The problem of discipline in the MET is very deep rooted. The gang badge was a directive from the Commissioner himself and they still choose to ignore it. The question is why do his colleagues and supervisors allow it. This is why the deep set corruption inside the MET will never end. Just like they ignored Couzens and Carrick. And we all know what happened there.
There was another Met 'officer' charged with rape about 2 weeks ago, but it was barely mentioned in the media. Women will never be safe as long as the Met roam the streets.
Clearly ,directives by superiors are only suggestions , like policies regarding ID, BWC, addressing the public with respect. Is anyone really surprised they ignore it all?!😏
So these 2 constables are directly disobeying their boss the Chief Commissioner. So obviously don't give 2 F**is for the public. SACK THEM. I DO NOT WANT TGEM TO WORK FOR ME.😎
Again just goes to show how some officers in the met just have nothing but contempt on the directive mark rowley THEIR BOSS regarding the thin blue line patch and that it shouldn't be worn whilst on duty and in uniform, makes you wonder do they have the same contempt not only to their rules regulation but also to the law of the land and the public
Msm media full-out attempts to portray march as danger a march for armistice , exactly the reason for the march typical cowardly craven msm hoping fotlr violence .which the police will certainly attempt to bring about .
ONLY I DIRECT MY BODY NOT SOME POLICY, SOME FACELESS MAN AND NOT EVEN THE KING HIMSELF HAS ANY RIGHT TO PUT HANDS ON MY;ESPECIALLY WHEN I AM NOT IN CRIME.
It seems that they can search outer clothing but if the member of the public requests an officer of another gender and they don't provide same, ask them to mention it on the stop and search. Generally it looks like most forces say that it is more appropriate to provide a female for female search
Good on you Yardley. I agree with you wholeheartedly. These clowns in uniform are so quick to spout "in this day and age" "with all the heightened threat" when it suits them yet so slow to realise it works both ways. In this day and age, it is 100% inappropriate for two male cops to be searching a female - regardless of what she's alleged to have done. If that was done to my daughter/granddaughter those cops heads would roll. The first thing I'd do is get their body-worn footage and, as you pointed out, see what they DIDN'T do while conducting the search. Did they learn nothing from Wayne Couzens, Adam Provan and the like? And the saddest thing about the whole incident is seeing the next generation of young women watching this type of thing still happening. In this day and age, it's the police who are heightening the threat.
So they leave the station to attend a job, go to job, then head straight back to the station. Why are they in the station rather than being on the streets? Shouldn't it be the other way around? The fact that the "badge" wearers are still doing it, just indicates that the attitude towards ignoring direct orders, will only continue to drag down the integrity of the met. The Sgt. not willing to do anything shows that rank is weak and/or powerless. The tail is wagging the dog.
LEGALS 1. Searching and searching. Empty your pockets vs aggressive pat down. Unsure what this was. 2. Opposite gender searches are allowed in Law and Policy but only if no same sex officer is present or can be there in a “reasonable time” (typically 5-8 minutes). So, only potentially inappropriate if they didn’t bother to even ask for a female officer. Given they appeared understaffed and had to attend from the station, only one issue remains… The same issue as always with the Met, bad management. Q. Why not just send a male and female officer to the call …!! ?? Simple. Basic management. Plus no management of gang badges. Same story.
I think the searching officer is in trouble at the point he asked that lady to remove items of clothing... You think after Wayne Couzens they would have learnt by now.
The MET have a very difficult job to do, and as shown here by these Charing Cross Constables they do not have the time for petty politeness or professionalism, let alone following police policies, procedures and guidelines. Not so long ago, they would NOT have identified themselves and they would have attacked you for recording them. Social media is gradually exposing these tyrants, keep up the good work Yardly
Why didn't you speak to the female as she passed you to see if she felt comfortable with 2 males searching her. Tell her you recorded it and offer advice
An apology for wearing the thin blue line gang badge followed by him removing it would have been an appropriate professional response. With it being Charing Cross it was no surprise that he blanked you in a rude manner.
The 2 cops were called to the job they should have been out on patrol preventing any crime instead of leaving their warm station and free mackies to act after the crime then go back to their warm stations....the cops should be on the streets most of their shift ,it could stop petty crime at least and show support for small businesses and the security of the general public .......
Can an officer search a person of the opposite sex? Yes, it is legitimate for an officer of any sex to stop and search a person of any sex providing the search is in public and is restricted to a superficial examination of outer garments. An officer can also place his or her hand inside the pockets of outer clothing, and feel round the inside of collars, socks and shoes if this is reasonably necessary in the circumstances to look for the object of the search. A person’s hair may also be searched in public (subject to the restrictions on removal of headgear). However, every reasonable effort must be made to minimise embarrassment that a person being searched may experience. Therefore, where practicable an officer of the same sex as the person to be searched should conduct these types of searches, unless an officer of the same sex is not readily available and waiting would unnecessarily delay the length of time taken to conduct the encounter or frustrate the object of the search. Any search involving the removal of more than an outer coat, jacket, gloves, headgear or footwear, or any other item concealing identity, may only be made by an officer of the same sex as the person searched and may not be made in the presence of anyone of the opposite sex unless the person being searched specifically requests it. Where there is doubt as to the sex of a person, the person will be asked what gender they consider themselves to be. They will then be treated by officers as their elected gender. Note: The gender of the searching officer may cause offence to the person being searched as would insensitivity by the searching officer towards persons who have undertaken gender reassignment. Failing to respect the confidentiality of the person being searched may be an offence under the gender Recognition Act 2004.
Male officers searching female suspects, that's how Wayne Cousands started of and got a power trip of dominating women, look how that finished up. R.I.P. Sarah Everard
G'day Yardley Ski, Charing Cross Cupid Stunts. So ignorant they make my blood boil😡. Great video , stay safe my friend, all the best form down under cheers 👍🏼👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Well done Yardley Ski for documenting this really inappropriate search. 2 burly tyrants doing an intimate search of that tiny young lady. This is probably how Wayne Couzens started out!
Wouldn’t be like our police service to have an unsolicited reef around now would it ! Keep exposing the Tripe we all pay for - Big P - Northern Ireland 🥊🥊
inapropriate for sure illegal prbly. so fast after arrival im sure the grounds were just hearsay without collaborating evidence. why these thugs dont investigate before illegally detaining and search people and get away with it most of the time, i just cant understand…
There is no law that prohibits male officers to search women during a stop and search where just the outer clothing e.g. coat, jacket, gloves and shoes, are being removed. It is however good practice for an officer of the same sex to be called to conduct the search and many police forces have a policy saying so. At the very least, a male officer should use the back of his hand when searching a woman as this is less intrusive (this should also be used to search sensitive parts of the body for any gender). If you are being searched by an officer whose gender makes you uncomfortable, ask them to call for someone more appropriate. If you are uncomfortable with where the search is taking place, ask for more privacy. If they fail to provide you with either ask them to mention this on the receipt. Stop and search is not supposed to be a humiliating experience. For more thorough searches, where inner clothing such as a jumper or t-shirt is removed, the police code of practice (Code A of PACE) states; “Any search involving the removal of more than an outer coat, jacket, gloves, headgear or footwear, or any other item concealing identity, may only be made by an officer of the same sex as the person searched and may not be made in the presence of anyone of the opposite sex unless the person being searched specifically requests it.” Removal of any religious items, such as a headscarf, must be treated in the same way.
If the female decides to sue the individual cops for sexual assault she will win. There is no law that prohibits male officers to search women during a stop and search where just the outer clothing e.g. coat, jacket, gloves and shoes, are being removed. It is however good practice for an officer of the same sex to be called to conduct the search and many police forces have a policy saying so. If their search is more than this then they are gone.
Why is the corrupt police officer still allowed to wear this gang member logo. Disgrace on them for wearing a disfigured Union Jack. Law to themselves when they don’t even listen to their superiors. Crooks in uniforms.
A male officer searching a women is restricted to a superficial search of outer garments. They were clever in asking her to remove her jacket which allowed them to "examine" her then outer garments. They can go in pockets around the collar and shoes. They can also search the hair
I guarantee that the search won’t be seen as illegal unless she asked for a female and there was availability. I’m guessing she didn’t have that information But we saw their attitude prior so it’s unsurprising. They switched the lights off I’m guessing because you were filming, judging by the attitude of the organisers. It’s sad we assume the police are the culprits of acting wrongly but there are so many who do act inappropriately that I think it’s a valid question. Be interesting to get the bodycam.
The reason they do stuff like this, and all the other stuff, is because they are the ones who would be expected to pursue charges against them. If you had the option to pass our fail yourself on a driving test, how many people would fail themselves? You only have to look at the American police to see where this leads.....
I do feel the search was inappropriate at the time.. and I agree with you, but they could say a female was not available therefore I'm sure it would be allowed to continue. Also I'm not able to say if they gave her correct information about her legal rights. Only the body cam would give this information.
I love how so called security come up and ask you what you are filming ? once some of these cretins put on their m on ke y suits they think they can tell the public what to do its none of his business why hes filming the police - they need watching as just proven
Yardley @08:24 I am horrified. I would prefer a WPC to search me if it had to happen, I don't want a blokes grubby hands all over me, this is so wrong. When I say a WPC you know that it excludes Lesbian Nana Officer, I just want to make that clear !
My parents told me to respect police men and women that was in sixties seventies. I am sorry I can not pass this on country has gone down the drain someone or the people must put the plug in quick or we will loose everything our parents fought for. Eighty year old I remember you could walk the streets at night and fill safe not any more
Did Carrick and Couzens get their kicks from searching lone females like these two seem to. The Met is simply rotten to the core. It looks for all the world to see, they can do whatever they want to whoever they want, male or female.
Yes, it is legitimate for an officer of any sex to stop and search a person of any sex providing the search is in public and is restricted to a superficial examination of outer garments.
There is no law that prohibits male officers to search women during a stop and search where just the outer clothing e.g. coat, jacket, gloves and shoes, are being removed. It is however good practice for an officer of the same sex to be called to conduct the search and many police forces have a policy saying so.
The paperwork you put in the vid at the end says clothing can be searched. Doesn't say anything about patting down the female which should definitely be conducted by a female officer.
male officers can search a female so long as it is restricted to outer clothing or removalof coatetc,but best practice is for officer of same sex to conduct the search, some forces insist upon it but the met is not one of those forces. if the female stated she did not want the officers to search her then they must have a female officer conduct the search.
An opposite sex search is not illegal, especially where there is a witness to the search Best practice dictates a female officer should be radioed if available. Officers always Activate BWV before commencing a search at arrival at the scene of DV or any domestic disturbance or at the scene of an RTA/ Road incident. Obviously opposite sex officers cannot conduct "intimate" searches in custody ,even with the benefit of Custody CCTV
You know how that crank, cyclingmikey goes around filming people on their phones whist they're behind the wheel and then reports them? We, the viewers should report the officers we see in these videos who behave inappropriately.
Thats some jedi skills walking and filming like that , and it beggars belief that the police can openly disregard directives given by their chief, its like there is zero oversight , they are completely out of control and a law unto themselves.
Im with you on on most of the video EXCEPT for one thing. ... and thats that she might have agreed to the search! Its up to the individuals really. On a separate and more serious topic. Ive noticed that the coppers are more belligerent and uncaring in the same way! Not just your footage, but that of others.
If the constables do not obey their senior officers and Sergeants and just do what they like then there is no hope for the public and we would be better off with a vigilante Force please note Mr rowe That your offices not give a fig What you say
This encounter is beyond disturbing. Two male officers can search a female with impunity and without consequences. I'm not sure how comfortable these morons would if that happened to their wifes, sisters or daughters Please YS if possible pursue this issue and let us know whether all this was legal we know it was immoral
That was sleazy af,. trapping that young girl in the corner for quite a while and then running his hands up and down her legs, sickening...nothing will be done about it, which is why they do whatever they like.
It can't be a very good event if the lights go out half way through and someone gets detained and searched by the police. Why are the police still wearing pith helmets, they were introduced in the 19th century and the army stopped wearing them in 1948. Do male police officers really need to look taller or is it just a silly hat? It was the ego of these police officers that stops them from actually serving the public.
The problem of discipline in the MET is very deep rooted. The gang badge was a directive from the Commissioner himself and they still choose to ignore it. The question is why do his colleagues and supervisors allow it. This is why the deep set corruption inside the MET will never end. Just like they ignored Couzens and Carrick. And we all know what happened there.
The contempt for the public is clear to see…
Only the very evilest enemy of the public thug would be so insubordinate as to continue wearing that disgraceful emblem.
It's not a swastika.
Tantamount to the same. @@stepbackandthink
@@stepbackandthink bootlicking national sympathiser
@@stepbackandthinkit's been hacked by extreme far right.
You know.... Exactly like the swastika was
Very concerning in a 'post-Wayne Couzens' world.
Well documented, Yard. Keep them looking over their shoulders, mate. ✌👊
There was another Met 'officer' charged with rape about 2 weeks ago, but it was barely mentioned in the media. Women will never be safe as long as the Met roam the streets.
Clearly ,directives by superiors are only suggestions , like policies regarding ID, BWC, addressing the public with respect.
Is anyone really surprised they ignore it all?!😏
They could have been abusing her like Wayne Couzens in that dark corner, this needs investigated.
Spellings police 👮♀️!!
Absolute disgrace
Disk race
The copper with the thin blue line badge , is probably one of the hundreds of met police awaiting there gross misconduct hearing.
So these 2 constables are directly disobeying their boss the Chief Commissioner. So obviously don't give 2 F**is for the public. SACK THEM. I DO NOT WANT TGEM TO WORK FOR ME.😎
Again just goes to show how some officers in the met just have nothing but contempt on the directive mark rowley THEIR BOSS regarding the thin blue line patch and that it shouldn't be worn whilst on duty and in uniform, makes you wonder do they have the same contempt not only to their rules regulation but also to the law of the land and the public
Msm media full-out attempts to portray march as danger a march for armistice , exactly the reason for the march typical cowardly craven msm hoping fotlr violence .which the police will certainly attempt to bring about .
ONLY I DIRECT MY BODY NOT SOME POLICY, SOME FACELESS MAN AND NOT EVEN THE KING HIMSELF HAS ANY RIGHT TO PUT HANDS ON MY;ESPECIALLY WHEN I AM NOT IN CRIME.
It seems that they can search outer clothing but if the member of the public requests an officer of another gender and they don't provide same, ask them to mention it on the stop and search. Generally it looks like most forces say that it is more appropriate to provide a female for female search
Good on you Yardley. I agree with you wholeheartedly. These clowns in uniform are so quick to spout "in this day and age" "with all the heightened threat" when it suits them yet so slow to realise it works both ways. In this day and age, it is 100% inappropriate for two male cops to be searching a female - regardless of what she's alleged to have done. If that was done to my daughter/granddaughter those cops heads would roll. The first thing I'd do is get their body-worn footage and, as you pointed out, see what they DIDN'T do while conducting the search. Did they learn nothing from Wayne Couzens, Adam Provan and the like?
And the saddest thing about the whole incident is seeing the next generation of young women watching this type of thing still happening.
In this day and age, it's the police who are heightening the threat.
Great comment 👍 thank you
So they leave the station to attend a job, go to job, then head straight back to the station. Why are they in the station rather than being on the streets? Shouldn't it be the other way around? The fact that the "badge" wearers are still doing it, just indicates that the attitude towards ignoring direct orders, will only continue to drag down the integrity of the met. The Sgt. not willing to do anything shows that rank is weak and/or powerless. The tail is wagging the dog.
They can't catch naughty tweeters and facebookers if they aren't sat in a comfy chair now can they !
Absolutely disgusting she must have felt so uncomfortable but unaware of her rights. In the dark?!!! Predators among us 🤢
Yeah, I'm not even sure she understood what was going on. Cheers for your comment 👍
LEGALS
1. Searching and searching. Empty your pockets vs aggressive pat down. Unsure what this was.
2. Opposite gender searches are allowed in Law and Policy but only if no same sex officer is present or can be there in a “reasonable time” (typically 5-8 minutes).
So, only potentially inappropriate if they didn’t bother to even ask for a female officer. Given they appeared understaffed and had to attend from the station, only one issue remains…
The same issue as always with the Met, bad management.
Q. Why not just send a male and female officer to the call …!! ?? Simple. Basic management. Plus no management of gang badges. Same story.
The way you kept up with them running away filming them. Was quality 👍
Ha ha ha ha.. 😂
Those lights went out deliberately.
Great to see you back from your hols Yardley and on top form.
I was thinking the same..went out at the start of the search then almost lasted the duration..very strange indeed.
No male should search a woman dirty perverts
It just shows how corrupt they really are .
I think the searching officer is in trouble at the point he asked that lady to remove items of clothing...
You think after Wayne Couzens they would have learnt by now.
Pork can't be educated.
They can search outer clothing only
He filmed you to watch when hes in the bath😂
Interesting that they carry torches but only used them to search the handbag. Searching the person in a dark corner???
The MET have a very difficult job to do, and as shown here by these Charing Cross Constables they do not have the time for petty politeness or professionalism, let alone following police policies, procedures and guidelines. Not so long ago, they would NOT have identified themselves and they would have attacked you for recording them. Social media is gradually exposing these tyrants, keep up the good work Yardly
That security guy had the badge on too 😮
Those cops looked completely broken and lacking in self confidence, hence why they clearly couldn't dignify themselves.
Earning the hate
😂them 2 gang members would have trouble building a Lego model let alone bridge's 😂😂😂😂
Why didn't you speak to the female as she passed you to see if she felt comfortable with 2 males searching her. Tell her you recorded it and offer advice
Absolutely brilliant
Cheers 🍻
An apology for wearing the thin blue line gang badge followed by him removing it would have been an appropriate professional response. With it being Charing Cross it was no surprise that he blanked you in a rude manner.
Auditing like a Boss 👊
It seems that Christmas decorations go on display earlier and earlier each year.
The 2 cops were called to the job they should have been out on patrol preventing any crime instead of leaving their warm station and free mackies to act after the crime then go back to their warm stations....the cops should be on the streets most of their shift ,it could stop petty crime at least and show support for small businesses and the security of the general public .......
Yardley owning the rozzers 😂😂…we are onto these tyrants fix up you bully boys
Can an officer search a person of the opposite sex?
Yes, it is legitimate for an officer of any sex to stop and search a person of any sex providing the search is in public and is restricted to a superficial examination of outer garments. An officer can also place his or her hand inside the pockets of outer clothing, and feel round the inside of collars, socks and shoes if this is reasonably necessary in the circumstances to look for the object of the search. A person’s hair may also be searched in public (subject to the restrictions on removal of headgear).
However, every reasonable effort must be made to minimise embarrassment that a person being searched may experience. Therefore, where practicable an officer of the same sex as the person to be searched should conduct these types of searches, unless an officer of the same sex is not readily available and waiting would unnecessarily delay the length of time taken to conduct the encounter or frustrate the object of the search.
Any search involving the removal of more than an outer coat, jacket, gloves, headgear or footwear, or any other item concealing identity, may only be made by an officer of the same sex as the person searched and may not be made in the presence of anyone of the opposite sex unless the person being searched specifically requests it.
Where there is doubt as to the sex of a person, the person will be asked what gender they consider themselves to be. They will then be treated by officers as their elected gender.
Note: The gender of the searching officer may cause offence to the person being searched as would insensitivity by the searching officer towards persons who have undertaken gender reassignment. Failing to respect the confidentiality of the person being searched may be an offence under the gender Recognition Act 2004.
Cheers 🍻
You should have intervened right away 😡🇬🇧
Male officers searching female suspects, that's how Wayne Cousands started of and got a power trip of dominating women, look how that finished up. R.I.P. Sarah Everard
G'day Yardley Ski, Charing Cross Cupid Stunts. So ignorant they make my blood boil😡. Great video , stay safe my friend, all the best form down under cheers 👍🏼👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Thank you for your comment 👍
Well done Yardley Ski for documenting this really inappropriate search. 2 burly tyrants doing an intimate search of that tiny young lady. This is probably how Wayne Couzens started out!
Thank you
Maybe these two now identify as female. Seems this is all the rage now!
Thugs with badges 🤬💯✊🏾
Good stuff mate... proper auditing.
Thank you 👍
I wonder why no senior officer back at the station noticed the blue line badge. And why they didn't direct him to take it off.
Wouldn’t be like our police service to have an unsolicited reef around now would it ! Keep exposing the Tripe we all pay for - Big P - Northern Ireland 🥊🥊
inapropriate for sure illegal prbly. so fast after arrival im sure the grounds were just hearsay without collaborating evidence. why these thugs dont investigate before illegally detaining and search people and get away with it most of the time, i just cant understand…
There is no law that prohibits male officers to search women during a stop and search where just the outer clothing e.g. coat, jacket, gloves and shoes, are being removed. It is however good practice for an officer of the same sex to be called to conduct the search and many police forces have a policy saying so. At the very least, a male officer should use the back of his hand when searching a woman as this is less intrusive (this should also be used to search sensitive parts of the body for any gender).
If you are being searched by an officer whose gender makes you uncomfortable, ask them to call for someone more appropriate. If you are uncomfortable with where the search is taking place, ask for more privacy. If they fail to provide you with either ask them to mention this on the receipt. Stop and search is not supposed to be a humiliating experience.
For more thorough searches, where inner clothing such as a jumper or t-shirt is removed, the police code of practice (Code A of PACE) states;
“Any search involving the removal of more than an outer coat, jacket, gloves, headgear or footwear, or any other item concealing identity, may only be made by an officer of the same sex as the person searched and may not be made in the presence of anyone of the opposite sex unless the person being searched specifically requests it.”
Removal of any religious items, such as a headscarf, must be treated in the same way.
Wow great video, thanks for the insight 🇬🇧😀👍
Cheers 🍻
If the female decides to sue the individual cops for sexual assault she will win.
There is no law that prohibits male officers to search women during a stop and search where just the outer clothing e.g. coat, jacket, gloves and shoes, are being removed. It is however good practice for an officer of the same sex to be called to conduct the search and many police forces have a policy saying so.
If their search is more than this then they are gone.
Why is the corrupt police officer still allowed to wear this gang member logo. Disgrace on them for wearing a disfigured Union Jack. Law to themselves when they don’t even listen to their superiors. Crooks in uniforms.
They dont give a shit about the rules and regulations that have been set out for there behaviour, anyone found breacking the rules should be sacked
A male officer searching a women is restricted to a superficial search of outer garments. They were clever in asking her to remove her jacket which allowed them to "examine" her then outer garments. They can go in pockets around the collar and shoes. They can also search the hair
Cheers 🍻
I guarantee that the search won’t be seen as illegal unless she asked for a female and there was availability. I’m guessing she didn’t have that information But we saw their attitude prior so it’s unsurprising. They switched the lights off I’m guessing because you were filming, judging by the attitude of the organisers. It’s sad we assume the police are the culprits of acting wrongly but there are so many who do act inappropriately that I think it’s a valid question. Be interesting to get the bodycam.
Great comment 👍
" I'm undercover" not any more you're not.
Ha ha ha ha.. He was a strange one
New young officers with a 1970s attitude.
more sex offenders in uniform
DONT GIVE UP THE FIGHT ~ Robert Nesta Marley
You are one of the best auditors
Thank you 🍻
I bet they didn’t tell her that she didn’t need to give her name
Disgraceful F1LTH in uniforms.
Disgraceful t@@t in the comments section.
Well done Yardley
Cheers 🍻
how many others fell victim to pigs like these unlawful search
I’d say the MET needs to be investigated and corrupt cops given a very stiff talking to.
slam dunk law suit victory
Shows they give two fingers up to mark rowley disgrace
The reason they do stuff like this, and all the other stuff, is because they are the ones who would be expected to pursue charges against them. If you had the option to pass our fail yourself on a driving test, how many people would fail themselves? You only have to look at the American police to see where this leads.....
It was more than a coat gloves shoes search it was full body search so yes female should be doing search
I do feel the search was inappropriate at the time.. and I agree with you, but they could say a female was not available therefore I'm sure it would be allowed to continue. Also I'm not able to say if they gave her correct information about her legal rights. Only the body cam would give this information.
this is exactly why police dont have any respects.
That search was absolutely fine you are waffling
Shouldn't they be wearing hi vis? Very inappropriate search.
I love how so called security come up and ask you what you are filming ? once some of these cretins put on their m on ke y suits they think they can tell the public what to do its none of his business why hes filming the police - they need watching as just proven
Yardley @08:24 I am horrified. I would prefer a WPC to search me if it had to happen, I don't want a blokes grubby hands all over me, this is so wrong. When I say a WPC you know that it excludes Lesbian Nana Officer, I just want to make that clear !
My parents told me to respect police men and women that was in sixties seventies. I am sorry I can not pass this on country has gone down the drain someone or the people must put the plug in quick or we will loose everything our parents fought for. Eighty year old I remember you could walk the streets at night and fill safe not any more
2 proper WRONGUNS
17:13 ex thug joins establishment.
Was it the badge wearer that initiated and conducted the search by any chance?
Did Carrick and Couzens get their kicks from searching lone females like these two seem to. The Met is simply rotten to the core. It looks for all the world to see, they can do whatever they want to whoever they want, male or female.
The police service is the most currupted organisation in the uk
Yes, it is legitimate for an officer of any sex to stop and search a person of any sex providing the search is in public and is restricted to a superficial examination of outer garments.
There is no law that prohibits male officers to search women during a stop and search where just the outer clothing e.g. coat, jacket, gloves and shoes, are being removed. It is however good practice for an officer of the same sex to be called to conduct the search and many police forces have a policy saying so.
The paperwork you put in the vid at the end says clothing can be searched. Doesn't say anything about patting down the female which should definitely be conducted by a female officer.
male officers can search a female so long as it is restricted to outer clothing or removalof coatetc,but best practice is for officer of same sex to conduct the search, some forces insist upon it but the met is not one of those forces. if the female stated she did not want the officers to search her then they must have a female officer conduct the search.
incompetent constables
An opposite sex search is not illegal, especially where there is a witness to the search Best practice dictates a female officer should be radioed if available. Officers always Activate BWV before commencing a search at arrival at the scene of DV or any domestic disturbance or at the scene of an RTA/ Road incident. Obviously opposite sex officers cannot conduct "intimate" searches in custody ,even with the benefit of Custody CCTV
You know how that crank, cyclingmikey goes around filming people on their phones whist they're behind the wheel and then reports them? We, the viewers should report the officers we see in these videos who behave inappropriately.
Great comment 👍
Thats some jedi skills walking and filming like that , and it beggars belief that the police can openly disregard directives given by their chief, its like there is zero oversight , they are completely out of control and a law unto themselves.
Ha ha ha ha.. they just wanted to getaway.. or for me to stop. Nope I had my trainers on, I was ready to go
So are they going to be the next Wayne couzens or David Carrick
Im with you on on most of the video EXCEPT for one thing.
... and thats that she might have agreed to the search!
Its up to the individuals really.
On a separate and more serious topic. Ive noticed that the coppers are more belligerent and uncaring in the same way!
Not just your footage, but that of others.
Thay itching to arrest ya can tell. Thay pissed of
If the constables do not obey their senior officers and Sergeants and just do what they like then there is no hope for the public and we would be better off with a vigilante Force please note Mr rowe That your offices not give a fig What you say
Who would want to be a police person in this day an age
Are these two another Couzens and Carrick in the making ??? But they’ve always got that ‘ get out of jail free warrant card ‘.
Certainly would have had a female officer if she wore a burka.
This encounter is beyond disturbing. Two male officers can search a female with impunity and without consequences. I'm not sure how comfortable these morons would if that happened to their wifes, sisters or daughters
Please YS if possible pursue this issue and let us know whether all this was legal we know it was immoral
I shall make a request for information about this search..
Well no point in having WPC in the met then is there. And looks like an assault men on female.
GOTCHA
are sia badges fit for purpose when so many security personel break the laws
What makes a search legal or not has nothing to do with the officers/detainees gender. Only an intimate search must be conducted by the same gender.
Gestpo britain
That was sleazy af,. trapping that young girl in the corner for quite a while and then running his hands up and down her legs, sickening...nothing will be done about it, which is why they do whatever they like.
Great comment 👍
You can't wave a union jack flag this weekend but he can were that the ski man schooled you mugs again the ski man is a boss respect the ski
It can't be a very good event if the lights go out half way through and someone gets detained and searched by the police.
Why are the police still wearing pith helmets, they were introduced in the 19th century and the army stopped wearing them in 1948. Do male police officers really need to look taller or is it just a silly hat?
It was the ego of these police officers that stops them from actually serving the public.
Great comment, 👍 much appreciated
Numpty , he had no reason to specify that you were filming cop's .so what? Springs to mind.