What starts as an interesting title, eventually turns out a click bait title link to a very superficial video where NOTHING gets explained, let alone answered :-(
Yes he did. You just thought he was going to support the idea that Dems hacked it. He is careless with Security and that was obvious during his first "hacked" term. He is a hack and so are all Politicians. Dems=Reps and the sooner you get that the sooner you'll see what is truly weak about the System.
The U.S. hacked my country's president's phone. That is probably why we didn't extradited Snowden when he came asking for asylum. Snowden revealed the hack. We didn't have anything against the U.S.
are you so stupid? You think, some random dude on youtube, some how got ahold of the presidents phone, or leaked information, that would've already made it to mainstream media??
Not his fault. Biden administration manages that, and they tried to get rid of his security detail right before the event, and then SS hires unqualified people and makes obvious mistakes uncontrolled by him out of office.
"...while phones have been a part of Whitehouse communications for centuries..." Centuries? One century ago it was 1924. Two centuries ago it was 1824. On 7 March 1876, Alexander Graham Bell was granted a patent for the telephone.
The first phone installed in the White House was by President Rutherford B. Hayes in 1877. Technically, 19th century to 21st century is considered centuries even if it has not been 200 years. Honestly, I was surprised the first phone in the White House was installed in 1877. I figured it would have been closer to 1900. Go figure.
@@mrwesley8926 What surprises me is how accustomed to the current level of technology we have become. I am acutely aware that our current (electronic) technologies are a very, very new thing indeed when measured over the span of recorded history / the existence of anatomically modern humans. Most people are at least nominally aware of that, too, but the degree to which some people would now be hamstrung if they lost their "telephone" (pocket computer, really) is shocking. I don't happen to own/want a smartphone, as I don't like them, but without my computer or (flip-phone) mobile phone... and I was 20 years old by the time "modern" (386) computers were in schools, so for the entirety of my childhood there was no such thing as always-connected.
@@staninjapan07 I hear you there. BASIC on the Commodore 64 was my first programming language followed by PASCAL while in high school and Debug in trade school. On a funny note, I did ask my instructor what happens when we hit the year 2000 and the date flip happens (this was in '93). His reply was "They'll have it figured out by then." We see how that all worked out. Personally, I don't like Boeing's idea of the Prez having an exploding phone. Imagine if someone were to convince (pay, blackmail, coerce through religious zealotry, etc) an aid to RAT the phone then the individual sends a trigger to the phone while it is in the vicinity or being used by the Prez. If I were Prez I personally would keep anything that can go boom well away from me.
0:51 No phones have not been used for centuries. Alexander Graham Bell didn't invent the telephone until 1876 therefore only 148 years have passed. So only one century.
@mrwesley8926 With your logic, you meant to say 3 centuries (19, 20, 21) and Secondly that's like saying I've been around for 2 centuries being born in 1998 (20th, 21st)
@@tannerw14 Yes, good catch. It has been used for 3 centuries. It was used in the 19th, 20th, and 21st. And again, technically, you have lived in 2 centuries.
@@c1ph3rpunk All I know, is it uses trinary instead of binary, so it ends up being far more secure than people would think because you end up having to learn not just an entire new programming language, but a whole new way of computing. Anything needing to be secure is generally encrypted at a level that makes AES look like it was designed by a todler, and it is properly air gapped, with very decent protections against things like stuxnet.
Sorry guys, he's right - there's no such thing as privacy. That's a social contract that was invented by human beings for human beings who agree to abide by that social contract, and reinforced by laws, and ultimately, a guy with a gun at the other end of those laws. Privacy doesn't exist except in our heads. That doesn't mean we can't still honor that social contract amongst each other for everyone's mutual benefit, but it's important to still understand that at its core, it isn't a real thing. It's a cooperation among people.
I would assume, the president gets a new personal phone switched everyday. The work of switching would be taken on by his staff so no interruption for the president
WOW!!! I rarely comment on youtube videos but this video is such a waste of 10min 54 sec that I felt the urge to comment. Save your time and skip. Perfect example of how to say a lot of words without showcasing anything meaningful.
Not to mention the SS7 vulnerabilities baked-in to every cell tower on earth. They still haven't "patched" the flaws, as that would require the change of every single cell tower physically.
0:48 - What likely happens is they have an array of phones for the president... and they are wiped daily, and any "passwords" reset every time and new ones issued - as well as a pure whitelist for all messages being sent to the device. Likely a consumer device, with an enterprise profile to restrict basically all features to the most basic and manual modification to disable camera, and only wireless charges.
We you start to say you can't hack something.... just know that immediately send many ppl to go hack it... anything can be hacked. Even the systems they said were unhackable....
When you say the secret service would notice a hack attempt, are you sure about that still? They seem pretty oblivious and irresponsible. They're probably going to be the one hacking it even, followed by finger pointing.
Yeah, kinda surprised he didn't mention that little incident. Especially as he seems to have fallen for the "iOS more secure" meme... when that laptop contained a backup of hunter's messages to everyone and his father, funny nickname included.
@@vak2586 Why would he mention this? Joe Biden wasn't president at that point he dropped of the laptop for repair. Also, Hunter Biden isn't an elected official.
No device is secure, not at all. If it is on a computer connected to power, it is not only hackable, but has already been hacked. Stuxnet and it's newer versions are much better than you think.
@@MegaLokopo bro, you keep talking out of your ass. You clearly never actually read how stuxnet was able to go undetected for years. Quick your fear mongering you troll.
Shouldn't the White House, Air Force One/Two etc..., Presidential Limousine, etc... all have their own "encrypted mobile cellular towers and Wi-Fi system" so that ONLY the President's cell phone can communicate on it? In other words, if the President is attending a Little League baseball game in Kansas City, Missouri, shouldn't his limousine and entourage have mobile cellular vans present which encrypt his cell phone's communications before relaying them to the main cellular network? I mean, let's face it. FDR and Truman had the SIGSALY network so they could talk to Winston Churchill. And that was in the 1940s. You'd think in 2024 someone could find a way to make sure the President of the United States' communications couldn't be intercepted!
The reality to this question is interesting. Simply put, it is likely that the phone are not even using mobile towers. They could be using an in house, end to end encrypted side loaded app to make calls via an internet connection that could be secured and mobile. Also just because the President is currently using an i Phone doesn't mean it's running standard iOS. The White House and executive branch has requested companies make special items for the sole use of the president. Some are made public, most are not. Many people like to think about this, but the main reason why is due to things like the Freedom of Information Act. Most countries in the world aren't able to inquiry things like this. I find it a bit odd how people receive a ton of information leaders in the US, but still want more... even to the point of hurting themselves and many others.
He says the secret service should recognize the danger of allowing personal devices in the white house. Then he asks why do they permit it. The president is the boss. Who is some underling to tell the top boss what he can or can't do? That applies whether the president is an orange man with a tribble on his head, a senile old buzzard or a laughing hyena.
I would imagine now that at a minimum, important iPhone users will have Lockdown Mode enabled (not sure if that exists on Android, or if it is foolproof)
🤨indirectly insulting Donald J. Trump also to the republican party...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
What starts as an interesting title, eventually turns out a click bait title link to a very superficial video where NOTHING gets explained, let alone answered :-(
Yes he did. You just thought he was going to support the idea that Dems hacked it. He is careless with Security and that was obvious during his first "hacked" term. He is a hack and so are all Politicians. Dems=Reps and the sooner you get that the sooner you'll see what is truly weak about the System.
I agree digital, he did pretty much address it
If you want to hack into into the president's phone so bad, learn the skills, and do it yourself. I'm sure you'll get very far.
The U.S. hacked my country's president's phone. That is probably why we didn't extradited Snowden when he came asking for asylum. Snowden revealed the hack. We didn't have anything against the U.S.
are you so stupid? You think, some random dude on youtube, some how got ahold of the presidents phone, or leaked information, that would've already made it to mainstream media??
So even back then Boeing was making things that selfdestruct
😂 Yoooooo
@francafu8951 👍🏽 well said 💯
i didnt even know boeing made a phone 💀
Be careful bro, some people unalive themselves with 7 shots.
Astronauts are stranded because they went on Boeing starliner.
As a channel called Cybernews, i figured actual information would be given. This was just click-bait, you explained nothing.
If Boeing made it then obviously it's self destructing 😂
😂fr
10:40 - interesting info; does not at all answer the title question ("Why you can't hack the US President's phone")
Some random 15 year old from the middle of Idaho: "Bet."
facts lmao
*Proceeds to leak president's photo with just a Amazon FireTV stick*
😂😂😂@@Redwan777
impossible because top WH officials and president very likely using their own private VPN
Creator: You can't hack U.S President's phone
CIA: It's already hacked by us 😅
Isnt hack if its "legal":)
@@borntoclimb7116 it isn't legal if it's a "hack"😅
CIA: and wtf u going to do about it?
they dont need to "hack" it, they would already monitor it anyway since THEY modified it for him to use
to counter the enemies or threats duh
Hacking has been a thing since the advent of wireless communications.
Nothing is hackproof. Though some devices certainly come pretty damn close.
I don't think it's possible to hack a piece of paper
@@Sartfla you can get a professional to identify the remaining graphite or ink contents to get something that was erased back
@@Sartfla astreal projection, remote viewing: hold my beer.
airgap
Try hacking mechanical clock..
They don't hack the phone. they hack the person.
People don't realize how true that is on a literal level.
@@MegaLokopowhat do you know???
3:31 *which thankfully isn't his additude to physical security* 💀
Not his fault. Biden administration manages that, and they tried to get rid of his security detail right before the event, and then SS hires unqualified people and makes obvious mistakes uncontrolled by him out of office.
That's where I paused the video, went into the comments section and ultimately left.
"...while phones have been a part of Whitehouse communications for centuries..."
Centuries?
One century ago it was 1924.
Two centuries ago it was 1824.
On 7 March 1876, Alexander Graham Bell was granted a patent for the telephone.
hy·per·bo·le
/hīˈpərbəlē/
noun
exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.
"he vowed revenge with oaths and hyperboles"
The first phone installed in the White House was by President Rutherford B. Hayes in 1877. Technically, 19th century to 21st century is considered centuries even if it has not been 200 years. Honestly, I was surprised the first phone in the White House was installed in 1877. I figured it would have been closer to 1900. Go figure.
@@mrwesley8926 What surprises me is how accustomed to the current level of technology we have become. I am acutely aware that our current (electronic) technologies are a very, very new thing indeed when measured over the span of recorded history / the existence of anatomically modern humans. Most people are at least nominally aware of that, too, but the degree to which some people would now be hamstrung if they lost their "telephone" (pocket computer, really) is shocking. I don't happen to own/want a smartphone, as I don't like them, but without my computer or (flip-phone) mobile phone... and I was 20 years old by the time "modern" (386) computers were in schools, so for the entirety of my childhood there was no such thing as always-connected.
@@staninjapan07 I hear you there. BASIC on the Commodore 64 was my first programming language followed by PASCAL while in high school and Debug in trade school. On a funny note, I did ask my instructor what happens when we hit the year 2000 and the date flip happens (this was in '93). His reply was "They'll have it figured out by then." We see how that all worked out. Personally, I don't like Boeing's idea of the Prez having an exploding phone. Imagine if someone were to convince (pay, blackmail, coerce through religious zealotry, etc) an aid to RAT the phone then the individual sends a trigger to the phone while it is in the vicinity or being used by the Prez. If I were Prez I personally would keep anything that can go boom well away from me.
@@repomansezyes let's talk using connotations only, why not?
You didn't include the part where Trump was still using his Galaxy S3 back in 2017 in the oval office for a couple of weeks
Obama used Blackberry though 👀💯
blackberry have always been known for their security,
the same galaxy manufactured in china
0:51 No phones have not been used for centuries. Alexander Graham Bell didn't invent the telephone until 1876 therefore only 148 years have passed. So only one century.
19th to 21st century. 2 centuries.
@mrwesley8926 With your logic, you meant to say 3 centuries (19, 20, 21) and Secondly that's like saying I've been around for 2 centuries being born in 1998 (20th, 21st)
@@tannerw14 Yes, good catch. It has been used for 3 centuries. It was used in the 19th, 20th, and 21st. And again, technically, you have lived in 2 centuries.
EVERY.THING. IS. HACKABLE.
Didn't address the issue of why usa president phone can't be hacked
Would love to see a video on the IT department at the WH and how they setup their network
It’s not one network. Beyond that not much can be said without clearance, let alone publicly.
It's an IntraNet but it still got hacked in 2022 with SolarWinds.
@@c1ph3rpunk All I know, is it uses trinary instead of binary, so it ends up being far more secure than people would think because you end up having to learn not just an entire new programming language, but a whole new way of computing. Anything needing to be secure is generally encrypted at a level that makes AES look like it was designed by a todler, and it is properly air gapped, with very decent protections against things like stuxnet.
@@MegaLokopoThat is cap. Idk where you’re getting that type of information but that’s totally false.
@@MegaLokopo well its definatly hackable then becuase humans are quadnary and they figureing how to "hack" humans so........
You cant hack a phone if there's no phone at all
I've always said that the best security available is pretty simple - unplug the ethernet cable
i'm using a Cat8 Ethernet cable for my computer but I bet my android could get hacked.
@@Marty_TH-camr remove the battery
Where is the NordVPN ad? 😱😱😱😱
OBAMAPAD CAME OUT OF NO WHERE DUDE 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Mannn i remembered having an ObamaPhone lol
I hope Boeing tightened the back-door-plug bolts on their phones..
that was the airlines fault, not boeing
@@TrinitysTalons
No no no.
Boing missed bolts I thought?
There's no such thing as privacy.
Mullvad VPN and giving up privacy-invasive platforms:
What about ProtonVPN?
MONERO XMR
Sorry guys, he's right - there's no such thing as privacy. That's a social contract that was invented by human beings for human beings who agree to abide by that social contract, and reinforced by laws, and ultimately, a guy with a gun at the other end of those laws. Privacy doesn't exist except in our heads. That doesn't mean we can't still honor that social contract amongst each other for everyone's mutual benefit, but it's important to still understand that at its core, it isn't a real thing. It's a cooperation among people.
Not if you want to live in modern society. Eh, it’s overrated anyway.
I would assume, the president gets a new personal phone switched everyday. The work of switching would be taken on by his staff so no interruption for the president
This guy loves to hear his own voice. What a load of nothing to say.
The Art of Ramblings, or as DJT in Flagrant put it : Weaving.
inferiority of all devices
Unless you are mossad
💣💣💥
WOW!!! I rarely comment on youtube videos but this video is such a waste of 10min 54 sec that I felt the urge to comment. Save your time and skip. Perfect example of how to say a lot of words without showcasing anything meaningful.
In September 2019 White House officials found Stingray surveillance devices near the White House.
Not to mention the SS7 vulnerabilities baked-in to every cell tower on earth. They still haven't "patched" the flaws, as that would require the change of every single cell tower physically.
0:48 - What likely happens is they have an array of phones for the president... and they are wiped daily, and any "passwords" reset every time and new ones issued - as well as a pure whitelist for all messages being sent to the device.
Likely a consumer device, with an enterprise profile to restrict basically all features to the most basic and manual modification to disable camera, and only wireless charges.
❤ Love the documentary , Specially the story telling.
the important thing is if your president can you root your phone or is it stinking unrootable.
Always wondered about this, thanks
Boeing made a self destructing product in 2008....and never stopped since
10 minutes i am never getting back
We you start to say you can't hack something.... just know that immediately send many ppl to go hack it... anything can be hacked. Even the systems they said were unhackable....
True But I don't fully agree
@@Marty_TH-camr feel free to thoroughly explain. I'll hear you out
When you say the secret service would notice a hack attempt, are you sure about that still? They seem pretty oblivious and irresponsible. They're probably going to be the one hacking it even, followed by finger pointing.
The secret service failed
tell that to the NSA
Stuxnet would like a word.
Everyone can't hack Russia President's phone ,because Russia President Vladimir Putin never uses cellphone or Internet 😂
That makes sense, If you look at the decisions that idiot makes!!
that's not even a joke, look at his daily routine it's truth
for fbi or cia they only use the old phones from 1978 or smth not mobile
and they also use burner phones to
That phone still uses gsm network. Theres always an insecure point in the network. It can also be jammed forcing coms other other means.
If this type of security is available then Big tech should provide it to us as a service,,
other presidents: iphones putin: old cable telephone ☎💀
damn that animation is crazy
He looks like Steve Jobs.
U cant because its already hacked, thats why he is behaving so weirdly
You can't hack the us president phone but you can leak entire us database 😂
Nobody said the president couldn't order a custom made mobile device looking like an ordinary one from the outside 🤷♂️
Don't forget about Hunter Biden's Laptop, a super secure device that one...
Yeah, kinda surprised he didn't mention that little incident. Especially as he seems to have fallen for the "iOS more secure" meme... when that laptop contained a backup of hunter's messages to everyone and his father, funny nickname included.
@@vak2586 Why would he mention this? Joe Biden wasn't president at that point he dropped of the laptop for repair. Also, Hunter Biden isn't an elected official.
😂😂😂
So basically any device held by people of great value can rest easy knowing there device is more secure then others?
No device is secure, not at all. If it is on a computer connected to power, it is not only hackable, but has already been hacked. Stuxnet and it's newer versions are much better than you think.
Until it isn't
@@iamlorddems3859 yep unfortunately cyber security is always evolving
@@MegaLokopo bro, you keep talking out of your ass. You clearly never actually read how stuxnet was able to go undetected for years. Quick your fear mongering you troll.
Always go for 2nd best option
Less doubtful
Shouldn't the White House, Air Force One/Two etc..., Presidential Limousine, etc... all have their own "encrypted mobile cellular towers and Wi-Fi system" so that ONLY the President's cell phone can communicate on it? In other words, if the President is attending a Little League baseball game in Kansas City, Missouri, shouldn't his limousine and entourage have mobile cellular vans present which encrypt his cell phone's communications before relaying them to the main cellular network? I mean, let's face it. FDR and Truman had the SIGSALY network so they could talk to Winston Churchill. And that was in the 1940s. You'd think in 2024 someone could find a way to make sure the President of the United States' communications couldn't be intercepted!
The reality to this question is interesting. Simply put, it is likely that the phone are not even using mobile towers. They could be using an in house, end to end encrypted side loaded app to make calls via an internet connection that could be secured and mobile. Also just because the President is currently using an i Phone doesn't mean it's running standard iOS. The White House and executive branch has requested companies make special items for the sole use of the president. Some are made public, most are not. Many people like to think about this, but the main reason why is due to things like the Freedom of Information Act. Most countries in the world aren't able to inquiry things like this. I find it a bit odd how people receive a ton of information leaders in the US, but still want more... even to the point of hurting themselves and many others.
There has been a recent trend with people reverting back to flip phones so maybe a future President might decide to do the same thing
Pegasus can even hack into the old keypad phones which don't have gps, camera.
Boeing phone? Damn
1:23 now I know where they got it from
A wave still flow like a wave
It sounds like lockdown mode on iPhone would be very useful for the US President's phone
He says the secret service should recognize the danger of allowing personal devices in the white house. Then he asks why do they permit it. The president is the boss. Who is some underling to tell the top boss what he can or can't do? That applies whether the president is an orange man with a tribble on his head, a senile old buzzard or a laughing hyena.
what about tim apple himself 😊
I just wasted 10 minutes of no new information, clickbait
the older the phone, the more secure it is
lol
Are you suggesting windows xp for instance?
Lol no.
@@ISBE91 Win XP phone?
@@PexiTheBuilder that's not the point
Nice to hear having president level or higher security on phone: too old to able connect to internet.
Why is Pep Guardiola talking about cyber security?
regardless the good info tge explaining and voice and detailed with some pivture and attracive movemnet ...is very very goood 😁😁😘😘😘
1:06 - Made by Boeing? We're f*cked.
never answered the question posed. clickbait
Because its illegal
Bezos had an iPhone 10 when he got hacked
Has anyone told you you sound like the 2b2t minecraft guy 😅
You are not Obama. That is why... carry on.
i wonder, What about President's Family Members?
Everything is connected even without internet connection 😊 Quantum Information About Those phones are actually infront of me 😊.
I would imagine now that at a minimum, important iPhone users will have Lockdown Mode enabled (not sure if that exists on Android, or if it is foolproof)
Why not just not buy a Iphone at all. can't you live without a smartphone?
It literally just got hacked by the Chinese lmao
Lol I'm the president can't break into my phone and I know the back door for this phone is always open
Give him an old windows phone 😂
Why isn't Joe hosting this 😢
the presidents phone should be biometric. only he or she can enter their phone.
Bro any thing build that can broke
As old people say which is born or made can be brake but u can't brake which made by god
why someone be hacking some president? he's just a representative... Oh.. maybe you want exactly same furniture as he bough on ebay? XD
Wow, are you really that naive?
@@williamvilleneuve5159 no. It’s sarcastic but represents some guys atittude for sure.
@@seedney Thank God. With internet comments, sarcasm dies.
At Spain we don't have prime minister Pedro Sanchez is our PRESIDENT
Wait Boeing!? Sweet Jesus
where's my ai joe
is this one also ai?
@@gautamkrishnar might be
Never seen a pic or video of a president on a mobile phone since the early years of the Obama presidency. Cellphones are not allowed.
Bangladesh used it during the Hasina regime
Boeing again? Are you, sure? 😅
tough, modifiable, fly-able🤣
TLDR: clickbait, also cant hack him cuz NSA and CIA already do that 😂
Presidents can keep phones away during private hours😁
Pegasus or phantom can't? Are you sure...?
Is this a challenge?
Really interesting. Knowing a presidents whereabouts is chilling. Great video.
Every phone has GPS...... How do you not know this????🤨
It would be very easy for the secret service, NSA, or CIA to spoof the gps read out to throw anyone off of the scent of the presidents phone.
Honeypot to use by the US Government.
Guys this is a Clickbait. Dont watch it
The best way to stay secure is to be unimportant as fuck. Like me.
What Phone do you use?
@@Marty_TH-camr motorola g 34
🤨indirectly insulting Donald J. Trump also to the republican party...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Challenge accepted.
Love your pfp considering what you just said but don't you just repack
Love how this just diss on Trump
There is no such thing as a secure phone!!!! If a man made it, a man can open it..... 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂