I don’t think I’ve ever seen this battle covered before. For a matter of fact I don’t think I’ve seen Philip II covered much at all except for the battle of cheorenea.
IMO the notable book “By the spear. Philip II, Alexander the Great, and the rise and fall of the Macedonian empire”, (Oxford University Press) by prominent Scholar Ian Worthington, is the best study over the legacy of the Ancient Greek Kingdom of Macedonia.
I would say Philip was just as capable if not more than his son. Alexander was at the head of an army that Phillip trained and built. Phillip made it possible for Alexander to be the Great.
@kaiza9184 Agreed, however I don't think if Philip invaded Persia instead of Alexander he would be as bold, he would have taken a peace to consolidate his holdings and definitely would have taken the marriage. Just my thoughts however, would have been a more stable empire
@@kaisertog7685 You’re right about that. Phillip was very patient and calculated. I don’t think he would have invaded Persia. If he did he I also believe it would have been very stable under his leadership. The world might have been a little different if Phillip was never assassinated. 😬
A list with some notable history books by credible Historians, regarding the legacy of the Ancient Greek Kingdom of Macedonia; “Alexander the Great. Man and God”, Pearson, Harlow 2004, by Ian Worthington. “The Miracle that was Macedonia” by N. G. L. Hammond. “By the spear. Philip II, Alexander the Great, and the rise and fall of the Macedonian empire”, Oxford University Press by Ian Worthington. “The Rise of the Greeks” by Michael Grant. “Alexander of Macedon, 356-323 B.C.: A Historical Biography” by Peter Green. A historical and academic treasure.
Yes please for god love please make this a series. I always love Philiph more than Alexander. Always wonder how Alexander got the "great" while philiph didnt. More people need to know who the true "great" was. Subscribe.
Well done man , a very good video with great editing as well .but if I would give you a piece of advice i would say you should focus on the forgetten battles and generals
Excellent, commendable work. I do have one objection though: the repeated mention of "Macedonia" and "the Greeks", in a way that it might sound as if Macedonia and "Greece" where two different entities. The fact is, that there was no unified Greece at the time, the race of the Hellenes consisted of a plentitude of independent City States, sharing a common Ethnicity, language, worshiping the same Gods etc. The fact that they were fighting amongst them, creating alliances etc., was a historical truth, but that was how things were at the time. Philip's greatest achievement in my view was to unite all these City States one way or another and thus form the so called "Hellenic League", under the commandership of the City State of Macedonia (the militarily strongest Hellenic City State at the time), the main objective being, through the concept of synergy (1+1=3), to deal with the Persian threat once and for all. His son Alexander went on to achieve this goal and spread the Hellenic civilization to the then known World.
Thanks for your comment! I'm sorry if you got the impression that I was trying to unify the southern Greeks into a singular entity. My intention was to compare the different situations that each were faced with. As the southern Greek city states had many similarities to each other; Military Tactics, Religion, Geography. While the Macedonian Greeks had vastly different Geography and were surrounded on 3/4 of there sides by "Barbarians". The Macedonians also used vastly different military tactics not adopting the Phalanx until under the reign of Philip II. But you are right, after rereading my script I can see how someone could easily get the impression I was referring to them as a more unified entity, I will be sure to pay more attention to this in the future, thank you.
@kingdomofhistory1 Thank you for your truly learned response. And for not having taken my observation, which was written in good faith, as a criticism for the whole truly excellent work. Best wishes for the New Year!
My main source for this comes from Diodorus Siculus' Library of History. When he recounts the events he states, "Philip his brother, who had escaped from his detention as a hostage, succeeded to the kingdom." this can be found at the end of 2.4.
@kingdomofhistory1 He was asked by the dardanians to lead them, he was the king of enchalei-dessareti, prior to war with macedon he had subdued all greeks up to Aetolia
Excellent, commendable work. I do have one objection though: the repeated mention of "the Greeks", in a way that it might sound that Macedonia and "Greece" where two different entities. The fact is, that there was no unified Greece at the time, the race of the Hellenes consisted of a plentitude of independent City States, sharing a common Ethnicity, language, worshiping the same Gods etc. The fact that they were fighting amongst them, creating alliances etc., was a historical truth, but that was how things were at the time. Philip's greatest achievement in my view was to unite all these City States one way or another and thus form the so called "Hellenic League", under the commandership of the City State of Macedonia (the militarily strongest Hellenic City State at the time), the main objective being, through the concept of synergy (1+1=3), to deal with the Persian threat once and for all. His son Alexander went on to achieve this goal and spread the Hellenic civilization to the then known World.
Excellent, commendable work. I do have one objection though: the repeated mention of "the Greeks", in a way that it might sound that Macedonia and "Greece" where two different entities. The fact is, that there was no unified Greece at the time, the race of the Hellenes consisted of a plentitude of independent City States, sharing a common Ethnicity, language, worshiping the same Gods etc. The fact that they were fighting amongst them, creating alliances etc., was a historical truth, but that was how things were at the time. Philip's greatest achievement in my view was to unite all these City States one way or another and thus form the so called "Hellenic League", under the commandership of the City State of Macedonia (the militarily strongest Hellenic City State at the time), the main objective being, through the concept of synergy (1+1=3), to deal with the Persian threat once and for all. His son Alexander went on to achieve this goal and spread the Hellenic civilization to the then known World.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen this battle covered before. For a matter of fact I don’t think I’ve seen Philip II covered much at all except for the battle of cheorenea.
I feel Alexander is so focused on. People generally forget about Philip.
IMO the notable book “By the spear. Philip II, Alexander the Great, and the rise and fall of the Macedonian empire”, (Oxford University Press) by prominent Scholar Ian Worthington, is the best study over the legacy of the Ancient Greek Kingdom of Macedonia.
Good video man you deserve much more attention.
This is one of the greatest history videos I have seen on youtube
Glad you enjoyed it!
Yes, yes! More about Philip the second please!
Thank you!
I plan on it!
Finally someone is really covering Philip
Philip II is truly a great man, easily on the level of Alexander for what he had to compete with and what he achieved.
I would say Philip was just as capable if not more than his son. Alexander was at the head of an army that Phillip trained and built. Phillip made it possible for Alexander to be the Great.
@kaiza9184 Agreed, however I don't think if Philip invaded Persia instead of Alexander he would be as bold, he would have taken a peace to consolidate his holdings and definitely would have taken the marriage. Just my thoughts however, would have been a more stable empire
@@kaisertog7685 You’re right about that. Phillip was very patient and calculated. I don’t think he would have invaded Persia. If he did he I also believe it would have been very stable under his leadership. The world might have been a little different if Phillip was never assassinated. 😬
A list with some notable history books by credible Historians, regarding the legacy of the Ancient Greek Kingdom of Macedonia;
“Alexander the Great. Man and God”, Pearson, Harlow 2004, by Ian Worthington.
“The Miracle that was Macedonia” by N. G. L. Hammond.
“By the spear. Philip II, Alexander the Great, and the rise and fall of the Macedonian empire”, Oxford University Press by Ian Worthington.
“The Rise of the Greeks” by Michael Grant.
“Alexander of Macedon, 356-323 B.C.: A Historical Biography” by Peter Green.
A historical and academic treasure.
Great video
Yes please for god love please make this a series. I always love Philiph more than Alexander. Always wonder how Alexander got the "great" while philiph didnt. More people need to know who the true "great" was. Subscribe.
I will most definitely be making this a series, I plan on it being a 4 part covering all his major battles.
Btw, Methone today is a touristic spot with great seafood
thanks
Thank you for the great video.
What is the name of the music? 8:35
It’s called Agent by Ben Hayden, it’s available for free on filmstro.
Alexander seems to have had great parents, his mother was also strong it seems.
Well done man , a very good video with great editing as well .but if I would give you a piece of advice i would say you should focus on the forgetten battles and generals
Excellent, commendable work. I do have one objection though: the repeated mention of "Macedonia" and "the Greeks", in a way that it might sound as if Macedonia and "Greece" where two different entities. The fact is, that there was no unified Greece at the time, the race of the Hellenes consisted of a plentitude of independent City States, sharing a common Ethnicity, language, worshiping the same Gods etc. The fact that they were fighting amongst them, creating alliances etc., was a historical truth, but that was how things were at the time. Philip's greatest achievement in my view was to unite all these City States one way or another and thus form the so called "Hellenic League", under the commandership of the City State of Macedonia (the militarily strongest Hellenic City State at the time), the main objective being, through the concept of synergy (1+1=3), to deal with the Persian threat once and for all. His son Alexander went on to achieve this goal and spread the Hellenic civilization to the then known World.
Thanks for your comment! I'm sorry if you got the impression that I was trying to unify the southern Greeks into a singular entity. My intention was to compare the different situations that each were faced with. As the southern Greek city states had many similarities to each other; Military Tactics, Religion, Geography. While the Macedonian Greeks had vastly different Geography and were surrounded on 3/4 of there sides by "Barbarians". The Macedonians also used vastly different military tactics not adopting the Phalanx until under the reign of Philip II. But you are right, after rereading my script I can see how someone could easily get the impression I was referring to them as a more unified entity, I will be sure to pay more attention to this in the future, thank you.
@kingdomofhistory1 Thank you for your truly learned response. And for not having taken my observation, which was written in good faith, as a criticism for the whole truly excellent work.
Best wishes for the New Year!
Phillip was a political hostage,he didn't escape from any kind of captivity he simply returned to Macedonia
My main source for this comes from Diodorus Siculus' Library of History. When he recounts the events he states, "Philip his brother, who had escaped from his detention as a hostage, succeeded to the kingdom." this can be found at the end of 2.4.
Excellent work. Perhaps a little more attention on your narration style.
Thanks, I'll work on it
where you find that maps are crazy
I made them myself.
How do you Guys make the maps of your videos?
Photoshop, I take a White World Shaded Relief map and then Color it and add political borders.
@@kingdomofhistory1 oh okay thanks
👍
🫡🇬🇷
did the ILLYRIAN KING Bartalus have a descendant living in springfield u.s.a, and was this kings last name Simpsonikus ?
Bardhylis controlled Dardania, Epirus, Taulantia and up to Dalmatia
Can you let me know your sources for this. I have no information stating that he ever controlled Dardania or Epirus?
@kingdomofhistory1 He was asked by the dardanians to lead them, he was the king of enchalei-dessareti, prior to war with macedon he had subdued all greeks up to Aetolia
Excellent, commendable work. I do have one objection though: the repeated mention of "the Greeks", in a way that it might sound that Macedonia and "Greece" where two different entities. The fact is, that there was no unified Greece at the time, the race of the Hellenes consisted of a plentitude of independent City States, sharing a common Ethnicity, language, worshiping the same Gods etc. The fact that they were fighting amongst them, creating alliances etc., was a historical truth, but that was how things were at the time. Philip's greatest achievement in my view was to unite all these City States one way or another and thus form the so called "Hellenic League", under the commandership of the City State of Macedonia (the militarily strongest Hellenic City State at the time), the main objective being, through the concept of synergy (1+1=3), to deal with the Persian threat once and for all. His son Alexander went on to achieve this goal and spread the Hellenic civilization to the then known World.
Excellent, commendable work. I do have one objection though: the repeated mention of "the Greeks", in a way that it might sound that Macedonia and "Greece" where two different entities. The fact is, that there was no unified Greece at the time, the race of the Hellenes consisted of a plentitude of independent City States, sharing a common Ethnicity, language, worshiping the same Gods etc. The fact that they were fighting amongst them, creating alliances etc., was a historical truth, but that was how things were at the time. Philip's greatest achievement in my view was to unite all these City States one way or another and thus form the so called "Hellenic League", under the commandership of the City State of Macedonia (the militarily strongest Hellenic City State at the time), the main objective being, through the concept of synergy (1+1=3), to deal with the Persian threat once and for all. His son Alexander went on to achieve this goal and spread the Hellenic civilization to the then known World.
lol , the molossos ruled EPIRUS
My family has a house in methone by the water at night time the mosquito's come out in full force, And go to town on you
lol