I like the video concept. This would benefit a lot from editing though. Show just the highlights and cut out the "empty parts" where you just search for a part or change the color. Could really blow up in the Lego SW community if executed well :D
Thank you, glad you like the concept. This for the feedback and I’ll definitely do more editing in the future. I wasn’t sure if people would enjoy it like a “livestream” with minimal edits or an edited version like you suggest.
A simple way to connect the computer legs would be to build the computer on top of a 2x4 plate, I believe that there is a modified 2x4 plate with the front middle 2 studs removed
Is there a 2x4 with two missing studs? I’ll have to check that out although I’m not sure how jut would attach to the front legs as there’s no antistud in the side of the 2x1 technic brick. I’ve noticed the game “cheating” by not connecting bits of models in other places as well, I think it’s part of the destruction physics so I’m not too worried but it’s nice to be able to build them physically without resorting to gravity fitted sections
This is a really cool video that I'm surprised hasn't gained more traction. Just some constructive criticism though, maybe like the other comment said edit it down a bit more, i could totally see this as an 8 minute video that would absolutely hit off on the home page. Overall, it's still really cool. Keep it up.
It's odd to me that the computer terminal cheats considering it's really simple to just make it work. On the part with the doorrail pieces, switch the 1x4 plate and 1x2 plate so that the longer one is sandwiched between the bottom two door rails. This way you can put a SNOT brick on top of the ends of the 1x4 plate and connect the legs that way.
Yeah, that was my other thought so I don’t know why. In a rush and it doesn’t really matter unless some idiot like me comes along and looks closely? I think some other models in the game aren’t fully connected for the destruction physics but you can’t destroy these
Maybe there is actually a 2×4 plate on the bottom of it but they clipped into the floor when building the level? Also nice video mate, i remember building those r2d2/character panels in the complete saga but i didnt question the other things in the game
There’s certainly somethings in the game that are held together by something that’s clipped away But yeah, I guess I’ll never know for this model. Glad you enjoyed the video
Thanks. I hadn’t seen it because I was looking for an AT-RT instead of AT-DP. Looking at the instructions I almost got it right, just one difference in how I attached the front bracket. so I’m pretty pleased anyway.
Now, that’s a set, that walker is a microfighter! I had it when I was younger
I like the video concept. This would benefit a lot from editing though. Show just the highlights and cut out the "empty parts" where you just search for a part or change the color. Could really blow up in the Lego SW community if executed well :D
Thank you, glad you like the concept. This for the feedback and I’ll definitely do more editing in the future. I wasn’t sure if people would enjoy it like a “livestream” with minimal edits or an edited version like you suggest.
@@GodspeedYouBrickEmperor
Don’t listen to him! Never back down! Never conform! Don’t be like everyone else! ✊
I really love the unedited live stream vibe u have going on tbh. It's very calming and pleasant to watch
Thank you for that, glad you enjoyed it. Maybe I should upload an edit and the unedited version.
A simple way to connect the computer legs would be to build the computer on top of a 2x4 plate, I believe that there is a modified 2x4 plate with the front middle 2 studs removed
Is there a 2x4 with two missing studs? I’ll have to check that out although I’m not sure how jut would attach to the front legs as there’s no antistud in the side of the 2x1 technic brick. I’ve noticed the game “cheating” by not connecting bits of models in other places as well, I think it’s part of the destruction physics so I’m not too worried but it’s nice to be able to build them physically without resorting to gravity fitted sections
This is a really cool video that I'm surprised hasn't gained more traction. Just some constructive criticism though, maybe like the other comment said edit it down a bit more, i could totally see this as an 8 minute video that would absolutely hit off on the home page. Overall, it's still really cool. Keep it up.
Thank you. I think you’re right and I’ll tighten them up (a lot) more.
It's attached on hopes and faith
Sometimes it’s the best way
It's odd to me that the computer terminal cheats considering it's really simple to just make it work. On the part with the doorrail pieces, switch the 1x4 plate and 1x2 plate so that the longer one is sandwiched between the bottom two door rails. This way you can put a SNOT brick on top of the ends of the 1x4 plate and connect the legs that way.
Yeah, that was my other thought so I don’t know why. In a rush and it doesn’t really matter unless some idiot like me comes along and looks closely? I think some other models in the game aren’t fully connected for the destruction physics but you can’t destroy these
there's this 5 plate high 1x1 piece with two studs on the side and one on top, they could've used a model of that one
Yeah, that might be it and then clipped it into the floor.
Hey, that's cool! (Btw what is the name of the app you are using to build lego on conputer?)
Hi, thanks for watching. it’s called bricklink studio.
@@GodspeedYouBrickEmperor Thanks❤
Maybe there is actually a 2×4 plate on the bottom of it but they clipped into the floor when building the level? Also nice video mate, i remember building those r2d2/character panels in the complete saga but i didnt question the other things in the game
There’s certainly somethings in the game that are held together by something that’s clipped away But yeah, I guess I’ll never know for this model. Glad you enjoyed the video
Btw the walker is an actual set! And i have that set!
Oh, is it? What set number? I’ve seen a few similar sets from over the years but I didn’t find one that was exactly the same
75130
Thanks. I hadn’t seen it because I was looking for an AT-RT instead of AT-DP.
Looking at the instructions I almost got it right, just one difference in how I attached the front bracket. so I’m pretty pleased anyway.