yeah there is no assassins creed in the game lol. but eivor kinda lives by his own creed that’s the point of the story. a very unlikely assassin who does things simply because they must be done.
@@diegoestmar559It's funny how these people love to bash on the RPGs like they're "not AC" but often seem to regard *Black Flag* as one of the best AC ever. Go figure...
All three of them, Valhalla, Oddysey, and Origins are works of art. My favorite overall after playing them all is Odyssey. It had the most immersive rpg system. It also had the best camera filters for awesome in game pictures. The other games' photo systems fell flat compared to Odyssey's. I think Valhalla might have been a step up in terms of puzzles. Not sure whuch one had the most immersive puzzle stories. AC has still yet to deliver on a super immersive puzzle system. I guess finding the keys was fun in Valhalla. Oddysey had the best world. Critisism has its place but to give proper credit they're all beautiful and fun games.
The internet is a double edged sword, in many ways it ruins the fun in exploring a game by yourself and sometimes saves your time and money from a bad game.
"Homefront: The Revolution" game is really good game but very hated on by reviewers. Same goes for "Metal Gear Survive". Edit: Every popular review about "Metal Gear Survive" is full of lies, you can't trust them. A lot of the reviews complained about the survival mechanics, scavenging for food and water, and also being limited on oxygen in the dust (Angry Joe complains about his stamina going down too quickly when his character is both really hungry and thirsty, not taking the time to hunt for food and water). Turns out food and water is plentiful later on. Not much you can do about the oxygen, you can only get a better O2 mask. (Most reviewers didn't even get to africa). A lot of people didn't like the game before even trying it, because it has "zombies" in it. However players must not be real fans of the MGS series if they think this is the first time Metal Gear has had any enemies with zombie like behavior. MGSV TPP had wandering mother base soldiers, and the Skulls. Theres also Vamp, and many others with similar behavior in past games. There has always been zombie like enemies, they just were not called zombies, just like in Metal Gear Survive they are wanderers. Plus, I don't remember zombies having hive mind, or group think.The story was bad to reviewers, however most reviewers never beat the game. Most definitely did not look at the archives to listen to the tapes in the game either ( like most did not do in TPP either ). This game actually has a good story that makes sense, although is also more complicated than one would think. The story is not just a side tale, its directly part of the series, even if its only a small part. I mean we need some explanation at least of where wormhole technology came from, how it was discovered, and so on for TPP. Metal Gear Survive gives us that explanation. Could the story have been better, longer, and portrayed in a better manner? Definitely, but what would you expect from a $40 game (now obtainable for less than $10 used). People found the gameplay boring. I would say early gameplay is annoying, using the spear and fences and just poking. However the game gets far better over time, as one would expect from a survival game. Killing wanderers gets harder, and ways of doing it get better with the different classes, class skills, and weaponry, not to mention traps, turrets, ect. Jumping into multiplayer is fun as you get larger hordes, more variety, and different elemental types, which you wont see in single player after beating the game.
In my case, I explored/played the whole game alone. In the end, I hated it, it become painful to finish this boring game ( + knowing what AC used to be). Nobody could give me back my money and time. You mentioned 2 things that cannot work together because no review out there changes YOUR OWN view of the game, you like it or not.
Finally someone who realized the same thing... Valhalla is best when you play it slowly. In my first playthrough I rushed through it. It was a chore and a bore (although I liked the story). For the second time I played it over the span of maybe 3 months. It was soooo satisfying to discover what Valhalla had to offer.
I felt the exact same way about Odyssey (have not played valhalla). All the little segemented stories on each island were a few hours long each, and sometimes quite interesting !
@K.C-2049 yea same. Heard all stuff about odyssey but as i went on playing i enjoyed it a lot and honestly felt like it was still an AC. Keep the same attitude with valhalla, go slow and immerse yourself in the character or how you like it, and you'll get a satisfying animus experience together with an AC game
The "God stuff" was cut from the main game at fan request. Basically what happened was people were being upset about the fantasy elements in their sci-fi series (Origins and Odyssey had these first) so Ubisoft introduced this solution for players to be able to skip the fantasy portions by making them optional. Now, given that it's mandatory to play the Asgard bits to understand the ending of the game it's safe to say they shot themselves in the foot and that they were waaaaay into the development of the game. The decision was made late and the devs weren't able to rewrite the the story to cut the fantasy stuff altogether - or actually make it optional.
Ah that's interesting! I wasn't following the game pre-release so I missed all that. Interesting that people complained about mythical stuff for this game despite it being in the other two, like you say.
The best Viking game of all time, for sure. Stunningly beautiful and with “endless buffet” of stories and discoveries to make, yet best enjoyed one meal at a time over many months. It was so easy to pick up and play again even if you took a break. It was like five seasons of an amazing TV show, which you can enjoy slowly while still binging a few episodes when you wanted to. I don’t get the haters, at all.
So if you don’t like mindless grinding, microtransactions and boring repetitive side quests in a game devoid of any innovation you are a hater? Keep shilling.
@@corn.3892lol, you clearly haven't played the game for yourself. Their really is no grinding. Yeah, you need to level up to unlock new areas but... Leveling up is so damn easy that it basically not a problem. Microtransactions are pointless. And the side quests are really good... I assume you are talking about world events, even if you don't know what the side quests are called since you never played the game. Their is a lot of different events that make you use your brain to complete them and some are just a lot of fun to do, a lot of them feel like GTA random events that just fill the world with a lot of life.
@@cookie.2118 There is grinding (level grinding, resource grinding), you haven't played the game, lol. Sure, it's better than Odyssey, but it's still annoying. The side content is repetitive, because the world is so peaceful, the main side quests or content is carrying crates and doing mindless chores. The drug trips don't give you any meaningful progress, the entire existence of the open world is basically meaningless, why? Because its side content (very little action, meaningless drug trips, carrying stuff around and stupid puzzles) is so unbearably BORING, that the best way to play Valhalla is to ignore it and focus on the main story. Sadly, the story is not good enough to carry this game. I don't know what makes you think carrying crates full of apples is good content, but I guess to each their own.
@@cookie.2118 Plus, the world events are, OBJECTIVELY bad. They make exploration so much worse and are the second-biggest problem of Valhalla. Forget infiltrating cool fortresses and brutal fights, shoot arrows at doors, throw things around and enjoy the broken climbing, WOW, I accept that many people like the game, but this is just blatantly shilling.
“I would play at my own pace, explore how I wanted to and not worry about racing to the finish line” Oh, you mean how games are MEANT to be played? That's the issue right there: most of you have lost that, or never had it to begin with.
Been playing this game for almost 3 months now,over 300hr and I’m still having a blast.Got the 2 dlc W o D and S o P for 1/2 price. Waiting for Valhalla Ragnarok to be discounted I’ve enjoyed all the AC that I have played.Been an AC fan from the first one that came out in 2007.Black Flag Probably is my favourite. Update...Holy crap, same day I made this post, I get home and turn on my PS5 and low and behold freakin Dawn of Ragnarok is on sale for $19.95!!! Crazy luck.Have not even finished Wrath o Druids and still to do Siege of Paris.
It's weird how much hate this game gets, it's a blast. People need to take of the nostalgia classes and play the game as a game. I've played almost all AC games and enjoyed all of them. Skipped rogue:) I always approach the games with curiosity. I just wanna see what is behind the next hill. Even if I just find a deer I'm honestly exited. I don't aim to 100% games but almost always end up doing it anyway, just because well there was this hill I hadn't looked behind yet😂
What the hell in Valhalla does it have to do with the Assassin's apart from the first 15 minutes? It's not nostalgia, these games are flat-out worse than the first 5 games and are designed to waste your time so you spend real money on cosmetics @@jerryb2965
While I played as female Eivor, I did honestly hate her voice a lot of the time lmao. And it sucks, because the voice actress has a lovely voice, but she went for this overly raspy tone that was just really unpleasant to hear and definitely impacted her performance. She also played the voice of Eivor's mother in which she sounded way more like her natural voice and I really wish she had done that for Eivor.
Female Eivor Voice was such a Pain in the Ears lol...,will try Male Eivor next time... and finish the fantasy stuff wich i completely avoided once i finished the "main" stroy line in England...
Oddly I feel the opposite of this. I think she has the best tone and voice in the games after Ivarr and Sigurd. She really nailed what a female viking should be
I believe many players are missing much of the "meta" stuff that ties them all together. Going back to the start, Adam and Eve themselves were hybrid human/ISU. This means that some ISU genetic exist in varying degrees across all humanity. Those with cetain combinations have varying abilities. I.e. the vision/bird tie-ins, that cause them to pervieve things and leads them toward the assassins or the templars. These being genetic in nature also means that these individuals are oftem groomed to these philosophies through familial bonds. What the Norse ISU (and atleast one other) did was incorporate more of themSelves into this hybridization. Appearanace, traits, but most important to Valhalla, memories. BUT the person whom these attributes begin to express in [seers] deal with them in unique ways. Some go mad (Tyr/Sigurd), some integrate fully (Basim/Loki) and some struggle and eventually come to a partnership (Eivor/Havi). I believe this is also some cross breeding between the existing ISU genetics present in human lines intermixing with the newer Norse lines. Basim being probably the best example (and also explain why he also got to the middle east). So lets suppose that Basim had more hybrid genes AND the norse genes which is why Basim integrated fully with Loki. This also explains why Basim can skip around in the Animus, because his norse ISU genes add capabilities (or genetic memory of how to use the anumus in this way). I would say that as a gamer when you run into something that doesn't initially make sense, instead of assuming it's a shortcut/retcon by the game devs. Try to look deeper. ❤
Honestly all the ancient aliens stuff just feels silly even fully explained. When you get to a point where you can say your original main character is strongly implied to be a direct descendant of Adam Bible it just... Feels off.
@@Noname72105 I get you. It is most def treated as an after thought or at best just a way to forward the game play into more "fantastical" ways. So yeah, definately silly, but that doesn't mean it can't be fun. 🤷♂️
I thought Aita (Roberts/john in bf and De Molay/Germaine in unity) was meant to be a random luck rebirth injected into the entirety of humanities DNA. Nothing to do with direct relation but genetically injected, cos Aita got trapped in some machine and Juno killed him. Aita i thought was human or half or something too (unless im misremembering that)
I love Valhalla. I completed it 100% with all the additions. I also liked collecting opals, I visited every nook and cranny. After finishing the game, I missed Eivor the Viking. After a year, I'm back and playing Valhalla again. :)
It's funny. I've played every single AC ever made.. AC Unity, Revelations, 3 and Odyssey being my favorites. It's odd though, because Valhalla has clocked the most play time, and I still find myself playing to this day. Over 300 hours and counting :)
To be fair if someone were to play through each game once, Valhalla would easily have the highest play time. I've played Black Flag 3 or 4 times and I still have more hours in my 1 playthrough of Valhalla 😅
According to Steam, I clocked over 660 hrs in 3, that's after 100% on the PS3 and I've just run up another couple of hundred on the remaster on PS5. Connor is still (deliberately) an ass, the mechanics are incredibly frustrating with their inconsistency, but it remains the most epic of the series for me and the most innovative. I think the reason I clocked in so many hours on PC was it was the closest I was going to get to a port of RDR and the sandbox is great to just run around, hunt and slaughter redcoats (or watch cougars doing it).
Been at this gem of a viking experience for several months, the dailies and weekly tasks are fantastic hooks to make you think "oh, go on..just a little more exploration" The lesson here is to always judge for thyself 😊
What I think reviewers hate about these long games is that they are rushing through the game to meet with the schedule and they lose the chance to properly dissect the game in it's slow-paced approach, as intended
I played Origins and loved it. I played Odyssey and hated it. Everyone said that Valhalla was terrible, so I didn't even buy it. But it was on discount last month, so I tried it. It's surprisingly good! To be fair, I haven't finished it and I'm just 30 hours in (Lunden arc), but the game is very solid so far. I like the combat, I like the world and the characters seem fine. Sure, the arc structure of the game means that pacing can suffer, but the actual gameplay loop is fun! The stealth also seems to be mostly fixed, because I haven't encountered any detection bugs that people were complaining about. And most importantly, Valhalla has this Assassin's Creed feel to it. When I go into cities, I walk around with a cloak and armed with just a dagger. It's kinda immersive.
Yeah it's longer than Odyssey. It took me 67 hours to beat Odyssey, but Valhalla took me about 83. That does include doing all the Order of Ancients and optional areas, but I didn't collect all the collectables and didn't do any DLC.
@@joshy9392 I just got my ship, had to stop to bake some pancakes, but everything is done, and I´m ready to continu,e I´m liking the game, the revelation abouit who "Just some Spartan general" was cool, sucks for everyone :( .
Being a male who, given the choice, prefers to play as a male character over a female one doesn’t make me an incel. It’s just a preference. When female is the only playable character, it makes no difference to me. Just thought you made a pretty harsh comment aimed at a group of people that probably rep the majority of gamers out there.
He was simping so hard to get thumbs up from certain communities. I'm playing a RPG game, making decisions I would make and I want my character to be relatable to me at least in most basic ways. Why should I believe female Eivor could take on most brutal men in the world in the least sneaky AC title is beyond me.
@@MurCellic1903 That's the point. Also, there's a window in which I can actually enjoy or accept playing a woman in a game as well...the same exists for men too. For example - I believe Abby from the TLOU2 could take on built men in that game simply because she was trained, big and extremely strong (probably roided up too) - hence when I saw that she doesn't even need melee weapons sometimes and can brute force a fight I can believe that - its basic biology not gender studies. Ellie on the other hand is a lanky underfed girl - she uses knives, shivs, machetes most of the time in her animations and that's what I'd like to do in that case since I can't expect her to beat a grown man to pulp with those physical attributes. TLOU2 isn't an RPG yes but come on there's things I can believe simply because of mass vs mass and biology. That's not to say I don't enjoy playing as the woman too - take the case of games like Control, TEW1and2, HZD, SH3, lots of older titles as well etc. Those are excellent games with female protagonists and playable characters. There's also a case to be made for actually selling a game - Most mainstream gamers are male but that's a more subjective thing where - which gamer a certain cover/game protagonist would appeal to. For example RDR2 is universally praised for its storytelling and character - I've seen men and women praise it and cry at the ending; I think choosing a male protagonist was a good choice in this case given the time and the story they wanted to tell; The same cannot be said for BFV - that game got backlash simply for not catering to the majority of gamers during the promotions lol (it's not a bad game mind you - but it did hurt the sales I think). Modern gaming just wants to " get thumbs up from certain communities ", get some sweet revenue from SBI etc. and it seems like it has also trickled into the game critics and the TH-cam channels.
It’s fun to play as a Viking, but I simply didn’t care for the setting, or the story. Not as interesting for me as the previous ones. I spent about 120 hours in the game too.
Hahha I know right, don’t get me wrong it has its issues, and I haven’t played any DLC. But I had a FUCKING BLAST playing this very long epic satisfying main story, in my homeland. The raids feel amazing especially the big main mission ones. They can go on for almost an hour sometimes
Loved the video, got me through a long drive. The length of this game can be extended by another 40 hours if you get all the dlc haha. I have only beat Wrath of the Druids so far, if you ever return to this game, highly recommend playing it, Ireland is beautiful and the story is great.
Yeah, I was told the same thing man over and over. So I stayed away from it. For a long time, just bought it Friday. And today is Tuesday Haven't put it down since take. My wife's gonna divorce me over LO. L.😅😅😅 The visuals Are spectacular Alone The storyline draws you in. Making you want to learn more as you play. The exploration is awesome. Bob Marley is I can't say enough I am so glad. I went with my instincts love this game❤❤❤❤
I think sometimes players who criticize a game harshly have played hundreds of games and are comparing them, sometimes unconsciously, to the best games they've ever played. Also, some players have played too many games and have gotten jaded and great graphics and gameplay don't engage their joy response much any longer.
I agree with graphics but obviously you will criticize a game when you have more knowledge than someone playing a game for the first time. Same thing happens with all forms of media.
Issue with that is that Ubisoft stopped making unique experiences and just started making witcher 3 knock offs. Their games get compared to other popular games because Ubisoft steals most of their ideas from successful titles and do nothing to actually innovate.
I don't think any game in this franchise has actually been a bad game. Some just stand out and are much more unique than others, others had either more development time or just in general better skill at being able to put together and polish the engine and gameplay and mission design, and with how many entries in the franchise there have been and how long they've been making them some just have to be at the bottom. I think otherwise there is enough variety at this point that even fans of the franchise are going to have certain developer teams or eras/styles of AC games that they prefer. And otherwise there are just going to be some general gamers that enjoy a fraction of these titles and aren't a fan of the others. For me, the thing that always appealed to me the most about these games was being able to play around in a historical sandbox. Sure I still liked the general plot and world that the game was building, however I'm one of those who never cared a single bit about anything happening in the present-day storyline or the character of Desmond. If it wasn't taking place in the historical portion of the game I just didn't care. And that comes from me just generally having an interest in lots of historical eras. However this also has kind of made it so that the setting can sometimes determine whether or not that becomes one of my favorite games in the franchise to begin with. I go back and forth between whether or not I like black flag or origins the best. And I think I pick origins not even necessarily because I think it's definitively a better constructed game, but just because it was so much more enticing for me to explore that game world because of an absolute love and fascination with ancient Egypt that dates back to my childhood. Otherwise I feel like I enjoy something like Assassin's Creed 3 more than many other people because I also have a high interest and attachment to the revolutionary War. That's one of my favorite eras in American history to study. Stuff like unity and syndicate, I can realize that they are mostly generally well made games, although unity still has technical issues to this day. And they feel more like traditional Assassin's Creed titles, however I just didn't really have a huge interest in the French revolution or industrial London. So those became the first two games that I never finished in the franchise and again a big part of it is the setting, but the other part is that that was about when Ubisoft was really starting to just create these overly bloated game worlds that had just a ton of icons everywhere and all of this side content where it became daunting to really know what was worth doing and what you were supposed to be doing, and what was just pointless filler and busy work. I feel like origins actually cleaned that up a little bit since it was taking such heavy inspiration from The Witcher 3, I felt compelled to do most of the things that I ran across in every area And then Odyssey did the too much on the map thing again lol It's taking me a while to finally get into Odyssey, I had to do a lot of initial grinding before that game felt like it really opened up and became fun to explore and go on adventures. And even then I've got to be 50 odd hours into that game at this point and still don't quite know how to progress the main story. Valhalla even though I hadn't completed Odyssey, was catching my eye because I needed something to show off my new series X, and because I generally am more interested in something like the Vikings over the ancient Greeks. So I hopped into Valhalla as well and played a bit through it and had some fun and can note which things I think it does better than Odyssey in which things I think it does worse. And although it kind of cleans up the map compared to Odyssey I still feel like it has this issue of just being too big with too much stuff for its own good. But my biggest issue with Valhalla is I just don't really care about any of the characters. Odyssey also has too much going on however there's a feeling of charm and whimsy and playful sarcasm that makes it entertaining, especially if you pick Kassandra Valhalla is just kind of missing that. So it sits as one of those games installed on my hard drive that I only ever made it a fraction of the way through, however one day I'm going to go back and give it a shake. Because it's gorgeous, even if I don't think all of the farmlands in England are all that exciting to explore, but it is mechanically sound. If you're looking for a Viking game, it is probably one of the best ones if not the best one depending on what you're looking for So even though it lost my interest, even though Odyssey lost my interest and syndicate and unity lost my interest... I still can't look at them and say that they did that because of they're bad games. It's just the combination of whether or not it's the right time and whether I'm the right person to really love that particular setting and concept This is a huge franchise, and at this point I would bet it's incredibly rare to find anyone who actually really loves every single entry And I'm not going to lie, once mirage goes on a decent sale I really want to try that one out, because once again just the setting interests me more. Plus if it's not as big or as long as these other ones I might have a chance to actually beat it l😅
@@nosouponhead definitely not implying any of them are perfect. But many sit amongst my favorite games I've ever played. Ghost of Tsushima is solid. But overall the setting / time doesn't personally interest me as much as many of the AC titles. Which can be a big part of how much I enjoy them or not
Also the online gaming communities are filled with crybabies who find everything bad and these communities do not represent the general audience. People keep forgetting the core aspect of video games, its for entertainment and if you are having fun, then who tf cares.
3:19 "20hrs in and not enjoying my time with it..." Dude. No. That alone makes me not want to play the game. Any game over 20hrs that feels like a chore is a bad game. "Dude, this bowl of turds finally gets good after you've been eating it for 10 days straight." No thank.s
That's because reviewers like Luke Stephens panned it. I loved playing Valhalla. It has one of the greatest video game characters in all video games, namely Ivarr. Valhalla is a game I will always enjoy playing.
They have no idea what direction to go with AC. They are basically just trying to milk money out of it until they run out of random crap they can come up with.
My only gripe with Valhalla was how repetitive the main story missions were. By the time I stormed the fifth castle I was already feeling like it had grown stale
i have to say that i liked it. if you take your time (as others have said) it really is a beautiful world and a good game. If you are rushing through it, then yes it becomes very repetitive. I like the voice acting (Eivor is the red headed actor in last kingdom) music is nice and ya it is a very beautiful game. Take your pace with this game because its long but had good elements and activities and really liked the detail they put into developing Ravensthorpe.
@@acest2098the main quests are mostly design the same in Valhalla, that's why it gets repetitive quickly when you just do main quests and nothing more. But the side content in this game is beautifully done, only players that take it slow will do them because you will miss out on most of the side activities if you are rushing to beat the game. Just do a good mix of both side quests and main quests, you will have a really good time... I will promise you that.
I never thought to play this one, but your video has me interested… still, I’m 300 hrs in and still not finished Odyssey… I spend a lot of time just wandering around checking out the sights
im playing Odyssey right NOW for the first time (80 hours in) and i totally know what u mean. I feel ashamed to miss such a gorgeous game all these years@@StillLateToTheParty
I'm a huge AC fan since the very beginning and I absolutely hated Odyssey with a passion for years forced myself to complete it even modded my level on pc just to help and never looked back until I got it on PS5 gave it another go knowing I'd hate it and I loved every second of it on my 2nd go didn't want to put it down it's not a great AC game but I'd include it in the franchise now and not call it the bastard child of the series
No they complained about it because it's bloated and grindy as hell with bad stealth mechanics, repetitive side activities, aggressive level-gating, spongy enemies, and a plot that moves forward about as quickly as a turtle crosses a highway. Odyssey isn't even close to the longest game I have ever completed, and yet it felt longer than even my week-long 198 hour binge of Persona 5 at launch.
It was a great game that didn't deserve the hate. It really isn't that long if you are just doing the main story. Most side stuff is completely optional. No different than something like skyrim or the Witcher 3.
It was a good game but imo suffered from the collectibles-hunting carbon copy-pasting of other Assassins Creed games. The best parts of Valhalla were the parts that weren’t in other AC games.
@wezzsimple6612 your opinion. To me the original is the worse now. It hasn't aged well at all. After playing the the modern games (origins to Valhalla) it's really hard to go back to the old ones. They feel too bare bones after having so much added.
What threw me off was how stupid all the side quests were. Why would you make a quest where npcs asks you to purposefully burn their home down to prove they’re strong warriors?💀
It's definitely boring. I just recently tried to play this game again. And wow are the missions just uninspired and bland. All the rpg elements honestly detract from the immersion and the story. Valhalla was the first Ac game I didn't want to force myself to finish.
It’s a solid game if: 1. Titled simply as “Valhalla”, and advertised it as a spinoff for AC 2. Remove The micro transactions, it’s a single player game and there are more armor sets in the store compared to the base game (At least in PC you could just do cheat engine to obtain all armor) Ubisoft is many things, but they make pretty maps and enjoyable combat. Not too easy and not too souls-like
To make a comment on your point of Eivor wearing the hidden blade on the top of the arm instead of under: they explained it in the game itself when Eivor first gets the blade. She says that she wants to show it off, which negates the point of the "hidden" part of it. Its under the arm intentionally to hide it as much as possible and back in these days they didnt have a way to make it so it doesnt take the finger on the way out
I'm not sure if I'm flattered or worried for your mental wellbeing, but thank you! I've been delayed in getting to play Mirage but hopefully next week I'll get lucky!
This is a great game and one of the best "viking" themed. I don't know what some people are thinking when they say it's bad. It's a beautiful game I like going around in the countryside on my horse and it's never boring and using the ship is beautiful too. The story is good the characters are good the landscapes are beautiful the lore is quite historically accurate (how it can be for a game). What else do they want? And the same people idolize games like The Wither 3 which is nothing special in my opinion. And I think with these games (Odyssey and Valhalla) Ubisoft has managed to find a great equilibrium between the story and the open world which is something nobody else has done so well. By the way Eivor is a unisex name. about female Eivor voice there is a reason why she talks like that because she was bitten by a wolf in her neck when she was a child (she has a big scar too) which damaged her vocal chords the rasp is present in the male voice too but it's less noticeable. I didn't find anything strange in her voice. and the music is outstanding. by the way (and then I shut up lol) this is a game you can't rush you have to enjoy the world and the story so any reasoning about how much time it takes to do something is nonsensical.
My advice to playing the AC RPG trio is, do a period of gameplay, play something else, make a set time limit at which you'll move on, and then come back. That way it doesn't kill you inside.
From what I was able to gather from Mirage is that Odin was trying to take over Eivor's body much how Loki did with Basim. However unlike Loki's Subtle approach by appearing as a friend of Basim, Odin tried to take it by force by claiming to be Eivor's god.
I spent 3 months on this game, off and on playing it. Racked up 350 plus hours, got all items & trophies - everything completed except didn't touch Ragnarok Saga and after a few times trying the Skill challenges & the River Raids DLC quit both. It was still waaaay too long. Prob completed 80% of the content & those River Raids are procedurally generated Loot, so can drag on for hours. Especially the main story just dragged on and on with very little to keep my interest after Ivarr & Coelbert portion of story are completed.
I spent the time to go through all side quests and every single wealth or collective item i could get before i proceeded with the main quest within the current area i was in. After doing such allowed me to understand the story far better. Ofc you can't expect everyone to have that sort of dedication however the option to do so is there and choosing not to go through it is your choice. If you complain you don't get the story you have only yourself to point at.
I did the same thing until it became so boring I was unable to continue playing the game. Which was unbelievably fast, I got to that point faster than in Odyssey.
Im literally playing Valhalla rn. The worst part is how long the story the is. If they made each arc two or 3 arcs (location only) itd shorten the story by like 20 or so hours and actually make it ok
Valhalla and Odyssey were great opportunities to break away from Assassins Creed. Ubisoft could've made whole games with ancient cultural touchstones. And let's face it, warrior cultures wouldn't have anything to do with honorless assassins, or sci-fi scenes.
I just tried it, and first thing that piss me off is that imagine how many resources they spread doing immersion braking huds and micro transactions, if they get rid of the game store they’ll had more resources to make a better game, the second one was the Skyrim skill tree, really? They think that makes an assassins creed that is the lack of all those rpg elements in favor of more realistic action, then ins the main character identity they didn’t have the guts of keeping Eibor female or male, many female were raised as boys so you telling me they couldn’t go that route. Then the whole immersion braking hit numbers and health bars. They need to make a simpler game, keep going with the original assassin formula and create just more cinematic side quest that teach you new abilities instead of having you unlock them with experience.
you couldn't skip through time in the original first games because of memory synchronization, I think in AC Brotherhood they tried to do it but they couldn't and that's the reason, Abstergo probably did it with Subject 16 which caused him to lose his mind and be trapped within the animus
That's right, which is why Basim being able to casually jump to the exact moment he's looking for stood out to me. That's a big deal, given what the early games established.
I’m impressed you did all of that in 83 hours. I had 90 hours and I still had areas not discovered and hadn’t finished the main story. By which time I was completely burnt out. Maybe I’ll go back and try finish it.
I got Valhalla on my birth day as a joke (i am a HUGE og ac fan) and then i was actually surprised at how GOOD ac valhalla was, i really loved Eivor (i played as male Eivor) and he was so fun to play and how (kinda) good the RPG combat was here, it was pretty fun to play Valhalla and i was so stupid to think it sucked before i even played it, i also really loved the side characters, it took me 3 months to finish ac Valhalla and i don't regret playing that underrated gem of a game.
same, i think i finished it in 2-3 weeks? i finish games fast, i also finished syndicate in 3 days, revelations in 1/5 and unity in 2... not sure how i do that...
The Order members will send assassin's after you but you need to fail a quest for this to happen (you choose whether to burn a paper or hand it over I think...something like that). Each region has 2 Order agents & they'll only search for Eivor if you're in their area. It's very tough when they come after you because it didn't matter my level & just 30 levels above suggested was a massive challenge & they don't stop hunting you all game.
This happens with every actually good game, you get burned out on the 3rd installment of the open world rpg trilogy that is Origins, Odyssey and then Valhalla. If Valhalla came before the other two I would have appreciated the game more. I've sunk so many hours into Origins and Odyssey that I found myself finding every task on Valhalla an absolute chore because it felt like the same loop I've already played time and time again.
Precisely. Its the same game mechanic formula as origins and odyssey. Thats why it gets boring quicker. Even if this was released before origins and odyssey, we would've found origins and odyssey boring lol.
Here’s the thing I hated odyssey and got bored of origins but this game just came out on gamepass and it’s already better than the other two. Just I wish it wasn’t an assassin creed game and wish Ubisoft didn’t make it either lol. These allot of things I like and love but then there’s just that dumb Ubisoft stuff that slightly ruins the experience. If they just made an brutal open world Viking game it would be so much better.
@@TomboyCactus I agree but even if Odyssey was released first I would still call it boring, it is by far the most boring game I've ever played. I already thought Origins was grindy and repetitive, Odyssey is a crime against humanity in that regard. Even if you buy their experience booster you still run into *constant* level gates that impede you from progressing the main story, and even if you did remove all the side-questing it's still glacially paced. I have never seen a story stretched so far beyond any point of reason, you could tell Odyssey's story in 1/4th the amount of time it takes to tell it and it would be infinitely better for it. The thing Valhalla does right is that by breaking its narrative up into distinct arcs and giving you a town to get invested in, you can take it at your own pace and there's always something new happening to keep the game engaging.
I loved this game. While I'm new to AC so cannot compare. I loved playing as a Viking. I don't mind it being long, I did find some points were repetitive, if they took the repetition out and added new ones it would be amazing. Overall if they brought out valhalla 2 I would get it
You might be surprised to know Farcry: Primal introduced a 'bird' pet which was the prototype for all the birds we get in AC: Origins/Odyssey/Valhalla. That mechanic was never used in any other Farcry game.
I dont know why there's so much hate for this game. I mean this is by far the most jam-packed features of all AC game But sadly they removed it to AC Mirage which is sucks for my opinion. This definitely one of my favorite AC game in the series
People hate it because it's too long, way too much pointless loot and way to bloated with chores for activities and collectibles, mediocre storyline and plot and pointless side content that just a snooze fest, skill trees are just way to long and bloated and it plays more like mediocre viking game rather then an ac game
Because the game is half baked and is designed to drive you to spend more money. -World too big and ypu don't want to get all the collectibles? Buy an xp booster. -your weapons and armor are blandly designed with boring passives? Buy some new ones in the store for $10 a pop. -want more than 10 poorly made raids? Buy the dlc.
@@kingpinavatar couldn't agree more they tarnish my favorite environment, culture and lore which is vikings, just imagine the damage they would do with samurai. And the Japan setting they probably make it play more like a mediocre or sub par sumari game or a boot leg version of ghost of tsushima but just a shittyer and half back version that's way too over priced with way too much micro transactions
Content and features for the sake of content and features is meaningless and shoving it into a game breaks immersion and makes the world open and dead because playing a collectathon is not fun especially for ac games which have the microtransactions curse supprised they didn't pull a star wars battle front before EA got hit up the ass with lawsuits forcing them to fix the game and make it playable with non intrusive micro transactions or put pointless skins in the game like fortnite that doesn't make in universe sense
Personally, I'm very tired of hearing how this game is bad and not part of AC. I actually believe this to be the fullest and most complete installment and playing Mirage following, I have cemented my view that going back to the old format is not the way to go. Shame.
I thought Mirage was worst than this game. It was too short, too little to do and too boring. The climbing mechanic was bad, abilities weren't that great and I completed it in about a week, collected everything and completed the quest. Was not worth the asking price.
It's the worst AC game because it's not actually a game. It's never-ending cutscenes one after another and sometimes you have to walk really slowly to get to the next cutscene. There is no actual gameplay whatsoever.
Dude I’m almost done with mirage and I just had to come back to Valhalla. So much more to do and weapons to choose from. Same with skills and fighting styles
my main problem with Valhalla is that the game is just too long and feels like a chore to play , not only this but also on my PC the stupid game just crashes every time after 2-3 hrs of play time. ( I'm playing on medium settings and my PC is 12 gen i7 with 3070 ) So my opinion just skip this game.
It’s unfortunate that not many people were aware that Valhalla pretty much serves as a “Love Letter” to the Franchise considering this Game makes Many References from Previous Titles.
This is my first AC game I've played. Started playing 3 days ago and I can't believe I've slept on this series all this time! It's already one of my favourite games of all time
I agree with most of your ideas and critizisms. I enjoyed a lot about Valhalla. It is not at all a bad game as such. I do not think it is too long at all. I had great fun roaming the world, and I actually loved the incremental upgrade mechanic. It felt natural to me, and you had to make strategic decisions while choosing your upgrade path. I often went to areas that required a higher skill level than I had, because the game is too easy as it is. - My main criticism is that this should have been developed as a separate IP, and not as an Assassin's Creed game. Viking gameplay does not connect well with the Assassin's Creed way of doing things. It works against it, actually. - I also missed the beautiful ancient city environments in this game, but they just did not exist in this area in this time period. - I did not like the supernatural/god nonsense in this game at all. I would have preferred a pure realistic approach to this historical setting. - I think the castle sieges were nonsensical. I could with ease conquer every castle on my own, by singlehandidly killing everyone inside, but was then in the next instance forced to do it all over again in a siege. This was a dumb mechanic. Not well-designed, and not thought through, by the devs.
it is too long. If you try to do EVERYTHING, side missions, secrets and such, u can be looking easy at 300 hours. With all DLCs, game mods, probably 400 or 500. That is just insane and, for completionists like me (i like to do everything in a game), its a nightmare. I myself just had to stop, is too much. Plus, the game is plagued with bad game decisions that hurt the game. - bloated content - extremely long and mostly empty maps. I get it, they tried to portrait England in the past, but its a game decision that hurts the game. Plus, points of interest are way too far apart from each other. - cryptic secrets and other annoyances in the world design - performance issues - such as constant crashes - animation problems (clunky combat, getting stuff in the enviromment) - sound mixing issues, muffled sounds, unimpactful weapon sounds etc. - kinda bland story that lacks.. "soul", in the lack of a better analogy, and other stuff i could stay here rambling about all day. - too many gameplay mechanics getting introduced, not well explained, many of those pointless and unconsequential. They could be removed from the game and you would not miss them one bit. That is the definition of bloat - repetitive all way around. Its just too much. This said, i dont think is a bad game at all, there are many things to be enjoyed (beautiful landscapes, nordic setting, cool weapons and gear, upgrade system is good, like you said, interesting characters, overall enjoyable game when it works well, and other stuff. I personally liked the raid missions, but also felt excessive and repetitive at some point. It feels like they used the good things from Odyssey, upped x20 everything, then scratched many good mechanics, introducing others are are worse. It feels like a disjointed mess that had good elements in between, but used in a disorganized, unfocused way.
@@hernanipereira"it is too long. If you try to do EVERYTHING, side missions, secrets and such, u can be looking easy at 300 hours. " I have no problem with 300 hours. And as you said, you do not have to do everything. It is there if you want to, but it is your choice.
of course its optional, but if is in the game, its there for a reason. right? If is just there to bloat and waste our time, or to be skipped, then its a bad sign. I liked the game overall but i felt over and over it was wasting my time - overall feeling with many sidequests etc - Plus, if u just skip stuff, you might be missing important stuff, you never know. The game would have benefited more with less stuff in game, like i said, being more focused in the main story with some side missions, being smaller in size and scope. I had the feeling Valhalla got a bit greedy or, at least, overambitious; devs at some point tried to do everything, all the same time, kept adding stuff that has no real meaning or purpose and lost focus (i mean, there is even a roguelite mode in game o.o)@@Ploskkky
Mind blown that you put all this energy & effort on such a small channel! Really well done. Honestly I assumed you had at LEAST 100K+ subs. Keep up the good work. That hour flew by & it was entertaining. You'll definitely hit those milestones someday soon! New sub!!👍🏾👍🏾
Thank you, I really appreciate those kind words! If you happen to know 100k or so people and could convince them to sub then I'd be super grateful, thanks!
Ac valhalla was my 1st AC game n I freaking loved it. It's one big ass adventure! After beating valhalla n all 3 dlc I now beat Origins plus dlc n oddesey n all dlc. I'm also almost finished with mirage witch I also love! People hate on valhalla yet it made ubisoft soooo much money.
It made money because Ubisoft design their games to waste your time so you end up buying them, the same thing Activision does with COD but people are too brain dead to stop buying them.
21:01 They can't fast forward because they don't know what exactly they are looking, or where and when it will turn up. That's been the case with most other AC stories. I think we can assume Basim knows what he's looking for, so he knows what bits he can afford to skip.
People are weird,who cares about minor stuff if it’s a good game that’s fine by me.People are obsessed with minutiae details. Anyway I love fantasy games and in reality all games are fantasy stories,it’s not real life 😂
I look at the new games as isu games. Which I like because when I first played rogue, I wanted to know more about them but the old games didn't have much besides the first few.
I loved AC Valhalla! It had possibly the best story of the new trilogy, and i'm primarily a story player. Odyssey had the best combat though, and Origins had the best setting.
Odyssey only works if you play as Kassandra. Alexios is an immersion breaking buffoon as the player character. So I played Valhallah as female Eivor, but after NG+, I chose male and the voice acting is just so much better, the reverse of Odyssey.
I've only ever played as Alexios (I can't stand Kassandra) and have about 20 complete play throughs, including all of the DLC. Btw, I don't like Atlantis. Hades however, I do. BTW, my NG+ char is so OP it's practically cheating. Boring really. BTW. I still save Cassandra in order to get the best ending where everyone that CAN live, does.
@@cassiespencer6134 Funny how the voice acting can have completely different effects. I find it ironic that Alexios is obviously the "correct" choice for Odyssey but I prefer Kass and that female is the correct choice for Valhalla, yret in that game I prefer male. I don't even consider Odyssey as a game per se, more of a tech demo sandbox. The engine, mechanics and sheer size & variety of the map, weapons, skills etc, sowed far more effort and attention to detail than the narrative. There are some real oddities like zero fall damage, disjointed & tonally inconsistent side quests & the ridiculous level gating of wildlife (carried over from Origins) that enhance the tech demo more than game feel for me. It's almost like the story was an afterthought they threw together to justify the sandbox. I've got 253h logged on PC and just started a PS5 playthrough as part of running through 3,4 & 5 while I avoid Mirage, so I love the sandbox - except for when i drop my toe over an invisible line and start getting one-shotted by level 60 boars.
Its a good game the only problem is they put assasins creed in the title
yeah there is no assassins creed in the game lol. but eivor kinda lives by his own creed that’s the point of the story. a very unlikely assassin who does things simply because they must be done.
@@leandroreyes5878yes their is
Its def an Assassins creed story. its like saying rogue one is not star wars due to the lack of jedi. Valhalla is full of Ac lore lol
@@diegoestmar559It's funny how these people love to bash on the RPGs like they're "not AC" but often seem to regard *Black Flag* as one of the best AC ever. Go figure...
All three of them, Valhalla, Oddysey, and Origins are works of art. My favorite overall after playing them all is Odyssey. It had the most immersive rpg system. It also had the best camera filters for awesome in game pictures. The other games' photo systems fell flat compared to Odyssey's. I think Valhalla might have been a step up in terms of puzzles. Not sure whuch one had the most immersive puzzle stories. AC has still yet to deliver on a super immersive puzzle system. I guess finding the keys was fun in Valhalla. Oddysey had the best world. Critisism has its place but to give proper credit they're all beautiful and fun games.
The internet is a double edged sword, in many ways it ruins the fun in exploring a game by yourself and sometimes saves your time and money from a bad game.
"Homefront: The Revolution" game is really good game but very hated on by reviewers. Same goes for "Metal Gear Survive".
Edit: Every popular review about "Metal Gear Survive" is full of lies, you can't trust them. A lot of the reviews complained about the survival mechanics, scavenging for food and water, and also being limited on oxygen in the dust (Angry Joe complains about his stamina going down too quickly when his character is both really hungry and thirsty, not taking the time to hunt for food and water). Turns out food and water is plentiful later on. Not much you can do about the oxygen, you can only get a better O2 mask. (Most reviewers didn't even get to africa). A lot of people didn't like the game before even trying it, because it has "zombies" in it. However players must not be real fans of the MGS series if they think this is the first time Metal Gear has had any enemies with zombie like behavior. MGSV TPP had wandering mother base soldiers, and the Skulls. Theres also Vamp, and many others with similar behavior in past games. There has always been zombie like enemies, they just were not called zombies, just like in Metal Gear Survive they are wanderers. Plus, I don't remember zombies having hive mind, or group think.The story was bad to reviewers, however most reviewers never beat the game. Most definitely did not look at the archives to listen to the tapes in the game either ( like most did not do in TPP either ). This game actually has a good story that makes sense, although is also more complicated than one would think. The story is not just a side tale, its directly part of the series, even if its only a small part. I mean we need some explanation at least of where wormhole technology came from, how it was discovered, and so on for TPP. Metal Gear Survive gives us that explanation. Could the story have been better, longer, and portrayed in a better manner? Definitely, but what would you expect from a $40 game (now obtainable for less than $10 used). People found the gameplay boring. I would say early gameplay is annoying, using the spear and fences and just poking. However the game gets far better over time, as one would expect from a survival game. Killing wanderers gets harder, and ways of doing it get better with the different classes, class skills, and weaponry, not to mention traps, turrets, ect. Jumping into multiplayer is fun as you get larger hordes, more variety, and different elemental types, which you wont see in single player after beating the game.
@@cookie.2118those are definitely not a good game
@@rbkgaming2581 why?
Edit: why does a 3 letter word like "why" scare people off? God forbid you for actually putting effort into your thoughts.
In my case, I explored/played the whole game alone. In the end, I hated it, it become painful to finish this boring game ( + knowing what AC used to be). Nobody could give me back my money and time. You mentioned 2 things that cannot work together because no review out there changes YOUR OWN view of the game, you like it or not.
@@cookie.2118 You wouldn't know what a bad game is if it smacked you in the mouth though.
Finally someone who realized the same thing... Valhalla is best when you play it slowly. In my first playthrough I rushed through it. It was a chore and a bore (although I liked the story). For the second time I played it over the span of maybe 3 months. It was soooo satisfying to discover what Valhalla had to offer.
I felt the exact same way about Odyssey (have not played valhalla). All the little segemented stories on each island were a few hours long each, and sometimes quite interesting !
@K.C-2049 yea same. Heard all stuff about odyssey but as i went on playing i enjoyed it a lot and honestly felt like it was still an AC. Keep the same attitude with valhalla, go slow and immerse yourself in the character or how you like it, and you'll get a satisfying animus experience together with an AC game
It's been a long time since I played, I just started up again recently trying to get excalibur. Already got Thors hammer
I don't think there is a way to play valhalla any way but slow lmaoo. its a slow boring game
@@LucianA-e5e look above matey. For you, there may be not. For others?
Each of our opinions is valid.
"Its like edging except it doesnt feel as good when u finish"💀💀
This guy!🤣💀☠️⚰️
Bro what 💀
no idea what was he thinking with that one…
Freaky ass analogy 🤣
@@Killerwhale317 it always feels good when you finish
At least for 10 seconds
It's pretty nice for the first 12-15 hours or so, while the viking setting still feels fresh, and then it just becomes a chore...
Exactly this.
The "God stuff" was cut from the main game at fan request. Basically what happened was people were being upset about the fantasy elements in their sci-fi series (Origins and Odyssey had these first) so Ubisoft introduced this solution for players to be able to skip the fantasy portions by making them optional.
Now, given that it's mandatory to play the Asgard bits to understand the ending of the game it's safe to say they shot themselves in the foot and that they were waaaaay into the development of the game. The decision was made late and the devs weren't able to rewrite the the story to cut the fantasy stuff altogether - or actually make it optional.
Ah that's interesting! I wasn't following the game pre-release so I missed all that. Interesting that people complained about mythical stuff for this game despite it being in the other two, like you say.
Asgard mission chain is literally part of the main mission chain but ok.
@@overheatedeskim054Asgard is completely optional, it’s a side area.
@@overheatedeskim054no it isn’t lmao
@@overheatedeskim054someone didn’t actually finish the game 😂
The best Viking game of all time, for sure. Stunningly beautiful and with “endless buffet” of stories and discoveries to make, yet best enjoyed one meal at a time over many months. It was so easy to pick up and play again even if you took a break. It was like five seasons of an amazing TV show, which you can enjoy slowly while still binging a few episodes when you wanted to. I don’t get the haters, at all.
thats how i get through so many games. black flag was the same. odyssey too. even death stranding which isnt ac lol
So if you don’t like mindless grinding, microtransactions and boring repetitive side quests in a game devoid of any innovation you are a hater? Keep shilling.
@@corn.3892lol, you clearly haven't played the game for yourself. Their really is no grinding. Yeah, you need to level up to unlock new areas but... Leveling up is so damn easy that it basically not a problem. Microtransactions are pointless. And the side quests are really good... I assume you are talking about world events, even if you don't know what the side quests are called since you never played the game. Their is a lot of different events that make you use your brain to complete them and some are just a lot of fun to do, a lot of them feel like GTA random events that just fill the world with a lot of life.
@@cookie.2118 There is grinding (level grinding, resource grinding), you haven't played the game, lol. Sure, it's better than Odyssey, but it's still annoying. The side content is repetitive, because the world is so peaceful, the main side quests or content is carrying crates and doing mindless chores. The drug trips don't give you any meaningful progress, the entire existence of the open world is basically meaningless, why? Because its side content (very little action, meaningless drug trips, carrying stuff around and stupid puzzles) is so unbearably BORING, that the best way to play Valhalla is to ignore it and focus on the main story. Sadly, the story is not good enough to carry this game. I don't know what makes you think carrying crates full of apples is good content, but I guess to each their own.
@@cookie.2118 Plus, the world events are, OBJECTIVELY bad. They make exploration so much worse and are the second-biggest problem of Valhalla. Forget infiltrating cool fortresses and brutal fights, shoot arrows at doors, throw things around and enjoy the broken climbing, WOW, I accept that many people like the game, but this is just blatantly shilling.
“I would play at my own pace, explore how I wanted to and not worry about racing to the finish line”
Oh, you mean how games are MEANT to be played?
That's the issue right there: most of you have lost that, or never had it to begin with.
Exactly.
Unfortunately some of us have lives and jobs with limited time to play games.
Doesn't mean you gotta rush @@DeadFool321
That's more reason why you shouldn't have problems with long games@@DeadFool321
@@DeadFool321 That has nothing to do with what was said.
Been playing this game for almost 3 months now,over 300hr and I’m still having a blast.Got the 2 dlc W o D and S o P for 1/2 price. Waiting for Valhalla Ragnarok to be discounted
I’ve enjoyed all the AC that I have played.Been an AC fan from the first one that came out in 2007.Black Flag Probably is my favourite.
Update...Holy crap, same day I made this post, I get home and turn on my PS5 and low and behold freakin Dawn of Ragnarok is on sale for $19.95!!! Crazy luck.Have not even finished Wrath o Druids and still to do Siege of Paris.
Cheers mate, this game was a good ride
It's weird how much hate this game gets, it's a blast. People need to take of the nostalgia classes and play the game as a game. I've played almost all AC games and enjoyed all of them. Skipped rogue:) I always approach the games with curiosity. I just wanna see what is behind the next hill. Even if I just find a deer I'm honestly exited. I don't aim to 100% games but almost always end up doing it anyway, just because well there was this hill I hadn't looked behind yet😂
What the hell in Valhalla does it have to do with the Assassin's apart from the first 15 minutes? It's not nostalgia, these games are flat-out worse than the first 5 games and are designed to waste your time so you spend real money on cosmetics @@jerryb2965
after I finished the main story it felt empty to me tbh unlike odyssey and origins
Odyssey is still #1.
I don't give a shit about a hidden blade, Odyssey was perfect
Yeah...Played ODYSSEY 3000 hours...😂😂😂
It's not my #1 game but i admit that the sailing is incredibly fun.
Not really it was designed to get you to spend money. The progression is boring the abilities are fun though.
@@frequencyoftruth2303not really, especially if you play on pc you can literally just get the paid stuff for free with cheat engine
The beginning put me off and i stopped playing
Do you not know? In AC community, every new ac release is worst game ever 👀
That is one of the most true statements about AC.
yeah they did that with black flag. Its so annoying.
@@LandonGasao Black Flag was immediately seen as an improvement to AC III.
People still rag on unity and the only thing it's praised for is the parkour
Nah, AC2 was seen as an improvement
While I played as female Eivor, I did honestly hate her voice a lot of the time lmao. And it sucks, because the voice actress has a lovely voice, but she went for this overly raspy tone that was just really unpleasant to hear and definitely impacted her performance. She also played the voice of Eivor's mother in which she sounded way more like her natural voice and I really wish she had done that for Eivor.
Female Eivor Voice was such a Pain in the Ears lol...,will try Male Eivor next time... and finish the fantasy stuff wich i completely avoided once i finished the "main" stroy line in England...
@@DiegoRYTmale Eivor has amazing voice acting
Oddly I feel the opposite of this. I think she has the best tone and voice in the games after Ivarr and Sigurd. She really nailed what a female viking should be
I liked her voice. I just found how everyone talked a bit cringe. 🤷♀️
Her voice was fine to me
I believe many players are missing much of the "meta" stuff that ties them all together. Going back to the start, Adam and Eve themselves were hybrid human/ISU. This means that some ISU genetic exist in varying degrees across all humanity. Those with cetain combinations have varying abilities. I.e. the vision/bird tie-ins, that cause them to pervieve things and leads them toward the assassins or the templars. These being genetic in nature also means that these individuals are oftem groomed to these philosophies through familial bonds. What the Norse ISU (and atleast one other) did was incorporate more of themSelves into this hybridization. Appearanace, traits, but most important to Valhalla, memories. BUT the person whom these attributes begin to express in [seers] deal with them in unique ways. Some go mad (Tyr/Sigurd), some integrate fully (Basim/Loki) and some struggle and eventually come to a partnership (Eivor/Havi). I believe this is also some cross breeding between the existing ISU genetics present in human lines intermixing with the newer Norse lines. Basim being probably the best example (and also explain why he also got to the middle east). So lets suppose that Basim had more hybrid genes AND the norse genes which is why Basim integrated fully with Loki. This also explains why Basim can skip around in the Animus, because his norse ISU genes add capabilities (or genetic memory of how to use the anumus in this way). I would say that as a gamer when you run into something that doesn't initially make sense, instead of assuming it's a shortcut/retcon by the game devs. Try to look deeper. ❤
An what most ppl don’t know that Cain was the the founder of the ancient order an the templars praise him
This was greatly helpful!
Honestly all the ancient aliens stuff just feels silly even fully explained. When you get to a point where you can say your original main character is strongly implied to be a direct descendant of Adam Bible it just... Feels off.
@@Noname72105 I get you. It is most def treated as an after thought or at best just a way to forward the game play into more "fantastical" ways. So yeah, definately silly, but that doesn't mean it can't be fun. 🤷♂️
I thought Aita (Roberts/john in bf and De Molay/Germaine in unity) was meant to be a random luck rebirth injected into the entirety of humanities DNA. Nothing to do with direct relation but genetically injected, cos Aita got trapped in some machine and Juno killed him. Aita i thought was human or half or something too (unless im misremembering that)
I love Valhalla. I completed it 100% with all the additions. I also liked collecting opals, I visited every nook and cranny. After finishing the game, I missed Eivor the Viking. After a year, I'm back and playing Valhalla again. :)
It's funny. I've played every single AC ever made..
AC Unity, Revelations, 3 and Odyssey being my favorites.
It's odd though, because Valhalla has clocked the most play time, and I still find myself playing to this day. Over 300 hours and counting :)
To be fair if someone were to play through each game once, Valhalla would easily have the highest play time. I've played Black Flag 3 or 4 times and I still have more hours in my 1 playthrough of Valhalla 😅
According to Steam, I clocked over 660 hrs in 3, that's after 100% on the PS3 and I've just run up another couple of hundred on the remaster on PS5. Connor is still (deliberately) an ass, the mechanics are incredibly frustrating with their inconsistency, but it remains the most epic of the series for me and the most innovative. I think the reason I clocked in so many hours on PC was it was the closest I was going to get to a port of RDR and the sandbox is great to just run around, hunt and slaughter redcoats (or watch cougars doing it).
AC2?
Played ODYSSEY 3000 hours...😂😂😂
Odyssey is my favorite
Been at this gem of a viking experience for several months, the dailies and weekly tasks are fantastic hooks to make you think "oh, go on..just a little more exploration"
The lesson here is to always judge for thyself 😊
The problem isn't the quality (which is great) it's that it is named assassins creed (and not vikings creed for example)
What I think reviewers hate about these long games is that they are rushing through the game to meet with the schedule and they lose the chance to properly dissect the game in it's slow-paced approach, as intended
This game is quantity over quality, I’m confused how y’all think this comes close to origins or Odyssey
This is not a Viking exprience tho. Nothing about this is Viking. It is not even in the general ball park of what Vikings were.
@@ncrranger6327 I did not rush and it was a bloated mess without any cohesion.
I played Origins and loved it. I played Odyssey and hated it. Everyone said that Valhalla was terrible, so I didn't even buy it. But it was on discount last month, so I tried it. It's surprisingly good! To be fair, I haven't finished it and I'm just 30 hours in (Lunden arc), but the game is very solid so far. I like the combat, I like the world and the characters seem fine. Sure, the arc structure of the game means that pacing can suffer, but the actual gameplay loop is fun! The stealth also seems to be mostly fixed, because I haven't encountered any detection bugs that people were complaining about. And most importantly, Valhalla has this Assassin's Creed feel to it. When I go into cities, I walk around with a cloak and armed with just a dagger. It's kinda immersive.
Damn, is it longer than Odyssey? I just started Odyssey yesterday and it took me 4 hours to clean the entire first area... then I opened the map :(
Yeah it's longer than Odyssey. It took me 67 hours to beat Odyssey, but Valhalla took me about 83. That does include doing all the Order of Ancients and optional areas, but I didn't collect all the collectables and didn't do any DLC.
its my fav assassin creed other than unity and mirage
Odyssey is a masterpiece.
@@joshy9392 I just got my ship, had to stop to bake some pancakes, but everything is done, and I´m ready to continu,e I´m liking the game, the revelation abouit who "Just some Spartan general" was cool, sucks for everyone :( .
500 hrs in Valhalla and 500 hrs in Oddessy. can't get enough of the best games in history.
Being a male who, given the choice, prefers to play as a male character over a female one doesn’t make me an incel. It’s just a preference. When female is the only playable character, it makes no difference to me. Just thought you made a pretty harsh comment aimed at a group of people that probably rep the majority of gamers out there.
I wish I could give this comment a 100 likes but that wouldn't be fair. Thanks mate you said what I wanted to.
He was simping so hard to get thumbs up from certain communities. I'm playing a RPG game, making decisions I would make and I want my character to be relatable to me at least in most basic ways. Why should I believe female Eivor could take on most brutal men in the world in the least sneaky AC title is beyond me.
@@MurCellic1903 That's the point. Also, there's a window in which I can actually enjoy or accept playing a woman in a game as well...the same exists for men too. For example - I believe Abby from the TLOU2 could take on built men in that game simply because she was trained, big and extremely strong (probably roided up too) - hence when I saw that she doesn't even need melee weapons sometimes and can brute force a fight I can believe that - its basic biology not gender studies. Ellie on the other hand is a lanky underfed girl - she uses knives, shivs, machetes most of the time in her animations and that's what I'd like to do in that case since I can't expect her to beat a grown man to pulp with those physical attributes. TLOU2 isn't an RPG yes but come on there's things I can believe simply because of mass vs mass and biology.
That's not to say I don't enjoy playing as the woman too - take the case of games like Control, TEW1and2, HZD, SH3, lots of older titles as well etc. Those are excellent games with female protagonists and playable characters.
There's also a case to be made for actually selling a game - Most mainstream gamers are male but that's a more subjective thing where - which gamer a certain cover/game protagonist would appeal to. For example RDR2 is universally praised for its storytelling and character - I've seen men and women praise it and cry at the ending; I think choosing a male protagonist was a good choice in this case given the time and the story they wanted to tell; The same cannot be said for BFV - that game got backlash simply for not catering to the majority of gamers during the promotions lol (it's not a bad game mind you - but it did hurt the sales I think).
Modern gaming just wants to " get thumbs up from certain communities ", get some sweet revenue from SBI etc. and it seems like it has also trickled into the game critics and the TH-cam channels.
It’s fun to play as a Viking, but I simply didn’t care for the setting, or the story. Not as interesting for me as the previous ones.
I spent about 120 hours in the game too.
Hahha I know right, don’t get me wrong it has its issues, and I haven’t played any DLC. But I had a FUCKING BLAST playing this very long epic satisfying main story, in my homeland. The raids feel amazing especially the big main mission ones. They can go on for almost an hour sometimes
Doing the raids with the community made Vikings that you can add to your crew were my favourite things to do in the game.
You're not supposed to like it 😭
@@the_marveraklet people enjoy what they want bruh
@@VinnyFrFr I know thats my point
Loved the video, got me through a long drive. The length of this game can be extended by another 40 hours if you get all the dlc haha. I have only beat Wrath of the Druids so far, if you ever return to this game, highly recommend playing it, Ireland is beautiful and the story is great.
I do the same thing. It’s good to listen to the story telling while driving along. 👍👍
You played a videogame while driving?
@@nosouponhead no I listened to the video while driving 😂
Yeah, I was told the same thing man over and over. So I stayed away from it. For a long time, just bought it Friday. And today is Tuesday Haven't put it down since take. My wife's gonna divorce me over LO. L.😅😅😅 The visuals Are spectacular Alone The storyline draws you in. Making you want to learn more as you play. The exploration is awesome. Bob Marley is I can't say enough I am so glad. I went with my instincts love this game❤❤❤❤
I think sometimes players who criticize a game harshly have played hundreds of games and are comparing them, sometimes unconsciously, to the best games they've ever played. Also, some players have played too many games and have gotten jaded and great graphics and gameplay don't engage their joy response much any longer.
I agree with graphics but obviously you will criticize a game when you have more knowledge than someone playing a game for the first time. Same thing happens with all forms of media.
Issue with that is that Ubisoft stopped making unique experiences and just started making witcher 3 knock offs. Their games get compared to other popular games because Ubisoft steals most of their ideas from successful titles and do nothing to actually innovate.
Even rockstar games is a clear upgrade. But ubisoft? Ac new ganes is like a new dlc of witcher 3.
I don't think any game in this franchise has actually been a bad game. Some just stand out and are much more unique than others, others had either more development time or just in general better skill at being able to put together and polish the engine and gameplay and mission design, and with how many entries in the franchise there have been and how long they've been making them some just have to be at the bottom. I think otherwise there is enough variety at this point that even fans of the franchise are going to have certain developer teams or eras/styles of AC games that they prefer. And otherwise there are just going to be some general gamers that enjoy a fraction of these titles and aren't a fan of the others.
For me, the thing that always appealed to me the most about these games was being able to play around in a historical sandbox. Sure I still liked the general plot and world that the game was building, however I'm one of those who never cared a single bit about anything happening in the present-day storyline or the character of Desmond. If it wasn't taking place in the historical portion of the game I just didn't care.
And that comes from me just generally having an interest in lots of historical eras. However this also has kind of made it so that the setting can sometimes determine whether or not that becomes one of my favorite games in the franchise to begin with. I go back and forth between whether or not I like black flag or origins the best. And I think I pick origins not even necessarily because I think it's definitively a better constructed game, but just because it was so much more enticing for me to explore that game world because of an absolute love and fascination with ancient Egypt that dates back to my childhood. Otherwise I feel like I enjoy something like Assassin's Creed 3 more than many other people because I also have a high interest and attachment to the revolutionary War. That's one of my favorite eras in American history to study.
Stuff like unity and syndicate, I can realize that they are mostly generally well made games, although unity still has technical issues to this day. And they feel more like traditional Assassin's Creed titles, however I just didn't really have a huge interest in the French revolution or industrial London. So those became the first two games that I never finished in the franchise and again a big part of it is the setting, but the other part is that that was about when Ubisoft was really starting to just create these overly bloated game worlds that had just a ton of icons everywhere and all of this side content where it became daunting to really know what was worth doing and what you were supposed to be doing, and what was just pointless filler and busy work.
I feel like origins actually cleaned that up a little bit since it was taking such heavy inspiration from The Witcher 3, I felt compelled to do most of the things that I ran across in every area
And then Odyssey did the too much on the map thing again lol
It's taking me a while to finally get into Odyssey, I had to do a lot of initial grinding before that game felt like it really opened up and became fun to explore and go on adventures. And even then I've got to be 50 odd hours into that game at this point and still don't quite know how to progress the main story.
Valhalla even though I hadn't completed Odyssey, was catching my eye because I needed something to show off my new series X, and because I generally am more interested in something like the Vikings over the ancient Greeks. So I hopped into Valhalla as well and played a bit through it and had some fun and can note which things I think it does better than Odyssey in which things I think it does worse. And although it kind of cleans up the map compared to Odyssey I still feel like it has this issue of just being too big with too much stuff for its own good. But my biggest issue with Valhalla is I just don't really care about any of the characters. Odyssey also has too much going on however there's a feeling of charm and whimsy and playful sarcasm that makes it entertaining, especially if you pick Kassandra
Valhalla is just kind of missing that. So it sits as one of those games installed on my hard drive that I only ever made it a fraction of the way through, however one day I'm going to go back and give it a shake. Because it's gorgeous, even if I don't think all of the farmlands in England are all that exciting to explore, but it is mechanically sound. If you're looking for a Viking game, it is probably one of the best ones if not the best one depending on what you're looking for
So even though it lost my interest, even though Odyssey lost my interest and syndicate and unity lost my interest... I still can't look at them and say that they did that because of they're bad games. It's just the combination of whether or not it's the right time and whether I'm the right person to really love that particular setting and concept
This is a huge franchise, and at this point I would bet it's incredibly rare to find anyone who actually really loves every single entry
And I'm not going to lie, once mirage goes on a decent sale I really want to try that one out, because once again just the setting interests me more. Plus if it's not as big or as long as these other ones I might have a chance to actually beat it l😅
None of these games have been particularly perfect either. It's hard to play these games after Ghost of Tsushima.
@@nosouponhead definitely not implying any of them are perfect. But many sit amongst my favorite games I've ever played. Ghost of Tsushima is solid. But overall the setting / time doesn't personally interest me as much as many of the AC titles. Which can be a big part of how much I enjoy them or not
Also the online gaming communities are filled with crybabies who find everything bad and these communities do not represent the general audience. People keep forgetting the core aspect of video games, its for entertainment and if you are having fun, then who tf cares.
Syndicate and Odyssey definitely *were* bad games.
@@nosouponheaddid you just mindlessly comment that without reading his comment???
I dislike long games because I usually don’t get to finish the story before I’m bored
3:19 "20hrs in and not enjoying my time with it..." Dude. No. That alone makes me not want to play the game. Any game over 20hrs that feels like a chore is a bad game. "Dude, this bowl of turds finally gets good after you've been eating it for 10 days straight." No thank.s
I’ve seen this exact thing said for universally praised games like BG3 and no one complains 🤷♂️
That's because reviewers like Luke Stephens panned it. I loved playing Valhalla. It has one of the greatest video game characters in all video games, namely Ivarr.
Valhalla is a game I will always enjoy playing.
Honestly, I personally enjoyed Valhalla, and as a ac fan, would consider it an ac game
They have no idea what direction to go with AC. They are basically just trying to milk money out of it until they run out of random crap they can come up with.
Bro did unity dirty 💀
Unity is ass
Nah @@rolandngom5080
@@rolandngom5080unity isn’t that bad, odyssey is fucking dog shit
@@rolandngom5080 You say that because your favorite youtuber says that. (I have no opinion on Unity)
My only gripe with Valhalla was how repetitive the main story missions were. By the time I stormed the fifth castle I was already feeling like it had grown stale
i have to say that i liked it. if you take your time (as others have said) it really is a beautiful world and a good game. If you are rushing through it, then yes it becomes very repetitive. I like the voice acting (Eivor is the red headed actor in last kingdom) music is nice and ya it is a very beautiful game. Take your pace with this game because its long but had good elements and activities and really liked the detail they put into developing Ravensthorpe.
Repetitive is repetitive no matter how fast you go through it. I don’t understand how taking it slow would help
@@acest2098the main quests are mostly design the same in Valhalla, that's why it gets repetitive quickly when you just do main quests and nothing more. But the side content in this game is beautifully done, only players that take it slow will do them because you will miss out on most of the side activities if you are rushing to beat the game. Just do a good mix of both side quests and main quests, you will have a really good time... I will promise you that.
It's definetely the worst in terms of historical accuracy.
I never thought to play this one, but your video has me interested… still, I’m 300 hrs in and still not finished Odyssey… I spend a lot of time just wandering around checking out the sights
I recently stated oddessy as well. It’s so much better than Valhalla.
@@citrusjelly9069I’m still working on Origins now, but planning to try Valhalla after that…
Still, I’m not sure anything can be as good as Odyssey….
im playing Odyssey right NOW for the first time (80 hours in) and i totally know what u mean. I feel ashamed to miss such a gorgeous game all these years@@StillLateToTheParty
Played ODYSSEY 3000 hours...😂😂😂
@@zicuvalentin2251 300… because this is Sparta!!
"It's like edging only it doesn't feel as good when you finally finish" 🤣🤣 What an analogy. Legit spat out my coffee. Subbed
Never listen to the critics, Odyssey was incredible and everybody complained about it just because it's trendy to hate on Ubisoft.
I'm a huge AC fan since the very beginning and I absolutely hated Odyssey with a passion for years forced myself to complete it even modded my level on pc just to help and never looked back until I got it on PS5 gave it another go knowing I'd hate it and I loved every second of it on my 2nd go didn't want to put it down it's not a great AC game but I'd include it in the franchise now and not call it the bastard child of the series
It's not trendy, it's just that Ubisoft is lazy. The hate is well deserved.
Ubisoft is Overhated
No they complained about it because it's bloated and grindy as hell with bad stealth mechanics, repetitive side activities, aggressive level-gating, spongy enemies, and a plot that moves forward about as quickly as a turtle crosses a highway. Odyssey isn't even close to the longest game I have ever completed, and yet it felt longer than even my week-long 198 hour binge of Persona 5 at launch.
Mirage was the worst AC game I've played. Valhalla is ok
Origin is the best
@@oblivian1308 your right about that 👍
It was a great game that didn't deserve the hate. It really isn't that long if you are just doing the main story. Most side stuff is completely optional. No different than something like skyrim or the Witcher 3.
It deserved the hate that it wouldn't have gotten when it weren't called "assassins creed"
It was a good game but imo suffered from the collectibles-hunting carbon copy-pasting of other Assassins Creed games. The best parts of Valhalla were the parts that weren’t in other AC games.
naw, main story was pretty long. And drug its feet
Nah great game is crazy, this is the worst AC game I’ve ever played 💀
@wezzsimple6612 your opinion. To me the original is the worse now. It hasn't aged well at all. After playing the the modern games (origins to Valhalla) it's really hard to go back to the old ones. They feel too bare bones after having so much added.
I am so incredibly pleased to see this video and channel doing so well. Congratulations mate, very well deserved!
What threw me off was how stupid all the side quests were. Why would you make a quest where npcs asks you to purposefully burn their home down to prove they’re strong warriors?💀
It's definitely boring. I just recently tried to play this game again. And wow are the missions just uninspired and bland. All the rpg elements honestly detract from the immersion and the story. Valhalla was the first Ac game I didn't want to force myself to finish.
It’s not assassins creed but it’s a good game but shouldn’t have been “assassins creed”
It’s a solid game if:
1. Titled simply as “Valhalla”, and advertised it as a spinoff for AC
2. Remove The micro transactions, it’s a single player game and there are more armor sets in the store compared to the base game (At least in PC you could just do cheat engine to obtain all armor)
Ubisoft is many things, but they make pretty maps and enjoyable combat. Not too easy and not too souls-like
This game was so fun. Been thinking about jumping back in.
Do it! I put about 40 hrs about a year ago and just the other day started playing again and I forgot how awesome it was
@@dedo7326 I think I have over 100. I was playing it everyday after work and every waking minute on the weekends
not that good@@dedo7326
As someone who has 100% completion in all of the RPG Assassins creed games i can confidently say that Valhalla is the worst to fully complete lol
Valhalla is one of my favorite games tbh
To make a comment on your point of Eivor wearing the hidden blade on the top of the arm instead of under: they explained it in the game itself when Eivor first gets the blade. She says that she wants to show it off, which negates the point of the "hidden" part of it. Its under the arm intentionally to hide it as much as possible and back in these days they didnt have a way to make it so it doesnt take the finger on the way out
I grinded for Excalibur and Mjolnir just for funsies and in return Ubisoft took my firstborn and half my 401k
2:45 "its like edging but it doesn't feel as good when you finally finish" had me dying of laughter
Just finished watching your whole AC series, you’re such an underrated TH-camr. Can’t wait for the mirage video. Appreciate you brother, cheers!
I'm not sure if I'm flattered or worried for your mental wellbeing, but thank you! I've been delayed in getting to play Mirage but hopefully next week I'll get lucky!
This is a great game and one of the best "viking" themed. I don't know what some people are thinking when they say it's bad. It's a beautiful game I like going around in the countryside on my horse and it's never boring and using the ship is beautiful too. The story is good the characters are good the landscapes are beautiful the lore is quite historically accurate (how it can be for a game). What else do they want? And the same people idolize games like The Wither 3 which is nothing special in my opinion. And I think with these games (Odyssey and Valhalla) Ubisoft has managed to find a great equilibrium between the story and the open world which is something nobody else has done so well. By the way Eivor is a unisex name.
about female Eivor voice there is a reason why she talks like that because she was bitten by a wolf in her neck when she was a child (she has a big scar too) which damaged her vocal chords the rasp is present in the male voice too but it's less noticeable. I didn't find anything strange in her voice. and the music is outstanding.
by the way (and then I shut up lol) this is a game you can't rush you have to enjoy the world and the story so any reasoning about how much time it takes to do something is nonsensical.
It’s a good game. I play it without the AC lore in mind, like a standalone title that made me appreciate it more.
My advice to playing the AC RPG trio is, do a period of gameplay, play something else, make a set time limit at which you'll move on, and then come back. That way it doesn't kill you inside.
From what I was able to gather from Mirage is that Odin was trying to take over Eivor's body much how Loki did with Basim. However unlike Loki's Subtle approach by appearing as a friend of Basim, Odin tried to take it by force by claiming to be Eivor's god.
Huh, comparing this trash with witcher 3?
I spent 3 months on this game, off and on playing it. Racked up 350 plus hours, got all items & trophies - everything completed except didn't touch Ragnarok Saga and after a few times trying the Skill challenges & the River Raids DLC quit both. It was still waaaay too long. Prob completed 80% of the content & those River Raids are procedurally generated Loot, so can drag on for hours. Especially the main story just dragged on and on with very little to keep my interest after Ivarr & Coelbert portion of story are completed.
I spent the time to go through all side quests and every single wealth or collective item i could get before i proceeded with the main quest within the current area i was in. After doing such allowed me to understand the story far better. Ofc you can't expect everyone to have that sort of dedication however the option to do so is there and choosing not to go through it is your choice. If you complain you don't get the story you have only yourself to point at.
I did the same thing until it became so boring I was unable to continue playing the game. Which was unbelievably fast, I got to that point faster than in Odyssey.
I stand by the fact that Valhalla is the worst Assassin's Creed game. But at the same time is a good action-rpg with vikings, raids, nordic gods etc.
My mom told me this along time ago. Whatever the internet says do/believe the opposite.
Im literally playing Valhalla rn. The worst part is how long the story the is. If they made each arc two or 3 arcs (location only) itd shorten the story by like 20 or so hours and actually make it ok
it's the worst assassins creed game because it isn't an assassins creed like game.
Yea, for you
@@juancarlosponce6664 I play it and it is really good but I is not assassin’s creed they just wanted to make money of calling it assassin’s creed
Valhalla and Odyssey were great opportunities to break away from Assassins Creed. Ubisoft could've made whole games with ancient cultural touchstones. And let's face it, warrior cultures wouldn't have anything to do with honorless assassins, or sci-fi scenes.
Having Origins and Unity so low, abstained me from watching the rest of the video =/
It's not the worst, but it's garbage compared to Origins or Odyssey.
Played ODYSSEY 3000 hours...😂😂😂
I just tried it, and first thing that piss me off is that imagine how many resources they spread doing immersion braking huds and micro transactions, if they get rid of the game store they’ll had more resources to make a better game, the second one was the Skyrim skill tree, really? They think that makes an assassins creed that is the lack of all those rpg elements in favor of more realistic action, then ins the main character identity they didn’t have the guts of keeping Eibor female or male, many female were raised as boys so you telling me they couldn’t go that route. Then the whole immersion braking hit numbers and health bars. They need to make a simpler game, keep going with the original assassin formula and create just more cinematic side quest that teach you new abilities instead of having you unlock them with experience.
I like to just pretend AC3 was the last game. Desmond dies saving the world and everything is fine.
you couldn't skip through time in the original first games because of memory synchronization, I think in AC Brotherhood they tried to do it but they couldn't and that's the reason, Abstergo probably did it with Subject 16 which caused him to lose his mind and be trapped within the animus
That's right, which is why Basim being able to casually jump to the exact moment he's looking for stood out to me. That's a big deal, given what the early games established.
The size of the map and the greatness of this game is too big for many little heads
I’m impressed you did all of that in 83 hours. I had 90 hours and I still had areas not discovered and hadn’t finished the main story. By which time I was completely burnt out. Maybe I’ll go back and try finish it.
Just try playing one day and rest for another day.
The worse creed game is mirage hands down, the combat and weapons in that game are absolutely trash
Played ODYSSEY 3000 hours...
I got Valhalla on my birth day as a joke (i am a HUGE og ac fan) and then i was actually surprised at how GOOD ac valhalla was, i really loved Eivor (i played as male Eivor) and he was so fun to play and how (kinda) good the RPG combat was here, it was pretty fun to play Valhalla and i was so stupid to think it sucked before i even played it, i also really loved the side characters, it took me 3 months to finish ac Valhalla and i don't regret playing that underrated gem of a game.
same, i think i finished it in 2-3 weeks? i finish games fast, i also finished syndicate in 3 days, revelations in 1/5 and unity in 2... not sure how i do that...
The Order members will send assassin's after you but you need to fail a quest for this to happen (you choose whether to burn a paper or hand it over I think...something like that). Each region has 2 Order agents & they'll only search for Eivor if you're in their area. It's very tough when they come after you because it didn't matter my level & just 30 levels above suggested was a massive challenge & they don't stop hunting you all game.
Bro, there's no Assassin's Creed in this 1 hour Assassin's Creed video.
If you keep uploading these great videos, your channel will blow up 100%
This happens with every actually good game, you get burned out on the 3rd installment of the open world rpg trilogy that is Origins, Odyssey and then Valhalla. If Valhalla came before the other two I would have appreciated the game more. I've sunk so many hours into Origins and Odyssey that I found myself finding every task on Valhalla an absolute chore because it felt like the same loop I've already played time and time again.
Precisely. Its the same game mechanic formula as origins and odyssey. Thats why it gets boring quicker. Even if this was released before origins and odyssey, we would've found origins and odyssey boring lol.
Here’s the thing I hated odyssey and got bored of origins but this game just came out on gamepass and it’s already better than the other two. Just I wish it wasn’t an assassin creed game and wish Ubisoft didn’t make it either lol. These allot of things I like and love but then there’s just that dumb Ubisoft stuff that slightly ruins the experience. If they just made an brutal open world Viking game it would be so much better.
@@TomboyCactus I agree but even if Odyssey was released first I would still call it boring, it is by far the most boring game I've ever played. I already thought Origins was grindy and repetitive, Odyssey is a crime against humanity in that regard. Even if you buy their experience booster you still run into *constant* level gates that impede you from progressing the main story, and even if you did remove all the side-questing it's still glacially paced. I have never seen a story stretched so far beyond any point of reason, you could tell Odyssey's story in 1/4th the amount of time it takes to tell it and it would be infinitely better for it. The thing Valhalla does right is that by breaking its narrative up into distinct arcs and giving you a town to get invested in, you can take it at your own pace and there's always something new happening to keep the game engaging.
Big Fan of AC series, and Valhalla is my favorite by far, I know Eivor is not a Assasin but nothing beats playing as Odyn
I loved this game. While I'm new to AC so cannot compare. I loved playing as a Viking. I don't mind it being long, I did find some points were repetitive, if they took the repetition out and added new ones it would be amazing. Overall if they brought out valhalla 2 I would get it
You might be surprised to know Farcry: Primal introduced a 'bird' pet which was the prototype for all the birds we get in AC: Origins/Odyssey/Valhalla. That mechanic was never used in any other Farcry game.
I beat AC Valhalla, the game was playable, but kinda boring
I just bought it for 19$ i liked odyssey so i think i would like valhalla tho
Personally AC Valhalla was one of the better AC games. There aren't many.
I dont know why there's so much hate for this game. I mean this is by far the most jam-packed features of all AC game But sadly they removed it to AC Mirage which is sucks for my opinion. This definitely one of my favorite AC game in the series
People hate it because it's too long, way too much pointless loot and way to bloated with chores for activities and collectibles, mediocre storyline and plot and pointless side content that just a snooze fest, skill trees are just way to long and bloated and it plays more like mediocre viking game rather then an ac game
Because the game is half baked and is designed to drive you to spend more money.
-World too big and ypu don't want to get all the collectibles? Buy an xp booster.
-your weapons and armor are blandly designed with boring passives? Buy some new ones in the store for $10 a pop.
-want more than 10 poorly made raids? Buy the dlc.
@@kingpinavatar couldn't agree more they tarnish my favorite environment, culture and lore which is vikings, just imagine the damage they would do with samurai. And the Japan setting they probably make it play more like a mediocre or sub par sumari game or a boot leg version of ghost of tsushima but just a shittyer and half back version that's way too over priced with way too much micro transactions
Content and features for the sake of content and features is meaningless and shoving it into a game breaks immersion and makes the world open and dead because playing a collectathon is not fun especially for ac games which have the microtransactions curse supprised they didn't pull a star wars battle front before EA got hit up the ass with lawsuits forcing them to fix the game and make it playable with non intrusive micro transactions or put pointless skins in the game like fortnite that doesn't make in universe sense
I wished origins had more content honestly.
I even go on and replay the side quests and enemy locations.
Personally, I'm very tired of hearing how this game is bad and not part of AC. I actually believe this to be the fullest and most complete installment and playing Mirage following, I have cemented my view that going back to the old format is not the way to go. Shame.
its not a problem to play a big game if its fun i.e. witcher, red dead, elden ring etc
Best AC game ever! Almost 400 hours in and still exploring.
You're still exploring because the map is a bloated mess of copy pasted assets. Wow, how exciting and intriguing
Well for me it just looked really ugly compared to Odyssey
My problem with this game is the length
I thought Mirage was worst than this game. It was too short, too little to do and too boring. The climbing mechanic was bad, abilities weren't that great and I completed it in about a week, collected everything and completed the quest. Was not worth the asking price.
You guys complain for being too long
You guys complain for being too short
Wtf do you want?? Can't win them all I guess
Mirage was just a short backstory for basim, you should have known this ..
the best AC game BY FAR
Not the best
@@xXNeOnSwAgXxyes the best
@@xXNeOnSwAgXx ppppffffft
It's the worst AC game because it's not actually a game. It's never-ending cutscenes one after another and sometimes you have to walk really slowly to get to the next cutscene. There is no actual gameplay whatsoever.
Dude I’m almost done with mirage and I just had to come back to Valhalla. So much more to do and weapons to choose from. Same with skills and fighting styles
my main problem with Valhalla is that the game is just too long and feels like a chore to play , not only this but also on my PC the stupid game just crashes every time after 2-3 hrs of play time. ( I'm playing on medium settings and my PC is 12 gen i7 with 3070 )
So my opinion just skip this game.
found out deleting contents in the cache folder solved my random crashes.
It’s unfortunate that not many people were aware that Valhalla pretty much serves as a “Love Letter” to the Franchise considering this Game makes Many References from Previous Titles.
This is my first AC game I've played. Started playing 3 days ago and I can't believe I've slept on this series all this time! It's already one of my favourite games of all time
It was mine too and I'm still playing it. I'm tryna beat it on aesir difficulty without dying once.
I agree with most of your ideas and critizisms.
I enjoyed a lot about Valhalla. It is not at all a bad game as such. I do not think it is too long at all.
I had great fun roaming the world, and I actually loved the incremental upgrade mechanic. It felt natural to me, and you had to make strategic decisions while choosing your upgrade path. I often went to areas that required a higher skill level than I had, because the game is too easy as it is.
- My main criticism is that this should have been developed as a separate IP, and not as an Assassin's Creed game. Viking gameplay does not connect well with the Assassin's Creed way of doing things. It works against it, actually.
- I also missed the beautiful ancient city environments in this game, but they just did not exist in this area in this time period.
- I did not like the supernatural/god nonsense in this game at all. I would have preferred a pure realistic approach to this historical setting.
- I think the castle sieges were nonsensical. I could with ease conquer every castle on my own, by singlehandidly killing everyone inside, but was then in the next instance forced to do it all over again in a siege. This was a dumb mechanic. Not well-designed, and not thought through, by the devs.
it is too long. If you try to do EVERYTHING, side missions, secrets and such, u can be looking easy at 300 hours. With all DLCs, game mods, probably 400 or 500. That is just insane and, for completionists like me (i like to do everything in a game), its a nightmare. I myself just had to stop, is too much. Plus, the game is plagued with bad game decisions that hurt the game.
- bloated content
- extremely long and mostly empty maps. I get it, they tried to portrait England in the past, but its a game decision that
hurts the game. Plus, points of interest are way too far apart from each other.
- cryptic secrets and other annoyances in the world design
- performance issues - such as constant crashes
- animation problems (clunky combat, getting stuff in the enviromment)
- sound mixing issues, muffled sounds, unimpactful weapon sounds etc.
- kinda bland story that lacks.. "soul", in the lack of a better analogy, and other stuff i could stay here rambling about
all day.
- too many gameplay mechanics getting introduced, not well explained, many of those pointless and unconsequential.
They could be removed from the game and you would not miss them one bit. That is the definition of bloat
- repetitive all way around. Its just too much.
This said, i dont think is a bad game at all, there are many things to be enjoyed (beautiful landscapes, nordic setting, cool weapons and gear, upgrade system is good, like you said, interesting characters, overall enjoyable game when it works well, and other stuff. I personally liked the raid missions, but also felt excessive and repetitive at some point. It feels like they used the good things from Odyssey, upped x20 everything, then scratched many good mechanics, introducing others are are worse. It feels like a disjointed mess that had good elements in between, but used in a disorganized, unfocused way.
@@hernanipereira"it is too long. If you try to do EVERYTHING, side missions, secrets and such, u can be looking easy at 300 hours. "
I have no problem with 300 hours. And as you said, you do not have to do everything. It is there if you want to, but it is your choice.
of course its optional, but if is in the game, its there for a reason. right? If is just there to bloat and waste our time, or to be skipped, then its a bad sign. I liked the game overall but i felt over and over it was wasting my time - overall feeling with many sidequests etc - Plus, if u just skip stuff, you might be missing important stuff, you never know. The game would have benefited more with less stuff in game, like i said, being more focused in the main story with some side missions, being smaller in size and scope. I had the feeling Valhalla got a bit greedy or, at least, overambitious; devs at some point tried to do everything, all the same time, kept adding stuff that has no real meaning or purpose and lost focus (i mean, there is even a roguelite mode in game o.o)@@Ploskkky
Mind blown that you put all this energy & effort on such a small channel!
Really well done. Honestly I assumed you had at LEAST 100K+ subs.
Keep up the good work. That hour flew by & it was entertaining.
You'll definitely hit those milestones someday soon!
New sub!!👍🏾👍🏾
Thank you, I really appreciate those kind words! If you happen to know 100k or so people and could convince them to sub then I'd be super grateful, thanks!
@@borangedunn 🤣🤣
Ac valhalla was my 1st AC game n I freaking loved it. It's one big ass adventure! After beating valhalla n all 3 dlc I now beat Origins plus dlc n oddesey n all dlc. I'm also almost finished with mirage witch I also love! People hate on valhalla yet it made ubisoft soooo much money.
It made money because Ubisoft design their games to waste your time so you end up buying them, the same thing Activision does with COD but people are too brain dead to stop buying them.
21:01 They can't fast forward because they don't know what exactly they are looking, or where and when it will turn up. That's been the case with most other AC stories.
I think we can assume Basim knows what he's looking for, so he knows what bits he can afford to skip.
People are weird,who cares about minor stuff if it’s a good game that’s fine by me.People are obsessed with minutiae details.
Anyway I love fantasy games and in reality all games are fantasy stories,it’s not real life 😂
Played ODYSSEY 3000 hours...
@@zicuvalentin2251But he didn't mantionted Odyssey
I look at the new games as isu games.
Which I like because when I first played rogue, I wanted to know more about them but the old games didn't have much besides the first few.
I loved AC Valhalla! It had possibly the best story of the new trilogy, and i'm primarily a story player. Odyssey had the best combat though, and Origins had the best setting.
Odyssey only works if you play as Kassandra. Alexios is an immersion breaking buffoon as the player character. So I played Valhallah as female Eivor, but after NG+, I chose male and the voice acting is just so much better, the reverse of Odyssey.
I've only ever played as Alexios (I can't stand Kassandra) and have about 20 complete play throughs, including all of the DLC. Btw, I don't like Atlantis. Hades however, I do. BTW, my NG+ char is so OP it's practically cheating. Boring really. BTW. I still save Cassandra in order to get the best ending where everyone that CAN live, does.
@@cassiespencer6134 Funny how the voice acting can have completely different effects. I find it ironic that Alexios is obviously the "correct" choice for Odyssey but I prefer Kass and that female is the correct choice for Valhalla, yret in that game I prefer male. I don't even consider Odyssey as a game per se, more of a tech demo sandbox. The engine, mechanics and sheer size & variety of the map, weapons, skills etc, sowed far more effort and attention to detail than the narrative. There are some real oddities like zero fall damage, disjointed & tonally inconsistent side quests & the ridiculous level gating of wildlife (carried over from Origins) that enhance the tech demo more than game feel for me. It's almost like the story was an afterthought they threw together to justify the sandbox. I've got 253h logged on PC and just started a PS5 playthrough as part of running through 3,4 & 5 while I avoid Mirage, so I love the sandbox - except for when i drop my toe over an invisible line and start getting one-shotted by level 60 boars.
What do you mean "after NG+"? AC Valhalla doesn't have NG+.
My bad. I was referring to play throughs other than Valhalla.
@@cassiespencer6134 I was responding to @Andrew-fq7pu.