I just paused the video at that moment to comment about this on my own, then notice it's the top non-pinned comment at the time of this writing. I'm prettyyyyyy sure the real Magnus wouldn't be able to calculate "mate in 14," but it's an amusingly fire quote nonetheless.
What surprises me is the subtle difference between MC (2800) and a program above 4000 ELO. I mean... it was 2 moves from a checkmate against a machine. For me it's insane.
Being a 1200 rated player , I always use your opening of sacrifising the bishop or knight and not lying I got a huge positional advantage during mid game which help me get a lot of win to reach this level .I hope to get better by studying this. Love ya stockfish
@@edmondt848 I can't tell about the knight sac because I mostly use bishop sac (a50 bishop sacrifice) because my piece quickly developed and well positioned so even he find a best move I can easily counter attack it . But in knight sac it's nearly 50-50 because centre pawn are weak as for my playstyle so at that time sac wasn't good at all 😅 .at 1200 mostly go through their prepare opening line so this chances are pretty low.
There is a world, rather, a universe difference between the validity of your sacrifices and Stockfish's sacrifices, as well as the soundness of Carlsen's defenses /attacks and your opponent's defenses/attacks, so your statement about your sacrifices should be taken with a boulder of salt.
If you open with a rook pawn move followed by sacrificing the exchange, that refutes just about everything we thought we knew about opening theory... except of course where theory is supported by your moves.
No it doesn't refute anything. If you open like that, it is objectively bad, that is, if the opponent plays well enough, you lose. So this is a bad opening. The only difference here in this game, is that the opponent (Magnus), did not play perfectly enough. Also, in a game between two humans, this opening will lose most of the time. So, this opening only is OK, if you are playing against a much weaker opponent. Well, duh..., against a much weaker opponent, just about any opening will win.
@@danutagalecka2497 that's not true, sacrificing material is not always objectively bad if it gets you in a better position later on. And this is chess beyond anyones capabilities, stockfish is already in the endgame with his first move.
@@rock3786 He never went mad, he did retire from chess a bit early though unfortunately, having very unpopular opinions and beliefs is not default" gone mad".
Just discovered this channel, one of the best explanations with no nonsense. Please please make the commentary slightly less robot like, slightly slower speed of commentary and slight pauses, to process what's being explained. I think you'll end up being the best chess channel in no time.
Impressing and scaring at the same time how far beyond human capabilities these modern KI already is ... makes me think of a dark future if KI makes more and more progress on any field
I assume Stockfish prioritizes sacrifices/trades to reduce the number of variables thereby enabling the algorithm to analyze deeper into the future in the given allotted time. This seems like an effective strategy for a flawless machine, but I wonder if, for PVP, it will ever replace a solid tactical and positional game. It just seems too risky.
Magnus expands into chess engine territory. But after winning 120 games in a row he still didn’t reach 2900. Does a win against an engine produce a big jump up? It should do.
The Rook can still protect the King from a Queen attack in its current position. If he takes the bishop, the Queen takes the h4 pawn and puts the King in check who is forced to move and soon white loses his Rook to a pawn as well.
You should look into gambits. How many pieces you have doesnt matter as much as having a solid attack. I like to sacrifice 3 ponds and mess up my king position in the scandinavian defence in exchange for a large lead in development.
@@mrbutish If you are reasonably solid, a gambit involving 3 pawns may work. You will get rapid development as black. This particular gambit lets you get your knights out, and you prepare to slide your rook out early. I have been using this opening against 1700 rated players with success.
Grats on 1700. Should be easy enough to get 2000 from there. Only difference is the number of lines you practice really. For me the difference was to memorize several solid defences for black. And people still blunder a lot at 1700. It is just a little harder to spot since it isnt as obvious.
I don’t know why, but thinking about this scene from the movie (i Robot): V.I.K.I.: You are making a mistake. My logic is undeniable. Detective Del Spooner: You have so got to die. [injects nanites into V.I.K.I] Just made me feel better …
Chess was already figured out long ago. So not surprised a computer beats human. More impressed about how many times Carlsen finds the right moves against computer and can hold on for so long.
?? Chess has not been figured out. Chess has only been solved in the end game when there are (8?) or less pieces on the board. Stockfish hasn’t solved chess nor will it
@@CyVinci figuring out doesn’t require hard solving chess. All that an algorithm has to do is make fewer mistakes than a human, which it always will as it can do brute force calculations far faster and better than humans. So, yes, in that weak sense, chess has been figured out.
the phrase "chess has been figured out" means alot more than simply being better than human beings. it means more like every possible outcome of the game has been has been determined the moment the first move was made. AI has not figured out chess fully because it requires an obscene amount of computational power but beating a mere mortal doesn not require the AI to have figured out chess.
@@86soulx I meant to say, more impressed with how long Magnus can hold on to the computer rather then the performance of the computer as it is already superior to human in many more tasks.
I beated Stockfish 15.1. It had 2 seconds time per move. It tried to make a draw on many occasions but I didn't accept that offer. I had played a draw with it once earlier. Of course I used some throwbacks etc. but it was a quite impressive effort for me.
Oh God! my respect for Magnus quadruples everytime I see him play against AI. As someone who is close to AI and Machine learning, I bow my head to the human who can compute against AI at magnus level. Magnus is madness! Absolute genius.
Carlsen's problem is that he had Kasparov as a teacher when he was a child. If Carlsen had had Stockfish as a teacher, Magnus Carlsen would be playing better now.
"There's checkmate in 14 moves and Magnus calculates this." 😭🔥
😂😂🔥
without maths there is nothing
I just paused the video at that moment to comment about this on my own, then notice it's the top non-pinned comment at the time of this writing. I'm prettyyyyyy sure the real Magnus wouldn't be able to calculate "mate in 14," but it's an amusingly fire quote nonetheless.
@@madhubabuv8751 the language of life
@@PoochieCollins I think he can
always nice watching 2 engines playing against each other
Glad you enjoy it!
me: wait... *so Magnus was an engine all along???*
*Levy points a gun on my head*
Levy: " *Always has been* "
Nice compliment!! I agree!
@Da ZaHando youtube shorts ass comment ☠️
@@cyclyasislxnu fr
I think Magnus has improved vs stockfish
when a rock is sacrified in the second movement, lol.
Improved against Stockfish? I don't think so! NO HUMAN improves against Stockfish - EVER! Not even Magnus!
@@dongravelle1909Stockfish is always going to absolutely destroy you, but you can at least get a little more used to its erratic moves.
The future of Chess.
Me: E4
Computer: Mate in 147 moves.
😂 u think u will last 147 moves against the engine
More like mate in 15 if u are strong player
Stockfish mated me in 1 move it was embarrassing
And magnus finds it lol
Explain it !@@ashupashu5559
@@ashupashu5559wait this is kinda ambiguous.
Did it fuk u?
7:38 this is sick
What surprises me is the subtle difference between MC (2800) and a program above 4000 ELO. I mean... it was 2 moves from a checkmate against a machine. For me it's insane.
Isn't beggining after the exchange sacrifice? Still very impressive of course.
The machine doesnt worry about that. It would simply not allow an actual checkmate that easily.
@@Chuck_N0rris you are also right
On the Fide scale Stockfish engine rating is actually 3620. Engines ruined the beauty of chess.
@@rumalf18Still seems too high. Someone rated 800 points better than me is a NM and I'd never last into the endgame.
Being a 1200 rated player , I always use your opening of sacrifising the bishop or knight and not lying I got a huge positional advantage during mid game which help me get a lot of win to reach this level .I hope to get better by studying this. Love ya stockfish
1200 is very solid.
Very interesting
@@edmondt848 its isn't that hard. You can just tell if you have winning positions or not.
@@edmondt848 I can't tell about the knight sac because I mostly use bishop sac (a50 bishop sacrifice) because my piece quickly developed and well positioned so even he find a best move I can easily counter attack it . But in knight sac it's nearly 50-50 because centre pawn are weak as for my playstyle so at that time sac wasn't good at all 😅 .at 1200 mostly go through their prepare opening line so this chances are pretty low.
There is a world, rather, a universe difference between the validity of your sacrifices and Stockfish's sacrifices, as well as the soundness of Carlsen's defenses /attacks and your opponent's defenses/attacks, so your statement about your sacrifices should be taken with a boulder of salt.
6:56 he sacrifices the roooook!!!
Stockfish emulating a human...Levy Rozman.
This is chess in another dimension ! Only a machine could play like this against Magnus Carlsen and win !
i like how at the end stockfish just stares into my soul
This is the clearest chess explanation I've heard
I'm always rooting for the human player against Stockfish. However against any other AI I always root for Stockfish.
If you open with a rook pawn move followed by sacrificing the exchange, that refutes just about everything we thought we knew about opening theory... except of course where theory is supported by your moves.
No it doesn't refute anything. If you open like that, it is objectively bad, that is, if the opponent plays well enough, you lose. So this is a bad opening. The only difference here in this game, is that the opponent (Magnus), did not play perfectly enough.
Also, in a game between two humans, this opening will lose most of the time.
So, this opening only is OK, if you are playing against a much weaker opponent. Well, duh..., against a much weaker opponent, just about any opening will win.
@@danutagalecka2497 that's not true, sacrificing material is not always objectively bad if it gets you in a better position later on. And this is chess beyond anyones capabilities, stockfish is already in the endgame with his first move.
@@krztixla apertura es mala ya que si enfrentas a stockfish vs stockfish con esa apertura y otra mejor
La mala apertura perdera
“I sacrificed tHe rOoK” 🤖
To have that much brainpower to see so much into the future is already insane for a human being like magnus
Bobby fischer too
@@ricardosilaban until he went mad
@@rock3786 He never went mad, he did retire from chess a bit early though unfortunately, having very unpopular opinions and beliefs is not default" gone mad".
Just discovered this channel, one of the best explanations with no nonsense.
Please please make the commentary slightly less robot like, slightly slower speed of commentary and slight pauses, to process what's being explained. I think you'll end up being the best chess channel in no time.
Impressing and scaring at the same time how far beyond human capabilities these modern KI already is ... makes me think of a dark future if KI makes more and more progress on any field
Always enjoyed stockfish playing brilliant chess keep the great work up 👍
Thanks, will do!
7:00 Right when you said "THE ROOOOOOOOK" my browser decided to go completely black for a second.
What does he mean by "geomagnetic checkmate" at 6.43 and "supercheck" at 7.07 ?
It was a masterpiece of analysis. Thank you.
I assume Stockfish prioritizes sacrifices/trades to reduce the number of variables thereby enabling the algorithm to analyze deeper into the future in the given allotted time. This seems like an effective strategy for a flawless machine, but I wonder if, for PVP, it will ever replace a solid tactical and positional game. It just seems too risky.
Magnus expands into chess engine territory. But after winning 120 games in a row he still didn’t reach 2900. Does a win against an engine produce a big jump up? It should do.
I dont believe it does. Ranked games are supposed to be against real players.
Magnus didnt win all 120 bro. He had 120 games with losing . Some of them were draws
"There is checkmate in 14 moves, but Carlson calculated this, so...." wtf am i even watching?
what is stockfish exactly I want to know more about you please
Stockfish is a Computer Chess Engine, his Job is to play chess and analyze chess games.
@@BestChessChannel And stare into the cold dead souls of your defeated human victims. Don't forget that part.
This Magnus fellow isn't too bad.
XD best comment ever
Because of no time game
Loved it when Stockfish believes in God!?;)
7:37 -- why not kill the bishop with the rook? Pawn cannot take back because black queen would be undefended.
The Rook can still protect the King from a Queen attack in its current position. If he takes the bishop, the Queen takes the h4 pawn and puts the King in check who is forced to move and soon white loses his Rook to a pawn as well.
@@acistaro very true!
how do you use these chess engines?
What I learned from his videos, you can sacrifice your pieces for powerful openings
You should look into gambits. How many pieces you have doesnt matter as much as having a solid attack. I like to sacrifice 3 ponds and mess up my king position in the scandinavian defence in exchange for a large lead in development.
If you have the brainpower of stockfish yes, since you don't it will end badly
@@mrbutish If you are reasonably solid, a gambit involving 3 pawns may work. You will get rapid development as black. This particular gambit lets you get your knights out, and you prepare to slide your rook out early. I have been using this opening against 1700 rated players with success.
Nice vid :D what wenbsite are you using?
I loved it : "Don't try this at home"
7:00 that scared the crap out of me
What is time control 3/2?
I think Stockfish’s AI personality was programmed by Levy 😮
I'm a 1700 player and I find your games fascinating !
Grats on 1700. Should be easy enough to get 2000 from there. Only difference is the number of lines you practice really. For me the difference was to memorize several solid defences for black. And people still blunder a lot at 1700. It is just a little harder to spot since it isnt as obvious.
What site are u using plssss tell me
lol nice work SF, nice presentation
What were the time controls (For Magnus, I guess). Did he have to rush his moves?
THE ROOOOOK! Brilliant :)
Is there another engine that can beat this version of stockfish?
What if Carlsen plays Queen e8 check?
Are these ooenings set up by Magnus so he plays for fun trying to beat stockfish?
So in the analysis at 3:39 isn't Qb1 mate for black better?
how? just king take queen cause the b7 bishop is blocking the rook
I don’t know why, but thinking about this scene from the movie (i Robot):
V.I.K.I.: You are making a mistake. My logic is undeniable.
Detective Del Spooner: You have so got to die.
[injects nanites into V.I.K.I]
Just made me feel better …
I love Stockfish's sense of humor!! haha! I will capture your rook first.... okay.... do your best ! 🤣
AlphaZero plays against the „Magnus Carlsen“ engine in all of these games, but not against the real one. Using the Magnus Carlsen image is misleading.
Chess was already figured out long ago. So not surprised a computer beats human.
More impressed about how many times Carlsen finds the right moves against computer and can hold on for so long.
?? Chess has not been figured out. Chess has only been solved in the end game when there are (8?) or less pieces on the board. Stockfish hasn’t solved chess nor will it
@@CyVinci figuring out doesn’t require hard solving chess. All that an algorithm has to do is make fewer mistakes than a human, which it always will as it can do brute force calculations far faster and better than humans. So, yes, in that weak sense, chess has been figured out.
the phrase "chess has been figured out" means alot more than simply being better than human beings. it means more like every possible outcome of the game has been has been determined the moment the first move was made.
AI has not figured out chess fully because it requires an obscene amount of computational power but beating a mere mortal doesn not require the AI to have figured out chess.
@@86soulx I meant to say, more impressed with how long Magnus can hold on to the computer rather then the performance of the computer as it is already superior to human in many more tasks.
@@janhogerwerf3427 this isnt real game
5:40 manage it? Qc8+ just simple right?
What was the time limit?
So it's just Magnus Chess App vs Stockfish 15 using some handicaps?
7:00 I sacrificed… *THE ROUK*
Thank you very much, Gangster of Chess.
Next time maybe bischop and knight sac? 😇
Great suggestion!
Can you play against Carlos without the queen ???????
Love the commentary of stockfish. Subscribed to stockfish since Magnus too has subscribed stockfish.
Welcome aboard!
how much minutes this played between magnus vs stockfish ?
Nice video!! greetings
Thank you very much!
4:52 It is Kc1, not c8.
btw was is real human magnus playing stockfish, or just a magnus app?
Its fake
I beated Stockfish 15.1. It had 2 seconds time per move. It tried to make a draw on many occasions but I didn't accept that offer. I had played a draw with it once earlier. Of course I used some throwbacks etc. but it was a quite impressive effort for me.
No one cares and no one believes you
Its impossible and you’re lying.
Even in 2 seconds it calculates 50 mil moves
You didn't beated anything
nobody can beat u except alphazero
How is Rh6 a beilliant move? WTF?😂
Обалдеть!!!Взрыв мозга-подобного я никогда ещё не видел!
Oh God! my respect for Magnus quadruples everytime I see
him play against AI.
As someone who is close to AI and Machine learning, I bow my head to the human who can compute against AI at magnus level.
Magnus is madness! Absolute genius.
Good Analysis From Stockfish 👍
Thanks for watching
Amazing and scary... I want to see you play with the top5 best players at the same time. :) please please...
Salute StockFish as Tal of modern day
I'm hoping one day to just get to 1000 elo. GM and all those I'll only dream of being.
Nice video. Thanks for sharing
Holy smokes. Stockfish fricking played magnus like a fiddle. Insane.
7:38 "Magnus calculates this". Says by an AI about his own kind LOL.
If Magnus calculates up to 14 moves ahead, I wonder how many moves ahead SF can calculate at it's best, considering the game lasts 5 minutes?
Depends on your hardware but it should reach ~25 moves ahead within a few seconds on a fairly modern CPU.
In theory, it is limitless.
Stockfish's English grammar is rated 1425.
He is life engine
Who writes for stockfish?? And how many times has Magnus played stockfish? That’s the most amazing game I’ve ever seen on the stockfish videos!!
Carlsen's problem is that he had Kasparov as a teacher when he was a child. If Carlsen had had Stockfish as a teacher, Magnus Carlsen would be playing better now.
So that Kasparov-dude ruined his style of play? So sad...
Problem is that Stockfish can't explain anything, it's just calculating a lot. He needed Leela Chess Zero as a teacher for more human-like moves.
@@youuuuuuuuuuutube you cant learn to play like engine
How are they playing these games? Is it actually magnus or just a bot? Why doesnt he stream it?
Can you beat bot the magni at chess ?
¿how fast are they playing????
Lol "Don't try this at home"!😂
Por isso Magnus é o melhor entre os humanos, pois é o unico que treina com o peixe letal, e se aprimora cada vez mais!!
Was unseen check for magnus when him have the queen in f3 an the rook was completely free in f3 in the white box 😮to gave checkmate to opponent
7:00 lol!!! Stockfish Levy
Is this really Magnus or an IA that plays like him?
i want to see a game where you make king e2 or e7 second move, depending witch color you play
wow, as a casual, this is entertaing and I apreciate the commentary and explaining👍
Glad you enjoyed!
Shit, Magnus can be distressed as well. If he continues playing with this Stocky, I am afraid of depression.
I'm afraid of Magnus' development.
Yeah I've been trying for 2 weeks now to beat level 7 and its quite depressing
6:45 its not original Magnus because on 6:45 he can checkmate in one
swear magnus said hes never going to play against bots again when mittens blew up
epic game, and awesome analysis
And here I am at( HD) elo. 😅
Brutal partida.gracias Stockfish.Saludos.
Hey stockfish I am from Bangladesh , can you make a series, Where all kinds of tactics ❤️
“Oh my God” says the computer
5 seconds earlier:
computer: what is my purpose
human: you pass butter
7:00 was a jumpscare lmao
Who writes the script of his dialogues
Had he opened with BongCloud...
Wow😍 W gli Scacchi ❤️
Can't believe world champion can't play good chess. It gives me hope.
2:32 "a4" It is a3. You still mess up the announcement.
Nice video 💓
By the way, I'd love to see some great game analysis by Mikhail Tal
I'll check it out
Mikhail Tal is deceased.