I tried the free trial, and as amazing as this is for unmixing clean, well produced audio, it's still not quite there if you want to unmix, say, lower fidelity audio recorded forty years ago on a cheap cassette four track with lots of track bouncing. It can't distinguish a guitar from a keyboard or even separate vocal tracks under these conditions. I also tried acid testing it with a 78rpm recording, and as you might expect, the limited frequency range and lack of stereo space really undermines the effectiveness of the algorithms. But still, this is fantastic, and I'll definitely be watching for future releases. The improvement between versions 9 and 10 is noticeable.
Bought spectralayers 10 ! It's awesome!!!!! I did a test, a mix song, in the "best quality" mode, of a 3.15 minute song on 3 different apple computers: iMac 27 late 2013 - 3.5 GHz Intel Core i7 quad-core 32 gb ram , unmix time : 6.01 minutes MacBook Air M1 8 gb ram, time 3.53 minutes, MacBook Pro 16” 2019 2,3 Ghz Intel Core I9 , 16 Gb ram unmix time : 4.38 minutes
Bravo, Hello, it is a great project, super features, it seems like it will provide a lot of work for us songwriters, you can also work on Turkish Instruments, especially Baglama, I think it will add many features to your projects!.. Scala and Depth are quite nice, loud and have a lot of effects!.. .
On best quality, I failed to convincingly isolate a harpsichord from a harpsichord - cello duo in a clear acoustic. The Guitar track features a vague approximation of the harpsichord as from a nearby room, but sounding more like a lute. Cello mostly on Other but also intermittently on Guitar. Try out your chosen ensemble first. Very sophisticated programming but, not unnaturally, optimised for a particular subset of instruments. NOTES: adding Guitar track to Project improves presence of the previously swamped harpsichord without noticeable artifacts. And separating a trio item with cello, harpsichord and Soprano worked significantly better.
The key here is, the sound to be extracted needs to be louder on one of the channels. The process first analyses the difference between channels, and then that difference is applied across the spectrum-*no matter what* the sound is. The algorithm isn't looking for 'sax'-rather, it's looking for 'difference'. Once you internalize that concept, the process is super easy to understand, and you'll actually be able to predict how well it's going to work. This tool is sort of analogous to the Harmonics Tool, which reaches above (and even below) a selected harmonic to grab other harmonics that are perhaps buried in the sound.
Thanks, so if I in a stereo file have a, say, electric guitar or harmony voice that is louder in one of the two channels than in the other, SL10 would identify it and separate it onto an individual layer?
sometimes i think all these software we have today is actually stratospheric exorbitant. it has at no time.. not in any way before been easier to make music!
@@Fox_is_Fox YES but that just means more oversaturation on alrady very oversaturated market .. coming up with some uniq and fresh ideas will be even harder in the future
Have there been any improvmeents in Touchscreen and Pen support? The Tablet/Desktop modes I've never really thought did anything, not to the extent of something like Bitwig where the interface changes to support pen and touch quite drastically. The GUI in V9 seems to get confused with multi-touch even when using a pen too which gets annoying.
under Unmix drop down, I can see only "Vocals..." but not other layers. just bought both SpectraLayers 10 and Cubase Pro 13 ... both have similar problem. HELP!
Significantly improved. In the case of vocals, vastly improved. Vocals and speech are a primary V10 focus, so the benefits apply to all kinds of vocals and speech, from music to post.
Is there a way to set or save Display settings yet? By that I view view, FFT, resolution, refinement etc. So I don't have to re-set to my preference every time I load the program or work with a new sound.
The stem separator algorithm is definitely improved. But I can still hear artifacts. And in fact, Spectralayers 9 almost sounds the exact same. Try again!
The AIs in SL10 really are a major upgrade in quality across all instruments extraction and restoration processes, when you'll be able to give it a try on different songs it should be a no-brainer :)
Guess you’re gonna have to stop being lazy & finish the rest of the work it didn’t complete like me & the rest of us & if you don’t know how well guess it’s time to learn 🤷🏼♂️
SpectraLayers Pro 10 will be released on June 22, 2023.
😊
Where is the source of this information? is June 22, and there is no SpectraLayers 10 ;) (yes, I saw the twitt about that ;)) I'm just impatient :D
@@GadesChannelGermany only just woke up give them a chance ; )
@@SamHocking Could not sleep last night...i am so waiting to try it out on difficult audio tasks.
@@MATTETRUEFACT Must admit I was hoping to begin my day on v10 too.
I tried the free trial, and as amazing as this is for unmixing clean, well produced audio, it's still not quite there if you want to unmix, say, lower fidelity audio recorded forty years ago on a cheap cassette four track with lots of track bouncing. It can't distinguish a guitar from a keyboard or even separate vocal tracks under these conditions. I also tried acid testing it with a 78rpm recording, and as you might expect, the limited frequency range and lack of stereo space really undermines the effectiveness of the algorithms. But still, this is fantastic, and I'll definitely be watching for future releases. The improvement between versions 9 and 10 is noticeable.
dear Steinberg... Thank you!!! 🙏
Wow, stunning development!
Bought spectralayers 10 ! It's awesome!!!!! I did a test, a mix song, in the "best quality" mode, of a 3.15 minute song on 3 different apple computers:
iMac 27 late 2013 - 3.5 GHz Intel Core i7 quad-core 32 gb ram , unmix time : 6.01 minutes
MacBook Air M1 8 gb ram, time 3.53 minutes,
MacBook Pro 16” 2019 2,3 Ghz Intel Core I9 , 16 Gb ram unmix time : 4.38 minutes
..this is amazing...!!regards
Bravo, Hello, it is a great project, super features, it seems like it will provide a lot of work for us songwriters, you can also work on Turkish Instruments, especially Baglama, I think it will add many features to your projects!.. Scala and Depth are quite nice, loud and have a lot of effects!.. .
On best quality, I failed to convincingly isolate a harpsichord from a harpsichord - cello duo in a clear acoustic. The Guitar track features a vague approximation of the harpsichord as from a nearby room, but sounding more like a lute. Cello mostly on Other but also intermittently on Guitar. Try out your chosen ensemble first. Very sophisticated programming but, not unnaturally, optimised for a particular subset of instruments. NOTES: adding Guitar track to Project improves presence of the previously swamped harpsichord without noticeable artifacts. And separating a trio item with cello, harpsichord and Soprano worked significantly better.
how much will it cost?
Excellent development 👏🏾
The saxophone extraction @6:05 is spectacular.😮
I’d wish to see a more explaining vid on this!
The key here is, the sound to be extracted needs to be louder on one of the channels. The process first analyses the difference between channels, and then that difference is applied across the spectrum-*no matter what* the sound is. The algorithm isn't looking for 'sax'-rather, it's looking for 'difference'. Once you internalize that concept, the process is super easy to understand, and you'll actually be able to predict how well it's going to work. This tool is sort of analogous to the Harmonics Tool, which reaches above (and even below) a selected harmonic to grab other harmonics that are perhaps buried in the sound.
Thanks, so if I in a stereo file have a, say, electric guitar or harmony voice that is louder in one of the two channels than in the other, SL10 would identify it and separate it onto an individual layer?
@@Superlead1970 Yes-that's the idea. I think that, the more unique the degree of separation, the better the result will be.
Fabulous! I’ll have to try this immediately! SL10 is in the computer since 22/6.😃
Wooow! I want it right now 😱😱😱
Can't wait for its release!
sometimes i think all these software we have today is actually stratospheric exorbitant. it has at no time.. not in any way before been easier to make music!
This language barrier is gradually falling and music is no longer reserved for those who speak it fluently.
@@Fox_is_Fox YES but that just means more oversaturation on alrady very oversaturated market .. coming up with some uniq and fresh ideas will be even harder in the future
I want to order! Is any discount / launch offer available now?
Have there been any improvmeents in Touchscreen and Pen support? The Tablet/Desktop modes I've never really thought did anything, not to the extent of something like Bitwig where the interface changes to support pen and touch quite drastically. The GUI in V9 seems to get confused with multi-touch even when using a pen too which gets annoying.
under Unmix drop down, I can see only "Vocals..." but not other layers. just bought both SpectraLayers 10 and Cubase Pro 13 ... both have similar problem. HELP!
How does the sound quality of the extracted audio compare to the original?
When separating tracks out of spectra 9 i get feedback from other tracks. Would you say this is handled in spectra10? Thanks in advance
Significantly improved. In the case of vocals, vastly improved. Vocals and speech are a primary V10 focus, so the benefits apply to all kinds of vocals and speech, from music to post.
@@mikescheibinger5191thanks boss
Are we going to get a trial?
Can’t wait
Hello, how to separate 2 lead vocals. Both panned mono? Both in a mixed song to start with. I would love to know the process.
..so there wont be ,,one,, version for cubase12..?🙄
SL 10 is VERY impressive... It has saved me a few times already!!!
@@MOTIFXF6420 Beta tester. Pro 10 was stable from day 1.
So what about the Metadata editor what features...thx.
Ok, looks good, let’s test it
I. Want to try this software but the downloader of steinberg don’t seem to work on Sonoma ! I hope soon an update !😢
Is this only for cubase?
It's a standalone application that can be used in Cubase as an ARA extension. You don't need to be a Cubase user to use SpectraLayers.
Is there a way to set or save Display settings yet? By that I view view, FFT, resolution, refinement etc. So I don't have to re-set to my preference every time I load the program or work with a new sound.
Yes, in SpectraLayers Preferences > Display tab.
@@rldivide Thanks! ❤
Can you separate different singers after extracting vocals?
To some extents, yes. You can use either Unmix > Multiple Voices or Process > Voice Denoiser > Other Voice to achieve that.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
👍i LoVe !
💙⚪❤
Wowowowowowwowowowowowowowowowowowowowow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It’s not available?
June 22
Where is it ? 😉
@@fredericdelatour994 Available now ;)
With great power comes great responsibility. 😂
Use it wisely. 🦾
The stem separator algorithm is definitely improved. But I can still hear artifacts. And in fact, Spectralayers 9 almost sounds the exact same.
Try again!
The AIs in SL10 really are a major upgrade in quality across all instruments extraction and restoration processes, when you'll be able to give it a try on different songs it should be a no-brainer :)
Vocal stem extraction is vastly improved. Go to 2:15.
@@mikescheibinger5191 Yes, I agree that it's improved. But I still hear artifacts. And it's a tad better than version 9. Womp.
@@rldivide Improvement for sure. But I wouldn't say major upgrade.
Guess you’re gonna have to stop being lazy & finish the rest of the work it didn’t complete like me & the rest of us & if you don’t know how well guess it’s time to learn 🤷🏼♂️
You just can't do that??? o_0
Maybe you didn't know and did it anyway? :D
Reverb reduction ! Wut da hell
V9 had this too, but the new V10 algorithm is outstanding-worlds beyond its predecessor.