 2024). // Anyone reading this who is not saved, ask the Messiah to be your Savior.
Not sure what's going on here. If made so plausible with all these qualifications (an education in itself; who has it?), then the Bible should have mass appeal. Everything makes specific sense now whereas there was mystery before with the onus on believing rather than understanding. If we were to rewrite the Bible the way Dr. Ross has it, would we still have, as a result, the Bible, or some other work? I am not sure where to draw a line. So many versions of the Bible have been written but all maintain a high degree of the supernatural and hard to grasp. Why has the "Dr. Ross Bible" not yet been written? Or has it? And how far can we bend science to incorporate the "facts" of the Bible? I'd love to follow Dr. Ross, but am not sure about the role and extent of interpretation, even, or especially, if correct! What happens to the Bible and us? What remains to believe? And wasn't faith the cornerstone of Christianity? I am now very much puzzled. I wrote to Reasons in Canada about just this point but haven't got a reply as yet.
FORGET H ROSS, STICK TO THE THE ONLY CORRECT TRANSLATION OF THE BIBLE THE KING JAMES AND LIVE FOR CHRIST WHO DIED FOR YOU, ROSE VICTORIOUS FROM THE GRAVE AND IS COMING BACK VERY SOON NOW. CONCENTRATE ON THE IMPORTANT STUFF. YOU CAN ASK JESUS ONE DAY TO EXPLAIN GENESIS. GOD BLESS YOU LAD
Don't be too easy on yourself. No, H Ross is great as he leads me to see these "book of nature" truths revealed in the Bible and vice versa. Also, I don't think God is a stickler for words, we can use interpretation without contradicting the spirit of the Holy Book. After all, He has given us the capacity of think.
I tend to agree with you and thank you. Be God with you.
@@pauljepson1379 Paul I agree totally. At 27:00 Mr. Ross says, “Let there be lights in the sky. God didn’t make the sun, moon and stars.” Reg flags are shooting up. Gen l :16, “And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.” King James Bible. I don’t know which Bible he believes, but it’s wrong. Sounds like Mr. Ross is am evolutionist to me. I can’t figure out Genesis 1, but I believe every word in my King James Bible. Our focus is to go out into all the world and preach the Gospel. Keep standing on God’s word brother!!
Are you Christian, water baptised Holy Spirit filled. Do you fellowship at a church. It seems you have many questions and are searching on an intellectual basis. Your questions could be shared with the church pastor/Christian brothers/sisters.
Dr Ross has often stated on TH-cam that he can be personally contacted ( Instagram/Twitter ) and willingly answers questions
Hugh Ross did Stephen Hawkings voice. Fact. He's also as wrong as Stephen Hawking.
Read this.
Old earth
“If God used unique creative processes to bring the universe into being, one cannot expect to understand the universe by applying “standard models” that are, by nature, oblivious to creative processes.”
EXACTLY! So why would any believer in a Creator God accept the secular theory of the origin of the universe when it is built on the assumption that there could not have been any miracles. Why would God choose to create the universe in such a way as to fit the secular assumptions about it’s origin? It would almost be like He is trying to hide the fact that He was involved in the creation/origin of the universe. But that is not like God. On the contrary, He puts His glory on display so to me, it makes no sense whatsoever to try to read the Bible in such a way as to harmonize with the godless secular view of the origin of the universe. Makes no sense whatsoever.
Hugh Ross is so stuck in his self made paradigm to fit the Bible into his science. Sad. Sad.
Stop whining
God came to me and told me that all religious scripture created by man. He told me that religious scripture is the test.
Probably the opposer of God posing as an angel of light. Not called the deceiver and liar for no reason. Just too much evidence that the bible is true. The rest of religious writings- he’s probably behind those as well as one of his schenes
@@pierrenel5767 God’s message was clear. Live life by man made religious scripture and fail the test.
Come on , we're to give credence and have faith in a fictional Jewish messiah who is invisible to observe and interact with and has promised that he would return " SOON " some 1900 + years ago ( revelation chapter 22 ) when he jesus forecast that the time was " Near " and Not seal up the scroll as in Daniel when he would return with his fathers celestial kingdom , which is Long , Long , Long overdue ! And we are to have faith in a false prophet and someone who was clearly wrong and deluded about himself and what was about to happen ? Now that's CRAZY !
Stop whining
Ross's presentation would have had greater credibility if he would have shared his god proposition with Aron Ra or Forrest Tucker ! But he would have Lost !
Aaron Ra? Really? That’s the best you got?
There are plenty of reasons NOT to believe, but you have to have a brain.
Yea, claiming to believe Bible, and still talking about billions years nonsense.... when Bible clearly states The Days!
"Day" does not necessarily mean a 24 hour day. Also, the word has more than one meaning in Hebrew.
Ex 20:8-11 God says they were 24 hour days.
Man, I listened to this and I could not believe how many lies he said. Animals did NOT appear all at once when the oxygen level reached 8%. And even if that were true, it is the fine tuning fallacy argument.
His books site the published studies. He has receipts and has made them available to you. He is an astrophysicist... the biology is taken from the works of the leading biologists and their published works. Most of them atheists. But scientific discovery is scientific discovery regardless of your beliefs.
God created the heavens and the Earth
First the heaven's before the actual ⁰ Earth
God called the dry land EARTH on the third day
Of creation
God called the FIRMAMENT HEAVEN on the
SECOND day of the creation
The EARTH was without form and VOID on the
First day of the creation
JOB 38 verse. 4. and 7 WHEN I LAID THE FOUNDATIONS
O] THE EARTH THE MORNING STARS SANG TOGETHER
and all sons of God shouted for joy