As with kant, some epistemic issue present with his Conception of knowledge. Modelling logic as a process with inputs and outputs is fair enough, but why limit, a priori , the feedback mechanism to simply sensory information ? "Authority" as the author derides, is itself a mere linguistic label, taken as near ad homenim here, for another epistemic input to the logical process. That of " causal revelation ".
In the end he basically says “yeah I know this paper was really obtuse, but tune in for the next one guys I swear it’ll all make sense and totally be with it!!” Extremely ironic.
6:05 💎🚨‼️
Hope we are getting a book soon 🙏
As with kant, some epistemic issue present with his Conception of knowledge. Modelling logic as a process with inputs and outputs is fair enough, but why limit, a priori , the feedback mechanism to simply sensory information ?
"Authority" as the author derides, is itself a mere linguistic label, taken as near ad homenim here, for another epistemic input to the logical process. That of " causal revelation ".
i am dunce
someone please tldr for me
In the end he basically says “yeah I know this paper was really obtuse, but tune in for the next one guys I swear it’ll all make sense and totally be with it!!” Extremely ironic.