I’ve owned a 9 second street/strip car since 2004. I need to know how to get 40k miles of street driving plus more than 500 passes on the drag strip without having to pull the engine every other season and re ring, new bearings, rebuilding the turbo, replacing head gaskets. I mean, it’s all part of the journey of having a street capable 9 second car but man I’m getting older and I’m about tired of working on it all the time. Basically what I’m saying is if you’ve only lost 1/10 and a few mph and almost never have to do maintenance on it then that’s considered a win. Stop complaining 😂😂
I mean, that is a thing but it depends on what engine and how much power you are making. Getting 40k miles out of an LS that is boosted (as long as its not a moonboosted car) should be more than fine. I don't see why the engine would fail overall.
A better question is, how will this Tesla perform in 20 years? Sure, you've had to do rebuilds and engine replacements over the years, but your 9 second car stayed a 9 second car with you working on it. This guy's talking about 10 grand for a brake upgrade or maybe just buying a new car instead. You gonna be able to rebuild the battery and replace components over and over again, or just have to buy a whole new car because new parts are so expensive it doesn't make sense to keep the same car going?
my Tesla model 3 Performance got faster after while. lol maybe also because the suspension was lower after more miles. Who knows. Just how it is. It shouldnt be that they lose performance. However i can understand using the car as a drag race car puts constant strain on the battery.
As for technical understanding of WHY trap speed is lower on OLD plaid here is the reason: The battery voltage sag more because of battery age. This translate to lower maximum kW = lower trap speed. The internal resistance of the battery is probably a bit higher after it aged. One way to verify that is to use one of the app that allow you to measure max and min battery voltage and record the minimum battery voltage during one pass and compare results with the NEW plad. You will get the answer.
This is the most likely reason. The vehicle keeps track of a variable called “Max Discharge”, which is affected by SOC, health, and temperature of the cells.
@@v4skunk739 Well that totally sucks. I wonder if there is any fine print that says the car derates and drops 100hp after so many miles or launches. A two year old car with only 30k miles is practically brand new in my book. I would want my 100hp back.
Tesla model s plaid uses panasonic NCA(nickel-cobalt-aluminum)18650 cells for it's battery pack which has worst degradation rates in all rechargeable lithium ion battery cells(NCA-NCM-LFP-LMFP),according to tesla and panasonic spec shit,panasonic 18650 NCA loses 12% of it's capacity after 800 cycles,compared with 1500 cycles for amazing LG energy solution's M58T 21700 cells with 290 wh/kg and 811 NCM chemistery for the same 12% capacity loss,or 3000 cycle for CATL condensed LFP cells with 260 wh/kg energy density for the same capacity loss,all of that means brooks tesla model s plaid has 97% of its original battery capacity
@@GF-mf7mlIn theory if the car can even last that long (which I doubt it won’t) if it’s still losing that 1/10th every 3 years you’d lose half a second in the 1/4 which is still 9.7-9.8 seconds…. Which for a 15 years old car is still *VERY* consistent I don’t think any Camry can even crack the 11th with stage 3 tune unless you completely swapped out the engine
@@oxidalpha6350 agreed. Why I liked the idea of comparing his car's performance when new vs now as opposed to comparing with a newer car. if he's loosing as much performance after 37k, you're right - something is wrong
Wherever turns left best, NASCAR! These cars aren't meant to be the best most interesting. They are designed to be predictable and safe family cars. What you've done is realized the clientele. Gas cars should aim to always beat EV. They have better energy density right.
Might be time to actually DYNO it, and see if it still outputs the same horsepower and torque. I feel like there is less torque, and this is 100% software related.
Every Tesla vehicle has a dynamic variable called “Max Discharge”. It’s likely that a worn battery has a slightly higher internal resistance, leading to a reduced peak power which begins to show its effect in the latter half of the drag race.
@@mmw0800 this is such a nonsense you spread here, completely meaningless and not true, this was a thing for ancient phones that would shut down so they could still operate.
@@VuBeClan yup, I tried on OEM wheels and tires and my lighter 20” Signature wheels and tires. 99% all the way down to 87% state of charge. I did back to back pulls. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not that upset about it…it’s still damn fast plus I’ve retired the Plaid to just daily driver status, just finished my F150 build.
@Jimster481 I think a big part of it is how you take care of the batteries. If you're using supercharger alot and keeping fully charged without driving it will degrade them faster. There's a guy that has 50K+ miles on his and he is still running 9.2-9.3 at 150+
@32inchquads and more power lol. It’s just software you silly goose. Just like how you can just pay money for accel boost aka more horsepower you silly little goose.
I love the new Tesla red color! In the end, your driving skill won the day. But it still was close enough that a better driver in either car would win. It says so much that the older Plaid can still run 9.3-9.4 in the 1/4 mile. I wonder how well an exotic car would have held up after 37K miles, and a LOT of drag racing?
Now Lucid is hammering the Plaid run after run. Doing all out runs is also temp regulated. If you live where it is very hot then the car will go with safety over speed. Some factors but Brooks you would know if you have run all these cars. LOVE THE CHANNEL !!!!! You put em to the test.
ICE cars usally gain horsepower as they get more miles, sometimes up to 100k, which is is where they begin to lose power due to blow by. At 37k an ICE engine is just starting to get into it's strongest running. This is all depends on how well it's maintained, of course.
I don't think it's losing 90HP. Probably more like 50Hp up top only. Losing 90HP would be essentially losing almost 9% power. You would be more than a 10th slower and trap would be gapped more if that were the case. A 5% loss is more in line with those numbers.
Realistically if its a battery issue it will show up in the trap speed and not the launch because the car is so traction limited at launch that up until 60mph+ (maybe even up to 100mph) the car is managing traction by reducing duty cycle on the motors. So a plaid with a worn battery might still launch brutally fast, but once traction is no longer a factor, the battery cannot supply the current needed without a voltage drop, so you lose power (watts) because Volts * Amps = Watts. And when the system is demanding upwards of probably 1900amps from the battery there is a big difference if the voltage drops from say 400v to 385v.
@@wjrneo2 use obd,you will see current draw from battery. i consider the modify wheel and tyre not to use factory spec make old car a bit slower at top end. consider every drag on car are very importance to reduce EV car performance at high speed. my English writing is not good sorry.
For context most battery deg happens with in the first couple years of ownership before falling off a lot. So this isn't surprising. Both cars at 100% would reduce the difference by a lot. Also petrol cars are FAR from immune to this kind of performance lose.
Someone like Brooks has enough money to buy a new plaid every couple months and not even thinking about the cost. He'll make more money from this video than what a new plaid cost... Lol
Great content, as always, Brooks. I would say that the old Plaid is still above and beyond quick even with its minimal loss. I wonder how it will perform with 60K miles on it. Too bad those brakes heated up so quickly. About the CCAN Action Fund: I always thought you were more of a Lincoln/Reagan type, not a FDR/JFK type.
Great Video. I just purchased a draggy and I still get 3.1 (w/ roll out) 0-60 with my 2020 M3P with 90K miles with stock wheels and tires. Haven't had enough road yet to do the 1/4 mile. Interesting!
The Tesla Plaid Channel guy has over 1900 time slips on his PLAID and the MPH is still within 1 mph from his best times! granted he has lighter wheels, but not much.
For anyone wondering its down to the battery. The motors are still perfectly capable of producing the 1000hp+ and making the car do 215mph (with speed limiter removed), but the battery will have some degredation. Could also do with Tesla limiting software somehow. Notice this will mainly be seen in the Plaid which is pushing the battery to the limit. But on the Long Range version with 650hp or whatever, you wont notice much, if any, difference after 37K miles
Interesting results. Sounds about right for the current battery technology. Once solid state batteries are refined that should help maintain HP in E cars.
Tesla is also notorious for updating/changing/tweaking things and not mentioning it anywhere on their site or documentation. They have prob made some small changes too, its been three years since it came out.
OK...I AM COMMENTING! Did the giveaway for the Plaid happen yet? The new Tesla colors are amazing. The quicksilver is one of the best silver colors I have ever seen. Batter life and degradation is the main issue. Also, my guess is your Tesla has FAR MORE launches than the average Tesla with 30k+ miles. HA! Keep on posting my friend!
That second race 4:24 you guys launched almost exactly the same! Less than .08 difference and 4mph is not bad at all with 37,000 miles. Still super fast and will still whoop most anything on the streets. Still a low 9 sec car and you've beat on that thing.
I think the difference is a radiator that isn’t performing as a brand new one is. My radiator had a ton of dirt and debris which made my fan loud and work hard which affected the performance. Could be what’s slowing down the times and performance. Might be worth looking into brooks.
@@DragTimesyour car was slower after you installed 20 inch signature wheels maybe you have a better start but loosing top end i have signature in stock 21 inch tires and is a Night and day difference not only in power but suspension less weight i really dont know why people are installing 20 inch wheels 😅
@@ew10j4turbo I think you're right about the wheels, and he probably uses 255s all around. The tires can't utilize 100% of the power. If we had data on wheel slip, we could see exactly what's happening.
@@DragTimes Yes Brooks your front 285 35 20 vs 265 35 21 are 0.4 inch lower but wider and your 305 30 20 vs 295 35 21 has 0.8 of an inch less heigth so you have more traction to start or go fast in to the apex but this is drag. Also tires weigh more than stock size. Look at Plaid racing channel 800 1/4 mile runs on stock 19 tires 9.24 1/4 mile! No power loss after 2 years of drag racing.
Brooks, ETS's TWIN TURBO C8 has gone 8.64 at 170 MPH! Now that car would be a great race against the Plaid that just set a new Plaid tecord at 8.56 at 160! Come on Brooks, if ANYONE can make that happen it would be DRAGTIMES!😊
I was recently in the market for a C8Z06, I wanted a 1LZ Z07 car with the comp seats, aka stripper with all the perf goodies, but due to the shortages my allocation got pushed WAAAAY back. Not surprised considering I negotiated a MSRP price. So I took my DP back and used it to buy the cheapest Plaid in the area, ended up with a 47K mile car, that I later found out had been used as a Turo car. When I finally got a L2 charger installed at home I did a Battery test and discovered the battery was only at 86% health. My range is not great, but I don't use the car for road trips really, I have 2 toy cars for that, one a Focus RS, and the other heavily modified 89 TransAm GTA. Your trap speeds make me feel a bit better, as when I discovered the battery health was at 86% I was kind of frustrated, thinking about the performance I had lost from not buying a new one. I saved ALOT buying used. So far, I've trapped about 144mph on draggy, but only when the battery is above 85%, under that trap speeds seem to drop, at around 70% I think its around 141mph, and when I get near 50% there is a huge difference in acceleration, I'd say like Sport vs Plaid mode feeling. My bet is that as a Turo rental car, this car was frequently supercharged as the only charge method, and probably kept at at or near 100% so it could be delivered to renters with a full SoC. Which negatively impacted the battery health. That said, I did save over $30k on it as a used car.
You can recover some of that back. Done that to two Tesla's and a Taycan and had great results. Run the car to under 15% state of charge. Leave it for a minimum of 12 hours uncharged. Then charge with Level 2 to 100% soc. Now test the battery health. You will be back to 90-93% health.
Think about what would happen to a 1,000+ HP ICE car if you daily drove it and raced it on the weekend. It wouldn’t even make it to 20k mile much less 30k+ miles. Honestly, that isn’t as much degradation as I thought it would be.
The first ICE vehicle was the Veyron to have that kind of power, because of the massive engine and reasonably low state of tune while it may loose a few horses it's nothing compared to this plaid, but yeah cost 10x the price 😂
@@23for82bigs Exactly. I deal with a lot of 4 figure street cars and these guys race (legally and illegally) all the time. Not uncommon to see them go 50k-60k miles on an 1100-1200 hp V8 on E85 before a rebuild. But in the aftermarket you're rolling the dice with who builds it/tunes it/maintains it - and no warranties.
It depends a lot on the charging habits and typical SOC the car has seen. Was it charged to or near 100% quite often? Supercharged to 100% often? Did it sit at 100% SOC for long periods? When it sits for longer periods, is it kept between 30-50% SOC? The power falloff from 100% down to ~65% is a tenth or less on a fresh battery, so there’s no need to charge the car to 100% a lot for daily use. Hell, it’ll still run 9s at a 20% SOC. Keep it between 50-80% max for daily, just charge to 100% right before you go to an event or something where you’re trying to put up your best possible numbers. When you do charge to 100%, try to time it to complete right before you leave so it’s not constantly recharging it from 98% to 100% over the time leading up to your event. Battery care has a slight learning curve to adapt to in order to keep it near full capacity for as long as possible. If these things were all done, then I’d venture to say that the battery is degrading at a slightly more rapid pace than it should, given that it’s not another problem that is. You may want to do a battery health check through the app to get an idea where it’s sitting. Love the videos. Keep it going!
This is really a loaded question. Battery tech and charging are still relatively new at this scale and Im sure improvements will be better over time. How do you charge? We know you run the car harder than the average consumer so does that play a factor? What are your charging habits, etc., etc? All of these unknowns play a part in answering your question. I also wonder if a software update can resolve the issue? Nice color on that Lucid in the background btw.
If you could run the new Plaid against a lower milage older one to see if the mileage and wear and tear may be the reason your car is slower. I think with anything mechanical, over time performance can diminish... I agree there should be a carbon ceramic brake option.
@@Christdeliverme Incredible yes because the bar starts out so high but it is concerning. 150mph+ trap speed is a very prestigious place and others here have said best they can do is 141mph. That knocks it down like an entire class of car at that point. You go from more 720S traps to Porsche Turbo S traps. I wouldn't be complaining with either but at 100k miles what does the trap speed look like?
@drewmorg. Not 141 mph. Haven't seen anybody say they can only trap that low. More like 145-146. So still whopping the majority of the super cars out there. Mclaren 720 would still get beat. Now a 765 LT might be a problem. Id still give the edge to Plaid more often than not because of AWD and instant power
In my opinion, the way the car is operated also affects the decrease in car performance. If you accelerate it so often using full power, the car wears out faster than operated calmly. Especially the battery
Dragtimes Great Video I think it's awesome that you showed how Tesla Model S Plaids lose horsepower over time and I think it's crazy and Happy 4th of July to you your family and all of your Subscribers
Bms of battery contros everything. The internal resistance of the cell may increase with time, more heat and BMS reduces the output. LPF battery is the future for longevity. NMC is for performance.
You should do a test where both Plaids have about 40k on them, but one that has been babied rarely do they on the accelerater and one that gets dogged out. I have a feeling there will be a difference in the two.
just connect obd scan tool to see the current draw from battery during drag. if current draw not differ from new one. the thing to reduce car performance at high speed might come from using oem part differ from original equip that include wheel and tyre and aeropart that might affect more drag force on car at hight speed. also check the cooling system is a big issue for ev car if current draw a bit lower than normal.
I apologize if already mentioned. What about the difference in wheel weights? I believe you’re running light signature wheels which may/should affect the moment of inertia and therefore overall race outcome. Maybe switch wheels and re-race?
One thing Tesla is known for is immediately implementing design improvements into the production line instead of waiting for model year changes or the traditional design cycle refreshes. Do we know that this new plaid is the same car inside? Did Telsa improve the inverters, motors, BMS etc. is this really comparing apples to apples? They could have easily changed something internally that improves the power delivery curve, even without changing the HP rating.
I would enjoy seeing what it does up here in Colorado. My refresh 22 MS (non plaid) ran a 10.61 so it would be interesting to see with the altitude and air density what the plaid would run.
Air density has a significantly reduced affect on an EV as it only affects the drag on the car and not the power produced by the motor system. on an ICE car less dense air means less oxygen in the engine, and if the car is NA that means reduced overall output. Even with a forced induction car it reduces power, though with less loss than compared to a NA car.
Great vid!! +1 for everyone who's commenting about battery degradation/age (especially if you Supercharge often). One other weird consideration: I really appreciate the way both cars started with equal SoC, but were they running the same Software version?? Just to ensure it's as apples-to-apples as possible!! Thanks!
Nice video Brooks , my 2021 S Plaid OG pre new headlight taillights like yours and it only has 16,000 miles but I have never ONCE used launch control nor taken to the track so no idea what loss at this point but that is slightly disappointing. Hope Tesla updates the plaid soon like you mentioned , Plaid + w more power and carbon ceramics etc , I’m down for an upgrade too at that point if it’s a sapphire killer 🙏🏼👌🏼💪🏼
Ice will likely gain after 37k miles: cause owner can’t resist modifying it by then. Still should look at all the old time slips and the degradation in trap speed will be linear I bet. One thing unrelated for Brooks: after owning a plaid for 30k+ miles, is it still worth it or just a 1/4 mi trick compared to albeit [slightly] slower (!) Hurrican/sf90/gt3/720?
A little bit trap speed is lost due to wheel & tire size/diameter. I’d say it’s 3.5 mph lost due to degradation at most. Rest is due to different wheel/tire setup
@@JohnSmith-pn2vlBrand new engine clearances are usually really tight. That's why you break them in and change the oil more frequently in the first 500 miles. As the engine spins easier the performance increases.
Power density drops off twice as fast as energy density. A drag race is about power density. Still, this beats ICE vehicles, especially over 500k where the ICE will have less than half its original power and the Plaid would probably have 85% of the original power and 95% of original range. For non-plaid, it would still have 100% of the original power since its power requirements are less than 85% of the plaid.
The new red is a huge improvement. Why didn't you ever upgrade to track package with the carbon brakes? Edit* I posted before the end of the video. I get not spending $10k at this point, but you could have bought that package 12-18 months ago when if first became available and make up a chunk of the purchase price back when you go to sell.
This is most likely dues to a bit of battery degradation and also motors wear. But very little difference in general, maybe comparing a 100K miles vs a 1K miles would be a better test to see what real degradation we have got. It would be good to also run a battery test on both vehicles to compare those numbers.
Look at @teslaplaidchannel he’s like the only plaid owner consistently hit 9.2s on a 2021 or 2022 plaid s & he also does a lot of testing with what tires slow you down the most and the results are actually pretty interesting.
You mentioned the state of charge for both cars at the beginning as being 97%. What was the state of charge for both after your runs were completed? Did they deplete at the same rate?
Lots of variables: tires, battery degradation, motor wear, true SOC. Hard to pin down any one cause. Or it could just be regular variation between builds.
@@DragTimes I chatted with Andrew, and his car has not lost any noticeable amount of power. He gutted his car but he's also faster than he was when he first got it. It also has nothing to do with mileage and more to do with charging cycles. How long do you keep it at 100% and how often do you charge it to 100% has way more impact on the lifespan of the battery than the mileage. If you only top it off to 85% on a day-to-day basis and occasionally go to 100% for the track or long distance use, you can stretch the output of the batteries for much longer. Also note that the Plaid is not using 100% of the battery output to begin with, there's a little bit on tap as far as potential current draw compared to the maximum discharge C rating of the cells. This in essence allows for moderate degradation with no impact as the battery controller has some room to compensate. My guess is that your car has seen many more 100% charges and has stayed at 100% for more overnight cycles than Andrew's car.
@@XennialGuy thank God you chimed in! He dropped some weight out of it to just be quicker that's all and that was like 2 years ago. I've seen his car still run an occasional 9.teens in the quarter. Maybe it's just Brooks car??
@@DragTimes the point is since he took weight out like probably 2 years ago....he has made 100's of runs and his car has not slowed down from that day till currently. He is even still running the original factory tires 90% of the time!
My 13 year old niece concluded that your video assumes your 2022 had identical performance to the 2024, when your 2022 was new... which it almost certainly didn't. This video simply demonstrates that the other guy's Tesla is faster than your Tesla and not that yours slowed down (stated amount) because it has 37k miles. The 2022 has likey lost some battery/motor performance but the exact loss will never be quantified.
@@DragTimes She says that's pretty conclusive but only based on your own stated numbers, not the times that a different Tesla is running. She also noted that had you posted your Dragy screenshots at the beginning of the video, or provided a video link for your new viewers, to those previous runs, that would have been enough.
In Australia we have hundreds of them sitting on the docks. No one is buying Teslas anymore. Too the point where the prices are dropping by ten of thousands of dollars.
I see what you sayin about the more miles the more power you lose but keep in mind, if you preconditioned the battery (as if you are going to a super charger) the batteries warm up and give you max performance. Please keep that in mind when you racing with the plaid plaid plaid plaid 😝😝😝
Battery degradation is just a fact of life with all EV's. It's totally fair if you know what you're getting into and Tesla's own warranty even mentions degradation happens. The power is simply limited by the batteries ability over time. Within the first year you lose 5-10% then it tapers off after that. Losing a tenth and a bit on the top end after high mileage isn't the greatest but it's still a drivers race and it's still beating almost everything and anything costing several times as much money. The value proposition is still extremely hard to beat. You wanna maintain your power, lighten the car a bit. Swap out the seats with lighter ones, put lighter rotors on it, CF trunk/frunk. All that said, next gen solid state and sodium batteries are going to really take things up a notch and degradation will be even less prominent. Right now we're just stuck with mid-life battery technology before things like this become less of an issue. I do hope Tesla upgrades and refreshes the S soon though... it's really getting long in the tooth and could use some further improvements.
I’ve owned a 9 second street/strip car since 2004. I need to know how to get 40k miles of street driving plus more than 500 passes on the drag strip without having to pull the engine every other season and re ring, new bearings, rebuilding the turbo, replacing head gaskets. I mean, it’s all part of the journey of having a street capable 9 second car but man I’m getting older and I’m about tired of working on it all the time. Basically what I’m saying is if you’ve only lost 1/10 and a few mph and almost never have to do maintenance on it then that’s considered a win. Stop complaining 😂😂
I mean, that is a thing but it depends on what engine and how much power you are making. Getting 40k miles out of an LS that is boosted (as long as its not a moonboosted car) should be more than fine. I don't see why the engine would fail overall.
A better question is, how will this Tesla perform in 20 years? Sure, you've had to do rebuilds and engine replacements over the years, but your 9 second car stayed a 9 second car with you working on it. This guy's talking about 10 grand for a brake upgrade or maybe just buying a new car instead. You gonna be able to rebuild the battery and replace components over and over again, or just have to buy a whole new car because new parts are so expensive it doesn't make sense to keep the same car going?
Well if you’re old you won’t have to worry about getting sterilized in that microwave oven.
battery level also plays a big role
Standard fair for ice boxes…9 second ice cars need to be transported and they also fall apart
4:58 Brooks checking that side view mirror for that Blondie he just passed 😂
priorities.
Hispeed
holy shit he did check her out xD
I noticed this a while back. Seems like all the Plaid videos (not just Brooks) went from trapping 150-152mph, to trapping 146-150mph.
Yeah best i can do with mine is trap 146 and low 5.0-5.1 is best i can do 60-130. 45K miles on it
That's why Teslas are way overrated. Subpar quality.
Facts some use to max out 155 in the 1/4
@@HUMC5 that's how degradation works buddy, happens to engines too, especially considering Plaid drivers drive those things like race cars
my Tesla model 3 Performance got faster after while. lol
maybe also because the suspension was lower after more miles. Who knows.
Just how it is. It shouldnt be that they lose performance. However i can understand using the car as a drag race car puts constant strain on the battery.
As for technical understanding of WHY trap speed is lower on OLD plaid here is the reason: The battery voltage sag more because of battery age. This translate to lower maximum kW = lower trap speed. The internal resistance of the battery is probably a bit higher after it aged. One way to verify that is to use one of the app that allow you to measure max and min battery voltage and record the minimum battery voltage during one pass and compare results with the NEW plad. You will get the answer.
The main reason is Tesla limits the cars power after so many launches.
This is the most likely reason. The vehicle keeps track of a variable called “Max Discharge”, which is affected by SOC, health, and temperature of the cells.
No, it doesnt, stop spreading bs.@v4skunk739
@@v4skunk739 Well that totally sucks. I wonder if there is any fine print that says the car derates and drops 100hp after so many miles or launches. A two year old car with only 30k miles is practically brand new in my book. I would want my 100hp back.
@@vinny9152 Is there an app that exposes these parameters in the logs that as a consumer we can see them?
Even with power going down with mileage the launch is so brutal the difference in ET is negligible not even a 10th of second.
A tenth is a lot in drag racing
Tesla model s plaid uses panasonic NCA(nickel-cobalt-aluminum)18650 cells for it's battery pack which has worst degradation rates in all rechargeable lithium ion battery cells(NCA-NCM-LFP-LMFP),according to tesla and panasonic spec shit,panasonic 18650 NCA loses 12% of it's capacity after 800 cycles,compared with 1500 cycles for amazing LG energy solution's M58T 21700 cells with 290 wh/kg and 811 NCM chemistery for the same 12% capacity loss,or 3000 cycle for CATL condensed LFP cells with 260 wh/kg energy density for the same capacity loss,all of that means brooks tesla model s plaid has 97% of its original battery capacity
ofc , all horsepower is useless down there
So when it's 15 years old, It'll slower than Toyota Camry.
@@GF-mf7mlIn theory if the car can even last that long (which I doubt it won’t) if it’s still losing that 1/10th every 3 years you’d lose half a second in the 1/4 which is still 9.7-9.8 seconds….
Which for a 15 years old car is still *VERY* consistent
I don’t think any Camry can even crack the 11th with stage 3 tune unless you completely swapped out the engine
You can also see your first months best Quarter mile time vs your earliest best quarter mile time to do a comparison
Compare apples to apples. Tesla is always changing parts, so it's just as likely the newer one is faster vs the older loosing as much HP
@@looknewmanits normal for new cars to have new tech yeah but if the same car loses performance after 37k miles than sonething is wrong
@@oxidalpha6350 agreed. Why I liked the idea of comparing his car's performance when new vs now as opposed to comparing with a newer car. if he's loosing as much performance after 37k, you're right - something is wrong
"who ever pushes down on the accelerator first wins" ahh race
Wherever turns left best, NASCAR!
These cars aren't meant to be the best most interesting. They are designed to be predictable and safe family cars. What you've done is realized the clientele.
Gas cars should aim to always beat EV. They have better energy density right.
you can see thenew one pulling away though
A tenth? Not bad. Any car run decently hard for 40k miles and a few years will lose a bit.
Brooks was more concerned with the reduced trap speeds. His roll racing game is getting hammered. 😂😂
@@ChosenMJ Pretty dramatic there. A tenth and a few MPH over a quarter mile? No, his roll racing game is not getting hammered.
Not gas cars
@@kevinle5810 lol, sure about that?
@@koreyb99 yes, positive, not after 40k miles, my car actually faster after 50k miles
Might be time to actually DYNO it, and see if it still outputs the same horsepower and torque. I feel like there is less torque, and this is 100% software related.
Or something similar as was with iPhone. Degrading battery, limiting performance for longevity.
Could be. I'm leaning more to the side of battery or even motor degradation. No piece of equipment is immune to degradation or fatigue over time.
Every Tesla vehicle has a dynamic variable called “Max Discharge”. It’s likely that a worn battery has a slightly higher internal resistance, leading to a reduced peak power which begins to show its effect in the latter half of the drag race.
Batteries do increase resistance over time ..
@@mmw0800 this is such a nonsense you spread here, completely meaningless and not true, this was a thing for ancient phones that would shut down so they could still operate.
Same boat as you. My 22 MSPlaid has 46k miles and 60-130 is now best of 5.10. Won’t touch anywhere in 4 seconds.
no way, really??? this is so strange.
@@VuBeClan yup, I tried on OEM wheels and tires and my lighter 20” Signature wheels and tires. 99% all the way down to 87% state of charge. I did back to back pulls.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not that upset about it…it’s still damn fast plus I’ve retired the Plaid to just daily driver status, just finished my F150 build.
Yeah mine has close to 46K miles as well and 9.4 at 146 is best i can do. 60-130 5.0-5.1
Yeah, it's clear that the cars are degrading and honestly it's a pretty big degradation for such a small amount of mileage.
@Jimster481 I think a big part of it is how you take care of the batteries. If you're using supercharger alot and keeping fully charged without driving it will degrade them faster. There's a guy that has 50K+ miles on his and he is still running 9.2-9.3 at 150+
To be fair, your 97% SOC is not the same as his 97% SOC when you account for degradation.
and one is a facelift and one is not.
Well that is exactly what he is demonstrating.
@32inchquads and more power lol. It’s just software you silly goose. Just like how you can just pay money for accel boost aka more horsepower you silly little goose.
@32inchquads someone didn’t doo their research 🙊
@32inchquads Dyno runs. Up from ~1,095 to 1,115 hp
I think so too : PLAID PLUS
I can’t wait
3:56 two red plaids launching side to side looks like one car is racing next to a giant mirror 😂
I love the new Tesla red color! In the end, your driving skill won the day. But it still was close enough that a better driver in either car would win. It says so much that the older Plaid can still run 9.3-9.4 in the 1/4 mile. I wonder how well an exotic car would have held up after 37K miles, and a LOT of drag racing?
I'd think the Tesla will have lost more power. Both because it's an ev, and because of the typically bad engineering by Tesla.
if you maintain the gas car, 37k miles is nothing and you can tune it but not much you can do with a Tesla.
My Plaid has 26K. I'd be in for the Plaid + if they come out with it.
Me too!!
Same
🌈🌈🌈🌈
Same
I believe they are that’s why I put off ordering right now. The Plaid+ in 2020 was running 8.9 second 1/4’s at 160mph+.
We need a Plaid Plus 😂
Now Lucid is hammering the Plaid run after run. Doing all out runs is also temp regulated. If you live where it is very hot then the car will go with safety over speed. Some factors but Brooks you would know if you have run all these cars. LOVE THE CHANNEL !!!!! You put em to the test.
ICE cars usally gain horsepower as they get more miles, sometimes up to 100k, which is is where they begin to lose power due to blow by. At 37k an ICE engine is just starting to get into it's strongest running. This is all depends on how well it's maintained, of course.
And 99 percent still isn't even close to running in the 9s
I don't think it's losing 90HP. Probably more like 50Hp up top only. Losing 90HP would be essentially losing almost 9% power. You would be more than a 10th slower and trap would be gapped more if that were the case. A 5% loss is more in line with those numbers.
Realistically if its a battery issue it will show up in the trap speed and not the launch because the car is so traction limited at launch that up until 60mph+ (maybe even up to 100mph) the car is managing traction by reducing duty cycle on the motors.
So a plaid with a worn battery might still launch brutally fast, but once traction is no longer a factor, the battery cannot supply the current needed without a voltage drop, so you lose power (watts) because Volts * Amps = Watts. And when the system is demanding upwards of probably 1900amps from the battery there is a big difference if the voltage drops from say 400v to 385v.
@@wjrneo2 use obd,you will see current draw from battery. i consider the modify wheel and tyre not to use factory spec make old car a bit slower at top end. consider every drag on car are very importance to reduce EV car performance at high speed. my English writing is not good sorry.
For context most battery deg happens with in the first couple years of ownership before falling off a lot. So this isn't surprising. Both cars at 100% would reduce the difference by a lot.
Also petrol cars are FAR from immune to this kind of performance lose.
Someone like Brooks has enough money to buy a new plaid every couple months and not even thinking about the cost. He'll make more money from this video than what a new plaid cost... Lol
Great content, as always, Brooks. I would say that the old Plaid is still above and beyond quick even with its minimal loss. I wonder how it will perform with 60K miles on it. Too bad those brakes heated up so quickly.
About the CCAN Action Fund: I always thought you were more of a Lincoln/Reagan type, not a FDR/JFK type.
Well Brooks back in the old days we would pull the motor and re-brush it and put new brushes on the front of the guide the kept the car in the slot 😛
cant do that anymore with brushless motors
Jeez you do have a keen eye for the obvious😉
Great Video. I just purchased a draggy and I still get 3.1 (w/ roll out) 0-60 with my 2020 M3P with 90K miles with stock wheels and tires. Haven't had enough road yet to do the 1/4 mile. Interesting!
That's because of how launch control works. You won't be using full power until some point after 60mph... to avoid slipping.
@@wtfskilz why does the acceleration boost LR pull the same after 60mph? I'm not including top speed runs since they aren't identical
The Tesla Plaid Channel guy has over 1900 time slips on his PLAID and the MPH is still within 1 mph from his best times! granted he has lighter wheels, but not much.
And he gutted his car....
I have a 2018 bolt i can take you on bro
Yeah those things are wicked fast bruh. 😂😂
I have a 2018 Leaf, I'm sure I beat you both!
@@jeanlafrance8746 my pops has a 2014 leaf with 60 miles left on the battery - pinks or nothing
I mean, if you drive it on the highway for long enough, you will definitely catch up.
My microwave will beat anything on the road.
For anyone wondering its down to the battery. The motors are still perfectly capable of producing the 1000hp+ and making the car do 215mph (with speed limiter removed), but the battery will have some degredation. Could also do with Tesla limiting software somehow.
Notice this will mainly be seen in the Plaid which is pushing the battery to the limit. But on the Long Range version with 650hp or whatever, you wont notice much, if any, difference after 37K miles
Interesting results. Sounds about right for the current battery technology. Once solid state batteries are refined that should help maintain HP in E cars.
Yep, mass produced gas cars have about 100 years on mass produced EV cars. Graphene may be the answer.
Regardless, the model S design looks the best out of all the family cars and most practical with the liftback.
My Model 3 has a 60-130 time of around 12 - 14 seconds, so even with the degradation that Plaid is still on another level lol.
FWIW - the 2024 Model 3 performance can do 60-130 in 8.62 secs
@@G82Watts looks better than you do I am sure.;)
Since they had different tires and rims, I am not sure we should look too much into the figures or?
Tesla is also notorious for updating/changing/tweaking things and not mentioning it anywhere on their site or documentation. They have prob made some small changes too, its been three years since it came out.
OK...I AM COMMENTING! Did the giveaway for the Plaid happen yet? The new Tesla colors are amazing. The quicksilver is one of the best silver colors I have ever seen. Batter life and degradation is the main issue. Also, my guess is your Tesla has FAR MORE launches than the average Tesla with 30k+ miles. HA! Keep on posting my friend!
Different trend, Different weights of both driver's Different reaction, and different tires it going to make a difference.
That second race 4:24 you guys launched almost exactly the same! Less than .08 difference and 4mph is not bad at all with 37,000 miles. Still super fast and will still whoop most anything on the streets. Still a low 9 sec car and you've beat on that thing.
4 MPH is a big deal
I think the difference is a radiator that isn’t performing as a brand new one is. My radiator had a ton of dirt and debris which made my fan loud and work hard which affected the performance. Could be what’s slowing down the times and performance. Might be worth looking into brooks.
You should compare with your old time slips instead because different cars can vary
I included the link to my original runs, 9.2 @ 152 MPH
@@DragTimesyour car was slower after you installed 20 inch signature wheels maybe you have a better start but loosing top end i have signature in stock 21 inch tires and is a Night and day difference not only in power but suspension less weight i really dont know why people are installing 20 inch wheels 😅
@@ew10j4turbo I think you're right about the wheels, and he probably uses 255s all around. The tires can't utilize 100% of the power. If we had data on wheel slip, we could see exactly what's happening.
No, my wheels and tires are the same spec as the Tesla track pack wheels and tires
@@DragTimes Yes Brooks your front 285 35 20 vs 265 35 21 are 0.4 inch lower but wider and your 305 30 20 vs 295 35 21 has 0.8 of an inch less heigth so you have more traction to start or go fast in to the apex but this is drag. Also tires weigh more than stock size. Look at Plaid racing channel 800 1/4 mile runs on stock 19 tires 9.24 1/4 mile! No power loss after 2 years of drag racing.
Brooks, ETS's TWIN TURBO C8 has gone 8.64 at 170 MPH! Now that car would be a great race against the Plaid that just set a new Plaid tecord at 8.56 at 160! Come on Brooks, if ANYONE can make that happen it would be DRAGTIMES!😊
Great video Brooks! I agree, Tesla needs a Track Pack option from the factory.
It might be because if racing it so many times, It would be interesting to see you race against a Plaid with similar milage that wasn't raced so much
I was recently in the market for a C8Z06, I wanted a 1LZ Z07 car with the comp seats, aka stripper with all the perf goodies, but due to the shortages my allocation got pushed WAAAAY back. Not surprised considering I negotiated a MSRP price.
So I took my DP back and used it to buy the cheapest Plaid in the area, ended up with a 47K mile car, that I later found out had been used as a Turo car. When I finally got a L2 charger installed at home I did a Battery test and discovered the battery was only at 86% health. My range is not great, but I don't use the car for road trips really, I have 2 toy cars for that, one a Focus RS, and the other heavily modified 89 TransAm GTA.
Your trap speeds make me feel a bit better, as when I discovered the battery health was at 86% I was kind of frustrated, thinking about the performance I had lost from not buying a new one. I saved ALOT buying used. So far, I've trapped about 144mph on draggy, but only when the battery is above 85%, under that trap speeds seem to drop, at around 70% I think its around 141mph, and when I get near 50% there is a huge difference in acceleration, I'd say like Sport vs Plaid mode feeling.
My bet is that as a Turo rental car, this car was frequently supercharged as the only charge method, and probably kept at at or near 100% so it could be delivered to renters with a full SoC. Which negatively impacted the battery health.
That said, I did save over $30k on it as a used car.
Yep, it’s proven not to be the supercharging but leaving it constantly above 90% SOC takes its toll.
@@aussie2uGA That and never charging at home. Charging at home once a week is recommended otherwise it can be detrimental to your battery.
You can recover some of that back. Done that to two Tesla's and a Taycan and had great results.
Run the car to under 15% state of charge. Leave it for a minimum of 12 hours uncharged. Then charge with Level 2 to 100% soc. Now test the battery health. You will be back to 90-93% health.
reliability wins, both are great!
Hey guys please arrange a New electric 1,100HP Porsche Taycan Turbo GT vs Tesla Model S Plaid
Think about what would happen to a 1,000+ HP ICE car if you daily drove it and raced it on the weekend. It wouldn’t even make it to 20k mile much less 30k+ miles. Honestly, that isn’t as much degradation as I thought it would be.
The first ICE vehicle was the Veyron to have that kind of power, because of the massive engine and reasonably low state of tune while it may loose a few horses it's nothing compared to this plaid, but yeah cost 10x the price 😂
@@johnjackson2349 They first production ICE car yes. But there have been modded 1,000 streetcars for a long time now.
Not nearly as reliable most are garage queens @@23for82bigs
@@23for82bigs Exactly. I deal with a lot of 4 figure street cars and these guys race (legally and illegally) all the time. Not uncommon to see them go 50k-60k miles on an 1100-1200 hp V8 on E85 before a rebuild. But in the aftermarket you're rolling the dice with who builds it/tunes it/maintains it - and no warranties.
I put over 15K miles on my supercharged 2018 Huracan Performante car was making 850hp+. ZERO ISSUES still pulled the same as day of install.
Another knock against EV's.
ICE vehicles also lose power as they age.
I got almost 19k miles on my M3P and it does BETTER 0-60 and 1/4 mile as it did brand new.
It depends a lot on the charging habits and typical SOC the car has seen. Was it charged to or near 100% quite often? Supercharged to 100% often? Did it sit at 100% SOC for long periods? When it sits for longer periods, is it kept between 30-50% SOC?
The power falloff from 100% down to ~65% is a tenth or less on a fresh battery, so there’s no need to charge the car to 100% a lot for daily use. Hell, it’ll still run 9s at a 20% SOC. Keep it between 50-80% max for daily, just charge to 100% right before you go to an event or something where you’re trying to put up your best possible numbers. When you do charge to 100%, try to time it to complete right before you leave so it’s not constantly recharging it from 98% to 100% over the time leading up to your event. Battery care has a slight learning curve to adapt to in order to keep it near full capacity for as long as possible. If these things were all done, then I’d venture to say that the battery is degrading at a slightly more rapid pace than it should, given that it’s not another problem that is. You may want to do a battery health check through the app to get an idea where it’s sitting. Love the videos. Keep it going!
What I've learned is that EV fans are not very intelligent.
This is really a loaded question. Battery tech and charging are still relatively new at this scale and Im sure improvements will be better over time. How do you charge? We know you run the car harder than the average consumer so does that play a factor? What are your charging habits, etc., etc? All of these unknowns play a part in answering your question. I also wonder if a software update can resolve the issue? Nice color on that Lucid in the background btw.
Thanks for showing this comparison!
9.3 and 9.4 is still so fast. Sweet
Brooks, for a apples to apples comparison. You need to have the same wheels\tires, same weight. The new Plaid might have a new motor revision.
It doesn't, my car trapped 152 when I first got it....
@@DragTimes gotta see more Plaids that trap 40k miles to compare. 1 car doesn't say much
If you could run the new Plaid against a lower milage older one to see if the mileage and wear and tear may be the reason your car is slower. I think with anything mechanical, over time performance can diminish... I agree there should be a carbon ceramic brake option.
My son said, are they racing?
I said YES why?
I don't hear anything.
100%! Mine ran 9.30@151 when new and after 30,000 miles best it’ll run is 9.50@146
That's still incredible
@@Christdeliverme Incredible yes because the bar starts out so high but it is concerning. 150mph+ trap speed is a very prestigious place and others here have said best they can do is 141mph. That knocks it down like an entire class of car at that point. You go from more 720S traps to Porsche Turbo S traps. I wouldn't be complaining with either but at 100k miles what does the trap speed look like?
@@Christdeliverme ya but still sucks to continue to lose performance with them
@drewmorg. Not 141 mph. Haven't seen anybody say they can only trap that low. More like 145-146. So still whopping the majority of the super cars out there. Mclaren 720 would still get beat. Now a 765 LT might be a problem. Id still give the edge to Plaid more often than not because of AWD and instant power
@@tornatic1983 Someone in comments said it ! Doesn't make it true but it's a data point
In my opinion, the way the car is operated also affects the decrease in car performance. If you accelerate it so often using full power, the car wears out faster than operated calmly. Especially the battery
Dragtimes Great Video I think it's awesome that you showed how Tesla Model S Plaids lose horsepower over time and I think it's crazy and Happy 4th of July to you your family and all of your Subscribers
no he didnt, you need to compare both cars with same wheels and tires and state of charge, this means nothing, a dyno would be useful
Interesting the new plaid beats the 37k miles plaid with lighter wheels (based on all 3 times). I thought the difference would be less than that
Never thought I would be so bored watching such a fast race. 🚗 🔋 🔌 🥱
For the money spent on the 21 plaid, Tesla should have given you the new brakes.
37k hard miles.. but great durability test
Exactly 1020hp ice car with almost 40k hard miles would be in a million pieces by now.
@@Json918 Many people don't keep this in mind. Something would've broken by now on an ICE car. Not just a brake warning light.
@@myxalplyx quiet you don't want to upset the dinosaurs with facts.
@@Timritchieblue12 LOL how many drag passes? It’s commuting miles by a vast majority. It’s inexcusable.
Still a great deal to pick up a used Plaid for high $40s to low $50s and run 9s all day.
Bms of battery contros everything. The internal resistance of the cell may increase with time, more heat and BMS reduces the output.
LPF battery is the future for longevity. NMC is for performance.
You should do a test where both Plaids have about 40k on them, but one that has been babied rarely do they on the accelerater and one that gets dogged out. I have a feeling there will be a difference in the two.
just connect obd scan tool to see the current draw from battery during drag. if current draw not differ from new one. the thing to reduce car performance at high speed might come from using oem part differ from original equip that include wheel and tyre and aeropart that might affect more drag force on car at hight speed. also check the cooling system is a big issue for ev car if current draw a bit lower than normal.
I apologize if already mentioned. What about the difference in wheel weights? I believe you’re running light signature wheels which may/should affect the moment of inertia and therefore overall race outcome. Maybe switch wheels and re-race?
Amazing how consistent the acceleration is.
One thing Tesla is known for is immediately implementing design improvements into the production line instead of waiting for model year changes or the traditional design cycle refreshes. Do we know that this new plaid is the same car inside? Did Telsa improve the inverters, motors, BMS etc. is this really comparing apples to apples? They could have easily changed something internally that improves the power delivery curve, even without changing the HP rating.
We do know my car when it was new ran better than the new one in this race..... 9.2 @ 152
I would enjoy seeing what it does up here in Colorado. My refresh 22 MS (non plaid) ran a 10.61 so it would be interesting to see with the altitude and air density what the plaid would run.
Air density has a significantly reduced affect on an EV as it only affects the drag on the car and not the power produced by the motor system.
on an ICE car less dense air means less oxygen in the engine, and if the car is NA that means reduced overall output. Even with a forced induction car it reduces power, though with less loss than compared to a NA car.
@@wjrneo2 yes I’m fully aware of that but ev rely on aerodynamics less air means less drag
@@wjrneo2 is this a joke or are you actually this dumb?
How many miles on the odometer and wheel size? That’s wicked quick 😮I have a 2021 refresh Model S with the stock 19 inch wheels.
@@mustangdaddy4125 25.8k miles and it’s the factory 19s. I’m lowered on n2itive links and wider spacers
Great vid!! +1 for everyone who's commenting about battery degradation/age (especially if you Supercharge often). One other weird consideration: I really appreciate the way both cars started with equal SoC, but were they running the same Software version?? Just to ensure it's as apples-to-apples as possible!! Thanks!
Nice video Brooks , my 2021 S Plaid OG pre new headlight taillights like yours and it only has 16,000 miles but I have never ONCE used launch control nor taken to the track so no idea what loss at this point but that is slightly disappointing. Hope Tesla updates the plaid soon like you mentioned , Plaid + w more power and carbon ceramics etc , I’m down for an upgrade too at that point if it’s a sapphire killer 🙏🏼👌🏼💪🏼
Ice will likely gain after 37k miles: cause owner can’t resist modifying it by then.
Still should look at all the old time slips and the degradation in trap speed will be linear I bet.
One thing unrelated for Brooks: after owning a plaid for 30k+ miles, is it still worth it or just a 1/4 mi trick compared to albeit [slightly] slower (!) Hurrican/sf90/gt3/720?
A little bit trap speed is lost due to wheel & tire size/diameter. I’d say it’s 3.5 mph lost due to degradation at most. Rest is due to different wheel/tire setup
Nope, my wheel and tire sizes are identical to Tesla's track pack
You got some body mass over the other guy makes a difference
I bet an ICE with 37k miles is faster than when it was brand new.
y, not gonna happen, they loose as well
@@JohnSmith-pn2vlBrand new engine clearances are usually really tight. That's why you break them in and change the oil more frequently in the first 500 miles. As the engine spins easier the performance increases.
@@JK-li7fp also don't forget about better ring seating
how much are you betting?
Has been proven many times that an ICE with several 100k miles on it does not loose power as long as it is nto borken and is maintained properly.
Power density drops off twice as fast as energy density. A drag race is about power density. Still, this beats ICE vehicles, especially over 500k where the ICE will have less than half its original power and the Plaid would probably have 85% of the original power and 95% of original range. For non-plaid, it would still have 100% of the original power since its power requirements are less than 85% of the plaid.
The new red is a huge improvement. Why didn't you ever upgrade to track package with the carbon brakes? Edit* I posted before the end of the video. I get not spending $10k at this point, but you could have bought that package 12-18 months ago when if first became available and make up a chunk of the purchase price back when you go to sell.
This is most likely dues to a bit of battery degradation and also motors wear. But very little difference in general, maybe comparing a 100K miles vs a 1K miles would be a better test to see what real degradation we have got. It would be good to also run a battery test on both vehicles to compare those numbers.
Look at @teslaplaidchannel he’s like the only plaid owner consistently hit 9.2s on a 2021 or 2022 plaid s & he also does a lot of testing with what tires slow you down the most and the results are actually pretty interesting.
except he gutted his car....
You mentioned the state of charge for both cars at the beginning as being 97%.
What was the state of charge for both after your runs were completed?
Did they deplete at the same rate?
Yes that would be useful to see.
Wow it really lost a bunch of MPH !
That R/T on run 3 😎
Lots of variables: tires, battery degradation, motor wear, true SOC. Hard to pin down any one cause. Or it could just be regular variation between builds.
Except my car ran 9.2 @ 152 mph when it was new
@@DragTimesyeah the fucking battery is on its way out
IMHO, the difference is probably due to the extra drag at high speeds from the lightweight wheels.
Nope. The power has dropped on old Plaid. I have a Plaid as well and run similar times to Brooks Plaid.
Elon knows more about manufacturing than anyone else alive. (By his own admission)
Good video. can you advise what your tire replecment / maintenance looked like over the 37k. thks
I'm on my 3rd set of tires....
@@DragTimes thks
Andrews plaid from the Tesla Plaid Channel is still just as quick and fast as ever even after hundreds and hundreds of runs.
No, he gutted his car, probably because it was getting slower
@@DragTimes I chatted with Andrew, and his car has not lost any noticeable amount of power. He gutted his car but he's also faster than he was when he first got it. It also has nothing to do with mileage and more to do with charging cycles. How long do you keep it at 100% and how often do you charge it to 100% has way more impact on the lifespan of the battery than the mileage. If you only top it off to 85% on a day-to-day basis and occasionally go to 100% for the track or long distance use, you can stretch the output of the batteries for much longer. Also note that the Plaid is not using 100% of the battery output to begin with, there's a little bit on tap as far as potential current draw compared to the maximum discharge C rating of the cells. This in essence allows for moderate degradation with no impact as the battery controller has some room to compensate. My guess is that your car has seen many more 100% charges and has stayed at 100% for more overnight cycles than Andrew's car.
@@XennialGuy thank God you chimed in! He dropped some weight out of it to just be quicker that's all and that was like 2 years ago. I've seen his car still run an occasional 9.teens in the quarter. Maybe it's just Brooks car??
Heh, ok, so have him put all that weight back in and test 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️ if he has a bunch of miles on the car it will 1000% be slower than new
@@DragTimes the point is since he took weight out like probably 2 years ago....he has made 100's of runs and his car has not slowed down from that day till currently. He is even still running the original factory tires 90% of the time!
Keep it for 100k miles then do the test again for us plz so we can see the difference
The batteries last 80k miles on average
@@effigy42 no, Elon Musk claims the batteries last at least 300k if not 500k
You mean my new flashlight is brighter than my old one with used batteries. Who would have thought?
Damn those cars are so damn hot! Sucks bout the HP loss, but who gives a damn, u still punish most cars out there!
My 13 year old niece concluded that your video assumes your 2022 had identical performance to the 2024, when your 2022 was new... which it almost certainly didn't. This video simply demonstrates that the other guy's Tesla is faster than your Tesla and not that yours slowed down (stated amount) because it has 37k miles. The 2022 has likey lost some battery/motor performance but the exact loss will never be quantified.
Except when my car was new it ran 9.2 @ 152 mph, now what do you conclude?
@@DragTimes She says that's pretty conclusive but only based on your own stated numbers, not the times that a different Tesla is running. She also noted that had you posted your Dragy screenshots at the beginning of the video, or provided a video link for your new viewers, to those previous runs, that would have been enough.
In Australia we have hundreds of them sitting on the docks. No one is buying Teslas anymore. Too the point where the prices are dropping by ten of thousands of dollars.
It's the Ultra Red color 😉
You lost me with your cause commercial. Merry Christmas should have a choice between electric and gas power.
I see what you sayin about the more miles the more power you lose but keep in mind, if you preconditioned the battery (as if you are going to a super charger) the batteries warm up and give you max performance. Please keep that in mind when you racing with the plaid plaid plaid plaid 😝😝😝
Rotational mass ur larger wheels slowed u down .even tho they are lightweight they are taller . Not bad for Tesla battery 🔋
Plaid + really needed with the competition out there.
No.
Battery degradation is just a fact of life with all EV's. It's totally fair if you know what you're getting into and Tesla's own warranty even mentions degradation happens. The power is simply limited by the batteries ability over time. Within the first year you lose 5-10% then it tapers off after that. Losing a tenth and a bit on the top end after high mileage isn't the greatest but it's still a drivers race and it's still beating almost everything and anything costing several times as much money. The value proposition is still extremely hard to beat. You wanna maintain your power, lighten the car a bit. Swap out the seats with lighter ones, put lighter rotors on it, CF trunk/frunk. All that said, next gen solid state and sodium batteries are going to really take things up a notch and degradation will be even less prominent. Right now we're just stuck with mid-life battery technology before things like this become less of an issue. I do hope Tesla upgrades and refreshes the S soon though... it's really getting long in the tooth and could use some further improvements.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the state of entropy of the entire universe, as an isolated system, will always increase over time.
Poor baby, it’s los a few feet in the quarter mile. Oh, the horror.