Or like you Just get rpd by your father 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂👩❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨🫄🫄🫄🫄🫄🫄🤱🤱🤱🤱🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗
Ironically enough post modern art is a perfect example of post modernism. It’s reached the point where art no longer requires an artist, because the true artist is the observer. Post modern art was always meant to demonstrate how the true value of art was created by our imagination, but that was not any less real than something the artist would have imagined. Now art has reached the point where it’s essentially a bunch of rich bums pretending to appreciate garbage. They don’t realize that by pretending it has meaning and value they are actually giving it meaning and value, even if it otherwise had none. It’s poetic.
@@уронитьthis reminds of that tweet where the guy said something like “Kanye could drop a record that is literally just compete silence for an hour straight and his fans wolf still buy it and be like ‘I hear it’.”
@@уронить post modern art are basically shitposts started by Duchamp, and everyone that genuinely thinks any art instalation like that as genuine art is part of the problem/joke he highlights.
The problem is less of random stuff being considered art and moreover said random stuff receives far too much popularity for what it's actually worth. The banana on the wall for instance, it's art in its own way, but it's wayyy too overrated, especially compared to greater works of art. What makes art "great" is by the effort, time, and creativity put into it. None of that was put into taping a banana to a wall and calling it a day.
I think that the biggest problem with modern art is that people can make every expression or simply random interaction with certain things and call it as art , and nobody will know if there an idea or reference behind it or nothing at all. This is in some if no most of cases basically a scam of snob people that will call art everything, and the reason that this is happening is excessive freedom or liberty when it comes to expressing yourself, that is killing actually talented people motivation and determination, because this field gets way to saturated.
One time i saw someone drew a realistic ricefield scenery on my hs bathroom wall, i can assured you, some of the bathroom stall arts are better than... these 😂
Except they aren't actually taking advantage--the rich people are just using it as a convenient money laundering scheme. These "artists" are complicit in the skullduggery of the rich, if anything.
On one hand these “artists” are stealing from the obscenely rich with no effort, but at the same time they degrade the good name of artist overall. Wonder which is worse/better?
i doubt any of these "artist" are "stealing" from anyone, they are probably in cahoots with whoever is buying their garbage. Just a bunch of rich people scratching each others backs.
see if you tell people to steal from the rich directly you get called a "socialist" and a "revilutionary" so what do you do. But yeah these artists usually come from similar social circles as their clients.
Many of these artists have been dead for a while and haven't seen a penny from those sales that occured years after their deaths. Collectioner's buy those pieces because of their names: Cy Twombly, Mark Rothko, Barnett Newman, Joan Miro etc...
Their only excuses are either "It's minimalistic" or "It has a meaning behind it". When those are both bullshit considering you can say that about anything.
Yes but Hunter Biden is definitely a legitimate artist and it's not money laundering at all when all of his art is sold to the same guy for absurd amounts of money
4:28 those are pretty nice though, its easy for someone who's not necessarily an artist to look at that and call it toddler scribbles. But there's a lot of though put into the colors and its clearly taking color theory into consideration. the way the shapes fill the canvas or lead your eyes to one point is also well thought out. think of it like this for example. if a baby who doesn't even know what they are saying calls you ugly bc they heard it on tv, your not gonna care. if someone your age who means what they say calls you ugly, that will hurt you a whole lot more as they said it with intent. toddlers can scribble and make something that looks similar, but there's not much thought behinds those scribbles. a big part of (4:28) pieces like theses is about the creation process more than the final visual. what tools where used, what body motion went into it, emotion, techniques where it was made, why. more then just visual beauty, people like things with a story behind it. to say something is bad bc you dont like how it looks while not understanding the concept is silly. the art in the time stamp defiantly isnt for everyone but threes no need to be disrespectful. 💛
My family took me in a modern art exhibition and among the incredibly stupid bullshit they have there, I was face to face with a painting where some dude smeared his meat with blue paint and just slapped it on the canvas, it was short too, which explains a lot
Ah yes, the blue symbolizes the emotion he feels because of his short meat. The fact that he slapped it onto the canvas is a way of expressing his frustration with the bleak, white emptiness in his pants. This is a brilliant reflection on the situation of many men today.
@@EliyahuShualPerhaps you resemble the same mentality of these artists! As per your ideology, Jesus couldn’t save himself from the J€w$. How can he save you?…. and Jesus didnt die voluntarily , he was crying for help calling Ela(h/o)i Ela(h/o)i lema sabachthani ? Meaning : My God , My God, why have you forsaken me ? Interestingly he was calling the SAME GOD of Muslims and Jews during his last earth days according to the Bible
Art wasn't supposed to be complicated. Most art represented creativity, emotion, but this? This is the literal definition of "It's evolving, just backwards".
Yes because human mentality toward art is also devolving. If you wanted highly crafted masterpiece then pay for it. Y'all ask for good art while refusing to paid artist a penny. Compare that to when those old art are make, artist can earn so much that they can go from poor to nobility.
To clarify: Evolution only happens in one direction. It can be evolving in a shittier direction that nobody likes, but it’s still evolving forwards. Devolving isn’t a real thing.
2:26 before this explanatin, I thought that it symbolized how hard it is to convince people. That would have been a 1000x better message than some weird diorama of a forest that has been blown down.
“The lore” you mean the bullshit tragic backstory that they just slapped onto the “art” to make it different from the scribbles some kid drew on the wall
@@totallyanoriginalusername no, it just means how it was made, why, when, what told where used, what point of life the artist is in, what it represents. its a story. people like stories and this kind of art is more then just visual. the art is only the book cover. the works at 4:28 for example + is not scribbles a toddler could have drawn. there is a clear understanding of colour theory and alot of intent behinds the way the marks are placed (wear they lead your eyes). we should put thing down we dont understand, but I 100% not liking this kinda of art😊 i more into cartoons myself
This is a period: . It is the finest piece of modern art to date. A period symbolises a lot of things, most commonly, the stop of things. Such as this. However, looking deeper into that, a period can be much more if put together with other periods… an ellipses… a state of longing, a state of continuation with no conclusion. Clearly, this can represent mankind, how the actions of one man cannot amount to much in the end and stop when the man stops living, but when a group of people congregate together, they can produce an effect of eternal motion, of eternal continuation… generation and generation…
As an artist (photographer) who used to hold similar beliefs, reading modernist poetry (I was forced to, but ended up liking it), as well having done my first major photography project and critique, has really changed my perspective. Whereas more classical art is more self contained, and more focused on technical art skills and creating a realistic rendition of a scene, it is limited by sorta just showing things to you. On the other hand, modern art is more about making meaning and emotion outside of what the work physically looks like on a computer screen. For example process it was made with, the room, layout, title, association, and whatnot. Instead of directly showing it to you, it makes you imagine and feel the message the artist was making. When you remove context you loose meaning. For example. A large imposing painting in a dark room will feel imposing in person, but not on a computer. Only showing one painting of a set that is meant to be presented together, removes the meaning of the set unless the viewer is already familiar with the set. Artists can, and do build off of personal experience and knowledge, so being separated from that can make modern art seem meaningless. Some art relies on a witty title for meaning, so removing the title can ruin the piece. What I’m getting at is modern art is wack and people tend to not understand it because context is removed, or they are trying to understand it in the same way as classical art. That said, there definitely are bullshit artists, and the modern art buying and selling world is definitely a bit wack, and money laundering-y, but calling all modern art objectively bad or meaningless and saying art has declined since classical art may be one of the worst, shallowest, and most basic takes ever. I hear it all the time and it makes me want to rip my head off. Also another issue with this whole thing is that by saying this, unless you already share these beliefs, i bet you think im some wacko pretentious modern art snob. I’m not trying to say that you should love modern art, but also understand that calling it objectively bad makes you objectively wrong, because art is subjective and that is your opinion. Also also I hate the “pfft look, haha a normie who doesn’t understand the intricacies of modern art” attitude of some art snobs. They just push people away and gatekeep people from actually enjoying it. Also also also, the idea that art has declined since classical art is very connected to fascism but I’m not qualified to talk about that.
The older I get the more I realize how important art actually is. There’s a reason why the Roman’s used so much of their time to build all kinds of buildings that not only served their purpose but also looked really good. It gave people a positive mindset and hope while modern buildings look like prison cells. Your nearest mc Donald’s looks like a prison compared to buildings in the past. Nature is beautiful and diverse which creates a different kind of beauty. We evolved with all kinds of plants and animals around us. We have to substitute the beauty of nature by building good looking buildings that give a similar feeling. No wonder people stay up at night since the concrete blocks only look good when they shine all kinds of LEDs during the night. Otherwise cities and modern buildings don’t look good at all. This is actually a bigger problem then you think it is when you realize why so many people are depressed nowadays. This plays a huge role no wonder so many people have insomnia
Comedian is actually an amazing artpiece in my eyes, as the name implies that the point of it is just that it's there to be a joke. There's no artistic meaning behind a banana taped to the wall, so the whole joke is this banana strapped to a wall is so low effort and ridiculous compared to the rest of the artpieces. That or he just really likes bananas
@@jopnop22 it's like a mordern day shitpost. Way better than those "deep meaning" ones. The only deep meaning one i find cool is the "I can't help myself" robot, that one is MAD cool, you should check it out.
7:15 jokes on you I said eight trillion five hundred and seventy six billion, five hundred and fifty eight million, four hundred and ninety five thousand, five hundred seventy one last week.
2:54 "You see how you can kinda like just take anything in life, and just twist it to sound artistic" Is literally what metaphors are, and I while yeah art and metaphors have a lot of Correlation, but Modern art just treats it like metaphors are the Causation of art
On the left painting I see an org¥ of three bodies with covered parts with black squares. It's not hard to see it, but yeah, monkey probably drew a flower and added some black just for beauty. Flower is more preferred to and kamasutra pic
3:05 i could be wrong about this specific one, but a lot of these colliding art pieces are 3d animations. Still more visually appealing and skillful than the wood blocks, but it wouldn't be as impressive if that is the case.
At this point these "art" its just like bitcoin and NFT. realistically it has no value, but since the creator made up the value and says it cost 50k dollars, people just believe it even tho it has less value then AI art.
@@angel_of_rust because part of art is finding ways of creating the image or idea that is in your head. typing a prompt and messing with sliders will never give you the image or sound you have in your head, only something else’s interpretation of your idea. ai can’t convey emotion or meaning the way humans can either, because it has no concept of it. it also tents to generally be visually unappealing, and there isn’t anything artistic in the way it generates its images and sounds (copying art made by real humans).
Freedom isn't the sole component of creativity and the art said creativity creates, rather it is limitations during the process, from either focused ideas all the way to even the medium the art is derived from. Creativity isn't just finding something unique, it's finding an answer to a question.
Yeah, back in the day you would actually have to put some effort into making art. At my national state art gallery, they literally had a lineup of rakes that had different stripes on it that I could literally make in less than a minute.
To add to @skootergirl22's reply, there are indeed clop artists who make clop with correct horse anatomy. *_My mind has been tainted with this eldritch knowledge, and I intend to infect others with it._*
Worshiping the lazy, the purposeless, the hideous is the point. To them, the world is arbitrary, and since beauty is not arbitrary it must be sidelined and ignored.
There used to be this annoying little girl in the 7th grade that pretended to cry so I could be sent out of the class because I argued , “Twisting a metal pipe is not a form of art.”
My art teacher just said that “modern art” is just seeing how well you can bullshit your explanation of the artwork. Fun fact: If you buy the banana artwork you just get a piece of paper that tells you how to put the tape on the banana and how to tape it to the wall.
At this point, even though I can draw really well, (like I know perspective, lighting, anatomy and rendering) in order to pass my art assignments I’m just gonna slap a bunch of shit on the canvas and call it a day
The banana on the wall, it was created by Maurizio Cattelan. He said he initially made it as a joke but was surprised that the "art piece" actually came to worth something.
Considering the timeline for that painting the only way it could plausibly hold value is if that was the original batch of YInMn blue discovered only recently. (Think Perkin's original mauve sample) Even then it's ridiculous to make such a sample as big as it was.
I have always thought that art can be anything (it can be made with any material, object, medium or representation) but you always have to give it a beautiful or understandable form, for example, painting was born mainly to paint things, but artists decided to use it to create humans, animals, landscapes, etc., on paper or on a wall, art need to be also considerate like a medium where you can create
i'm gonna try to summarize my story: I've always loved art, I remember when I was like 10 - 13 I went to a lot of museums and made countless pieces, etc. In said museums they had plenty of ABSTRACT or contemporary art and I remember saying: "I LOVE THIS" and argued that It was about just letting the art be (i hate that) and not questioning it. From 2018 until 2020 I stopped taking art so intensively (both making and contemplating it in museums, etc) but I engaged back w it during late 2020 (where I specifically became very passionate about painting). In 2021 I discovered the impressionistic movement and became OBSESSED with it. It wasn't until 2022-23 that I started reconsidering the idea of contemporary art (since I had started going back to art galleries and expositions), thinking that It lack the true authenticity and depth that other paintings had (i.e. Avant-Garde movements). I definitely became more conservative with my judgement and understanding of art, and I know that art is subjetive, but I trully believe that people who claim that they are artists (because art can't be questioned) are either people with frustated wishes to either profit or generate attention from their "pieces" or people who think that through their artwork they go against the system and that with their messages and/or concepts they will make people rebel against this one. And what frustates me about this last type is that most of these persons that criticize the system (the capitalism system, that is) end up taking advantage of it (having expensive phones, houses, worlwide recognition, making profit, etc), playing by its rules and treating as "inferior" to those who either don't get their "concept" or criticize their work (they believe that they are above everyone and everything). This is also frustating to inferior or more amateur artists who are WAYYYY better (like you said) than them, since they have the capability but not the attention and or money to be recognized for their work.
I totally agree with what you say, as an artist and student myself with over a decade of experience. The funny thing is that I joined a Certificate III Visual Arts class at my school in hopes of learning a new skill or challenging myself to create a huge acrylic project for an assignment. Instead, I literally was told to replicate a Rothko painting (yes, the colour palette squares at 08:14 ) and do 9 miniature ones for practice beforehand. Oh, and can't forget a 500-word deep analysis of his artwork is required as well. Might as well drop out and do something like ICT instead lmaooo
In defence of some of the older modern art like Rothco and polloc, their art had effort, structure and composition. Rothkos color fields are built up in multiple thin layers of oil paint that creates a unique color when you see it in person, but looks like any shade of color viewed from a screen. And Rothko was very secretive about his technique so no one to this day knows how he did it exactly. Modern art of today still mostly suck however. TLDR: old modern art had effort that holds value. Modern art of today usually does not.
Slapping together some random materials and then making up a vague meaning for it afterwards was literally how I got by in my high school art classes because my teacher told me I couldn't draw cartoons anymore and I needed to make an installation. I got a B+ for sticking a bunch of photos of the beach onto a cardboard disco ball and then putting it over a potted plant. What was the meaning behind the artwork? Well uh, it was uh, it was...a commentary about how we tend to repeat the same ideas over and over in our heads without seeing the true meaning of the subject beneath. The photos of the ocean are fake, and serve as a distraction to make the viewer think the installation has something to do with the beach, but the real actual object, it's actually just a tree all along if you look beneath the surface. Yeah...
If you are going to criticize art you should at least know that modern art is an late 19th century - 20th century impressionism, realism, and architecture. Post-modern art is still 50 - 60 years old now. Videos like this hyperfocus on pieces representing ideas and transgressions already explored. Artists like Njideka Akunyili Crosby, Yayoi Kusama, Anselm Kiefer, and Mark Bradford all have pieces that are impressive in many of the same movements and types of installations in this video. Is a falling bucket of sand beyond critique, no of course not. But choosing the most asinine pieces and photographs is deliberate at best.
The worst part about the banana is it was originally intended to make fun of the current state of modern art, and ended up being a flagship of it.
Sooo... it did its job correctly then.
$120,000 because I said so fr
ah, so the money is worth it if it's all for the memes.
fun fact the same dude who made the banana art also made a GIGANTIC STATUE OF A HAND FLIPPING EVERYONE OFF.
you know the state of art is bad when nobody can tell the difference between genuine work and obvious mockery
How to be good at painting:
1. Be a schizo
2. Don't take your meds
3. Profit
Im doing that right now and i still get no paper
Now the voices are telling me to wear girly clothes and waterboard my face in sulfuric acid
Or like you Just get rpd by your father 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂👩❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👩❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨👨❤️💋👨🫄🫄🫄🫄🫄🫄🤱🤱🤱🤱🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗
You forgot step 4
Be extremely stupid
@@JunniferLuzeytonzthe "voices" are PragerU
What the hell is that? Looks like the ground there is alive... Whatever it is, it ain't natural. Burn it boys.
My college art teacher taught me one thing: Modern art is a money laundering.
Jackson Pollock CIA
Ironically enough post modern art is a perfect example of post modernism. It’s reached the point where art no longer requires an artist, because the true artist is the observer. Post modern art was always meant to demonstrate how the true value of art was created by our imagination, but that was not any less real than something the artist would have imagined. Now art has reached the point where it’s essentially a bunch of rich bums pretending to appreciate garbage. They don’t realize that by pretending it has meaning and value they are actually giving it meaning and value, even if it otherwise had none. It’s poetic.
@@уронитьthis reminds of that tweet where the guy said something like “Kanye could drop a record that is literally just compete silence for an hour straight and his fans wolf still buy it and be like ‘I hear it’.”
W art teacher
@@уронить post modern art are basically shitposts started by Duchamp, and everyone that genuinely thinks any art instalation like that as genuine art is part of the problem/joke he highlights.
And they call Hitler's paintings mediocre...
Hitler, for all his faults, was a professional artist.
The pioneers of this Modern "Art" BS literally did (it was when Modern "Art" started to get famous) and many of their brainwashed losers still does
Thank you for not calling him “tHe aUStRiaN pAInTEr” . Its an insult to him
He did a pretty good job he certainly did so much better than Picasso
@josephdillon9698 how?
"lets get one thing straight: if I can do it, its not art". -red green
That show was amazing
"art is subjective" and its consequences ruined an entire generation of art
Who would’ve guessed subjectivist ideas ruin entire walks of life 💀
The problem is less of random stuff being considered art and moreover said random stuff receives far too much popularity for what it's actually worth. The banana on the wall for instance, it's art in its own way, but it's wayyy too overrated, especially compared to greater works of art.
What makes art "great" is by the effort, time, and creativity put into it. None of that was put into taping a banana to a wall and calling it a day.
if everything is considered art... nothing is..
I think that the biggest problem with modern art is that people can make every expression or simply random interaction with certain things and call it as art , and nobody will know if there an idea or reference behind it or nothing at all. This is in some if no most of cases basically a scam of snob people that will call art everything, and the reason that this is happening is excessive freedom or liberty when it comes to expressing yourself, that is killing actually talented people motivation and determination, because this field gets way to saturated.
art is subjective by definition
what ure talking about is money laundering
If this is art then my school's bathroom must be a gallery
Good one.
Had to take a double take (I had to scroll up again)
😂😂😅
Dang this comment cracked me up
One time i saw someone drew a realistic ricefield scenery on my hs bathroom wall, i can assured you, some of the bathroom stall arts are better than... these 😂
After rejecting a cool Austrian guy, they call everything art.
Don't wanna take another risk
I wonder who is making this art?
Since then, can't tell fart from art
i miss him so much bros
@@zebulaun he lives within us ♥
0:11 bad apple mentioned
OMG YES
MIZUKI AAAAAAA
Mizu5
No
Bumshakataka
5:14 the monkeys is lowkey better😭
😂😂😂
for real😭
ONG BRO 💀💀
these new age artists are lowkey genius; taking advantage of rich people’s restorted to make a bank is a crazy infinite money glitch
Except they aren't actually taking advantage--the rich people are just using it as a convenient money laundering scheme. These "artists" are complicit in the skullduggery of the rich, if anything.
Then they failed to realize that they become what they were taking advantage of 😬
They could die as Robin Hood, yet end up live long enough to be his "victims" instead 😔
They are rich as well, they're just helping their friends make 6 million dollars conveniently be tax deductible
More like taking part in a money laundering scheme.
blud thinks he can ignore the clown girls
We'll never let him live it down
Damn straight
are clown girls art?
He gonna get sent more
dont forget the psycho criminal girls
On one hand these “artists” are stealing from the obscenely rich with no effort, but at the same time they degrade the good name of artist overall. Wonder which is worse/better?
Most of these people are also extremely rich. There is no positive side to this
These "artists" are also rich, there is no good side to this, it's all bad
i doubt any of these "artist" are "stealing" from anyone, they are probably in cahoots with whoever is buying their garbage. Just a bunch of rich people scratching each others backs.
see if you tell people to steal from the rich directly you get called a "socialist" and a "revilutionary" so what do you do. But yeah these artists usually come from similar social circles as their clients.
Many of these artists have been dead for a while and haven't seen a penny from those sales that occured years after their deaths. Collectioner's buy those pieces because of their names: Cy Twombly, Mark Rothko, Barnett Newman, Joan Miro etc...
0:09 bad apple
modern apple
Naba rete kumuki no
bad apple can be played on anything, now THAT'S true art
@@junaugust2705 FR it's truly phenomenal.
worse apple
The fact that half of these are called “Untitled” or “Unfinished” is absolutely hilarious
NFTs before NFTs
@@supb1848 This is basically nfts if they were actually good to invest in.
@@Nigerosaurus420 Both are used for money laundering by idiots who think they are too important to be poor with the rest
@@Nigerosaurus420except its not
@@myhonestreaction6217 You can get even more money with even worse works.
@@Nigerosaurus420 except this just money laundering to avoid taxes or sumethin 😂
when everything is art, nothing is art.
💯
Realest thing
And when everyone's super, no one will be.
-Syndrome
I dunno, it reminds me of that quote.
@@KENNYLEE0204because it’s that same line but with art
Real
I was just about to eat my food, CLUTCH
Hope you enjoyed the part at 2:38
3:53 , hopefully that makes your experience better.
@@gab0_267I actually did not enjoy that part, unfortunately
bad idea
“I wonder what new video ibz has posted!”
“I may have lost my appetite for good.”
5:21 monkey did it better looks like it has a deeper meaning to it
The black marks on the left look like humans
4:25 Watch out when these guys pop their collars, that usually means they think the world revolves around them.
we could put period blood on a painting and it would sell for a million dollars
Gojo figure incident.
I would buy it and drink it all up
male feminists would buy that shit in an instant
insane grift
@@2735angelayo chill dawg💀
@@2735angel Bro...no. 😕
Their only excuses are either "It's minimalistic" or "It has a meaning behind it". When those are both bullshit considering you can say that about anything.
I mean, if its bullshit... Does that mean they are actually shit posting on the museum?
how the heck is scribbling gonna mean something unless you are like a child and cant do better???
@@steadfast1448 if all this art is bullshit, does that mean they're shitposting in the museum?
My cat took a shit, it’s metaphor. 890000000$ btw
well what if anything can be considered art, why would you constrain yourself with the definition of art, art is just a fun thing to look or listen to
Truly a classic money laundering moment
gotta dodge them taxes somehow
Yes but Hunter Biden is definitely a legitimate artist and it's not money laundering at all when all of his art is sold to the same guy for absurd amounts of money
a sigma bagillionare moment
A caterpillonaire type situation
you do art for a living
i do art for paying my bills and taxes
we are not the same.
1:49 that joke is more artistic than the art here
4:28 those are pretty nice though, its easy for someone who's not necessarily an artist to look at that and call it toddler scribbles. But there's a lot of though put into the colors and its clearly taking color theory into consideration. the way the shapes fill the canvas or lead your eyes to one point is also well thought out.
think of it like this for example. if a baby who doesn't even know what they are saying calls you ugly bc they heard it on tv, your not gonna care. if someone your age who means what they say calls you ugly, that will hurt you a whole lot more as they said it with intent. toddlers can scribble and make something that looks similar, but there's not much thought behinds those scribbles. a big part of (4:28) pieces like theses is about the creation process more than the final visual. what tools where used, what body motion went into it, emotion, techniques where it was made, why. more then just visual beauty, people like things with a story behind it.
to say something is bad bc you dont like how it looks while not understanding the concept is silly. the art in the time stamp defiantly isnt for everyone but threes no need to be disrespectful. 💛
My family took me in a modern art exhibition and among the incredibly stupid bullshit they have there, I was face to face with a painting where some dude smeared his meat with blue paint and just slapped it on the canvas, it was short too, which explains a lot
WTF LOL
😂😂😂😂
Ah yes, the blue symbolizes the emotion he feels because of his short meat. The fact that he slapped it onto the canvas is a way of expressing his frustration with the bleak, white emptiness in his pants. This is a brilliant reflection on the situation of many men today.
@@NPC-9361nawh Mine is big,strong and long :3
Does it also show his erectile disfunction
This has got to be the biggest thing to come out of Tajikistan 🇹🇯 🔥🔥🔥
DUSHANBE ART SCHOOL COOKS UP SOME BANGERS 🇹🇯🇹🇯🇹🇯🇹🇯💪💪💪💪🗣🗣🗣🔥🔥
They're actually that bad irl?!!!!!!
@@yuhaturi3329 no they are the greatest
Do you know or follow Jesus Christ (Yahusha)? Only He can take you to Heaven and give you eternal life.
@@EliyahuShualPerhaps you resemble the same mentality of these artists! As per your ideology, Jesus couldn’t save himself from the J€w$. How can he save you?….
and Jesus didnt die voluntarily , he was crying for help calling Ela(h/o)i Ela(h/o)i lema sabachthani ? Meaning : My God , My God, why have you forsaken me ?
Interestingly he was calling the SAME GOD of Muslims and Jews during his last earth days according to the Bible
Art wasn't supposed to be complicated. Most art represented creativity, emotion, but this? This is the literal definition of
"It's evolving, just backwards".
Devolving then.
Yes because human mentality toward art is also devolving. If you wanted highly crafted masterpiece then pay for it. Y'all ask for good art while refusing to paid artist a penny. Compare that to when those old art are make, artist can earn so much that they can go from poor to nobility.
To clarify: Evolution only happens in one direction. It can be evolving in a shittier direction that nobody likes, but it’s still evolving forwards. Devolving isn’t a real thing.
6:11 WHAAAAATTTT
elephants painting is cool but also the amount of abuse the animals go through is sickening
2:26 before this explanatin, I thought that it symbolized how hard it is to convince people. That would have been a 1000x better message than some weird diorama of a forest that has been blown down.
Art like this survives from either it’s pretentious title or the lore
“The lore” you mean the bullshit tragic backstory that they just slapped onto the “art” to make it different from the scribbles some kid drew on the wall
@@totallyanoriginalusername yes
Or because it can be used as money laundering
@@totallyanoriginalusername no, it just means how it was made, why, when, what told where used, what point of life the artist is in, what it represents. its a story. people like stories and this kind of art is more then just visual. the art is only the book cover.
the works at 4:28 for example + is not scribbles a toddler could have drawn. there is a clear understanding of colour theory and alot of intent behinds the way the marks are placed (wear they lead your eyes). we should put thing down we dont understand, but I 100% not liking this kinda of art😊 i more into cartoons myself
one dot on a canvas and put a joker style meaning and that goes for 600k dollars
one line could be the price of a cybertruck
5:02 I lowkey like the monkey's painting more cuz it kinda looks like a flower lol.
Me too
Great video my friend 👏🏾 👏🏾
I think that if something doesn’t require high level of skill and effort is not art.
I personally think more manga artists need to be put in museums instead of just one solid color
And some comic artists
@@TheManFromJupiter I agree with that
I think that also animators need to be in that place
@@teddybear7200 for real, just any pop culture artist
dude I think even some drawings I made are better than most of these "modern art" 😭😭😭
Modern art ia just a fancy name for tax evasion
I’m literally taking a shit rn
As you should
Your Uncle wants to rpe you after all, and having chocolate would Ruin His experience.🤱🤱🤱🤱🫄🫄🫄🫄🫄🫄🫄🪳🇹🇷🇮🇱🚽🇮🇱🚽🇹🇷🪳
me too
@@mohammedabdul4832 my uncle is out of the country because he committed several acts of fraud
better be on a canvas
@@mohammedabdul4832 WAT
This is a period: .
It is the finest piece of modern art to date. A period symbolises a lot of things, most commonly, the stop of things. Such as this. However, looking deeper into that, a period can be much more if put together with other periods… an ellipses… a state of longing, a state of continuation with no conclusion. Clearly, this can represent mankind, how the actions of one man cannot amount to much in the end and stop when the man stops living, but when a group of people congregate together, they can produce an effect of eternal motion, of eternal continuation… generation and generation…
📷 📸 😮
How does someone make this o:
As an artist (photographer) who used to hold similar beliefs, reading modernist poetry (I was forced to, but ended up liking it), as well having done my first major photography project and critique, has really changed my perspective. Whereas more classical art is more self contained, and more focused on technical art skills and creating a realistic rendition of a scene, it is limited by sorta just showing things to you. On the other hand, modern art is more about making meaning and emotion outside of what the work physically looks like on a computer screen. For example process it was made with, the room, layout, title, association, and whatnot. Instead of directly showing it to you, it makes you imagine and feel the message the artist was making. When you remove context you loose meaning.
For example. A large imposing painting in a dark room will feel imposing in person, but not on a computer. Only showing one painting of a set that is meant to be presented together, removes the meaning of the set unless the viewer is already familiar with the set. Artists can, and do build off of personal experience and knowledge, so being separated from that can make modern art seem meaningless. Some art relies on a witty title for meaning, so removing the title can ruin the piece.
What I’m getting at is modern art is wack and people tend to not understand it because context is removed, or they are trying to understand it in the same way as classical art.
That said, there definitely are bullshit artists, and the modern art buying and selling world is definitely a bit wack, and money laundering-y, but calling all modern art objectively bad or meaningless and saying art has declined since classical art may be one of the worst, shallowest, and most basic takes ever. I hear it all the time and it makes me want to rip my head off.
Also another issue with this whole thing is that by saying this, unless you already share these beliefs, i bet you think im some wacko pretentious modern art snob.
I’m not trying to say that you should love modern art, but also understand that calling it objectively bad makes you objectively wrong, because art is subjective and that is your opinion.
Also also I hate the “pfft look, haha a normie who doesn’t understand the intricacies of modern art” attitude of some art snobs. They just push people away and gatekeep people from actually enjoying it.
Also also also, the idea that art has declined since classical art is very connected to fascism but I’m not qualified to talk about that.
“And when everything’s art… nothing will be”
The older I get the more I realize how important art actually is. There’s a reason why the Roman’s used so much of their time to build all kinds of buildings that not only served their purpose but also looked really good. It gave people a positive mindset and hope while modern buildings look like prison cells. Your nearest mc Donald’s looks like a prison compared to buildings in the past. Nature is beautiful and diverse which creates a different kind of beauty. We evolved with all kinds of plants and animals around us. We have to substitute the beauty of nature by building good looking buildings that give a similar feeling. No wonder people stay up at night since the concrete blocks only look good when they shine all kinds of LEDs during the night. Otherwise cities and modern buildings don’t look good at all. This is actually a bigger problem then you think it is when you realize why so many people are depressed nowadays. This plays a huge role no wonder so many people have insomnia
mmm yes, ancient art = good 👍
Comedian is actually an amazing artpiece in my eyes, as the name implies that the point of it is just that it's there to be a joke. There's no artistic meaning behind a banana taped to the wall, so the whole joke is this banana strapped to a wall is so low effort and ridiculous compared to the rest of the artpieces. That or he just really likes bananas
You probably put more effort into this than most would.
@@jopnop22 it's like a mordern day shitpost. Way better than those "deep meaning" ones. The only deep meaning one i find cool is the "I can't help myself" robot, that one is MAD cool, you should check it out.
@@jopnop22 lol
it was made to make fun of art
even AI art is more impressive then this
0:19 Me looking back on all of my achievements in life after I die:
7:15 jokes on you I said eight trillion five hundred and seventy six billion, five hundred and fifty eight million, four hundred and ninety five thousand, five hundred seventy one last week.
💀
2:54 "You see how you can kinda like just take anything in life, and just twist it to sound artistic"
Is literally what metaphors are, and I while yeah art and metaphors have a lot of Correlation, but Modern art just treats it like metaphors are the Causation of art
5:12 bro on the monkeys pic you can kind of see a flower or sum, literally 10x better
On the left painting I see an org¥ of three bodies with covered parts with black squares. It's not hard to see it, but yeah, monkey probably drew a flower and added some black just for beauty. Flower is more preferred to and kamasutra pic
Minimalism and absurdism is modern art
We went from valuing creativity and hard work to "try" finding a masterpiece in poop
3:05 i could be wrong about this specific one, but a lot of these colliding art pieces are 3d animations. Still more visually appealing and skillful than the wood blocks, but it wouldn't be as impressive if that is the case.
0:29, this some shit Rodrick would do
FR 😭
3:30 I thought this dude was faking but after seeing the whiskey kayak I’m convinced he’s the real deal.
PEAK ibz would've just mentioned clown girls EXCLUSIVELY when talking about art 😭🙏
At this point these "art" its just like bitcoin and NFT.
realistically it has no value, but since the creator made up the value and says it cost 50k dollars, people just believe it even tho it has less value then AI art.
bro did NOT have to show us more than a single frame of cow feces FRESH FROM THE SOURCE
Apparently anything is art nowadays
unless ai makes it then suddenly it's no longer art
if anything is art, nothing is art
@@angel_of_rust that is an objectively correct take, yes
@@angel_of_rust Because ai has no soul. Even this stuff has a modicum of soul in it.
@@angel_of_rust because part of art is finding ways of creating the image or idea that is in your head. typing a prompt and messing with sliders will never give you the image or sound you have in your head, only something else’s interpretation of your idea. ai can’t convey emotion or meaning the way humans can either, because it has no concept of it. it also tents to generally be visually unappealing, and there isn’t anything artistic in the way it generates its images and sounds (copying art made by real humans).
Freedom isn't the sole component of creativity and the art said creativity creates, rather it is limitations during the process, from either focused ideas all the way to even the medium the art is derived from. Creativity isn't just finding something unique, it's finding an answer to a question.
Most art gallerys show good stuff, its just the big ones that sometimes dont.
Yeah, back in the day you would actually have to put some effort into making art. At my national state art gallery, they literally had a lineup of rakes that had different stripes on it that I could literally make in less than a minute.
I've seen MLP art so detailed it goes into the uncanny valley. It's crazy dude
Including correct horse anatomy
@@skootergirl22☹
@@skootergirl22 One shudders to imagine what you are saying
@@FuzDoesStuff No need to shudder. Only fear that there is worse
To add to @skootergirl22's reply, there are indeed clop artists who make clop with correct horse anatomy.
*_My mind has been tainted with this eldritch knowledge, and I intend to infect others with it._*
I needed a soundtrack for my food and you came just in time, god bless u
True as hell, but then you can't criticize it because the beauty of it is "subjective"?
Shi goes both way bro
wait til ai pours the whiskey on the boat
now it won't be art or whatever
It's not subjective
@@QTwoSix it is but I agree for me its straight ass
Do you have any objective way of criticizing art?
Worshiping the lazy, the purposeless, the hideous is the point.
To them, the world is arbitrary, and since beauty is not arbitrary it must be sidelined and ignored.
There used to be this annoying little girl in the 7th grade that pretended to cry so I could be sent out of the class because I argued , “Twisting a metal pipe is not a form of art.”
Fun fact ibz: the term for the type of art you are looking at is actually called contemporary art, modern art ended during the 1970s :)
No, it's called dada art and it's been around since the 20s and it's trash
4:05 they got wall apple too
The Person who ate the Wall Banana is a absolute Chad🙃
that is the best thumbnail i’ve seen all day
the german painters art that is actually good: rejected
shit lines with colors: ART
A guy from my city literally pooped on one of his paintings, stepped on it, and then sold it. Beats me how people can get away with this
My art teacher just said that “modern art” is just seeing how well you can bullshit your explanation of the artwork.
Fun fact: If you buy the banana artwork you just get a piece of paper that tells you how to put the tape on the banana and how to tape it to the wall.
you have a shitty art teacher then
At this point, even though I can draw really well, (like I know perspective, lighting, anatomy and rendering) in order to pass my art assignments I’m just gonna slap a bunch of shit on the canvas and call it a day
Right the only cool modern art is the one with the candies
Does that mean someone taking a photo of me eating a piece of cucumber is classified as art now?
yes. it’s obviously a metaphor for homosexuality and the aids crisis of the 1980’s.
yessss, based on those who defended that bullshit lazy ass people doing
Just existing alone is already considered an art
Photography is an art form, So yes
7:10 OH MY GOSH ITS ART, THANK YOU FOR THIS WONDERFULL PEICE
The banana on the wall, it was created by Maurizio Cattelan.
He said he initially made it as a joke but was surprised that the "art piece" actually came to worth something.
5:07 The monkey's looks better ngl
Fr
1:29, that made my laugh so hard. That's not art, it's Idiocracy. A banana duct tape to a wall is not art, it's Ludicrous.
Oh shit, so that's what happened to my lunch when I stuck it on the wall so I wouldn't forget it. I thought somebody had nicked it.
The banana was meant as a critique of modern art. That's why the guy came and ate it. But the people of the banana are unable to look at themselves
6:49 That is not a new shade of blue, that is #000870
Considering the timeline for that painting the only way it could plausibly hold value is if that was the original batch of YInMn blue discovered only recently. (Think Perkin's original mauve sample) Even then it's ridiculous to make such a sample as big as it was.
I have always thought that art can be anything (it can be made with any material, object, medium or representation) but you always have to give it a beautiful or understandable form, for example, painting was born mainly to paint things, but artists decided to use it to create humans, animals, landscapes, etc., on paper or on a wall, art need to be also considerate like a medium where you can create
The fact that you made a video about this kind of proved the point that contemporary art is conversation worthy
7:55 I'd buy this, not for two million dollars but if this was like five dollars I'd buy it, it's kinda cute to be honest
Standard traditionalist W.
Reject modernity, embrace tradition
Modern art is retarded but let's not pretend like traditionalism is any less retarded
🤮
Another win for hyperborean traditionalists
@@kyr...Bucks broken
4:39 that looks like he drew something else and this was where he put the paint he used
5:22 not gonna lie i like the monkeys one more
1:57 certainly impacted someone.
2:15 using 100% of my brain to find fancy words in my vocabulary that will make me sound smarter than Albert Einstein.
6:39 that’s most of what most painting like this does
3:24 I find at actually funny, that this commertial have more meaning and idea than a alchohole filled kayak.
I’m glad to see that most artist I’ve met despise this “genre”
i hate it too
I love it
the fact that even a kid could replicate it is just sad for modern art
Watching this new banger from Uzbekistan 💪🇺🇿
People:How did you get rich
Artist: I shit on the painting
8:15 Clearly that's an abstract render of a Minion
i'm gonna try to summarize my story:
I've always loved art, I remember when I was like 10 - 13 I went to a lot of museums and made countless pieces, etc. In said museums they had plenty of ABSTRACT or contemporary art and I remember saying: "I LOVE THIS" and argued that It was about just letting the art be (i hate that) and not questioning it. From 2018 until 2020 I stopped taking art so intensively (both making and contemplating it in museums, etc) but I engaged back w it during late 2020 (where I specifically became very passionate about painting). In 2021 I discovered the impressionistic movement and became OBSESSED with it. It wasn't until 2022-23 that I started reconsidering the idea of contemporary art (since I had started going back to art galleries and expositions), thinking that It lack the true authenticity and depth that other paintings had (i.e. Avant-Garde movements). I definitely became more conservative with my judgement and understanding of art, and I know that art is subjetive, but I trully believe that people who claim that they are artists (because art can't be questioned) are either people with frustated wishes to either profit or generate attention from their "pieces" or people who think that through their artwork they go against the system and that with their messages and/or concepts they will make people rebel against this one. And what frustates me about this last type is that most of these persons that criticize the system (the capitalism system, that is) end up taking advantage of it (having expensive phones, houses, worlwide recognition, making profit, etc), playing by its rules and treating as "inferior" to those who either don't get their "concept" or criticize their work (they believe that they are above everyone and everything). This is also frustating to inferior or more amateur artists who are WAYYYY better (like you said) than them, since they have the capability but not the attention and or money to be recognized for their work.
this was perfectly times for me to cut off LMAO 3:00
An ad appeared right at that moment lol
I totally agree with what you say, as an artist and student myself with over a decade of experience.
The funny thing is that I joined a Certificate III Visual Arts class at my school in hopes of learning a new skill or challenging myself to create a huge acrylic project for an assignment. Instead, I literally was told to replicate a Rothko painting (yes, the colour palette squares at 08:14 ) and do 9 miniature ones for practice beforehand. Oh, and can't forget a 500-word deep analysis of his artwork is required as well.
Might as well drop out and do something like ICT instead lmaooo
In defence of some of the older modern art like Rothco and polloc, their art had effort, structure and composition. Rothkos color fields are built up in multiple thin layers of oil paint that creates a unique color when you see it in person, but looks like any shade of color viewed from a screen. And Rothko was very secretive about his technique so no one to this day knows how he did it exactly. Modern art of today still mostly suck however.
TLDR: old modern art had effort that holds value. Modern art of today usually does not.
8:00 was wild, literally ROFL rn, huehuehue
Slapping together some random materials and then making up a vague meaning for it afterwards was literally how I got by in my high school art classes because my teacher told me I couldn't draw cartoons anymore and I needed to make an installation. I got a B+ for sticking a bunch of photos of the beach onto a cardboard disco ball and then putting it over a potted plant.
What was the meaning behind the artwork? Well uh, it was uh, it was...a commentary about how we tend to repeat the same ideas over and over in our heads without seeing the true meaning of the subject beneath. The photos of the ocean are fake, and serve as a distraction to make the viewer think the installation has something to do with the beach, but the real actual object, it's actually just a tree all along if you look beneath the surface. Yeah...
I remember when school ported my art to a museum and it was just a really childish Mario doodle.
If you are going to criticize art you should at least know that modern art is an late 19th century - 20th century impressionism, realism, and architecture. Post-modern art is still 50 - 60 years old now. Videos like this hyperfocus on pieces representing ideas and transgressions already explored. Artists like Njideka Akunyili Crosby, Yayoi Kusama, Anselm Kiefer, and Mark Bradford all have pieces that are impressive in many of the same movements and types of installations in this video. Is a falling bucket of sand beyond critique, no of course not. But choosing the most asinine pieces and photographs is deliberate at best.
And us real artists are struggling ✊