Lmao truee, watched it all and I am still none the wiser about AI, all the interviewees were making such painfully generic comments on AI, asking rhetorical useless questions and using the most amount of buzzwords possible
i listened to 6 minutes of this, and this is the most airheaded garbage ive ever listend to. its literal horse manuer. seriously, nothing of substance was said. no original thoughts. an ai would of done a much better job spectacular waste of my time with a 0/10 video
They should focus on loyalty and work on agent software systems, not track their employees to death so they want to quit and become an entrepreneur. They are forgetting the job is there for the lazy, the focused entrepreneur 10x programmers cost too much and don't want to dedicate their finite time to rubbish systems.
AI does water flowers, but not sure they're in pots... And, I suppose through a certain perspective, that Aqua-something that cleans public or workplace toilets is a form of AI because it doesn't just work on sensors as a function.
Algorithms and to a much lesser extent ai are used for large scale greenhouse irrigation, it's also being used in drone tech and farming equipment. There are robots and automatically cleaning toilets which use algorithms to clean toilets, using ai is just a waste for such a system task.
So the poor get to work for minimum wage, while the rich either owns shares in AI companies or uses AI to micro-manage their workers, sure sounds like a great future...
The real concern should be only the energy used by AI. AI it is expensive and we can't afford it as humans, the world is already suffering for the lack of energy and AI it is so hungry of energy. The Big Tech companies have to put down lots of money on Nuclear power plants as soon as they can.
Absolutely agree! 🌍 The energy consumption of AI is a pressing issue that needs immediate attention. With our current energy crisis, balancing technological advancement with sustainable initiatives is essential. Investing in nuclear power could be a way forward, but it’s crucial to explore all green energy avenues for a more sustainable future. 🌿 Let's hope Big Tech steps up to the plate. ⚡
@@qlmbusinessnews I forgot to mention the most important thing, energy and as consequence AI needs plenty of water. I agree all the green resources are necessary but the first one must be nuclear because can produce energy h24.
One other reason for not using AI that they didn't discuss is how much energy and water it consumes (for cooling data centers). This is why I think there will always be limits to how much AI we can and should use. We also don't have the chip capacity to keep up with current demand, much less if everyone uses AI. While I doubt this is a reason most people aren't using AI, I do think it is a good thing that most aren't. It should be reserved for science and high end uses where it can do the most good, not trivial things like memos.
A lot of money is being thrown at finding sustainable solutions to building and operating data centers. Google, Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon, IBM, HP, Lenovo are all putting in millions into research and development. Using water and relying on the current grid is simply not feasible, and they know that. I think we’re going to innovate our way out of this issue. Look at the COOLERCHIPS program. Governments are pushing this too.
Absolutely agree! 🌍 AI is revolutionizing the workplace at lightning speed. It's vital we adapt and embrace these changes. Let's stay informed and proactive to reap its full benefits! 🤖✨
Office workers will go the way of laborers during industrialization. Executives are licking their chops at the prospect of cutting down their workforce
The tech is really useful, the few will be supercharged thanks to it, most will under employ is and the rest will be bamboozled or disenfranchised, well at least that's what I was thinking when i did my masters
Very useful, thank you. If you are considering a follow up video, you might consider looking into the risk of losing organizational "tribal knowledge" to an AI service that has an uncertain future. Like all SAS products, once a company grows then founders sell and a hedge fund takes over and strips the human overhead and changes terms of service. The legal terms of service show how at risk a company is when dealing with a monolithic company that decides to "evolve". Rarely do profit minded companies do what is best for society, or all of their customers... they do what gets the humans the most short term payouts.
I found it fascinating to learn we're in the fourth industrial revolution when listening to a talk on the subject. I suppose I had the notion it was mills and mass movement to cities far too entrenched as an idea in my head.
I find it hillarious to think that HR types use AI to create long corpo speak out of short corpo speak. As a programmer I find AI useful to safe time on questions I otherwise would have solved googling. I rarely use it to create production code. The problem with ai-generated code is that it is very difficult to find the mistakes because it looks good while still being wrong in subtle ways.
This video completely ignored the concern of most people. AI in "cost-cutting" measures is the issue. The job displacement of millions of people in the economy, while tech companies try to improve AI where it becomes a self-improving technology with the general intelligence of human beings is the main issue. Why adopt it now, if it will replace me later? What is inspiring OpenAI to do tests for UBI? It's because they anticipate massive job displacement, and in some sense, permanent industrial cuts. Distrust of top-level leadership to self-preserve over the needs of their workforce is the secondary issue. The general public doesn't trust top-level corporate leadership - they will always choose to cut others over themselves. And with our pursuit of a self-improving/self-replicating artificial general intelligence, new jobs that are created while old ones are destroyed is not a viable option as the self-improving/self-replicating artificial general intelligence could simply fill those needs theoretically as well.
Something that I have learnt is that If you really enjoy your job - you enjoy doing research yourself and NLPs take out that joy of it. Haha and someone that delegates is because does not know how to do things anymore
*Your explanations are clear and straight forward It's always a honor to have you here as a mentor, I appreciate you for the time being spent to educate us financially. Regardless of how bad it gets the economy, I still makeover $28K every single week. I truly value Bianca, and her helpful guides.*
I value your perspective and content .Bitcoin is on its way to breaking records, getting closer to hitting new high prices, showing that it's gaining more value and could go even higher than we've seen before. This could mean great things for people looking to invest, suggesting now might be a good time to get involved before it jumps even higher .
Now, I Just realized that the secret to making a million is saving for better trades. I always tell myself you don't need that new Maserati or that vacation just yet. That mindset helped me make more money trading.. I Traded with 10k in Crypto and made about $146k,but guess what? I put it all back and traded again and now I am rounding up close to a million
You're doing a fantastic job! I have a quick question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?
Ai is still in the stage of a hyped crap. While automation is fast paced, it's automation that is taking over jobs rather this Ai hype. I tried simple tasks with ai, 5/10 times random information which can't be used as real output. Be coding, videos, chatbot none as per the level of standard human output. The responses are stolen from peoples conversation or from some website.
The downside no one speaks about is there will be less roles for juniors vs seniors...and then secondly, the rich will get richer and the poor poorer. He explained the seniors thing..senior people have been delegating work to juniors...now they will delegate it to AIs...eventually the AI will also become good at delegating tasks and will comfortably replace even senior people...but thats much later. The second less obvious thing is that the rich will become richer and the poor poorer. There is a lie being peddled by people like elon musk about AI leading to the rise of universal basic income. AI that works on your behalf but you get the salary...that stuff will never happen. AI is going to replace the need the rich to need the poor. Before, rich people still needed lower class people to do menial tasks...they needed a driver, a maid, a gardener etc...now all those roles will be replaced by robots and suddenly the rich wont need to pay poor people. The rich will get richer and the poor poorer because they will lose the few jobs they have. Eventually there will be big protests against AI and machines/robots...AI will be banned in certain spheres...new companies will push the fact that they hire real humans as an advantage...a feature of their products.
Obviously they are talking about GenAI in most of this video - FT should be more clear about it. The Slack lady is clearly lacking experience- presenting the work she was talking about as some amazing breakthrough “why humans use or not use AI” - big smile attached of course. Just laughable. A real nothing burger
@@issiewizziethis is different. writing was always a therapeutic exercise for me, but AI took that away for me. Now I am just asked to use chatgpt to produce content, rendering me entirely useless. Part of writing is thinking and getting answers in that way. But I know we have to accept this new reality.
"builgind trust", leaders in big organizations achieve this through empty phrases like "building trust" 😂 A.huge. prod gain for the average worker would be a computer that starts up in less than 30sec and office applications+2browser windows not slowing down the machine to "click&coffee break". Most of the AI ia still too far away from reality.
20 minutes of corporate noise, thanks FT
An AI to reduce corporate noise would be helpful... wait a minute,...it may do the opposite 😂
Lmao truee, watched it all and I am still none the wiser about AI, all the interviewees were making such painfully generic comments on AI, asking rhetorical useless questions and using the most amount of buzzwords possible
i listened to 6 minutes of this, and this is the most airheaded garbage ive ever listend to. its literal horse manuer. seriously, nothing of substance was said. no original thoughts. an ai would of done a much better job
spectacular waste of my time with a 0/10 video
@@Will-kp1iv yep
Your job gets easier so you will be given more work. The level of monitoring of performance will be increased.
They should focus on loyalty and work on agent software systems, not track their employees to death so they want to quit and become an entrepreneur. They are forgetting the job is there for the lazy, the focused entrepreneur 10x programmers cost too much and don't want to dedicate their finite time to rubbish systems.
Hit all the right buzzwords ✅
Answered questions with 10 more questions ✅
17 minutes of vague speculation ✅
@@stonersgym8120 yep
Haven't noticed AI cleaning the toilets or watering the pot plants yet.
AI does water flowers, but not sure they're in pots... And, I suppose through a certain perspective, that Aqua-something that cleans public or workplace toilets is a form of AI because it doesn't just work on sensors as a function.
Algorithms and to a much lesser extent ai are used for large scale greenhouse irrigation, it's also being used in drone tech and farming equipment.
There are robots and automatically cleaning toilets which use algorithms to clean toilets, using ai is just a waste for such a system task.
So the poor get to work for minimum wage, while the rich either owns shares in AI companies or uses AI to micro-manage their workers, sure sounds like a great future...
@@Loppy2345 you can buy shares, too. 👍
@@combatwombat2134until inflation and one bad break forces you to sell.
Now you can ask AI if your CEOs decision was correct
The real concern should be only the energy used by AI. AI it is expensive and we can't afford it as humans, the world is already suffering for the lack of energy and AI it is so hungry of energy. The Big Tech companies have to put down lots of money on Nuclear power plants as soon as they can.
Absolutely agree! 🌍 The energy consumption of AI is a pressing issue that needs immediate attention. With our current energy crisis, balancing technological advancement with sustainable initiatives is essential. Investing in nuclear power could be a way forward, but it’s crucial to explore all green energy avenues for a more sustainable future. 🌿 Let's hope Big Tech steps up to the plate. ⚡
@@qlmbusinessnews I forgot to mention the most important thing, energy and as consequence AI needs plenty of water. I agree all the green resources are necessary but the first one must be nuclear because can produce energy h24.
Of course a big company at 3:16 has created a "personality type" around AI, despite such concepts being being utter nonsense.
Feels like it may remove the middle management entirely from the corporate world!
One other reason for not using AI that they didn't discuss is how much energy and water it consumes (for cooling data centers). This is why I think there will always be limits to how much AI we can and should use. We also don't have the chip capacity to keep up with current demand, much less if everyone uses AI. While I doubt this is a reason most people aren't using AI, I do think it is a good thing that most aren't. It should be reserved for science and high end uses where it can do the most good, not trivial things like memos.
A lot of money is being thrown at finding sustainable solutions to building and operating data centers. Google, Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon, IBM, HP, Lenovo are all putting in millions into research and development. Using water and relying on the current grid is simply not feasible, and they know that. I think we’re going to innovate our way out of this issue. Look at the COOLERCHIPS program. Governments are pushing this too.
3:29 "Why are the humans not using it?" - A human 👀
Absolutely agree! 🌍 AI is revolutionizing the workplace at lightning speed. It's vital we adapt and embrace these changes. Let's stay informed and proactive to reap its full benefits! 🤖✨
Useless info! So much more could have been said in this time. SMH
Once AI stops hallucinating and starts providing reliable results in an energy efficient way, it may become a useful tool.
some Ai is good for humanity but some Ai might make some group of peoples much more powerfull than anyone else
Office workers will go the way of laborers during industrialization. Executives are licking their chops at the prospect of cutting down their workforce
So funny how media accounts still tout how amazing AI is while real people accounts demonstrate how embarrassingly stupid it is
The tech is really useful, the few will be supercharged thanks to it, most will under employ is and the rest will be bamboozled or disenfranchised, well at least that's what I was thinking when i did my masters
Smaller companies will take full advantage.
Humanities job will change. For the better why most of us will become overseer guiding AI robots on a specific work or task
i'm trying to pull AI onto the companyfloor I work at but I face a lot of resistance
Very useful, thank you. If you are considering a follow up video, you might consider looking into the risk of losing organizational "tribal knowledge" to an AI service that has an uncertain future. Like all SAS products, once a company grows then founders sell and a hedge fund takes over and strips the human overhead and changes terms of service. The legal terms of service show how at risk a company is when dealing with a monolithic company that decides to "evolve". Rarely do profit minded companies do what is best for society, or all of their customers... they do what gets the humans the most short term payouts.
Did you forget to color grade the footage?
what is a step above maximalist? like not being able to go without it anymore?
In the future all call centers will have AI. Artificial Indians.
We are not ready for AI, but the good news is that AI isn't ready either... Current models require a lot of new theoretical advancement
I found it fascinating to learn we're in the fourth industrial revolution when listening to a talk on the subject.
I suppose I had the notion it was mills and mass movement to cities far too entrenched as an idea in my head.
If AI is a tool, why does it feel like we're the ones being reshaped? Are we adapting to tech, or is it the other way around?
you use AI a couple of times a week and you are a maximalist? I think the bar is too low. 4:50
I find it hillarious to think that HR types use AI to create long corpo speak out of short corpo speak. As a programmer I find AI useful to safe time on questions I otherwise would have solved googling. I rarely use it to create production code. The problem with ai-generated code is that it is very difficult to find the mistakes because it looks good while still being wrong in subtle ways.
This video completely ignored the concern of most people. AI in "cost-cutting" measures is the issue. The job displacement of millions of people in the economy, while tech companies try to improve AI where it becomes a self-improving technology with the general intelligence of human beings is the main issue. Why adopt it now, if it will replace me later? What is inspiring OpenAI to do tests for UBI? It's because they anticipate massive job displacement, and in some sense, permanent industrial cuts. Distrust of top-level leadership to self-preserve over the needs of their workforce is the secondary issue. The general public doesn't trust top-level corporate leadership - they will always choose to cut others over themselves. And with our pursuit of a self-improving/self-replicating artificial general intelligence, new jobs that are created while old ones are destroyed is not a viable option as the self-improving/self-replicating artificial general intelligence could simply fill those needs theoretically as well.
I’m a Maximalist also! 😎🤖
Something that I have learnt is that If you really enjoy your job - you enjoy doing research yourself and NLPs take out that joy of it.
Haha and someone that delegates is because does not know how to do things anymore
Noted 😊
What about Gdpr? Don't people worry about uploading customer data? Where does it go?
Yang kita harapkan AI nya cerdas pengguna AI nya pun juga cerdas
AI agents will be like real employee and surely will do most of the tasks efficiently. May be better than trained humans.
Do you know what you talking about ?
FT you all okay over there? what’s going on with your office space?
*Your explanations are clear and straight forward It's always a honor to have you here as a mentor, I appreciate you for the time being spent to educate us financially. Regardless of how bad it gets the economy, I still makeover $28K every single week. I truly value Bianca, and her helpful guides.*
If you don't find a means of multiplying your income you will wake up one day to realize you didn't plan..
I value your perspective and content .Bitcoin is on its way to breaking records, getting closer to hitting new high prices, showing that it's gaining more value and could go even higher than we've seen before. This could mean great things for people looking to invest, suggesting now might be a good time to get involved before it jumps even higher .
She mostly interacts on Telegrams, using the user-name,
Biancalind60💯..that's it
Now, I Just realized that the secret to making a million is saving for better trades. I always tell myself you don't need that new Maserati or that vacation just yet. That mindset helped me make more money trading.. I Traded with 10k in Crypto and made about $146k,but guess what? I put it all back and traded again and now I am rounding up close to a million
You're doing a fantastic job! I have a quick question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?
Ai is still in the stage of a hyped crap. While automation is fast paced, it's automation that is taking over jobs rather this Ai hype. I tried simple tasks with ai, 5/10 times random information which can't be used as real output. Be coding, videos, chatbot none as per the level of standard human output. The responses are stolen from peoples conversation or from some website.
Non essential workers are cooked. if you were working from home you'll be staying home.
We might have AGI by 2030, so I guess no jobs for everyone
The downside no one speaks about is there will be less roles for juniors vs seniors...and then secondly, the rich will get richer and the poor poorer. He explained the seniors thing..senior people have been delegating work to juniors...now they will delegate it to AIs...eventually the AI will also become good at delegating tasks and will comfortably replace even senior people...but thats much later. The second less obvious thing is that the rich will become richer and the poor poorer. There is a lie being peddled by people like elon musk about AI leading to the rise of universal basic income. AI that works on your behalf but you get the salary...that stuff will never happen. AI is going to replace the need the rich to need the poor. Before, rich people still needed lower class people to do menial tasks...they needed a driver, a maid, a gardener etc...now all those roles will be replaced by robots and suddenly the rich wont need to pay poor people. The rich will get richer and the poor poorer because they will lose the few jobs they have. Eventually there will be big protests against AI and machines/robots...AI will be banned in certain spheres...new companies will push the fact that they hire real humans as an advantage...a feature of their products.
The question is which country will regulate it the more - that’s the country to move to.
well , I am a maximalims for AI lol
Obviously they are talking about GenAI in most of this video - FT should be more clear about it. The Slack lady is clearly lacking experience- presenting the work she was talking about as some amazing breakthrough “why humans use or not use AI” - big smile attached of course. Just laughable.
A real nothing burger
Sky Net. Are we making our own replacements?
If Ai takes over people's job. Do you think people will have children ?
17 minutes of clueless women yapping
What a waste of time
Stop calling them leaders!!! So cringe!
Gorge In The Feeding Frenzy
Without The Fantasy Floor
Loving it!! Looking forward to the AI revolution. It's a promise that needs to be met. Great video!!😊
UR A 5 , MAXIMALIST, YEA
نه😊
I use AI religiously at work and I could tell you not the most reliable thing for now
I use it too but even if it’s really good, I only feel bad that my mind is no longer challenged to think.
@ I hear you. I must admit I used to hear people say that about Google back in the day.
@@issiewizziethis is different. writing was always a therapeutic exercise for me, but AI took that away for me. Now I am just asked to use chatgpt to produce content, rendering me entirely useless. Part of writing is thinking and getting answers in that way. But I know we have to accept this new reality.
Don't forget your pronouns 🤣
Leveraging Fantasy = ShitCoin = Bitcoin
Block The MockStock
Remove All Fantasy Floors
As Cilla Used To Say
You Gorra Gorra Laugh
"builgind trust", leaders in big organizations achieve this through empty phrases like "building trust" 😂
A.huge. prod gain for the average worker would be a computer that starts up in less than 30sec and office applications+2browser windows not slowing down the machine to "click&coffee break".
Most of the AI ia still too far away from reality.