What an amazingly in depth and fun interview, Michael is always residing in my top ten actor list. He was the best in everything but i especially like him in Bird Man and The Other Guys.
Michael is a very under rated actor and in my book one of the best. Every time a movie is released and he's in it...I'm seeing it. Great conversation..
He was one of best Stand up comics ever. Very funny and clever. Then he decided to switch to Acting. It appears to have worked out because he plays both heroes and villains well.
Wow! that was cool, I think he would be so fun to "hang out" with. I am a super fan of Batman '89! Best Batman ever! Also my 9yr old daughter is a huge Beetlejuice fan. Thank you sir!
All the WTF interviews are outstanding. Neil Young, Mike Judge, Norm was excellent and Mel Brooks. WTF with Marc Maron will be the standard bearer of Podcasts from now on. It doesn't get better than Marc .
Love Michael Keaton's personality & stories. But what's the deal with his constant choking up on weird swallows? Wonder if he has major acid reflux issues.
A semi-automatic weapon is NOT a machine gun. practically every kind of pistol on the market is semi--automatic. It's always people who know literally NOTHING about guns that think they know everything about gun policy.
They know you fruitloop ammosexuals don't need unfettered access to them. The states need to form legitimate militias and regulate the shit out of guns. THAT is what the second amendment protects. The rights of "the people," not of "persons." That's what the gun lobby lies to you about, knowing that you don't actually know shit about the Constitution or how the Second Amendment was developed. The way the Constitution is written, things that are states rights are of "the people," and things that are individual rights are of "persons." The Second Amendment was only written to protect the rights of each state to have their own militias. And that's it. I'm sick of you gunhumpers repeating the same boring shit about how sane people can't enforce common sense gun regulation unless we are as obsessed about guns as you are. Which is just a ridiculous argument. Meanwhile, I have literally NEVER once met a gun nut who actually studied the Constitution, researched the history of the Second Amendment, read the part about guns in the Articles of Confederation which is what the second amendment is based on, or know anything about the second amendment that you didn't learn from the NRA or some right wing media source
@@christheghostwriter You are wrong. The operative phrase in the Amendment is "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed," Lund said. The prefatory phrase about militias is "an ablative absolute clause giving context for the main clause," and is illuminating in that function. "The Second Amendment does not say it protects the right of state militias to bear arms," he noted. "No one thinks that when the First Amendment speaks about the right of the people to petition the government that it means only to protect the rights of lobbyists for state governments. It means individuals. What the Second Amendment is saying is you can't disarm the people under the pretext of regulating the militia." www.law.virginia.edu/news/2001_02/amendment.htm
@@investinfastudios no, YOU are wrong. You have clearly absorbed the bought and paid for bullshit of the NRA with this "operative phrase" garbage, which is derived from a nonsensical and unprecedented 2008 interpretation of the 2A authored by Chief Justice Antonin Scalia (a guy who routinely took bribes from the NRA in the form of paid hunting trips). He invented that "operative phrase" terminology out of thin air, and ignored the intent, history, and 200 years of application of the 2A to do it. Literally ZERO cases had ever asserted an individual right to own guns before the 21st century. If you can't do the math on that, that's your shortcoming, not mine. The REASON THE SECOND AMENDMENT EXISTS is to reassure each state that they can run their own militias. Period. End of sentence. It was always intended to protect a collective states right, NOT an individual right. Just because you don't understand this doesn't make it not true.
@@investinfastudios instead of regurgitating the bullshit you've been programmed with, like 21st century judicial commentary that ignores more than two centuries of legal precedent, try learning the actual history of gun legislation in this country. Start with the Articles of Confederation and what that document has to say about guns. The sole reason the 2A was written was to reassure the new states that they would not be subject to a standing federal army (which we now have anyway. Where's your outrage about THAT trashing of the Constitution?). The 2A was only ever intended to limit the power of the federal government. It was NEVER intended to strip the rights of individual states to make and enforce their own gun regulations. If you actually read the Constitution, studied its history and precedents, and examined the history of the Founders' comments on guns, you would know all this. The SOLE REASON for the 2A was to assure the states that they could run their own militias without infringement by the new federal government. It was NEVER intended to state that everyone can have unfettered access to guns. or that individual states could not pass whatever gun laws they liked. Here's a good place to start: www.salon.com/2017/12/16/sorry-nra-the-u-s-was-actually-founded-on-gun-control/ But I suggest you follow through and read the primary sources, like the Articles of Confederation, or James Madison's original version of the Second Amendment, and other historical materials for yourself, instead of letting the NRA force-feed you a narrow and controversial legal opinion from 2008 written by a Chief Justice who took money from the gun lobby.
Most people I talk to about the 2A don't seem to understand it or even understand the point of the Constitution. When you think of the 2A, you should imagine that it ends with "by the federal government." The 2A was never intended to control or limit the rights of states to regulate guns, it was only intended to limit the actions of the federal government. That's why each state also has it's own Constitution. The 2A doesn't assert any activist position on the part of the federal government, like saying "if the states limit your access to guns, the feds will step in and make sure you get access to guns." That's a fundamental misunderstanding (or a purposeful misrepresentation) of the Constitution itself. The federal Constitution does not take any affirmative stance on guns. It is solely and exclusively about what the feds WON'T do, not what they will do. What's ironic is that this is the quintessential states rights issue, yet most people who tend to bray the loudest about states rights are also the ones who are quickest to say "except on guns, the feds can override the states where guns are concerned."
Im actually so sick or Rogan that I went looking for a new podcast, loving this one, not at all controversial just great interviews with interesting guests.
I love it when it's so plainly clear that Marc and the guest genuinely enjoy chatting with each other
Interview starts at 10:33
What an amazingly in depth and fun interview, Michael is always residing in my top ten actor list. He was the best in everything but i especially like him in Bird Man and The Other Guys.
Fell in love with Keaton when I was a kid watching "Night Shift"...Bill Blazejowski
"So.... let's get to the fucking movie star shit!! ... if you don't mind"
LOL brilliant
Michael is a very under rated actor and in my book one of the best. Every time a movie is released and he's in it...I'm seeing it. Great conversation..
Keaton OWNED the 1980's.
He is still going really strong The Founder was great
Me too, these guys. Brothers from a different mother. Gotta love this one…
Amazing chemistry between them made it really fun to listen to.
Michael Keaton is one of those rare actors that I can't think of a shit film he's been in
Batman Returns, but he wasn't really in it.
He was one of best Stand up comics ever. Very funny and clever. Then he decided to switch to Acting. It appears to have worked out because he plays both heroes and villains well.
One of your best. He is everything I imagined. He was very present
I like when his guests are engaged, funny and relate. Not acting like they're doing us a favor.
Fargo
11/2023..........Fantastic interview! Interesting and educational.
Wow! that was cool, I think he would be so fun to "hang out" with. I am a super fan of Batman '89! Best Batman ever! Also my 9yr old daughter is a huge Beetlejuice fan. Thank you sir!
Pacific Heights is an excellent 90's thriller.
scared the hell out of me !
one of the best wtfs, up there with norm macdonald and todd hanson. thanks for posting.
If you like this one, I highly recommend to check out the one with Josh Brolin.
All the WTF interviews are outstanding. Neil Young, Mike Judge, Norm was excellent and Mel Brooks. WTF with Marc Maron will be the standard bearer of Podcasts from now on. It doesn't get better than Marc .
Keaton seems like a real person not the average actor out of touch with reality
He did well but never made the kind of money that ruins you.
Keaton was amazing in 'Døpesick.'
Hope all of the Sackler children become hopeless dope addicts with no end in sight...ever.
Look up the Last Kings of Shanghai. That "religion" has been pushing dope for hundreds of years.
Michael Keaton such an Ultra versatile actor. One might call him MK Ultra.
lol. mind kontrol keats
Booooo!
Keaton was awesome on Mister Rogers...really
"Hey Steve. I like pizza."
"She touched my pepe, Steve".
“we’re gonna eat a dolphin.”
?? ,
😆
@@brianwoods9266 😂
Another fun one!!! TY
I don't remember if Keaton has ever been on Curb your Enthusiasm, but he should be on a episode before it ends.
That’s a great shout 👌🏼
Keaton's too good for that show.
Keaton worked with Larry David on “clear history “ which is the closest you’ll get 😂
I’m in my 50’s Michael Keaton is one in a trillion type talent ❤
The best character entrance of all time is Keaton in Night Shift.
im so glad he got more success after this interview
After Birdman he got a lot of roles, it reminded everybody what a great actor he is.
He’s a lovely man x
Batman at 1:27:44
"220 221 whatever it takes"
One of the greatest lines in the history of comedy movies
🗣Excellent interview!👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
damn, Keaton is very likable
WHAT did Michael eat right before this. God.
He is a great interviewee
Michael has aged very well. Seems to be one of those men who get better looking as they age.
Great guy
Love Michael Keaton's personality & stories. But what's the deal with his constant choking up on weird swallows? Wonder if he has major acid reflux issues.
He's clearing his throat. Probably post-nasal drip. If it were me being interviewed, I'd be worse.
Hadn’t noticed
@@pyrobison2002 Go "Notice". You got one life (as far as we know), try being Aware of your surroundings.
@@JohnJohnson-mo4bn i hadn’t gotten far enough
Maybe it's not the original Michael Keaton, but a slightly less perfect clone of Michael Keaton with a physical distortion.
Aaliyah Wells
1:37:00
10:35
A semi-automatic weapon is NOT a machine gun. practically every kind of pistol on the market is semi--automatic. It's always people who know literally NOTHING about guns that think they know everything about gun policy.
They know you fruitloop ammosexuals don't need unfettered access to them. The states need to form legitimate militias and regulate the shit out of guns. THAT is what the second amendment protects. The rights of "the people," not of "persons." That's what the gun lobby lies to you about, knowing that you don't actually know shit about the Constitution or how the Second Amendment was developed. The way the Constitution is written, things that are states rights are of "the people," and things that are individual rights are of "persons." The Second Amendment was only written to protect the rights of each state to have their own militias. And that's it.
I'm sick of you gunhumpers repeating the same boring shit about how sane people can't enforce common sense gun regulation unless we are as obsessed about guns as you are. Which is just a ridiculous argument. Meanwhile, I have literally NEVER once met a gun nut who actually studied the Constitution, researched the history of the Second Amendment, read the part about guns in the Articles of Confederation which is what the second amendment is based on, or know anything about the second amendment that you didn't learn from the NRA or some right wing media source
@@christheghostwriter You are wrong.
The operative phrase in the Amendment is "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed," Lund said. The prefatory phrase about militias is "an ablative absolute clause giving context for the main clause," and is illuminating in that function. "The Second Amendment does not say it protects the right of state militias to bear arms," he noted.
"No one thinks that when the First Amendment speaks about the right of the people to petition the government that it means only to protect the rights of lobbyists for state governments. It means individuals. What the Second Amendment is saying is you can't disarm the people under the pretext of regulating the militia."
www.law.virginia.edu/news/2001_02/amendment.htm
@@investinfastudios no, YOU are wrong. You have clearly absorbed the bought and paid for bullshit of the NRA with this "operative phrase" garbage, which is derived from a nonsensical and unprecedented 2008 interpretation of the 2A authored by Chief Justice Antonin Scalia (a guy who routinely took bribes from the NRA in the form of paid hunting trips). He invented that "operative phrase" terminology out of thin air, and ignored the intent, history, and 200 years of application of the 2A to do it.
Literally ZERO cases had ever asserted an individual right to own guns before the 21st century. If you can't do the math on that, that's your shortcoming, not mine.
The REASON THE SECOND AMENDMENT EXISTS is to reassure each state that they can run their own militias. Period. End of sentence. It was always intended to protect a collective states right, NOT an individual right. Just because you don't understand this doesn't make it not true.
@@investinfastudios instead of regurgitating the bullshit you've been programmed with, like 21st century judicial commentary that ignores more than two centuries of legal precedent, try learning the actual history of gun legislation in this country. Start with the Articles of Confederation and what that document has to say about guns. The sole reason the 2A was written was to reassure the new states that they would not be subject to a standing federal army (which we now have anyway. Where's your outrage about THAT trashing of the Constitution?). The 2A was only ever intended to limit the power of the federal government. It was NEVER intended to strip the rights of individual states to make and enforce their own gun regulations. If you actually read the Constitution, studied its history and precedents, and examined the history of the Founders' comments on guns, you would know all this. The SOLE REASON for the 2A was to assure the states that they could run their own militias without infringement by the new federal government. It was NEVER intended to state that everyone can have unfettered access to guns. or that individual states could not pass whatever gun laws they liked.
Here's a good place to start:
www.salon.com/2017/12/16/sorry-nra-the-u-s-was-actually-founded-on-gun-control/
But I suggest you follow through and read the primary sources, like the Articles of Confederation, or James Madison's original version of the Second Amendment, and other historical materials for yourself, instead of letting the NRA force-feed you a narrow and controversial legal opinion from 2008 written by a Chief Justice who took money from the gun lobby.
Most people I talk to about the 2A don't seem to understand it or even understand the point of the Constitution. When you think of the 2A, you should imagine that it ends with "by the federal government." The 2A was never intended to control or limit the rights of states to regulate guns, it was only intended to limit the actions of the federal government. That's why each state also has it's own Constitution. The 2A doesn't assert any activist position on the part of the federal government, like saying "if the states limit your access to guns, the feds will step in and make sure you get access to guns." That's a fundamental misunderstanding (or a purposeful misrepresentation) of the Constitution itself. The federal Constitution does not take any affirmative stance on guns. It is solely and exclusively about what the feds WON'T do, not what they will do.
What's ironic is that this is the quintessential states rights issue, yet most people who tend to bray the loudest about states rights are also the ones who are quickest to say "except on guns, the feds can override the states where guns are concerned."
Foul mouth host … didn’t listen for long
Joe rogan is better change my mind.
Rogan is great. Until you hear him repeat himself or he interupts a scientist midsentence to ask about chimps or dmt for the 1,000,000th time
No.
Syed A ur on crack. Marc is 1000 times better
Im actually so sick or Rogan that I went looking for a new podcast, loving this one, not at all controversial just great interviews with interesting guests.
Pretty that anyone who prefers Rogan is not going to have their mind changed. Rogan is far too self-important.
1:05:00