Gary became world champ before engines. When engines came along he showed the rest of the world how to use them. His opening preparation is legendary. The GOAT
What can he do anyway? He couldn't play in Russia anymore where, back then, many of major events held. His interest of politics cost him his chess career.
@@BattleheartDLS Lets call things with real names. Kasparov never showed interest in politics. He became a face of anti-russian campaign. A traitor who wants his country to be detroyed. A person who showed interest in politics and got chess problems coz of that is Karayakin.
My very first chess computer was the Kasparov Turbo 16k which my parents bought in 1985. I loved chess and idolized Kasparov. What a great man and ambassador for the sport.
Kasparov played in an era where there were no chess engines and online gaming etc. I bet the current crop of players without all these would be half of the players of the older generation.
“Ah hah yes I have found it you are dead I am the greatest oh wait maybe he has counterplay no I destroy him I am prepared for every possible outcome but I will continue calculating lines to see my weaknesses but there are none I have won”
@@Dustyplastic73 Haha, that sounds like the inner monologue of a chess player at peak confidence! The rollercoaster of feeling invincible one moment and questioning everything the next-classic chess mindset!
funny coz most of the time when i see games with higher level player i'm like ok they're strong but everything seems logical and reachable but here with kasparov most of his moves was a surprise for me and he'sone of the best so , very interesting
Kasparov the GOAT. Carlsen doesn't have half the charisma and character that Kasparov had and has. Dude lives every move with total involvement. This game was spectacular.
At this point, I totally agree with you. Kasparov's passion for chess shows in every game, and he's always been an iconic figure on the board. This game was truly spectacular!
I wish Kasparov wasn’t so disrespectful in his earlier years of playing chess I think it would make me like him more but he’s still one of the greatest of all time
Of course, we have better and stronger players today. But Kasparov was the last hero before the rise of chess engines. Dynamic games that are thrilling to watch are becoming rarer because everyone plays like a computer now.
Absolutely, the human touch in games felt different back then. Kasparov’s era had that raw intensity that’s hard to replicate with today’s engine-influenced play.
Can anybody tell me why the king is dead and is not boxed . I didn't understand the endgame . It is assumed that the black king is not trapped and cannot be killed.
The black pieces don't really have a way to stop that white b5 pawn from queening. Eventually Hikaru will need to sacrifice his bishop to stop the pawn from queening and then White will be up an entire Bishop, he will capture all the rest of the pawns and queen his second one. Then he will be up a queen and checkmate the king. None of that can be stopped.
Superbe intuition a la fin de Kasparov qui joue un coup de roi en éventuellement se laisser prendre son fou , dans les deux cas de figure de la réponse de Nakamura , Kasparov passe un pion sur l aile dame et gagne .
@@ricardosilaban u cant call Boby Fischer the greatest while he has played a few great games while Kasparov had many more brilliant games its like calling Pele better than Maradona in football
No doubt that both players are incredible, but at the beginning when both players turn aside their heads they recall of previous played chess games through the history what is the best move to proceed. That is way Bobby Fischer sad I hate chess because chess is all about memorization, creativity is low down on the list.
That's a great point! The opening phase often involves recalling theory but also deciding which approach to follow. Fischer’s comment was more about people who play chess rather than chess itself.
Good question! It's often a mix of recalling opening theory, visualizing positions, and calculating potential moves. Looking away helps them focus better and think deeply without being distracted by the board.
I would like to say that I was calling (some of) Kasparov's moves several seconds before he made them. But, then, I was only looking at the current move ahead only! :o)
Man, i dont understand chess at all. 😢 Why did that final move by the bishop make it unwinnable for black? Is it because the white pawn is closer to getting to the other side than the black pawn? And therefore closer to getting queened (or whatever piece)? What did the white bishop have to do with that, except avoid getting taken? Or is that the point? Or am i completely missing the ball here? I am very new at this. 😂
Nakamura will have to give up the bishop for Kasparov's b-pawn to prevent the promotion. So, with an extra bishop, the victory is easy, capturing the black pawns and promoting the other remaining white pawn.
Nakamura will have to give up the bishop for Kasparov's b-pawn to prevent the promotion. So, with an extra bishop, the victory is easy, capturing the black pawns and promoting the other remaining white pawn.
I think we're kinda bias about this remarks generally... Hikaru deserves some accolades too, don't you think so? I mean, it's not like he's some alien or some demigod..he's human, younger, and by that, less experienced. So, to hold Kasparov like that at all, is something remarkable.. Before you begin to throw bricks at me, please, I've not intentionally offended anyone.. and just Incase anyone feels so, I'm sorry in advance..
Kasparov is not even close to his prime. Hikaru is a Blitz specialist. He has the highest Blitz rating ever. Hikaru will beat Kasparov more than lose to him in Blitz, possibly even in Kasparov's prime, but certainly these days. Also, White in games of strong players, always has an advantage, so it's not a shocker that Kasparov won.
Nakamura will have to give up the bishop for Kasparov's b-pawn to prevent the promotion. So, with an extra bishop, the victory is easy, capturing the black pawns and promoting the other remaining white pawn.
Nakamura will have to give up the bishop for Kasparov's b-pawn to prevent the promotion. So, with an extra bishop, the victory is easy, capturing the black pawns and promoting the other remaining white pawn.
Nakamura will have to give up the bishop for Kasparov's b-pawn to prevent the promotion. So, with an extra bishop, the victory is easy, capturing the black pawns and promoting the other remaining white pawn.
@@gospelvcr Nakamura will have to give up the bishop for Kasparov's b-pawn to prevent the promotion. So, with an extra bishop, the victory is easy, capturing the black pawns and promoting the other remaining white pawn.
_As Ben Finegold has often said, both Robert Fischer and Garry Kasparov could calculate deeper than any player that ever pushed the carved wooden pieces!_ ♟♟♟ - j q t -
@@ChessPlay64I'm not sure about this theory when the preparation of modern age is not even human. You can learn all the openings for even 20 moves, theoretically, if both have the same preparation, will end up draw. But what if someone goes outta theory or book moves? Champions of the past were like "I play chess, I make deep calculation" rather than today's champions that are like "my engine is more powerful than yours". It's Carlsen technique: surprise the opponent with exotics openings and then he's like "now, LET'S PLAY CHESS".
@@ciolamorta True, the great world champions like to take the game out of theory and explore creativity. Even with so much preparation, there's always room for the unexpected.
Nakamura will have to give up the bishop for Kasparov's b-pawn to prevent the promotion. So, with an extra bishop, the victory is easy, capturing the black pawns and promoting the other remaining white pawn.
Накамуре придется отдать слона за пешку b Каспарова, чтобы предотвратить превращение. Так что с дополнительным слоном победа будет легкой, захват черных пешек и превращение оставшейся белой пешки.
Gary's games are interesting with an attacking style, not boring like Magnus's games. Magnus's games are too simple and have too many draws against weaker players, he can't attack like Gary. Magnus is the second Tigran Petrosian
No, it's not a Red Bull organization. This game was at the Champions Showdown: Chess 9LX tournament held in 2017 at the Saint Louis Chess Club. In this event, Kasparov, one of the greatest chess players in history, participated in a series of rapid games, also playing against other grandmasters.
Gary became world champ before engines. When engines came along he showed the rest of the world how to use them. His opening preparation is legendary. The GOAT
Without a doubt, his opening preparation skills really set him apart as one of the best!
Such a shame he retired so early, his mind is sharp as a razor to this day even at this age
It really was an early retirement.
What can he do anyway?
He couldn't play in Russia anymore where, back then, many of major events held.
His interest of politics cost him his chess career.
@@BattleheartDLS no its cos of engines they became strong, same with Polgar
@@BattleheartDLSWhat politics have to do with chess?
@@BattleheartDLS Lets call things with real names. Kasparov never showed interest in politics. He became a face of anti-russian campaign. A traitor who wants his country to be detroyed.
A person who showed interest in politics and got chess problems coz of that is Karayakin.
My very first chess computer was the Kasparov Turbo 16k which my parents bought in 1985. I loved chess and idolized Kasparov. What a great man and ambassador for the sport.
What an amazing memory! The Kasparov Turbo 16k was a classic, and it’s inspiring how Kasparov influenced generations of players.
I so agree he did what Fischer should’ve done
Kasparov played in an era where there were no chess engines and online gaming etc. I bet the current crop of players without all these would be half of the players of the older generation.
not half, 99%!
Yeah. No
Interesting point👍
What about chess engines I don understand
Gary's expressions are so damn funny man
Haha, absolutely! His reactions are just as legendary as his chess moves!
“Ah hah yes I have found it you are dead I am the greatest oh wait maybe he has counterplay no I destroy him I am prepared for every possible outcome but I will continue calculating lines to see my weaknesses but there are none I have won”
@@Dustyplastic73 Haha, that sounds like the inner monologue of a chess player at peak confidence! The rollercoaster of feeling invincible one moment and questioning everything the next-classic chess mindset!
10:51 The artist shows his full understanding of the game and I like it.
@@davidbourgie2843 Indeed, his deep understanding makes the game feel like a masterpiece
Eachs players hair color matches their pieces.
😎🤓😍
well observed 😄
And shirt for that matter 😝
@@albe7292 😆 true
@@ChessPlay64😊😊😊😊
Most of the players don't know who the Kasparov really is 💀 The GOAT
You're absolutely right! Kasparov's legacy is unmatched
The American.
The last human to beat a computer
@@ChessPlay64 Yes, He has great resuls , for example 15-0 against Shirov in classical games.
@@szilagyiandras-o9j Wow, that's true. I didn't know:www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?pid=15940&pid2=15809
Amazing game. I love the Kasparov move at 12:31 with both of his Hands. :)
It was very funny, hahaha.
If any regular players moved their pawns like that they would be told not to. Kasparov has the mastery skills to do so and the freedom of a beginner
impressive understanding of pawn endgame 😁
Thing is gms know the game so well they don't have to play by the rules cause they know when to brake them
@@TheVladacar That's true, it's the result of many years of study and experience...
GK does not even bother to castle his king.😂
@@gujjwal GK has a great understanding of the game and knows when he can or cannot break the rules.
Kasparov the best.
a living legend
Ему бы не помешало подлечить нервы. Раскачивается, машет руками, пыхтит. Неадекватное поведение.
@@adalaavala Ха-ха-ха. Посмотрела бы я на твою игру с Хикару LOL
@@LiskaDoll-w7v с вероятностью а 99.99% я бы проиграл. Но при этом вёл себя как здоровый человек, а не душевнобольной
@@adalaavalaНадо начать именно с того, что ты бы проиграл. А победителей не судят.
Под конец партии эмоций Г.Каспарова зашкаливает легенда!
Точно. Он всегда играет на победу.
kasparov's secret weapon was attacking queen side pawns and advance them.
Absolutely! His pawn advances were often game-changers!
funny coz most of the time when i see games with higher level player i'm like ok they're strong but everything seems logical and reachable but here with kasparov most of his moves was a surprise for me and he'sone of the best so , very interesting
True, Kasparov has always had that ability to surprise even the best. He sees the game in a way that few can.
H6 was very surprising, instead of simply Exchange that pawn
@@dirkpohle538 Yes, H6 was unexpected! Sometimes these creative moves can completely change the dynamics of the game. I should have marked it with
I love you Kasparov.
😉 Thanks for watching
Kasparov é russo. Diga “Yá vás liubov, Kaspárova.”
Eu não acho que ele vá ler a sua mensagem neste canal. Mas ele é o meu favorito também.
@@ThierryDeOliveiraBR Quem sabe?!
@@ThierryDeOliveiraBRКаспаров не русский. Он вообще против России, к сожалению.
@@jazz64 Kasparov is ethnically russian. You can change your documents, but never your blood.
Why do Kasparov plays in such a unique manner. I feel like he undestrands the game at another level wow truly the goat
Kasparov has a unique and extremely dynamic style that sets him apart. His deep understanding of the game truly places him on another level.
H6 brilliant problem solving ability from Kasparov!
After Kb6 Hikaru look shocked.
9:45 Hikaru thought "ok lets just draw this game" Lol
Kasparov really showed his brilliance with that move! It's always interesting to see the players' reactions in moments like that.
Kasparov looks exactly like my busdriver in the earlies
They called him the Michael Jordan of chess I think they should call Michael Jordan the Gary Kasparov of basketball
That's a great comparison! Both were absolute legends in their fields, dominating their sports with unmatched skill and mental toughness.
entrañable,,,,el mejor de todos los tiempos alegrandose como un niño por ganar a nakamura,,,,grandioso gesto
Es emocionante ver que su pasión por el ajedrez nunca ha disminuido.
I wish someone would post commentary explaining a lot of these moves. 🎉
Ask your questions, and we'll answer them...
Kasparov the GOAT. Carlsen doesn't have half the charisma and character that Kasparov had and has. Dude lives every move with total involvement. This game was spectacular.
At this point, I totally agree with you. Kasparov's passion for chess shows in every game, and he's always been an iconic figure on the board. This game was truly spectacular!
You are a kid
@@BP-rn3nl Fischer is undeniably a legend
@@Damon-gg4ep 😅
Es increíble lo quite juega ese hombre a esa edad.!!!!!!
Que privilegio poder verlo activo aún........🎉
¡Totalmente de acuerdo! Es un privilegio verlo seguir jugando a un nivel tan alto.
I wish Kasparov wasn’t so disrespectful in his earlier years of playing chess I think it would make me like him more but he’s still one of the greatest of all time
true
0:15 what are they looking😂
They're staring into space, thinking about the possibilities of the moves they can make.
A hot lady from Hikaru’s harem walked by to distract Kasporov.
@@ZeroComment-qs2te
In memory 😂
Kasparov swings when he plays. I do that too when I play. 😂😂😂
😂😂😂so we are 3
wow.. impressive understanding of pawn endgame.
Of course, we have better and stronger players today. But Kasparov was the last hero before the rise of chess engines. Dynamic games that are thrilling to watch are becoming rarer because everyone plays like a computer now.
Absolutely, the human touch in games felt different back then. Kasparov’s era had that raw intensity that’s hard to replicate with today’s engine-influenced play.
Can anybody tell me why the king is dead and is not boxed . I didn't understand the endgame . It is assumed that the black king is not trapped and cannot be killed.
There is no move g5; for b5 pawn Naka must to give up his bishop; Kasparov with additional bishop easily win.
The black pieces don't really have a way to stop that white b5 pawn from queening. Eventually Hikaru will need to sacrifice his bishop to stop the pawn from queening and then White will be up an entire Bishop, he will capture all the rest of the pawns and queen his second one. Then he will be up a queen and checkmate the king. None of that can be stopped.
Forever Kasparov!!
Do they visualize the board in their head?
Yes, very easily ( for them )
absolutely
Superbe intuition a la fin de Kasparov qui joue un coup de roi en éventuellement se laisser prendre son fou , dans les deux cas de figure de la réponse de Nakamura , Kasparov passe un pion sur l aile dame et gagne .
Kasparov a vraiment montré son talent. Sa vision de l'échiquier est incroyable !
No doubt hes the best chess player in the world 😎👑
Bobby fischer
@@ricardosilaban u cant call Boby Fischer the greatest while he has played a few great games while Kasparov had many more brilliant games its like calling Pele better than Maradona in football
Nah, Magnus is a perfect player. Kasparov is 2. Fischer is probably 3. Then all the rest. And it's not even close.
A 10'58", quand il prend la reine pour montrer qu'il savait qu'il irait promouvoir un pion : quelle pression de folie pour Hikaru !!😓😓
A velocidade que o Kasparov sai da mesa é muito engraçado kkkkkkk.
🙃😂 é uma figuraça esse Kasparov!!!
Yes haha
No doubt that both players are incredible, but at the beginning when both players turn aside their heads they recall of previous played chess games through the history what is the best move to proceed. That is way Bobby Fischer sad I hate chess because chess is all about memorization, creativity is low down on the list.
You cannot memorize all possibilities, there are too many of them
That's a great point! The opening phase often involves recalling theory but also deciding which approach to follow. Fischer’s comment was more about people who play chess rather than chess itself.
@@egor.okhterov
Now with kids memorizing AI assisted lines, the game doesn't even begin until move 30
@@egor.okhterov Yes you can ask Magnus Carlsen
as so often happens, games are lost in the endgame. Bishops of opposite colors should be a draw until Naka goes Kh5.
Exactly, Kh5 was a crucial mistake. Until then, it seemed like the game was heading for a draw.
At 04:21 I've seen the correct move. As I always say, my 600 ELO is not accurate.
Haha, maybe your inner grandmaster is showing!
After kf3 why didnt Kasparov even bother to defend those two pawns between the king? Was he just being savage here.
Because you lose tempo
@@egor.okhterov Exactly, it would give Nakamura time to defend himself
Velho Kaspa, GOAT!
a living legend
When thinking, they actually look away from the board!! Is it to recall opening theory, memorized positions or just calculate?
Visualising tactics
Left is thinking
Right is creating
Cancel the eyes
Trigger the mind
That means memories will be obtained from previous matches
Good question! It's often a mix of recalling opening theory, visualizing positions, and calculating potential moves. Looking away helps them focus better and think deeply without being distracted by the board.
that grabbing of the queen was savage 🤣
That move completely changed the game! Glad you enjoyed it! 😄
I would like to say that I was calling (some of) Kasparov's moves several seconds before he made them. But, then, I was only looking at the current move ahead only! :o)
That's impressive! The ability to anticipate moves is a valuable skill in chess.
Engine everytime Hikaru move a piece: ⁉️
Nakamura is indeed a chess machine!
Man, i dont understand chess at all. 😢 Why did that final move by the bishop make it unwinnable for black? Is it because the white pawn is closer to getting to the other side than the black pawn? And therefore closer to getting queened (or whatever piece)? What did the white bishop have to do with that, except avoid getting taken? Or is that the point? Or am i completely missing the ball here? I am very new at this. 😂
Nakamura will have to give up the bishop for Kasparov's b-pawn to prevent the promotion. So, with an extra bishop, the victory is easy, capturing the black pawns and promoting the other remaining white pawn.
10:58 naka: Are you kidding???
🤭🤭
Garry: yes
@@soumyajyotihait1247 💪
I know this game. I´ve seen this game for years.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👍
Is that a checkmate? I can't see it, can some one explain to me i'm still a beginner
Nakamura will have to give up the bishop for Kasparov's b-pawn to prevent the promotion. So, with an extra bishop, the victory is easy, capturing the black pawns and promoting the other remaining white pawn.
@@ChessPlay64 Oh yes I can see it now, thank you for explaining
@@Walid-gm2ns You're welcome! Glad it makes sense now.
Kb6!! é o único lance que ganha
Their body language is extraordinary when they aren’t looking at the chessboard.
the body speaks
El gesto que hace garry antes de agarrar la dama que esta fuera del tablero jajajaajaj. Que personaje!!!
for those who haven't seen: 10:50
from the beginning of the game there wasn't a single moment where black had chances.
you're absolutely right; it seemed like white controlled the game entirely.
At 7:45, if the white tower taked the knigt than the pawn couldn't take the tower because B.D5 would pin the king with the black tower.
Que partida emocionante.
Muita intensa
both of giant grandmaster, they know if their opponent is not just a GM so they played so serious
Alguien me explica porque ganaron las blancas?
There is no move g5; for b5 pawn Naka must to give up his bishop; Kasparov with additional bishop easily win.
Nakamura tendrá que capturar el peón b para evitar la promoción, quedando perdido
@@AbaCaba-jh7ty thank you!
Disculpen. En qué año se jugo ese torneo?
2017
@@ChessPlay64 gracias por el dato
Just when I thought Magnus was the only player who could take Hikaru...
hehehe, I know others who would beat Hikaru...
@@ChessPlay64 In Blitz, very few and only on a good day.
@@ashocck8065 In blitz, it's 6 to 6 (Kasparov vs Hikaru)
www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?pid=15940&pid2=10084
Garry is a living legend ♟️
Im a beginner can someone explain how's that a checkmate?
I think we're kinda bias about this remarks generally...
Hikaru deserves some accolades too, don't you think so? I mean, it's not like he's some alien or some demigod..he's human, younger, and by that, less experienced. So, to hold Kasparov like that at all, is something remarkable..
Before you begin to throw bricks at me, please, I've not intentionally offended anyone.. and just Incase anyone feels so, I'm sorry in advance..
Absolutely, Hikaru has his own style and impressive achievements. The rivalry and respect between them make chess even more interesting!
Kasparov is not even close to his prime. Hikaru is a Blitz specialist. He has the highest Blitz rating ever. Hikaru will beat Kasparov more than lose to him in Blitz, possibly even in Kasparov's prime, but certainly these days. Also, White in games of strong players, always has an advantage, so it's not a shocker that Kasparov won.
@@ashocck8065 In blitz, it's 6 to 6.
www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?pid=15940&pid2=10084
Nakamura simply expected a hxg6 capture and opposite Bishop ending. Except that his King is miles away from a6 pawn.
That h6 caught me by surprise!! I should have noted it with
I hate Kasparov. He often beat our Anand in the 90s. If you watch his old games you can say about him "ruthless".
I understand your frustration! Kasparov was definitely ruthless on the board, but that’s what made their rivalry so memorable.
4:30 bishop H3 instead of D2 looks good to me.
I don't understand. At what time in the video? Because the D2 square (in 4:30) is already occupied...
Даже не пописася, но бой с5 это круто
How is this a win, can someone explain ?
Nakamura will have to give up the bishop for Kasparov's b-pawn to prevent the promotion. So, with an extra bishop, the victory is easy, capturing the black pawns and promoting the other remaining white pawn.
c5 by Naka? You have to develop your pieces first
Perhaps Ba6 or Bb7 would be better...
Gary made Hikaru looks like Hikarus openent in Disrespect Run, Truth
Gary truly showed his superiority in this match. It's amazing how he makes it look easy!
I can see the result of the match in the description. Spoiler
🤭😜
Гарик, ты лучший.
Наслаждайтесь ребята, играет легенда. Потом будете детям рассказывать "... я видел как играет Каспаров"
Вы абсолютно правы, наблюдать за игрой Каспарова - это настоящее удовольствие и привилегия.
How did he lose? there's still a lot to move
Nakamura will have to give up the bishop for Kasparov's b-pawn to prevent the promotion. So, with an extra bishop, the victory is easy, capturing the black pawns and promoting the other remaining white pawn.
When this game was played?
2017
Can someone explain why Kasparov won?
Nakamura will have to give up the bishop for Kasparov's b-pawn to prevent the promotion. So, with an extra bishop, the victory is easy, capturing the black pawns and promoting the other remaining white pawn.
Who win?
Kasparov
@@ChessPlay64 can you explain how? im new to chess and i dont see a mate nor time run out. how did kasparov win this match?
@@gospelvcr Nakamura will have to give up the bishop for Kasparov's b-pawn to prevent the promotion. So, with an extra bishop, the victory is easy, capturing the black pawns and promoting the other remaining white pawn.
Bravo mr Kasparov❤
No hadshake at the end?
They handshake quickly at the end.
Why did Hikaru lost on purppse? Or did he just have a bad day?
Good game❤
Hikaru was having a good day, as he won the other game. In this one, it's because Kasparov was brilliant.
Kasparov is the best of the best at all times!
If you say so. He used to be the best of all time, but Magnus ate him.
@@ashocck8065
Thanks to him, Magnus became the champion, beating Anand.
With new rating calculations, Kasparov at his peak would have 2900+
I don't doubt it. His dominance during his time was incredible.
_As Ben Finegold has often said, both Robert Fischer and Garry Kasparov could calculate deeper than any player that ever pushed the carved wooden pieces!_ ♟♟♟ - j q t -
Kb6 is proof of that
Kasparov rules!
We can see the difference between a fast chess player and a genius chess player.
The genius brings depth and creativity to the game, while the fast player relies on quick calculations.
Could Fischer in his prime even compete with these juggernauts?? Especially Kasparov!!
That's an interesting question! Theoretically, every world champion from one era would defeat their predecessors. But we can never prove that.
@@ChessPlay64I'm not sure about this theory when the preparation of modern age is not even human. You can learn all the openings for even 20 moves, theoretically, if both have the same preparation, will end up draw. But what if someone goes outta theory or book moves? Champions of the past were like "I play chess, I make deep calculation" rather than today's champions that are like "my engine is more powerful than yours". It's Carlsen technique: surprise the opponent with exotics openings and then he's like "now, LET'S PLAY CHESS".
@@ciolamorta True, the great world champions like to take the game out of theory and explore creativity. Even with so much preparation, there's always room for the unexpected.
How kasparov wins its an incomplete match 😮
Nakamura resigned. He's lost. He'll have to sacrifice the bishop for Kasparov's b pawn.
It was over when Kas went Kc5-b6. You could tell Kasparov already knew.
@@willtuanaki1854 For sure, he's a master at sensing when a game is already decided.
Once a Kasparov always a Kasparov
Monster!!
the Baku Ogre
Как он выиграл? Не понимаю почему тут мат? Король же мог походить без препятствий 🤷♀️ Кто-нибудь объясните конец
Nakamura will have to give up the bishop for Kasparov's b-pawn to prevent the promotion. So, with an extra bishop, the victory is easy, capturing the black pawns and promoting the other remaining white pawn.
Накамуре придется отдать слона за пешку b Каспарова, чтобы предотвратить превращение. Так что с дополнительным слоном победа будет легкой, захват черных пешек и превращение оставшейся белой пешки.
Neither of them can find Ukraine on a map.
Maybe it's not geography that matters here! 😄
Kasparov looked like he wanted to eat you alive
He definitely had an intimidating presence!
End's in equal.... but Kasper is older player than Hikaro
Kasparov has much more experience forged without computers.
Не понял кто выиграл? И каким образом?
Kasparov win. There is no move g5; for b5 pawn Naka must to give up his bishop; Kasparov with additional bishop easily win.
Каспаров выиграл. Хода g5 нет; чтобы защитить пешку на b5, Нака должен пожертвовать своим слоном; с дополнительным слоном Каспаров легко выиграет
Гарри легенда
Живая легенда!!
Gary's games are interesting with an attacking style, not boring like Magnus's games. Magnus's games are too simple and have too many draws against weaker players, he can't attack like Gary. Magnus is the second Tigran Petrosian
So would Magnus be an improved Petrosian? Kasparov's attacking play truly made history.
I think hikaru made a mistake of trading bishop with knight
Bxc3 is theoretical...
Its a fact. Red bull does not give you wins
This game was played 8 years ago not sure why so many views
A masterpiece never dies
Gods never die
is this some sort of red bull organization?
No, it's not a Red Bull organization. This game was at the Champions Showdown: Chess 9LX tournament held in 2017 at the Saint Louis Chess Club. In this event, Kasparov, one of the greatest chess players in history, participated in a series of rapid games, also playing against other grandmasters.
kasparov la legende !!
Kaspárov,very good.
The Great Kasparov ❤️❤️❤️
The living legend