Infant Universe | Hugh Ross and Brian Keating

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 46

  • @DrBrianKeating
    @DrBrianKeating 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Thank you so much for hosting me, Hugh. This was great fun with a highly skilled and professional team and I am looking forward to more chats in the future😊

    • @RTB_official
      @RTB_official  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      We loved having you join us! Looking forward to many more conversations!

    • @Chazd1949
      @Chazd1949 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Astronomy and QM are my favorite science topics. Now I have to buy and read one of your books. Thanks for all of the work you do to advance our understanding of the universe!

    • @DrBrianKeating
      @DrBrianKeating 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Chazd1949thx I hope
      You enjoy

    • @gregrice1354
      @gregrice1354 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thanks for your kind acceptance to discuss your powerful experiences in advancing astrophysics observations with Dr. Ross, Dr. Keating. I've seen you appear on some other TH-cam videos, as well, discussing deep philosophical and scientific verification/qualification of advanced theories.
      I'm no scientist, but I volunteered with Reasons To Believe for about 20 years, and am glad to see Dr. Ross so pleased to interact publicly with experts in his field. You are a great inspiration for everyone involved.

    • @DrBrianKeating
      @DrBrianKeating 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@gregrice1354 🙏

  • @andrettanylund830
    @andrettanylund830 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    God bless Hugh Ross. He has taught me so much. A brilliant man that is very humble and kind. Love you Hugh

  • @slamrn9689
    @slamrn9689 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The CMB - "Let there be light!". Thanks for having Brian Keating on. This was a very informative and interesting interview.

  • @truincanada
    @truincanada 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I believe this intelligent astronomer has maintained and now accelerated his academic velocity throughout his still young career. Outstanding. May you receive the results and answers promptly and with vigor. God be praised.

  • @Chazd1949
    @Chazd1949 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    This was a great discussion between two scholars who have an exceptional gift to communicate the intricacies of science to non-specialists. I hope Dr. Ross will have Dr. Keating back again as a guest for more of this fascinating content.

    • @RTB_official
      @RTB_official  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Thank you for the feedback and kind words. We are so glad you enjoyed it!

    • @edsnantonio
      @edsnantonio 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I'm a Humanities major at heart trying to get a handle on Physics 101 & QM 101. Hence I can only understand either field by osmosis. Difficult but I "soldier" on in these two fields.😎

  • @MichaelUle
    @MichaelUle 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I really appreciated this episode, it has to be one of my favorite -- it is rare to see anyone challenge statements of fact in videos on this channel, and I really appreciated Brian's willingness to challenge Hugh's statements in order to bring greater clarity to the discussion, it was all very "enlightening!" I look forward to the next time Brian is on the show!

    • @RTB_official
      @RTB_official  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      We appreciate your feedback. Thanks for watching and joining the conversation!

  • @jasonmrosek342
    @jasonmrosek342 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Way to go Dr. Keating and thanks RTB for bringing him on.

    • @RTB_official
      @RTB_official  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching! :)

  • @dgh5760
    @dgh5760 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    2 of my favorite hosts on TH-cam channels. This was a real treat for me. Thank you both Dr. Ross and Dr. Keating! It was an unexpected pairing to hear you both discuss the same topic.

  • @fadeitluie9356
    @fadeitluie9356 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Awesome video brothers Amen

  • @gregrice1354
    @gregrice1354 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dr. Ross, you have that deep, happy glint in your eyes and grin on your face after talking with Dr Keating! It looks like the joy of a 4 to 6 year child on Christmas Eve or Christmas Day. (I can't speak for Boxing Day.)
    This chat is encouraging for RTB supporters as well, as we hear hints of recognition of you and your super, solid knowledge and experience and skills in the science of astrophysics and observations.
    I am finding more opportunities online to suggest scientists, and those interested in the field, such as viewers of Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder's TH-cam channel, to consider the issues of E.T. intelligent, and those factors started with the rough Drake Equation model, and learning the new 300 measurements of evidence of necessary Fine Tuning of the cosmos for ANY life. I suggest that they consider applying the SETI type search and critical thinking back to time on Earth, between about 2,000 B.C. and A.D. 300.

  • @LukaszStolarczuk
    @LukaszStolarczuk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Plain brilliant! Can't wait for more news. Well done guys.

  • @terryoquinn8199
    @terryoquinn8199 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow ! Once again completely blown away by depth of knowledge Dr. Ross brings to the discussion . And thank you for having Dr. Keating on , the same applies to him as well ! I’m barely able to follow along and frequently have to rewind and hear parts again but I’m slowly being converted into an astrophysicist ! Hobby level at best . This is amazing work I didn’t know existed , so again , thank you both for taking the time to explain your thoughts and positions . Take care and may God bless you both and your work . Amen !

  • @bevnfred
    @bevnfred 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great conversation. Makes me want to know more, having never heard about B-mode polarization.

  • @pierreabbat6157
    @pierreabbat6157 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What's B mode? I know of three kinds of polarization: orthogonal, diagonal, and circular; each coming in two opposite senses.

  • @JaneSmith-x4x
    @JaneSmith-x4x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you

  • @lurgee-yh8ej
    @lurgee-yh8ej 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great guest

  • @laurafortier9295
    @laurafortier9295 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We finally live in an era that an observer with no knowledge of our culture would think we were sharing childhood fantasies. "We decided to build a telescope in the south pole. And then we upgraded it. Because it was cheaper than putting it in space". 😅😅😅

  • @Seekthetruth3000
    @Seekthetruth3000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It all depends on your definition of God. Good discussion.

  • @ji8044
    @ji8044 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Enjoyed it, but I'm not ashamed to say that I only understood about 20% of it.

  • @lukelovell1055
    @lukelovell1055 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ok. Now I need an explanation to his explanation in the beginning haha

  • @gmotionedc5412
    @gmotionedc5412 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And why was Brian taken out of the leadership of his project?? What happened? He never tells that story.

  • @pierreabbat6157
    @pierreabbat6157 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Beware the polar bear's biceps!

  • @stevenwiederholt7000
    @stevenwiederholt7000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Brian Keating is going to get into Trouble going on RTB!

    • @Chazd1949
      @Chazd1949 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I hope not. He demonstrates an openness to an intelligent discussion, knowing that many other scientists share that same sentiment. As Christians, we know that the "heavens declare the glory of God," and the more we learn about the heavens, the more we learn about the infinitely wise and powerful Creator. Our desire is for more scientists to know that Creator also, and in a personal way.

    • @stevenwiederholt7000
      @stevenwiederholt7000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Chazd1949
      I'm A FAN, because of his openness

    • @Chazd1949
      @Chazd1949 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stevenwiederholt7000 Me too!

    • @paulclancy789
      @paulclancy789 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is a disgrace and truly unscientific. To shutdown ideas is to shut down knowledge, especially those ideas you don't agree with.

  • @PiersYves-k2z
    @PiersYves-k2z 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jackson Gary Johnson Ruth Jones Laura

  • @Detectken
    @Detectken 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I still prefer the Rh=ct universe, Big Bang model. It has the universe at about 13.97 +/- 0.08 to 14.01 +/- 0.08 billion years old, and doesn’t use inflation. It also beats the standard inflation model in almost every head-to-head test.

  • @timkhan3238
    @timkhan3238 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    lol, this is the universe of Genesis 1:1 based upon the imagination of Dr. Hugh Ross. lol, how in the world that Dr. Hugh Ross applies the present world to the PERFECT UNIVERSE in Genesis 1:1? Have he experienced living inside the perfect universe where you don't grow old and die? Where decay doesn't exists? He can do this only by doing gymnastics in his brains. EVOLUTIONISTS DO THIS IN A REGULAR BASIS.
    So, now you have readings of GENESIS 1:1 ACCORDING TO DR. HUGH ROSS. If he believes that his readings are the correct one, WHY WON'T HE MAKE a BIBLE base ON MILLIONS OF YEARS? That way, HIS CONVERTS will have PERFECT CORRECT READINGS. Stop using day. Instead, apply your readings based on your imagination. That's what your religion truly believes in.

    • @paulclancy789
      @paulclancy789 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Your lack of understanding is galactic.

    • @timkhan3238
      @timkhan3238 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@paulclancy789 please educate me

  • @lorenzor124
    @lorenzor124 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could Dr. Ross comment on that structure on the moon called Iapetus? What does he think it is?
    Richard Hoagland has some fascinating info about it.
    Is it simply natural, or was it built by the rebel angels?