I really enjoyed this talk alot, but though I agree that creative freedom is important, and that also in reality art can't be judged by an objective metric of beauty, because there isn't one, I sti think what should be graded are the skills that are being taught, so for example, value studies, anatomy, perspective, color theory, etc. If there is no criterion then it's basically pointless, here we're not grading the beauty but the we're grading the skill that is the goal to achieve at any given assignment. Which will give the student the power to artistic expression Now I agree that grading is tricky and alot of times is up to subjective judgement but we could work around that by having multiple judges and taking the average as the grade? Would that be practical? That's up to debate and there is plenty of room for improvement there, but what I'm trying to say is that eliminating grading as a whole is not the way to go.
![กี่หมื่นฟ้า | Your Sky Series EP.1 [1/4]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vLGjxFL6U_I/mqdefault.jpg)
I really enjoyed this talk alot,
but though I agree that creative freedom is important, and that also in reality art can't be judged by an objective metric of beauty, because there isn't one, I sti think what should be graded are the skills that are being taught, so for example, value studies, anatomy, perspective, color theory, etc. If there is no criterion then it's basically pointless, here we're not grading the beauty but the we're grading the skill that is the goal to achieve at any given assignment.
Which will give the student the power to artistic expression
Now I agree that grading is tricky and alot of times is up to subjective judgement but we could work around that by having multiple judges and taking the average as the grade? Would that be practical? That's up to debate and there is plenty of room for improvement there, but what I'm trying to say is that eliminating grading as a whole is not the way to go.
Very good!!!!!!!!
Good show Good show