@@HH-hd7nd campaign actually. I imagine hes much weaker in multiplayer. Througout his campaign he acumulates buffs from literally everything and becomes a one man doomstack by default.
Sisters doesn't have the option to dismount, Mazadamundi can nuke enemies by consistently casting comet of Cassandra, malekith is very tanky even on foot and Manfred is the ultimate anti infantry because of his ability to cast lots of wind of death. Teclis is the only one that gets huge buff from his mount.
actually i prefer the sisters on the eagle for the following reasons: 1. the eagle is smaller, so they take less damage from missiles. 2. i prefer to summon the dragon rather than the eagle. because then the dragon can go into melee and the sisters keep on shooting
If we go by campaign, things look a lot different. Sisters would probably still be in top 5 though(I also prefer them on the Eagle. Smaller target and faster too). This is probably their "skirmish/MP" version though, and if we look at max potential instead of cost efficiency, the dragon mount makes sense.
It depends. If the enemy has something that can catch the eagle, then I'd rather have the dragon. If they can't, I'll take the eagle. So it depends on how long you think the battle will be. If it's gonna be very long battle, then the bird will limit damage potential bc their melee won't be very good when they're out of ammo. Dragon is your boy, there. Also, if the enemy doesn't really have good ranged units, then the dragon is better because you're still very fast, can probably kill anything that can fly up to you, and can fight in the ground.
@@CharliMorganMusic The thing is, the Dragon does not provide that much more damage than the eagle, outside of having access to breath attacks, because most of your damage will still be from range(you can shoot in melee while your mount fights). In melee, the Dragon has more AP damage per attack and more health. It also provides poison and magic damage to your melee attacks. But it has a worse MA, so in duels with other lords/heroes/single entities, you will land a hit less often. Also, their ranged attack either reduces armor(the anti-large shot) or poisons(multishot), so very often, the additional AP and poison debuff of the Dragon Mount has less of an impact than expected at first glance. In the end, for MP-gameplay, the dragon provides you with more health and a breath attack(oh, and Terror), for 800 gold(roughly the price of a Waystalker hero). So both options have their pros and cons when compared to each other, but both options are strong.
Actually think morathi is beter then malakith, the melee attack debuff isn't even calculated in her value and often gets more vaule for less cost. but hey opinions differ
I just love Teclis in campaign. Gets insane dmg resistance so cannot really be killed , heals forever and never runs out of magic. One bird killing machine that solos most armies and sieges are insanely easy with him as an attacker.
I think Malagor deserves a spot on this list. Being able to fly around(without a mount) and cast flock of doom for 2 winds of magic is insanely good. He’s so fast as well so not many flying units can catch him.
Isnt that only in campaign? Because if we go by campaign "potential", it gets a lot more complicated. Gelt can eventually cast several of his spells for 1-2 WoM. Volkmar has 20 seconds cooldowns on his various prayers(including Grand Soulfire Bombardmen), Sisters can summon a dragon(no duration) and Waywatchers(no duration) etc..
This is for MULTIPLAYER. Malagor in SP is fkin busted beyond belief but he aint doing any of that shit in MP as your spell selection is limited by the budget, your opponent always bring a big flyer to go after your tail (like big boi Teclis there or 1/2 Chaos Manticores) and nobody is gonna sit down and let him cast his spell. Malagor is a weakness of the Beastmen in MP in fact. I would rather bring Morghur than him to fight in rank >1000 tbh
Ok lets not mention reworked Morghur. Walk him into a blob and suddenly hes gotten 300000 damage and won the battle for you. Vile aura of transmutation made him op.
I believe that Vlad is just a better option than Manfred since with his blood drinker and the von Carstein ring he can stay in the fight for a really long time and on top of that his fighting stats are respectfully good too which makes up for the fact that he doesn't get any mounts and let's not forget that if you put him and Isabella together in the battle, they are pretty much immortals
RIP Grimgor. He IS very strong, he's just too slow. If only he had like 5-10 more speed or you could just turn him into a boar-boy. He's probably the best Lord killer in the game along with the deathmaster, at least in my opinion and can one-on-one just about anyone
@@eclipsingshadows5421 I mean yeah that would be really cool but I don't think we'll ever see those in Total Warhammer 3. That's why I'm saying you could do something easy like just give him a pig to ride. Black orc big bosses who are basically mini Grimgors get them.
@@CallioNyx Yeah the main issue I end up having is what I call the 'Giant' problem. He wins the combat he's in, sure, but he spends the rest of the battle waddling after enemies. That being said though, he's stupid hard to kill and his leadership is very high. He's basically a Dwarf LL in that respect. What in your opinion would make him more viable? To me, all he really needs is a mount or like 10 more speed and he suddenly becomes great.
Would have thought late game imrik would take first, star dragon mount, breath attacks, bound spell, healing and cd refresh on his armour, synergies amazingly with sword of cain, dragon quest buffs, can buff himself in red tree, can get him to very high ward save/resist. Easy to play 1 man doomstack.
I forgot how awesome the vampire counts trailers are. Even if FFFFFF I'm still mad that Mannfred is so good and Vlad the Chad is left behind. Great vid!
He was talking about Multi-player battles, and sadly (or fortunately, depending on if your playing as or against) Ikit doesn't have nukes in multi-player, only campaign.
Zerk, you´re talking a lot about Arcane Conduit in this video. I always use it immediately when it´s off cooldown, but what is the perfect time to use it? A buddy said you always use it just before you cast a spell...
If this is for MP, it’s 100% gotta be, from 1 to 4, Fay, Volkmar, Morathi, Mazda with the number 5 spot being a close fight between the rest of the top ten (seriously, so many lords could take that spot)
I would love to see another who is the best of all losers mixed specialties ofcourse. Or some reruns but eqauling value like rat ogres and slaves vs minotaurs.
I think Ikit might have been in there. He is a very good mage, a good fighter and just overall a 9/10 Legendary Lord on an OP faction Sure that is more of an Single Player view on things...but I don't play MP as Skaven There is only one true Chaos God for me anyway Anarchy out
your literally just grading mounts though. there are some lords that smack cheeks against some of the lords on this list. Teclis is an egregious one as there is a better lord right next to him in Luthor Harkon. damage output with deep lore is fantastic as well as being ranged and melee, and on top of that he's a duelist making him nuts for lord dropping.
Why isn't Taurox on this list? If properly leveled and kitted out, Taurox can easily 1v1 ANY of the lords mentioned on this list. I know because I've seen him do it. Oh, and he can do it WITHOUT relying on a mount. And Sigmar help you if he ever gets his hands on the sword of Khain, I've seen him murder monsters, lords, and everything in between in three or four hits with that thing. Not to mention he can get to a point where he's damn near invincible between regeneration, his abilities, and resistances.
this tier list is based on what? if it based on combat skill, how couldn't u mention malus darkblade, imrik,... and if it based on general like buff army, buff faction,.... telics, mazdamundi, manfred aren't top 5 LLs lol
Why is Grimgor (da Best) so weak compared to these lords ... No mount, similar amount of melee damage, no heal, no magic, no ranged attacks, bad mobility, no impressive army buffs in skill-tree. Add to that fact that Greenskins dont have a lot of very good units in their army in general, not to mention is mostly Melee focused at least in theory, but has one of worst cavalries in game and low/bad melee defense in general.... so why is Grimgor (da Best) so bad compared to the lords in this video... and also many other lords ?!
Somebody is really stuck in 2019 MP meta game. So the more expensive is the lord, the better? Nyeah, not too sure about what this list is really aiming to tell.
I believe in WH3 there will be a "wounded" system. When a single entity(like a lord, or a giant) is reduced below 50% health, they lose some of their effectiveness.
While I'm a fan of Manfred, I have to agree with this - Imrik, when he gets going in Campaign, is just insane. Noone else comes even close. But, that's including dragon quest traits, items everything - I'm not sure the criteria Z uses here (And Manfred, in Campaign, gets basically unlimited winds of magic - even if Imrik is individually stronger, Manfred may have a better potential to kill armies.).
Thought final lord would be Luthor Harkon. When the sisters are capable of shooting infantry Harkon is so good at taking enemy lords down with the missile damage.
I think personally Noctilus on his necrofex with his 2 mixed spell lores is the most powerful. Is like Mannfred in terms of healing but has a super powerful range attack although no flying
Honestly kinda confused how neither imrik or Taurox are on here. They both get insane damage reduction and can solo late game full stacks without much trouble
Luthor harkon is one of the toughest lords I faced he was destroying my elthorian+ knights of tor goraval in a duel in aircombat and he pretty much tanked a 5 sisters of avelorn focus fire and not to mention no winds of magic with him really made the battle hard. The only downfall his army is super weak but even after defeating all of them he was still quite tanky and took a while for me to bring him down and it cost me a lot
Morathi is clearly better than Malekith. Ask literally any top level player or DE main and they'll tell you she is far superior. Malekith has less soul stealers, is slower, is a larger target on his dragon, and is more expensive on a dragon. Not really sure why you think malekith is stronger because he isn't really good on his dragon anymore since the mass change update. Also Manfred isn't even the strongest lord on the VC roster. Ghorst, the better Strogoi, the blood dragon vampire, and the lhamian lord are all better than him.
You could argue Lahmian Bloodline lords are better than Mannfred. They have perfect vigor, they have higher melee stats, they get a zombie dragon as well,, still have lore of vampires, and they are hotter in comparison.
Go to nordvpn.com/zerkovich to get a 2-year plan plus 4 additional months with a huge discount!
Should have made a differene between mounts used and not used in my opinion, but the vid is nice.
I still can’t afford nordvpn, but when I do, I’ll buy it from you zerk.
i call bullshit. Imrik beats all of these, both in duels and in total damage during normal battles. (otherwise i agree with the list)
Zerkovich You're talking about Multiplayer only I sassume?
@@HH-hd7nd campaign actually. I imagine hes much weaker in multiplayer. Througout his campaign he acumulates buffs from literally everything and becomes a one man doomstack by default.
Should have called this video "5 strongest legendary mounts"
I mean teclis malekith and mannfred are still super powerful even without their mounts
Sisters doesn't have the option to dismount, Mazadamundi can nuke enemies by consistently casting comet of Cassandra, malekith is very tanky even on foot and Manfred is the ultimate anti infantry because of his ability to cast lots of wind of death. Teclis is the only one that gets huge buff from his mount.
Why wasn't Alarielle on the list? She's got the best mount, Tyrion.
@@attila2246 lmao
😎😎😎😎😎
actually i prefer the sisters on the eagle for the following reasons: 1. the eagle is smaller, so they take less damage from missiles. 2. i prefer to summon the dragon rather than the eagle. because then the dragon can go into melee and the sisters keep on shooting
Isn't the list for multipler? Because you can't summon a then
If we go by campaign, things look a lot different. Sisters would probably still be in top 5 though(I also prefer them on the Eagle. Smaller target and faster too).
This is probably their "skirmish/MP" version though, and if we look at max potential instead of cost efficiency, the dragon mount makes sense.
It depends. If the enemy has something that can catch the eagle, then I'd rather have the dragon. If they can't, I'll take the eagle.
So it depends on how long you think the battle will be. If it's gonna be very long battle, then the bird will limit damage potential bc their melee won't be very good when they're out of ammo. Dragon is your boy, there.
Also, if the enemy doesn't really have good ranged units, then the dragon is better because you're still very fast, can probably kill anything that can fly up to you, and can fight in the ground.
@@CharliMorganMusic The thing is, the Dragon does not provide that much more damage than the eagle, outside of having access to breath attacks, because most of your damage will still be from range(you can shoot in melee while your mount fights).
In melee, the Dragon has more AP damage per attack and more health. It also provides poison and magic damage to your melee attacks. But it has a worse MA, so in duels with other lords/heroes/single entities, you will land a hit less often.
Also, their ranged attack either reduces armor(the anti-large shot) or poisons(multishot), so very often, the additional AP and poison debuff of the Dragon Mount has less of an impact than expected at first glance.
In the end, for MP-gameplay, the dragon provides you with more health and a breath attack(oh, and Terror), for 800 gold(roughly the price of a Waystalker hero).
So both options have their pros and cons when compared to each other, but both options are strong.
The true winner, Karl Franz because who the hell else is going to summon the elector counts?
Manfred von carstien. The true emperor! Lol playing through a vampire campaign, can you tell?
@@icarusjumped2705 "Behold, a power beyond Nagash!" good luck with that lmao
Tretch is the strongest legendary lord! He's strong enough to break the fourth wall.
"Order them not me!"
Actually think morathi is beter then malakith, the melee attack debuff isn't even calculated in her value and often gets more vaule for less cost. but hey opinions differ
Yes, I prefer Malekith cause he is also a decent duelist and has armour but for the price, the debuffs, magic... Morathi is just so much better.
Watching the pros play they all pick Morathi.
It's Morathi for sure when it comes to high skill players.
I don't think cost is taken into account in this video.
Morathi's better value, but this is which is best not which is best for its cost - hence they're all very expensive units.
The best thing I expect in warhammer 3 are your videos
I knoooww right. That’s why I subscribed to this channel. His materials are different
That is so sweet. I might have to see my dentist.
I just love Teclis in campaign. Gets insane dmg resistance so cannot really be killed , heals forever and never runs out of magic. One bird killing machine that solos most armies and sieges are insanely easy with him as an attacker.
yesss! love him, have like over 150 winds of magic reserve and never run out of mana or spells, can even like fight whole siege battle by himself
Teclis has that essay deadline look
I think Malagor deserves a spot on this list. Being able to fly around(without a mount) and cast flock of doom for 2 winds of magic is insanely good. He’s so fast as well so not many flying units can catch him.
Shadow King beg to differ he said he doesn't need no stupid Mount he has a Moonbow
Isnt that only in campaign? Because if we go by campaign "potential", it gets a lot more complicated. Gelt can eventually cast several of his spells for 1-2 WoM. Volkmar has 20 seconds cooldowns on his various prayers(including Grand Soulfire Bombardmen), Sisters can summon a dragon(no duration) and Waywatchers(no duration) etc..
This is for MULTIPLAYER. Malagor in SP is fkin busted beyond belief but he aint doing any of that shit in MP as your spell selection is limited by the budget, your opponent always bring a big flyer to go after your tail (like big boi Teclis there or 1/2 Chaos Manticores) and nobody is gonna sit down and let him cast his spell.
Malagor is a weakness of the Beastmen in MP in fact. I would rather bring Morghur than him to fight in rank >1000 tbh
The problem with the sisters is their quest for the dragon mount is bugged in campaign so I have no idea how good it is because I can’t get it 😫
Ok lets not mention reworked Morghur. Walk him into a blob and suddenly hes gotten 300000 damage and won the battle for you. Vile aura of transmutation made him op.
Some other ones I think do a grest job: The fay, Volkmar and siggi
Ikket Claw would like to have a word with these scrubs with rookie numbers.
I believe that Vlad is just a better option than Manfred since with his blood drinker and the von Carstein ring he can stay in the fight for a really long time and on top of that his fighting stats are respectfully good too which makes up for the fact that he doesn't get any mounts and let's not forget that if you put him and Isabella together in the battle, they are pretty much immortals
RIP Grimgor. He IS very strong, he's just too slow. If only he had like 5-10 more speed or you could just turn him into a boar-boy. He's probably the best Lord killer in the game along with the deathmaster, at least in my opinion and can one-on-one just about anyone
@@eclipsingshadows5421 I mean yeah that would be really cool but I don't think we'll ever see those in Total Warhammer 3. That's why I'm saying you could do something easy like just give him a pig to ride. Black orc big bosses who are basically mini Grimgors get them.
Too slow, no regen, no magic - that's a lot of drawbacks to overcome. He hits hard, no doubt about it, but not hard enough to overcome that.
@@CallioNyx Yeah the main issue I end up having is what I call the 'Giant' problem. He wins the combat he's in, sure, but he spends the rest of the battle waddling after enemies. That being said though, he's stupid hard to kill and his leadership is very high. He's basically a Dwarf LL in that respect. What in your opinion would make him more viable? To me, all he really needs is a mount or like 10 more speed and he suddenly becomes great.
Wulfrik is the biggest bad ass in the game for sure... no else sits like a king on his mount :D
Oh...come on, we all know Franz is number one! He has two legendary weapons! 🤣
Holy Hell, Teclis has seen some sh*t
Ah yes top 5 STONGEST lords nice thumbnail
Really hope they overhaul the legendary lords post twwh3. Archaon, Wulfrik and Kholek specifically.
Would have thought late game imrik would take first, star dragon mount, breath attacks, bound spell, healing and cd refresh on his armour, synergies amazingly with sword of cain, dragon quest buffs, can buff himself in red tree, can get him to very high ward save/resist. Easy to play 1 man doomstack.
i guess the focus of this video is multiplayer not campaign. in campaign every lord the player controls is the mightiest in the universe
Great vid and thanks for keeping the content coming man!
Durthu is totally sick.
Think I see Alarielle picked more though. Her heal is just something else.
In the beginning he said only raw damage matters here.
Lies!!! Grimgor is da BIGGEST and da BEST! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGHHHH!!!!!!!
Alarielle/Tyrion is really good they can boost their entire faction significantly through upkeep reduction and public order
i'm pretty sure this is primarily talking about multiplayer.
Did you watch the introduction zett?
I forgot how awesome the vampire counts trailers are. Even if FFFFFF I'm still mad that Mannfred is so good and Vlad the Chad is left behind. Great vid!
hard to argue with those
I was like... Morathi? I think shes better then Malekith if used properly
You and Josh strife sound like brothers
I think Throgg is the best Troll lord in the game.
Can't believe you would betray Grimgor like this
To be honest, I was expecting to see Ikit in here somewhere.
Fully upgraded, with his Doom wheel and FRIGGING NUKES! Surely he is a contender
He was talking about Multi-player battles, and sadly (or fortunately, depending on if your playing as or against) Ikit doesn't have nukes in multi-player, only campaign.
Personally would have put archeon on the list. Fire is a great lore, he is a monster in melee and he has good items and abilities.
Here was i hoping it was a melee 1v1 Whos the best video.
ARCAHON THE EVERCHOSEN WILL ALLWAYS BE THE BEST LORD 😁
Yes but can any of these lords spit rhymes and wear assless-chaps like Sigvald can?
Thank you for the content, you were the first and best channel I found when starting my TW: Warhammer journey.
I mean, have you seen azhags machinegun arrer boyz ? They have explosive arrows with 158 dps when fully upgraded. He is also a bit broken too ..
Volkmar on his altar had to be in the list. he has regen, durability and magic in form of battle prayers.
Wulfrik looks the best :) the sisters are my fav though
HE LITERALLY SOLOS EVERYONE! TAUROX IS GOD
*Me clicking on this video knowing Malus is number 1 :
Zerk, you´re talking a lot about Arcane Conduit in this video. I always use it immediately when it´s off cooldown, but what is the perfect time to use it? A buddy said you always use it just before you cast a spell...
If this is for MP, it’s 100% gotta be, from 1 to 4, Fay, Volkmar, Morathi, Mazda with the number 5 spot being a close fight between the rest of the top ten (seriously, so many lords could take that spot)
Riding a phoenix can give you roasted nuts.
I would love to see another who is the best of all losers mixed specialties ofcourse.
Or some reruns but eqauling value like rat ogres and slaves vs minotaurs.
I think Ikit might have been in there. He is a very good mage, a good fighter and just overall a 9/10 Legendary Lord on an OP faction
Sure that is more of an Single Player view on things...but I don't play MP as Skaven
There is only one true Chaos God for me anyway
Anarchy out
your literally just grading mounts though. there are some lords that smack cheeks against some of the lords on this list. Teclis is an egregious one as there is a better lord right next to him in Luthor Harkon. damage output with deep lore is fantastic as well as being ranged and melee, and on top of that he's a duelist making him nuts for lord dropping.
Is this MP or campaign?
Why isn't Taurox on this list? If properly leveled and kitted out, Taurox can easily 1v1 ANY of the lords mentioned on this list. I know because I've seen him do it. Oh, and he can do it WITHOUT relying on a mount. And Sigmar help you if he ever gets his hands on the sword of Khain, I've seen him murder monsters, lords, and everything in between in three or four hits with that thing. Not to mention he can get to a point where he's damn near invincible between regeneration, his abilities, and resistances.
this tier list is based on what? if it based on combat skill, how couldn't u mention malus darkblade, imrik,... and if it based on general like buff army, buff faction,.... telics, mazdamundi, manfred aren't top 5 LLs lol
Why is Grimgor (da Best) so weak compared to these lords ... No mount, similar amount of melee damage, no heal, no magic, no ranged attacks, bad mobility, no impressive army buffs in skill-tree. Add to that fact that Greenskins dont have a lot of very good units in their army in general, not to mention is mostly Melee focused at least in theory, but has one of worst cavalries in game and low/bad melee defense in general.... so why is Grimgor (da Best) so bad compared to the lords in this video... and also many other lords ?!
Once we get glotkin and nagash everything will change
Somebody is really stuck in 2019 MP meta game. So the more expensive is the lord, the better? Nyeah, not too sure about what this list is really aiming to tell.
Wish they'd dial back lord power overall. Single units overpower most units and reduce the need for tactics and army comp.
I believe in WH3 there will be a "wounded" system. When a single entity(like a lord, or a giant) is reduced below 50% health, they lose some of their effectiveness.
Is this for multiplayer or campaign? Cause it looks like made for multiplayer, but its not really viable for competitive high level games...
i hate flying hellstorm sisters
그래 만빡아 여기서라도 행복하거라....
i was thinking gotrek
Imrik for me. Once you get the traits from the dragons - he is amazing
While I'm a fan of Manfred, I have to agree with this - Imrik, when he gets going in Campaign, is just insane. Noone else comes even close. But, that's including dragon quest traits, items everything - I'm not sure the criteria Z uses here (And Manfred, in Campaign, gets basically unlimited winds of magic - even if Imrik is individually stronger, Manfred may have a better potential to kill armies.).
I'm honestly shocked Grom isn't on this list
First video I do not get. Is it single player? Is it multiplayer? Is it both? Not clear, very confusing. Value 0.
Thought final lord would be Luthor Harkon. When the sisters are capable of shooting infantry Harkon is so good at taking enemy lords down with the missile damage.
How much ammo is he down to now? 12? He was great when he had near-unlimited ammo, though.
RONG! My green boi Grimgor is da meanest and da strongest! WAAAGH!
Strongest in terms of stats? Cost-effectiveness? Single or Multi? If we are talking about mutli meta, then this list is mostly wrong imho.
Archaon is my favorite
Teclis is #1 by far. I’ve soloed so many armies hiding my army and just melt them all down with his chain lightning + fiery convocation
yes, also the net works SO well with archer or lothern sea guard arrow storm!!!!
I think personally Noctilus on his necrofex with his 2 mixed spell lores is the most powerful. Is like Mannfred in terms of healing but has a super powerful range attack although no flying
In campaign, maybe. In MP octopus prime just gets sniped to by anything and everything in my experience.
OK I was about to ask where Throt was but he got mentioned
5 strongest legendary lords without new dlc Grombrindal or especially Imrik? Seriously?
Very logical choices. All rock solid
WAER IS GRIMGOR!!! WHO AR ALL DEEZ GITZ??
HOW DID TAUROX NOT MAKE THIS LIST!!!
I was thinking the same. Taurox is the strongest fighter by far. It s not even a competition.
Honestly kinda confused how neither imrik or Taurox are on here. They both get insane damage reduction and can solo late game full stacks without much trouble
Same with Archeon
I think this is mostly for multiplayer
Zlaaq is whackin while Mazda be Slaackin
I always liked to play Luthor Harkon.. If there are S, A, B, C and D tiers.. Were would you place him? I'm curious
Luthor harkon is one of the toughest lords I faced he was destroying my elthorian+ knights of tor goraval in a duel in aircombat and he pretty much tanked a 5 sisters of avelorn focus fire and not to mention no winds of magic with him really made the battle hard. The only downfall his army is super weak but even after defeating all of them he was still quite tanky and took a while for me to bring him down and it cost me a lot
So long story short.. If it rides a dragon it's a top tier lord
And I have only played the Sisters from this list. i guess I prefer the underdogs ^^
Vlad and Isabella are far better than Manny the manchild. He's bottom, not top
Grimgor Ironhide hates this video
Grimgor will show tiny human who da 'ardest is
i want ogres in warhammer 2...i've played the game enough without new content
Are we talking SP or MP? I feel like Wurzag should be in there if talking SP.
Clearly about MP
@@35663455 Well, it is not "clear" because he never states whether he means SP or MP.
Manny the strongest? What about his bad ass father?) He even don’t need a mount
Ah ha - thats why you kept saying Mannfred rather than Vlad :)
Very shocked it wasn't Karl Franz.
Morathi is clearly better than Malekith. Ask literally any top level player or DE main and they'll tell you she is far superior. Malekith has less soul stealers, is slower, is a larger target on his dragon, and is more expensive on a dragon. Not really sure why you think malekith is stronger because he isn't really good on his dragon anymore since the mass change update.
Also Manfred isn't even the strongest lord on the VC roster. Ghorst, the better Strogoi, the blood dragon vampire, and the lhamian lord are all better than him.
No way. Top 5 strongest legendary must be:
1. Alarielle
2. Twin sister
3. Morathi
4. Crone
5. Isabella
taurox
You could argue Lahmian Bloodline lords are better than Mannfred. They have perfect vigor, they have higher melee stats, they get a zombie dragon as well,, still have lore of vampires, and they are hotter in comparison.
Love your videos but Malagor is better than all these lords
No Imrik
Chief Warlock engineer of clan Skryre? where-where?
Lol just bought this game getting rekt everywhere
No Ikit Claw? He can just chilling ride his doomflayer while spamming spells while regen HP
As can Manfred, but with better spells and more magic. And way better melee stats. Ikit is good, but a lot of that is because of his lab.
No Manfred dont have a nuke 🤷🏽♂️
Vlad the Chad - best lord period.
The true Von Carstein is going to have to bully Freddie boi
Damn tyrion must have fell off pretty hard eh
Gorrok can murder each and every one of these lords
Damm, why it is not Chad Vlad but Virgin Manfred ((
GrimGor! da best lord....
😕 wagg
Where is Manfred better then Vlad?
No Siege Attacker, no Vanguard for the full army?
multiplayer