Support the channel by grabbing a t-shirt: www.clownplanet... Don’t forget to subscribe. Hit the bell to stay updated on the latest videos. Watch on Rumble: rumble.com/c/c...
Reminds me of the time I stuck a fire cracker into a big dog turd, lit it. Didn't realize it would cover someone's house with a fine mist of feces. Me unscathed, but damn I bet it could make someone a dump truck of cash.
I think it goes more by the intellect, because there were lots of artist who were in fact poor people When an average person does this, it's bullshit But when an "intellectual" or ideological/political representative does this, it's a masterpiece
Hunter Biden and every FBI executive who's examined his affairs disagrees with you. I mean - it's not like the FBI and the US criminal justice system has been bought by the bad guys, is it? Or maybe...
It's not about money. Sometimes mb, but not mainly. Art is supposed to point to God, to remind us to rise up out of our animal nature and become more. This type of art demoralizes, it tells us to wallow in our own shit and despair. Sacrifice, murder, primal instincts unleashed..are on the horizon. Friendly reminder to create something beautiful today and every day. Don't forget how much it matters.
"My goodness it is truly a breath-taking masterpiece that signifies division, boundary, the limitation of movement......it's telling me a silent story of segregation, the connection with past and present human conflict.....the liminal abstraction is very thought-provoking......tell me, who made this beautiful piece?" "Sir that's a fence, the museum is this way"
Yes - very true and well spoken! Was there also some form of " _juxtapose_ " in this work?? Perhaps a " _dialogue with the original custodians of these lands_ "??
Its not about how youre fingerpainting, its bout what you do before, im waiting for someone to eat dirt, then take a dump and the last part would be finger painting, thats what you can call an art, big A!!!!!!
The sad thing is that there are probably people willing to pay millions for this crap. The same crowd who attend "fashion"shows and applaud the thousand pound bin liners.
PETA would come after you for animal abuse, and would shame you into giving all the profits from the “art” to the bird. You didn’t shit on that canvas, why should you be compensated?
Remember the "painting" of three stripes that sold to the government for millions ? And the cosmetic industry makes billions every years to make the ladies look like mannequins and same with fashion that changes styles every year to make billions . We still have a very rich society .
Unfortunately, the days are long gone for both the artists and the turtles. They've repeatedly tried to reboot the turtles; however, it doesn't have same magic or soul as my childhood.
There's more great artists in the world than ever before, you just don't hear about them. You only hear about the extreme fringes of "modern art" catastrophes of human stupidity and money laundering.
Many years ago, I took my 4yo daughter to the NSW Art Gallery in Sydney. We marvelled at the works of the great masters. On the way out of the classics section, we stopped in front of the only 'abstract' artwork and stood among the typical 'artsy' types, gazing with admiration at this mess of colour. In the silence, my daughter's voice rang out true as she asked... "daddy, did the kids do this one?". It was pure gold and standing among us were a few who nodded in agreement with my daughter's honest appraisal.
Art students are notoriously full of themselves. They are not artists, they are just narcissists, who think whatever they draw, mold, or create in anyway is considered artistic. This is why most of them have purple and pink hair and dress in a way that beckons you to look at them. The crap I put in my toilet can be considered art these days!
@@lewis1544and that is crap from 1961! The conceptual art movement is over a century old now. I am fed up. Duchamp's "Fountain" (urinol) is from 1917. How much longer for art to be art again? When will it get old!? Yoko screaming, crapping in cans, hanging bananas on walls...slowest clap in the world.
@@Haley497 what's worse is that Duchamp's "Fountain" is critiquing an actual issue in art back in the day, elitism, originality, and overusing checklist of beauty for art. These modern artist don't understand that and now they're doing it without purpose.
"NoOO yOu DoNt uNDErStanD thE mEanINg". There is no meaning behind it; they put no effort, skill or care into it. They did what is the equivalent of me taking a morning piss but saying you dont understand the meaning except my piss atleast tells me if I'm dehydrated.
I immediately thought of the 1988 remake of 'The Blob' (which is actually a really great movie). Not seeing someone absorbed/melted/digested by the pink goo is highly disappointing.
I don't think I could do the pink foam, that one does require some knowledge of chemistry - it kinda looked like fun. Not so much for whoever is stuck cleaning up the mess after though.
art has always been meaningless and uncreative. wtf are you on it serves no purpose but self gratification why do you think these clowns love it so much.
As a mediocre artist self-taught artist with no connections, it kinda makes me glad that I make what I make because I hate this pretentious post-modern bullshit from art academia.
The works of dead artists are the favored exhibits because society put value on them on arbitrary reasons, works that really have no extraordinary objective merit.
Tbh if u actually had the balls to do that, it could be considered art. Cause that would be a statement right here. But instead ur just fantasizing about it. I guess thats the difference between u and the artists, they'll actually do something instead of only bitching about it.
As an artist i watch all the art shows and a blank canvas sold recently for 1000s - dont know why i even bother anymore. People pay 1000s for banksy's crappy politcal stencil art a kid could do and nobody knows of his amazing fine he creates
I'm a hotelier. I like to paint big canvases white, then dribble spare emulsion paint over them in the style of Pollock. Nice big paintings to fill empty walls. The trick is to use pastel colours (not dark) in shades which match the room's colour scheme (carpet, curtains) and apply three coats of varnish via a small roller.
Still though Banksy is an artist. As a "kid" who would do the same work would also be an artist, age certainly does not define who is an artist. For me art is when you have a concept and visualize it in a way that the viewer will understand it, better yet if it also makes the viewer think deeper and even better while also it is visually pleasing and inspiring in some way. If the viewer does not understand what the "artist" is trying to express then its not the viewer that is "stupid", its the "artist" which is stupid and talentless.
@@ThePhilosophersYawn never said he wasnt an artist - i said his real isnt kniwn - i dont lije his wall art - its highly overated - but i love his fine art
@@ThePhilosophersYawn i fully understand his political art - im far from stupid - its acmessage it has very little skill involved and you missed my entire point - and why do you think banksy shredded his piece at auction - for exactly what I stated - he doesn't like pretentious art world either
I still this is art, since art can be described as a physical representation of what's inside artist head, or it's perception of the world, if you find the pieces of art in this video a bucket full liquid shit, it's just because the head of those artists is also full of shit.
These smug, self-important visual artists dream up something really silly they want to do, then fabricate an even sillier story wrapped up around social commentary to convince people they are the deep thinkers of our day. They are not.
Art is more interested in being metaphorical and philosophical than it is concerned with being appreciable as a metaphor or philosophy. That's why modern art sucks, its like writing that the moon has a dark side and a bright side and pretending there's incredible depth to that idea, and when someone points out that while there might be, simply saying so isn't enough. That what all these displays are, saying there is meaning without backing it up with any substance. You want to talk about the "sound of butter" as some sort of environmental message, how about naming every cow within a documentary about the life of a selection of cows, show mother cows walking into the slaughter house after saying goodbye to their young, how about putting a camera on the young crying for its mother. THAT IS FUCKING ART. It hurts, it makes us think, it makes us question ourselves. I'd still eat beef, but at least I'd appreciate that an animal had to die for it. I'd also possibly be in favor of more humane slaughter methods. But slapping pile of butter with a mic is shitty substanceless art.
Yeah, I remember when I watch a film in school about that stuff. It really does change your opinion about things. I still eat meat though, just very sparingly.
As an artist myself I never considered any of this crap to be art. I know that in general art shouldn't have any rules, but I think no matter what it should be pleasing to look at.
I think that we simply shouldn't use word "art" in a positive light. Art can be skillfully made or it can be poorly made, art can be profound and can be shallow. Also I strongly disagree with art being something pleasing to look at. You can draw disemboweled, mutilated bodies and it will make most people nauseous, but it will still be art.
Art, like Beauty, is in the eye of the beholder - The tragedy is that some people have mud in their eyes because they want to be trendy and like to believe there is something meaningful in this 'Art', something that the majority do not have the intelligence to see. However, the majority do not have mud in their eyes and see it for what it is.........
This has the same bullshit energy of the guy and the wine thing. He brought a $15 dollar wine from walmart(I think it was) and said it came from a history vineyard in Europe and it won first place. Much like that competition, this art is bullshit.
Didn’t that guy have something like experience and was well-known from other wine competition people’s perspectives? (Might be wrong but atleast that’s what I heard. Still bullshit though)
Contemporary art is just professional trolling. You tell people it’s one thing, the majority disagrees, then you get the idiots who agree with you. It’s a social experiment. The real “art” is finding out who sees the king’s clothes and who are contrarians.
Artisan: Works a full-time job and uses his free time to make incredible work that takes hours and sells for less than minimum wage. He feels like he has a good life. Artist: Is unemployed and spends thirty seconds slapping paint on a canvas to sell for the price of a house. Claims to have a life of darkness!
Sweet, my seven year old can make millions with her drawings, just got to find the nearest gallery - We will call it, 'An Innocent View' a journey into the present as seen through the eyes of a child, a multi-piece exhibition in coloured pencil on A4 paper. I'm sure I can figure out some kind of symbolic meaning for each drawing.
Just teach your daughter some really big words and tell her to string them together in a nonsensical way to explain her pieces. That'll be the finishing touch 🎀
The painting: [ / ] Dumb people: Wow is such a magnificent work you can see the reflection of his traumas and deep fears on the canvas is magnificent.. The "Artist": Yeah sure that was exactly what i was thinking when i did it... it would be $1,000,000.00 Dumb people: $500,000.00 "Artist": Sold
Am I not cult enough and ignorant or I think art should be MINIMALLY aesthetically pleasing to be considered art? I don't think "conceptual" art should be a thing... Makes no sense
Yeah, but those laborers don't do it in a way that shows they've clearly never used a shovel before. The utter lack of ability to handle the shovel there is what is the art.
The degradation of man....we haven't produced high art since the renaissance... approximately 600 years ago, let it sink in. Now, we tape bananas to walls. We are living through a dark age and dont even realise.
Ok that's nonsense. Plenty of high quality, timeless paintings, sculptures, and other works have been produced all throughout the 18th, 19th, and early to mid 20th centuries.
@@robertstaples3256 I wrote 'high art'.... Not good, quality art, but peak art....give me one example that tops the la pieta for example? No. Exactly. We have been in a state of steady degradation for centuries, and only a moron would argue otherwise.
I think the sanctuary of truth looks pretty nice, it serves as a monument to its country’s religious and cultural history. I don’t like how it’s become infested with tourists though but I suppose that’s how they fund the construction.
@@heroicjourney2508You do know that even among high quality art, it's appeal is subjective, right? If that is your favorite work of art, or if Renaissance art floats your boat, nothing I ever say will ever be good enough in your mind. Nothing will ever "top" it. Art is varied, even among high quality works. Someone might prefer the likes of The Thinker, or the surrealism of The Persistence of Time, or heck, the sculpture of your own profile picture, which is from 1824. To say that the Renaissance saw the absolute peak of human artistic expression, you'd have to quantify human expression itself, to put it on a grade scale. Gather a thousand artists, or students of art history, in a room, and you'll have a thousand and one grade scales.
As an avant-garde composer, I think the majority of modern art is sensitively and meaningfully created.. but from these excerpts I can't discern any of that. This "performance art" is reactionary and nothing else.
I will say some of the modern art where the person swings around dropping paint on the canvas is kinda neat looking but it should never be displayed next to high class art.
A decade ago, this'd be one of the worst insanities of humanity. Now, its meh-tier insanity. Hell, it is practically benign compared to everything else.
Those so called "artists" could just make random things and the media would just create a deep meaning out of it making it feel like it has this so called art value making people believe it is fascinating. Why won't we just take a challenge making art that resembles those deep meanings with direct symbolisms.
Children do this for free.
Exactly , my first thought looks like something a child would do . Ridiculous.
😂
They are taking our jobs ! 👶
Love this comment and childrenl
If you installed that trampoline setup for kids they'd have a blast!
When you're used to painting the walls of the local mental asylum with your own feces but they closed it so you need to find an alternative.
Reminds me of the time I stuck a fire cracker into a big dog turd, lit it. Didn't realize it would cover someone's house with a fine mist of feces.
Me unscathed, but damn I bet it could make someone a dump truck of cash.
A sophisticated one
LOL 🤣
'Care' in the Community has most definitely backfired...!!!
Those 'Caring' for US ALL... are actually honing their skills... at OUR expense.
Plezze don't inspire Em...
They got out along with the lgbtq+÷×/□¡#
It's vandalism when the poor do it, it's art when the rich do it
Underrated comment
Actually it's vandalism when you do it with another person's property
I think it goes more by the intellect, because there were lots of artist who were in fact poor people
When an average person does this, it's bullshit
But when an "intellectual" or ideological/political representative does this, it's a masterpiece
Well, they don't get called 'stupid rich' for nothing.
🤣🤣💨💩😳😱👀🤎
It's what you call money laundering
Exactly
it's why those art pieces are so expensive, tax write offs for the rich
Hunter Biden and every FBI executive who's examined his affairs disagrees with you.
I mean - it's not like the FBI and the US criminal justice system has been bought by the bad guys, is it?
Or maybe...
It's not about money. Sometimes mb, but not mainly. Art is supposed to point to God, to remind us to rise up out of our animal nature and become more. This type of art demoralizes, it tells us to wallow in our own shit and despair. Sacrifice, murder, primal instincts unleashed..are on the horizon. Friendly reminder to create something beautiful today and every day. Don't forget how much it matters.
You understand everything, they needed more work of “art”, so they transformed the art so that any puppet could produce it in number.
"My goodness it is truly a breath-taking masterpiece that signifies division, boundary, the limitation of movement......it's telling me a silent story of segregation, the connection with past and present human conflict.....the liminal abstraction is very thought-provoking......tell me, who made this beautiful piece?"
"Sir that's a fence, the museum is this way"
The ones who disliked are the modern artist
Hahahah
Congrats, because you made me laugh hard like a maniac XD
Yes - very true and well spoken! Was there also some form of " _juxtapose_ " in this work?? Perhaps a " _dialogue with the original custodians of these lands_ "??
All those French Farmers spraying (bleep) on politicians doorsteps - they're actually ARTISTS :) :) :)
Yes I would legit pay for that
Best art out there.
And that's no joke Jack 😆👍
👍😂👍
Yes that right
If you're poor and try to do this they call it vandalism
*""DEMOCRACY""*
*""EQUALITY""*
*""SOLIDARITY""*
*""DIVERSITY""*
*""PEACE""*
*""EMPOWERMENT""*
*""BOLD & BRAVE""*
@@B7R8 you forgot inclusion
@@Jacy-dx6dx *They're so many ""names"'...*
*Thank you Jacy.*
shit in your hand and throw it at a wall now your Banksy or whatever
@@B7R8Words that were ruined in this century
And to think I was a genius finger painting in kindergarten. Now I'm depressed because I missed my calling.
Its not about how youre fingerpainting, its bout what you do before, im waiting for someone to eat dirt, then take a dump and the last part would be finger painting, thats what you can call an art, big A!!!!!!
I’ll finger paint while taking a crap and sell that… that’s gotta go for a few thousand at least.
All you had to do was shave your head and use butter, coulda made a million dollars.
Cheer up - it's not too late!!! Just identify as a five year old and get at it! There's a fortune waiting for you!
@@brandonsmith2299give the painting depth and texture, don’t chew your corn.
Modernists then: "I'll break rules and create whatever i want!"
Modernists now: "Banana".
🤗 …. 👏 👏👏👏👏
Modern art is when you run out of ideas and do crap and then say that it has a special meaning that only you can understand)
What about that urinal art piece?
When asked "What is Art?", Andy Warhol answered: "Whatever you can get away with." HI-YA!
"Making money is Art and working is Art, and good business is the best Art." - Andy Warhol
“I’m a pretentious muppet whose popularity correlated to societal moral degeneracy.” - Andy Warhol
@@ServusChristi777 I know he didn't really say that but great summary. Scumbags quoting scumbags to justify being scumbags😂😂😂
@@EdwardGaydosIII Why is Warhol a scumbag?
@@ServusChristi777is that what mother told you?
The sad thing is that there are probably people willing to pay millions for this crap.
The same crowd who attend "fashion"shows and applaud the thousand pound bin liners.
some of that fecal stuff is sold for millions, only for money laundering, the rest just catches crust
Lets put a huge emphasis on crap
Hunter Bidens masterpieces
Yes, heads of corporations buy the "art" of the children of politicians.
I wonder why.
its money laundering, just ask Hunter Biden
I’m putting a canvas on the bottom of my Cockatiel’s cage for a week and sell it as bird art.🤔
Will it be going…..cheep?
It's probably already been done.
I'm sure a Big Guy supporter will buy it and that's no joke Jack 😁👍
Probably be less shit than what I just watched." literally "
PETA would come after you for animal abuse, and would shame you into giving all the profits from the “art” to the bird.
You didn’t shit on that canvas, why should you be compensated?
Rich people, money laundering... the story goes on and on
AI art and other artist do the job better than this 😂😂😂
@@KlarenceMSai art is just as bad and EEEWWW UR A NAZI GO FOLLOW UR LEADER BLEEEEH
After a certain man with a small mustache failed art school, they decided they would never fail anyone again
YOU DIDN'T 🤣
@@LindyLimeIf nobody fails, nobody gets into politics
😂😂😂
I see "Modern Art" is on the same level as
"Modern Fashion" .
Or modern music
I see it's also on the same level as "modern education"
And television
There are many modern things that are completely hosed.
@@timothysmith160and radio and audio drama
If this is what they call art then they can keep it
Meanwhile, people at a small town craft fair have more artistic talent in their little finger.
Remember the "painting" of three stripes that sold to the government for millions ? And the cosmetic industry makes billions every years to make the ladies look like mannequins and same with fashion that changes styles every year to make billions . We still have a very rich society .
Long gone are the days of Michelangelo, Donnatello, Raphael and Leonardo. I mean the artists, not the turtles.
Cowabungga ma dude! 🍕🐢🤙
I hurt my big soft abdomen laughing.
Thanks for clarifying 😂
Unfortunately, the days are long gone for both the artists and the turtles. They've repeatedly tried to reboot the turtles; however, it doesn't have same magic or soul as my childhood.
There's more great artists in the world than ever before, you just don't hear about them. You only hear about the extreme fringes of "modern art" catastrophes of human stupidity and money laundering.
Many years ago, I took my 4yo daughter to the NSW Art Gallery in Sydney. We marvelled at the works of the great masters. On the way out of the classics section, we stopped in front of the only 'abstract' artwork and stood among the typical 'artsy' types, gazing with admiration at this mess of colour. In the silence, my daughter's voice rang out true as she asked... "daddy, did the kids do this one?".
It was pure gold and standing among us were a few who nodded in agreement with my daughter's honest appraisal.
to be fair, some do say that they shall put their inner kid to the work, and she’s not wrong about it
Just imagine if these
People didn’t have art. They would probably be serial killers.
You can be two things.
My kids did some of this stuff at the house and got in trouble for it... I didn't realize they were such talented artists... my bad.
Yeah, most of these 'artists' are probably lashing out at mommy and daddy with these 'performances'.
Must suck to have kids haha
My parents would punish me for that.
@@WinkLinkletter I read an interview with a performance artist once that basically said exactly that.
Gosh, I wish I was cultured and sophisticated enough to ‘get’ this 🙄🙄🙄
"If the human mind were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't"
Apply that to modern art
No- one gets it, but they pretend they do, because it makes them look terribly sophisticated.
In that case, I'm very glad I know zero about modern art. Keeps me sane anyway.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The purpose of 'modern art' is to make us feel like uncultured, unsophisticated sheep.
Art students are notoriously full of themselves. They are not artists, they are just narcissists, who think whatever they draw, mold, or create in anyway is considered artistic. This is why most of them have purple and pink hair and dress in a way that beckons you to look at them. The crap I put in my toilet can be considered art these days!
My wife dragged me into the Tate Modern in Liverpool some years back. One of the exhibits was a tin of sh+t by Manzoni. It was stunning and brave.
accurate narcissism is a culture trend in general.
Idiocracy, sums it up in 1 word!
@@lewis1544and that is crap from 1961! The conceptual art movement is over a century old now. I am fed up. Duchamp's "Fountain" (urinol) is from 1917. How much longer for art to be art again? When will it get old!? Yoko screaming, crapping in cans, hanging bananas on walls...slowest clap in the world.
@@Haley497 what's worse is that Duchamp's "Fountain" is critiquing an actual issue in art back in the day, elitism, originality, and overusing checklist of beauty for art. These modern artist don't understand that and now they're doing it without purpose.
"NoOO yOu DoNt uNDErStanD thE mEanINg".
There is no meaning behind it; they put no effort, skill or care into it. They did what is the equivalent of me taking a morning piss but saying you dont understand the meaning except my piss atleast tells me if I'm dehydrated.
Well you see, rejecting people from art university may lead to bad things...
Oh the competent intelligent ones witb values do get rejected so we waiting..
You could reject these mfs all day nun will happen they about nun
Heh, the RejectedArtist sure left his mark
@@MeowPh1across the entire of europe
Why, it would only lead people to look for a more suitable career....
Like politics maybe
What a load of Pollocks.
That's funny, but this stuff doesn't come close to Pollock.
Clever girl.
@@BWOOHAHAHAAAYeah, they need to be at least 10x more drunk to match Pollocks work 😂
Jackson Pollack had more boring long drawn out party pieces. He was painting pictures, at least. Not these zany little autistic darlings.
over most heads here man
The guy with the black oaint/crayon was having a mental breakdown! And that pink shit coming down the stairs??? Is that some sort of pollutant??
I immediately thought of the 1988 remake of 'The Blob' (which is actually a really great movie). Not seeing someone absorbed/melted/digested by the pink goo is highly disappointing.
@@Dystopia1111 YES!!!
People like this used to be arrested for vandalism. Now they're "artists".
@@Dystopia1111 Wasn't that Steve McQueen's first film?? I remember watching all those crap B movies after the pubs shut on BBC2!!
@@jonhunter8737 Yes, that was the 1950s original with MacQueen. It got a very good remake in 1988. Really well-done movie, lots of fun.
Yes we definitely devolved as a species
God is forgotten when beauty is stripped away. We don't live in a civilization anymore. What have we created lately?
@@RunninUpThatHillh a whole generation of idiots, if you'd ask me...
Humanity needs to get back to greatness - badly.
@@RunninUpThatHillh dinosaurs, the ones who didn't evolve and got wiped by planetary wrecking ball
Is it possible that you mean de-evolved?
Devolved has a very different meaning.
" Are we not Men - we are Devo " - Jocko Homo ( monkey man ) by Devo.
There is a reason A.I is taking over
0:35 bro looks like he's playing with 💩
Activity hour in the asylum.
I'm howling
Underrated comment
Simple rule. If I can do it, it’s not art.
I could do all of these first time.
Hahaha
I don't think I could do the pink foam, that one does require some knowledge of chemistry - it kinda looked like fun.
Not so much for whoever is stuck cleaning up the mess after though.
@@tdeo2141 That looks like an "Elephant's Toothpaste" reaction.
Not worthy of the title of "art".
@@Seekingthesky Closer to an act of vandalism.
@@Seekingthesky more worthy than the guy getting dirt poured over him.
I've seen ancient portraits get destroyed by worse artists than these out of spite.
Never mind blackpilled; I'm damn near cyanided.
And i thought my art was bad but these Guys are making me look like fucking Leonardo da vinci.
Modern art proving once again that literally ANYONE can be an artist.
About as creative as a copy machine, about as much art as a pile of horse dung. This is what happens when words lose meaning.
art has always been meaningless and uncreative.
wtf are you on
it serves no purpose but self gratification why do you think these clowns love it so much.
This is what happens when artists get sterilized from being offensive right in the art school.
And suddenly, my old art teachers are thinking my work wasn't so bad after all.
Yeah, and that would be a KINDERGARTEN teacher....
Art, like everything else in life, comes in three categories:
1) Excellent
2) Average
3) Crap
All these pieces would fall into category 3.
😀Yep
I'd consider some of my works classified under Category 3 but I guess it's now Average because these reταrds entered the competition.
@@Bruhsaurus-Moment
Sounds about right.
Art has to have artistry not just an idea. An unmade bed a pile of bricks is not artistry.
I spent quite a few years working in a museum. There's a reason that the works of dead artists are the favored exhibits.
As a mediocre artist self-taught artist with no connections, it kinda makes me glad that I make what I make because I hate this pretentious post-modern bullshit from art academia.
The works of dead artists are the favored exhibits because society put value on them on arbitrary reasons, works that really have no extraordinary objective merit.
Guess I should go to one of these "exhibits", shit in my hands, throw it at the wall, and call it art. GIVE ME MONEY!
My next idea " 2 Dogs garden poop Murial" it's got colour texture size and smell.
What you think ? 🤣
My laughing hurt.
Tbh if u actually had the balls to do that, it could be considered art. Cause that would be a statement right here. But instead ur just fantasizing about it. I guess thats the difference between u and the artists, they'll actually do something instead of only bitching about it.
Arts & crafts at the lunatic asylum.
Well, we all knew what happened last time when art is rejected...
No thanks I’ll go back to my working on my stick figure drawings.
“Now pay for my student loans.”
As an artist i watch all the art shows and a blank canvas sold recently for 1000s - dont know why i even bother anymore. People pay 1000s for banksy's crappy politcal stencil art a kid could do and nobody knows of his amazing fine he creates
I'm a hotelier. I like to paint big canvases white, then dribble spare emulsion paint over them in the style of Pollock. Nice big paintings to fill empty walls. The trick is to use pastel colours (not dark) in shades which match the room's colour scheme (carpet, curtains) and apply three coats of varnish via a small roller.
Still though Banksy is an artist. As a "kid" who would do the same work would also be an artist, age certainly does not define who is an artist.
For me art is when you have a concept and visualize it in a way that the viewer will understand it, better yet if it also makes the viewer think deeper and even better while also it is visually pleasing and inspiring in some way. If the viewer does not understand what the "artist" is trying to express then its not the viewer that is "stupid", its the "artist" which is stupid and talentless.
@@ThePhilosophersYawn It's bad news when somebody tells an artist he can't make the grade.
Sometimes, 25 years later, they invade Poland.
@@ThePhilosophersYawn never said he wasnt an artist - i said his real isnt kniwn - i dont lije his wall art - its highly overated - but i love his fine art
@@ThePhilosophersYawn i fully understand his political art - im far from stupid - its acmessage it has very little skill involved and you missed my entire point - and why do you think banksy shredded his piece at auction - for exactly what I stated - he doesn't like pretentious art world either
What's next? Someone going to duct tape a banana to the wall? Oh, wait... 😄
That was stolen, they seriosly did tape a banana to a wall.
I would like to think modern art is representing the modern intensity of degeneracy in society tdy, than long ago
Idk the last one was fucking awesome
Yeah but imagine being the guy who has to clean that up.
That dude pouring dirt on the lady is not art. That is what you call 'degrading a person' or a fetish.
Graveling is now a fetish? WTF?!
@@Bruhsaurus-MomentEverything is.
The great works of art worthy of our clown planet!
Anyone who considers that Art is not a full bubble
It's nothing but a money laundering scheme anyway. "They" just used to care about hiding it.
I still this is art, since art can be described as a physical representation of what's inside artist head, or it's perception of the world, if you find the pieces of art in this video a bucket full liquid shit, it's just because the head of those artists is also full of shit.
These are the same kinds of people that try and destroy actual art
True!
Why tho
Nope. Simply not true.
500 years ago Leonardo da vinci painted the mona Lisa. Look how far we have regressed.
I can’t believe I just wasted 1:10 of my life watching this crap
Not me practicing art for over 10 years js to be called "not art" by... THOSE WHATEVER.
People who love arts and seeing this💀
Spilled paint in the Sherwin Williams parking lot looks better than this.
“A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within.” - Will & Ariel Durant
These smug, self-important visual artists dream up something really silly they want to do, then fabricate an even sillier story wrapped up around social commentary to convince people they are the deep thinkers of our day. They are not.
Art is more interested in being metaphorical and philosophical than it is concerned with being appreciable as a metaphor or philosophy. That's why modern art sucks, its like writing that the moon has a dark side and a bright side and pretending there's incredible depth to that idea, and when someone points out that while there might be, simply saying so isn't enough. That what all these displays are, saying there is meaning without backing it up with any substance. You want to talk about the "sound of butter" as some sort of environmental message, how about naming every cow within a documentary about the life of a selection of cows, show mother cows walking into the slaughter house after saying goodbye to their young, how about putting a camera on the young crying for its mother. THAT IS FUCKING ART. It hurts, it makes us think, it makes us question ourselves. I'd still eat beef, but at least I'd appreciate that an animal had to die for it. I'd also possibly be in favor of more humane slaughter methods. But slapping pile of butter with a mic is shitty substanceless art.
Yeah, I remember when I watch a film in school about that stuff. It really does change your opinion about things. I still eat meat though, just very sparingly.
0:23 was actually kinda good and seems like real art. I know all of them use creativity but I choose it because it actually looked good at the end.
You joke ?
It looks like a 5 year old spilling his paint all over the floor. The heck are you seeing there?
Lol what
girl what
Agreed
As an artist myself I never considered any of this crap to be art.
I know that in general art shouldn't have any rules, but I think no matter what it should be pleasing to look at.
Absolutely.
Doesnt have to be @GiovanniderBosewichtsome pieces are horrifying
@GiovanniderBosewicht remember to look at the shit in your toilet it will look way better than any of the art in the video
I think that we simply shouldn't use word "art" in a positive light. Art can be skillfully made or it can be poorly made, art can be profound and can be shallow.
Also I strongly disagree with art being something pleasing to look at. You can draw disemboweled, mutilated bodies and it will make most people nauseous, but it will still be art.
@@petrorlov2599 i though there is difference between art and shitting on the floor
Art, like Beauty, is in the eye of the beholder - The tragedy is that some people have mud in their eyes because they want to be trendy and
like to believe there is something meaningful in this 'Art', something that the majority do not have the intelligence to see. However, the majority do not have
mud in their eyes and see it for what it is.........
The F art world
Good one 😂😂😂
The ancestor of nft
Both are used for money laundering so this checks
I thought my drawing skills were bad until I saw this
Considering today's culture, this looks about right.
This has the same bullshit energy of the guy and the wine thing. He brought a $15 dollar wine from walmart(I think it was) and said it came from a history vineyard in Europe and it won first place. Much like that competition, this art is bullshit.
Didn’t that guy have something like experience and was well-known from other wine competition people’s perspectives?
(Might be wrong but atleast that’s what I heard. Still bullshit though)
what a perfectly good waste of butter!
The guy with the ink and brick looks like a crazy person
Contemporary art is just professional trolling.
You tell people it’s one thing, the majority disagrees, then you get the idiots who agree with you.
It’s a social experiment. The real “art” is finding out who sees the king’s clothes and who are contrarians.
"Cocaine is a hell of a drug ..." - Rick James.
Artisan: Works a full-time job and uses his free time to make incredible work that takes hours and sells for less than minimum wage. He feels like he has a good life.
Artist: Is unemployed and spends thirty seconds slapping paint on a canvas to sell for the price of a house. Claims to have a life of darkness!
Sweet, my seven year old can make millions with her drawings, just got to find the nearest gallery - We will call it, 'An Innocent View' a journey into the present as seen through the eyes of a child, a multi-piece exhibition in coloured pencil on A4 paper. I'm sure I can figure out some kind of symbolic meaning for each drawing.
As an actual artist that seems like an interesting concept. Like unironically.
Just teach your daughter some really big words and tell her to string them together in a nonsensical way to explain her pieces. That'll be the finishing touch 🎀
0:49 COVID 9188282 variant invading the building🦠🦠🦠🦠
NPCS: omg art!!! 🗣️🗣️🤳🤳🤳🤳📸📸📸
The painting: [ / ]
Dumb people: Wow is such a magnificent work you can see the reflection of his traumas and deep fears on the canvas is magnificent..
The "Artist": Yeah sure that was exactly what i was thinking when i did it... it would be $1,000,000.00
Dumb people: $500,000.00
"Artist": Sold
Am I not cult enough and ignorant or I think art should be MINIMALLY aesthetically pleasing to be considered art? I don't think "conceptual" art should be a thing... Makes no sense
Thousands of laborers need to demand a raise as shoveling dirt is now clearly valuable modern art
Yeah, but those laborers don't do it in a way that shows they've clearly never used a shovel before. The utter lack of ability to handle the shovel there is what is the art.
The degradation of man....we haven't produced high art since the renaissance... approximately 600 years ago, let it sink in. Now, we tape bananas to walls. We are living through a dark age and dont even realise.
Ok that's nonsense. Plenty of high quality, timeless paintings, sculptures, and other works have been produced all throughout the 18th, 19th, and early to mid 20th centuries.
@@robertstaples3256 I wrote 'high art'.... Not good, quality art, but peak art....give me one example that tops the la pieta for example? No. Exactly. We have been in a state of steady degradation for centuries, and only a moron would argue otherwise.
I think the sanctuary of truth looks pretty nice, it serves as a monument to its country’s religious and cultural history. I don’t like how it’s become infested with tourists though but I suppose that’s how they fund the construction.
@@heroicjourney2508"It only counts if I say it does."
Splendid reasoning, ol' chap. 🙄 Let me guess, gender studies major?
@@heroicjourney2508You do know that even among high quality art, it's appeal is subjective, right? If that is your favorite work of art, or if Renaissance art floats your boat, nothing I ever say will ever be good enough in your mind. Nothing will ever "top" it. Art is varied, even among high quality works. Someone might prefer the likes of The Thinker, or the surrealism of The Persistence of Time, or heck, the sculpture of your own profile picture, which is from 1824.
To say that the Renaissance saw the absolute peak of human artistic expression, you'd have to quantify human expression itself, to put it on a grade scale. Gather a thousand artists, or students of art history, in a room, and you'll have a thousand and one grade scales.
End of civilization is fun
tbh, it looks pretty cool because it is a motivational quote with a randomAss background like this lol.
I have to believe people attend there to laugh at them. I have to.
The mind bogles were they stopped from making a mess as children art my arse
Yep, lashing out at mommy and daddy art.
Apparently we were the species that built the Pyramids of Giza. Just sayin'
Now I want to believe in Ancient Aliens 👽
This is what happens when you tell every kid they're special.
🍇Remember when art was like Rembrandt, Monet, Picasso, Michelangelo, Da Vinci?
At least Warhol drew his own prints, at one point!
Yes he did. Then when he was finished, he also cut the film for each screen by hand with a hobby knife - a long and tedious process. @@TheRealFraston
Bob Ross would call all these unhappy big accidents
As an avant-garde composer, I think the majority of modern art is sensitively and meaningfully created.. but from these excerpts I can't discern any of that. This "performance art" is reactionary and nothing else.
i got arrested doing the exact same thing these guys are doing.
For people who want to appear intelligent rather than be intelligent. No different than people who ostentatiously wear designer labels to appear rich.
I assume these people do not believe in God, and when you don't believe in God, you have no shame. Their self pride is incalculable.
I will say some of the modern art where the person swings around dropping paint on the canvas is kinda neat looking but it should never be displayed next to high class art.
A decade ago, this'd be one of the worst insanities of humanity.
Now, its meh-tier insanity.
Hell, it is practically benign compared to everything else.
Anybody HOME? 🙃
My budgie poops on paper. I had no idea my bird is an Artist. 🐦 🎨
I always wondered what butter sounds like
Lmao, that soyboy is so weak he can barely hold that shovel. Dude.
Those so called "artists" could just make random things and the media would just create a deep meaning out of it making it feel like it has this so called art value making people believe it is fascinating. Why won't we just take a challenge making art that resembles those deep meanings with direct symbolisms.
They forgot the finest of new art. Hunter, high on coke, melting skittles and smearing them around! $500,00] 😏