A great video! The only shameful part is I had never had the opportunity to fly on one of these magnificent flying machines! Cool takeoff view from the cabin!
Rode that seat several times as a non rev on the DC9-30 with JT8D-7s. I always thought about the times the blades disintegrated and just hoped I would not have that story to tell. The older 9's also would have a tendency to go out of sync when throttle pulled back for descent. Loud rowr rowr rowr rowr sound would seem to go in circles around the cabin. Good times .
I just love the JT-8D's!!! Sadly, I don't get to fly them anymore since Allegiant pulled out of DLH. United doesn't have any and Delta only seems to use them in the south-east.
This A/C was at my former working company "Nordic Airways" I was working as maint mgr there! This is really a rocket! The reg # there was SE-RBA Sweden fan!
One of the steepest take offs I've ever encountered was a nearly empty SAS MD83 departure from Manchester to Denmark...... Thought it was going vertical lol
What is the standard flap setting for takeoff on the MD-87? Looking at the wings, it seams negligible on this particular take-off. Could it explain the long roll?
Among other resons- lift performance of these type of aircraft are above standard exceptional thanks to an inherent (Clean Wing) design- thanks simply by not adding an engine designed on to the wing surface wich will ultimately induce unwanted but preventable drag againg the wing being use, also the engines placement being mounted on the tail is of a Conciderable benefit to any aircraft's flight performance. Rear engines have a more focused cleaner thrust dispersal spread thanks to the 2 power units being in closer proximity to each other an either of them not being hampered by a form of wing! engine placement on the tail does also modify the balance an center of gravity of the craft in a positive way to facilitate increased flight performance. .😉😆😆
Center of gravity purposes, and more stability with engines under the main wing. I currently fly the A320,, used to fly the b737 and before b727. most of the time in the b727 we had problems of lift due to back C.G and it has many drown backs ,, thats why you dont see ANY new ones with back engines. other factors such as servicing the engines are easier with bottom wing engines. And many many more.
I was a Flight Attendant and we HATED THIS plane. We called it the SLAVE SHIP. No place to hide, third position had to sit between two nasty lav’s and it just sucked to work on as a Flight Attendant ... I don’t miss it at all..
That's awesome! The JT8-D is a Pratt & Whitney juke box of wonderful mechanical music. A symphony for aviation enthusiasts!
The best seat in the world! Love that sound! Thanks for the video.
You have to love those old Prat and Whitney JT-8D turbofan engines!
Long takeoff roll for an MD-80... must have been a flex takeoff.
I remember flying back from Glasgow to Bristol on bonfire night. Flying at 26000ft same seat and seeing a rooftop of fireworks. Great memory !!!
in the video: not to loud even with headphones
while recording: oops i accidentally broke my speakers because it was too loud
A great video! The only shameful part is I had never had the opportunity to fly on one of these magnificent flying machines! Cool takeoff view from the cabin!
Rode that seat several times as a non rev on the DC9-30 with JT8D-7s. I always thought about the times the blades disintegrated and just hoped I would not have that story to tell. The older 9's also would have a tendency to go out of sync when throttle pulled back for descent. Loud rowr rowr rowr rowr sound would seem to go in circles around the cabin. Good times .
Hmmm! WOW! Very stimulating to hear!
I just love the JT-8D's!!! Sadly, I don't get to fly them anymore since Allegiant pulled out of DLH. United doesn't have any and Delta only seems to use them in the south-east.
This is correct...Delta uses it for their ATL-RIC runs all the time. I'm sure for plenty of other routes to and from ATL.
Dana Danarosana what about American airlines!! the still have a lot Left
JENDREKK RICAN American Airlines doesn't fly to DLH... :-(
Flew these in the eighties...Avoided the catbird seat like the plague!
This A/C was at my former working company "Nordic Airways"
I was working as maint mgr there!
This is really a rocket!
The reg # there was SE-RBA
Sweden fan!
Did the pilot ever throttle the engines back? Sounds like he was at takeoff thrust the whole flight lol.
If they use takeoff flex, then maybee the takeoff thrust is the same as climb thrust.
I flew in a 727 back in 1977 I sat in a similar seat just a few feet from the engine. sounded just like this plane.
It sounds just perfect for me, really cool sound.
Nice Video Bud. Now thats what you call noise.
Thanks.Great video.
I miss the md80s
I love the rumble of take off
One of the steepest take offs I've ever encountered was a nearly empty SAS MD83 departure from Manchester to Denmark...... Thought it was going vertical lol
Nice to see them in Europe which has almost become an A320 monoculture.
thank u
Awesome engine view!
lovely video from a lovely airplane.
Best roller coaster ride.
Those MDs....LONG take off roll!!!
I noticed the flaps aren't down that far. the engine does have a unique sound
What causes the whining/ howl noise? Music to my ears👍
Slats retracting
Great job!!
Wow.... thanks a lot.
What is the standard flap setting for takeoff on the MD-87? Looking at the wings, it seams negligible on this particular take-off. Could it explain the long roll?
I think a typical setting for an airliner is 5 degrees.
11 to 15 degrees on the MD its very typical.
Great sound!
The thruster engine sound like a buzzing bumble bee
It sounds like my hard drive
Do I hear a dog in the background?
Nice Video :)
flaps 5? almost looks like no flaps extension at all!
MD-80 Typically uses flap 11 for takeoff.
Damn long takeoff
If engine is in that place, just behind wing, does it increase lift power?
Among other resons- lift performance of these type of aircraft are above standard exceptional thanks to an inherent (Clean Wing) design- thanks simply by not adding an engine designed on to the wing surface wich will ultimately induce unwanted but preventable drag againg the wing being use, also the engines placement being mounted on the tail is of a Conciderable benefit to any aircraft's flight performance. Rear engines have a more focused cleaner thrust dispersal spread thanks to the 2 power units being in closer proximity to each other an either of them not being hampered by a form of wing! engine placement on the tail does also modify the balance an center of gravity of the craft in a positive way to facilitate increased flight performance. .😉😆😆
No not really. But it does feel a bit different that the fixed engine aircraft.
Your question about this,engines vacuum increase air speed for wings , and lift will increase ı think. I hope ı understood true.
Yes, my Q was about that :)
But, if it is true why they do not make planes with engines behind wings to make air go faster above wings :|
Center of gravity purposes, and more stability with engines under the main wing.
I currently fly the A320,, used to fly the b737 and before b727.
most of the time in the b727 we had problems of lift due to back C.G and it has many drown backs ,, thats why you dont see ANY new ones with back engines.
other factors such as servicing the engines are easier with bottom wing engines.
And many many more.
Danish safety tour? Is that a Sterling Airlines jet?
excellent thx!!!
optimum flap uses all the concrete
why isnt' the engine moving? wtf
Notice how they retracted the flaps while rolling for the take off. Wuuut
SO LOUD OH GOD.
very loud amazing
Same with me but md80 delta
2:39 why aren't the fans of the engine spinning?
thats not the fan blades just some protection I think
Those are guide vanes
+Julio Romeresto I never heard of that, thanks for the info.
How about a hairdryer for extra noise!!
sound engine MD87vs B707-300
It might just be me but that engine does not even look like the turbines are spinning???
doesnt look like engine is runnin ? blades not turning
Im never going to sit there
the most wyndefrull sound - and imagin to take a lift on as an 4 yera old
The plane must of been heavy
+Apps Jobs you are just really uninformed
They didn't earn the nickname "Mad Dog" because they were underpowered.
Cool
Bad seat for a window blow out.
But i like sit near 737 engine cuz it far away
no flaps ? :-O
Sounds painful
Worst seat on the plane lol
wtf is wrong with this engine?
Wreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Turbojets were better and louder.
Airbus too bad engine noise!!!!
666 likes
Was never the loudest, man:)
I was a Flight Attendant and we HATED THIS plane. We called it the SLAVE SHIP. No place to hide, third position had to sit between two nasty lav’s and it just sucked to work on as a Flight Attendant ... I don’t miss it at all..
Cool