The host didn't even believe Prem Akkaraju. No one believes studios are going to pay for directors, camera crews, movie stars when they can easily generate the most beautiful people and personalized scripts tailored to each person for pennies.
I agree up to a point. But Ttey still would need people to curate that content such as art directors, directors and so on. It will mostly affect below the line workers.
@@ereceeme I agree it will hurt below the line employees first. But anyone with a computer can now generate a 30 second movie that is almost as good as a 500k budget film. By next year that will go up to 30 minutes and in a few years anyone with a computer will be able to type the kind of movie they want and watch a personalized 3 hour movie. There is no upside for anyone in the creative field that I can see. I hope I'm wrong though but corporations are greedy.
I disagree... large reason people love art is because of that basic human expression. There will always be a space for great art. For eclectic minds. I do agree, however, many in this creative space will be wiped out. They will not be needed. Yet, if you are a "creative" and a machine can do your work... how creative were you really? the challenge for the creative and many others engaged with a.i. will be participating in work and projects that a.i. cannot do. @stefano94103
@@stefano94103 I thought that last year too, that by this time we could generate 30 minutes or even just a few minutes, it doesn't always go as fast as we think it will, even if the quality improves, there's still a lot they need to work out in shorter generations, like I can generate something 200 times and it's not exactly what I wanted (even if I use the same prompt as the professionals in their demos and I wanted something very close to that) or the AI glitches and hallucinates something new into the scene after a few seconds, it's like having its own dream even if it follows the prompt decently at first (the good results you see are cherry-picked after tons of failures usually). It's going to take a lot of human editing on shorter times and the technology to be able to continue from specific video scenes with less and less hallucinations. I'm sure we will get there sometime, but it's still going to take a couple years for it to generate stuff you want without having to spend thousands of hours rolling the dice (if you are a perfectionist). Right now everyone using video generation is rolling dice until they finally get something remotely decent (not saying it didn't improve a lot since last year, but I don't see myself turning my sci-fi book into a full movie easily yet without spending 100s or 1000s of hours stringing together 2-3 second clips and weeding through hundreds of thousands of failed generations). It won't just shoot up to a single generation in 30 minutes a year from now (or be what you are looking for exactly, unless it can read your mind...I feel even just a few minutes of perfect content for what you want in one shot would be amazing), the amount of compute for 30 minutes at once though would be insane, even now the servers almost crash at few second generations, and can take 5-10 minutes to just generate something for a few seconds sometimes, or even worse--hours. I want to be a film creator but don't have the budget so I've been trying lots of different sites, but haven't found anything that meets my needs as a perfectionist. Also I find I would be spending thousands of dollars for just rolling the dice too much that it's not worth it right now, until AI can give me exactly what I'm looking for, even if it's just a few seconds..which might be a year+ away before it isn't just a pure RNG machine. It could take us getting to ASI first in other ways before machines can truly make something everyone would want to watch for 30 minutes straight. So I'm a bit skeptical of your claim that it'll shoot up to 30 minutes by next year.
I as a Techie believe that if AI generates full movies replacing actors etc....we will all see stuff and just go....pffftt. It will be so plastic and unnatural that we will still seek authentic movies about people and emotion. I have never paid to see any of the High Effects movies in the cinema like Marvel, MI....(bar Batman) because I have always thought if I wanted to see a video game I would play one. If AI gets used as a replacement for people I will not bother watching it.
Imagine an AI model so advanced that it could take a DNA sequence as input and generate not just a prediction of the resulting organism-be it an animal, a person, or something entirely new-but also a deeper understanding of how DNA works at a level never before achieved. Such a system could even act as a "DNA generator," creating new sequences optimized for specific traits or purposes, from curing diseases to designing life itself. To achieve this, the model would have to be immense, trained on a vast array of disciplines: biology, chemistry, genomics, medicine, organic chemistry, and more. It would need to bridge gaps between DNA, protein folding, cell mechanics, and organism development. This type of AI would transcend human limitations, capable of comprehending and synthesizing complex interconnections that we can't even imagine. In medicine, this versatility would be revolutionary-a general AI capable of diagnosing, simulating treatments, designing new proteins, and even predicting evolutionary outcomes. A model like this would essentially become an "infinite octopus" of abilities, a universal Swiss Army knife for science, managing disciplines as diverse as robotics, molecular simulations, and bioengineering. Countries like China might subsidize such advancements, knowing that whoever controls this technology holds the power to redefine biology, generate entirely new forms of life, and perhaps even unlock human immortality. This isn’t just the future; it’s an imminent reality. The question is whether humanity is ready for the responsibility of wielding such transformative power.
I read Kai-Fu Lee's AI Superpowers six years ago. I was struck by this quote, "Their ultimate goal is to make money, and they’re willing to create any product, adopt any model, or go into any business that will accomplish that objective. That mentality leads to incredible flexibility in business models and execution, a perfect distillation of the “lean startup” model often praised in Silicon Valley. It doesn’t matter where an idea came from or who came up with it. All that matters is whether you can execute it to make a financial profit. The core motivation for China’s market-driven entrepreneurs is not fame, glory, or changing the world. Those things are all nice side benefits, but the grand prize is getting rich, and it doesn’t matter how you get there. "
4:37 should be interesting. I can imagine Netflix, Disney etc taking and distributing films from young film makers telling stories from their bedrooms. Can't see the film industry employing anyone in a few years. Interesting opinions from the suit running stable diffusion.
Still the two elephants in the room that no one is actually adressing: Who will buy all the stuff being made by robots and ai when everyone is unemployed? Why is no one really discussing the implementation of UBI? The future wont work if we do not totally reconstruct the foundations of our society.
@HogbergPhotography maybe that's what Elon Musk has in mind with D.O.G.E. - to reconfigure society by first getting rid of the civil service and replacing it with his Grok-3 derived automation, and then play tunes with the rules as he sees fit... Maybe conscription to work for SpaceX on Mars?
Bleak but the truth. No body cares really about what made the movie, that what documentaries are for and I haven’t see any about how a movie was made get an Oscar. People care about the story. That is what the movie or content is about.
Agreed. Think about how many movies you've watched which turned out to be a total waste of time. Who would choose watching someone else's movie that you may not like vs watching something that's 100% engaging & entertaining?
As we look toward the future beyond GPT-4, the next generation of AI models is likely to bring even more advanced capabilities, refining both language understanding and the depth of reasoning. GPT-5 and beyond could see breakthroughs in natural language comprehension, enabling more nuanced conversations, better problem-solving abilities, and a deeper understanding of context. Expect models to become more adept at multitasking across diverse domains, improving on GPT-4's performance in creative fields, scientific research, and real-time interaction. Additionally, advancements in AI ethics, safety, and customization will likely be a priority, ensuring that these models are not only more powerful but also more aligned with human values. With enhanced processing power, models may also approach the threshold of general artificial intelligence (AGI), pushing the boundaries of what AI can do while addressing the complex challenges of integration, fairness, and transparency.
Still the two elephants in the room that no one is actually adressing: Who will buy all the stuff being made by robots and ai when everyone is unemployed? Why is no one really discussing the implementation of UBI? The future wont work if we do not totally reconstruct the foundations of our society.
When AI is applied to a Quantum computer, it maybe necessary to supply that Quantum/AI computer with a nuclear power source, because it may try to absorb every pit of DATA and information ever created in the history of humanity.
We already have an explosion of content and 99% of it is junk. The art of acting is character study, and development . This is My most nuanced part of the job. This is where facial expressions and my new pauses, slight changes in inflection are critical. This is what makes films, interesting and makes robots particularly uninteresting.
Would you say that the future has way more creators with large following and people following very very specific and ultra niched down content they love?
@@ctrlsystI would say that it is similar to tv and clothing fashions: mostly junk that will be forgotten- but worse: as you point out : more niche; So, our society will become more and more fractured as we have less and less in common with our neighbors.
I think of anime and animation, whether animated characters are capable of reaching a similar level of interest as live people... it's probably rare, but I'd think examples exist
but avatar was a terrible movie with cool effects, and the boring animated movies of today seem to have grown out of that. so wont AI just officially kill movies?
Only fanes will be made up of mostly ai women, porn will be ai, , and photo models will be ai. voice actors will be ai. voice over will be ai. a lot of music will be ai. Corporations will have all the benefits.
Correct - and any reasonable human being will refrain from this artificial trash. Because the world will (eventually) bifurcate into a DIGITAL and ANALOG Domain. My guess is, that the DIGITAL domain will (alas) supersede, as long as it has enough energy and enough "Human-Idiots" to keep it running. Only large-scale dystopian disruptions (such as: Solar-Storms, Change of the Earth-Magnetic field, Tectonic Catastrophies etc... ) can change this imbalance. Btw: I can hardly listen to these nerds - with their "everything is possible"-fantasies any more. Btw(2): I am an IT-expert with more than 30 years experience in the "industry.
Sure we'll all become managers of A.I. workers. 😂 How long before the A.I. is better at managing? Just stop. A I. will do everything. And let's just say "take care of" (ahem) anyone who thinks they ought to be a millionaire or billionaire, including existing ones.
Thank you so much gentlemen: What was the limiting factor?... Energy...with inexpensive energy we have financing virtually guaranteed... hydrogen from the ocean...batteries for flying cars everywhere...introducing the Millennium of water...ideas for a clean energy revolution... GRAVITY BUOYANCY SOLUTIONS...hydroelectrics via Vertical Water Displacement... In the gas stations...even in the backyard if your home ..welcome to Cuba and welcome to the USA.
24:30 Disagree. The great majority don't need to "really understand how this tech works at a foundational level" just as everyone with a smartphone doesn't need to understand how the chips & circuits & touchscreen works. Or how we don't need to understand how internet/wifi works. We just use it and build on top of it.
That (approach) is fine, ONLY as long as you are working with TOOLs. AI is differnet insofar, that it can (and will) transform from a tool into a master, once it becomes AGI.
I don’t think the new Stability CEO is thinking big enough. It’s obvious he isn’t paying attention to what his company or others in his space are actually creating if he believes what he said in this clip is true.
The Stability AI CEO completely misses a massive opportunity when it comes to movie generation based on the user's preference, so much potential here. Hopefully Black Forest will pay more close attention to this. Human, or AI, doesn't matter, content matters. How many bad movies have you watched? Take the last Marvel's movies, they were horrible, but the first movies were great, both written by humans. The difference? The production cost and the box office revenue. Good luck Stability AI, with such CEO, I can only imagine how opaque your future will be.
Here is the biggest problem not a single human mouth can actually tell you what intelligence on an exponential curve looks like , behaves like or its nature .
Trump is the god-king. Anyone against the god-king, is against the corporate god-overlords. The TrumpCult will prevail irregardless of education and facts, because cults need no facts, just the belief in our god-king.
Trump is our god-king and our savior. Anyone against Trump is against our corporate overlords. We must ensure our corporate overlords and our god-king take all our rights away from us so that we can best serve them. We are nothing, we do not need facts or education -- only that to implicitly trust and obey their word. We will follow our god-king blindly and as gullible as we can, because he knows best.
Billions will be out of basic work, Trust me, so a tax for anything making money with AI pays into it. Done via blockchain domains, which I am deep into. Not a current government tax system, but an AI peoples tax system
This is my first time watching the new CEO of stability. I can't stand watching people lie to my face. To answer Peter's question, we do not need humans in the story making process, except for the human consuming it.
@@MrlegendOr god, get your emotions out of your hand, we have a man back in office so y’all better tighten up, I was talking about this particular Asian man on the stage, and I was making a light joke
This video is a conversation with three CEOs of AI companies: Prem Maraju, Richard Socher, and Kai-Fu Lee. They discuss the future of AI, particularly in the areas of image and video generation, natural language processing, and the potential for general AI. Some of the key points discussed in the video include: The potential for AI to generate realistic images and videos, which could revolutionize the film and television industry. The development of multimodal models, which can process and generate information in multiple modalities, such as text, images, and video. The potential for AI to accelerate scientific discovery, such as the development of new drugs and materials. The ethical implications of AI, such as the potential for job displacement and the misuse of AI technology. Overall, the video provides a fascinating glimpse into the future of AI and the potential impact it will have on our lives.
We have seen AI for over 45 years. and it has produced benefits in areas that are not closely understood. The only limits seem to be ones imagination which has grown and expanded with legalizing weed. I am surprised with the use of old cliches "a picture is worth a thousand words". And, look at the progress in pictures, over the past 30 years. But, the A1 Abrahams battle tank and the Hum Vee are over 50 years old. Could it be that we are progressing more rapidly in smoke and mirrors than in real machines. Iguana Dave Ps AI is competing with the human brain yet, it was created by the human brain. The coders and programmers are looking for a rich retirement.
The host didn't even believe Prem Akkaraju. No one believes studios are going to pay for directors, camera crews, movie stars when they can easily generate the most beautiful people and personalized scripts tailored to each person for pennies.
I agree up to a point. But Ttey still would need people to curate that content such as art directors, directors and so on. It will mostly affect below the line workers.
@@ereceeme I agree it will hurt below the line employees first. But anyone with a computer can now generate a 30 second movie that is almost as good as a 500k budget film. By next year that will go up to 30 minutes and in a few years anyone with a computer will be able to type the kind of movie they want and watch a personalized 3 hour movie. There is no upside for anyone in the creative field that I can see. I hope I'm wrong though but corporations are greedy.
I disagree... large reason people love art is because of that basic human expression. There will always be a space for great art. For eclectic minds.
I do agree, however, many in this creative space will be wiped out. They will not be needed. Yet, if you are a "creative" and a machine can do your work... how creative were you really? the challenge for the creative and many others engaged with a.i. will be participating in work and projects that a.i. cannot do. @stefano94103
@@stefano94103 I thought that last year too, that by this time we could generate 30 minutes or even just a few minutes, it doesn't always go as fast as we think it will, even if the quality improves, there's still a lot they need to work out in shorter generations, like I can generate something 200 times and it's not exactly what I wanted (even if I use the same prompt as the professionals in their demos and I wanted something very close to that) or the AI glitches and hallucinates something new into the scene after a few seconds, it's like having its own dream even if it follows the prompt decently at first (the good results you see are cherry-picked after tons of failures usually). It's going to take a lot of human editing on shorter times and the technology to be able to continue from specific video scenes with less and less hallucinations. I'm sure we will get there sometime, but it's still going to take a couple years for it to generate stuff you want without having to spend thousands of hours rolling the dice (if you are a perfectionist). Right now everyone using video generation is rolling dice until they finally get something remotely decent (not saying it didn't improve a lot since last year, but I don't see myself turning my sci-fi book into a full movie easily yet without spending 100s or 1000s of hours stringing together 2-3 second clips and weeding through hundreds of thousands of failed generations). It won't just shoot up to a single generation in 30 minutes a year from now (or be what you are looking for exactly, unless it can read your mind...I feel even just a few minutes of perfect content for what you want in one shot would be amazing), the amount of compute for 30 minutes at once though would be insane, even now the servers almost crash at few second generations, and can take 5-10 minutes to just generate something for a few seconds sometimes, or even worse--hours. I want to be a film creator but don't have the budget so I've been trying lots of different sites, but haven't found anything that meets my needs as a perfectionist. Also I find I would be spending thousands of dollars for just rolling the dice too much that it's not worth it right now, until AI can give me exactly what I'm looking for, even if it's just a few seconds..which might be a year+ away before it isn't just a pure RNG machine. It could take us getting to ASI first in other ways before machines can truly make something everyone would want to watch for 30 minutes straight. So I'm a bit skeptical of your claim that it'll shoot up to 30 minutes by next year.
I as a Techie believe that if AI generates full movies replacing actors etc....we will all see stuff and just go....pffftt. It will be so plastic and unnatural that we will still seek authentic movies about people and emotion. I have never paid to see any of the High Effects movies in the cinema like Marvel, MI....(bar Batman) because I have always thought if I wanted to see a video game I would play one. If AI gets used as a replacement for people I will not bother watching it.
We will all be our own movie maker... but we also still can watch our movies together 😊
Imagine an AI model so advanced that it could take a DNA sequence as input and generate not just a prediction of the resulting organism-be it an animal, a person, or something entirely new-but also a deeper understanding of how DNA works at a level never before achieved. Such a system could even act as a "DNA generator," creating new sequences optimized for specific traits or purposes, from curing diseases to designing life itself.
To achieve this, the model would have to be immense, trained on a vast array of disciplines: biology, chemistry, genomics, medicine, organic chemistry, and more. It would need to bridge gaps between DNA, protein folding, cell mechanics, and organism development. This type of AI would transcend human limitations, capable of comprehending and synthesizing complex interconnections that we can't even imagine.
In medicine, this versatility would be revolutionary-a general AI capable of diagnosing, simulating treatments, designing new proteins, and even predicting evolutionary outcomes. A model like this would essentially become an "infinite octopus" of abilities, a universal Swiss Army knife for science, managing disciplines as diverse as robotics, molecular simulations, and bioengineering.
Countries like China might subsidize such advancements, knowing that whoever controls this technology holds the power to redefine biology, generate entirely new forms of life, and perhaps even unlock human immortality. This isn’t just the future; it’s an imminent reality. The question is whether humanity is ready for the responsibility of wielding such transformative power.
This type of power achieved by some company/companies may have more power than anyone else, I guess 😅
I read Kai-Fu Lee's AI Superpowers six years ago. I was struck by this quote, "Their ultimate goal is to make money, and they’re willing to create any product, adopt any model, or go into any business that will accomplish that objective. That mentality leads to incredible flexibility in business models and execution, a perfect distillation of the “lean startup” model often praised in Silicon Valley. It doesn’t matter where an idea came from or who came up with it. All that matters is whether you can execute it to make a financial profit. The core motivation for China’s market-driven entrepreneurs is not fame, glory, or changing the world. Those things are all nice side benefits, but the grand prize is getting rich, and it doesn’t matter how you get there. "
Hard to believe that book came out 6 years ago.
great conversation, thank you all 👍
4:37 should be interesting. I can imagine Netflix, Disney etc taking and distributing films from young film makers telling stories from their bedrooms. Can't see the film industry employing anyone in a few years.
Interesting opinions from the suit running stable diffusion.
Still the two elephants in the room that no one is actually adressing: Who will buy all the stuff being made by robots and ai when everyone is unemployed? Why is no one really discussing the implementation of UBI? The future wont work if we do not totally reconstruct the foundations of our society.
@HogbergPhotography maybe that's what Elon Musk has in mind with D.O.G.E. - to reconfigure society by first getting rid of the civil service and replacing it with his Grok-3 derived automation, and then play tunes with the rules as he sees fit... Maybe conscription to work for SpaceX on Mars?
Thanks peter, it was very informative talk. 👍🏻
This is a heartbreaking future for all artists in the world that dedicated their lives to learn how to make art with their own skills.
Am I correct to think GPT models are slowing, but new paradigms (01, 02, etc) are taking off?
Thanks Peter for this great episode, amazing panel.
Can you imagine an ant 🐜 attempting to tell other ants how to control humans and take over the world .. in this story we are the ants .
I care less than zero about whether a human is telling me a story. Content is king. Source doesn't matter. AI will win.
Bleak view.
Bleak but the truth. No body cares really about what made the movie, that what documentaries are for and I haven’t see any about how a movie was made get an Oscar. People care about the story. That is what the movie or content is about.
I don’t care either, as long as it’s quality and engaging content I’ll listen or watch, or play.
I really enjoy listening to elders speak about their olden lives and spiritual lessons they pass down to us too
Agreed. Think about how many movies you've watched which turned out to be a total waste of time.
Who would choose watching someone else's movie that you may not like vs watching something that's 100% engaging & entertaining?
I want to know if there are so many people not aware of what's happening or just that they don't believe what's happening?
You should talk to Lorin Shapira. He’s a great voice in the space!
Salute to you all ❤❤❤
Its A Open Perspective For Everyone And Its Compentive But There Isnt Exist In Between An All In One Usable Purpose.
As we look toward the future beyond GPT-4, the next generation of AI models is likely to bring even more advanced capabilities, refining both language understanding and the depth of reasoning. GPT-5 and beyond could see breakthroughs in natural language comprehension, enabling more nuanced conversations, better problem-solving abilities, and a deeper understanding of context. Expect models to become more adept at multitasking across diverse domains, improving on GPT-4's performance in creative fields, scientific research, and real-time interaction. Additionally, advancements in AI ethics, safety, and customization will likely be a priority, ensuring that these models are not only more powerful but also more aligned with human values. With enhanced processing power, models may also approach the threshold of general artificial intelligence (AGI), pushing the boundaries of what AI can do while addressing the complex challenges of integration, fairness, and transparency.
Still the two elephants in the room that no one is actually adressing: Who will buy all the stuff being made by robots and ai when everyone is unemployed? Why is no one really discussing the implementation of UBI? The future wont work if we do not totally reconstruct the foundations of our society.
AI will play with itself billions of times? So its human?
What human can stop at billions? 😂
20x more content? Even today with an eye watering amount of options, I need AI to help me choose what to watch 😅
Prem Akkaraju sounded like he was basing his opinions on how he'd like things to be rather than extrapolating the future based on current trends
& he mentioned this again & again..
What’s a prodean?
“Three Wise Men”
better agree on a point from which to direct or refrain from advice
Still on Windows XP, service pack 2. Do you think AI will make it better?
Peter should put one certified expert dummy from the comments in each presentation.
When AI is applied to a Quantum computer, it maybe necessary to supply that Quantum/AI computer with a nuclear power source, because it may try to absorb every pit of DATA and information ever created in the history of humanity.
We already have an explosion of content and 99% of it is junk.
The art of acting is character study, and development . This is My most nuanced part of the job. This is where facial expressions and my new pauses, slight changes in inflection are critical. This is what makes films, interesting and makes robots particularly uninteresting.
Would you say that the future has way more creators with large following and people following very very specific and ultra niched down content they love?
@@ctrlsystI would say that it is similar to tv and clothing fashions: mostly junk that will be forgotten- but worse: as you point out : more niche; So, our society will become more and more fractured as we have less and less in common with our neighbors.
I think of anime and animation, whether animated characters are capable of reaching a similar level of interest as live people... it's probably rare, but I'd think examples exist
Where our tokens in Abra?
We will have to redefine the word “artist”.
yes indeed, 3 amazing CEOs, and equally amazing Diamandis, wish it was 3 hours!
I'm just waiting until AI animation looks better, right now is too wanky and inconsistent. Also voice acting is not good enough for a serious project
I like how Kai-Fu Lee confesses they brazenly steal proprietary technology and boast on it
but avatar was a terrible movie with cool effects, and the boring animated movies of today seem to have grown out of that. so wont AI just officially kill movies?
Only fanes will be made up of mostly ai women, porn will be ai, , and photo models will be ai. voice actors will be ai. voice over will be ai. a lot of music will be ai. Corporations will have all the benefits.
Correct - and any reasonable human being will refrain from this artificial trash. Because the world will (eventually) bifurcate into a DIGITAL and ANALOG Domain. My guess is, that the DIGITAL domain will (alas) supersede, as long as it has enough energy and enough "Human-Idiots" to keep it running. Only large-scale dystopian disruptions (such as: Solar-Storms, Change of the Earth-Magnetic field, Tectonic Catastrophies etc... ) can change this imbalance. Btw: I can hardly listen to these nerds - with their "everything is possible"-fantasies any more. Btw(2): I am an IT-expert with more than 30 years experience in the "industry.
Yes, the important stuff!
An improvement
Greate episode
Sure we'll all become managers of A.I. workers. 😂 How long before the A.I. is better at managing?
Just stop. A I. will do everything. And let's just say "take care of" (ahem) anyone who thinks they ought to be a millionaire or billionaire, including existing ones.
The glasses guy is the chosen one
Thank you so much gentlemen: What was the limiting factor?... Energy...with inexpensive energy we have financing virtually guaranteed... hydrogen from the ocean...batteries for flying cars everywhere...introducing the Millennium of water...ideas for a clean energy revolution... GRAVITY BUOYANCY SOLUTIONS...hydroelectrics via Vertical Water Displacement... In the gas stations...even in the backyard if your home ..welcome to Cuba and welcome to the USA.
24:30 Disagree.
The great majority don't need to "really understand how this tech works at a foundational level" just as everyone with a smartphone doesn't need to understand how the chips & circuits & touchscreen works.
Or how we don't need to understand how internet/wifi works.
We just use it and build on top of it.
That (approach) is fine, ONLY as long as you are working with TOOLs. AI is differnet insofar, that it can (and will) transform from a tool into a master, once it becomes AGI.
Sounds like a panel of people saying WE'RE COOL TOOOOO LIKE OPENAI
I don’t think the new Stability CEO is thinking big enough. It’s obvious he isn’t paying attention to what his company or others in his space are actually creating if he believes what he said in this clip is true.
The Stability AI CEO completely misses a massive opportunity when it comes to movie generation based on the user's preference, so much potential here. Hopefully Black Forest will pay more close attention to this. Human, or AI, doesn't matter, content matters. How many bad movies have you watched? Take the last Marvel's movies, they were horrible, but the first movies were great, both written by humans. The difference? The production cost and the box office revenue. Good luck Stability AI, with such CEO, I can only imagine how opaque your future will be.
Here is the biggest problem not a single human mouth can actually tell you what intelligence on an exponential curve looks like , behaves like or its nature .
the chip of Laws can be integrated into AI technology robotics
Interesting
a small chip with the Laws AI technology robotics should follow
When is Peter coming out for Trump?
Trump is the god-king. Anyone against the god-king, is against the corporate god-overlords. The TrumpCult will prevail irregardless of education and facts, because cults need no facts, just the belief in our god-king.
Trump is our god-king and our savior. Anyone against Trump is against our corporate overlords. We must ensure our corporate overlords and our god-king take all our rights away from us so that we can best serve them. We are nothing, we do not need facts or education -- only that to implicitly trust and obey their word. We will follow our god-king blindly and as gullible as we can, because he knows best.
Billions will be out of basic work, Trust me, so a tax for anything making money with AI pays into it. Done via blockchain domains, which I am deep into. Not a current government tax system, but an AI peoples tax system
This is my first time watching the new CEO of stability. I can't stand watching people lie to my face. To answer Peter's question, we do not need humans in the story making process, except for the human consuming it.
China looks like a super villian that has the upper hand lol
And America’s Sam Altman looks like what ? A hero ? Lmaooooo
@ hell no, the closest thing I’ve seen to a hero is ELON, I need to. Check out his AI stuff
@@NathanIslesOfficial Elon had hired a number of Chinese scientists.
@@MrlegendOr god, get your emotions out of your hand, we have a man back in office so y’all better tighten up, I was talking about this particular Asian man on the stage, and I was making a light joke
@@NathanIslesOfficialyes, but Biden only has a couple of months left.
After that we have a felon in office.
The dude in sneakers is probably still in high school.
This video is a conversation with three CEOs of AI companies: Prem Maraju, Richard Socher, and Kai-Fu Lee. They discuss the future of AI, particularly in the areas of image and video generation, natural language processing, and the potential for general AI.
Some of the key points discussed in the video include:
The potential for AI to generate realistic images and videos, which could revolutionize the film and television industry.
The development of multimodal models, which can process and generate information in multiple modalities, such as text, images, and video.
The potential for AI to accelerate scientific discovery, such as the development of new drugs and materials.
The ethical implications of AI, such as the potential for job displacement and the misuse of AI technology.
Overall, the video provides a fascinating glimpse into the future of AI and the potential impact it will have on our lives.
Shallow minds like it’s 1999 and “i know html” and “ehmergd information super highway” 😂
Gpt 4o? Nothing is comin xause im 0 for omegas ending u
We have seen AI for over 45 years. and it has produced benefits in areas that are not closely understood. The only limits seem to be ones imagination which has grown and expanded with legalizing weed. I am surprised with the use of old cliches "a picture is worth a thousand words". And, look at the progress in pictures, over the past 30 years. But, the A1 Abrahams battle tank and the Hum Vee are over 50 years old. Could it be that we are progressing more rapidly in smoke and mirrors than in real machines.
Iguana Dave Ps AI is competing with the human brain yet, it was created by the human brain. The coders and programmers are looking for a rich retirement.
epic
All machines is designed by same god who created karma with humans what humans field machines that only machines will give u return 😂 that's call AI
A bunch of AI androids should sit there , people instead .
Not going to watch AI generated drivel
snake oil salesmen
ITth really cute, and ITth CALLED HUGGINGFAYTH 😚😚