I’m a lawyer. This judge covered all his bases. I’ve never heard a judge cite so much law in justifying his rulings. There’s no way she’ll win on appeal. She’s just trying not to be held accountable for her actions
She is just being a pain in the ass but it’s not going to get her anywhere. Look what the 4 years of being a pain in the ass got her, right where she belongs. The judge was more patient and thorough than I’ve ever seen.
Yeah he was very well researched in this trial and I think it's because he's thorough but also because she showed her true colors early on and he wanted to make SURE it was on the record that he was making a fair and impartial decision based on case law because, you know, there never in the world was a bigger victim than Sarah Boone. Also, that was the biggest run on sentence in the history of man (possibly)
@@divadawn509- I think Sarah Boone had several looong run-on sentences in the novel she wrote & read to the judge right before sentencing!! Lots of run-on sentences here just discussing Sarah Boone! I think your good! LOL
My husband and I were there for the sentencing, and we went in early to watch Judge Kraynick in ordinary cases. My husband sneezed and got the Judge Kraynick Bless You! Judge Kraynick is exactly the same in dealing with a violation of probation as he was with a murder 2 case - professional, citing law, respectful, and wishing every defendant good luck. A great judge!
Kraynik’s ability to cite law off the top of his head, while giving “bless you’s” to anyone in his court who needed it; just goes to show how brilliantly above the rest he truly is. He’s phenomenal and won’t be overturned.❤
@@wernerfoerster3666 affirmations of state and federal courts are more common than over ruling a decision. The court would have had to err to such a degree that it could change the outcome of the trial. Mr. Owen's met with Ms. Boone quite a few times before deciding to take the case on the eve of the hearing. Addionally, Ms. Boone's testimony did her in as it was in conflict with her prior statements, her statements during trial, the witnesses and the evidence presented. The judge did edit out Ms. Boone's racist comments during her interrogation.
@@AnaFernandez-jp5uh As an appellate atty, I thank you for the strawman statement of your first sentence. Your second sentence is not necessarily true (Fundamental Error). The remainder of your comment does not foreclose fertile appellate arguments.
100% Agreed and I'm guessing it was by the grace of God and powerful prayer that this man was able to completely hold his tongue all the way through to the end. Certainly a better human being and professional than I could have been. Lol
I agree with everything that was said in the replies. And I'm no lawyer, but it seems very clear to me that Kraynick bent over backwards to protect all of Sarah's rights as the defendant. If anything,he gave her too many chances. I can't imagine an appellate court striking down the jury's verdict or saying she didn't have enough continuances . This is all BS from her lawyers. I have heard that in most cases a new trial is NOT granted on appeal. There would have to be something egregiously wrong and there isn't anything!
Nope,,, she did admit it,,,,, everyone just needs to know that because she was drinking and vile, she NOT INTENTIONALLY murdered her fiance an a very cruel way and then dragged him and his family through the mud at sentencing. Let her get a new trial. She might get the death penalty this time. Regardless, sarah boonickus needs money on her kiosk NOW😂😂😂😂 it's gonna be sarah long john boonickus after she gets to the actual prison. She can be exceptional with making toilet wine. I just don't know how the new celly is going to be able to sleep with all that gold shining in her face at night. Perhaps a suitcase for sarah to sleep in so she can feel closer to Jorge.
To bad shes making the family continue to suffer and shes costing the county/state more and more $$$ when she is exactly where she belongs and for as long as she belongs but she will never see that. The perpetual victim - Sarah Boone.
It seems like Judge Kraynick was very aware that Sarah Boone would be appealing many of his rulings, and so he was extremely careful to cover all his bases. He did his research to make sure his decisions were legally sound before he ruled, and he cited ample case law to support them on the record. In my opinion, there's no way Sarah Boone is going to win an appeal.
Lol you don’t know any of these things you bring up, which aren’t even remotely close to legal terms. Honey your personal opinion on how nice and polite the judge was has no legal bearing. Let’s not pretend like you’re making any kind of well thought out prediction here other than the obvious fact that practically nobody ever wins an appeal.
@@QueenofMarine Agree - I think all judges are aware that there will be appeals; that’s a given. However, I think Judge Kraynick was hypervigiliant regarding case law because he was well aware of the type of personality he was dealing with. His case law was always directly on point. The average appeal win is between 5 - 20% with criminal cases coming in at a 6.9% success rate. It is extremely doubtful that Sarah Boone will win an appeal.
Yes how?? I’d love a gifted membership!! I watch every video of Lawyer you know, but unfortunately, I can’t afford a membership, due to reasons beyond my control. Or should I say, I’m a giver and willing to help everyone I can, but never spend my hard earned money on MYSELF. I just can’t, guess it was the way I was raised! I do love watching this channel!! I just watch it on TH-cam! Keep up the good work!! You’re an amazing person and break stuff down for the majority to understand! I love it!!❤❤❤
@@YSLnurseYT gives them out randomly to people subscribed to the channel. It’s just luck. Make sure you have your account set to allow gifted memberships
I have watched ALOT of trials but I'm no lawyer. However, I've never seen a judge justify his decisions so well and take so much time ensuring he thought about what he was ruling on and showing the case law he looked at to make that decision. He gave her so many chances to act right. She never will and she will always be the problem. I loved this judge and lately I haven't been loving too many judges ***cough cough*** AUNT BEV ***cough cough*** Judge of the year goes to Judge Kraynick!!!!
@@wernerfoerster3666 Oh, the judge was very careful with the record and of Sarah. The judge asked Sarah no less than 20 times twice a day every day of the trial Ms. Boone: Ma'am Are you happy with your lawyers: - Yes Are you able to ask questions and exchange in a dialogue with your attorneys - Yes Do you have a strategy outlined with your defense team - Yes Are you happy with your strategy - Yes Plus, there were no less than 5 legal “professionals” at the defense table one would think they would've had their ish together, but considering the Fact that Sarah Boone considers herself part of the defense team I am not surprised...
If she still had her first judge assigned, judge Wooten, she’d really be complaining because he had very little patience left for her after 3.5 YEARS. Judge Kraynek was firm, polite, respectful and way more patient of her self centered attitude and obnoxious letters.🤦🏼♀️
I highly doubt Judge K made any mistakes at all. He is the most professional and knowledgebale judge I have ever seen. Endless patience, good manners, extremely knowledgable and an all round good guy.
She’s lucky she wasn’t in front of Fran Gull in the Delphi case. All of his constitutional rights were stomped on. Abuse of power,the whole state of Indiana the Richard Allen case.
According to case law, a judge may decide if a defendant has FORFEITED their right to an attorney if there is strong evidence to suggest that the defendant is using the system to delay the trial. In this case, there were numerous delays and eight attorney's with whom Sarah Boone was never satisfied with. I don't believe that the judge was wrong and once the appeals court review the entire case, they will side with the Judge. Also, understanding that Sarah Boone's attorney asked for and was denied a continuance, the court could look at the fact that the case has been held up for almost five years. If every defendant presented themselves in the manner that Sarah Boone did, justice would never be had and the courts will be tied up for years.
If you watched tgis channel you'd know it wasn't Sarah's fault for every attorney. Regardless once one does take up her case why would what others have done apply to them? He certainly didn't prepare 5 years in advance to accept the case. I couldn't disagree with you more if you actually want justice.
@@MrMancreatedgodthis is where I wonder if it will be a problem for the judge for not doing even a short and strict continuance. It’s really the only think that would even be there for appeals but it can be a big one
@@MrMancreatedgodI don’t actually know that the defense lost out on anything tangible from being denied the continuance. If I recall correctly the issue was that her lawyer wasn’t sure he could get together everything necessary to put on battered spouse syndrome as a defense. Turns out he was able to do that without the extra time. This is important because an appeal court is going to look at the totality of the case and ask “How would this defense have been presented differently if the continuance had been granted?” as well as “Would it have been different enough that the jury’s verdict would have been different as well?” I think the answer to the second question is probably no.
Overall I agree with you. However. I think he messed this up. I'd grant retrial were I voting on it because of this specific issue that I think he screwed up. He let in loads of evidence he could have blocked. Well done. The continuance should have been granted. Overall I don't think it changes the verdict but I also don't think this aspect of her trial was handled correctly.
@@MrMancreatedgod you may be right, but I’m sure Kraynick had his reasons. Sarah flat out lied multiple times on the stand and her and Owens submitted evidence that was clearly fake. The black eye with black paint.
@@MrMancreatedgod Over the holidays, I talked with several family members who are defense attorneys, one a death penalty specialist. Each one agreed that there was no need for a continuance. With at least two attorneys basically ready to go to trial (Padilla and Cashman), the work had been done and just needed to be reviewed. Owens chose to go with Battered Spouse, and he said he had to “educate” Sarah on that - it showed, as she was just not believable.
@@HRHMom As a former prosecutor and defense attorney, I would be shocked if ANY defense attorney would not need and feel more comfortable with a continuance.
Boone kept claiming she never saw discovery. She claimed that certain videos and text were missing. If she didn't see the discovery, how would she know what is missing? Cashman said while going through discovery, she came across some of boones' medical records, which had notes on them in boones handwriting, which clearly showed she had viewed discovery. All the attorneys said they went through discovery with her. Boones problem may have been that she didn't see what she wanted (because it didn't exist) or certain bits of discovery she wanted yo use the attorneys did not want to use.
Exactly. She seems to think that she has been her own “lead counsel” during the pendency of this case and all the attorneys assigned or retained were below here.
If she wanted to claim she didn’t review the discovery of parts of discovery, then they should be allowed to review all the letters she sent regardless of what issues is being raised because the totally of her letters and her attitude and everything she says you can tell she is a liar. She lies and makes stuff up, and all you have to do is read a portion of any letter she has sent. Just because Sarah was arguing about her “bond” and why she can’t use her phone or read every piece of everything that existed during this trial, while her lawyer(a) were trying to explain to her and review it with her, doesnt mean she didn’t show you x, y; or z, it just means you were not paying attention when you should have
those 5 issues were all argued ad nauseum in the trial, none reversible. Judge K ran a tight trial and allowed the totally fraudulent battered spouse defense. Even the jury knew Jorge was the only victim.
@wernerfoerster3666 true but judge kraynick had sarahs number early on in PTC s which is why he wrote the unusually long detailed rulings. I have confidence that the appellate judges already expect her to bombard them with letters
@@TheeSnitch 1. I would hope all judges, especially on homicide cases, would be conscientious generally, and that he did not single out SB for particular treatment. 2. As far as having SB's number, virtually all homicide convictions at trial will be appealed - so that he went out of his way doesn't ring true for me. Any judge would already have an appeal in mind. 3. Letters from SB to the appellate court would not be part of the appellate record or read by the appellate judges. They'd likely be returned to sender or rejected from the filing portal.
Something in me knowing sarah has spent and will spend all of her Christmas "celebrations " in prison, brings me a little happiness. Regardless of her appeal process that will take years, she is going to learn some very...... golden experiences.
I believe those issues were already addressed by judge Kraynick and his legal basis for each of his decisions. He was patient and fair all throughout this circus with Sarah.
Honestly…i think that it’s fair for her to appeal. If he did it properly the decision will reinforce the abilities of the judges to call halt and can be quoted in future instances of bar behavior. If it is found to be wrong it will give direction to everyone how to do it properly
The Honorable Judge Kraynick, is the smartest judge I had ever seen in a case. What an honest and blessed genius he is! No way she can appeal after the nasty letter she wrote to insult him and calling him Mr. Kraynick, the woman is insane and so was her lawyer. How dare she speak of him that way, this needs to end, the woman deserved everything she deserved. Judge Kraynick is a hero and deserves to be respected. When will this end? God please protect Judge Kraynick from the murderer and keep him safe from evil.
The amount of times she referenced how long she was incarcerated and has not gone to trial yet and the complaints that she hasn’t had a trial yet, she was trying to say her rights were being denied because there wasn’t a trial in excess of 4 years. It’s definitely one of those… be careful what you wish for
Judge Kraynik was great. Patient, matter a fact, no preferential treatment for one side or the other, very smart and clear. Massachusetts needs more judges like this.
Merry Christmas, Peter, Papa Tragos and the rest of your family! Safe travels to NC tomorrow! We all love and appreciate your time and effort that you always put into these videos! All respect to you all!
I seriously doubt as patient and fair as Judge Kraynick was with Sarah Boone giving her every act of compassion and professionalism he did could even come close to being found of doing something wrong. Judge Kraynick is very smart and knows the law and walked carefully as he gave Sarah Boone more than a fair amount of chances not to hang herself. She was hellbent on doing so and mastered it quite well. As Sarah Boone says in her own words, she excels at everything. We have to give her much credit for how well she videotaped her own demise. RIP Jorge. Justice you and your family got and the jury and Judge got it right. Enjoy LWOP Sarah you have earned it. 😮😮😮😮😮
Yes...I'm in agreement 💯 with you...SB is not only a belligerent nuisance, but she is a textbook narcissistic, selfish, cruel, self absorbed, psychotic murderer who so kindly left no room for speculation or false allegations by providing us and the jury with video proof of her evil and malicious intentions leading up until the actual crime taking place in real time...She sealed her fate with those videos just as she sealed the fate of Jorge as soon as she zipped up that suitcase..Every delay in this trial has been caused by her inability to play nicely with others, a problem I strongly suspect has plagued her since childhood...A granted appeal would be such a miscarriage of justice and a slap in the face to the Judge, prosecution and the jury....I truly hope it never happens...🙏🙏
I don’t think the appellate court will read Sarah’s letters though I wish they would. They will only be reviewing the hearings and trial transcripts to see if there were any reversible errors. I bet they will have no idea what an obnoxious pain in the rear she has been.
@mandystrong8196 I agree Mandy 💯....I wish the same thing about her obnoxious letters...But unfortunately even if they read every one they can only go by the transcripts...Anyway, I'm hopeful she won't get an appeal...It really seems like Judge K. crossed all his T's and dotted all his I's...🙏🙏...Have a great weekend !!
A Very intelligent, kind, and patient Judge. Knows his law and totally controlled his courtroom. She had a great deal with 15 year offer but her narcissism got the best of her. No remorse, deserves life.
Agreed. He didn’t even lay into here at sentencing which I was so disappointed about after everything she’d put him through and in general. If this comes back on appeal I will legit snap and lose my 💩 for sure. She makes me feel violent every time I see her but ESPECIALLY when she speaks! This includes her infamous and endless “letters” to the Judge. I can feel the rage bubbling up inside of me right now just writing about it!!!! 😤🤮🤢🙄🤡!!!!!!!
@superren8107 he knew there was another letter coming. Keep it short and sweet and she wouldn't have listened anyways. Remember she didn't do anything wrong.
oh yes, she definitely perjured herself, over and over again, on the stand, in the letters, she deserves nothing, and then Owens also was a party in her on the stand perjury, he should be charged too.
I would love for the defense expert, Dr Harper, to take a look at the videos shown in the State’s rebuttal…. So she could see what an actual battered spouse looks like.
You’re right, I believe! This judge was the perfect judge for the case. When judges in the appellate courts review the grounds for appeal and Judge Kraynick’s rulings, they will not be considering whether Sarah was nice or not, whether she was a pain or not, or any of the other things we talk about - they will be looking at the specific objections and rulings as compared to the case law. Judge Kraynick is so strong on case law! Also, something that hasn’t been mentioned is that the State will have an opportunity to respond to the appeal, and Mr. Jay, especially, is also very strong with case law. Owens tends to argue policy and feelings; Mr. Jay and Judge Kraynick argue case law and precedent.
Right after Sarah was sentenced, James Owens spoke to the press explaining he would support Sarah with her motions for the next 30 days, and that's exactly what he's been doing. After January 2nd, he's done & dusted.
My question exactly - she has already been appointed an appeals attorney. If the appeals attorney has a different strategy, wouldn’t this “appeal” by Owens, who is no longer the attorney on record, just muddy the waters? Owens said after the verdict that he would not represent her in the appeals but he would be there for the sentencing. The day of sentencing, she was appointed an appeals lawyer. That lawyer withdrew (seriously, not her fault for real), and a second appeals lawyer was named. Tanika’s Two Cents has the documents to review. Even if Owens believed the second appeals lawyer was going to withdraw, it would seem he would have to be made the lawyer on the record. If he’s going to do the appeals, he needs to be prepared to shut down his practice for another few years because Sarah is going to expect 100% of his attention.
@@HRHMom This isn't an appeal, though, this is a request for transcripts from the trial, which Owens can absolutely share with whoever her proper appellate attorney is. Think of this as Owens doing a little bit of pre-show prep work for him.
@ Not so sure - but I could be wrong. The document says that the items listed are for review on appeal, and then there is the request for documents. The document also says that the appellant is coming through the undersigned - Owens. Is Owens working for the appellate attorney? If so, he should be listed in the docket just as Henderson’s involvement (and the other attorney, Beck, I think) had to be provided to the court in writing before they became involved. Owens can share whatever he wants, I suppose, but I’m not so sure he has a right to make an appearance (even on paper) if he is not her attorney on record. I’ll admit it’s a mystery to me - you may be absolutely right, but it seems Owens would have to be listed as her attorney before filing on her behalf. There are days I wish I’d gone to law school.
She inadvertently fired them by refusing to work with them remember there were times she wouldn't see the lawyer during a visit, I can't remember what layer because there were so many. I think she didn't like their tactics she wanted to pretend to be a battered spouse but there was no proof and I think lawyer didn't want to go down that road so Sarah behaved badly so they'd withdraw and she'd get a new one. She did this at least with 2 lawyers. I don't think Jorge being caught on camera ruining TV equals battered syndrome. She recorded everything but never once any time did she record him hurting attacking her
@@Excitedutterance I heard someone - maybe Brother Counsel, but maybe not - say that she fired them “in effect” because they were pushed to the point of not being able to work with her. I re-watched the hearing where Bankowitz withdrew, and the judge asked her if it was her position that she wanted him to withdraw, and she said yes. She didn’t say “fire him,” but she did say yes, she wanted him gone. She may not have said the words, “You’re fired” to each of the four who represented and withdrew, but she fired them through her actions, just as she waived her right to counsel through her conduct.
@@HRHMom the court documents are what matters. The sources you refer to are not on the record. If you read the records you will find 8 recusals. Interestingly, 3 of those recusals were before the court appointed lawyers even stood next to Sarah to represent her. They recused due to conflict of interest. This is a common reason to bow out of a case as it is unethical to continue if you have represented someone involved or know someone personally, for example. That’s just a side note. Facts matter. Rumours distort the process. Have a good day!
I think the actual wording is “forfeited and thereby waived” her right to court appointed counsel - I think they’re pretty much the same. I believe you have to personally waive your right, but she forfeited through her conduct which is the equivalent of waiving her right. In my mind, it’s kind of like saying she didn’t “fire” her attorneys although she made it impossible for them to represent her, which is, in effect, firing them. It’s just semantics, and gaslighters like Sarah love to twist words!
Peter I truly love that you don't give in to negative comments, they ususally come from people who lack self awarness and don't understand that we are all entitled to our own opinions. But most importantly, that its OK. As long as we are respectful towards each other . Thank you for being you. ❤
Essentially what you stated is an insult of those that have a different opinion to you, and you frame as negative comments..."people who lack self awareness and don't understand that we are all entitled to our own opinions". Do you realise that the people you criticize are merely expressing their own opinions? Darwin winner, 1st prize 😂
@jonoharper4729 🤦♀️ if you can not be RESPECTFUL while expressing your opinion, you most likely lack self-awareness. Or you're just a bully. But thank you for your comment.
@@MidnightL2008 not really the warden or whatever you call them from the jail said no that it goes against protocol. Couldnt do the makeup in the jail or the hair. Judge said she could have someone do it in the courtroom only. She didn't want that, I mean everyone staring looking at her while it's done in there. So yea that was really up to the jail for that one not really the judge, he can't go against jail rules.
@ that is true but I can absolutely see Sarah trying to blame the judge because she is looking to make him be the villain in the story her twisted mind is trying to create.
Would be interesting if the appellate court does find that Judge K did something wrong. I doubt that’s the case. Owen’s biggest downfall was going with the battered spouse syndrome instead of “blackout drunk FL woman unintentionally leaves boyfriend zipped up in suitcase that leads to his death”! No mention of SB in 2025 would be golden!
There's a reason that her previous attorneys wouldn't capitulate to her defense strategy. The difference is that Owens didn't review the evidence until after he had passed the point of no return.
might have been four years for everyone but the lawyer who represented her. In ANY other case a judge wouldn’t expect a lawyer just assigned to the case to be ready for trial that soon. I am not defending sarah, it’s about rights that should be preserved for EVERYONE or no one has them
@ReneeSmitley She had gone through something like eight attorneys and several years by the point Owens stepped in. The court had already drawn the line and forced the trial to commence with herself self-represented before he came in. Owens knew this when he took the case. Allowing a trial to get delayed ad nauseum because of a defendant's inability to form a coherent defence is not a precedent that needs to be set. Jorge Torres' family had just as much right to a prompt and fair trial as Sarah did, and Sarah flouted that right with endless antics.
Hello Peter! Thank you so much for this update! Sarah will never give up until there is nothing more she can do! I wish you and your family a very Happy New Year and safe travels to N.C! I have lots of relatives in N.C. Enjoy your trip! ❤❤❤❤
Then she'll start suing the state over denial of her rights as a prisoner. "They're all being so mean to me. They make jokes about suitcases and ask me if I need a makeup artist."
Boone is guilty! All the evidence was in her very own videos. Not just Jorge in the suitcase, but calling the cops on him to kick him out, then harassing him to come back just to get him arrested again while he was sleeping. Waking him up to start arguments... I guess you can't blame her for trying though..
As far as the counterbalance, the Sixth Amendment works both ways in terms of the right to a speedy trial. The defendant has a right to a speedy trial, but to counterbalance the scales of justice the people have the same right. According the US Supreme Court in Vega v. Tekoh Miranda rights "are not themself rights protected by the Constitution."
@@MrMancreatedgod what part? She is claiming that the denial of her getting another delay after 4 years of delay is a reversible error! The state has the same 6th Amendment right to a speedy trial as the defendant! She is the one who caused her qualified counsel to withdraw from the case. Also as far as Miranda warnings, the Supreme Court ruled on this in the case I noted in 2022!
Have fun in NC. I live here and personally think it’s the best state, (but I know I’m biased). I think you have said you go to the mountains. Our mountains in Western NC are still devastated from Helene; please keep the people in Western NC in your prayers.
@Annasayshello agree! I live in MI, and my hubby and I visited Pictured Rocks, and it was amazing. The views were incredible. I would love to go to NC one day. I do enjoy mountains every now and then.
@wernerfoerster3666 absolutely she can file an appeal. She should. My comment was more about the attitude that she carries and think everyone is out to get her.
😥 Oh man last post for awhile! I love coming home to a new video this month. Thank you again for the awesome recap. I'm going to go watch this show now and then rewatch your explanations as is customary!
I don't know where you're going in North Carolina, but I live just outside Fayetteville. Enjoy your time while you are here and have a Happy New Year, Peter! 🙌
I came in late to this case but the judge seems pretty chill and put up with a lot from her, a lot more than other judges I have seen. I hope she loses, and loses bad, she should have taken the deal, she would have been home by now, not that she deserves anything but life with no parole, EVER. She abused Jorge, I was with a very abusive ex, just like Sarah, but he didn't hit me, just words. Boy that video of her yelling at Jorge in the hallway brought back some bad memories.
My husband and I spent vacation time in North Myrtle Beach over Christmas. The first week weather was great. This week much cooler. We go back to Texas on the 28th. We love the beach here. Texas beaches are not as nice and ten hours from Midland Tx.
I’m a lawyer. This judge covered all his bases. I’ve never heard a judge cite so much law in justifying his rulings. There’s no way she’ll win on appeal. She’s just trying not to be held accountable for her actions
She is just being a pain in the ass but it’s not going to get her anywhere. Look what the 4 years of being a pain in the ass got her, right where she belongs. The judge was more patient and thorough than I’ve ever seen.
Yeah he was very well researched in this trial and I think it's because he's thorough but also because she showed her true colors early on and he wanted to make SURE it was on the record that he was making a fair and impartial decision based on case law because, you know, there never in the world was a bigger victim than Sarah Boone. Also, that was the biggest run on sentence in the history of man (possibly)
SB will do anything to be seen. She needs to wake up to her actions.
@@kke78 she will…I’m so over her and thought we were done! The entitlement is unreal!
@@divadawn509- I think Sarah Boone had several looong run-on sentences in the novel she wrote & read to the judge right before sentencing!! Lots of run-on sentences here just discussing Sarah Boone! I think your good! LOL
Judge K said “bless you” to every single person who sneezed in his courtroom. AND he got this sh!tshow done & dusted. The man is a saint.
And he needs a podcast! Or audible episode .. that voice tho
@@michelleeven24 He should read audiobooks.
My husband and I were there for the sentencing, and we went in early to watch Judge Kraynick in ordinary cases. My husband sneezed and got the Judge Kraynick Bless You! Judge Kraynick is exactly the same in dealing with a violation of probation as he was with a murder 2 case - professional, citing law, respectful, and wishing every defendant good luck. A great judge!
hahahahaha my fav comment of 2024
@HRHMom that’s incredible! I love that he was blessed by Judge K. 😄
Gosh, leave that poor judge alone. He's been abused by her enough!
Ms Boone should have just taken the deal, it was beyond generous.
Judge Kraynick has the patience of a Saint!!
Judge Kraynick reminds me of what Marcus Aurelius echos. His reserve is admirable and judgement is resolute.
He doesn't though... 😂
Bringing religion into the courtroom is unacceptable. It directly goes against separation of Church & State. Clearly shows bias.
@@LordOfThePancakes What ruling was made that was unduly influenced by religion?
Kraynik’s ability to cite law off the top of his head, while giving “bless you’s” to anyone in his court who needed it; just goes to show how brilliantly above the rest he truly is. He’s phenomenal and won’t be overturned.❤
Brilliant indeed!!
errors by trial courts are common .. no matter how impressed you are, this judge is not immune
@@wernerfoerster3666 affirmations of state and federal courts are more common than over ruling a decision. The court would have had to err to such a degree that it could change the outcome of the trial. Mr. Owen's met with Ms. Boone quite a few times before deciding to take the case on the eve of the hearing. Addionally, Ms. Boone's testimony did her in as it was in conflict with her prior statements, her statements during trial, the witnesses and the evidence presented. The judge did edit out Ms. Boone's racist comments during her interrogation.
@@AnaFernandez-jp5uh
As an appellate atty, I thank you for the strawman statement of your first sentence. Your second sentence is not necessarily true (Fundamental Error).
The remainder of your comment does not foreclose fertile appellate arguments.
💯✅️
This judge was very professional during this entire case & his decisions were well thought out & documented. Good luck, Sarah!
100% Agreed and I'm guessing it was by the grace of God and powerful prayer that this man was able to completely hold his tongue all the way through to the end.
Certainly a better human being and professional than I could have been. Lol
Judge Kraynick is 100 percent class!!
I agree with everything that was said in the replies. And I'm no lawyer, but it seems very clear to me that Kraynick bent over backwards to protect all of Sarah's rights as the defendant. If anything,he gave her too many chances. I can't imagine an appellate court striking down the jury's verdict or saying she didn't have enough continuances . This is all BS from her lawyers. I have heard that in most cases a new trial is NOT granted on appeal. There would have to be something egregiously wrong and there isn't anything!
Exactly
No, very mean
Sarah Boone the gift that keeps on giving. This woman will never admit to what she did. May Jorge RIP
Nope,,, she did admit it,,,,, everyone just needs to know that because she was drinking and vile, she NOT INTENTIONALLY murdered her fiance an a very cruel way and then dragged him and his family through the mud at sentencing. Let her get a new trial. She might get the death penalty this time. Regardless, sarah boonickus needs money on her kiosk NOW😂😂😂😂 it's gonna be sarah long john boonickus after she gets to the actual prison. She can be exceptional with making toilet wine. I just don't know how the new celly is going to be able to sleep with all that gold shining in her face at night. Perhaps a suitcase for sarah to sleep in so she can feel closer to Jorge.
I agree i think i know her last words on her dead bed. IT WAS NOT INTENTIONAL!
@@Ashnod24 Or I forgive you
Definitely 👍.
To bad shes making the family continue to suffer and shes costing the county/state more and more $$$ when she is exactly where she belongs and for as long as she belongs but she will never see that. The perpetual victim - Sarah Boone.
It seems like Judge Kraynick was very aware that Sarah Boone would be appealing many of his rulings, and so he was extremely careful to cover all his bases. He did his research to make sure his decisions were legally sound before he ruled, and he cited ample case law to support them on the record. In my opinion, there's no way Sarah Boone is going to win an appeal.
Have you researched the law?
Have you cuz she's not getting out @wernerfoerster3666
Lol you don’t know any of these things you bring up, which aren’t even remotely close to legal terms.
Honey your personal opinion on how nice and polite the judge was has no legal bearing. Let’s not pretend like you’re making any kind of well thought out prediction here other than the obvious fact that practically nobody ever wins an appeal.
@@QueenofMarine Agree - I think all judges are aware that there will be appeals; that’s a given. However, I think Judge Kraynick was hypervigiliant regarding case law because he was well aware of the type of personality he was dealing with. His case law was always directly on point. The average appeal win is between 5 - 20% with criminal cases coming in at a 6.9% success rate. It is extremely doubtful that Sarah Boone will win an appeal.
@@LordOfThePancakes ew
I have been watching this channel religiously for quite some time now and I was just gifted a membership! It’s a Christmas miracle 😁
How??
Yes how?? I’d love a gifted membership!! I watch every video of Lawyer you know, but unfortunately, I can’t afford a membership, due to reasons beyond my control. Or should I say, I’m a giver and willing to help everyone I can, but never spend my hard earned money on MYSELF. I just can’t, guess it was the way I was raised! I do love watching this channel!! I just watch it on TH-cam! Keep up the good work!! You’re an amazing person and break stuff down for the majority to understand! I love it!!❤❤❤
Awww, congratulations! 🎉❤
@@YSLnurseYT gives them out randomly to people subscribed to the channel. It’s just luck. Make sure you have your account set to allow gifted memberships
@@klburke How do we do that?
I have watched ALOT of trials but I'm no lawyer. However, I've never seen a judge justify his decisions so well and take so much time ensuring he thought about what he was ruling on and showing the case law he looked at to make that decision. He gave her so many chances to act right. She never will and she will always be the problem.
I loved this judge and lately I haven't been loving too many judges ***cough cough*** AUNT BEV ***cough cough***
Judge of the year goes to Judge Kraynick!!!!
Yes a huge round of applause for Judge Kraynick
errors by trial courts are common .. no matter how impressed you are, this judge is not immune
@@wernerfoerster3666 Oh, the judge was very careful with the record and of Sarah.
The judge asked Sarah no less than 20 times twice a day every day of the trial
Ms. Boone: Ma'am Are you happy with your lawyers: - Yes
Are you able to ask questions and exchange in a dialogue with your attorneys - Yes
Do you have a strategy outlined with your defense team - Yes
Are you happy with your strategy - Yes
Plus, there were no less than 5 legal “professionals” at the defense table one would think they would've had their ish together, but considering the Fact that Sarah Boone considers herself part of the defense team I am not surprised...
If she still had her first judge assigned, judge Wooten, she’d really be complaining because he had very little patience left for her after 3.5 YEARS. Judge Kraynek was firm, polite, respectful and way more patient of her self centered attitude and obnoxious letters.🤦🏼♀️
She has wasted way to much tax payer money. She is guilty. I am tired of seeing her face.
she has a right of appeal
I agree , I'm tired of seeing her face too..and it makes me sick to think of all our tax money she has wasted.
@@wernerfoerster3666 both statements can be true.
I highly doubt Judge K made any mistakes at all. He is the most professional and knowledgebale judge I have ever seen. Endless patience, good manners, extremely knowledgable and an all round good guy.
errors by trial courts are common .. no matter how impressed you are, this judge is not immune
@@wernerfoerster3666 Like I said, I highly doubt he made any mistakes.
@@debbiejames3096
As an appellate atty, I'm not so sure about that.
She’s lucky she wasn’t in front of Fran Gull in the Delphi case. All of his constitutional rights were stomped on. Abuse of power,the whole state of Indiana the Richard Allen case.
@@tammymartin880
yes, it happens
According to case law, a judge may decide if a defendant has FORFEITED their right to an attorney if there is strong evidence to suggest that the defendant is using the system to delay the trial. In this case, there were numerous delays and eight attorney's with whom Sarah Boone was never satisfied with. I don't believe that the judge was wrong and once the appeals court review the entire case, they will side with the Judge. Also, understanding that Sarah Boone's attorney asked for and was denied a continuance, the court could look at the fact that the case has been held up for almost five years. If every defendant presented themselves in the manner that Sarah Boone did, justice would never be had and the courts will be tied up for years.
If you watched tgis channel you'd know it wasn't Sarah's fault for every attorney. Regardless once one does take up her case why would what others have done apply to them? He certainly didn't prepare 5 years in advance to accept the case. I couldn't disagree with you more if you actually want justice.
@@MrMancreatedgodYou’re right, it wasn’t her fault for every attorney. But if it’s her fault for even 2, isn’t that enough to deny her a third?
My point exactly, Debra!
@@MrMancreatedgodthis is where I wonder if it will be a problem for the judge for not doing even a short and strict continuance. It’s really the only think that would even be there for appeals but it can be a big one
@@MrMancreatedgodI don’t actually know that the defense lost out on anything tangible from being denied the continuance. If I recall correctly the issue was that her lawyer wasn’t sure he could get together everything necessary to put on battered spouse syndrome as a defense. Turns out he was able to do that without the extra time. This is important because an appeal court is going to look at the totality of the case and ask “How would this defense have been presented differently if the continuance had been granted?” as well as “Would it have been different enough that the jury’s verdict would have been different as well?” I think the answer to the second question is probably no.
The judge was expecting this trust me. I believe he was more than fair and Sarah's going to lose........again. Of course she will not accept it
Overall I agree with you. However. I think he messed this up. I'd grant retrial were I voting on it because of this specific issue that I think he screwed up.
He let in loads of evidence he could have blocked. Well done. The continuance should have been granted.
Overall I don't think it changes the verdict but I also don't think this aspect of her trial was handled correctly.
@@MrMancreatedgod you may be right, but I’m sure Kraynick had his reasons. Sarah flat out lied multiple times on the stand and her and Owens submitted evidence that was clearly fake. The black eye with black paint.
@@MrMancreatedgod Over the holidays, I talked with several family members who are defense attorneys, one a death penalty specialist. Each one agreed that there was no need for a continuance. With at least two attorneys basically ready to go to trial (Padilla and Cashman), the work had been done and just needed to be reviewed. Owens chose to go with Battered Spouse, and he said he had to “educate” Sarah on that - it showed, as she was just not believable.
@@HRHMom
As a former prosecutor and defense attorney, I would be shocked if ANY defense attorney would not need and feel more comfortable with a continuance.
Ruling over a trial in order to stimy a defendant's appellate rights, seems like abuse of power to me.
Boone kept claiming she never saw discovery. She claimed that certain videos and text were missing. If she didn't see the discovery, how would she know what is missing? Cashman said while going through discovery, she came across some of boones' medical records, which had notes on them in boones handwriting, which clearly showed she had viewed discovery. All the attorneys said they went through discovery with her. Boones problem may have been that she didn't see what she wanted (because it didn't exist) or certain bits of discovery she wanted yo use the attorneys did not want to use.
Because there’s a list? Lol
@@EricaB763And the phantom notes on the med records? Lol
Exactly. She seems to think that she has been her own “lead counsel” during the pendency of this case and all the attorneys assigned or retained were below here.
If she wanted to claim she didn’t review the discovery of parts of discovery, then they should be allowed to review all the letters she sent regardless of what issues is being raised because the totally of her letters and her attitude and everything she says you can tell she is a liar. She lies and makes stuff up, and all you have to do is read a portion of any letter she has sent. Just because Sarah was arguing about her “bond” and why she can’t use her phone or read every piece of everything that existed during this trial, while her lawyer(a) were trying to explain to her and review it with her, doesnt mean she didn’t show you x, y; or z, it just means you were not paying attention when you should have
@@kepecos I’m obviously not a fan of hers. And she deserves her sentence. But she didn’t get a fair shake.
I'm so done with Sarah Boone. I felt the same way about Jodi Arias. I never wanted to hear anything more about Jodi after the case was over.
But don’t you wish we had a Peter for that trial!?
@KerriStalley Yes! That would've been great!
@@KerriStalley oh, yes, 100%
those 5 issues were all argued ad nauseum in the trial, none reversible. Judge K ran a tight trial and allowed the totally fraudulent battered spouse defense. Even the jury knew Jorge was the only victim.
@@TheeSnitch THIS
errors by trial courts are common .. no matter how impressed you are, this judge is not immune
@wernerfoerster3666 true but judge kraynick had sarahs number early on in PTC s which is why he wrote the unusually long detailed rulings. I have confidence that the appellate judges already expect her to bombard them with letters
@@TheeSnitch
1. I would hope all judges, especially on homicide cases, would be conscientious generally, and that he did not single out SB for particular treatment.
2. As far as having SB's number, virtually all homicide convictions at trial will be appealed - so that he went out of his way doesn't ring true for me. Any judge would already have an appeal in mind.
3. Letters from SB to the appellate court would not be part of the appellate record or read by the appellate judges. They'd likely be returned to sender or rejected from the filing portal.
The only two people who were of any other opinion was Sarah and apparently owens was insane enough to think otherwise
Something in me knowing sarah has spent and will spend all of her Christmas "celebrations " in prison, brings me a little happiness. Regardless of her appeal process that will take years, she is going to learn some very...... golden experiences.
That, she will!
I believe those issues were already addressed by judge Kraynick and his legal basis for each of his decisions. He was patient and fair all throughout this circus with Sarah.
They were, but she still has the right to appeal. The request for a new trial was her asking the judge to change his own decisions.
Honestly…i think that it’s fair for her to appeal. If he did it properly the decision will reinforce the abilities of the judges to call halt and can be quoted in future instances of bar behavior. If it is found to be wrong it will give direction to everyone how to do it properly
_already addressed by judge Kraynick_ you understand how an appeal works, right?
The Honorable Judge Kraynick, is the smartest judge I had ever seen in a case. What an honest and blessed genius he is! No way she can appeal after the nasty letter she wrote to insult him and calling him Mr. Kraynick, the woman is insane and so was her lawyer. How dare she speak of him that way, this needs to end, the woman deserved everything she deserved. Judge Kraynick is a hero and deserves to be respected. When will this end? God please protect Judge Kraynick from the murderer and keep him safe from evil.
My three favorite words to hear "What's Up Everybody!"
Boone will never go away. Perhaps were should just ignore her.
The gift that keeps on giving!
Should’ve took the plea Sarah! 👀😳🧐
This is just facts.
I’m so glad she didn’t. She deserved more than 15 years.
HELL YEAH……that was a foolish decision…it was her Ego that got in the way
@@ElizabethPuglisi-df2gtI don't think it's ego. I think she thinks she's right and everyone is wrong.
"taken" (yikes)
The amount of times she referenced how long she was incarcerated and has not gone to trial yet and the complaints that she hasn’t had a trial yet, she was trying to say her rights were being denied because there wasn’t a trial in excess of 4 years. It’s definitely one of those… be careful what you wish for
Judge Kraynik was great. Patient, matter a fact, no preferential treatment for one side or the other, very smart and clear. Massachusetts needs more judges like this.
Great eyebrows too.
Merry Christmas, Peter, Papa Tragos and the rest of your family! Safe travels to NC tomorrow! We all love and appreciate your time and effort that you always put into these videos! All respect to you all!
I seriously doubt as patient and fair as Judge Kraynick was with Sarah Boone giving her every act of compassion and professionalism he did could even come close to being found of doing something wrong. Judge Kraynick is very smart and knows the law and walked carefully as he gave Sarah Boone more than a fair amount of chances not to hang herself. She was hellbent on doing so and mastered it quite well. As Sarah Boone says in her own words, she excels at everything. We have to give her much credit for how well she videotaped her own demise. RIP Jorge. Justice you and your family got and the jury and Judge got it right. Enjoy LWOP Sarah you have earned it. 😮😮😮😮😮
errors by trial courts are common .. no matter how impressed you are, this judge is not immune
Pls keep continuing covering this case and ty in advance....my hope is that she doesn't get an appeal now..or ever!
If this woman gets another trial, I give up completely on the justice system. Ugh…
The only other trials her and Darrell Brooks should have are for abusing the court system and the families of their victims.
Yes...I'm in agreement 💯 with you...SB is not only a belligerent nuisance, but she is a textbook narcissistic, selfish, cruel, self absorbed, psychotic murderer who so kindly left no room for speculation or false allegations by providing us and the jury with video proof of her evil and malicious intentions leading up until the actual crime taking place in real time...She sealed her fate with those videos just as she sealed the fate of Jorge as soon as she zipped up that suitcase..Every delay in this trial has been caused by her inability to play nicely with others, a problem I strongly suspect has plagued her since childhood...A granted appeal would be such a miscarriage of justice and a slap in the face to the Judge, prosecution and the jury....I truly hope it never happens...🙏🙏
I don’t think the appellate court will read Sarah’s letters though I wish they would. They will only be reviewing the hearings and trial transcripts to see if there were any reversible errors. I bet they will have no idea what an obnoxious pain in the rear she has been.
@mandystrong8196 I agree Mandy 💯....I wish the same thing about her obnoxious letters...But unfortunately even if they read every one they can only go by the transcripts...Anyway, I'm hopeful she won't get an appeal...It really seems like Judge K. crossed all his T's and dotted all his I's...🙏🙏...Have a great weekend !!
Yeah, she'd need to be a rich politician to get _that_ much "justice"
SB has the rest of her life to keep the court busy. Let it go, Sarah
Go Boone
A Very intelligent, kind, and patient Judge. Knows his law and totally controlled his courtroom.
She had a great deal with 15 year offer but her narcissism got the best of her. No remorse, deserves life.
Enjoy your Trip. Thanks for the year of coverage. I’ve learned so much!
I am dyslexic and just thought my brain was messing up with the hat 🤭 Happy Christmas and New year everyone!
😅 I didn't notice it. 😅😅😅 I am not dyslexic.
@@mariee.5912maybe you are!
Dum dum dummmm. 🎶😂😂😊
Awwe
Id be very shocked and surprised if he did make a mistake
Agreed. He didn’t even lay into here at sentencing which I was so disappointed about after everything she’d put him through and in general. If this comes back on appeal I will legit snap and lose my 💩 for sure. She makes me feel violent every time I see her but ESPECIALLY when she speaks! This includes her infamous and endless “letters” to the Judge. I can feel the rage bubbling up inside of me right now just writing about it!!!! 😤🤮🤢🙄🤡!!!!!!!
Exactly. Judge K had this case buttoned up back to front. I find it hard to believe anything they try to throw at him could stick.
I think Judge Kraynick went above & beyond to be fair in this trial
Agreed. Clearly this was not his first rodeo.
@superren8107 he knew there was another letter coming. Keep it short and sweet and she wouldn't have listened anyways. Remember she didn't do anything wrong.
The judge was solid. I'm a big fan of extreme fairness and judge k was extremely fair. Her sentence was the most fair of all...
Hello everyone ❤❤❤hope everyone had an amazing holiday …and hope everyone has a wonderful and safe new year
Thank you , you too😀
I'm here for this one! Know that! 😂
Are Ms Boone's hand written letters to the court and submitted as part of court record then subject to purjury?
oh yes, she definitely perjured herself, over and over again, on the stand, in the letters, she deserves nothing, and then Owens also was a party in her on the stand perjury, he should be charged too.
Good thinking.
Thanks! Btw I love the grey
Merry Christmas Peter! All the best to you, your family and the community in 2025!!!!
I would love for the defense expert, Dr Harper, to take a look at the videos shown in the State’s rebuttal…. So she could see what an actual battered spouse looks like.
Good luck getting a good result on appeal with this judge. Happy Hollidays to everyone.
Appeal is a different court altogether different judges
You’re right, I believe! This judge was the perfect judge for the case. When judges in the appellate courts review the grounds for appeal and Judge Kraynick’s rulings, they will not be considering whether Sarah was nice or not, whether she was a pain or not, or any of the other things we talk about - they will be looking at the specific objections and rulings as compared to the case law. Judge Kraynick is so strong on case law! Also, something that hasn’t been mentioned is that the State will have an opportunity to respond to the appeal, and Mr. Jay, especially, is also very strong with case law. Owens tends to argue policy and feelings; Mr. Jay and Judge Kraynick argue case law and precedent.
If the case is closed and Owens is not the Appeal Attorney, how can he file this on behalf of DipDoo Sarah?
There's a time limit to appeal I believe. He can file it on her behalf even if the expectation is to have a different appeal attorney.
Right after Sarah was sentenced, James Owens spoke to the press explaining he would support Sarah with her motions for the next 30 days, and that's exactly what he's been doing. After January 2nd, he's done & dusted.
My question exactly - she has already been appointed an appeals attorney. If the appeals attorney has a different strategy, wouldn’t this “appeal” by Owens, who is no longer the attorney on record, just muddy the waters? Owens said after the verdict that he would not represent her in the appeals but he would be there for the sentencing. The day of sentencing, she was appointed an appeals lawyer. That lawyer withdrew (seriously, not her fault for real), and a second appeals lawyer was named. Tanika’s Two Cents has the documents to review. Even if Owens believed the second appeals lawyer was going to withdraw, it would seem he would have to be made the lawyer on the record. If he’s going to do the appeals, he needs to be prepared to shut down his practice for another few years because Sarah is going to expect 100% of his attention.
@@HRHMom This isn't an appeal, though, this is a request for transcripts from the trial, which Owens can absolutely share with whoever her proper appellate attorney is. Think of this as Owens doing a little bit of pre-show prep work for him.
@ Not so sure - but I could be wrong. The document says that the items listed are for review on appeal, and then there is the request for documents. The document also says that the appellant is coming through the undersigned - Owens. Is Owens working for the appellate attorney? If so, he should be listed in the docket just as Henderson’s involvement (and the other attorney, Beck, I think) had to be provided to the court in writing before they became involved. Owens can share whatever he wants, I suppose, but I’m not so sure he has a right to make an appearance (even on paper) if he is not her attorney on record. I’ll admit it’s a mystery to me - you may be absolutely right, but it seems Owens would have to be listed as her attorney before filing on her behalf. There are days I wish I’d gone to law school.
In effect she DID waive her right to counsel by firing so many court appointed lawyers. Enough already. She was delaying the trial.
She fired no one. They recused themselves.
She inadvertently fired them by refusing to work with them remember there were times she wouldn't see the lawyer during a visit, I can't remember what layer because there were so many. I think she didn't like their tactics she wanted to pretend to be a battered spouse but there was no proof and I think lawyer didn't want to go down that road so Sarah behaved badly so they'd withdraw and she'd get a new one. She did this at least with 2 lawyers. I don't think Jorge being caught on camera ruining TV equals battered syndrome. She recorded everything but never once any time did she record him hurting attacking her
@ this is all irrelevant. My point stands. She fired no one.
@@Excitedutterance I heard someone - maybe Brother Counsel, but maybe not - say that she fired them “in effect” because they were pushed to the point of not being able to work with her. I re-watched the hearing where Bankowitz withdrew, and the judge asked her if it was her position that she wanted him to withdraw, and she said yes. She didn’t say “fire him,” but she did say yes, she wanted him gone. She may not have said the words, “You’re fired” to each of the four who represented and withdrew, but she fired them through her actions, just as she waived her right to counsel through her conduct.
@@HRHMom the court documents are what matters. The sources you refer to are not on the record. If you read the records you will find 8 recusals. Interestingly, 3 of those recusals were before the court appointed lawyers even stood next to Sarah to represent her. They recused due to conflict of interest. This is a common reason to bow out of a case as it is unethical to continue if you have represented someone involved or know someone personally, for example. That’s just a side note. Facts matter. Rumours distort the process. Have a good day!
Hope everyone had a wonderful Christmas ❤
I hope you had a wonderful Christmas with your family as well sweetie .❤
@Rita-yw2tn thank you, it was wonderful ✌️💖
Owen isn't any brighter than Boone
Owen and Henderson and their dodgy past - they’re clutching at straws
Replay. I thought Judge K was very thorough, patient and fair …
Thank You Peter as Always You are the best to break this down! Blessings and enjoy Your time with family in Mountains!!!
It’s gorgeous in NC right now. Happy, safe travels to you!
Didn't the judge find that she had "forfeited" (not waived) her right to court appointed counsel based on her conduct?
Either way she got a whole team to work for her defense for nothing.
I think the actual wording is “forfeited and thereby waived” her right to court appointed counsel - I think they’re pretty much the same. I believe you have to personally waive your right, but she forfeited through her conduct which is the equivalent of waiving her right. In my mind, it’s kind of like saying she didn’t “fire” her attorneys although she made it impossible for them to represent her, which is, in effect, firing them. It’s just semantics, and gaslighters like Sarah love to twist words!
I’m not a lawyer and I know Owen’s is doing his job…but I find him just as annoying as Sarah
She taunted and mocked a man who was begging for his life. There's no defense. Case closed.
Peter I truly love that you don't give in to negative comments, they ususally come from people who lack self awarness and don't understand that we are all entitled to our own opinions. But most importantly, that its OK. As long as we are respectful towards each other . Thank you for being you. ❤
Or maybe we don't lack anything! We call BS when we smell it! Thanx karayna for allowing others to think different different
Essentially what you stated is an insult of those that have a different opinion to you, and you frame as negative comments..."people who lack self awareness and don't understand that we are all entitled to our own opinions".
Do you realise that the people you criticize are merely expressing their own opinions?
Darwin winner, 1st prize 😂
@jonoharper4729 🤦♀️
if you can not be RESPECTFUL while expressing your opinion, you most likely lack self-awareness. Or you're just a bully. But thank you for your comment.
This is literally filed in EVERY SINGLE CASE that is appealed in Florida. It is a complete, utter, nothingburger.
Basically she wants the fact that she was tried at all to be suppressed and she be allowed to walk free.
I don't think that's her argument
Oh that's definitely what's she's up to. May not be for this motion but it is her plan overall. So over her
@@nadinekary3767
That's not a proper legal argument - her appellate counsel would not / could not advance a frivolous argument
I hope Peter you won’t be stating that Owen’s has a good point about grievances with Judge K. He gave Sarah Boone everything she asked for
he didn't give her snacks
He did deny her request for a hairstylist and makeup artist!
@@lindacarruth4729😂😂
@@MidnightL2008 not really the warden or whatever you call them from the jail said no that it goes against protocol. Couldnt do the makeup in the jail or the hair. Judge said she could have someone do it in the courtroom only. She didn't want that, I mean everyone staring looking at her while it's done in there. So yea that was really up to the jail for that one not really the judge, he can't go against jail rules.
@ that is true but I can absolutely see Sarah trying to blame the judge because she is looking to make him be the villain in the story her twisted mind is trying to create.
Would be interesting if the appellate court does find that Judge K did something wrong. I doubt that’s the case. Owen’s biggest downfall was going with the battered spouse syndrome instead of “blackout drunk FL woman unintentionally leaves boyfriend zipped up in suitcase that leads to his death”! No mention of SB in 2025 would be golden!
There's a reason that her previous attorneys wouldn't capitulate to her defense strategy. The difference is that Owens didn't review the evidence until after he had passed the point of no return.
@ Owen’s is a fool and SB is a tool!
How many more continuances did she need? It's not as if the judge never issued any continuances. There were already too many!
16 continuance s to be exact, and a week delay due to a hurricane.
many court dates are normal for a homicide case
might have been four years for everyone but the lawyer who represented her. In ANY other case a judge wouldn’t expect a lawyer just assigned to the case to be ready for trial that soon.
I am not defending sarah, it’s about rights that should be preserved for EVERYONE or no one has them
@@ReneeSmitleycorrect. Completely agree.
@ReneeSmitley She had gone through something like eight attorneys and several years by the point Owens stepped in. The court had already drawn the line and forced the trial to commence with herself self-represented before he came in. Owens knew this when he took the case.
Allowing a trial to get delayed ad nauseum because of a defendant's inability to form a coherent defence is not a precedent that needs to be set. Jorge Torres' family had just as much right to a prompt and fair trial as Sarah did, and Sarah flouted that right with endless antics.
Hello Peter! Thank you so much for this update! Sarah will never give up until there is nothing more she can do! I wish you and your family a very Happy New Year and safe travels to N.C! I have lots of relatives in N.C. Enjoy your trip! ❤❤❤❤
Even after she has exhausted she will still try lol
Then she'll start suing the state over denial of her rights as a prisoner. "They're all being so mean to me. They make jokes about suitcases and ask me if I need a makeup artist."
Boone is guilty! All the evidence was in her very own videos. Not just Jorge in the suitcase, but calling the cops on him to kick him out, then harassing him to come back just to get him arrested again while he was sleeping. Waking him up to start arguments... I guess you can't blame her for trying though..
As far as the counterbalance, the Sixth Amendment works both ways in terms of the right to a speedy trial. The defendant has a right to a speedy trial, but to counterbalance the scales of justice the people have the same right. According the US Supreme Court in Vega v. Tekoh Miranda rights "are not themself rights protected by the Constitution."
This doesn't apply here at all and is not an argument anyone would use. Cmon dude
@@MrMancreatedgod what part? She is claiming that the denial of her getting another delay after 4 years of delay is a reversible error! The state has the same 6th Amendment right to a speedy trial as the defendant! She is the one who caused her qualified counsel to withdraw from the case. Also as far as Miranda warnings, the Supreme Court ruled on this in the case I noted in 2022!
Lovely to see you. Thank you!
Merry Merry Peter! Thanks for your consistent content. I love this channel, it’s so familiar and great
OMG ‼️ Peter it never ceases to amaze me how many people take comments/statements/things said wrong!
Have fun in NC. I live here and personally think it’s the best state, (but I know I’m biased). I think you have said you go to the mountains. Our mountains in Western NC are still devastated from Helene; please keep the people in Western NC in your prayers.
I’m sure it’s beautiful where you are, but do come and visit Michigan. The beauty here may change your mind.
@Annasayshello agree! I live in MI, and my hubby and I visited Pictured Rocks, and it was amazing. The views were incredible. I would love to go to NC one day. I do enjoy mountains every now and then.
My niece lives close to Asheville and has told us about the devastation there.
@@kristijones2334 I would like to see NC too, I have never been there.
@@kristijones2334 yes. It’s awful. My heart breaks for those still there trying to rebuild.
Sarah Boone will not get an appeal granted
Good evening everyone
She just won't quit. Here we go again.
she is entitled to appeal just like everyone else
@wernerfoerster3666 absolutely she can file an appeal. She should. My comment was more about the attitude that she carries and think everyone is out to get her.
😥 Oh man last post for awhile! I love coming home to a new video this month. Thank you again for the awesome recap. I'm going to go watch this show now and then rewatch your explanations as is customary!
No, he did not make a mistake
errors by trial courts are common .. no matter how impressed you are, this judge is not immune
@@wernerfoerster3666here you go again. Troll
This is going to be interesting. Owen's taking on Judge Kraynick.
Merry Christmas
Looking forward to this 💜
I don't know where you're going in North Carolina, but I live just outside Fayetteville. Enjoy your time while you are here and have a Happy New Year, Peter! 🙌
After listening to Sarah Boones letters of forgiveness, it's obvious she feels it's all our fault. 😮
😂
Saw something on Sarah causing trouble in jail - post conviction. Causing trouble between cell mates, disobedient behavior.
She got kicked out of jail church for bullying the other inmates.
You mean to tell me that this nasty, manipulative, abusive woman wasn't playing nice with other inmates? I am just shocked.
@BDaltonYoung they are not listening to her.
@@BDaltonYoungand in jail church..no less.. well my word😂
@@mariee.5912 I'm sure she's at the pulpit screaming forgiveness at everyone as we speak
Happy Holiday to you and your family ❤
Love your channel and seeing Reversed Brand represented, our family are huge fans❣️
She is such a vicious, horrible person. Thank God she won’t be able to raise her son anymore. Hopefully any damage done can be reversed.
Great work as always @LYK !!!
Peter, making sure that you're aware that Bruce Rivers lost his son. Michael died in November.
Oh no! I'm so sorry to hear this. The two of them seemed so close. (I hardly watched, but loved their kindness to each other.)
Rest in peace.
I came in late to this case but the judge seems pretty chill and put up with a lot from her, a lot more than other judges I have seen. I hope she loses, and loses bad, she should have taken the deal, she would have been home by now, not that she deserves anything but life with no parole, EVER.
She abused Jorge, I was with a very abusive ex, just like Sarah, but he didn't hit me, just words. Boy that video of her yelling at Jorge in the hallway brought back some bad memories.
Love you content because your so real .. Happy New Year to you and your family 🎊. Thank you
Great coverage
Merry Christmas 🎄 🎁 and Happy New Year to all the Tragos family! 🎉 🥳 🎆
Have a Happy Safe trip!!
Thank you Peter. Hapoy Christmas to you and your family
Thank you, Peter. Enjoy your vacation with family.
My husband and I spent vacation time in North Myrtle Beach over Christmas. The first week weather was great. This week much cooler. We go back to Texas on the 28th. We love the beach here. Texas beaches are not as nice and ten hours from Midland Tx.
He was so incredibly patient and kind to that woman. I couldn't have been 🙅🏼♀️
Welcome to North Carolina!!! I’m here in the Hickory area!
Sarah and Owens are boils on everyone's butts, she will never accept her fate and Owens needs to accept that he took on a loser, because he's one too!
umm appeals are routine
@wernerfoerster3666 If you believe this is the end of it, I've got some land on mars for yea! 🤡
Peter, Hope you & your family had a wonderful Holiday. 😊 🌲
Thank you❤
TLYK always keeping it classy ❤
Give it up Sarah ! Missing her time in spotlight, forever the narcissist.
All I want for Christmas is Sarah Boone to take accountability and fade into my distant memory.