Thank you for going over these videos I appreciate it and I also appreciate the way that you do inform us on what the law says. I like the way that you show the law and then orally present the law too. I have reading and writing comprehension problems so by not only showing it .explaining it let's me be able to soak up that information🙏
It's always a pleasure to like and comment on your videos. You deserve the support. Surprisingly enough, even if there is a disagreement or I go on a heartfelt rant, my fellow commenters on your videos are polite and seem to enjoy honest debate. That's rare on TH-cam. It's too bad that that cannot be figured into the algorithm.
@chief tp shutup. the comment you just made involving race is completely unjustified. your lack of knowledge of the situation is very clear. peace officers wouldnt have to baby sit as much if people would just obey the law. its not the officers fault they have to enforce a few bad laws. if they dont enforce these laws, they lose their job and their families starve. but i forgot thats what you entitled miscreants want. a world of chaos without policing.
Please, for the love of god, you have the right to remain silent. OMG please stop talking! Pretty sure at least one of her future boyfriends ends up being suicidal, I'm sure she has no problem turning people off.
She’s young and a collage student she just wants to let her knowledge be heard and learned she’s young ! Giver her a break she will learn that invoking your right to remain silent is the better rout to go bec cops lose their pacient after a while esp when they believed they are right and they are done listening to someone who is not listening to what they are saying and they can end up getting ID bec certain places a bike is also considered a vehicle n ride and stop as cars do! But she is talking way too much I get annoyed also
I would take these officers in the street vs 90% of the ones that end up on this channel. They were extremely patient and even helped her when she tried to use words that she didn’t understand.
Its nice to see, it is exactly how police interactions are supposed to be, that being said if I had been that officer I would have gone on my way and found something else to do a looooooooooooooong time ago because whats the fucking point, just tell her she it looked like she was going down the wrong way put Jane doe on the paperwork and get on with your day mr police officer, oh and tell your supervisor to stick it up his ass when he questions the Jane Doe bit because fuck him we dont always get to do a clean job by the red tape in the real world.
I think the only reason for any of the cops good behavior was group of people standing around filming the interaction, and because they had a contract with the university to provide policing services for the University which required them to be more circumspect with their behavior towards students, and providing that they respected their rights and persons. If The crowd hadn't been there filming she would have been on the ground and in handcuffs in under a minute.
It is irrational for police to be 100% right 100% of the time and knowing the laws. But a citizen is required to know 100% of the law 100% of the time. I see problems with that.
As a matter of fact, to your point, we should all be thankful l.e.o's. aren't an encyclopedia of the law; as we all break some kind of law, somewhere, sometimes, at some point. We are all guilty.
He stopped her for "riding the wrong way" on a bicycle??? On this street with no lines and doesn't seem that busy to begin with? How are people actually siding with the cop? Stopping someone on a bicycle for that on this street is absurd.
They just have so much of a disconnect with every citizen that looks is shit on their shoes to their perceived authority. And lawmakers are just as bad for allowing police to run and dictate everything against the law just let people live their own life ffs.
Mike Levi damn that some racist crap to say. Corvallis has the highest bicycle accident per population size in Oregon. It’s because biking is like driving a car in many of these small towns. People are pulled over all the time for improper biking and having the proper equipment. All she had to do was say her name and he would have gave a warning, like they do for all other college students in these towns. She’s an entitled brat
I was 100% with the civilian at first. Good on you, challenge the officer to know the law. She lost me half way through, when she wouldn't even accept what the middle of the road is.
No, questioning the lanes is a pretty legit argument, especially under the specific circumstances. She's riding a bicycle on a presumably 2 lane, residential road. This entire stop was retarded and completely unnecessary to start with. I've had an officer try to stop me for this once, and while I tried to explain that it's easier to pay to attention to oncoming traffic than what is behind me, he got all pissy and floored the gas, speeding off. It's a bicycle guys. Just take a few moments to consider that it's a bicycle before responding.... 🙄
Yeah articulent, stadoffish young buck expressing respect. You know she had to watch a McDonald's style training video on how to talk to the police right, and they still put her on the ground lol
My favorite quote is at 19:08 when she says, "yes that's why I've been standing here." She's been standing there because of her own garrulousness, stalling, and long diatribes during which she doesn't like being interrupted. Lol. Its comical.
Sure, in a situation where the person is reasonable and you believe informing them that their actions are a violation will correct the action in the future. When you have this lady, who is defiant to the end and simply will not listen to a single thing you say, I'd also cite her for the violation. A reasonable person would take the ticket and fight it in court if they truly thought they were in the right... oh no, but not this lady, this lady wont let you ticket her by with holding her information because of how utterly right she thinks she is. That is when you get situations like this, and if I were that cop I wouldn't let her just get away with violating the law because it was inconvenient to enforce it because of how petulant this lady is. Take your ticket or play stupid games and win stupid prizes. She chose the latter. Apparently they don't teach you that court isn't held in the streets by yelling down cops at her school.
GoodSteve123 So basically submit you’re rights because they have a badge and a gun. She was asking basic questions where he could have easily said that we didn’t have it on hand especially when it was something that minor. Explain the law to her give her the warning and inform her that she should research the state laws instead to avoid any future misunderstandings. Simple. But it seems to me like your view is the reason why a lot of police officers feel like they can do whatever they want. He turned a simple issue that could have been handled with more understanding into force because he didn’t like she questioned his authority. Let’s be honest.
@@bloodhx3697 No you don't "submit you are rights." You are a person. It is not the job of the police to explain the law to you. If you are interested in learning the laws, feel free to do so. There are numerous ways one can accomplish this simple task, impeding a police officer who is currently undertaking their duties is not one of those ways. He could have told her all the stuff, sure, and she could have been polite instead of interrupting him every chance she got, and flippantly dismissing his points. She was rude to him and you want him to give her a break? What she did was a ticket able offense, that coupled with the fact that she was rude to the officer means he is well within his rights to give her a citation. In order to do so she has to, under law, provide her I.D. She didn't, that is interference and the second offense of the day. I'm not sure what rights you think she's forced to give up in order to adhere to traffic laws and provide her I.D. when being given a citation but I'll give you a little hint, there are none. She should have taken the ticket and fought it in court. She had a point about the lack of painted lanes on the road, the officer also had a point about driving on the correct side of the street. This would have gone a lot smoother if both parties weren't in a heightened emotional state but nothing the officer did was untoward. He is being paid to write citations to people breaking the law, this woman did that... that's pretty much the end of the story.
@@fortifarse citations are based on the law. She was in violation of it. Giving out warnings or giving people a break are based on whether the cop wants to or not, so being rude to them and then expecting to be treated far better than you're treating them isn't a very good plan. That's pretty common sense. Her "being manhandled" was because she forced the cop to arrest her for refusing to ID and then pulling away from the police when they were arresting her. See, everything that happened and everything that everyone is so up in arms about is all due to this woman's failure to abide by the law.
Dude. She got arrested for riding a bike. When was the last time any cop stopped a cyclist near you? Like, this is ridiculous. You don't even need ID to ride a bike.
@@BenedictMHolland She wasn't arrested for riding a bike, she was arrested for being an idiot and refused a lawful order because she think she knows everything. The cop was exemplary and showed a lot of patience. @Anime Zone she isn't acting very educated, I have a PhD and I don't go around swinging my dick around acting like it's a difficult thing to be cooperative at a lawful stop.
@Torei M in my town, right now, kids are riding a bike the wrong way down a one way street. Have you literally ever seen someone on a bike get pulled over by a cop?
Cops ego got hurt so badly by this young lady he had no choice but to take her to jail. He admitted it was minor but chose to escalate the interaction. Bad cop
You're talking opinion. The real question is what authority do the cops have. They do have the legal authority to detain her until they are able to identify her. His rationale was questionable the declining to provide identification was off but his authority to cart her off to jail until she could be identified was correct.* *According to the ACLU anyhow.
@@KarlH1980 you seem to try to talk smart as if you know something or you are educated, but deep down you are just projecting while calling ppl Simps, you say you hold cops accountable, well all cops should be held accountable and should be fired and retrained. Cuz at this point in history all cops are modern day redcoats.
I give her an F, as she continued to ask the same question over and over after already being given an answer. This just exacerbated the situation unnecessarily.
@Donald Thorpe watch the full video. He didn't lose the contract for the officers, they terminated the contract when the school admonished the officer for making a lawful arrest.
His final deep breathe when he tells her that he’s not giving her a warning and is now citing her & she asks him for the 100th time for the documentation, is PRICELESS!
Belle French Gold she talked her way into a citation. That is why she needed to provide her ID. I think she would have said something along the lines of I’m sorry I didn’t know I was in the middle as there are no lines. I will stay the right better. Thank you. Or even just a simple I’m sorry. The warning would have stayed.
@Ian L Jesus you have issues if you really think this officer was a dickhead. I watch every video on this channel and 99% of the time I can't believe what these officers do and I hope they lose their jobs and have to deal with the repercussions. But seriously, this officer was respectful, even was patient enough to try and point out the statutes that allows him to issue a citation or an arrest, and still have the girl an option to present ID twice at the very end. Your bias towards police knows no bounds, and its narrow minded individuals like yourself that prevent progress between citizens and police and increases hostility in general. You're far worse than anyone in this video.
@@byne2323 Agreed....I was in cuffs many times in my younger days...These cops were polite, proffesional and very patient.... The young lady is a brat who was simply instigating as evidenced by her playing the race card...
@Ian L ...please...She was an uninformed brat who was asking for it... People like her (and you) discredit the cause... Should he gave bothered her in the 1st place ..No...But when she played the race card she exposed her actual intentions...
8:40 “ it is customary in our society” to provide ID upon request. It is more like it is customary in police interactions that the public be subservient to the presumed authority of thugs with badges
"All you guys that are recording, I'm also recording." Why do they always say that. Good for you. You're recording because you have to, because no one trusts you.
They do have to inform people that they are recording, if they are actually recording. I could see it being used as an ignorant mark. But I could also see it being used against the officer. (If someone was to say “this officer made this stop, but he wasn’t even recording the situation”). He could be covering his tracks to make sure someone doesn’t accuse him of “not recording”.
I'd I had recorded, rather than trust that exact statement, I'd have no record. only the video, no audio, was actually recording. laugh at my ignorance!
This is what society looks like when the hogs arrest people for the society of fucking cars. You americans are in world war 3 against the environment thanks to your cars. They are industrial space heaters with a side effect of transportation. Your car heats up your home 3 times faster than the furnace at home. Your car is the "fossil fuel industry". Welcome to the hell you made. Its these guys' job to defend the status quo. People riding bikes are fighting on the good side of WW3. White men make good cops because they are raised to be the main character in the hollywood movie. You americans are more silly than the north koreans because they dont lead the way in burning down the world like you fucking americans. You rooting for a grown white man for bullying a little girl? You americans will make really good nazis cause of how fucking twisted you have to have your mind to be an american. You are apathetic to the way your prisons are full of black people right now and you will be apathetic in 10 or 20 years when black people run out of money and have to be put in concentration camps;. The world will never get an apology for iraq because you fucking americans refuse to stop playing stupid in your part in burning down the world. Dirty Dirty fucking Americans.
Sad but so true lol. He was so patient, I don’t understand why there was a issue with this arrest she deed refuse to identify so she got her ass arrested
She’s doing way too much. So intent on pushing back against the police that she talked herself into a more complicated situation. Just wants to talk and argue rather than genuinely work out the situation in good faith. This is about her ego. I normally blame the cops for allowing their ego to takeover but this was on her this time
Yep ... halfway through I was like ,please stun this chick ... I liked what another auditor did saying "I won't identify but if it's a legal stop my wallet is in my pocket and while I don't consent you may get my wallet to identify if need be " .. which was good cause if it's 100% legal stop then that allows officer to get ID and person told them exactly where it was..
This is the most annoying thing about Oregonians. They love to protest literally anything when it comes to the government…. But are so often misinformed about the right time and place to do it
I'd say it leans more anti-police, and goes absolutely by the book without any consideration of common courtesies until he decides to grade the individual's at the end
@@cadillacmoto - i think you mean the videos submitted run more anti police, which is to say they show bad policework. He is always very fair in his commentary.
@@Rosy2468 what an individual posts or retweets or shares is a reflection of their person, and I believe that for facebook, twitter, TH-cam, or any other social media platform. A youtube channel showing mostly anti-police videos reflects on their character as such. I've noticed that the channels commentary throughout the videos to be relatively neutral, but the grading at the end to be more anti-police, or anti-commonsense or common courtesy. Look at a more recent video that the channel posted, something along the lines of being "unscripted", I forget the word the channel used, but it was self admittedly a video without deep research into states laws, and more of analyzing just as any viewer would. It suggested things that reflected the channels poor view of law enforcement as it suggested the department in question had connections with a victim's father, and that was the basis for their behavior. Completely uncalled for and leans far away from supporting LEOs from carrying out their duty.
@@cadillacmoto - i mean i hope you understand i can't comment at all about your post until you find the video you're talking about. In the mean time I'll say he has a video titled "captain shows sheriff how policing is done" where he talks about how a good cop runs a situation vs a not so good cop. He shows to me awareness that cops as a concept aren't good or bad but their personal actions decide that. Also he comments frequently in the rating system that he'll take away points for civilians who don't know the law, or who lash out OR even against those who don't press charges because they allow for a corrupt system or corrupt cop to continue on. That shows to me he's critical in all directions.
"Ignorance of the law is no excuse" for me and you, but Heien V. North Carolina allows a (supposedly) trained cop to make "a reasonable mistake of facts".
Well they are allowed to lie anyway, so they can say "I am the law" and shoot you in the head. THEN, due to qualified immunity, they will leave the victim's family with no care giver and there be no penalty on the pig themselves. FTP
@@AndrewFosterSheff69 That's not how qualified immunity works. Qualified immunity only applies if the average person in the same situation could have made the same mistake, I think AtA even explains it in this very video but I could be wrong on that.
“I had the right to remain silent... I just didn’t have the ability”. Also, complains that the officer interupts her, then proceeds to interrupt him when he tries to answer her questions. 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
Dudeyou have no idea or appreciate the freedom you have and your surroundings. You are too comfortable. Sit down on your bed at night look forward and ask yourself what it was like when you were a kid riding your bike through yards and on sidewalks and what we've become only you can face yourself
yes, to avoid the other vehicles parked on the road. the roads are state property, not private property. no one is entitled to the road and the civilians that travel them are required to follow the laws.
It's almost as if she was wanting a similar interaction like Weinman had? Maybe some sort of payout? Or at the very least wanted it to go viral for attention.
@@blakesmith9039 A girl on a bicycle.... firstly; that is a young woman; she is 21. Secondly wtf has her gender got to do with her breaking the law? Do laws only apply to men? What is wrong with you?
I had a friend that received a ticket for the same thing when I was in Senior High. He took photos of the road to court with him and WON because he proved their were no lines painted, therefore no "lanes."
static erratic You don't have much of a brain up there do you? You're simply ignorant. Since police officers are such terrorists how about we take them away, I'm sure that would make you happy. You have hear how stupid you sound. Idk what job you work at but I am 100% sure it's not as important as a police officer's job or as hard
@@christianstark7748 you don't have much of a brain up there do you? He's complaining about police violence, hypocrisy and abuse of power. He never said that the police force should be abolished. Better training and police accountability can fix that.
@Malayan Man literally never said he said police should be abolished...I said since he said that the police are such terrorists that we should abolish them...because why would you want terrorists on the streets. Look back and actually think about it
I was thinking that as well like don't assert your rights out here during the contact let me do what I want with you and then you argue in court. That's not freedom
A trooper pulls over a student on a bike and says she's on the wrong side of the road, when there are no painted lines? Are you serious? A simple "Hey. You'll probably want to be more careful" would've been more than adequate.
This is what I believe should be the role of the police as well. Helpful and at the max, protective......rather than this crap that makes people hate them.... stop/detain/fine/punish/ticket/arrest over things of this nature.
@@JimCampbell777 Indeed I've literally had this same interaction with a police officer in UK, granted he seemed to think the change in tarmac colour where a utility had dug up part of the road was the centreline (despite being clearly on the left side) but still the entire interaction consisted of them telling me to cycle on the left hand side of the road and my response of yeah ok sorry officer. Granted I'm well aware disputing the matter at that point would have certainly escalated it but UK police are generally trained to deescalate and resolve the matter as quickly and painlessly as possible especially for such minor things, then again they actually train for more than the 5 minutes US police do too so maybe that helps.
I was thinking the same. A good cop might stop them and say, “Hey, you could get a ticket for that. Be careful. Have a good day.” No need to identify her. She wasn’t robbing a bank. She was riding barely over the center. Ridiculous.
@man0z no you shudnt go through red lights even on a bike. Ur on the road ya obey rules full stop. Ud b very 1 suing if hit by a car after cycling through red light
but they love doing it. i was an avid bicyclist for about 20 years riding my bike to work and literally for everything. i got pulled over more on a bike than i ever did in a car all so the cops could tell me a 20 year veteran at dodging careless drivers on a bicycle how to be safe. they are a joke.
Student should've taken the ticket and fought it in court. C- to the officers is ridiculous. Should be better. They remained calm throughout the encounter and told her what she had to do to avoid being arrested. If officers get a C-, absolutely no way does she get a B+ for needlessly complicating the encounter.
bear in mind that this channel is super biased by nature of it being made to criticize the police. It very rarely sides with the cops and has a very high propensity of overrating "auditors".
That's exactly what I was thinking when he said it's unreasonable to ask the officer to be 100% right about the laws he's trying to enforce 100% of the time. I guess ignorance of the law is indeed an excuse, *when you're a cop.*
You gotta give them room to breath. They were hired by those that take your money to pay them to enforce the laws and to make sure you keep paying more
@@TheTC915 cut the hypocrisy! She wasn't supposed to arrest like she a mass shooter! She was racially profiled and the police officers didn't like she asked questions!
@@dianadowie3985 🤣 whether or not she should have been arrested has nothing to do with the comment I made. My comment was strictly about the officers patience which the narrator also commended by the way. 🤣
I love this kid and her perseverance. She never loses her cool, articulates intelligently, poses nor presents any threat to anyone, and never even swears. I'm glad this thing went viral to expose yet more jack boots abusing their badge for the sole purpose of bullying.
@@kian8203 If you read little more about this incident and about her, you will learn that she is not only very intelligent, but she is actually a superstar of that college, the #1 cheerleader, and the only one who was sent to England to represent her college in something. Which probably contributed to the unusually sharp college's reaction on her arrest.
UNTIL she gets creamed by a car.... She was being a pain in the ass and didn't know what she was talking about. She sounds like my youngest kid. As they said dispute in court
@@mysocratesnote8110 Cars can adjust driving lane faster than a bicycle, much faster. And if a car drives completely in the wrong lane, they will get pulled over.
The officer accidentally makes a very good point. “We don’t carry a copy of department policies and procedures.” Why not? It’s easy enough to carry on your phone!
Because they don't have to. They have no legal obligation to inform a person of the crime they are being suspected of until they receive the citation or are arrested.
This video is just more proof to me that we should completely fire these police departments to the ground, and start over from scratch with a radically different approach. What I see here is completely moronic.
modolief disban the police altogether. Just train children from atleast 10 on law, court rulings, observation,taking mental notes, collecting evidence and self defense armed unarmed. We only need a non-armed investigation unit to collect evidence and court
Fixing the police is like trying to fix a broken dam that springs a leak ever time you fix the last leak... I dont think we can fix it and need a new approach also.People think if your against this type of policing then your against law enforcement ,but in reality that its because I'm for better law enforcement I think the police should be abolished... They cost to much and dont do much of anything to keep people safe and statistics prove that.For example when there was a massive explosion in a in the funding giving to police in the early 90's ,the only thing it lead to was more prison getting built, but did little to stop drug overdoses, murders and robberies or anything that really mmatters..They write millions of tickets and people still speed... Police are a reactionary service that are called in after a crime is committed and dont ever seem to be around when people need them.Most likely because they are to busy writing tickets. Even the police know they are of little use and that's one of the reasons they only the lowest class of people become police.. It's been that way since the police first started and the people that were made to do the patrols during the night watch.. It was often given as a punishment to the people in town that were on the fridges of society.Rather then risk anyone of significants or class, the town would often voted that the one of the poor and unruly would do this job... Nothing has changed
They aren't required to show ID, because you do not need a drivers license to use a bicycle. However, since a bike is considered a vehicle, the rider must follow all traffic laws, just as a car would. She didn't and was pulled over. She doesn't have to provide ID, but she does have to give her identifying information (name, address, etc) so that the officer can issue a citation.
@@nicknitro4420 she's not too smart either. She kept asking to see what code requires her to provide an id. She could have just said her name and dob to the officer and told him you have my identification, you don't need a physical id. She chose her path to nit pick that point.
@@renpope1210 She's a lot smarter than the 100k a year cop... Who cost his department a contract with the school and most likely a lawsuit.. He never once asked her for a name and DOB why should she volunteer and help him do his job ? The cop is an idiot..
I am normally on citizens side but this young lady talked her self into this. The side of the road is not the courthouse and not to place to push the issue.
Finally a video from my State and in the same city my sister went to college in. This is the most Oregonian Audit to Audit video I could have imagined. No that would give me too much credit. The girl, the cop, the absurdity and irony... ho boy. Even the fallout. I agree with the assessment from AtA. The cop's patience on the surface seems extraordinary, but if it fails to actually help the situation it's worthless. Even with all that 'patience' his frustration _still_ causes him to make mistakes. A lot of the comments bemoan the girl but she stood her ground, defended her rights, and the stop was BS. How was she supposed to know he would only give a warning? He could have changed his mind at any time. The whole warning thing can't be seen as some kind of panacea cudgel. There is no denying that her tactic worked too. Don't mess with bicyclists in Oregon. Doesn't matter who you are or what organization you are a part of. All hope will wither and crumble against BIKERS RIGHTS! BIKERS RIGHTS!
“Interfering” the ultimate contempt of pig 🐖 charge! So a piggy 🐷 following you, stopping you for literally nothing (on a bike), then getting ButtHurt = interferences.
Me thinks, things like obstruction and interfering can only apply to the police dealing with others. Not cooperating with the effort to put you in jail is not only natural, but is the very essence of the 5th Amendment, and demanding that the suspect "cooperates" with his own intimidation is a form of sadism. Whenever the cop says "you are not cooperating", the only logical answer is "only an idiot would cooperate in the project of putting himself in prison".
The girl is the one acting irrational out of feeling butthurt. Right half of road... Not a hard concept. But she had to be a pain in the ass because her feelers were hurt for being told so.
I think quotas are the main problem. Quotas force them to look for petty nonsense so they can fill out paperwork so they can get credit for not sitting around all day.
@Jenna Kern One of the reasons a bunch of rag-tag colonists went to war with the most powerful empire in the world was because its king, in their estimation, "...obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers." I.e., the colonists felt the government wasn't following the law. It starts with demanding ID for no lawful reason. The "people in these videos on this channel that are detained, pulled over etc" are more often than not the subjects of unlawful detainments and arrests. If citizens, especially minorities, simply "handed over their ID" the cops will continue to become more and more brazen. Let's see how you feel after you're tazed over something an officer unlawfully orders you to do. That said, in this case, the young woman was lawfully asked for ID and refused to show it, falling back on her nonsense, gobbledygook philosophy she's been marinating in at one of Oregon's fine universities.
@Jenna Kern The cops are over stepping their boundaries. She is standing up for her rights as an American. It is patriotic to see what she is doing. You should really think about standing up for your rights as well. When the police get used to dealing with pushovers like you who don't know the law they begin to trample on everyone and when somebody does know the law they end up tazed or dead.
I dont agree. When a car is turning right at an intersection they tend to only look left for oncoming traffic then start to look right as they pull into the intersection turning right. Source, I hit a guy on a bike riding against traffic and he was faulted. Did not see him at all behind a parked u-haul.
This channel is arguably one the most insightful channels on this entire platform. The research efforts put into each video are absolutely first rate. Truly outstanding work product that is second to none.
You’re allowed to briefly cross the line to avoid risking hitting pedestrians ( or law officers) obstructing traffic. That’s different than continuing down the road going the wrong direction in the wrong lane.
He stopped her for riding her bike on the wrong side of the road and then required her ID when all he wanted to do was educate her on why she should ride on the right side. That's absurd. Just educate her you don't need her ID and all that. These are just cops with nothing to do so they need to write down something they were doing. So he needs her name so he can tell his captain he actually did something that day.
@@marksommers4179 She got her education in the best way possible. She was an entitled brat that didn't want to shut up and listen for 2 seconds, but instead, she knew better didn't she? They gave her an immense amount of chances, and she felt she knew the law, which she didn't. He even offered straight up to give her a warning and she kept spouting off. She requested another cop on the scene, so he obliged. This would have been a 30 second stop if she had some couth.
@@mortekaieve4729 She was dumb for sure but the situation is exactly what I described. Worthless cop busy doing nothing so he wants to stop some girl riding her bike so he can waste her time and tell his superior thats what he was doing.
@@marksommers4179 She wasted his time, not the other way around. If she shut her trap and opened her ears it would have been over in under a minute. Let her try that crap with her boss when she gets into the real world and see what happens. Apparently her parents let her get away with it and it didn't serve her well.
@@mortekaieve4729 He could've left at anytime. He said he was keeping her there because she wasn't complying with a lawful order. All because she didn't want to show her ID after she was riding her bicycle on the wrong side of the road. Which he said he only stopped her for because he wanted to educate her. But sure she was the one who wasted his time, delusional much?
6:20 “I didn’t call you because I needed backup. I called you here to witness the circus.” Why would he create a circus about a young college student biking the wrong way? I’m just glad the American people aren’t paying for this production.
I thought that is what those expensive body cameras are for to be a neutral accurate witness. Could he have foreseen the brouhaha to follow, is that why he wanted a human, and therefore by definition, biased witness? Or does he mean I wanted an audience, a cheering section? Or maybe, I'm starting to lose my conviction in my argument - she IS wrong, right?
@@xavier.ashkar thats the original source but in the video he said where he got the video i havent watched the video in 3 weeks and dont remember but the only wasnt blurred then the source he got it from blurred it not him.
Um no when you are lawfully stopped as she was you must identify, even if in the end the cop was wrong, she is totally in the wrong. No police officer has to justify or show you why he stopped or what law you want to be shown. As it was already stated this is not a courtroom. Take you dame ticket or warning as it was going to be and move on.
24:14 “community uproar”? Really? I’d bet 1000000 more people in that community were on the officers side. Just shows how out of touch and biased the media is.
I am open to the possibility of being wrong, but this is the first video I essentially disagree with. I'm all for defending your rights, but any idiot can see the line in the middle and know if they are on the right "lane" so after driving on the wrong side of the street, she just tried to outsmart a cop instead of just letting herself get a warning and be done with it. Everything that happened after was an overreaction on all parts, specially from the school. I see no injustice here.
Totally agree. Let's acknowledge that young people don't like cops and it didn't matter what the cop did, they would disagree somehow. Young people think they have so much power with social media.. well, they kinda do unfortunately. I guess the girl was light-skinned biracial? Not sure. I didn't see any evidence the cop was being racist. She should've taken the L. Girls think they can talk their way outta anything. They don't like being held accountable.
No we are made to think we gta do what cops say and what cops are saying is the truth and this showed that we don't have to we can ask questions and we don't just gta bend over cos a cop says so
@@zdtu8 absolutely and I'm in the same boat - usually agreeing with the citizen, But these cops were saints by any measure! There simply weren't any 'correct' answers that the officers could've given. It would've only spiraled in another circular direction
But there is no road marking. The line was the result of surfacing - not reliable. We didn't see the alleged offence, so not clear what happened. In any event, resources deployed disproportionate to the alleged offence.
Was there an injured party? No. No crime was committed. She can drive on any side she wants, AND if there is parking on the street sometimes you HAVE TO cross the line.
I was with her in the beginning but she lost me once she refused to accept reality and the fact that vehicles drive on the right side of the road in the US
Sure. But it's a bike. Should they follow all rules of the road? Sure. But motorists should also give 4 to 6 feet of clearance when passing and none of them do. We hate cyclists in the US. And still no, she doesn't need to give her ID. You don't even need one to ride a bike.
Yet the defining line required to determine sides of the road was clearly vacant. I'm glad she won her case. Qualified immunity just means the people enforcing laws don't have to know the laws.
@@BishopStars you have to follow the bike until it's safe to pass. Right? I mean, what else are you going to do? Imagine if the bike spins out and falls in front of your car. I think you would be quite happy you gave the extra room, you know, to not murder someone.
@@kevinzink9063 how can you ride on the right side of the road when most of the road is line with cars blocking the side you can ride on. plus did you not see then cars going pass? they was not on the right side of the road. they was in the center of the road do to "NO LINES" so there how can you brake the law when you can not see a line to brake?
@@kevinzink9063 I think having a bike follow the same rules of the road as a car is... Stupid. It's a bike. It's not a 2 ton car. People should be able to ride on sidewalks, roads, dirt, etc and not be subject to any of the laws that govern the movement of a normal vehicle.
She was on the wrong side of the road! Clearly she needs prison time. Whats next? Wheelies? Talking while riding? Turning your head to far in one direction? Not looking 100ft ahead? To low psi in tires? LOL!!
He was trying to give her the exact code. How can you expect him to have ever code and ordinance memorized along with every state and federal law. These cops did a great job.
@@atm9566 the exact reason why we say there are too many laws, you can simply walk down the street and break a law by doing your everyday activities and never know it... I get we have laws for many reasons but jeez, even the Supreme Court can't memorize the millions of laws in the books... but she could've dealt with this differently
@@wtfronsson She was exercising her good old American rights. This was an unmarked road. There's no way to tell what side of the road she was. The police was just looking for an issue. Whatever happened to protect and serve. It's has become fines and jail. Where's the discretion for warning a person instead of jail and fines.
@@Lokey_8664 It was a case of both parties being wrong on various points. However, refusing a lawful order is what lead to the arrest. And she did that based on wrong information. Also, that lawful order would have never been issued in the first place, if the lady would have simply accepted that she is getting a warning. She decided to press an issue she wasn't that informed in, but still went to absolute non-compliance regarding the identification issue. You also see the officer be patient and expend a very long time trying to politely argue with someone literally committing a crime by arguing instead of complying. The cops have rights too, and this one was acting within said rights. I hate to see a complex "no one is right" issue be spun into a celebration of one side's actions taken in ignorance.
@@Lokey_8664 in the case of unmarked roads, it falls to what a reasonable person would consider the halfway point between the curbs. The officer was definitely the one correct about where the center of the road was. And even then, you don't argue it with the cop, you argue it with the judge. And the cop was going to give her a warning, until she started to fail to ID, which is required on a law traffic stop, which this was as the officer initiated the stop upon observing an infraction.
“We’re not in a court room , just so you know” lmaooo Girl was trying to win the case in the streets. If she’s right it’ll show in court , not the streets.
@@beemerbill1572 BULLSHIT any of your info CAN AND WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU.... Unles lawfully arrested you have no obligation to id. Brown v Texas. Kolender v Lawson. 5th amendment. Maxim of Law: "No one is bound to arm their adversary." You do not have to answer their questions. Terry v Ohio 392 U.S. 1 "Of course, the person stopped is not obliged to answer, answers may not be compelled and refusal to answer furnishes no basis for an arrest, although it may alert the officer to the need for continued observation." “The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that refusal to answer law enforcement questions cannot form the basis of reasonable suspicion. See Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429, 437, 111 S.Ct. 2382, 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991) ("We have consistently held that a refusal to cooperate, without more, does not furnish the minimal level of objective justification needed for a detention or seizure.") - U.S. v. Santos 403 F.3d 1120 (2005) The 5th amendment does not give us any rights it is their chains that bind them....NOT US. The cop did not know the law on a civil contractual matter, had no contract and cannot be the plaintiff in a case against her and had ZERO cause of action against her.
@@beemerbill1572 so even if my name or who I say I am or related to can be used against me. Because anything I say can + will be used against me in a court of law ! There words not mine. We really (unless driving ) do not have to show ID. No ID is required in America... oh no but " cops can be trusted " so should I take the word of a professional story teller or LIER about what's legal Haha hahaha that's funny . You show your papers I will keep mine to myself so.... Keep complying . It's no big deal just a tiny bit more every time. So you go talk to them all day long + we will see what happens. Wake up sleepy head before you wake up in a 3rd world commie country. You will only be able to blame yourself !
@@6StimuL84 thank you well put . Sometimes I think nobody cares , thank you for being a real believer in the constitution + everyone's God given rights . Stay strong everyone its gonna be a hell of a ride.
John Murray If there is a cogent point in this moronic babbling, I was unable to detect it. In the SCOTUS Decision Hiibel v. Nevada, the court noted that in cases like this, disclosure of a person’s name presented no reasonable danger of incrimination. And therefore, there is no 5th Amendment protection. Refuse to give a LEO your name (documents cannot be demanded) for the purpose of issuing a citation (regardless if the citation may not be correct) will most likely result in a charge of obstruction and arrest. Argue in front of a judge and not alongside the road.
Me too.. these videos from the police and citizens are an eye opener and shows what’s going on and people can make up their own mind up. I guess all the crimes are solved in that area to waste 30 mins and 7-8 officers time on this nonsense.🤷♂️
The second a cop says "I'm recording also" you know he's developed a chronic case of ego infringement with possible complications of butthurt. Expect things to go wildly wrong from that point.
machinech bruhhh he said “just to let you know” as to tell them that they are being recorded. He just wanted to let them know that they were being recorded it has nothing to do with his ego
She is responsible for her own arrest, ignorance of the law is not an excuse. She could have taken the citation gone to court and cleared it up there. She wanted to play lawyer on the street and made it more then it was.
@@christhornton2772 I do on a bike, I can see a car coming at me easier then lol. I see more bicyclist get hit from behind, then in a head on collision.
@@mehrunez4838 could that be because almost all bikes travel with the flow of traffic, not against it? If all cyclists travelled with the flow of traffic, no cyclists would get hit head on. That doesn't mean it's safer.
Exactly. He likely stopped her in the first place because he was attracted to her. Of course, once she opened her mouth, that attraction probably ended instantly.
US police training class 201 day 1: Be sure to use common phrases to justify your actions, such as: “I smell marijuana, I’m going to have to search your vehicle” “Why are you so nervous, do police make you nervous?” And lastly but most importantly “STOP GRABBING FOR MY GUN!!!”
I noticed that as well. The tone is condescending, as if civilians are wasting their time because - DUH - the cops have the video so you don't need to!
@@BecauseRC413 she didn't say anything smart lol. She was completely ignorant of the officers obligations in this situation and made herself look like an ass
@james anonymous An Indian grandfather in Alabama was going home to babysit...cops are called cause he's walking while dark skinned. he's not told he's detained or offered a translator in spite of the cops implying they know he can't speak English. he didn't argue. he points to his home n states the address. they randomly slam him hard, paralyzing him. 10 of the 12 jurrors were white, n were the ones who acquitted the cop, in spite of video evidence showing he was slammed for nothing and didnt even pull away like the cops claimed. they didn't even pay his medical bill. -ACLU, BLM (Black Lives Matter), most women etc: Still silent. Black person and/or female arrested after being warned, with a crime stated, without being slammed so hard... -BLM and/or ACLU: Uproar! Maybe protest (maybe riot too) to get results. Also, men are given harsher sentences than women are for the same crime. AND this girl plays victim for being black/female. no, i dont think the cop should go this far for an ID, which is probably what he really wanted and that was his main flaw. too bad most commenters dont try to be as objective and considerate as this channel. Modern society is wack. See the main vid/description on channel Playitalready for something better n click my sub/bell icons for some fun, upcoming vids.
I think this is the only one of the audits I’ve ever seen that I agree with the law more than the person being stopped. She made this so much harder on herself. I believe that some people take this to this point just because they think the cops will back down.. I really can’t believe I’m saying this but in this case the cops did a good job..
I wholeheartedly agree, im normally on the side of the auditors but the cops were professional, patient and she was being obtuse for the sake of holding a torch.
They think the cops will back down cause the cops can’t prove anything. they showed her everything except what she asked. And when they did answer they lied and she caught on and wasn’t going to let them lie to her
She's absolutely right officers lie all the time in their job how can she be sure that this officer is being honest and not try to violate her rights or molest , kidnap ,extort money from her because that is in their job description
Please provide proof of this quota system... they wouldnt be able to fill a quota if people werent breaking the law. Do you forget the part of this video where the cop was gonna gibe her a warning.... so no he wasnt just ticket happy. Try again.
She wasn't though. The officer was requesting her information as she is required to provide it on a lawful traffic stop. She refused to give him her information.
@@kevinzink9063 the Identify for traffic stops does not apply for Bicycles as Bicycles are a none motorized vehicle and thus do not require a drivers license to operate and are thus considered in a separate category form a Car or motorized vehicals.
@Drew A she was being issue a citation, so yes, she has to identify herself whether it be with a driver license or first & last name and date of birth.
Why didnt he just talk to her. Why does it always have to be id yourself so i can talk to you. I believe the for profit system is what drives officers to id someone to see if they have a warrant.
So he can find if she has multiple tickets for same infarction to decide whether he is going to issue warning or another ticket since it is repeated behavior.
@randy s If the traffic stop was valid, and he's issuing a citation, then he can demand ID. No rational person disputes that. The problem here is this started out as a warning, and he escalated when she declined to ID. Which she is allowed to do.
I am 3/4 of the way through the video and this officer has been a model of how all officers should treat citizens in public. Has been polite, calm, and allows the citizen to speak. Hopefully this citizen goes to law school, because her level of discord and questioning would be valuable in court.
@@FernandoRodriguez-ds5ri The police officer still works for the department. She didnt win anything, she had an attorney and the NAACP. If a fan gets called down during halftime and makes a hail Mary shot from half court does he automatically get a Trailblazer contract. If I gotta pee so I speed all the way home should Nascar give me a contract. Girl gets in a debate with the cops, happens to get her rights 50 percent correct but still ends up in jail, she should be a lawyer...ok.
on the contrary, she's an entitled idiot, Ignorantia legis non excusat just because you do not know the law does not make you right, instead of getting away with some lecture she will end up before court and losing her case, paying all the fees and such and for what?
She's not going to do well. She got away with this because the cops decided to let her talk, but irl, people don't have to. Even in a class, once your time is up, its up. Shes just good at obfuscation.
Eeeh, in this case I actually agree with the officer, if he would have ended it with a warning she'd continue making the same violations and just shrug it off, as he stated due to how she was acting it was clear that A. She disagrees with the fact that she did something wrong there and B. That she thinks she can get away with it. And you know how it is, you think you got away with something once, you probably could get away with it again, right? Her getting a saitation/arrest would deter her from breaking that rule any further
@Klaa2 Thanks, that's what I thought. It's unfortunate. I've been targeted and now I've got a ton of traffic stops with no tickets no warnings yet the interactions are documented 😕
Thanks for being here! Help us grow and defeat the TH-cam algorithm by liking and commenting on this video!
Thanks so much for responding to my request. I appreciate your audit.
Thank you for going over these videos I appreciate it and I also appreciate the way that you do inform us on what the law says. I like the way that you show the law and then orally present the law too. I have reading and writing comprehension problems so by not only showing it .explaining it let's me be able to soak up that information🙏
It's always a pleasure to like and comment on your videos. You deserve the support.
Surprisingly enough, even if there is a disagreement or I go on a heartfelt rant, my fellow commenters on your videos are polite and seem to enjoy honest debate. That's rare on TH-cam. It's too bad that that cannot be figured into the algorithm.
You give the officer a D. I give him a F-.
Might I suggest you cover Travis Heinze he has a very unique way of interacting with police.
I'll be honest, no officer has ever allowed me to speak that much, or took the time to look up the law to explain it too me.
chief tp Really? Kid gloves? So 7 bullets in the back is kid gloves. I think you mixed up your colors there bud.
@chief tp , nah, I'm black.
@chief tp shutup. the comment you just made involving race is completely unjustified. your lack of knowledge of the situation is very clear. peace officers wouldnt have to baby sit as much if people would just obey the law. its not the officers fault they have to enforce a few bad laws. if they dont enforce these laws, they lose their job and their families starve. but i forgot thats what you entitled miscreants want. a world of chaos without policing.
You're probably not a chick.
@@vnavailable747 they could always get real jobs that don't involve violating rights. 🤷
I can almost guarantee that this young lady will never invoke the right to remain silent.
Police future date.. 'Oh no it's her.. ' quick retreat.. 👀🤣🤣 One might suggest she does audio books.. 😶🤣🤣
Please, for the love of god, you have the right to remain silent. OMG please stop talking! Pretty sure at least one of her future boyfriends ends up being suicidal, I'm sure she has no problem turning people off.
She’s young and a collage student she just wants to let her knowledge be heard and learned she’s young ! Giver her a break she will learn that invoking your right to remain silent is the better rout to go bec cops lose their pacient after a while esp when they believed they are right and they are done listening to someone who is not listening to what they are saying and they can end up getting ID bec certain places a bike is also considered a vehicle n ride and stop as cars do! But she is talking way too much I get annoyed also
I thought she was brilliant.......what a petty cop......i would have told him to go find some burglars
@@vinengling Get help
Legend has it she’s still looking for more clarification to this day
hopefully the line is painted on the floor so she doesn't get lost in all her searching lol
Imagine being friends or dating this dumb chick. I seriously wouldn't be able to have a conversation with her more than once.
Guy asks her on a date. Her response... "Can you present to me the legal code that gives you the right to ask me on a date?"
@Donald Thorpe Angry? How?
Narcissist thinks she can debate why she doesn't have to go to hell
I would take these officers in the street vs 90% of the ones that end up on this channel. They were extremely patient and even helped her when she tried to use words that she didn’t understand.
Yeah, and that despite her being so disgusting and playing the race card with nothing having happened to her
Its nice to see, it is exactly how police interactions are supposed to be, that being said if I had been that officer I would have gone on my way and found something else to do a looooooooooooooong time ago because whats the fucking point, just tell her she it looked like she was going down the wrong way put Jane doe on the paperwork and get on with your day mr police officer, oh and tell your supervisor to stick it up his ass when he questions the Jane Doe bit because fuck him we dont always get to do a clean job by the red tape in the real world.
Her voice made want to taser her. The self entitled little brat.
I think the only reason for any of the cops good behavior was group of people standing around filming the interaction, and because they had a contract with the university to provide policing services for the University which required them to be more circumspect with their behavior towards students, and providing that they respected their rights and persons. If The crowd hadn't been there filming she would have been on the ground and in handcuffs in under a minute.
All this for riding a bike? When I was a kid we would ride our bikes in the middle of the street, in both directions, right in front of our homes.
Sounds like a confession to me. Put your hands behind your back! You have a right to remain silent....
Tattle Tale 😆!!
Kitten Bo .. Exactly!
GET DOWN ON THE GROUND!!
HANDS BEHIND YOUR BACK!! lol
Go and turn yourself in now, peasant! No more statues of limitations in Pigland
She was definitely the kid in school who reminded the teacher they had homework.
she was the student that made their teacher quit teaching and get sterilized.
My 1st reaction to this comment "was omg I know that girl lol haha"
My 1st reaction to this comment "was omg I know that girl lol haha"
She was the student who became the principal by getting the school board addicted to Meth.
@@frozenfresh6406 I don't see that connection st all in any way but your sentence is a wonderfully expressive concept so I am down
It is irrational for police to be 100% right 100% of the time and knowing the laws. But a citizen is required to know 100% of the law 100% of the time. I see problems with that.
*E X A C T L Y*
As a matter of fact, to your point, we should all be thankful l.e.o's. aren't an encyclopedia of the law; as we all break some kind of law, somewhere, sometimes, at some point. We are all guilty.
I hope that everyone driven knows 100% of the law
@@Sel-Shackfield go fuck yourself just because something is law doesn't make it just
stepping lightly
The sooner everybody realizes how over criminalized we are, the better.
He stopped her for "riding the wrong way" on a bicycle??? On this street with no lines and doesn't seem that busy to begin with? How are people actually siding with the cop? Stopping someone on a bicycle for that on this street is absurd.
That's a bag of bullshit sure seems like a "free" country
They just have so much of a disconnect with every citizen that looks is shit on their shoes to their perceived authority. And lawmakers are just as bad for allowing police to run and dictate everything against the law just let people live their own life ffs.
She's a black woman, most TH-cam commenters are white American men. Do the math.
😂😂😂
Imagine if they cared this much about stopping actual criminals.
She initially was not stopped for a crime, but rather a traffic violation, which officers are required to enforce.
We would all live in the brady bunch neighborhood
That' would actually be hard
Why risk it when they can harass armless civilian's
Cops are the real criminals.
cops are at the bottom of the Illuminati pyramid being the pawns of the 1% to protect themselves from the American public.
Just tell her to ride on the other side of the road.
that would've been case if she was white.
christopher Manning: cop has to confirm all authority.
christopher Manning
What’s the fun in that if you have the ego the size of Mount Fuji!?
😂😂😂
Mike Levi damn that some racist crap to say. Corvallis has the highest bicycle accident per population size in Oregon. It’s because biking is like driving a car in many of these small towns. People are pulled over all the time for improper biking and having the proper equipment. All she had to do was say her name and he would have gave a warning, like they do for all other college students in these towns. She’s an entitled brat
christopher Manning that be the logical thing to do and do it with a smile like a caring public servant...but being an ass gives them more pleasure
Meanwhile a true criminal is laughing. I got away...
Dave Dodge shut up my man😂
A dog is a man's best friend
cops catch there own ass much alone a criminal dude they useless
There are far less real criminals than cops.
@Big Steve Criminal justice had been a big business already for quite a while (my favorite quote is below), but recently besides that, the numbers of cops have also obviously increased, to a degree where there's obvious overabundance of the police compared to their potential targets, so they are literally looking for every opportunity while patrolling the streets.
"Widespread use of drugs and proactive policing have created a 30-year
boom in jail, prison, and courthouse construction. In every city thousands
of people make their livings processing clueless petty offenders. These
include judges, bailiffs, attorneys, paralegals, cops, corrections officers,
court reporters, file clerks, receptionists, security staff, maintenance workers,
cafeteria cooks, jail bus drivers, mechanics, and so on. In my city, for
example, the riverfront skyscraper that houses the courts is no longer considered
sufficient, so a $300 million replacement is under consideration.
*Half the criminal justice system would be out of business if dope were
legalized* . You’d see cops on strike holding signs saying, “Bring Back
Our Dope!” Defense attorneys in tattered suits, with holes in their handstitched
Cole-Hahn loafers, would wander down the streets holding pieces
of cardboard saying “Will Defend for Food.” Dope’s not only a moral and
public health issue; it’s also a jobs issue for city and state employees and us
poor little ol’ attorneys!
When you’re arrested and jailed, the state gives you a job, whether you
understand this or not. Your job is to provide state and city employees
with work. Think this isn’t so? Let me use an example. It’s a bit gruesome,
but that will emphasize the point. Ted Bundy, “the coed killer,”
was executed in “Old Sparky,” Florida’s electric chair. Afterward, a coroner
performed an autopsy. This sounds routine, but let’s ponder. After an
execution, is there any doubt as to the cause of death? After the electric
chair does its job, you’re toast! Does it really matter whether you pop up
light or dark or a bit charred around the edges? Was it important for a
pathologist to discover that Ted had a touch of artery disease or maybe a
kidney stone ossifying his nephrons? Basically, Ted was doing his job of
providing work for state employees. Even death cannot extinguish this
solemn obligation.
Just the other day a bail bondsman and I were enjoying fine adult beverages
in moderation in one of the more elegant riverfront restaurants in
my city. My friend looked wistfully across the water to the jail and offered
a toast to “the gold mine.” The jail a gold mine? Of course it is. For thousands
of city and state employees, it’s a job, insurance, and a pension. For
my friend, and for many attorneys, it truly is an inexhaustible vein of
golden ore. My buddy has a 44-foot yacht to prove it."
(from the book "Arrest-Proof Yourself" , © 2007 by Dale C. Carson and Sam Wesley Denham III)
"Can I please finish my sentence?" Then proceeds to interrupt every sentence uttered by the officer.
I was 100% with the civilian at first. Good on you, challenge the officer to know the law. She lost me half way through, when she wouldn't even accept what the middle of the road is.
She lost me the minute she wouldn't shut up.
It depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is
No, questioning the lanes is a pretty legit argument, especially under the specific circumstances. She's riding a bicycle on a presumably 2 lane, residential road.
This entire stop was retarded and completely unnecessary to start with. I've had an officer try to stop me for this once, and while I tried to explain that it's easier to pay to attention to oncoming traffic than what is behind me, he got all pissy and floored the gas, speeding off.
It's a bicycle guys. Just take a few moments to consider that it's a bicycle before responding.... 🙄
She is very good at arguing, not debating, she is always right.
@@robm5581 exactly and its even more stupid that the 2nd officer is not like just let her go
this is the type of girl that u will NEVER win an argument with even if you are 100% right
Lock her away
Yeah articulent, stadoffish young buck expressing respect. You know she had to watch a McDonald's style training video on how to talk to the police right, and they still put her on the ground lol
Lol never mind just got to your part. Fuck that chick lol
Without your observation, there would be no reasonable explanation for getting married.
My favorite quote is at 19:08 when she says, "yes that's why I've been standing here." She's been standing there because of her own garrulousness, stalling, and long diatribes during which she doesn't like being interrupted. Lol. Its comical.
"Ma'am. You are required to ride your bike on this side of the road. Have a nice day". That's how this is solved.
Sure, in a situation where the person is reasonable and you believe informing them that their actions are a violation will correct the action in the future. When you have this lady, who is defiant to the end and simply will not listen to a single thing you say, I'd also cite her for the violation. A reasonable person would take the ticket and fight it in court if they truly thought they were in the right... oh no, but not this lady, this lady wont let you ticket her by with holding her information because of how utterly right she thinks she is. That is when you get situations like this, and if I were that cop I wouldn't let her just get away with violating the law because it was inconvenient to enforce it because of how petulant this lady is. Take your ticket or play stupid games and win stupid prizes. She chose the latter. Apparently they don't teach you that court isn't held in the streets by yelling down cops at her school.
GoodSteve123 So basically submit you’re rights because they have a badge and a gun. She was asking basic questions where he could have easily said that we didn’t have it on hand especially when it was something that minor. Explain the law to her give her the warning and inform her that she should research the state laws instead to avoid any future misunderstandings. Simple. But it seems to me like your view is the reason why a lot of police officers feel like they can do whatever they want. He turned a simple issue that could have been handled with more understanding into force because he didn’t like she questioned his authority. Let’s be honest.
@@bloodhx3697 No you don't "submit you are rights." You are a person.
It is not the job of the police to explain the law to you. If you are interested in learning the laws, feel free to do so. There are numerous ways one can accomplish this simple task, impeding a police officer who is currently undertaking their duties is not one of those ways. He could have told her all the stuff, sure, and she could have been polite instead of interrupting him every chance she got, and flippantly dismissing his points. She was rude to him and you want him to give her a break? What she did was a ticket able offense, that coupled with the fact that she was rude to the officer means he is well within his rights to give her a citation. In order to do so she has to, under law, provide her I.D. She didn't, that is interference and the second offense of the day. I'm not sure what rights you think she's forced to give up in order to adhere to traffic laws and provide her I.D. when being given a citation but I'll give you a little hint, there are none. She should have taken the ticket and fought it in court. She had a point about the lack of painted lanes on the road, the officer also had a point about driving on the correct side of the street. This would have gone a lot smoother if both parties weren't in a heightened emotional state but nothing the officer did was untoward. He is being paid to write citations to people breaking the law, this woman did that... that's pretty much the end of the story.
@@GoodSteve123 so citations can be based on how badly one bruises the cops ego? None of which justified her being manhandled as she was.
@@fortifarse citations are based on the law. She was in violation of it. Giving out warnings or giving people a break are based on whether the cop wants to or not, so being rude to them and then expecting to be treated far better than you're treating them isn't a very good plan. That's pretty common sense. Her "being manhandled" was because she forced the cop to arrest her for refusing to ID and then pulling away from the police when they were arresting her. See, everything that happened and everything that everyone is so up in arms about is all due to this woman's failure to abide by the law.
Not quite sure how old she is… but this seems like a case of the early college entitlement I lost a lot of my friends to.
Yes! She's acting so entitled!
Dude. She got arrested for riding a bike. When was the last time any cop stopped a cyclist near you? Like, this is ridiculous. You don't even need ID to ride a bike.
I’m not gonna lie y’all seem like the type of ppl who hates education and look down on those who have it
@@BenedictMHolland She wasn't arrested for riding a bike, she was arrested for being an idiot and refused a lawful order because she think she knows everything. The cop was exemplary and showed a lot of patience. @Anime Zone she isn't acting very educated, I have a PhD and I don't go around swinging my dick around acting like it's a difficult thing to be cooperative at a lawful stop.
@Torei M in my town, right now, kids are riding a bike the wrong way down a one way street. Have you literally ever seen someone on a bike get pulled over by a cop?
Cops ego got hurt so badly by this young lady he had no choice but to take her to jail. He admitted it was minor but chose to escalate the interaction. Bad cop
You're talking opinion. The real question is what authority do the cops have. They do have the legal authority to detain her until they are able to identify her. His rationale was questionable the declining to provide identification was off but his authority to cart her off to jail until she could be identified was correct.*
*According to the ACLU anyhow.
And his partners just as bad for not stepping in and stopping it
@Ringo Garvin Did you get that cop hating attitude in jail getting _probed_ like most of you cop haters?
@@TheNyion912 I get that a lot from simpletons. I'm fine with it. Smart enough to know how to hold coppers accountable without acting like a moron.
@@KarlH1980 you seem to try to talk smart as if you know something or you are educated, but deep down you are just projecting while calling ppl Simps, you say you hold cops accountable, well all cops should be held accountable and should be fired and retrained. Cuz at this point in history all cops are modern day redcoats.
“All of you recording it’s ok, I am recording too.”
Passive aggressive crap. The only difference is police videos routinely get lost.
Those LOSERS would have been recording even if one of their relatives was getting murdered right in the middle of the street.
You don't think citizen video's get lost when they don't show what the owner wants them to show? Not really a difference in that respect. :-)
Or are unavailable
StevenFromTexas the cops sound like children “in recording too” like it’s a damn contest that’s who watch over you
@@KarlH1980 A huge difference. Police recording are official public records. Criminal offense to tamper or destroy.
I give her an F, as she continued to ask the same question over and over after already being given an answer. This just exacerbated the situation unnecessarily.
tries to act smart but is stupid like a rock.
@Donald Thorpe watch the full video. He didn't lose the contract for the officers, they terminated the contract when the school admonished the officer for making a lawful arrest.
It's not against the law to be a spoiled brat.
@@robinperini5226 lol, unfortunately not
Cops do that too...
His final deep breathe when he tells her that he’s not giving her a warning and is now citing her & she asks him for the 100th time for the documentation, is PRICELESS!
Why did she have to ID herself for a "warning" though which is how it started out
Belle French Gold she talked her way into a citation. That is why she needed to provide her ID. I think she would have said something along the lines of I’m sorry I didn’t know I was in the middle as there are no lines. I will stay the right better. Thank you. Or even just a simple I’m sorry. The warning would have stayed.
@Ian L Jesus you have issues if you really think this officer was a dickhead. I watch every video on this channel and 99% of the time I can't believe what these officers do and I hope they lose their jobs and have to deal with the repercussions. But seriously, this officer was respectful, even was patient enough to try and point out the statutes that allows him to issue a citation or an arrest, and still have the girl an option to present ID twice at the very end. Your bias towards police knows no bounds, and its narrow minded individuals like yourself that prevent progress between citizens and police and increases hostility in general.
You're far worse than anyone in this video.
@@byne2323 Dude
Bootlick elsewhere
@@byne2323 Agreed....I was in cuffs many times in my younger days...These cops were polite, proffesional and very patient....
The young lady is a brat who was simply instigating as evidenced by her playing the race card...
@Ian L ...please...She was an uninformed brat who was asking for it...
People like her (and you) discredit the cause...
Should he gave bothered her in the 1st place ..No...But when she played the race card she exposed her actual intentions...
8:40 “ it is customary in our society” to provide ID upon request. It is more like it is customary in police interactions that the public be subservient to the presumed authority of thugs with badges
A M E N
And in LA we have actual gangs in the LAPD.. They have their gang tatto and everything.. like woooooow
Bullies with badges
To be fair, it is customary, but that doesn't mean it is required by law.
In a 30 minute long video, dude misused one word in a basically academic debate.
"All you guys that are recording, I'm also recording." Why do they always say that. Good for you. You're recording because you have to, because no one trusts you.
I had a similar reaction when he said that. I was more like, "and so..."
They do have to inform people that they are recording, if they are actually recording.
I could see it being used as an ignorant mark. But I could also see it being used against the officer. (If someone was to say “this officer made this stop, but he wasn’t even recording the situation”). He could be covering his tracks to make sure someone doesn’t accuse him of “not recording”.
Jenna Kern thank you for existing here, I thought I was going to have to comment something logical for a moment, but seems you've beaten me to it...
I'd I had recorded, rather than trust that exact statement, I'd have no record. only the video, no audio, was actually recording. laugh at my ignorance!
I saw that a bunch of people standing on the sidewalk recording! This guy is a dick!
Not too often I'm rooting for the law, but this girl managed to make it happen.
Lol, that was my thought
This is what society looks like when the hogs arrest people for the society of fucking cars. You americans are in world war 3 against the environment thanks to your cars. They are industrial space heaters with a side effect of transportation. Your car heats up your home 3 times faster than the furnace at home. Your car is the "fossil fuel industry". Welcome to the hell you made. Its these guys' job to defend the status quo.
People riding bikes are fighting on the good side of WW3.
White men make good cops because they are raised to be the main character in the hollywood movie. You americans are more silly than the north koreans because they dont lead the way in burning down the world like you fucking americans.
You rooting for a grown white man for bullying a little girl? You americans will make really good nazis cause of how fucking twisted you have to have your mind to be an american. You are apathetic to the way your prisons are full of black people right now and you will be apathetic in 10 or 20 years when black people run out of money and have to be put in concentration camps;. The world will never get an apology for iraq because you fucking americans refuse to stop playing stupid in your part in burning down the world.
Dirty Dirty fucking Americans.
Sad but so true lol. He was so patient, I don’t understand why there was a issue with this arrest she deed refuse to identify so she got her ass arrested
She’s doing way too much. So intent on pushing back against the police that she talked herself into a more complicated situation. Just wants to talk and argue rather than genuinely work out the situation in good faith. This is about her ego. I normally blame the cops for allowing their ego to takeover but this was on her this time
Yep ... halfway through I was like ,please stun this chick ... I liked what another auditor did saying "I won't identify but if it's a legal stop my wallet is in my pocket and while I don't consent you may get my wallet to identify if need be " .. which was good cause if it's 100% legal stop then that allows officer to get ID and person told them exactly where it was..
Omg!!! You're speaking my language!!! I am on the same page
Couldn’t agree more.
This is the most annoying thing about Oregonians. They love to protest literally anything when it comes to the government…. But are so often misinformed about the right time and place to do it
exactly...she's being rather insufferable...
He just said it's customary and a requirement in the same sentence.
That's because he didn't have enough time to make sure all his fabrications didn't conflict with each other.
Hes trying to sound smart bc he knows this girl is intelligent
It's called copspeak
Sauce?
It’s called double speak
I love when cops say im also recording... yeah any idea how hard it is to get that video?
So hard....that's why we just watched it, something that only happened 2 wks ago.
Audit the Audit obtained it. Just say'n.
Thomas Karl obviously they’re saying cops delete the video or they deny the fois requests
Is he a cop?? Since he called for a police officer!
They deleted several tapes I needed for court
She has the right to remain silent, not the ability.
I truly appreciate the unbiased nature of this channel.
I'd say it leans more anti-police, and goes absolutely by the book without any consideration of common courtesies until he decides to grade the individual's at the end
@@cadillacmoto well yeah because the police are shit.
@@cadillacmoto - i think you mean the videos submitted run more anti police, which is to say they show bad policework. He is always very fair in his commentary.
@@Rosy2468 what an individual posts or retweets or shares is a reflection of their person, and I believe that for facebook, twitter, TH-cam, or any other social media platform. A youtube channel showing mostly anti-police videos reflects on their character as such. I've noticed that the channels commentary throughout the videos to be relatively neutral, but the grading at the end to be more anti-police, or anti-commonsense or common courtesy. Look at a more recent video that the channel posted, something along the lines of being "unscripted", I forget the word the channel used, but it was self admittedly a video without deep research into states laws, and more of analyzing just as any viewer would. It suggested things that reflected the channels poor view of law enforcement as it suggested the department in question had connections with a victim's father, and that was the basis for their behavior. Completely uncalled for and leans far away from supporting LEOs from carrying out their duty.
@@cadillacmoto - i mean i hope you understand i can't comment at all about your post until you find the video you're talking about. In the mean time I'll say he has a video titled "captain shows sheriff how policing is done" where he talks about how a good cop runs a situation vs a not so good cop. He shows to me awareness that cops as a concept aren't good or bad but their personal actions decide that.
Also he comments frequently in the rating system that he'll take away points for civilians who don't know the law, or who lash out OR even against those who don't press charges because they allow for a corrupt system or corrupt cop to continue on. That shows to me he's critical in all directions.
"Ignorance of the law is no excuse" for me and you, but Heien V. North Carolina allows a (supposedly) trained cop to make "a reasonable mistake of facts".
Well they are allowed to lie anyway, so they can say "I am the law" and shoot you in the head. THEN, due to qualified immunity, they will leave the victim's family with no care giver and there be no penalty on the pig themselves. FTP
@Iam Impossibru yh lots of cops lie to try and get u to admit things
@@AndrewFosterSheff69 That's not how qualified immunity works. Qualified immunity only applies if the average person in the same situation could have made the same mistake, I think AtA even explains it in this very video but I could be wrong on that.
ignorance of the law dosent matter unless your a cop
@@Palpetinus actually you are totally correct.
@ 17:00 he goes over it and backs up what you said.
“I had the right to remain silent... I just didn’t have the ability”.
Also, complains that the officer interupts her, then proceeds to interrupt him when he tries to answer her questions. 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
Yeah this girl isn't the brightest bulb in the disposal bin.
Dudeyou have no idea or appreciate the freedom you have and your surroundings. You are too comfortable. Sit down on your bed at night look forward and ask yourself what it was like when you were a kid riding your bike through yards and on sidewalks and what we've become only you can face yourself
You missed a perfect opportunity to quote from Shrek 2:
“Donkey you HAVE the right to remain silent. What you lack is the capacity”
@@blakesmith9039 lol what are you even talking about!
And yet despite all of this, the police officers are still in the wrong. Y'all just keep being mad and sucking on that boot.
A pedal bike is not a motor vehicle. She did not have to provide ID unless this is a stop and identify state
Meanwhile every car that came up or down that road drives right In the middle lol
One of them was on the left
yes, to avoid the other vehicles parked on the road. the roads are state property, not private property. no one is entitled to the road and the civilians that travel them are required to follow the laws.
I hadn't noticed that but you're right. So basically he accomplished what here?
well since the police were there you are supposed to move over a bit
They have to, do you not understand why?
"Co-operative" and "mindlessly obedient" are not the same.
I hate that word, cooperative.
This has to be the most patient cop interaction I've ever seen. Honestly think she brought all this on herself.
It's almost as if she was wanting a similar interaction like Weinman had? Maybe some sort of payout? Or at the very least wanted it to go viral for attention.
Really? A girl on bicycle.. what police work.
@@blakesmith9039 exactly like a girl riding her bike he felt like harassing someone.
@@leannerobinson1536 they do it because they can theyre bums
@@blakesmith9039 A girl on a bicycle.... firstly; that is a young woman; she is 21.
Secondly wtf has her gender got to do with her breaking the law? Do laws only apply to men?
What is wrong with you?
I had a friend that received a ticket for the same thing when I was in Senior High. He took photos of the road to court with him and WON because he proved their were no lines painted, therefore no "lanes."
I always find it hilarious when cops say "im filming as well" like they never have "technical difficulties" 😆🤣
Or like filming it gives them permission to harass and attack citizens! I guess he forgot that he's a PUBLIC SERVANT not the other way around!
static erratic You don't have much of a brain up there do you? You're simply ignorant. Since police officers are such terrorists how about we take them away, I'm sure that would make you happy. You have hear how stupid you sound. Idk what job you work at but I am 100% sure it's not as important as a police officer's job or as hard
@@christianstark7748 Did you agree with everything before the terrorist statement though?
@@christianstark7748 you don't have much of a brain up there do you? He's complaining about police violence, hypocrisy and abuse of power. He never said that the police force should be abolished. Better training and police accountability can fix that.
@Malayan Man literally never said he said police should be abolished...I said since he said that the police are such terrorists that we should abolish them...because why would you want terrorists on the streets. Look back and actually think about it
“It’s customary you go along with the program”
Error 404: site not found.
I was thinking that as well like don't assert your rights out here during the contact let me do what I want with you and then you argue in court. That's not freedom
A trooper pulls over a student on a bike and says she's on the wrong side of the road, when there are no painted lines? Are you serious? A simple "Hey. You'll probably want to be more careful" would've been more than adequate.
This is what I believe should be the role of the police as well. Helpful and at the max, protective......rather than this crap that makes people hate them.... stop/detain/fine/punish/ticket/arrest over things of this nature.
i mean it was obvious what side of the road was what but i agree unless they see her a few times just push her on her way lol
most neighborhoods dont have painted lines. do you drive on the opposite side of the street
@@JimCampbell777 Indeed I've literally had this same interaction with a police officer in UK, granted he seemed to think the change in tarmac colour where a utility had dug up part of the road was the centreline (despite being clearly on the left side) but still the entire interaction consisted of them telling me to cycle on the left hand side of the road and my response of yeah ok sorry officer. Granted I'm well aware disputing the matter at that point would have certainly escalated it but UK police are generally trained to deescalate and resolve the matter as quickly and painlessly as possible especially for such minor things, then again they actually train for more than the 5 minutes US police do too so maybe that helps.
I was thinking the same. A good cop might stop them and say, “Hey, you could get a ticket for that. Be careful. Have a good day.” No need to identify her. She wasn’t robbing a bank. She was riding barely over the center. Ridiculous.
"It's a minor stop, but I think we can make a big deal about it."
Yep. They take money out of our paychecks for this. They're using our own labor to construct our own prison bars.
David Dickey 😂😂😂😂 your so fucking stupid
It’s not the cop making a big deal it’s that bitch, all she had to do was tell him her fucking name.
relyTッ Calm down kiddie.
He's saying, "I just wanted to meet her."
unless the cyclist is doing something egregious, I think its stupid to waste time stopping someone on a bicycle
it is a waste not just of time but of taxpayer dollars!
People who break the road safety rules endanger themselves and others. A local resident posted earlier about the issues with cyclists there.
until they are the hood ornament of an suv
@man0z no you shudnt go through red lights even on a bike. Ur on the road ya obey rules full stop. Ud b very 1 suing if hit by a car after cycling through red light
but they love doing it. i was an avid bicyclist for about 20 years riding my bike to work and literally for everything. i got pulled over more on a bike than i ever did in a car all so the cops could tell me a 20 year veteran at dodging careless drivers on a bicycle how to be safe. they are a joke.
Student should've taken the ticket and fought it in court. C- to the officers is ridiculous. Should be better. They remained calm throughout the encounter and told her what she had to do to avoid being arrested. If officers get a C-, absolutely no way does she get a B+ for needlessly complicating the encounter.
I concur
bear in mind that this channel is super biased by nature of it being made to criticize the police. It very rarely sides with the cops and has a very high propensity of overrating "auditors".
Absolutely. No answer or response from the officers would've sufficed. These officers were saints in this case
Yes, submit to the police no matter what. Don't ever make sure your right aren't violated.
@@bumbaclot813 Well that's definitely a stupid opinion to have! What makes you think people should do that?
She is smarter than both of them. Hope she becomes a lawyer.
Funny how citizens are required to know the law, while qualified immunity allows cops to be ignorant or the law.
That's exactly what I was thinking when he said it's unreasonable to ask the officer to be 100% right about the laws he's trying to enforce 100% of the time. I guess ignorance of the law is indeed an excuse, *when you're a cop.*
Stupid Plumbing exactly. They arrest in bogus laws then say " it you're responsibility to prove I'm a liar by being a lawyer as an average citizen"
You gotta give them room to breath. They were hired by those that take your money to pay them to enforce the laws and to make sure you keep paying more
The copsucker audit the audit let it loose in this video his feelings on that matter.
Citizens, required, no, rather it is recommended for you not to be stupid. I hate cops too.... still, ignorance does not have an excuse.
Yeah that cop has a lot of patience lol.
No. He didn't! She should of never been arrested!
@@dianadowie3985 Like I said, the officer was very patient in this case. She talked her way into cuffs. 🤣
@@dianadowie3985 The arguments she was making were supposed to be made in a court room not on the side if the road 🙄
@@TheTC915 cut the hypocrisy! She wasn't supposed to arrest like she a mass shooter! She was racially profiled and the police officers didn't like she asked questions!
@@dianadowie3985 🤣 whether or not she should have been arrested has nothing to do with the comment I made. My comment was strictly about the officers patience which the narrator also commended by the way. 🤣
I love this kid and her perseverance. She never loses her cool, articulates intelligently, poses nor presents any threat to anyone, and never even swears. I'm glad this thing went viral to expose yet more jack boots abusing their badge for the sole purpose of bullying.
she's obviously not very intelligent..
@@kian8203 WAY more intelligent than you......
@@kian8203 , in what aspect? Because she sounds very eloquent in my opinion.
@@kian8203
Would you prefer she kowtow?
@@kian8203 If you read little more about this incident and about her, you will learn that she is not only very intelligent, but she is actually a superstar of that college, the #1 cheerleader, and the only one who was sent to England to represent her college in something. Which probably contributed to the unusually sharp college's reaction on her arrest.
Man.. that right to silence though
"How can I know that what you're telling me is the truth?" Hell, you know that whatever cops say is probably a lie.
This is quite literally a 27 minute long confrontation over riding a bike in the wrong lane.
On a road with no marked lanes
They have to follow-up. Imagine if the they were like "well, you're not playing along, we'll just leave".
UNTIL she gets creamed by a car.... She was being a pain in the ass and didn't know what she was talking about. She sounds like my youngest kid. As they said dispute in court
Meanwhile in the background of the video, every car passing by was driving down or near the middle of the road......cops did nothin about them....!!!!
@@mysocratesnote8110 Cars can adjust driving lane faster than a bicycle, much faster. And if a car drives completely in the wrong lane, they will get pulled over.
The officer accidentally makes a very good point. “We don’t carry a copy of department policies and procedures.” Why not? It’s easy enough to carry on your phone!
CandyGramForMongo or laptop inside the police car
Because they don't have to. They have no legal obligation to inform a person of the crime they are being suspected of until they receive the citation or are arrested.
But what about the hours and hours of training they so call go through.🙄
I agree but even so department policies and procedures aren't law and citizens still dont legally have to adhere to them.
No but the police do. :)
All this over a bicycle?! Wasted of time.
This video is just more proof to me that we should completely fire these police departments to the ground, and start over from scratch with a radically different approach. What I see here is completely moronic.
modolief completely agree
modolief disban the police altogether. Just train children from atleast 10 on law, court rulings, observation,taking mental notes, collecting evidence and self defense armed unarmed. We only need a non-armed investigation unit to collect evidence and court
Fixing the police is like trying to fix a broken dam that springs a leak ever time you fix the last leak...
I dont think we can fix it and need a new approach also.People think if your against this type of policing then your against law enforcement ,but in reality that its because I'm for better law enforcement I think the police should be abolished...
They cost to much and dont do much of anything to keep people safe and statistics prove that.For example when there was a massive explosion in a in the funding giving to police in the early 90's ,the only thing it lead to was more prison getting built, but did little to stop drug overdoses, murders and robberies or anything that really mmatters..They write millions of tickets and people still speed...
Police are a reactionary service that are called in after a crime is committed and dont ever seem to be around when people need them.Most likely because they are to busy writing tickets.
Even the police know they are of little use and that's one of the reasons they only the lowest class of people become police..
It's been that way since the police first started and the people that were made to do the patrols during the night watch..
It was often given as a punishment to the people in town that were on the fridges of society.Rather then risk anyone of significants or class, the town would often voted that the one of the poor and unruly would do this job...
Nothing has changed
@Ronnie Longdick Jr. read the about the history of police ,I didnt make it up
@Ronnie Longdick Jr. for example where do you think the term patty wagon came from?
Someone really went crazy with blurring everyones face on a video that is public record
on a public road in daylight??
so a average citizen is supposed to know the law more then cops? something has to change
According to Oregon law there is no statutory requirement that bike riders must show ID if stopped for a traffic violation. Case Closed!
Nick Nitro right that’s what I was thinking.. since when are bicycle riders required to show ID
They aren't required to show ID, because you do not need a drivers license to use a bicycle. However, since a bike is considered a vehicle, the rider must follow all traffic laws, just as a car would. She didn't and was pulled over. She doesn't have to provide ID, but she does have to give her identifying information (name, address, etc) so that the officer can issue a citation.
@@kevinzink9063 Correct but the officer never asked for her to state her name and date of birth. Cause he's an idiot..
@@nicknitro4420 she's not too smart either. She kept asking to see what code requires her to provide an id. She could have just said her name and dob to the officer and told him you have my identification, you don't need a physical id. She chose her path to nit pick that point.
@@renpope1210 She's a lot smarter than the 100k a year cop... Who cost his department a contract with the school and most likely a lawsuit.. He never once asked her for a name and DOB why should she volunteer and help him do his job ? The cop is an idiot..
I am normally on citizens side but this young lady talked her self into this. The side of the road is not the courthouse and not to place to push the issue.
I think I love her, she’s cute
I think I love you
@@mraggressivestoic8442 sure?
@@YallaMiami I don't mind if you use sure. I prefer mitchum.
Why are you normally "on the citizens side"? In what context? You just assume the civilian is right to begin with? lmao
Rumor has it, she’s still asking questions...
Rumor has it you're ignorant because you don't!
lol
👀🙄😶🤣🤣
Lol
🤣🤣🤣
Finally a video from my State and in the same city my sister went to college in. This is the most Oregonian Audit to Audit video I could have imagined. No that would give me too much credit. The girl, the cop, the absurdity and irony... ho boy.
Even the fallout.
I agree with the assessment from AtA. The cop's patience on the surface seems extraordinary, but if it fails to actually help the situation it's worthless. Even with all that 'patience' his frustration _still_ causes him to make mistakes.
A lot of the comments bemoan the girl but she stood her ground, defended her rights, and the stop was BS. How was she supposed to know he would only give a warning? He could have changed his mind at any time. The whole warning thing can't be seen as some kind of panacea cudgel. There is no denying that her tactic worked too.
Don't mess with bicyclists in Oregon. Doesn't matter who you are or what organization you are a part of. All hope will wither and crumble against BIKERS RIGHTS! BIKERS RIGHTS!
“Interfering” the ultimate contempt of pig 🐖 charge!
So a piggy 🐷 following you, stopping you for literally nothing (on a bike), then getting ButtHurt = interferences.
Pig logic
If he was following that young lady, sounds like stalking to me
Me thinks, things like obstruction and interfering can only apply to the police dealing with others. Not cooperating with the effort to put you in jail is not only natural, but is the very essence of the 5th Amendment, and demanding that the suspect "cooperates" with his own intimidation is a form of sadism. Whenever the cop says "you are not cooperating", the only logical answer is "only an idiot would cooperate in the project of putting himself in prison".
@@vadr1651 "I am not interested in aiding you in your investigation against me." Should be ones only response.
The girl is the one acting irrational out of feeling butthurt. Right half of road... Not a hard concept. But she had to be a pain in the ass because her feelers were hurt for being told so.
Police love to escalate any stop example: Your tire is low on air come with me I'm calling back up and waste time and money.
I think quotas are the main problem. Quotas force them to look for petty nonsense so they can fill out paperwork so they can get credit for not sitting around all day.
@Jenna Kern One of the reasons a bunch of rag-tag colonists went to war with the most powerful empire in the world was because its king, in their estimation, "...obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers." I.e., the colonists felt the government wasn't following the law. It starts with demanding ID for no lawful reason. The "people in these videos on this channel that are detained, pulled over etc" are more often than not the subjects of unlawful detainments and arrests. If citizens, especially minorities, simply "handed over their ID" the cops will continue to become more and more brazen. Let's see how you feel after you're tazed over something an officer unlawfully orders you to do.
That said, in this case, the young woman was lawfully asked for ID and refused to show it, falling back on her nonsense, gobbledygook philosophy she's been marinating in at one of Oregon's fine universities.
@Jenna Kern The cops are over stepping their boundaries. She is standing up for her rights as an American. It is patriotic to see what she is doing. You should really think about standing up for your rights as well. When the police get used to dealing with pushovers like you who don't know the law they begin to trample on everyone and when somebody does know the law they end up tazed or dead.
Heres a fun fact riding a bike against traffic is safer then with traffic
I agree with that 100%.
I agree too. I want to at least see what's coming from all the distracted drivers out there. Their important text could kill me.
I dont agree. When a car is turning right at an intersection they tend to only look left for oncoming traffic then start to look right as they pull into the intersection turning right. Source, I hit a guy on a bike riding against traffic and he was faulted. Did not see him at all behind a parked u-haul.
Only when on a sidewalk
But when you're on the road you are EXPECTED to follow the rules of the road. Or are you saying the laws don't apply to you?
This is a prime example of why you don’t argue with police, you argue with the courts.
This channel is arguably one the most insightful channels on this entire platform. The research efforts put into each video are absolutely first rate. Truly outstanding work product that is second to none.
** inarguably
;)
I think JCS- criminal psychology is also a great channel
Yea this channel gets an A + lolol for the work they put in llol...awesome!
I learn a lot
@seantatum you ain't never lying
Drinking game: Take a shot every time a vehicle is visible in the video straddling the center seam of the roadway as it drives past.
Good one 👍 let the game begin 👏
Thanks alot. I played the game and now I am smashed :P
Nah, id get sick lol
Well they’re trying to move over for the stop sooo
You’re allowed to briefly cross the line to avoid risking hitting pedestrians ( or law officers) obstructing traffic. That’s different than continuing down the road going the wrong direction in the wrong lane.
This is exactly why he signed up
The fact that there was uproar over this is insane. These cops were insanely patient and the girl was equally as insufferable.
He stopped her for riding her bike on the wrong side of the road and then required her ID when all he wanted to do was educate her on why she should ride on the right side. That's absurd. Just educate her you don't need her ID and all that. These are just cops with nothing to do so they need to write down something they were doing. So he needs her name so he can tell his captain he actually did something that day.
@@marksommers4179 She got her education in the best way possible. She was an entitled brat that didn't want to shut up and listen for 2 seconds, but instead, she knew better didn't she? They gave her an immense amount of chances, and she felt she knew the law, which she didn't. He even offered straight up to give her a warning and she kept spouting off. She requested another cop on the scene, so he obliged. This would have been a 30 second stop if she had some couth.
@@mortekaieve4729 She was dumb for sure but the situation is exactly what I described. Worthless cop busy doing nothing so he wants to stop some girl riding her bike so he can waste her time and tell his superior thats what he was doing.
@@marksommers4179 She wasted his time, not the other way around. If she shut her trap and opened her ears it would have been over in under a minute. Let her try that crap with her boss when she gets into the real world and see what happens. Apparently her parents let her get away with it and it didn't serve her well.
@@mortekaieve4729 He could've left at anytime. He said he was keeping her there because she wasn't complying with a lawful order. All because she didn't want to show her ID after she was riding her bicycle on the wrong side of the road. Which he said he only stopped her for because he wanted to educate her. But sure she was the one who wasted his time, delusional much?
6:20 “I didn’t call you because I needed backup. I called you here to witness the circus.” Why would he create a circus about a young college student biking the wrong way? I’m just glad the American people aren’t paying for this production.
The American people pay for this nonsense EVERYDAY!
@@JimCampbell777 (they know)
Fun fact: we do
I thought that is what those expensive body cameras are for to be a neutral accurate witness. Could he have foreseen the brouhaha to follow, is that why he wanted a human, and therefore by definition, biased witness? Or does he mean I wanted an audience, a cheering section? Or maybe, I'm starting to lose my conviction in my argument - she IS wrong, right?
Blurred her face the whole video then shows it at the end lol
How do you know that the police didn't do that for the provided body cam footage?
I think the video was just blurred that why he got a picture of her
He got the video of a different source so he didn't have control of whether the video was blurred or not
Jaimz Myers it was literally his body cam haha
@@xavier.ashkar thats the original source but in the video he said where he got the video i havent watched the video in 3 weeks and dont remember but the only wasnt blurred then the source he got it from blurred it not him.
"Passive resistance??" In other words: Standing up for your constitutional rights.
rationalguy yep that is passive resistance
rationalguy nonviolent opposition to authority is passive resistance
rationalguy would you agree that that is what she did?
Um no when you are lawfully stopped as she was you must identify, even if in the end the cop was wrong, she is totally in the wrong. No police officer has to justify or show you why he stopped or what law you want to be shown. As it was already stated this is not a courtroom. Take you dame ticket or warning as it was going to be and move on.
You're an idiot. You should change your username
24:14 “community uproar”? Really? I’d bet 1000000 more people in that community were on the officers side. Just shows how out of touch and biased the media is.
I am open to the possibility of being wrong, but this is the first video I essentially disagree with. I'm all for defending your rights, but any idiot can see the line in the middle and know if they are on the right "lane" so after driving on the wrong side of the street, she just tried to outsmart a cop instead of just letting herself get a warning and be done with it. Everything that happened after was an overreaction on all parts, specially from the school. I see no injustice here.
Totally agree. Let's acknowledge that young people don't like cops and it didn't matter what the cop did, they would disagree somehow. Young people think they have so much power with social media.. well, they kinda do unfortunately. I guess the girl was light-skinned biracial? Not sure. I didn't see any evidence the cop was being racist. She should've taken the L. Girls think they can talk their way outta anything. They don't like being held accountable.
No we are made to think we gta do what cops say and what cops are saying is the truth and this showed that we don't have to we can ask questions and we don't just gta bend over cos a cop says so
@@zdtu8 absolutely and I'm in the same boat - usually agreeing with the citizen, But these cops were saints by any measure! There simply weren't any 'correct' answers that the officers could've given. It would've only spiraled in another circular direction
But there is no road marking. The line was the result of surfacing - not reliable. We didn't see the alleged offence, so not clear what happened. In any event, resources deployed disproportionate to the alleged offence.
Was there an injured party? No. No crime was committed. She can drive on any side she wants, AND if there is parking on the street sometimes you HAVE TO cross the line.
I was with her in the beginning but she lost me once she refused to accept reality and the fact that vehicles drive on the right side of the road in the US
Sure. But it's a bike. Should they follow all rules of the road? Sure. But motorists should also give 4 to 6 feet of clearance when passing and none of them do. We hate cyclists in the US. And still no, she doesn't need to give her ID. You don't even need one to ride a bike.
Yet the defining line required to determine sides of the road was clearly vacant. I'm glad she won her case. Qualified immunity just means the people enforcing laws don't have to know the laws.
@@BenedictMHolland Don't you think it would be dangerous for traffic if cars were swerving an extra 6 feet into oncoming traffic to go around bikes?
@@BishopStars you have to follow the bike until it's safe to pass. Right? I mean, what else are you going to do? Imagine if the bike spins out and falls in front of your car. I think you would be quite happy you gave the extra room, you know, to not murder someone.
Can't even ride a bicycle anymore. What sad times we live in. 😞
Shit crazy these days
People can, as long as they follow the laws and ride on the correct side of the road.
@@kevinzink9063 how can you ride on the right side of the road when most of the road is line with cars blocking the side you can ride on. plus did you not see then cars going pass? they was not on the right side of the road. they was in the center of the road do to "NO LINES" so there how can you brake the law when you can not see a line to brake?
@@kevinzink9063 I think having a bike follow the same rules of the road as a car is... Stupid. It's a bike. It's not a 2 ton car. People should be able to ride on sidewalks, roads, dirt, etc and not be subject to any of the laws that govern the movement of a normal vehicle.
She was on the wrong side of the road!
Clearly she needs prison time.
Whats next? Wheelies?
Talking while riding?
Turning your head to far in one direction?
Not looking 100ft ahead?
To low psi in tires?
LOL!!
She was hoping to wear down his patience so he would give up and go away. Lol.
"Let me educate you on the law."
"OK, what's the law?"
..."I don't know I don't have my law book!?"
Lmao that’s what you took from that? Smh and they did get a book.... way too much time spent dealing with her
Fucking clown
He was trying to give her the exact code. How can you expect him to have ever code and ordinance memorized along with every state and federal law. These cops did a great job.
He isn't required to show her anything. That is what court is for.
@@atm9566 the exact reason why we say there are too many laws, you can simply walk down the street and break a law by doing your everyday activities and never know it... I get we have laws for many reasons but jeez, even the Supreme Court can't memorize the millions of laws in the books... but she could've dealt with this differently
Ladies and gentlemen we are officially in a police state. I love this girl I hope she go on to become a defense attorney she is very intelligent.
The video clearly states she was breaking the law and making misguided demands, because of her ignorance to the actual law. Did you even watch?
@@wtfronsson She was exercising her good old American rights. This was an unmarked road. There's no way to tell what side of the road she was. The police was just looking for an issue. Whatever happened to protect and serve. It's has become fines and jail. Where's the discretion for warning a person instead of jail and fines.
@@Lokey_8664 It was a case of both parties being wrong on various points. However, refusing a lawful order is what lead to the arrest. And she did that based on wrong information. Also, that lawful order would have never been issued in the first place, if the lady would have simply accepted that she is getting a warning. She decided to press an issue she wasn't that informed in, but still went to absolute non-compliance regarding the identification issue.
You also see the officer be patient and expend a very long time trying to politely argue with someone literally committing a crime by arguing instead of complying. The cops have rights too, and this one was acting within said rights. I hate to see a complex "no one is right" issue be spun into a celebration of one side's actions taken in ignorance.
@@Lokey_8664 in the case of unmarked roads, it falls to what a reasonable person would consider the halfway point between the curbs. The officer was definitely the one correct about where the center of the road was. And even then, you don't argue it with the cop, you argue it with the judge. And the cop was going to give her a warning, until she started to fail to ID, which is required on a law traffic stop, which this was as the officer initiated the stop upon observing an infraction.
@@kevinzink9063 I can agree with that
“We’re not in a court room , just so you know” lmaooo
Girl was trying to win the case in the streets. If she’s right it’ll show in court , not the streets.
If they cannot turn the exercising of a right ( to remain silent ) in to a crime how can one be charged with delay/obstruct an officer ?
The 5th Amendment does not give you the right to not state your name in this type of a situation. But, you can certainly remain silent afterwards.
@@beemerbill1572 BULLSHIT any of your info CAN AND WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU....
Unles lawfully arrested you have no obligation to id.
Brown v Texas.
Kolender v Lawson.
5th amendment.
Maxim of Law: "No one is bound to arm their adversary."
You do not have to answer their questions.
Terry v Ohio 392 U.S. 1
"Of course, the person stopped is not obliged to answer, answers may not be compelled and refusal to answer furnishes no basis for an arrest, although it may alert the officer to the need for continued observation."
“The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that refusal to answer law enforcement questions cannot form the basis of reasonable suspicion. See Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429, 437, 111 S.Ct. 2382, 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991) ("We have consistently held that a refusal to cooperate, without more, does not furnish the minimal level of objective justification needed for a detention or seizure.") - U.S. v. Santos 403 F.3d 1120 (2005)
The 5th amendment does not give us any rights it is their chains that bind them....NOT US.
The cop did not know the law on a civil contractual matter, had no contract and cannot be the plaintiff in a case against her and had ZERO cause of action against her.
@@beemerbill1572 so even if my name or who I say I am or related to can be used against me. Because anything I say can + will be used against me in a court of law ! There words not mine. We really (unless driving ) do not have to show ID. No ID is required in America... oh no but " cops can be trusted " so should I take the word of a professional story teller or LIER about what's legal Haha hahaha that's funny . You show your papers I will keep mine to myself so.... Keep complying . It's no big deal just a tiny bit more every time. So you go talk to them all day long + we will see what happens. Wake up sleepy head before you wake up in a 3rd world commie country. You will only be able to blame yourself !
@@6StimuL84 thank you well put . Sometimes I think nobody cares , thank you for being a real believer in the constitution + everyone's God given rights . Stay strong everyone its gonna be a hell of a ride.
John Murray
If there is a cogent point in this moronic babbling, I was unable to detect it. In the SCOTUS Decision Hiibel v. Nevada, the court noted that in cases like this, disclosure of a person’s name presented no reasonable danger of incrimination. And therefore, there is no 5th Amendment protection. Refuse to give a LEO your name (documents cannot be demanded) for the purpose of issuing a citation (regardless if the citation may not be correct) will most likely result in a charge of obstruction and arrest. Argue in front of a judge and not alongside the road.
I was obsessed with this one last week. I watched the full unedited video at least a dozen times. This upload has made my month. Once again 👌🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿
Me too. A very interesting story.
Me too.. these videos from the police and citizens are an eye opener and shows what’s going on and people can make up their own mind up. I guess all the crimes are solved in that area to waste 30 mins and 7-8 officers time on this nonsense.🤷♂️
@@shookoneldn300 a gigantic ego driven waste of time.
MrsRivera
Tell me about it!
You need a job.
The second a cop says "I'm recording also" you know he's developed a chronic case of ego infringement with possible complications of butthurt. Expect things to go wildly wrong from that point.
exactly what im thinking
machinech bruhhh he said “just to let you know” as to tell them that they are being recorded. He just wanted to let them know that they were being recorded it has nothing to do with his ego
I think they do have to say that they're wearing body-cameras and that they're also recording
The “great.” from one of them had me dead cuz he really thought he was intimidating 💀 “k...” 😂
Xavier Ashkar I sense you’re a bit of a boot licker.
She is responsible for her own arrest, ignorance of the law is not an excuse. She could have taken the citation gone to court and cleared it up there. She wanted to play lawyer on the street and made it more then it was.
When passing parked cars on a bicycle it is sensible to give them a wide berth, as someone might suddenly open a door.
Never ride in the door zone
If you ride in the door zone, you WILL get doored
That is true, however, it is also sensible to not travel on the opposite side of the roadway.
@@christhornton2772 I do on a bike, I can see a car coming at me easier then lol. I see more bicyclist get hit from behind, then in a head on collision.
@@mehrunez4838 could that be because almost all bikes travel with the flow of traffic, not against it? If all cyclists travelled with the flow of traffic, no cyclists would get hit head on. That doesn't mean it's safer.
Bicycles are vehicles and you are required to ride with the flow of traffic.
I'd love to see if the trooper is so patient with somebody who isn't so cute, calm, and well-spoken. I'm betting not!
Exactly. He likely stopped her in the first place because he was attracted to her. Of course, once she opened her mouth, that attraction probably ended instantly.
@@geo-george2639 Yes you are correct, he only wants dumbfucks because they won't know their rights.
@@rentiap Actually, I meant she was very annoying to listen to.
@@geo-george2639 Yeah it must suck for you to hear someone able to articulate their thoughts.
US police training class 101 day 1: when citizens are clearly recording you, make sure to explain to them you are, in fact, also recording.
..this ensures that an edited version of the encounter will also be available :-)
@@robertdore9592 lmao good one
US police training class 201 day 1: Be sure to use common phrases to justify your actions, such as: “I smell marijuana, I’m going to have to search your vehicle” “Why are you so nervous, do police make you nervous?” And lastly but most importantly “STOP GRABBING FOR MY GUN!!!”
I noticed that as well. The tone is condescending, as if civilians are wasting their time because - DUH - the cops have the video so you don't need to!
US police training class 101 day 2: There is no day 2
She has the most sweetest voice, and this clown calls for backup. "Help help, officer's ego is down, i need backup"
self-designating himself as "prosecuting officer" says it all. This girls is awesome.
listening to her for the entirety of this video caused me physical pain.
Sorry smart woman cause you pain. You probably smack your wife when she talks back
Oh yeah that’s me, cuz I made a funny comment on TH-cam
@@BecauseRC413 she didn't say anything smart lol. She was completely ignorant of the officers obligations in this situation and made herself look like an ass
@@BecauseRC413 a smart women wouldn’t speak
In that case... You might be entitled to financial compensation!
He could have just said hey stay on this side of the road , have a nice day and stay safe
and then a block later, she proceeds to drive left of center. a slap on the wrist doesnt work in this generation of entitlement.
@@vnavailable747 then ticket, citation or whatever comes next
If he was decent, which he isn't.
He would like have just put her name in his note book and done that.
@james anonymous An Indian grandfather in Alabama was going home to babysit...cops are called cause he's walking while dark skinned. he's not told he's detained or offered a translator in spite of the cops implying they know he can't speak English. he didn't argue. he points to his home n states the address. they randomly slam him hard, paralyzing him. 10 of the 12 jurrors were white, n were the ones who acquitted the cop, in spite of video evidence showing he was slammed for nothing and didnt even pull away like the cops claimed. they didn't even pay his medical bill.
-ACLU, BLM (Black Lives Matter), most women etc: Still silent.
Black person and/or female arrested after being warned, with a crime stated, without being slammed so hard...
-BLM and/or ACLU: Uproar! Maybe protest (maybe riot too) to get results.
Also, men are given harsher sentences than women are for the same crime.
AND this girl plays victim for being black/female.
no, i dont think the cop should go this far for an ID, which is probably what he really wanted and that was his main flaw. too bad most commenters dont try to be as objective and considerate as this channel.
Modern society is wack. See the main vid/description on channel Playitalready for something better n click my sub/bell icons for some fun, upcoming vids.
What a waste of time and money. They must have something better to do rather than bullying a student, who by the way, fights her corner brilliantly.
I think this is the only one of the audits I’ve ever seen that I agree with the law more than the person being stopped. She made this so much harder on herself. I believe that some people take this to this point just because they think the cops will back down.. I really can’t believe I’m saying this but in this case the cops did a good job..
Agreed 👍🏻
I wholeheartedly agree, im normally on the side of the auditors but the cops were professional, patient and she was being obtuse for the sake of holding a torch.
They think the cops will back down cause the cops can’t prove anything. they showed her everything except what she asked. And when they did answer they lied and she caught on and wasn’t going to let them lie to her
They're not cops, they're SS soldiers of the American Gestapo
She's absolutely right officers lie all the time in their job how can she be sure that this officer is being honest and not try to violate her rights or molest , kidnap ,extort money from her because that is in their job description
Absolutely true.
Is this satire/ sarcasm?
Absolutely true.
I always love the “ we’re recording too” bullshit they say. 😂. Here’s the problem, y’all’s recordings always go missing 😂
😂😂😂
or footage is cut out
@J B
And also white
Coming from black guy
These cops moved from just hating black to hating white who are not kkk or support neo nazi agenda
I was just thinking the same shit yo Lmfaooo when some bad shit goes down they don’t let the public see it sometimes
Except this recording. Lmao
This whole quota system is getting out of hand. Cops will write anyone, for anything, just to meet their quota.
@tea marks money might as well grow on trees for the government they just print it
Please provide proof of this quota system... they wouldnt be able to fill a quota if people werent breaking the law. Do you forget the part of this video where the cop was gonna gibe her a warning.... so no he wasnt just ticket happy. Try again.
Wow she’s being very cooperative, those cops are on a power trip. LET HER GO ALREADY.... Christ.
She wasn't though. The officer was requesting her information as she is required to provide it on a lawful traffic stop. She refused to give him her information.
@@kevinzink9063 the Identify for traffic stops does not apply for Bicycles as Bicycles are a none motorized vehicle and thus do not require a drivers license to operate and are thus considered in a separate category form a Car or motorized vehicals.
@Drew A she was being issue a citation, so yes, she has to identify herself whether it be with a driver license or first & last name and date of birth.
Why didnt he just talk to her. Why does it always have to be id yourself so i can talk to you. I believe the for profit system is what drives officers to id someone to see if they have a warrant.
It makes no sense that it's for profit when taxpayers do pay for their service- but you're right.
So he can find if she has multiple tickets for same infarction to decide whether he is going to issue warning or another ticket since it is repeated behavior.
So the warning can be documented. Then if she rides on the wrong side again, a citation give be given.
@@skyrask1948 from ur comments, it seems like youre supporting alot of bad behaviors from cops
@randy s
If the traffic stop was valid, and he's issuing a citation, then he can demand ID. No rational person disputes that.
The problem here is this started out as a warning, and he escalated when she declined to ID. Which she is allowed to do.
I am 3/4 of the way through the video and this officer has been a model of how all officers should treat citizens in public. Has been polite, calm, and allows the citizen to speak.
Hopefully this citizen goes to law school, because her level of discord and questioning would be valuable in court.
She's practicing for her debate class next week...she's an aspiring attorney apparently.
since she ended up in jail, I will pass on her services
Charges were later dropped and the police officers duties were terminated. So she won the case.
@@FernandoRodriguez-ds5ri The police officer still works for the department. She didnt win anything, she had an attorney and the NAACP. If a fan gets called down during halftime and makes a hail Mary shot from half court does he automatically get a Trailblazer contract. If I gotta pee so I speed all the way home should Nascar give me a contract. Girl gets in a debate with the cops, happens to get her rights 50 percent correct but still ends up in jail, she should be a lawyer...ok.
on the contrary, she's an entitled idiot, Ignorantia legis non excusat just because you do not know the law does not make you right, instead of getting away with some lecture she will end up before court and losing her case, paying all the fees and such and for what?
She's not going to do well. She got away with this because the cops decided to let her talk, but irl, people don't have to. Even in a class, once your time is up, its up. Shes just good at obfuscation.
You break the the law when you hurt an officers ego.
Facts
One billion, 345million, 933 thousand 275 % facts
Yup!
Eeeh, in this case I actually agree with the officer, if he would have ended it with a warning she'd continue making the same violations and just shrug it off, as he stated due to how she was acting it was clear that A. She disagrees with the fact that she did something wrong there and B. That she thinks she can get away with it. And you know how it is, you think you got away with something once, you probably could get away with it again, right? Her getting a saitation/arrest would deter her from breaking that rule any further
Ego is the problem here.
Is it true that when an officer runs your ID it is saved as an interaction with law enforcement?
@Klaa2
Thanks, that's what I thought. It's unfortunate. I've been targeted and now I've got a ton of traffic stops with no tickets no warnings yet the interactions are documented 😕
@Klaa2 true, and it seems that a few if my stops were not legit. It's hard to assert your rights when certain things happen.
Unfortunately, yessir 😑
@@apparentlynot1stLeonchubbs
It's ma'am! 😂👌
Space Kat Yes and you could be branded for life. Even on a felonious charge