The Nub Of India-China Boundary Row

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 192

  • @umeshdesh
    @umeshdesh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Why golden opportunity to get POK was lost in 1971 war. We should have bargained against the release of 90000 Pakistani soldiers

    • @ameyabakre4609
      @ameyabakre4609 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      India has always wants to mother India to entire world...

    • @raviptv
      @raviptv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Going by Pakistan track record of disowning their Martyrs in wars. Don't think it would have made any difference to Pakistan.....

    • @swaminathanr8794
      @swaminathanr8794 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Greatest blunder was to give up occupied territories in 1971 war which 1000s of Indian army soldiers gave their life for..India should have taken Gilgit, which now Pakistan is gifted to Chinese for CPEC corridor

    • @ameyabakre4609
      @ameyabakre4609 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@raviptv Please take a note that same solders were present in next kargil war against India..

    • @SureshKumar-lm9qy
      @SureshKumar-lm9qy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They would disown their own . Cheap types.

  • @saurabhtiwari7810
    @saurabhtiwari7810 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    It is the best explanation I have seen of this conflict. Thank you

  • @AmitSingh-nl7mp
    @AmitSingh-nl7mp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We stand with our leadership and army..everything for country..jai hind..

  • @sguptamech
    @sguptamech 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I think India is equally responsible for not manning the its boundries for more than a decade after independance.

  • @praveenlakhe2471
    @praveenlakhe2471 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Whats different this time?
    Its not shephards,nomads,etc.who noticed and alerted agencies but the security forces.
    Its huge difference this time.

  • @reetipandey2768
    @reetipandey2768 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir your presentation is immaculate, making even the most complex of issues very lucid to understand. Keep going!!

  • @promodebandyopadhyay1686
    @promodebandyopadhyay1686 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    More people need to watch SNG. I find SNG to be very clear and informative.

  • @iphonesmartphone7948
    @iphonesmartphone7948 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Clean and clear explanation, one of the best I have heard so far. Thank-you for this episode.

  • @treckmaster4
    @treckmaster4 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Superbly explained. Appreciate the clarity this video brought about on the Chinese claim lines. Thank you Mr Nitin

  • @damodarbhat1344
    @damodarbhat1344 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Good information and narrative, liked it

  • @rsridhar63
    @rsridhar63 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Clear... This time the map remained nearly still making it easier to correlate the narration to the image... 👍

  • @rallapalliprabhu1998
    @rallapalliprabhu1998 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for clear historic perspective of the conflict.We should free Tibet.

  • @srinivasmorey4229
    @srinivasmorey4229 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir You Are Doing A Tremendous Job Of Brefing The People Who Sre Interested

  • @kapilrana5075
    @kapilrana5075 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Stratnews should release 5 to 7 to 10 minutes documentaries without any anchor n fill it with pics n vidoes and quotes every week on defence issues around the world..thats the surest way to rise your subscribers..pls do it.

  • @venkatesanraviram
    @venkatesanraviram 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great. Informative

  • @subhashwigh5583
    @subhashwigh5583 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great👌👌really very very informative,thanks alot

  • @Vikramadithya02
    @Vikramadithya02 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the video. Right timing.

  • @RajAil
    @RajAil 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sir Thanks for the walk down to the root cause of this clashes. Sir I would like you to make a detail analysis of the cost for both the Country in case of limited war in Himalayas!

  • @ashwinbadri2976
    @ashwinbadri2976 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great work NG, good insights and the most authentic and realistic perspective of the ground situation and long term challenges ahead for us .

  • @ravindervenkataraman7009
    @ravindervenkataraman7009 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Nitin ji 🙏🏿 for the clear explanation of the Ladakh border situation and background.

  • @rajiblochanpanigrahi2198
    @rajiblochanpanigrahi2198 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks sir.. always waiting for your individual lecture... explanation with proper representation is knowledgefull..🤗🤗 thanks

  • @akmachama5025
    @akmachama5025 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for updating

  • @sumitvfx
    @sumitvfx 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for explaining in simple terms... really simply nitin

  • @shubhamsingh7816
    @shubhamsingh7816 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for such good analysis and info graphics !

  • @sunitjain7333
    @sunitjain7333 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks, Nitin....v good info

  • @amudhanr2666
    @amudhanr2666 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb and impartial analysis giving facts,as usual 👏 👌

  • @spartan-self4518
    @spartan-self4518 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good work sir .. keep us informing 🤙🤙

  • @Vinodkumar-bm9ig
    @Vinodkumar-bm9ig 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your videos with lot information which young generation don’t know sir .. keep doing good work

  • @hkpcnair
    @hkpcnair 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Precisely explained using map. Thank you sir.

    • @nestser
      @nestser 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      what he did not tell you is India map of 1950 showed the border as undefined. Only in 1954 India came up with its border claim, based on mixing two historical documents from different decades. Google and read the academic paper 'Treaties, Maps and the Western Sector of the Sino-Indian Boundary Dispute'
      By ALASTAIR LAMB

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nestser Same with Chinese map before 1949..

    • @nestser
      @nestser 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Vipra vipra Definitely not the same. We do not just declare a new border unilaterally, out of no where, like the India case. China's objective is to define its border through new treaty signed by PRC itself, although historical claim does have a role in the process. The problem is India believe it's all well defined and no disputes at all, at least before the 1962 war, which is not true. Basically recognizing vs denying existence of the problem.

    • @hkpcnair
      @hkpcnair 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nestser Xinjiang and Tibet both are occupied by china and will be free soon.

    • @nestser
      @nestser 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hari Only after Kashmir becomes independent and away from India!

  • @MAHENDRADALVIGoa47
    @MAHENDRADALVIGoa47 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This time China has miscalculated and is in dilemma.

  • @thirutheboss1212
    @thirutheboss1212 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Clear explanation sir.. good work..

  • @nagindersahota7276
    @nagindersahota7276 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent!

  • @visheshverma6240
    @visheshverma6240 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great clip, very informative

  • @souravmukherjee8620
    @souravmukherjee8620 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Informative episode

  • @karthikb5
    @karthikb5 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    1. Excellent analysis Sir, as always
    2. Shifting goal-post behavior from China - clearly tells, they do not really want to settle anything but keep the fire on

  • @virenbgada
    @virenbgada 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good explanation & great job.

  • @alokkumarsingh1852
    @alokkumarsingh1852 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One of best on strategy affairs.

  • @blackmamba3427
    @blackmamba3427 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video and commentary 👌

  • @AMITKUMAR_Hindu
    @AMITKUMAR_Hindu 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for great information 🙏

  • @manurashkaushal9325
    @manurashkaushal9325 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Superb Sir

  • @alokbhattacharya6523
    @alokbhattacharya6523 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful explanation ...

  • @Abbyramrosy
    @Abbyramrosy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well explained

  • @kumarkr3599
    @kumarkr3599 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Clearly explained, the Chinese ever - widening claims with changing colors.

  • @VijeDerm
    @VijeDerm 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very neatly put

  • @sanjayram4831
    @sanjayram4831 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    vacuum created by the deficiencies of our on make,lead this crisis and will continue till we overcome them.

  • @shubhampandey9812
    @shubhampandey9812 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Nitin Sir for this as well as for previous episodes of simply Nitin it is very very informative for us to know what's was going in Ladakh form past several times. Sir my request is to make one video on Battle of rezangla on mighty mountains of Himalaya. I want to know the details of how small company of Kumaon regiment defeated the chinese army.

  • @rajbodepudi
    @rajbodepudi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    India should lead to a global
    Coalition to Free Tibet!

  • @craumm
    @craumm 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please talk of Pulam Sumda/o and couple of other areas in HP and UK that China claims (as per Google maps). Is that area militarised and safe from incursions?

  • @ABHILASH307
    @ABHILASH307 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir pls do make a video explaining why India lost the 1962 war ,if possible try to cover it sector wise

  • @nirmal3028
    @nirmal3028 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If China is accepting to 1959, India must not fall into trap, whole Aksai chin belongs to India and Tibet was illegally occupied, India must directly hit the bull eye by declaring Tibet as independent country, anyhow Tibet security will be maintained by Indian army till Tibet builds its army........lets workout solution that will benefit India to maximum. Mr Nitin Explanation and Clarification about border issue from 1950 to 1962 & present condition was excellent ,clear & to the point . Mr Nitin can contribute well in Ministry of external affairs

  • @subramanyapadmanabhan1548
    @subramanyapadmanabhan1548 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whereas, we are strategically located in Andaman-Nicobar, there is a Myanmar owned island in the vicinity which the owner government not finding worth, they leased out to China instead of India: the Coco Islands, 3 of them where the Chinese have built up an airport and some buildingsfrom which they can watch us. Govt. of India must.

    • @subramanyapadmanabhan1548
      @subramanyapadmanabhan1548 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      must acquire them from Myanmar on lease or sale to ward off Chinese from Coco Islands.

  • @rajeev4243
    @rajeev4243 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am a bit confused on the 1959 claim line which appears to be quite East of existing LAC..? At least that's what it appears in the multiple maps I have seen till now including today's video. Would be grateful Mr Gokhale if you could explain why we should not accept 1959 line 9f it means PLA moving back substantially from present positions?

    • @nirmal3028
      @nirmal3028 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why means, whole aksai chin belongs to India, by accepting 1959 boundary, India will give up Aksai chin fully to China

  • @nayanbuch4075
    @nayanbuch4075 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    As you mentioned about 1959 as lac is giving more area in Ladakh region as compared to present lac .I think China can not give the area which they have already occupied.There must be some big game in their mind and under standing it GOI refused to accept it. What is the game can you explain?

  • @arunbhatia6344
    @arunbhatia6344 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent piece of analysis. Didn’t know that Indians, till 1957 used patrol right up to the edge of Aksai Chin !
    Let’s say, hypothetically India goes offensive, do they have a chance to go back and create a border till the edge of Aksai Chin ?!

  • @BlessedReader
    @BlessedReader 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nitinji...don't you think you should start differentiating between the Tibet Autonomous Region and China in your maps?

  • @SureshKumar-lm9qy
    @SureshKumar-lm9qy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Clear explanation .👍

  • @louistao9505
    @louistao9505 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As long as India don’t join the belt and road and try to counter it... China and India border will never be resolved... China need that border dispute...China don’t need an inch of India land... they need India to join China... that’s the long goal...

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      No that's not, long term goal of Chinese Communist Party is to eliminate all the future potential rivals in their quest for world dominance..

    •  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      BRI was started by Xi Jinping. Border troubles between India and China going on since 1959.

    • @louistao9505
      @louistao9505 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Vipra vipra... wtf U.S can’t even do that how can China dominate the world.... they need allies like Russia and India... its China wishful thinking if they think they can win Russia in a war...

  • @praveendugar4122
    @praveendugar4122 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    नितिन जी एक छोटा सा सुझाव कृपया लड़ाक की जगह लद्दाख ही उच्चारण करने का प्रयास करें। प्रचलन में यही है

  • @vijaykadam7950
    @vijaykadam7950 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nitin can you throw some light on QUAD

  • @adroitspartan7907
    @adroitspartan7907 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why doesn't the govt put a "no quid pro quo wealth tax" on Indian billionaires in India they have a lot to lose(mcap) from an all out war and none of them sacrifice any of their progeny to the motherland. The forces can be equipped with better hardware and gear from the proceeds. Also, preference in access to central funds and FDI should be given to states/communities who provide the most(%) manpower to the forces not the others who give so little but take so much ...

  • @surendrabarsode8959
    @surendrabarsode8959 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good program. Please also make some programs on possible war/battle scenarios and how we are pitched against the Chinese. This will give us a better understanding of the ground level situation. Of course, we all know that now LAC is LOC and in future, we will be face to face with the Chinese but we are fully capable of defending against them and protect areas under our physical control. The issue is if we can ever take back areas under our official map and how.

  • @shanu7uday
    @shanu7uday 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If CRPF used to patrol till Lanka La, then how come we had no hint of such large highway being built by China 1955???

  • @tusharkorde6015
    @tusharkorde6015 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If India still claims the Axai Chin, why India want to clarify LAC?

  • @pravin3783
    @pravin3783 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    1959 Chinese claim line is beyond current LAC? Are Chinese ready to vacate area in between, if India agrees to accept it as IB?

  • @jaswindersian3159
    @jaswindersian3159 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ideal opportunity to get back POK back and drive China to its original border with Tibet. India did not have a border with China.

  • @sunilkumar-lb6en
    @sunilkumar-lb6en 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can u pl talk sometime about china's internal politics in occupied Tibet region and whether in the event of war india can get some advantage.

  • @vinodhkona9936
    @vinodhkona9936 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow we did not discovered a highway for a decade which is built on our land🤭🤭

  • @dunkinpossum
    @dunkinpossum 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    News outta Force magazine is that the Chinese hav black topped roads, established an ecological system n laid down microfibre cables...n here I hear that they rn't as prepared as the IDF?
    I'm sure that we'll hear/know more after this winter passes.

    • @sarathnair5466
      @sarathnair5466 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Force magazine brings out points on a different manner... what they say cannot be neglected...however whatever is happening in India-China border may not end well for anyone...hopefully this will be resolved in a peaceful manner... it will end as nuclear war and other adversaries will involve.... China has done a number of blunders .. they have made almost all major world powers as their enemies.. i will not be surprised to see a Chinese revolution against CCP in near future even a part of PLA could turn against them..

  • @SuperRambala
    @SuperRambala 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    1959 line seems to be ok, compared to 1962 line or today where they are , why we are concerned

  • @sekarsubburam8656
    @sekarsubburam8656 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pl enlighten us on Depsong area. Who is in advantageous position vis-a-vis the LAC stand off. Why we are not forthcoming to capture Akchaichin. A lready we have given a long rope to Pakistan vis-a-vis capturing of the POK . Now it is time which we should not loose.

  • @ddarrenmsamey8115
    @ddarrenmsamey8115 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    China deployment seems not to contain but to confront and expand continuously . As you rightly said Creepy forward strategy

  • @snair10
    @snair10 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Nithin, nice to know some new points. Can you please throw some light on the Kailash range, as you mentioned now India is in control of it does it mean the sacred pilgrimage where we go to will not require a visa from Chinese from now on.
    Regards
    Satish

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No Kailash range is not same Kailash mansarovar mountain..

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kailash range is south of Spranggar Tso lake across Indus river..

  • @craumm
    @craumm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amit Shah statement; is it really that important. Barely anyone sees parliamentary proceedings even in India🤔

    • @craumm
      @craumm 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Kambojas Kambo yes. But a lot goes in the parliament proceedings and literally no one hears them

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Kambojas Kambo It's our birth right claims which is same as China claims Arunachal Pradesh..
      So China don't feel shame about this, so I don't feel India should feel the same..
      Besides India in 1994 under PV Narsimha Rao had passed the Parliamentary resolution on the Undivided State of Jammu and Kashmir..
      hwnews.in/news/opinion/pv-narasimha-rao-india-kashmir/47630

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Kambojas Kambo Besides China is unapologetic about the One China policy so why should we not be on United one India policy..

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Kambojas Kambo The Indian parliament unanimously passed Kashmir Resolution on 22 February 1994. The resolution read: “On behalf of the People of India, the Indian Parliament firmly declares that:
      (a) The State of Jammu & Kashmir has been, is and shall be an integral part of India and any attempts to separate it from the rest of the country will be resisted by all necessary means; (b) India has the will and capacity to firmly counter all designs against its unity, sovereignty and territorial integrity; and demands that (c) Pakistan must vacate the areas of the Indian State of Jammu and Kashmir, which they have occupied through aggression; and resolves that (d) All attempts to interfere in the internal affairs of India will be met resolutely.”

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Kambojas Kambo Just relax and chill..
      People before 2019 were saying same things regarding Ram mandir and Article 370 issues that's it just political gimmick of BJP, Modi had proven them wrong..
      Basically Government is planning about it but maybe due to secrecy they will not tell when they will take the steps..
      So when the Government take the steps we as a responsible citizen should help the government and Indian Army to recover our lost territories..

  • @shanu7uday
    @shanu7uday 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    एक बात समझ नहीं आयी.. जब १९६२ में हमारी हार हो गई थी, तो उस ज़मीन (अक्साई चीन) पर चीन का हक़ हुआ ना ?

  • @rikbhattacharya5019
    @rikbhattacharya5019 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Infrastructure is the only answer, we have our massive capable military concentrated in comparatively small area than C. _ (#IN), -@ . If our army can reach in place xyz at the border then our northern neighbor has no chance, on top of that if we can effectively use quad as a military alliance in the naval front.

  • @ddarrenmsamey8115
    @ddarrenmsamey8115 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good post 👌👍👏👏 Also make a post on Honey trap , Debt trap etc , Spying etc, About Percentages to be paid to CCP from business profits of Chinese companies in foreign companies in detail if any for info

  • @carryon2197
    @carryon2197 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    We have traditionally had excellent relations with Tibet. Help the Tibetans in their struggle for freedom. Once Tibetans establish their Independent self rule surely border differences resolve completely.
    It is for the world to recognise the plight of Tibetans loosing their homeland & under constant subjugation. Elsewhere if Israelis could be sympathised with to find their home, so why not Tibetans.
    Tibetans need all the help to stay free in their homeland. Then it would be meaningful to resolve border differences with the gentle Buddhist people of Tibet than greedy CCP.

    • @craumm
      @craumm 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tibetans are almost a minority in Tibet

    • @pokbanegahindustan2160
      @pokbanegahindustan2160 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Instead of India, at first USA should support Tibetans like they did in Afganistan against USSR

  • @mayakoushik
    @mayakoushik 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Might is right.

  • @aniltewari7043
    @aniltewari7043 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    We have to take tuff stand this time against China . Engage them in a long stand off and wait for a situation when we can put pressure on them to solve the boundary issues once for ever . This time exchange of , negotiated map is a must . Both of us can't afford conflict and standoff for a long period .

  • @mr.d2124
    @mr.d2124 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    🙏🔥🔥

  • @illuminatusdeus3051
    @illuminatusdeus3051 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you deal with someone who wants to save his face, but wants another to lose theirs? They want to be seen as a superpower, prince regent, leader but to another, they want diminished and humiliated? I think this is inevitable, India has to militarize their borders. I am talking serious militarization with land mines so that they stop creeping in further. They will not fight a war because their supply lines will be stretched from the plateau. And if they sink into Indian territory, Indian slope disadvantage becomes their disadvantage, they think Indians aren't able to do that. You cannot allow another element of surprise, instead, claim Aksai Chin and bargain it for dropping their claims on Arunachal. Simple trade, less drama, the Chinese have lost Tawang, this needs to be accepted. India is China's counter weight, this needs to be accepted by them.

  • @sandeepssangha
    @sandeepssangha 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    High chance China will try to repeat 1962 on 20-22nd October this year.. They like to repeat old playbook which worked for them earlier.

    • @cctvcamera2105
      @cctvcamera2105 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      China is not interested any war

    • @Partha.N
      @Partha.N 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cctvcamera2105 , China interested in bat soup.

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      India is prepared and no of troops they requested to overrun the entire LAC would be more than 1 million+..

  • @nrao8977
    @nrao8977 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rehashing old stories will not help.
    Glad MEA has declined to take Chinese offer - that was to be expected. But, the continued silence is very undemocratic. Once a month GoI should appraise of the status.

  • @tarunpoddar4913
    @tarunpoddar4913 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should hand it to the Chinese that they had a strategic view even when the Communists came to power in 1949 and they have worked continuously towards this end. Nibbling, salami slicing, two steps forward one step back or creation of artificial islands and the EEZ with it was and is an ongoing process towards it’s expansionism . USA fell to lobbying of American business interests to bury the hatchet during the Nixon era and compromised it’s strategic interests. USA is now confronted by a Frankenstein. India unfortunately at the time of Independence was led by a political novice who believed in morality even after the recent tragedy of the War and wanted to do away with the Army. The politicians failed India time and again. The Chinese communists are to thrashed like a bully and thrown out of Aksai Chin.

  • @sanjayv8467
    @sanjayv8467 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It will help us to understand the Chinese aggression better if you could delve & explain about this "Middle Kingdom Syndrome". Also provide references for serious researchers.

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just Google 'TianXia' ... Wikipedia article wouldbe good enough..

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Basically Chinese emperor are son of heaven and whatever the land lies below the Heaven (sky) is there domain or territories..
      No other nation is there equal to them and everyone has to pay tribute to them..

  • @shiladityadas8791
    @shiladityadas8791 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very illaborately discussed about the line of control changed by time. Only option to tackle Imperial china a strong military resistance. As China take care a fig any agreement as seen from past as communists are always double standards and imperial by heart. Like to have a details discussion on Arunachal Pradesh and latest situation about Himachal Pradesh & Uttarakhand border with Cina occupied Tibet.

  • @hemangmehta7081
    @hemangmehta7081 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    We expect your analysis on how much we still need to prepare to get an edge over the Chinese and a crushing defeat so that nobody dares to attack india

  • @frostbyte8285
    @frostbyte8285 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    *World should Prepare for Long term China Chalange.*

  • @nvmsivaji
    @nvmsivaji 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, how is India prepared to face tank warfare of China in Depsang and DBO areas?

  • @JBC100
    @JBC100 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    After all this happened...I'm really looking India army has to teach a lesson to China by advancing forward in peak winter and Occupy Aksai Chin and give a bloody nose 👃

  • @vp4439
    @vp4439 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What you have ignored is QUAD alliance and US realisation that India needs support of US leadership

  • @KaranKaran-wy7er
    @KaranKaran-wy7er 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    About Chinese Stand Off - Chinese Smoke Screen is not Depsung Or Finger 4 Ladak it's.. Making Gilgit Baltistan 5th State of Pakistan for CPEC than Retreat.... Unless statblity is maintain in Gil-Balt the stand off will prevail.... 😂😂😂😂

  • @santoshr2984
    @santoshr2984 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Insecurity in Chinese minds is a good thing :0)

  • @indd7871
    @indd7871 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    whenver you have time make a episode on Pakistan like not only for border dispute with India but also afghanistan and what price it paid to China in 60s .

  • @umeshdesh
    @umeshdesh 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why India has never tried to get back POK including Gilgit Baltistan and Aksai Chin which we claim ours.

    • @dilipmundhada5875
      @dilipmundhada5875 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It has no guts. Moreover India lacked killing spirit. All this could have been settled and sorted out during 1971 war and win. We have lost the war on negotiating table. Indira Gandhi was drunk during Shimla summit.

    • @nestser
      @nestser 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then why separate Pakistan? Regretting now?

  • @humayunbawkher5372
    @humayunbawkher5372 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Insightful, but if you ask China to explain or justify its border claims it too will present similar or even older maps possibly dating back to the Chinese Middle Kingdom era that they believe in . So the border issue and tension will probably linger and cost a lot of money. People in India should rally thank Mr Amit Shah and Mr Modi for so unwisely stoking this border issue by claiming POK and Aksai Chin.

    • @VijaySingh-oh6gl
      @VijaySingh-oh6gl 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They have passed a bill in parliament showing Ladakh and JnK, to do that in Indian Parliament u have to face opposition n then u have to explain why u show something which u don't have, hence they said we will take back Aksai Chin, because otherwise opposition will not sit quite as ruling party will gain upperhand without saying this so they made them say this . China got alarmed that India is going to take back Aksai Chin. But ur statement comes from fear that China will obliterate us and what not, that's the first time in so many 100 years China has worried and that's very good indeed, it is not used to such utterances from any Indian in last 100years. India will not lose an inch now. Chinese cannot fight Vietnamese on land let alone Indian Army which is ready to fight China alongwith Air and Naval support. Thanks to Amit Shah and Modiji for doing this.

  • @alecmisra4964
    @alecmisra4964 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well i dont think india can get a hard border with this claim line anyway, so it seems to be a hoax offer.

  • @SuperRambala
    @SuperRambala 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Simple, When China occupied Tibet, the trouble started not due to Aksai chin or not

  • @azhakathranjith
    @azhakathranjith 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Nitin, would 1959 line (yellow line) be a sensible option especially since India will get a part of Aksai chin and solve a long standing dispute

    • @kmhjn4363
      @kmhjn4363 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whole Aksai Chin belongs to India.

  • @huanghermann5207
    @huanghermann5207 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is very clear but it's Indian version, not the Chinese version of interpretation, hence the dispute.

    • @huanghermann5207
      @huanghermann5207 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Lady Anon this is exact the root of the problem: your words can be applied to my Indian friends too.