I have owned both and they were/are the current generation. I’m not even considering going back to Triumph. You do have some legit points but your Triumph bias is impacting your perspective. I have yet to find anyone say the suspension on the BMW is bad. That is out of left field for myself and any other rider I know out here. Triumph is a good bike, but GS is still king when it comes to Adv.
My Triumph bias is only from my recent Triumph ownership but I have owned more Hondas and Suzukis than Triumph so I'm not their no1 fan or anything. Most people don't say they think their suspension is bad because they think what they have is normal not having sampled better they are non the wiser. The GS is till king of course because the sales numbers say so 👍. Cheers Joey.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff I would love to read or watch they plethora of folks complaining about the suspension. I think and agree with just about everything else. You at the fist and only person I have have read or watched complain about the suspension. Sorry… one person is not indicative of a problem.
Comments on quickshifter - Downshift with throttle closed, Upshift throttle in acceleration state. Cruising at steady state - don't get your hopes up. So in short - more use in spirited ridinng than day to day. It's a shift assistant, not an autoshifter.
Two points to mention. 1. The quick-shifter works well when you use it properly - I see other comments mentioning how to let it do its job, it's not for changing gears to slow the motor when cruising. 2. The suspension is fine. It differs from what you may be accustomed to due to the design, but it is not as you suggest.
I beg to differ. Yes, you can get it to work better if you take your time and it can be good but it is not a patch on so many other bikes, even BMW's own XR on which it is superbly light and smooth and requires no thought. My bike requires a reasonably heavy boot on the downshift, often point blank refuses to drop out of fourth to third without a clutch. Objectively it is poor compared to what is out there. My suspension is fine in many scenarios but it is most certainly not on poor or rough tarmac roads, high speed damping is very poor compared to many other bikes I have owned. Many commenters here who have had the low chassis (LC) and the regular chassis version of the bike attribute what I am experiencing to the LC variant, stating they felt the same on their LC but not the regular setup bike. My riding buddy has a LC GSA, he hates the high speed damping too. Maybe its a geometry thing with the telelever and not the suspension? I still own the bike and it does an awful lot extremely well.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff Sure, I'm not dismissing what you are saying. I think there may be more to the situation in this case, you may have a bike that is not well put together from the factory and needs the quick-shifter reset. Here's why I'm suggesting this as a possibility. I moved from a 2013 Triumph Tiger Explorer to a 2015 GS Triple Black. The engine and chassis made the Triumph feel slow at the bottom end, rough at the top end, and obviously, a bit top heavy. I also owned a 1200 Monster with a quick shift, and the BMW shift made the Ducati shift feel agricultural by comparison. I later swapped the 1200 Monster for an S1000XR. The S was a smoother shift and handled better, but (here's my other point) It's bound to feel better on the road because it's a road-based bike with conventional forks and an inline four-cylinder engine. The shifter will also be smoother due to that fact. Perhaps you might consider you are comparing two different purpose bikes, and that you may need to have a friend with a GS ride your bike to see if there's a problem to fix.
My 1250 and 1200 all click in and out of all gears with the quickshifter / blipper / shift assist pro. Only the upshift from 1 to 2 is not smooth enough when you’re riding slowly. If your bike sometimes outright refuses to quickshift, I would recommend getting the dealer to fix it.
So you bought the lowered suspension version of the GS and are now complaining about the ride? Did you not bother to search the internet for comments about how the GS/GSA rode with lowered suspension? I'm on my 4th GSA, a 1250, all with standard height suspension and whilst the ride on any of them is not as plush as say, a K1600GT, its really not bad. And you missed one of the other major advantages of the BMW suspension and that is lack of dive under braking. As for the brakes themselves, being progressive is surely an advantage not a disadvantage? The brakes certainly work if you pull the lever hard enough. I will agree with you on the quickshifter. Its shit but then thats why God gave us the clutch and a hand to operate it with! As for your other complaints, you are missing out on one of the major functions of the whizz wheel by not having the BMW satnav because the whizz wheel can also control that. I find it particularly useful for zooming in and out on the screen when following a route. Apart from that the whizz wheel/button control is way simpler than on some other bikes and is all the better for that. I also have a Honda Africa Twin Adventure Sports and the controls still fry my brain after 18 months of ownership. And one last comment. The most truly amazing thing about the 1250 engine is the smooth low down torque which means it will pull at virtually any revs in any gear
Even with ~30mm lowered suspension the travel is significantly more than most road bikes, its should have no bearing on the matter. The two bikes I mention on the same bit of road have far less suspension travel, one being from 1995 and the other from 2018. The CB1100 doesn't even have manually adjustable suspension? I tend not to suffer with dive under braking and so don't find this feature as anything unusual. On a public road and If you are observing well in advance there should be no need to be continually be using your brakes in an aggressive way at all, it is just not required. That does not mean riding slowly, brakes are for stopping at junctions unless you are using the road as a public racetrack. A bike equipped with forks needn't dive at all if you use it correctly. Any bike costing as much as a GS will have adjustable damping, if you are going to brake hard at every bend it is merely a matter of increasing the damping as you would be expected to do if riding aggressively. In summary I don't place any particular value on the anti dive feature of the GS because the forks don't dive on my other bikes either? The brakes If prefer to be more aggressive If I'm honest as I only expect to be using them with gusto in an emergency. You can two finger brake with superb strength in a hurry if needed. They are better than the brakes on my Daytona 1200 and the Nissins on my CB1000 though but not by a lot. Thanks for your input and experience Mick.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff Well my Honda ATAS still dives under braking with the front suspension damping set to max so I guess it must be my riding then. I still think the lack of dive on the BMW suspension is a big plus. As for the ride I think you should have ridden the standard suspension version before damning the bike
Lowering a trail bike denatures it’s DNA. Yes it may have more suspension travel even in lowered form compared to your average roadster but it also weighs much more, it’s telelever and paralever suspension geometry makes it squat under braking or over bumps as opposed to forks compressing. The bike might by mechanically lowered but the spring rate on both shocks are the same as a non lowered bike. At the end, your short legs are penalizing the bikes natural performance. I switched from two K16’s to a 1250GSA because it’s suspension travel is literally TWICE that of the k16. The last three years and 40000km have been like riding a magic carpet.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuffEven with ~30mm lowered suspension the travel is significantly more than most road bikes, its should have no bearing on the matter. Yes, yes it does.
I’m shocked at the review of the suspension. I find the suspension the best quality of my GS . It soaks up all the bumps and never gets out of shape (maybe because I’m a 10stone rider?) . Apart from that, it was a great review 👍
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff After 55k km on a 2020 1250GS I am surprised about the critical suspension review. Well, I don't have the comparison to a Tiger, but the GS is not limiting me on BADLY damaged roads. I have it always on Dynamic Pro and switch it often on the left handle between Dynamic and Road. Accidently, i was 15 stones when I bought the bike and reached 9 stones a year ago. (96kg to 58) I could say the bike is a bit less mushy, but not by much. More impressive is the positive impact to the experienced power output. Less weight is making the bike nimble af. xD Maybe I am missing something better, since I am satisfied with the existing. Thanks for your experience exchange. Btw: Big compliment to your review. Either you're a hell of an actor or you just simply shared your honest, direct, personal impressions. Obviously without influences of any mainstreams. 👍
@@Basalderalder Many thanks for your kind words and documenting your experiences with the GS. This was a totally unbiased review, I have no bad feelings towards the BMW brand at all and I am enjoying the many positive parts of my GS. I plan on doing a more in depth review focusing purely on the suspension to try and explain it more from my perspective and why I think it may be like this. Some comments have highlighted a few things. Take care👍.
I have the same inside leg 29" and have the standard height frame with a low seat. I then set the the suspension to a low setting and have no problems. As far as the quick shifter, I never use it in 1st -2nd - 3rd. It's fine to 4,5 &6. I have however had some instances when the downshifter does'nt want to play ball. No big deal. The Hill Hold took a bit of getting used to but all good now. The brakes on mine are exceptional I've always had RTs in the past but find the GS much more comfortable. Some of my previous steeds....Kawasaki 440ltd, Honda 250 superdream, Honda 750F2, K100, K1100lt, R1100rt, R1200rt and now R1250GS. This is by far the most comfortable of all.
Thanks for the detail. I like the ergos and seat, very comfy. My QS has the same issue, sometimes on the downshift I just doesn't want to change, as you say, if you allow for it it can be dealt with. I came from a Triumph Tiger 1200 and the GS hill hold is a lot better, the release is much lighter so happy with that. My brakes still just average, tried a 2023 BMW S1000XR with non Brembo brakes, they were awesome in comparison to my GS.
I have 4 versions of gs 22-23: standard, lowered, sport suspension, and adventure. Lowered and sport suspensions are not suitable for bad roads. It works the way you are talking about. And it's really hard to ride on small old roads, especially with a pillion. Standard and adv are different.
Terence, I have watched a thousand reviews of the 1250GS, I have owned the normal height and the lowered one. This is the first review that has correctly called it out on its failings. The suspension on a bad road and the quick shifter are woeful. Thanks for your honesty.
For an average rider, there is a lot of opinion about suspension. I’ve ridden my GS around Australia on some seriously bad roads and the GS took it in its stride. To say it’s “absolutely rubbish” on a comparatively smooth road is a demonstration of bias.
Consensus seems to point at my choice of the low chassis model. A lot of people who have owned both say they had the same experience. Standard Chassis no problems. :-(
Do you realise that if you select dynamic you can change the damping to road or one of the other damping settings . That's what I use on my gs You can also buy a cockpit cover to hide the open part of the cockpit .
SUSPENSIONS: Do you have Dynamic ESA suspension? Does the Factory Lowered Suspension degraded your damping experience? QUICK SHIFTER: BMW Quick Shifter has been designed for high rev acceleration and reductions. They should adapt the system for normal riding in the next update (1300GS)
Thanks for your honest video. Just test rode and have ordered one of the last GSA Trophy's available in Australia. One thing nobody seems to mention, in relation to it's amazing nimbleness, is the longitudinal crank. Much easier to roatate a bike around a crank than turning an across the frame spinning mass. Like the R-series, the Honda ST1300 (across the frame V4) also belies it's weight turning in to corners
I had the gen 3 t1200 and then for 5000 km the rally explorer and now i am owner of the gs 1250 triple black . Gs is by far hands down the best suspension i have ridden in any bike with pillion / luggage on and off . I dont know what have you done with your bike but the telelever and paralever works ultra smooth . The centre of gravity and the way the bike handles through corners is fantastic and non comparable also with rhe tiger . Gs can be driven sporty and has more friendly feeling to curve and lean through the corner vs the rally explorer which I was really afraid to lean or drive sporty . The wind protection could be better i have to say but it can be fixed with an aftermarket windshield like wunderlich . The fit and finish is a little bit terrible and you dont expect that from bmw . I have to say terry and keep in mind that the plastics are REALLY REALLY EASY to scratch so keep in mind that ! After all , the engine is really spot on. Very smooth non vibey when touring , smoother than the triumph but when tou are idle 1000 rpm you will feel some.vibes . I personally dont mins because you feel the bike alive in the other hand the bike works very VERY smooth on highways. The gs is the best bike ever made
Thanks for your experiences Aldvex, we agree on an awful lot and that is why the handling of the bike (on a good road) was in the amazing category, it really is to be experienced. I think the tall, 21" wheel Rally Explorer from Triumph is not selling as well as the GT range as witnessed by free luggage options being offered (in the UK at least) but only on the Rally models. I think the GT & GT Pro are probably Triumph's best bet. I'm not convinced the Explorer's tank layout can compete with the GS Adventure without that boxer twin to offset it. I'm OK with the GS vibes and haven't found them intrusive at all. The engine note on the GS is addictive too. I have a two up trip planned for Europe later in the year, it will be great to see how it fares. 👍
This video is a good example, why one should form an own opinion. The screen adjustment is overly complex? You cannot adjust at the screen at 120 kph? This is a plain lie. Its totally possible and not a problem. Did you ever ride a KTM or Africa Twin for example? There you have complex mechanisms with screws and what not. I don´t have any issues with the screen. No noise, no wind tubulence.
This video was my experience, I purchased the bike, it is not a demo. My screen would not adjust at 120kph, that is a fact, why would I lie? If I slow down it adjusts. It is also considerably noisier than my last bike but this is quite common on a lot of bikes until you find one that suits your frame. Yes, I owned an Africa Twin, 2016 where the screen does not adjust, I mention it in the video? Many bikes now though do have a much simpler screen adjust mechanism, it is just my point of view, you can form your own opinions.
I’ve only had my Triumph GT Pro a few days but you’re right about the suspension, it’s something you notice immediately very plush. I’ve never owned a GS but I have test ridden one, the instruments and switchgear I thought were actually better in my opinion. I love your approach / reviews something dead honest about your delivery, and of course never a truer word spoken when you see some YTubers missing out the bigger problems. It’s clear they’re just acting like paid shills, keeping an eye on the relationship with the dealer /manufacturer so they nurture a steady stream of rides enabling them to produce content and earn revenue. Fair enough…….but it does smack at being fake and some people buy into that.
Congratulations on the GT Pro Andrew, enjoy. Yes, I’m just not convinced we get the full story from most road tests at all for the very reasons you state. You even have to be weary of overly glowing owner’s reviews as that testosterone inside us doesn’t like to admit something might not be right with our purchasing decisions 🫣😲😀.
Watched your video yesterday and thought about your suspension issue I think that you must have a problem bike because the two gs bikes I’ve had and got have been perfect
It’s been back to the dealer for it’s first service and given a clean bill of health. I specifically said I wasn’t impressed with the suspension and they said they were surprised and all was well with the bike.
I have owned tons of spirts bikes and nakeds all engine types and the gsai own now is by a country mile the very best. I have owned 2 hexhead 1200rt bimes and an xr the r bikes are the only bikes i have ever owned that were cimfy out of tbe box. Needing very few alterations
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff your welcome 🙏. Another thing you mentioned was the pegs. I was already aware of the cylinders not lining up. But the foot pegs to?! That might drive me nuts 😆. I'll have to test ride one to see
I have a 22 Rallye lowered edition. The handling is why I bought the machine, lower center of gravity. Justin road mode it is springy but absolutely floats down the road like a Cadillac. If that bothers you then go to another mode. Yes electronic sucks because you don't know how to adjust it but most people don't know how to adjust their suspension anyway. Concerning the quickshifter going up is just a hoot. Pin it and bang the gears up yes going down it does not want to and the dealership said that. If that little bit makes you get a 1300 more power to you
I'd get the S1000XR over the GS after a test ride, the QS is sublime on that. I will have to stick with my choice for now though, trading so early will see me lose my shirt! I do ride in Dynamic suspension bias now and Enduro for the rougher roads even though they are not "off-road" lanes, that made a big difference.
I agree with the damping, Dynamic is way too jerky for bad roads, Road is way too soft and flowy. When I'm riding with a passenger, I usually set it to Road just to not upset them, and ride much slower than I normally would. As for the quickshifter, the way I'm using it is 1-2-3 I clutch, above 3 I use the QS. I also almost always use the QS going down even to 1st, it does a good job with that. What I found is when I took it to a track, the quickshifter is a blessing, and works wonderfully in every gear. I think since it works on the principle of cutting the ignition, in higher revs there is a finer amount of control, as there are more ignition cycles in any given period of time. No wonder it's a "race inspired" technology, and fittingly, it works best in that context.
Thanks for the insight and your experience with the quick-shifter, makes complete sense. 👍. I'm glad your experience the ride as I do, lots of people don't believe it!
I would disagree with a few of your findings. First off, you want a front brake that grabs with the slightest input? That would be a dangerous situation for especially inexperienced riders. A caliper that works with a more progressive pull to stop gives you actually better control, especially in trail braking. As far as suspension is concerned, remember, you have a modified suspension motorcycle that the little people can ride. You have less suspension travel and also less ground clearance. This is an ADV bike, not a Goldwing. Don't expect it to ride like one.
I respectfully disagree on the brake performance, this isn’t a bike for the novice and most owners will have a good few years under their belt. The action on a better braked bike with a light two fingered touch is very relaxed because the action requires no effort. I agree it is no Goldwing and is not expected to be so, that bike whilst I admire it, is not my cup of tea either. Whilst I do have the shortened suspension version, by 30mm, this bike has significantly more suspension travel than most road bikes and much more than two of my other 1000cc plus road bikes to which I compared the ride. They were both much more well behaved with this test road. I plan to make a video focusing on the suspension some more to try and explain my rationale. Thanks for your comment 👍.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff It was a good review in all honesty. I ride a 2020 GSA HP and love this bike. Definitely not perfect but pretty damn close IMO. Especially after riding my Harley lol. I think BMW should have done a little more refining of the GS such as backlit switches, a more precise suspension setting that would truly match the riders preference before increasing the engine displacement which I feel is just to keep up with the Jones's. Keep up the good work Terence
I have an R1250RS. I'm going to disagree a bit about the quick shifter, but you have to get a feel for it. First, yes, it breaks in a bit. Next, the owner's manual does give some specific and spot on instructions. You have to be on the throttle to upshift and you have to have the throttle closed to downshift. So, if I'm at a steady throttle but want to upshift, I just goose the throttle a bit and it's reasonably smooth. As for the suspension, at least on the RS, the damping is not tied to the rider mode. You can set the mode to road or rain and have the damping set to dynamic. I don't know if the GS is similar or not.
You can set the damping to dynamic or road independent of the rider modes yes. I have used quick shifters for years on the Triumph and yes they are all better on the up shift on acceleration and off throttle downshift but this bike is particularly bad. It will often flat refuse to drop from 4th to 3rd at all even on zero throttle. It’s not completely hopeless but it is very bad, I shan’t be using it. Thanks for the tips Paul.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff I might have gotten lucky on my particular bike, or it's now broken in. That said, it's the only quick shifter I've used so I can't really judge.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff Mine shifts easily from 4th to 3rd. No issues. Take that in to BMW for them to look at. Sounds like something is wrong if it is that repeatable.
What lovely scenery, a brilliant looking route. David and I are planning on doing this in June, we will do it over 2 days so that we can visit lots of coffee establishments and “goo steady” (fen talk) safe riding and keep the vids coming.
Excellent, enjoy the trip. Be sure to include the Glendalough Green Cafe in the Wicklow Mountains for a coffee and cake stop (or a salad lunch), always a few bikes parked up there. Goo Steady!
Thanks for making this eye opening video! Where I ride, there are no roads. This really put things in perspective for me when it comes to my next purchase.
Mine came without heated seats even though they still advertised with them on the website. I did get the LED light package though which is brilliant at night. But they do not fitted the electronics for the heated seats so you cannot just buy them after.
I’ve loved the suspension on my 2016 GSA model. You have to figure out what rider set up (1,1+luggage,2 rider), then your rider mode, then your suspension setting. I think you’ve missed using some adjustability options on your bike because all those options are in the new 1250 models.
No, these are not options. That was the older way of customizing the suspension. Now the rear preload is automatically measured and adjusted, that works perfectly. It is the two road modes you have for damping that are the limiting factor. I get it is continually trying to optimise the damping and in "Dynamic" it does create a sharp bike for handling purposes but with poor high speed damping. In the "Road" bias damping it is like riding on waves.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff you can still opt to have it set the preload in any riding mode. Press and hold the suspension button, once the suspension settings appear, press and hold the button again until it changes from auto to either min or max - this is the new version of 1 or 2 rider set up.
@@geoloseth Hi Seth, many thanks for this info, but I do feel you are mistaken. The Auto Preload is setting the preload based on the measured SAG from the swingarm position sensor on the left hand side of the bike under that small plastic cover. Whether it is a single rider, rider plus passenger or rider/passenger/luggage it is measuring the SAG under that weight and applying the appropriate preload to compensate. It is a closed loop system requiring no human input. They have been doing this on the Triumph Tiger 1200's for many years now. This replaces that open loop manual selection process that you have where it is you making the decision about your load and applying the appropriate preload to compensate. Separately from that I do know about the min and max preload option on the switchgear you mention which affects the preload amount, hence the ride height. This is something different, not related to load and the manual suggest the low setting for convenience and the higher setting for extra ground clearance that you may want when off-road.
That is the SW-Motech Tailbag. Very high quality, at least five years old now. There is a new version out now, looks very similar but with little improvements all around. A little dear but absolutely worth it. Rubbery concave base has it sitting on a pillion seat very well.
Love your honesty❤ Actually my quick shift works nice for anything 3rd gear plus if you know how to use it. Suspension I have no idea what you talk about. I stick to my 22 1250GS 😂
“ QS works nice for anything 3rd gear plus if you know how to use it.” That basically is how to describe a shitty quick shifter…… There are bikes with quickshifters that work through all gears and require no special knowledge on how to operate them. Having owned a 1250 GS, a Tiger 900 and a Tiger 1200 and currently owning a 1250 GSA, I know the difference between a good and a bad quick shifter.
Road GS's from 80's to now. Also other makes and models. Had over 200,000 miles on BMW etc. Tried my friends DR650 for a week since he needed me to do some simple maintenance. ( and had to go out of town) ... guess what... The GS is up for sale! If BMW would ever produce a 750 CC boxer twin in the 360 pound range with simple carbs, and CDI ignition... I would consider it and so would others!
I know the feeling David. A buddy lent me his Aprilia Tuareg 660 (204kg fully fueled) for a week and I had an absolute blast on it. My favorite part was the manually adjustable suspension. Took me about 50-70km to suss it out to what worked best for me and wow what a bike. Need ear plugs though, that induction roar gets old real quick! :-)
Weird to hear about the damping. On my 2013 R1200GSA I can set the damping separately from soft to normal to hard, independent of the riding modes. Works perfectly, just like the quickshifter which I find amazing.
My R1250GS has Wilburs installed. They work with the ESA setup. On Dynamic it works very well. Not harsh like you are describing. On Road in Road mode, it is floaty but with the suspension in Road mode and Dynamic Pro riding mode chosen it is quite good. I see you had the bike in Road mode and Road suspension...yes way underdamped, but I never ride in Road mode and have found much of these issues go away when choosing Dynamic pro as suspension settings are quite different in all the riding modes. One big advantage of changing to Wilburs is it also has the standard clicker adjustments for damping as well to fine tune the electronic choices. Also, it was built for my weight and is much higher quality suspension and not really that expensive. My 2 cents.
Thanks for the comprehensive detail. I like Wilbers as a brand and have a Wilbers custom monoshock on my Daytona 1200 and absolutely love it. I do ride with the suspension in Dynamic 95% of the time now and only switch to road damping in town where there are a lot of speed bumps etc. I tend to switch to Dynamic on the suspension bias button and leave the rider mode in road, that way I get to keep full traction/ABS and have that better performing damping. I have been on to the Wilbers agent here and it doesn't look like they have a solution for the low chassis GS. They do a lowered suspension kit for the regular bike and same height replacement suspension for the regular bike but nothing for the factory lowered as far as I can tell and enquired about. Cheers
Nice, accurate and honest review, well done!! Ive had 6 GS's/GSA's sine 2006 and have never gone off road, thats why I'e just taken delivery of a 2023 1250 RS SE in my opinion a far better road bike. lower, quicker ( i don't know why but it is) has all the same tech and because it has 17in wheels a better selection of tyres.
Cheers you Grumpy Old Git! Whenever a 2nd hand RS comes on the market round here it gets snapped up, quite unique on the road and terribly good looking. Enjoy.
Great vid Terry. Was thinking about selling my 2020 Tiger 1200 Desert and getting a GS but as you said I love the suspension and ride on my Tiger. You may have kept me from making a mistake. Think I’ll wait to see what the 1300 GS will be like. Thanks!
I think that is a wise choice, keeping the WP suspension of the Desert Edition compared to this silly ZF system. The GS has a draw, I cannot deny sales figures but when you have had better suspension you don't want to go backwards. Cheers Bob.
I have the first Triumph 1200 GT Explorer in the states from 7/22- middle January 2023. NEVER looking back. The new Showa suspension kills the 2020 1200 XCX I traded for the new one. Choose wisely...
@@bobholley6202 No, I have the GT Explorer like I stated. Zero issues and I love the bike!👍👍 The Rally versions are tall and here in New England we don't have the off road terrain.
@@ttrguy9952 good deal. I live just south of the Appalachian Mountains in Georgia. Great twisties and a lot of off road gravel and dirt roads open on the national forests. Great to hear no issues. I’m pretty tall so I was thinking about the rally.
I noted in your comments about the suspension that you only mention road, rain, and Dynamic Pro modes. Why did you not include the Enduro modes? Would those modes not do better on rough surfaces?
That is a suggestion from others too. Enduro does actually allow the rear end to use up more of its compression stroke and seems to control rebound much better. So I do actually use it on poorer tarmac roads now. The only downside to that is having the ABS/Traction features reduced as a result which is not ideal on wet days.
I have a R1200RT and it’s an amazing bike. I have ridden the BMW is all kinds of weather and never had an issue. My RT does have hard, medium and soft suspension settings
Great looking bike the RT. I did try the ergos but it was a little too tight on the hips for me with the shorter seat to peg relationship. But I do have a dodgy left hip so that is my fault. Great that you have the more flexible control over your damping.
Traded my Ktm 890 adventure in for a r1250gs , previously lve always had naked/sports bikes, all l can say is l ride the gs harder and faster than any other bike I’ve own. I was worried about the so called lack of feel from the tele-lever front suspension but l find it gives great feedback, certainly agree with the quick shifter comments great up shifting but down shifts are hit and miss.
You can ride this bike hard and as you say, fast. Dynamically it is wonderful and i 100% acknowledge that. It is looking like the low chassis version of this bike is the culprit from owners who have had both versions.
3 years ago I have sold my F850GS for many reasons you mentioned here too. I am shocked 2023 R1250GS is still suffering from so many poor engineering solutions. I absolutely hated level of menus and buttons interface, the crapy navigation and forcing me to buy Gamin from BMW. Connectivity? Poorest ever and not stable (forgetting devices constantly). I was recently considering getting back to GS (from my Husky 701 Enduro, with amazing WP XPLOR suspension by the way) but your video made me want to wait for R1300GS and _your_ review of the suspension, connectivity and user interface (button functions) after a test drive. Thanks for making this video, very informative. Respect.
I’m glad it served a purpose. Yes, I think the wait for a much needed update would be worth it. Not sure I’d want to be first out the block on the new 1300 purchase though. Every manufacturer is going to have first release problems that will take 18 months or so to sort out. No doubt it will sell very well though. Thanks for watching. 👍
Just curious. Did you criticise the Triumph for the Cross Plan Crank which introduced vibration into the otherwise excellent triple engine just to appease the 10% (max) of people who go off road?
Use Speakon connectors for power. They are heavy duty and twist lock into place. Heated gloves & vests have their own pull-outs so you won’t be tied to the bike.
THANK GOD it’s not just me. I have ridden GSs of one king or another since 1984 (I still have my g/s). I love boxer GSs…I have my 2012 GSA which I love. I thought it’s about time I upgrade and spoil myself with a 1250 as a retirement present. Having had one for half a day I couldn’t believe how crap the suspension was. I felt like I was on a bloody trampoline in road mode so decided dynamic was the only option but boy, it that stiff over the potholes…..as for the quick shifter BMW should be ashamed of themselves charging good money for a virtually useless bit of kit. ……BMW have sold tonnes of these things and thought….surely it can’t just be me who think a great bike has been ruined by the damping. My 11 year old (non ESA) Wilbers suspensioned GSA is much better damped giving far greater control and hugely more comfortable. The current electronic set up is a joke….I was genuinely saddened that that amazing engine and chassis was sol let down and that for the first time in 39 years my main bike will not be a GS.
Phew, you are one of the few to concur, I am not the flavour of the day here as you can imagine! I have a Wilbers on my 1995 Daytona and it does a brilliant job too, chalk and cheese in the ride quality from a 28 year older bike.
Great review. 2019 was the first year of the 1250. I have one an have put 40,000 miles on it. It’s an amazing bike, never ridden a Triumph. The torque it has and when it wheelies make me giggle. Quick shifter works smoother in the higher gears and when you’re ripping it. I don’t know much about suspensions but I will say the bike is a little “stiff” and doesn’t absorb the bumps as I’d like. It’s better when loaded down.
I have the seat in the lowest position. I used to be 6’ tall. I’ve shrunk over the years but my inseam is still 32”. My only complaint is it’s just a tad too tall. Thought about the low version but I’ve heard too many stories that it rides rough and you lose some clearance. I’m on the balls of my feet but just wish it was 2-3” lower. I dropped my brand new bike the night I bought it,🤣🤣. 2023 GSA triple black. Crash bars work! No damage. Just a scratch or two on the crash bars. Can barely see them. Will touch them up soon.
Ouch! My Tiger 1200 with its top heaviness went over 3 times too, lost footing on gravel a couple of times and the other time I thought I had the sidestand down :-( Try the low seat from BMW or maybe the Wunderlich low version. I have gone back to using it all the time now and find it comfortable now I am used to it.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff I bought the BMW low seat and it helps but there’s not too much you can do if all you can do is flat foot it. Raise your leg outwards just a bit and you’ve lost footing. My Harley, I can flat foot it with my legs/knees bent a good bit so I can step outwards and still be flat footing it. Easier to keep the bike upright. With the GSA, it’s just gonna be a learning curve to deal with it. I dropped it again the other day coming into the driveway and it’s at a steep angle and a sudden stop or I hit the garage door. I lost momentum and the bike fell.
I have a 2019 R1250GS Adventure covering all types of terrain & I’m really impressed with suspension, no issues whatsoever. Also the quick shifter is smooth. Perhaps yours needs calibrating?
This is why I love owner reviews. An excellent, honest, and at times funny review. I'm considering a move from an MT10 to something more upright and sensible. Certainly food for thought here.
Glad it added to the info gathering. The new GS must be so close I think I would bypass this one for now and see what comes of the new bike. But there will be a pile of the 1250's up for sale at bargain prices once the 1300 gets released. Cheers Banditmanuk 👍
great review Terry. I am from NSW Australia were we pride ourselves on having the worst roads in AU. I bought my 2nd hand 2020 GS after owning a '14 Ducati 1200 Pikes Peak Multistrada. The suspension was way better on the Ducati but otherwise the GS is I believe a better bike so much so that i went and spent $5K on new Tractive TT Experience suspension. WOW. After a few 1000km of bedding in the bike has now great suspension that compliments the great chassis and weight distribution. If you own a GS and plan on keeping it for a while bite the somewhat $bitter$ bullet and buy the Tractive. It is the same suspension that is rebranded by Touratech (+$1K) but it is really good stuff. Yeah QS is crap though
A good and interesting review that I would agree with to 95%. Being on the shorter side (torso) than Terence, I don't have any issues with the screen, but regarding the suspension I think he's spot on. I came from a Triumph 1200 (2017) which had fantastic suspension (W.P.) and I couldn't believe how poor the GS suspension is by comparison. On the GS I have the suspension either on "Dyna" which I use most of the time and is quite firm or "Rain" for country lanes which is very compliant if not slightly wallowy. I never use "Road" because it's neither one thing or another. But the suspension comments made by Terence made me realise how I have eventually become used to the BMW suspension.
A awful lot of comments from owners are putting this down to the fact that it is the low chassis version of the bike. Many owners have had both and the standard version is totally different apparently. It is pretty much 100% Dynamic for me too, I get seasick otherwise.
Probably the best review out there. Have some differences, such as the fact I think the the whizzwheel works well, and you do indeed get use to it, as you do a joystick that sits too close to the indicators (triumph!). Also, I find the brakes excellent - much prefer the feel of these brembos over the hayes. Screen, well you either like a short screen and are happy with the trade off, or you aren't and don't. I think these aspects are neutral and depend on rider preferences. Quickshifter, has to be used at the right revs - it's a big boxer that you are changing gear on, not a triple! On suspension, for some reason, they seem to have set up the non-dynamic softer on this compared to the GS1200, and I really don't know why. It isn't good, though I haven't found dynamic much of an issue. But the lack of settings is a real drawback no question. Praise be that you haven't moaned about the Honda drl indicators or the 'unsafe' rear indicators, the latter being the latest modding fad being pushed by the aftermarket guys and without able being to provide a scenario in which they are unsafe.
Yes, the aftermarket are doing a roaring trade on indicator systems aren't they! I had always on front indicators on my Africa Twin, loved them. Thanks for your feedback on the other points, agree completely. It is becoming very apparent, from other posts that the low chassis version of the bike is probably the issue with the suspension characteristics I complain of. Those that have owned both styles have no such problem on the standard height bike but did on the lowered too. Cheers samsara
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff Undeservedly! BTW I would be interested to hear what you make of the RT if you’ve ridden it? I tested it t’other day and was really impressed.
I just did a test ride on a gs1250te felt great. 1st time on a GS. Didn't have time to really test the suspension and I was on good roads. I was really impressed with the quick shifter though. I thought it was silky smooth.. great review. Top stuff. 👍
Hi Terrance, can I ask where you got the TomTom mount that appears to fit the existing GS navigation mount? I have a Tom Tom and would love to fit it up the same so it feeds off thr bikes power using the existing Garmon bracket. Cheers Ron
Hi Ron. This is from an Italian company 3D AM and I bought it direct but I see it for sale in many online suppilers. www.adventurebikeshop.co.uk/satnav-phones/3d-am-e-nav-400500-tomtom-mount-bmw-r12001250gs-gsa-rs-750850gsaf900xrs1000xr/
It is only 30mm less travel than the std GS and it is still significantly more travel than most road bikes come equipped with so I don't think it is that. The other two bikes in the comparison have far less travel and they cope just fine.
I find the suspension on my 2021 GSA to be amazing and not as you describe at all. I wonder if the difference is whether you have the low seat option or standard....
I'm getting the feeling the low chassis model has quite a different characteristic to the standard. One of the other posters has four 2022/23 models and he says his low chassis models are like this but not the regular models.
I currently have the GS HP version and have absolutely no issues with the suspension. Maybe it’s cos you’re a short-arse and have the low suspension model🤔. As for your ineptitude with the quick shifter .. you should learn how to use it correctly🤦♂️. Other than these 2 points where you’re talking out of your arse .. the rest of the review was ok.
Just purchased a GSA 1250 Trophy edition to replace my 1200LC GSA. I note your comments on the suspension, but I don’t agree. It is definitely harder than the 1200Lc, and I rode both almost exclusively in Dynamic unless it was raining. The handling in the 1250 is slightly better albeit with a firmer ride and I have noticed bumps and road imperfections are more noticeable, but I think that’s the cost to slightly better handling.
We rode this bike on Indian roads a few months back and the bike was completely out of order. Same roads we did also on the africa twin and a tiger 900 Rally, no problems. But the 1250GS felt absolute shite on those bouncy roads. Thanks for pointing out the poor suspension.
I have just seen this vid & the quick shifter is absolutely fine on my albeit the 2019/20 GS Adventure. Your vid is for the 21 onwards so did they change the quick shifter?
I doubt it but great yours is up to scratch. 👍 Have you tried many other bike quick-shifters? Most are now buttery smooth at any revs and zero hassle. Sometimes mine just point blank refuses to shift without the clutch ( usually 4th to 3rd)but it is better now that I have a good few thousand km on it.
Yes tried several bikes, in particular the S1000XR & my GS is just as good. Also I have to say my suspension on all types of roads is very good. I did own a 2013 R1200GS & that suspension was a bit vague. Having said this I do think your vid is very good.
Not sure what you mean about the tiger key less alarm. I've had no issues with its operating methodology.. gen4 bike though so maybe different from gen3?
Does it auto arm when you stop the bike? On return do you need to get the alarm keyfob out and switch the alarm off before riding away? I'm trying to say it is pointless having a wireless key on you if you have to deactivated the alarm with the alarm fob on your keyring.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff I guess I never really thought about it. If I'm just stopping for a short while and I'm not wandering off then I won't turn the bike completely off with the key button so it will just fire up again straight away. The bike can't be started unless the key is within range of the receiver under the seat. I don't mind the way it works although I don't like the reliance on a battery (key or bike).
I think your comments about suspension is backwards and maybe thats why its not working for you because the spring preload is on the left side switch and the damping adj is on the right side mode switch but hey what do i know i only had my bike a couple weeks now
I know exactly where you mean, no confusion here. I am not getting confused between the damping bias ROAD or DYNAMIC and then PRELOAD options. Cheers though Paul.
I have always owned GS’s and I switched to the new Tiger 1200 Rally Pro as I was getting bored with the GS. Sorry I couldn’t wait to go back to a GS. You comment a lot about the wonder wheel what about that silly toggle switch on the new Triumph? Trying to use it on the fly you have to take your eyes off the road to look at the switch to make sure your not hitting the blinker switch. Secondly don’t try using the Toggle switch while on a bumpy road that almost is impossible. The 21” front wheel on the Tiger 1200 gives you a little bit of insecurity feeling while going around bends especially when there is bumps. Yes your review was honest but found it hard to believe it all when you were wearing a Triumph Jumper 😂😂😂
I will agree I fell out of love with 21" wheels on my Africa Twin over the winter of 2016/17 and decided I would never go back to that size. The Tiger 1200 Rally would not be for me either with its 21". The Triumph jumper was actually my mid layer, made for Triumph by "cold killers", great bit of kit. I did wear it on purpose though 😜
My '22 GSA has a great suspension when taxed. I have no complaints at all except back lit switches. Power is great, carries a load really well and on a 500 mile day it doesn't wear me out. When I bought mine, I ditched the heated seat, the LED light and the quick shifter. All of this was way more expensive than they are worth. I guess I do have one complaint. I only get 38-40 miles per gallon and that happens if I cruise at over 75 mph. Wish that was better. Great video, thank you. But I can not see changing to the new GSA. To me, it isn't "better", just different.................... And advice ???? ......... Buy a Zumo XT. Best aftermarket investment ever !!!!!!! 🙂
I like the ZUMO XT, probably the best out there but got to wait for my Tom Tom Rider 550 to expire :-) Yes, long days are easy on the GS and I now use the "Enduro" suspension mode a lot more which copes with poor roads much better than any of the other two damping modes. Same for me on the Motorway, MPG plummets :-(
Congrats on a very detailed and insightful review. Can’t say I agreed with some of your inputs but great respect for your intelligent video. I’ve had five GS’s and now have a wonderful RS and RnineT. Love Boxers!
Yes, I also found out you can auto arm it and it will switch on and off as you approach without even using the buttons. It is a very good system on the GS.
I only did that as I traded in my Tiger 1200 which was also a 1200cc shaft drive. Top contenders are the Ducati MultiStrada, KTM 1290, Harley Pan America (ridden it, brilliant), Africa Tin, V-Strom 1050.
I have a 22 R1250GS. I agree with most of your opinions. I will add these comments though: The quick shifter is useful when putting the power down and at higher revs for upshifting. Then it works as expected. Downshifting there are a lot of safeguards to protect from locking up the rear. Can't have throttle on, maybe a lean angle restriction. I use the clutch when upshifting at relaxed RPMs and I use the clutch when down shifting when turns are in the mix. It is usually too aggressive to use when shifting from 1st to 2nd. I don't have any problem with the brakes. They have more than enough power for me. There are safety overrides that do affect things, but in a straight line and hard on the brakes they will use every bit of tire to stop me pretty quick. I've never tried a tiger though. I agree with your impression of the whizzy wheel, its rubbish. I agree on the suspension too. It's either too hard or too soft. It needs a few middle damping modes. Thanks for the video!
Yes, I think you have the Quick-Shifter described to a tee, it's high revs for me all the way now if I am going to use it. Given up on it completely 4th to 3rd as it is problematic for me in totally random way, it will often work well then other times totally refuse to budge at all, this may improve as the gearbox wears in a little. The brakes do stop quick with power from you hand. It is just the striking difference for me that the Tiger could apply huge braking power with a very easy light two finger touch to the lever, it makes for relaxed riding. I have exercised the ABS front and rear many times, on purpose, to get the full feel of the bike and I will say it is very controllable with the ABS cutting in considering the blocky Anakee Adventure tyres it comes equipped with (which I like). Thanks for leaving your comments.
I'm up to date on that. It has loosened up and got better but struggles on the downshift still between 5 to 4 and 4 to 3 particularly. It takes a heavy boot and often point blank refuses to shift requiring the clutch. Rode an S1000XR not to long ago, the QS was sublime.
I was in the market for a substitution for my 2017 Tiger Explorer 2017 and I did a quite long test rider on a 2023 R1250 GSA. I completely agree with you about the quick shifter and the suspension. The quick shifter was not a surprise (it just don't work properly), but I was surprised with the suspension. Every video I see states that the suspension is magnificent. But compared with the Tiger, it is really strange. I felt disconnected from the road and the dumping was either too soft or too hard. On a brick road, it was quite off, doesn't matter what I set. With the Tiger Explorer, I can set the proper damping for a given surface, on the fly and quite easily. I am just glad that I found someone else that thinks the same. I thought I was the only crazy one out there. 😂😂😂😂
The trouble is we were spoilt by the nine damping levels on offer from the Tiger and the complete control we had over it. You might still be crazy though 😄.
I’ve got the standard height gsa and I’ve not come across mine as having poor suspension I can ride it faster on poor roads in comfort than I can my 2009 speed triple. Is it because it’s a low chassis or have you got a problem with the suspension itself. Maybe worth mentioning it to your dealer. I do like the trophy colours
It could be because it has the shortened suspension and they have kept the setup from the longer suspended bike? Regardless the other two bikes have shorter suspension travel than the GS and they cope just fine. Recently had its first service and all was deemed fine.
I noticed the quick shifter has to be used under load. And it doesn’t like going from 1st to 2nd. Upshifts at least half throttle and above 5k rpm should work fine. Downshifting is a bit trickier. And at low rpm it doesn’t work, sometimes it sounds clunky. But apart from that I really enjoy BMW solution, although I only rode another brand with that optional extra.
It has loosened up a little but not by much. I do use it at higher revs as you say and it does give me something. It is only when you come off a bike that has one implemented well at low speed that you realise how much this one could be improved. Thanks for the input Miguel.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff thank you for the video. You suspension/riding mode tips helped a LOT. For day to day I now I use road mode and switch suspension between road/dynamic according to the number of potholes 😁
Watching this video, I am so glad that I had the opportunity to ride my BMWR90S and BMWR80GS bikes for 20 and 15 years respectively. I did all my own servicing and repairs on both bikes. Them were t'days?
I used to lead the demo rides at my local Triumph dealer before they closed. I really like the Tiger and would have bought one but there is no area dealer. Regarding your review. I'm on my second GSA. First a 2017 fully loaded and now a 2023 Triple Black GSA fully loaded. One thing to understand is this bike is not designed for those only taking on the street. Everything about this bike is designed for true adventure riding. For that reason there are specific design features you found awful that are actually superb German engineering. The rider left foot peg for example. That is NOT quality issue. That foot peg is designed to be canted that way. The purpose is to assist with shifting when wearing adventure boots and your boots are wet or muddy. It is canted on purpose in the direction of the shifter to help you find it and make it easier to shift when off-road. Another thing is you don't really use pre-load to compensate for the wrong spring. If you are a heavier rider you really should have the bike sprung for your weight. This bike has almost 8" of travel. Over an inch more than the Tiger. But again I would not use pre-load to adjust the bike for your weight if the quality of suspension ride is important to you. Lastly, the shift assist isn't mean to help you shift around town at low speeds. It really is meant to help you shift under heavy acceleration and at faster speeds or downshifting from faster speeds. The system is attempting to speed match. There is no reason to use it around town. It works great accelerating on the onramp to the interstate. Enjoy your new ride...
Thank you for the detailed response Barrett. But i'll take some issue with what you have said on that preload. Yes, I get the spring could be sprung for my weight, that is exactly what I have done on my other 1200cc bike. A new rear Wilbers Shock with a custom spring rate and built with a damping range accordingly. That has it riding brilliantly and to my preference. But, this bike has an automatic rear preload, I have zero control of it so there is nothing I can do there. I am also riding solo on a bike designed with a carrying capacity of 216kg. If it rides like that with half of this weight that is not good, it should be able to cope. Other bikes on the same road do not suffer as bad as this bike in terms of high speed and low speed damping. Both my Daytona 1200 (custom rear shock) and my CB1100EX (no damping adjustment at all) provide a more controlled ride. Quickshifters have come along way, there are so many bikes with super smooth QS's, including on other BMW bikes that shifting up and down through town is a pure joy, the change is barely perceptible to a pillion too. I cannot believe this is something BMW are not feverishly working on in the next incarnation of the bike. Every road tester brings up the QS on this bike, it is measurably poor compared to what is out there on the market. When you live in busy old Europe with our short and bendy roads the QS is a boon. One of the reasons I got rid of my 2016 Africa Twin was the heavy clutch and lack of QS after a week on the West Coast of Ireland where you were constantly changing gear. There is no need to be riding fast or at higher revs to get the most out of a QS. You misunderstand me on the footpeg. I don't mean canted forward on its mounting axis as in making your boot pointing down, I agree that would be useful. I mean they are not perpendicular to the bike looking from the top and on the left peg only. I do thank you for you experienced thoughts on this bike Barrett. Take care.
Nice review, thank you. I have a 2015 1200GS I've had since new with over 40,000 miles, quickshifter works great and I love it and use it all the time, any gear, up and down. Just saying!
I think the GT & GT Pro are the sweet spot in that range. Not sure the Explorer versions could compete with the weight distribution of a GSA. The Tigers are a breath of fresh air though, I thought I was on a 900 the first time I tried the 1200 GT Pro.
In many points I agree. Not with the experience of the suspension. It might be, that with the lowered bike the suspension sucks. But in a standard height it absolutely perfect, from fast twisties to bad backroads. I bought a 2022 GSAdventure. Fully, but fully equiped. I think you missed one very important point. The Telelevertunnel. The noise which comes from the front wheel (esp. with the Brigdeston A41) is nervwracking. You just cannot enjoy rides between 40 and 80 km/h. I change at the first service to Conti, which makes it a little better, but far from good. The main reason I sold this bike with 4.000 km after 4 months. I wait for the new model and will give the (at least its called so) Quickshifter and the noises a last try. Because, line you said, the ergonomics, weight distribution and engine character are top-class.
Thanks for your experience Thomas. I have read a lot about the front tyre noise but it is not too bad on my bike which is equipped with Anakee Adventure Tyres. It does have a weird noise from both tyres (i think) at high speed on the motorway though. The Tiger was terrible from nearly new with the Metzeler Tourance Next tyres, the drone through the front tunnel would drive you too distraction and a headache. Weirdly I fitted A41's and they were much better? Yes, I think the lowered suspension is the culprit, lots of owners of both saying so from their experience.
I thought that was a great video, Terry. It's good to see the GS subjected to such scrutiny. My two cents, having had the full-height suspension 2018 and a reduced-height 2019 is that the full-height is much better on a bumpy road. Unfortunately that means the bike works best for the taller rider. Because of this and the difficulty I found with heaving it around while parking etc, I no-longer have one, preferring the R (which still has its own issues; too harsh in dynamic and too under-damped in Road). Overall, you're dead right in your observations and BMW need to sort out their suspension damping, quick-shift (on the R-series) and put the thing in a wind-tunnel to control wind noise. Apart from that, it's a brilliant bike and I'm looking forward to seeing what they have done with the forthcoming R1300.
Thanks for the feedback re the two different chassis styles Julian. After most of the comments I was wondering if I was a) exaggerating it or b) imagining it? Given the competition from others, KTM, Triumph, Ducati etc I can't believe they will run with this system on the next bike. I will be in line for that test ride. I wonder if the difference between a GS1300 & GS1400 will be conventional forks and a different suspension setup?
Being a simpleton rider with very little cash and getting old I bought a 1200 gs The best bike I have ever riden put to one side all the gismos that you so well reviwed It is so well balanced as a bike I feel like I could almost do anything on this bike that a sports bike could do but in comfort I have been riding since 1969 and trust me riden all sorts Triumph are all top heavy so if short in the leg as I am very very unstable when at a standstill or in slow motion or even on bends for that matter !!! The B.M.W you can ride at a snails pace with both feet off the ground then we come to tourq and ease of servicing also no water on the older bikes I stil have 4 bikes and if I had to keep just one the B.M.W. would be the one!!!! I honestly wish it were not the case but it is 110% every day of the week.... My Triumph is going to another owner as much as I love the triple soind it is going !!
That low centre of gravity is something to experience at high and low speed as you say Allan, it does make the bike a joy to ride on good roads. That side to side handlebar movement in traffic is a non experience on the GS which is a boon.
I took 2022 1250 GS Advanture for a demo few days last year in Serbia, let me say we have some awful roads. I am 184 tall, an I have never noticed any issues, in road it's wobbly and like sitting on a pillow. I was pushing it in mountain twisties like my Honda CBR in Dynamic, also no issues. I suspect that lover variant has some limitations or your's is just defective and needs inspection.
I am not sure what’s going on with your bike. I believe it’s you! I love the suspension on my 23 GS and I love the quick shifter. I ride the bike off road as well and have only complements about the suspension. 37:41
The quick shifter? Can you use it with power on? Or back off then shift? Looking at the footage he had power on. This could bd the issue. As far as the suspension is concerned my GS is absolutely incredible and no issues at all.
I’ve just bought the same bike , I agree the suspension isn’t the best around, it’s better than what your saying. If you put any suspension to a ‘sport’ setting on shit roads they’ll all jolt your fillings out. No bike is perfect, but for the price of these a few more settings on damping would or should be on the bike. This is my 12th GS, so I’ve had enough to experience the ESA over the last 15 years. From 2008 until now. I’ve had five Multistrada’s and their standard nor Skyhook suspension isn’t as good as they say either.
Thanks for noting your long term experiences Peter, appreciated. The trouble with knocking it out of sport on those roads is that you end up bouncing along it the whole way round. I am a heavy person and my weight has to play a role but if this system was truly intelligent it should know that.
Nice review; many thanks. I ride since 1982, then a Honda 750F. No talks about pre loads, suspensions, electronics etc, only decisions were 4in1 or stay with the beautiful 2 Aluminium exhausts. For the past years I am renting mostly and all over the world. Suspension I never had to fault on the GS nor the GSA. I am 190cm and 100kg. Even with three panniers no issue. Did Hechlingen off road class twice, no issue. Did dirt roads in the Cape, South West parts of Australia and various states in the USA. Alps, no issue, even fully loaded, but always alone. Never use the quick shift, I guess after so many years riding to use the clutch is second nature. Models were 2016/18/22. Have to try the Tiger and Ducati but feel so comfy on the GS. Safe riding to all.
Cheers for posting your experience Albert. Many others share your thoughts on the suspension. I have this nagging feeling the low chassis version does not work so well as the standard bikes.
Gosh… I just ordered this bike as an upgrade from my F700GS but after seeing this video I think I might cancel and try something else! I guess you’re about to sell yours too by the tone of this video, which was brutally honest but entertaining. Wouldn’t be surprised if you have already moved back to another Triumph! Cheers!
No, Triumph too tall for me! There are positive aspects about the bike but the bank owns a lot of it so I'll have to hang on a lot longer! It is becoming apparent that this is the nature of the low chassis version, the standard chassis is much better according to owners who have had both.
Agree on some points, and strongly disagree on most, but that doesn't matter. I'll just try to help you out as a fellow rider. Quickshifter is clunky in 1st and 2nd, silky smooth upshift from there on, downshift is always smooth. The trick is in reading instructions, you must have throttle on for upshift and absolutely MUST fully close down throttle for downshifting. It's a boxer and shaft drive thing, not to go into details now. As for suspension, you have to keep it in Auto setting (not min pr max, they are for special use only) and you are right you only get 2 settings. BUT, if you plug on the dongle under your seat into the bike, you get buke to memorize what you use for what riding mode between the two, and you can use Dynamic PRO that you can set to have Road damping with Road or rain traction control and lets say dynamic throttle response and it will memorize it for you for good. Hope you find this tips helpful to enjoy your GS more.
Thanks Jugo. Yes, I keep the preload in auto, my Triumph had a similar system. The GS just gives you a little more flexibility on that for a temporary upper/lower setting. The 2023 bikes do not use the dongle so I have Dynamic Pro as standard and have that set up as an extra rider mode. That defaults to DYNAMIC on the damping bias and as you say I can choose my other parameters. But It is just as easy for me to switch the damping bias and stay on road mode, same amount of button presses at the end of the day. Thanks for the comment, much appreciated.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff Yes, but with a Dynamic PRO, you get to choose dynamic throttle while keeping ABS, damping and traction control in check. And if you wish to unleash full crazy, just swap to "normal" Dynamic and that actually gives you the maximum you can get without manually disabling TC and ABS. If you stay in road mode, you can only swap damper to dynamic to firm up the ride, but I don't see the point in that if the rest of the ride is "dampened", so to say. On the other hand, going dynamic, but keeping some of the safety or comfort of road mode for certain conditions makes all the sense to me. Could it be better, probably, but then it's overly complicated for those not crazy happy with the tech stuff. Perhaps they could have given us some option to ask in the dealership to unlock more control for people that know what it means to fiddle and tune their suspension settings (high and low-speed damping, preloads, spring progression and similar). Maybe in some next generation...
Good Day Terence. In your opinion which bike would be better to own in the long run. 2017 triumph xcx 1200 with 14k or a late 2013 1200 GS with 11k on the clock. Both well maintained
This is a tough one. The 2017XCx (Gen 2) does have the WP suspension that was on the later 2018-2022 Tiger models and it is brilliant. There have been a number of Tiger 1200's with gearbox issues in 6th and 2 & 3rd, two separate issues, one a simple selector wearing and the other a gear wheel issue. I never suffered from it but then I only put 40,000km on mine. If you can get a test ride of the XCx treat the gearbox to a decent thrashing to coax any issues out of it. If it is a dealer purchase see what sort of warranty is being offered and specifically ask about what would happen in the event of a gearbox issue. It is not an endemic issue but it is quite well known. The XCx will need a valve service at 20,000 miles I think it is, that will be VERY expensive, budget a lot for it. The XCx is quite top heavy though compared to the BMW, have at least a 31" leg. I don't have direct experience with the 2013 models and I'm sure there are a load of known issues with that model, even the latest models are getting shaft drives swapped out under warranty like nobodies business at the moment. Valve services on the GS are lower labour costs for obvious reasons but a shorter interval so for longer mileages they both come out as dear as each other to maintain if it were to be done via a dealer. I think that GS is due a valve service at 12K miles so budget for that too. Triumph parts do tend to be reasonablly priced, a new rear shock is half the price of a GS shock as an example. If you are happy with the weight distribution and have a decent leg length I would go with the Tiger but only because it offers a brilliant ride and is a good few years newer. Thrash that gearbox first though!
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff Thanks for the advice!!!. The triumph has a little over 9,000 miles on the clock so I have some time before that expensive service comes up. Its from a private owner that babied his bike so i will definitely thrash the gearbox before dropping down money. The GS did have some issues in the first few years of the wet heads. Its been dealer maintained to. I have videos on both and they both sound like they should. The triumph just had oil changes. I believe the GS has had all its recalls addressed as well. Its a hard choice since I never rode a GS but I have rode the triumph twice. Love it. coming from a sport bike background it ticked all the boxes for me. Fun as hell in the twists. The weight doesn't bother me either since Ive ridden everything from a harley to indian, victory, zx 14 hybusas. And ducatis. Its going to be a hard choice. Love your new bike by the way!!!
I agree with you about the suspension 100% On road mode it is too bouncy and on dynamic it is harsh. If the road is good and a sudden bump comes along, it shatters my teeth. I don't think it is caused by the rider weight as I weigh 11 stones compared to your 18.5
Owned latest Triumph Tiger 1200 pro for 2months but it was so rubbish was glad to get rid ….. now a proud owner of a proper bike BMW 1250GS Tophy👍…….. and the dealer was happy to shag the Missus on a Sunday morning so I could go out on breakfast run. Result😊
I have the 2022 GSA Standard Suspension and enjoy both the quick shifter and the suspension. This is my first road bike so can't compare it to others. I would be driving a Cadillac rather than a motorcycle and jeep wrangler if I didn't want to feel the road. I do need to ride some alternatives to feel what you mean. I have had jolts with the quick shifter but far more smooth transitions even between the lower gears but again I have not had the opportunity to experience a better quick shifter experience. Definitely a couple things I will keep in mind for my next bike but I still enjoy what I have. Thanks.
Thanks for your experiences Robert. Yes, I think the standard suspension is superior by all accounts from owners who have had both. I think the new 1300 with its ride height lowering may be the key to an improved ride for shorter legged riders such as myself.
Love my Tiger 1200 Alpine SE Terry, delicious suspension and I can push the front end into oblivion with no worries, W.P at it's best, great honest video mate, well done!
I test rode a 2020 GS and just didn’t like the bike. I thought the engine sounded a bit agricultural and I thought, as you do, the brakes weren’t brilliant. Also like yourself I found the latest Tigers a little tall, so I ended up getting a 2020 Gen3 Tiger 1200 Alpine with with only 2067 miles on it. I also had the lower seat the lower seat fitted, just to give me a little more confidence handling the weight at standstill. I think Triumph missed a trick not adding a low chassis version to the latest model range. Hope you come to terms with your new bike’s nuances and grow to love it.
I have owned both and they were/are the current generation. I’m not even considering going back to Triumph. You do have some legit points but your Triumph bias is impacting your perspective. I have yet to find anyone say the suspension on the BMW is bad. That is out of left field for myself and any other rider I know out here. Triumph is a good bike, but GS is still king when it comes to Adv.
My Triumph bias is only from my recent Triumph ownership but I have owned more Hondas and Suzukis than Triumph so I'm not their no1 fan or anything. Most people don't say they think their suspension is bad because they think what they have is normal not having sampled better they are non the wiser. The GS is till king of course because the sales numbers say so 👍. Cheers Joey.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff I would love to read or watch they plethora of folks complaining about the suspension. I think and agree with just about everything else. You at the fist and only person I have have read or watched complain about the suspension. Sorry… one person is not indicative of a problem.
@@JMZM7907 as the yoof of today say, “it is my lived experience“.
I got the gs adventure.. with the electronic suspension... man it's awesome for crunching miles.. trail braking sucks with that front suspension..
Comments on quickshifter - Downshift with throttle closed, Upshift throttle in acceleration state. Cruising at steady state - don't get your hopes up. So in short - more use in spirited ridinng than day to day. It's a shift assistant, not an autoshifter.
Nailed it. 😊
Excactly.. I, only use the quick shifter when accelerating hard.. Rarely use the auto blipper much more satisfying doing that your self
Two points to mention. 1. The quick-shifter works well when you use it properly - I see other comments mentioning how to let it do its job, it's not for changing gears to slow the motor when cruising. 2. The suspension is fine. It differs from what you may be accustomed to due to the design, but it is not as you suggest.
I beg to differ. Yes, you can get it to work better if you take your time and it can be good but it is not a patch on so many other bikes, even BMW's own XR on which it is superbly light and smooth and requires no thought. My bike requires a reasonably heavy boot on the downshift, often point blank refuses to drop out of fourth to third without a clutch. Objectively it is poor compared to what is out there. My suspension is fine in many scenarios but it is most certainly not on poor or rough tarmac roads, high speed damping is very poor compared to many other bikes I have owned. Many commenters here who have had the low chassis (LC) and the regular chassis version of the bike attribute what I am experiencing to the LC variant, stating they felt the same on their LC but not the regular setup bike. My riding buddy has a LC GSA, he hates the high speed damping too. Maybe its a geometry thing with the telelever and not the suspension? I still own the bike and it does an awful lot extremely well.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff Sure, I'm not dismissing what you are saying. I think there may be more to the situation in this case, you may have a bike that is not well put together from the factory and needs the quick-shifter reset. Here's why I'm suggesting this as a possibility.
I moved from a 2013 Triumph Tiger Explorer to a 2015 GS Triple Black. The engine and chassis made the Triumph feel slow at the bottom end, rough at the top end, and obviously, a bit top heavy. I also owned a 1200 Monster with a quick shift, and the BMW shift made the Ducati shift feel agricultural by comparison. I later swapped the 1200 Monster for an S1000XR. The S was a smoother shift and handled better, but (here's my other point) It's bound to feel better on the road because it's a road-based bike with conventional forks and an inline four-cylinder engine. The shifter will also be smoother due to that fact. Perhaps you might consider you are comparing two different purpose bikes, and that you may need to have a friend with a GS ride your bike to see if there's a problem to fix.
My 1250 and 1200 all click in and out of all gears with the quickshifter / blipper / shift assist pro. Only the upshift from 1 to 2 is not smooth enough when you’re riding slowly.
If your bike sometimes outright refuses to quickshift, I would recommend getting the dealer to fix it.
So you bought the lowered suspension version of the GS and are now complaining about the ride? Did you not bother to search the internet for comments about how the GS/GSA rode with lowered suspension? I'm on my 4th GSA, a 1250, all with standard height suspension and whilst the ride on any of them is not as plush as say, a K1600GT, its really not bad. And you missed one of the other major advantages of the BMW suspension and that is lack of dive under braking. As for the brakes themselves, being progressive is surely an advantage not a disadvantage? The brakes certainly work if you pull the lever hard enough. I will agree with you on the quickshifter. Its shit but then thats why God gave us the clutch and a hand to operate it with! As for your other complaints, you are missing out on one of the major functions of the whizz wheel by not having the BMW satnav because the whizz wheel can also control that. I find it particularly useful for zooming in and out on the screen when following a route. Apart from that the whizz wheel/button control is way simpler than on some other bikes and is all the better for that. I also have a Honda Africa Twin Adventure Sports and the controls still fry my brain after 18 months of ownership. And one last comment. The most truly amazing thing about the 1250 engine is the smooth low down torque which means it will pull at virtually any revs in any gear
Even with ~30mm lowered suspension the travel is significantly more than most road bikes, its should have no bearing on the matter. The two bikes I mention on the same bit of road have far less suspension travel, one being from 1995 and the other from 2018. The CB1100 doesn't even have manually adjustable suspension? I tend not to suffer with dive under braking and so don't find this feature as anything unusual. On a public road and If you are observing well in advance there should be no need to be continually be using your brakes in an aggressive way at all, it is just not required. That does not mean riding slowly, brakes are for stopping at junctions unless you are using the road as a public racetrack. A bike equipped with forks needn't dive at all if you use it correctly. Any bike costing as much as a GS will have adjustable damping, if you are going to brake hard at every bend it is merely a matter of increasing the damping as you would be expected to do if riding aggressively. In summary I don't place any particular value on the anti dive feature of the GS because the forks don't dive on my other bikes either? The brakes If prefer to be more aggressive If I'm honest as I only expect to be using them with gusto in an emergency. You can two finger brake with superb strength in a hurry if needed. They are better than the brakes on my Daytona 1200 and the Nissins on my CB1000 though but not by a lot. Thanks for your input and experience Mick.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff Well my Honda ATAS still dives under braking with the front suspension damping set to max so I guess it must be my riding then. I still think the lack of dive on the BMW suspension is a big plus. As for the ride I think you should have ridden the standard suspension version before damning the bike
Lowering a trail bike denatures it’s DNA. Yes it may have more suspension travel even in lowered form compared to your average roadster but it also weighs much more, it’s telelever and paralever suspension geometry makes it squat under braking or over bumps as opposed to forks compressing. The bike might by mechanically lowered but the spring rate on both shocks are the same as a non lowered bike. At the end, your short legs are penalizing the bikes natural performance.
I switched from two K16’s to a 1250GSA because it’s suspension travel is literally TWICE that of the k16. The last three years and 40000km have been like riding a magic carpet.
How is the sport suspension with its +20mm
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuffEven with ~30mm lowered suspension the travel is significantly more than most road bikes, its should have no bearing on the matter.
Yes, yes it does.
I’m shocked at the review of the suspension. I find the suspension the best quality of my GS . It soaks up all the bumps and never gets out of shape (maybe because I’m a 10stone rider?) . Apart from that, it was a great review 👍
Thanks Rick, yes, I'm 18.5st, I think that is having some impact alright.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff After 55k km on a 2020 1250GS I am surprised about the critical suspension review. Well, I don't have the comparison to a Tiger, but the GS is not limiting me on BADLY damaged roads. I have it always on Dynamic Pro and switch it often on the left handle between Dynamic and Road. Accidently, i was 15 stones when I bought the bike and reached 9 stones a year ago. (96kg to 58) I could say the bike is a bit less mushy, but not by much. More impressive is the positive impact to the experienced power output. Less weight is making the bike nimble af. xD
Maybe I am missing something better, since I am satisfied with the existing. Thanks for your experience exchange.
Btw:
Big compliment to your review. Either you're a hell of an actor or you just simply shared your honest, direct, personal impressions. Obviously without influences of any mainstreams. 👍
@@Basalderalder Many thanks for your kind words and documenting your experiences with the GS. This was a totally unbiased review, I have no bad feelings towards the BMW brand at all and I am enjoying the many positive parts of my GS. I plan on doing a more in depth review focusing purely on the suspension to try and explain it more from my perspective and why I think it may be like this. Some comments have highlighted a few things. Take care👍.
I am 19 stone and mine is perfect suspension. He must have a faulty bike.
@@nf4833stone is a unit of measure in UK
I have the same inside leg 29" and have the standard height frame with a low seat. I then set the the suspension to a low setting and have no problems. As far as the quick shifter, I never use it in 1st -2nd - 3rd. It's fine to 4,5 &6. I have however had some instances when the downshifter does'nt want to play ball. No big deal. The Hill Hold took a bit of getting used to but all good now. The brakes on mine are exceptional I've always had RTs in the past but find the GS much more comfortable. Some of my previous steeds....Kawasaki 440ltd, Honda 250 superdream, Honda 750F2, K100, K1100lt, R1100rt, R1200rt and now R1250GS. This is by far the most comfortable of all.
Thanks for the detail. I like the ergos and seat, very comfy. My QS has the same issue, sometimes on the downshift I just doesn't want to change, as you say, if you allow for it it can be dealt with. I came from a Triumph Tiger 1200 and the GS hill hold is a lot better, the release is much lighter so happy with that. My brakes still just average, tried a 2023 BMW S1000XR with non Brembo brakes, they were awesome in comparison to my GS.
Do you have the lowered suspension model? That’s supposed to be bad.
I do. It shouldn’t be mind as it still has plenty more travel than most road bikes.
It’s not the travel. It’s a known thing the short suspension is really harsh.
Is it possible that the normal height version would perform better than the lower chassis version?
This is becoming the common answer from those who have owned both TacNipples.
I have 4 versions of gs 22-23: standard, lowered, sport suspension, and adventure. Lowered and sport suspensions are not suitable for bad roads. It works the way you are talking about. And it's really hard to ride on small old roads, especially with a pillion. Standard and adv are different.
Thanks for that concise statement Serj.
Two votes that it's the lowered suspension. I have a GSA and I don't have issues with the suspension being underdamped.
Terence, I have watched a thousand reviews of the 1250GS, I have owned the normal height and the lowered one. This is the first review that has correctly called it out on its failings. The suspension on a bad road and the quick shifter are woeful. Thanks for your honesty.
Glad I'm not the only one, I was beginning to feel like the odd man out here. Since then a good few comments echoing mine & your thoughts too. Thanks.
Will suspension swap fix it?
For an average rider, there is a lot of opinion about suspension. I’ve ridden my GS around Australia on some seriously bad roads and the GS took it in its stride. To say it’s “absolutely rubbish” on a comparatively smooth road is a demonstration of bias.
Consensus seems to point at my choice of the low chassis model. A lot of people who have owned both say they had the same experience. Standard Chassis no problems. :-(
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff Ah. My apologies are owed. Because the standard size works well; I hadn’t picked up on that.
Do you realise that if you select dynamic you can change the damping to road or one of the other damping settings .
That's what I use on my gs
You can also buy a cockpit cover to hide the open part of the cockpit .
SUSPENSIONS: Do you have Dynamic ESA suspension? Does the Factory Lowered Suspension degraded your damping experience? QUICK SHIFTER: BMW Quick Shifter has been designed for high rev acceleration and reductions. They should adapt the system for normal riding in the next update (1300GS)
"Does the Factory Lowered Suspension degraded your damping experience?" - I'm beginning to think this is the issue.
Thanks for your honest video.
Just test rode and have ordered one of the last GSA Trophy's available in Australia.
One thing nobody seems to mention, in relation to it's amazing nimbleness, is the longitudinal crank. Much easier to roatate a bike around a crank than turning an across the frame spinning mass. Like the R-series, the Honda ST1300 (across the frame V4) also belies it's weight turning in to corners
Thanks Justin. Yes, a very valid engineering point, it does handle superbly. Thanks for the comment.
I had the gen 3 t1200 and then for 5000 km the rally explorer and now i am owner of the gs 1250 triple black . Gs is by far hands down the best suspension i have ridden in any bike with pillion / luggage on and off . I dont know what have you done with your bike but the telelever and paralever works ultra smooth . The centre of gravity and the way the bike handles through corners is fantastic and non comparable also with rhe tiger . Gs can be driven sporty and has more friendly feeling to curve and lean through the corner vs the rally explorer which I was really afraid to lean or drive sporty . The wind protection could be better i have to say but it can be fixed with an aftermarket windshield like wunderlich . The fit and finish is a little bit terrible and you dont expect that from bmw . I have to say terry and keep in mind that the plastics are REALLY REALLY EASY to scratch so keep in mind that ! After all , the engine is really spot on. Very smooth non vibey when touring , smoother than the triumph but when tou are idle 1000 rpm you will feel some.vibes . I personally dont mins because you feel the bike alive in the other hand the bike works very VERY smooth on highways. The gs is the best bike ever made
Thanks for your experiences Aldvex, we agree on an awful lot and that is why the handling of the bike (on a good road) was in the amazing category, it really is to be experienced. I think the tall, 21" wheel Rally Explorer from Triumph is not selling as well as the GT range as witnessed by free luggage options being offered (in the UK at least) but only on the Rally models. I think the GT & GT Pro are probably Triumph's best bet. I'm not convinced the Explorer's tank layout can compete with the GS Adventure without that boxer twin to offset it. I'm OK with the GS vibes and haven't found them intrusive at all. The engine note on the GS is addictive too. I have a two up trip planned for Europe later in the year, it will be great to see how it fares. 👍
This video is a good example, why one should form an own opinion. The screen adjustment is overly complex? You cannot adjust at the screen at 120 kph? This is a plain lie. Its totally possible and not a problem. Did you ever ride a KTM or Africa Twin for example? There you have complex mechanisms with screws and what not. I don´t have any issues with the screen. No noise, no wind tubulence.
This video was my experience, I purchased the bike, it is not a demo. My screen would not adjust at 120kph, that is a fact, why would I lie? If I slow down it adjusts. It is also considerably noisier than my last bike but this is quite common on a lot of bikes until you find one that suits your frame. Yes, I owned an Africa Twin, 2016 where the screen does not adjust, I mention it in the video? Many bikes now though do have a much simpler screen adjust mechanism, it is just my point of view, you can form your own opinions.
I’ve only had my Triumph GT Pro a few days but you’re right about the suspension, it’s something you notice immediately very plush. I’ve never owned a GS but I have test ridden one, the instruments and switchgear I thought were actually better in my opinion.
I love your approach / reviews something dead honest about your delivery, and of course never a truer word spoken when you see some YTubers missing out the bigger problems. It’s clear they’re just acting like paid shills, keeping an eye on the relationship with the dealer /manufacturer so they nurture a steady stream of rides enabling them to produce content and earn revenue. Fair enough…….but it does smack at being fake and some people buy into that.
Congratulations on the GT Pro Andrew, enjoy. Yes, I’m just not convinced we get the full story from most road tests at all for the very reasons you state. You even have to be weary of overly glowing owner’s reviews as that testosterone inside us doesn’t like to admit something might not be right with our purchasing decisions 🫣😲😀.
Total agree regarding, what you said .
Could the low chassis have a detrimental effect on the suspension?
This seems to be the consensus coming out of this with that feedback coming from owners who have had both Roberto.
Watched your video yesterday and thought about your suspension issue I think that you must have a problem bike because the two gs bikes I’ve had and got have been perfect
It’s been back to the dealer for it’s first service and given a clean bill of health. I specifically said I wasn’t impressed with the suspension and they said they were surprised and all was well with the bike.
I have owned tons of spirts bikes and nakeds all engine types and the gsai own now is by a country mile the very best. I have owned 2 hexhead 1200rt bimes and an xr the r bikes are the only bikes i have ever owned that were cimfy out of tbe box. Needing very few alterations
Your the first person that has been honest about the suspension on the GS. I appreciate that!!
Thank you for that. Yes, I love many of the bike’s great attributes but unfortunately suspension isn’t one of them😬.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff your welcome 🙏. Another thing you mentioned was the pegs. I was already aware of the cylinders not lining up. But the foot pegs to?! That might drive me nuts 😆. I'll have to test ride one to see
I have a 22 Rallye lowered edition.
The handling is why I bought the machine, lower center of gravity. Justin road mode it is springy but absolutely floats down the road like a Cadillac. If that bothers you then go to another mode. Yes electronic sucks because you don't know how to adjust it but most people don't know how to adjust their suspension anyway. Concerning the quickshifter going up is just a hoot. Pin it and bang the gears up yes going down it does not want to and the dealership said that. If that little bit makes you get a 1300 more power to you
I'd get the S1000XR over the GS after a test ride, the QS is sublime on that. I will have to stick with my choice for now though, trading so early will see me lose my shirt! I do ride in Dynamic suspension bias now and Enduro for the rougher roads even though they are not "off-road" lanes, that made a big difference.
I agree with the damping, Dynamic is way too jerky for bad roads, Road is way too soft and flowy. When I'm riding with a passenger, I usually set it to Road just to not upset them, and ride much slower than I normally would.
As for the quickshifter, the way I'm using it is 1-2-3 I clutch, above 3 I use the QS. I also almost always use the QS going down even to 1st, it does a good job with that.
What I found is when I took it to a track, the quickshifter is a blessing, and works wonderfully in every gear. I think since it works on the principle of cutting the ignition, in higher revs there is a finer amount of control, as there are more ignition cycles in any given period of time. No wonder it's a "race inspired" technology, and fittingly, it works best in that context.
Thanks for the insight and your experience with the quick-shifter, makes complete sense. 👍. I'm glad your experience the ride as I do, lots of people don't believe it!
I would disagree with a few of your findings.
First off, you want a front brake that grabs with the slightest input? That would be a dangerous situation for especially inexperienced riders. A caliper that works with a more progressive pull to stop gives you actually better control, especially in trail braking.
As far as suspension is concerned, remember, you have a modified suspension motorcycle that the little people can ride.
You have less suspension travel and also less ground clearance. This is an ADV bike, not a Goldwing. Don't expect it to ride like one.
I respectfully disagree on the brake performance, this isn’t a bike for the novice and most owners will have a good few years under their belt. The action on a better braked bike with a light two fingered touch is very relaxed because the action requires no effort. I agree it is no Goldwing and is not expected to be so, that bike whilst I admire it, is not my cup of tea either. Whilst I do have the shortened suspension version, by 30mm, this bike has significantly more suspension travel than most road bikes and much more than two of my other 1000cc plus road bikes to which I compared the ride. They were both much more well behaved with this test road. I plan to make a video focusing on the suspension some more to try and explain my rationale. Thanks for your comment 👍.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff It was a good review in all honesty. I ride a 2020 GSA HP and love this bike. Definitely not perfect but pretty damn close IMO. Especially after riding my Harley lol.
I think BMW should have done a little more refining of the GS such as backlit switches, a more precise suspension setting that would truly match the riders preference before increasing the engine displacement which I feel is just to keep up with the Jones's.
Keep up the good work Terence
I have an R1250RS. I'm going to disagree a bit about the quick shifter, but you have to get a feel for it. First, yes, it breaks in a bit. Next, the owner's manual does give some specific and spot on instructions. You have to be on the throttle to upshift and you have to have the throttle closed to downshift. So, if I'm at a steady throttle but want to upshift, I just goose the throttle a bit and it's reasonably smooth.
As for the suspension, at least on the RS, the damping is not tied to the rider mode. You can set the mode to road or rain and have the damping set to dynamic. I don't know if the GS is similar or not.
You can set the damping to dynamic or road independent of the rider modes yes. I have used quick shifters for years on the Triumph and yes they are all better on the up shift on acceleration and off throttle downshift but this bike is particularly bad. It will often flat refuse to drop from 4th to 3rd at all even on zero throttle. It’s not completely hopeless but it is very bad, I shan’t be using it. Thanks for the tips Paul.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff I might have gotten lucky on my particular bike, or it's now broken in. That said, it's the only quick shifter I've used so I can't really judge.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff Mine shifts easily from 4th to 3rd. No issues. Take that in to BMW for them to look at. Sounds like something is wrong if it is that repeatable.
What lovely scenery, a brilliant looking route. David and I are planning on doing this in June, we will do it over 2 days so that we can visit lots of coffee establishments and “goo steady” (fen talk) safe riding and keep the vids coming.
Excellent, enjoy the trip. Be sure to include the Glendalough Green Cafe in the Wicklow Mountains for a coffee and cake stop (or a salad lunch), always a few bikes parked up there. Goo Steady!
Thanks for making this eye opening video! Where I ride, there are no roads. This really put things in perspective for me when it comes to my next purchase.
Glad it was of some insight. If you have no roads you will definitely benefit from a bike with much more suspension control and adjustment.
I heard they don’t put heating seats anymore in 2023 ? Do you know something about it ? Do they leave electronics at least ?
Mine came without heated seats even though they still advertised with them on the website. I did get the LED light package though which is brilliant at night. But they do not fitted the electronics for the heated seats so you cannot just buy them after.
I’ve loved the suspension on my 2016 GSA model. You have to figure out what rider set up (1,1+luggage,2 rider), then your rider mode, then your suspension setting. I think you’ve missed using some adjustability options on your bike because all those options are in the new 1250 models.
No, these are not options. That was the older way of customizing the suspension. Now the rear preload is automatically measured and adjusted, that works perfectly. It is the two road modes you have for damping that are the limiting factor. I get it is continually trying to optimise the damping and in "Dynamic" it does create a sharp bike for handling purposes but with poor high speed damping. In the "Road" bias damping it is like riding on waves.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff you can still opt to have it set the preload in any riding mode. Press and hold the suspension button, once the suspension settings appear, press and hold the button again until it changes from auto to either min or max - this is the new version of 1 or 2 rider set up.
@@geoloseth Hi Seth, many thanks for this info, but I do feel you are mistaken. The Auto Preload is setting the preload based on the measured SAG from the swingarm position sensor on the left hand side of the bike under that small plastic cover. Whether it is a single rider, rider plus passenger or rider/passenger/luggage it is measuring the SAG under that weight and applying the appropriate preload to compensate. It is a closed loop system requiring no human input. They have been doing this on the Triumph Tiger 1200's for many years now. This replaces that open loop manual selection process that you have where it is you making the decision about your load and applying the appropriate preload to compensate. Separately from that I do know about the min and max preload option on the switchgear you mention which affects the preload amount, hence the ride height. This is something different, not related to load and the manual suggest the low setting for convenience and the higher setting for extra ground clearance that you may want when off-road.
Hi Terry may I ask what bag you have on the passenger seat
That is the SW-Motech Tailbag. Very high quality, at least five years old now. There is a new version out now, looks very similar but with little improvements all around. A little dear but absolutely worth it. Rubbery concave base has it sitting on a pillion seat very well.
Love your honesty❤
Actually my quick shift works nice for anything 3rd gear plus if you know how to use it. Suspension I have no idea what you talk about.
I stick to my 22 1250GS 😂
“ QS works nice for anything 3rd gear plus if you know how to use it.” That basically is how to describe a shitty quick shifter……
There are bikes with quickshifters that work through all gears and require no special knowledge on how to operate them.
Having owned a 1250 GS, a Tiger 900 and a Tiger 1200 and currently owning a 1250 GSA, I know the difference between a good and a bad quick shifter.
Road GS's from 80's to now. Also other makes and models. Had over 200,000 miles on BMW etc. Tried my friends DR650 for a week since he needed me to do some simple maintenance. ( and had to go out of town) ... guess what... The GS is up for sale! If BMW would ever produce a 750 CC boxer twin in the 360 pound range with simple carbs, and CDI ignition... I would consider it and so would others!
I know the feeling David. A buddy lent me his Aprilia Tuareg 660 (204kg fully fueled) for a week and I had an absolute blast on it. My favorite part was the manually adjustable suspension. Took me about 50-70km to suss it out to what worked best for me and wow what a bike. Need ear plugs though, that induction roar gets old real quick! :-)
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff YES indeed! Sad that BMW has gone the wrong direction.
Weird to hear about the damping. On my 2013 R1200GSA I can set the damping separately from soft to normal to hard, independent of the riding modes. Works perfectly, just like the quickshifter which I find amazing.
You can do that on the 2023 but just Dynamic and Road (in the road modes).
Enduro mode will do what you need on this roads and that works amazing well
some others have stated the same.
My R1250GS has Wilburs installed. They work with the ESA setup. On Dynamic it works very well. Not harsh like you are describing. On Road in Road mode, it is floaty but with the suspension in Road mode and Dynamic Pro riding mode chosen it is quite good. I see you had the bike in Road mode and Road suspension...yes way underdamped, but I never ride in Road mode and have found much of these issues go away when choosing Dynamic pro as suspension settings are quite different in all the riding modes. One big advantage of changing to Wilburs is it also has the standard clicker adjustments for damping as well to fine tune the electronic choices. Also, it was built for my weight and is much higher quality suspension and not really that expensive. My 2 cents.
Thanks for the comprehensive detail. I like Wilbers as a brand and have a Wilbers custom monoshock on my Daytona 1200 and absolutely love it. I do ride with the suspension in Dynamic 95% of the time now and only switch to road damping in town where there are a lot of speed bumps etc. I tend to switch to Dynamic on the suspension bias button and leave the rider mode in road, that way I get to keep full traction/ABS and have that better performing damping. I have been on to the Wilbers agent here and it doesn't look like they have a solution for the low chassis GS. They do a lowered suspension kit for the regular bike and same height replacement suspension for the regular bike but nothing for the factory lowered as far as I can tell and enquired about. Cheers
Nice, accurate and honest review, well done!! Ive had 6 GS's/GSA's sine 2006 and have never gone off road, thats why I'e just taken delivery of a 2023 1250 RS SE in my opinion a far better road bike. lower, quicker ( i don't know why but it is) has all the same tech and because it has 17in wheels a better selection of tyres.
Cheers you Grumpy Old Git! Whenever a 2nd hand RS comes on the market round here it gets snapped up, quite unique on the road and terribly good looking. Enjoy.
i changed from a 2018 R1200RS to a 2022 R1250GSA. You are right, the RS is a really good and fast bike, but the GSA fit my needs better (and my back).
Great vid Terry. Was thinking about selling my 2020 Tiger 1200 Desert and getting a GS but as you said I love the suspension and ride on my Tiger. You may have kept me from making a mistake. Think I’ll wait to see what the 1300 GS will be like. Thanks!
I think that is a wise choice, keeping the WP suspension of the Desert Edition compared to this silly ZF system. The GS has a draw, I cannot deny sales figures but when you have had better suspension you don't want to go backwards. Cheers Bob.
I have the first Triumph 1200 GT Explorer in the states from 7/22- middle January 2023. NEVER looking back. The new Showa suspension kills the 2020 1200 XCX I traded for the new one. Choose wisely...
@@ttrguy9952 do you have the 1200 Rally? If so, any issues so far? That’s another option I’ve been contemplating.
@@bobholley6202 No, I have the GT Explorer like I stated. Zero issues and I love the bike!👍👍
The Rally versions are tall and here in New England we don't have the off road terrain.
@@ttrguy9952 good deal. I live just south of the Appalachian Mountains in Georgia. Great twisties and a lot of off road gravel and dirt roads open on the national forests. Great to hear no issues. I’m pretty tall so I was thinking about the rally.
I noted in your comments about the suspension that you only mention road, rain, and Dynamic Pro modes. Why did you not include the Enduro modes? Would those modes not do better on rough surfaces?
That is a suggestion from others too. Enduro does actually allow the rear end to use up more of its compression stroke and seems to control rebound much better. So I do actually use it on poorer tarmac roads now. The only downside to that is having the ABS/Traction features reduced as a result which is not ideal on wet days.
I have a R1200RT and it’s an amazing bike. I have ridden the BMW is all kinds of weather and never had an issue. My RT does have hard, medium and soft suspension settings
Great looking bike the RT. I did try the ergos but it was a little too tight on the hips for me with the shorter seat to peg relationship. But I do have a dodgy left hip so that is my fault. Great that you have the more flexible control over your damping.
Traded my Ktm 890 adventure in for a r1250gs , previously lve always had naked/sports bikes, all l can say is l ride the gs harder and faster than any other bike I’ve own. I was worried about the so called lack of feel from the tele-lever front suspension but l find it gives great feedback, certainly agree with the quick shifter comments great up shifting but down shifts are hit and miss.
You can ride this bike hard and as you say, fast. Dynamically it is wonderful and i 100% acknowledge that. It is looking like the low chassis version of this bike is the culprit from owners who have had both versions.
3 years ago I have sold my F850GS for many reasons you mentioned here too. I am shocked 2023 R1250GS is still suffering from so many poor engineering solutions. I absolutely hated level of menus and buttons interface, the crapy navigation and forcing me to buy Gamin from BMW. Connectivity? Poorest ever and not stable (forgetting devices constantly).
I was recently considering getting back to GS (from my Husky 701 Enduro, with amazing WP XPLOR suspension by the way) but your video made me want to wait for R1300GS and _your_ review of the suspension, connectivity and user interface (button functions) after a test drive.
Thanks for making this video, very informative. Respect.
I’m glad it served a purpose. Yes, I think the wait for a much needed update would be worth it. Not sure I’d want to be first out the block on the new 1300 purchase though. Every manufacturer is going to have first release problems that will take 18 months or so to sort out. No doubt it will sell very well though. Thanks for watching. 👍
Just curious. Did you criticise the Triumph for the Cross Plan Crank which introduced vibration into the otherwise excellent triple engine just to appease the 10% (max) of people who go off road?
I think Triumph should of put the regular triple in the GT and the cross plane in the Rally, that would of suited a lot of people.
Use Speakon connectors for power. They are heavy duty and twist lock into place. Heated gloves & vests have their own pull-outs so you won’t be tied to the bike.
I shall look them up.
THANK GOD it’s not just me. I have ridden GSs of one king or another since 1984 (I still have my g/s). I love boxer GSs…I have my 2012 GSA which I love. I thought it’s about time I upgrade and spoil myself with a 1250 as a retirement present. Having had one for half a day I couldn’t believe how crap the suspension was. I felt like I was on a bloody trampoline in road mode so decided dynamic was the only option but boy, it that stiff over the potholes…..as for the quick shifter BMW should be ashamed of themselves charging good money for a virtually useless bit of kit. ……BMW have sold tonnes of these things and thought….surely it can’t just be me who think a great bike has been ruined by the damping. My 11 year old (non ESA) Wilbers suspensioned GSA is much better damped giving far greater control and hugely more comfortable. The current electronic set up is a joke….I was genuinely saddened that that amazing engine and chassis was sol let down and that for the first time in 39 years my main bike will not be a GS.
Phew, you are one of the few to concur, I am not the flavour of the day here as you can imagine! I have a Wilbers on my 1995 Daytona and it does a brilliant job too, chalk and cheese in the ride quality from a 28 year older bike.
Great review. 2019 was the first year of the 1250. I have one an have put 40,000 miles on it. It’s an amazing bike, never ridden a Triumph. The torque it has and when it wheelies make me giggle. Quick shifter works smoother in the higher gears and when you’re ripping it. I don’t know much about suspensions but I will say the bike is a little “stiff” and doesn’t absorb the bumps as I’d like. It’s better when loaded down.
Thanks for sharing your knowledge. Good to know on the loading, I have a two up trip planned for the Dolomites later on in the year.
Fall 2018 was the first year of the 1250. Just for info.
As a 2019 model.@@chrisvodka2412
I have the seat in the lowest position. I used to be 6’ tall. I’ve shrunk over the years but my inseam is still 32”. My only complaint is it’s just a tad too tall. Thought about the low version but I’ve heard too many stories that it rides rough and you lose some clearance. I’m on the balls of my feet but just wish it was 2-3” lower. I dropped my brand new bike the night I bought it,🤣🤣. 2023 GSA triple black. Crash bars work! No damage. Just a scratch or two on the crash bars. Can barely see them. Will touch them up soon.
Ouch! My Tiger 1200 with its top heaviness went over 3 times too, lost footing on gravel a couple of times and the other time I thought I had the sidestand down :-( Try the low seat from BMW or maybe the Wunderlich low version. I have gone back to using it all the time now and find it comfortable now I am used to it.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff I bought the BMW low seat and it helps but there’s not too much you can do if all you can do is flat foot it. Raise your leg outwards just a bit and you’ve lost footing. My Harley, I can flat foot it with my legs/knees bent a good bit so I can step outwards and still be flat footing it. Easier to keep the bike upright. With the GSA, it’s just gonna be a learning curve to deal with it. I dropped it again the other day coming into the driveway and it’s at a steep angle and a sudden stop or I hit the garage door. I lost momentum and the bike fell.
I have a 2019 R1250GS Adventure covering all types of terrain & I’m really impressed with suspension, no issues whatsoever. Also the quick shifter is smooth. Perhaps yours needs calibrating?
This is why I love owner reviews. An excellent, honest, and at times funny review. I'm considering a move from an MT10 to something more upright and sensible. Certainly food for thought here.
Glad it added to the info gathering. The new GS must be so close I think I would bypass this one for now and see what comes of the new bike. But there will be a pile of the 1250's up for sale at bargain prices once the 1300 gets released. Cheers Banditmanuk 👍
great review Terry. I am from NSW Australia were we pride ourselves on having the worst roads in AU. I bought my 2nd hand 2020 GS after owning a '14 Ducati 1200 Pikes Peak Multistrada. The suspension was way better on the Ducati but otherwise the GS is I believe a better bike so much so that i went and spent $5K on new Tractive TT Experience suspension. WOW. After a few 1000km of bedding in the bike has now great suspension that compliments the great chassis and weight distribution. If you own a GS and plan on keeping it for a while bite the somewhat $bitter$ bullet and buy the Tractive. It is the same suspension that is rebranded by Touratech (+$1K) but it is really good stuff. Yeah QS is crap though
Hi Gregory, cheers for the info, I shall look them up. Great to get first hand knowledge of a user.
A good and interesting review that I would agree with to 95%. Being on the shorter side (torso) than Terence, I don't have any issues with the screen, but regarding the suspension I think he's spot on. I came from a Triumph 1200 (2017) which had fantastic suspension (W.P.) and I couldn't believe how poor the GS suspension is by comparison. On the GS I have the suspension either on "Dyna" which I use most of the time and is quite firm or "Rain" for country lanes which is very compliant if not slightly wallowy. I never use "Road" because it's neither one thing or another. But the suspension comments made by Terence made me realise how I have eventually become used to the BMW suspension.
A awful lot of comments from owners are putting this down to the fact that it is the low chassis version of the bike. Many owners have had both and the standard version is totally different apparently. It is pretty much 100% Dynamic for me too, I get seasick otherwise.
Probably the best review out there. Have some differences, such as the fact I think the the whizzwheel works well, and you do indeed get use to it, as you do a joystick that sits too close to the indicators (triumph!). Also, I find the brakes excellent - much prefer the feel of these brembos over the hayes. Screen, well you either like a short screen and are happy with the trade off, or you aren't and don't. I think these aspects are neutral and depend on rider preferences.
Quickshifter, has to be used at the right revs - it's a big boxer that you are changing gear on, not a triple!
On suspension, for some reason, they seem to have set up the non-dynamic softer on this compared to the GS1200, and I really don't know why. It isn't good, though I haven't found dynamic much of an issue. But the lack of settings is a real drawback no question.
Praise be that you haven't moaned about the Honda drl indicators or the 'unsafe' rear indicators, the latter being the latest modding fad being pushed by the aftermarket guys and without able being to provide a scenario in which they are unsafe.
Yes, the aftermarket are doing a roaring trade on indicator systems aren't they! I had always on front indicators on my Africa Twin, loved them. Thanks for your feedback on the other points, agree completely. It is becoming very apparent, from other posts that the low chassis version of the bike is probably the issue with the suspension characteristics I complain of. Those that have owned both styles have no such problem on the standard height bike but did on the lowered too. Cheers samsara
Super points you raise. Have to agree as GSA owner. Thanks very much sir. G.
Thanks G. As you might have guessed I am getting a panning here :-)
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff Undeservedly! BTW I would be interested to hear what you make of the RT if you’ve ridden it? I tested it t’other day and was really impressed.
I’m guessing the root of the “suspension hatred” is the lowered chassis version you’re riding. Or personal bias.
This seems to be the overwhelming consensus by those that have owned the low and the regular chassis.
I just did a test ride on a gs1250te felt great. 1st time on a GS. Didn't have time to really test the suspension and I was on good roads. I was really impressed with the quick shifter though. I thought it was silky smooth.. great review. Top stuff. 👍
Glad you got on with it. I think a lot of owners will stick with the GS a little longer rather than rushing to the new 1300, it is quite a departure.
Hi Terrance, can I ask where you got the TomTom mount that appears to fit the existing GS navigation mount?
I have a Tom Tom and would love to fit it up the same so it feeds off thr bikes power using the existing Garmon bracket.
Cheers
Ron
Hi Ron. This is from an Italian company 3D AM and I bought it direct but I see it for sale in many online suppilers. www.adventurebikeshop.co.uk/satnav-phones/3d-am-e-nav-400500-tomtom-mount-bmw-r12001250gs-gsa-rs-750850gsaf900xrs1000xr/
Could the experienced suspension feel is due to ( or specific to ) lowered chassis model?
It is only 30mm less travel than the std GS and it is still significantly more travel than most road bikes come equipped with so I don't think it is that. The other two bikes in the comparison have far less travel and they cope just fine.
I find the suspension on my 2021 GSA to be amazing and not as you describe at all. I wonder if the difference is whether you have the low seat option or standard....
I'm getting the feeling the low chassis model has quite a different characteristic to the standard. One of the other posters has four 2022/23 models and he says his low chassis models are like this but not the regular models.
I currently have the GS HP version and have absolutely no issues with the suspension. Maybe it’s cos you’re a short-arse and have the low suspension model🤔. As for your ineptitude with the quick shifter .. you should learn how to use it correctly🤦♂️. Other than these 2 points where you’re talking out of your arse .. the rest of the review was ok.
Also you may try to bring this bike to bmw and ask them to flash latest software and do suspension calibration. This helps sometimes
Just purchased a GSA 1250 Trophy edition to replace my 1200LC GSA. I note your comments on the suspension, but I don’t agree. It is definitely harder than the 1200Lc, and I rode both almost exclusively in Dynamic unless it was raining. The handling in the 1250 is slightly better albeit with a firmer ride and I have noticed bumps and road imperfections are more noticeable, but I think that’s the cost to slightly better handling.
We rode this bike on Indian roads a few months back and the bike was completely out of order. Same roads we did also on the africa twin and a tiger 900 Rally, no problems. But the 1250GS felt absolute shite on those bouncy roads. Thanks for pointing out the poor suspension.
Glad you can corroborate my experience.
I have just seen this vid & the quick shifter is absolutely fine on my albeit the 2019/20 GS Adventure. Your vid is for the 21 onwards so did they change the quick shifter?
I doubt it but great yours is up to scratch. 👍 Have you tried many other bike quick-shifters? Most are now buttery smooth at any revs and zero hassle. Sometimes mine just point blank refuses to shift without the clutch ( usually 4th to 3rd)but it is better now that I have a good few thousand km on it.
Yes tried several bikes, in particular the S1000XR & my GS is just as good. Also I have to say my suspension on all types of roads is very good. I did own a 2013 R1200GS & that suspension was a bit vague. Having said this I do think your vid is very good.
@@Gary-UBIQUE144 cheers 🍻
Not sure what you mean about the tiger key less alarm. I've had no issues with its operating methodology.. gen4 bike though so maybe different from gen3?
Does it auto arm when you stop the bike? On return do you need to get the alarm keyfob out and switch the alarm off before riding away? I'm trying to say it is pointless having a wireless key on you if you have to deactivated the alarm with the alarm fob on your keyring.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff I guess I never really thought about it. If I'm just stopping for a short while and I'm not wandering off then I won't turn the bike completely off with the key button so it will just fire up again straight away. The bike can't be started unless the key is within range of the receiver under the seat. I don't mind the way it works although I don't like the reliance on a battery (key or bike).
I think your comments about suspension is backwards and maybe thats why its not working for you because the spring preload is on the left side switch and the damping adj is on the right side mode switch but hey what do i know i only had my bike a couple weeks now
I know exactly where you mean, no confusion here. I am not getting confused between the damping bias ROAD or DYNAMIC and then PRELOAD options. Cheers though Paul.
I have always owned GS’s and I switched to the new Tiger 1200 Rally Pro as I was getting bored with the GS. Sorry I couldn’t wait to go back to a GS. You comment a lot about the wonder wheel what about that silly toggle switch on the new Triumph? Trying to use it on the fly you have to take your eyes off the road to look at the switch to make sure your not hitting the blinker switch. Secondly don’t try using the Toggle switch while on a bumpy road that almost is impossible. The 21” front wheel on the Tiger 1200 gives you a little bit of insecurity feeling while going around bends especially when there is bumps.
Yes your review was honest but found it hard to believe it all when you were wearing a Triumph Jumper 😂😂😂
I will agree I fell out of love with 21" wheels on my Africa Twin over the winter of 2016/17 and decided I would never go back to that size. The Tiger 1200 Rally would not be for me either with its 21". The Triumph jumper was actually my mid layer, made for Triumph by "cold killers", great bit of kit. I did wear it on purpose though 😜
My '22 GSA has a great suspension when taxed. I have no complaints at all except back lit switches. Power is great, carries a load really well and on a 500 mile day it doesn't wear me out. When I bought mine, I ditched the heated seat, the LED light and the quick shifter. All of this was way more expensive than they are worth. I guess I do have one complaint. I only get 38-40 miles per gallon and that happens if I cruise at over 75 mph. Wish that was better. Great video, thank you. But I can not see changing to the new GSA. To me, it isn't "better", just different.................... And advice ???? ......... Buy a Zumo XT. Best aftermarket investment ever !!!!!!! 🙂
I like the ZUMO XT, probably the best out there but got to wait for my Tom Tom Rider 550 to expire :-) Yes, long days are easy on the GS and I now use the "Enduro" suspension mode a lot more which copes with poor roads much better than any of the other two damping modes. Same for me on the Motorway, MPG plummets :-(
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff I tried "Enduro" and so far you are right !!!!!! It does do a much better job over a broader range of conditions. 🙂
@@TheAmerican1963 Excellent. Just be careful in the wet as traction and ABS are dialled down a bit.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff will do !!!!! Thanks for the advice !!!! 🙂
Congrats on a very detailed and insightful review. Can’t say I agreed with some of your inputs but great respect for your intelligent video.
I’ve had five GS’s and now have a wonderful RS and RnineT. Love Boxers!
Thanks for watching and the kind words 👍.
I wonder if having the lower chassis model affects the suspension , having less travel? Have you tested a regular height setup ?
I have not, buts lots of owners of both versions have commented that they noticed a difference between the two so I think there is something there.
If you have alarm set to auto simply pushing the keyless button disables alarm as ignition comes on
Yes, I also found out you can auto arm it and it will switch on and off as you approach without even using the buttons. It is a very good system on the GS.
You are comparing GS to Tiger, are there any other bikes/manufacturers it can be compared to?
I only did that as I traded in my Tiger 1200 which was also a 1200cc shaft drive. Top contenders are the Ducati MultiStrada, KTM 1290, Harley Pan America (ridden it, brilliant), Africa Tin, V-Strom 1050.
I have a 22 R1250GS. I agree with most of your opinions. I will add these comments though: The quick shifter is useful when putting the power down and at higher revs for upshifting. Then it works as expected. Downshifting there are a lot of safeguards to protect from locking up the rear. Can't have throttle on, maybe a lean angle restriction. I use the clutch when upshifting at relaxed RPMs and I use the clutch when down shifting when turns are in the mix. It is usually too aggressive to use when shifting from 1st to 2nd. I don't have any problem with the brakes. They have more than enough power for me. There are safety overrides that do affect things, but in a straight line and hard on the brakes they will use every bit of tire to stop me pretty quick. I've never tried a tiger though. I agree with your impression of the whizzy wheel, its rubbish. I agree on the suspension too. It's either too hard or too soft. It needs a few middle damping modes. Thanks for the video!
Yes, I think you have the Quick-Shifter described to a tee, it's high revs for me all the way now if I am going to use it. Given up on it completely 4th to 3rd as it is problematic for me in totally random way, it will often work well then other times totally refuse to budge at all, this may improve as the gearbox wears in a little. The brakes do stop quick with power from you hand. It is just the striking difference for me that the Tiger could apply huge braking power with a very easy light two finger touch to the lever, it makes for relaxed riding. I have exercised the ABS front and rear many times, on purpose, to get the full feel of the bike and I will say it is very controllable with the ABS cutting in considering the blocky Anakee Adventure tyres it comes equipped with (which I like). Thanks for leaving your comments.
There was also a software update recall for the quick shifter that I’ve heard helps it out tremendously.
I'm up to date on that. It has loosened up and got better but struggles on the downshift still between 5 to 4 and 4 to 3 particularly. It takes a heavy boot and often point blank refuses to shift requiring the clutch. Rode an S1000XR not to long ago, the QS was sublime.
I was in the market for a substitution for my 2017 Tiger Explorer 2017 and I did a quite long test rider on a 2023 R1250 GSA. I completely agree with you about the quick shifter and the suspension. The quick shifter was not a surprise (it just don't work properly), but I was surprised with the suspension. Every video I see states that the suspension is magnificent. But compared with the Tiger, it is really strange. I felt disconnected from the road and the dumping was either too soft or too hard. On a brick road, it was quite off, doesn't matter what I set. With the Tiger Explorer, I can set the proper damping for a given surface, on the fly and quite easily. I am just glad that I found someone else that thinks the same. I thought I was the only crazy one out there. 😂😂😂😂
The trouble is we were spoilt by the nine damping levels on offer from the Tiger and the complete control we had over it. You might still be crazy though 😄.
I heard a lot of riders upgrade to Touratech suspension after awhile properly explain why?
I’ve seen that kit, with individual low and high speed damping, but €€€! It shouldn’t need that much spent on it 😬.
I’ve got the standard height gsa and I’ve not come across mine as having poor suspension I can ride it faster on poor roads in comfort than I can my 2009 speed triple. Is it because it’s a low chassis or have you got a problem with the suspension itself. Maybe worth mentioning it to your dealer. I do like the trophy colours
It could be because it has the shortened suspension and they have kept the setup from the longer suspended bike? Regardless the other two bikes have shorter suspension travel than the GS and they cope just fine. Recently had its first service and all was deemed fine.
Just want to ride..not interested in tech unless it flies.
Currently 1980 R100 RT..superb
Great vid..many thanks
Good choice! Just did an 800km 2-day round trip on my carbed Daytona 1200. Suspension brilliant, didn't miss a beat.
I noticed the quick shifter has to be used under load. And it doesn’t like going from 1st to 2nd. Upshifts at least half throttle and above 5k rpm should work fine.
Downshifting is a bit trickier. And at low rpm it doesn’t work, sometimes it sounds clunky.
But apart from that I really enjoy BMW solution, although I only rode another brand with that optional extra.
It has loosened up a little but not by much. I do use it at higher revs as you say and it does give me something. It is only when you come off a bike that has one implemented well at low speed that you realise how much this one could be improved. Thanks for the input Miguel.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff thank you for the video. You suspension/riding mode tips helped a LOT. For day to day I now I use road mode and switch suspension between road/dynamic according to the number of potholes 😁
Watching this video, I am so glad that I had the opportunity to ride my BMWR90S and BMWR80GS bikes for 20 and 15 years respectively. I did all my own servicing and repairs on both bikes. Them were t'days?
I rode an R90S through London eons ago, it was my brothers, what a bike yes.
I used to lead the demo rides at my local Triumph dealer before they closed. I really like the Tiger and would have bought one but there is no area dealer.
Regarding your review. I'm on my second GSA. First a 2017 fully loaded and now a 2023 Triple Black GSA fully loaded. One thing to understand is this bike is not designed for those only taking on the street. Everything about this bike is designed for true adventure riding. For that reason there are specific design features you found awful that are actually superb German engineering. The rider left foot peg for example. That is NOT quality issue. That foot peg is designed to be canted that way. The purpose is to assist with shifting when wearing adventure boots and your boots are wet or muddy. It is canted on purpose in the direction of the shifter to help you find it and make it easier to shift when off-road.
Another thing is you don't really use pre-load to compensate for the wrong spring. If you are a heavier rider you really should have the bike sprung for your weight. This bike has almost 8" of travel. Over an inch more than the Tiger. But again I would not use pre-load to adjust the bike for your weight if the quality of suspension ride is important to you.
Lastly, the shift assist isn't mean to help you shift around town at low speeds. It really is meant to help you shift under heavy acceleration and at faster speeds or downshifting from faster speeds. The system is attempting to speed match. There is no reason to use it around town. It works great accelerating on the onramp to the interstate.
Enjoy your new ride...
Agreed ! !
Thank you for the detailed response Barrett. But i'll take some issue with what you have said on that preload. Yes, I get the spring could be sprung for my weight, that is exactly what I have done on my other 1200cc bike. A new rear Wilbers Shock with a custom spring rate and built with a damping range accordingly. That has it riding brilliantly and to my preference. But, this bike has an automatic rear preload, I have zero control of it so there is nothing I can do there. I am also riding solo on a bike designed with a carrying capacity of 216kg. If it rides like that with half of this weight that is not good, it should be able to cope. Other bikes on the same road do not suffer as bad as this bike in terms of high speed and low speed damping. Both my Daytona 1200 (custom rear shock) and my CB1100EX (no damping adjustment at all) provide a more controlled ride.
Quickshifters have come along way, there are so many bikes with super smooth QS's, including on other BMW bikes that shifting up and down through town is a pure joy, the change is barely perceptible to a pillion too. I cannot believe this is something BMW are not feverishly working on in the next incarnation of the bike. Every road tester brings up the QS on this bike, it is measurably poor compared to what is out there on the market. When you live in busy old Europe with our short and bendy roads the QS is a boon. One of the reasons I got rid of my 2016 Africa Twin was the heavy clutch and lack of QS after a week on the West Coast of Ireland where you were constantly changing gear. There is no need to be riding fast or at higher revs to get the most out of a QS.
You misunderstand me on the footpeg. I don't mean canted forward on its mounting axis as in making your boot pointing down, I agree that would be useful. I mean they are not perpendicular to the bike looking from the top and on the left peg only.
I do thank you for you experienced thoughts on this bike Barrett. Take care.
Nice review, thank you. I have a 2015 1200GS I've had since new with over 40,000 miles, quickshifter works great and I love it and use it all the time, any gear, up and down. Just saying!
Many thanks. If it works for you all well and good, that is all that matters. But try a four cylinder BMW and see the HUGE difference.
good info thanks terry......never considered a tiger but will take a look
I think the GT & GT Pro are the sweet spot in that range. Not sure the Explorer versions could compete with the weight distribution of a GSA. The Tigers are a breath of fresh air though, I thought I was on a 900 the first time I tried the 1200 GT Pro.
In many points I agree.
Not with the experience of the suspension.
It might be, that with the lowered bike the suspension sucks. But in a standard height it absolutely perfect, from fast twisties to bad backroads.
I bought a 2022 GSAdventure. Fully, but fully equiped.
I think you missed one very important point.
The Telelevertunnel.
The noise which comes from the front wheel (esp. with the Brigdeston A41) is nervwracking. You just cannot enjoy rides between 40 and 80 km/h.
I change at the first service to Conti, which makes it a little better, but far from good.
The main reason I sold this bike with 4.000 km after 4 months.
I wait for the new model and will give the (at least its called so) Quickshifter and the noises a last try.
Because, line you said, the ergonomics, weight distribution and engine character are top-class.
Thanks for your experience Thomas. I have read a lot about the front tyre noise but it is not too bad on my bike which is equipped with Anakee Adventure Tyres. It does have a weird noise from both tyres (i think) at high speed on the motorway though. The Tiger was terrible from nearly new with the Metzeler Tourance Next tyres, the drone through the front tunnel would drive you too distraction and a headache. Weirdly I fitted A41's and they were much better? Yes, I think the lowered suspension is the culprit, lots of owners of both saying so from their experience.
I thought that was a great video, Terry. It's good to see the GS subjected to such scrutiny. My two cents, having had the full-height suspension 2018 and a reduced-height 2019 is that the full-height is much better on a bumpy road. Unfortunately that means the bike works best for the taller rider. Because of this and the difficulty I found with heaving it around while parking etc, I no-longer have one, preferring the R (which still has its own issues; too harsh in dynamic and too under-damped in Road). Overall, you're dead right in your observations and BMW need to sort out their suspension damping, quick-shift (on the R-series) and put the thing in a wind-tunnel to control wind noise. Apart from that, it's a brilliant bike and I'm looking forward to seeing what they have done with the forthcoming R1300.
Thanks for the feedback re the two different chassis styles Julian. After most of the comments I was wondering if I was a) exaggerating it or b) imagining it? Given the competition from others, KTM, Triumph, Ducati etc I can't believe they will run with this system on the next bike. I will be in line for that test ride. I wonder if the difference between a GS1300 & GS1400 will be conventional forks and a different suspension setup?
I’ve done over 150k miles on numerous gs’s , never had problem with suspension . Maybe I’m not sensitive enough
Expect not.
Being a simpleton rider with very little cash and getting old I bought a 1200 gs The best bike I have ever riden put to one side all the gismos that you so well reviwed It is so well balanced as a bike I feel like I could almost do anything on this bike that a sports bike could do but in comfort I have been riding since 1969 and trust me riden all sorts Triumph are all top heavy so if short in the leg as I am very very unstable
when at a standstill or in slow motion or even on bends for that matter !!! The B.M.W you can ride at a snails pace with both feet off the ground then we come to tourq and ease of servicing also no water on the older bikes I stil have 4 bikes and if I had to keep just one the
B.M.W. would be the one!!!! I honestly wish it were not the case but it is 110% every day of the week.... My Triumph is going to another owner as much as I love the triple soind it is going !!
That low centre of gravity is something to experience at high and low speed as you say Allan, it does make the bike a joy to ride on good roads. That side to side handlebar movement in traffic is a non experience on the GS which is a boon.
I took 2022 1250 GS Advanture for a demo few days last year in Serbia, let me say we have some awful roads. I am 184 tall, an I have never noticed any issues, in road it's wobbly and like sitting on a pillow. I was pushing it in mountain twisties like my Honda CBR in Dynamic, also no issues. I suspect that lover variant has some limitations or your's is just defective and needs inspection.
It is looking like the low chassis version acts quite differently to the standard GS.
That's the best and most comprehensive, honest, objective analysis of a bike on TH-cam, I'm leaning toward the new tiger 1200, ray in Co Cork
Cheers Ray, thanks for saying so. The Tiger is great, just too tall for me.
I am not sure what’s going on with your bike. I believe it’s you! I love the suspension on my 23 GS and I love the quick shifter. I ride the bike off road as well and have only complements about the suspension.
37:41
Everything is pointing to the fact I have the low chassis version.
The non low chassis suspension is much better with the extra travel.
This is becoming a very common answer from a lot of posters, cheers West Coast Fresh.
The quick shifter? Can you use it with power on? Or back off then shift? Looking at the footage he had power on.
This could bd the issue.
As far as the suspension is concerned my GS is absolutely incredible and no issues at all.
Upshifting is best done with power on like most quickshifters.
I’ve just bought the same bike , I agree the suspension isn’t the best around, it’s better than what your saying.
If you put any suspension to a ‘sport’ setting on shit roads they’ll all jolt your fillings out.
No bike is perfect, but for the price of these a few more settings on damping would or should be on the bike.
This is my 12th GS, so I’ve had enough to experience the ESA over the last 15 years. From 2008 until now.
I’ve had five Multistrada’s and their standard nor Skyhook suspension isn’t as good as they say either.
Thanks for noting your long term experiences Peter, appreciated. The trouble with knocking it out of sport on those roads is that you end up bouncing along it the whole way round. I am a heavy person and my weight has to play a role but if this system was truly intelligent it should know that.
Nice review; many thanks. I ride since 1982, then a Honda 750F. No talks about pre loads, suspensions, electronics etc, only decisions were 4in1 or stay with the beautiful 2 Aluminium exhausts.
For the past years I am renting mostly and all over the world. Suspension I never had to fault on the GS nor the GSA. I am 190cm and 100kg. Even with three panniers no issue. Did Hechlingen off road class twice, no issue. Did dirt roads in the Cape, South West parts of Australia and various states in the USA. Alps, no issue, even fully loaded, but always alone. Never use the quick shift, I guess after so many years riding to use the clutch is second nature.
Models were 2016/18/22. Have to try the Tiger and Ducati but feel so comfy on the GS. Safe riding to all.
Cheers for posting your experience Albert. Many others share your thoughts on the suspension. I have this nagging feeling the low chassis version does not work so well as the standard bikes.
Gosh… I just ordered this bike as an upgrade from my F700GS but after seeing this video I think I might cancel and try something else! I guess you’re about to sell yours too by the tone of this video, which was brutally honest but entertaining. Wouldn’t be surprised if you have already moved back to another Triumph! Cheers!
No, Triumph too tall for me! There are positive aspects about the bike but the bank owns a lot of it so I'll have to hang on a lot longer! It is becoming apparent that this is the nature of the low chassis version, the standard chassis is much better according to owners who have had both.
Agree on some points, and strongly disagree on most, but that doesn't matter.
I'll just try to help you out as a fellow rider.
Quickshifter is clunky in 1st and 2nd, silky smooth upshift from there on, downshift is always smooth. The trick is in reading instructions, you must have throttle on for upshift and absolutely MUST fully close down throttle for downshifting. It's a boxer and shaft drive thing, not to go into details now.
As for suspension, you have to keep it in Auto setting (not min pr max, they are for special use only) and you are right you only get 2 settings. BUT, if you plug on the dongle under your seat into the bike, you get buke to memorize what you use for what riding mode between the two, and you can use Dynamic PRO that you can set to have Road damping with Road or rain traction control and lets say dynamic throttle response and it will memorize it for you for good.
Hope you find this tips helpful to enjoy your GS more.
Thanks Jugo. Yes, I keep the preload in auto, my Triumph had a similar system. The GS just gives you a little more flexibility on that for a temporary upper/lower setting. The 2023 bikes do not use the dongle so I have Dynamic Pro as standard and have that set up as an extra rider mode. That defaults to DYNAMIC on the damping bias and as you say I can choose my other parameters. But It is just as easy for me to switch the damping bias and stay on road mode, same amount of button presses at the end of the day. Thanks for the comment, much appreciated.
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff Yes, but with a Dynamic PRO, you get to choose dynamic throttle while keeping ABS, damping and traction control in check. And if you wish to unleash full crazy, just swap to "normal" Dynamic and that actually gives you the maximum you can get without manually disabling TC and ABS. If you stay in road mode, you can only swap damper to dynamic to firm up the ride, but I don't see the point in that if the rest of the ride is "dampened", so to say. On the other hand, going dynamic, but keeping some of the safety or comfort of road mode for certain conditions makes all the sense to me.
Could it be better, probably, but then it's overly complicated for those not crazy happy with the tech stuff. Perhaps they could have given us some option to ask in the dealership to unlock more control for people that know what it means to fiddle and tune their suspension settings (high and low-speed damping, preloads, spring progression and similar). Maybe in some next generation...
Good Day Terence. In your opinion which bike would be better to own in the long run. 2017 triumph xcx 1200 with 14k or a late 2013 1200 GS with 11k on the clock. Both well maintained
This is a tough one. The 2017XCx (Gen 2) does have the WP suspension that was on the later 2018-2022 Tiger models and it is brilliant. There have been a number of Tiger 1200's with gearbox issues in 6th and 2 & 3rd, two separate issues, one a simple selector wearing and the other a gear wheel issue. I never suffered from it but then I only put 40,000km on mine. If you can get a test ride of the XCx treat the gearbox to a decent thrashing to coax any issues out of it. If it is a dealer purchase see what sort of warranty is being offered and specifically ask about what would happen in the event of a gearbox issue. It is not an endemic issue but it is quite well known. The XCx will need a valve service at 20,000 miles I think it is, that will be VERY expensive, budget a lot for it. The XCx is quite top heavy though compared to the BMW, have at least a 31" leg. I don't have direct experience with the 2013 models and I'm sure there are a load of known issues with that model, even the latest models are getting shaft drives swapped out under warranty like nobodies business at the moment. Valve services on the GS are lower labour costs for obvious reasons but a shorter interval so for longer mileages they both come out as dear as each other to maintain if it were to be done via a dealer. I think that GS is due a valve service at 12K miles so budget for that too. Triumph parts do tend to be reasonablly priced, a new rear shock is half the price of a GS shock as an example. If you are happy with the weight distribution and have a decent leg length I would go with the Tiger but only because it offers a brilliant ride and is a good few years newer. Thrash that gearbox first though!
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff Thanks for the advice!!!. The triumph has a little over 9,000 miles on the clock so I have some time before that expensive service comes up. Its from a private owner that babied his bike so i will definitely thrash the gearbox before dropping down money. The GS did have some issues in the first few years of the wet heads. Its been dealer maintained to. I have videos on both and they both sound like they should. The triumph just had oil changes. I believe the GS has had all its recalls addressed as well. Its a hard choice since I never rode a GS but I have rode the triumph twice. Love it. coming from a sport bike background it ticked all the boxes for me. Fun as hell in the twists. The weight doesn't bother me either since Ive ridden everything from a harley to indian, victory, zx 14 hybusas. And ducatis. Its going to be a hard choice. Love your new bike by the way!!!
@@milesdavis8665 Cheers for that 👍. OK, yes, the weight will be fine comparted to where you are coming from! 😆. Good luck!
@@terenceokeeffesmotorcyclestuff indeed. Thank you for the work you put in on the videos
Where did you get the tom-tom extention for sat nav pls
Google 3D AM Tom Tom adapter for GS. Lots of suppliers or you could buy direct. Not let me down yet.
Thank you for this! I'm a 750 GS owner and into upgrading to 1250 next month. I think I should try Triumph then (never tried it).
Good luck whichever way you go. Test ride is your friend on the types of roads you use most.
Agree on damping. 1200 2016 my had 3 modes for road soft medium hard and two for offroad.
I agree with you about the suspension 100% On road mode it is too bouncy and on dynamic it is harsh. If the road is good and a sudden bump comes along, it shatters my teeth. I don't think it is caused by the rider weight as I weigh 11 stones compared to your 18.5
Thanks for the feedback on the weight sharagan, very interesting
Owned latest Triumph Tiger 1200 pro for 2months but it was so rubbish was glad to get rid ….. now a proud owner of a proper bike BMW 1250GS Tophy👍…….. and the dealer was happy to shag the Missus on a Sunday morning so I could go out on breakfast run. Result😊
What did you not like about your Tiger 1200?!
@@richardmagnusson6419 Why so concerned about negative comments about Tiger? ……. you’re s BMW GS owner not Triumph employee
You should hear what your Missus said about yer man. If she starts suggesting you trade in your bike every week you know there's trouble ahead 😆
The missus doesn't need you dunk in the slightest😅🤣😂.
Yea, I had a GS1250 for 2 weeks, it was crap! Traded it and the missus in for a Tiger 1200, now my life is pure bliss! 👍🇬🇧
Coudnt agree more on the suspension! Traded in my 2021 GS for a 2022 Tiger Rally pro.
Thanks for you posting your experience George.
I have the 2022 GSA Standard Suspension and enjoy both the quick shifter and the suspension. This is my first road bike so can't compare it to others. I would be driving a Cadillac rather than a motorcycle and jeep wrangler if I didn't want to feel the road. I do need to ride some alternatives to feel what you mean. I have had jolts with the quick shifter but far more smooth transitions even between the lower gears but again I have not had the opportunity to experience a better quick shifter experience. Definitely a couple things I will keep in mind for my next bike but I still enjoy what I have. Thanks.
Thanks for your experiences Robert. Yes, I think the standard suspension is superior by all accounts from owners who have had both. I think the new 1300 with its ride height lowering may be the key to an improved ride for shorter legged riders such as myself.
Love my Tiger 1200 Alpine SE Terry, delicious suspension and I can push the front end into oblivion with no worries, W.P at it's best, great honest video mate, well done!
Cheers Andrew, WP is brilliant stuff and KTM owned of course. 👍
I test rode a 2020 GS and just didn’t like the bike. I thought the engine sounded a bit agricultural and I thought, as you do, the brakes weren’t brilliant. Also like yourself I found the latest Tigers a little tall, so I ended up getting a 2020 Gen3 Tiger 1200 Alpine with with only 2067 miles on it. I also had the lower seat the lower seat fitted, just to give me a little more confidence handling the weight at standstill. I think Triumph missed a trick not adding a low chassis version to the latest model range. Hope you come to terms with your new bike’s nuances and grow to love it.
I'll have to get used to it! 😃 The Alpine edition is probably the best value Gen 3 Tiger out there, congrats, enjoy.