2017 Mazda CX-5 vs. 2017 Seat ATECA (technical comparison)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ก.ย. 2024
  • Technical comparison between 2017 Mazda CX-5 vs. 2017 Seat ATECA.
    - External dimensions (length, width, height, wheelbase, ground clearance),
    - Internal dimensions (head room, leg room, shoulder room)
    - Cargo volume/luggage compartment
    - Engine and performance (maximum power, maximum torque, top speed, acceleration 0-100 km/h / 0-62 mph)
    - Price.
    Detailed 2017 Mazda CX-5 review:
    www.worldautoev...
    Detailed 2016 Seat ATECA review:
    www.worldautoev...
    Please note that this is only a technical comparison, based solely on the technical specifications of both cars. Not a real life Mazda CX-5 vs. Seat ATECA test. Images are taken from the manufacturer website.
    Browse through our channel for more interesting video comparisons or visit our web page www.worldautoev... for detailed reviews.
    Thank you for your visit! We hope to see you again!

ความคิดเห็น • 11

  • @jan-douwevanbeek6484
    @jan-douwevanbeek6484 ปีที่แล้ว

    I cant decide between 2018 CX5 2.0 Manual or this 1.4 TSI Ateca. What car is faster and drives better? I live in the Netherlands, so all straight roads. I like the exterior of the CX5, it looks much "newer" then the Ateca. The Ateca on the other hand has a nicer interior with Android Auto.

  • @changingmindshd5422
    @changingmindshd5422 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How can it be that the CX-5 is 187mm longer but has less place inside? - going for the Ateca anyways

  • @user-tg1vq5hb3t
    @user-tg1vq5hb3t 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The video sound is pretty good, beyond my imagination

  • @deaddream_deep
    @deaddream_deep 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    basic model ateca ist 1.0 tsi :) without all only raid and wheel

  • @przemysawsobek8568
    @przemysawsobek8568 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This comparison is too simplistic. Basic CX5 petrol engines are sluggish compared to TSI. The reason is that TSI's have lots of torque at low revs

    • @Worldautoevolutions
      @Worldautoevolutions  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi!
      This video is intended as a simple and transparent comparison of two cars based exclusively on technical data.
      Of course, we encourage our viewers to share their (more detailed) experiences in comments.
      So, thank you for sharing yours.
      Have a nice day!

  • @sw51s
    @sw51s 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So Ateca is roomier, way cheaper and has better engines... sorry mazda.

    • @sw51s
      @sw51s 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You should drive TSI and NA and you will never choose NA.. Besides define "less reliable" - if you mean after 15 years of use and 200 000km mileage - may be...