Good news ! I got the audio fixed for the next videos. I had to go through 2 more cables before finally having one that works perfectly as expected. I'll be trying to take some footage on my next flights and will hopefully have the next video ready soon :) Stay tuned !
Its really nice to see how the captain tells the copilot what to expect and to be prepared for a change in weather conditions. That was very professional and amazing to watch.
mathias1dk of course, no doubt like all skills you get to the point of unconscious competence and the procedure becomes relatively natural. Saying that it’s still incredibly impressive and the professionalism of pilots allows me to enjoy flying rather than fear it.
Perfect editing and camera angles....please share more!! You could show a from dark and could to ready to taxi or walkarounds or communication and paperwork with the dispatcher. God speed!!
Thank you ! I thought "what is the best viewpoint in the cockpit?" and then figured out it was ours, so I try to place my camera as close to my own viewpoint as possible, so you can enjoy the whole cockpit and exterior. There will be more videos, stay tuned.
GREAT video, you definitely have to keep uploading videos like this one more frequently. Videos of the takeoff and then skip it to the approach like in this video and the camera angle is just perfect. Videos in the morning and evening are just amazing like in this one, I don’t say the same thing about night because it normally doesn’t look good at night. Keep it up! 😃✈️
Thank you for your comment. I definitely plan to keep doing these kinds of videos. Currently I'm waiting for a new cable to fix the interphone audio, I'm testing a new camera support to be able to quickly install my camera on each flight, and I'm also testing a new position for a second camera on the displays to blend in some close up display shots. Last but not least, I'll be using another microphone for the general cockpit sound :)
Tenerife and Boeing 737 MAX 8 - two things that aren't particularly auspicious in the world of aviation... but other than that, very good video and landing.
Colin & Rachel NBCorkey Today’s planes basically land themselves on their own, pilots only need to set parameters for ILS approach and ensure that general settings on the way down are followed (ex. Speed and Flaps) plus of course stand by in case of trouble. The plane’s computers do all the maneuvering (as you see the controls move on their own)... I’ve been flying as a passenger since 1975 (I was a kid) and in the past 20 years I’ve been flying for business 40-50 flights a year and there has been a dramatical change since 2008-2009 when most of the “oldies” with analogic controls like the DC-9 (late MD Super-80) were scrapped. I started feeling the continuous computer corrections to thrusts and asset during final approach neatly :-) Before che corrections were a lot less and more abrupt, you could actually feel the different style of the pilots (smoothest were the Dutch from KLM probably because of the many landings in heavy conditions in their Caribbean islands like Sankt Marteen, Aruba and so on)....now they all feel the same...computer.
@@ClaudeMagicbox I am working on being a pilot and I will say it’s actually a lot easier in many case to just fly manually than operate all of the computer stuff They deserve the praise whether they are flying using the autopilot or flying manually. Either way, operating thr equipment is complicated and requires a lot of skill. I have to use a simple autopilot in my flight training and getting the autopilot to do what it has to do when it has to do it is more of a pain than flying manually which is why I avoid using it unless my instructor tells me to. These guys have to do more work (more complex autopilot) going roughly 5 times faster than I am. Also this landing (like 99% of landings ) was manual the autopilot is off during the video The reason why the controls are “moving on their own” is because the pilot is holding the yoke on the bottom and the camera angle cuts his hand on the throttle. Also the autopilot command switches are off and FD is on the PFD and not CMD which means the Flight Director is on and not the Autopilot
@@ClaudeMagicbox you dont know what you re talking about. 90% of the time these planes are landed manually. What you call an ILS approach ends up manual most of the time. The only moment when you can expect a plane to land itself is in cat 3 conditions. In other words when the visibility is horrendous and you cant see the runway enough to try a manual landing,which was absolutely not the case in this video,thats why the landing was manual.
@@Hk-uw8my I know and in fact I'm from Milano, Italy and usually land in Malpensa (MXP) and Linate (LIN) airports which are among the foggiest in the world, look it up.
Landing on Tenerife in the 80’s was like landing on the moon. Lol very rocky and volcanic. Not many buildings around the airport. Even worse in lazurite. But beautiful holidays. Love it miss it. 💞
@@jjraga No I'm not. I just found a discord with somebody that has the files. I didn't really want to beta test since I was trying out the flight factor 757 for the first time
@@noahhenshaw4731 nope. the guy who runs it (walter white) was working with ultimate, the team behind the max and he stole it and released in beta as his own. thats why its quite controversial to use it if youre in a virtual airline. compared to the zibo you can tell that its really quite incomplete and thats because he just stole it. i can assure we would have a very good 737 max mod for xp11 if it wasnt for this piece of crap stealing it.
Good video, nice approach and landing with or without the wind. The sound wasn't very good and I found it a little confusing and hard to understand who was saying and doing what during the approach, landing, and taxi. The subtitles helped. At first I wasn't even sure who was PF, but then I figured out FO flying, captain takes control on taxi. @4:18 Flaps 30 callout but I don't see anyone actually changing the flaps. Noticed that the APU was started on final, you don't see that all the time. I assume you know ahead of time when the airport you are landing at doesn't have ground power and you need to start the APU before landing. I see from your pinned comment (3 years ago) you got the audio fixed..I have watched some later videos of yours and the sound was better.
Ik ben de laatste weken bezig geweest met het maken van nieuwe supports voor de camera's en ik heb ondertussen de audio kunnen fixen ook. Hopelijk krijg ik schone beelden van mijn volgende vluchten en kan ik snel een nieuwe video publiceren. Even geduld maar het komt wel :)
By 1:09 you say, that your Flight Director is indicating you to dive to the selected altitude and that you are not going to follow that. After that there appears "ALT ACQ". Can you explain to me, why you didn't changed the altitude?
Interesting video. The cockpit controls of the 737 Max look like an old washing machine. Lucky for those passengers that MCAS (that pilots would have known nothing about) did not send this old relic into the ground due to it's design flaws. Happy that everyone survived and that that 737 Max junk is not flying now.
Excellent video, fantastic approach and landing! I have a question: did you go puposely 1 dot below the glideslope because you were expecting the wind shear to blow upwards? What if the windshear would blow downwards?
Thank you :) The windshear is not blowing up or down, but rather horizontally. At 1500ft we have no wind and a bit later we expect 25kts headwind. If that wind arrives instantly, that's 25kts extra indicated airspeed ! That extra speed would mean extra lift, so being pushed upwards. I would also increase my pitch so as to regain the correct speed. During that time the glideslope has probably gone under and there is not much time left to regain it. Also diving to the glide at low altitude is not a very good idea. That's why I try to stay a little bit below. If the extra airspeed pushes me up a little bit, it will push me back onto the correct profile, all I have to correct then is my speed, but that shouldn't be a problem. Hope that helps :)
It looks like the max would take some getting used to compared to the NG... Like just looking I couldn't find flaps. and the engine screen looks smaller and harder to read than the NG's. Along with lack of giant gear handle xD except thats probably not a necessary
Cams located centre overhead facing forward and on either side at the same angle as this one, one looking out via side window (use same side cam, just turn for occasional external view) and perhaps one dashmounted facing forward looking over the nose. Then record footage on the different cams, so when using the various angles edited together into a video, transform your videos to the next level - trust me. Not sure what cams you're using, but GoPro hero 5 session are nice and compact.
This was filmed with a Hero5 session on a gimbal. The fact that it is so small means I can put it at exactly the right location without being in the way. Unfortunately in the 737 there are very few places you can attach a camera to. Suction cups only stick to windows, and for the rest you have to be creative. Most of my supports I made myself (like the window handle support you can see on my last video). I'm trying to find new and better views each time I go flying. As said on a previous comment, I don't want my cameras to be in the way if anybody enters/leaves the cockpit, I don't want it to be over any instrument panel or sensitive equipment, should the mount break the camera just falls on the floor. And I don't want to bother the captain with hanging camera's. Thank you for your comment :)
I think a camera placed on the back wall of flightdeck to show the whole dash and the front windshield view would be the best if you only are going to have one camera. That would gain you the most bang for buck.
really cool video, and landing. Thought the aircraft landed itself till I saw your hands moving the yoke! Question: is it true the MCAS system on these can be disabled with the stab trim cut off switches below the throttle? Curious to know with the 737 max issues, would appreciate the information. Merci!
Im not him, but Im pretty sure that the stab trim cutout switches disable the electric motor which is responsible for moving the elevators as a part of the fly-by-wire system that has MCAS software built into it.
Hi. Partly correct. Yes the trim can be disabled by the cutout switches, that includes all trim functions, including the MCAS. The elevators are only mechanical like on the 737NG, there's no fly by wire on the 737 MAX ;)
@@pilotmax Great video by the way . when stab trim disabled by cut out switches I presume buttons on yoke disabled (I'm not a pilot ) so is all trim done manually by trim wheels ? . Would it have been hard to trim level after MCAS had put so much nose down trim in ie lots of aerodynamic loads on trim tabs . Just curious as doomed pilots as far as I know put switches back in I presumed because hoped trim motors would give nose up trim lot faster than manually with trim wheels . Sorry to go on about MCAS problems just interesting to get view from real 737 max pilot
A question: Had Capt. Sullenberger been in a 737 instead of the Airbus A320-214 would he still have been able to make a safe landing in the Hudson River? my comment posted 07/20/2018
That's a good question and I'm unfortunately unable to give an answer to that, I think nobody can. What he did was amazing. Would his experience/reaction/CRM be as good ? Yes probably. Would the 737 handle the situation as the A320 did ? I don't know.
no one can tell The A320 was definitely assisting Sullenberger a great deal in a way that the 737 is not programmed to do. Whether he would still have made it is unanswerable but for sure the fact that this was an A320 and that he started the APU immediately increased the odds.
Indeed. What I really find annoying is that they transfer from the captain screen to FO screen together with the engine displays (look at 08:06). When you need to look at it you're always searching for it. You can hear it in this video on my respons delay on flaps during the landing checklist (04:33). It seems stupid but on the NG they are always at the same place and you get the habit to look at it.
that's very annoying , the idea of just made the screen bigger without any update to the system to make it more helpful for the pilot is very bad , and i think the a320 win in this side , the EFIS is very helpful and reduce the workload , airbus developed it from the 80s and still modern until now
I do agree that the Airbus is way more modern regarding the EFIS (ECAM, checklists, etc). And here we are with gigantic screens and still a crappy master caution system with 28V bulbs above... Boeing can do the same (777 for example which uses the same displays as the 737NG), or the newer 787, but probably decided not to on the 737 max to conserve the same type rating, which is economically a very very good choice according to me. A few hours CBT and all 737 crew are qualified for the MAX. There are some great things with the Max, which should be mentioned as well : the new maintenance system makes it possible to do a lot of tests/procedures from the cockpit on the displays in stead of having to go on each system in the avionic bay, makes it much easier to work with for maintenance ! Personally I do like the bigger screens even if there is no extra information displayed on it : the situational awareness is way better than on the NG. I like the big horizon which is nearly always in your view, makes flying when you look a lot outside way easier (on visual approaches for example). And the map which can take the whole screen is fantastic. When briefing your routing in PLAN mode, everything is clear. You can zoom out and display much more information (airports for example) on the map than the NG before it stops displaying because there is too much data selected. In flight, with the map more zoomed out than on the NG, with water now visible in blue on the terrain radar, makes your position awareness very good. And then of course the new engines, which is by far the best upgrade compared to the NG. It takes a lot more time to start them, but once they are started they produce an awesome sound and consume a lot less fuel. (really a lot, I'm always amazed when I see the flight plan fuel with the Max)
thanx for your time that you take to wrote this useful information that i wasn't know about the 737max . i always want to know what pilots like and dislike about their planes because they are in field and know better than fanboys of boeing or airbus :D
Thanks for that - busy with my Max CBT, also a bit irritated about information shifting around the screens depending on the situation, which already sometimes happens on the NG (radar alt I think, and ILS DME vs VOR DME just off the top of my head). I'll see how quickly I get used to it, but of course the problem is as always that we will be operating a mixed fleet for a long, long time so we'll always be flying both types (NG and Max). I can see this is going to trigger my 'stupid design decisions' sensitive spot.... :)
Ik ben ooit als inwoner van Gent vanaf Zaventem naar Tenerife gevlogen, en Tenerife is me zeer goed bevallen. NU woon ik weer terug in Nederland namelijk in Hengelo .
At 60 knots the reversers need to be reduced to idle reverse. On this landing I didn't use more than idle reverse so that was already ok. Once they are idle you can restow them, in this case when coming around taxi speed (20kts).
I suppose both the captain and the F/O are Flemish, because I heard both of you saying a few things in Dutch. Is there a reason why you mainly communicate in English? Thanks for sharing these videos!
Salut Max! Très chouette vidéo! C'est cool de voir des gens du pays faire des vidéos comme ça, on en apprend beaucoup! J'ai quelques questions, chez Jetair vous utilisez un derated thrust au décollage ? Si oui dans quelles circonstances ? Va-t-on plus privilégier un ass temp qu'un derated thrust ? Merci pour ta réponse! :)
Merci ;) Le but à chaque décollage est de réduire la poussée au maximum pour conserver les moteurs. Les derates et assumed sont combinés et notre outil de calcul de performances nous sort la valeur optimale à utiliser. Cependant dans certaines circonstances il est recommandé d'utiliser la puissance maximale, par exemple lors de windshear.
@@jeremydebroux6716 C'est une très bonne question. Ca dépends de l'avion aussi. Dans ma compagnie il y a un avion qui ne permets pas de faire de Derate. Cela dépends surement de pleins de choses, les avions sont en leasing avec différents contrats, les moteurs également, les certifications ne sont probablement pas les mêmes, etc etc Techniquement l'avion en est capable mais l'option a été désactivée.
Hi. I'm using the free version of Davinci Resolve, which is already way to powerful for my needs. The airplane and taxi routing animation is all done within the editing software.
Superb video. Quick question, is the max any better feedback/response wise without real cable & pulley system as on the NG? Is auto pilot more responsive considering it's actuators & not physical cables... please respond!
Thank you ! The primary flight controls are still with cables and pulleys on the Max, so no changes on that side and no changes on autopilot respons. Only the spoilers are now fly by wire. This allow for extra functions like the Landing Attitude Modifier, that automatically extends spoilers during flare for better control on pitch. It takes time to get used to, especially the speedbrake handle which is now very light (no cables to pull) and the first time you apply the same pressure you're used to on the NG and get a nice surprise :D
Thanks for your response! I thought the max had gotten rid of pulleys & cables entirely like how the a320 is fbw entirely. So this means the extra 6 tons versus NG at base weight is due to mostly quieter cabin requiring extra materials & heavier engines?
The extra weight is mostly due to reinforcement of the wings and landing gear for the heavier engines. Biggest change on the Max is of course the engines, and this alone is incredible. The fuel figures Max vs NG are really impressive (saving a few tons per flight on longer flights). If you count that for all 737's flying around the world on each day that makes a massive difference. And being able to hold the same type rating and that no further training is required to be able to fly the max is economically very interesting as well.
Please show us a video of speed brake arming... I've always wanted to see how it works & there's no specific Boeing cockpit video on youtube describing it's way of working. I personally love it when it moves upon touchdown... I love boeing cockpits!
Hallo, zeer mooie video! Ik zie al aan de perfecte landing dat je vliegt voor TUI :) Vlieg je toevallig op Corfu deze zondag? Met vriendelijke groeten, Benjamin Coussement
Good news ! I got the audio fixed for the next videos. I had to go through 2 more cables before finally having one that works perfectly as expected. I'll be trying to take some footage on my next flights and will hopefully have the next video ready soon :) Stay tuned !
Maxime Lambrechts alles kits? Leuke videos man
Hi. Which cables did you use?
good job capt
The videos are amazing anyway...so thank you very much.
I love your videos. I will keep following and watching.
Its really nice to see how the captain tells the copilot what to expect and to be prepared for a change in weather conditions. That was very professional and amazing to watch.
This cockpit view is so beautiful - correct perspective for the camera. I love it. Great Thanks
Love the professionalism. Very reassuring.
Brilliant video. I'm always impressed at how Pilots make these things look ridiculously easy when I'm sure the reality is very different.
It is actually not that hard (usually). But the reason for that is all the training we get, prepared for almost every scenario.
mathias1dk of course, no doubt like all skills you get to the point of unconscious competence and the procedure becomes relatively natural. Saying that it’s still incredibly impressive and the professionalism of pilots allows me to enjoy flying rather than fear it.
@@thecornedbeefcouncil9792 Agreed, it's a joy to watch.
@@mathias1dk better not be hard when you have hundreds to thousands of hours of experience and continuous retraining every 6 months
Perfect editing and camera angles....please share more!! You could show a from dark and could to ready to taxi or walkarounds or communication and paperwork with the dispatcher. God speed!!
Great video and nice landing. It's good to see how two professionals work so well together. Keep the videos coming please!
You should have a merch with the text “I Survived The Boeing 737 MAX”
A bit dark 😂
Great video ! The camera angle is perfect , you make me feel I fly this plane , looking forward to more videos , thank you !
Thank you ! I thought "what is the best viewpoint in the cockpit?" and then figured out it was ours, so I try to place my camera as close to my own viewpoint as possible, so you can enjoy the whole cockpit and exterior. There will be more videos, stay tuned.
GREAT video, you definitely have to keep uploading videos like this one more frequently. Videos of the takeoff and then skip it to the approach like in this video and the camera angle is just perfect. Videos in the morning and evening are just amazing like in this one, I don’t say the same thing about night because it normally doesn’t look good at night. Keep it up! 😃✈️
Thank you for your comment. I definitely plan to keep doing these kinds of videos. Currently I'm waiting for a new cable to fix the interphone audio, I'm testing a new camera support to be able to quickly install my camera on each flight, and I'm also testing a new position for a second camera on the displays to blend in some close up display shots. Last but not least, I'll be using another microphone for the general cockpit sound :)
That’s great! I’ll be waiting then :)
Tenerife and Boeing 737 MAX 8 - two things that aren't particularly auspicious in the world of aviation... but other than that, very good video and landing.
Very astute. Tenerife being where the biggest air accident ever occured and the Max of course with its recently poor safety record
@@sj460162 Well, the accident happened at another Tenerife airport, up north on the island. This airport is the south airport, Tenerife Sur.
@@sundar999 Yep.
It was really just the Tenerife bit I refered to.
Superb seeing this from your eyes and view. Hats of to all pilots. What an amazing job. Safe hands
Colin & Rachel NBCorkey
Today’s planes basically land themselves on their own, pilots only need to set parameters for ILS approach and ensure that general settings on the way down are followed (ex. Speed and Flaps) plus of course stand by in case of trouble.
The plane’s computers do all the maneuvering (as you see the controls move on their own)... I’ve been flying as a passenger since 1975 (I was a kid) and in the past 20 years I’ve been flying for business 40-50 flights a year and there has been a dramatical change since 2008-2009 when most of the “oldies” with analogic controls like the DC-9 (late MD Super-80) were scrapped.
I started feeling the continuous computer corrections to thrusts and asset during final approach neatly :-)
Before che corrections were a lot less and more abrupt, you could actually feel the different style of the pilots (smoothest were the Dutch from KLM probably because of the many landings in heavy conditions in their Caribbean islands like Sankt Marteen, Aruba and so on)....now they all feel the same...computer.
@@ClaudeMagicbox I am working on being a pilot and I will say it’s actually a lot easier in many case to just fly manually than operate all of the computer stuff
They deserve the praise whether they are flying using the autopilot or flying manually. Either way, operating thr equipment is complicated and requires a lot of skill.
I have to use a simple autopilot in my flight training and getting the autopilot to do what it has to do when it has to do it is more of a pain than flying manually which is why I avoid using it unless my instructor tells me to. These guys have to do more work (more complex autopilot) going roughly 5 times faster than I am.
Also this landing (like 99% of landings ) was manual the autopilot is off during the video
The reason why the controls are “moving on their own” is because the pilot is holding the yoke on the bottom and the camera angle cuts his hand on the throttle. Also the autopilot command switches are off and FD is on the PFD and not CMD which means the Flight Director is on and not the Autopilot
@@ClaudeMagicbox you dont know what you re talking about. 90% of the time these planes are landed manually. What you call an ILS approach ends up manual most of the time. The only moment when you can expect a plane to land itself is in cat 3 conditions. In other words when the visibility is horrendous and you cant see the runway enough to try a manual landing,which was absolutely not the case in this video,thats why the landing was manual.
@@Hk-uw8my I know and in fact I'm from Milano, Italy and usually land in Malpensa (MXP) and Linate (LIN) airports which are among the foggiest in the world, look it up.
Love the max sounds!
Landing on Tenerife in the 80’s was like landing on the moon. Lol very rocky and volcanic. Not many buildings around the airport. Even worse in lazurite. But beautiful holidays. Love it miss it. 💞
I tried this plane in xplane11 the MCAS and the screens look so nice with the blend with no trim
are u in the beta testing thing?
@@jjraga No I'm not. I just found a discord with somebody that has the files. I didn't really want to beta test since I was trying out the flight factor 757 for the first time
Shaan oh wow is it possible if you could send me the files or is it payware.?
Jaehu Lee look up maxteamdesign, they basically used the zibo 737 and added everything for the MAX including the engine and engine sounds :)
@@noahhenshaw4731 nope. the guy who runs it (walter white) was working with ultimate, the team behind the max and he stole it and released in beta as his own. thats why its quite controversial to use it if youre in a virtual airline. compared to the zibo you can tell that its really quite incomplete and thats because he just stole it. i can assure we would have a very good 737 max mod for xp11 if it wasnt for this piece of crap stealing it.
Good video, nice approach and landing with or without the wind. The sound wasn't very good and I found it a little confusing and hard to understand who was saying and doing what during the approach, landing, and taxi. The subtitles helped. At first I wasn't even sure who was PF, but then I figured out FO flying, captain takes control on taxi. @4:18 Flaps 30 callout but I don't see anyone actually changing the flaps. Noticed that the APU was started on final, you don't see that all the time. I assume you know ahead of time when the airport you are landing at doesn't have ground power and you need to start the APU before landing. I see from your pinned comment (3 years ago) you got the audio fixed..I have watched some later videos of yours and the sound was better.
The captain reaches for the flaps after my flaps 30 call, you can't see it on the video ;) And the APU was started at 8:15, after landing ;)
Perfect camera angle - thank you.
Wow Boeing 737-MAX! I am very impressed!
Thank you for keeping the cockpit sterile for landing. The first officer's nose was featured a lot in this video.
Good landing, good cockpit resource management
Blijft mooi dat vlaams! En die grote schermen trouwens ook. Goed gedaan!
There is nothing easy about it, great skill.
Good landing PilotMax.
Pilots and an Airline which is very professional and diligent.
Mike Smith i
Seems like a nice captain to fly with.
Subbed. Liked. Please continue with more videos like this. No editing (background music), please if possible. Raw, raw cockpit footage! ;-)
Thank you ! I'm definitely planning to keep doing these kind of videos ;)
That airport will always be remembered for being ground Zero for the worst aircraft crash in aviation history.
No, the accident happened on the northern airport in Tenerife. They are landing on the southern airport.
Really excellent to watch . Best office in the world .
High quality and a pleasure to watch your videos. Well done
Excelent Video!!! Congratulations!!
Wanner de volgende video? ik hou van dit soort video's. weet zelf erg veel van de B738 en B739 dus dit is erg interressant om te zien
Ik ben de laatste weken bezig geweest met het maken van nieuwe supports voor de camera's en ik heb ondertussen de audio kunnen fixen ook. Hopelijk krijg ik schone beelden van mijn volgende vluchten en kan ik snel een nieuwe video publiceren. Even geduld maar het komt wel :)
By 1:09 you say, that your Flight Director is indicating you to dive to the selected altitude and that you are not going to follow that. After that there appears "ALT ACQ". Can you explain to me, why you didn't changed the altitude?
Very smooth landing! Do you look past the end of the runway, and just let it 'come up' to you? Nice landing!
Interesting video. The cockpit controls of the 737 Max look like an old washing machine. Lucky for those passengers that MCAS (that pilots would have known nothing about) did not send this old relic into the ground due to it's design flaws. Happy that everyone survived and that that 737 Max junk is not flying now.
That’s was butter! 👏
Hi, nice video! Do you mind sharing with me the setting of your GoPro how to focus both cockpit and outside view? Thanks!
nice video!:) professional and good crew :)
Amazing video. Great landing. Liked and subscribed.
Thank you ;)
Nice to ride along! Thanks.
Excellent video, fantastic approach and landing! I have a question: did you go puposely 1 dot below the glideslope because you were expecting the wind shear to blow upwards? What if the windshear would blow downwards?
Thank you :) The windshear is not blowing up or down, but rather horizontally. At 1500ft we have no wind and a bit later we expect 25kts headwind. If that wind arrives instantly, that's 25kts extra indicated airspeed ! That extra speed would mean extra lift, so being pushed upwards. I would also increase my pitch so as to regain the correct speed. During that time the glideslope has probably gone under and there is not much time left to regain it. Also diving to the glide at low altitude is not a very good idea. That's why I try to stay a little bit below. If the extra airspeed pushes me up a little bit, it will push me back onto the correct profile, all I have to correct then is my speed, but that shouldn't be a problem. Hope that helps :)
Thank you very much for the good explanation. I thought that Windshear meant a wind suddenly pushing the aircraft down, but now I see. Thanks!
You are the best❤️
It looks like the max would take some getting used to compared to the NG... Like just looking I couldn't find flaps. and the engine screen looks smaller and harder to read than the NG's. Along with lack of giant gear handle xD except thats probably not a necessary
Cams located centre overhead facing forward and on either side at the same angle as this one, one looking out via side window (use same side cam, just turn for occasional external view) and perhaps one dashmounted facing forward looking over the nose. Then record footage on the different cams, so when using the various angles edited together into a video, transform your videos to the next level - trust me. Not sure what cams you're using, but GoPro hero 5 session are nice and compact.
This was filmed with a Hero5 session on a gimbal. The fact that it is so small means I can put it at exactly the right location without being in the way. Unfortunately in the 737 there are very few places you can attach a camera to. Suction cups only stick to windows, and for the rest you have to be creative. Most of my supports I made myself (like the window handle support you can see on my last video). I'm trying to find new and better views each time I go flying. As said on a previous comment, I don't want my cameras to be in the way if anybody enters/leaves the cockpit, I don't want it to be over any instrument panel or sensitive equipment, should the mount break the camera just falls on the floor. And I don't want to bother the captain with hanging camera's. Thank you for your comment :)
wonderful flying
You make it look so easy!! MAX A+!!
Thanks ! ;)
Great landing!Congratulations
Thank you ;)
I think a camera placed on the back wall of flightdeck to show the whole dash and the front windshield view would be the best if you only are going to have one camera. That would gain you the most bang for buck.
really cool video, and landing. Thought the aircraft landed itself till I saw your hands moving the yoke! Question: is it true the MCAS system on these can be disabled with the stab trim cut off switches below the throttle? Curious to know with the 737 max issues, would appreciate the information. Merci!
Im not him, but Im pretty sure that the stab trim cutout switches disable the electric motor which is responsible for moving the elevators as a part of the fly-by-wire system that has MCAS software built into it.
Hi. Partly correct. Yes the trim can be disabled by the cutout switches, that includes all trim functions, including the MCAS. The elevators are only mechanical like on the 737NG, there's no fly by wire on the 737 MAX ;)
@@pilotmax Great video by the way . when stab trim disabled by cut out switches I presume buttons on yoke disabled (I'm not a pilot ) so is all trim done manually by trim wheels ? . Would it have been hard to trim level after MCAS had put so much nose down trim in ie lots of aerodynamic loads on trim tabs . Just curious as doomed pilots as far as I know put switches back in I presumed because hoped trim motors would give nose up trim lot faster than manually with trim wheels . Sorry to go on about MCAS problems just interesting to get view from real 737 max pilot
Glad you fly better than act as a audio engineer!! good job fella!
Nice Landing
Amazing!!! Wonderful!!!
A question: Had Capt. Sullenberger been in a 737 instead of the Airbus A320-214 would he still have been able to make a safe landing in the Hudson River? my comment posted 07/20/2018
That's a good question and I'm unfortunately unable to give an answer to that, I think nobody can. What he did was amazing. Would his experience/reaction/CRM be as good ? Yes probably. Would the 737 handle the situation as the A320 did ? I don't know.
Thank you for responding. I appreciate it!
no one can tell
The A320 was definitely assisting Sullenberger a great deal in a way that the 737 is not programmed to do.
Whether he would still have made it is unanswerable but for sure the fact that this was an A320 and that he started the APU immediately increased the odds.
But....but...he didn't press the 'ditching' switch! :)
RogerC - Yes he most likely would have been able to, as would most other airline pilots.
AMAZING, VERYYYYYYYYYY GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDDDD
Great work! Thanks for sharing.
Perfect camera angle
C'est bien de voir des jeunes pilotes voler à la main en arrivant en compagnie :) Joli posé !
Very nice video, Maxime!
Very cool with all the small inputs from the planeboss! :D
they made bigger screens to add digital flaps indicator instead of the analog one :D :D
Indeed. What I really find annoying is that they transfer from the captain screen to FO screen together with the engine displays (look at 08:06). When you need to look at it you're always searching for it. You can hear it in this video on my respons delay on flaps during the landing checklist (04:33). It seems stupid but on the NG they are always at the same place and you get the habit to look at it.
that's very annoying , the idea of just made the screen bigger without any update to the system to make it more helpful for the pilot is very bad , and i think the a320 win in this side , the EFIS is very helpful and reduce the workload , airbus developed it from the 80s and still modern until now
I do agree that the Airbus is way more modern regarding the EFIS (ECAM, checklists, etc). And here we are with gigantic screens and still a crappy master caution system with 28V bulbs above... Boeing can do the same (777 for example which uses the same displays as the 737NG), or the newer 787, but probably decided not to on the 737 max to conserve the same type rating, which is economically a very very good choice according to me. A few hours CBT and all 737 crew are qualified for the MAX. There are some great things with the Max, which should be mentioned as well : the new maintenance system makes it possible to do a lot of tests/procedures from the cockpit on the displays in stead of having to go on each system in the avionic bay, makes it much easier to work with for maintenance ! Personally I do like the bigger screens even if there is no extra information displayed on it : the situational awareness is way better than on the NG. I like the big horizon which is nearly always in your view, makes flying when you look a lot outside way easier (on visual approaches for example). And the map which can take the whole screen is fantastic. When briefing your routing in PLAN mode, everything is clear. You can zoom out and display much more information (airports for example) on the map than the NG before it stops displaying because there is too much data selected. In flight, with the map more zoomed out than on the NG, with water now visible in blue on the terrain radar, makes your position awareness very good. And then of course the new engines, which is by far the best upgrade compared to the NG. It takes a lot more time to start them, but once they are started they produce an awesome sound and consume a lot less fuel. (really a lot, I'm always amazed when I see the flight plan fuel with the Max)
thanx for your time that you take to wrote this useful information that i wasn't know about the 737max .
i always want to know what pilots like and dislike about their planes because they are in field and know better than fanboys of boeing or airbus :D
Thanks for that - busy with my Max CBT, also a bit irritated about information shifting around the screens depending on the situation, which already sometimes happens on the NG (radar alt I think, and ILS DME vs VOR DME just off the top of my head). I'll see how quickly I get used to it, but of course the problem is as always that we will be operating a mixed fleet for a long, long time so we'll always be flying both types (NG and Max). I can see this is going to trigger my 'stupid design decisions' sensitive spot.... :)
an absolutely great video!!
Nice Vlog Max....!
At the 8:50 mark, was that aircraft on the radio saying they had requested police meet them? Seems an interesting little bit to hear over a radio.
It happens whenever there's disruptive passengers. They land, the police embark and arrest them.
Flawless guys.
Ik ben ooit als inwoner van Gent vanaf Zaventem naar Tenerife gevlogen, en Tenerife is me zeer goed bevallen. NU woon ik weer terug in Nederland namelijk in Hengelo .
How come you are using reverse thrusts below 60 knots? Won't it harm the engines?
Muy bueno su Max
Very nice video!
Great video! At the end when u say 3 minute cooldown is that a reference to brake temperature?
That is for the engines to cooldown ;) They need to run 3 minutes at idle before shutdown.
Fantastic video!!!
Nice landing!
how late they cut the reverse thrust - I was thinking it should be at 60 knots latest
At 60 knots the reversers need to be reduced to idle reverse. On this landing I didn't use more than idle reverse so that was already ok. Once they are idle you can restow them, in this case when coming around taxi speed (20kts).
thanks for the explanation, and thanks for sharing this great video
I suppose both the captain and the F/O are Flemish, because I heard both of you saying a few things in Dutch. Is there a reason why you mainly communicate in English? Thanks for sharing these videos!
@pilotmax Why do you manually operate thrust level (1min up to 2min) ? Should be that operated automatically by Speed level autopilot.
And a dam fine landing if I say it myself
Thank you ;)
Nice job. Do the golfers know about the windshear?
Great video sir!
Thank you !
So much late flaps 30 and so much late gear down... Is it because possible windshear?
No, it's because of fuel saving ;)
@@pilotmax Cool ) Keep shoot videos! It's really very usefull.
Mooie landing!
Bedankt ;)
Beautiful
🇮🇸❤
Trés bon angle caméra. Cela nous permet de voir votre réalité. Merci.
Good job!
Is it safe to fly in the Boeing 737-8 MAX?
I'm so saddened how hard the COVID-19 Crisis has hit the Airlines. Then ai learned tonight, AA is retiring 😔 its Boeing 737 Max 8's ...
AA is keeping the Max's, they are only retiring the 757/767's.
I'm glad you didn't dive to the selected altitude!
Great landing..cheers
Nice touchdown ...
Salut Max!
Très chouette vidéo!
C'est cool de voir des gens du pays faire des vidéos comme ça, on en apprend beaucoup!
J'ai quelques questions, chez Jetair vous utilisez un derated thrust au décollage ? Si oui dans quelles circonstances ? Va-t-on plus privilégier un ass temp qu'un derated thrust ?
Merci pour ta réponse! :)
Merci ;) Le but à chaque décollage est de réduire la poussée au maximum pour conserver les moteurs. Les derates et assumed sont combinés et notre outil de calcul de performances nous sort la valeur optimale à utiliser. Cependant dans certaines circonstances il est recommandé d'utiliser la puissance maximale, par exemple lors de windshear.
@@pilotmax ok merci pour les infos :)
Mais pourquoi certaines compagnies ne font que des assumed temp et non un combiné des deux ?
@@jeremydebroux6716 C'est une très bonne question. Ca dépends de l'avion aussi. Dans ma compagnie il y a un avion qui ne permets pas de faire de Derate. Cela dépends surement de pleins de choses, les avions sont en leasing avec différents contrats, les moteurs également, les certifications ne sont probablement pas les mêmes, etc etc Techniquement l'avion en est capable mais l'option a été désactivée.
@@pilotmax oui c'est assez complexe du coup.. merci pour tes réponses !
I think that max is still in Tenerife
What video editing program did you use? And how to get that animated airplane on the map? I'd love to do similar. Thank you,
Hi. I'm using the free version of Davinci Resolve, which is already way to powerful for my needs. The airplane and taxi routing animation is all done within the editing software.
Maxime Lambrechts Dank je wel! Great video’s, keep ‘em coming!
You have nice smooth hands.
Epic! Have you ever tried to put the landing gear lever to the OFF position in a B737 MAX? ;)
Great Video Maxime! Subscribing!
great job
Good job guys.....
i think this is where two 747s hit taxie way 4 1977
No. That was at Tenerife North ;)
ya ur right but on the other side 5 85 lives were lost a sad day indeed
Nice video. Loved the auto pilot landing it didn't seem like the pilot was handling the controls just the throttle.
He had his right hand on the yoke the entire time + he said he was going visual on the short final. The landing wasnt performed by the autopilot.
The autopilot wasn't engaged for a single second of this video, it was all by hand ;)
@@pilotmax amazing landing then. I would love to see what a CAT III landing would look like. Any chance of this?
Superb video. Quick question, is the max any better feedback/response wise without real cable & pulley system as on the NG? Is auto pilot more responsive considering it's actuators & not physical cables... please respond!
Thank you ! The primary flight controls are still with cables and pulleys on the Max, so no changes on that side and no changes on autopilot respons. Only the spoilers are now fly by wire. This allow for extra functions like the Landing Attitude Modifier, that automatically extends spoilers during flare for better control on pitch. It takes time to get used to, especially the speedbrake handle which is now very light (no cables to pull) and the first time you apply the same pressure you're used to on the NG and get a nice surprise :D
Thanks for your response! I thought the max had gotten rid of pulleys & cables entirely like how the a320 is fbw entirely. So this means the extra 6 tons versus NG at base weight is due to mostly quieter cabin requiring extra materials & heavier engines?
The extra weight is mostly due to reinforcement of the wings and landing gear for the heavier engines. Biggest change on the Max is of course the engines, and this alone is incredible. The fuel figures Max vs NG are really impressive (saving a few tons per flight on longer flights). If you count that for all 737's flying around the world on each day that makes a massive difference. And being able to hold the same type rating and that no further training is required to be able to fly the max is economically very interesting as well.
Please show us a video of speed brake arming... I've always wanted to see how it works & there's no specific Boeing cockpit video on youtube describing it's way of working. I personally love it when it moves upon touchdown... I love boeing cockpits!
Any MCAS scares when you flew the max?
5:47 REEE....VERSERS NORMAL😂😂😂 You sound like a Antonov An-22😀
Nice video!!
These must be the luckiest Pilots their 737 max 8 Plane had no problems like lion air and Ethiopian airlines that crashed.
Hallo, zeer mooie video! Ik zie al aan de perfecte landing dat je vliegt voor TUI :) Vlieg je toevallig op Corfu deze zondag? Met vriendelijke groeten, Benjamin Coussement