Between all the Drone Lidar Integrators there is huge differences in capability included in software. We don't advertise our software price because we offer more features, tools, and high end geospatial corrections than anyone. It is not an apples to apples comparison like some people would like you to believe. if you are curious on our pricing, please reach out to sales@phoenixlidar.com and one of our experts will be happy to talk to you.
Very misleading to the novice or naive user to say "allows you to collect and process lidar and imagery data from a variety of vehicles and sensors using a single software". Most of us know that the only"variety" is what Phoenix sells. Which is not unusual for the industry. Everything is proprietary nowadays. I might add that SE is lacking in some tools, especially for topographical surveys. I have voiced this to no avail, and I have had to rely on other software to streamline a workflow. I will say that Phoenix's LidarMill, which incorporates SE in a cloud service to create an initial point cloud, is very good. However, to go beyond with SE is cumbersome compared to other options. Phoenix has invested much effort and resources ($$$) into development. If they only had received some input from those that had real world experience in the downstream workflows instead of relying on internals and devs.
I know I could work with any client, thank you thank you
No transparent pricing is always a bad sign.
Between all the Drone Lidar Integrators there is huge differences in capability included in software. We don't advertise our software price because we offer more features, tools, and high end geospatial corrections than anyone. It is not an apples to apples comparison like some people would like you to believe. if you are curious on our pricing, please reach out to sales@phoenixlidar.com and one of our experts will be happy to talk to you.
Very misleading to the novice or naive user to say "allows you to collect and process lidar and imagery data from a variety of vehicles and sensors using a single software". Most of us know that the only"variety" is what Phoenix sells. Which is not unusual for the industry. Everything is proprietary nowadays. I might add that SE is lacking in some tools, especially for topographical surveys. I have voiced this to no avail, and I have had to rely on other software to streamline a workflow. I will say that Phoenix's LidarMill, which incorporates SE in a cloud service to create an initial point cloud, is very good. However, to go beyond with SE is cumbersome compared to other options. Phoenix has invested much effort and resources ($$$) into development. If they only had received some input from those that had real world experience in the downstream workflows instead of relying on internals and devs.