Room Reverb is annoying and tricky to remove unless you have a whisper booth. Now there is an impressive voice enhancer which will perform the task for you and without resorting to building a pillow fort!
Sounds really good Garry. Thanks for bringing it to everyones attention. Whether this means that VO artists can record without a proper insulated environment remains to be seen. I'll try this out and compare with my studio output. 😊
You’re welcome. I think it will help with situations where, for whatever reason, the studio acoustics are compromised, but treating your recording space is still essential for achieving high-quality voice-over recordings.
Thanks for this Gary. I've started using my home studio more regularly now and still get underlying room reverb - possibly from mic feedback - so this will prove useful. Might also be good for recording on my phone as well which I sometimes have to do for auditions with tight deadlines.
@@GaryTerzza Adobe is really taking advantage of the AI boom by calling all processes that use digital processing "AI". DAWs didn't use that term for background noise filters or declickers before now. Reaper still calls it audio FX, iZotope calls them modules, and audacity calls them effects. I suppose it's only considered A plug-in when it comes from a third party. Still, I think these are clearer and less contentious terms for these types of functions over just calling it an AI
Room Reverb is annoying and tricky to remove unless you have a whisper booth. Now there is an impressive voice enhancer which will perform the task for you and without resorting to building a pillow fort!
I've been using it for awhile now (I think I now pay about $10 USD monthly for "Premium"?).
I also sometimes record from my living room chair!
Your chair studio sounds ideal for narrating audiobooks!
Sounds really good Garry. Thanks for bringing it to everyones attention. Whether this means that VO artists can record without a proper insulated environment remains to be seen. I'll try this out and compare with my studio output. 😊
You’re welcome. I think it will help with situations where, for whatever reason, the studio acoustics are compromised, but treating your recording space is still essential for achieving high-quality voice-over recordings.
Sounds nice indeed, thank you!
But what happened to your camera?
I know - I need to up my lighting budget!
WOW! What a difference! …Goodbye sound booths??
Nothing compares to a well treated booth!
Thanks for this Gary. I've started using my home studio more regularly now and still get underlying room reverb - possibly from mic feedback - so this will prove useful. Might also be good for recording on my phone as well which I sometimes have to do for auditions with tight deadlines.
Absolutely Nick. It will be interesting to see what your phone sounds like when given an AI spruce up!
Remarkable difference
There is - I was blown away 🤯
Sounds amazing
I must admit, I was impressed.
I get why you would call it AI, but you really shouldn't. The term has been bastardized and really means something different now.
Point taken. What would you call the voice enhancer?
@@GaryTerzza I think sticking to plug in or audio editor stays pretty concise while not muddying up what you're talking about.
@@MegaCocoa125But it isn’t a plugin, it’s an “AI powered tool” in Adobe’s own words
@@GaryTerzza Adobe is really taking advantage of the AI boom by calling all processes that use digital processing "AI". DAWs didn't use that term for background noise filters or declickers before now. Reaper still calls it audio FX, iZotope calls them modules, and audacity calls them effects. I suppose it's only considered A plug-in when it comes from a third party. Still, I think these are clearer and less contentious terms for these types of functions over just calling it an AI